Consumer Insights Archives

Milk tea isn’t just a drink. It is a social signal. Samgyupsal isn’t just a meal — it has become a weekend ritual.

Few food trends have achieved what these did: mass appeal across socioeconomic classes, viral traction across platforms, and real estate-level impact in malls and high streets nationwide. Their success offers a blueprint for how food fads evolve into full-fledged consumer movements in the Philippines, driven by youth culture, social validation, and the pursuit of immersive, shareable experiences.

With over half the population under 30, Filipino consumers aren’t just early adopters; they’re active trendsetters. Food isn’t simply nourishment; it’s identity, entertainment, and currency for connection. Whether it’s a TikTok-worthy bite or a heritage dish reimagined for a new generation, the choices Filipinos make at the table are deeply intertwined with how they see themselves and the world.

For F&B brands operating in this space, understanding what drives these choices means tapping into a uniquely layered market – one where Western influences blend with local pride, and novelty only sticks when it aligns with culture, context, and community.

Fusion Finds Its Filipino Soul

Restaurants across Metro Manila are rewriting the rulebook for Filipino cuisine. A new wave of chefs is blending local comfort food with global influences – turning kare-kare into curry bowls, transforming adobo into bao buns, and giving sinigang a Japanese ramen twist. These aren’t gimmicks; they’re calculated plays to tap into the Filipino craving for novelty without abandoning familiarity.

This approach appeals to a generation raised on K-pop and content algorithms. Diners want flavour, but they also want narrative – a dish that photographs well and tells a story. Fusion provides both. Sinigang is reinvented with beef short rib and watermelon at spots like Manam Comfort Filipino, offering a playful yet rooted take on the classic. Sarsa Kitchen + Bar builds on Negrense traditions but packages them with a contemporary edge, perfect for the urban millennial crowd.

F&B groups are taking notice. Mid-scale franchises are testing bolder menus inspired by these high-concept eateries, hoping to scale trend-led items before they hit saturation. With younger diners using food discovery as entertainment, fusion isn’t fringe – it’s a fast-moving commercial opportunity.

The Rise of Regional Ingredients

The mainstream Filipino menu is undergoing a quiet revolution – and it’s being led by ingredients once considered too obscure, too rural, or too slow to scale. Diners are now seeking depth: flavours that feel earned, ingredients that come with provenance, and dishes that tell regional stories.

Items like batuan, pili nuts, tabon-tabon, and taba ng talangka are moving from weekend palengke hauls to chef specials and curated tasting menus. Adlai, once a heritage grain, now appears in health-forward bowls and upscale rice alternatives. These ingredients aren’t just rich in flavour; they’re signalling exclusivity, craftsmanship, and cultural pride.

Restaurants like Toyo Eatery and Locavore have championed this movement by reintroducing ancestral ingredients to urban diners and building menus that are proudly Filipino but globally competitive. For F&B groups, this opens a path to elevating brand storytelling – whether through seasonal LTOs (limited-time offers), regionally inspired menu capsules, or direct sourcing partnerships with local farmers.

The shift isn’t about going backwards – it’s about building forward with authenticity. As Filipino consumers increasingly equate food choices with values, using regional and artisanal ingredients is a culinary and commercial advantage.

Plant-Based and Flexitarian

Meat may still dominate the Filipino plate, but the momentum behind plant-forward eating is growing – not as a fringe lifestyle but as a mainstream shift among millennials and Gen Z. This shift isn’t driven by ideology alone; it’s about wellness, affordability, and the increasing accessibility of meat alternatives in urban centres.

Traditional dishes are being reformatted for a new generation: laing without bagoong, kare-kare with jackfruit, sisig with tofu and mushrooms. Homegrown spots like Green Bar in Makati and The Wholesome Table in BGC have found success by blending comfort food aesthetics with health-forward menus. Their dishes don’t preach – they sell through flavor, familiarity, and lifestyle branding.

There’s a gap in the casual dining space for restaurant groups where plant-based menus are still treated as secondary. Introducing flexitarian lines – not full vegan menus, but deliberate plant-forward heroes – is a low-risk, high-upside way to meet the rising demand. It also signals alignment with values like sustainability, something younger consumers are rewarding with loyalty and spending.

What once felt like a niche segment is now a whitespace for innovation. And in a country where vegetables have always been part of the table, rethinking them for modern preferences is a return, not a departure.

Street Food 2.0 – Elevated and Instagrammable

Filipino street food has always been bold, flavorful, and accessible, but it’s never been this photogenic. What used to be served from pushcarts and roadside grills is now being reimagined for curated food halls, food parks, and Gen Z-focused dining places.

Think kwek-kwek with truffle aioli, isaw glazed in honey sriracha, or balut turned into a small-plate delicacy with sinamak foam. Brands like Boy Isaw and Mang Larry’s Isawan have helped normalise street food in structured retail settings, while new concepts like IhawJuan lean into design-forward booths, premium packaging, and consistent flavour control.

This trend thrives on nostalgia wrapped in novelty. It appeals to Filipino diners’ emotional connection to childhood and street culture while meeting modern expectations for hygiene, branding, and presentation. On TikTok and Instagram, street food with a twist is shareable gold.

For restaurant groups, the opportunity lies in format innovation: bite-sized, affordable, customizable items that fit both dine-in and grab-and-go formats. It’s also a chance to localise at scale, with regional street food variants offering ready-made menu expansion paths across the country.

Ancestral Filipino Cooking Techniques with A Modern Flair

Filipino chefs are reaching into the past not to replicate it but to reinterpret it. Slow, regional methods like pinaupong manok, pinais, kinilaw, tinapa, and kulawo are being reintroduced in refined forms, framed less as throwbacks and more as culinary heritage elevated for today’s palate.

At restaurants like Balay Dako in Tagaytay and Café Juanita in Pasig, long-held techniques are presented with care, often paired with storytelling that links each dish to family tradition or regional history. The appeal isn’t just authenticity – it’s depth. For consumers burned out by over-engineered food fads, these dishes offer a sense of grounding and meaning.

What was once seen as slow and provincial now feels premium. The tactile nature of these cooking methods – from banana-leaf wrapping to open-fire grilling – offers rich sensory experiences, ideal for diners seeking more than just taste.

For restaurant groups, this movement is an opportunity to differentiate themselves. Ancestral techniques lend themselves to seasonal menus, chef’s specials, and content-rich brand narratives. They also create space for regional partnerships and experiential formats, such as heritage dining nights or interactive prep counters. Tradition isn’t the opposite of innovation – it’s becoming its most compelling form in the Filipino market.

Filipino dining is not just about what’s on the plate – it’s a statement of identity, intent, and influence. As tastes evolve and boundaries blur between tradition and trend, the winning brands will move beyond imitation and lean into insight, capturing the cultural undercurrent driving the next wave of consumption.

Market research is your edge if you’re looking to tap into the next wave of Filipino food trends with confidence. From concept testing and menu optimisation to understanding shifting consumer behaviours across regions and generations, our team delivers the insights you need to make bold, informed decisions. Let’s uncover what’s next – together.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The fastest way to read the economy might be through a grocery receipt.

In the United States, a staple as simple as frozen pizza has become a financial strategy, signalling how households manage cost, comfort, and consistency.

And the US isn’t alone. Across markets, pantry staples are doubling as economic sensors. In the UK, a jump in baked bean and private-label ready meal sales mirrors cost-of-living anxiety. In Japan, instant noodles remain resilient despite price hikes, especially premium options. In China, frozen dumplings are no longer seasonal but weekday staples. Each reflects how consumers behave when their budgets are under pressure.

For brands, these patterns aren’t background noise. They’re forecasting tools. The staples consumers cling to during disruption are often early indicators of more profound shifts in sentiment and strategy.

The psychology behind food choices

When financial stress sets in, consumers don’t just look for cheaper options; they look for control. Food becomes a tool to reclaim routine, reduce effort, and preserve small pleasures. In inflationary periods, what matters isn’t just price. It’s perceived value.

Today’s shoppers are making what behavioural economists call satisfying decisions: good-enough choices that balance budget, emotion, and effort. That explains the rise of “premiumised basics.” In Japan, consumers choose upscale instant ramen precisely because inflation makes dining out less accessible, and these products offer the comfort and experience of a restaurant meal at home. A frozen pizza or store-brand ready meal isn’t just a shortcut; it’s a psychological release valve.

Aggregated across millions of carts, these choices offer powerful signals. Brands that can spot the patterns early and build for them gain an edge.

Frozen pizza and the power of low-effort indulgence

In the US, frozen pizza has moved from the edge of the freezer to the centre of the meal plan. Sales reached $7.0 billion in 2024, reflecting growing demand for foods that balance indulgence and utility.

The pandemic normalised at-home dining, and inflation extended the habit. Frozen pizza delivers more than calories: it’s familiar, flexible, and low-friction. It substitutes for takeout, satisfies a group, and feels like a treat without requiring cooking skills. Consumers aren’t just trading down; they’re trading differently.

That shift has created space for brands like Screamin’ Sicilian and California Pizza Kitchen to position frozen products as restaurant-quality. Clear packaging, upscale branding, and perceived authenticity all signal that compromise isn’t necessary.

Evaluate your portfolio by the effort-to-satisfaction ratio. Consumers gravitate toward products that offer fast prep, emotional payoff, and cost consistency. Frozen pizza’s success shows how categories that meet these criteria outperform even in volatile markets.

UK shoppers trade brands for value

Baked beans have long been a UK staple, but recent sales data tells a deeper story.

In 2023, total baked bean sales rose 2.5%, but Heinz saw a 5.1% decline. Private labels surged, with Euroshopper and others gaining share. The shift is primarily driven by price sensitivity. As grocery bills rise, shoppers increasingly trade down to store-brand or value-tier options that offer similar taste and portion sizes at significantly lower prices. Loyalty to the category remains, but brand allegiance weakens when meaningful differentiation doesn’t match premium pricing.

The same is playing out in chilled ready meals. Tesco and Sainsbury’s expanded their value lines, and consumers responded. These aren’t subpar options as packaging, taste, and positioning have all improved. The new trade-down doesn’t feel like a sacrifice.

Legacy brands need to reassess elasticity. When brand loyalty erodes under pricing pressure, winning back market share means redefining value, not just dropping price. Functional improvements and narrative clarity are now essential to justify a premium.

Japan’s affordable upgrades

According to The Guardian, the price of instant ramen increased 20% over the past two years, but consumption remained high.

In Japan, inflation hasn’t dented demand for instant noodles. Nissin raised prices, yet consumption held steady. More surprising: it’s the premium SKUs that are growing fastest.

Consumers are seeking quality within constrained budgets. The appeal isn’t just cost; it’s comfort and cultural continuity. A bowl of gourmet-style ramen at home replaces an expensive lunch out. The transaction becomes emotional as much as practical.

Affordable premiumization is a long-term play. Consumers will spend a little more if the return feels meaningful. That means elevating basics, through taste, story, or packaging, to deliver a perceived upgrade without a price shock.

China’s modernised tradition

Frozen dumplings have become a year-round staple in Chinese households. Once reserved for holidays or family occasions, they’re now an everyday solution for time-strapped urban consumers. In 2024, the market reached $6.86 billion, with younger buyers, balancing long hours and shrinking leisure time, driving much of the demand.

This isn’t convenience displacing tradition; it’s adapting to new consumption habits. Frozen dumplings retain cultural relevance while offering speed, consistency, and modern formats.

Culturally rooted convenience products can unlock mass-market growth when paired with modern positioning. The key is to evolve the format and accessibility without stripping away the story.

India and the Philippines: Time-saving staples under strain

According to Future Market Insights, the ready-to-mix food market in India reached $440 million in 2023 and is projected to grow to $1.75 billion by 2033. Snacks and mixes form a dual growth engine, as consumers manage rising costs and time poverty.

These products aren’t replacing traditional meals; they’re reshaping them. Dosa batter and spice blends offer cultural authenticity without daily prep. Convenience without compromise is becoming a national default.

In the Philippines, canned sardines serve as both sustenance and security. With inflation averaging 6.1% in 2023 and over 20 tropical storms a year, demand for shelf-stable protein spikes in response to economic and environmental stress. Mega Global, which holds a 30% market share, invested over USD 1.7 million to expand capacity by 20%, betting on continued category growth. The company’s investment in expanded capacity is a bet that pantry-stable proteins will remain a default safety net.

In emerging and climate-vulnerable markets, brands win by delivering reliability. Food products that address economic or environmental uncertainty earn long-term trust. Packaging, shelf stability, and affordability aren’t features. They’re foundations.

Micro-trends as macro signals

The grocery aisle is a real-time indicator of consumer mood. It reveals where people are willing to compromise and where they won’t. In every market, different staples are rising for the same underlying reasons: they feel safe, smart, and familiar.

Country	Food Signal	Behavior Cue
USA	Frozen Pizza	Indulgent efficiency
UK	Baked Beans, Ready Meals	Brand elasticity
Japan	Instant Noodles	Affordable premiumization
China	Frozen Dumplings	Cultural speed
India	Mixes & Snacks	Time-cost optimization
Philippines	Canned Sardines	Resilience stockpiling

That’s not just retail behaviour. It’s brand insight. When inflation hits, when trust dips, when time disappears, the categories that survive aren’t the trendiest – they’re the ones that deliver.

The lesson for brands is clear: resilience lives in the ordinary. When the economic cycle turns again, the brands that stay in the basket will stay in the conversation.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Blueprints and performance specs no longer tell the full story. With buyers and stakeholders demanding greater transparency, industrial tech firms are under increasing pressure to disclose more than just technical capabilities.

Procurement teams across sectors are asking deeper questions – about carbon emissions, labour conditions, and lifecycle impact. European disclosure mandates and US reporting proposals are accelerating the shift. Once confined to consumer brands, transparency expectations are now reaching B2B suppliers of semiconductors, robotics, and industrial machinery.

