Market research resources Archives | Page 3 of 60

In theory, younger consumers should be leading the green economy. Gen Z and millennials routinely rank climate change among their top global concerns, follow sustainability influencers, and expect brands to take a stance on everything from packaging to politics. But in practice, their purchasing behaviour last year tells a different story.

According to McKinsey, the percentage of Gen Z and millennial consumers in Western markets who ranked sustainability as a top purchasing factor dropped noticeably in the first quarter of 2024 compared to the previous year. Willingness to pay more for eco-friendly products, once a defining trait of these generations, is also declining. In fashion and CPG categories in particular, demand for green-labelled products is increasingly conditional on price parity. When faced with economic pressure, even the most vocal proponents of sustainability are defaulting to affordability.

The data mirrors a pattern captured in our Green Brand report: while most consumers say they care about sustainability, fewer are willing to compromise on convenience, performance, or price to act on it. Gen Z respondents across markets still express high levels of environmental concern, but that concern is no longer translating into behaviour when budgets are tight. One of our report’s starkest findings is that even those who consider themselves eco-conscious rarely let that identity drive final purchase decisions unless the value proposition is unmistakable.

This isn’t a retreat from climate concern. It’s a recalibration. As the cost of living continues to rise, the question isn’t whether people care—it’s how much they’re willing to pay to prove it. Brands that built their messaging around values alone now face a harder truth: today, value is back in charge.

Why Price Is Outweighing Principle

There is no shortage of public support for sustainability. In our Green Brand report, concern about environmental issues remains high across generations, especially among Gen Z and millennials. But concern and commitment are diverging—and fast.

While younger consumers continue to express strong interest in climate action, their ability to act on that interest is constrained by more immediate economic realities. High inflation, stagnant wages, and escalating rent costs are forcing difficult trade-offs. The result is a growing gap between intention and execution, particularly when sustainable products carry a higher price tag.

Our research shows that while the majority of consumers globally say sustainability matters to them, few follow through if the greener option costs more. In the UK and US, this drop-off is especially pronounced. A majority of Gen Z respondents in these markets describe themselves as environmentally conscious, but fewer than a third said they would consistently choose a sustainable product if it were more expensive than a conventional alternative. In Southeast Asia, the tension plays out differently.

In countries like Indonesia and Vietnam, younger consumers often express optimism about sustainable living, but price sensitivity remains high. In lower-income urban areas, premium-priced green goods are seen as aspirational but out of reach.

Across regions, the pattern is consistent: concern remains high, but economic pressure is shifting priorities. In many cases, consumers expect brands to absorb the cost of sustainability. Our data reveals that a growing segment of buyers believe it’s the company’s job—not theirs—to make products sustainable without charging more. This expectation is reshaping how value is judged, particularly in categories like food, fashion, and household goods, where switching between brands is easy and driven by price.

What’s fading is the assumption that people will pay more for principles. A rising number of consumers are now treating sustainability as a baseline expectation rather than a bonus feature worth a premium. In doing so, they are redefining the terms of brand trust—placing the burden of responsibility squarely on the supplier, not the shopper.

When Green Marketing Meets Market Reality

For years, brands that positioned themselves as sustainable leaders were seen as future-proof. Marketing strategies emphasised recycled fabrics, low-emissions sourcing, refill programs, and purpose-driven storytelling. But that return is now beginning to stall—particularly as price tags no longer align with consumer priorities.

Fashion is one of the clearest case studies. Mid-market brands that led with environmental credentials—organic cotton, closed-loop production, carbon offsetting—are facing stagnant growth as customers opt for cheaper alternatives with fewer claims and fewer caveats. Some DTC labels that built their reputations on sustainability are quietly shifting messaging away from mission and toward price, discounts, and durability. The signals are subtle: fewer lifestyle montages about purpose, more emphasis on value-per-wear.

In the beauty sector, refillable packaging and clean ingredient lists once helped newer entrants differentiate themselves. But our Green Brand report found that in mature markets, especially the US and UK, those features are no longer enough to justify a higher price. Many consumers now expect sustainable packaging as standard—and increasingly reject the idea of paying extra for it.

This creates a bind. According to the report, more than half of Gen Z and millennials still believe sustainability should be a priority for brands. Yet those same consumers are often unwilling to pay more for products with environmental certifications unless they also deliver a personal, tangible benefit. The disconnect is particularly acute in categories like skincare and cleaning products, where brand responsibility is expected—but the price premium is not tolerated.

A recent McKinsey analysis on consumer sentiment echoes the frustration felt by sustainability-led brands. Many are investing in responsible sourcing and packaging, only to find those efforts do little to influence final purchase decisions. Analysts have described this behavior as part of a growing “green fatigue”—where price and convenience consistently override eco-focused messaging, particularly in sectors like beauty, apparel, and household goods.

Automotive brands are facing their own version of this. While electric vehicle adoption is growing, brands that leaned heavily on sustainability messaging without solving for infrastructure, affordability, or maintenance are struggling to scale. Consumers might support the idea in theory, but without practical solutions, the value case remains unconvincing.

The tension isn’t going away. If anything, it’s becoming sharper. Brands are learning, sometimes reluctantly, that belief in sustainability doesn’t always translate into action. And when value is promised but not delivered, the backlash is quick.

What Consumers Actually Want From Sustainable Brands

The rules have changed. Consumers aren’t walking away from sustainability, but they’re no longer accepting vague virtue signals or price premiums in exchange for loosely defined ethics. The demand now is for relevance, utility, and clarity—sustainability that works for them.

What’s Driving Sustainable Purchase Today:

Priority	Consumer Expectation
Health & Safety	Products must offer tangible benefits—like being toxin-free or allergy-safe—not just eco
Durability	“Buy less, buy better” resonates—if durability equals savings over time
Convenience	Circularity is attractive only if seamless; friction kills follow-through
Local Impact	Locally sourced > carbon offsetting; it feels real, not symbolic

Our Green Brand report found that while seven in ten Gen Z and millennial consumers claim sustainability matters to them, less than one in three will follow through if the greener product comes at a premium. Instead, they reward products that solve real-world problems while aligning with environmental values.

Simon-Kucher’s recent study supports this behavioural gap: among those who rank sustainability as a top-three concern, half admit they only choose green alternatives when pricing is equal or better.

The data also reveals growing scepticism around broad claims. Phrases like eco-friendly or sustainable packaging are now met with caution unless backed by specifics. Consumers are gravitating toward hard metrics—“90% recycled material,” “no microplastics,” or “locally sourced within 100 miles.” Clarity, not idealism, builds trust.

Circular and refillable models remain appealing but require frictionless execution. In our study, Gen Z consumers repeatedly flagged dropout points—confusing signage, inconsistent availability, or unclear value propositions. Euromonitor echoes this, noting that in 2024, the leading barrier to reusable product uptake isn’t cost—it’s complexity.

The expectation has shifted: brands are still expected to lead on sustainability, but the terms have changed. Consumers are asking less about the planet in the abstract and more about how your product fits into their daily life—and whether it’s worth switching for. That’s not disengagement. It’s discernment.

Making Sustainability Make Sense

Some brands are no longer treating sustainability as a message. They’re treating it as a system. The difference shows in performance.

Uniqlo is one of the clearest examples. Its “LifeWear” positioning emphasises longevity and utility over trend. The brand avoids the language of sustainability but delivers it in practice. Consumers aren’t sold on values—they’re sold on fewer purchases, less waste, and more function. The result: Uniqlo consistently ranks high in consumer trust, despite rarely leading with climate or ethics messaging.

In the household category, Seventh Generation has narrowed the price gap with mainstream competitors. Once considered a premium eco-label, it now competes on convenience and cost, not just mission. Refill concentrates and simplified packaging have reduced production costs while giving consumers a product that fits into existing routines. Our Green Brand report notes that this shift toward seamless integration is key to retaining sustainability-conscious buyers who are also budget-conscious.

Southeast Asian retailers are pushing refillable models that require almost no behavioural change. Supermarkets in Thailand and Indonesia offer branded refill stations with clear instructions and price incentives. These programs succeed where others have failed because the decision is built into the shopping experience. Consumers aren’t persuaded by ethics alone. They follow the easier, faster option—if it aligns with their values.

Circularity is gaining ground when positioned as service, not sacrifice. Patagonia’s resale platform, Worn Wear, is growing steadily because the process is simple and familiar. IKEA’s buy-back program lets customers return used furniture for store credit with minimal effort. Both succeed not by appealing to ethics, but by creating easy, cost-effective alternatives to new consumption.

The brands making headway aren’t winning on messaging. They’re winning on design. They’ve stopped asking consumers to make difficult choices. Instead, they’ve made the better choice feel automatic.

The Future of Sustainability Hinges on What Consumers Do Next

The idea that consumers will make sacrifices for sustainability has been overstated. What they’re doing instead is recalibrating. That shift—from saying to choosing, from caring to acting—deserves more attention than most strategy decks allow. Especially now.

The gap between what consumers claim to value and what they actually buy isn’t new. What’s changed is how quickly that gap is shifting, and how unevenly it plays out across categories, price points, and cultures. In some markets, refill stations thrive. In others, they collect dust. The same consumer who buys reusable packaging in one category won’t tolerate it in another. Context matters, friction matters, timing matters. It always has—but brands that succeed now are those that bother to map it.

Market research is not a post-rationalisation tool. It’s what should tell you where your sustainability story breaks down, which claims build trust, and which changes are worth making because the consumer will notice. It reveals where values still win, where value dominates, and where new expectations are quietly forming.

The path forward won’t be defined by idealists or sceptics. It will be shaped by the millions of individual decisions made every day at the shelf, on a screen, or in-store. Brands that understand those decisions in real time—and respond accordingly—will be the ones that make sustainability mean something again.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In the last year alone, bookings for luxury river cruises by travellers over the age of 65 rose by more than 70%. In Southeast Asia, spa and wellness retreats report that seniors now make up the fastest-growing customer group. And in the United States, recent data shows that older adults are adopting wearable tech at a faster clip than millennials. These aren’t isolated shifts—they’re signals of a broader recalibration underway in global consumption.

For decades, older consumers have been cast in a supporting role: brand loyal, budget conscious, and resistant to change. The stereotype of the frugal retiree—committed to saving, disinterested in trends—has shaped how marketers target, serve, and sometimes overlook the over-65 segment. But the demographic reality has changed, and so have the consumers within it.

Today’s seniors are living longer, staying active, and spending more. In markets like the US and UK, they hold the bulk of wealth and show no hesitation in using it. In Southeast Asia, where ageing populations are rising sharply, many seniors are approaching retirement with more education, financial independence, and an appetite for indulgence than the generation before them. From travel and wellness to personal tech and home upgrades, older consumers are not only participating—they’re leading demand in categories once reserved for younger buyers.

This isn’t a niche. It’s a market-wide shift. As ageing populations expand in both developed and emerging economies, their economic power is no longer confined to healthcare and insurance. It’s influencing the way brands think about experience, design, value, and messaging. Marketers who continue to fixate on youth risk missing one of the most quietly powerful growth segments in the global economy. Because while demographic trends might move slowly, consumer behaviour is already changing, and the brands that recognise it early stand to benefit most.

A New Consumer Class with Global Influence

The global demographic landscape is undergoing a significant transformation. By 2030, individuals aged 65 and older are projected to constitute over 20% of the population in most developed countries, marking a substantial increase from previous decades .

In the United States, baby boomers—those born between 1946 and 1964—hold a dominant financial position. They control approximately 70% of the nation’s disposable income, making them a formidable economic force . This wealth accumulation is attributed to factors such as prolonged careers and favourable investment returns .

Regional Spending Patterns

Japan: With nearly 30% of its population aged 65 or older, Japan faces unique economic challenges and opportunities. The ageing demographic has led to increased demand for healthcare services and age-friendly technologies
Singapore: Retired households in Singapore allocate a significant portion of their expenditures to health and wellness. Studies indicate that these households prioritise recreation and cultural activities, reflecting a desire for active and engaged lifestyles
United Kingdom: In the UK, seniors are playing a pivotal role in preserving and revitalising traditional crafts. The resurgence of interest in heritage crafts, such as cask ale brewing, is partly driven by older consumers who value authenticity and tradition .

Emerging Markets

India: Urban Indian seniors are exhibiting increased consumer confidence. Recent surveys show a rise in sentiment regarding personal finances and investments, suggesting a growing willingness to spend on quality products and services

Vietnam: Vietnamese seniors are among the most optimistic consumers in Southeast Asia. Their positive outlook translates into active participation in the economy, with increased spending on healthcare, leisure, and technology

The Spending Habits That Are Defying Age Expectations

The conventional image of older adults as cautious spenders is increasingly outdated. Recent data reveals that seniors are actively engaging in various sectors, from travel and wellness to home improvements and technology, often outspending younger demographics.

Travel and Leisure

Seniors are embracing travel experiences that prioritise comfort and enrichment. In the UK, luxury rail journeys are booming—Railbookers added nearly one new high-end booking for every two made the year prior. Similarly, wellness tourism added more than $200 billion in a single year—growing by nearly one-third to reach $868 billion in 2023, indicating a growing preference for health-focused travel among older adults.

