For years, brands have poured billions into social media, banking on its power to capture consumer attention. But many users are logging off, exhausted by algorithm-driven content, relentless ads, and digital fatigue. The rise of the social media detox movement presents an inconvenient truth for marketers: the platforms once considered indispensable may now push consumers away.

This shift isn’t anecdotal. Market research indicates a clear trend – users, especially Gen Z and millennials, are actively reducing screen time, muting notifications, and deactivating accounts in pursuit of mental clarity and reclaimed time. What was once an occasional break from digital noise is evolving into a broader consumer reset on social media engagement.

For brands, this poses a fundamental question: If audiences are stepping away from social platforms, how do businesses maintain visibility, connection, and influence?

The answer lies not in resisting the trend but in understanding the new rules of engagement. 

Why are Consumers Logging Off?

Social media has dominated brand-consumer interactions for over a decade, but a growing segment of users is actively stepping back. The social media detox movement is no longer a fringe trend – it’s a behavioural shift with real marketing implications. Consumers, especially younger demographics, make intentional choices to reduce screen time, limit influencer engagement, and seek more authentic interactions.

The Numbers Behind the Shift

The ‘why’ behind the great digital detox.

the-why-behind-social-detox

Digital detoxing isn’t just about reducing screen time; it’s rejecting the attention economy. Research indicates consumers are logging off due to:

  • Mental wellness concerns: Young users cite anxiety, comparison culture, and doomscrolling as reasons to disengage.
  • Algorithm fatigue: The push toward AI-driven content curation has left users feeling manipulated rather than engaged.
  • Scepticism of influencer culture: With trust in influencers eroding, consumers are shifting toward community-based recommendations over celebrity endorsements.
  • Privacy concerns: Users are more aware of data collection practices and choose to interact in closed, private digital spaces.

While some consumers return to social media after temporary detox periods, others are making long-term behavioural changes, limiting their reliance on platforms indefinitely. Brands must prepare for a future where digital engagement is increasingly fragmented, requiring a more adaptable marketing strategy.

What the Social Media Detox Trend Means for Brand Marketing Strategies

Consumers aren’t just scrolling less – they’re re-evaluating their digital habits. Brands must rethink their engagement models if social media detoxing becomes a long-term shift rather than a temporary trend.

How do brands remain relevant when audiences deliberately tune out? 

For years, brands have built marketing strategies around the assumption that social media is the primary touchpoint for consumer engagement. But with growing numbers of users stepping away, relying solely on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook is becoming a risky proposition. The shift toward social media detoxing isn’t just about personal well-being—it’s altering how consumers interact with brands, discover products, and build trust.

The most immediate challenge is declining engagement. If consumers are reducing screen time, brands face shrinking opportunities to reach them through traditional social ads and influencer partnerships. This is particularly concerning for brands targeting Gen Z and Millennials, leading the movement toward digital detoxing. Ad fatigue is also accelerating the problem as consumers grow increasingly resistant to sponsored content and algorithm-driven recommendations.

Another major concern is the vulnerability of relying on rented platforms. With social media engagement declining, brands that have built their digital presence entirely on these platforms are now at the mercy of shifting algorithms and user behaviours. The lack of control over audience reach makes brands susceptible to sudden drops in visibility, forcing them to rethink their approach to audience building.

This shift is also reshaping digital advertising ROI. Brands that once saw high conversion rates from social media campaigns may now struggle as users actively disengage. 

Customer acquisition costs (CAC) are rising as social media platforms become less effective at driving conversions. With ad engagement rates declining, brands are shifting investments toward alternative channels such as Google Ads, podcast sponsorships, and streaming service placements. Understanding where audiences are migrating is essential for maximising marketing ROI. Marketers must evaluate whether continued investment in these channels delivers sustainable returns or if it’s time to diversify into owned media and alternative digital touchpoints.

Social media detoxing is not a sign that digital marketing is failing but indicates that consumer preferences are evolving. Brands that recognise this shift early can adapt their strategies to maintain engagement without being overly dependent on social media platforms. 

How Brands Can Stay Relevant in an Era of Digital Detox 

As consumers disengage from social media, brands must rethink their marketing approach. The solution isn’t to fight the trend – it’s to adapt by diversifying digital touchpoints, strengthening direct customer relationships, and creating value beyond algorithm-driven platforms.

First-party data is becoming a brand’s most valuable asset.

Zero-party data strategies: collecting voluntarily shared consumer insights through interactive content, preference centres, and surveys.

AI-driven CRM systems: leveraging predictive analytics to anticipate customer behaviours and engagement patterns.

Direct-to-consumer models: building deeper relationships via email marketing, loyalty programs, and exclusive brand communities.

With social media engagement fluctuating, brands can no longer rely on third-party platforms to maintain customer relationships. Investing in email marketing, loyalty programs, and brand-owned communities ensures a more direct and sustainable connection with consumers. Email, in particular, is experiencing a resurgence, with open rates outperforming social media engagement rates. Brands focusing on personalised, high-value content in inboxes can build deeper relationships without competing against ever-changing social algorithms.

Brands must also embrace alternative digital spaces. 

Community-driven platforms such as Discord, Substack, and brand-owned apps offer a way to engage audiences without relying on social feeds. These platforms foster deeper loyalty by creating spaces where consumers opt in for value-driven interactions rather than being bombarded by passive content. SMS marketing is another underutilised tool, boasting high open rates while offering a direct, personal channel for communication. However, brands must strategically use it, ensuring messages provide real value rather than feeling intrusive.

Offline engagement is also gaining importance once again. 

The return of experiential marketing, pop-up activations, and real-world brand interactions allows brands to reach audiences in meaningful ways beyond digital screens. With consumers craving authenticity, brands that create real-world experiences, whether through in-person events or retail activations, can strengthen connections in ways social media alone cannot achieve.

Influencer marketing is evolving as well. 

The traditional influencer model, which relied on celebrity endorsements and massive follower counts, is losing effectiveness as trust in influencers declines. Consumers are now looking for recommendations from micro-communities and real-life social circles. Brands that pivot toward peer-driven advocacy – leveraging customer testimonials, employee ambassadors, and brand superfans – will have a stronger foundation for long-term engagement.

The era of passive social media consumption is fading, and brands that rely solely on scrolling behaviour will struggle. The shift toward meaningful, value-driven engagement requires a new playbook, one that prioritises direct relationships, diversified digital ecosystems, and real-world touchpoints. The next section explores how market research can help brands navigate this transition and predict future consumer behaviours.

The Role of Market Research in Navigating the Detox Trend

Guesswork is not an option for brands adjusting to the social media detox movement. Understanding evolving consumer behaviour requires a data-driven approach, and market research plays a critical role in helping brands anticipate shifts, measure engagement beyond social media, and refine their strategies accordingly.

Predictive analytics is key to staying ahead of consumer behaviour trends. Instead of relying on retrospective engagement metrics from social platforms, brands should leverage AI-driven modelling to forecast how audiences will likely interact with digital content. Behavioural data analysis can identify early signals of declining engagement, helping brands pivot before they see a drop in visibility or conversion rates.

Consumer sentiment tracking is another essential tool. While traditional social listening tools focus on platform-based conversations, the social media detox movement means brands must expand their reach to alternative data sources. This includes direct surveys, focus groups, in-app engagement metrics, and customer service interactions. Understanding why consumers are disengaging from social platforms and what alternatives they prefer allows brands to adapt without losing their audience.

Longitudinal studies provide deeper insights into whether digital detoxing is a passing trend or a lasting behavioural shift. Brands should not only measure current engagement levels but track behavioural changes over time. Are consumers leaving platforms temporarily before re-engaging, or are they permanently reducing their social media presence? Are younger audiences more likely to embrace alternative digital experiences? These insights help brands build long-term strategies instead of reacting to short-term fluctuations.

Beyond digital, ethnographic research can uncover how consumer behaviours are evolving offline. Observational studies and in-depth interviews can provide a clearer picture of how consumers interact with brands in physical spaces, whether through in-store experiences, brand-hosted events, or offline word-of-mouth. This shift is crucial as brands look to re-engage audiences in ways that don’t rely on algorithm-driven visibility.

Relying solely on past engagement patterns is no longer sufficient. Market research offers brands a proactive approach to understanding shifting consumer behaviours, enabling them to adapt with precision rather than assumption. 

Examples of Brands Successfully Adapting to the Social Media Detox Trend

Some brands are already ahead of the curve, recognising that relying solely on social media is no longer a sustainable marketing strategy. By diversifying their approach, prioritising first-party data, and investing in alternative engagement channels, these companies are maintaining strong consumer relationships despite the rise of digital detoxing.

One example is Lush, the UK-based cosmetics brand that made headlines by stepping away from social media altogether. Frustrated with algorithm-driven limitations and the growing toxicity of digital spaces, Lush removed itself from major platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. Instead, the brand doubled down on email marketing, in-store experiences, and community-driven engagement. The result? A more direct, controlled communication strategy that allowed them to maintain brand loyalty while reinforcing their ethical values.

Image Credit: Lush 

Another company adapting to the decline of social engagement is Patagonia. The outdoor apparel giant has long embraced an anti-advertising stance, prioritising storytelling over traditional digital campaigns. While many brands compete for social media attention with aggressive paid promotions, Patagonia invests in long-form content, sustainability reports, and documentary-style storytelling. The company builds a stronger emotional connection with its audience without relying on social media algorithms by publishing in-depth research and hosting real-world environmental initiatives.

Luxury brands are also rethinking their digital presence. Bottega Veneta, for example, strategically decided to delete its social media accounts in favour of an exclusive digital magazine and VIP community model. By creating a more controlled, high-value content ecosystem, the brand shifted attention away from mass-market social media feeds and toward more personalised, premium engagement.

Image Credit: The Impression

Even FMCG brands are adjusting. Oatly, known for its plant-based milk alternatives, has embraced offline marketing activations and guerrilla-style advertising to maintain visibility without overly relying on digital engagement. From eye-catching billboards to in-person brand experiences, Oatly’s approach shows awareness can be built in ways that don’t require consumers to be constantly online.

These brands demonstrate a fundamental shift – brands that successfully navigate the social media detox movement build direct, value-driven consumer relationships. The key takeaway? Brands must stop treating social media as the default marketing channel and start viewing it as just one of a broader, more resilient engagement strategy.

The Next Phase of Digital Detoxing

The rise of social media detoxing isn’t a fleeting trend; it’s a symptom of a larger shift in how consumers engage with digital platforms. While some users may eventually return, their behaviour will not be the same. The next phase of digital engagement will be defined by intentionality, privacy, and deeper value exchanges, forcing brands to rethink their long-term marketing strategies.

Social media platforms themselves are already adapting to this detox trend. Features like Instagram’s Quiet Mode and TikTok’s time management reminders signal that even tech giants recognise the risks of overexposure. Platforms will likely continue evolving, offering more user control over content consumption. However, these changes won’t necessarily benefit brands – if anything, they may further limit ad exposure and organic reach as users prioritise personal well-being over passive engagement.

Social media detoxing is not a rejection of digital engagement – it’s a demand for better digital experiences. Consumers are no longer willing to engage with brands passively; they expect intentionality, privacy, and authentic connections. For brands, the question is no longer whether they can survive without social media as their primary channel. The real question is whether they can afford to depend on it at all.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The fastest-growing consumer in the toy industry is not a kid. A new generation of adults is rewriting the rules of play, driving billions in annual sales and reshaping how toy brands approach product development and marketing. These buyers, known as kidults, are fueling growth as they seek nostalgia, collectables, and high-end toys once marketed exclusively to children. Their spending habits have become a defining force in the industry, outpacing traditional toy buyers and reshaping market strategies.

According to NPD Group data, these consumers now account for one-fourth of all toy sales annually, generating around $9 billion in revenue. Their presence in the market is not new, but spending has accelerated since the pandemic, leading to year-over-year gains despite challenging economic conditions. At a time when overall toy sales volume has dipped, higher prices and strong demand from kidults have offset losses and kept the industry growing.

Brands that once targeted parents shopping for kids are now catering directly to an audience willing to spend more for limited-edition action figures, premium Lego sets, and collectables tied to their beloved franchises. The shift is not a passing trend; it is a transformation in consumer behaviour that companies can no longer ignore.

Who are Kidults and Why are they Buying Toys and Games?

Play is no longer just for children. Adulthood has been redefined by a generation that sees nostalgia as a lifestyle rather than a fleeting indulgence. Millennials and Gen Z, raised in an era of immersive entertainment and franchise-driven storytelling, embrace toys as symbols of identity and self-expression.

Kidults are particularly drawn to cartoons, superheroes, and collectables that remind them of their childhood. They buy merchandise such as action figures, Lego sets, and dolls that might typically be meant for kids. In response, toy makers have created entire product lines tailored for these buyers, recognising that demand for nostalgic and high-quality collectables continues to surge.

Social media has amplified this shift, turning fandoms into global communities where collectables are status symbols. Limited-edition releases, high-end figures, and retro-inspired toys are not just purchases – they are cultural markers. What was once considered a niche hobby has become mainstream, with brands tapping into a lucrative market that values authenticity, nostalgia, and exclusivity.

Beyond nostalgia, psychological factors like stress relief, escapism, and personal identity also drive this trend. Many adult toy buyers see these purchases as a way to disconnect from daily pressures, embrace childhood joy, and express individuality. 

For many kidults, these purchases provide a sense of relaxation and familiarity, helping them cope with daily stress and responsibilities. The ritual of collecting, displaying, and engaging with nostalgic brands creates a sense of stability in an unpredictable world.

Case Study: Funko’s Collector Market Success


Image Credit: The Gamer

Funko, best known for its Pop! Vinyl figures have built an empire catering to adult toy collectors. The brand strategically partnered with major franchises like Marvel, Star Wars, and Harry Potter, offering limited-edition releases and convention-exclusive drops that create demand through scarcity.

Focusing on pop culture nostalgia and tapping into fan-driven communities, Funko has positioned itself as a powerhouse in the collector market. The brand’s direct-to-consumer strategy and exclusive collaborations with major retailers have made it a staple for kidults looking to expand their curated collections.

Toy Companies Are Rewriting Their Playbook for Kidults

The world’s biggest brands are no longer designed solely for children. Lego, Mattel, and Hasbro have pivoted to meet the demands of adults in the toy market, launching premium product lines tied to pop culture, gaming, and blockbuster franchises. High-end collectables, intricate building sets, and nostalgia-driven reboots now dominate shelves, targeting consumers willing to pay a premium for quality and exclusivity.

Lego’s detailed Star Wars and architecture sets, Mattel’s collector-edition Barbie dolls, and Hasbro’s Black Series action figures are just a few examples of how the industry has evolved. Limited-edition drops and direct-to-consumer sales have become critical strategies, leveraging scarcity and brand loyalty to drive demand.

At a time when traditional toy sales have slowed, kidults have emerged as the industry’s biggest growth driver. While board games, puzzles, and playsets saw a pandemic-fueled boom, the first nine months of 2022 recorded a 3% drop in sales volume. Higher prices helped offset this decline, boosting overall sales revenue by 3%. Kidults, who tend to spend more per purchase, have maintained industry momentum.

For toy companies, catering to adults is no longer an experiment; it is a core business strategy.

Kidults Around the World

Kidults-around-the world

Case Study: Lego’s Strategic Pivot to Capturing the Kidult Market

Image Credit: Lego

Lego, known for its interlocking brick sets, has skillfully targeted the growing kidult demographic. Recognising the growing demand among adults for complex and nostalgic play experiences, Lego expanded its product line to include intricate sets that appeal to mature consumers.

