Technology Archives

The global tech retail market is slowing. Consumers who once chased every new release are now holding off, thinking harder, and stretching upgrade cycles across devices – from phones to wearables to home tech. What’s changed isn’t just price sensitivity; it’s mindset. The old rhythm of new-for-new’s sake is being replaced by a more deliberate calculation: Is this upgrade worth it?

Behind that shift are macroeconomic pressures that haven’t let up. Interest rates remain high, currencies are volatile, and fresh tariffs – particularly between the US and China – are reshaping buying decisions. Even the major players are feeling it. Apple posted a year-on-year decline in iPhone sales, while Samsung saw a temporary lift as consumers rushed to buy ahead of expected price hikes. In both cases, caution, not innovation, drove behaviour.

The shift is generational too. Gen Z, long viewed as the frontline for early tech adoption, is starting to show signs of saturation. They still care about technology – but now they’re weighing durability, repairability, and long-term functionality over simply owning the newest device. The behavior is less impulsive, more selective.

This isn’t a rejection of innovation. It’s a recalibration. And it has real implications for how the world’s biggest technology companies market, price, and position their next wave of products.

The Shrinking Upgrade Window

Consumers aren’t replacing their tech as often as they used to. The once-standard two-year smartphone upgrade has stretched into a multi-year wait, with buyers holding onto devices for longer – sometimes much longer. It’s not just caution in a soft economy; it’s a growing sense that new releases simply aren’t offering enough to warrant the swap.

At Verizon, leadership recently acknowledged the shift. The average smartphone replacement cycle has crept past 3.5 years, a far cry from the predictable two-year rhythm that once drove steady sales. Apple users, too, are waiting longer, with data showing a noticeable lengthening of ownership compared to five years ago. It’s a trend driven partly by pricing, partly by the reality that last year’s model is still more than good enough.

Laptops are on a similar track. The three- to five-year refresh cycle is no longer a given. Consumers are holding off until their machines physically break or performance lags in a noticeable way. Best Buy’s CEO recently pointed to a lack of meaningful innovation as a reason buyers aren’t feeling urgency. And with cloud computing and browser-based software doing more of the heavy lifting, the need for higher-end specs is flattening for everyday users.

Televisions, too, are staying in homes longer. Improvements in display technology have plateaued from a consumer benefit perspective, and with software updates extending the life of streaming-enabled TVs, most households see no need to upgrade unless there’s a failure. Brands that offer long-term software support – up to seven years in some cases – are winning loyalty from customers who prefer durability over dazzle.

Even wearables, a category once defined by rapid iteration, are feeling the shift. Consumers are growing more selective, favouring meaningful innovation like medical-grade sensors or long battery life over iterative changes in design or interface. Replacement cycles are expanding, especially as prices climb and expectations rise.

In Southeast Asia, a surge in mid-tier smartphones is driving sales, suggesting buyers still want new tech – but they want it to stretch further. In contrast, consumers in the US and UK are sticking with their devices for three or four years, increasingly weighing whether an upgrade will deliver genuine daily impact.

Economic Pressures Meet Consumer Pragmatism

Inflation has eased slightly in some markets but remains a persistent factor shaping consumer behaviour worldwide. In the US and UK, interest rates remain elevated, keeping credit card debt expensive and discretionary spending under pressure. Across Europe and Japan, wages have struggled to keep pace with core price increases, dampening retail confidence. And in high-growth regions like Southeast Asia, India, and China, economic uncertainty is pushing consumers toward more deliberate purchase decisions.

In the US, the impact is already visible. Retailers are reporting softer demand in key electronics categories, while store traffic has declined year-on-year. Online, browsing activity remains strong, but cart abandonment is climbing – particularly for products over the $500 mark. It’s not that consumers aren’t interested; they’re just taking longer to commit. The same story is playing out in the UK, where buyers are increasingly opting for refurbished tech, financing options, or delaying non-essential upgrades entirely.

In India and Southeast Asia, frugality doesn’t mean silence – it means selectivity. Consumers are still engaging, but through a different lens. Mid-tier smartphones and high-functionality budget laptops are outperforming premium models. Retailers in these markets report growing traction for bundled offers and longer warranty terms, as value and reliability edge out brand prestige.

Indonesia offers one of the clearest signals of this recalibrated mindset. Consumers there continue to spend, but with more scrutiny. Brand loyalty is softening, and trial is rising – especially for newer entrants that offer durability and local relevance. Many shoppers are trading up slowly, looking for technology that serves multiple roles, rather than devices that signal status or trend.

China, long a bellwether for tech enthusiasm, has shown uneven recovery in the retail sector. Urban consumers remain engaged, but rural and lower-tier city shoppers are increasingly budget-conscious. Brands with local manufacturing and flexible pricing structures are gaining share.

In Japan, where tech adoption tends to skew practical, the economic slowdown has reinforced existing behaviours. Consumers are delaying replacements, relying more on service programs, and opting for features that serve real lifestyle utility – especially among older demographics.

Retailers and manufacturers across all regions are adjusting accordingly. In-store messaging is shifting from “newest” to “smartest.” Online platforms are pushing price-match guarantees, extended return periods, and loyalty perks over flash launches. What used to be a race for innovation has become a contest of value – and the companies that acknowledge that shift early are seeing steadier results.

Gen Z Hits Pause

For years, Gen Z was seen as the tech industry’s sure bet – the cohort most likely to queue for launches, post the unboxing, and evangelise the next upgrade. But the momentum has shifted. While their interest in technology hasn’t faded, their expectations have evolved. Now, the question isn’t “what’s new?” but “what fits?”

Rising costs have played a role, but this is more than economics. It’s a cultural recalibration. Among younger consumers, there’s a growing rejection of hyper-consumption in favour of intentionality. The latest phone isn’t an automatic buy. The better question is whether it adds something meaningful to life – fewer Gen Z consumers are upgrading for status alone.

That shift is fuelling the refurbished and secondhand tech market, which has seen steady growth in the US, UK, and across Southeast Asia. Platforms offering certified pre-owned devices, especially smartphones and laptops, are seeing strong engagement from younger demographics. For many, it’s not just about price – it’s about extending the life of a product and avoiding unnecessary waste.

Aesthetic trends are moving in parallel. There’s a rise in what some in the industry are calling “tech quiet luxury” – products that prioritise function, minimalism, and long-term reliability over flash. Sleek, understated design is winning out over bold colours or feature overload. The appeal lies in gear that integrates cleanly into life, not tech that dominates it.

Online, the social narrative is shifting too. Gen Z’s digital footprint shows less excitement around launch-day content and more focus on utility. The rise of “why I didn’t upgrade” posts is telling. Influencers now get traction by explaining how they kept the same phone for four years, or why buying secondhand was the smarter move. The underlying message isn’t anti-tech – it’s pro-agency.

Brands are adjusting their messaging in kind. Marketing language has toned down the superlatives. Features are framed around real-life relevance – sleep tracking for mental health, battery life that actually lasts a weekend, cameras that work well in low light for night outs. There’s less interest in what a device can do, and more focus on what it should do, consistently.

Why Selling Smarter Is the New Selling Faster

Retailers and manufacturers are no longer assuming the upgrade cycle will take care of itself. As consumers grow more cautious with their tech spending, the industry is adapting – not by accelerating the push for newness, but by reengineering the value proposition.

Trade-in programs are now a core feature of the sales funnel. In the US and UK, major electronics chains have expanded their platforms to offer instant credit for used devices, with bonuses tied to specific models or upgrade windows. The aim isn’t just to incentivise sales, but to soften the sticker shock and signal circular value. In India, trade-ins have gone further. E-commerce platforms have introduced programs that accept non-functional phones and appliances – opening up access to affordable upgrades even for consumers sitting on obsolete tech.

Manufacturers are adjusting their product mix in parallel. Samsung’s A-series smartphones have become a centrepiece of the brand’s value-tier portfolio, offering everyday functionality without the premium markup. Apple, long a symbol of high-end exclusivity, is now leaning into the same logic. The latest iteration of its SE line – and more recently, the iPhone 16e – has quietly outperformed expectations, especially among younger buyers and in cost-sensitive markets.

Support for longer device life is becoming a differentiator. Retailers are offering extended warranties, low-cost protection plans, and – critically – greater support for self-service repair. The “right to repair” movement, once niche, has reached mainstream awareness in the US and Europe, pushing brands to make replacement parts and documentation publicly available. Some have gone further, offering repair kits and in-store diagnostics to extend product life without voiding warranties.

In Southeast Asia, telcos and electronics retailers are updating their messaging to meet the moment. Campaigns that once emphasised speed, camera quality, or size now lean into durability, battery longevity, and environmental impact. Flipkart, for instance, has repositioned its marketing language to speak to responsibility, not just features. These aren’t surface-level tweaks – they’re recalibrations shaped by a consumer mood that’s moved past launch-day glitz in favour of durability and long-term value.

Retailers that can respond to this shift without undermining revenue goals are likely to retain customer loyalty. The challenge now is delivering upgrades that feel earned, not obligatory – and that means competing not just on innovation, but on usefulness and trust.

Innovation Isn’t Dead. But It’s on Trial.

The appetite for innovation isn’t gone – it’s just more selective. As upgrade cycles stretch and wallets tighten, consumers are no longer lured by incremental improvements. They’re still willing to invest in technology, but only when the payoff feels tangible.

Devices that deliver clear, differentiated value are still commanding attention. Foldables, once a novelty, have matured into a legitimate category. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip and Fold lines continue to draw interest, not just for the form factor, but for the utility – larger displays in a pocket-sized profile, and new modes of productivity. Google’s Pixel 8 Pro, powered by its custom Tensor chip, is earning traction for its AI-driven tools that enhance real-world usage – from call screening to image editing – without relying on buzzwords.

Apple’s Vision Pro, meanwhile, may not be a mass-market product yet, but it offers a case study in how anticipation builds when the innovation is clear. Its launch was met with skepticism on price, but its mixed-reality interface and potential as a new computing platform still turned heads. Early adopters aren’t buying features – they’re buying futures.

What’s changed is the level of scrutiny. Consumers aren’t rejecting high-end tech; they’re applying higher standards. Battery life must hold up in real use, not just lab tests. Cameras must perform in varied conditions, not just daylight. AI features need to do something meaningful, not just inflate a spec sheet.

That’s changing the language of marketing. Across the US, UK, and Asia, brands are pulling back on superlatives and pushing use cases. Proof-of-benefit now matters more than megapixel counts or processing speeds. Instead of promoting what’s new, marketers are being forced to answer, “Why now?”

For companies that can deliver answers that resonate – whether through new form factors, smarter chips, or lifestyle utility – there’s still room to win. But unlike before, consumers aren’t just asking whether something works. They’re asking if it’s worth disrupting their routine for.

Global Trends in Divergence

While the broader trajectory of tech consumption is moving toward caution and selectivity, the pace and shape of that shift varies across markets. Cultural norms, economic stability, and consumer trust in brands all play a role in how – and when – people decide to upgrade.

In the US, the shift has been shaped by economic pressure and high consumer debt. Shoppers are taking longer to replace their devices, with the average upgrade cycle now stretching to 3.5 years. Refurbished phones and lower-tier models are gaining traction, especially among Gen Z and older millennials. Brand loyalty remains strong, but purchase decisions are being filtered through a sharper value lens.

The UK follows a similar pattern, though with more aggressive adoption of SIM-only plans and long-term laptop use. Brand messaging emphasises durability and repairability more, and buyers are more willing to switch between ecosystems if they perceive better value.

In Japan, where consumer electronics are deeply embedded into everyday life, the trend is even more conservative. Many households prefer to maintain well-functioning older devices, especially in categories like home tech. The appetite for premium remains – but only if it’s built to last.

Emerging markets present a more nuanced picture. In India and Indonesia, demand continues to grow, but through a pragmatic filter. Consumers still want to upgrade, but they’re making trade-offs between features and affordability. Entry-level and mid-range Android models dominate, and demand for value-driven smart TVs is rising. Device repair shops are also thriving, offering affordable fixes that extend product life.

Germany reflects yet another dimension – green consciousness. There, sustainability is not just an ethical add-on; it’s a purchase driver. Consumers are increasingly seeking eco-certified products, energy efficiency, and software support that extends a product’s usable life.

These regional divergences remind us that consumer behaviour doesn’t shift in a straight line. Global brands must not only read the macro trends, but understand the local motivations underneath them.

Regional Snapshot

Region	Consumer Sentiment	Average Upgrade Cycle	Popular Segments
US	Cautious	3.5 years	Budget, Refurbished
UK	Value-driven	3 years	Sim-only phones, Laptops
Japan	Conservative	4–5 years	Home tech, Premium older models
India	Mixed	2–3 years	Mid-range Android, TVs
Indonesia	Budget-first	2–3 years	Entry smartphones, Repairs
Germany	Green-conscious	4 years	Eco-friendly, Long-life gear

The Next Era of Tech Retail Is Measured, Not Mass-Market

The slowdown in tech upgrades isn’t a phase. It’s a reckoning. Consumers are no longer buying into the rhythm of annual releases and short-term novelty. The next era of consumer tech will be defined not by what’s new, but by what’s necessary – and by how well brands can prove their relevance beyond launch day.

The companies that will thrive over the next five years aren’t the ones with the biggest product pipeline. They’re the ones building around lifecycle value – prioritising modularity, software longevity, and service ecosystems that extend the relationship between user and device. Subscription-based diagnostics, AI-powered support, and upgradeable components are already reshaping how loyalty is earned – and how revenue is sustained without constant churn.

It’s a shift in strategic fundamentals. Margins may compress as consumers stretch the life of their hardware, but brands that invest in intelligent add-ons, system integration, and health or sustainability functionality will find new pathways to relevance. A camera upgrade isn’t enough. Neither is a new colour. If it doesn’t serve a deeper role in how we manage health, reduce waste, or improve everyday decision-making, it won’t pass the new test of value.

That also means guesswork is no longer good enough. The consumer calculus is changing fast, and brands need real insight – beyond sentiment, beyond surveys. They need to know who’s holding back, why they’re hesitating, and what would tip the balance. That’s where market research steps forward – not as validation, but as vision.