Wellness and Beauty

The pursuit of health and longevity is driving seniors to invest in wellness products and services. Thailand’s wellness economy expanded by nearly $9 billion in just one year, reaching $40.5 billion in 2023, with older consumers contributing significantly to this surge . The global skincare supplement market also reflects this trend, valued at $2.81 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $5.86 billion by 2032 .

Home and Lifestyle

Ageing in place has become a priority for many seniors, leading to increased spending on home modifications. In the U.S., homeowners spent an average of $13,667 on home improvement projects in 2023, with accessibility and comfort being key motivators . Retailers like Home Depot and Lowe’s have responded by offering products tailored to the needs of older adults, such as ergonomic fixtures and safety enhancements.

Technology Adoption

Contrary to stereotypes, seniors are increasingly adopting smart technologies. AARP reports that nearly 9 in 10 adults over 50 now use smartphones, with two-thirds streaming on smart TVs and one in three engaging with voice assistants at home. This trend underscores the importance of user-friendly technology that caters to the preferences and needs of older consumers.

In category after category, senior preferences are leading—not lagging—market demand. Their choices no longer mirror trends; they initiate them.

Challenging the Utility-Only Narrative

The prevailing notion that older consumers prioritise practicality over pleasure is increasingly being challenged. Increasingly, older consumers are choosing experiences that deliver joy, autonomy, and a sense of identity—not just utility.

Seniors are drawn to luxury not for function alone, but for how it affirms identity. A 2025 study by Bargaoui found that older adults associate luxury consumption with emotional reward and self-worth—a signal that indulgence and aspiration are still core drivers well past middle age.

This shift in consumer behaviour necessitates a reevaluation of product positioning strategies. For instance, hearing aids are increasingly marketed not just as medical devices but as lifestyle enhancers that seamlessly integrate with other technologies. Apple’s approach to product design exemplifies this trend. Features like Voice Control and fall detection are incorporated into devices like the iPhone and Apple Watch, offering functionality that appeals to seniors without overtly targeting them as a separate demographic.

The same logic applies outside of tech. In the UK, older travellers are fueling demand for immersive rail experiences built around comfort, not spectacle. In Southeast Asia, seniors are driving bookings at wellness retreats that blend self-care with cultural depth.

Why the Marketing World Still Prioritises Youth

Despite the growing economic influence of older consumers, advertising strategies continue to disproportionately target younger demographics. This focus persists even as individuals aged 50 and above contribute significantly to consumer spending.

In the United States, consumers over 50 account for more than half of all consumer spending. However, only 5–10% of marketing budgets are allocated to engage this demographic . This disparity is not limited to the U.S.; in the United Kingdom, over-50s represent a third of the population and hold 80% of the nation’s wealth, yet they remain largely invisible in advertising campaigns

Several factors contribute to this imbalance. One is the composition of the advertising industry itself. According to Forbes, only 5% of ad agency employees are over 50, and most do not work in creative departments . This lack of age diversity within agencies can lead to a limited understanding of older consumers’ preferences and needs.

There remains a persistent stereotype that older consumers are less receptive to digital media. Yet data shows adults aged 55 and above now spend over half (54.4%) of their media time online—a shift that challenges the industry’s long-held assumptions.

Neglecting the older demographic not only overlooks a substantial market segment but also poses risks to brand relevance and loyalty. Competitors who recognise and address the needs of older consumers can capture market share and build lasting relationships. The influence of older consumers isn’t coming. It’s already reshaping how value is defined across categories—from beauty to tech to travel. Brands still tethered to a youth-first playbook aren’t just behind the trend—they’re blind to where the momentum has moved.

Meeting Older Consumers Where They Are

A handful of brands are beginning to adjust course—not by singling out older consumers with age-stamped campaigns, but by rethinking product design, messaging, and experience in ways that recognise the influence and expectations of this group.

L’Oréal has expanded its age-inclusive approach beyond token representation. In markets like the UK and Japan, it has invested in research and formulation targeting mature skin, while casting women over 60 in its mainstream campaigns—not in niche “silver” editions. What’s notable is the absence of the patronising tone that once marked age-focused advertising. The positioning is subtle: aspirational without being age-anxious, confident without being corrective.

In travel, companies like Viking and Belmond have seen a surge in demand from older travellers seeking richer, more immersive journeys over fast-paced itineraries. These brands have responded by retooling the product—not just offering mobility-friendly options, but reshaping the tone of travel itself. Longer stays, expert-led local immersion, and a focus on comfort over spectacle have proven to resonate. It’s not age that defines the appeal, but sensibility.

Tech companies have also begun to shift. Apple, as noted, integrates accessibility features across its product suite, yet never markets them explicitly as “senior” tools. Voice commands, larger interfaces, and health tracking appeal to all users, but are particularly beneficial for older ones. This universality is intentional—and effective. In 2023, adoption of the Apple Watch among consumers aged 60 and above increased by more than 25% year over year, according to Counterpoint Research.

In Southeast Asia, telcos and financial platforms are investing in UX overhauls aimed at improving digital fluency for older users. Singtel’s wellness and lifestyle offerings for seniors, for instance, go beyond low-cost data plans to include curated content, concierge services, and simple app layouts tailored to common needs. The pitch isn’t that seniors are less tech-savvy—it’s that good design should accommodate everyone.

These brands succeed not by targeting older consumers differently—but by removing age as a constraint. Their advantage lies in recognising behaviour, not categorising it.

For brands looking to operationalise these insights, the following cheat sheet outlines actionable ways to better engage senior consumers across touchpoints—from UX and messaging to service and product design.

How to Appeal to Senior Consumers

Category	Best Practices
Customer Understanding	– Maintain responsive phone support- Use empathetic, clear communication- Ensure continuity across channels (phone, in-store, digital)- Offer personalised follow-up (call, mail, or email)
UX & Product Design	– Font size ≥ 14–16pt, high contrast text- Simple, intuitive navigation- Large touch zones (≥44x44px)- Screen reader–friendly code- Clear, concise copy without jargon- Progress indicators and confirmation messages- Design with accessibility (WCAG) in mind
Customer Service	– Aspirational, not patronising- Purpose-led (quality, legacy, sustainability)- Emotionally intelligent (family, community, joy)
Marketing Channels	– Email (well-targeted, not overwhelming)- Google Search (strong SEO and PPC)- Facebook (high usage globally among 60+)- YouTube (growing for how-tos, lifestyle)- Traditional media (TV, print) still valuable in key sectors
Messaging & Tone	– Prioritise ergonomic, easy-to-use design- Offer modular or personalized options- Highlight safety, quality, and customer support- Allow for trials or no-commitment use (especially for tech or wellness)
	– Feature active, diverse older adults—not stereotypes
Product & Service	– Prioritise ergonomic, easy-to-use design- Offer modular or personalised options- Highlight safety, quality, and customer support- Allow for trials or no-commitment use (especially for tech or wellness)

Age Is No Longer a Signal of Decline—It’s a Forecast of Opportunity

For decades, brands have treated older consumers as the end point of a lifecycle—an audience to retain, not one to build around. That logic no longer holds. Seniors are not only outliving the systems built to serve them—they are outspending, outpacing, and, increasingly, out-influencing expectations.

They are the early adopters of wellness routines previously marketed to 30-somethings, the repeat buyers of luxury services, and the most consistent upgraders of home technology. Their behaviour is not defined by age, but by intent. And if there’s one insight brands should act on now, it’s this: longevity is no longer just a medical issue. It’s a commercial one.

Their economic power is growing, but their motivations remain misunderstood. Too often, research flattens them into averages, surveys them through outdated assumptions, and overlooks the complexity that defines their choices. This is not just a missed opportunity. It’s a strategic blind spot.

To lead in the decade ahead, brands need to stop asking how to market to older consumers and start asking what they are telling us through the choices they make. That shift—from messaging to meaning—is where research proves its value. Not in confirming what we think we know, but in uncovering the complexity we’ve long overlooked.

In a marketplace increasingly driven by flexibility, aspiration, and self-determination, it may be the oldest consumers who are best positioned to show us what the future looks like. But only if we ask better questions—and actually listen.

Looking to better understand the evolving expectations of senior consumers—or any audience segment reshaping your market? At Kadence International, we help brands uncover the insights that drive results. Through in-depth research across key global markets, we go beyond demographics to decode behaviours, motivations, and emerging opportunities. Let’s start working together today.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Today, every brand has a dashboard problem.

Real-time data tracks everything. Purchase paths are mapped down to the millisecond. Heatmaps show where consumers hover and hesitate. The real-time analytics market is booming, valued at $25 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $193.71 billion by 2032.

But in the race to be data-led, something is breaking.

Creativity gets boxed in by past behaviour. Brand identity erodes under the weight of what’s trending. Short-term metrics win out over long-term vision.

Now, some of the world’s most ambitious brands are pushing back.

From fashion houses to fintech startups, companies are flipping the script — treating data not as a decision-maker but as a decision-support tool. This is data-informed leadership, where numbers sharpen instincts but never replace them.

Because the brands shaping the future aren’t the ones following the dashboard. They’re the ones willing to look up from it.

This is a real power move. This isn’t about ignoring data. It’s about knowing its place.

When Data Leads, Brands Lose Their Edge

Nowhere is the fallout of being data-led more visible than in marketing departments locked in endless loops of optimisation.

Look at the wave of direct-to-consumer brands that flooded social feeds over the past decade. Fueled by performance marketing metrics – clickthrough rates, conversion percentages, cost-per-acquisition – these companies became masters of the micro-adjustment. Headlines were A/B tested to exhaustion. Product pages shifted based on heatmaps. Ads were churned out by the dozen, tweaked and re-tweaked until only the most clickable version survived.

Yet, many of these brands began to blur into one another – stripped of personality, chasing the same lookalike audiences with the same algorithm-friendly formulas.

Optimising for KPIs without a clear brand compass is how brands lose their edge. The numbers might show what’s working now, but they rarely tell you whether anyone will care about your brand a year from now.

This is the risk brands face when they let data lead: it pulls them toward what’s proven, not what’s possible. It creates echo chambers of past behaviour. And in a market where consumers crave identity, meaning, and human connection, it’s not enough to follow what the dashboard says.

Because the brands that are remembered – the ones people talk about, love, and come back to – don’t just follow patterns. They break them.

Data Can’t Read the Room

Data can tell you what people clicked. It can tell you how long they hovered over a product image. But it can’t tell you what made them laugh at the dinner table. It can’t decode why a slogan fell flat. And it certainly can’t predict the next cultural wave before it hits.

This is where market research proves its value – not as a report card on past behaviour, but as a lens into the emerging culture, unmet needs, and emotional drivers that dashboards can’t track. Qualitative studies, ethnographic research, and in-depth interviews offer what raw analytics can’t: context, nuance, and human stories that decode the why behind the what.

Brands chasing data-led decisions often learn this the hard way. Take Pepsi’s 2017 advertisement featuring Kendall Jenner. The campaign aimed to resonate with younger audiences by aligning with themes of unity and protest – elements that data likely indicated were essential to this demographic. However, the execution was widely criticised for appearing to trivialise serious social justice movements, leading to public backlash and the eventual withdrawal of the ad.

This is where market research proves its value, not as a report card on past behaviour, but as a lens into the emerging culture, unmet needs, and emotional drivers that dashboards can’t track. Qualitative studies, ethnographic research, and in-depth interviews offer what raw analytics can’t: context, nuance, and human stories that decode the why behind the what.

Where performance data might highlight rising engagement on social content using trending slang, a well-run focus group or semiotic analysis could reveal whether that language resonates, or risks alienating the audience by trying too hard. Research would have focused on tone, cultural sensitivity, and perceived authenticity long before backlash hit the feed. It doesn’t just show whether people noticed. It uncovers how they felt and why it matters.

Smart brands are starting to push back — treating data not as gospel but as one of many inputs in a much messier, more human process of understanding what matters to people.

This misstep underscores a critical limitation of data-led strategies: while analytics can highlight trends, they often lack the contextual understanding necessary to navigate complex cultural landscapes. Relying solely on data without human insight can result in messages that miss the mark, alienating the very audiences they intend to engage.

Smart brands are starting to push back – treating data not as gospel but as one of many inputs in a much messier, more human process of understanding what matters to people.

Data-Informed Brands Are Playing the Long Game

Across industries, a quiet shift is happening. The most resilient brands aren’t the ones chasing every data blip — they’re the ones brave enough to zoom out.

Consider Ben & Jerry’s, the iconic ice cream brand known for its bold flavors and unapologetic activism. In 2020, the company launched “Justice ReMix’d,” a limited-edition flavor supporting criminal justice reform. The campaign generated widespread buzz, and sales surged. Customers flooded social media and retail partners with requests to make the flavor permanent.

A data-led strategy might have given in. The metrics were strong, and the demand was obvious. But Ben & Jerry’s made a different call.