In 2024, Lego reported a 6% increase in sales, largely attributed to the popularity of its Botanics flower sets specifically designed for older consumers. These sets offer a blend of creativity and relaxation, resonating with adults seeking mindful activities. Lego’s collaborations with popular franchises have bolstered its appeal to the kidult market. Lego taps into the nostalgia and fandoms that drive adult toy purchasing decisions by producing detailed models tied to beloved series.

Lego’s success with the kidult segment shows the value of catering to adult consumers’ desires for nostalgic and hands-on experiences.

What Toys are Kidults Buying?

Kidults are not just a niche segment – they are the backbone of the toy industry’s growth. While they make up only a quarter of total toy buyers, they account for 60% of dollar growth, according to NPD’s Checkout data. Their willingness to pay for premium products has created a revenue stream that far outpaces spending by parents buying for children.

Unlike cost-conscious parents who seek budget-friendly options, kidults gravitate toward collectibles, high-quality models, and limited-edition releases with higher price points. Their spending is not dictated by seasonality in the same way as traditional toy buyers. While holiday shopping remains a peak sales period, this audience purchases year-round, making them a more predictable and stable consumer base.

This shift has allowed toy companies to move beyond the cyclical boom-and-bust nature of holiday-driven sales. Even as inventory challenges and inflation pressure retailers, demand from kidults has remained strong. As a result, brands are increasingly designing marketing campaigns and product launches with this audience in mind, ensuring their place as a long-term driver of industry revenue.

Marketing Strategies For Toy Brands Targeting Kidults

Toy brands no longer rely on traditional retail displays or children’s TV ads to drive sales. Instead, they target kids where they are most engaged – on social media, in collector communities, and through direct-to-consumer platforms. Digital-first campaigns, influencer collaborations, and nostalgia-driven storytelling have become essential tools for capturing this audience.

Limited-edition drops and exclusive collaborations create a sense of urgency and exclusivity that resonates with collectors. Brands like Lego and Mattel have successfully leveraged pre-orders and premium-tier product launches to tap into this demand. Hasbro’s Black Series and Mattel’s Hot Wheels Red Line Club offer high-end collectables directly to fans, bypassing mass-market retail channels and reinforcing brand loyalty.

Community engagement is also key. Toy companies invest in fan-driven events, interactive content, and product tie-ins with entertainment franchises to keep their audiences invested. This approach has expanded beyond the toy aisle – adult-focused toy marketing now includes lifestyle branding, apparel collaborations, and interactive experiences designed to deepen brand attachment.

The brands that understand how to market to kidults are not just selling toys – they are selling identity, nostalgia, and belonging.

Case Study: Pop Mart’s Success with Labubu Collectibles

Image Credit: Los Angeles Times

Pop Mart, a Chinese toy company, has achieved remarkable success by targeting the adult market with its Labubu collectable figures. Created by Hong Kong artist Kasing Lung, Labubu features distinctive rabbit-like ears and spiky teeth, appealing primarily to adults seeking nostalgic and comforting collectables. Priced between $15 and $85, these figurines often sell out within minutes of restocking, leading fans to rely on group chats for updates and endure long lines. Celebrity endorsements, particularly from Lisa of Blackpink, have further boosted Labubu’s popularity. Collectors view these toys not just as playthings but as art pieces that add personality to their homes. Despite the prevalence of knockoffs, demand for Labubu continues to grow, with Pop Mart expanding its presence in the U.S. and reporting strong sales figures. This trend reflects a broader rise in kidult-targeted emotional comfort toys. 

The Future of the Toy Industry Belongs to Adults

Kidults are not just spending – they are shaping the industry’s future. The brands that continue to evolve, embracing technology, sustainability, and personalisation, will lead the next evolution of the toy market. Augmented reality experiences, app-connected toys, and AI-powered collectables are emerging as the next “it” toys, blending nostalgia with modern tech. Eco-conscious buyers also influence brands to redesign packaging, adopt sustainable materials, and explore digital collectables.

The next step for brands is clear: those who embrace innovation while preserving nostalgia will remain at the forefront of this booming market.

For your research needs, trust insights that drive real impact. Whether you’re exploring consumer trends, market opportunities, or brand strategies, our expertise ensures you stay ahead. Get in touch to unlock data-driven success for your brand.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A decade ago, purpose-driven marketing set brands apart by championing social and environmental causes. Today, it’s an expectation, not a differentiator. As scrutiny from consumers, watchdogs, and regulators intensifies, the stakes have never been higher. Public trust in corporate promises has plummeted, with over 60% of consumers sceptical of sustainability and social impact claims. Meanwhile, global regulations are tightening, imposing hefty penalties for vague or unverified ESG statements. The pressure is mounting, and the cracks are beginning to show.

For brands, the challenge is clear: evolve or risk being called out, cancelled, or left behind.

How Evolving Expectations Are Redefining Purpose-Driven Marketing

Consumer Scepticism at an All-Time High

Consumers are increasingly critical of brands’ ESG claims. High-profile incidents have intensified this scepticism. 

A 2023 survey revealed that 57% of Canadian consumers are sceptical of most corporate green claims.

Regulatory Crackdowns Are Raising the Stakes for Brands

Regulatory bodies are tightening their oversight of corporate ESG claims in response to growing consumer distrust. The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), enacted in 2023, requires companies with over 250 employees to disclose comprehensive ESG metrics backed by concrete evidence.

Failure to comply carries significant repercussions. In 2024, the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority banned several advertisements for misleading environmental claims, signalling a zero-tolerance approach to greenwashing. Similarly, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has initiated investigations into companies exaggerating sustainability claims, with potential fines reaching millions of dollars.

Technology as a Transparency Tool

To meet heightened scrutiny, brands are turning to technology for greater transparency. Blockchain is being utilised to trace product origins and verify sustainability claims. Platforms like Provenance enable companies to offer consumers verifiable supply chain information, fostering trust.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is also playing a pivotal role. By analyzing vast data sets in real-time, AI can help brands monitor compliance with ESG standards, identify potential risks, and ensure sustainability initiatives are not merely performative but result in measurable outcomes.

Why Some Purpose-Driven Efforts Fail

Superficial Storytelling Backfires

In early 2025, Procter & Gamble faced a lawsuit over misleading environmental claims for its Charmin toilet paper. The lawsuit alleged greenwashing, arguing that the company’s sustainability promises lacked meaningful environmental benefits.

The case highlights the dangers of superficial ESG storytelling. Unsupported environmental claims not only mislead consumers but also expose brands to legal and reputational risks.

Misalignment Between ESG Claims and Practices

In August 2024, LVMH’s Dior came under scrutiny for failing to meet supply chain disclosure requirements under the UK’s Modern Slavery Act. The brand’s website had outdated anti-slavery statements, casting doubt on the authenticity of its ESG commitments.

Discrepancies between ESG commitments and actual practices erode trust and invite regulatory scrutiny. Brands must ensure their operational realities align with public commitments to maintain credibility.

Case Study: H&M – A Cautionary Tale in Purpose-Driven Marketing

Image Credit: Just Style

Background

H&M launched its “Conscious Collection” to position itself as a leader in sustainable fashion. It pledged to achieve 100% sustainable or recycled materials by 2030 and introduced sustainability scores for its products, aiming to empower consumers to make informed choices.

The Issue

In 2022, H&M faced a class-action lawsuit in New York, accusing the brand of greenwashing. Investigations revealed that some sustainability scores were misleading and that the company’s fast-fashion business model contradicted its environmental claims. Critics argued that while H&M promoted sustainability, its overproduction and waste practices remained unaddressed.

The Outcome

The lawsuit dealt a significant blow to H&M’s reputation, highlighting the dangers of overpromising and failing to align purpose with core business operations. The incident symbolised how greenwashing could backfire, amplifying consumer scepticism and regulatory scrutiny.

Lessons Learned

  1. Avoid Superficial Messaging: Sustainability efforts must be deeply integrated into business operations.
  2. Ensure Transparency: Verifiable and accurate data builds trust and credibility.
  3. Address Systemic Issues: Tackle industry-wide challenges, such as overproduction, to align messaging with meaningful action.

Overpromising and Underperforming

In 2024, luxury fashion brands, including Gucci and Bottega Veneta, came under fire for scaling back their ambitious sustainability targets. Many revised their goals to align with the Paris Agreement’s 2050 net-zero target, highlighting the challenges of meeting earlier, more ambitious deadlines.

Overpromising ESG commitments without clear, actionable plans erodes public distrust and harms brand reputation. Companies must set realistic goals and communicate their progress to avoid perceptions of insincerity.

Building Credibility Through Authenticity

  • Align Actions with Words: Ensure that marketing messages accurately reflect the company’s actual practices. Misrepresentations can lead to legal repercussions and loss of consumer trust.
  • Maintain Transparency: Regularly update stakeholders on ESG initiatives and progress. Transparency fosters trust and demonstrates a genuine commitment to stated goals.
  • Set Achievable Goals: Establish realistic ESG targets with clear roadmaps for achievement. Overambitious promises without concrete plans can backfire, leading to incredulity.
global-dining-trends

Purpose-Driven Marketing Strategies Shaping the Future

Measuring Impact Over Messaging

Consumers and stakeholders demand tangible evidence of a company’s environmental and social commitments. Unilever exemplifies this by integrating comprehensive sustainability disclosures into its Annual Report. Included in the report are detailed insights into its progress on sustainability metrics, reinforcing the brand’s commitment to transparency and accountability.

Similarly, Danone has embraced the B Corp certification, reflecting its dedication to meeting rigorous social and environmental performance standards, accountability, and transparency. 

The Rise of Regenerative Business Models

Leading brands are shifting from traditional sustainability to regenerative practices that restore and enhance ecosystems. Patagonia, for instance, leads the way in regenerative organic agriculture, enhancing soil health, animal welfare, and social equity.

Driving Change Through Collaboration

Tackling complex global challenges demands collective action. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s New Plastics Economy initiative exemplifies how collaboration can drive systemic change. This initiative unites businesses, governments, and organisations worldwide behind a common vision of a circular economy for plastics, aiming to eliminate waste and pollution through innovative design and reuse strategies.

Image Credit: Ellen MacArthur Foundation – Circular economy butterfly diagram 

By leveraging shared knowledge and resources, the New Plastics Economy initiative effectively combats plastic pollution through cross-sector partnerships. These efforts prove that systemic change is possible when stakeholders unite around a common goal.

Engaging Communities for Meaningful Impact

Companies are recognising the power of working alongside local communities to develop solutions to social and environmental challenges. Engaging stakeholders at the grassroots level allows brands to create initiatives with lasting impact.

Harnessing Technology to Build Trust and Transparency

Technology is transforming corporate transparency. Blockchain, for instance, helps trace product origins and verify sustainability claims, offering consumers clear insights into supply chains. This integration fosters trust and drives accountability in purpose-driven marketing.

The Future of Purpose-Driven Marketing 

Authenticity as the Cornerstone

The evolution of purpose-driven marketing underscores a simple but critical truth: authenticity is non-negotiable. Consumers today expect more than buzzwords and polished campaigns; they want tangible proof of meaningful impact.

From Optics to Impact

Brands that will succeed in this new era focus on measurable outcomes rather than superficial messaging. Companies like Patagonia, Unilever, and Danone set the standard by embedding purpose into their operations, using technology for transparency, and co-creating with communities to drive meaningful change. Their efforts demonstrate that purpose-driven marketing isn’t just about addressing consumer demands – it’s about redefining what it means to do business responsibly.

For brands navigating this new landscape, the way forward is clear:

  • Embed Purpose into Core Operations: Purpose must extend beyond marketing and permeate every aspect of the business, from supply chain management to product development.
  • Invest in Transparency and Accountability: Leveraging technologies like blockchain and AI can help validate ESG claims and foster consumer trust.
  • Focus on Long-Term Value Creation: Sustainability should shift from a compliance-driven effort to a strategy for competitive advantage and systemic change.

Brands today face a pivotal choice: adapt to meet rising expectations or risk obsolescence. In a landscape where authenticity, transparency, and impact are paramount, the most successful brands will embed purpose into their core operations, treating it as a long-term business strategy rather than a passing trend.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The second-hand goods market in Japan has seen extraordinary growth over the past decade, more than doubling in value since 2010. This surge reflects a shift in consumer behaviour toward more sustainable and economic choices, driven by the rising popularity of second-hand goods platforms and a cultural focus on quality and reuse.

Our sister company, Cross Marketing Inc., recently conducted a study exploring the purchase behaviours, benefits, and concerns of Japanese consumers regarding second-hand goods. This research highlights key trends shaping the second-hand market and provides valuable insights for brands looking to tap into this growing sector.

Understanding Japan’s Second-Hand Ecosystem

The second-hand market in Japan has evolved into a dynamic and thriving sector driven by affordability, sustainability, and a cultural appreciation for quality. According to our latest study, books and manga are the top choices for second-hand purchases, with almost half of respondents identifying these as their top choices. Games, CDs, and DVDs follow closely at 38%, and cars, bikes, and bicycles at 27%. 

Top-Categories-for Second-Hand-or-Reused-Goods-Purchases

Japan’s focus on meticulous product preservation and high-quality standards plays a crucial role in the popularity of reused goods. Unlike in some Western markets, where thrift shopping often involves bargain hunting, Japanese consumers seek items that retain their original value, emphasising condition and authenticity.

Generational differences further highlight the diverse appeal of second-hand goods. Younger consumers in their 20s favour clothing and accessories, reflecting a growing trend toward sustainable fashion. Meanwhile, respondents in their 30s preferred entertainment products like games and DVDs, often driven by nostalgia or affordability. 

Second-Hand-Goods-Purchase-Trends-by-Age-Group-in-Japan

These preferences underline a broader cultural shift toward sustainable consumption, with second-hand shopping becoming a practical and socially conscious choice. As Japan’s second-hand market grows, brands have a unique opportunity to align with these values while addressing consumer concerns about product authenticity and condition. 

Benefits-of-Buying-Second-Hand-or-Reused-Goods-Japan

Comparing Japan’s Second-Hand Market to the US and UK

While Japan’s second-hand market is rooted in quality and sustainability, its Western counterparts offer a contrasting yet complementary picture, particularly in the US and UK. In the US, thrift shopping has long been associated with affordability and individuality, with platforms like Goodwill and Poshmark. Meanwhile, the UK has seen a rise in sustainability-focused resale platforms such as Depop and Vinted, driven by a younger audience concerned about environmental impact.

Key Differences in Consumer Behavior

  • In Japan, second-hand goods are often valued for their pristine condition and longevity, reflecting a cultural emphasis on care and maintenance. By contrast, in the US, the “thrill of the hunt” for unique or vintage finds plays a larger role in consumer motivation.
  • Western markets, particularly in the UK, see a stronger emphasis on sustainability as a driver for second-hand purchases, aligning with broader environmental movements.

Retail Strategies Across Markets

  • In the US and UK, the second-hand ecosystem thrives on a mix of traditional thrift stores and digital marketplaces. The convenience of online platforms has expanded their reach significantly, mirroring Japan’s growing reliance on e-commerce for second-hand goods.
  • Japanese brands can integrate Western best practices, such as authenticity certifications and user-friendly online interfaces, to address domestic consumer concerns about quality and transparency.

Lessons for Global Brands

Understanding cultural nuances is key for brands operating across these regions. Western markets offer insights into leveraging sustainability and community-driven marketing, while Japan provides lessons in quality assurance and brand trust. Together, these approaches highlight the global potential of the second-hand market, which continues to grow as consumers increasingly prioritize affordability and environmental impact.