Buyers Want More Than a Product Sheet

Technical performance remains critical, but it is no longer the only factor in industrial procurement. A 2024 study by Market Expertise found that ESG-related concerns now rank among the top ten decision drivers for global B2B buyers. This highlights a broader shift in evaluation criteria.

Suppliers are increasingly required to provide data on emissions reduction, ethical sourcing, and corporate governance. In sectors such as aerospace, mining equipment, and chemical processing, procurement teams are requesting carbon audits, labour practice disclosures, and diversity metrics alongside traditional technical specifications.

Firms that do not meet these requirements may be excluded from consideration altogether.

New Rules Are Forcing the Issue

Industrial tech firms no longer disclose sustainability data out of goodwill; they’re doing it to comply. In the US and Europe, regulators are making ESG transparency a legal requirement.

In January 2024, the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) came into effect, requiring thousands of companies – both EU-based and international firms with regional operations – to disclose detailed information on environmental impact, human rights, and governance. For the industrial tech sector, this means publishing previously considered proprietary metrics: carbon intensity, supply chain traceability, and even energy sources.

The pressure is mounting stateside as well. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to finalise rules this year mandating climate-related disclosures from publicly traded companies. This includes direct and indirect emissions data, climate risk assessments, and mitigation strategies, pushing firms in manufacturing and engineering to build new reporting infrastructures almost overnight.

The result: what was once optional is quickly becoming standard. And for firms hoping to win contracts in highly regulated markets, compliance isn’t just a checkbox; it’s a competitive edge.

Industrial Giants Begin Opening the Books

Some of the world’s largest industrial tech players are beginning to respond, not just with compliance but with proactive disclosures that mirror the transparency seen in consumer sectors.

Intel’s 2023–24 Corporate Responsibility Report goes beyond carbon emissions to include water usage, chemical management, and workforce diversity – information that was once buried in internal audits. In its 2023/24 ESG report, Lenovo disclosed targets for reducing scope 1 and 2 emissions, supply chain sustainability efforts, and metrics tied to circular economy goals. The company now ranks highest in the IT industry on the Hang Seng Corporate Sustainability Index.

NVIDIA’s 2024 sustainability report outlines how its data centres are optimised for energy efficiency, with scope 3 emissions and supplier climate programs prominently featured. These aren’t one-off updates; they’re becoming annual staples, complete with third-party verification and downloadable datasets.

For an industry known for tight-lipped operations and long procurement cycles, this shift signals more than regulatory compliance. It’s a recalibration of what trust looks like in the industrial age.

Supply Chains Are No Longer Exempt

Industrial tech firms are extending ESG scrutiny beyond their own operations. Suppliers are now under pressure to meet the same standards, sometimes higher. Contracts increasingly require disclosures not just on raw materials or manufacturing timelines but also on carbon intensity, labour conditions, and waste management practices.

Microsoft has already set the tone. In 2024, the company announced it would require key suppliers to use 100% carbon-free energy by 2030. The move came as Microsoft’s emissions rose nearly 30% year-over-year, largely due to expanded AI infrastructure and Scope 3 emissions tied to its supply base. It signals to partners: clean up or lose the business.

In Australia, chemicals and explosives company Orica has installed nitrous oxide abatement technology across multiple sites, reducing emissions by an estimated 15%, roughly equal to the annual output of all other Australian chemical producers combined. This investment wasn’t just about optics; it was about securing long-term contracts with environmentally conscious buyers.

The trend is clear: if your data isn’t clean, your bid may not even make the table.

Reporting Is Messy, Expensive, and Unfinished

For all the momentum, ESG reporting remains a logistical hurdle for many industrial tech firms. Gathering emissions data across sprawling operations, inconsistent supplier systems, and decades-old infrastructure isn’t just difficult; it’s costly and time-consuming.

A major pain point is standardisation. With dozens of frameworks in play—from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)—companies struggle to align disclosures that simultaneously satisfy investors, regulators, and buyers. Even firms that publish detailed ESG reports often face scepticism over data quality.

Governments are taking note. In February 2025, the European Commission proposed a 25% reduction in reporting burdens as part of its “Simplification Omnibus,” a move estimated to save businesses across the bloc €40 billion annually. While it won’t eliminate the need for transparency, the shift suggests that complexity may be one of the biggest roadblocks to effective ESG strategy.

The challenge now is not whether to report, but how to report meaningfully, consistently, and at scale.

Transparency Is Becoming a Selling Point

In industrial tech, where margins are tight and products are often commoditised, ESG transparency is emerging as a powerful differentiator. Firms that can clearly communicate their sustainability practices are gaining ground, not just with regulators but also with clients who now see environmental and social metrics as a measure of long-term value.

According to research, B2B buyers are more likely to renew contracts and pay premium prices to suppliers who can prove sustainable practices. This shift is being felt across sectors – from advanced manufacturing to semiconductors – as procurement teams weigh emissions data and ethics policies alongside delivery timelines and service-level agreements.

To meet demand, companies are investing in ESG-focused digital tools, embedding reporting capabilities into enterprise systems, and training frontline teams to speak the language of sustainability. The goal isn’t just compliance; it’s credibility.

For industrial tech firms, the message is clear: transparency isn’t a liability. It’s leverage.

What Was Optional Is Now Expected

The industrial tech sector is no longer immune to the scrutiny once reserved for high-profile consumer brands. Whether building chips, circuit boards, or heavy equipment, companies are being judged not just on what they make, but on how they make it, what they emit, and who they employ.

Procurement has become a proving ground. ESG credentials are now as critical as certifications and specs. The risk isn’t reputational for firms unprepared to meet these expectations – it’s commercial. Buyers are choosing partners who reflect their values, and those values are becoming quantifiable.

As regulatory timelines shorten and client expectations rise, the question isn’t whether to disclose but whether you’re disclosing enough, soon enough.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Protein has slipped out of the gym and into everyday life. It’s no longer the domain of weightlifters or meal-prep obsessives, but something far more ordinary and far more widespread. In Britain, it now turns up in desk drawers, schoolbags, glove compartments, and corner shop fridges. It’s being stirred, shaken, squeezed, and snackified. And, crucially, it’s not being consumed for muscle. It’s for focus. For balance. For the small but satisfying sense of doing something right.

Sales of protein bars, powders, and drinks have climbed 24.2% in the past year, pushing the UK’s sports nutrition market to £1.1 billion. But the term “sports” is misleading. For many, protein isn’t about performance at all. It’s about practicality. Commuters pick up ready-to-drink shakes between trains. Office workers reach for a bar between Zoom calls. Parents hand protein yoghurts to teenagers because they feel vaguely healthier than crisps. Protein, today, is about keeping things ticking over.

That quiet normalisation is most obvious on the high street. Where once there was a dusty corner of the supermarket for “active lifestyles”, now there are prominent displays of high-protein snacks, cereals, bakery items, and even desserts. It’s a word that works across the nutritional spectrum, something that can sit beside indulgence as easily as it can beside restraint.

And British shoppers aren’t short on options. Shelves are filled with chocolate-coated, dairy-free, oat-based, and whey-packed bars, flavoured with everything from peanut butter to salted caramel. The variety says as much about branding as it does about diet. Protein has become shorthand for modern food values: a desire for function, as well as taste, convenience, and, increasingly, identity.

Protein is no longer just a supplement. For many, it reflects small, everyday choices that align with broader intentions—eating well, staying alert, and maintaining balance. In a culture increasingly shaped by wellbeing, high-protein foods offer a quiet reassurance that you’re doing something good for yourself.

What’s Driving the Protein Push

What’s driving protein’s rise isn’t hype, but how effortlessly it fits into everyday routines. Unlike other health trends that require restriction or reinvention, protein works quietly in the background, adding structure, energy, and reassurance. From Gen Z to pensioners, each generation is finding its own reasons to embrace it.

Millennials and Gen Z are leading the shift, but they’re not chasing muscle gains. Recent research revealed that over 60% of UK adults under 35 say they consume high-protein foods to feel energised and manage stress, rather than for fitness. On platforms like TikTok, #highproteinmealprep has surpassed 700 million views, with fridge tours and influencer routines turning protein bars and powders into everyday essentials. These are not supplements. They are lifestyle markers, shared as much for accountability as for aesthetics.

Yet the interest is not confined to the under-40s. In a recent survey, 45% of UK consumers over 55 said they were increasing protein intake to support healthy ageing. This group is not buying protein for trend’s sake, but for muscle preservation and mobility. The shift reflects a broader awareness that protein is not just for the gym. It is a foundation for long-term wellbeing.

One motivation stands out across age groups and lifestyles: functionality. Unlike diets that cut, cleanse, or punish, high-protein choices add something. They help people feel fuller, stay sharper, snack less, and simplify mealtimes. This reflects Britain’s broader wellness economy, where the emphasis is on feeling well rather than performing wellness.

This also helps explain why consumers prefer familiar formats. Bars, shakes, yoghurts, and puddings continue to dominate, not because they are new, but because they are practical. Most shoppers are not looking for lab-designed alternatives. They want recognisable foods that fit their habits and offer clear functional benefits.

The result is not a fleeting trend, but a gradual evolution in how people approach food. Protein is not a disruptor. It is an enabler. It offers small, practical wins that add up over time. In a culture where wellness is no longer niche, that promise holds lasting appeal.

The Brand Strategy Behind the Boom

As the appetite for protein grows, so too has the way it is marketed. In supermarkets and corner shops alike, protein is no longer confined to the health aisle. It appears on endcaps, in meal deals, and even in vending machines. It has been repositioned not as a supplement, but as a shortcut to modern living.

Marketing once focused on performance: leaner, stronger, faster. Now it leans toward everyday credibility. Products no longer ask consumers to train harder. They position themselves as tools to help people keep going. UFIT’s ready-to-drink shakes, for instance, are priced at £1.79 for a grab-and-go bottle, aimed at shoppers who have never set foot in a supplement store. Grenade, one of the UK’s bestselling protein bar brands, leads with indulgence rather than nutrition. Flavours like white chocolate cookie, fudge brownie, and peanut butter make the experience feel more like a treat than a transaction.

Even traditionally masculine brands like Jack Link’s have adapted. The US-born jerky maker now invests in UK campaigns across esports, festivals, and social media. This is no longer protein for the gym. It is protein for gaming, raving, and late-night snacking. The shift is strategic. In Britain, protein has become a lifestyle.

Much of this success comes down to the flexibility of the format. Bars and shakes don’t require a new habit. They fit easily into existing ones. That’s also why brands have doubled down on packaging that communicates quickly, using bold labels like “20g PROTEIN,” simplified ingredient lists, and soft colour palettes borrowed from the wellness world.

And the storytelling doesn’t stop at the shelf. Influencer partnerships, especially with micro-influencers who reflect everyday routines, have helped protein products blend seamlessly into social feeds. Not as a flex, but as a cue. In a world where the line between food and self-image continues to blur, that visibility matters.

In the UK, brands aren’t selling protein as performance. They’re selling it as permission. Permission to snack, to simplify, to opt into health without opting out of pleasure. It is this careful balance between function and familiarity that has propelled protein from niche to necessity.

Image credit: Huel

Huel’s success tells a story far bigger than meal replacement. Founded in the UK in 2015, the brand launched with a promise of nutritional completeness and convenience, offering vegan shakes and powders for those too busy to cook but unwilling to compromise on health. It quickly moved from niche to norm, propelled by savvy digital marketing and a cult-like community of professionals, students, and time-pressed urbanites.

What makes Huel notable is how it positioned protein as a practical staple instead of a specialist tool. Its expansion from online-only sales to supermarket shelves brought ready-to-drink shakes and bars into the hands of everyday shoppers. By 2024, Huel’s global footprint had reached 25,650 stores, its UK retail presence strengthened, and its annual sales hit £214 million, an increase of 16 percent year-on-year. The brand’s profitability also grew sharply, with pre-tax profit nearly tripling in the same period.

Huel hasn’t leaned on performance or indulgence. Instead, it has championed efficiency, routine, and nutritional balance, values that resonate with modern British consumers, especially millennials and Gen Z. In doing so, it helped redefine what protein means in everyday life.

How the UK Compares Globally

Britain’s protein habit may feel local, but it is playing out on a global stage. Around the world, consumers are rethinking when and why they reach for protein. Yet the UK stands apart not in volume, but in tone. While other countries frame protein around performance, Britain treats it more like a life skill. It is about balance, ease, and everyday upkeep.

In the United States, the trend has gone maximalist. Protein shows up in ice cream, pancake mix, breakfast cereal, and even candy. Proffee, a mash-up of protein and iced coffee, started as a TikTok trend and quickly moved into cafés and ready-to-drink ranges. Sixty-three percent of Americans actively look for protein in snacks. The line between indulgence and function is all but gone.

In Southeast Asia, the shift looks different. Economic growth has made animal protein more accessible, driving up demand. At the same time, younger consumers in countries like Thailand and Singapore are drawn to plant-based alternatives, which they associate with health, sustainability, and modernity. In Thailand, sixty-seven percent of consumers say they plan to reduce meat consumption. The motivation is not ethical but personal. People want to feel better and live longer.

In Japan, protein trends are shaped by age. An older population is fuelling demand for products that support strength and mobility but are easy to consume. Protein jellies, soft snacks, and drinkable supplements are now common, pitched as daily maintenance rather than athletic fuel.

China is experiencing a boom in online protein sales, up sixty-eight percent yearly in 2023. A mix of fitness aspirations and beauty messaging drives the growth. Protein powders are popular with women and have been promoted as tools for weight management and skin health. Livestream shopping and influencer campaigns sell a lifestyle as much as a product.

In India, the conversation is still emerging. A large percentage of the population remains protein deficient, but a growing middle class is engaging with protein as a marker of wellbeing. Dairy brands like Amul have launched fortified lassi and ice cream, positioning protein as both nutritious and desirable.

Across these regions, protein is rising in relevance. But few markets have made it as ordinary as the UK. Here, it is not aspirational or remedial. It is part of the meal deal, the snack shelf, and the weekday routine. It does not announce itself. It just fits.