They chose to keep it a one-off, not because the numbers weren’t there, but because the long-term brand strategy was. The flavor wasn’t just a bestseller; it was a statement. Part of that impact came from its temporary nature—using ice cream as a cultural spotlight, not just a product.

This is what data-informed decision-making looks like: using numbers to gauge impact, but staying grounded in brand purpose. Sales figures and social metrics mattered, but didn’t override the strategic intent. Ben & Jerry’s understood the difference between what was popular now and what was authentic long term.

It’s the same muscle that other data-informed companies are flexing. They use data to pressure-test their instincts, to spark ideas, to avoid blind spots, but never to replace judgment. They know the difference between reacting and leading.

And in an era where consumers see right through opportunism, playing the long game isn’t just smart. It’s survival.

Case Study: Hugo Boss – Using Data to Guide Creativity, Not Replace It

Background

Hugo Boss, one of the world’s leading fashion brands, faced the same challenge confronting many legacy companies: how to embrace digital transformation without losing its creative edge. Under CEO Daniel Grieder, appointed in 2021, the company set an ambitious goal: to double sales to €4 billion by 2025.

Central to this ambition was a bold shift in strategy: becoming more data-driven while staying brand-led.

What the Hugo Boss Did

As part of its €150 million “Claim 5” strategy, Hugo Boss invested €15 million in a new Digital Campus in Gondomar, Portugal. This hub was designed to harness advanced data analytics across product design, marketing, and sales – creating faster feedback loops and operational efficiency.

But crucially, the company drew a line. Data was used to inform creative teams, not to dictate their decisions.

Designers still led product development based on brand vision and long-term strategy. Data helped validate ideas, identify emerging trends, and sharpen customer insights – but final decisions stayed rooted in brand instinct and creative direction.

Outcome

Hugo Boss’s approach has positioned it as a front-runner among heritage fashion brands navigating digital transformation. By resisting the trap of becoming purely data-led, the brand has maintained its distinct identity while accelerating growth.

Since implementing the strategy, Hugo Boss reported record sales in 2023 and is tracking ahead of its 2025 targets. Industry analysts have cited the company’s ability to blend creativity with smart data use as a key differentiator in a hyper-competitive market.

As CEO Daniel Grieder put it:
“Data can show us what’s happening – but creativity shows us what’s next.”

Product Teams Want Direction, Not Dictation

Inside product teams, the mood is shifting. For all the power of dashboards and predictive models, there’s growing fatigue with treating data like a final answer key.

Data shows you where the traffic is, not where the road should go. If teams only respond to what’s already happening, they’re not innovating; they’re following.

This is why product teams at some of the world’s most agile companies are moving away from absolutist, data-led roadmaps. Instead, they’re asking for directional data – insights that point to opportunity areas without shutting down creative thinking.

Increasingly, product development teams are leaning on market research not just to validate ideas but to shape them early – using consumer co-creation, concept testing, and journey mapping to pressure-test decisions before they go live. Research isn’t the finish line. It’s the starting point for informed creativity.

Consider Fisdom, a leading Indian fintech company. Through extensive UX research, Fisdom discovered that placing the Know Your Customer (KYC) form at the beginning of the signup process was a significant barrier for new users. By moving the KYC step to the end of the signup flow, they reduced friction and saw a notable increase in user completions. This change was guided not just by analytics but by a deeper understanding of user behaviour and preferences.

This kind of data-informed decision-making is harder. It requires teams to accept ambiguity, weigh trade-offs, and trust their understanding of the customer beyond the numbers.

But it’s also where differentiation lives.

In the end, the smartest brands aren’t anti-data. They’re pro-human. They combine what the dashboard says with what market research uncovers – using evidence to sharpen their instincts, not replace them.

Data will always tell you what people did yesterday. Brand instinct decides what they’ll care about tomorrow.

Smart brands know the difference. The rest are just watching the dashboard.

At Kadence International, we help brands turn data into direction. As a global market research agency, we uncover the human insights behind the numbers, helping brands move with confidence, not (just) caution.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

British shoppers are entering a new era of grocery buying – less impulsive, more deliberate, and increasingly shaped by price. Grocery inflation rose to 3.5 percent in March, capping off two years of compounded cost pressure. Supermarket sales have softened, not because people are walking away, but because they’re buying fewer items and skipping anything that doesn’t feel essential.

Essentials are winning, volume is shrinking, and price has become the lead story. This shift isn’t just thrift – it’s agency. After months of rising bills and economic fatigue, shoppers are regaining a sense of control by editing their baskets. That often means skipping branded goods and sticking to private labels.

Discounters are reaping the gains. Aldi’s market share is up to 11 percent, and Lidl is outpacing rivals in sales growth. But this isn’t just about who’s winning – it’s about how. Shoppers aren’t compromising; they’re recalibrating. Value now means quality at the right price, not a badge name. What’s happening isn’t tactical – it’s behavioural.

What distinguishes this period from past inflation spikes is the speed and confidence of the switch. Brand loyalty, long considered a mainstay of British retail, is now a conditional contract. If a supermarket can’t justify its price point – through quality, loyalty perks, or convenience – shoppers will walk.

Retailers are moving fast to keep up: shrinking private-label ranges to what works, tuning promotions, and reframing value as a daily promise. On paper, it looks like a margin problem. In reality, it’s a permanent shift in how households define value – and there’s little reason to think it’ll snap back.

This isn’t a belt-tightening moment. It’s a consumer reorientation. People aren’t just buying less; they’re buying differently. And in doing so, they’re quietly forcing a reset in how the UK grocery industry defines, delivers, and earns loyalty.

Inflation at the Checkout: What’s Really Driving the Shift?

Walk through any UK supermarket right now, and the change isn’t just in the receipt – it’s in the way people are shopping. Labels are read more slowly. Own-brand products are picked up, put back, then chosen again. Familiar items suddenly feel like indulgences.

What’s happening at the checkout isn’t just about price increases. It’s a psychological shift. Shoppers aren’t just spending less – they’re thinking differently. The same budget now feels tighter, not only because of higher prices but because of how those prices are being perceived.

Anchoring is one reason. Consumers aren’t comparing this week’s price to last week’s – they’re comparing it to what they used to pay before “everything got expensive.” That reference point, even if outdated, sticks. When a block of cheese crosses the £3 mark, it doesn’t matter if it’s only a 5p rise – it’s crossed an invisible line. And that line reshapes everything around it.

Mental accounting adds another layer. People are rebalancing invisible budgets in their heads. Spend £2 more on milk, and that £2 has to come from somewhere else. They’re not just making trade-offs – they’re making calculations. Essentials stay, extras go, and even mid-tier items are under scrutiny if there’s a cheaper equivalent close by.

Then there’s price perception. It’s not what something costs – it’s what it feels like it should cost. That’s why a 10% rise might barely dent volume in one category but trigger a collapse in another. It’s not rational, but it’s real – and it’s guiding what goes in the basket.

For retailers and brands, this moment demands more than sharper pricing. It requires fluency in how shoppers frame value. That might mean pricing just below emotional thresholds or structuring offers that signal stability – even when costs are climbing. In this climate, perception can be as powerful as reality.

What does inflation feel like in real terms? The chart below shows just how much everyday items have risen since 2020.

How-inflation-has-impacted-the-everyday-basket-in-the-UK

Brand Erosion in the Era of the Basket Reboot

Brand loyalty isn’t dead – but it’s under review. Across the UK, what once felt automatic is now under scrutiny. Shoppers are looking at familiar labels, hesitating, and reaching for something cheaper – often store-brand, often good enough.

It’s not just trading down. It’s trading out. The basket reset happening now is exposing which brands still hold meaning and which were riding on habit. In categories like cereal, canned goods, and pasta sauces, private label has moved from backup plan to first choice. When shoppers feel squeezed, brand preference isn’t about awareness – it’s about justification.

The most vulnerable brands are the ones that rely on shelf presence and recognition without clearly articulating why they cost more. A fancy label or nostalgic logo doesn’t hold up when the price delta is visible, and the value isn’t. Own-label is no longer the compromise – it’s the baseline.

Supermarkets know this. That’s why they’ve built out three-tiered private label strategies: essential ranges for price-sensitive shoppers, core lines that match national brands on quality, and premium sub-brands designed to compete with legacy products on both taste and packaging. In many cases, they’re winning on all three fronts.

Branded suppliers are feeling the squeeze. Promotions are being pulled. Negotiations are tighter. Some products are being delisted entirely as retailers prioritise margin and private-label growth. Even in higher-margin categories like snacks and beverages, shoppers are experimenting more – and defaulting less.

This moment demands more than marketing. It demands a proposition that holds up under pressure. Brands that offer clear functional benefits – whether that’s health, sustainability, or convenience – still earn a place. But those that relied on emotional inertia are being quietly swapped out, one basket at a time.

The question for consumer goods companies isn’t just how to defend share. It’s how to rebuild relevance. Because if shoppers are open to changing their habits, they’re also open to forgetting the brands that no longer reflect how they want to spend.

Also, read our study on the UK’s Cost of Living Crisis here.

The New Class of Smart Shoppers

Frugality has rebranded itself – and fast. What used to be framed as a necessity or even a source of quiet shame has become a signal of control, intention, and in many cases, pride. The UK’s cost-of-living pressures have given rise to a new kind of grocery shopper: not just cost-conscious, but value-literate.

This isn’t driven solely by economics. It’s cultural. Discount shopping has moved out of the shadows and into the spotlight. TikTok is full of haul videos not from high-end retailers, but from Aldi and Lidl – highlighting bulk buys, dupes, and smart swaps. The tone isn’t apologetic. It’s instructional. Look what I saved. Look how much farther I stretched my budget. There’s a certain confidence in the captions: “You’d be mad to pay more.”

Digital tools have amplified the shift. Couponing, once a paper-based pursuit of extreme savers, has gone mobile and mainstream. Apps like Too Good To Go and supermarket loyalty platforms now offer real-time deals that reward flexibility, not just spending. Younger shoppers – especially millennials with families and Gen Z renters – are building grocery strategies around digital offers and flash pricing. Price matching isn’t a race to the bottom; it’s a form of skill.

What’s changed is the identity that surrounds all this. Saving money used to imply you didn’t have it. Now, it implies you’re informed. Especially among middle-income shoppers, there’s been a quiet erosion of stigma. Being a “deal hunter” no longer contradicts being design-conscious or health-focused. You can buy the store-brand canned tomatoes and still splurge on artisanal olive oil. You can track every penny and still care about the story behind your coffee.

This hybrid mindset – blending thrift and selectivity – is what many legacy brands are still struggling to read. Their customers didn’t disappear. They just rewrote the rules of what makes a product worth paying for.

It’s no longer enough to assume aspiration equals premium. In this landscape, brands have to justify every line of the receipt. They need to speak the language of value – but not just through lower prices. It’s about usefulness, quality, longevity, and emotional return on spend.

Smart shoppers aren’t waiting for brands to get it. They’re building baskets that reflect who they are now – pragmatic, digitally fluent, and empowered by information, not overwhelmed by it. The question isn’t whether this shift will last. It’s whether brands can keep up with customers who’ve stopped equating value with volume – and started defining it for themselves.

Retailers Rewrite the Rules

Retailers have stopped waiting for shoppers to come back to old habits. Instead, they’re adapting to new ones – fast. The traditional promotional cycle, once built around limited-time offers and seasonal spikes, has been replaced by something more fundamental: proving long-term value in real-time.

That shift is showing up everywhere. Tesco’s Clubcard Prices and Sainsbury’s Nectar Prices have moved from reward mechanics to central pricing strategies. What began as a loyalty tactic is now a core part of how these retailers compete with discounters. And it’s not just about price. It’s about visibility. Price tags on shelves now tell a story of what the customer is saving, not just spending.

Even premium grocers are adjusting. Waitrose, long associated with quality-first positioning, has expanded its Essentials range and emphasised value messaging in advertising. Its recent campaigns have spotlighted affordability without abandoning tone, suggesting that smart shopping doesn’t have to mean compromise.

But nowhere is the shift more aggressive than in private label. Across the sector, own-brand lines have become the innovation lab. Aldi and Lidl continue to lead, not just with price, but with product development that mirrors – and sometimes beats – national brands. The battleground isn’t just about matching flavor or format anymore. It’s about convenience, sustainability, and shopper emotion. A well-packaged ready meal that costs less and feels like a small win at the end of a long day? That’s more powerful than a deep discount.

Retailers are also experimenting with format. Smaller footprint stores are popping up in urban areas, designed around the grab-and-go shopper who wants efficiency, not abundance. Meal deals, shoppable recipes, “value hacks” – all of it engineered to speak the new shopper’s language: stretch, save, simplify.

Marketing has evolved in step. Circulars and point-of-sale have been replaced by in-app push notifications, hyper-local personalisation, and digital shelves that highlight time-sensitive offers. Messaging is less about indulgence and more about empowerment. You’re not just saving money; you’re being smart. You’re beating the system.