Japanese-consumer-concerns-about-second-hand-goods-market

Opportunities and Challenges for Brands in the Second-Hand Market

The second-hand market in Japan presents a unique opportunity for brands to tap into shifting consumer behaviours and the growing demand for sustainable solutions. However, with these opportunities come challenges that require strategic navigation.

Opportunities for Brands

  1. Incorporating Resale Initiatives:
    Brands can embrace resale programs to strengthen their sustainability credentials. Companies like Patagonia and Uniqlo have successfully introduced programs for reselling used items, building trust and fostering customer loyalty.
  2. Meeting Demand for Affordability and Quality:
    By offering second-hand options at competitive prices, brands can attract cost-conscious consumers while maintaining quality assurance, a key expectation in Japan.
  3. Leveraging Digital Platforms:
    As e-commerce dominates second-hand transactions, brands can partner with online platforms or build resale marketplaces, offering enhanced transparency, authenticity guarantees, and user-friendly experiences.
Japanese-attitudes-toward-second-hand-goods

Challenges for Brands

  1. Addressing Consumer Concerns:
    Trust remains a significant hurdle, with concerns about product condition, authenticity, and hygiene topping the list. To alleviate these fears, brands must invest in clear product descriptions, certifications, and return policies.
  2. Balancing Resale and New Product Sales:
    Expanding resale operations without cannibalising new product sales requires careful pricing strategies and consumer education about the benefits of new and used offerings.
  3. Navigating Cultural Nuances:
    Focusing on pristine condition and authenticity in Japan is critical, whereas Western consumers may be more accepting of minor imperfections. Tailoring marketing strategies to these expectations is essential for success.

Case Study: Mercari – Transforming Japan’s Second-Hand Marketplace

Image Credit: Forward2Me

Background

Established in 2013, Mercari has rapidly become Japan’s leading community-powered marketplace. It enables individuals to buy and sell various items directly from their smartphones. The platform boasts over 23 million monthly active users (MAUs) in Japan.

Approach

Mercari’s success can be attributed to several strategic initiatives:

  1. User-Friendly Platform
    Mercari’s intuitive interface simplifies buying and selling, making it accessible to a broad demographic. Users can list items by simply uploading photos and adding descriptions, while buyers can easily search and filter listings to find desired products.
  2. Trust and Safety Measures
    Mercari has implemented an escrow-based payment system to foster trust among users. This system ensures funds are securely held until the buyer confirms receipt of the item in satisfactory condition. This approach minimises the risk of fraud and enhances user confidence in transactions.
  3. Promotion of the Circular Economy
    Mercari’s mission emphasises creating value in a global marketplace where anyone can buy and sell, promoting the reuse of goods and contributing to environmental sustainability. Mercari supports the reduction of waste and efficiently uses resources.

Results

Mercari’s innovative approach has solidified its position as Japan’s largest C2C marketplace. The platform’s extensive user base and diverse listings have made it a go-to destination for consumers seeking common and unique items. Mercari’s efforts have also contributed to normalising second-hand shopping in Japan, aligning with global trends toward sustainable consumption.

Takeaway for Brands

Mercari’s model demonstrates the potential of combining user-centric design with robust safety features to build a thriving online marketplace. Brands looking to enter or expand within the second-hand market can draw valuable insights from Mercari’s strategies, particularly in fostering trust, promoting sustainability, and leveraging technology to enhance user experience.

Patagonia’s Worn Wear program is another example of how brands can integrate sustainability and second-hand initiatives into their core operations, enhancing their environmental impact and consumer loyalty.

Strategic Insights: Leveraging the Second-Hand Trend for Brand Success

As the second-hand market expands in Japan, brands have a significant opportunity to align with shifting consumer values while addressing key challenges. Below are actionable strategies for brands to capitalise on this growing trend.

1. Build Trust Through Transparency

Consumer trust is paramount in the second-hand ecosystem, especially in Japan, where authenticity and quality are critical. Brands can:

  • Implement product certifications to verify authenticity.
  • Provide detailed product descriptions and high-resolution images for online listings.
  • Offer buyer protection programs, including inspection guarantees and hassle-free return policies.

2. Embrace Digital Innovation

E-commerce drives the second-hand revolution, and brands must prioritise digital platforms to stay competitive. Strategies include:

  • Creating dedicated second-hand sections on official websites.
  • Partnering with popular resale platforms like Mercari or Rakuma to reach existing audiences.
  • Leveraging AI and data analytics to personalise recommendations and identify resale demand trends.

3. Integrate Sustainability Into Marketing

Highlighting the environmental benefits of second-hand shopping can resonate with eco-conscious consumers. Brands should:

  • Promote circular economy initiatives, such as buy-back or trade-in programs.
  • Use storytelling to emphasise the sustainability impact of choosing reused goods over new items.
  • Collaborate with sustainability influencers to amplify their message.

4. Balance Resale with New Product Strategies

Second-hand sales should complement, not cannibalise, new product sales. Brands can achieve this by:

  • Pricing second-hand goods strategically to differentiate them from new products.
  • Using resale platforms to attract new customers who may transition to buying new items.
  • Introducing exclusive collections or limited-edition items for resale to maintain product desirability.

5. Draw Inspiration from Global Markets

Western markets like the US and UK offer valuable lessons on branding and consumer engagement in the second-hand space:

  • Adopt the community-driven marketing tactics popular on platforms like Depop.
  • Explore partnerships with thrift-focused organisations to enhance brand visibility and credibility.

The Second-Hand Market as a Long-Term Strategy for Brands

The rise of Japan’s second-hand market signals more than just a shift in consumer preferences – it reflects a broader evolution in how value, sustainability, and quality are perceived. From books and clothing to cars and collectables, Japanese consumers are embracing reused goods for their affordability, unique appeal, and contribution to a circular economy.

This presents a compelling opportunity for brands to innovate and connect with consumers on deeper levels. Companies can build trust by addressing key concerns like product authenticity, quality, and transparency while carving a niche in this growing sector. Initiatives like resale platforms, trade-in programs, and partnerships with second-hand marketplaces are no longer optional – they are critical strategies for staying relevant.

The success of platforms like Mercari demonstrates the immense potential of this market, while global examples from Western markets show the scalability of second-hand strategies. As the reuse economy grows, brands that adapt quickly and strategically will thrive and lead toward a more sustainable and consumer-centric future.

The second-hand market is here to stay. For brands ready to align with this transformative trend, the time to act is now.

Contact us today for in-depth insights and strategic recommendations tailored to your brand’s needs. Let’s explore how your business can tap into Japan’s second-hand market and drive sustainable growth.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A pair of limited-edition sneakers sells out in seconds. A countdown timer warns shoppers to buy now—or miss out. An influencer teases an exclusive event, restricted to a select few. Despite a surplus of consumer choices, brands are making products deliberately harder to buy.

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO—the fear of missing out—have become core strategies in modern marketing, shaping how consumers shop and perceive value. What once seemed like organic demand is now carefully engineered. From luxury brands restricting supply to streaming services pulling content after 24 hours, the result is the same: consumers feel pressured to act before it’s too late.

How did brands turn psychology into a marketing machine? And when does persuasion cross into manipulation? As companies refine these tactics, the ethics of influence are becoming harder to ignore.

Why Consumers React to Scarcity, Urgency, and FOMO

Consumers like to believe they make rational decisions, weighing options and choosing what best fits their needs. The reality? Decisions are often driven by instinct. Scarcity, urgency, and fear exploit cognitive biases, triggering impulse rather than logic.

Scarcity: The Fear of Limited Supply
Nothing fuels demand like the illusion of rarity. When something is harder to get, it feels more valuable. Behavioural economist Richard Thaler’s research supports this: scarcity drives desire. Luxury brands have perfected the game. Hermès doesn’t limit Birkin bag production due to material shortages—it’s a strategy to keep the bags exclusive. Tech companies use the same approach. PlayStation 5’s perpetual “out of stock” status during launch wasn’t just supply chain issues—it kept consumers hooked, waiting for their moment to buy.

Urgency: The Pressure of Time
Hesitation feels like a loss when the clock is ticking. The Zeigarnik Effect, a psychological tendency to remember unfinished tasks, drives consumers to complete a purchase before the window closes. E-commerce platforms have perfected this trigger. Amazon’s “Lightning Deals” refresh hourly, urging shoppers to act fast. Travel sites flash “Only 2 rooms left!” warnings to heighten anxiety. The result? Split-second decisions with little time for second thoughts.

FOMO: The Power of Social Influence
Social media has turned FOMO into a marketing force. Seeing friends attend exclusive events or snag limited drops triggers an urgency no ad campaign can match. Snapchat and Instagram Stories disappear after 24 hours, making users compulsively check-in. Brands engineer this further with invitation-only product launches – think Clubhouse’s early-access model or Supreme’s drop culture. The goal isn’t just to sell; it’s to make consumers feel they’re part of something others can’t have.

Brands That Have Mastered Psychological Triggers

Some brands don’t just use scarcity, urgency, and FOMO; they’ve built their entire business models around them. They’ve turned these psychological levers into powerful revenue drivers by engineering desire and controlling access.

Hermès: The Art of Scarcity
No waiting lists. No online checkout. No guarantee of purchase even if you can afford it. The Hermès Birkin bag isn’t just a handbag; it’s a masterclass in controlled scarcity. By severely limiting production and requiring buyers to develop relationships with sales associates, Hermès ensures demand always outstrips supply. The result? A resale market where Birkins appreciate like investments, sometimes selling for double their retail price. In an industry where most items eventually go on sale, Hermès has made being unable to buy its product the ultimate status symbol.

Amazon: Urgency at Scale
E-commerce thrives on speed, and Amazon has utilised urgency better than anyone. Limited-time “Lightning Deals,” countdown timers, and messages like “Only 3 left in stock!” nudge consumers toward checkout. Prime Day, the company’s annual shopping event, is a prime example of when millions of deals disappear within hours, pushing shoppers to act fast. Amazon sells the anxiety of missing out on a bargain.

Supreme: FOMO in Its Purest Form
Supreme’s business model is built on hype. The streetwear brand’s infamous “drops” happen weekly, with products selling out in minutes, sometimes seconds. By keeping supply deliberately low and collaborating with high-profile brands, Supreme fuels a cycle of exclusivity and demand. Fans don’t just buy Supreme; they line up for hours to compete for the chance. With a resale market where items often fetch triple their original price, the brand has turned FOMO into a profitable ecosystem of scarcity-driven desire.

Social Commerce Meets FOMO with TikTok Shop:
TikTok has taken FOMO-driven shopping to a new level. By integrating e-commerce directly into its platform, the app encourages impulse purchases through time-sensitive deals and influencer-driven recommendations. “Only available for the next 24 hours” captions, live shopping events, and viral trends create a sense of now-or-never urgency. The difference? Consumers aren’t just buying from brands – they’re buying because their favourite creators make them feel like they’ll miss out if they don’t.

These brands are selling access, exclusivity, and the psychological rush of securing something before it’s gone. However, as consumers become more aware of these tactics, brands must ask themselves: how long before urgency turns into exhaustion?

Where Do Brands Draw the Line?

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO are undeniably effective, but when does persuasion cross into manipulation? As brands push these psychological triggers harder, consumers are starting to push back.

Artificial Scarcity – Manufacturing Hype or Deception?
Not all scarcity is real. Some brands intentionally create stock shortages to generate buzz, only to quietly restock later. Luxury brands have long used this tactic, but now, even fast-fashion and tech companies are adopting it. Many product releases “sell out” in minutes, only reappearing later on resale platforms at inflated prices. The illusion of exclusivity works, but at what cost? Consumers are growing wary of brands that manufacture demand rather than earn it.

Urgency Fatigue – When Consumers Stop Caring
Constant countdown timers, flashing “limited stock” warnings, and one-day-only deals can lose their impact when overused. Studies show that consumers who repeatedly encounter false urgency eventually stop responding. Travel booking sites have faced regulatory scrutiny for exaggerating scarcity and listing “only one room left” when more are available. When urgency becomes routine rather than real, brands risk credibility.

FOMO Burnout – The Mental Toll on Consumers
Social media-driven FOMO isn’t just a marketing tool; it’s an emotional trigger. The pressure to stay ahead, secure the latest drop, or participate in an exclusive event can lead to anxiety and compulsive spending. A survey by Credit Karma found that nearly 40% of millennials have gone into debt because of FOMO-fueled purchases. Brands that lean too heavily on this strategy risk alienating consumers who feel manipulated rather than empowered.

Regulation and Consumer Backlash
Regulators are beginning to crack down. The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has fined companies for misleading urgency tactics. In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has warned brands against deceptive scarcity claims. Consumers, too, are becoming more vocal, calling out brands for fake limited editions and “forever sales.”

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO can drive engagement, but brands that misuse these tactics risk long-term damage. Once lost, trust is difficult to regain. The challenge now is clear: how can brands create real value?

How Brands Can Apply Psychological Triggers Effectively

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO aren’t inherently unethical when used correctly, they can enhance customer experience, create meaningful engagement, and drive sales without alienating consumers. The key is authenticity. Brands that use these psychological triggers responsibly build stronger relationships with their audience, while those that rely on deception risk losing credibility.

Authentic Scarcity – When Limited Means Limited
Consumers can spot artificial scarcity. If a product is marketed as exclusive but keeps reappearing, trust erodes. Instead, brands should create real constraints, whether through limited production runs, seasonal availability, or exclusive collaborations. Hermès maintains exclusivity by restricting supply, while high-end automotive brands use limited releases to sustain long-term desirability.

Strategic Urgency – Pressure Without Manipulation
Urgency works best when it feels natural, not forced. Time-sensitive promotions should be genuine, like early-bird event pricing, flash sales with clear expiration dates, or rewards for loyal customers who act quickly. Travel companies, after facing scrutiny for misleading urgency tactics, are shifting toward more transparent messaging, highlighting real-time booking trends rather than fabricating scarcity.

FOMO-Driven Engagement – Creating Experiences, Not Just Sales
FOMO doesn’t have to be about fear; it can be about excitement and belonging. Brands that foster community-driven experiences see long-term success. Exclusive memberships, VIP access, and interactive product launches tap into the power of FOMO while providing real value. For instance, TikTok’s live shopping feature blends urgency with entertainment, encouraging consumers to engage rather than feel pressured.

The Long Game – Balancing Demand with Trust
Short-term sales tactics can generate immediate results, but brands that rely too heavily on them risk fatigue. The most successful companies use scarcity, urgency, and FOMO sparingly, ensuring that when they do, it feels special. Transparency is key. If consumers understand why a product is limited, why a sale is ending, or why an offer is exclusive, they’re more likely to trust the brand and return for future purchases.

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO are some of the most powerful marketing tools, but their real strength lies in their use. Brands that use them responsibly will not only drive conversions but also build lasting loyalty in a market where trust is harder to earn than ever.

keeping-up-with-Gen-z

The Future of Scarcity, Urgency, and FOMO in Marketing

As consumers grow savvier, brands must rethink how they use psychological triggers. The old playbook – endless countdown timers, fake exclusivity, and misleading urgency – no longer works. Trust is becoming the new currency, and brands that misuse these tactics risk long-term damage.

AI-Driven Personalisation – The Next Evolution of Urgency
Instead of blasting the same urgency messages to everyone, brands now leverage AI to make scarcity and FOMO feel personal. E-commerce platforms analyze browsing habits and purchase history to create dynamic, hyper-targeted urgency. Rather than generic “Only 3 left in stock!” alerts, AI can now tell a shopper, “This item has been viewed 200 times in the past hour by customers in your city.” This shift makes urgency more relevant and harder to ignore.