The Rise of a Rotational Approach to Protein

Protein may be having its moment, but British shoppers are not choosing sides. The surge in high-protein eating has not sparked a divide between meat and plants. Instead, people are mixing both, often within the same day, and sometimes the same meal.

Part of the shift is pragmatic. Meat remains central to most diets, but plant-based options have gained ground as a way to lighten meals without losing satisfaction. The UK leads Europe in plant-protein innovation, accounting for roughly 18 percent of all new product launches. Supermarket shelves now carry lentil-based pasta, oat-protein shakes, vegan protein bars, and meat-free versions of familiar British dishes.

This is not happening because the nation has gone vegetarian. Most consumers still identify as omnivores or flexitarians. What has changed is the desire for variety and balance. A plant-based lunch does not preclude roast chicken at dinner. It simply reflects a flexible approach to food, guided by mood, values, or convenience.

Protein branding speaks to this shift. On one shelf, whey-based shakes and jerky target muscle and recovery. A few paces away, pea-protein bars promise calm, clarity, and clean ingredients. Both are selling, often to the same household. In The Telegraph’s round-up of the year’s best protein bars, vegan and dairy-based options sit side by side, not as rivals but as parallel answers to different needs.

Taste, convenience, and credibility matter more than protein source. Shoppers want it to work, but they also want it to feel right—nutritionally, culturally, and ethically. The success of the category depends less on what it is made from and more on how well it fits into daily life.

In Britain, this is not about replacement. It is about rotation. And that, more than anything, explains why protein has found a place across such a wide swathe of the population.

What the Protein Economy Means for the Future

Protein may be having its moment, but British shoppers are not choosing sides. The rise of high-protein eating has not triggered a divide between meat and plants. Instead, people are blending both, often within the same day, and sometimes the same meal.

Part of this shift is practical. Meat remains a staple, but plant-based options have gained ground as a way to lighten meals without sacrificing taste. The UK leads Europe in plant-protein innovation, responsible for around 18 percent of all new launches. Supermarkets now stock lentil-based pasta, oat-protein shakes, vegan protein bars from brands like Huel and Tribe, and meat-free versions of familiar dishes.

This is not happening because the country has gone vegetarian. Most consumers still identify as omnivores or flexitarians. What has changed is the desire for variety and balance. A plant-based lunch does not mean skipping chicken at dinner. It simply reflects a flexible, responsive way of eating.

Protein branding follows suit. On one aisle, whey-based shakes and jerky from brands like UFIT and Jack Link’s are positioned for strength and recovery. Nearby, pea-protein bars and oat-based products promise calm, energy, and simplicity. Both types sell, often to the same person.

Taste, convenience, and credibility matter more than the source. Consumers want protein that works, but they also want it to align with their habits, values, and sense of self. Success in this category depends not on whether the protein is animal or plant, but on how well it fits into daily life.

In the UK, this is not about replacement. It is about rotation. And that, more than anything, explains why protein has broad appeal across generations, income brackets, and lifestyles.

Looking to understand the next wave of protein consumers?
At Kadence International, we help brands uncover what drives demand, from satiety to sustainability, and how to connect with evolving needs through the right formats, flavours, and messaging. Whether you’re refining recipes, developing new product lines, or targeting new segments, our research gives you the evidence to act confidently. Get in touch to see how we can support your next move.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Marketing history is full of examples where even the most innovative companies misjudged consumer demand. Juicero attracted $120 million in funding for a Wi-Fi-connected juice press—only for the product to be scrapped within two years after consumers showed little interest. ESPN’s mobile phone service failed to take off due to a high price point and limited handset options. And New Coke remains one of the most infamous examples of misjudged brand innovation.

Even Google Glass failed to achieve traction, arguably due to timing, pricing, and lack of consumer readiness.

These cautionary tales underscore why concept testing is so essential. By validating product ideas with your target audience before launch, brands can avoid costly mistakes and build offerings that genuinely connect with consumer needs.

One thing is clear: whatever you launch has to be right. The problem is, “right” isn’t something you get to decide.

Your customers do.

It doesn’t matter if your team loves the idea. It doesn’t matter how clever the name is or how polished the prototype looks. If your target audience doesn’t understand it, want it, or find value in it—it’s not going anywhere.

That’s why the smartest brands don’t leave it to chance. They ask the people who matter most—before it’s too late to change direction. This is where concept testing comes in, delivering early, actionable feedback from your target audience.

What is concept testing?

Concept testing is how brands evaluate and refine ideas before taking them to market. It’s a way to pressure-test new concepts—whether that’s an entirely new product, a rebrand, or a packaging refresh—before major investment.

The concept itself could be a never-before-seen innovation or simply a new twist on something familiar. Either way, it pays to ask the right questions early on:

Does the concept meet real consumer needs? Do people understand it? Does it resonate?
Is the price right? What are people willing to pay? Is the idea commercially viable?
How should it be positioned? Does it fit the brand? How does it stand out from competitors?
What needs to be improved? Are key features missing, confusing, or unnecessary?

Concept testing isn’t a single method. It’s a suite of research tools—from concept screening surveys to qualitative interviews—designed to uncover the strongest ideas and shape them into winning propositions. The approach depends on the challenge, the category, and the stage of development.

Why concept testing matters

Concept testing takes time, effort, and budget. But skipping it is far more expensive.

Launching without feedback risks wasting not only investment but reputation. Failed products don’t just disappear—they can damage brand equity and undermine trust. The cost isn’t always visible in quarterly reports, but it shows up in lost momentum, team morale, and market position.

Concept testing isn’t just risk mitigation—it’s market strategy made smarter.

The history of product innovation is filled with high-profile flops—even from some of the world’s biggest brands.

The Amazon Fire Phone failed to gain traction despite the tech giant’s backing. With a high price tag, confusing interface, and lack of compelling features, it launched into a market already dominated by better-established smartphones.

Google’s Stadia, its cloud gaming platform, shut down just three years after launch. Despite promising a new era of gaming without consoles, it lacked exclusive content, struggled with latency, and failed to capture a committed user base.

Crystal Pepsi, relaunched in the 2010s after a brief 1990s run, was again pulled from shelves when nostalgic appeal couldn’t make up for consumer confusion over the taste.

Concept testing helps brands avoid these pitfalls. It identifies what works, what doesn’t, and why—long before a launch is on the line.

More than just risk mitigation, concept testing is a way to move forward with clarity and confidence.

To better understand how to choose the right research tools for the job, it helps to explore the differences between concept testing and related approaches. While concept testing evaluates the appeal, clarity, and potential of early ideas, test marketing is a more advanced phase that focuses on launch readiness—often requiring prototypes, pilots, or small-scale rollouts.

The choice of concept testing method should reflect the stage of development you’re in. If you’re still refining the idea, early-stage concept screening or co-creation research may be more appropriate than fully structured surveys. On the other hand, if you’ve already narrowed your shortlist, tools like conjoint analysis or max diff can help compare features and pricing more precisely.

At Kadence, we support brands at every point on this journey—whether you’re seeking feedback on rough ideas or testing final-stage execution. Visit our concept testing services page to explore how we design studies that match your market, method, and moment.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

9 Use Cases for Concept Testing

1. Validate whether your idea will take off

Just because something feels like a good idea doesn’t mean it’s market-ready. Concept testing gives brands evidence—rather than gut instinct—on whether a new idea resonates with real consumers. It’s a chance to double down on the right concepts and walk away from the rest.

2. Cut through internal debate

Strong opinions can stall progress. Concept testing gives everyone—from product teams to stakeholders—objective data to work from. It brings clarity to creative discussions and helps unify decision-making around what the audience actually wants.

3. Compare competing concepts

Put multiple ideas in front of consumers and let them decide. Online concept testing lets you test head-to-head and identify clear winners before moving into development.

4. Prioritize the right features and benefits

Which features matter most? Which could be dropped without impact? Testing helps refine the value proposition by spotlighting what your audience really cares about.

5. Understand price sensitivity

A concept isn’t viable unless it can be sold profitably. Testing can uncover how much consumers are willing to pay and what pricing tier the concept fits.

6. Iterate before you launch

Concept testing isn’t just a greenlight mechanism. It’s a feedback loop. Test, tweak, retest—until the idea is tight.

7. Find your ideal audience

Early testing can reveal which segments respond best—whether that’s by age, income, lifestyle, or geography. That insight can shape both product development and marketing.

8. Fine-tune your messaging

The best idea still needs the right words. Use concept testing to explore different messages, formats, or taglines before you commit to a campaign.

9. Continue learning post-launch

Testing doesn’t stop at go-live. Keep tracking reactions to refine your offer, improve communication, or inform future versions.

Does concept testing really work?

Some brand leaders believe that true innovation comes from bold intuition—not research. There’s the often-quoted line about Henry Ford: “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”

But Ford wasn’t anti-feedback. He understood that innovation isn’t about asking people what they want—it’s about understanding what they value. That’s where concept testing proves its worth.

At Kadence, concept testing goes beyond asking respondents to pick a favorite. We design studies that uncover emotional triggers, hidden expectations, and real-world trade-offs—between product features, brand fit, and price.

It’s not about dumbing down ideas. It’s about making sure the best ones succeed.

The Kadence Approach to Concept Testing

Our approach blends both qualitative and quantitative methods, tailoring the study design to the market, objective, and stage of development. Below are a few examples of how concept testing delivers results:

Toiletries

A personal care brand wanted to create a new line of shower gels for teenagers. We began with an online concept screening survey to identify early-stage winners, then moved into co-creation sessions with the target audience. The result: a validated, compelling range of fragrance and packaging ideas ready for development.

Takeaway Coffee

To tap into the summer iced coffee market, a global beverage brand partnered with us to run a full concept development sprint. After an internal ideation workshop, we tested multiple drink concepts and price points using online quantitative methods. Follow-up focus groups fine-tuned the winning ideas. The brand launched with confidence, backed by clear consumer demand data.

Travel Advertising

For a national tourism board, we tested multiple ad concepts to see which creative route would drive the greatest increase in intent to visit. By establishing a baseline and tracking uplift across variations, we helped the client land on messaging and visuals that resonated most with high-value travelers.

Food (B2B)

A major food brand wanted to explore the viability of a direct-to-customer (D2C) model for its business buyers. Through in-depth interviews, we tested different fulfillment concepts and gathered feedback on brand perception, value, and pricing. Insights helped shape a more appealing offer with a clear route to market.

Research methods for concept testing

At Kadence, we use a range of concept testing methods—qualitative, quantitative, and hybrid—depending on the stage of development and the decisions a brand needs to make.

We don’t lead with methodology. We start by asking the right questions. What do you already know? Are you testing multiple concepts or refining one? Do you need high-level feedback or deep diagnostic insight? Should your focus be on emotional resonance, commercial potential, or both?

The answers shape our approach.

If you’re deciding which research technique to use, your approach should match the development phase you’re in. For example, exploratory qualitative research can help shape ideas during early-stage innovation, while online surveys are ideal when you’re comparing finalised concepts at scale. We break this down in our guide to how to conduct concept testing for different stages of product development, which outlines which tools to use—and when.

Online Surveys

Online concept testing is one of the most effective ways to gather structured feedback at scale. Surveys can reach thousands of carefully profiled respondents, producing data that can be analyzed, ranked, and compared across audiences. Our team builds surveys that simulate real-world decisions—allowing brands to test features, pricing, and positioning in controlled conditions. We then apply advanced statistical techniques to extract what matters most.

Qualifying the Right Audience

Before diving into the core of the concept test, we recommend using screener questions to ensure you’re speaking to the right respondents. These filter out participants who don’t meet your criteria, like frequency of use, category involvement, or geography.

Demographic questions—such as age, income bracket, and profession—are typically placed at the end. They allow for segmentation analysis without overwhelming the participant up front. When used thoughtfully, this profiling ensures your results reflect your true target market.

Focus Groups

Focus groups deliver the kind of texture and nuance you can’t get from numbers alone. Whether online or in-person, they create a space where consumers engage with your concept, react in real time, and build on each other’s thoughts. We use these sessions to uncover gut reactions, decode emotional cues, and surface new angles that spark further refinement.

Depth Interviews

When individual perspective matters more than group dynamics, depth interviews offer space to go deeper. We speak one-on-one with target users to explore motivations, hesitations, and behavioral drivers—often revealing insights that shape messaging, design, or product positioning.

Ethnography

Sometimes, the richest insights come from observation rather than direct questioning. Ethnographic research puts us in the everyday environments of your target audience. Through diaries, photo journals, and in-context observation, we gain a clearer picture of the unmet needs and behaviors that influence purchasing decisions.

Online Communities

Online concept testing communities allow brands to capture evolving feedback over time. These short-term, private digital spaces encourage participants to interact with your concepts through posts, videos, and tasks. Unlike traditional surveys, communities evolve as the research progresses—ideal for iterative concept development or creative refinement.

By matching the right method to the right stage, we help brands maximize insight while staying conscious of timing, scale, and cost.

Comparing Concept Testing Methods

Method	Best For	Key Benefits
Online Surveys	Screening and prioritizing multiple concepts at scale	Fast turnaround, scalable, enables clear comparison across attributes like price and features
Focus Groups	Exploring emotional reactions and creative direction	Rich qualitative insight, visual feedback, discussion of messaging and positioning
Depth Interviews	Understanding motivations and reactions in detail	In-depth exploration of decision-making, barriers, and expectations
Ethnography	Observing how people interact with concepts in real life	High authenticity, uncovers unmet needs and real-world context
Online Communities	Iterative concept development and testing over time	Continuous feedback, co-creation, adaptable over several days or weeks

Not sure whether concept testing or test marketing is the right approach for your stage? While both involve gathering real consumer feedback, they differ in purpose, timing, and scale. Explore our breakdown of concept testing vs. test marketing to understand which method best fits your innovation pipeline.

