Rising inflation and economic uncertainty were expected to put an end to discretionary spending for middle-income households. Instead, consumers are making room for indulgence. Across the US, UK, and Europe, households earning moderate incomes continue to prioritise non-essential purchases at rates far closer to affluent consumers than economic models predicted. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Consumer Sentiment Survey found that 42% of middle-income respondents in developed markets still plan to spend on travel, dining out, and personal care in the next year, just nine percentage points lower than high-income households.

The resilience of discretionary spending in the face of rising costs defies conventional economic assumptions. It is not a case of irrationality or denial. It reflects a shift in how consumers measure value. After years of pandemic-driven disruption, middle-class buyers are increasingly framing small luxuries as essential to emotional well-being, not as reckless spending. An affordable meal out, a short domestic trip, or a new skincare product carries more than monetary worth. It represents normalcy, reward, and agency in an environment where larger financial goals often feel less attainable.

This trend is not a short-term reaction to inflation, nor is it purely sentimental. It is structurally rational behaviour shaped by stress, lifestyle adjustment, and evolving definitions of security. Spending on modest treats provides a sense of control and immediacy when long-term stability—home ownership, retirement savings—feels increasingly out of reach. Consumers are not abandoning caution; they are recalibrating what prudence looks like in real terms.

Understanding this shift is critical for brands, retailers, and policymakers. Indulgence spending among the middle class is not a deviation from rational economic behaviour. It is an adaptation to new realities, where emotional resilience and quality of life have become primary considerations alongside price and necessity.

submit-research-request

Tight Budgets, Sharp Choices

The pressure on household budgets is real. Inflation has driven up the cost of essentials—housing, food, energy—leaving less flexibility for discretionary categories. Yet rather than abandoning non-essential purchases altogether, middle-class consumers are reprioritising with striking precision. The pattern is visible across the US, UK, and Europe: subscription services are among the first to be cancelled, big-ticket electronics are postponed, and plans for major home renovations are shelved. But the impulse to carve out space for small luxuries remains intact.

KPMG’s 2024 Middle-Class Financial Priorities report highlights this shift. In a survey of households earning between 75% and 150% of median income, nearly 60% reported cutting back on monthly expenses such as media subscriptions and dining delivery apps. However, the same respondents overwhelmingly indicated an intention to preserve budget for “quality of life” items, including occasional dining out, personal care products, and leisure travel under 500 miles. The data suggests that discretionary spending is not vanishing—it is being filtered through a more selective lens.

A similar rebalancing is evident in Europe. OECD research published earlier this year shows that while the ownership of new vehicles among middle-income households declined by over 8% between 2022 and 2024, spending on local travel, cultural events, and speciality food purchases held steady. In the UK, Deloitte’s 2024 consumer tracker found that middle-income households were 30% more likely to describe smaller, experiential purchases as “essential for well-being” than they were before the pandemic.

The underlying dynamic is a redefinition of value. Consumers are moving away from evaluating purchases solely on cost or prestige. Instead, the metric is experiential reward—whether a purchase delivers emotional uplift, stress relief, or a sense of personal investment. A $50 skincare product or a weekend away is justified not by indulgence for its own sake, but by what it represents: a manageable, affirming investment in quality of life.

This sharpening of priorities is not a retreat from financial responsibility. It is a recalibration. Households are preserving choice and pleasure even as long-term goals grow more distant. The middle-class response to inflation is not to close the wallet entirely, but to spend carefully, reinforcing emotional resilience where it matters most.

Where the Money Is Still Flowing

The resilience of middle-class discretionary spending becomes clearest when looking at where the money continues to move. Small luxuries, particularly those offering immediate personal gratification without long-term financial strain, are absorbing a disproportionate share of discretionary budgets. These are not extravagant purchases but considered indulgences—choices that allow consumers to feel rewarded without incurring future economic risk.

Dining out remains one of the strongest performing sectors. Mastercard SpendingPulse data from early 2024 showed that spending at fast-casual and premium-casual restaurants in the US rose by 8% year-on-year, even as fine dining bookings declined. Consumers are trading down from high-end experiences but refusing to give up the social and emotional value of meals shared outside the home. In the UK, Statista reports that visits to casual dining chains increased by nearly one-fifth compared to 2022 levels, concentrated among households earning £30,000 to £70,000 annually.

Beauty and skincare purchases are following a similar trajectory. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Beauty Survey found that middle-income consumers accounted for nearly half of the growth in skincare sales across Europe and North America, often favouring mid-tier brands offering “clinical-grade” results at accessible prices. Rather than abandoning beauty spending, buyers are shifting toward products that promise tangible outcomes—improved skin health, self-care benefits—over prestige branding. The emphasis is not on conspicuous consumption but on self-affirmation.

Domestic travel, particularly short-haul trips, has also proven remarkably resilient. According to Mastercard’s travel trends report, bookings for domestic leisure trips under 300 miles rose by 12% in the US during the past year, primarily driven by middle-income households. European markets such as France and Germany showed parallel trends, with regional rail and car rental bookings outperforming international air travel. Travel, even scaled down, remains a critical outlet for recreation and stress relief, viewed as a justifiable investment rather than a luxury.

Personal wellness has evolved from a niche concern to a consistent budget item. Deloitte’s 2024 Health and Wellness Tracker found that expenditures on fitness apps, meditation subscriptions, and nutritional supplements rose by nearly 15% among middle-income consumers compared to 2022. Spa treatments and boutique fitness sessions also saw modest but steady gains, especially when bundled into affordable packages. Wellness is increasingly framed not as optional self-indulgence but as proactive health maintenance—a narrative that middle-class consumers embrace even under financial strain.

What ties these sectors together is not mere resilience but strategic prioritisation. Consumers actively choose experiences and products that deliver emotional payoff without undermining longer-term financial goals. Small luxuries have become part of how households navigate financial pressure, balancing restraint with resilience.

How Indulgence Looks Different Around the World

The appetite for small luxuries is global, but its expression varies sharply across markets. Cultural context, inflationary pressure, and recovery patterns from the pandemic shape how and where middle-class consumers indulge.

In the United States, experience is taking precedence over material accumulation. Mastercard’s 2024 SpendingPulse report shows that while retail sales for durable goods have slowed, spending on travel, dining, and entertainment continues to climb. Middle-income households prioritise activities that create memories and offer a sense of immediacy, even as they pull back on home goods and apparel. The pattern reflects a broader recalibration, where the value of money is increasingly measured in lived experience rather than possessions.

The United Kingdom mirrors this behavioural split, though with sharper trade-offs. Ipsos data published earlier this year indicates that middle-income British households are aggressively trading down on everyday essentials—switching to discount supermarkets and delaying home improvements—while deliberately protecting spending on experiential categories. Budget airline bookings, concert attendance, and dining at independent restaurants remain surprisingly resilient. The message is clear: not all spending is negotiable, even under pressure.

In continental Europe, the indulgence lens often narrows toward artisanal quality. In France and Germany, Euromonitor reports that while overall household budgets have tightened, purchases of artisanal food, skincare, and local leisure travel have held steady or even grown modestly. Consumers are not abandoning discretionary spending, but are redirecting it toward smaller, more meaningful pleasures that emphasise craftsmanship, locality, and authenticity.

Southeast Asia presents a different dynamic, driven by digital acceleration and aspirational consumption. In Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines, middle-income consumers are investing in affordable upgrades—beauty products, domestic travel, and entry-level tech such as smartphones and wearable devices. According to Bain & Company’s 2024 Southeast Asia Digital Economy Report, there has been a surge in beauty e-commerce, with mid-tier brands seeing the fastest growth among urban middle-class buyers. Here, indulgence is closely tied to self-improvement and digital connectivity rather than traditional luxury markers.

China and India present a distinct dynamic. In China, middle-class consumers focus on premium health, wellness, and education-related services. Mastercard’s 2024 China Consumption Outlook shows strong growth in short domestic leisure travel, boutique fitness memberships, and “new luxury” beauty brands that offer substance over logo appeal. In India, indulgence is often family-centred. Euromonitor data highlights that spending on family experiences—mall outings, cinema, casual dining, and affordable domestic holidays—is being prioritised, even as households economise on electronics and apparel. The middle class is seeking small windows of joy that offer collective, not just individual, payoff.

Across these regions, indulgence spending is far from homogeneous. It is shaped by cultural narratives about success, wellness, and emotional reward. Yet the underlying behaviour is consistent: even under inflationary strain, middle-income consumers are unwilling to surrender the experiences and products that sustain a sense of control, progress, and personal value.

Why Indulgence Feels Necessary, Not Excessive

The persistence of small luxuries in strained economic times is not a matter of consumer irrationality. It is a rational psychological response to prolonged stress, uncertainty, and shifting social norms. For many middle-class households, small indulgences have moved beyond occasional rewards to become a form of emotional maintenance—a way to reassert agency and sustain morale when broader financial goals feel increasingly distant.

Much of this shift can be traced to the post-pandemic “live for today” mindset. After years of deferred plans and disrupted routines, consumers across income levels have shown a greater willingness to prioritise present-day satisfaction. Behavioural economists point to the acceleration of hedonic adaptation—the tendency to return to a baseline level of happiness despite external changes—as a key factor. When future security feels less certain, spending on immediate emotional uplift becomes a practical way to protect mental well-being.

American Psychological Association research on stress-related spending supports this view. A 2024 report found that nearly 60% of middle-income consumers in the US admitted to occasional “treat spending” as a coping mechanism, with the majority framing such purchases not as extravagance, but as essential self-care. Similar patterns emerged in the UK and Singapore, where smaller, experience-driven expenditures were linked to lower reported stress levels in middle-income groups.

Social behaviour further reinforces the normalisation of indulgence. Small splurges—dining out, a weekend getaway, a new skincare regimen—are highly visible on platforms like Instagram and TikTok. Sharing these moments has become part of how consumers construct narratives of resilience and self-investment. The effect is cumulative. What once might have been considered unnecessary spending is now broadly perceived as a reasonable way to manage life’s pressures.

Rather than retreating into austerity, many middle-class consumers are making conscious choices to maintain emotional balance through manageable rewards. In modern economic conditions, where traditional markers of financial progress are harder to achieve, these decisions are not acts of recklessness. They are strategies for preserving stability, dignity, and optimism in everyday life.

Small Luxuries, Big Opportunities

For brands, the persistence of small indulgences offers more than a temporary sales opportunity. It signals a deeper shift in how consumers assign value—one that demands careful strategic recalibration. Positioning products as accessible rewards or emotional enhancers, rather than as markers of status or success, will increasingly define market relevance.

Middle-class consumers are not looking for extravagant gestures. They are seeking personal moments of satisfaction, convenience, or self-expression that fit into constrained budgets. Products that deliver relaxation, confidence, or small affirmations of progress resonate far more than those that lean heavily on traditional luxury cues. In this environment, storytelling around personal value matters more than aspirational branding. A meal kit that saves time and creates family rituals, a skincare serum that represents self-care rather than vanity, a local mini-break that restores mental clarity—these are the narratives gaining traction.

The danger for brands lies in misreading the room. Overemphasising luxury, exclusivity, or aspirational distance risks alienating a consumer base that values relatability and tangible benefit over status. Innovation must centre on affordability without sacrificing the experience of quality. Smart packaging, modular services, and tiered product lines are helping some brands maintain margins while broadening emotional appeal.

Real-time market research is critical to navigating these shifts. Understanding which categories of small luxuries matter most—and how definitions of indulgence vary between regions, income brackets, and life stages—allows brands to tailor offerings with precision. Blanket assumptions about “affordable luxury” no longer hold. The brands that invest in nuanced, behaviour-led insights will be the ones best positioned to capture loyalty in an economy where emotional and financial resilience are increasingly intertwined.

Indulgence in an Age of Restraint

Discretionary spending among middle-income consumers is too often dismissed as irrational, a stubborn refusal to accept economic reality. This view misses the point. Small indulgences are not acts of denial. They are structural adjustments to a world where traditional financial milestones—home ownership, long-term savings, upward mobility—have become harder to secure. Preserving moments of joy, autonomy, and emotional stability has become a rational survival strategy.

Understanding these patterns is critical for anyone forecasting the next phase of consumer behaviour. Micro-indulgence is more than a passing phenomenon. It is a leading indicator of broader consumer sentiment, revealing how confidence, stress, and hope are negotiated at the household level. Brands and policymakers that fail to track these shifts will misread the market, mistaking emotional recalibration for economic irrationality.

At Kadence International, our global research shows that middle-class indulgence is not a short-term reaction to inflationary pressure. It is an embedded behavioural shift, one that will continue to shape spending across sectors well beyond the current cycle. Those who frame their growth strategies around emotional consumption, rather than rigid income segmentation, will be best positioned to capture resilience spending in an economy where financial caution and the pursuit of quality of life are no longer at odds, but deeply intertwined.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In the last year alone, bookings for luxury river cruises by travellers over the age of 65 rose by more than 70%. In Southeast Asia, spa and wellness retreats report that seniors now make up the fastest-growing customer group. And in the United States, recent data shows that older adults are adopting wearable tech at a faster clip than millennials. These aren’t isolated shifts—they’re signals of a broader recalibration underway in global consumption.

For decades, older consumers have been cast in a supporting role: brand loyal, budget conscious, and resistant to change. The stereotype of the frugal retiree—committed to saving, disinterested in trends—has shaped how marketers target, serve, and sometimes overlook the over-65 segment. But the demographic reality has changed, and so have the consumers within it.

Today’s seniors are living longer, staying active, and spending more. In markets like the US and UK, they hold the bulk of wealth and show no hesitation in using it. In Southeast Asia, where ageing populations are rising sharply, many seniors are approaching retirement with more education, financial independence, and an appetite for indulgence than the generation before them. From travel and wellness to personal tech and home upgrades, older consumers are not only participating—they’re leading demand in categories once reserved for younger buyers.

