How you enter a market often dictates whether you’ll be successful there. Different approaches all have pros and cons – and deciding which to choose is as much about market insight as it is financial logic. So what are the four market entry strategies?

Export? Licensing? Franchising? Partnering? JVs? M&A? There are many ways to get into a new market. What situations typically suit each variety? What do you need to know about the market to select the most appropriate options? How do we assess the strengths and weaknesses – and their long-term effect on your business? Here’s our brief overview of your options for an entry strategy into a new market.

Early exposure: the passive way in

Online retail – and social media these days – mean brand exposure in new markets has become relatively easy. Social media shopping, for instance, is becoming an increasingly popular entry point for brands into new markets, particularly if they’re picked up by influencers. This could be by traditional media outlets (like fashionable magazines), web-based trend-setters (such as popular tech review channels on YouTube) or specialist social media influencers on global platforms such as Instagram and TikTok. Most markets have their own versions of these channels – and there are plenty of popular global options, too.

(Caveat: many global influencers, and those within markets, may need inducement to feature products or services. While ‘accidental’ market exposure is possible, you’re still likely to need some kind of strategy for this kind of introduction.)

But e-commerce can be a double-edged sword. Yes, consumers might get exposure to a brand online. But if it’s not available in their market, they can end up buying the next best thing that is available. Your brand could be doing an excellent category building job for local rivals.

It’s also worth looking out for platforms that are not global. In many markets, local e-commerce platforms have emerged. Any attempt to exploit the market will rely on having access to it. (We look into that further in our guide to entering emerging markets.)

In addition to working with local platforms, brands need to consider carefully how to fulfil orders and handle customer relations. Managing all these elements through third parties in a straight commercial relationship can work well. That said, there’s a massive gulf between entering a market virtually via e-commerce and getting ‘boots on the ground’.

That’s not just about commitment. Each of the third parties you work with is taking a chunk of your profit margin. And in some cases – particularly with perishable or heavyweight products, and especially services – the arm’s length approach just won’t work. To access that pool of consumers, you’re going to need a local presence. Here are some main routes in.

1. Structured exporting

The default form of market entry. Consumers and companies in other markets can easily buy your products wholesale, sort out logistics and handle local marketing. Increasingly, brands can ship internationally – riding the kind of passive market entry discussed above – but assigning a local trusted distributor to conduct transactions with your buyers, and even partnering directly with major wholesalers or retailers, is a perfectly good way in.

Working with the right partners can be a make-or-break decision. So thoroughly researching the key players, their terms of trade and their local reputations is vital. Even seemingly innocuous business practices can have a big effect on the way products are handled, sold and supported.

Having local agents doesn’t mean you can ignore the nuances of the local market. It still pays to get under the skin of local retail, for example, understanding any patterns of consumption and thinking about local tastes and behaviours that might shift how a product is presented. Even in an arms-length distribution agreement, it pays to tailor a product to local preferences. Chocolate brands, for example, must cater to both local biases on the flavour and texture of their product – but also the local climate. Getting under the skin of target consumers in new markets is something we’ve supported many businesses with as they’ve entered new territories.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

2. Licensing and franchising

Licensing is giving legal rights to in-market parties to use your company’s name and other intellectual property. Any licensee can produce and sell products under your name or offer services using your brand. In exchange, you get royalties or other payments. It can be an effective light-touch way of entering a market, especially if you’re a service business that needs a local workforce; or your products would benefit from local manufacturing.

But it’s not all plain sailing. How a licensee behaves towards customers, the quality of their output and the local spin they put on your product can affect the brand. That means thorough due diligence is needed on potential partners, and brands that come to the table with detailed research on their new market are much more likely to be able to tie down any important factors affecting those decisions into a contract.

Franchising is similar to licensing but requires a lot more heavy lifting up front. As well as researching any new market before entering it, brands should think about how they will structure any franchise agreement – which will require additional research into local legal structures and potential franchisees; working out what the franchise buys (for some businesses it’s little more than a licence; for others, it’s a suite of processes, marketing support materials and even hardware that come with the deal); and how they might be able to handle disputes with franchisees later.

3. Direct investment

For many companies, setting up a fully-fledged operation in the new market is a big commitment – but also brings huge advantages. This kind of ‘greenfield’ investment – ‘greenfield’ meaning the establishment of new facilities – means complete control over the operations in the new market. Many countries welcome foreign investment of this kind.

Some companies will choose only to enter new markets where this kind of investment is possible – for a variety of reasons. If the product is particularly sensitive to different kinds of handling, for example, or needs to be manufactured to particular tolerances, ownership provides a reassuring level of control.

If that’s the case, the legal and regulatory burden of different potential markets should be a factor in the due diligence process right at the outset. Having local legal and financial advice, in additional to in-market research expertise, is essential.

4. Buying a business

International M&A is still fraught with risks and paperwork, but even in a bad year – 2019 is the last we have figures for, and we might expect 2020 to be an outlier one way or another – cross-border acquisitions accounted for $1.2 trillion. (A ‘bad year’? That was a third lower than the US$1.8 trillion in deals in 2018.) The reason? Buying an existing business is a genuine fast-track for foreign companies to enter a new market.