Choosing Between Monadic and Sequential Design

Two of the most common approaches in survey-based concept testing are monadic and sequential designs. In a monadic design, participants evaluate one concept in isolation, allowing for deep focus and reducing bias. This method delivers high-quality feedback but requires a larger sample size to compare concepts statistically.

A sequential design—where respondents review multiple concepts in one sitting—is faster and more cost-effective, especially in early screening stages. However, results can be influenced by order effects and fatigue, so it’s essential to randomize presentation order and monitor data quality carefully.

How Long Should a Concept Survey Be?

Length affects engagement. In our experience, surveys for concept testing perform best when kept under 25 minutes or 30 questions. Beyond that, respondent fatigue sets in, and data quality drops. Shorter, focused surveys tend to yield clearer insights—and make it more likely participants give considered feedback.

Making Sense of the Data

In survey-based concept testing, many responses are captured using Likert scales—asking how likely someone is to buy, how appealing a concept is, or how innovative it feels, rated on a 5- or 7-point scale.

One of the most actionable ways to interpret this data is by using Top 2 Box scoring: calculating the percentage of respondents who selected the top two positive responses (e.g., “very likely” or “likely”). This allows for fast comparison across multiple concepts and reveals which ideas stand out from the crowd.

Whether you’re running a product concept survey, testing pricing scenarios, or evaluating new messaging, these metrics can reveal what matters most to your audience.

The Role of Design

At Kadence, we bring creativity to every stage of concept testing, combining research expertise with in-house design capabilities to help brands move from idea to impact.

Often, the early concepts we receive are rough. They might start as a few words on a Post-it note or a collage of reference images. That’s where our design team steps in. We transform early-stage ideas into tangible stimuli that consumers can engage with—whether that’s a mock-up of an ad, a service visualisation, a website prototype, or test copy for a landing page.

We’re also exploring the use of augmented reality (AR) to elevate product concept testing. Using AR, we can generate digital 3D prototypes that participants can view through their smartphones in real environments. This approach enhances engagement and delivers more authentic feedback—especially when compared to static visuals—while remaining highly efficient and scalable.

Beyond visual execution, our work is shaped by the principles of design thinking, a framework that ensures ideas are developed with consumer needs at the center.

The five stages of design thinking include:

Empathise: Understand your audience’s real-world context, needs, and pain points.
Define: Frame the core problem or opportunity you want to solve with precision.
Ideate: Brainstorm solutions based on what the research has revealed so far.
Prototype: Build a working version—whether physical, digital, or visual—for feedback.
Test: Put your concept in front of your audience, gather reactions, and refine as needed.

Many of our clients reach us during the ideation or prototype phase, but concept testing can also inform earlier and later stages. Our design-led, research-backed approach is part of what makes concept testing with Kadence more actionable and more commercially relevant.

10 Top tips for successful concept testing

Set clear objectives
Start with a focused brief. What exactly do you want to learn—and how will you act on the findings? Whether you’re choosing between concepts or refining a single idea, clarity up front keeps the research sharp and the results meaningful.
Don’t fall too in love with your ideas
Concept testing isn’t about validating hunches. It’s about letting the customer response guide decisions. Stay open. If a promising product concept flops in testing, let it go. Great ideas are rarely one-offs—and the right research helps you spot what’s worth pursuing.
Find the right people
Your target audience matters more than volume. We’ve tested concepts with teenage gamers, healthcare professionals, rural farmers, and C-suite decision-makers. Whether you need broad reach or a niche segment, finding the right participants is half the battle.
Bring it to life
Early-stage ideas often need help becoming real for consumers. That’s why our in-house team turns sketches, mockups, and rough copy into visuals that spark real feedback. The stronger the stimulus, the sharper the insight.
Iterate quickly and often
Few concepts are perfect the first time. That’s why iterative testing—refining, retesting, refining again—gets better results. We use agile design and research cycles to sharpen ideas quickly, often in just days.
Stay flexible
Concept testing is not a fixed recipe. Sometimes you need a quick screen. Other times, deep qualitative work. Let your goals and the audience shape the approach—not the other way around.
Listen beyond the words
Good research isn’t just about what people say—it’s how they say it. Our researchers are trained to pick up on hesitations, contradictions, and patterns that reveal deeper insight into what people really think.
Context matters
A winning idea on paper might underperform in the real world. Test in context: how the idea compares to alternatives, fits with your brand, and lands emotionally with the audience. Concept scores are just one piece of the puzzle.
Protect your IP
Early concepts are sensitive. We’ve built secure systems to ensure designs, copy, and mockups stay confidential. Features like watermarked images and self-destructing videos help reduce leaks—and in over a decade, we haven’t seen one.
Keep testing after launch
Consumer needs shift fast. Great brands keep refining after launch. Concept testing isn’t a one-off event—it’s a habit. Keep listening, keep adjusting, and your product stays relevant.

Why It Pays to Get Concept Testing Right

Every great brand knows this: launching a new product isn’t just about creativity or gut feel. It’s about getting closer to your audience—understanding their reactions, their hesitations, their unmet needs—and building from there. That’s what concept testing delivers.

It’s not a barrier to innovation. It’s the mechanism that makes innovation work.

When done right, concept testing doesn’t just tell you which ideas are most appealing. It helps you craft better ones. It shows you where to focus investment, how to improve your offer, what to communicate, and—crucially—what not to pursue. It gives teams clarity, stakeholders confidence, and brands a stronger shot at real-world success.

Because the difference between a bold idea and a breakthrough product isn’t luck. It’s research-backed confidence.

To explore how concept testing services can support your product development process—whether you’re refining early ideas or validating go-to-market strategies—learn more about our concept testing solutions.

Rising inflation and economic uncertainty were expected to put an end to discretionary spending for middle-income households. Instead, consumers are making room for indulgence. Across the US, UK, and Europe, households earning moderate incomes continue to prioritise non-essential purchases at rates far closer to affluent consumers than economic models predicted. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Consumer Sentiment Survey found that 42% of middle-income respondents in developed markets still plan to spend on travel, dining out, and personal care in the next year, just nine percentage points lower than high-income households.

The resilience of discretionary spending in the face of rising costs defies conventional economic assumptions. It is not a case of irrationality or denial. It reflects a shift in how consumers measure value. After years of pandemic-driven disruption, middle-class buyers are increasingly framing small luxuries as essential to emotional well-being, not as reckless spending. An affordable meal out, a short domestic trip, or a new skincare product carries more than monetary worth. It represents normalcy, reward, and agency in an environment where larger financial goals often feel less attainable.

This trend is not a short-term reaction to inflation, nor is it purely sentimental. It is structurally rational behaviour shaped by stress, lifestyle adjustment, and evolving definitions of security. Spending on modest treats provides a sense of control and immediacy when long-term stability—home ownership, retirement savings—feels increasingly out of reach. Consumers are not abandoning caution; they are recalibrating what prudence looks like in real terms.

Understanding this shift is critical for brands, retailers, and policymakers. Indulgence spending among the middle class is not a deviation from rational economic behaviour. It is an adaptation to new realities, where emotional resilience and quality of life have become primary considerations alongside price and necessity.

Tight Budgets, Sharp Choices

The pressure on household budgets is real. Inflation has driven up the cost of essentials—housing, food, energy—leaving less flexibility for discretionary categories. Yet rather than abandoning non-essential purchases altogether, middle-class consumers are reprioritising with striking precision. The pattern is visible across the US, UK, and Europe: subscription services are among the first to be cancelled, big-ticket electronics are postponed, and plans for major home renovations are shelved. But the impulse to carve out space for small luxuries remains intact.

KPMG’s 2024 Middle-Class Financial Priorities report highlights this shift. In a survey of households earning between 75% and 150% of median income, nearly 60% reported cutting back on monthly expenses such as media subscriptions and dining delivery apps. However, the same respondents overwhelmingly indicated an intention to preserve budget for “quality of life” items, including occasional dining out, personal care products, and leisure travel under 500 miles. The data suggests that discretionary spending is not vanishing—it is being filtered through a more selective lens.

A similar rebalancing is evident in Europe. OECD research published earlier this year shows that while the ownership of new vehicles among middle-income households declined by over 8% between 2022 and 2024, spending on local travel, cultural events, and speciality food purchases held steady. In the UK, Deloitte’s 2024 consumer tracker found that middle-income households were 30% more likely to describe smaller, experiential purchases as “essential for well-being” than they were before the pandemic.

The underlying dynamic is a redefinition of value. Consumers are moving away from evaluating purchases solely on cost or prestige. Instead, the metric is experiential reward—whether a purchase delivers emotional uplift, stress relief, or a sense of personal investment. A $50 skincare product or a weekend away is justified not by indulgence for its own sake, but by what it represents: a manageable, affirming investment in quality of life.

This sharpening of priorities is not a retreat from financial responsibility. It is a recalibration. Households are preserving choice and pleasure even as long-term goals grow more distant. The middle-class response to inflation is not to close the wallet entirely, but to spend carefully, reinforcing emotional resilience where it matters most.

Where the Money Is Still Flowing

The resilience of middle-class discretionary spending becomes clearest when looking at where the money continues to move. Small luxuries, particularly those offering immediate personal gratification without long-term financial strain, are absorbing a disproportionate share of discretionary budgets. These are not extravagant purchases but considered indulgences—choices that allow consumers to feel rewarded without incurring future economic risk.

Dining out remains one of the strongest performing sectors. Mastercard SpendingPulse data from early 2024 showed that spending at fast-casual and premium-casual restaurants in the US rose by 8% year-on-year, even as fine dining bookings declined. Consumers are trading down from high-end experiences but refusing to give up the social and emotional value of meals shared outside the home. In the UK, Statista reports that visits to casual dining chains increased by nearly one-fifth compared to 2022 levels, concentrated among households earning £30,000 to £70,000 annually.

Beauty and skincare purchases are following a similar trajectory. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Beauty Survey found that middle-income consumers accounted for nearly half of the growth in skincare sales across Europe and North America, often favouring mid-tier brands offering “clinical-grade” results at accessible prices. Rather than abandoning beauty spending, buyers are shifting toward products that promise tangible outcomes—improved skin health, self-care benefits—over prestige branding. The emphasis is not on conspicuous consumption but on self-affirmation.

Domestic travel, particularly short-haul trips, has also proven remarkably resilient. According to Mastercard’s travel trends report, bookings for domestic leisure trips under 300 miles rose by 12% in the US during the past year, primarily driven by middle-income households. European markets such as France and Germany showed parallel trends, with regional rail and car rental bookings outperforming international air travel. Travel, even scaled down, remains a critical outlet for recreation and stress relief, viewed as a justifiable investment rather than a luxury.

Personal wellness has evolved from a niche concern to a consistent budget item. Deloitte’s 2024 Health and Wellness Tracker found that expenditures on fitness apps, meditation subscriptions, and nutritional supplements rose by nearly 15% among middle-income consumers compared to 2022. Spa treatments and boutique fitness sessions also saw modest but steady gains, especially when bundled into affordable packages. Wellness is increasingly framed not as optional self-indulgence but as proactive health maintenance—a narrative that middle-class consumers embrace even under financial strain.

What ties these sectors together is not mere resilience but strategic prioritisation. Consumers actively choose experiences and products that deliver emotional payoff without undermining longer-term financial goals. Small luxuries have become part of how households navigate financial pressure, balancing restraint with resilience.

How Indulgence Looks Different Around the World

The appetite for small luxuries is global, but its expression varies sharply across markets. Cultural context, inflationary pressure, and recovery patterns from the pandemic shape how and where middle-class consumers indulge.

In the United States, experience is taking precedence over material accumulation. Mastercard’s 2024 SpendingPulse report shows that while retail sales for durable goods have slowed, spending on travel, dining, and entertainment continues to climb. Middle-income households prioritise activities that create memories and offer a sense of immediacy, even as they pull back on home goods and apparel. The pattern reflects a broader recalibration, where the value of money is increasingly measured in lived experience rather than possessions.

The United Kingdom mirrors this behavioural split, though with sharper trade-offs. Ipsos data published earlier this year indicates that middle-income British households are aggressively trading down on everyday essentials—switching to discount supermarkets and delaying home improvements—while deliberately protecting spending on experiential categories. Budget airline bookings, concert attendance, and dining at independent restaurants remain surprisingly resilient. The message is clear: not all spending is negotiable, even under pressure.

In continental Europe, the indulgence lens often narrows toward artisanal quality. In France and Germany, Euromonitor reports that while overall household budgets have tightened, purchases of artisanal food, skincare, and local leisure travel have held steady or even grown modestly. Consumers are not abandoning discretionary spending, but are redirecting it toward smaller, more meaningful pleasures that emphasise craftsmanship, locality, and authenticity.

Southeast Asia presents a different dynamic, driven by digital acceleration and aspirational consumption. In Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines, middle-income consumers are investing in affordable upgrades—beauty products, domestic travel, and entry-level tech such as smartphones and wearable devices. According to Bain & Company’s 2024 Southeast Asia Digital Economy Report, there has been a surge in beauty e-commerce, with mid-tier brands seeing the fastest growth among urban middle-class buyers. Here, indulgence is closely tied to self-improvement and digital connectivity rather than traditional luxury markers.

China and India present a distinct dynamic. In China, middle-class consumers focus on premium health, wellness, and education-related services. Mastercard’s 2024 China Consumption Outlook shows strong growth in short domestic leisure travel, boutique fitness memberships, and “new luxury” beauty brands that offer substance over logo appeal. In India, indulgence is often family-centred. Euromonitor data highlights that spending on family experiences—mall outings, cinema, casual dining, and affordable domestic holidays—is being prioritised, even as households economise on electronics and apparel. The middle class is seeking small windows of joy that offer collective, not just individual, payoff.

Across these regions, indulgence spending is far from homogeneous. It is shaped by cultural narratives about success, wellness, and emotional reward. Yet the underlying behaviour is consistent: even under inflationary strain, middle-income consumers are unwilling to surrender the experiences and products that sustain a sense of control, progress, and personal value.