This isn’t a niche. It’s a market-wide shift. As ageing populations expand in both developed and emerging economies, their economic power is no longer confined to healthcare and insurance. It’s influencing the way brands think about experience, design, value, and messaging. Marketers who continue to fixate on youth risk missing one of the most quietly powerful growth segments in the global economy. Because while demographic trends might move slowly, consumer behaviour is already changing, and the brands that recognise it early stand to benefit most.

submit-research-brief

A New Consumer Class with Global Influence

The global demographic landscape is undergoing a significant transformation. By 2030, individuals aged 65 and older are projected to constitute over 20% of the population in most developed countries, marking a substantial increase from previous decades .​

In the United States, baby boomers—those born between 1946 and 1964—hold a dominant financial position. They control approximately 70% of the nation’s disposable income, making them a formidable economic force . This wealth accumulation is attributed to factors such as prolonged careers and favourable investment returns .​

Regional Spending Patterns

  • Japan: With nearly 30% of its population aged 65 or older, Japan faces unique economic challenges and opportunities. The ageing demographic has led to increased demand for healthcare services and age-friendly technologies
  • Singapore: Retired households in Singapore allocate a significant portion of their expenditures to health and wellness. Studies indicate that these households prioritise recreation and cultural activities, reflecting a desire for active and engaged lifestyles
  • United Kingdom: In the UK, seniors are playing a pivotal role in preserving and revitalising traditional crafts. The resurgence of interest in heritage crafts, such as cask ale brewing, is partly driven by older consumers who value authenticity and tradition .

Emerging Markets

  • India: Urban Indian seniors are exhibiting increased consumer confidence. Recent surveys show a rise in sentiment regarding personal finances and investments, suggesting a growing willingness to spend on quality products and services 
  • Vietnam: Vietnamese seniors are among the most optimistic consumers in Southeast Asia. Their positive outlook translates into active participation in the economy, with increased spending on healthcare, leisure, and technology 

The Spending Habits That Are Defying Age Expectations

The conventional image of older adults as cautious spenders is increasingly outdated. Recent data reveals that seniors are actively engaging in various sectors, from travel and wellness to home improvements and technology, often outspending younger demographics.

Travel and Leisure

Seniors are embracing travel experiences that prioritise comfort and enrichment. In the UK, luxury rail journeys are booming—Railbookers added nearly one new high-end booking for every two made the year prior. Similarly, wellness tourism added more than $200 billion in a single year—growing by nearly one-third to reach $868 billion in 2023, indicating a growing preference for health-focused travel among older adults.

Wellness and Beauty

The pursuit of health and longevity is driving seniors to invest in wellness products and services. Thailand’s wellness economy expanded by nearly $9 billion in just one year, reaching $40.5 billion in 2023, with older consumers contributing significantly to this surge . The global skincare supplement market also reflects this trend, valued at $2.81 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $5.86 billion by 2032 .​

Home and Lifestyle

Ageing in place has become a priority for many seniors, leading to increased spending on home modifications. In the U.S., homeowners spent an average of $13,667 on home improvement projects in 2023, with accessibility and comfort being key motivators . Retailers like Home Depot and Lowe’s have responded by offering products tailored to the needs of older adults, such as ergonomic fixtures and safety enhancements.

Technology Adoption

Contrary to stereotypes, seniors are increasingly adopting smart technologies. AARP reports that nearly 9 in 10 adults over 50 now use smartphones, with two-thirds streaming on smart TVs and one in three engaging with voice assistants at home. This trend underscores the importance of user-friendly technology that caters to the preferences and needs of older consumers.​

In category after category, senior preferences are leading—not lagging—market demand. Their choices no longer mirror trends; they initiate them.

Challenging the Utility-Only Narrative

The prevailing notion that older consumers prioritise practicality over pleasure is increasingly being challenged. Increasingly, older consumers are choosing experiences that deliver joy, autonomy, and a sense of identity—not just utility.

Seniors are drawn to luxury not for function alone, but for how it affirms identity. A 2025 study by Bargaoui found that older adults associate luxury consumption with emotional reward and self-worth—a signal that indulgence and aspiration are still core drivers well past middle age.

This shift in consumer behaviour necessitates a reevaluation of product positioning strategies. For instance, hearing aids are increasingly marketed not just as medical devices but as lifestyle enhancers that seamlessly integrate with other technologies. Apple’s approach to product design exemplifies this trend. Features like Voice Control and fall detection are incorporated into devices like the iPhone and Apple Watch, offering functionality that appeals to seniors without overtly targeting them as a separate demographic. 

The same logic applies outside of tech. In the UK, older travellers are fueling demand for immersive rail experiences built around comfort, not spectacle. In Southeast Asia, seniors are driving bookings at wellness retreats that blend self-care with cultural depth.​

Why the Marketing World Still Prioritises Youth

Despite the growing economic influence of older consumers, advertising strategies continue to disproportionately target younger demographics. This focus persists even as individuals aged 50 and above contribute significantly to consumer spending.​

In the United States, consumers over 50 account for more than half of all consumer spending. However, only 5–10% of marketing budgets are allocated to engage this demographic . This disparity is not limited to the U.S.; in the United Kingdom, over-50s represent a third of the population and hold 80% of the nation’s wealth, yet they remain largely invisible in advertising campaigns 

Several factors contribute to this imbalance. One is the composition of the advertising industry itself. According to Forbes, only 5% of ad agency employees are over 50, and most do not work in creative departments . This lack of age diversity within agencies can lead to a limited understanding of older consumers’ preferences and needs.

There remains a persistent stereotype that older consumers are less receptive to digital media. Yet data shows adults aged 55 and above now spend over half (54.4%) of their media time online—a shift that challenges the industry’s long-held assumptions.

Neglecting the older demographic not only overlooks a substantial market segment but also poses risks to brand relevance and loyalty. Competitors who recognise and address the needs of older consumers can capture market share and build lasting relationships. The influence of older consumers isn’t coming. It’s already reshaping how value is defined across categories—from beauty to tech to travel. Brands still tethered to a youth-first playbook aren’t just behind the trend—they’re blind to where the momentum has moved.

Meeting Older Consumers Where They Are

A handful of brands are beginning to adjust course—not by singling out older consumers with age-stamped campaigns, but by rethinking product design, messaging, and experience in ways that recognise the influence and expectations of this group.

L’Oréal has expanded its age-inclusive approach beyond token representation. In markets like the UK and Japan, it has invested in research and formulation targeting mature skin, while casting women over 60 in its mainstream campaigns—not in niche “silver” editions. What’s notable is the absence of the patronising tone that once marked age-focused advertising. The positioning is subtle: aspirational without being age-anxious, confident without being corrective.

In travel, companies like Viking and Belmond have seen a surge in demand from older travellers seeking richer, more immersive journeys over fast-paced itineraries. These brands have responded by retooling the product—not just offering mobility-friendly options, but reshaping the tone of travel itself. Longer stays, expert-led local immersion, and a focus on comfort over spectacle have proven to resonate. It’s not age that defines the appeal, but sensibility.

Tech companies have also begun to shift. Apple, as noted, integrates accessibility features across its product suite, yet never markets them explicitly as “senior” tools. Voice commands, larger interfaces, and health tracking appeal to all users, but are particularly beneficial for older ones. This universality is intentional—and effective. In 2023, adoption of the Apple Watch among consumers aged 60 and above increased by more than 25% year over year, according to Counterpoint Research.

In Southeast Asia, telcos and financial platforms are investing in UX overhauls aimed at improving digital fluency for older users. Singtel’s wellness and lifestyle offerings for seniors, for instance, go beyond low-cost data plans to include curated content, concierge services, and simple app layouts tailored to common needs. The pitch isn’t that seniors are less tech-savvy—it’s that good design should accommodate everyone.

These brands succeed not by targeting older consumers differently—but by removing age as a constraint. Their advantage lies in recognising behaviour, not categorising it.

For brands looking to operationalise these insights, the following cheat sheet outlines actionable ways to better engage senior consumers across touchpoints—from UX and messaging to service and product design.

How to Appeal to Senior Consumers

CategoryBest Practices
Customer Understanding– Maintain responsive phone support- Use empathetic, clear communication- Ensure continuity across channels (phone, in-store, digital)- Offer personalised follow-up (call, mail, or email)
UX & Product Design– Font size ≥ 14–16pt, high contrast text- Simple, intuitive navigation- Large touch zones (≥44x44px)- Screen reader–friendly code- Clear, concise copy without jargon- Progress indicators and confirmation messages- Design with accessibility (WCAG) in mind
Customer Service– Aspirational, not patronising- Purpose-led (quality, legacy, sustainability)- Emotionally intelligent (family, community, joy)
Marketing Channels– Email (well-targeted, not overwhelming)- Google Search (strong SEO and PPC)- Facebook (high usage globally among 60+)- YouTube (growing for how-tos, lifestyle)- Traditional media (TV, print) still valuable in key sectors
Messaging & Tone– Prioritise ergonomic, easy-to-use design- Offer modular or personalized options- Highlight safety, quality, and customer support- Allow for trials or no-commitment use (especially for tech or wellness)
– Feature active, diverse older adults—not stereotypes
Product & Service– Prioritise ergonomic, easy-to-use design- Offer modular or personalised options- Highlight safety, quality, and customer support- Allow for trials or no-commitment use (especially for tech or wellness)

Age Is No Longer a Signal of Decline—It’s a Forecast of Opportunity

For decades, brands have treated older consumers as the end point of a lifecycle—an audience to retain, not one to build around. That logic no longer holds. Seniors are not only outliving the systems built to serve them—they are outspending, outpacing, and, increasingly, out-influencing expectations.

They are the early adopters of wellness routines previously marketed to 30-somethings, the repeat buyers of luxury services, and the most consistent upgraders of home technology. Their behaviour is not defined by age, but by intent. And if there’s one insight brands should act on now, it’s this: longevity is no longer just a medical issue. It’s a commercial one.

Their economic power is growing, but their motivations remain misunderstood. Too often, research flattens them into averages, surveys them through outdated assumptions, and overlooks the complexity that defines their choices. This is not just a missed opportunity. It’s a strategic blind spot.

To lead in the decade ahead, brands need to stop asking how to market to older consumers and start asking what they are telling us through the choices they make. That shift—from messaging to meaning—is where research proves its value. Not in confirming what we think we know, but in uncovering the complexity we’ve long overlooked.

In a marketplace increasingly driven by flexibility, aspiration, and self-determination, it may be the oldest consumers who are best positioned to show us what the future looks like. But only if we ask better questions—and actually listen.

Looking to better understand the evolving expectations of senior consumers—or any audience segment reshaping your market? At Kadence International, we help brands uncover the insights that drive results. Through in-depth research across key global markets, we go beyond demographics to decode behaviours, motivations, and emerging opportunities. Let’s start working together today.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

British shoppers are entering a new era of grocery buying – less impulsive, more deliberate, and increasingly shaped by price. Grocery inflation rose to 3.5 percent in March, capping off two years of compounded cost pressure. Supermarket sales have softened, not because people are walking away, but because they’re buying fewer items and skipping anything that doesn’t feel essential.

Essentials are winning, volume is shrinking, and price has become the lead story. This shift isn’t just thrift – it’s agency. After months of rising bills and economic fatigue, shoppers are regaining a sense of control by editing their baskets. That often means skipping branded goods and sticking to private labels.

Discounters are reaping the gains. Aldi’s market share is up to 11 percent, and Lidl is outpacing rivals in sales growth. But this isn’t just about who’s winning – it’s about how. Shoppers aren’t compromising; they’re recalibrating. Value now means quality at the right price, not a badge name. What’s happening isn’t tactical – it’s behavioural.

What distinguishes this period from past inflation spikes is the speed and confidence of the switch. Brand loyalty, long considered a mainstay of British retail, is now a conditional contract. If a supermarket can’t justify its price point – through quality, loyalty perks, or convenience – shoppers will walk.

Retailers are moving fast to keep up: shrinking private-label ranges to what works, tuning promotions, and reframing value as a daily promise. On paper, it looks like a margin problem. In reality, it’s a permanent shift in how households define value – and there’s little reason to think it’ll snap back.

This isn’t a belt-tightening moment. It’s a consumer reorientation. People aren’t just buying less; they’re buying differently. And in doing so, they’re quietly forcing a reset in how the UK grocery industry defines, delivers, and earns loyalty.

submit-a-market-research-brief

Inflation at the Checkout: What’s Really Driving the Shift? 

Walk through any UK supermarket right now, and the change isn’t just in the receipt – it’s in the way people are shopping. Labels are read more slowly. Own-brand products are picked up, put back, then chosen again. Familiar items suddenly feel like indulgences.

What’s happening at the checkout isn’t just about price increases. It’s a psychological shift. Shoppers aren’t just spending less – they’re thinking differently. The same budget now feels tighter, not only because of higher prices but because of how those prices are being perceived.

Anchoring is one reason. Consumers aren’t comparing this week’s price to last week’s – they’re comparing it to what they used to pay before “everything got expensive.” That reference point, even if outdated, sticks. When a block of cheese crosses the £3 mark, it doesn’t matter if it’s only a 5p rise – it’s crossed an invisible line. And that line reshapes everything around it.

Mental accounting adds another layer. People are rebalancing invisible budgets in their heads. Spend £2 more on milk, and that £2 has to come from somewhere else. They’re not just making trade-offs – they’re making calculations. Essentials stay, extras go, and even mid-tier items are under scrutiny if there’s a cheaper equivalent close by.

Then there’s price perception. It’s not what something costs – it’s what it feels like it should cost. That’s why a 10% rise might barely dent volume in one category but trigger a collapse in another. It’s not rational, but it’s real – and it’s guiding what goes in the basket.

For retailers and brands, this moment demands more than sharper pricing. It requires fluency in how shoppers frame value. That might mean pricing just below emotional thresholds or structuring offers that signal stability – even when costs are climbing. In this climate, perception can be as powerful as reality.

What does inflation feel like in real terms? The chart below shows just how much everyday items have risen since 2020.