Market research plays an even more important role in due diligence when you’re buying a business in unfamiliar territory. The traditional metrics you might assess – and even the gut feel of key decision-makers – have to be translated through completely different lenses of cultural and market norms. (Due diligence isn’t easy on domestic M&A deals; it’s much tougher abroad…)

That’s also true, to a lesser extent, with buying a minority stake in a business in your new market. This might mean less up-front investment albeit with less control, too. But in both cases, you’re also buying into local market expertise – which can be invaluable.

That’s also the big benefit of setting up a joint venture­ (JV) – a new partnership between your company and one or more parties where the ownership is shared. You get the benefits of a greenfield start-up; a lower investment than M&A or setting up on your own; local expertise baked in; and legal status as a native in the new market. Many businesses see a JV as a turnkey project: each party brings existing expertise and capabilities to bear for fast deployment.

But be warned: joint ventures only thrive when the contractual commitments of each partner and the beneficial ownership structures are crystal clear. And some big brands have come unstuck in joint ventures where the local partner’s vision for the product or service deviates from their own. Conflict resolution mechanisms are a must. Unsurprisingly, joint ventures are more common in time-limited projects where several contractors need a legal entity to collaborate on a very specific mission – and have clear terms for the joint venture’s dissolution.

Building your intelligence network

The choice of entry route will be dictated by many factors, then – consumer habits, culture, legal status, taxes and tariffs, local business practices, the transparency you can attain around potential partners and more. As a rule of thumb, the less exposure to cost and risk you have, the less control and margin you can secure.

Arms-length surveys and analysis can only tell you so much, however. Working with international agencies who have their own people on the ground in a new market not only means better access to the nuances of consumer behaviours and local trading rules – it also means dealing with people who have first-hand experience of running a business in that market. This approach has enabled to us to successfully support clients in entering new and lucrative markets.

You can learn more about our market entry expertise, or get in touch to discuss a potential project. 

Entering a new market can lead to a massive boost to sales, brand strength and long-term profits. But there’s more to a market entry strategy than great products or services. Understanding the local market – its distribution channels, culture, economic and social trends – through a market research-driven due diligence process is crucial. And sometimes the most valuable insight is the hidden reason why you shouldn’t proceed…

The art and science of market entry

Over the past 40 years globalisation has redefined what it is to be an international brand. For decades, a handful of dominant players in markets such as food and drink (driven by marketing prowess) or automotive (reliant on economies of scale) had been able to enter new markets in ways that most businesses simply couldn’t imagine.

The rapid growth of global trade capacity, and particularly the ubiquity of the internet, has levelled the playing field. Today, a business in Bolton has myriad options for selling in Beijing; an Australian specialist retailer has lots of ways into the Austrian market.

But the process of choosing which markets to enter, how and why remains fraught with danger. The rewards of opening up a new market are potentially great. On the other hand, the cost can be significant, and the list of powerful global brands that have failed to successfully enter new markets is a long.

The factors to consider are varied: there are economic and social dimensions, competition from local companies, the quirks of regional distribution channels, cultural mismatches… and much more. That means undertaking a market-research-driven due diligence project before entering a new market is a must.

Why look elsewhere? The reasons for market entry

What motivates companies to investigate entering a new market? Every organisation will have its own reasons. Exploring them in detail is a useful first step in defining the later market entry strategy.

Brand growth 

A huge proportion of value in modern enterprises is wrapped up in intangibles. That means increasing enterprise value requires diversification of the brand. Some very strong domestic brands can move into adjacent markets (Dyson, for example, can leverage its reputation for air-moving engineering from vacuums, to hand-dryers, to room fans and even hair straighteners). A select few can jump into non-adjacent categories (Virgin, for example). But opening up a whole new geographic market can establish a brand with many more consumers, boosting its value.

Saturation of existing markets

Once you have gained significant market share and consumer penetration domestically, it’s easy to see growth stall. Launching new products to address existing customers is costly and high risk. But taking proven products or services to a new market can create fresh upside for growing brands.

Optimising overhead costs

As businesses grow, they build up overheads – around head office functions, for example. They also build up niche skills and experience – in fields such as logistics, legal or financial. These scale well: the more times you can put your experts to work in a new market, the more productive they are. And the more markets you have, the lower the amount each one pays to meet head office costs.

Strategic partnership

Globalisation has meant businesses can easily work with partners in new markets – creating new opportunities for blended products and services. Local distributors, for example, might be pathfinders for a brand into a new market – demonstrating the potential for a more structured entry into that market.

There are plenty of other motivations, often overlapping. Knowing which is driving the decision to explore new markets will help frame the strategy for successfully entering one.

A phased approach to market entry

There are different phases to a market entry project. You need to size the opportunity to judge whether it’s worth entering a new market. There ought to be concept testing, especially for new categories or innovations in that market. Many clients focus on competitor analysis when they’re dealing with less well-known rivals.

Market entry has many dimensions – and no business is too big to skip them.

We work with a number of high-profile Japanese brands, global names that are already present in different countries in some form of another. But they still need to tailor particular products or brands to the local markets they’re looking to exploit; and understand the specific needs of consumers in those categories.