We’re not watching a slowdown. We’re witnessing a reset. The expectations have changed, the thresholds have risen, and the reward now goes to those who understand behaviour before it hits the balance sheet.

I’d frame it this way: the most powerful upgrade a brand can offer today isn’t a new feature – it’s foresight.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Wearables aren’t fringe anymore. Once seen as fitness accessories for gym-goers and early adopters, smartwatches and health trackers are becoming everyday essentials. In the first quarter of 2024 alone, global shipments of wearable devices hit 113 million units – an almost 9% jump compared to the year before. And that’s despite persistent inflation and consumer pullback across key markets.

What’s shifting? People are treating these devices less like gadgets and more like tools for managing stress, sleep, and overall health. Consumers are using them to take control – sometimes even before they know something’s wrong. And tech companies are keeping pace, building in more sophisticated health features, wrapping them in sleek design, and expanding their reach far beyond Silicon Valley.

China, for example, led the world in wrist-worn device shipments through most of 2024, with almost 46 million units sold in just the first three quarters. Japan’s older population is increasingly using wearables to monitor vitals and stay independent longer. In the US and UK, mainstream use is now less about steps and more about holistic wellness. Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia and India, lower-cost models are making wearables accessible to first-time buyers – especially younger users who want health data but don’t need an Apple logo to get it.

This rise isn’t just about health – it’s about habits. The adoption curve shows that consumers are steadily folding digital health tracking into their everyday routines, reshaping not only how we think about wellness but also how we’ll live and age in the years ahead.

From step counters to personal health assistants

The evolution of wearables mirrors a larger shift in how we define health. A decade ago, a fitness tracker was mostly just that – a tool for counting steps or logging runs. Now, it’s a wrist-worn health hub, checking heart rhythms, analyzing sleep, detecting stress, and even alerting users to abnormal vitals before symptoms appear.

This transformation hasn’t just changed the product – it’s reshaped the market. What started with athletes and early tech adopters has now spread across age groups and income levels. Smartwatches are on the wrists of office workers in Singapore, older adults in Tokyo, commuters in London, and Gen Z students in Delhi. And the demand isn’t slowing.

Global sales of wearables reached over $84 billion in 2024, with projections putting the market on track to more than double by 2030. That growth is being powered by consumers in Asia, where China continues to dominate volume thanks to homegrown brands, and where India and Southeast Asia are seeing rising uptake of budget-friendly devices. In Japan, demand is strongest among an ageing population who are using wearables for peace of mind – keeping tabs on heart rate, sleep, and medication reminders.

The US and UK still lead when it comes to higher-end models and paid health tracking subscriptions. But what’s consistent across regions is the shift from passive to active wellness. As one analyst at Canalys put it recently, “We’re watching wearables move from fitness to full-spectrum lifestyle tech.”

And while device makers keep layering in new features – temperature sensing, stress tracking, blood oxygen levels – it’s the behavior behind the screen that matters most. Consumers aren’t just buying wearables; they’re changing how they relate to their own health. What’s changing fastest isn’t the tech – it’s how people are folding it into their everyday decisions.

Consumer Adoption Across Generations and Borders

Younger consumers may be driving volume, but wearables are winning over every generation – for very different reasons.

Among Gen Z and millennials, wearables are lifestyle enhancers. Sleep tracking, stress insights, and gamified fitness goals are baked into daily routines, often synced to social media. According to a 2024 YouGov poll in the US and UK, nearly 60% of millennials who own a wearable use it at least five days a week, while Gen Z’s interest is climbing fastest, especially in India, Indonesia, and the Philippines where affordable models are surging.

For younger users, it’s not just fitness. Wearables help manage anxiety, track menstrual cycles, and even gauge productivity. In Southeast Asia, TikTok influencers regularly promote smartwatch brands with built-in wellness challenges, and the appeal is sticking.

By contrast, Gen X and boomers tend to use wearables with a more clinical lens. In Japan, uptake among older adults rose sharply in the past two years, driven by growing interest in managing hypertension, irregular heart rhythms, and fall risk. Apple’s expanded medical alerts and ECG functions are frequently cited by Japanese media as valuable features for ageing consumers. In the UK, NHS-backed pilot programs are offering wearables to older patients recovering from surgery or managing long-term conditions.

In the US, over 40% of Gen Xers who own a wearable say they’ve shared data with a healthcare provider, up from just 27% in 2021. But privacy concerns linger, especially among Gen Z. Despite their high usage, only 26% of Gen Z respondents to a 2024 eMarketer study said they would be comfortable sharing health data with doctors or insurers – suggesting a growing tension between usage and trust.

Here’s how adoption looks across some of the key markets:

Country/Region	Top Adopting Cohorts	Primary Use Cases	Notable Trends
US	Millennials, Gen X	Sleep, stress, fitness, medical alerts	High usage of subscription models like Fitbit Premium
UK	Millennials, Boomers	Heart monitoring, post-surgery recovery	NHS pilot programs integrating wearable tech
Japan	Boomers	Heart rate, fall detection, medication	Growing adoption in eldercare and wellness insurance schemes
India	Gen Z, Millennials	Step counting, calorie burn, wellness apps	High growth in low-cost smartwatch brands
Indonesia	Gen Z	Fitness tracking, daily health challenges	Influencer marketing fueling adoption
China	All age groups	Everything from fitness to medical alerts	Domestic brands dominate; strong public sector partnerships
Singapore	Millennials, Gen X	Health monitoring, workplace wellness	Wearables integrated into corporate wellness programs
Germany	Boomers, Gen X	Blood pressure, diabetes management	Insurance discounts tied to wearable usage

The generations aren’t divided – they’re stacked. What started with Gen Z is now reshaping how everyone manages health. And the industry knows it.

The Technology Arms Race

The more wearables become part of daily life, the harder tech companies are pushing to stay ahead. And they’re not just making devices faster or sleeker – they’re turning them into medical-grade tools, payment platforms, and personal wellbeing dashboards, all in one.

What started as a step-counting competition is now a full-blown innovation sprint. Apple’s latest Watch models detect arrhythmias and track ovulation patterns through temperature fluctuations. Samsung has layered in blood pressure monitoring and sleep scoring tied to cardiovascular insights. Google-backed Fitbit has pivoted from steps to stress, with its newer models using electrodermal activity sensors to gauge emotional strain in real time.

And it’s not just the big brands. In Japan, wearable developers are exploring integration with long-term care plans, while Singapore’s public health teams have trialled government-backed trackers to incentivise exercise and preventive check-ups. In India and Indonesia, homegrown brands like Noise and Realme are keeping up by offering entry-level smartwatches with features that mirror high-end models – heart rate variability, SpO₂ monitoring, and meditation modes – at a fraction of the cost.

The market is clearly rewarding innovation. Smart rings, once a fringe category, are now booming. Oura has become shorthand for wellness among executives and athletes, while Samsung’s anticipated launch of its Galaxy Ring is already stirring up the category. Analysts at Canalys expect the global smart ring segment to triple by 2026, with Asia leading the growth.

Sensors are getting better, but software is where the race is heating up. The shift toward AI-enabled personalisation means devices are starting to behave less like monitors and more like coaches – detecting patterns, learning user behaviour, and nudging people to take breaks, breathe deeply, or move more. Apple’s upcoming software update includes passive tracking of mental well-being, aiming to surface early indicators of depression and anxiety based on behavioural signals.

This arms race is no longer about having the best display or longest battery. It’s about owning the feedback loop: gathering data, interpreting it meaningfully, and turning that insight into habit-changing nudges. And with more users willing to share health data – whether for clinical support or lifestyle optimisation – tech brands are rapidly becoming key players in the future of healthcare.

The Economics of Adoption in a Soft Economy

The flood of innovation might be grabbing headlines, but it’s the economics of wearables that’s driving their expansion into the mainstream – especially as consumers grow more cost-conscious.

Subscription models are a major pivot point. Fitbit Premium, Whoop, and Apple’s Fitness+ aren’t just upsells – they’re positioning wearables as part of a recurring wellness lifestyle. Fitbit Premium alone now has over 10 million paid users globally, according to Alphabet’s 2024 earnings report. Whoop, which has no upfront device cost and instead charges a monthly fee, has doubled its subscriber base since 2022, banking on athletes and executives willing to pay for deeper recovery and strain insights.

Yet in many markets, recurring costs are a harder sell. That’s where public and private incentives are stepping in. Singapore’s government-led LumiHealth program – developed with Apple – offers financial rewards for completing activity challenges and tracking sleep. In Germany, health insurers like TK and Barmer provide partial reimbursements for certified fitness wearables when used as part of preventive care. These programs aren’t about gadgets – they’re about reducing long-term healthcare costs.

Affordability is also being tackled at the hardware level. In India, for example, wearable brands like Noise and boAt have carved out a dominant position by offering smartwatches with fitness and health tracking features for under ₹2,500 ($30). These devices may lack the polish of premium models, but they’ve dramatically widened access, especially among younger consumers in urban areas. The result? India is now one of the fastest-growing wearables markets in the world, with domestic brands accounting for nearly 75% of total shipments in 2024.

In the US and UK, cost still matters. Refurbished models, bundle deals, and corporate wellness perks are helping buyers justify their spending. Entry prices are falling, but expectations are climbing. People want value – not just on the sticker but in the insights, the ecosystem, and the staying power of the device.

Wearables as Part of the Health Ecosystem

As wearable technology becomes more sophisticated, its integration into the broader health ecosystem is deepening, transforming patient care and preventive health strategies. Today’s devices don’t just count steps – they stream health data to doctors, flag risks in real time, and plug directly into telehealth platforms.

Seamless Integration with Healthcare Systems

In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) has initiated pilot programs to incorporate wearable devices into patient care. These programs focus on remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions, allowing healthcare professionals to track vital signs and detect early signs of deterioration without requiring patients to visit healthcare facilities. This approach not only improves patient outcomes but also alleviates the burden on healthcare resources.

Similarly, in Japan, addressing the needs of an ageing population has led to innovative uses of wearable technology. Companies like Tellus You Care have developed non-contact remote monitoring systems that track the health and safety of elderly individuals. These wearables can detect falls and monitor daily activities, enabling caregivers and medical professionals to respond promptly to emergencies.

Enhancing Telehealth Services

In the United States, the synergy between wearable devices and telehealth applications is revolutionising patient care. Wearables can sync with telehealth platforms, providing clinicians with continuous health data streams. This integration allows for more accurate assessments during virtual consultations and facilitates proactive management of conditions such as hypertension and diabetes. For instance, patients using wearable blood pressure monitors can transmit their readings directly to their electronic health records, enabling healthcare providers to adjust treatments in real-time.

Addressing Data Privacy and Reliability Concerns

Still, the deeper wearables penetrate healthcare, the more they raise questions – especially around privacy. These devices collect a steady stream of highly personal health data, and not everyone knows where that information ends up. Breaches are rare, but when they happen, the fallout is big. Surveys show many users remain unclear about how their data is handled, which puts pressure on tech companies and healthcare providers to be far more transparent.

There’s also the question of how reliable the data really is. Wearables offer useful health snapshots, but they’re not always accurate enough to replace clinical tools. If users or doctors lean too heavily on that information, it can lead to wrong calls – or unnecessary stress. That’s why most healthcare providers treat wearable data as one piece of the puzzle, not the whole picture.

How Singapore Turned Wearables into a Public Health Tool

Image credit: LumiHealth

Singapore may be small in size, but it’s been outsized in ambition when it comes to health tech. In 2020, the government launched LumiHealth, a joint initiative with Apple that turns the Apple Watch into a national wellness tool. The idea was simple: incentivise citizens to stay healthy by gamifying fitness and preventive behaviours.

Participants download an app, pair it with an Apple Watch, and earn vouchers by completing health goals like walking, meditating, or getting flu shots. The rewards are modest – up to S$380 over two years – but the behavioral nudge is powerful. More than 200,000 residents signed up in the program’s first year, with high retention and engagement among older adults and those managing chronic conditions.

What makes LumiHealth notable isn’t just its use of wearable tech, but how it reframes wellness as a shared responsibility between citizen, government, and platform. It’s one of the first large-scale examples of a nation leveraging consumer-grade devices for population health – and a blueprint for how data, design, and nudges can shift real-world behaviour.

The program has also informed broader policy. Health officials now see wearables as part of Singapore’s preventive care strategy. In 2024, pilot extensions were announced to include nutrition tracking and mental wellbeing prompts – making the Watch not just a step counter, but a guide for daily living.

From Devices to Digital Selfhood

As wearables sync more deeply with our health, they’re also syncing with something else: identity.

Fitness trackers and smartwatches are no longer just tools – they’ve become quiet status symbols, wellness affirmations, and, in some cases, lifestyle declarations. Wearing a Whoop band or an Oura ring signals a commitment to optimisation. A Garmin on the wrist might suggest serious training. Even design choices – stainless steel finishes, leather straps, minimalist rings – convey intention. The wearable, in short, has become part of the personal brand.

This isn’t accidental. Tech companies are leaning into the rise of the quantified self: a movement that treats data as a mirror for self-improvement. Sleep scores are shared in group chats. Heart rate variability is discussed on Reddit threads. There’s even a social layer – Apple’s fitness rings can be closed collaboratively, while Fitbit allows real-time challenges with friends. What began as private tracking is now an interactive, sometimes performative, pursuit.

That said, cultural context shapes how wearables are used – and what they mean.

Region	Attitude Toward Wearables	Underlying Values
US & UK	Individualised health and performance tools	Self-optimisation, control, productivity
Japan	Monitors for long-term care and group wellbeing	Safety, longevity, family responsibility
India	Lifestyle enhancers for youth and urbanites	Aspirational health, affordability, digital status
Singapore	Incentivised national wellness participation	Community health, public-private collaboration
China	Everyday convenience tools across all ages	Functional utility, tech-forward lifestyle

In the West, wearable data is often framed in terms of productivity – how to sleep better, train harder, or manage stress. In much of Asia, especially in countries like Japan and Singapore, adoption has leaned more toward collective well-being: tracking to stay safe, support ageing populations, or meet national health goals. While the hardware might be the same, the intention behind it can be radically different.