How-inflation-has-impacted-the-everyday-basket-in-the-UK

Brand Erosion in the Era of the Basket Reboot

Brand loyalty isn’t dead – but it’s under review. Across the UK, what once felt automatic is now under scrutiny. Shoppers are looking at familiar labels, hesitating, and reaching for something cheaper – often store-brand, often good enough.

It’s not just trading down. It’s trading out. The basket reset happening now is exposing which brands still hold meaning and which were riding on habit. In categories like cereal, canned goods, and pasta sauces, private label has moved from backup plan to first choice. When shoppers feel squeezed, brand preference isn’t about awareness – it’s about justification.

The most vulnerable brands are the ones that rely on shelf presence and recognition without clearly articulating why they cost more. A fancy label or nostalgic logo doesn’t hold up when the price delta is visible, and the value isn’t. Own-label is no longer the compromise – it’s the baseline.

Supermarkets know this. That’s why they’ve built out three-tiered private label strategies: essential ranges for price-sensitive shoppers, core lines that match national brands on quality, and premium sub-brands designed to compete with legacy products on both taste and packaging. In many cases, they’re winning on all three fronts.

Branded suppliers are feeling the squeeze. Promotions are being pulled. Negotiations are tighter. Some products are being delisted entirely as retailers prioritise margin and private-label growth. Even in higher-margin categories like snacks and beverages, shoppers are experimenting more – and defaulting less.

This moment demands more than marketing. It demands a proposition that holds up under pressure. Brands that offer clear functional benefits – whether that’s health, sustainability, or convenience – still earn a place. But those that relied on emotional inertia are being quietly swapped out, one basket at a time.

The question for consumer goods companies isn’t just how to defend share. It’s how to rebuild relevance. Because if shoppers are open to changing their habits, they’re also open to forgetting the brands that no longer reflect how they want to spend.

Also, read our study on the UK’s Cost of Living Crisis here.

The New Class of Smart Shoppers

Frugality has rebranded itself – and fast. What used to be framed as a necessity or even a source of quiet shame has become a signal of control, intention, and in many cases, pride. The UK’s cost-of-living pressures have given rise to a new kind of grocery shopper: not just cost-conscious, but value-literate.

This isn’t driven solely by economics. It’s cultural. Discount shopping has moved out of the shadows and into the spotlight. TikTok is full of haul videos not from high-end retailers, but from Aldi and Lidl – highlighting bulk buys, dupes, and smart swaps. The tone isn’t apologetic. It’s instructional. Look what I saved. Look how much farther I stretched my budget. There’s a certain confidence in the captions: “You’d be mad to pay more.”

Digital tools have amplified the shift. Couponing, once a paper-based pursuit of extreme savers, has gone mobile and mainstream. Apps like Too Good To Go and supermarket loyalty platforms now offer real-time deals that reward flexibility, not just spending. Younger shoppers – especially millennials with families and Gen Z renters – are building grocery strategies around digital offers and flash pricing. Price matching isn’t a race to the bottom; it’s a form of skill.

What’s changed is the identity that surrounds all this. Saving money used to imply you didn’t have it. Now, it implies you’re informed. Especially among middle-income shoppers, there’s been a quiet erosion of stigma. Being a “deal hunter” no longer contradicts being design-conscious or health-focused. You can buy the store-brand canned tomatoes and still splurge on artisanal olive oil. You can track every penny and still care about the story behind your coffee.

This hybrid mindset – blending thrift and selectivity – is what many legacy brands are still struggling to read. Their customers didn’t disappear. They just rewrote the rules of what makes a product worth paying for.

It’s no longer enough to assume aspiration equals premium. In this landscape, brands have to justify every line of the receipt. They need to speak the language of value – but not just through lower prices. It’s about usefulness, quality, longevity, and emotional return on spend.

Smart shoppers aren’t waiting for brands to get it. They’re building baskets that reflect who they are now – pragmatic, digitally fluent, and empowered by information, not overwhelmed by it. The question isn’t whether this shift will last. It’s whether brands can keep up with customers who’ve stopped equating value with volume – and started defining it for themselves.

Retailers Rewrite the Rules

Retailers have stopped waiting for shoppers to come back to old habits. Instead, they’re adapting to new ones – fast. The traditional promotional cycle, once built around limited-time offers and seasonal spikes, has been replaced by something more fundamental: proving long-term value in real-time.

That shift is showing up everywhere. Tesco’s Clubcard Prices and Sainsbury’s Nectar Prices have moved from reward mechanics to central pricing strategies. What began as a loyalty tactic is now a core part of how these retailers compete with discounters. And it’s not just about price. It’s about visibility. Price tags on shelves now tell a story of what the customer is saving, not just spending.

Even premium grocers are adjusting. Waitrose, long associated with quality-first positioning, has expanded its Essentials range and emphasised value messaging in advertising. Its recent campaigns have spotlighted affordability without abandoning tone, suggesting that smart shopping doesn’t have to mean compromise.

But nowhere is the shift more aggressive than in private label. Across the sector, own-brand lines have become the innovation lab. Aldi and Lidl continue to lead, not just with price, but with product development that mirrors – and sometimes beats – national brands. The battleground isn’t just about matching flavor or format anymore. It’s about convenience, sustainability, and shopper emotion. A well-packaged ready meal that costs less and feels like a small win at the end of a long day? That’s more powerful than a deep discount.

Retailers are also experimenting with format. Smaller footprint stores are popping up in urban areas, designed around the grab-and-go shopper who wants efficiency, not abundance. Meal deals, shoppable recipes, “value hacks” – all of it engineered to speak the new shopper’s language: stretch, save, simplify.

Marketing has evolved in step. Circulars and point-of-sale have been replaced by in-app push notifications, hyper-local personalisation, and digital shelves that highlight time-sensitive offers. Messaging is less about indulgence and more about empowerment. You’re not just saving money; you’re being smart. You’re beating the system.

The result is a retail environment where success no longer comes from a breadth of range or deepest pockets. It comes from relevance – knowing who your customer is today, what trade-offs they’re willing to make, and how to meet them with the right balance of function, emotion, and frictionless value.

grocery-shopper-persona-types

Case Study: How Aldi Became the Benchmark for Value With Purpose

Aldi’s rise in the UK has long been tied to price, but its current momentum speaks to something deeper: cultural relevance. While many retailers are reacting to consumer caution, Aldi has anticipated it – shaping not just how people shop but also how they think about spending.

Its private label dominance is no longer just about cost-cutting. Aldi has invested heavily in product development and packaging design that challenges branded equivalents, often earning accolades in blind taste tests. Shoppers aren’t settling – they’re discovering. Categories like wine, ready meals, and snacks now generate loyalty not as substitutes, but as preferred choices.

Where Aldi’s strategy truly stands out is in how it aligns with emerging shopper identity. The brand doesn’t apologise for low prices. It builds pride around them. Recent campaigns have leaned into humor and confidence, casting Aldi customers as smart, in-the-know shoppers rather than bargain hunters. The brand’s “Like Brands. Only Cheaper.” messaging isn’t defensive – it’s disruptive.

In-store, Aldi’s stripped-back format reinforces that every inch of shelf space must earn its keep. The tight range, fast checkout model, and curated promotions reflect a retailer that understands time, budget, and simplicity as core values – not just marketing points.

Aldi isn’t winning by chasing premium. It’s winning by reshaping what premium means in the mind of today’s value-driven consumer.

What Comes Next for Grocery, Brand Building, and British Retail

This isn’t just a cycle – it’s a structural shift. The current realignment in UK grocery is forcing a deeper redefinition of how brands are built, how value is communicated, and what kind of loyalty can actually be sustained in a low-growth, high-scrutiny environment.

The old model – premium equals quality, discount equals compromise – has fractured. What’s rising in its place is a hybrid mindset: shoppers who blend store brands and branded goods, who track savings as a personal KPI, and who want clarity in place of clutter. For brands and retailers, the challenge is no longer just about margin. It’s about meaning.

Products will still matter – but the story around them matters more. Why this? Why now? Why at this price? The brands that survive won’t just be better stocked or better known – they’ll be better understood. That means strategy rooted in real consumer behaviour, not assumptions. It means investing in insight before investing in shelf space.

We’ve entered an era where margins are thinner, decisions faster, and the consumer’s tolerance for noise almost nonexistent. The winners will be those who can decode the mindset behind the spend – what drives trust, what cues value, what kills interest – and adapt before the data shows up in declining sales.

For British retail, this could be a renaissance moment. But it will favor the precise, not the broad. Those who treat their audience as a living, evolving signal – not a static segment – those who invest in listening as much as launching.

Because the real growth ahead won’t come from pushing more into baskets. It will come from knowing what truly earns a place there.

A Market Redefined by Value Will Reshape the Industry

What’s happening in UK grocery right now isn’t a blip. It’s a reset. A recalibration of trust, relevance, and what constitutes a purchase worth making.

For brands, the margin for error has collapsed. Shoppers are not just selective – they’re strategic. They aren’t waiting to be impressed. They’re asking harder questions: Is this worth it? Is this credible? Does it deliver more than just a label?

Retailers that respond with nuance – not just price cuts – are the ones shaping the future. The discounter isn’t the disruptor anymore; it’s the new center of gravity. Traditional grocers that once competed on scale or loyalty must now compete on understanding. That means fewer assumptions, more clarity, and a sharper grasp on how value is perceived – not just priced.

Consumer behaviour isn’t snapping back. Once a shopper has built a new mental model of spending – one grounded in empowerment, not deprivation – it tends to stick. The post-abundance era doesn’t signal a withdrawal from consumption. It signals a new consciousness around it.

Over the next five years, British retail will be defined not by who shouts the loudest but by who listens best. That requires precision, pattern recognition, and real, ongoing intelligence on the evolving expectations of the people pushing the trolleys.

Smart brands won’t just ride this out. They’ll use it to rebuild better – on foundations that reflect today’s shopper, not yesterday’s playbook.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The Philippine gambling industry operates within a structured but complex regulatory framework, with multiple entities overseeing different aspects of gaming. While legal, state-regulated gambling platforms thrive, underground gambling networks continue to exist, shaping the broader betting environment. Understanding these structures is essential to navigating the evolving landscape of both traditional and online betting.

PAGCOR Regulates Casinos and Online Betting

The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) is the chief regulatory body overseeing casinos, integrated resorts, and online gaming platforms. As a state-run corporation, PAGCOR plays a dual role – it licenses gaming establishments and operates its gaming businesses, contributing a significant portion of revenue to national development projects.

  • PAGCOR is responsible for issuing land-based and online gambling operators’ licenses and enforcing compliance with national gaming laws.
  • The agency has ramped up efforts to crack down on illegal online gambling platforms, which continue to attract unregulated activity.
  • PAGCOR generates revenue for education, healthcare, and infrastructure development, reinforcing its economic importance.

However, while PAGCOR controls regulated online betting platforms, it does not oversee all gambling activities in the Philippines.

PCSO Oversees State-Sanctioned Lotteries and Sweepstakes

Separate from PAGCOR, the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) manages lotteries, sweepstakes, and Small Town Lottery (STL) operations. Unlike casinos and online betting, which fall under PAGCOR’s jurisdiction, PCSO exclusively handles lottery-based gambling.

  • PCSO operates Lotto, STL, Keno, and scratch-card games, which are widely played nationwide.
  • Some of PCSO’s revenue funds public health programs, medical assistance, and disaster relief efforts.
  • Many Filipino bettors prefer PCSO-backed games because they are backed by the government, have regulatory oversight, and contribute to social welfare.

PCSO’s focus on lottery and sweepstakes means it does not oversee or profit from the growing digital betting industry, which falls under PAGCOR’s jurisdiction.

Illegal Gambling Remains a Shadow Market

Despite government oversight, unregulated gambling activities remain deeply ingrained in certain regions, particularly in lower-income and rural communities. Underground betting networks, such as Jueteng, Masiao, and Sakla, continue to attract players who prefer informal wagering over state-sanctioned alternatives.

  • Jueteng, an illegal numbers game, is widespread and operates outside government control.
  • Masiao, another underground lottery, thrives in Visayas and Mindanao.
  • Sakla, a card-based gambling game, is frequently played at wakes and community gatherings despite legal restrictions.

These informal games persist due to the following:

  • Accessibility in rural areas where formal gambling establishments are scarce.
  • Perceived fairness due to community-driven prize distribution.
  • A reliance on cash-based transactions, avoiding the digital footprint required by legal betting platforms.

How This Framework Shapes Gambling Preferences

The interplay between regulated gambling, state lotteries, and illegal gaming influences how and where Filipinos place their bets.

  • Traditional gamblers prefer PCSO-regulated games due to their legitimacy and social impact.
  • Skepticism toward online gambling is fueled by concerns over fraud, scams, and lack of oversight.
  • The rise of e-wallets is driving gambling toward cashless transactions, but many lower-income players still rely on informal, cash-based betting.

For brands, gaming operators, and financial service providers, navigating this landscape requires balancing digital innovation with credibility. Establishing transparency, security, and regulatory compliance will be critical in shaping the future of gambling in the Philippines.

A High-Stakes Shift in Filipino Gambling Habits

Gambling in the Philippines has moved beyond casinos and betting halls. Mobile platforms and digital payments have broadened access, attracting a diverse range of players across ages and income levels. Yet, despite the digital surge, traditional gambling remains deeply woven into the routines of Filipino bettors.

Who Are the Players?

Gambling in the Philippines is still largely male-dominated, with nearly two-thirds of bettors being men. Yet, participation cuts across generations – from young adults to seniors – highlighting its dual role as a form of entertainment and a potential financial opportunity.

A striking finding from our study is the high participation of non-earning individuals – homemakers and the unemployed make up 18% of gamblers. For many, gambling isn’t just a pastime; it’s seen as a potential source of income despite the inherent risks.

More than half of Filipino gamblers come from lower-income households, earning between PHP 9,000 and PHP 18,200 a month. This underscores how gambling is often fueled by economic aspirations, with many hoping for a financial windfall.