Market entry projects usually involve a series of questions, and typically each of these is a discrete engagement.

Key questions for any market entry project

  1. Which markets might we look at?
  2. What is the macro environment like in a market we want to enter?
  3. How does the competitive landscape affect its attractiveness?
  4. What is the best way to enter the market in practical terms?
  5. How do we adjust our product, service or messaging to optimise our offer there?

While market entry studies are a vital tool in successfully growing a brand somewhere new, sometimes their value comes from showing that entering a new market will not be successful. Around 50% of these projects results in a recommendation not to go ahead as planned. That finding can emerge at any one of the stages above. Far from being bad news, it’s often the most valuable insight a brand can get. Market entry can be costly and complex – not doing so when the conditions aren’t right can save massive amounts of money and time.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The world is your oyster. But where’s the pearl?

A crucial first step in investigating markets for entry is to analyse why a brand, product or service is successful in its existing markets. How is it used? Who are the type of people that love it? What are those customers’ attitudes across different domains? What role does it play in their lives – and why?

The next step is to look for markets where groups like this already exist. A good starting point can be detailed desk research – using tools like the CIA World Factbook for demographic information, or understanding cultural similarities to your home market through cultural awareness studies like the Hofstede Insights Culture Compass. But ultimately, it’s approaches developed precisely for the brand or product that will reveal good matches. Narrowing down the high-probability markets is hugely valuable for brands that don’t have other clues to go on.

Sometimes brands do have a clear idea from the outset which markets they want to enter. We worked with a company producing ceramics which had a light-touch arrangement with an international distributor. They started to notice a significant uptick in orders from Korea – which was obviously a strong signal that entering that market could pay dividends.

But that also meant understanding why was key to a successful market entry. Closer research revealed that an increase in purchasing power among the country’s middle class had made the designs more attractive; plus online shopping had taken hold and made previously hard-to-get products more visible.

Target acquired. Now what? Next steps in a market entry project

Specific country research starts with fundamental market insight and competitor intelligence work. Initially, that’s secondary research, analysing available insights for the particular category in question. After that, we might move on to interviewing people whose knowledge of the market will provide more nuanced insights.

Companies usually see this as their feasibility study, helping them understand who else is operating in their category, what regulations might be applicable, what the domestic distribution and supply chain infrastructure is like, and what investment they’re likely to need to make under different scenarios.

That industry analysis and expert insight helps generate a strategic overview of the market tailored to the client. Often that’s enough to substantiate the decision on whether and how to enter a market, especially if it’s a close match with the brand’s existing markets.

A good example is some work we did with an electronics brand looking to launch a new product in the US. The group already has a huge presence in America – but not for its new product, a battery system for domestic renewable electricity.

Our project involved interviewing a range of potential stakeholders – such as real estate developers, housing associations, planning authorities and environmental regulators – to get a holistic view of how that market might evolve. That enabled the client to take a realistic view of both the existing appetite for the product and current regulations; and how the landscape might change as they developed the product.

It’s not uncommon for a company to walk away at this point – there might be competitive, regulatory or infrastructure barriers that no mode of entry can overcome cost-effectively.

Frameworks to assess a new market

A structured framework can be valuable in assessing a new market. You might see great consumer interest – but if the regulatory stance is hostile, you have to think twice. One way of conducting a thorough overview of a market to pick up all those factors is to analyse the environment through different PESTLE lenses:

PESTLE

  • Political – how stable is the country? What’s the prevailing ideology? What biases – intervention in markets, say, or taxation – do politicians have?
  • Economic – how rich is the country? How is wealth distributed? What’s growth like, and where is it likely to continue?
  • Social – what’s the culture in the country? What are the typical social structures – family, work, community? What about religious norms? Education levels?
  • Technological – what’s the infrastructure like? How wired is the country? How lumpy is technology penetration? What about population ‘techiness’?
  • Legal – what rules are there about business ownership? How about liability laws? What recourse do overseas businesses have in the courts?
  • Environmental – how might the local climate affect the product or service? What about use of resources? Or end-of-life disposal of products?

Porter’s Five Forces

The next step is to get a grip on the competitive landscape, and that’s where tools such as Porter’s Five Forces come in. Michael Porter worked at Harvard University, and in 1979 he published a paper aiming to describe the ‘microenvironment’ for the attractiveness of any given industry – or, in this case, a new market.

There are three forces from ‘horizontal’ competition:

  • The threat of substitute products or services – what’s the alternative to your own offering that people might use? How are they achieving the same goals now, and what might shift their views?
  • The threat of established rivals – bearing in mind that in a new market for you, there will be lots of players who know how to operate there better than you do.
  • The threat of new entrantsbeing a new entrant to a market doesn’t mean others won’t follow, too. And if you’re establishing a new category in a market, that might tempt others in, or prompt local businesses to muscle in.

Two forces come from ‘vertical’ competition:

  • The bargaining power of suppliers – opening up a new market might help you gain economies of scale from higher sales volumes. But it also makes you more reliant on suppliers – especially around issues such as logistics.
  • The bargaining power of customers – understanding the broader competitive landscape will help you see what choices customers have; but, especially in the initial phases, they might need to be tempted to switch brands or try a new category.