The result is a retail environment where success no longer comes from a breadth of range or deepest pockets. It comes from relevance – knowing who your customer is today, what trade-offs they’re willing to make, and how to meet them with the right balance of function, emotion, and frictionless value.

Case Study: How Aldi Became the Benchmark for Value With Purpose

Aldi’s rise in the UK has long been tied to price, but its current momentum speaks to something deeper: cultural relevance. While many retailers are reacting to consumer caution, Aldi has anticipated it – shaping not just how people shop but also how they think about spending.

Its private label dominance is no longer just about cost-cutting. Aldi has invested heavily in product development and packaging design that challenges branded equivalents, often earning accolades in blind taste tests. Shoppers aren’t settling – they’re discovering. Categories like wine, ready meals, and snacks now generate loyalty not as substitutes, but as preferred choices.

Where Aldi’s strategy truly stands out is in how it aligns with emerging shopper identity. The brand doesn’t apologise for low prices. It builds pride around them. Recent campaigns have leaned into humor and confidence, casting Aldi customers as smart, in-the-know shoppers rather than bargain hunters. The brand’s “Like Brands. Only Cheaper.” messaging isn’t defensive – it’s disruptive.

In-store, Aldi’s stripped-back format reinforces that every inch of shelf space must earn its keep. The tight range, fast checkout model, and curated promotions reflect a retailer that understands time, budget, and simplicity as core values – not just marketing points.

Aldi isn’t winning by chasing premium. It’s winning by reshaping what premium means in the mind of today’s value-driven consumer.

What Comes Next for Grocery, Brand Building, and British Retail

This isn’t just a cycle – it’s a structural shift. The current realignment in UK grocery is forcing a deeper redefinition of how brands are built, how value is communicated, and what kind of loyalty can actually be sustained in a low-growth, high-scrutiny environment.

The old model – premium equals quality, discount equals compromise – has fractured. What’s rising in its place is a hybrid mindset: shoppers who blend store brands and branded goods, who track savings as a personal KPI, and who want clarity in place of clutter. For brands and retailers, the challenge is no longer just about margin. It’s about meaning.

Products will still matter – but the story around them matters more. Why this? Why now? Why at this price? The brands that survive won’t just be better stocked or better known – they’ll be better understood. That means strategy rooted in real consumer behaviour, not assumptions. It means investing in insight before investing in shelf space.

We’ve entered an era where margins are thinner, decisions faster, and the consumer’s tolerance for noise almost nonexistent. The winners will be those who can decode the mindset behind the spend – what drives trust, what cues value, what kills interest – and adapt before the data shows up in declining sales.

For British retail, this could be a renaissance moment. But it will favor the precise, not the broad. Those who treat their audience as a living, evolving signal – not a static segment – those who invest in listening as much as launching.

Because the real growth ahead won’t come from pushing more into baskets. It will come from knowing what truly earns a place there.

A Market Redefined by Value Will Reshape the Industry

What’s happening in UK grocery right now isn’t a blip. It’s a reset. A recalibration of trust, relevance, and what constitutes a purchase worth making.

For brands, the margin for error has collapsed. Shoppers are not just selective – they’re strategic. They aren’t waiting to be impressed. They’re asking harder questions: Is this worth it? Is this credible? Does it deliver more than just a label?

Retailers that respond with nuance – not just price cuts – are the ones shaping the future. The discounter isn’t the disruptor anymore; it’s the new center of gravity. Traditional grocers that once competed on scale or loyalty must now compete on understanding. That means fewer assumptions, more clarity, and a sharper grasp on how value is perceived – not just priced.

Consumer behaviour isn’t snapping back. Once a shopper has built a new mental model of spending – one grounded in empowerment, not deprivation – it tends to stick. The post-abundance era doesn’t signal a withdrawal from consumption. It signals a new consciousness around it.

Over the next five years, British retail will be defined not by who shouts the loudest but by who listens best. That requires precision, pattern recognition, and real, ongoing intelligence on the evolving expectations of the people pushing the trolleys.

Smart brands won’t just ride this out. They’ll use it to rebuild better – on foundations that reflect today’s shopper, not yesterday’s playbook.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

When wallets tighten, lipstick sales often loosen.

Beauty counters are buzzing across the US and UK – even as consumers pull back on big-ticket splurges like fashion, tech, and travel. Luxury lipsticks, skincare serums, and fragrances are flying off shelves, offering shoppers a small but satisfying escape from financial uncertainty.

It’s a familiar phenomenon with a new edge. Known as the “lipstick effect,” this pattern sees consumers trading down on larger purchases while indulging in little luxuries that deliver an instant emotional lift. But today’s version is shaped not just by economic pressures – but also by a cultural obsession with self-care.

In recent weeks, prestige beauty sales have proven remarkably resilient. According to Circana (formerly NPD Group), the U.S. prestige beauty market experienced an 8% growth in the first half of 2024, reaching $15.3 billion. In the UK, similar trends are playing out, with consumers leaning into beauty rituals to brighten up bleak headlines.

And it’s not just older shoppers who are clinging to old habits. Younger consumers – especially Millennials and Gen Z – drive this feel-good spending, treating beauty buys as affordable wellness investments in anxious times.

Younger Consumers Lead the Way

While beauty spending cuts across generations, younger consumers are shaping what small luxury looks like today.

Millennials and Gen Z – already steeped in self-care culture – keep beauty at the top of their shopping lists, even as they cut back on bigger lifestyle purchases like fashion or tech. For these consumers, beauty buys are less about occasional splurges and more about everyday wellness routines.

Fragrance layering, skincare rituals, and makeup experimentation have become embedded in how younger shoppers navigate stress and self-expression. Beauty products are positioned not just as cosmetics but as affordable tools for relaxation, creativity, and confidence.

Social media continues to fuel this behaviour, turning beauty trends into global moments overnight. Viral skincare products, fragrance hacks, and affordable luxury recommendations constantly shape younger shoppers’ wishlists.

For a generation that values both experience and accessibility, small luxuries in beauty offer the perfect balance – indulgent enough to feel special and practical enough to justify the spend.

How Beauty Retailers Are Responding

Beauty retailers are moving quickly to meet consumers where they are – in search of small luxuries that feel special and attainable.

Premium beauty brands are expanding their ranges of travel-sized products, mini sets, and giftable formats to capture demand from shoppers looking for affordable indulgences. Retailers like Sephora and Ulta Beauty in the US have invested heavily in “trial and discovery” zones, allowing consumers to experiment with high-end skincare, makeup, and fragrance at lower prices.

In the UK, while mass-market chains like Boots may not operate in the luxury segment, they are leaning into accessible self-care with curated beauty edits, exclusive product bundles, and limited-time offers – helping cost-conscious consumers stretch their budgets without sacrificing quality.

Luxury fragrance brands are also innovating, offering layering bars, engraving stations, and bespoke consultation services in flagship stores, creating memorable experiences around smaller purchases.

Online, digital personalisation has become a powerful tool. Beauty retailers are enhancing their platforms with tailored product recommendations, virtual try-ons, and rewards programs designed to keep shoppers engaged between purchases – reinforcing beauty as a repeat treat rather than a rare splurge.

For the industry, this pivot toward small luxuries isn’t just a response to the moment – it’s emerging as a long-term strategy for growth in a market where big-ticket spending remains unpredictable.

Luxury Brands Winning with Small Indulgences

Tom Ford Beauty – Turning Wellness into a Fragrance Success

Image Credit: Escentual
Background

Tom Ford Beauty, under Estée Lauder Companies, is best known for its ultra-luxurious positioning in fragrance and beauty. But as consumer demand shifted toward wellness and self-care, the brand saw an opportunity to evolve its narrative beyond glamour and sensuality.

Strategy

In 2024, Tom Ford Beauty launched Bois Pacifique, a fragrance inspired by founder Tom Ford’s childhood memories of Big Sur, California. The product was positioned within the growing wellness fragrance space – marketed as a calming, nature-inspired scent designed for emotional well-being.

Beyond the product, Estée Lauder doubled down on its ambitions for Tom Ford Beauty following its $2.8 billion brand acquisition in late 2022. The brand leaned on storytelling, innovation, and the strength of its global distribution network to fuel growth.

Outcome

Bois Pacifique is projected to generate $50 million in sales within its first launch year.
Prior to the acquisition, Tom Ford Beauty reported nearly 25% net sales growth in its fiscal year ending June 2022.
Estée Lauder has set an ambitious target for Tom Ford Beauty to reach $1 billion in annual net sales by the end of 2024.

(Sources: Vogue Business, Luxury Tribune)

YSL Beauty – Leveraging Digital Influence for Small Luxury Growth

Image Credit: Fashion Gone Rogue

Background

Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) Beauty, part of L’Oréal Group, is a leading player in prestige beauty with a strong foothold in fragrance, makeup, and skincare. Recognising the power of digital culture – especially among Gen Z and Millennials – YSL Beauty has heavily invested in influencer-driven marketing and social media campaigns.

Strategy

Throughout 2023 and early 2024, YSL Beauty collaborated with high-profile celebrities like Dua Lipa while boosting its presence across TikTok and Instagram. The brand amplified visibility during key moments like Fashion Week, creating shareable content and interactive campaigns that resonated with younger, trend-savvy consumers.

Product innovation also remained at the heart of YSL Beauty’s strategy, with mini-sized offerings and discovery sets crucial to driving trial and engagement.

Outcome

YSL Beauty recorded a 94% surge in Earned Media Value (EMV) between April 2023 and March 2024.
Total impressions increased by 109%, reaching 9.1 billion during the same period.
The brand saw a 314% year-over-year growth in TikTok EMV, underscoring its success in capturing younger audiences on digital platforms.

Why This Trend May Last

What began as a response to economic uncertainty is fast becoming a new consumer habit – and beauty brands are betting it’s here to stay.

Unlike larger discretionary purchases, beauty products deliver instant gratification and emotional value. A new lipstick, a signature scent, or a skincare upgrade offers a quick mood boost — often for the price of a night out or less. In uncertain times, that balance of affordability and emotional return on investment is hard to beat.

The growing cultural emphasis on self-care is also reinforcing this behaviour. For many consumers — especially younger ones — small beauty purchases are no longer occasional splurges but regular acts of personal wellness. A face mask or fragrance isn’t just about appearance — it’s tied to relaxation, routine, and identity.

Even if economic conditions improve, retailers and brands are unlikely to abandon strategies built around accessible luxury. Discovery sets, travel-sized products, and personalised shopping experiences are proving effective at driving loyalty and repeat purchases.

Beauty’s resilience in the face of economic pressures offers a glimpse of how future retail may evolve: not necessarily bigger, but smarter — built on emotional connection, small indulgences, and everyday moments of joy.

For consumers navigating an unpredictable world, the little luxuries may well become the ones that last.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The Philippine gambling industry operates within a structured but complex regulatory framework, with multiple entities overseeing different aspects of gaming. While legal, state-regulated gambling platforms thrive, underground gambling networks continue to exist, shaping the broader betting environment. Understanding these structures is essential to navigating the evolving landscape of both traditional and online betting.

PAGCOR Regulates Casinos and Online Betting

The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) is the chief regulatory body overseeing casinos, integrated resorts, and online gaming platforms. As a state-run corporation, PAGCOR plays a dual role – it licenses gaming establishments and operates its gaming businesses, contributing a significant portion of revenue to national development projects.

PAGCOR is responsible for issuing land-based and online gambling operators’ licenses and enforcing compliance with national gaming laws.
The agency has ramped up efforts to crack down on illegal online gambling platforms, which continue to attract unregulated activity.
PAGCOR generates revenue for education, healthcare, and infrastructure development, reinforcing its economic importance.

However, while PAGCOR controls regulated online betting platforms, it does not oversee all gambling activities in the Philippines.

PCSO Oversees State-Sanctioned Lotteries and Sweepstakes

Separate from PAGCOR, the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) manages lotteries, sweepstakes, and Small Town Lottery (STL) operations. Unlike casinos and online betting, which fall under PAGCOR’s jurisdiction, PCSO exclusively handles lottery-based gambling.

PCSO operates Lotto, STL, Keno, and scratch-card games, which are widely played nationwide.
Some of PCSO’s revenue funds public health programs, medical assistance, and disaster relief efforts.
Many Filipino bettors prefer PCSO-backed games because they are backed by the government, have regulatory oversight, and contribute to social welfare.

PCSO’s focus on lottery and sweepstakes means it does not oversee or profit from the growing digital betting industry, which falls under PAGCOR’s jurisdiction.

Illegal Gambling Remains a Shadow Market

Despite government oversight, unregulated gambling activities remain deeply ingrained in certain regions, particularly in lower-income and rural communities. Underground betting networks, such as Jueteng, Masiao, and Sakla, continue to attract players who prefer informal wagering over state-sanctioned alternatives.

Jueteng, an illegal numbers game, is widespread and operates outside government control.
Masiao, another underground lottery, thrives in Visayas and Mindanao.
Sakla, a card-based gambling game, is frequently played at wakes and community gatherings despite legal restrictions.