What Drives Filipinos to Gamble

drivers-of-gambling-in-the-Philippines

The motivations behind gambling in the Philippines extend beyond entertainment. For many players, betting represents a chance to win big, a way to engage socially, or even a financial strategy during economic uncertainty. Understanding these motivations is critical for brands, gaming operators, and financial service providers looking to navigate shifting consumer betting behaviors.

Winning Is the Primary Driver

Across traditional and online gambling, the biggest motivator for Filipino players is the prospect of high rewards. The possibility of achieving financial gain is the primary motivator for gambling, especially among those with lower incomes, for whom a single win could be life-changing. While entertainment is still a factor, it is secondary to the allure of potential wealth.

Dual Players Show a Clear Preference for Online Betting

Among those who engage in both traditional and online gambling, our findings reveal a clear inclination toward digital platforms. 65% of dual players prefer online games over their traditional counterparts. The reasons behind this shift point to the strengths of digital gambling.

Online-betting-stats-in-the-philippines

However, the remaining 35% of dual players still prefer traditional gambling, citing factors such as trust and reliability, competitiveness and cost considerations.

Preference-for-traditional-gambling-stats-in-the-Philippines

The Expanding Digital Divide in Gambling

Despite the surge in digital gambling, a clear divide remains. Younger players and those in Metro Manila are drawn to online betting, while rural and older gamblers stick with traditional formats, reflecting deep-rooted habits and varying levels of digital access.

Trust and accessibility shape where Filipinos place their bets. While online gambling offers convenience, many remain wary of digital platforms due to concerns about transparency and fraud. This skepticism drives players toward government-backed PCSO games, which are seen as more reliable and secure.

What This Means for Brands and the Gambling Industry

Gambling in the Philippines is a blend of tradition and transformation. Digital platforms are on the rise, but they haven’t replaced traditional gambling. Instead, both coexist, appealing to different audiences shaped by factors like access, trust, and personal motivations.

This shift brings both challenges and opportunities for gaming operators and financial service providers. The rise of digital platforms and e-wallets points to a growing cashless gambling economy. Yet traditional gaming’s resilience underscores the need for hybrid strategies that serve both digital-savvy players and those loyal to legacy systems.

Traditional and Online Gambling Compete for Player Loyalty

The Philippine gambling industry is evolving, but the digital shift isn’t absolute. Online betting is gaining ground, yet traditional gambling holds strong, especially among rural and lower-income players. The dynamic market, with both formats thriving on distinct motivations and behaviors.

The Enduring Appeal of Traditional Gambling

Traditional games still dominate among Filipino bettors, with 8 in 10 preferring them over online options. This strong loyalty reflects deep-rooted trust in familiar betting practices. In-person gambling is especially popular among older players, those in rural areas, and individuals at both ends of the income spectrum.

Several factors contribute to this continued reliance on traditional gaming:

  • Trust and Credibility: Many players feel more confident betting through PCSO-regulated games, which they perceive as having higher transparency and legitimacy.
  • Limited Digital Access: Some bettors lack reliable internet connections, making physical betting outlets more accessible.
  • Avoidance of Digital Risks: Concerns about scams and fraudulent online betting platforms keep some players loyal to traditional gambling.

These insights suggest that traditional gaming remains a cornerstone of the gambling industry, not just for legacy players but for those who prioritise trust and accessibility over convenience.

Online Gambling Is Growing, but Old Fears Linger

The growth of online gambling in the Philippines is undeniable, with digital platforms offering ease of access and round-the-clock availability. Our study found that 85% of online gamblers own smartphones, reflecting the strong link between mobile penetration and digital betting.

But despite its rapid growth, online betting hasn’t overtaken traditional formats, largely due to lingering concerns about trust and reliability.

Many traditional bettors remain skeptical, citing:

  • Unregulated platforms with questionable security and fairness.
  • Unreliable internet access that can interrupt gameplay.
  • Lack of personal interaction, a key part of the gambling experience for some.

Still, for younger and Metro Manila-based bettors, the convenience of digital betting outweighs these concerns. The ability to place bets anytime, anywhere, and check results instantly via mobile apps has become a compelling factor in online gambling’s growth.

What This Means for the Industry

The battle between traditional and online gambling is not a case of one format overtaking the other but rather an industry adapting to diverse consumer needs. While online gambling offers accessibility and ease of use, traditional betting maintains a stronghold among players who prioritise trust, regulation, and in-person transactions.

This means balancing innovation with credibility for brands, gaming platforms, and financial service providers. The path forward involves:

  • Strengthening consumer trust in digital betting platforms through transparency, regulation, and fraud prevention measures.
  • Enhancing accessibility for rural players by integrating hybrid betting solutions that combine digital convenience with physical cash-in points.
  • Leveraging mobile technology to attract younger bettors while ensuring safe, fair, and responsible gambling practices.

Understanding player motivations and addressing concerns will determine the trajectory of gambling in the Philippines.

The Role of Financial Constraints and Perceived Value

Interestingly, financial constraints play a different role depending on the format. While some gamblers are drawn to online betting for its lower-cost entry points and flexible wagering, others see traditional gambling as a more secure and controlled way to bet.

  • Online bettors appreciate the ability to wager small amounts frequently.
  • Traditional gamblers, particularly those in lower-income brackets, may view larger, less frequent bets as a more strategic approach.

This distinction reinforces the idea that the gambling industry in the Philippines is not a one-size-fits-all market. Instead, players’ financial situations, risk tolerance, and perceptions of fairness all shape how and where they choose to gamble.

What This Means for Brands and Operators

For gaming companies, fintech firms, and policymakers, understanding what drives gamblers is key to creating responsible, engaging experiences. Our data points to clear opportunities:

  • Boost engagement by highlighting jackpot prizes and adding gamification features to online platforms.
  • Build trust through stronger transparency, security measures, and regulatory oversight to ease skepticism among traditional bettors.
  • Promote responsible gaming with solutions that reflect players’ financial realities, ensuring gambling stays entertainment – not a financial risk.

While the Philippine gambling market evolves, player motivations remain constant: the pursuit of rewards, the need for trust, and easy access. The brands that balance these factors will shape the industry’s future.

Why Online Gambling’s Boom Faces a Trust Hurdle

Online gambling is booming in the Philippines, but trust remains a major roadblock. Mobile-first platforms, e-wallets, and instant access have fueled its growth, yet concerns about fraud, transparency, and weak regulation continue to shape player behavior. For many, loyalty depends not just on convenience but on feeling secure.

From Occasional to Everyday

Online gambling has shifted from a casual pastime to a daily habit for many Filipinos:

  • In 2022, 29% of players gambled online daily, averaging three sessions per week.
  • By 2023, that number jumped to 39%, with players betting four times a week on average.

This surge reflects the ease of mobile betting and the appeal of quick, cashless transactions. The ability to place bets anytime, anywhere has made online gambling the go-to choice for a growing audience.

Top Online Games and Betting Platforms Are Gaining Traction

As online gambling gains momentum, specific games and platforms have emerged as clear favorites.

Top-online-games-and-betting-platforms-in-The-Philippines

The dominance of e-wallet-powered platforms highlights a critical industry trend: cashless gambling is becoming the norm. With e-wallets enabling seamless deposits and withdrawals, players are gravitating toward platforms that offer frictionless transactions.

Trust Issues Are Slowing Online Adoption

Despite the convenience of online betting, skepticism remains a major hurdle. Our study found that:

  • 27% of traditional gamblers choose to avoid online betting because they do not trust digital platforms.
  • Concerns about scams, unreliable payouts, and unregulated operators are common deterrents.
  • Lack of internet access remains a barrier for 14% of players, preventing them from fully transitioning to digital platforms.

For many, the reliability of PCSO-backed traditional games outweighs the accessibility of online gambling. This signals a need for stronger industry regulation, clearer consumer protections, and better fraud prevention measures to build confidence in digital betting platforms.

What This Means for the Industry

The expansion of online gambling in the Philippines hinges on trust, security, and seamless user experience. While mobile-first gaming is gaining popularity, its long-term success will depend on how well operators address consumer concerns.

To sustain growth, industry players must:

  • Strengthen regulatory frameworks to increase transparency and consumer confidence.
  • Implement advanced fraud detection and security measures to protect players from scams.
  • Leverage fintech partnerships to enhance the credibility of digital betting transactions.
  • Improve digital accessibility to ensure all players, regardless of location or financial status, can participate safely.

The future of online gambling in the Philippines will not be determined solely by convenience. Building player trust will be the defining factor in whether digital betting platforms can truly dominate the market.

types-of-financial-services-buyers

E-Wallets Are Powering the Future of Gambling in the Philippines

The rise of online gambling in the Philippines is closely tied to the rapid adoption of e-wallets, which have become the dominant payment method for digital betting. With seamless deposits, withdrawals, and integration into popular gaming platforms, e-wallets are not just facilitating transactions—they are reshaping how players engage with gambling.

E-Wallets Dominate Online Gambling Transactions

Our study reveals e-wallets have emerged as the preferred payment method for online bettors in the Philippines. Among the most widely used digital wallets in gambling transactions are:

  • GCash (GLife, GGames)
  • Maya
  • Shopee Pay

These platforms have transformed how players fund their accounts, eliminating the need for physical cash transactions and providing faster, more secure payment options.

How Players Fund Their Gambling Accounts

Despite the shift to digital transactions, cash remains a key entry point into the online gambling ecosystem. Players frequently cash in their e-wallets through physical retail locations, including:

  • Sari-sari stores that act as informal cash-in hubs.
  • Convenience stores where players load funds onto their digital wallets.
  • Cash-in machines that allow seamless top-ups.
  • Bank transfers for those with formal banking access.

This highlights an important industry dynamic – while gambling is moving online, cash remains an essential part of the ecosystem, particularly in rural areas.

The Link Between Financial Inclusion and Gambling Growth

The success of e-wallets in the gambling industry reflects a broader trend: the growing reliance on fintech solutions among Filipinos. As cashless payments gain traction across retail, transport, and remittances, digital betting platforms benefit from increased trust in mobile transactions.

However, financial inclusion gaps remain a challenge. While many players can access e-wallets, not all can link them to traditional banking services. This explains why alternative cash-in methods like sari-sari stores thrive alongside digital payment solutions.

What This Means for the Industry

The widespread adoption of e-wallets in online gambling presents both opportunities and challenges for industry players:

  • For gaming platforms: Streamlining e-wallet integration will be critical in capturing the growing digital-first gambling market.
  • For fintech companies: The demand for secure, seamless gambling transactions presents an opportunity for product expansion.
  • For policymakers: Striking a balance between financial inclusion and responsible gambling will be key in shaping regulatory frameworks.

The Philippine gambling industry is not just moving online- it is going cashless. As e-wallets become the backbone of digital betting, the ability to build trust, ensure security, and provide seamless user experiences will define the next phase of industry growth.

The Future of Gambling in the Philippines Will Be Shaped by Trust and Innovation

The Philippine gambling industry is driven by digital transformation, shifting player behaviors, and the rise of cashless transactions. While online gambling is expanding, traditional formats remain deeply embedded, particularly among players who prioritise trust and regulatory oversight. The industry’s challenge is not just to grow digital adoption but also to address the concerns of players who remain hesitant about fully transitioning to online platforms.

Key Trends That Will Define the Industry’s Next Phase

Several key trends will shape the future of gambling in the Philippines:

  • Hybrid Gambling Models Will Gain Traction
    • While online betting is growing, traditional gambling remains resilient. Future growth will likely blend both formats, offering digital solutions that integrate with physical betting locations.
    • E-wallet cash-ins through sari-sari stores and convenience shops illustrate how offline and online gambling ecosystems are merging.
  • Regulation Will Become a Decisive Factor in Online Gambling’s Growth
    • Trust remains a significant barrier for players hesitant to gamble online. Concerns over fraud, unreliable payouts, and scams continue to slow full digital adoption.
    • Stronger government oversight and regulation will be necessary to ensure a fair, secure, and transparent betting environment.
  • E-Wallets Will Dominate, but Cash Remains Relevant
    • The widespread adoption of GCash, Maya, and Shopee Pay in online gambling suggests that cashless transactions will define the industry’s future.
    • However, for many lower-income and rural players, cash remains a critical entry point, reinforcing the need for financial inclusion in digital gambling.
  • Younger and Urban Gamblers Will Continue to Drive Online Betting
    • Metro Manila and younger players are the primary adopters of online gambling, while rural and older bettors still favor traditional formats.
    • The industry’s ability to bridge this gap will determine the speed at which digital gambling replaces—or coexists with—traditional betting.

Balancing Growth With Consumer Protection

Gambling in the Philippines will not be defined solely by technological advancements but by how well the industry builds player trust. While fintech innovations and mobile accessibility drive adoption, addressing concerns around fair play, fraud prevention, and responsible gambling will be critical to long-term success.

For gaming operators, financial service providers, and regulators, the focus must be on:

  • Ensuring transparency and security in digital betting platforms.
  • Creating a seamless bridge between traditional and online gambling.
  • Developing consumer protection policies that balance growth with responsible gaming.

Today’s decisions will shape whether digital betting truly takes over or remains a complement to legacy formats. The key to success will lie in offering players a seamless, secure, and rewarding experience wherever and however they choose to place their bets.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

I live in Tornado Alley, which means a roof isn’t just a roof – it’s armour. So when I found out mine needed replacing, I didn’t hesitate. I reviewed quotes, selected a company, signed the contract. All the hard stuff, I thought, was behind me.

Then came the question: what colour?

It felt like it should’ve been easy. But standing in my driveway, staring up at the expanse of shingles-to-be, I froze. It’s a massive, permanent decision – visible from every angle, exposed to the sky, the neighbours, and every passing storm chaser. Would black make the house too hot? Would brown make it look dated? Would grey clash with the brick?

Naturally, I turned to ChatGPT. I uploaded a photo of my home, asked for help, and was met with an avalanche of color-coded logic – slate complements red brick, brown warms the palette, weathered wood is a “classic choice.” The suggestions were smart, thoughtful… and somehow made things worse. I now had more choices, just better argued.