Web3 and Digital Scarcity – The New Luxury?
Blockchain is reshaping the concept of exclusivity. NFTs, tokenised memberships, and limited digital assets are turning scarcity into a verified, traceable feature rather than a marketing gimmick. In fashion and entertainment, brands are experimenting with “phygital” drops, where limited-edition physical products are tied to digital ownership, making them impossible to replicate or mass-produce. The result? Scarcity that is verifiable, not just implied.

The Consumer Backlash: Brands Walking a Fine Line
Consumers are pushing back against overused urgency tactics. The rise of anti-FOMO movements, such as the slow fashion trend, conscious consumerism, and “buy less, buy better” messaging, signals a shift away from impulse-driven spending. Brands that continue to rely on aggressive scarcity marketing without delivering real value could find themselves losing consumer trust.

The Shift Toward Ethical Marketing
Regulations will only get stricter, and consumer expectations will only rise. The future belongs to brands that create demand without deception – companies that balance excitement with authenticity. Whether through genuine exclusivity, AI-powered personalisation, or blockchain-backed scarcity, the next wave of marketing won’t be about forcing consumers to act. It will be about making them want to.

Urgency still matters with fleeting attention spans. But in the future, the most successful brands will not just create FOMO – they’ll create something worth waiting for.

The Fine Line Between Influence and Manipulation

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO have shaped modern marketing, but they are no longer foolproof tactics. Consumers today are more informed, more sceptical, and less willing to be pressured into making purchases. The brands that continue to rely on outdated urgency tricks risk alienating their audience, while those that evolve will be the ones that thrive.

The future of marketing isn’t about manufacturing demand; it’s about meeting it in smarter ways. Real scarcity, backed by transparent supply constraints. Urgency that reflects genuine time-sensitive value, not fabricated pressure. FOMO that fuels community and belonging rather than consumer anxiety.

The brands that win in this landscape will be the ones that recognise a simple truth: consumers don’t just want to buy; they want to believe. And belief is built on trust, not tricks.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

When Miguel and Mikayla Reyes launched Quesadilla Gorilla in Visalia, California, they weren’t just selling quesadillas – they were tapping into a growing demand for customisation. By letting customers build their meals with fresh ingredients and signature salsas, they transformed a small local shop into a rapidly expanding chain.

Fast food chains are no longer defined by speed alone – choice now drives the industry. Consumers are rejecting fixed menus in favour of meals that fit their diets, tastes, and lifestyles. A 2024 report by Tillster found that one in three quick-service diners skipped a restaurant because it lacked customisation, a jump from 21% the previous year.

Personalisation isn’t just a trend – it’s an expectation. More than half of diners (58%) say they’re more likely to recommend a fast food chain if they had a positive custom-ordering experience. For Quick Serve Restaurants or QSRs, that’s not just about loyalty – it’s about survival.

QSRs are racing to keep up, using technology to turn customisation from a challenge into a competitive advantage. Self-service kiosks, now fixtures in many chains, fuel this shift. Demand is rising fast – 57% of diners want more of them, up from 36% last year. Beyond convenience, kiosks give customers greater control over their meals, making customisation seamless.

But technology alone isn’t enough. A seamless experience matters just as much as the ability to customise. Nearly nine in ten diners (89%) say inconsistency across locations frustrates them, and more than half (57%) will take their business elsewhere because of it. Fast food chains that embrace personalisation but fail to execute it uniformly risk losing the very customers they’re trying to attract.

Image credit: Quesadilla Gorilla

Quesadilla Gorilla is proof that customisation isn’t just a gimmick – it’s a growth strategy. By giving customers complete control over their meals, the California-based chain has built a cult-like following and expanded rapidly. When diners feel ownership over what they’re eating, they don’t just return – they become brand ambassadors.

The Consumer-Driven Shift

Fast food was built on uniformity – the same burger, the same fries, the same experience. But consumers now expect meals that reflect their diets, values, and preferences – and they’re willing to pay for that control.

A recent report found that 72% of fast food customers prefer restaurants with personalised ordering, and a third have ditched a restaurant that lacked it. The message is clear: if QSRs don’t offer customisation, someone else will.

Dietary Needs Are Driving Change

Health-conscious consumers and specialised diets are reshaping fast food. More people are adopting plant-based, keto, and allergen-free options, forcing QSRs to adapt. In the UK, a study found that 34% of Brits follow a flexitarian, vegetarian, or vegan diet. McDonald’s responded with its McPlant burger – a fully vegan option that proved so popular it became a permanent menu item.

Gluten-free and allergen-conscious dining is no longer niche – it’s mainstream. In the US, 32 million people have food allergies, and one in ten adults avoids gluten. QSRs that once overlooked these needs are now making them a priority. Chipotle lets customers filter its entire digital menu by allergens and diet preferences, making ordering safer and easier.

Regional Preferences Are Reshaping Menus

Personalisation isn’t a one-size-fits-all trend – it looks different in every market. In Japan, MOS Burger lets customers swap ingredients for vegan, keto, or high-protein options. In India, where 40% of the population is vegetarian, McDonald’s runs separate vegetarian kitchens in select locations to meet demand.

Image credit: Salad Stop!

Customisation in Southeast Asia is shaped by local food culture. In Singapore, SaladStop! thrives on made-to-order salads and grain bowls, catering to a region where 65% of consumers prioritise fresh, healthy ingredients (Statista, 2024). In South Korea, Lotteria’s “Mix Your Own Burger” system lets customers pick everything from the bun to the sauce, tapping into a younger generation that values choice.

Fast Food No Longer Means Fast Decisions

Fast food has evolved from a mass-production model to a made-for-you experience. Consumers expect meals to match their dietary needs and personal values and are willing to pay for that control. Whether it’s plant-based options, high-protein choices, or allergen-free meals, customisation is no longer a perk; it’s the baseline. The brands that keep up are driving higher order values and stronger customer loyalty. Those that fall behind risk becoming irrelevant.

How AI and Technology Are Making It Possible

Technology is reshaping fast food, making personalisation scalable. AI and machine learning are making customisation scalable, helping restaurants tailor meals while streamlining operations. For fast food chains, this isn’t just about convenience – it’s about survival in an era where consumer expectations are shifting faster than ever.

AI-Powered Ordering Systems

Image credit: Wendy’s

Automation is now streamlining drive-thru service. Wendy’s has partnered with Google Cloud to roll out FreshAI, a voice assistant designed to speed up service and reduce errors. Already in 100 locations, the system is set to expand to 600 outlets by 2025. While some diners appreciate the efficiency, others miss the human touch – highlighting the tension between automation and experience in fast food’s tech-driven future.

Digital Kiosks and Personalisation

Self-service kiosks are not just about convenience – they’re becoming personalised digital waiters. AI-driven kiosks now remember past orders, suggest meal pairings, and tailor recommendations based on dietary needs. By reducing friction and speeding up service, these machines are transforming customer interactions – and helping fast food chains increase sales along the way.

Machine Learning for Menu Customisation

The smartest menus now learn from you. Machine learning lets QSRs track past orders, adapt to dietary preferences, and even tweak menus based on ingredient availability. Running low on an item? The system suggests an alternative in real-time. Beyond customer convenience, these AI-driven menus help restaurants reduce waste, streamline inventory, and boost margins.

Operational Efficiency Through AI

AI isn’t just in the front of house—it’s redefining kitchen operations behind the scenes. Predictive analytics help QSRs anticipate demand, adjust staffing, and keep inventory tight. The same technology can even flag equipment issues before they cause breakdowns, cutting costly downtime. The result? Faster service, lower costs, and a more efficient back-end operation.

This shift isn’t just changing how customers order – it’s restructuring the entire industry, from kitchen design to staffing strategies.

Business Impact and Industry Disruption

The push for hyper-personalisation is reshaping how fast food chains operate, forcing them to balance customisation with efficiency. Kitchens once designed for assembly-line efficiency are now adapting to a made-to-order model – one that delivers choice but also adds complexity. While brands that get it right see higher sales and stronger customer loyalty, those that can’t balance personalisation with efficiency risk slowing down service and driving up costs.

Rethinking fast food Kitchens

Fast food kitchens are undergoing a major overhaul to meet the demands of customised ordering. McDonald’s is experimenting with automation at a Texas location, where robots handle grilling and order assembly. Meanwhile, AI-powered kitchen display systems (KDS) are helping restaurants reduce human error and improve efficiency.

Chipotle’s “Chipotlanes” are redefining the drive-thru experience. By separating app-based orders from in-store transactions, these digital lanes reduce congestion and speed up fulfilment. CEO Brian Niccol reports that digital sales reached 37% of total revenue in 2023 – a figure likely to climb as more customers opt for customised meals.

The Business Upside

Customisation isn’t just a consumer preference – it’s also good for business. A study by McKinsey & Company found that brands offering personalised experiences drive 40% more revenue than competitors that stick to traditional menus. In fast food, higher-order values, repeat purchases, and improved brand loyalty are the biggest wins.

Data collection is another major advantage. Every custom order provides insight into consumer preferences, allowing QSRs to fine-tune menu options, predict demand, and minimise food waste. A report by the National Restaurant Association found that smart inventory management driven by AI could reduce waste by up to 15%, saving businesses millions annually.

The Hidden Costs of Personalisation

Despite the upside, the shift toward extreme customisation brings new risks. More complex orders require more ingredients, increased prep time, and a higher likelihood of operational slowdowns. In 2023, Shake Shack’s CFO, Katie Fogertey, noted that over-customisation led to longer wait times, straining kitchens and frustrating customers.

There’s also the cost of technology. AI-powered ordering systems, digital kiosks, and smart kitchen tech require significant upfront investment – something smaller franchises may struggle to afford. According to a 2024 industry analysis by Deloitte, the cost of implementing AI-driven food prep technology can range from $500,000 to over $2 million per location, depending on the scale of automation.

For QSRs, the challenge is clear: how to balance efficiency with personalisation without sacrificing speed or profitability. Some are leaning on AI, others on pre-set customisation limits, but one thing is certain – fast food is no longer just about being fast.

Fast Food’s New Balancing Act: Customisation Versus Efficiency

Fast food chains are under pressure to rethink their entire model as customisation moves from novelty to necessity. The old system of standardised meals is being replaced by flexible menus that cater to individual preferences, but adapting at scale is no easy feat. While personalised ordering can boost sales and improve inventory management, the operational complexities are mounting – forcing even the biggest QSRs to reassess how they function.

Kitchens Built for Speed Are Getting a Makeover

The shift toward customisation is forcing QSRs to rethink not just their menus, but their kitchens. Designed for efficiency and volume, traditional back-of-house operations are now struggling to accommodate a growing demand for personalised meals. Chains that once thrived on uniformity are now experimenting with new layouts, technology, and automation to keep up.

Quick-service chains are automating to stay competitive. McDonald’s is testing a robotics-driven location in Texas, where AI-powered kiosks and automated fry stations are reducing labour costs and speeding up prep times. At the same time, Chipotle is using automation in its kitchens, piloting robotic tortilla chip makers to streamline production without disrupting customisation. As QSRs scale automation, the challenge isn’t just efficiency – it’s integrating technology without sacrificing the personalised experience customers expect.

More Choices, Bigger Profits

Customisation isn’t just about consumer preference – it’s driving higher spending at fast food chains. Research from Deloitte highlights that brands excelling in personalisation see stronger customer engagement and long-term loyalty. Meanwhile, studies on digital ordering trends show that consumers spend more when they can modify their meals, opting for premium ingredients or add-ons. For QSRs, this means a direct link between menu flexibility and increased revenue, making personalisation more than just a marketing tool – it’s a business strategy.

Data is another major driver. Every custom order provides valuable insight into consumer preferences, allowing QSRs to refine menus, optimise ingredient sourcing, and reduce food waste. AI-driven inventory tracking is helping QSRs minimise waste and maximise margins. The National Restaurant Association estimates these systems could save restaurants millions annually by optimising ingredient use.

The Cost of Getting Personal

Offering limitless choices isn’t always good for business. Shake Shack CFO Katie Fogertey warned that an influx of custom orders slowed service and strained kitchen operations, frustrating both customers and staff. More ingredients mean more prep time, higher operational costs, and a greater risk of bottlenecks – issues that can erode the efficiency QSRs rely on.

The shift toward automation comes with a steep price tag. AI-powered kiosks, digital ordering systems, and robotic kitchen assistants require significant upfront investment. A 2024 Deloitte report estimates the cost of implementing AI-driven food prep technology ranges from $500,000 to over $2 million per location – an expense that could widen the gap between industry giants and smaller franchises.

QSRs are now walking a tightrope between customisation and efficiency. Some are doubling down on AI to streamline operations, while others are setting boundaries on how much personalisation they allow. The brands that strike the right balance will define the next era of fast food – one where convenience and choice must work in sync.

global-dining-trends

The Future of Hyper-Personalised Fast Food

The next wave of fast food will be shaped by technology and consumer demand for hyper-personalization. What was once a novelty is fast becoming the norm, with AI-driven pricing, predictive meal planning, and real-time nutrition tracking set to redefine how QSRs serve their customers.

Dynamic Pricing

Dynamic pricing, long used in airlines and hotels, is now entering fast food. AI-powered pricing models adjust costs in real-time based on demand, location, and even weather. A surge in lunchtime traffic? Expect a slight uptick in menu prices. A slow afternoon? Discounts might appear to draw in customers. The goal isn’t just profit – it’s about balancing kitchen efficiency and customer flow to avoid bottlenecks.

AI-Generated Meal Plans

AI-driven meal planning is changing how customers interact with fast food menus. Using past orders, dietary preferences, and budget constraints, algorithms can now recommend tailored meals in real time. Billionaire Marc Lore, through his company Wonder, is betting on AI-powered meal curation that personalises menus to match individual needs. The result? A shift from one-size-fits-all offerings to menus that adapt to customers – not the other way around.

Personalised Nutrition Tracking

Nutrition-conscious consumers are demanding more than just quick meals – they want food that fits their health goals. fast food chains are tapping into this trend by linking menus to wearable tech and health apps, offering real-time meal recommendations based on calorie needs, macros, or fitness plans. By turning fast food into a data-driven dining experience, QSRs are positioning themselves as allies in personal wellness rather than just a convenient option.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

AI-powered personalisation isn’t without controversy. With fast food chains collecting customer data to refine menus and pricing, concerns over privacy and data security are growing. The 2024 exposure of the WildChat dataset, which leaked sensitive AI interactions, highlighted the risks of poor data handling. If QSRs want consumers to embrace AI-driven dining, they must prove their systems are transparent, secure, and not exploiting personal data for profit.

AI-driven menus raise another concern – are they truly serving consumers, or just steering them toward higher-margin meals? Critics warn that AI could prioritise profits over nutrition, subtly pushing customers toward pricier, less healthy choices. Regulators are beginning to scrutinise how food brands deploy AI, with calls for transparency around algorithmic decision-making and whether recommendations serve the diner or the bottom line.

Empowering Consumers in the Age of Personalisation

Fast food is no longer a one-size-fits-all industry. Consumers expect choices that reflect their health goals, ethical beliefs, and personal tastes – shifting from passive diners to active decision-makers. But with more power comes more risk. The industry must find a way to balance innovation with transparency, ensuring that personalisation enhances, rather than exploits, the dining experience.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A billion people depend on India’s wheat harvests. What happens when the heat rises too fast for crops to survive?