Why Indulgence Feels Necessary, Not Excessive

The persistence of small luxuries in strained economic times is not a matter of consumer irrationality. It is a rational psychological response to prolonged stress, uncertainty, and shifting social norms. For many middle-class households, small indulgences have moved beyond occasional rewards to become a form of emotional maintenance—a way to reassert agency and sustain morale when broader financial goals feel increasingly distant.

Much of this shift can be traced to the post-pandemic “live for today” mindset. After years of deferred plans and disrupted routines, consumers across income levels have shown a greater willingness to prioritise present-day satisfaction. Behavioural economists point to the acceleration of hedonic adaptation—the tendency to return to a baseline level of happiness despite external changes—as a key factor. When future security feels less certain, spending on immediate emotional uplift becomes a practical way to protect mental well-being.

American Psychological Association research on stress-related spending supports this view. A 2024 report found that nearly 60% of middle-income consumers in the US admitted to occasional “treat spending” as a coping mechanism, with the majority framing such purchases not as extravagance, but as essential self-care. Similar patterns emerged in the UK and Singapore, where smaller, experience-driven expenditures were linked to lower reported stress levels in middle-income groups.

Social behaviour further reinforces the normalisation of indulgence. Small splurges—dining out, a weekend getaway, a new skincare regimen—are highly visible on platforms like Instagram and TikTok. Sharing these moments has become part of how consumers construct narratives of resilience and self-investment. The effect is cumulative. What once might have been considered unnecessary spending is now broadly perceived as a reasonable way to manage life’s pressures.

Rather than retreating into austerity, many middle-class consumers are making conscious choices to maintain emotional balance through manageable rewards. In modern economic conditions, where traditional markers of financial progress are harder to achieve, these decisions are not acts of recklessness. They are strategies for preserving stability, dignity, and optimism in everyday life.

Small Luxuries, Big Opportunities

For brands, the persistence of small indulgences offers more than a temporary sales opportunity. It signals a deeper shift in how consumers assign value—one that demands careful strategic recalibration. Positioning products as accessible rewards or emotional enhancers, rather than as markers of status or success, will increasingly define market relevance.

Middle-class consumers are not looking for extravagant gestures. They are seeking personal moments of satisfaction, convenience, or self-expression that fit into constrained budgets. Products that deliver relaxation, confidence, or small affirmations of progress resonate far more than those that lean heavily on traditional luxury cues. In this environment, storytelling around personal value matters more than aspirational branding. A meal kit that saves time and creates family rituals, a skincare serum that represents self-care rather than vanity, a local mini-break that restores mental clarity—these are the narratives gaining traction.

The danger for brands lies in misreading the room. Overemphasising luxury, exclusivity, or aspirational distance risks alienating a consumer base that values relatability and tangible benefit over status. Innovation must centre on affordability without sacrificing the experience of quality. Smart packaging, modular services, and tiered product lines are helping some brands maintain margins while broadening emotional appeal.

Real-time market research is critical to navigating these shifts. Understanding which categories of small luxuries matter most—and how definitions of indulgence vary between regions, income brackets, and life stages—allows brands to tailor offerings with precision. Blanket assumptions about “affordable luxury” no longer hold. The brands that invest in nuanced, behaviour-led insights will be the ones best positioned to capture loyalty in an economy where emotional and financial resilience are increasingly intertwined.

Indulgence in an Age of Restraint

Discretionary spending among middle-income consumers is too often dismissed as irrational, a stubborn refusal to accept economic reality. This view misses the point. Small indulgences are not acts of denial. They are structural adjustments to a world where traditional financial milestones—home ownership, long-term savings, upward mobility—have become harder to secure. Preserving moments of joy, autonomy, and emotional stability has become a rational survival strategy.

Understanding these patterns is critical for anyone forecasting the next phase of consumer behaviour. Micro-indulgence is more than a passing phenomenon. It is a leading indicator of broader consumer sentiment, revealing how confidence, stress, and hope are negotiated at the household level. Brands and policymakers that fail to track these shifts will misread the market, mistaking emotional recalibration for economic irrationality.

At Kadence International, our global research shows that middle-class indulgence is not a short-term reaction to inflationary pressure. It is an embedded behavioural shift, one that will continue to shape spending across sectors well beyond the current cycle. Those who frame their growth strategies around emotional consumption, rather than rigid income segmentation, will be best positioned to capture resilience spending in an economy where financial caution and the pursuit of quality of life are no longer at odds, but deeply intertwined.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In the last year alone, bookings for luxury river cruises by travellers over the age of 65 rose by more than 70%. In Southeast Asia, spa and wellness retreats report that seniors now make up the fastest-growing customer group. And in the United States, recent data shows that older adults are adopting wearable tech at a faster clip than millennials. These aren’t isolated shifts—they’re signals of a broader recalibration underway in global consumption.

For decades, older consumers have been cast in a supporting role: brand loyal, budget conscious, and resistant to change. The stereotype of the frugal retiree—committed to saving, disinterested in trends—has shaped how marketers target, serve, and sometimes overlook the over-65 segment. But the demographic reality has changed, and so have the consumers within it.

Today’s seniors are living longer, staying active, and spending more. In markets like the US and UK, they hold the bulk of wealth and show no hesitation in using it. In Southeast Asia, where ageing populations are rising sharply, many seniors are approaching retirement with more education, financial independence, and an appetite for indulgence than the generation before them. From travel and wellness to personal tech and home upgrades, older consumers are not only participating—they’re leading demand in categories once reserved for younger buyers.

This isn’t a niche. It’s a market-wide shift. As ageing populations expand in both developed and emerging economies, their economic power is no longer confined to healthcare and insurance. It’s influencing the way brands think about experience, design, value, and messaging. Marketers who continue to fixate on youth risk missing one of the most quietly powerful growth segments in the global economy. Because while demographic trends might move slowly, consumer behaviour is already changing, and the brands that recognise it early stand to benefit most.

A New Consumer Class with Global Influence

The global demographic landscape is undergoing a significant transformation. By 2030, individuals aged 65 and older are projected to constitute over 20% of the population in most developed countries, marking a substantial increase from previous decades .

In the United States, baby boomers—those born between 1946 and 1964—hold a dominant financial position. They control approximately 70% of the nation’s disposable income, making them a formidable economic force . This wealth accumulation is attributed to factors such as prolonged careers and favourable investment returns .

Regional Spending Patterns

Japan: With nearly 30% of its population aged 65 or older, Japan faces unique economic challenges and opportunities. The ageing demographic has led to increased demand for healthcare services and age-friendly technologies
Singapore: Retired households in Singapore allocate a significant portion of their expenditures to health and wellness. Studies indicate that these households prioritise recreation and cultural activities, reflecting a desire for active and engaged lifestyles
United Kingdom: In the UK, seniors are playing a pivotal role in preserving and revitalising traditional crafts. The resurgence of interest in heritage crafts, such as cask ale brewing, is partly driven by older consumers who value authenticity and tradition .

Emerging Markets

India: Urban Indian seniors are exhibiting increased consumer confidence. Recent surveys show a rise in sentiment regarding personal finances and investments, suggesting a growing willingness to spend on quality products and services

Vietnam: Vietnamese seniors are among the most optimistic consumers in Southeast Asia. Their positive outlook translates into active participation in the economy, with increased spending on healthcare, leisure, and technology

The Spending Habits That Are Defying Age Expectations

The conventional image of older adults as cautious spenders is increasingly outdated. Recent data reveals that seniors are actively engaging in various sectors, from travel and wellness to home improvements and technology, often outspending younger demographics.

Travel and Leisure

Seniors are embracing travel experiences that prioritise comfort and enrichment. In the UK, luxury rail journeys are booming—Railbookers added nearly one new high-end booking for every two made the year prior. Similarly, wellness tourism added more than $200 billion in a single year—growing by nearly one-third to reach $868 billion in 2023, indicating a growing preference for health-focused travel among older adults.

Wellness and Beauty

The pursuit of health and longevity is driving seniors to invest in wellness products and services. Thailand’s wellness economy expanded by nearly $9 billion in just one year, reaching $40.5 billion in 2023, with older consumers contributing significantly to this surge . The global skincare supplement market also reflects this trend, valued at $2.81 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $5.86 billion by 2032 .

Home and Lifestyle

Ageing in place has become a priority for many seniors, leading to increased spending on home modifications. In the U.S., homeowners spent an average of $13,667 on home improvement projects in 2023, with accessibility and comfort being key motivators . Retailers like Home Depot and Lowe’s have responded by offering products tailored to the needs of older adults, such as ergonomic fixtures and safety enhancements.

Technology Adoption

Contrary to stereotypes, seniors are increasingly adopting smart technologies. AARP reports that nearly 9 in 10 adults over 50 now use smartphones, with two-thirds streaming on smart TVs and one in three engaging with voice assistants at home. This trend underscores the importance of user-friendly technology that caters to the preferences and needs of older consumers.

In category after category, senior preferences are leading—not lagging—market demand. Their choices no longer mirror trends; they initiate them.

Challenging the Utility-Only Narrative

The prevailing notion that older consumers prioritise practicality over pleasure is increasingly being challenged. Increasingly, older consumers are choosing experiences that deliver joy, autonomy, and a sense of identity—not just utility.

Seniors are drawn to luxury not for function alone, but for how it affirms identity. A 2025 study by Bargaoui found that older adults associate luxury consumption with emotional reward and self-worth—a signal that indulgence and aspiration are still core drivers well past middle age.

This shift in consumer behaviour necessitates a reevaluation of product positioning strategies. For instance, hearing aids are increasingly marketed not just as medical devices but as lifestyle enhancers that seamlessly integrate with other technologies. Apple’s approach to product design exemplifies this trend. Features like Voice Control and fall detection are incorporated into devices like the iPhone and Apple Watch, offering functionality that appeals to seniors without overtly targeting them as a separate demographic.

The same logic applies outside of tech. In the UK, older travellers are fueling demand for immersive rail experiences built around comfort, not spectacle. In Southeast Asia, seniors are driving bookings at wellness retreats that blend self-care with cultural depth.

Why the Marketing World Still Prioritises Youth

Despite the growing economic influence of older consumers, advertising strategies continue to disproportionately target younger demographics. This focus persists even as individuals aged 50 and above contribute significantly to consumer spending.

In the United States, consumers over 50 account for more than half of all consumer spending. However, only 5–10% of marketing budgets are allocated to engage this demographic . This disparity is not limited to the U.S.; in the United Kingdom, over-50s represent a third of the population and hold 80% of the nation’s wealth, yet they remain largely invisible in advertising campaigns

Several factors contribute to this imbalance. One is the composition of the advertising industry itself. According to Forbes, only 5% of ad agency employees are over 50, and most do not work in creative departments . This lack of age diversity within agencies can lead to a limited understanding of older consumers’ preferences and needs.

There remains a persistent stereotype that older consumers are less receptive to digital media. Yet data shows adults aged 55 and above now spend over half (54.4%) of their media time online—a shift that challenges the industry’s long-held assumptions.

Neglecting the older demographic not only overlooks a substantial market segment but also poses risks to brand relevance and loyalty. Competitors who recognise and address the needs of older consumers can capture market share and build lasting relationships. The influence of older consumers isn’t coming. It’s already reshaping how value is defined across categories—from beauty to tech to travel. Brands still tethered to a youth-first playbook aren’t just behind the trend—they’re blind to where the momentum has moved.

Meeting Older Consumers Where They Are

A handful of brands are beginning to adjust course—not by singling out older consumers with age-stamped campaigns, but by rethinking product design, messaging, and experience in ways that recognise the influence and expectations of this group.

L’Oréal has expanded its age-inclusive approach beyond token representation. In markets like the UK and Japan, it has invested in research and formulation targeting mature skin, while casting women over 60 in its mainstream campaigns—not in niche “silver” editions. What’s notable is the absence of the patronising tone that once marked age-focused advertising. The positioning is subtle: aspirational without being age-anxious, confident without being corrective.

In travel, companies like Viking and Belmond have seen a surge in demand from older travellers seeking richer, more immersive journeys over fast-paced itineraries. These brands have responded by retooling the product—not just offering mobility-friendly options, but reshaping the tone of travel itself. Longer stays, expert-led local immersion, and a focus on comfort over spectacle have proven to resonate. It’s not age that defines the appeal, but sensibility.

Tech companies have also begun to shift. Apple, as noted, integrates accessibility features across its product suite, yet never markets them explicitly as “senior” tools. Voice commands, larger interfaces, and health tracking appeal to all users, but are particularly beneficial for older ones. This universality is intentional—and effective. In 2023, adoption of the Apple Watch among consumers aged 60 and above increased by more than 25% year over year, according to Counterpoint Research.

In Southeast Asia, telcos and financial platforms are investing in UX overhauls aimed at improving digital fluency for older users. Singtel’s wellness and lifestyle offerings for seniors, for instance, go beyond low-cost data plans to include curated content, concierge services, and simple app layouts tailored to common needs. The pitch isn’t that seniors are less tech-savvy—it’s that good design should accommodate everyone.

These brands succeed not by targeting older consumers differently—but by removing age as a constraint. Their advantage lies in recognising behaviour, not categorising it.

For brands looking to operationalise these insights, the following cheat sheet outlines actionable ways to better engage senior consumers across touchpoints—from UX and messaging to service and product design.