These informal games persist due to the following:

Accessibility in rural areas where formal gambling establishments are scarce.
Perceived fairness due to community-driven prize distribution.
A reliance on cash-based transactions, avoiding the digital footprint required by legal betting platforms.

How This Framework Shapes Gambling Preferences

The interplay between regulated gambling, state lotteries, and illegal gaming influences how and where Filipinos place their bets.

Traditional gamblers prefer PCSO-regulated games due to their legitimacy and social impact.
Skepticism toward online gambling is fueled by concerns over fraud, scams, and lack of oversight.
The rise of e-wallets is driving gambling toward cashless transactions, but many lower-income players still rely on informal, cash-based betting.

For brands, gaming operators, and financial service providers, navigating this landscape requires balancing digital innovation with credibility. Establishing transparency, security, and regulatory compliance will be critical in shaping the future of gambling in the Philippines.

A High-Stakes Shift in Filipino Gambling Habits

Gambling in the Philippines has moved beyond casinos and betting halls. Mobile platforms and digital payments have broadened access, attracting a diverse range of players across ages and income levels. Yet, despite the digital surge, traditional gambling remains deeply woven into the routines of Filipino bettors.

Who Are the Players?

Gambling in the Philippines is still largely male-dominated, with nearly two-thirds of bettors being men. Yet, participation cuts across generations – from young adults to seniors – highlighting its dual role as a form of entertainment and a potential financial opportunity.

A striking finding from our study is the high participation of non-earning individuals – homemakers and the unemployed make up 18% of gamblers. For many, gambling isn’t just a pastime; it’s seen as a potential source of income despite the inherent risks.

More than half of Filipino gamblers come from lower-income households, earning between PHP 9,000 and PHP 18,200 a month. This underscores how gambling is often fueled by economic aspirations, with many hoping for a financial windfall.

What Drives Filipinos to Gamble

The motivations behind gambling in the Philippines extend beyond entertainment. For many players, betting represents a chance to win big, a way to engage socially, or even a financial strategy during economic uncertainty. Understanding these motivations is critical for brands, gaming operators, and financial service providers looking to navigate shifting consumer betting behaviors.

Winning Is the Primary Driver

Across traditional and online gambling, the biggest motivator for Filipino players is the prospect of high rewards. The possibility of achieving financial gain is the primary motivator for gambling, especially among those with lower incomes, for whom a single win could be life-changing. While entertainment is still a factor, it is secondary to the allure of potential wealth.

Dual Players Show a Clear Preference for Online Betting

Among those who engage in both traditional and online gambling, our findings reveal a clear inclination toward digital platforms. 65% of dual players prefer online games over their traditional counterparts. The reasons behind this shift point to the strengths of digital gambling.

However, the remaining 35% of dual players still prefer traditional gambling, citing factors such as trust and reliability, competitiveness and cost considerations.

Preference-for-traditional-gambling-stats-in-the-Philippines

The Expanding Digital Divide in Gambling

Despite the surge in digital gambling, a clear divide remains. Younger players and those in Metro Manila are drawn to online betting, while rural and older gamblers stick with traditional formats, reflecting deep-rooted habits and varying levels of digital access.

Trust and accessibility shape where Filipinos place their bets. While online gambling offers convenience, many remain wary of digital platforms due to concerns about transparency and fraud. This skepticism drives players toward government-backed PCSO games, which are seen as more reliable and secure.

What This Means for Brands and the Gambling Industry

Gambling in the Philippines is a blend of tradition and transformation. Digital platforms are on the rise, but they haven’t replaced traditional gambling. Instead, both coexist, appealing to different audiences shaped by factors like access, trust, and personal motivations.

This shift brings both challenges and opportunities for gaming operators and financial service providers. The rise of digital platforms and e-wallets points to a growing cashless gambling economy. Yet traditional gaming’s resilience underscores the need for hybrid strategies that serve both digital-savvy players and those loyal to legacy systems.

Traditional and Online Gambling Compete for Player Loyalty

The Philippine gambling industry is evolving, but the digital shift isn’t absolute. Online betting is gaining ground, yet traditional gambling holds strong, especially among rural and lower-income players. The dynamic market, with both formats thriving on distinct motivations and behaviors.

The Enduring Appeal of Traditional Gambling

Traditional games still dominate among Filipino bettors, with 8 in 10 preferring them over online options. This strong loyalty reflects deep-rooted trust in familiar betting practices. In-person gambling is especially popular among older players, those in rural areas, and individuals at both ends of the income spectrum.

Several factors contribute to this continued reliance on traditional gaming:

Trust and Credibility: Many players feel more confident betting through PCSO-regulated games, which they perceive as having higher transparency and legitimacy.
Limited Digital Access: Some bettors lack reliable internet connections, making physical betting outlets more accessible.
Avoidance of Digital Risks: Concerns about scams and fraudulent online betting platforms keep some players loyal to traditional gambling.

These insights suggest that traditional gaming remains a cornerstone of the gambling industry, not just for legacy players but for those who prioritise trust and accessibility over convenience.

Online Gambling Is Growing, but Old Fears Linger

The growth of online gambling in the Philippines is undeniable, with digital platforms offering ease of access and round-the-clock availability. Our study found that 85% of online gamblers own smartphones, reflecting the strong link between mobile penetration and digital betting.

But despite its rapid growth, online betting hasn’t overtaken traditional formats, largely due to lingering concerns about trust and reliability.

Many traditional bettors remain skeptical, citing:

Unregulated platforms with questionable security and fairness.
Unreliable internet access that can interrupt gameplay.
Lack of personal interaction, a key part of the gambling experience for some.

Still, for younger and Metro Manila-based bettors, the convenience of digital betting outweighs these concerns. The ability to place bets anytime, anywhere, and check results instantly via mobile apps has become a compelling factor in online gambling’s growth.

What This Means for the Industry

The battle between traditional and online gambling is not a case of one format overtaking the other but rather an industry adapting to diverse consumer needs. While online gambling offers accessibility and ease of use, traditional betting maintains a stronghold among players who prioritise trust, regulation, and in-person transactions.

This means balancing innovation with credibility for brands, gaming platforms, and financial service providers. The path forward involves:

Strengthening consumer trust in digital betting platforms through transparency, regulation, and fraud prevention measures.
Enhancing accessibility for rural players by integrating hybrid betting solutions that combine digital convenience with physical cash-in points.
Leveraging mobile technology to attract younger bettors while ensuring safe, fair, and responsible gambling practices.

Understanding player motivations and addressing concerns will determine the trajectory of gambling in the Philippines.

The Role of Financial Constraints and Perceived Value

Interestingly, financial constraints play a different role depending on the format. While some gamblers are drawn to online betting for its lower-cost entry points and flexible wagering, others see traditional gambling as a more secure and controlled way to bet.

Online bettors appreciate the ability to wager small amounts frequently.
Traditional gamblers, particularly those in lower-income brackets, may view larger, less frequent bets as a more strategic approach.

This distinction reinforces the idea that the gambling industry in the Philippines is not a one-size-fits-all market. Instead, players’ financial situations, risk tolerance, and perceptions of fairness all shape how and where they choose to gamble.

What This Means for Brands and Operators

For gaming companies, fintech firms, and policymakers, understanding what drives gamblers is key to creating responsible, engaging experiences. Our data points to clear opportunities:

Boost engagement by highlighting jackpot prizes and adding gamification features to online platforms.
Build trust through stronger transparency, security measures, and regulatory oversight to ease skepticism among traditional bettors.
Promote responsible gaming with solutions that reflect players’ financial realities, ensuring gambling stays entertainment – not a financial risk.

While the Philippine gambling market evolves, player motivations remain constant: the pursuit of rewards, the need for trust, and easy access. The brands that balance these factors will shape the industry’s future.

Why Online Gambling’s Boom Faces a Trust Hurdle

Online gambling is booming in the Philippines, but trust remains a major roadblock. Mobile-first platforms, e-wallets, and instant access have fueled its growth, yet concerns about fraud, transparency, and weak regulation continue to shape player behavior. For many, loyalty depends not just on convenience but on feeling secure.

From Occasional to Everyday

Online gambling has shifted from a casual pastime to a daily habit for many Filipinos:

In 2022, 29% of players gambled online daily, averaging three sessions per week.
By 2023, that number jumped to 39%, with players betting four times a week on average.

This surge reflects the ease of mobile betting and the appeal of quick, cashless transactions. The ability to place bets anytime, anywhere has made online gambling the go-to choice for a growing audience.

Top Online Games and Betting Platforms Are Gaining Traction

As online gambling gains momentum, specific games and platforms have emerged as clear favorites.

Top-online-games-and-betting-platforms-in-The-Philippines

The dominance of e-wallet-powered platforms highlights a critical industry trend: cashless gambling is becoming the norm. With e-wallets enabling seamless deposits and withdrawals, players are gravitating toward platforms that offer frictionless transactions.

Trust Issues Are Slowing Online Adoption

Despite the convenience of online betting, skepticism remains a major hurdle. Our study found that:

27% of traditional gamblers choose to avoid online betting because they do not trust digital platforms.
Concerns about scams, unreliable payouts, and unregulated operators are common deterrents.
Lack of internet access remains a barrier for 14% of players, preventing them from fully transitioning to digital platforms.

For many, the reliability of PCSO-backed traditional games outweighs the accessibility of online gambling. This signals a need for stronger industry regulation, clearer consumer protections, and better fraud prevention measures to build confidence in digital betting platforms.

What This Means for the Industry

The expansion of online gambling in the Philippines hinges on trust, security, and seamless user experience. While mobile-first gaming is gaining popularity, its long-term success will depend on how well operators address consumer concerns.

To sustain growth, industry players must:

Strengthen regulatory frameworks to increase transparency and consumer confidence.
Implement advanced fraud detection and security measures to protect players from scams.
Leverage fintech partnerships to enhance the credibility of digital betting transactions.
Improve digital accessibility to ensure all players, regardless of location or financial status, can participate safely.

The future of online gambling in the Philippines will not be determined solely by convenience. Building player trust will be the defining factor in whether digital betting platforms can truly dominate the market.

E-Wallets Are Powering the Future of Gambling in the Philippines

The rise of online gambling in the Philippines is closely tied to the rapid adoption of e-wallets, which have become the dominant payment method for digital betting. With seamless deposits, withdrawals, and integration into popular gaming platforms, e-wallets are not just facilitating transactions—they are reshaping how players engage with gambling.

E-Wallets Dominate Online Gambling Transactions

Our study reveals e-wallets have emerged as the preferred payment method for online bettors in the Philippines. Among the most widely used digital wallets in gambling transactions are:

GCash (GLife, GGames)
Maya
Shopee Pay

These platforms have transformed how players fund their accounts, eliminating the need for physical cash transactions and providing faster, more secure payment options.

How Players Fund Their Gambling Accounts

Despite the shift to digital transactions, cash remains a key entry point into the online gambling ecosystem. Players frequently cash in their e-wallets through physical retail locations, including:

Sari-sari stores that act as informal cash-in hubs.
Convenience stores where players load funds onto their digital wallets.
Cash-in machines that allow seamless top-ups.
Bank transfers for those with formal banking access.

This highlights an important industry dynamic – while gambling is moving online, cash remains an essential part of the ecosystem, particularly in rural areas.

The Link Between Financial Inclusion and Gambling Growth

The success of e-wallets in the gambling industry reflects a broader trend: the growing reliance on fintech solutions among Filipinos. As cashless payments gain traction across retail, transport, and remittances, digital betting platforms benefit from increased trust in mobile transactions.

However, financial inclusion gaps remain a challenge. While many players can access e-wallets, not all can link them to traditional banking services. This explains why alternative cash-in methods like sari-sari stores thrive alongside digital payment solutions.

What This Means for the Industry

The widespread adoption of e-wallets in online gambling presents both opportunities and challenges for industry players:

For gaming platforms: Streamlining e-wallet integration will be critical in capturing the growing digital-first gambling market.
For fintech companies: The demand for secure, seamless gambling transactions presents an opportunity for product expansion.
For policymakers: Striking a balance between financial inclusion and responsible gambling will be key in shaping regulatory frameworks.

The Philippine gambling industry is not just moving online- it is going cashless. As e-wallets become the backbone of digital betting, the ability to build trust, ensure security, and provide seamless user experiences will define the next phase of industry growth.

The Future of Gambling in the Philippines Will Be Shaped by Trust and Innovation

The Philippine gambling industry is driven by digital transformation, shifting player behaviors, and the rise of cashless transactions. While online gambling is expanding, traditional formats remain deeply embedded, particularly among players who prioritise trust and regulatory oversight. The industry’s challenge is not just to grow digital adoption but also to address the concerns of players who remain hesitant about fully transitioning to online platforms.