Export bans. Soaring grain prices. A scramble for alternatives. Across Asia and beyond, food systems are under strain as extreme weather makes staple crops increasingly unpredictable. In response, scientists in China have developed drought-resistant rice to protect food security, yet consumer scepticism remains high. 

Meanwhile, in the US, biotech giants like Bayer and Syngenta are pushing climate-proof seeds, but supermarket shelves still prominently feature “Non-GMO” labels – proof that consumer hesitation lingers despite scientific advancements.

This paradox defines the future of food security. Climate change is upending agriculture at an unprecedented pace – longer droughts, erratic rainfall, and rising temperatures are cutting into global crop yields. In response, agribusinesses and research institutions are racing to develop climate-resilient crops that can withstand these harsh conditions. The science is advancing rapidly, but will consumers accept it in time?

The science behind genetically engineered crops is well-established, yet scepticism remains deeply entrenched. Public attitudes vary widely: China and India are ramping up biotech adoption to secure food supplies, while Japan and the UK remain resistant, prioritising “natural” and organic labels. Meanwhile, Southeast Asia – a critical agricultural hub – faces a delicate balancing act, weighing the urgency of food security against long-standing cultural reservations about modified crops.

The question now is whether scientific innovation can outpace consumer scepticism. As extreme weather disrupts global food systems, climate-resilient crops could be the key to stabilizing agriculture. But will they gain mainstream acceptance in time, or will regulatory delays and public distrust slow their adoption? The outcome could determine whether the world’s farmers can keep feeding a growing population in an era of climate volatility.

The Climate Crisis Driving Innovation

Climate change is no longer a looming threat – it is already redrawing the global agricultural map. Farmers in some of the world’s most productive regions are contending with crippling droughts, unpredictable monsoons, and heat waves that arrive earlier and last longer. Yields are dropping, and supply chains are fraying. The stakes are high: without immediate adaptation, food security in major economies will be under serious threat within the next two decades.

Science has a solution – but can it scale fast enough? Researchers are developing crops that withstand floods, survive heat waves, and thrive in drought-stricken soil. Yet the challenge isn’t just in the lab. Getting these climate-resilient crops into the hands of farmers – before extreme weather renders existing varieties obsolete – is the real test.

The Data on Climate Impact on Agriculture

The warning signs are already here. In some of the world’s biggest agricultural hubs, extreme weather is slashing yields and reshaping the future of food production.

  • United States: The US Corn Belt, which supplies nearly a third of global corn exports, is in jeopardy. The USDA warns that by 2050, heat stress could cut corn yields by 30% – and in some areas, losses could reach 44%. California’s almond industry is already feeling the strain, with water shortages forcing growers to abandon thousands of acres of orchards.
  • Asia: Rice, the staple for more than half the world’s population, is under direct threat. FAO projections show that by 2050, rice yields across Asia could fall by 15% due to rising temperatures and unpredictable monsoons. Thailand and Vietnam – two of the world’s biggest rice exporters – are already struggling with prolonged droughts, shaking global supply chains.
  • Indonesia and the Philippines: Archipelagic nations like Indonesia and the Philippines aren’t just battling drought – they’re losing farmland to the sea. Salinisation is creeping inland, making traditional rice paddies unviable. Farmers are being forced to pivot to salt-tolerant and flood-resistant varieties, but adaptation is slow.
  • Singapore: As a nation that imports more than 90% of its food, Singapore is acutely vulnerable to agricultural disruptions. To counter this, it is betting on vertical farms and gene-edited crops as a way to build a more self-sufficient food supply.

The Urgency for Climate-Resilient Crops

As climate extremes intensify, scientists are in a race against time to engineer crops that can survive the chaos. Governments and research institutions are doubling down on drought-proof wheat, flood-resistant rice, and heat-tolerant corn – hoping to keep food supplies stable in an increasingly unpredictable world.

  • China: In the country’s northern plains, farmland is turning to dust. Desertification is creeping southward, threatening wheat and rice yields in one of the world’s biggest food producers. In response, China is fast-tracking drought-resistant crop trials, hoping to shore up food security before harvests take a major hit.
  • Indonesia: Rice paddies are drowning. Every year, typhoons and monsoon floods submerge vast swathes of farmland, wiping out crops overnight. Now, the government is betting on submergence-resistant rice – strains designed to survive weeks underwater. If successful, these biotech varieties could become a lifeline for Southeast Asia’s most populous nation.
  • Singapore: In a city where farmland is scarce, food security is a growing concern. The island nation imports more than 90% of its food, leaving it vulnerable to supply chain shocks. To counter this, Singapore is betting on gene-edited crops and vertical farms, pushing the boundaries of high-tech agriculture. The government’s 30 by 30 initiative is a bold attempt to produce 30% of the country’s nutritional needs locally by 2030 – a challenge for a nation where skyscrapers vastly outnumber fields.

The science is clear – climate change is moving faster than agriculture can adapt. Farmers are already struggling to keep up. The real battle now isn’t just about innovation – it’s about trust. Will policymakers and the public embrace the science in time to prevent a global food crisis?

The Science Behind Climate-Resilient Crops

The fight to secure the future of food is happening in laboratories as much as in fields. As rising temperatures, droughts, and erratic weather threaten global harvests, scientists are engineering crops that can survive extreme conditions. But not all solutions are the same – some rely on age-old techniques, while others push the boundaries of genetic science.

GMOs vs. CRISPR vs. Selective Breeding: What’s the Difference?

  • Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): This approach involves inserting foreign DNA into a plant’s genome to introduce traits that wouldn’t naturally occur. The most well-known example is Bt corn, which carries a gene from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis – allowing it to produce a protein lethal to insect pests but harmless to humans. Despite widespread use, GMOs remain a flashpoint of debate, with critics raising concerns over long-term ecological impact and corporate control of seeds.
  • CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats): A revolution in genetic science, CRISPR offers a scalpel-like precision compared to the blunt instrument of traditional GMOs. Instead of inserting foreign DNA, this gene-editing tool allows scientists to modify a plant’s own genes, enhancing traits like drought resistance or disease immunity without introducing external genetic material. Because CRISPR mimics natural mutations, regulators in countries like Japan and the UK are moving to fast-track approvals, arguing it is closer to selective breeding than traditional genetic modification.
  • Selective Breeding: The oldest agricultural tool in human history, selective breeding has shaped the crops we eat today – from sweeter apples to drought-hardy wheat. Farmers crossbreed plants with favourable traits over multiple generations, slowly refining resilience, flavour, and yield. But in a world where climate change is accelerating, this slow, incremental process may no longer be enough. Unlike CRISPR or GMOs, selective breeding is constrained by what exists in nature, limiting how quickly crops can adapt to rising temperatures and shifting rainfall patterns.

Golden Rice: A Case Study in Asia

A bowl of rice can mean the difference between sight and blindness. In parts of Asia, where rice is a staple but diets lack essential nutrients, millions of children suffer from vitamin A deficiency (VAD), a condition that can cause blindness and even death. Enter Golden Rice – a genetically engineered grain designed to deliver life-saving nutrients to those who need them most. But despite its promise, this crop has spent more time in policy debates than in the hands of farmers.

In the 1990s, scientists Ingo Potrykus and Peter Beyer set out to solve a deadly problem – how to infuse rice, the primary food source for billions, with a nutrient that could save lives. Their solution: Golden Rice, a genetically modified variety engineered to produce beta-carotene, the precursor to vitamin A. Its distinctive golden hue isn’t just for show – it’s a sign that the grain carries the potential to prevent blindness and child mortality across Asia.

But Golden Rice’s journey from lab to field has been anything but smooth. Activists have torched test plots, anti-GMO campaigns have labelled it “Frankenfood,” and bureaucratic red tape has stalled its approval for years. While scientists hail it as a game-changer for nutrition, critics argue that it opens the door to greater corporate control of the food system and unknown environmental risks. The question remains: is the world ready to accept a genetically engineered solution to malnutrition?

After two decades of political battles and scientific trials, Golden Rice has finally reached farmers’ fields. In 2021, the Philippines became the first country to approve it for commercial cultivation, marking a milestone in the fight against malnutrition. Other nations, including Bangladesh and India, are still weighing its adoption. But even with regulatory green lights, the biggest hurdle remains: Will consumers embrace it?

Science alone won’t decide the fate of Golden Rice – trust will. Dr. Adrian Dubock, one of its leading advocates, believes acceptance hinges on education and transparency. “The successful deployment of biofortified crops like Golden Rice depends not only on scientific innovation but also on building public trust,” he says. That trust, however, has been decades in the making – and is still far from guaranteed.

The Global Divide on Consumer Trust

A technology that can feed the world is also one of the most divisive. While some countries champion biotechnology as the future of farming, others reject it outright, driven by deep-seated cultural beliefs, political decisions, and misinformation. The result? A fractured global food system, where scientific breakthroughs face vastly different levels of consumer acceptance – shaping everything from government policy to supermarket shelves.

Consumer Perception Across Key Markets

  • United States: Once a battleground for GMO opposition, the US is slowly shifting toward acceptance. A 2020 Pew Research Center survey found that 27% of Americans believe GMOs are safe to eat, while 38% consider them unsafe. Yet, old fears die hard. Supermarket aisles are still packed with “non-GMO” labels, even on foods that have no genetically modified equivalent – more a marketing strategy than a scientific necessity.
  • China: The government wants biotech crops, but the people remain unconvinced. A 2023 China Agricultural University study found that 55% of Chinese consumers still oppose eating GM foods, citing safety concerns and deep distrust of corporate-controlled agriculture. Yet Beijing isn’t waiting for public sentiment to change. By classifying CRISPR-edited crops as “precision breeding” rather than genetic modification, regulators are pushing forward with gene-edited agriculture – betting that branding will make all the difference.
  • India: Farmers embrace GM crops. Consumers reject them. The divide couldn’t be clearer. While Indian farmers widely cultivate pest-resistant genetically modified cotton, a Statista survey found that 45% of Indian consumers actively avoid GM foods, citing fears of health risks. Despite this, the government is inching toward approving GM mustard – a decision that has sparked protests and political infighting.
  • Japan and the United Kingdom: Few places are more resistant to biotech foods than Japan and the UK. In Japan, over 70% of consumers favour “natural” labels, and government restrictions on GMOs remain among the toughest in the world. The UK, meanwhile, has begun rethinking its stance post-Brexit, with officials debating whether gene-edited crops should be regulated separately from traditional GMOs. But consumer sentiment hasn’t caught up to policy changes – demand for organic and non-GMO options remains strong.
  • Southeast Asia: A region caught between food security concerns and biotech scepticism. The Philippines made history as the first nation to approve Golden Rice, but protests from anti-GMO activists have slowed its rollout. In Indonesia and Thailand, gene-edited crops are being tested, but public scepticism keeps governments cautious. Meanwhile, Singapore – a leader in agritech – is moving ahead with lab-grown and gene-edited foods, though consumer acceptance remains uncertain.

The Role of Misinformation in Fueling Skepticism

Fear spreads faster than facts. Nowhere is this more evident than in the debate over genetically modified foods. Social media has supercharged public scepticism, fueling viral claims about “Frankenfoods” and exaggerated health risks. A recent study in Nature Food found that misinformation about GMOs spreads six times faster than science-backed evidence – giving fear an outsized influence on consumer perception.

“The future of billions of people literally depends on changing the narrative about how we view genetically modified food and genetic technologies,” says Professor Ian Godwin, a plant geneticist at the University of Queensland. “Misinformation has distorted public perception, and we need to refocus the conversation on science, safety, and the role of biotechnology in food security.”

The real challenge isn’t just growing climate-resilient crops – it’s convincing consumers to accept them. With climate change straining global food supplies, the gap between scientific innovation and public perception has never been wider. If biotech crops are to help feed the future, winning public trust may matter just as much as the next agricultural breakthrough.

dining-personas

The Industry’s Strategy to Win Over Consumers

Science is on one side. Public opinion is on the other. Despite overwhelming evidence that genetically engineered crops are safe, scepticism remains one of the biggest hurdles to widespread acceptance. In response, the biotech industry is rethinking its messaging – rebranding GMOs, influencing regulations, and tapping into behavioural science to shift consumer sentiment.

How Food Companies Are Rebranding GMOs and Gene-Editing

The term “GMO” has become a branding disaster. Decades of fear-based messaging have turned it into a red flag for many consumers, prompting biotech firms to distance themselves from the label altogether. Now, companies and policymakers are rewriting the language of genetic innovation – betting that new terminology will reshape public perception.

The new labels sound less like science and more like sustainability slogans:

  • “Precision Breeding” – the UK’s preferred term, positioning gene-edited crops as an extension of traditional breeding rather than genetic modification.
  • “Climate-Smart Crops” – a phrase gaining traction, emphasising the role of biotech in reducing agriculture’s environmental footprint.
  • “Next-Gen Agriculture” – used by industry giants like Bayer and Syngenta to make gene editing sound more futuristic and consumer-friendly.

But this isn’t just a marketing play – it’s a regulatory strategy. In countries like China and the UK, policymakers are reclassifying CRISPR-edited crops as something separate from GMOs, making them easier to approve and less likely to spark consumer backlash. The distinction matters: if gene editing is seen as “breeding” rather than “modification,” it faces fewer restrictions – and far less public scrutiny.

Corporate Investments in Gene-Edited Foods

The race to secure climate-resilient crops isn’t just happening in labs – it’s now a boardroom priority. Major food corporations are pouring millions into biotech investments, betting that gene-edited foods will protect their supply chains from climate shocks and shifting consumer demands.

  • Nestlé is backing CRISPR-edited coffee beans that can survive rising temperatures without losing flavour or yield – an urgent investment as climate change threatens global coffee production.
  • Unilever has teamed up with agritech firms to develop gene-edited oilseed crops, positioning gene-editing as a tool to make plant-based foods more sustainable.
  • PepsiCo is investing in drought-resistant potato strains, aiming to reduce the environmental footprint of its global snack empire.

These corporate bets aren’t just about innovation – they’re about survival. As extreme weather upends agriculture, food giants are moving to insulate their supply chains before climate disruption hits their bottom line.

Can Branding Change the Narrative?

Rebranding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can influence public perception, but it doesn’t alter the underlying realities. Behavioural science indicates that consumer trust is built through education and transparency, not just terminology shifts. A 2022 study by the European Food Safety Authority found that consumers were 40% more likely to accept gene-edited foods when provided with clear, science-backed explanations of their benefits.

Dr. Kevin Folta, a plant scientist at the University of Florida, emphasises the importance of clear communication: “Stop using ‘GMO.’ It is imprecise. Everything not arising as a clone is genetically modified from previous forms.”

The future of food isn’t just about innovation – it’s about persuasion. As climate pressures mount and global food demand rises, gaining consumer trust is essential for genetic breakthroughs to reach their full potential. The stakes extend beyond corporate profits; they encompass the future of global food security.

The Future of Climate-Resilient Crops

The future of food is being rewritten – one policy, one investment, and one breakthrough at a time. As climate change threatens global food systems, governments are redrawing the regulatory landscape for genetically modified and gene-edited crops. Some nations are fast-tracking approvals to ensure food security, while others remain trapped in political and public pushback. Meanwhile, agritech startups are seeing an influx of capital, and carbon markets are emerging as unexpected drivers of sustainable agriculture. The question is no longer if biotech crops will play a role in feeding the future, but how quickly they will be embraced.