That’s the shift: wearables aren’t just keeping score anymore. They’re helping shape identity – quiet signals of the kind of life we’re trying to live.

The Future Forecast: Smart Living 2030

If the last decade was about wearables gaining acceptance, the next will be about wearables becoming invisible – fully embedded in our surroundings, our health systems, and our daily decision-making. By 2030, the line between body and technology will blur further, not through flashy upgrades, but through quiet, continuous presence.

One of the most anticipated frontiers is continuous, noninvasive blood glucose monitoring, widely viewed as the “holy grail” of wearables. Major tech players, including Apple and Samsung, have been investing heavily in research to bring this functionality to market. Success here wouldn’t just serve diabetics – it would recalibrate how millions think about food, energy, and performance in real time.

Another inflection point will be emotional health. Devices are beginning to detect mood states based on physical cues – micro-fluctuations in skin temperature, heart rate variability, or voice tone. In the next few years, we may see wearables that can flag the early signs of anxiety, burnout, or depressive episodes before the user is even aware. The implications for preventative mental health are enormous – but so are the ethical questions.

Artificial intelligence will be the connective tissue that binds these advances together. Already, AI is being used to turn raw data into feedback loops, coaching users to adjust behaviours. But by 2030, it’s likely that wearables will be part of more coordinated, multi-device ecosystems – syncing not just with phones and watches but also with smart homes, personal health dashboards, and even city infrastructure.

It’s a shift adjacent industries are already watching closely. Insurers are piloting risk models based on real-time biometric data. Pharma firms are testing wearable-driven trial designs and adherence tools. And in some cities, planners are exploring responsive environments – public spaces that adjust to physiological signals, from light and sound to air quality.

What’s next for wearables won’t be defined by tech specs – but by what people do with the data, and who they’re willing to share it with. Smart living by 2030 may not look like sci-fi. It may just look… seamless.

A Tipping Point for Personal Health

We’ve passed the point where wearables are optional tech accessories. They’ve moved into the domain of lifestyle infrastructure – tools people rely on not just for information, but for insight, motivation, and increasingly, autonomy.

When Apple’s COO Jeff Williams stood on stage at CES and said, “We’re not just building a watch – we’re building a guardian for your wellbeing,” it wasn’t marketing hype. It was a quiet signal of where the industry sees its role going: less device, more guide.

And yet, as wearables grow smarter, more embedded, and more predictive, we’re entering a new kind of contract with our devices – one where personal health is constantly measured, interpreted, and nudged. The convenience is undeniable. The value is rising. But so is the question: who controls the loop?

Will the decade ahead empower us to become more informed, more proactive, and more in tune with our health? Or will we find ourselves outsourcing our instincts to a wristband?

It’s a future being shaped now, one wrist at a time.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

On a rainy Thursday in Jakarta, over 8,000 Sociolla customers received a flash SMS alert offering 20% off select skincare products. By 12:10 p.m., web traffic had tripled. Less than 24 hours later, a follow-up email landed in their inboxes – cleanly designed, product-focused, and personalised with recommendations based on browsing history. The conversion spike didn’t come from a single channel. It came from the right message, at the right time, on the right screen.

It’s a pattern playing out across global markets. With notification fatigue and rising acquisition costs, brands are rediscovering the power of email and SMS – two of the most overlooked but effective tools in the marketer’s arsenal. What’s different now is how they’re being used together.

According to Statista, ad spending in the SMS Advertising market worldwide is forecasted to reach US$809.05m in 2025. Email continues to dominate ROI metrics, delivering an average return of $36 for every $1 spent. But the real shift is strategic. Marketers are no longer siloing these tools. They’re orchestrating them.

In the US, Brooklinen sends a gentle SMS nudge 30 minutes after an abandoned cart, followed by an email packed with customer reviews and lifestyle imagery to rebuild interest. In the UK, ASOS primes audiences with SMS during peak sale periods, then follows up with immersive lookbooks that drive larger basket sizes. For Asian markets like Indonesia and Thailand, timing SMS around commutes or lunch hours and layering email content after hours is a high-conversion formula.

And increasingly, WhatsApp Business is becoming part of that mix. In regions where the app dominates daily communication, brands are using it to share order updates, personalised offers, and real-time service, bridging the immediacy of SMS with the interactivity of chat. In countries like India, Malaysia, and the Philippines, WhatsApp isn’t just a messaging tool. It’s a conversion channel.

What’s emerging is a model of engagement where immediacy and storytelling coexist. Consumers may not articulate it, but their actions show a clear preference: urgency on the lock screen, depth in the inbox – and conversation in the chat thread.

Data That Demands Attention

The performance metrics behind email and SMS are impressive.

Omnisend’s 2024 ecommerce report shows that automated emails account for just 2% of sends but drive 41% of all email orders. These messages see open rates of 42.1%, click rates of 5.4%, and convert at 1.9% – outperforming bulk campaigns across every measure. Automated emails like welcome, cart abandonment, and browse abandonment flows are particularly effective. Take Baking Steel, a U.S. brand known for its professional-grade pizza-baking surfaces. The company drives 33% of its total email revenue through automated messages, even though they represent just 2.3% of sends. Their cart abandonment series alone accounts for 27% of email revenue, while their welcome series delivers between $10 to $15 per email sent. It’s a clear example of how a small number of well-timed, behaviour-based messages can punch far above their weight.

When paired with SMS, the impact grows sharper. SMS open rates hover around 98%, making it a high-visibility tool for time-sensitive nudges and transactional prompts.

Retailers are taking notice. In Southeast Asia, Love, Bonito enhances customer loyalty through LBCommunity+, offering perks like early access alerts and personalised styling sessions. While specific performance metrics aren’t publicly available, the brand’s hybrid approach – pairing SMS and email across loyalty tiers – has been widely recognised for deepening engagement and increasing repeat purchases among members.

The numbers tell a clear story. SMS delivers reach and urgency, while email drives context and conversion. Together, they’re not just a communications strategy – they’re an engine for revenue.

Speed Meets Substance

Brands are learning that velocity alone doesn’t drive results – it’s the balance between urgency and depth that converts.

Email and SMS each offer distinct strengths. SMS delivers speed, with nearly instantaneous open rates – ideal for alerts, reminders, and real-time nudges. Email offers space to tell a story, showcase visuals, and reinforce value.

Brooklinen, a US-based home goods brand, effectively demonstrates this balance through its abandoned cart email strategy. The emails highlight free shipping, surface customer reviews, and feature clean product visuals, adding persuasion where a short-form message might fall short. The brand’s approach shows how reinforcing urgency with context can reignite purchase intent.

Image Credit: Active Campaign

Beauty Pie, a UK-based direct-to-consumer beauty brand, integrates email into its promotional ecosystem by offering exclusive perks to subscribers, including discounts and early access offers. These incentives drive sign-ups and build a permission-based channel for richer engagement.

While many brands continue experimenting with channel timing, the best results come when communication flows are mapped with intent – starting with immediacy and followed by storytelling.

Timing Isn’t Everything – Coordination Is

Hitting send at the right time is no longer enough. Today’s consumers expect connected experiences – where messages don’t just arrive on schedule but arrive with purpose.

Disjointed campaigns risk confusion or, worse, being ignored. According to Omnisend, brands that use three or more channels in a coordinated way see a 287% higher purchase rate than those using single-channel outreach. But coordination doesn’t mean duplication. It means sequencing messages across platforms in a way that feels human, not robotic.

Brands that succeed build journeys, starting with a short SMS that grabs attention and followed by a visual email that deepens the story. Automated triggers based on user behaviour (like browse abandonment or wishlist adds) help ensure these touchpoints feel timely, not templated.

This shift from reactive timing to proactive orchestration pushes marketers to rethink their flows. It’s not about when a message is sent; it’s about how it fits into the bigger narrative.

Personalisation That Pays Off

Personalisation is no longer optional; it’s the standard. Brands that succeed use customer behaviour as the blueprint for when, where, and how to communicate.

Brooklinen exemplifies this strategy by utilising behavioural data to send personalised messages – welcoming new subscribers, reminding users of abandoned carts, and re-engaging inactive shoppers. Each email is optimised for timing and relevance, often highlighting customer testimonials and free shipping incentives to drive conversions. These flows are built to respond, not interrupt.

Personalisation at scale means more than using a first name – it means designing communications that adapt to customer intent. The brands that get this right don’t just see better metrics; they build better relationships.

Inside the Inbox and Lock Screen

The real test of a campaign happens in seconds – on a lock screen swipe or an inbox scan. Successful brands know that getting the message seen is only the beginning. Getting it acted on is the goal.

Brooklinen’s cart abandonment email is a masterclass in the visual hierarchy: a clean header, compelling product image, a short reassurance (“Don’t worry, your cart’s still here”), and a call-to-action button with contrast and urgency. Paired with their SMS—“Still thinking it over? Your Brooklinen cart’s waiting…”—the combined impact is gentle and effective. No pressure, just presence.

Email marketers often focus on copy, but design plays just as critical a role. Omnisend recommends mobile-first layouts with clear CTAs, minimal text, and product visuals above the fold. For SMS, the best-performing messages are under 160 characters and feature clickable short links – delivered during peak engagement hours like lunchtime or early evening.

Though design elements may vary by region and industry, the pattern remains consistent: a visual hook, a clear message, and a frictionless path to action.

Whether it’s a text reminder to “Finish checking out before your 10% off expires” or an email showcasing reviews from people with similar purchase behaviour, these touchpoints are designed to feel relevant at the moment. Not just another notification.

Lessons from the Brands Getting It Right

Some brands aren’t just testing SMS and email integration; they’re building it into how they communicate. And the results show.

Brooklinen has become a case study in lifecycle marketing. Their welcome flows introduce the brand’s voice with simplicity and style, often including a first-purchase discount and lifestyle imagery that reflects their clean aesthetic. Follow-up emails and SMS reminders – especially around cart abandonment – are personalised, brief, and supported by social proof. This multistep approach increases the likelihood of conversion without overloading the user.

Love, Bonito, a fashion brand based in Southeast Asia, strengthens loyalty through its LBCommunity+ program. Members receive early access notifications and personalised recommendations via email. While SMS is often used for time-sensitive drops, email delivers richer content – lookbooks, styling tips, and editor picks tailored to user preferences. It’s a strategy that respects both format and context.

Warby Parker, in the US, offers another strong model. Their abandoned cart emails pair sharp product imagery with service-driven reminders – like free shipping and easy returns. Meanwhile, SMS is used sparingly but strategically, such as to confirm appointments or alert customers when their in-store pickup is ready. The brand’s restraint adds to its impact.

Each of these brands succeeds not by doing more but by doing it better. Clear roles for each channel. Data-driven triggers. Messages that respect the medium and the consumer’s attention span.

Avoiding the Double Tap Trap

With nonstop notifications, message fatigue is real, and brands that overcommunicate are paying the price.

According to GetApp’s 2024 Digital Content Consumer Survey, 40% of U.S. consumers unsubscribe from brand texts and emails at least once weekly. Over half will unsubscribe if they receive four or more marketing messages from the same company within 30 days. The problem isn’t communication; it’s saturation.

Many consumers also see diminishing value in brand outreach. Nearly 49% of Americans say more than half of the emails they receive feel like junk, a perception that erodes trust and damages engagement.

The smartest marketers are now designing campaigns that avoid redundancy. A time-sensitive SMS may kick off a promotion, while email follows with more detail and imagery. Triggered automation ensures once a customer clicks or converts on one channel, the other backs off – preserving relevance without repetition.

Avoiding the double tap isn’t just about frequency; it’s about flow. Respecting your customer’s attention span is now a competitive advantage.

What Great Design Looks Like

In integrated campaigns, how a message looks can matter as much as what it says. Design is the first filter – especially on mobile, where space is limited and attention is scarce.

Omnisend’s benchmarks point to a consistent pattern: campaigns with a clear CTA, minimal text, and mobile-optimised visuals significantly outperform cluttered or text-heavy alternatives. For SMS, the highest-performing messages stay under 160 characters, often including a short, trackable link and a clear sense of urgency – whether it’s “Last chance: 20% off ends tonight” or “Your order is ready for pickup.”

On the other hand, emails benefit from layered content – clear headers, bold product imagery above the fold, and buttons that pop. Brooklinen’s campaigns frequently use short copy and soft colour palettes that echo the brand’s tone. Beauty brands like Glossier and Love, Bonito often lead with visuals, letting product photos and user-generated content do the talking.

The golden rule is design for the scroll. Whether it’s a swipeable message or a mobile inbox preview, every pixel counts. Alignment between email and SMS design – through tone, colour, and CTA language – helps reinforce the message without repetition.

The most effective campaigns don’t just look good. They work hard in small spaces – and stay out of the way once the job is done.

The Tech That Ties It All Together

Smart strategy means little without the infrastructure to support it. Behind every well-timed message and seamless customer journey is a stack of tools built to automate, segment, and adapt in real-time.

Marketers are increasingly turning to platforms that integrate email and SMS – allowing for centralised data, unified campaign flows, and cross-channel automation. Brands use technology to sync customer behaviour across touchpoints, trigger messages based on actions (like page views or cart additions), and suppress redundant sends if a user has already converted.

This orchestration isn’t just efficient; it’s essential. With third-party cookies phasing out, first-party data has become the lifeblood of personalised marketing. Integrated platforms offer a direct line to user behaviour, purchase history, and channel preferences, helping marketers reach the right audience without overstepping.

Brooklinen’s flows, for example, are powered by behaviour-triggered automation that adjusts timing and content depending on customer interaction. Meanwhile, Glossier leverages its CRM system to send personalised messages to loyalty members based on engagement tiers and product affinity.

Tech isn’t the show’s star – but it’s what keeps the spotlight aligned. Without it, even the best creative and messaging strategy risks falling flat.

Final Send-Off

Consumers aren’t just scrolling; they’re actively filtering. Every ping, preview, and push competes for attention in a space where attention is finite.