Key Trends That Will Define the Industry’s Next Phase

Several key trends will shape the future of gambling in the Philippines:

Hybrid Gambling Models Will Gain Traction
- While online betting is growing, traditional gambling remains resilient. Future growth will likely blend both formats, offering digital solutions that integrate with physical betting locations.
- E-wallet cash-ins through sari-sari stores and convenience shops illustrate how offline and online gambling ecosystems are merging.
Regulation Will Become a Decisive Factor in Online Gambling’s Growth
- Trust remains a significant barrier for players hesitant to gamble online. Concerns over fraud, unreliable payouts, and scams continue to slow full digital adoption.
- Stronger government oversight and regulation will be necessary to ensure a fair, secure, and transparent betting environment.
E-Wallets Will Dominate, but Cash Remains Relevant
- The widespread adoption of GCash, Maya, and Shopee Pay in online gambling suggests that cashless transactions will define the industry’s future.
- However, for many lower-income and rural players, cash remains a critical entry point, reinforcing the need for financial inclusion in digital gambling.
Younger and Urban Gamblers Will Continue to Drive Online Betting
- Metro Manila and younger players are the primary adopters of online gambling, while rural and older bettors still favor traditional formats.
- The industry’s ability to bridge this gap will determine the speed at which digital gambling replaces—or coexists with—traditional betting.

Balancing Growth With Consumer Protection

Gambling in the Philippines will not be defined solely by technological advancements but by how well the industry builds player trust. While fintech innovations and mobile accessibility drive adoption, addressing concerns around fair play, fraud prevention, and responsible gambling will be critical to long-term success.

For gaming operators, financial service providers, and regulators, the focus must be on:

Ensuring transparency and security in digital betting platforms.
Creating a seamless bridge between traditional and online gambling.
Developing consumer protection policies that balance growth with responsible gaming.

Today’s decisions will shape whether digital betting truly takes over or remains a complement to legacy formats. The key to success will lie in offering players a seamless, secure, and rewarding experience wherever and however they choose to place their bets.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A bold move into familiar territory – will it pay off?

Chipotle’s announcement to open its first restaurant in the country, which inspired its menu, raises eyebrows and expectations. Partnering with Latin American restaurant operator Alsea, the US-based chain is entering a market where culinary authenticity isn’t a differentiator; it’s the starting point. For Chipotle, this market entry isn’t just about expansion. It’s a litmus test: Can a brand that interprets Mexican cuisine resonate with consumers who live and breathe it?

The answer will depend not just on flavor but also on strategy and whether modern tools like hyper-local research and cultural intelligence can bridge the gap between inspiration and expectation.

Lessons From the First Movers

Chipotle isn’t the first American brand to try its luck in Mexico. In 1992, Taco Bell debuted in the country with ambitions just as bold. It launched with localised menu tweaks and a confident footprint, but the venture didn’t last. The brand ultimately withdrew, not because of a lack of visibility or investment, but because the offering didn’t quite land with local palates.

That chapter is often cited in business schools, but rarely for what it truly was: an early experiment in exporting food culture into a market that didn’t ask for it. The reaction underscored a gap between adaptation and resonance that modern market research now works to close.

Starbucks’ early entry into Australia offers a parallel lesson. Despite its global brand power, the company struggled to gain traction in a country with a deeply rooted, independent coffee culture. The issue wasn’t coffee quality; it was a misread of consumer behavior, expectations, and local identity. Like Taco Bell in Mexico, Starbucks in Australia became a case study in how even the most successful brands can stumble without cultural alignment.

It’s not a failure; it’s a framework, a snapshot of how global ambition once outran local alignment.

The Evolution of Market Entry Strategy

When Taco Bell opened in Mexico City in the early ’90s, global expansion followed a different playbook. Brands leaned on instinct, broad profiling, and the belief that what worked in the US would translate with minimal adjustment.

But exporting a concept doesn’t guarantee acceptance. Back then, cultural nuance often took a back seat to operational scale. Research was high-level. Brands made decisions based on economic opportunity, not emotional alignment.

That’s changed. Today, market entry starts with precision—predictive analytics to map taste profiles, behavioral segmentation to decode subcultures, and AI-powered simulations to test concepts before rollout. Tools like geo-targeted taste testing, cultural immersion labs, and brand mapping techniques that track real-time perception shifts are helping brands decode how products will land before they ever hit shelves.

In Chipotle’s case, these tools offer a sharper perspective on what Mexican consumers want and will not tolerate.

What Chipotle Brings to the Table

Chipotle isn’t entering Mexico as a fast-food chain. It is arriving as a brand that’s always walked a fine line: Mexican-inspired, never quite Mexican. Its menu leans into simplicity—burritos, bowls, and tacos built around a few core ingredients. This model resonated with US consumers seeking customisable, ingredient-forward meals. But in Mexico, where flavor, preparation, and regional identity are sacred, that same simplicity may land very differently.

Chipotle is partnering with Alsea to bridge that gap, a strategic move offering far more than logistics. Alsea operates Starbucks, Domino’s, and Burger King in Mexico. Its distribution networks, real estate expertise, and consumer insight pipelines offer Chipotle a turnkey path to localisation.

This isn’t Chipotle’s first time using a partnership-first approach. In 2023, the brand entered the Middle East through an agreement with Alshaya Group, opening restaurants in Kuwait and the UAE. There, too, Chipotle leaned on a local partner to navigate cultural preferences and consumer habits. The result? A thoughtful, localised rollout that aligned Chipotle’s “real food, responsibly sourced” ethos with regional values.

But even with the right partner, Chipotle must tread carefully. Mexican consumers know their cuisine – and they know when they’re being sold a version of it. For Chipotle, the win won’t come from mimicry. It’s not competing with Mexico’s beloved taquerias; it’s introducing a distinctly Americanised take on Mexican food. The challenge? Making that distinction matter.

It’s still unclear whether Chipotle will localise its menu for the Mexican market or keep its US offerings intact, which is an early test of how much flexibility the brand is willing to show. Will the Mexican consumer see Chipotle as a fresh alternative, or a foreign remix of something they already do better?

Chipotle’s international journey hasn’t been without its challenges. The brand has maintained a limited footprint in the UK, with around 20 locations, primarily in London, serving a niche but loyal customer base. While not a breakout success, its measured expansion offers lessons in pacing, positioning, and the importance of location strategy. That experience appears to have informed a more deliberate and partnership-driven approach in newer markets like the Middle East and now, Mexico.

Chipotle will also enter a market with an established and competitive fast-casual ecosystem. Local players like El Fogoncito and international chains like Carl’s Jr. and Subway already cater to urban consumers with varied prices and menu formats. However, the real competition may come from independent taquerias and fondas, neighborhood staples that offer affordable, regional fare with generational credibility. Chipotle must offer not just quality, but a reason to belong in Mexico’s culinary hierarchy.

Cultural Intelligence as a Competitive Edge

Culture isn’t a box to check—it’s the playing field.

The brands that succeed today don’t just bring a product; they bring a point of view. They understand how they’re seen, how authenticity is defined, and which signals matter. Cultural intelligence is the edge that separates a foreign brand from a familiar one.

For Chipotle, entering Mexico means navigating a minefield of expectations, where a single design choice or flavor decision could spark either loyalty or backlash. What looks neutral on paper can carry deep meaning on the plate.

Urban consumers in Mexico are increasingly drawn to brands that balance tradition with health-consciousness, speed, and sustainability – expectations that Chipotle must meet beyond just flavor.

This is where research evolves from insight to assurance. Ethnographic studies, in-market panels, and social listening help brands anticipate friction points before they go live. Cultural intelligence doesn’t guarantee success, but it’s often the only way to earn a second look in heritage markets.

Chipotle executives remain optimistic. The company points to the country’s familiarity with Chipotle’s ingredients and affinity for fresh food as key reasons for expansion. But that framing may miss the heart of the matter. Mexican consumers don’t reject American chains outright – Starbucks and Domino’s enjoy massive success. What they’re wary of is reinterpretation. When it comes to their culinary heritage, familiarity isn’t enough. It is identity. And that’s sacred ground.

All eyes will be on how Mexican consumers respond, because in markets where food is identity, perception can make or break the plan. Early commentary across Mexican business and food media has ranged from curiosity to skepticism, with some questioning whether Chipotle’s version of “authentic” will resonate or fall flat. That tension may be the most accurate test of the brand’s cultural fluency.

The New Rules of Global Brand Expansion

Chipotle’s Mexico debut isn’t just another store opening; it’s a bellwether moment. In markets steeped in cultural pride, success no longer hinges on menu tweaks or marketing spend. It hinges on mindset. Brands must listen, learn, and adapt before launch and long after the doors open.

Around the world, consumers are demanding transparency, local relevance, and cultural respect. They expect brands to reflect their values, not just satisfy their appetites.

The one-size-fits-all era is over. Whether entering heritage markets like Mexico, culturally complex ones like India, or hyper-digitised ones like South Korea, the strategy must start with ground-level intelligence. Brands need to know who their customers are, what they value, and when they feel seen.

In food-driven markets, that also means understanding how flavors, textures, and even aromas trigger emotional and cultural responses. Sensory research – testing taste profiles, mouthfeel, and multisensory experiences with local audiences – is emerging as a critical tool for brands looking to translate offerings across borders. It’s not just about what’s on the menu, but how it feels, smells, and satisfies in context.

The companies that thrive treat research not as a formality but as their competitive edge. Chipotle’s move into Mexico may be a test, but it could also be the new blueprint for global brand growth.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In cafés from Stockholm to Singapore, something curious is happening to the humble latte. The milk has changed – but the meaning of what’s being poured has changed even more. Oat milk, once a fringe choice in vegan corners of Brooklyn and East London, now commands entire refrigerator shelves in mainstream supermarkets. In London alone, sales of oat milk have more than doubled in recent years, outpacing almond and soy. But its rise has sparked a question with global implications: is this just a Western infatuation – or the beginning of a broader, localised reinvention?

As plant-based milks grow in popularity, they are revealing more than just a shift in taste. They have become markers of identity, class, health politics, and cultural resistance. For younger generations in Western cities, oat milk is as much a badge of sustainability as it is a coffee additive. But in Asia, where soy and coconut milk have been kitchen staples for generations, Western brands often appear as tone-deaf outsiders. In India, almond milk is aspirational, signifying affluence and global awareness. In Japan, flavoured soy milk is sold in vending machines next to corn soup and iced matcha. Each tells a story – not just of diet, but of what progress tastes like in different corners of the world.

The Western Story: When Climate Guilt Meets Café Culture

In the West, plant-based milk has surged from niche to mainstream at breakneck speed. In the UK, oat milk has overtaken almond as the best-selling non-dairy option, with the market valued at over £146 million in 2023 and projected to reach more than £430 million by 2030—a growth trajectory that reflects not just a change in taste, but in values. In the United States, the plant-based milk market has experienced significant growth, with revenue increasing from $2.71 billion in 2024, more than doubling since 2019. This surge reflects a broader trend, as supermarkets now allocate entire aisles to milk alternatives, accommodating the rising consumer demand.

For Gen Z and Millennials, this shift is as much about values as it is about flavour. The rise of “climatarian” diets—eating based on environmental footprint—has positioned oat milk as the virtuous option. It requires far less water than almond milk (48 litres per litre vs. 1,600) and carries a lower carbon footprint than cow’s milk. Among baristas, oat milk’s texture and foam-ability have cemented its status as the café go-to.

But these motivations are not universal. Among Gen X and Boomers, plant-based milk adoption often stems from health concerns—lactose intolerance, cholesterol, weight management—rather than climate ethics. Many still view oat and almond milk as a wellness product, not a moral choice. And the taste? It’s tolerated more than it is loved.

Despite its early momentum, the plant-based milk category in the U.S. is starting to show signs of fatigue. In 2024, sales declined by 5.2%, driven more by inflation-driven price sensitivity than by waning interest. What we’re seeing at Kadence International is that consumers are making sharper trade-offs at the shelf. While oat milk is still seen as on-trend, its pricing—often double that of dairy—has started to generate real resistance.

Image credit: Minor Figures

Minor Figures, a UK-based oat milk brand, has carved out a niche among creative professionals. Its hand-drawn packaging, minimalist design, and carbon-neutral commitment resonate with urban Gen Z. The brand installed oat milk refill stations in eco-minded cafés in East London, turning sustainability into something tangible. Co-founder Stuart Forsyth emphasises their approach: “We want to grow sustainably, we want to grow ethically and just see where this sort of journey takes us.”

Still, even Minor Figures must contend with growing scepticism about “performative sustainability.” A growing share of younger consumers now want traceability—where was it grown? What happens to the packaging? As oat milk begins to look like the new default, the question becomes: what comes after default?

Southeast Asia: Taste First, Sustainability Later

If oat milk is the sustainability symbol of the West, in much of Southeast Asia, it’s still a curiosity—often priced high, unfamiliar in flavor, and positioned more as a lifestyle accessory than a kitchen staple. Here, taste and tradition are still the gatekeepers, and consumer priorities follow a different rhythm.

Soy and coconut milks remain the dominant non-dairy choices across the region. Long before Western plant-based trends took hold, these ingredients were already foundational in Southeast Asian cuisine. From Indonesia’s tempeh to Thailand’s tom kha, from soy puddings in Vietnam to rich coconut-based curries in Malaysia, non-dairy milk isn’t an “alternative”—it’s the original.