So I went to the manufacturer’s website and used their simulation tool, dropping different shingle colours onto a photo of my house. It helped, in theory. But once I narrowed it down to three, they all started to blur. On screen, they looked practically the same. That’s when my roofing company stepped in. They brought physical samples, laid them out in the sunlight, and – most importantly – showed me actual homes nearby with each of the colours installed. Only then, after all the tech, the swatches, and the analysis, could I make a choice I felt confident in.

This wasn’t indecision. It was decision friction. And it’s the kind of friction that brands, in their pursuit of offering more, often overlook.

The Psychology of Too Much Choice

We tend to think more choice equals more freedom. But in reality, more choice often creates more anxiety. Psychologist Barry Schwartz coined this dynamic the Paradox of Choice – the idea that while some choice is good, too much can lead to decision paralysis, increased regret, and less satisfaction overall.

This is especially true when the decision feels high-stakes. Choosing a roof colour isn’t just cosmetic – it’s a long-term investment, highly visible, and not easily reversed. When the pressure is on, our brain doesn’t appreciate abundance. It defaults to avoidance.

In one of the most cited studies in consumer psychology, Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper set up a jam sampling table in a grocery store. Shoppers were either offered six flavours or twenty-four. The larger display drew more interest – but those offered just six choices were ten times more likely to make a purchase. The takeaway? More options may attract attention, but fewer options drive action.

What’s happening under the surface is cognitive overload. Our working memory – responsible for weighing pros and cons – gets saturated quickly. With each new variable, our mental model has to recalculate. At a certain point, the decision becomes so mentally taxing that it feels easier to defer it, abandon it, or outsource it entirely. That’s not a lack of willpower. That’s the brain protecting itself from burnout.

When brands ignore this psychological friction, they unknowingly increase the likelihood of customer hesitation, second-guessing, or worse – inaction. Because when everything looks like a good option, nothing feels like the right one.

Why Some Decisions Deserve More Support

Marketers often treat decisions like they exist on a flat playing field. But in reality, choice sits on a hierarchy, and the higher up you go, the more psychological support people need.

Low-stakes decisions, such as choosing a gum flavour or a side dish, rarely cause friction. They’re inexpensive, reversible, and carry minimal consequences. High-stakes choices, on the other hand, are more complex, costly, and deeply personal. Whether it’s selecting a mortgage provider, a wedding dress, or a new roof, the risk of regret weighs heavier.

That’s when the brain switches gears. We move from intuition to analysis, and if overloaded, to avoidance. Behavioural economists refer to this as the decision fatigue curve. As the number of variables and the stakes increase, so does cognitive load. That’s why people delay home renovations or abandon full carts at checkout. It isn’t laziness – it’s self-preservation.

This is where tiered choice architecture can help. Instead of dumping every possibility on the table, brands can scaffold decisions. For example, a meal kit service might start by asking about dietary needs, then cooking skill, then taste preferences – delivering a filtered set of meals instead of all 200 at once. The consumer still feels in control, but the decision feels digestible.

Think of it like an elevator. Not every customer is heading to the top floor. Some want a shortcut to level two, others want to explore every stop. But without floors, stairs, or signage, everyone just stands around in the lobby – unsure of where to go next.

Smart brands design choice structures based on where decisions fall in the hierarchy and how much friction they carry. It’s not a nice-to-have – it’s essential.

Why Smart Tools Sometimes Backfire

Even when tools are meant to help, they can still make it worse. AI-generated recommendations, product filters, simulations – these were designed to ease decision-making. But when they simply layer on new variables without eliminating others, they amplify the problem.

In my case, ChatGPT gave me additional, well-reasoned colour suggestions. The roofing brand’s simulator let me “see” each option on my house. But with every added perspective, I became more uncertain – not less. What I needed wasn’t more input. I needed a system that filtered, narrowed, and helped me move forward confidently.

That’s the trap brands fall into. They assume the answer to choice anxiety is better information. But the real solution is constraint.

People don’t want endless options. They want a sense that they’re on the right path. And while visual tools are helpful, they rarely match the nuance of real-world conditions – light changes, neighborhood aesthetics, material textures. That’s why physical samples and in-person examples were what ultimately helped me decide. Not because they offered more data, but because they reduced ambiguity.

Even the smartest tools can fail if they don’t acknowledge the emotional weight of uncertainty. Help should feel like progress, not pressure.

The Business Case for Simplifying Choice

It’s one thing to talk about the theory of too much choice. It’s another to see what happens when companies actually do something about it.

Procter & Gamble once sold 26 different versions of Head & Shoulders shampoo. From dandruff control to citrus burst, there was something for every scalp scenario. But instead of boosting sales, the abundance of options led to customer hesitation – and stagnant shelves. When P&G reduced the number of variants from 26 to 15, something surprising happened: sales went up.

Why? Because fewer choices didn’t mean less relevance. It meant less confusion.

This pattern repeats across industries. GAP, for example, simplified its denim wall – once packed with indistinguishable fits – and saw shoppers choose faster and with more certainty. In tech, Apple’s limited product lines stand in stark contrast to Android’s sprawling menus. Apple doesn’t overwhelm with options. It offers what’s needed – and nothing more.

Even in the world of digital entertainment, Netflix has tested ways to surface fewer titles on screen to reduce decision paralysis and increase view time. Endless scroll may seem like engagement, but often it’s just a user trapped in the loop of not knowing what to pick.

These companies realised that offering fewer, better-differentiated choices creates momentum. It respects the consumer’s time, reduces cognitive strain, and makes the path to “yes” feel like a confident step – not a leap of faith.

In a world that equates abundance with value, restraint has become a competitive advantage.

What Brands Should Learn

When consumers are overwhelmed, they don’t want more options – they want clarity. The role of the brand is no longer just to offer a catalogue of possibilities, but to actively guide people through a decision journey that feels considered, contextual, and reassuring.

Start with curated collections. Rather than overwhelming customers with endless variants, group products into purposeful sets: “best for small spaces,” “most popular among professionals,” “ideal for warm climates.” Curation is not restriction – it’s a form of empathy.

Next, invest in personalised guidance. This could be as simple as a quiz that identifies key needs and filters options, or as advanced as AI-driven suggestions based on behavioural patterns. But the goal is the same: to remove irrelevant options, not add to the noise.

Then there’s context. Il Makiage, for example, doesn’t just match foundation shades – they show how those shades look on real people, under real conditions. They reinforce your selection with testimonials and visual proof, not just swatches on a screen.

Brands should also think about post-purchase validation. The moment after a decision is made is just as critical as the moment before. Thoughtful follow-up emails, affirming language, tips for first-time use – these reassure the customer they made a smart call.

Ultimately, this is about choice architecture. The brands that win don’t just give people more to choose from. They design the experience around how people actually make choices – emotionally, socially, and cognitively.

The Role of Research in Reducing Friction

Understanding decision friction isn’t guesswork – it’s measurable. According to a Baymard Institute study, nearly 70% of online shopping carts are abandoned – and one of the top reasons is a complicated decision process. This is where market research proves invaluable.

At its core, decision friction stems from uncertainty. But the source of that uncertainty – whether it’s lack of clarity, hesitation, or unspoken objections – differs by category, audience, and context. Research identifies these hidden blocks.

Qualitative studies reveal how consumers feel in the moment of indecision. Quantitative methods like conjoint analysis or maxdiff help identify which features drive real value. Segmentation shows how different customer types make decisions – some need freedom, others need a path.

Research also plays a critical role in post-choice validation – what gives people confidence after they say yes. The right message, email, or proof point can turn relief into brand trust.

If friction is the obstacle, research is the flashlight.

UX Doesn’t Stand for Unlimited Experience

In digital environments, more space doesn’t automatically mean more freedom. It often means more friction. In user experience (UX) design, subtraction – not expansion – is often the most powerful conversion tool.

Booking.com once overloaded its interface with filters, price badges, and urgency cues. But A/B testing revealed that simplifying the layout led to higher engagement. Shopify restructured its onboarding to guide users through sequential tasks rather than overwhelming dashboards. Completion rates rose.

Even streaming platforms like Disney+ and Netflix have learned to surface fewer but more relevant titles. Endless choice wasn’t delight – it was paralysis.

This is called cognitive offloading – helping users conserve mental energy by removing unnecessary decisions.

UX design, at its best, doesn’t just look good. It helps people move forward.

Final Thought

Decision-making is rarely logical alone. It’s emotional, contextual, and deeply personal – particularly when the stakes are high. Smart brands don’t just sell products. They design experiences that acknowledge the mental load customers carry.

The best marketing today isn’t louder. It’s sharper. It removes friction not by simplifying what you offer, but by anticipating how people choose. If you’re not thinking about how your customer feels at the point of decision, you’re not really in the business of persuasion.

You’re in the business of hoping.

And hope is not a strategy.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Consumer sentiment shifts rapidly, shaped not only by your company’s directives and strategies but also by external forces, such as viral trends, cultural movements, and economic forces. The brands that endure and adapt to these changes in real-time. Brand tracking is more than a periodic check-in – it’s essential for survival. By continuously monitoring brand health, companies can identify strengths, spot weaknesses, understand competitive positioning and adjust strategy accordingly.

But perception isn’t static. A brand with strong awareness today can lose relevance tomorrow if it fails to track how consumers feel, engage, and respond over time. To remain competitive, brands must continuously track their position in the market and be agile enough to adapt.

What is Brand Tracking, and Why Does it Matter?

Brand tracking measures a brand’s performance over time, helping companies identify shifts in the market, consumer trends, competitive trends, strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities to refine brand strategy.

Brand perception is fluid and influenced by consumer experiences, media narratives, and competitive shifts. Brand tracking helps companies answer critical questions:

  • Is our brand positioning resonating with the right audience?
  • How does our reputation compare to competitors?
  • What messaging, campaigns, or brand attributes build consumer loyalty?
  • Are external factors – economic shifts, social trends, or market disruptions – impacting our brand perception?

Key Elements of Brand Tracking

Brand tracking goes beyond surface-level metrics to assess a brand’s health and market position. Key components include:

  • Brand Awareness: Measuring Recognition and Recall
    • Unaided vs. Aided Awareness 
    • Top-of-Mind Awareness: The first brand a consumer thinks of in a category often signals market leadership and competitive strength.
  • Brand Perception & Sentiment Analysis
    • Consumer Attitudes and Associations: Understanding how consumers feel about a brand—and the attributes they link to it—is key to shaping brand identity. These should include both functional benefits and emotional benefits.  As well as brand personality. 
  • Purchase Intent, Satisfaction & Customer Loyalty Metrics
    • Likelihood of Purchase: Gauging how likely consumers are to choose a brand helps predict future sales.
    • Satisfaction: Understanding brand satisfaction versus competitors.
    • Net Promoter Score (NPS): Measuring customers’ willingness to recommend a brand indicates satisfaction and loyalty.
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Market Position Analysis: Comparing brand performance against competitors to identify strengths, weaknesses, and market opportunities.
    • Share of Voice: Measuring a brand’s visibility in the market through media coverage and advertising reach.
  • Media & Advertising Effectiveness
    • Campaign Impact Assessment: Assessing how marketing efforts affect awareness, perception, and sales.
brand-tracking-funnel

Turning Data into Strategy

Brand tracking only matters if insights lead to action. Using data strategically, companies can refine marketing, reposition products, and strengthen customer loyalty.

Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses Before They Become Market Issues

Tracking brand health helps brands pinpoint areas where they excel and where they are losing ground. Rather than relying on assumptions, brands that act on measurable shifts in consumer sentiment can adjust messaging and engagement tactics before losing relevance.

Optimising Marketing Campaigns

Effective marketing isn’t just about visibility; it’s about impact. Brand tracking measures how marketing efforts influence perception, loyalty, and purchase intent. If a campaign falls short, data allows brands to tweak real-time messaging rather than wait until the next cycle.

Benchmarking Against Competitors

Brand tracking is most powerful when measured against competitors. Comparing brand health metrics against competitors enables companies to identify gaps in positioning, capitalise on underserved markets, and anticipate industry shifts before rivals do.

Building Customer Loyalty

Brand tracking isn’t just for attracting new customers; it helps brands understand why existing customers stay or leave. Tracking loyalty metrics allows brands to implement better retention strategies, such as loyalty programs, improved customer service, or product innovation.

Brand Tracking Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Even the best tracking methods fail if poorly executed. Avoid these common mistakes to ensure insights lead to action.

  • Measuring Awareness Without Sentiment
    A high awareness score means little if there are negative perceptions. Brands must pair awareness tracking with perception analysis to get a complete picture of their market position.
  • Tracking Without Business Goals
    Brand tracking is useless if not tied to clear objectives. Tracking must support strategy, whether expanding markets, improving retention, or refining advertising.
  • Ignoring Qualitative Data
    Numbers alone don’t tell the full story. Open-ended customer feedback and sentiment analysis reveal why brand perception shifts.
  • Failing to Act on Insights
    Insights are useless if brands don’t act. Whether trust is eroding or a competitor is gaining ground, companies must adjust accordingly.
  • Overlooking Market Trends
    Brand perception doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Economic shifts, cultural trends, and competitors shape public opinion. Effective tracking accounts for these factors.

Brand Tracking Is Not an Option—It’s Survival

Brand perception is a moving target. What consumers think today may not hold true tomorrow, and brands that fail to monitor these shifts risk becoming irrelevant. The market does not wait for companies to catch up; brands that do not track, analyse, and act on data are at the mercy of competitors who do.

Tracking isn’t just about data—it’s about influence. It reveals when a brand resonates or repels, when trust strengthens or erodes. The best brands spot risks before they escalate and seize opportunities before they go mainstream.

Market leaders don’t wait for a crisis to understand their position. They track, measure, and adapt before perception shifts beyond their control. A brand that isn’t tracking its relevance isn’t just falling behind – it’s already lost control of the narrative.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Before they reach the target market, products or services always start off as unproven ideas. But in order to avoid costly failures, businesses need to understand whether or not they’ll be a hit with consumers.