The brands winning today aren’t louder. They’re smarter. They know when to text and when to email. They automate without sounding robotic. They build systems that talk to each other so their messages don’t overlap – or get ignored.

As marketing budgets tighten and customer expectations rise, the margin for error shrinks. SMS and email, when used in sync, offer rare precision: fast, personal, and measurable.

The smart play isn’t about choosing the right channel. It’s about connecting them and knowing when to pause.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The wellness economy isn’t just growing – it’s taking over.

What started as a niche industry of boutique fitness studios and green juice bars has exploded into a $1.8 trillion global powerhouse. Today, wellness means AI-powered health diagnostics, biohacking retreats, and personalised longevity plans tailored down to the cellular level. Consumers aren’t just tracking steps anymore; they’re measuring stress responses, monitoring metabolic health, and optimising their bodies like data-driven machines.

And they’re not just buying into wellness – they’re questioning it. Who can prove their claims? Which brands offer real science over marketing hype? Consumers demand transparency, personalisation, and measurable results. The wellness-first mandate is rewriting the rules of business. Products that fail to deliver real well-being won’t just lose market share – they’ll disappear.

From skincare to financial services, travel to technology, brands are racing to embed wellness into every touchpoint. But who’s doing it right? And how will this next phase of the wellness revolution separate the disruptors from the dinosaurs?

Wellness as a Brand Imperative

Wellness isn’t an industry anymore. It’s an expectation. And for brands, failing to deliver isn’t just a missed opportunity – it’s a death sentence.

Millennials and Gen Z aren’t buying into wellness trends blindly. Raised on health tracking and biohacking culture, they don’t just want feel-good branding; they demand proof. Can a product deliver real cognitive benefits? Does a service measurably improve longevity? If not, it won’t last.

The stakes go beyond retail. Consumers want stress-free money management in finance—automated savings, real-time spending insights, and AI-powered financial planning. Employees now evaluate companies in the workplace on their mental health support, flexibility, and work-life balance policies. A free gym membership or wellness app isn’t enough. If brands don’t take well-being seriously, they’ll lose top talent to those who prioritise it.

Wellness is not just a product feature; it is an expectation that spans industries. The question isn’t whether brands should adapt. It’s whether they’ll survive if they don’t.

Workplace Wellness Is No Longer a Perk – It’s a Business Survival Strategy

Employee burnout is no longer a quiet crisis – it’s a corporate emergency. A disengaged, exhausted workforce isn’t just unproductive; it’s walking out the door. The companies that fail to prioritise well-being aren’t just losing morale. They’re losing their workforce.

For years, workplace wellness meant subsidised gym memberships and stress management webinars. That’s not enough anymore. Employees demand real change – flexible work, mental health support, and financial security. Companies that resist? They’ll watch their top talent leave for organisations that treat well-being as a business priority, not a line item in HR’s annual report.

Some companies are getting it right. Goldman Sachs expanded its mental health offerings, giving employees free therapy and resilience coaching. Microsoft’s four-day workweek experiment in Japan resulted in a 40% productivity boost – without burnout. Salesforce has gone beyond wellness perks, integrating financial literacy coaching and savings programs to reduce employees’ money stress.

The message is clear: workers expect companies to care about more than just their output. Leadership isn’t about offering wellness benefits as an afterthought; it’s about embedding well-being into the foundation of corporate culture.

The companies that lead on workplace wellness won’t just retain talent – they’ll attract the next generation of high performers. The ones that don’t? They’ll be left scrambling when the best employees leave for competitors that take well-being seriously.

Innovations in Product Development to Meet Wellness Expectations

At 3 p.m., Amanda Chang hits a wall. She’s not tired from lack of sleep, nor has she skipped lunch. She’s dehydrated—a reality she only recently started tracking after her smartwatch nudged her with a hydration reminder. Now, like millions of others, she reaches for an electrolyte packet instead of an afternoon coffee.

She’s not alone. The hydration economy is booming, fueled by a new consumer mindset that views optimal fluid balance as a pillar of longevity, mental clarity, and peak performance. Once reserved for athletes, electrolyte-enhanced drinks and functional hydration products have gone mainstream, reshaping how people approach energy and wellness.

Companies have taken note. Unilever’s acquisition of Liquid I.V. signals a strategic shift – hydration is no longer a niche category but a global wellness priority. Nestlé, too, has expanded its portfolio of functional beverages, tapping into a market where consumers aren’t just looking to quench their thirst but to optimise their biological performance.

This is just one example of how brands reinvent their products to align with a wellness-first consumer base. Across categories, companies are shifting from passive health benefits to science-backed, measurable, and highly personalised solutions.

In food and beverage, gut health is now front and centre. Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics are transforming everything from yoghurt to snack bars, with major players racing to offer digestive-support products backed by clinical research. Cognitive performance is another emerging focus, fueling demand for nootropics and adaptogens – ingredients designed to enhance focus, stress resilience, and mental clarity.

The shift toward longevity and biohacking is accelerating in beauty and personal care. Consumers are moving beyond anti-ageing to skin health at the cellular level, with brands investing in microbiome research, peptides, and NAD+ boosters to enhance skin regeneration. Shiseido, for example, has poured resources into advanced skin longevity research, aligning with the consumer push for products that deliver quantifiable, long-term benefits rather than superficial fixes.

Meanwhile, household and consumer goods are experiencing a clean-label revolution. Transparency in sourcing and formulations is no longer optional – shoppers scrutinise ingredient lists, demanding non-toxic, sustainable, and ethically sourced products. Regulatory bodies are catching up, forcing brands to substantiate wellness claims with hard evidence. In a significant move, the Federal Trade Commission issued its first major update to health marketing guidelines since 1998, tightening restrictions on unproven claims and requiring all health-related advertising to be backed by credible, peer-reviewed scientific research.

Under the updated guidance, the FTC is taking a firm stance against what it identifies as “vague qualifying terms” in advertising. The agency asserts that all health-related claims made by companies must be substantiated by credible, peer-reviewed scientific research. This shift signals a tougher regulatory environment for health product marketers, emphasising the importance of transparency and evidence-based communication in an industry often criticised for its lack of accountability.

Wellness is no longer an add-on – it’s the foundation of modern product development. Companies that treat it as a marketing gimmick risk losing to disruptors who understand that today’s consumers aren’t just buying products. They’re investing in performance, longevity, and measurable results.

AI, Wearables, and Predictive Wellness

Your body is now a data stream, and Big Tech wants in.

What started with step counters and calorie trackers has evolved into AI-driven biohacking, where algorithms don’t just monitor your health – they attempt to predict and optimise it. Consumers are no longer passively checking fitness stats; they’re outsourcing their well-being to wearables, biometric scans, and AI-driven health assistants.

And the biggest players are moving fast. Google’s AI-powered dermatology tool claims medical-grade accuracy. Apple’s Health app quietly reshapes preventive medicine, feeding real-time biometric data into predictive alerts for conditions like atrial fibrillation. Platforms like InsideTracker promise to extend your lifespan using machine learning to analyze your blood biomarkers and recommend longevity-focused interventions.

AI-powered mental health tools, like Woebot, offer chatbot-based cognitive behavioural therapy. Meanwhile, smart rings and glucose monitors claim to optimise health.

The next frontier? Brain-computer interfaces. Neuralink is experimenting with cognitive enhancement, and startups like Sens.ai are launching neurofeedback headsets that claim to rewire the brain for improved focus and resilience.

As technology continues to merge with biology, wellness is shifting from a reactive model to a precision-driven, predictive experience. Consumers no longer want generic health advice; they expect data-driven, AI-curated, real-time insights that empower them to optimise their lives with surgical precision. Brands that can deliver on this promise will lead the next wave of the wellness economy.

Wellness Is Rewiring the Way We Shop, Stay, and Travel

The future of retail and hospitality isn’t just about convenience; it’s about well-being. From high-end hotels to grocery stores, brands are redesigning physical spaces to support mental, physical, and emotional health in ways that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

At Lululemon’s immersive wellness hubs, customers can do more than shop for activewear – they can meditate, attend breathwork sessions, or recover with guided treatments. Sephora is curating its shelves to reflect a new consumer demand: clean beauty products with transparent, safety-tested ingredients. Meanwhile, luxury hotels are pivoting from indulgence to longevity, offering IV therapy, cryotherapy, and biometric-driven nutrition plans designed for more than relaxation. They’re selling optimisation.

Even mass-market brands are responding. Airlines are no longer just upgrading seat comfort; they’re integrating circadian lighting and personalised nutrition options to mitigate jet lag. Coworking spaces are incorporating biophilic design and air purification systems as professionals demand healthier work environments.

This shift isn’t cosmetic; it’s structural. Wellness is no longer a category – it’s a design principle shaping how we shop, travel, and experience spaces. Consumers now expect retail stores, hotels, and workspaces to not only offer products and services but also actively enhance their well-being.

For brands, this is no longer about staying ahead of the curve. It’s about staying relevant.

Wellness Goes Ethical, But Are Brands Keeping Up?

Consumers aren’t just buying wellness. They’re demanding it on their terms. From sustainable packaging to ethical sourcing, today’s shoppers expect well-being to extend beyond the individual to the planet and society. And they’re holding brands accountable like never before.

This shift isn’t theoretical; it’s shaping spending habits. Nearly 80% of global consumers say sustainability influences purchasing decisions (IBM Institute for Business Value). That’s why Patagonia’s commitment to regenerative supply chains isn’t just branding; it’s a business necessity. Aesop has built a cult following around its sustainability-first skincare, while Stella McCartney is pushing the fashion industry toward bioengineered materials and circular design to cut waste.

But ethical wellness isn’t just about environmental impact – it’s about who gets included. Wellness has long catered to a narrow demographic, but consumers now expect cultural competence and inclusivity. Fenty Skin has set a new standard in beauty with its commitment to diverse skin types, while fitness brands are finally recognising the need for more representation in product design and marketing.

Yet, for all the progress, the industry still faces a reckoning. Greenwashing remains rampant, with brands exaggerating sustainability claims without transparency. Inclusivity marketing is everywhere, but how many companies reflect it in their hiring and leadership? Consumers are paying attention, and performative wellness will no longer cut it.

The new era of ethical wellness isn’t just about selling sustainability or inclusivity. It’s about proving it. The brands that back up their claims with action will earn loyalty. Those that don’t? They’ll be called out and left behind.

The Future of Wellness Is Personal, and Big Business Knows It

Wellness is no longer about staying healthy. It’s about engineering longevity, optimising biology, and hacking the human body for peak performance.

This isn’t science fiction. Billion-dollar biotech startups like Altos Labs are pouring funding into cellular rejuvenation, while advances in senolytics – compounds designed to eliminate ageing cells – are setting the stage for a world where ageing itself could become a treatable condition. Skincare, nutrition, and fitness brands are already pivoting from anti-ageing to lifespan optimisation, signalling a shift that will reshape consumer health as we know it.

At the same time, digital wellness is becoming a fully immersive, data-driven experience. The metaverse isn’t just a playground for gamers – it’s becoming a wellness hub. Virtual reality meditation apps like TRIPP are gamifying mindfulness, and AI-powered health coaches are turning biometric data into real-time lifestyle interventions.

The era of one-size-fits-all health solutions is ending. DNA-driven nutrition plans, microbiome-based dietary regimens, and continuous glucose monitoring replace outdated wellness norms. Companies like Viome are leveraging gut microbiome analysis to create ultra-personalised food and supplement plans, while wearable tech is evolving from passive tracking to real-time health optimisation.

For brands, the opportunity is massive, but so is the pressure. Consumers will no longer accept generic wellness promises. They expect science-backed, precision-driven solutions that seamlessly integrate into their daily lives.

The brands that embrace hyper-personalised, predictive wellness will define the future of health. The ones that don’t will be left selling yesterday’s version of well-being in a world that’s already looking ahead.

The Wellness-First Mandate – Adapt or Be Left Behind

Wellness is no longer a trend. It’s the economic engine reshaping industries, the cultural shift redefining consumer priorities, and the business imperative separating industry leaders from the obsolete.

This transformation isn’t about virtue signalling or slapping a “clean” label on a product. It’s about structural change – a radical rethinking of how brands serve consumers when well-being is the ultimate currency. Companies that embed wellness into their DNA, from product formulation to workplace culture, will thrive. Those who view it as a passing fad will fade into irrelevance.

The future belongs to brands that do more than just sell – they safeguard, optimise, and extend quality of life. Precision health, longevity science, AI-driven well-being, and sustainability aren’t niche concerns anymore; they are market expectations. Consumers aren’t just buying – they’re scrutinising. They want proof, not promises.

For brands, the choice is stark: evolve or fall behind. Wellness is no longer a consumer preference; it’s a corporate survival strategy. The brands that hesitate won’t just lose market share. They’ll disappear.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

When Miguel and Mikayla Reyes launched Quesadilla Gorilla in Visalia, California, they weren’t just selling quesadillas – they were tapping into a growing demand for customisation. By letting customers build their meals with fresh ingredients and signature salsas, they transformed a small local shop into a rapidly expanding chain.

Fast food chains are no longer defined by speed alone – choice now drives the industry. Consumers are rejecting fixed menus in favour of meals that fit their diets, tastes, and lifestyles. A 2024 report by Tillster found that one in three quick-service diners skipped a restaurant because it lacked customisation, a jump from 21% the previous year.

Personalisation isn’t just a trend – it’s an expectation. More than half of diners (58%) say they’re more likely to recommend a fast food chain if they had a positive custom-ordering experience. For Quick Serve Restaurants or QSRs, that’s not just about loyalty – it’s about survival.

QSRs are racing to keep up, using technology to turn customisation from a challenge into a competitive advantage. Self-service kiosks, now fixtures in many chains, fuel this shift. Demand is rising fast – 57% of diners want more of them, up from 36% last year. Beyond convenience, kiosks give customers greater control over their meals, making customisation seamless.

But technology alone isn’t enough. A seamless experience matters just as much as the ability to customise. Nearly nine in ten diners (89%) say inconsistency across locations frustrates them, and more than half (57%) will take their business elsewhere because of it. Fast food chains that embrace personalisation but fail to execute it uniformly risk losing the very customers they’re trying to attract.