How to Appeal to Senior Consumers

Category	Best Practices
Customer Understanding	– Maintain responsive phone support- Use empathetic, clear communication- Ensure continuity across channels (phone, in-store, digital)- Offer personalised follow-up (call, mail, or email)
UX & Product Design	– Font size ≥ 14–16pt, high contrast text- Simple, intuitive navigation- Large touch zones (≥44x44px)- Screen reader–friendly code- Clear, concise copy without jargon- Progress indicators and confirmation messages- Design with accessibility (WCAG) in mind
Customer Service	– Aspirational, not patronising- Purpose-led (quality, legacy, sustainability)- Emotionally intelligent (family, community, joy)
Marketing Channels	– Email (well-targeted, not overwhelming)- Google Search (strong SEO and PPC)- Facebook (high usage globally among 60+)- YouTube (growing for how-tos, lifestyle)- Traditional media (TV, print) still valuable in key sectors
Messaging & Tone	– Prioritise ergonomic, easy-to-use design- Offer modular or personalized options- Highlight safety, quality, and customer support- Allow for trials or no-commitment use (especially for tech or wellness)
	– Feature active, diverse older adults—not stereotypes
Product & Service	– Prioritise ergonomic, easy-to-use design- Offer modular or personalised options- Highlight safety, quality, and customer support- Allow for trials or no-commitment use (especially for tech or wellness)

Age Is No Longer a Signal of Decline—It’s a Forecast of Opportunity

For decades, brands have treated older consumers as the end point of a lifecycle—an audience to retain, not one to build around. That logic no longer holds. Seniors are not only outliving the systems built to serve them—they are outspending, outpacing, and, increasingly, out-influencing expectations.

They are the early adopters of wellness routines previously marketed to 30-somethings, the repeat buyers of luxury services, and the most consistent upgraders of home technology. Their behaviour is not defined by age, but by intent. And if there’s one insight brands should act on now, it’s this: longevity is no longer just a medical issue. It’s a commercial one.

Their economic power is growing, but their motivations remain misunderstood. Too often, research flattens them into averages, surveys them through outdated assumptions, and overlooks the complexity that defines their choices. This is not just a missed opportunity. It’s a strategic blind spot.

To lead in the decade ahead, brands need to stop asking how to market to older consumers and start asking what they are telling us through the choices they make. That shift—from messaging to meaning—is where research proves its value. Not in confirming what we think we know, but in uncovering the complexity we’ve long overlooked.

In a marketplace increasingly driven by flexibility, aspiration, and self-determination, it may be the oldest consumers who are best positioned to show us what the future looks like. But only if we ask better questions—and actually listen.

Looking to better understand the evolving expectations of senior consumers—or any audience segment reshaping your market? At Kadence International, we help brands uncover the insights that drive results. Through in-depth research across key global markets, we go beyond demographics to decode behaviours, motivations, and emerging opportunities. Let’s start working together today.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

British shoppers are entering a new era of grocery buying – less impulsive, more deliberate, and increasingly shaped by price. Grocery inflation rose to 3.5 percent in March, capping off two years of compounded cost pressure. Supermarket sales have softened, not because people are walking away, but because they’re buying fewer items and skipping anything that doesn’t feel essential.

Essentials are winning, volume is shrinking, and price has become the lead story. This shift isn’t just thrift – it’s agency. After months of rising bills and economic fatigue, shoppers are regaining a sense of control by editing their baskets. That often means skipping branded goods and sticking to private labels.

Discounters are reaping the gains. Aldi’s market share is up to 11 percent, and Lidl is outpacing rivals in sales growth. But this isn’t just about who’s winning – it’s about how. Shoppers aren’t compromising; they’re recalibrating. Value now means quality at the right price, not a badge name. What’s happening isn’t tactical – it’s behavioural.

What distinguishes this period from past inflation spikes is the speed and confidence of the switch. Brand loyalty, long considered a mainstay of British retail, is now a conditional contract. If a supermarket can’t justify its price point – through quality, loyalty perks, or convenience – shoppers will walk.

Retailers are moving fast to keep up: shrinking private-label ranges to what works, tuning promotions, and reframing value as a daily promise. On paper, it looks like a margin problem. In reality, it’s a permanent shift in how households define value – and there’s little reason to think it’ll snap back.

This isn’t a belt-tightening moment. It’s a consumer reorientation. People aren’t just buying less; they’re buying differently. And in doing so, they’re quietly forcing a reset in how the UK grocery industry defines, delivers, and earns loyalty.

Inflation at the Checkout: What’s Really Driving the Shift?

Walk through any UK supermarket right now, and the change isn’t just in the receipt – it’s in the way people are shopping. Labels are read more slowly. Own-brand products are picked up, put back, then chosen again. Familiar items suddenly feel like indulgences.

What’s happening at the checkout isn’t just about price increases. It’s a psychological shift. Shoppers aren’t just spending less – they’re thinking differently. The same budget now feels tighter, not only because of higher prices but because of how those prices are being perceived.

Anchoring is one reason. Consumers aren’t comparing this week’s price to last week’s – they’re comparing it to what they used to pay before “everything got expensive.” That reference point, even if outdated, sticks. When a block of cheese crosses the £3 mark, it doesn’t matter if it’s only a 5p rise – it’s crossed an invisible line. And that line reshapes everything around it.

Mental accounting adds another layer. People are rebalancing invisible budgets in their heads. Spend £2 more on milk, and that £2 has to come from somewhere else. They’re not just making trade-offs – they’re making calculations. Essentials stay, extras go, and even mid-tier items are under scrutiny if there’s a cheaper equivalent close by.

Then there’s price perception. It’s not what something costs – it’s what it feels like it should cost. That’s why a 10% rise might barely dent volume in one category but trigger a collapse in another. It’s not rational, but it’s real – and it’s guiding what goes in the basket.

For retailers and brands, this moment demands more than sharper pricing. It requires fluency in how shoppers frame value. That might mean pricing just below emotional thresholds or structuring offers that signal stability – even when costs are climbing. In this climate, perception can be as powerful as reality.

What does inflation feel like in real terms? The chart below shows just how much everyday items have risen since 2020.

How-inflation-has-impacted-the-everyday-basket-in-the-UK

Brand Erosion in the Era of the Basket Reboot

Brand loyalty isn’t dead – but it’s under review. Across the UK, what once felt automatic is now under scrutiny. Shoppers are looking at familiar labels, hesitating, and reaching for something cheaper – often store-brand, often good enough.

It’s not just trading down. It’s trading out. The basket reset happening now is exposing which brands still hold meaning and which were riding on habit. In categories like cereal, canned goods, and pasta sauces, private label has moved from backup plan to first choice. When shoppers feel squeezed, brand preference isn’t about awareness – it’s about justification.

The most vulnerable brands are the ones that rely on shelf presence and recognition without clearly articulating why they cost more. A fancy label or nostalgic logo doesn’t hold up when the price delta is visible, and the value isn’t. Own-label is no longer the compromise – it’s the baseline.

Supermarkets know this. That’s why they’ve built out three-tiered private label strategies: essential ranges for price-sensitive shoppers, core lines that match national brands on quality, and premium sub-brands designed to compete with legacy products on both taste and packaging. In many cases, they’re winning on all three fronts.

Branded suppliers are feeling the squeeze. Promotions are being pulled. Negotiations are tighter. Some products are being delisted entirely as retailers prioritise margin and private-label growth. Even in higher-margin categories like snacks and beverages, shoppers are experimenting more – and defaulting less.

This moment demands more than marketing. It demands a proposition that holds up under pressure. Brands that offer clear functional benefits – whether that’s health, sustainability, or convenience – still earn a place. But those that relied on emotional inertia are being quietly swapped out, one basket at a time.

The question for consumer goods companies isn’t just how to defend share. It’s how to rebuild relevance. Because if shoppers are open to changing their habits, they’re also open to forgetting the brands that no longer reflect how they want to spend.

Also, read our study on the UK’s Cost of Living Crisis here.

The New Class of Smart Shoppers

Frugality has rebranded itself – and fast. What used to be framed as a necessity or even a source of quiet shame has become a signal of control, intention, and in many cases, pride. The UK’s cost-of-living pressures have given rise to a new kind of grocery shopper: not just cost-conscious, but value-literate.

This isn’t driven solely by economics. It’s cultural. Discount shopping has moved out of the shadows and into the spotlight. TikTok is full of haul videos not from high-end retailers, but from Aldi and Lidl – highlighting bulk buys, dupes, and smart swaps. The tone isn’t apologetic. It’s instructional. Look what I saved. Look how much farther I stretched my budget. There’s a certain confidence in the captions: “You’d be mad to pay more.”

Digital tools have amplified the shift. Couponing, once a paper-based pursuit of extreme savers, has gone mobile and mainstream. Apps like Too Good To Go and supermarket loyalty platforms now offer real-time deals that reward flexibility, not just spending. Younger shoppers – especially millennials with families and Gen Z renters – are building grocery strategies around digital offers and flash pricing. Price matching isn’t a race to the bottom; it’s a form of skill.

What’s changed is the identity that surrounds all this. Saving money used to imply you didn’t have it. Now, it implies you’re informed. Especially among middle-income shoppers, there’s been a quiet erosion of stigma. Being a “deal hunter” no longer contradicts being design-conscious or health-focused. You can buy the store-brand canned tomatoes and still splurge on artisanal olive oil. You can track every penny and still care about the story behind your coffee.

This hybrid mindset – blending thrift and selectivity – is what many legacy brands are still struggling to read. Their customers didn’t disappear. They just rewrote the rules of what makes a product worth paying for.

It’s no longer enough to assume aspiration equals premium. In this landscape, brands have to justify every line of the receipt. They need to speak the language of value – but not just through lower prices. It’s about usefulness, quality, longevity, and emotional return on spend.

Smart shoppers aren’t waiting for brands to get it. They’re building baskets that reflect who they are now – pragmatic, digitally fluent, and empowered by information, not overwhelmed by it. The question isn’t whether this shift will last. It’s whether brands can keep up with customers who’ve stopped equating value with volume – and started defining it for themselves.

Retailers Rewrite the Rules

Retailers have stopped waiting for shoppers to come back to old habits. Instead, they’re adapting to new ones – fast. The traditional promotional cycle, once built around limited-time offers and seasonal spikes, has been replaced by something more fundamental: proving long-term value in real-time.

That shift is showing up everywhere. Tesco’s Clubcard Prices and Sainsbury’s Nectar Prices have moved from reward mechanics to central pricing strategies. What began as a loyalty tactic is now a core part of how these retailers compete with discounters. And it’s not just about price. It’s about visibility. Price tags on shelves now tell a story of what the customer is saving, not just spending.

Even premium grocers are adjusting. Waitrose, long associated with quality-first positioning, has expanded its Essentials range and emphasised value messaging in advertising. Its recent campaigns have spotlighted affordability without abandoning tone, suggesting that smart shopping doesn’t have to mean compromise.

But nowhere is the shift more aggressive than in private label. Across the sector, own-brand lines have become the innovation lab. Aldi and Lidl continue to lead, not just with price, but with product development that mirrors – and sometimes beats – national brands. The battleground isn’t just about matching flavor or format anymore. It’s about convenience, sustainability, and shopper emotion. A well-packaged ready meal that costs less and feels like a small win at the end of a long day? That’s more powerful than a deep discount.

Retailers are also experimenting with format. Smaller footprint stores are popping up in urban areas, designed around the grab-and-go shopper who wants efficiency, not abundance. Meal deals, shoppable recipes, “value hacks” – all of it engineered to speak the new shopper’s language: stretch, save, simplify.

Marketing has evolved in step. Circulars and point-of-sale have been replaced by in-app push notifications, hyper-local personalisation, and digital shelves that highlight time-sensitive offers. Messaging is less about indulgence and more about empowerment. You’re not just saving money; you’re being smart. You’re beating the system.

The result is a retail environment where success no longer comes from a breadth of range or deepest pockets. It comes from relevance – knowing who your customer is today, what trade-offs they’re willing to make, and how to meet them with the right balance of function, emotion, and frictionless value.

Case Study: How Aldi Became the Benchmark for Value With Purpose

Aldi’s rise in the UK has long been tied to price, but its current momentum speaks to something deeper: cultural relevance. While many retailers are reacting to consumer caution, Aldi has anticipated it – shaping not just how people shop but also how they think about spending.

Its private label dominance is no longer just about cost-cutting. Aldi has invested heavily in product development and packaging design that challenges branded equivalents, often earning accolades in blind taste tests. Shoppers aren’t settling – they’re discovering. Categories like wine, ready meals, and snacks now generate loyalty not as substitutes, but as preferred choices.

Where Aldi’s strategy truly stands out is in how it aligns with emerging shopper identity. The brand doesn’t apologise for low prices. It builds pride around them. Recent campaigns have leaned into humor and confidence, casting Aldi customers as smart, in-the-know shoppers rather than bargain hunters. The brand’s “Like Brands. Only Cheaper.” messaging isn’t defensive – it’s disruptive.

In-store, Aldi’s stripped-back format reinforces that every inch of shelf space must earn its keep. The tight range, fast checkout model, and curated promotions reflect a retailer that understands time, budget, and simplicity as core values – not just marketing points.

Aldi isn’t winning by chasing premium. It’s winning by reshaping what premium means in the mind of today’s value-driven consumer.

What Comes Next for Grocery, Brand Building, and British Retail

This isn’t just a cycle – it’s a structural shift. The current realignment in UK grocery is forcing a deeper redefinition of how brands are built, how value is communicated, and what kind of loyalty can actually be sustained in a low-growth, high-scrutiny environment.

The old model – premium equals quality, discount equals compromise – has fractured. What’s rising in its place is a hybrid mindset: shoppers who blend store brands and branded goods, who track savings as a personal KPI, and who want clarity in place of clutter. For brands and retailers, the challenge is no longer just about margin. It’s about meaning.

Products will still matter – but the story around them matters more. Why this? Why now? Why at this price? The brands that survive won’t just be better stocked or better known – they’ll be better understood. That means strategy rooted in real consumer behaviour, not assumptions. It means investing in insight before investing in shelf space.

We’ve entered an era where margins are thinner, decisions faster, and the consumer’s tolerance for noise almost nonexistent. The winners will be those who can decode the mindset behind the spend – what drives trust, what cues value, what kills interest – and adapt before the data shows up in declining sales.

For British retail, this could be a renaissance moment. But it will favor the precise, not the broad. Those who treat their audience as a living, evolving signal – not a static segment – those who invest in listening as much as launching.