Yet, the surge of interest in plant-based eating is not being ignored. The market for dairy alternatives in Southeast Asia hit USD 3 billion in 2024 and is forecast to reach USD 4.1 billion by 2030. But the motivations driving that growth are not always what Western marketers expect.

For urban Gen Z consumers, the shift is being fueled by café culture and aesthetic appeal. In Singapore, Bangkok, and Ho Chi Minh City, oat milk is showing up in third-wave coffee shops, where latte art meets lifestyle branding. The creamy mouthfeel and mild taste of oat milk plays well with espresso, and baristas often frame it as the more “sophisticated” or “global” option. But the price—often two or three times higher than soy or coconut milk—makes it more of a treat than a household switch.

Health and digestion are also central to plant-based appeal. For Millennials balancing fast-paced urban lives with rising wellness awareness, soy milk retains a stronghold due to its protein content and familiarity. It’s not uncommon to see fortified soy drinks marketed for beauty benefits, gut health, or as part of fitness routines.

Among Gen X and Boomers, however, there’s little appetite for novelty. Traditional dairy is still prized, especially in countries like Vietnam, where sweetened condensed milk remains the heart of the national coffee. Coconut milk is not just nostalgic—it’s seen as natural, trusted, and tied to home cooking.

For Western brands attempting to gain traction here, the learning curve is steep. Oatly’s entrance into the region began with Malaysia and Singapore, distributed via speciality grocers and upscale cafés. The company announced in 2022 that Southeast Asia would form a “growth corridor” as part of its Asia expansion. But by 2024, it had shuttered its Singapore production facility to consolidate manufacturing back to Europe—a sign that demand in the region had not yet scaled fast enough to justify local production.

Oatly continues to maintain shelf presence in Singapore, but its growth in the region faces challenges. In December 2024, the company announced the closure of its production facility in Singapore as part of an asset-light supply chain strategy aimed at improving cost structures and reducing capital expenditures. This move reflects broader operational adjustments in response to evolving market dynamics in Asia.

The plant-based milk market in Singapore is becoming increasingly competitive, with local brands like Oatside gaining traction. In June 2023, Flash Coffee announced it would serve Oatside as the default in all milk-based beverages across its 24 outlets in Singapore. This highlights the growing consumer interest in plant-based options and the competitive landscape Oatly faces.

It’s evident that for plant-based products to succeed in Singapore, they must appeal to consumers in both taste and affordability. The sustainability pitch alone often isn’t sufficient; products need to meet consumer expectations in flavour and be competitively priced to gain widespread acceptance.

Local innovation may hold the key. In Thailand, companies are experimenting with rice milk made from surplus grains. In Indonesia, startups are blending coconut and cashew milk to cater to local palates while improving texture. Unlike oat, which has to be imported and processed, these ingredients are homegrown—offering not just flavor familiarity but economic resonance.

The tension in Southeast Asia isn’t whether consumers will adopt plant-based milk—it’s which ones, and why. Taste leads. Price follows. Sustainability, for now, lags behind. But for a younger class raised on Instagram, global branding, and iced matcha oat lattes, the next shift may arrive faster than expected.

Japan: Tradition Meets Innovation

In Japan, plant-based milk isn’t a trend—it’s tradition. Long before Western oat and almond milks arrived on convenience store shelves, soy was already woven into daily life. From tofu to miso to soy-based desserts, the legume’s liquid form has been consumed for centuries—not as a replacement, but as a cultural staple.

This historical baseline gives Japan a unique position in the global plant-based milk story. While much of the West is shifting away from cow’s milk, in Japan, dairy was never dominant to begin with. Lactose intolerance affects approximately 45% of the population to some degree, and the country’s culinary heritage has long favoured plant-based ingredients.

Yet even here, the landscape is shifting—quietly, and with the precision Japan is known for. In 2024, the soy milk segment still made up the overwhelming majority of plant-based milk sales, but oat and almond are inching upward. Projections estimate Japan’s oat milk market will expand from approximately $51.7 million in 2024 to over $163 million by 2033, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 12.6%.

But growth in Japan doesn’t mirror that of its Western counterparts. Oat milk here is not a lifestyle statement. It’s more likely to be encountered in a café serving Nordic-style pastries than in a supermarket fridge. In Tokyo’s upscale coffee districts—Daikanyama, Aoyama, and parts of Shibuya—young professionals are experimenting with oat lattes, but the movement is still niche.

Soy milk is still the default. People are curious about oat milk, but it’s expensive and unfamiliar. Soy is part of the Japanese identity.

Image credit: Marusan

The soy milk aisle in Japan looks nothing like its Western equivalents. There are over 30 flavours of soy milk in most convenience stores—banana, sweet potato, black sesame, and even matcha. Sold in small, colourful cartons, these drinks are as much a snack as a supplement. They appeal across generations and demographics, from school children to business executives.

Almond milk, introduced in earnest in the early 2010s, is viewed as a beauty product as much as a drink—touted for its vitamin E content and its role in “clean eating” routines. It’s marketed in lifestyle magazines and television ads featuring pop stars and Olympic athletes.

So where does that leave oat? Still finding its place. Japanese consumers value texture and subtlety in flavor—qualities that oat milk sometimes struggles to deliver in traditional dishes or teas. But its creamy body is finding fans in the coffee world, and as more cafés experiment with it, familiarity may breed demand.

What’s clear is that plant-based milk in Japan isn’t driven by environmental activism or dietary rebellion. It’s driven by harmony—with the body, with the palate, with the past. While the West frames oat milk as progress, in Japan, progress tastes familiar—it just might be flavoured with yuzu or kinako.

India: Plant-Based Milk as Urban Status and Spiritual Alignment

In India, dairy isn’t just nutrition—it’s ritual. From temple offerings of milk to the everyday comfort of chai with malai, dairy products are woven into the country’s emotional and religious fabric. The white splash in a steel tumbler holds centuries of symbolic weight. So any conversation about plant-based milk here starts not with a health trend, but with the question: what could possibly replace something sacred?

The answer, for now, is: not much—but something is beginning to stir.

India’s plant-based milk market is still young, valued at around USD 50 million in 2024, but it is projected to grow at nearly 15% CAGR over the next six years. That growth, however, is uneven and tells a story less about dietary shifts and more about social signalling.

For Gen Z in India’s metros, plant-based milk is about cruelty-free living, fitness influencers, and Instagrammed morning routines. It’s not uncommon to see “dairy-free” smoothies and almond milk lattes showcased in the digital lives of young professionals in Bengaluru, Delhi, or Mumbai. These consumers often cite animal welfare, clean eating, and compatibility with lactose intolerance—affecting an estimated 60% of the population—as reasons for switching. But the shift is as much aesthetic as it is ethical. Almond milk isn’t just good for you; it looks good in a glass.

Millennials, especially those navigating careers abroad or within cosmopolitan India, are caught between reverence for traditional staples like paneer and ghee, and a rising curiosity about global wellness norms. Many are not rejecting dairy outright, but are experimenting with substitutes during certain meals, fasts, or fitness cycles. The language of Ayurveda also looms large—“easy on digestion,” “balance for pitta”—guiding product marketing and consumer trust.

For Gen X and Boomers, though, the idea of dairy-free milk is still foreign. Cow’s milk is considered pure in Hindu tradition. To deviate from it can feel like cultural heresy, particularly in religious households. Even within vegan circles, spiritual negotiations are common—almond milk in the smoothie, but cow’s milk in the temple.

And yet, there is movement at the margins.

Image credit: Good Mylk Co.

One company pioneering this shift is Goodmylk, a Bengaluru-based startup founded by Abhay Rangan in his teens. The company produces cashew and oat-based milk, peanut curd, and vegan butter. What sets it apart is its insistence on affordability and accessibility. “If we make it premium, we limit who gets to choose it,” Rangan said in an interview. Goodmylk raised $400,000 in seed funding and has focused on scaling without pricing itself out of the Indian middle class.

The brand also localises its innovation. Mung bean and millet-based milks are in development—grains familiar to Indian households, now reimagined for lattes and cereal bowls. This strategy isn’t just functional—it’s cultural. “People trust what they’ve grown up with,” Rangan notes. “If we can use those same ingredients in new ways, we don’t have to change people. We just meet them where they are.”

What India reveals, perhaps more than any other market, is that the future of plant-based milk may not be about substitution—but about addition. The almond milk doesn’t replace the dairy in the chai. It sits next to it in the fridge, as an option, a symbol, a signal of modernity. Milk, in this context, is not just nourishment. It’s narrative.

Cross-Cultural Observations: What Tastes Like Progress?

From Bangkok cafés to Berlin grocery aisles, plant-based milk carries different meanings depending on where you are—and who you ask. To understand the global arc of milk alternatives, it’s not enough to look at adoption rates. You have to ask what each product represents in a cultural context. Because in the world of milk, progress has many flavours.

In the UK, oat milk has become shorthand for ethical living. It’s the fuel of the “climatarian”—those who select food based on its carbon footprint. It helps that oats grow abundantly in Europe and require far less water than almonds. But this is also about optics. Oat milk in a flat white signals something specific: sustainability without sacrifice. It says, “I’m paying attention.”

In Japan, soy milk is the opposite of a trend—it’s a staple. You’ll find banana soy milk in vending machines, black sesame soy in school lunch trays, and unflavored soy behind the counter of every ramen bar. Oat milk, by contrast, is a foreigner: imported, expensive, and still largely a café novelty. Where Western markets romanticise innovation, Japan reveres the familiar.

In India, almond milk is climbing—but it’s doing so as a marker of status. Its presence in a smoothie bowl or a vegan café menu connotes wellness, modernity, and a kind of cosmopolitan sophistication. It’s aspirational, not essential. Meanwhile, mung bean and millet milks are emerging quietly from startups like Goodmylk, using ingredients that feel both futuristic and deeply local.

In Southeast Asia, coconut milk is tradition in liquid form. It’s thick, aromatic, and the base of comfort food across generations. Oat milk, by comparison, is still figuring out how to earn trust—or at least a spot in the fridge. Soy milk, sold sweet and chilled at street stalls and in grocery chains, continues to dominate the category for its price, protein, and familiarity.

And then there’s the matter of price. Across nearly every market, oat milk carries a premium—often double or triple the price of cow’s milk, and far more than local alternatives. In the UK, it retails for £1.90 per litre compared to £1.20 for dairy. In Southeast Asia, import costs push oat milk into the realm of aspirational indulgence.

This price disparity cuts to the heart of a growing identity tension: who gets to eat for the planet? In many regions, sustainability remains a luxury. And with that, a subtle backlash is brewing against the Westernisation of food. Consumers in Asia, Latin America, and Africa are increasingly questioning why “plant-based” must mean foreign, expensive, and out of touch with local ecosystems.As these questions simmer, the most forward-thinking brands aren’t scaling Western models—they’re turning inward. Instead of exporting oat milk to Jakarta or Mumbai, they’re asking: what’s already growing here? And how do we make that the new norm?

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Global demand for chocolate is rising, even as consumer concern over sugar, processed foods and wellness reaches new heights. Across the UK, the US, and key Asian markets, confectionery companies are reporting growth not just in premium segments, but also in functional and “better-for-you” formulations once considered niche.

The shift reflects a broader recalibration of what indulgence means in the modern marketplace. Shoppers are eating less in volume but paying more for chocolate that aligns with evolving personal values-whether that means fewer ingredients, higher cocoa content, or the addition of protein and adaptogens.

Multinational players and local upstarts alike are moving quickly to capture this redefined sweet spot. In the US, dark and portion-controlled chocolates are gaining share despite higher prices. In the UK, new regulations on high-sugar foods have prompted a wave of reformulation and repositioning. And in Asia, where per capita consumption remains relatively low, demand is accelerating as chocolate becomes both an aspirational treat and a vessel for functional benefits.

For an industry once synonymous with excess, chocolate is proving remarkably adaptive. What was once a discretionary snack is now being repackaged as self-care-and that subtle shift in perception is proving to be a powerful driver of growth.

A Global Market Defying Expectations

Chocolate’s commercial momentum is not just anecdotal – it’s backed by hard numbers that defy nutritional orthodoxy. While public health messaging around sugar reduction has grown louder, global retail sales of chocolate continue to expand, particularly in markets where health consciousness and affluence are rising in tandem.

Recent industry estimates place global chocolate confectionery sales at around US$130 billion, with steady value growth driven by pricing power, premiumisation, and consumer appetite for smaller, higher-quality products. In contrast to other processed snack categories, chocolate has retained pricing resilience and cultural relevance – often viewed not as a vice, but as an acceptable reward.

In mature markets like the United States and the United Kingdom, manufacturers are offsetting flat or declining volumes with premium offerings, clean-label positioning, and targeted innovation. In the US, even as unit sales dipped last year, dollar sales rose. UK consumers, faced with inflation and regulatory pressure on high-fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) products, are adjusting by buying smaller formats or turning to private-label options – but they haven’t walked away from the category.