Image credit: Quesadilla Gorilla

Quesadilla Gorilla is proof that customisation isn’t just a gimmick – it’s a growth strategy. By giving customers complete control over their meals, the California-based chain has built a cult-like following and expanded rapidly. When diners feel ownership over what they’re eating, they don’t just return – they become brand ambassadors.

The Consumer-Driven Shift

Fast food was built on uniformity – the same burger, the same fries, the same experience. But consumers now expect meals that reflect their diets, values, and preferences – and they’re willing to pay for that control.

A recent report found that 72% of fast food customers prefer restaurants with personalised ordering, and a third have ditched a restaurant that lacked it. The message is clear: if QSRs don’t offer customisation, someone else will.

Dietary Needs Are Driving Change

Health-conscious consumers and specialised diets are reshaping fast food. More people are adopting plant-based, keto, and allergen-free options, forcing QSRs to adapt. In the UK, a study found that 34% of Brits follow a flexitarian, vegetarian, or vegan diet. McDonald’s responded with its McPlant burger – a fully vegan option that proved so popular it became a permanent menu item.

Gluten-free and allergen-conscious dining is no longer niche – it’s mainstream. In the US, 32 million people have food allergies, and one in ten adults avoids gluten. QSRs that once overlooked these needs are now making them a priority. Chipotle lets customers filter its entire digital menu by allergens and diet preferences, making ordering safer and easier.

Regional Preferences Are Reshaping Menus

Personalisation isn’t a one-size-fits-all trend – it looks different in every market. In Japan, MOS Burger lets customers swap ingredients for vegan, keto, or high-protein options. In India, where 40% of the population is vegetarian, McDonald’s runs separate vegetarian kitchens in select locations to meet demand.

Image credit: Salad Stop!

Customisation in Southeast Asia is shaped by local food culture. In Singapore, SaladStop! thrives on made-to-order salads and grain bowls, catering to a region where 65% of consumers prioritise fresh, healthy ingredients (Statista, 2024). In South Korea, Lotteria’s “Mix Your Own Burger” system lets customers pick everything from the bun to the sauce, tapping into a younger generation that values choice.

Fast Food No Longer Means Fast Decisions

Fast food has evolved from a mass-production model to a made-for-you experience. Consumers expect meals to match their dietary needs and personal values and are willing to pay for that control. Whether it’s plant-based options, high-protein choices, or allergen-free meals, customisation is no longer a perk; it’s the baseline. The brands that keep up are driving higher order values and stronger customer loyalty. Those that fall behind risk becoming irrelevant.

How AI and Technology Are Making It Possible

Technology is reshaping fast food, making personalisation scalable. AI and machine learning are making customisation scalable, helping restaurants tailor meals while streamlining operations. For fast food chains, this isn’t just about convenience – it’s about survival in an era where consumer expectations are shifting faster than ever.

AI-Powered Ordering Systems

Image credit: Wendy’s

Automation is now streamlining drive-thru service. Wendy’s has partnered with Google Cloud to roll out FreshAI, a voice assistant designed to speed up service and reduce errors. Already in 100 locations, the system is set to expand to 600 outlets by 2025. While some diners appreciate the efficiency, others miss the human touch – highlighting the tension between automation and experience in fast food’s tech-driven future.

Digital Kiosks and Personalisation

Self-service kiosks are not just about convenience – they’re becoming personalised digital waiters. AI-driven kiosks now remember past orders, suggest meal pairings, and tailor recommendations based on dietary needs. By reducing friction and speeding up service, these machines are transforming customer interactions – and helping fast food chains increase sales along the way.

Machine Learning for Menu Customisation

The smartest menus now learn from you. Machine learning lets QSRs track past orders, adapt to dietary preferences, and even tweak menus based on ingredient availability. Running low on an item? The system suggests an alternative in real-time. Beyond customer convenience, these AI-driven menus help restaurants reduce waste, streamline inventory, and boost margins.

Operational Efficiency Through AI

AI isn’t just in the front of house—it’s redefining kitchen operations behind the scenes. Predictive analytics help QSRs anticipate demand, adjust staffing, and keep inventory tight. The same technology can even flag equipment issues before they cause breakdowns, cutting costly downtime. The result? Faster service, lower costs, and a more efficient back-end operation.

This shift isn’t just changing how customers order – it’s restructuring the entire industry, from kitchen design to staffing strategies.

Business Impact and Industry Disruption

The push for hyper-personalisation is reshaping how fast food chains operate, forcing them to balance customisation with efficiency. Kitchens once designed for assembly-line efficiency are now adapting to a made-to-order model – one that delivers choice but also adds complexity. While brands that get it right see higher sales and stronger customer loyalty, those that can’t balance personalisation with efficiency risk slowing down service and driving up costs.

Rethinking fast food Kitchens

Fast food kitchens are undergoing a major overhaul to meet the demands of customised ordering. McDonald’s is experimenting with automation at a Texas location, where robots handle grilling and order assembly. Meanwhile, AI-powered kitchen display systems (KDS) are helping restaurants reduce human error and improve efficiency.

Chipotle’s “Chipotlanes” are redefining the drive-thru experience. By separating app-based orders from in-store transactions, these digital lanes reduce congestion and speed up fulfilment. CEO Brian Niccol reports that digital sales reached 37% of total revenue in 2023 – a figure likely to climb as more customers opt for customised meals.

The Business Upside

Customisation isn’t just a consumer preference – it’s also good for business. A study by McKinsey & Company found that brands offering personalised experiences drive 40% more revenue than competitors that stick to traditional menus. In fast food, higher-order values, repeat purchases, and improved brand loyalty are the biggest wins.

Data collection is another major advantage. Every custom order provides insight into consumer preferences, allowing QSRs to fine-tune menu options, predict demand, and minimise food waste. A report by the National Restaurant Association found that smart inventory management driven by AI could reduce waste by up to 15%, saving businesses millions annually.

The Hidden Costs of Personalisation

Despite the upside, the shift toward extreme customisation brings new risks. More complex orders require more ingredients, increased prep time, and a higher likelihood of operational slowdowns. In 2023, Shake Shack’s CFO, Katie Fogertey, noted that over-customisation led to longer wait times, straining kitchens and frustrating customers.

There’s also the cost of technology. AI-powered ordering systems, digital kiosks, and smart kitchen tech require significant upfront investment – something smaller franchises may struggle to afford. According to a 2024 industry analysis by Deloitte, the cost of implementing AI-driven food prep technology can range from $500,000 to over $2 million per location, depending on the scale of automation.

For QSRs, the challenge is clear: how to balance efficiency with personalisation without sacrificing speed or profitability. Some are leaning on AI, others on pre-set customisation limits, but one thing is certain – fast food is no longer just about being fast.

Fast Food’s New Balancing Act: Customisation Versus Efficiency

Fast food chains are under pressure to rethink their entire model as customisation moves from novelty to necessity. The old system of standardised meals is being replaced by flexible menus that cater to individual preferences, but adapting at scale is no easy feat. While personalised ordering can boost sales and improve inventory management, the operational complexities are mounting – forcing even the biggest QSRs to reassess how they function.

Kitchens Built for Speed Are Getting a Makeover

The shift toward customisation is forcing QSRs to rethink not just their menus, but their kitchens. Designed for efficiency and volume, traditional back-of-house operations are now struggling to accommodate a growing demand for personalised meals. Chains that once thrived on uniformity are now experimenting with new layouts, technology, and automation to keep up.

Quick-service chains are automating to stay competitive. McDonald’s is testing a robotics-driven location in Texas, where AI-powered kiosks and automated fry stations are reducing labour costs and speeding up prep times. At the same time, Chipotle is using automation in its kitchens, piloting robotic tortilla chip makers to streamline production without disrupting customisation. As QSRs scale automation, the challenge isn’t just efficiency – it’s integrating technology without sacrificing the personalised experience customers expect.

More Choices, Bigger Profits

Customisation isn’t just about consumer preference – it’s driving higher spending at fast food chains. Research from Deloitte highlights that brands excelling in personalisation see stronger customer engagement and long-term loyalty. Meanwhile, studies on digital ordering trends show that consumers spend more when they can modify their meals, opting for premium ingredients or add-ons. For QSRs, this means a direct link between menu flexibility and increased revenue, making personalisation more than just a marketing tool – it’s a business strategy.

Data is another major driver. Every custom order provides valuable insight into consumer preferences, allowing QSRs to refine menus, optimise ingredient sourcing, and reduce food waste. AI-driven inventory tracking is helping QSRs minimise waste and maximise margins. The National Restaurant Association estimates these systems could save restaurants millions annually by optimising ingredient use.

The Cost of Getting Personal

Offering limitless choices isn’t always good for business. Shake Shack CFO Katie Fogertey warned that an influx of custom orders slowed service and strained kitchen operations, frustrating both customers and staff. More ingredients mean more prep time, higher operational costs, and a greater risk of bottlenecks – issues that can erode the efficiency QSRs rely on.

The shift toward automation comes with a steep price tag. AI-powered kiosks, digital ordering systems, and robotic kitchen assistants require significant upfront investment. A 2024 Deloitte report estimates the cost of implementing AI-driven food prep technology ranges from $500,000 to over $2 million per location – an expense that could widen the gap between industry giants and smaller franchises.

QSRs are now walking a tightrope between customisation and efficiency. Some are doubling down on AI to streamline operations, while others are setting boundaries on how much personalisation they allow. The brands that strike the right balance will define the next era of fast food – one where convenience and choice must work in sync.

The Future of Hyper-Personalised Fast Food

The next wave of fast food will be shaped by technology and consumer demand for hyper-personalization. What was once a novelty is fast becoming the norm, with AI-driven pricing, predictive meal planning, and real-time nutrition tracking set to redefine how QSRs serve their customers.

Dynamic Pricing

Dynamic pricing, long used in airlines and hotels, is now entering fast food. AI-powered pricing models adjust costs in real-time based on demand, location, and even weather. A surge in lunchtime traffic? Expect a slight uptick in menu prices. A slow afternoon? Discounts might appear to draw in customers. The goal isn’t just profit – it’s about balancing kitchen efficiency and customer flow to avoid bottlenecks.

AI-Generated Meal Plans

AI-driven meal planning is changing how customers interact with fast food menus. Using past orders, dietary preferences, and budget constraints, algorithms can now recommend tailored meals in real time. Billionaire Marc Lore, through his company Wonder, is betting on AI-powered meal curation that personalises menus to match individual needs. The result? A shift from one-size-fits-all offerings to menus that adapt to customers – not the other way around.

Personalised Nutrition Tracking

Nutrition-conscious consumers are demanding more than just quick meals – they want food that fits their health goals. fast food chains are tapping into this trend by linking menus to wearable tech and health apps, offering real-time meal recommendations based on calorie needs, macros, or fitness plans. By turning fast food into a data-driven dining experience, QSRs are positioning themselves as allies in personal wellness rather than just a convenient option.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

AI-powered personalisation isn’t without controversy. With fast food chains collecting customer data to refine menus and pricing, concerns over privacy and data security are growing. The 2024 exposure of the WildChat dataset, which leaked sensitive AI interactions, highlighted the risks of poor data handling. If QSRs want consumers to embrace AI-driven dining, they must prove their systems are transparent, secure, and not exploiting personal data for profit.

AI-driven menus raise another concern – are they truly serving consumers, or just steering them toward higher-margin meals? Critics warn that AI could prioritise profits over nutrition, subtly pushing customers toward pricier, less healthy choices. Regulators are beginning to scrutinise how food brands deploy AI, with calls for transparency around algorithmic decision-making and whether recommendations serve the diner or the bottom line.

Empowering Consumers in the Age of Personalisation

Fast food is no longer a one-size-fits-all industry. Consumers expect choices that reflect their health goals, ethical beliefs, and personal tastes – shifting from passive diners to active decision-makers. But with more power comes more risk. The industry must find a way to balance innovation with transparency, ensuring that personalisation enhances, rather than exploits, the dining experience.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

When OpenAI launched ChatGPT Pro, it positioned the $200-per-month premium subscription as an offering for power users. Yet, less than a year later, CEO Sam Altman revealed a surprising reality in a recent interview: the company is losing money on those subscriptions. “Insane thing: we are currently losing money on OpenAI Pro subscriptions! People use it much more than we expected,” Altman remarked.

This revelation underscores a critical oversight in one of the world’s fastest-growing tech companies. Despite OpenAI’s impact on artificial intelligence, its pricing strategy appears to have been driven by intuition rather than data. In the same interview, Altman admitted that the decision to price the standard Plus plan at $20 per month involved minimal testing. It seems the Pro plan’s pricing followed a similar approach.

Missteps like these are not unique to OpenAI. Pricing remains a complex challenge for many brands, especially in rapidly evolving industries like AI. But, with projected losses of $5 billion for 2024 and revenue of $3.7 billion, according to The New York Times, OpenAI’s case highlights the high stakes of getting it wrong. Effective pricing strategies require more than instinct – they rely on thoughtful market research and cost analysis to align with consumer expectations and business sustainability

The High Cost of Guesswork in Pricing

OpenAI has seen remarkable growth, with ChatGPT reaching 300 million weekly active users and earning its reputation as the gold standard in AI chatbots. Yet, this success is overshadowed by significant financial strain. Steep operational costs—driven by massive computational demands, data centre investments, and energy consumption—have outpaced revenue, highlighting the perils of unsustainable pricing.

This situation underscores the importance of data-driven pricing strategies, especially for companies managing high-demand, high-cost products. OpenAI’s case shows that even the most innovative offerings can falter without a pricing model that accounts for operational realities and consumer behaviour.

The company’s decision to adopt flat pricing reveals the risks of intuition-led strategies. While the $20 Plus plan and $200 Pro plan aimed to simplify access, they overlooked critical factors like regional affordability and usage intensity. As a result, the Pro subscription, tailored for power users, costs more to maintain than it generates in revenue—a problem amplified by the strain on computational resources.