What Is Concept Testing and Why It’s Essential for Product Development

Concept testing is the process of using qualitative or quantitative research to evaluate your product ideas ahead of launch. It enables you to understand which features are likely to be popular with the target audience, and which may require refinement.

Key methodologies include in-depth interviews, online communities, and structured testing surveys—each designed to gather actionable feedback on your potential product or service. If you’re unfamiliar with the broader benefits of concept testing, our guide to concept testing provides a helpful overview.

The Role of Concept Testing in Market Readiness

Testing product ideas with your target audience enables you to optimize your offering before market entry. By understanding consumer reactions early, businesses can fine-tune features, adjust positioning, and reduce the risk of costly missteps. A robust concept testing strategy dramatically boosts your chances of success—because it replaces assumptions with evidence.

Even seemingly minor product features can profoundly impact outcomes. Concept testing allows you to uncover which elements your potential customers value most. It also gives you clarity on what to include, what to revise, and what to drop before the product ever hits the shelf.

To explore this in the context of innovation pipelines, see our article on why concept testing is important.

Product and Concept Testing in Research and Development

Behind every successful product lies a thoughtful research and development process—and concept testing plays a vital role within it. At Kadence, we’ve partnered with some of the world’s most recognizable brands to transform promising ideas into commercially viable solutions through strategic product and concept testing.

When done correctly, concept testing not only validates the idea but can help shape its final execution—from functionality to pricing to messaging. But how do you test a product concept effectively?

Below are five tested approaches that leading companies use to assess and improve product ideas before launch.

1. Use Concept Testing Surveys to Gauge Overall Appeal and Prioritize Ideas

A concept testing survey can be one of the most powerful tools in your product development toolkit. These surveys can reach large, targeted audiences and provide robust quantitative data on how different ideas resonate.

You can test multiple product concepts to understand their relative appeal and determine which are worth pursuing. Surveys allow you to evaluate core attributes—like usefulness, differentiation, and pricing thresholds—by asking the right questions of the right people.

Often, a Likert scale is used to measure attitudes toward each concept, capturing nuance in consumer perception. It’s critical that your respondent base reflects your actual target market. If not, your results will lack reliability.

A strong concept testing survey can also identify which geographies, age groups, or demographic segments show the highest intent, helping you make smarter investment and go-to-market decisions.

We explore this method further in our examples of product testing article.

2. Conduct Conjoint Analysis to Prioritize Features and Trade-Offs

Conjoint analysis is a statistical technique used to determine how people value different attributes of a product. Rather than asking consumers what they prefer, it uncovers what drives decision-making by presenting combinations of product features for comparison.

For example, in a product testing scenario, respondents might compare variations in price, packaging, and functionality—revealing the trade-offs they’re willing to make. This method helps marketers and product teams categorize features into must-haves and nice-to-haves and assess how changes impact perceived value.

However, it’s important to avoid overwhelming participants with too many combinations. A well-structured conjoint study should be digestible, yet thorough enough to yield insights that guide real-world product planning.

If you’re navigating new product development, explore our dedicated page on concept testing in innovation pipelines.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

3. Use Monadic Product Testing to Avoid Bias and Improve Clarity

Monadic testing presents each product concept to respondents individually, rather than side-by-side. This allows for cleaner, unbiased evaluations of each idea in isolation—particularly useful when you want to gather focused feedback without the influence of direct comparison.

Each participant evaluates a single concept based on criteria such as purchase intent, uniqueness, relevance, and likelihood of recommendation. By isolating the exposure, you can assess raw consumer sentiment and identify whether the idea stands on its own merits.

This approach is often used when testing early-stage concepts or when you want to avoid the cognitive fatigue that can come with multiple exposures. It’s especially useful when the concepts being tested are fundamentally different in form or positioning.

To understand when this method makes the most impact, our overview of concept testing approaches provides more detail.

4. Apply Comparative Concept Testing to Measure Preference and Differentiation

Comparative concept testing places two or more ideas side-by-side and asks respondents to choose their preferred option. This is a practical method for evaluating relative strengths—ideal when you’re deciding between multiple product names, taglines, packaging options, or functional benefits.

While this technique is fast and cost-effective, it does come with a caveat: more polished or visually appealing concepts often outperform less refined ones, even if the core idea is stronger. To mitigate this, ensure all concepts are presented at a comparable fidelity and that creative variables don’t distort results.

This form of testing is particularly valuable when time is limited and decisions must be made quickly. It’s frequently used in packaging research, ad testing, and feature prioritization.

Looking to understand more about how this method fits into the larger testing strategy? See our 5 reasons concept testing is important article for insights into its strategic role.

5. Conduct Concept Screening for Early-Stage Idea Elimination

When you’re at the beginning of the innovation process and have a wide array of ideas, concept screening helps you eliminate weaker options early. This method relies on quick-read formats—typically short descriptions or visual summaries—delivered to a broad sample of your target audience.

The goal is not deep feedback, but rather directional input: Which ideas generate interest? Which fall flat? Which warrant further development?

Concept screening is particularly useful in the fuzzy front end of product development, when you’re working through broad ideation and need to narrow the field efficiently. It’s often followed by more robust methods like monadic or conjoint testing once a shortlist has been established.

To explore how this fits into the research process, our guide to concept testing in new product development explains how to integrate screening into your overall validation plan.

Choosing the Right Concept Testing Method for Your Product

With so many ways to test product ideas, how do you choose the right one? It depends on where you are in the development cycle, how many concepts you’re testing, and what kind of feedback you need.

  • Early-stage ideation: Use concept screening to eliminate weaker ideas and highlight front-runners.
  • Refinement phase: Choose monadic or sequential monadic testing to evaluate each concept independently and in detail.
  • Comparative decisions: Use comparative testing when you’re deciding between two similar options, such as logos or slogans.
  • Feature prioritization: Apply conjoint analysis to understand which elements drive value and which are expendable.

If you’re launching a product in a new market, it’s especially important to localize your testing methods. What works in one region may not resonate in another. Our global teams at Kadence can help adapt methodologies for cultural context and ensure you’re getting feedback that’s not just statistically significant—but actually useful.

To learn more about adapting testing to different markets and business models, our full guide to concept testing outlines strategic considerations in depth.

Turning Insight Into Impact Through Concept Testing

Concept testing isn’t just a checkpoint—it’s a strategic advantage. Brands that build feedback into the earliest stages of development don’t just avoid failure; they design more meaningful products, faster. Whether you’re refining an MVP or comparing go-to-market options, choosing the right testing method can be the difference between assumptions and assurance.

The most successful businesses are those that stay curious—constantly validating, adjusting, and aligning their offer with what real consumers value. In a market defined by shrinking attention spans and rising expectations, the best product isn’t always the one with the best features. It’s the one that speaks most clearly to what people truly want.

Ready to Validate Your Next Big Idea?

If you’re developing a new product or repositioning an existing one, concept testing can help you uncover what your audience values most—and where your idea stands out. From feature prioritization to launch messaging, we help brands remove guesswork and build with confidence.

Explore our concept testing services or request a tailored proposal to speak with our team.

Late one evening in Lagos, 22-year-old Chika is scrolling through TikTok, eyes fixed on a local influencer demoing the latest face serum. She watches the 30-second video twice, screenshots the product, and toggles over to Jumia to compare prices, scanning reviews that look a little too polished to be real. Before checking out, she sends a message to her cousin in Ibadan: “Have you tried this one? Is it legit?” Only after a thumbs-up and a money-back assurance from the seller does she complete the purchase – on mobile, of course.

This isn’t an isolated case. It’s a snapshot of how the next billion consumers will shop, click, and connect.

While Western economies grapple with saturation, inflation, and shifting loyalty, the momentum is migrating – toward Southeast Asia, Africa, and parts of Latin America. These regions are no longer just “emerging markets.” They are where the most dynamic, mobile-first, and digitally sophisticated consumers are coming of age.

The numbers make the case undeniable. According to the United Nations, over 85% of global population growth through 2050 will come from Africa and Asia. The GSMA reports that mobile internet penetration in Sub-Saharan Africa is set to reach 50% by 2025, up from 28% in 2019. Meanwhile, the World Bank highlights how smartphone adoption is leapfrogging traditional infrastructure, giving rise to an entire generation that skipped the PC era entirely.

But these consumers are not easily won. They are bilingual and bicultural, equally fluent in local slang and global memes. They are digitally native but deeply mistrustful, having grown up in online ecosystems rife with scams, misinformation, and empty brand promises. And they are forcing brands – both global and local – to rethink what it means to earn attention, deliver relevance, and build trust in the age of hyper-connectivity.

This is not just a demographic shift. It’s a behavioural revolution. And it’s already underway.

Meet the Next Billion: Demographics, Access, and Expectations

This new wave of consumers is young, connected, and coming online fast. In markets like Nigeria, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, the median age hovers around 25. These are societies where more than half the population wasn’t yet born when Facebook launched – and for them, digital engagement isn’t an evolution; it’s a native state.

Urbanisation is accelerating across these regions, but it’s not confined to megacities. Second- and third-tier cities are becoming powerful engines of growth, fueled by digital access and rising educational attainment. In Vietnam, for instance, over 94% of youth are literate, and the number of university graduates has doubled over the past decade. Similarly, Nigeria’s youth enrollment in tertiary education is climbing, despite infrastructure constraints. With education comes language dexterity: millions speak at least two languages – one local, one global – and they switch between them instinctively, depending on the context, platform, or audience.

If their predecessors logged onto the internet, this generation lives inside it – and does so almost exclusively via smartphone. In Indonesia, smartphone penetration has surpassed 75%, with apps like Tokopedia, Gojek, and Shopee becoming gateways to everything from groceries to financial services. In sub-Saharan Africa, handset affordability and prepaid data plans have made mobile the default medium for learning, shopping, and socialising. The desktop? Many have never touched one.

Browser-based experiences are increasingly irrelevant. Instead, this generation navigates a constellation of apps, each with its own cultural role. WhatsApp is for family, Instagram for aspiration, TikTok for entertainment, and Telegram or local forums for unfiltered information. Platform behaviour is deeply segmented and purpose-driven. Brands attempting to force a uniform message across channels are quickly tuned out.

And while their tech habits may look similar from a distance, the nuances run deep. In Nigeria, digital spaces are often leveraged as tools for activism and community solidarity. Mistrust in institutions has made peer recommendations and online reputation more powerful than formal brand campaigns. By contrast, in Indonesia, religious and cultural values shape how products are perceived and promoted – especially in sectors like fashion, beauty, and food. Vietnamese consumers, on the other hand, exhibit a high degree of tech optimism, embracing e-wallets and livestream commerce, but place enormous emphasis on product quality and after-sales service, driven by prior experiences with low-cost imports.

These differences matter. What unites the next billion is their digital fluency, but what distinguishes them is the lens through which they evaluate brands. A price drop may trigger interest in Nigeria, but in Vietnam, durability and performance often take precedence. In Indonesia, localised design or halal certification may be the tipping point. The common thread is that these consumers are not passive recipients of global marketing – they are active participants, savvy navigators, and, increasingly, vocal critics.

To engage them, brands must move past old assumptions about emerging markets being homogenous or easily won with scale. What’s unfolding is a more complex, more nuanced, and more demanding consumer environment – and it’s being shaped not just by demographics, but by deep-seated expectations forged in mobile-first, culturally hybrid, and rapidly evolving societies.

million

Mistrust Is the Default Setting

For many of the next billion consumers, scepticism isn’t a reaction – it’s a reflex. Decades of unreliable infrastructure, political instability, and inconsistent enforcement of consumer rights have conditioned buyers to approach brands and platforms with guarded caution. In these markets, trust is not assumed; it’s earned slowly and lost quickly.

The scale of the challenge is significant. According to Edelman’s 2024 Trust Barometer, trust in institutions – including businesses – remains markedly lower in developing regions than in developed ones. In Nigeria, only 42% of respondents said they trust brands “to do what is right,” compared to 62% in the UK. In Indonesia, that figure was closer to 50%, but even there, trust is often linked to familiarity rather than formal reputation – people tend to trust people, not corporations.

This backdrop has fueled the rise of peer-to-peer influence as a dominant decision-making force. In the Philippines, Facebook community groups like “Online Budol Finds” (slang for impulsive purchases) function as real-time marketplaces and review boards, where users share unfiltered opinions about products, pricing, and service. In Kenya, WhatsApp groups play a similar role, serving as both watchdog and validator in a system where traditional consumer protections are weak or absent. Even in Vietnam, where e-commerce infrastructure has rapidly improved, 54% of online shoppers say they rely on recommendations from friends or family over brand messaging, according to Statista.

This preference for informal verification mechanisms stems from bitter experience. Counterfeit goods remain a rampant issue across markets – from fake electronics in Ghana to diluted skincare products in Indonesia. In response, many consumers have developed an internal checklist: check the seller’s social proof, confirm the payment method, look for real customer images, and verify delivery policies. Brands that fail even one of these checks are likely to be discarded in seconds.

At the same time, digital mistrust is compounding the issue. Scams, phishing attacks, and fake reviews have tainted the e-commerce experience. The GSMA estimates that more than 40% of mobile internet users in Africa and Southeast Asia have experienced some form of online fraud or misleading advertising. In Indonesia alone, the National Cyber and Crypto Agency reported over 190 million cyberattacks and suspicious traffic incidents in 2023.

In this climate, even influencer marketing – a strategy once thought to fast-track trust – has grown less effective. In Vietnam, consumers increasingly question whether influencers are being paid to promote products they don’t actually use. The same holds true in Nigeria, where audiences are savvy enough to distinguish between genuine recommendations and sponsored scripts. The result is a gradual shift toward micro-influencers and community advocates, whose endorsements feel more relatable and less rehearsed.