How Governments Are Handling Biotech Crops

China is breaking its long-standing GMO hesitation – and food security is the reason. In late 2023, the government greenlit commercial planting of gene-edited soybeans and corn, a major policy shift for the world’s largest food importer. Officials have positioned the move as an economic and strategic necessity – designed to cut reliance on foreign seed technology, boost domestic yields, and protect China’s food supply from worsening climate volatility.

India remains deeply divided on biotech crops. While farmers champion genetic innovation as key to improving yields, environmental groups continue to push back against its expansion. The Supreme Court is now weighing a landmark case on GM mustard, a ruling that could set the tone for future biotech approvals. Farmers argue that modified crops are critical to boosting productivity, but critics warn of corporate seed monopolies and environmental fallout. Despite the deadlock, India has already embraced GM cotton – the question is whether food crops will be next.

Post-Brexit, the UK is embracing biotech in a way the EU never did. In 2023, lawmakers fast-tracked the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act, slashing EU-era restrictions and making Britain a testing ground for gene-edited agriculture. Officials argue that CRISPR crops should not be lumped together with traditional GMOs – a move designed to attract investment in gene-edited wheat, oilseeds, and climate-resilient fruits. With fewer regulatory hurdles, the UK is positioning itself as a biotech leader in Europe.

Southeast Asia is turning to biotech and urban farming to secure its food future. Singapore is leading the charge with its “30 by 30” initiative, investing heavily in vertical farming and gene-edited crops to meet 30% of its nutritional needs domestically by 2030. Indonesia, meanwhile, is channelling capital into agritech startups focused on climate-resilient crops – but policymakers remain wary of fully legalising GMOs. The region’s approach reflects a balancing act between food security and public caution.

Investment Trends in Biotech Agriculture

Biotech investment is no longer a niche bet – it’s a global race. As climate volatility disrupts food production, investors are pouring capital into agricultural biotechnology, betting that genetic innovation will be the key to long-term food security. The global agri-biotech market is projected to hit $104 billion by 2030, fueled by demand for climate-smart crops, precision breeding, and gene-editing breakthroughs.

Venture capital is chasing the next frontier in food tech: gene-editing. Unlike traditional GMOs, CRISPR-edited crops face fewer regulatory hurdles, making them a safer bet for investors. Startups like Tropic Biosciences, Pairwise, and Inari Agriculture have secured major funding rounds, developing crops such as fungus-resistant coffee and nutrient-enhanced leafy greens. The appeal is clear – gene-edited foods promise climate resilience without the regulatory baggage of older biotech crops.

The Role of Carbon Markets in Driving Adoption

The future of biotech crops could be shaped by an unlikely force: carbon markets. Indonesia and Vietnam are rolling out carbon credit initiatives that reward farmers for adopting regenerative agriculture practices – including biotech crops that boost soil health and reduce chemical inputs. If these incentives take off, farmers could be financially rewarded for planting gene-edited crops that sequester carbon, use less water, or cut fertilizer reliance. This shift could turn biotech adoption into not just an environmental decision, but an economic one.

Biotech crops are no longer just a scientific breakthrough – they are becoming an economic and political necessity. The intersection of government policy, venture capital, and sustainability incentives is redefining agriculture, with gene-edited crops at the centre of the debate. While regulatory fights continue, one thing is clear: the success of biotech crops won’t be decided in labs – it will be decided by farmers, investors, and consumers.

The Race Between Innovation and Acceptance

Climate change isn’t waiting for regulatory approvals or consumer sentiment to catch up. Extreme weather is already reducing global crop yields, disrupting supply chains, and putting food security at risk in regions dependent on staple crops like wheat, rice, and corn. Scientists are engineering solutions, policymakers are reshaping regulations, and agribusinesses are scaling up climate-resilient crops – but none of it matters if regulatory roadblocks and consumer hesitancy delay adoption.

Some nations are moving forward. China and the UK are accelerating approvals for gene-edited crops, while India and Southeast Asia remain caught between the urgency of food security and deep-rooted public hesitation. The industry has rebranded, investors are funnelling billions into biotech, and breakthroughs have produced crops that can withstand extreme heat, require less water, and resist disease.

For climate-resilient crops to reach their potential, three critical shifts must take place:

  • Public education must dismantle outdated GMO fears – moving beyond decades-old misconceptions and clearly explaining how modern gene editing differs.
  • Companies must change how they communicate biotech benefits – focusing on sustainability and nutrition rather than technical jargon that alienates consumers.
  • Regulators must find a balance between public trust and innovation – streamlining approvals without ignoring consumer concerns.

The future of food security won’t be decided in labs – it will be decided in grocery aisles, political chambers, and consumer conversations. The race between scientific progress and public acceptance will determine whether climate-resilient crops become a global necessity – or a solution that came too late.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

B2B marketers have traditionally relied on account-level intent data, measuring company-wide engagement signals – website visits, content downloads, and webinar attendance – to identify potential buyers. But as decision-making power fragments across multiple stakeholders, these broad indicators are proving unreliable. Marketers aren’t just missing key players in the buying process; they’re wasting valuable resources targeting the wrong ones.

The playbook for digital tracking is being rewritten. With third-party cookies nearing extinction and privacy laws tightening, marketers are losing access to the passive behavioural insights they once took for granted. Marketers who once depended on aggregated company data to guide outreach are finding it increasingly difficult to pinpoint high-intent buyers. At the same time, the B2B buying journey has become more independent, with decision-makers conducting research long before speaking with vendors.

To navigate these shifts, companies are turning to buyer-level intent data, a more precise approach that focuses on individual engagement rather than generalised company activity. By tracking specific behaviours – such as downloading whitepapers, attending webinars, or engaging with product demos – marketers can identify real decision-makers, improve targeting, and accelerate the sales cycle.

The impact of this shift is already reshaping how businesses identify and engage potential buyers. The way B2B buyers engage has changed – and marketers are struggling to keep up. A 2023 Demand Gen Report revealed that 68% of B2B buyers now complete much of their research independently, long before speaking with a sales rep. This shift means old-school lead tracking methods – waiting for buyers to fill out a form or request a demo – are losing relevance fast. Account-level intent data – long considered a reliable indicator of interest – now often misdirects marketing efforts by signalling company-wide activity without revealing who within the organisation is actually making decisions.

The inefficiencies are not just inconvenient – they are costly. Forrester (2024) reports that companies relying solely on account-level intent data misallocate up to 40% of their sales and marketing resources by targeting the wrong contacts. In response, leading enterprises such as Adobe, Salesforce, and IBM are investing in first-party and zero-party data strategies to refine how they track and engage actual buyers, shortening sales cycles and improving marketing ROI.

Marketers who continue to rely on outdated tracking models may soon struggle to keep up. As third-party tracking fades and precision targeting becomes the industry standard, companies that fail to adapt risk falling behind competitors who have already embraced buyer-level insights.

The End of Account-Level Intent Data? 

Account-level intent data is no longer an asset – it’s a liability. The strategy that once shaped demand generation is now misleading marketers and misallocating budgets. Marketers have relied on broad signals – such as employees from the same company visiting a website – to gauge interest. Yet these indicators rarely reveal who within the organisation has the authority to buy.

The inefficiencies are hard to justify. Studies show that nearly half of marketing budgets are misallocated because traditional tracking targets businesses, not the people making purchasing decisions. A recent LinkedIn B2B Institute report underscores the problem: only 17% of B2B decision-makers engage with cold outreach, making a scattershot approach increasingly ineffective.

The Cookiepocalypse: A Catalyst for Change

At the same time, data privacy laws and the decline of third-party cookies are forcing companies to rethink their strategies. With Google’s 2024 cookie phase-out, digital marketing is entering uncharted territory. For years, third-party cookies provided a passive, behind-the-scenes view of buyer behaviour, allowing companies to infer intent without direct engagement. Now, with GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California tightening restrictions, the industry is at a crossroads: marketers must transition to first-party tracking or risk losing buyer visibility altogether.

The shift away from account-level tracking isn’t just about privacy concerns – it’s about effectiveness. Without third-party cookies or unrestricted tracking, marketers can no longer rely on aggregated company activity to infer buying intent. A company’s employees may be researching solutions, but without knowing who is leading the conversation, outreach efforts remain a gamble.

Industry Perspective: Why Marketers Are Moving On

Most marketing teams still get one thing wrong: they target companies instead of the people making decisions. Lee Odden, CEO of TopRank Marketing, sees this flaw firsthand:

“If you don’t know who within an organisation is actively evaluating a purchase, you’re working with incomplete data and hoping for the best – rather than making informed, strategic decisions.”

This realisation is pushing B2B firms toward buyer-level intent tracking, a more precise and privacy-compliant approach that focuses on identifying real decision-makers rather than broad company interest.

The Rise of Buyer-Level Intent Data

As traditional tracking methods fall short, buyer-level intent data is emerging as the solution. Unlike broad company-wide signals, this approach focuses on real individuals actively researching and evaluating solutions. For sales and marketing teams struggling with inefficiencies, this shift is more than a tactical adjustment – it’s a competitive necessity.

A More Targeted Approach

Buyer-level intent data captures specific behavioural signals that indicate a prospect’s actual interest. Instead of aggregating website visits or company-wide engagement, this method pinpoints:

  • Who downloaded a whitepaper or attended a webinar, signalling early-stage interest?
  • Who engaged with case studies or product demos, indicating deeper evaluation?
  • Who interacted with sales emails or initiated direct contact, revealing purchase readiness.

By mapping these real-time behaviours, marketing teams can craft more personalised outreach, while sales teams can engage high-intent buyers at the right moment, increasing efficiency and conversion rates.

digital-privacy-and-tracking-timeline

Adoption Across the Industry

Leading B2B firms are overhauling their sales strategies by shifting to buyer-level intent tracking. Instead of casting a wide net, they are using real-time behavioural signals to prioritise engagement with actual decision-makers. By aggregating behavioural signals across digital channels, these tools help companies separate genuine prospects from passive interest. Some solutions integrate AI-driven analytics to prioritise outreach, identifying which individuals within an organisation are actively evaluating a purchase rather than relying on vague company-wide activity.

The results are significant. A shift toward buyer-level intent tracking isn’t just theoretical – it’s driving real revenue gains. In one case, companies leveraging intent-driven targeting reported a 32% jump in lead-to-sale conversions, according to a Heinz Marketing study. Instead of chasing broad signals, these firms focused on high-intent buyers and saw immediate results.

A Data-Driven Competitive Edge

With B2B sales cycles becoming more complex, companies that pinpoint individual decision-makers are gaining a clear edge over competitors still relying on outdated tracking models. Businesses investing in buyer-level intent strategies report:

  • Higher engagement rates, thanks to more relevant, data-driven outreach.
  • Shorter sales cycles, as sales teams connect with prospects at the right moment.
  • Improved marketing efficiency, with resources directed toward buyers already in-market.

The shift is no longer optional – it’s a necessity for companies looking to stay ahead in a landscape where precision targeting is becoming the industry standard.

How Companies Are Using It

For businesses adopting buyer-level intent tracking, the results go beyond theory. By pinpointing decision-makers rather than chasing vague company-wide signals, sales and marketing teams are refining how and when they engage high-intent prospects. Instead of launching broad campaigns hoping to reach the right people, companies are now delivering highly targeted outreach based on real-time behavioral data.

Precision in Sales Outreach

The biggest transformation is in how sales teams prioritise and engage leads. Instead of filtering prospects by job title or company size, businesses are leveraging real-time intent signals to determine who is actively researching solutions and ready to buy. This shift allows for more strategic engagement, reducing wasted effort on unqualified leads and focusing resources where they matter most.

Tech giants like Adobe and Salesforce have already embedded buyer-level intent tracking into their sales enablement platforms, refining when and how their teams engage prospects. By analyzing interactions with content, pricing pages, and product demos, their sales reps are no longer relying on cold outreach or guesswork – they are reaching buyers at the right time, with messaging aligned to their specific interests. The result? Higher response rates and fewer wasted efforts.

AI-Powered Insights and Predictive Analytics

This shift isn’t just about who to contact – it’s about when. AI-driven tools are now deciphering behavioural signals to predict buying intent with unprecedented accuracy. These platforms track real-time engagement patterns – such as how often a prospect revisits a pricing page or downloads a product whitepaper – helping sales teams determine when a buyer is nearing a decision.

A 2024 Forrester study found that a leading cloud software company saw a 45% increase in engagement rates after abandoning traditional lead scoring in favour of AI-powered buyer intent tracking. Sales reps no longer pursued cold prospects – instead, they prioritised high-intent buyers, reducing their sales cycle length by 25% and significantly improving conversion rates.

Industry Perspective: A More Strategic Approach

Matt Heinz, President of Heinz Marketing, sees this shift as a defining moment in sales strategy:

“With buyer-level intent, sales teams don’t just know who to target – they know when and why. The difference between a warm lead and a ready-to-buy lead is timing, and this level of insight allows teams to focus their efforts where they’ll have the biggest impact.”

In an industry where deals are won or lost based on timing, acting too early means wasting resources; acting too late means losing to a competitor. Buyer-level intent tracking eliminates the guesswork, giving sales teams a real-time view into when a prospect moves from research to serious consideration.

A Competitive Edge in B2B Marketing

Companies that have moved beyond broad account-level tracking are seeing the benefits firsthand. By aligning outreach with actual buyer behaviour, sales and marketing teams report:

  • Higher engagement rates, as prospects receive outreach tailored to their stage in the buying process.
  • More effective content strategies, with marketing teams producing insights that match real decision-making needs.
  • Shorter sales cycles, as sales teams identify and engage buyers before they formally enter the pipeline.

As B2B buying behaviour grows more complex, relying on outdated tracking models is no longer sustainable. Companies still measuring broad company engagement rather than individual buyer activity risk wasting resources on leads that will never convert. Meanwhile, competitors using buyer-level insights are moving faster, engaging smarter, and closing deals while others are still chasing prospects that have already made a decision.

Ethical Considerations and Privacy Compliance

As companies shift to buyer-level intent tracking, the debate over data privacy and ethical marketing is growing. With regulators and consumers pushing for greater transparency, businesses that fail to adapt risk eroding trust and facing legal scrutiny. Unlike third-party tracking – where users are often monitored without their knowledge – buyer-level intent data operates on consent.

Why Opt-In Data Matters

The difference isn’t just technical – it’s fundamental. Traditional intent tracking relied on third-party cookies and passive data collection, often gathering user behaviour without explicit approval. Buyer-level tracking, in contrast, is built on opt-in engagement, meaning prospects knowingly share their information. This includes:

  • Webinar registrations and gated content downloads.
  • Surveys and preference selections.
  • Direct interactions with sales and marketing campaigns.

A recent TrustArc study found that 73% of B2B buyers prefer companies that are transparent about how their data is used, reinforcing the need for clear, ethical data practices.

A Legal and Competitive Shift

The tightening of privacy laws worldwide is forcing companies to rethink how they collect and use data. Regulations such as GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California have already placed strict limits on tracking without consent, and Google’s Privacy Sandbox initiative is set to further restrict access to behavioural insights. Businesses that fail to adapt risk not only compliance issues but also losing consumer trust in an era where privacy expectations are higher than ever.

Unlike third-party tracking, first-party buyer intent strategies comply with evolving regulations by gathering data only from individuals who have actively opted in. But knowing who is engaging isn’t enough – companies need to understand what’s driving them.

This is where market research becomes essential. Buyer-level intent tracking may show who downloads a whitepaper or attends a webinar, but it doesn’t explain why they are searching, what pain points they are trying to solve, or what barriers exist before a purchase. Without deeper research, even the most advanced intent tracking risks misinterpreting engagement signals.