Other tech giants have also struggled with pricing missteps. Take MoviePass, for example. The company famously offered unlimited movie tickets for $9.95 per month, far below the actual cost of a single ticket in most markets. The model led to a rapid influx of users but proved financially unsustainable, ultimately causing the company’s collapse. Similarly, Uber’s early ride-share pricing strategies ignored the long-term costs of driver incentives, leading to billions in losses as it fought to compete with rivals like Lyft.

Even in retail, companies have stumbled. JCPenney’s decision to eliminate sales and discounts in favour of “everyday low pricing” alienated loyal customers accustomed to frequent promotions. The misstep resulted in a significant revenue decline and a tarnished brand reputation.

For OpenAI, projected losses of $5 billion against $3.7 billion in revenue further emphasise the high stakes of getting pricing wrong. Without adjustments, ChatGPT’s unsustainable operational costs could undermine its long-term viability.

The lesson is clear: groundbreaking products, whether in AI, entertainment, or retail, can become financial liabilities without data-driven pricing strategies. Guesswork might deliver short-term gains but often leads to long-term instability. To thrive, businesses must align pricing with consumer behaviour, regional realities, and operational costs—a task best accomplished through rigorous market research.

The Challenge of Fixed Global Pricing and Freemium Conversion

Fixed global pricing, such as the $20 ChatGPT Plus subscription, simplifies user acquisition but risks alienating users in lower-income regions where affordability varies. Tailored regional pricing could address these disparities, improving conversion rates and expanding the paying user base.

Additionally, OpenAI’s freemium model achieves a conversion rate of 5-6%, driving most of its revenue from subscriptions. However, sustaining growth in these figures demands deeper insights into user behaviour. For example, which features encourage free users to convert? How do price thresholds differ for professional versus casual users? Robust market research could answer these questions, offering pathways to refine pricing and expand the paying user base.

How Market Research Could Have Informed OpenAI’s Pricing

OpenAI’s pricing challenges stem from a lack of market research. Methods like Gabor-Granger and Van Westendorp’s price sensitivity meter could have revealed the ‘sweet spot’ for balancing affordability and profitability.

By digging deeper into what users value, OpenAI could have tailored its tiers to appeal to different needs—without alienating heavy users or underserving casual ones. By leveraging these insights, OpenAI could have introduced pricing tiers that balanced accessibility and profitability across diverse user groups.

Market Research as the Key to Conversion

For OpenAI, converting free users to paid plans is both an opportunity and a challenge. With 5-6% of users upgrading, market research could uncover which features—affordability, advanced tools, or seamless access—drive these decisions. Techniques like conjoint analysis and A/B testing would provide valuable insights to align pricing and features with user needs, ensuring plans resonate with both casual and professional users.

Anticipating High Computational Costs

High operational costs, such as data centre investments and energy consumption, drive OpenAI’s losses. Market research could have forecasted usage patterns to align pricing with demand, mitigating the strain of offering unlimited access to power users.

Testing Pricing Tiers Through Consumer Feedback

Testing pricing scenarios before launching the Plus and Pro tiers could have revealed acceptable price points, feature preferences, and perceived value through A/B testing and consumer feedback.

Bridging Global Markets and User Needs

Market research could have offered OpenAI critical insights to refine its global pricing strategy, aligning with regional purchasing power and user expectations. Techniques like Van Westendorp’s price sensitivity meter could have revealed pricing thresholds that resonate across diverse markets, striking a balance between accessibility and profitability.

Equally important is understanding the freemium user journey. Data-driven approaches like conjoint analysis would identify the features that drive free users to upgrade. Armed with these insights, OpenAI could have crafted subscription tiers that resonate with specific user segments, boosting conversion rates and ensuring sustainable revenue growth.

How Market Research Could Have Informed OpenAI’s Pricing

The challenges OpenAI faces with ChatGPT Pro’s pricing underscore the critical need for robust market research to guide financial decisions. By leveraging proven research methodologies, the company could have addressed key issues that now contribute to its financial strain.

Understanding User Segments and Price Sensitivity

Market research would have enabled OpenAI to segment its user base and assess each group’s willingness to pay for various subscription tiers. For instance:

Casual Users: Individuals using ChatGPT for light, occasional tasks may prioritise affordability and would likely gravitate toward a lower-tier subscription.
Power Users: Professionals, developers, or enterprises relying heavily on ChatGPT’s advanced features, like OpenAI o1 and Sora AI, may value efficiency and capabilities over price, making them more open to a higher-tiered model.

By understanding these distinctions, OpenAI could have introduced tailored pricing options that cater to specific needs while ensuring profitability.

Anticipating High Computational Costs

One of OpenAI’s greatest challenges is the high computational demand required to run ChatGPT. Market research could have helped forecast usage intensity across different user segments, providing critical data for pricing that aligns with operational costs. By factoring in expected usage patterns, OpenAI might have set higher prices or implemented limits for heavy users to balance the financial impact of intensive computational loads.

Testing Pricing Tiers Through Consumer Feedback

Before launching its Plus and Pro subscription models, OpenAI could have employed targeted market research to test pricing tiers and identify optimal price points. Techniques such as A/B testing would have allowed the company to evaluate real-world reactions to various pricing combinations, ensuring that the final structure resonated with users while covering costs.

Proven Market Research Techniques

Gabor-Granger Technique: OpenAI could have directly assessed users’ willingness to pay for features included in ChatGPT Pro. Respondents would be presented with different price points, and their responses would help identify the price elasticity of demand, highlighting a sustainable price range for the subscription.
Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter: This technique could have gauged customer perceptions of pricing ranges, determining the “too cheap,” “too expensive,” and “just right” price thresholds. OpenAI could have used this data to position its Pro offering at a price seen as both premium and fair, avoiding alienation while maximising revenue potential.

Rethinking the Pricing Model

Sam Altman’s recent suggestion of a potential shift to usage-based pricing reflects an acknowledgement that the current flat-rate subscription model may not be sustainable. Transitioning to a usage-based or hybrid pricing model could offer a path to profitability, but success depends on understanding user behaviour and pricing thresholds – a task ideally suited for market research.

Identifying Willingness to Pay for Additional Features

Market research can help pinpoint where users find value in additional features or increased computational power, guiding the creation of scalable pricing. For instance:

Power users, such as businesses or developers, may be willing to pay more for advanced capabilities like OpenAI o1 or Sora AI video generation.
Casual users might prioritise affordability but could accept additional costs for occasional access to premium features.

Techniques like conjoint analysis could evaluate trade-offs users are willing to make, helping OpenAI determine the features that justify higher pricing.

Balancing Accessibility with Profitability

Usage-based pricing introduces a challenge: ensuring accessibility for casual users while maintaining profitability from heavy users. Market research could map out demand curves, revealing usage patterns and helping establish fair thresholds. For example:

Light users might benefit from a pay-as-you-go model, ensuring they only pay for what they use.
Heavy users, who consume significant computational resources, could be charged progressively higher rates as usage increases, aligning costs with revenue.

Through techniques like surveys and simulations, OpenAI could test user responses to proposed pricing structures, minimising backlash while maintaining equitable access.

Exploring Tiered Pricing Models

Tiered pricing, informed by market research, could provide flexibility for different user segments without alienating any group. For example:

A Basic Tier for casual users, offering limited access at a low price.
A Pro Tier for professionals and power users, with expanded features and higher computational allowances.
An Enterprise Tier for organisations, offering custom solutions based on usage and specific needs.

Each tier could be tested through pilot programs or focus groups to assess demand and fine-tune features and pricing. Techniques like Gabor-Granger or Van Westendorp could ensure each tier aligns with user expectations and willingness to pay.

From Flat Rates to Tailored Solutions

By integrating market research into its pricing strategy, OpenAI could shift from a one-size-fits-all model to a flexible system that reflects user needs and operational realities. Whether adopting usage-based, tiered, or hybrid pricing, the goal remains the same: aligning value with cost to create a sustainable and scalable model that works for both users and the company.

Final Thoughts: Lessons for CEOs and Brands

OpenAI’s pricing missteps provide a powerful case study on the critical importance of data-driven decision-making in today’s complex and competitive markets. Despite its innovations and rapid user growth, OpenAI’s reliance on intuition over data has caused financial strain. The lesson for leaders across industries is clear: structured analysis is essential.

First, pricing is not just about setting numbers—it is a strategic lever that impacts profitability, accessibility, and user satisfaction. Companies must move beyond assumptions or limited testing and instead leverage robust market research to understand consumer behaviour, willingness to pay, and regional dynamics. Techniques such as the Gabor-Granger and Van Westendorp methods offer precise data on pricing thresholds, while conjoint analysis and A/B testing can uncover which features users value most.

Second, market research is not a one-time activity. Regularly revisiting pricing strategies is essential to stay aligned with evolving consumer preferences, market conditions, and operational realities. As OpenAI’s case demonstrates, even the most innovative offerings can become unsustainable if they fail to account for high operational costs or diverse user needs. Tools like usage-based or tiered pricing models, informed by ongoing research, can create equitable solutions for both light and heavy users.

Third, the freemium model is both an opportunity and a challenge. OpenAI’s 5-6% conversion rate is a testament to the potential of free-to-paid upgrades, but sustaining and growing these figures requires deeper insights into user behaviour. Understanding what drives conversions—whether it’s affordability, premium features, or seamless access—is key to designing subscription tiers that resonate with different segments.

Finally, visionary leadership is strengthened by structured decision-making. While intuition and bold moves often define industry leaders, the best outcomes are achieved when those instincts are paired with disciplined analysis. Investing in the right tools, teams, and methodologies for market research ensures that every decision is grounded in actionable insights.

OpenAI’s experience underscores that pricing is not merely a financial consideration—it’s a strategic cornerstone of long-term success. For business leaders navigating similar challenges, the takeaway is clear: in an increasingly complex market, thriving requires more than innovation; it demands a commitment to data-driven strategies that align user expectations with business realities.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Meet Ryan, a young professional in Singapore who, just five years ago, couldn’t afford the high fees of traditional wealth management services. Today, thanks to robo-advisors like StashAway, she not only manages her investments effortlessly but also watches her portfolio grow with personalised, data-driven strategies.

Wealth management is undergoing a digital revolution, redefining how individuals invest, save, and secure their financial futures. Technology is shifting the industry from an exclusive service for the wealthy elite to an accessible, data-driven platform that empowers investors of all demographics. From robo-advisors providing affordable investment entry to AI-driven platforms offering hyper-personalised recommendations, the landscape is rapidly evolving.

Across Western and Asian markets, technology bridges traditional financial institutions and modern investors, democratising access and fostering inclusivity. Innovations like blockchain enhance transparency and security, making wealth management more efficient and reliable. As these technologies converge, they redefine the industry by reshaping portfolio construction and expanding participation to a broader audience.

Trend 1: The Rise of Robo-Advisors

The rise of robo-advisors in 2008 marked a new era of financial innovation, opening doors for everyday investors.

Think of robo-advisors as your financial GPS, guiding you through the intricate investment routes without needing a human navigator. These automated platforms leverage sophisticated algorithms to provide investment advice and portfolio management with minimal human intervention, offering a more affordable and scalable alternative to traditional advisory services. This shift marks a move from high-cost, exclusive services to a more inclusive model catering to a wider audience.

As digital culture continues to ascend, dozens of firms have developed their proprietary models to tap into this burgeoning market. These companies leverage advanced algorithms and user-friendly platforms to provide personalised investment strategies, making wealth management accessible and efficient for millions of investors worldwide.

Accessibility and Affordability

Millions now rely on robo-advisors for efficient, affordable investment management.

In the US, platforms like Betterment and Wealthfront lower investment barriers, enabling users to begin with minimal capital. They offer personalised investment strategies tailored to individual risk tolerance, goals, and financial situations—all without the need for a human financial advisor. This accessibility has opened wealth management to individuals who previously found traditional services inaccessible due to high fees or minimum balance requirements.

Key Benefits of Robo-Advisors:

Affordability: Lower fees compared to traditional advisors.
Accessibility: Minimal initial investment required.
Personalisation: Tailored strategies based on individual goals and risk tolerance.

Global Adoption and Market-Specific Innovations

In Asia, the adoption of robo-advisors has been equally transformative. Platforms such as StashAway in Singapore and Welab Bank in Hong Kong are leading the charge, catering to a tech-savvy, young population that values convenience, low costs, and digital accessibility. These platforms enable users to set financial goals, automate investments, and receive real-time portfolio adjustments based on market conditions, aligning with the preferences of younger investors who prefer a hands-off approach.

Investors like the Operational Efficiency and Data-Driven Strategies of Robo-advisors

Robo-advisors analyze vast financial datasets to provide useful insights. Features like tax-loss harvesting, automatic rebalancing, and diversified asset allocation enhance returns without human bias. This systematic, data-driven method provides stable investment management, unlike traditional financial advisors, who can be inconsistent and less available.

Operational efficiency of robo-advisors vs. traditional advisors.

Operational Aspect	Robo-Advisors	Traditional Advisors
Cost (Fees)	Lower fees, typically 0.25% – 0.50% annually	Higher fees, ranging from 1% – 2% annually
Accessibility	High accessibility, minimal or no minimum investment	Limited accessibility, often requiring high minimums
Transaction Speed	Fast processing, real-time adjustments	Slower processing, manual adjustments required
Personalisation	Automated personalisation, based on algorithms	High personalisation, based on advisor’s expertise
Transparency	High transparency, clear fee structures	Variable transparency, depends on advisor
Scalability	Highly scalable, can serve a large number of clients	Limited scalability, constrained by human resources
Data Handling	Advanced data analytics, real-time data processing	Basic data handling, periodic reviews
Human Interaction	Minimal human interaction, primarily digital	Frequent human interaction, personalised support
Operational Costs	Lower operational costs, automated systems	Higher operational costs, staff salaries
Adaptability to Market Changes	Highly adaptable, immediate strategy adjustments	Less adaptable, slower to implement changes

Challenges and the Path Forward

Despite their advantages, robo-advisors face regulatory hurdles, particularly in Asian markets. Compliance with local financial regulations and the need for consumer education about automated services can impede broader adoption. Some investors still seek the human touch, especially during economic uncertainty, highlighting the importance of hybrid models that blend digital tools with human expertise.