Because the real growth ahead won’t come from pushing more into baskets. It will come from knowing what truly earns a place there.

A Market Redefined by Value Will Reshape the Industry

What’s happening in UK grocery right now isn’t a blip. It’s a reset. A recalibration of trust, relevance, and what constitutes a purchase worth making.

For brands, the margin for error has collapsed. Shoppers are not just selective – they’re strategic. They aren’t waiting to be impressed. They’re asking harder questions: Is this worth it? Is this credible? Does it deliver more than just a label?

Retailers that respond with nuance – not just price cuts – are the ones shaping the future. The discounter isn’t the disruptor anymore; it’s the new center of gravity. Traditional grocers that once competed on scale or loyalty must now compete on understanding. That means fewer assumptions, more clarity, and a sharper grasp on how value is perceived – not just priced.

Consumer behaviour isn’t snapping back. Once a shopper has built a new mental model of spending – one grounded in empowerment, not deprivation – it tends to stick. The post-abundance era doesn’t signal a withdrawal from consumption. It signals a new consciousness around it.

Over the next five years, British retail will be defined not by who shouts the loudest but by who listens best. That requires precision, pattern recognition, and real, ongoing intelligence on the evolving expectations of the people pushing the trolleys.

Smart brands won’t just ride this out. They’ll use it to rebuild better – on foundations that reflect today’s shopper, not yesterday’s playbook.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The Philippine gambling industry operates within a structured but complex regulatory framework, with multiple entities overseeing different aspects of gaming. While legal, state-regulated gambling platforms thrive, underground gambling networks continue to exist, shaping the broader betting environment. Understanding these structures is essential to navigating the evolving landscape of both traditional and online betting.

PAGCOR Regulates Casinos and Online Betting

The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) is the chief regulatory body overseeing casinos, integrated resorts, and online gaming platforms. As a state-run corporation, PAGCOR plays a dual role – it licenses gaming establishments and operates its gaming businesses, contributing a significant portion of revenue to national development projects.

PAGCOR is responsible for issuing land-based and online gambling operators’ licenses and enforcing compliance with national gaming laws.
The agency has ramped up efforts to crack down on illegal online gambling platforms, which continue to attract unregulated activity.
PAGCOR generates revenue for education, healthcare, and infrastructure development, reinforcing its economic importance.

However, while PAGCOR controls regulated online betting platforms, it does not oversee all gambling activities in the Philippines.

PCSO Oversees State-Sanctioned Lotteries and Sweepstakes

Separate from PAGCOR, the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) manages lotteries, sweepstakes, and Small Town Lottery (STL) operations. Unlike casinos and online betting, which fall under PAGCOR’s jurisdiction, PCSO exclusively handles lottery-based gambling.

PCSO operates Lotto, STL, Keno, and scratch-card games, which are widely played nationwide.
Some of PCSO’s revenue funds public health programs, medical assistance, and disaster relief efforts.
Many Filipino bettors prefer PCSO-backed games because they are backed by the government, have regulatory oversight, and contribute to social welfare.

PCSO’s focus on lottery and sweepstakes means it does not oversee or profit from the growing digital betting industry, which falls under PAGCOR’s jurisdiction.

Illegal Gambling Remains a Shadow Market

Despite government oversight, unregulated gambling activities remain deeply ingrained in certain regions, particularly in lower-income and rural communities. Underground betting networks, such as Jueteng, Masiao, and Sakla, continue to attract players who prefer informal wagering over state-sanctioned alternatives.

Jueteng, an illegal numbers game, is widespread and operates outside government control.
Masiao, another underground lottery, thrives in Visayas and Mindanao.
Sakla, a card-based gambling game, is frequently played at wakes and community gatherings despite legal restrictions.

These informal games persist due to the following:

Accessibility in rural areas where formal gambling establishments are scarce.
Perceived fairness due to community-driven prize distribution.
A reliance on cash-based transactions, avoiding the digital footprint required by legal betting platforms.

How This Framework Shapes Gambling Preferences

The interplay between regulated gambling, state lotteries, and illegal gaming influences how and where Filipinos place their bets.

Traditional gamblers prefer PCSO-regulated games due to their legitimacy and social impact.
Skepticism toward online gambling is fueled by concerns over fraud, scams, and lack of oversight.
The rise of e-wallets is driving gambling toward cashless transactions, but many lower-income players still rely on informal, cash-based betting.

For brands, gaming operators, and financial service providers, navigating this landscape requires balancing digital innovation with credibility. Establishing transparency, security, and regulatory compliance will be critical in shaping the future of gambling in the Philippines.

A High-Stakes Shift in Filipino Gambling Habits

Gambling in the Philippines has moved beyond casinos and betting halls. Mobile platforms and digital payments have broadened access, attracting a diverse range of players across ages and income levels. Yet, despite the digital surge, traditional gambling remains deeply woven into the routines of Filipino bettors.

Who Are the Players?

Gambling in the Philippines is still largely male-dominated, with nearly two-thirds of bettors being men. Yet, participation cuts across generations – from young adults to seniors – highlighting its dual role as a form of entertainment and a potential financial opportunity.

A striking finding from our study is the high participation of non-earning individuals – homemakers and the unemployed make up 18% of gamblers. For many, gambling isn’t just a pastime; it’s seen as a potential source of income despite the inherent risks.

More than half of Filipino gamblers come from lower-income households, earning between PHP 9,000 and PHP 18,200 a month. This underscores how gambling is often fueled by economic aspirations, with many hoping for a financial windfall.

What Drives Filipinos to Gamble

The motivations behind gambling in the Philippines extend beyond entertainment. For many players, betting represents a chance to win big, a way to engage socially, or even a financial strategy during economic uncertainty. Understanding these motivations is critical for brands, gaming operators, and financial service providers looking to navigate shifting consumer betting behaviors.

Winning Is the Primary Driver

Across traditional and online gambling, the biggest motivator for Filipino players is the prospect of high rewards. The possibility of achieving financial gain is the primary motivator for gambling, especially among those with lower incomes, for whom a single win could be life-changing. While entertainment is still a factor, it is secondary to the allure of potential wealth.

Dual Players Show a Clear Preference for Online Betting

Among those who engage in both traditional and online gambling, our findings reveal a clear inclination toward digital platforms. 65% of dual players prefer online games over their traditional counterparts. The reasons behind this shift point to the strengths of digital gambling.

However, the remaining 35% of dual players still prefer traditional gambling, citing factors such as trust and reliability, competitiveness and cost considerations.

Preference-for-traditional-gambling-stats-in-the-Philippines

The Expanding Digital Divide in Gambling

Despite the surge in digital gambling, a clear divide remains. Younger players and those in Metro Manila are drawn to online betting, while rural and older gamblers stick with traditional formats, reflecting deep-rooted habits and varying levels of digital access.

Trust and accessibility shape where Filipinos place their bets. While online gambling offers convenience, many remain wary of digital platforms due to concerns about transparency and fraud. This skepticism drives players toward government-backed PCSO games, which are seen as more reliable and secure.

What This Means for Brands and the Gambling Industry

Gambling in the Philippines is a blend of tradition and transformation. Digital platforms are on the rise, but they haven’t replaced traditional gambling. Instead, both coexist, appealing to different audiences shaped by factors like access, trust, and personal motivations.

This shift brings both challenges and opportunities for gaming operators and financial service providers. The rise of digital platforms and e-wallets points to a growing cashless gambling economy. Yet traditional gaming’s resilience underscores the need for hybrid strategies that serve both digital-savvy players and those loyal to legacy systems.

Traditional and Online Gambling Compete for Player Loyalty

The Philippine gambling industry is evolving, but the digital shift isn’t absolute. Online betting is gaining ground, yet traditional gambling holds strong, especially among rural and lower-income players. The dynamic market, with both formats thriving on distinct motivations and behaviors.

The Enduring Appeal of Traditional Gambling

Traditional games still dominate among Filipino bettors, with 8 in 10 preferring them over online options. This strong loyalty reflects deep-rooted trust in familiar betting practices. In-person gambling is especially popular among older players, those in rural areas, and individuals at both ends of the income spectrum.

Several factors contribute to this continued reliance on traditional gaming:

Trust and Credibility: Many players feel more confident betting through PCSO-regulated games, which they perceive as having higher transparency and legitimacy.
Limited Digital Access: Some bettors lack reliable internet connections, making physical betting outlets more accessible.
Avoidance of Digital Risks: Concerns about scams and fraudulent online betting platforms keep some players loyal to traditional gambling.

These insights suggest that traditional gaming remains a cornerstone of the gambling industry, not just for legacy players but for those who prioritise trust and accessibility over convenience.

Online Gambling Is Growing, but Old Fears Linger

The growth of online gambling in the Philippines is undeniable, with digital platforms offering ease of access and round-the-clock availability. Our study found that 85% of online gamblers own smartphones, reflecting the strong link between mobile penetration and digital betting.

But despite its rapid growth, online betting hasn’t overtaken traditional formats, largely due to lingering concerns about trust and reliability.

Many traditional bettors remain skeptical, citing:

Unregulated platforms with questionable security and fairness.
Unreliable internet access that can interrupt gameplay.
Lack of personal interaction, a key part of the gambling experience for some.

Still, for younger and Metro Manila-based bettors, the convenience of digital betting outweighs these concerns. The ability to place bets anytime, anywhere, and check results instantly via mobile apps has become a compelling factor in online gambling’s growth.

What This Means for the Industry

The battle between traditional and online gambling is not a case of one format overtaking the other but rather an industry adapting to diverse consumer needs. While online gambling offers accessibility and ease of use, traditional betting maintains a stronghold among players who prioritise trust, regulation, and in-person transactions.

This means balancing innovation with credibility for brands, gaming platforms, and financial service providers. The path forward involves:

Strengthening consumer trust in digital betting platforms through transparency, regulation, and fraud prevention measures.
Enhancing accessibility for rural players by integrating hybrid betting solutions that combine digital convenience with physical cash-in points.
Leveraging mobile technology to attract younger bettors while ensuring safe, fair, and responsible gambling practices.

Understanding player motivations and addressing concerns will determine the trajectory of gambling in the Philippines.

The Role of Financial Constraints and Perceived Value

Interestingly, financial constraints play a different role depending on the format. While some gamblers are drawn to online betting for its lower-cost entry points and flexible wagering, others see traditional gambling as a more secure and controlled way to bet.

Online bettors appreciate the ability to wager small amounts frequently.
Traditional gamblers, particularly those in lower-income brackets, may view larger, less frequent bets as a more strategic approach.

This distinction reinforces the idea that the gambling industry in the Philippines is not a one-size-fits-all market. Instead, players’ financial situations, risk tolerance, and perceptions of fairness all shape how and where they choose to gamble.

What This Means for Brands and Operators

For gaming companies, fintech firms, and policymakers, understanding what drives gamblers is key to creating responsible, engaging experiences. Our data points to clear opportunities:

Boost engagement by highlighting jackpot prizes and adding gamification features to online platforms.
Build trust through stronger transparency, security measures, and regulatory oversight to ease skepticism among traditional bettors.
Promote responsible gaming with solutions that reflect players’ financial realities, ensuring gambling stays entertainment – not a financial risk.

While the Philippine gambling market evolves, player motivations remain constant: the pursuit of rewards, the need for trust, and easy access. The brands that balance these factors will shape the industry’s future.

Why Online Gambling’s Boom Faces a Trust Hurdle

Online gambling is booming in the Philippines, but trust remains a major roadblock. Mobile-first platforms, e-wallets, and instant access have fueled its growth, yet concerns about fraud, transparency, and weak regulation continue to shape player behavior. For many, loyalty depends not just on convenience but on feeling secure.

From Occasional to Everyday

Online gambling has shifted from a casual pastime to a daily habit for many Filipinos:

In 2022, 29% of players gambled online daily, averaging three sessions per week.
By 2023, that number jumped to 39%, with players betting four times a week on average.

This surge reflects the ease of mobile betting and the appeal of quick, cashless transactions. The ability to place bets anytime, anywhere has made online gambling the go-to choice for a growing audience.

Top Online Games and Betting Platforms Are Gaining Traction

As online gambling gains momentum, specific games and platforms have emerged as clear favorites.

Top-online-games-and-betting-platforms-in-The-Philippines

The dominance of e-wallet-powered platforms highlights a critical industry trend: cashless gambling is becoming the norm. With e-wallets enabling seamless deposits and withdrawals, players are gravitating toward platforms that offer frictionless transactions.

Trust Issues Are Slowing Online Adoption

Despite the convenience of online betting, skepticism remains a major hurdle. Our study found that:

27% of traditional gamblers choose to avoid online betting because they do not trust digital platforms.
Concerns about scams, unreliable payouts, and unregulated operators are common deterrents.
Lack of internet access remains a barrier for 14% of players, preventing them from fully transitioning to digital platforms.

For many, the reliability of PCSO-backed traditional games outweighs the accessibility of online gambling. This signals a need for stronger industry regulation, clearer consumer protections, and better fraud prevention measures to build confidence in digital betting platforms.

What This Means for the Industry

The expansion of online gambling in the Philippines hinges on trust, security, and seamless user experience. While mobile-first gaming is gaining popularity, its long-term success will depend on how well operators address consumer concerns.

To sustain growth, industry players must:

Strengthen regulatory frameworks to increase transparency and consumer confidence.
Implement advanced fraud detection and security measures to protect players from scams.
Leverage fintech partnerships to enhance the credibility of digital betting transactions.
Improve digital accessibility to ensure all players, regardless of location or financial status, can participate safely.

The future of online gambling in the Philippines will not be determined solely by convenience. Building player trust will be the defining factor in whether digital betting platforms can truly dominate the market.

E-Wallets Are Powering the Future of Gambling in the Philippines

The rise of online gambling in the Philippines is closely tied to the rapid adoption of e-wallets, which have become the dominant payment method for digital betting. With seamless deposits, withdrawals, and integration into popular gaming platforms, e-wallets are not just facilitating transactions—they are reshaping how players engage with gambling.