Market Research’s Role in the Buyer Intent Revolution

Buyer-level intent tracking reveals who is engaging and how they behave – but without market research, the why behind their decisions remains a mystery. Without insights into buyer motivations, barriers, and triggers, intent signals risk being misinterpreted, leading sales teams to pursue the wrong prospects. Tracking behavioural data is only one piece of the puzzle – understanding the motivations behind those behaviours is what turns data into strategy.

Traditional quantitative and qualitative research methods provide the context needed to validate and refine intent signals, ensuring companies aren’t just chasing clicks but engaging with real buyers who have a clear path to purchase. By combining survey research, focus groups, and ethnographic insights with real-time behavioural tracking, businesses can move beyond surface-level engagement data and uncover why buyers are searching, what they need, and what factors influence their decisions.

Market research also plays a crucial role in segmenting intent data effectively. Not all high-engagement prospects are equally valuable – without proper segmentation, companies risk wasting resources on buyers who may be interested but lack decision-making authority or budget alignment. By integrating attitudinal and psychographic research into intent tracking, businesses can build a complete picture of their buyers – not just who they are but what drives them to act.

The Future of Buyer Intent Tracking 

B2B marketing is moving into a new phase, driven by AI, privacy-first strategies, and shifting data collection models. Companies that once relied on broad third-party tracking are now investing in AI-driven analytics and zero-party data to better understand and engage real buyers. The focus is shifting from passive tracking to active, consent-based insights, giving businesses a clearer, more accurate picture of buyer behaviour without compromising privacy.

AI’s Role in Predicting Buyer Behavior

Advancements in machine learning and predictive analytics are transforming how companies interpret intent signals. AI-driven platforms now track patterns of engagement across multiple touchpoints – from whitepaper downloads to webinar participation – allowing businesses to determine not just who is interested, but when they are likely to act. Instead of relying on broad lead scoring models, sales teams can now prioritise real-time buyer readiness, increasing conversion rates and shortening deal cycles.

The End of Third-Party Dependence

With Google’s phase-out of third-party cookies, businesses are being forced to rethink how they collect and apply customer data. The reliance on passive tracking is fading, replaced by first-party and zero-party data strategies that capture explicitly shared intent signals rather than inferred behaviour. This shift is not just about compliance – it’s about building trust and credibility in a market where buyers are increasingly wary of invasive tracking practices.

Industry Outlook: What’s Next?

Industry forecasts suggest that the shift to buyer-level intent tracking is only accelerating. Research shows that companies shifting to buyer-level intent tracking are already seeing a measurable advantage. In one industry survey, B2B firms using AI-driven buyer intent models reported higher engagement rates and faster sales cycles compared to those relying on account-based signals. Companies that fail to make this transition will not only struggle with lead quality – they risk being left behind in a market that increasingly values data transparency and hyper-personalised engagement.

A New Reality for B2B Marketing

For B2B companies, buyer-level intent tracking is no longer an emerging trend – it’s the new reality. The shift away from third-party tracking and broad account-level signals is reshaping how businesses generate demand, allocate resources, and close deals. In a competitive environment where timing, precision, and ethical data collection are becoming key differentiators, companies that fail to adapt will find themselves chasing leads that never convert while competitors secure high-intent buyers first.

This isn’t just an incremental improvement – it’s a fundamental restructuring of how marketing and sales teams identify and engage potential customers. Companies still relying on outdated tracking models will continue wasting budgets on low-quality leads, while those leveraging buyer-level insights will increase efficiency, shorten sales cycles, and improve conversion rates.

This isn’t just an evolution – it’s an ultimatum. The B2B world is changing fast, and the companies that master buyer-level intent tracking will control the future of sales and marketing.

The cost of hesitation? Wasted budgets. Slower deal cycles. Watching competitors close deals that should have been yours.

The question isn’t whether intent tracking will define the next era of demand generation – it already is. The only real question is whether your company will lead the shift, or get left behind.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Every morning, millions of people worldwide perform the same rituals: a cup of coffee brewed to perfection, the click of an app to order their favourite latte, or the familiar swipe to unlock a fitness tracker. Behind these seemingly mundane actions lies a powerful force brands have quietly mastered – consumer habits.

Take Gymshark, the billion-dollar fitness brand that transformed a simple New Year’s resolution into a cultural movement. With its 66-Day Challenge, Gymshark didn’t just sell activewear; it inspired customers to commit to a lifestyle. By pairing daily fitness goals with social validation and gamified incentives, the campaign turned fleeting resolutions into lasting routines – one app notification at a time.

Today’s brands aren’t just selling products – they’re engineering behaviour with precision tactics once reserved for behavioural psychologists. By exploiting behavioural triggers like the urgency of flash sales or the dopamine hit from loyalty rewards, companies are shaping consumer decisions in ways most customers barely notice. These strategies are rewriting the rules of consumer loyalty, creating a landscape where habitual engagement isn’t just encouraged – it’s meticulously designed.

But how are these habits built? And what can marketers learn from the brands that have turned routine behaviours into global phenomena? The answers lie in the intersection of science and strategy.

The Habit Loop: A Blueprint for Brand Loyalty

Behind every enduring habit lies a simple but powerful framework: the habit loop. Coined by Charles Duhigg in The Power of Habit, the loop consists of three parts: a cue (the trigger that initiates the behaviour), a routine (the action itself), and a reward (the payoff that reinforces repetition). For brands, understanding this loop isn’t just theoretical – it’s a playbook for embedding themselves into consumers’ daily lives.

Consider how Apple engineers its ecosystem. The cue is the familiar buzz of a notification on an iPhone, prompting users to check their device. The routine follows: opening an app, engaging with a message, or completing a task. The reward is immediate – dopamine-fueled gratification, whether the satisfaction of crossing something off a to-do list or a burst of social validation through a text reply. By repeating this cycle, Apple doesn’t just sell devices; it fosters a dependency on its seamless, interconnected products.

The habit loop isn’t confined to tech giants. Retailers like Sephora also weave it into their strategies. Their Beauty Insider loyalty program uses personalised emails as cues, encouraging shoppers to browse their latest product lines. The routine? Redeeming points, making a purchase, or attending exclusive events. Over time, this loop transforms sporadic customers into loyal brand advocates.

The genius of the habit loop lies in its subtlety. When done right, customers don’t feel manipulated; they feel empowered. And for brands, that’s the ultimate reward.

Habit Formation in Action

Brand/ExampleCueRoutineReward
Gymshark (66-Day Challenge)App notifications reminding participants of daily fitness goals.Tracking fitness activities and sharing progress.Discounts, social validation, and a sense of accomplishment.
Apple Notification buzz or alert.Checking the device, opening an app, or responding to a message.Immediate gratification from completing tasks or receiving social validation.
Sephora (Beauty Insider Loyalty Program)Personalized email reminders about promotions or new products.Redeeming loyalty points, making purchases, or attending exclusive events.Discounts, free samples, and the feeling of being part of an elite club.
Nike (Sneaker Drops)Announcement of a limited-edition sneaker release.Participating in the rush to secure a pair before they sell out.Owning an exclusive product and gaining social prestige.
HelloFresh (Meal Kits)Weekly subscription reminders to select meals.Preparing home-cooked meals using pre-portioned ingredients.Convenience, time-saving, and the satisfaction of a well-prepared meal.
LEGO Ideas (Crowdsourcing)Seeing others participate and submit design ideas.Submitting or voting on fan-created designs for new LEGO sets.Recognition, influence over product development, and being part of the brand’s story.
Barbell CoffeeSocial media posts of fitness enthusiasts showcasing the coffee.Drinking Barbell Coffee as part of a fitness routine.Enhanced workout experience and a sense of belonging to the fitness community.

Case Study: Gymshark – Turning Resolutions into Rituals

Image Credit: Chris Mussell

Background:
Founded in 2012 by Ben Francis, Gymshark grew from a small startup to a billion-dollar brand. Its appeal extends beyond stylish fitness apparel; it’s a brand that inspires action and fosters community.

Approach:
The 66-Day Challenge was grounded in behavioural science, specifically research by Phillippa Lally that found it takes 66 days on average to form a habit. Gymshark encouraged participants to set fitness goals, track progress via its app, and share their journey using the hashtag #gymshark66. The brand amplified the challenge through incentives like discounts and public recognition, reinforcing a sense of accomplishment.

Outcomes:
The campaign generated over 45.5 million views on TikTok, 1.9 million likes on Instagram, and countless user-generated posts. More importantly, it turned fitness goals into habits, positioning Gymshark as a partner in its customers’ fitness journeys rather than just a clothing brand.

Research-brief

The Science of Scarcity: Creating Urgency That Sticks

Scarcity is one of the most potent psychological tools in a brand’s arsenal. Rooted in the fear of missing out (FOMO), it taps into a primal urge to act quickly when something feels limited, exclusive, or fleeting. When employed strategically, scarcity doesn’t just drive a one-time purchase – it fosters habitual engagement and loyalty.

Take sneaker brands like Nike and Adidas. Their limited-edition drops, known as “sneaker drops,” have become cultural phenomena. Customers line up – virtually or physically – for a chance to own a piece of the brand’s exclusivity. 

Scarcity works because it triggers the brain’s reward centres. Studies in behavioral neuroscience have shown that perceived scarcity amplifies the value of an item. The less available something feels, the more desirable it becomes, even if its intrinsic value hasn’t changed. This is why countdown timers, limited stock alerts, and exclusive access notifications are effective marketing tools – they create a sense of urgency that compels action.

For brands looking to leverage scarcity without alienating customers, the key lies in balance.

  • Create Authentic Scarcity: Artificial scarcity – like pretending a product is in short supply when it’s not – can backfire. Instead, tie scarcity to genuine factors, such as limited production runs or exclusive collaborations.
  • Align with Customer Aspirations: Scarcity works best when it aligns with the audience’s values, whether premium craftsmanship, uniqueness, or status.
  • Reinforce the Reward: Ensure the payoff feels worth the effort. Customers should walk away from the experience feeling they’ve gained something exceptional, not manipulated.

Scarcity isn’t just about urgency; it’s about anticipation. When used thoughtfully, it becomes a tool for building habits that keep customers returning for more – the thrill of the chase or the pride of owning something rare. Brands that master this art form elevate their offerings from mere products to coveted experiences.

Social Proof: The Habit Amplifier

Why do you trust a restaurant with a long line or feel reassured when a product boasts five-star reviews? That’s social proof in action – a psychological phenomenon where people mimic the actions of others to make decisions. For brands, leveraging social proof isn’t just about building credibility; it’s about creating habits that feel natural because they’re reinforced by collective behaviour.

Consider the viral power of user-generated content. Consider the viral impact of Starbucks’ #RedCupContest, which encouraged customers to share creative photos of their holiday-themed red cups on social media. The brand turned its everyday customers into content creators, leveraging their enthusiasm to amplify the campaign. Each post showcasing personalised red cup designs acted as a cue, inspiring others to participate. The routine of sharing photos was rewarded with likes, comments, and the potential to win Starbucks gift cards, creating a sense of excitement and belonging to a festive community.

Social proof works because humans are hardwired to follow the crowd. Research from Robert Cialdini, a leading authority on influence, shows people are more likely to adopt behaviors when they see others – especially those they perceive as similar – doing the same. For brands, showcasing relatable stories can be more effective than aspirational messaging.

Case in point: Airbnb’s use of social proof. The platform creates an immediate sense of trust and urgency by displaying how many people have booked a property or highlighting reviews from previous guests. The cue is seeing others’ positive experiences, the routine is exploring listings and making a booking, and the reward is the reassurance of making a safe, validated choice.

When done right, social proof not only builds trust but also creates an ecosystem where habitual behaviours – such as buying, posting, or recommending – become second nature. For brands, the ultimate reward isn’t just loyalty; it’s becoming the default choice in a crowded marketplace.

For marketers, the lesson is clear:

  • Amplify User Voices: Encourage customers to share their stories, whether through reviews, testimonials, or social media. Genuine content is far more compelling than polished ads.
  • Leverage Influencers Strategically: Influencers act as powerful cues, but authenticity matters. Select voices that align with your audience’s values and interests.
  • Show Numbers That Matter: Whether “1 million sold” or “500 people are viewing this product,” data-driven proof triggers the fear of missing out while validating consumer choices.

Case Study: LEGO Ideas – The Power of Crowdsourcing

Image Credit: Lego Ideas

Background:
LEGO, the iconic toy brand, sought to deepen engagement with its fanbase through a platform called LEGO Ideas.

Approach:
LEGO Ideas invited fans to submit and vote on new design concepts. The cue was seeing others participate, the routine was engaging with the platform, and the reward was the chance to influence LEGO’s product line.

Outcomes:
LEGO Ideas has produced several successful products, including fan-designed sets like the NASA Apollo Saturn V. The initiative strengthened the brand’s connection with its audience, turning casual customers into active contributors.

Building Habit-Forming Products: Lessons from Behavioral Science

Creating a product that consumers return to again and again isn’t just about innovation – it’s about embedding habits into the design itself. The most successful brands today are those who understand how to weave behavioural triggers into every touchpoint, ensuring their offerings become indispensable in daily life.

Take Spotify, for example. The platform’s algorithms are designed to create a habit loop that feels seamless and personal. Over time, this habit loop keeps users hooked, transforming Spotify from a music service into a daily ritual.

The secret lies in understanding consumer behaviour at a granular level. By leveraging data, brands can anticipate what customers need before they even realise it themselves. This level of personalisation not only builds loyalty but also creates a sense of dependency – making the product feel essential rather than optional.

For marketers aiming to design habit-forming products, here are some key strategies:

  • Make It Effortless: Simplicity is crucial. Complex user experiences deter repetition. Apps like Duolingo succeed because they break down learning into bite-sized, manageable tasks, encouraging daily engagement.
  • Use Variable Rewards: Behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner demonstrated that unpredictable rewards – like a surprise discount or an unexpected playlist recommendation – are more compelling than consistent ones. The unpredictability keeps users coming back for more.
  • Reinforce Progress: Visual indicators, such as progress bars or streaks, tap into the human desire for completion. Gymshark’s 66-Day Challenge capitalised on this by tracking daily achievements, creating a sense of momentum that users were motivated to maintain.

However, habit-building isn’t just about driving repetitive behaviour – it’s about fostering a sense of value. If a product doesn’t solve a problem or enhance the user’s life, no amount of behavioural science will make it stick. Brands that focus on delivering tangible benefits while subtly embedding habit loops are the ones that transform from being a choice into a necessity.

Forming habits isn’t just a competitive advantage – it’s survival. Products that seamlessly integrate into the fabric of daily life don’t just build loyalty; they create lasting relationships.

The Long Game: Why Habits Require Sustained Effort

Habits may feel automatic, but building them is anything but. The science is clear: meaningful habits take time and consistent reinforcement. For brands, short-term campaigns or one-off initiatives rarely deliver lasting results. Success lies in long-term strategies that nurture customer behaviours over weeks, months, or even years.

Consider Peloton, the fitness brand that redefined home workouts. Peloton doesn’t rely on selling a bike – it sells an ongoing lifestyle. The cue is a scheduled live class or a motivational email reminder. The routine is logging in and working out, and the reward is immediate: real-time encouragement from instructors and the camaraderie of a leaderboard filled with peers. Over time, this repetition turns Peloton users into loyal advocates who associate their fitness journey with the brand itself.