StashAway has successfully integrated robo-advisory services in Singapore by addressing local regulatory requirements and tailoring its platform to meet the specific needs of Asian investors. Their approach has resulted in significant market penetration, showcasing how localised strategies can drive global success.

Trend 2: AI-Driven Investment Platforms Where Personalisation Meets Precision

Artificial Intelligence has transformed wealth management, redefining the boundaries of personalised finance. AI platforms analyze vast amounts of data, predict market trends, and provide hyper-personalised investment recommendations, offering bespoke financial advice accessible to a broader audience.

Real-Time Personalisation and Predictive Analytics

AI-driven platforms are not just tools; they are revolutionising how we approach investments. By analyzing vast datasets in real time, these platforms offer insights that were once the domain of elite financial advisors. In Western markets, platforms like Wealthfront and SigFig leverage AI to optimise tax efficiency, balance portfolios, and adjust investments dynamically based on market conditions. AI’s real-time ability to assess market trends enables data-backed decisions faster than any human advisor, providing investors with a competitive edge.

AI in Asia: Tailoring Solutions for a Diverse Market

Technology giants like Ant Financial incorporate AI into their financial platforms in China, offering intelligent risk profiling and personalised financial planning. Alibaba’s Yu’e Bao utilises AI to understand user behaviour and recommend financial products aligned with individual preferences and risk appetites. This is particularly significant in a vast and diverse market like China, where financial institutions must cater to a wide range of investor profiles.

Beyond Portfolio Balancing and Enhancing Customer Service

AI’s capabilities extend beyond portfolio management. Intelligent chatbots provide around-the-clock support for financial queries, ensuring timely information and guidance without human intervention. Machine learning algorithms continuously learn from user interactions, predicting investor needs and proactively suggesting suitable financial products.

Hyper-Personalisation and Emotional Intelligence

AI-driven platforms are advancing toward hyper-personalisation, integrating insights from investors’ financial status, spending habits, preferences, and emotional responses to market fluctuations. This creates a customised investment experience, where strategies adapt in real time to fit individual lives. For example, AI can identify when an investor may need a conservative approach due to increased financial obligations or when they can afford to take on more risk.

Bridging the Financial Literacy Gap Through AI

In regions like India and Southeast Asia, AI-driven platforms provide underserved populations access to sophisticated financial advice. With widespread smartphone use, these platforms enable millions to participate in wealth-building activities, bridging the financial inclusion gap and empowering new investors.

Addressing AI Challenges of Privacy, Bias, and Transparency

Despite its promise, AI in wealth management faces challenges related to data privacy, algorithmic biases, and transparency in decision-making processes. Ensuring AI-driven recommendations are fair, unbiased, and understandable is crucial for widespread adoption. Regulators are also developing frameworks to balance innovation with consumer protection, ensuring ethical AI usage in financial services.

Future Outlook: Quantum Computing and Decentralised Finance

Looking ahead, quantum computing promises to revolutionise financial modelling with unparalleled processing power, enabling more accurate predictions and risk assessments. Decentralised finance (DeFi) platforms could further democratise wealth management by eliminating intermediaries and reducing costs, paving the way for a more inclusive financial ecosystem.

Trend 3: Blockchain Technology —The Backbone of Transparency and Security

Blockchain technology offers unprecedented transparency, security, and efficiency. As a distributed ledger technology (DLT), blockchain records transactions securely and immutably, providing a reliable method for tracking financial activities. For wealth management firms, this means reduced risks associated with data breaches, fraud, and operational inefficiencies, enhancing trust and operational excellence.

Streamlining Operations with Blockchain

One of blockchain’s most promising applications in wealth management is streamlining back-office operations. By handling transactions, settlements, and record-keeping on a blockchain, firms can significantly reduce administrative costs and improve operational efficiency. Processes like trade settlements and regulatory compliance, traditionally cumbersome and paper-intensive, become near-instantaneous and cost-effective through blockchain’s distributed nature.

Global Adoption and Regional Innovations in Blockchain

In Asia, blockchain adoption is gaining momentum, driven by the region’s openness to technological innovation and a desire to enhance financial inclusivity. Singapore’s DBS Bank, for instance, explores blockchain solutions to improve its wealth management offerings, aiming to create a transparent and efficient ecosystem with enhanced security features. Blockchain-based platforms also enable fractional ownership of assets, allowing investors to own portions of high-value assets like real estate, fine art, or private equity—previously inaccessible to the average investor.

Tokenisation and Democratising Asset Ownership

Tokenisation, enabled by blockchain, transforms asset ownership by breaking down assets into smaller digital tokens. This allows investors to purchase fractions of traditionally illiquid assets, expanding investable opportunities. In Asian markets, where younger, tech-savvy investors seek new diversification methods, tokenisation is particularly appealing. Crypto Finance AG and Singapore’s Propine are pioneering tokenised asset offerings, exposing investors to unique and previously inaccessible asset classes.

Enhancing Transparency and Trust

Blockchain significantly enhances transparency in wealth management. Every transaction is recorded on a distributed ledger, visible to all relevant parties, and virtually impossible to manipulate. This transparency builds trust, especially for wealth managers handling high-value transactions, by providing clients with a clear and verifiable investment history.

Overcoming Blockchain Challenges

Blockchain adoption faces regulatory uncertainty despite its potential, particularly as jurisdictions vary in their approach to digital assets and blockchain technology. In the United States, regulators still define how blockchain-based financial products fit into existing legal frameworks, creating adoption barriers. Similarly, in Asia, strict regulations on cryptocurrencies in countries like China impact blockchain’s growth in wealth management. Scalability remains a challenge, as blockchain technology currently struggles with processing large transaction volumes quickly, limiting its application in high-frequency trading environments.

Integrating Blockchain with AI and IoT in the Future

As blockchain technology matures, its integration with AI and the Internet of Things could unlock new efficiencies and security measures in wealth management. Combining blockchain’s security with AI’s predictive capabilities and IoT’s real-time data can create a highly responsive and secure financial ecosystem, further enhancing operational efficiencies and client trust.

Download our comprehensive report, Money Matters, for an in-depth analysis of the latest trends in wealth management technology.

Impact of Financial Services Technology on Investor Behavior

The rise of transformative technologies—robo-advisors, AI-driven platforms, and blockchain—fundamentally alters the financial services landscape, particularly within wealth management. These innovations are dismantling traditional barriers, creating opportunities for new market entrants, and reshaping investor behaviour.

Broadening Market Access with Robo-Advisors

Robo-advisors have broadened market access by lowering fees and providing digital-first, automated investment advice. This has attracted young investors and first-time savers, particularly Millennials and Gen Z, who are drawn to these platforms’ convenience, lower costs, and seamless user experience. The availability of mobile apps for wealth management enables users to manage their portfolios from anywhere, reflecting a broader trend towards digital convenience.

Enhancing Investor Engagement with AI

AI-driven platforms have significantly impacted investor behaviour by enhancing the personalisation of financial services. AI’s ability to provide tailored recommendations based on each investor’s financial history, risk tolerance, and goals has increased investor engagement with their portfolios. The use of AI in wealth management has also boosted investor confidence, as individuals feel their recommendations are backed by powerful data analytics. AI’s predictive capabilities enable investors to anticipate market movements and make more informed decisions, fostering a sense of empowerment among retail investors.

Rebuilding Trust with Blockchain

Blockchain technology is reshaping trust dynamics in the financial services sector. In emerging markets, where a lack of trust in financial institutions has been a significant barrier to participation in formal wealth management, blockchain’s immutable transaction records offer unprecedented transparency. This transparency helps bridge the trust gap by ensuring that every transaction is verifiable and secure. Additionally, blockchain-enabled tokenisation provides new avenues for portfolio diversification, granting access to asset classes previously out of reach for the average investor and helping reduce portfolio risk through increased diversification.

Institutional Adoption and Competitive Advantage

The impact of these technologies extends to institutional investors as well. Adopting AI and blockchain enables wealth management firms to offer more sophisticated products and services, such as algorithm-driven trading strategies and blockchain-backed asset management solutions. These innovations enhance operational efficiency, reduce costs, and enable firms to offer more competitive services to their clients.

Addressing New Challenges

However, adopting these technologies also introduces new challenges for the financial services industry. Regulatory bodies are struggling to keep pace with rapid technological advancements, necessitating new frameworks to address issues like data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and the legal status of digital assets. Investors are also navigating a learning curve as they adapt to new tools and platforms, highlighting the need for accessible and understandable technologies that cater to varying levels of financial literacy.

Future Outlook: Inclusive and Transparent Financial Ecosystem

As these technologies evolve, their impact on financial services and investor behaviour will only grow. The future of wealth management envisions a technology-centric ecosystem that is more inclusive, efficient, and transparent. Whether through robo-advisors making financial planning accessible to all, AI providing hyper-personalised investment advice, or blockchain enhancing trust and security, technology is poised to create a brighter future for investors seeking to build and manage their wealth.

Challenges and Considerations for Wealth Management Technology

While the technological transformation of wealth management offers numerous benefits, it also presents challenges and considerations that the industry must navigate. These challenges range from regulatory and compliance issues to concerns over data privacy, the ethical use of AI, and the need for balanced human involvement in an increasingly automated environment.

Regulatory and Compliance Challenges

Regulation remains a significant hurdle for adopting technologies like AI, robo-advisors, and blockchain in wealth management. Financial regulators strive to keep up with rapid advancements while ensuring consumer protection. In many jurisdictions, outdated regulations hinder the deployment of technologies that could otherwise enhance efficiency and inclusivity. For example, blockchain-based services face legal ambiguities across different countries, leading to inconsistent adoption in Western and Asian markets.

The cross-border nature of digital platforms necessitates compliance with varying laws across regions, complicating global expansion for wealth management firms. Developing a balanced regulatory framework that supports innovation while protecting investors requires collaboration between regulators, Fintech companies, and wealth management firms.

Data Privacy and Security Concerns

Data privacy is paramount in wealth management, especially using AI-driven platforms and blockchain technologies. AI platforms depend on vast amounts of user data to provide personalised recommendations, raising concerns about data collection, storage, and utilisation. Investors must trust that their sensitive financial information is secure, and any breach of this trust could have severe consequences for both firms and clients.

While blockchain offers enhanced security through its distributed ledger, maintaining user privacy remains challenging. Wealth management firms must balance blockchain’s transparency with the confidentiality required by clients, ensuring that sensitive data is protected without compromising the benefits of transparency.

Algorithmic Bias and Ethical Concerns

AI in wealth management introduces ethical concerns related to algorithmic biases. AI-driven investment platforms rely on machine learning algorithms trained on historical data, which may contain biases that inadvertently reinforce existing inequities. For instance, if training data reflects a bias against certain investment types prevalent in specific demographics or regions, those investors might receive less favourable recommendations.

To provide fair and inclusive financial services, wealth management firms must prioritise transparency in algorithmic decision-making and offer clear explanations to clients about how recommendations are generated. This transparency helps build trust and mitigates concerns over the ethical use of AI in financial services.

Human Element vs. Automation

Balancing automation with the human element remains a critical consideration in wealth management. While robo-advisors and AI-driven platforms enhance accessibility, many investors still value human advisors’ insights and personalised support, particularly during market volatility or economic uncertainty.

Although the investment process is becoming more digital, maintaining personal connections remains a crucial element of wealth management. Hybrid models that combine human expertise with automated services offer the best of both worlds. Human advisors can provide emotional intelligence and nuanced judgment that automated platforms lack, while robo-advisors and AI systems deliver data-driven insights and efficiency. Wealth management firms must integrate technology without losing the personal touch that builds client trust.

Scalability and Technological Limitations

Scalability remains a challenge for blockchain and AI technologies. Blockchain, for example, struggles with processing high transaction volumes quickly, limiting its application in high-frequency trading environments. Similarly, AI systems require substantial computational power and data, making them expensive to implement and maintain. Smaller firms may find it difficult to invest in the necessary infrastructure, hindering their ability to compete with larger players who can leverage AI and blockchain at scale.

Advancements in blockchain scalability solutions, such as layer-2 protocols and more efficient AI algorithms, could alleviate these challenges, enabling broader adoption and more robust applications in wealth management.

Adapting to a Changing Workforce

As technology reshapes wealth management, the skillset required by industry professionals is evolving. There is a growing need for financial advisors and analysts to be tech-savvy and proficient in digital tools, data analytics, and AI-driven decision-making processes. Wealth management firms must invest in training their workforce to ensure employees can effectively utilise and explain these technologies to clients.

Attracting and retaining talent with expertise in both finance and technology is becoming crucial. Firms that bridge the gap between traditional financial knowledge and technological fluency will be best positioned to thrive in the digital era.

Addressing the Gaps: Enhancing the Wealth Management Ecosystem

To create a truly comprehensive and forward-looking wealth management ecosystem, it is essential to address several additional areas:

Regulatory Technology (RegTech)

RegTech solutions assist firms in navigating complex regulatory landscapes by automating compliance processes, monitoring transactions, and managing risk. Implementing RegTech can streamline regulatory adherence, reduce compliance costs, and enhance operational efficiency.

Example: Automated Compliance Monitoring

Firms like ComplyAdvantage use RegTech to provide real-time compliance monitoring and risk management, ensuring that wealth management operations align with evolving regulations.

Sustainability and ESG Investing

Digital platforms increasingly integrate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria, allowing investors to align their portfolios with their values. Advanced analytics assess sustainability metrics, facilitating informed ESG investing.

Example: ESG-Focused Robo-Advisors

Platforms like Sustainably invest in ESG-compliant assets, enabling investors to support sustainable initiatives while leveraging technology for optimized portfolio performance.

Cybersecurity Measures

Advanced cybersecurity strategies, such as multi-factor authentication and end-to-end encryption, are critical in safeguarding client data against evolving cyber threats. Implementing robust cybersecurity measures builds trust and protects sensitive financial information.

Example: Enhanced Security Protocols

Firms like Norton LifeLock offer comprehensive cybersecurity solutions tailored for financial services, ensuring wealth management platforms remain secure and resilient against breaches.