The implications for global brands are profound. Standard top-down marketing no longer carries weight. Instead, trust must be layered in – through reliable service, consistent messaging, transparency in returns and refunds, and responsiveness on the platforms where consumers are active. Brands must also recognise the importance of publicly visible customer interactions. A fast, empathetic reply to a complaint in the comments section may matter more than a million-dollar ad campaign.

Trust, in this context, is not a brand asset; it’s a user experience outcome. And in a market where every interaction becomes a review, the next billion are watching, judging, and sharing – with or without you.

The Battle for the First Page (or First Screen)

For the next billion consumers, the path to purchase doesn’t begin with a browser search – it starts with a scroll. Discovery has shifted from keywords to content, from desktop search bars to full-screen video, and from global search engines to localised social ecosystems. As a result, the first screen – what shows up in a feed, on a homepage, or in a chat group – has become the most valuable real estate in the customer journey.

In Indonesia, 71% of internet users aged 16–24 say they use social media as their primary source for researching brands, according to DataReportal 2024. In Nigeria, that figure is nearly identical. TikTok, Instagram Reels, Facebook Marketplace, and YouTube Shorts aren’t just distractions – they’re digital storefronts where decisions are made in real time, often before a brand’s official website is ever visited. The lines between content, commerce, and community have all but vanished.

And while this trend is visible globally, its intensity in emerging markets is distinct. A key reason: data affordability drives platform choice and usage behaviour. Telecom bundles that include free access to Facebook or WhatsApp often influence which platforms dominate attention. In the Philippines, for example, “Free FB” packages have made Facebook one of the most deeply entrenched platforms in the country’s digital culture – so much so that some users mistakenly believe it is the internet.

The importance of platform-specific strategy can’t be overstated. In Vietnam, product discovery frequently occurs through livestream commerce on TikTok Shop, where real-time interactions foster a sense of authenticity. In Kenya, small businesses routinely post promotions through WhatsApp Status or Telegram channels, bypassing traditional ad formats altogether. In Nigeria, where Twitter (now X) has a strong political and cultural presence, product conversations often unfold in threads filled with memes, humour, and direct audience engagement.

But it’s not just about where brands show up – it’s about how they’re experienced in the moment. Load speed, image optimisation, and mobile UX have a direct impact on trust and retention. According to Google, 53% of mobile users in emerging markets will abandon a page that takes longer than three seconds to load. And that’s not just about tech – it’s about expectations. These consumers are used to fast, seamless, and low-friction digital experiences. Anything less suggests the brand doesn’t understand them.

Just as critically, language and localisation now serve as first impressions. A landing page that defaults to English – or worse, uses awkward machine translations – can signal cultural detachment. By contrast, content tailored in local languages, with region-specific slang and visual references, is seen as a mark of respect and investment. It says: we’re not just here to sell; we’re here to understand.

In a space where attention is both fleeting and fiercely fought over, success no longer goes to the loudest voice or biggest budget. It goes to the most culturally fluent, visually intuitive, and platform-native presence. Winning the first screen isn’t about visibility alone – it’s about resonance.

The Rise of Reverse Aspiration and Quiet Power

Western brands once assumed that success in emerging markets meant becoming aspirational – symbols of modernity and affluence. But for today’s mobile-first generation, the tables are turning. Increasingly, it is not global prestige that earns admiration, but local relevance. In place of overt aspiration, there’s a growing sense of pride in indigenous culture, self-made success, and digital independence. What’s emerging is a quiet power: consumers who no longer seek to imitate the West, but expect brands – foreign and domestic – to meet them on their terms.

Across Southeast Asia and Africa, there’s a perceptible shift from status to substance. In Nigeria, youth are driving a surge in support for homegrown fashion labels like Orange Culture and Ashluxe – brands that blend global aesthetics with distinctly African narratives. A 2023 Euromonitor report found that 64% of Nigerian Gen Z consumers said they prefer to buy local brands that reflect their identity, even when international options are available.

This isn’t limited to apparel. In Indonesia, the halal cosmetics market has seen explosive growth, not merely as a religious preference but as an expression of cultural values. Brands like Wardah and Emina now rival – or outperform – multinational competitors in brand recognition among young women. These brands don’t compete by mimicking Western tropes. They succeed by embedding themselves in the rhythms of local life, from religious observances to beauty standards shaped by regional influencers rather than global celebrities.

The same dynamic is playing out in Vietnam’s tech sector, where local e-wallets like MoMo are outpacing foreign fintech entrants – not because of superior technology but because they better understand the daily behaviours, payment rituals, and security concerns of the Vietnamese consumer. According to a 2023 study by Decision Lab, MoMo enjoys over 60% brand preference among young urbanites, in part due to its partnerships with local merchants and integration into everyday routines like topping up phone credit or paying utility bills.

Meanwhile, global culture is increasingly being shaped by these same markets. Afrobeats, once a niche genre, now tops international charts. Thai skincare routines are influencing global beauty trends. Filipino content creators are gaining global followers on TikTok not because they adapt to global norms, but because they confidently showcase their own. In this way, reverse aspiration is not just a rejection of old hierarchies – it’s an export of influence.

For brands, the lesson is clear: you are not the centre of the story. Consumers no longer measure themselves against your brand identity. Instead, they measure your brand against their values, communities, and cultural fluency. Products must be flexible, not fixed; branding must adapt, not dictate.

The rise of reverse aspiration doesn’t signal hostility toward global brands – it signals maturity. These consumers aren’t trying to join the global mainstream. They are the mainstream – digitally savvy, culturally proud, and shaping the conversation on their own terms. And they expect brands to understand that before making their pitch.

Strategies to Earn Attention and Trust

Capturing the attention of the next billion is not a matter of flashy creative or inflated ad budgets. These consumers are deliberate and discerning, quick to disengage from brands that don’t meet their standards or speak their language – both literally and figuratively. Trust is not a funnel; it’s a framework. And it requires consistent, intentional action across every touchpoint.

1. Hyper-localisation isn’t optional – it’s foundational.
For emerging market consumers, brand credibility is tightly linked to cultural fluency. It goes beyond simple translation to a full embrace of local values, references, and usage contexts. In Vietnam, the delivery app Baemin differentiated itself by infusing its platform with witty Vietnamese slang, inside jokes, and hyper-specific product categories – earning loyalty not through function, but through cultural intimacy. In Kenya, Safaricom’s M-Pesa succeeded not just as a mobile payments tool, but because it was built around the realities of an unbanked population, with offline integration and SMS functionality that anticipated connectivity challenges.

2. Trust is built in the micro-moments.
In high-trust economies, consumers might forgive a misstep. In low-trust markets, every interaction matters. A delayed delivery, a missing refund, or a slow response to a query can permanently damage perception. In Indonesia, beauty brand Sociolla won favour by offering guaranteed authentic products, tracked delivery, and a no-hassle return policy – features that directly addressed consumer anxieties in a market flooded with counterfeits. Transparency, speed, and customer service are not operational choices; they are brand positioning strategies.

3. Community voices trump corporate messaging.
The age of the polished brand ambassador is fading. Peer influence, especially from micro-influencers and everyday content creators, now holds more sway. These are people with modest followings but high engagement, often speaking in native dialects or regional slang. In the Philippines, Shopee’s partnership with grassroots creators in smaller cities – rather than national celebrities – helped drive adoption among new internet users. Brands that co-create with local voices, elevate real customer stories, and share behind-the-scenes content signal a level of openness that consumers find relatable and reassuring.

4. Simplification drives conversion.
The mobile-first mindset means consumers expect streamlined interfaces, fast-loading pages, and frictionless payment processes. The most successful brands eliminate barriers rather than adding features. In India, Meesho – a platform that allows users to resell products through WhatsApp and Facebook – gained explosive traction not by competing on price or product, but by simplifying commerce to match the rhythms of informal entrepreneurship. Especially in markets with lower digital literacy or inconsistent connectivity, simplicity is not just convenient – it’s empowering.

5. Offer real value, not just marketing.
Beyond product benefits, brands that offer utility, knowledge, or community are more likely to earn sustained engagement. During the pandemic, Vietnam’s Vinamilk launched a nutrition education series across Facebook Live, fronted by local pediatricians and nutritionists. The effort was not overtly commercial, but it positioned the brand as a trusted source in a time of uncertainty – building long-term brand equity. Similarly, in Africa, MTN’s “Y’ello Hope” campaign provided remote learning support and free data for health workers, deepening brand connection far beyond mobile service.

6. Show up where it matters – and stay.
Too often, international brands treat emerging markets as seasonal experiments, testing campaigns without long-term investment. But consistency is critical. Consumers notice who’s around during key holidays, national events, and crises – and who disappears when results don’t come quickly. Building trust means being present, listening actively, and responding quickly, even when it’s not convenient. It means moving from transactional to relational.

Attention and trust are hard-won in these markets – but not impossible. Brands that succeed will be those that listen before speaking, localise without diluting, and deliver value at every step. It’s not about cracking a code – it’s about showing up, with respect, relevance, and reliability.

guide-to-gen-z

What the Next Billion Means for Global Strategy

The next billion consumers will not just change where companies grow – they will fundamentally reshape how companies think. For too long, emerging markets have been treated as the final frontier for global brands – places to extend reach and scale after success was achieved elsewhere. That model is not only outdated; it’s strategically short-sighted.

In markets like Vietnam, Kenya, and the Philippines, consumer expectations are being forged under entirely different conditions: mobile-first access, economic volatility, rapid urbanisation, and a deep mistrust of centralised systems. The result is a set of behaviours that are more adaptive, more sceptical, and often more innovative than those seen in mature markets. Consumers here are not merely catching up – they are setting new standards.

Rather than viewing these markets as extensions of Western playbooks, companies should see them as innovation testbeds. Take mobile commerce: features like embedded payments, one-click checkout via messaging apps, or app-free transactions are not novelties – they are necessities driven by constraints around bandwidth, infrastructure, and financial inclusion. Yet these same constraints are producing solutions that may become best practices globally.

Similarly, platform design in these regions often centres on immediacy, low data consumption, and local integration. Global teams should be asking: What can we learn from the success of super apps in Southeast Asia? From the rise of voice notes and vernacular language content in India? From trust mechanics built into informal commerce networks across West Africa? These are not fringe behaviors – they are indicators of where global user expectations are headed.

The ability to operate in these ecosystems requires more than translation. It demands cultural intelligence, operational flexibility, and a long-term mindset. Localisation must move beyond interface tweaks to encompass everything from payment methods and logistics to influencer partnerships and community engagement. A product launch is no longer the finish line; it’s the beginning of a multi-year trust-building process.

This shift calls for investment – not just in marketing – but in on-the-ground research, in building local teams with decision-making power, and in systems that can adapt quickly to feedback loops. The brands that will thrive are those that listen early, prototype fast, and refine continuously. That’s not reactive – it’s resilient.

The next billion are not waiting to be discovered. They are already online, already informed, already choosing. But they are choosing carefully. Their loyalty isn’t earned by reputation – it’s earned by repetition: consistent delivery, relevance, and respect over time.

What we’re seeing isn’t a short-term trend – it’s a structural redefinition of what global success looks like. And in this new equation, the old formulas – centralised control, broad generalisations, and push marketing – no longer hold. The competitive edge will belong to those who approach these markets not as territories to conquer, but as partners in evolution.

Because when consumers are multilingual, mobile-first, and mistrustful by design, brand engagement becomes a privilege – not a right. The challenge is not whether companies can reach them. It’s whether they can rise to meet them.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Wearables aren’t fringe anymore. Once seen as fitness accessories for gym-goers and early adopters, smartwatches and health trackers are becoming everyday essentials. In the first quarter of 2024 alone, global shipments of wearable devices hit 113 million units – an almost 9% jump compared to the year before. And that’s despite persistent inflation and consumer pullback across key markets.

What’s shifting? People are treating these devices less like gadgets and more like tools for managing stress, sleep, and overall health. Consumers are using them to take control – sometimes even before they know something’s wrong. And tech companies are keeping pace, building in more sophisticated health features, wrapping them in sleek design, and expanding their reach far beyond Silicon Valley.

China, for example, led the world in wrist-worn device shipments through most of 2024, with almost 46 million units sold in just the first three quarters. Japan’s older population is increasingly using wearables to monitor vitals and stay independent longer. In the US and UK, mainstream use is now less about steps and more about holistic wellness. Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia and India, lower-cost models are making wearables accessible to first-time buyers – especially younger users who want health data but don’t need an Apple logo to get it.

This rise isn’t just about health – it’s about habits. The adoption curve shows that consumers are steadily folding digital health tracking into their everyday routines, reshaping not only how we think about wellness but also how we’ll live and age in the years ahead.

From step counters to personal health assistants

The evolution of wearables mirrors a larger shift in how we define health. A decade ago, a fitness tracker was mostly just that – a tool for counting steps or logging runs. Now, it’s a wrist-worn health hub, checking heart rhythms, analyzing sleep, detecting stress, and even alerting users to abnormal vitals before symptoms appear.

This transformation hasn’t just changed the product – it’s reshaped the market. What started with athletes and early tech adopters has now spread across age groups and income levels. Smartwatches are on the wrists of office workers in Singapore, older adults in Tokyo, commuters in London, and Gen Z students in Delhi. And the demand isn’t slowing.

Global sales of wearables reached over $84 billion in 2024, with projections putting the market on track to more than double by 2030. That growth is being powered by consumers in Asia, where China continues to dominate volume thanks to homegrown brands, and where India and Southeast Asia are seeing rising uptake of budget-friendly devices. In Japan, demand is strongest among an ageing population who are using wearables for peace of mind – keeping tabs on heart rate, sleep, and medication reminders.

The US and UK still lead when it comes to higher-end models and paid health tracking subscriptions. But what’s consistent across regions is the shift from passive to active wellness. As one analyst at Canalys put it recently, “We’re watching wearables move from fitness to full-spectrum lifestyle tech.”

And while device makers keep layering in new features – temperature sensing, stress tracking, blood oxygen levels – it’s the behavior behind the screen that matters most. Consumers aren’t just buying wearables; they’re changing how they relate to their own health. What’s changing fastest isn’t the tech – it’s how people are folding it into their everyday decisions.