E-Wallets Dominate Online Gambling Transactions

Our study reveals e-wallets have emerged as the preferred payment method for online bettors in the Philippines. Among the most widely used digital wallets in gambling transactions are:

GCash (GLife, GGames)
Maya
Shopee Pay

These platforms have transformed how players fund their accounts, eliminating the need for physical cash transactions and providing faster, more secure payment options.

How Players Fund Their Gambling Accounts

Despite the shift to digital transactions, cash remains a key entry point into the online gambling ecosystem. Players frequently cash in their e-wallets through physical retail locations, including:

Sari-sari stores that act as informal cash-in hubs.
Convenience stores where players load funds onto their digital wallets.
Cash-in machines that allow seamless top-ups.
Bank transfers for those with formal banking access.

This highlights an important industry dynamic – while gambling is moving online, cash remains an essential part of the ecosystem, particularly in rural areas.

The Link Between Financial Inclusion and Gambling Growth

The success of e-wallets in the gambling industry reflects a broader trend: the growing reliance on fintech solutions among Filipinos. As cashless payments gain traction across retail, transport, and remittances, digital betting platforms benefit from increased trust in mobile transactions.

However, financial inclusion gaps remain a challenge. While many players can access e-wallets, not all can link them to traditional banking services. This explains why alternative cash-in methods like sari-sari stores thrive alongside digital payment solutions.

What This Means for the Industry

The widespread adoption of e-wallets in online gambling presents both opportunities and challenges for industry players:

For gaming platforms: Streamlining e-wallet integration will be critical in capturing the growing digital-first gambling market.
For fintech companies: The demand for secure, seamless gambling transactions presents an opportunity for product expansion.
For policymakers: Striking a balance between financial inclusion and responsible gambling will be key in shaping regulatory frameworks.

The Philippine gambling industry is not just moving online- it is going cashless. As e-wallets become the backbone of digital betting, the ability to build trust, ensure security, and provide seamless user experiences will define the next phase of industry growth.

The Future of Gambling in the Philippines Will Be Shaped by Trust and Innovation

The Philippine gambling industry is driven by digital transformation, shifting player behaviors, and the rise of cashless transactions. While online gambling is expanding, traditional formats remain deeply embedded, particularly among players who prioritise trust and regulatory oversight. The industry’s challenge is not just to grow digital adoption but also to address the concerns of players who remain hesitant about fully transitioning to online platforms.

Key Trends That Will Define the Industry’s Next Phase

Several key trends will shape the future of gambling in the Philippines:

Hybrid Gambling Models Will Gain Traction
- While online betting is growing, traditional gambling remains resilient. Future growth will likely blend both formats, offering digital solutions that integrate with physical betting locations.
- E-wallet cash-ins through sari-sari stores and convenience shops illustrate how offline and online gambling ecosystems are merging.
Regulation Will Become a Decisive Factor in Online Gambling’s Growth
- Trust remains a significant barrier for players hesitant to gamble online. Concerns over fraud, unreliable payouts, and scams continue to slow full digital adoption.
- Stronger government oversight and regulation will be necessary to ensure a fair, secure, and transparent betting environment.
E-Wallets Will Dominate, but Cash Remains Relevant
- The widespread adoption of GCash, Maya, and Shopee Pay in online gambling suggests that cashless transactions will define the industry’s future.
- However, for many lower-income and rural players, cash remains a critical entry point, reinforcing the need for financial inclusion in digital gambling.
Younger and Urban Gamblers Will Continue to Drive Online Betting
- Metro Manila and younger players are the primary adopters of online gambling, while rural and older bettors still favor traditional formats.
- The industry’s ability to bridge this gap will determine the speed at which digital gambling replaces—or coexists with—traditional betting.

Balancing Growth With Consumer Protection

Gambling in the Philippines will not be defined solely by technological advancements but by how well the industry builds player trust. While fintech innovations and mobile accessibility drive adoption, addressing concerns around fair play, fraud prevention, and responsible gambling will be critical to long-term success.

For gaming operators, financial service providers, and regulators, the focus must be on:

Ensuring transparency and security in digital betting platforms.
Creating a seamless bridge between traditional and online gambling.
Developing consumer protection policies that balance growth with responsible gaming.

Today’s decisions will shape whether digital betting truly takes over or remains a complement to legacy formats. The key to success will lie in offering players a seamless, secure, and rewarding experience wherever and however they choose to place their bets.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

I live in Tornado Alley, which means a roof isn’t just a roof – it’s armour. So when I found out mine needed replacing, I didn’t hesitate. I reviewed quotes, selected a company, signed the contract. All the hard stuff, I thought, was behind me.

Then came the question: what colour?

It felt like it should’ve been easy. But standing in my driveway, staring up at the expanse of shingles-to-be, I froze. It’s a massive, permanent decision – visible from every angle, exposed to the sky, the neighbours, and every passing storm chaser. Would black make the house too hot? Would brown make it look dated? Would grey clash with the brick?

Naturally, I turned to ChatGPT. I uploaded a photo of my home, asked for help, and was met with an avalanche of color-coded logic – slate complements red brick, brown warms the palette, weathered wood is a “classic choice.” The suggestions were smart, thoughtful… and somehow made things worse. I now had more choices, just better argued.

So I went to the manufacturer’s website and used their simulation tool, dropping different shingle colours onto a photo of my house. It helped, in theory. But once I narrowed it down to three, they all started to blur. On screen, they looked practically the same. That’s when my roofing company stepped in. They brought physical samples, laid them out in the sunlight, and – most importantly – showed me actual homes nearby with each of the colours installed. Only then, after all the tech, the swatches, and the analysis, could I make a choice I felt confident in.

This wasn’t indecision. It was decision friction. And it’s the kind of friction that brands, in their pursuit of offering more, often overlook.

The Psychology of Too Much Choice

We tend to think more choice equals more freedom. But in reality, more choice often creates more anxiety. Psychologist Barry Schwartz coined this dynamic the Paradox of Choice – the idea that while some choice is good, too much can lead to decision paralysis, increased regret, and less satisfaction overall.

This is especially true when the decision feels high-stakes. Choosing a roof colour isn’t just cosmetic – it’s a long-term investment, highly visible, and not easily reversed. When the pressure is on, our brain doesn’t appreciate abundance. It defaults to avoidance.

In one of the most cited studies in consumer psychology, Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper set up a jam sampling table in a grocery store. Shoppers were either offered six flavours or twenty-four. The larger display drew more interest – but those offered just six choices were ten times more likely to make a purchase. The takeaway? More options may attract attention, but fewer options drive action.

What’s happening under the surface is cognitive overload. Our working memory – responsible for weighing pros and cons – gets saturated quickly. With each new variable, our mental model has to recalculate. At a certain point, the decision becomes so mentally taxing that it feels easier to defer it, abandon it, or outsource it entirely. That’s not a lack of willpower. That’s the brain protecting itself from burnout.

When brands ignore this psychological friction, they unknowingly increase the likelihood of customer hesitation, second-guessing, or worse – inaction. Because when everything looks like a good option, nothing feels like the right one.

Why Some Decisions Deserve More Support

Marketers often treat decisions like they exist on a flat playing field. But in reality, choice sits on a hierarchy, and the higher up you go, the more psychological support people need.

Low-stakes decisions, such as choosing a gum flavour or a side dish, rarely cause friction. They’re inexpensive, reversible, and carry minimal consequences. High-stakes choices, on the other hand, are more complex, costly, and deeply personal. Whether it’s selecting a mortgage provider, a wedding dress, or a new roof, the risk of regret weighs heavier.

That’s when the brain switches gears. We move from intuition to analysis, and if overloaded, to avoidance. Behavioural economists refer to this as the decision fatigue curve. As the number of variables and the stakes increase, so does cognitive load. That’s why people delay home renovations or abandon full carts at checkout. It isn’t laziness – it’s self-preservation.

This is where tiered choice architecture can help. Instead of dumping every possibility on the table, brands can scaffold decisions. For example, a meal kit service might start by asking about dietary needs, then cooking skill, then taste preferences – delivering a filtered set of meals instead of all 200 at once. The consumer still feels in control, but the decision feels digestible.

Think of it like an elevator. Not every customer is heading to the top floor. Some want a shortcut to level two, others want to explore every stop. But without floors, stairs, or signage, everyone just stands around in the lobby – unsure of where to go next.

Smart brands design choice structures based on where decisions fall in the hierarchy and how much friction they carry. It’s not a nice-to-have – it’s essential.

Why Smart Tools Sometimes Backfire

Even when tools are meant to help, they can still make it worse. AI-generated recommendations, product filters, simulations – these were designed to ease decision-making. But when they simply layer on new variables without eliminating others, they amplify the problem.

In my case, ChatGPT gave me additional, well-reasoned colour suggestions. The roofing brand’s simulator let me “see” each option on my house. But with every added perspective, I became more uncertain – not less. What I needed wasn’t more input. I needed a system that filtered, narrowed, and helped me move forward confidently.

That’s the trap brands fall into. They assume the answer to choice anxiety is better information. But the real solution is constraint.

People don’t want endless options. They want a sense that they’re on the right path. And while visual tools are helpful, they rarely match the nuance of real-world conditions – light changes, neighborhood aesthetics, material textures. That’s why physical samples and in-person examples were what ultimately helped me decide. Not because they offered more data, but because they reduced ambiguity.

Even the smartest tools can fail if they don’t acknowledge the emotional weight of uncertainty. Help should feel like progress, not pressure.

The Business Case for Simplifying Choice

It’s one thing to talk about the theory of too much choice. It’s another to see what happens when companies actually do something about it.

Procter & Gamble once sold 26 different versions of Head & Shoulders shampoo. From dandruff control to citrus burst, there was something for every scalp scenario. But instead of boosting sales, the abundance of options led to customer hesitation – and stagnant shelves. When P&G reduced the number of variants from 26 to 15, something surprising happened: sales went up.

Why? Because fewer choices didn’t mean less relevance. It meant less confusion.

This pattern repeats across industries. GAP, for example, simplified its denim wall – once packed with indistinguishable fits – and saw shoppers choose faster and with more certainty. In tech, Apple’s limited product lines stand in stark contrast to Android’s sprawling menus. Apple doesn’t overwhelm with options. It offers what’s needed – and nothing more.

Even in the world of digital entertainment, Netflix has tested ways to surface fewer titles on screen to reduce decision paralysis and increase view time. Endless scroll may seem like engagement, but often it’s just a user trapped in the loop of not knowing what to pick.

These companies realised that offering fewer, better-differentiated choices creates momentum. It respects the consumer’s time, reduces cognitive strain, and makes the path to “yes” feel like a confident step – not a leap of faith.

In a world that equates abundance with value, restraint has become a competitive advantage.

What Brands Should Learn

When consumers are overwhelmed, they don’t want more options – they want clarity. The role of the brand is no longer just to offer a catalogue of possibilities, but to actively guide people through a decision journey that feels considered, contextual, and reassuring.

Start with curated collections. Rather than overwhelming customers with endless variants, group products into purposeful sets: “best for small spaces,” “most popular among professionals,” “ideal for warm climates.” Curation is not restriction – it’s a form of empathy.

Next, invest in personalised guidance. This could be as simple as a quiz that identifies key needs and filters options, or as advanced as AI-driven suggestions based on behavioural patterns. But the goal is the same: to remove irrelevant options, not add to the noise.

Then there’s context. Il Makiage, for example, doesn’t just match foundation shades – they show how those shades look on real people, under real conditions. They reinforce your selection with testimonials and visual proof, not just swatches on a screen.

Brands should also think about post-purchase validation. The moment after a decision is made is just as critical as the moment before. Thoughtful follow-up emails, affirming language, tips for first-time use – these reassure the customer they made a smart call.

Ultimately, this is about choice architecture. The brands that win don’t just give people more to choose from. They design the experience around how people actually make choices – emotionally, socially, and cognitively.

The Role of Research in Reducing Friction

Understanding decision friction isn’t guesswork – it’s measurable. According to a Baymard Institute study, nearly 70% of online shopping carts are abandoned – and one of the top reasons is a complicated decision process. This is where market research proves invaluable.

At its core, decision friction stems from uncertainty. But the source of that uncertainty – whether it’s lack of clarity, hesitation, or unspoken objections – differs by category, audience, and context. Research identifies these hidden blocks.

Qualitative studies reveal how consumers feel in the moment of indecision. Quantitative methods like conjoint analysis or maxdiff help identify which features drive real value. Segmentation shows how different customer types make decisions – some need freedom, others need a path.

Research also plays a critical role in post-choice validation – what gives people confidence after they say yes. The right message, email, or proof point can turn relief into brand trust.

If friction is the obstacle, research is the flashlight.

UX Doesn’t Stand for Unlimited Experience

In digital environments, more space doesn’t automatically mean more freedom. It often means more friction. In user experience (UX) design, subtraction – not expansion – is often the most powerful conversion tool.

Booking.com once overloaded its interface with filters, price badges, and urgency cues. But A/B testing revealed that simplifying the layout led to higher engagement. Shopify restructured its onboarding to guide users through sequential tasks rather than overwhelming dashboards. Completion rates rose.

Even streaming platforms like Disney+ and Netflix have learned to surface fewer but more relevant titles. Endless choice wasn’t delight – it was paralysis.

This is called cognitive offloading – helping users conserve mental energy by removing unnecessary decisions.

UX design, at its best, doesn’t just look good. It helps people move forward.

Final Thought

Decision-making is rarely logical alone. It’s emotional, contextual, and deeply personal – particularly when the stakes are high. Smart brands don’t just sell products. They design experiences that acknowledge the mental load customers carry.

The best marketing today isn’t louder. It’s sharper. It removes friction not by simplifying what you offer, but by anticipating how people choose. If you’re not thinking about how your customer feels at the point of decision, you’re not really in the business of persuasion.

You’re in the business of hoping.

And hope is not a strategy.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.