The challenge for brands lies in maintaining momentum. Research shows that habits can falter without consistent reinforcement. Even Gymshark’s wildly successful 66-Day Challenge recognises this reality. After the campaign ends, participants are encouraged to set new goals, ensuring the habits formed don’t fizzle out but evolve into deeper, lasting routines.

For marketers, sustaining habits requires:

  • Regular Engagement: Consistent touchpoints, such as app notifications, newsletters, or loyalty rewards, keep the habit loop active. However, overloading users with messages can backfire – timing and relevance are key.
  • Evolving Incentives: As customers progress, their motivations may shift. Brands should adapt rewards and messaging to match their audience’s changing needs and aspirations.
  • Building Communities: Social belonging is a powerful motivator. Platforms like Reddit or fitness groups tied to specific brands foster environments where habits are reinforced by peer validation.

It’s also crucial to plan for setbacks. Behavioural scientists note that lapses are natural and shouldn’t derail the process. Brands that offer ways to “restart the streak” or provide gentle nudges to re-engage are better positioned to retain their customer base.

The takeaway is simple: habits don’t form overnight, and they don’t sustain themselves. Brands that commit to the long game – through thoughtful design, consistent reinforcement, and adaptability – stand the best chance of embedding themselves into their customers’ lives. Customer loyalty is hard-won; this approach separates fleeting trends from enduring success.

Beyond Products: Building Emotional Connections Through Habits

For truly habit-forming brands, the goal isn’t just repeat purchases – it’s building emotional connections that transcend the product itself. When habits become rituals, they anchor the brand in the customer’s identity, creating loyalty that’s as much about emotion as it is about utility.

Look at how Coca-Cola has turned drinking soda into a cultural moment. The cue might be a hot summer day or a festive holiday gathering. The routine is reaching for a bottle of Coke, and the reward is both physical – quenching thirst – and emotional, tied to nostalgia, happiness, or celebration. Coca-Cola reinforces these associations through campaigns like “Taste the Feeling,” ensuring the product is linked to more than just refreshment.

Emotional connections are particularly powerful because they integrate the brand into life’s meaningful moments. Research by behavioural scientists shows that emotions, not logic, drive most decisions, especially when it comes to habitual behaviour. Customers are far more likely to stick with a brand aligned with their values, memories, or aspirations.

To build these connections, brands must:

  • Tap into Personal Narratives: Encourage customers to see the brand as part of their story. Nike’s “Just Do It” campaign, for example, isn’t about shoes – it’s about personal triumphs and perseverance.
  • Leverage Sensory Triggers: Familiar sounds, visuals, or scents can evoke emotional responses. Think of how the “ba-da-ba-ba-bah” jingle makes McDonald’s instantly recognisable and stirs feelings of comfort and familiarity.
  • Celebrate Milestones: Recognise and reward customer achievements tied to the brand. Whether tracking fitness goals or celebrating years of loyalty, these gestures create a deeper bond.

The result is a shift from transactional relationships to lasting partnerships. Customers don’t just buy a product; they invite the brand into their lives. When a brand achieves this level of connection, it becomes far more than a choice – it becomes a habit woven into the fabric of daily existence.

In the end, habits are about more than behaviour; they’re about identity. Brands that successfully align themselves with who their customers are – and who they aspire to be – don’t just win loyalty. They earn a place in their customers’ lives that competitors can’t easily disrupt.

Final Thoughts: Habits Are the New Currency of Brand Loyalty

With endless choices competing for attention, the brands that succeed are those that seamlessly embed themselves into daily routines. By mastering the science of habits—leveraging cues, routines, and rewards—leading companies aren’t merely selling products; they’re transforming behaviours and forging emotional bonds that endure.

From brand challenges to cultural rituals, the strategies behind big campaign successes reveal a universal truth: habits are the backbone of loyalty. They transform one-time purchases into repetitive behaviours fleeting interest into steadfast engagement. For marketers, the lesson is clear – understanding and shaping customer habits isn’t optional; it’s essential.

The challenge lies in the execution. Successful brands understand this is a long-term commitment that requires adaptability, authenticity, and a deep understanding of what drives their audience.

Ultimately, it’s about more than repeat sales—it’s about building a brand that becomes an essential part of customers’ lives. Those who master the art and science of habit formation will not only earn loyalty but also position themselves as indispensable, no matter how the market evolves.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

They don’t fit into a neat generational box, yet they are shaping the future of commerce, content, and connectivity. Meet Gen C – Generation Connected, a powerful psychographic group that defies traditional demographics. Unlike millennials, Gen X, or Gen Z, they aren’t defined by birth years but by behaviour: always-on, digitally fluent, and community-driven.

For brands, Gen C is both an opportunity and a challenge. They consume, create, and curate content with the same intensity. They expect seamless digital experiences, hyper-personalised interactions, and authentic engagement, not just advertising. The old marketing playbook doesn’t work anymore. This generation of connected consumers trusts people over logos, conversations over campaigns, and social proof over brand messaging.

Fail to meet their expectations, and they’ll move on in seconds. Get it right, and they’ll be your most loyal advocates, driving sales, amplifying your brand, and influencing others.

So, who exactly is Gen C, and what do brands need to know to connect with them? Let’s break it down.

What Defines Gen C? A Psychographic Shift Beyond Age Groups

Gen C isn’t a demographic, it’s a mindset. They are the connected consumers, a group shaped by digital behaviours rather than conventional generational divides. Whether they’re 16 or 60, they share a common DNA: hyper-connected, content-driven, and community-focused.

Unlike traditional generations, Gen C doesn’t passively consume media; they shape it. They create TikTok trends, spark viral conversations, and turn niche products into overnight sensations. They move seamlessly across devices, platforms, and experiences, demanding instant access, real-time interactions, and highly personalised content.

But their defining trait? They trust people over institutions. Influencers, online reviews, and peer recommendations hold more weight than corporate messaging. Traditional ads fall flat; authenticity and relevance win every time.

For brands, this means a fundamental shift: marketing to Gen C isn’t about broadcasting; it’s about engaging. It’s about being part of their ecosystem, earning their trust, and delivering value beyond the product. Anything less, and they’ll swipe away without a second thought.

The DNA of Gen C – How They Consume, Create, and Influence

Gen C doesn’t just consume content—they shape the digital world. Every post, review, and share is an extension of their identity. They are not passive audiences; they are creators, curators, and critics who expect brands to meet them on their terms.

Hyper-Personalization is Their Standard

Gen C has no patience for generic marketing. They expect AI-driven recommendations, interactive content, and frictionless transactions tailored to their preferences. Netflix knows what they’ll binge next. Spotify builds playlists based on their mood. Amazon anticipates their next purchase. If a brand doesn’t offer this level of personalisation, they’ll find one that does.

From Consumers to Creators

For Gen C, content is currency. They don’t just watch videos; they produce them. TikTok trends, YouTube vlogs, Instagram reels – they create, share, and remix content at scale. They influence what’s cool, what sells, and what goes viral. A single review or unboxing video can make or break a brand.

Community-Driven Commerce

This generation trusts real people over brand messaging. They seek recommendations from Reddit, Discord, and micro-influencers, not corporate ads. They are more likely to buy a product shared by a trusted friend than one promoted by a celebrity. Social proof is their decision-making engine.

According to a Nielsen study, 92% of consumers trust recommendations from friends and family over traditional advertising.

The Death of Passive Consumption

They multitask across devices, skipping ads in seconds. They crave interactive experiences like live shopping, AR try-ons, and direct brand engagement. Static content is dead. Brands that fail to create immersive, engaging experiences will be left behind.

For brands, this means rethinking the traditional marketing funnel. Gen C doesn’t just want products; they want experiences, authenticity, and a reason to engage. If a brand doesn’t deliver, they’ll move on—fast.

Case Study: CeraVe’s Digital Marketing Success

CeraVe, a skincare brand developed by dermatologists, has adeptly navigated the Gen C terrain through innovative marketing strategies emphasising authenticity, community engagement, and digital fluency. Their approach offers a compelling case study on connecting with the connected consumer.

Strategic Influencer Partnerships

Image credit: The Guardian

CeraVe’s collaboration with skincare influencer Hyram Yarbro exemplifies effective engagement with Gen C. Known for his candid and educational content, Yarbro’s genuine endorsement of CeraVe products, particularly their cleansers and moisturizers, resonated with his audience. This partnership not only enhanced CeraVe’s credibility but also significantly increased its visibility among digitally savvy consumers.

Innovative Campaigns

Image Credit: PRN

In a bold move, CeraVe launched the “Michael CeraVe” campaign during Super Bowl LVIII. The campaign played on the phonetic similarity between the brand’s name and actor Michael Cera, creating a month-long conspiracy theory that Cera was behind the brand. This narrative was amplified by 450 influencers, resulting in 15.4 billion earned impressions before the official commercial aired, revealing the truth. The campaign not only garnered widespread attention but also led to a 25% increase in sales.

Educational Content and Community Engagement

CeraVe has also focused on creating educational content that demystifies skincare, aligning with Gen C’s desire for informative and valuable information. By partnering with dermatologists and leveraging social platforms, CeraVe provides content that educates consumers about skincare routines and the science behind their products. This approach has solidified CeraVe’s position as a trusted brand among Generation C.

CeraVe’s approach highlights the importance of understanding and engaging with the connected consumer on their terms.

The Connected Consumer Economy and How Gen C is Reshaping Business

Gen C is dismantling traditional business models. They demand seamless digital experiences, personalised engagement, and brands that move as fast as they do. The old rules of loyalty, advertising, and customer retention no longer apply.

Seamless Integration is Non-Negotiable

Gen C expects frictionless transactions across devices and platforms. A slow-loading website, a clunky checkout process, or a lack of mobile optimisation is enough to lose them. They move effortlessly between social media, e-commerce, and real-world interactions, expecting brands to provide a consistent, integrated experience across all touchpoints.

According to Google’s Consumer Insights Report, 53% of mobile users abandon sites that take more than three seconds to load, a critical statistic for brands targeting Gen C. 

Speed, convenience, and omnichannel accessibility define their expectations.

Loyalty is Transactional

Gen C does not pledge long-term brand loyalty, at least not in the traditional sense. Instead, they assess value in real-time. Subscription models, gamified loyalty programs, and membership-based communities are replacing outdated customer retention tactics. If a competitor offers a better, faster, or more relevant experience, they will switch instantly.

Nike’s SNKRS app is a powerful example of community-driven loyalty. It doesn’t just sell sneakers; it creates an interactive buying experience featuring exclusive drops, live events, and direct engagement with the brand. This strategy builds a sense of exclusivity and keeps Gen C engaged beyond just transactions.

Image Credit: Nike

The Privacy Paradox – Balancing Personalisation and Trust with Gen C

Gen C craves hyper-personalisation but remains sceptical of how brands use their data. Transparency is non-negotiable. Companies that fail to articulate how they handle personal information risk losing trust and engagement.

A Cisco Consumer Privacy Survey found that 81% of consumers feel they have little control over how their data is collected and used. 

Brands that implement ethical data practices, clear opt-in policies, and privacy-centric marketing strategies will gain a competitive advantage.

This shift requires brands to rethink how they operate. Traditional marketing tactics like aggressive advertising, mass email campaigns, and outdated loyalty programs are no longer enough. Gen C has reset the playing field, and brands must build agile, data-driven, and consumer-first strategies that evolve in real time.

How Brands Can Win Over Generation C

Reaching Gen C is not about broadcasting messages – it’s about earning relevance in their digital ecosystem. They don’t just buy products; they buy into experiences, communities, and values. Brands that understand this shift can turn them into engaged advocates.

Be Everywhere, Seamlessly

Gen C moves across platforms without friction. They might discover a brand on TikTok, research it through Reddit, and purchase through a mobile app. A fragmented customer journey is a deal-breaker. To keep pace, brands must integrate social commerce, AI-driven recommendations, and one-click transactions.

A Meta study revealed that 57% of Gen Z and millennials discover new brands through social media ads and influencer content. For Gen C, this discovery process is even more dynamic, involving interactive content, live shopping, and peer recommendations.

Think Community-First

Traditional advertising falls flat with this audience. Peer validation, micro-influencers, and real-time interactions carry more weight than polished brand messaging. Live shopping events, interactive Q&As, and organic brand storytelling drive engagement. The more participatory the experience, the stronger the connection.

Offer Value-Driven Engagement

Gen C expects brands to deliver more than just products. Content must be educational, entertaining, or problem-solving – ideally, all three. They engage with brands that help them learn, create, or improve their digital lives. Brands that focus solely on selling risk becoming irrelevant.

Duolingo, the language-learning app, leverages gamification, humour, and micro-content to engage users. Rather than simply selling language courses, it creates viral social media moments and personalised learning streaks that make users return daily. This approach builds loyalty through experience rather than transactions.

Image Credit: UX Design

Leverage Micro-Influencers and User-Generated Content

Celebrity endorsements are losing impact. Instead, Gen C trusts real people, like content creators with niche influence who feel authentic. Encouraging brand advocacy through user-generated content not only builds credibility but also fuels organic reach.

A HubSpot report found that 79% of consumers say user-generated content highly impacts purchasing decisions. 

For Gen C, this influence is even stronger as they seek out honest reviews, behind-the-scenes content, and real customer experiences.

For brands, the key to winning Gen C is participation, not persuasion. They don’t want to be marketed to; they want to be part of the conversation. Brands that enable interaction, authenticity, and community will thrive in this new era of consumer engagement.

The Future of Gen C – What’s Next for Connected Consumers?

Gen C is not a trend. They are the architects of a digital-first economy where immediacy, personalisation, and participation define success. As technology advances, their expectations will only grow sharper. Brands that fail to evolve will become obsolete.

AI-Driven Digital Experiences Will Redefine Engagement

AI will shape how Gen C interacts with brands, from predictive shopping assistants to hyper-personalised content feeds. Chatbots will no longer be basic customer service tools. They will act as intelligent brand representatives, anticipating needs and offering real-time solutions.

Decentralised Platforms Will Shift Control

The dominance of centralised social media platforms is fading. Gen C is exploring blockchain-based communities, private Discord servers, and creator-driven ecosystems where they control data and interactions. Brands must rethink their reliance on traditional platforms and embrace new digital spaces.

The End of Passive Brand-Consumer Relationships

Gen C does not want to be marketed to; they want to co-create. Future-forward brands will integrate consumers into product development, decision-making, and storytelling. Interactive campaigns, community-driven product launches, and immersive digital experiences will become the standard.

From Consumers to Digital Citizens

Gen C expects brands to meet their digital demands and align with their values. Purpose-driven marketing, ethical data usage, and authentic connections determine which brands earn long-term relevance.

The brands that thrive in the Gen C era will not be the ones with the biggest advertising budgets. They will be the ones that understand, adapt, and integrate seamlessly into the connected world Gen C is shaping.

Why Brands Must Adapt Now

This new generation of connected consumers has rewritten the rules of consumer engagement. They are not a passive audience waiting to be sold to – they are active participants shaping the marketplace. Their expectations for seamless digital experiences, real-time interaction, and community-driven commerce demand a fundamental shift in how brands operate.

For brands, the message is clear: adapt or become irrelevant. Traditional marketing strategies built on broad demographics and static messaging no longer work. Winning in the Gen C economy requires brands to be dynamic, responsive, and embedded in their audience’s digital culture.

This shift has already happened. The brands that recognise Gen C’s influence and invest in hyper-personalised engagement, trust-driven relationships, and participatory experiences will lead the next era of consumer marketing. Those that fail to evolve will watch as their relevance fades.

The connected consumer revolution is here. The only question is: is your brand ready for it?

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.