Consumer Adoption Across Generations and Borders

Younger consumers may be driving volume, but wearables are winning over every generation – for very different reasons.

Among Gen Z and millennials, wearables are lifestyle enhancers. Sleep tracking, stress insights, and gamified fitness goals are baked into daily routines, often synced to social media. According to a 2024 YouGov poll in the US and UK, nearly 60% of millennials who own a wearable use it at least five days a week, while Gen Z’s interest is climbing fastest, especially in India, Indonesia, and the Philippines where affordable models are surging.

For younger users, it’s not just fitness. Wearables help manage anxiety, track menstrual cycles, and even gauge productivity. In Southeast Asia, TikTok influencers regularly promote smartwatch brands with built-in wellness challenges, and the appeal is sticking.

By contrast, Gen X and boomers tend to use wearables with a more clinical lens. In Japan, uptake among older adults rose sharply in the past two years, driven by growing interest in managing hypertension, irregular heart rhythms, and fall risk. Apple’s expanded medical alerts and ECG functions are frequently cited by Japanese media as valuable features for ageing consumers. In the UK, NHS-backed pilot programs are offering wearables to older patients recovering from surgery or managing long-term conditions.

In the US, over 40% of Gen Xers who own a wearable say they’ve shared data with a healthcare provider, up from just 27% in 2021. But privacy concerns linger, especially among Gen Z. Despite their high usage, only 26% of Gen Z respondents to a 2024 eMarketer study said they would be comfortable sharing health data with doctors or insurers – suggesting a growing tension between usage and trust.

Here’s how adoption looks across some of the key markets:

Country/RegionTop Adopting CohortsPrimary Use CasesNotable Trends
USMillennials, Gen XSleep, stress, fitness, medical alertsHigh usage of subscription models like Fitbit Premium
UKMillennials, BoomersHeart monitoring, post-surgery recoveryNHS pilot programs integrating wearable tech
JapanBoomersHeart rate, fall detection, medicationGrowing adoption in eldercare and wellness insurance schemes
IndiaGen Z, MillennialsStep counting, calorie burn, wellness appsHigh growth in low-cost smartwatch brands
IndonesiaGen ZFitness tracking, daily health challengesInfluencer marketing fueling adoption
ChinaAll age groupsEverything from fitness to medical alertsDomestic brands dominate; strong public sector partnerships
SingaporeMillennials, Gen XHealth monitoring, workplace wellnessWearables integrated into corporate wellness programs
GermanyBoomers, Gen XBlood pressure, diabetes managementInsurance discounts tied to wearable usage

The generations aren’t divided – they’re stacked. What started with Gen Z is now reshaping how everyone manages health. And the industry knows it.

The Technology Arms Race

The more wearables become part of daily life, the harder tech companies are pushing to stay ahead. And they’re not just making devices faster or sleeker – they’re turning them into medical-grade tools, payment platforms, and personal wellbeing dashboards, all in one.

What started as a step-counting competition is now a full-blown innovation sprint. Apple’s latest Watch models detect arrhythmias and track ovulation patterns through temperature fluctuations. Samsung has layered in blood pressure monitoring and sleep scoring tied to cardiovascular insights. Google-backed Fitbit has pivoted from steps to stress, with its newer models using electrodermal activity sensors to gauge emotional strain in real time.

And it’s not just the big brands. In Japan, wearable developers are exploring integration with long-term care plans, while Singapore’s public health teams have trialled government-backed trackers to incentivise exercise and preventive check-ups. In India and Indonesia, homegrown brands like Noise and Realme are keeping up by offering entry-level smartwatches with features that mirror high-end models – heart rate variability, SpO₂ monitoring, and meditation modes – at a fraction of the cost.

The market is clearly rewarding innovation. Smart rings, once a fringe category, are now booming. Oura has become shorthand for wellness among executives and athletes, while Samsung’s anticipated launch of its Galaxy Ring is already stirring up the category. Analysts at Canalys expect the global smart ring segment to triple by 2026, with Asia leading the growth.

Sensors are getting better, but software is where the race is heating up. The shift toward AI-enabled personalisation means devices are starting to behave less like monitors and more like coaches – detecting patterns, learning user behaviour, and nudging people to take breaks, breathe deeply, or move more. Apple’s upcoming software update includes passive tracking of mental well-being, aiming to surface early indicators of depression and anxiety based on behavioural signals.

This arms race is no longer about having the best display or longest battery. It’s about owning the feedback loop: gathering data, interpreting it meaningfully, and turning that insight into habit-changing nudges. And with more users willing to share health data – whether for clinical support or lifestyle optimisation – tech brands are rapidly becoming key players in the future of healthcare.

The Economics of Adoption in a Soft Economy

The flood of innovation might be grabbing headlines, but it’s the economics of wearables that’s driving their expansion into the mainstream – especially as consumers grow more cost-conscious.

Subscription models are a major pivot point. Fitbit Premium, Whoop, and Apple’s Fitness+ aren’t just upsells – they’re positioning wearables as part of a recurring wellness lifestyle. Fitbit Premium alone now has over 10 million paid users globally, according to Alphabet’s 2024 earnings report. Whoop, which has no upfront device cost and instead charges a monthly fee, has doubled its subscriber base since 2022, banking on athletes and executives willing to pay for deeper recovery and strain insights.

Yet in many markets, recurring costs are a harder sell. That’s where public and private incentives are stepping in. Singapore’s government-led LumiHealth program – developed with Apple – offers financial rewards for completing activity challenges and tracking sleep. In Germany, health insurers like TK and Barmer provide partial reimbursements for certified fitness wearables when used as part of preventive care. These programs aren’t about gadgets – they’re about reducing long-term healthcare costs.

Affordability is also being tackled at the hardware level. In India, for example, wearable brands like Noise and boAt have carved out a dominant position by offering smartwatches with fitness and health tracking features for under ₹2,500 ($30). These devices may lack the polish of premium models, but they’ve dramatically widened access, especially among younger consumers in urban areas. The result? India is now one of the fastest-growing wearables markets in the world, with domestic brands accounting for nearly 75% of total shipments in 2024.

In the US and UK, cost still matters. Refurbished models, bundle deals, and corporate wellness perks are helping buyers justify their spending. Entry prices are falling, but expectations are climbing. People want value – not just on the sticker but in the insights, the ecosystem, and the staying power of the device.

Wearables as Part of the Health Ecosystem

As wearable technology becomes more sophisticated, its integration into the broader health ecosystem is deepening, transforming patient care and preventive health strategies. Today’s devices don’t just count steps – they stream health data to doctors, flag risks in real time, and plug directly into telehealth platforms.

Seamless Integration with Healthcare Systems

In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) has initiated pilot programs to incorporate wearable devices into patient care. These programs focus on remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions, allowing healthcare professionals to track vital signs and detect early signs of deterioration without requiring patients to visit healthcare facilities. This approach not only improves patient outcomes but also alleviates the burden on healthcare resources. ​

Similarly, in Japan, addressing the needs of an ageing population has led to innovative uses of wearable technology. Companies like Tellus You Care have developed non-contact remote monitoring systems that track the health and safety of elderly individuals. These wearables can detect falls and monitor daily activities, enabling caregivers and medical professionals to respond promptly to emergencies. ​

Enhancing Telehealth Services

In the United States, the synergy between wearable devices and telehealth applications is revolutionising patient care. Wearables can sync with telehealth platforms, providing clinicians with continuous health data streams. This integration allows for more accurate assessments during virtual consultations and facilitates proactive management of conditions such as hypertension and diabetes. For instance, patients using wearable blood pressure monitors can transmit their readings directly to their electronic health records, enabling healthcare providers to adjust treatments in real-time. ​

Addressing Data Privacy and Reliability Concerns

Still, the deeper wearables penetrate healthcare, the more they raise questions – especially around privacy. These devices collect a steady stream of highly personal health data, and not everyone knows where that information ends up. Breaches are rare, but when they happen, the fallout is big. Surveys show many users remain unclear about how their data is handled, which puts pressure on tech companies and healthcare providers to be far more transparent.

There’s also the question of how reliable the data really is. Wearables offer useful health snapshots, but they’re not always accurate enough to replace clinical tools. If users or doctors lean too heavily on that information, it can lead to wrong calls – or unnecessary stress. That’s why most healthcare providers treat wearable data as one piece of the puzzle, not the whole picture.

How Singapore Turned Wearables into a Public Health Tool

Image credit: LumiHealth

Singapore may be small in size, but it’s been outsized in ambition when it comes to health tech. In 2020, the government launched LumiHealth, a joint initiative with Apple that turns the Apple Watch into a national wellness tool. The idea was simple: incentivise citizens to stay healthy by gamifying fitness and preventive behaviours.

Participants download an app, pair it with an Apple Watch, and earn vouchers by completing health goals like walking, meditating, or getting flu shots. The rewards are modest – up to S$380 over two years – but the behavioral nudge is powerful. More than 200,000 residents signed up in the program’s first year, with high retention and engagement among older adults and those managing chronic conditions.

What makes LumiHealth notable isn’t just its use of wearable tech, but how it reframes wellness as a shared responsibility between citizen, government, and platform. It’s one of the first large-scale examples of a nation leveraging consumer-grade devices for population health – and a blueprint for how data, design, and nudges can shift real-world behaviour.

The program has also informed broader policy. Health officials now see wearables as part of Singapore’s preventive care strategy. In 2024, pilot extensions were announced to include nutrition tracking and mental wellbeing prompts – making the Watch not just a step counter, but a guide for daily living.

fitness-medtech-industry-trends-report

From Devices to Digital Selfhood

As wearables sync more deeply with our health, they’re also syncing with something else: identity.

Fitness trackers and smartwatches are no longer just tools – they’ve become quiet status symbols, wellness affirmations, and, in some cases, lifestyle declarations. Wearing a Whoop band or an Oura ring signals a commitment to optimisation. A Garmin on the wrist might suggest serious training. Even design choices – stainless steel finishes, leather straps, minimalist rings – convey intention. The wearable, in short, has become part of the personal brand.

This isn’t accidental. Tech companies are leaning into the rise of the quantified self: a movement that treats data as a mirror for self-improvement. Sleep scores are shared in group chats. Heart rate variability is discussed on Reddit threads. There’s even a social layer – Apple’s fitness rings can be closed collaboratively, while Fitbit allows real-time challenges with friends. What began as private tracking is now an interactive, sometimes performative, pursuit.

That said, cultural context shapes how wearables are used – and what they mean.

RegionAttitude Toward WearablesUnderlying Values
US & UKIndividualised health and performance toolsSelf-optimisation, control, productivity
JapanMonitors for long-term care and group wellbeingSafety, longevity, family responsibility
IndiaLifestyle enhancers for youth and urbanitesAspirational health, affordability, digital status
SingaporeIncentivised national wellness participationCommunity health, public-private collaboration
ChinaEveryday convenience tools across all agesFunctional utility, tech-forward lifestyle

In the West, wearable data is often framed in terms of productivity – how to sleep better, train harder, or manage stress. In much of Asia, especially in countries like Japan and Singapore, adoption has leaned more toward collective well-being: tracking to stay safe, support ageing populations, or meet national health goals. While the hardware might be the same, the intention behind it can be radically different.

That’s the shift: wearables aren’t just keeping score anymore. They’re helping shape identity – quiet signals of the kind of life we’re trying to live.

The Future Forecast: Smart Living 2030

If the last decade was about wearables gaining acceptance, the next will be about wearables becoming invisible – fully embedded in our surroundings, our health systems, and our daily decision-making. By 2030, the line between body and technology will blur further, not through flashy upgrades, but through quiet, continuous presence.

One of the most anticipated frontiers is continuous, noninvasive blood glucose monitoring, widely viewed as the “holy grail” of wearables. Major tech players, including Apple and Samsung, have been investing heavily in research to bring this functionality to market. Success here wouldn’t just serve diabetics – it would recalibrate how millions think about food, energy, and performance in real time.

Another inflection point will be emotional health. Devices are beginning to detect mood states based on physical cues – micro-fluctuations in skin temperature, heart rate variability, or voice tone. In the next few years, we may see wearables that can flag the early signs of anxiety, burnout, or depressive episodes before the user is even aware. The implications for preventative mental health are enormous – but so are the ethical questions.

Artificial intelligence will be the connective tissue that binds these advances together. Already, AI is being used to turn raw data into feedback loops, coaching users to adjust behaviours. But by 2030, it’s likely that wearables will be part of more coordinated, multi-device ecosystems – syncing not just with phones and watches but also with smart homes, personal health dashboards, and even city infrastructure.

It’s a shift adjacent industries are already watching closely. Insurers are piloting risk models based on real-time biometric data. Pharma firms are testing wearable-driven trial designs and adherence tools. And in some cities, planners are exploring responsive environments – public spaces that adjust to physiological signals, from light and sound to air quality.

What’s next for wearables won’t be defined by tech specs – but by what people do with the data, and who they’re willing to share it with. Smart living by 2030 may not look like sci-fi. It may just look… seamless.

A Tipping Point for Personal Health

We’ve passed the point where wearables are optional tech accessories. They’ve moved into the domain of lifestyle infrastructure – tools people rely on not just for information, but for insight, motivation, and increasingly, autonomy.

When Apple’s COO Jeff Williams stood on stage at CES and said, “We’re not just building a watch – we’re building a guardian for your wellbeing,” it wasn’t marketing hype. It was a quiet signal of where the industry sees its role going: less device, more guide.

And yet, as wearables grow smarter, more embedded, and more predictive, we’re entering a new kind of contract with our devices – one where personal health is constantly measured, interpreted, and nudged. The convenience is undeniable. The value is rising. But so is the question: who controls the loop?

Will the decade ahead empower us to become more informed, more proactive, and more in tune with our health? Or will we find ourselves outsourcing our instincts to a wristband?

It’s a future being shaped now, one wrist at a time.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.