In Asia, the story is different. Markets like China and Singapore are seeing growing interest in chocolate, particularly among urban, middle-class consumers. Premium brands, often imported, are benefiting from rising disposable income and a gifting culture that values quality and presentation. Even in Japan, where the market has been contracting, companies are finding ways to win back consumers through functional formulations and high cocoa content offerings.

Whether as comfort, status symbol, or perceived health supplement, chocolate’s role is being redefined. And with that reframing comes an expansion in both who is buying – and why.

Changing Consumer Drivers

The growth in chocolate sales isn’t coming from nostalgia alone. It reflects a more nuanced shift in consumer mindset – one that doesn’t reject indulgence, but instead reclassifies it. Chocolate is increasingly seen as compatible with modern lifestyles, not in spite of its decadence but because of how consumers are redefining what balance looks like.

Across markets, there is growing tolerance – even encouragement – for what industry analysts term “permissible indulgence.” Rather than eliminating treats, consumers are looking for control: smaller portions, higher cocoa content, and labels that read more like pantry ingredients than chemistry sets. In the UK, more than a third of chocolate consumers say they are consciously limiting sugar – but not abstaining entirely. In the US, 91% say they’re willing to pay more for chocolate that feels like a personal reward.

What has changed is the framing. Where chocolate once sat squarely in the category of “guilty pleasures,” it’s now more likely to be marketed as self-care. Brands have responded with messaging that leans on mood, mindfulness, and mental health – themes that resonate particularly well with millennial and Gen Z consumers. In Asia, products with added collagen or calming botanicals are performing strongly, positioned as part of a broader wellness routine.

Functionality is part of the equation. But just as important is the emotional rationale. In a volatile global climate, consumers are granting themselves small indulgences, so long as they carry a justification – be it clean ingredients, health benefits, or sustainability claims. Chocolate, perhaps more than any other treat, has adapted to meet that need without losing its core appeal.

Market	Primary Positioning	Trending Segments	Notable Retail Behavior
US	Indulgence-first	Dark, functional, protein-added	Portion control, DTC growth
UK	Sustainability/Moderation	Plant-based, lower sugar, private label	HFSS-regulated placement, ethical labels
Japan	Functional-first	Stress-relief, GABA, polyphenols	Mini packs, convenience store dominance
China	Premium & Aspirational	Imported brands, gift sets	Gifting culture, boutique speciality retail
Singapore	Luxury meets wellness	Vegan, single-origin, no added sugar	Gifting culture, boutique specialty retail

Innovation in Product Development

Much of chocolate’s resilience can be traced to how aggressively manufacturers have innovated in recent years. The category has undergone a quiet but significant transformation, with R&D efforts focused on meeting modern expectations around health, quality, and purpose.

Product reformulation is now a baseline strategy. Across the UK and parts of Europe, pressure from HFSS regulations and consumer advocacy groups has accelerated the development of lower-sugar alternatives. Major brands, including Mondelēz and Nestlé, have introduced chocolate lines with 30% less sugar, while also cutting artificial additives and using alternative sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit. In the US, Hershey has expanded its zero-sugar range and invested in cleaner labels across its mainstream portfolio.

The fastest-growing segment, however, isn’t necessarily lower in sugar – it’s higher in cocoa. Dark chocolate continues to outperform traditional milk variants, buoyed by its association with antioxidants, reduced sugar, and a more “sophisticated” profile. Lindt & Sprüngli, Ferrero, and other global players have reported strong growth in dark chocolate sales across both Western and Asian markets, supported by expanding ranges with cocoa content of 70% and above.

In Asia, innovation has taken a more functional route. Japanese confectioners, long known for their product precision, have introduced chocolate fortified with stress-reducing botanicals, dietary fibre, and even blood pressure–supporting polyphenols. In China, new launches incorporate traditional ingredients like ginseng or goji berries, often positioned as “balance-enhancing” or “body-friendly.”

At the premium end, smaller brands are leading with single-origin sourcing, artisanal techniques, and clean-label credentials. Their appeal lies not just in purity of ingredients but in transparency – with packaging that highlights cocoa origin, ethical certification, and handcrafted quality. These innovations are helping redefine chocolate as not just permissible, but aspirational – a snack that delivers on taste, health alignment, and brand values simultaneously.

Some of the most telling examples of how chocolate makers are evolving come from established players experimenting beyond their traditional formulas.

In the UK, Mondelēz launched the Cadbury Plant Bar, a vegan version of its flagship Dairy Milk, using almond paste in place of dairy. The move marked the brand’s first foray into plant-based chocolate in nearly two centuries of operation, reflecting not just a shift in ingredients, but a broader strategy to reach flexitarian consumers. While still a small part of total sales, the Plant Bar represents a growing segment within confectionery where plant-based credentials are seen as a proxy for health, ethics, and modernity.

In the United States, Hu Kitchen has carved out a loyal following by doing less. Its clean-label chocolate bars – free from dairy, refined sugar, palm oil, lecithins, and emulsifiers – have thrived in premium health retailers and online marketplaces. The brand’s minimalist packaging and “Get Back to Human” tagline struck a chord with consumers seeking indulgence without compromise. Hu’s rapid success led to its acquisition by Mondelēz in 2021, underscoring how legacy players are using startup acquisitions to absorb innovation.

In Japan, functionality is a competitive advantage. Meiji’s “The Chocolate” line and Lotte’s “GABA-infused” chocolates target adult consumers seeking both pleasure and health benefits. GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid), a naturally occurring neurotransmitter linked to stress reduction, is featured prominently in Lotte’s marketing, tapping into Japan’s growing demand for mood-supportive snacks. These products are often sold in convenience stores – not as candy, but as part of the functional food aisle.

Taken together, these cases illustrate how manufacturers are navigating a more complex chocolate landscape – where taste is non-negotiable, but health cues, ingredient ethics, and wellness positioning are becoming essential to growth.

Packaging and Positioning as Strategy

As much as product formulation has shifted, so too has the way chocolate is presented – and that evolution is proving just as important in driving consumer uptake. Packaging and messaging have become strategic tools in redefining how chocolate fits into a health-conscious lifestyle. In many cases, what’s on the outside of the bar is doing just as much work as what’s inside it.

One of the most noticeable changes across global markets is the move away from traditional share-size formats toward portion-controlled, individually wrapped offerings. Whether driven by calorie-conscious consumers or regulatory nudges, this shift aligns with broader health narratives. Smaller sizes are marketed not as a cutback, but as a mindful choice. In the UK, major supermarkets have reorganised confectionery aisles to prioritise “treatwise” options, while in Japan and Singapore, individually wrapped squares dominate shelves, reinforcing the idea of moderation and intentionality.

At the premium end of the market, design language has also evolved. Brands are increasingly leaning on matte finishes, minimalist typography, and earthy colour palettes to signal quality and modernity. Sustainable packaging has become a competitive differentiator: compostable wrappers, recyclable boxes, and carbon-neutral claims are now common among premium and artisanal brands. According to NielsenIQ, 72% of global consumers say they’re willing to pay more for products that offer sustainable packaging, and confectionery is no exception. In the UK, where eco-consciousness is deeply embedded in consumer decision-making, this has helped smaller brands gain traction.

Equally important is the messaging printed on the front of pack. Chocolate makers are experimenting with a vocabulary that reshapes indulgence into alignment with health, ethics, or personal care. Terms like “source of antioxidants,” “plant-based,” “no added sugar,” and “ethically sourced cacao” are increasingly used to build trust and justify premium pricing. In Asia, functional benefits take centre stage, with Japanese and South Korean brands promoting relaxation, cognitive support, and gut health directly on packaging. In the US, mood-related cues – “energy,” “calm,” or “focus” – are finding their way onto wrappers once reserved for novelty slogans.

What’s striking is how positioning diverges across markets, reflecting local consumer priorities. In the United States, chocolate is still framed primarily around indulgence, but with an upgraded narrative: it’s an “earned” treat, often marketed with language around self-reward and quality ingredients. In Japan, functionality leads, with packaging that emphasises health outcomes and precision. In the UK, sustainability and transparency are front and centre, with brands competing on cocoa sourcing, packaging recyclability, and sugar reduction metrics.

For multinationals, adapting packaging and messaging to these local nuances has become essential. What resonates in a Los Angeles health food store may not land in a Tokyo pharmacy or a London high street supermarket. But across all regions, the direction is clear: chocolate is no longer sold simply as a sweet. It is being positioned as a curated experience – one that reflects the consumer’s lifestyle, values, and desired level of indulgence.

Regulatory and Retail Landscape

As health concerns reshape consumer expectations, regulatory bodies and retailers are playing a growing role in influencing how, where, and what kind of chocolate is sold. Far from slowing the category, these shifts are prompting structural changes in how brands operate – from formulation to shelf placement.

In the United Kingdom, one of the most ambitious regulatory efforts has been the government’s restriction on the promotion of high-fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) products. Since October 2022, chocolate and other confectionery brands have faced limitations on prominent in-store placements such as aisle ends and checkouts, along with bans on advertising HFSS products during primetime TV and online slots aimed at children. While critics initially forecast a sharp decline in impulse sales, early results from Kantar suggest a more nuanced picture: some volume loss has occurred, but consumers are increasingly switching to HFSS-compliant versions or smaller-format treats that are still allowed in high-traffic zones. Brands that anticipated these changes – either by reformulating or launching reduced-sugar SKUs – have retained shelf visibility and sales stability.

Retail strategy is also evolving in response to both regulation and pandemic-era behavioural shifts. The rise of direct-to-consumer (DTC) models and online artisanal chocolate brands has created a new layer of competition. In the United States, premium players like Dandelion Chocolate and Raaka have built thriving businesses selling craft bars online, complete with subscription models and seasonal releases. In Asia, particularly Singapore and South Korea, social commerce and messaging platforms are enabling local chocolatiers to bypass traditional retail entirely.

At the same time, speciality health retailers such as Whole Foods, Planet Organic, and iHerb have expanded their chocolate assortments, focusing on functional, low-sugar, and vegan options. Their merchandising strategies give these products front-facing visibility – a stark contrast to conventional supermarkets, where legacy brands still dominate shelf space.

Traditional grocers are responding. IGD data shows that major supermarket chains in Europe and Asia are reallocating shelf space toward “better-for-you” indulgences, particularly as demand grows for low-sugar and plant-based chocolate. Some are trialling “wellness treat” zones, while others are integrating chocolate into broader health-and-lifestyle aisles – a sign that chocolate’s category boundaries are shifting.

Taken together, these developments point to a category in flux – not shrinking, but reshaping. Chocolate remains a high-frequency purchase, but how it’s discovered, promoted, and purchased is changing rapidly, driven by policy, platform, and purpose.

Market Outlook and Investment Trends

Chocolate’s continued growth in a health-conscious world is not an anomaly. It is a lesson in the malleability of consumer perception – and a case study in how legacy categories can evolve when indulgence is repackaged as alignment with personal values.

From an investment standpoint, this has not gone unnoticed. The past five years have seen a wave of M&A activity as global FMCG players seek to future-proof their portfolios. Mondelēz’s acquisitions of Hu Kitchen and Lily’s, Mars’ purchase of KIND and Trü Frü, and Nestlé’s investments in functional and plant-based startups reflect a strategic shift: legacy companies are buying their way into health-aligned chocolate because they understand that future growth lies at the intersection of taste, wellness, and ethics.

At the same time, private label competition is intensifying, particularly in markets like the UK and Asia. As inflation pressures persist, consumers are increasingly opting for supermarket-owned brands that deliver on price without abandoning claims like “ethical sourcing” or “no artificial ingredients.” Retailers are capitalising on this, not only by expanding their own lines but also by positioning them as premium, narrowing the gap between store brand and artisanal in both packaging and provenance. In the UK, Tesco’s and Sainsbury’s premium private label chocolates now include single-origin and vegan lines. In Asia, Don Quijote has become a bellwether for how convenience and quality can coexist, with curated chocolate assortments from both domestic and imported brands.

The bigger question is whether the category can continue to bridge the tension between health and indulgence. All signs point to yes – but not without nuance. The hybridisation of chocolate is likely to continue: functional ingredients will gain ground, especially those linked to mental wellness, gut health, and energy support. Meanwhile, classic indulgence will persist, albeit in cleaner formats and more restrained sizes. Consumers are not abandoning pleasure; they are recalibrating it.

The success of chocolate in this new era lies in its emotional elasticity. It can be a gift, a ritual, a moment of calm, or a functional snack – sometimes all at once. Unlike many processed food categories that struggle to justify their place in a health-first world, chocolate has managed to make itself feel essential. That is not just clever marketing; it’s a deep understanding of how modern consumers make trade-offs. They don’t want to eliminate joy – they want to justify it.

For investors, that makes chocolate a rare thing in today’s food landscape: a category with legacy scale, emotional equity, and evolving relevance. For brands, the challenge now is not to follow fads, but to build trust, deliver on new expectations, and never forget that taste is still the gatekeeper. The future of chocolate will belong to those who understand that indulgence and intention are no longer opposites – they are partners in modern consumerism.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.