Digging into the nuances

Those kinds of analytical tools mean companies can enter a new market with their eyes wide open. But they’ll still need to develop a sophisticated view of customers, competitors and regulations – the kind of insights that will tell them how they might enter a market, not just whether it’s a good idea.

That’s when they’ll commission more in depth market research and run projects like a market segmentation analysis to dig deeper into nuances they can exploit later to optimise their market entry.

At this point, they’ll be starting to research more detail on potential partners; exactly how they would use infrastructure to import, manufacture and distribute in that market; what specific customer niches exist; and even financial planning to take into account the kind of regulatory and cost-of-trade analysis they revealed in the feasibility study.

But above all they need to understand how their brand might be received. It’s not a given that you can simply transplant over your image or core messages.

Culture and behaviour: getting the key variables right

Cultural fit is hugely important. In this phase of the project, we would drill down into the local factors that might help a brand; or create barriers for its acceptance. This is typically a traditional market research exercise, exploring the behavioural aspects of consumers in the new market.

For example, we worked with a Japanese food manufacturer looking to expand into new Asian markets. But in the Philippines, it quickly became clear that there was no appetite for the more subtle flavourings and preservatives in the Japanese product. It was the perfect case of a potentially costly market entry being avoided through strong research findings.

That’s a lesson Pret a Manger learned in Japan, where it opened 14 sandwich shops across greater Tokyo in 2003. Just 18 months later, the company withdrew after its local partner, McDonald’s Japan, pulled out citing heavy losses. Superficial research indicated that Japanese people would love the convenience and novelty of eating-on-the-go sandwiches. But once the novelty wore off, sales dipped quickly. That combination of financial and cultural barriers hadn’t been picked up.

Speaking the language

As well as deciding whether the consumer will use the product, it’s important to explore the way in which it’s marketed. This is particularly important for brand with an established global image – the logos, slogans and even colour palettes that they’ve invested in heavily to define themselves – because those might have unexpected connotations in a new culture. Take, for example, the beauty treatment marketed in Japan as “for clear skin” – which translated elsewhere in Asia as “ghostliness”.

There have been plenty of cases of companies that didn’t do their market research with disastrous consequences:

  • Clairol’s ‘Mist Stick’ curling iron flopped in Germany: ‘Mist’ is slang for manure.
  • Coors’s slogan ‘Turn It Loose’ translated into Spanish is slang for diarrhoea.
  • KFC is known globally for being ‘finger-licking good’ – which translated as ‘eat your fingers off’ in China.
  • Also in China, ‘Pepsi Brings You Back to Life’ was interpreted as ‘Pepsi Brings You Back from the Grave.’

But rival Coca Cola entered the China market much more deftly. Initially, signs produced by local distributors for ‘ko-ka-ko-la’ (using symbols for the closest phonetic translation) were translated as ‘bite the wax tadpole’. But the company was developing its own local brand positioning, and settled on the symbols ‘K’o-K’ou-K’o-lê’ – which means ‘to allow the mouth to be able to rejoice,’ a far more apt trademark that it registered in 1928.

The money question – how to approach pricing

The other marketing fundamental that research can steer is pricing – a factor every market entry project needs to examine. Where is the competitive price point for consumers in the new market? What volumes and margins might you expect, based on the market opportunity? How does the new market stack up cost-wise – are you importing or manufacturing locally, for example – and what does that do to your opportunity to flex prices?

More broadly, the profitability of different business models often dictates whether and how to enter a new market at all. For some businesses there’s relatively little financial penalty to operating exclusively through local distributors. But at a certain point, issues such as volume of sales, cost of distribution, tariff levels, changes to local taxes and so on will shift the financial rationale. For example, we’ve already seen many UK businesses enter EU markets directly as a mean of offsetting post-Brexit tariffs, staffing, distribution and other costs.

The financial calculations can also dictate the viable means of getting into a market. At one level, that’s purely a ‘treasury’ consideration. How will profits be repatriated? What are the currency risks associated with the new market? How does banking and taxation work there? But how much you can control the brand locally – rather than relying on local agents – is also a factor. (We’ll look at the different modes for entering new markets in more detail in a separate guide.)

Know when to hold… and when to fold

All these factors are a reminder that even strong and established global brands don’t always have an easy time expanding into a new market. They might have some leverage with their global brand name. They have the resources to invest in market penetration. But to do so effectively – and without incurring higher opportunity costs elsewhere – they need data and insights to ensure their entry is tailored.

Even brands that take precautions to adapt to local culture can miss valuable clues as to their viability in a new market. Starbucks famously waited 47 years to open its first branch in Italy – wary of the very particular approach to coffee there. In 2018, its first shop opened in Milan. But the brand has struggled in the country. Limited research into new markets had affected the brand before, with its Australian business failing to meet the demands of local coffee-lovers; its Israeli operation closed in 2003 within two years of launch.

Granular, holistic research is the key

To gain the right insight to inform your market entry strategies, you’ll need to work with external agencies. For some very fast-growing and global brands, there might be a case for building an in-house team with the kind of expertise and experience needed to evaluate new markets in sequence. But when it comes to local research expertise and cultural understanding, the insights can often be two-dimensional.

McDonald’s Japan is a great example of using local insight to tailor what is, on the face of it, a universal brand. Every country has their tiny variations in the McDonald’s menu. But visitors to Tokyo will find radical departures such as Ebi Filet-o (a burger with breaded shrimp); Teriyaki McBurger; and even chocolate fries.

For many businesses – and business models – international expansion is likely to be a multi-year project with long pauses. That means bringing agencies to advise and evaluate each market entry is the only practical solution – especially if they bring specific knowledge on particular markets to bear.

At Kadence, with offices spanning Europe, the US and Asia Pacific, we are well positioned to support brands with market entry research. Find out more about our market entry services or get in touch to discuss a potential project.

Market segmentation studies are powerful tools for businesses. They help organisations divide the market into distinct groups that share specific attributes. This enables businesses to focus on the most lucrative segments. Segmentation can guide everything from marketing to product development, right through to identifying new market opportunities. In this article, we outline the key benefits of market segmentation and how it supports growth across functions.

The benefits of market segmentation studies

Focus on the customers that matter most

The core principle at the heart of market segmentation is to divide the market into groups of customers you can target, rather than addressing everyone in the same way. Instead of trying to be all things to all people, segmentation helps brands concentrate on the most valuable customers—those with the greatest potential for conversion, loyalty, or long-term value.

So what does this look like in practice? A recent case study brings this to life. We partnered with a leading university to design a segmentation of its alumni. Securing donations from alumni is a core revenue stream for universities. While it might seem logical to target all alumni equally, the reality is that a small proportion make the biggest impact.

There are many ways of segmenting a market. In this instance, we used a needs-based segmentation, exploring the attitudes and values of past students. A demographic segmentation would have enabled targeting based on income bracket or profession—but what truly mattered was alumni sentiment. Those who had valued their university experience and saw it as a stepping stone to their careers were most likely to donate. By segmenting in this way, brands can focus on those most likely to convert, helping to lower acquisition costs.

Power new product development

Another benefit of market segmentation is the ability to uncover new opportunities for innovation. Needs-based segmentation is particularly valuable here, as it breaks the market into distinct groups based on underlying customer needs. By understanding what people are looking for from the category—and the pain points they experience—brands can identify whitespace and design products, services, and experiences that genuinely meet demand.

Segmentation can also play a crucial role post-launch. It helps brands assess where a product may be falling short of customer expectations—and how to refine the offer to better compete.

Design more effective marketing

Segmentation also strengthens marketing strategies. It doesn’t just clarify who to target—but also where to find them and how to tailor messaging. This ensures your marketing spend is more efficient, while delivering greater cut-through and relevance in communications.

You might be investing in TV advertising year after year, aiming to reach as much of the mass market as possible. But segmentation often reveals smarter paths. Your audience may be Instagram enthusiasts or loyal readers of niche publications—reachable on those platforms at a lower cost. In an age of digital targeting, market segmentation provides the clarity needed to invest wisely and improve campaign efficiency.

Another important application of segmentation is in shaping your marketing messaging. Different customers respond to different triggers, and a strong segmentation can help you understand what to say—and to whom. Imagine you’re a mobile phone company with a broad customer base spanning all ages and levels of tech fluency. Segmenting this audience enables you to create tailored campaigns that speak to each group’s priorities. Early adopters may want technical specifications front and centre. Bargain hunters will be drawn to pricing and value. By matching messages to mindsets, you can boost engagement and increase conversion.

Deliver better customer service

Segmentation is often mistakenly viewed as the sole domain of marketing. In reality, its value multiplies when everyone—from the CEO to the cashier—understands and uses it.

We partnered with an online dating platform to build segments based on user behaviours and usage patterns. Each customer was assigned to a segment in the CRM, which appeared during every interaction—giving call centre agents instant insight into the person they were speaking with. This context allowed them to tailor conversations more effectively. You’ve probably experienced something similar: the network provider that offers you new perks when you threaten to leave, or the TV service that recommends the perfect plan based on your habits. These aren’t guesses—they’re segmentation strategies in action. Armed with the right insights, frontline teams can drive retention and upsell with confidence.


Use your resources more efficiently

As the examples above show, segmentation studies can help businesses understand where to focus. This leads to more efficient use of resources—whether it’s allocating sales teams to high-value segments or prioritising marketing spend on high-impact channels, like a trade show known to attract your target customers.

This focus on smart resource use is exactly why segmentation studies can be especially valuable for the businesses least likely to consider them: SMEs. While robust segmentation requires investment—often involving in-depth research into behaviours, attitudes, values, and needs—there are ways to start small. Begin with simpler segmentation types, such as geographic, demographic, or behavioural (if the data is available). Even a basic approach can cut through the noise and bring sharper focus to your strategy.

Develop a more customer-centric culture

One of the more underrated benefits of segmentation is the cultural shift it can support. A well-executed segmentation can encourage employees across departments to better understand your target customers—and to put their needs at the centre of business decisions.

It’s important to recognise that creating a segmentation alone won’t lead to cultural change. That shift needs to be nurtured through intentional management and internal engagement.

Start by securing buy-in early. Work with key stakeholders so they feel involved in the process. Segmentations can be disruptive, so it’s critical that those expected to use them feel a sense of ownership. That ownership is what drives long-term adoption.

Next, ensure the segments are clearly communicated across the organisation. They should be easy to understand and memorable. Visual tools can help here. Our in-house design team has created deliverables that transform insight-heavy slides into accessible, engaging outputs—ensuring segments live on beyond the research team. These should be widely shared. Everyone, from engineers to sales teams, should be able to picture the segments and use them in their daily work.

Finally, activate the segments and embed them into future strategy. We often work directly with teams to help them interpret the segments and understand what they mean for their work.

Create a superior experience for customers

At its core, segmentation is about delivering a better experience for the people you serve. When targeted marketing, responsive service, and innovation are aligned to customer needs, brands create experiences that build loyalty and strengthen long-term relationships.

Increase profitability

Segmentation is one of the most effective ways to improve your bottom line. By focusing your time, energy, and budget on the most promising customer groups, brands reduce waste and increase conversion. You’re no longer investing equally in every potential buyer—you’re prioritising the ones who are most likely to deliver value. That shift leads to higher margins, stronger returns, and a more efficient path to growth. It’s a smarter way to work—and one that delivers results.

Improve return on investment (ROI)

ROI is a critical metric for every team—especially when budgets are under pressure. Segmentation boosts ROI by helping teams allocate spend more effectively across campaigns, channels, and initiatives. Instead of spreading your marketing or product development budget thin, you can focus it on the segments most likely to respond. Whether you’re launching a new product or testing messaging strategies, segmentation helps you get more out of every pound spent.

Achieve better customer retention

Acquiring customers is one thing. Keeping them is another. Segmentation helps brands better understand what their different audiences need—not just to buy, but to stay. When service teams are armed with segment-specific insights, they’re more likely to anticipate problems, offer the right solutions, and build relationships that last. Personalisation becomes easier. Upsell opportunities are clearer. And the cost of churn goes down.

Gain competitive advantage

In crowded categories, segmentation can be the difference between blending in and standing out. It allows brands to position themselves more precisely, spot unmet needs faster, and adapt more quickly to shifting consumer expectations. Rather than chasing trends, you’re responding to real differences in what customers want. That deeper understanding of your market gives you an edge—and a roadmap for staying ahead.

Why segmentation is more essential than ever

Segmentation isn’t just a research exercise—it’s a strategic imperative. In markets shaped by shifting behaviours, evolving needs, and rising customer expectations, brands that truly understand their audiences are the ones that thrive. The most successful organisations use segmentation to focus their resources, spark innovation, and build lasting relationships.

Whether you’re targeting new customers, refining your messaging, or transforming how teams make decisions, segmentation provides the clarity and confidence to move forward.

Want to know how we can help? Explore our segmentation services or get in touch to discuss your next challenge.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.


How do you calculate your market size and determine your serviceable obtainable market?

Understanding your market is a vital step in building a strong business case. It enables you to quantify the number of potential customers and estimate your revenue potential. If you’re new to the concept, start by exploring what is market size to get clarity on the fundamentals before diving deeper into the models. Accurate sizing helps secure internal buy-in, allocate resources, and prioritise opportunities with confidence.

Top-down market sizing is one of the two primary techniques used to calculate the serviceable obtainable market (SOM). This article explores what top-down market sizing entails, how to apply it, and the benefits and limitations of this approach.

What is top-down market sizing and how does it work?

There are two main approaches to estimating your serviceable obtainable market: top-down and bottom-up. Each method offers a different perspective on how to define your market opportunity.

  • Top-down market sizing begins with a macro-level view of the total addressable market (TAM)—the entire revenue opportunity available if every potential customer were to choose your product or service. From there, you narrow the focus to your serviceable available market (SAM), which includes only those customers your offering can realistically reach based on product fit, geography, or business model. Finally, the serviceable obtainable market (SOM) refers to the portion of the SAM that you can actually capture, given your resources, competition, and reach.
  • In contrast, bottom-up market sizing starts with your business fundamentals—your product, pricing, distribution, and existing customer base. From there, you build upwards, estimating how those units can scale over time. This method focuses on operational realities and helps model growth based on specific inputs, rather than general assumptions.

Comparing TAM, SAM, and SOM

To help visualise the differences between these three market size tiers, here’s a simple breakdown:

Market Size TermDefinitionExample
TAMTotal market demand for your product or serviceAll meal kit buyers in the UK
SAMThe portion of TAM you can serve based on business model and capabilitiesUrban households with broadband
SOMThe portion of SAM you can realistically win in the short term2% of urban households with broadband

This comparison gives a clear snapshot of how broad market figures are refined into realistic, actionable segments. Whether you’re assessing your current position or sizing up a new launch, distinguishing between TAM, SAM, and SOM is a vital step in making grounded commercial decisions.

How to apply top-down market sizing in practice

To apply top-down market sizing effectively, start by taking a wide-angle view of the total market before narrowing down to your realistic opportunity. This method begins at the macro level, using available industry data to assess the largest possible market size your product or service could address.

The first step is identifying your total addressable market (TAM). Look at reputable industry reports, government databases, and analyst forecasts to understand the size and scope of the broader market. From there, narrow this to your serviceable available market (SAM)—the subset of customers that your product could logically serve, based on location, product features, or business model constraints.

Let’s say you are launching a payment management platform for hair salons in the US. You would begin by estimating the total number of salons across the country. Then, refine the segment: remove those that are too small to need a digital system, or those operating in regions where your business does not currently operate. Next, account for existing clients and competitors—salons that are already served or unlikely to switch—until you are left with a realistic estimate of your serviceable obtainable market (SOM).

To strengthen your approach:

  • Use trusted data sources. Analysts like Gartner, Statista, or government bodies such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics can provide foundational data. Supplement this with primary research to validate assumptions and add nuance.
  • Maintain consistency. Use a clear, repeatable methodology and document your data sources and assumptions for transparency.
  • Interrogate the data. Ask critical questions as you work through the sizing: Who are our ideal customers? Where are they located? What share of this segment can we realistically convert?

Accurate market sizing is not just a numbers exercise—it sets the foundation for strategic planning, forecasting, and investor confidence.

Worked Example: Calculating Top-Down Market Size

Imagine you’re launching a new meal kit service in the UK. Here’s how you might size the market using a top-down approach:

  • TAM (Total Addressable Market):
    Start with the number of UK households (28 million). Let’s assume 60% are open to subscription services → 16.8 million.
  • SAM (Serviceable Available Market):
    Focus on urban households with broadband access and sufficient disposable income. Say that’s 50% of your TAM → 8.4 million.
  • SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market):
    Based on marketing budget, delivery infrastructure, and competitive landscape, you estimate you can capture 2% in the next 3 years → 168,000 households.

Top-down and Bottom-up Market Sizing — Which is Better?

There’s no universal answer to which method is superior—it depends on your product, industry, and growth stage. Both top-down and bottom-up market sizing offer valuable perspectives and are often most effective when used together to cross-validate your estimates. Below, we outline the strengths and limitations of each approach to help you choose the most appropriate one.

Top-down Market Sizing

ProsCons
Quicker to execute—ideal when time or resources are limitedRelies on third-party data that may be outdated or not tailored to your specific business
Leverages existing market reports and analyst data, making it suitable for large, mature industriesNot well-suited for innovative, niche, or emerging categories with limited historical data
Provides a broad, investor-friendly view of market opportunityLacks granularity and may overlook critical micro-level dynamics such as distribution bottlenecks or customer behaviour

Bottom-up Market Sizing

ProsCons
Built on your actual sales model, pricing, and operational footprint—making it highly customisedCan be time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially without strong internal data tracking
Better suited to disruptive innovations or new product categories where historical data is unreliableRisk of compounding small errors across calculations, leading to inflated market size estimates
Enables detailed forecasting by linking market size directly to your business inputs (e.g. units sold, price, conversion rates)May be overly conservative if market expansion potential is underestimated

In practice, many successful brands apply both models. The top-down approach paints the bigger picture, while bottom-up offers a ground-level view rooted in operational reality. When both tell a consistent story, you can move forward with stronger conviction.

Ultimately, using both models in your market sizing can be useful. If they both agree, you can assume you have a reasonably accurate market size estimate. The approach you opt for will also depend on the type of business you’re building and the product you’re selling.

Why Market Sizing Should Be an Ongoing Process

While market sizing is essential for initial planning, it shouldn’t be treated as static. Markets shift. New competitors emerge. Consumer behavior evolves. That’s why the most successful brands revisit their estimates regularly—especially when expanding into new regions or launching new products.

In global contexts, market sizing becomes even more complex. Brands must factor in cultural nuances, economic conditions, and local demand patterns. Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches can help validate assumptions and reduce risk.

If you’re preparing to enter a new market, you may also find it helpful to explore our advanced techniques to calculate market size globally and dive into the nuances of how to calculate market potential in specific categories.

Market sizing is more than just a numbers game. When done right, it becomes a strategic tool to guide investment, align internal stakeholders, and prioritise where to compete. Whether you’re just starting out or fine-tuning a go-to-market strategy, it pays to get your numbers right.

Partner with Kadence to Build a Robust Market Sizing Strategy

At Kadence, we don’t just calculate market size—we help brands turn that data into direction. Whether you’re exploring a new category, entering an unfamiliar region, or reassessing your growth strategy, our market sizing services can help you build an accurate, defensible model that guides smart decision-making. Get in touch to see how our research can power your next move.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the difference between TAM, SAM, and SOM?
A: TAM (Total Addressable Market) is the total demand for a product or service in a given market. SAM (Serviceable Available Market) refers to the portion of TAM you can actually serve based on your business model, region, or capabilities. SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market) is the realistic share of that market you can capture, considering your resources and competition.

Q: When should I use top-down market sizing instead of bottom-up?
A: Top-down market sizing is ideal when you need a quick estimate and have access to reliable secondary data sources—such as industry reports or government statistics. It works best for mature industries with established competitors and historical data.

Q: How do I calculate SOM from TAM or SAM?
A: First, estimate your TAM using high-level data. Then define your SAM by narrowing this to only the segment your product can serve. From there, calculate SOM based on your expected market penetration rate or the percentage of the SAM you believe is attainable, factoring in competitors and current reach.

Q: Is it better to use both top-down and bottom-up methods?
A: Yes. Combining both approaches provides a more robust and accurate estimate. If both methods converge on a similar figure, it can increase your confidence in the forecast. This is especially helpful for cross-functional alignment or when seeking investment.

I’ve been a market researcher for more than 15 years, during which I’ve done countless projects conducted through online and offline methodologies, both in Singapore, and across Asia. It’s a common research cliché to say that ‘one size fits all’ does not apply in Asia, and that the only unifying factor across all Asian markets is their very uniqueness. As such, I’m happy share my view on why Singapore is a market where brands stand to benefit from online research alongside offline research. 

Singapore is one of the most technologically-advanced countries in the world, with internet penetration not that drastically different from the US and indeed higher than many European nations such as Spain, Portugal and Austria. The government’s ‘smart nation’ ambitions are laid out in a masterplan that constantly gets revisited and progress against it tracked. Digital device ownership is high, and digital literacy is something that’s improving, even amongst elderly Singaporeans. It is becoming a common sight in the suburbs to see older Singaporeans making their way to the local community centre for regular lessons on smartphone usage or getting online, while savvier ones conduct video calls with distant loved ones across time zones, with a smile plastered on their faces. 

Blog_Image

What this all means is an increasing willingness amongst clients to explore digital means of qualitatively engaging Singaporean respondents. Though still not the mainstream methodology of choice, we at Kadence International have interacted with consumers in Singapore via online communities on the topic of financial management, understood their preferences when it comes to beer via mobile diaries, and even explored their attitudes and expressions online on the topic of camera usage via social listening.

Online quantitative surveys have always been the norm in Singapore, so it’s good to see an increasing willingness on the part of clients to adopt a similar way to engage and understand local consumers qualitatively. 

From these experiences, we have honed best practices that guide every piece of online work that comes our way. For example, because Singaporeans are generally quite experienced and savvy with tech platforms, we are able to make our task introductions concise, thereby focusing on what we want them to complete or achieve. Also, culturally we may not be as open to casual acquaintances, but the right tonality on the mobile platform will definitely encourage very effusive inputs when it comes to tasks, sometimes even through the form of videos and images! On top of that, working with the right recruiters / fieldwork managers is even more crucial for online fieldwork compared to offline, as they are the crucial link to ensure sustained participation, especially for longitudinal studies (i.e. more than 10 days).

Despite Singapore’s position as a digital leader, over the past 5 years, there have been sporadic episodes of data breaches, even at government agencies, which have affected the daily lives of average Singaporeans. This is on top of the occasional ‘phishing’ instances and increasingly common episodes of white-collar crimes conducted on the digital / mobile platform. 

Though not catastrophic in nature, these instances do reduce overall consumer confidence in digital platforms to a certain degree, while highlighting increasing consciousness amongst consumers about their rights to personal data and digital privacy. This needs to be considered when implementing any form of online research. 

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The impact of this is that we need to think carefully about how we set up a study and what we say to reassure respondents participating in online research. Clarity around what kinds of information will be collected, how it will be used, and giving people the option to opt in and out of some of these, will definitely work towards reducing reluctance to participate, as well as increasing willingness to be even more open towards sharing their thoughts and the data points that we ask of them. It can’t just be a ‘blanket’ set of generic text filled with jargon, because that will not sufficiently explain the importance of them sharing their information, and of us respecting what they have shared. 

As mentioned, offline research is still a popular option in the Singapore and there are a number of reasons for this in spite of the efficiencies that online alternatives can offer. The small size of this ‘red dot’ island nation means that it can be easier and quicker to track hard-to-reach individuals in person rather than online. Offline is often favoured by government-related agencies, because more Singaporeans are choosing to forgo having a landline in their homes, instead relying on a mobile phone number. That means while it used to be possible to achieve representativeness on a neighbour level via the home telephone, going face-to-face is now a more effective method. 

In Singapore we see a matrix of reasons why considering both online and offline research is important. From demographic shifts and technological adoption, to legislation and daily behaviour, we see that the market houses consumers that can be optimally reached through a mix of methodologies. This is the key takeout from my years of experience running both kinds of research across Asia, and underlies my belief that any brand that wants to truly understand Singapore as a market will stand to maximize that understanding if it starts by recognizing the value that combined methodologies can bring.

How to conduct online market research in Asia: The Go-To Guide
Interested in understanding how to approach online research across other Asian countries? Download the guide here

Our kids media experts Bianca Abulafia and Sarah Serbun shared their top tips at Qual 360 of how to conduct qual research with kids and the culture considerations to bar in mind in each market.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.