Customer Education and Financial Literacy

Financial literacy among investors is crucial for maximising the benefits of digital wealth management tools. Interactive educational tools and AI-powered financial advisors can empower investors to make informed decisions.

Example: Interactive Learning Platforms

Platforms like Khan Academy offer financial literacy courses integrated within wealth management apps, providing users with the knowledge to navigate their financial journeys effectively.

DBS Bank’s integration of blockchain solutions in Singapore has enhanced transparency and operational efficiency, demonstrating the tangible benefits of blockchain in wealth management.

Final Thoughts

Technology is reshaping wealth management, unlocking opportunities for access, efficiency, and personalised services. Yet, these advancements bring challenges, from regulatory uncertainties and data privacy to algorithmic bias and the balance between human and automated advisory.

Overcoming these hurdles requires collaboration between FinTech innovators, wealth management firms, and regulators. By proactively addressing these issues, the wealth management sector can harness the power of technology to create a more inclusive, transparent, and efficient future for investors globally.

Embracing and effectively communicating the multifaceted changes in wealth management will resonate with industry professionals and potential clients. Leveraging emerging technologies to provide cutting-edge insights ensures your content remains relevant and highly valuable in the fast-paced financial sector.

Download our latest trend report, Money Matters, for more insights on financial trends and innovations shaping wealth management.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The technology industry, long known for its constant innovation, is about to undergo even more transformative changes in 2025. As emerging technologies continue to evolve and global dynamics shift, businesses will face new opportunities and challenges that will reshape the future of tech. From quantum computing breakthroughs to the rise of ethical AI and the expansion of edge computing, these trends are set to disrupt the way industries operate and how technology will drive progress.

In this rapidly evolving environment, staying ahead of the curve is essential for tech companies to remain competitive. Let’s explore the four key trends that will redefine the technology landscape in the coming year.

Trend 1: Quantum Computing Enters Commercialisation

After years of research and theoretical advancements, quantum computing is finally making the leap from academic breakthroughs to real-world applications. In 2025, quantum technology is poised to solve complex, data-intensive problems across industries like finance, healthcare, logistics, and beyond. Companies are beginning to harness the power of quantum computing to perform calculations and simulations that would have been unimaginable with classical computers. This shift marks the start of a new era in computing, where quantum algorithms will drive unparalleled advancements in problem-solving capabilities.

Why This Will Disrupt:

Offers exponential speed-ups for data-intensive computations: Quantum computers have the potential to process massive datasets at speeds far beyond the capabilities of today’s supercomputers. This capability could revolutionise sectors such as pharmaceuticals, where simulations of molecular interactions could accelerate drug discovery, or finance, where quantum computing could optimise complex algorithms in real time.
Forces industries to reimagine processes that rely on advanced analytics: As quantum computing begins to tackle problems once thought unsolvable, industries will need to rethink their existing frameworks. From logistics to supply chain management, quantum algorithms could offer solutions that drastically improve efficiency and reduce costs by enabling more sophisticated predictive models and optimisation techniques.
Creates a race among tech companies to lead in quantum innovation and commercialisation: With its enormous potential, quantum computing has sparked a global race among tech giants, startups, and academic institutions to develop practical applications. Companies that successfully commercialise quantum technology first will hold a major competitive edge, driving innovations and leading the charge in industries from machine learning to climate modelling.

As quantum computing moves into the mainstream in 2025, businesses must adapt quickly to incorporate this powerful new technology or risk being left behind. The disruption it will bring across industries is profound, as quantum algorithms promise to revolutionise the speed and efficiency of data processing and complex decision-making.

Case Study: Google – Sycamore and the Quantum Leap

Google’s quantum computing project, Sycamore, demonstrated quantum supremacy in 2019 by solving a problem that was previously intractable for classical computers. The project marked a historic breakthrough, showing that quantum computers can perform specific tasks exponentially faster than conventional ones. As Google continues to push the boundaries of quantum technology, its ongoing research aims to transition quantum computing from theoretical breakthroughs to real-world applications that could revolutionise industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, particularly those reliant on massive data processing and computational power.

Trend 2: AI Ethics and Regulation Take Center Stage

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in technology across industries, concerns regarding its ethical use and societal impact are growing louder. In 2025, AI is no longer just a tool; it’s a critical driver of business operations, decision-making, and even personal lives. With its vast potential, AI is also raising complex questions about fairness, accountability, and transparency. To address these concerns, stricter regulations and ethical frameworks are expected to reshape how AI is developed and deployed, ensuring it aligns with societal values while mitigating risks.

Why This Will Disrupt:

Adds compliance costs and slows down unregulated AI deployments: As governments and international bodies introduce new laws to ensure AI technologies are safe, fair, and transparent, companies will face increased regulatory compliance costs. The need to adhere to these regulations will slow down the rapid deployment of AI tools, particularly in sectors like finance, healthcare, and autonomous systems, where ethical considerations are paramount.
Pushes tech companies to prioritise transparency and bias mitigation: In 2025, the focus on AI ethics will force companies to address the biases that AI models can inherit from historical data or skewed training sets. Tech companies will need to invest in developing transparent AI systems that can be audited for fairness and accountability. This emphasis on ethical AI will drive innovation in tools for bias detection, algorithm transparency, and ethical oversight.
Creates opportunities for innovation in ethical AI tools and auditing solutions: With the growing demand for ethical AI, there will be a surge in the development of tools and services aimed at auditing, monitoring, and enhancing the ethical standards of AI systems. Companies will invest in creating new software, platforms, and methodologies to ensure that AI applications meet established ethical guidelines. This opens the door to new business opportunities focused on responsible AI development.

In 2025, as AI continues to shape industries, its ethical implications will take centre stage. With growing scrutiny from regulators, consumers, and advocacy groups, technology companies will need to innovate and prioritise the ethical development of AI to maintain trust and compliance, positioning themselves for long-term success in a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.

Case Study: NVIDIA – Revolutionising Edge Computing with Jetson

NVIDIA’s edge computing solutions, including the Jetson platform, enable real-time AI processing directly on edge devices, which is crucial for industries requiring immediate decision-making, such as autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and industrial automation. By bringing AI capabilities closer to where data is generated, NVIDIA helps reduce latency and improve the speed and efficiency of critical systems. With its innovations in edge computing, NVIDIA is accelerating the development of real-time applications in sectors where immediate data processing is essential, providing a competitive edge for businesses in fast-evolving markets.

Trend 3: The Growth of Edge Computing

Edge computing is rapidly emerging as a critical infrastructure in the technology landscape, especially as the Internet of Things (IoT) and 5G connectivity continue to expand. By processing data closer to the source—whether it’s on IoT devices or at local data centres—edge computing reduces latency and enhances real-time decision-making capabilities. As industries and applications become more reliant on fast, data-intensive tasks, edge computing offers a solution that minimises the delays associated with transmitting data to centralised cloud servers. This trend is not just about improving efficiency; it’s enabling new, more sophisticated use cases across multiple sectors.

Why This Will Disrupt:

Revolutionises sectors like autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and industrial automation: Edge computing is crucial in areas that require instantaneous data processing, such as autonomous driving and smart city infrastructure. In autonomous vehicles, for example, edge computing enables real-time analysis of data from sensors and cameras, ensuring the vehicle can respond to its environment with minimal delay. Similarly, smart cities rely on edge computing to manage traffic systems, utilities, and emergency responses, providing faster, localised control.
Reduces reliance on centralised cloud services, shifting infrastructure investments: As edge computing becomes more widespread, companies will increasingly invest in decentralised infrastructures rather than relying solely on centralised cloud services. This shift not only reduces the dependency on long-distance data transmission but also enables more localised control, enhancing security and efficiency. Organisations will have to rethink their cloud strategies, balancing centralised cloud computing with edge solutions.
Opens up new markets for edge devices and localised data solutions: With the growing adoption of edge computing, new markets are emerging for devices and solutions that support localised data processing. This includes edge hardware like micro data centres and software platforms for managing edge networks. The demand for edge solutions is opening opportunities for businesses to offer innovative products and services in sectors ranging from healthcare to retail, where real-time data processing is becoming more critical.

Edge computing is becoming a foundational technology, revolutionising industries by enabling faster data processing, reducing latency, and unlocking new possibilities in real-time decision-making. As this trend grows, it will not only change the way businesses handle data but also create new opportunities for innovation in tech infrastructure and localised services.

Case Study: The European Union’s AI Act – Shaping Ethical AI Regulation

The European Union has taken a global lead in AI regulation, with its AI Act establishing one of the world’s first legal frameworks for AI deployment. This act is designed to ensure that AI is used ethically across all sectors, focusing on high-risk applications such as healthcare, transportation, and public safety. By prioritising transparency, accountability, and fairness, the EU is pushing companies to comply with stringent guidelines, thereby addressing societal concerns related to bias, privacy, and safety in AI systems. The AI Act represents a major step forward in balancing innovation with responsibility in AI development.

Trend 4: The Global Tech Talent Shortage

Despite rapid advancements in technology, the demand for skilled tech professionals continues to outpace supply, creating a significant challenge for companies across industries. As businesses increasingly rely on digital transformation, the need for experts in fields like AI, cybersecurity, data science, and software development has never been greater. However, the competition for these highly specialised roles is intensifying, leading to a global tech talent shortage. To address this gap, companies are focusing on upskilling programs, adopting no-code and low-code platforms, and exploring global talent pools to stay competitive in an evolving market.

Why This Will Disrupt:

Drives the adoption of automation tools to bridge the talent gap: With fewer tech professionals available, companies are turning to automation tools to handle repetitive tasks and optimise workflows. Technologies like AI and machine learning are increasingly being used to supplement human workforces, enabling companies to maintain productivity while navigating the shortage of skilled talent.
Increases competition for top talent, raising salaries and benefits: As companies vie for a limited pool of qualified tech professionals, compensation packages are becoming more competitive. High salaries, flexible work arrangements, and attractive benefits are being offered to lure top talent, which is driving up labour costs. For tech companies, this creates both a challenge and an opportunity to attract the best minds in the industry.
Forces companies to innovate workforce strategies and expand talent pipelines globally: To mitigate the talent shortage, companies are exploring new strategies for sourcing and retaining talent. This includes expanding their search beyond traditional markets and embracing global talent pools. Furthermore, companies are increasingly investing in programs to upskill existing employees, fostering a culture of continuous learning and adaptability within their workforce.

The global tech talent shortage is reshaping how companies recruit, train, and manage their workforce. As businesses face this critical challenge, they must adapt by embracing automation, investing in talent development, and expanding their reach to global talent pools. This shift will have lasting effects on the tech industry and the broader economy as companies continue to innovate to meet the growing demand for skilled professionals.

Case Study: Upwork – Bridging the Global Tech Talent Gap

Upwork, a leading freelancing platform, addresses the global tech talent shortage by connecting businesses with skilled professionals worldwide. Upwork’s AI-driven matching system allows companies to find the right tech talent—whether developers, data scientists, or other specialists—regardless of their geographic location. This flexible, on-demand workforce solution is helping organisations bridge the talent gap and scale quickly in a competitive market. By tapping into a global network of tech professionals, Upwork is helping companies overcome the challenges posed by the shortage of skilled workers, making it an essential platform in today’s tech-driven economy.

Final Thoughts

These four trends—quantum computing, AI ethics, edge computing, and the global tech talent shortage—represent a paradigm shift in the technology industry. As businesses adapt to the increasing pace of change, they will need to be agile and forward-thinking to stay ahead of the curve. Embracing innovation will be key to success, but companies must also address significant challenges, such as ethical AI development and workforce shortages, to build sustainable growth in this rapidly evolving landscape. To stay ahead of the disruptions on the horizon, it’s crucial for businesses to explore these trends and adapt their strategies accordingly. Subscribe to Connecting the Dots, our monthly e-newsletter, for deeper insights and strategies that will help you navigate these changes and prepare for the future of technology. Stay informed, stay inspired, and stay competitive.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The media industry is experiencing profound shifts driven by technological innovation, changing consumer preferences, and the ever-growing battle for audience attention. As traditional media models are challenged by new, more personalised, and on-demand content, media companies face both significant challenges and opportunities. Fragmentation in audience behaviour, the rise of digital platforms, and evolving revenue models are forcing companies to rethink their strategies in order to remain competitive.

Four key trends are expected to disrupt the media landscape in 2025: the rise of AI-generated content, the dominance of niche streaming platforms, the rise of creator-led media ecosystems, and the expansion of immersive media experiences. Each of these trends is reshaping how content is created, distributed, and consumed, driving the media industry towards more efficient, personalised, and interactive solutions.

Trend 1: The Rise of AI-Generated Content

AI tools are revolutionising the content creation process, from scriptwriting and video production to real-time translation and voiceovers. These advancements are enabling faster production timelines, reducing costs, and providing more personalised content. AI-generated media is quickly becoming a mainstream solution across industries, empowering smaller creators and businesses to produce high-quality content with limited resources.

The disruption caused by AI-generated content is multi-faceted:

Reduces production costs and timelines, levelling the playing field for smaller creators: With AI tools, content production is faster and more affordable, making it possible for smaller creators to compete with larger, established media companies. For example, AI-generated text and video content can reduce the time required for scriptwriting and video editing, cutting production costs by up to 30% for smaller productions.
Raises ethical questions about authenticity and copyright in content: As AI-generated content becomes more prevalent, questions about the ownership of content and intellectual property are gaining importance. Who owns AI-generated media, and how can the authenticity of such content be verified? These are ongoing debates that will affect not only content creators but also traditional media companies and advertisers.
Forces traditional media companies to adapt workflows or risk falling behind: With the rise of AI-generated content, established media companies must innovate or risk being left behind. This shift requires them to reassess their workflows, investment strategies, and how they integrate AI tools into their production processes. A 2023 study by PwC found that 45% of media companies are already using AI to improve content creation, with an expected 20% annual increase in AI integration through 2025.

The speed, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness AI brings to content creation will force media companies to adapt their traditional workflows to remain competitive. As the market evolves, AI-generated media will likely continue to play a dominant role in shaping the future of the media industry.

Case Study: Synthesia – Revolutionising Video Content Creation with AI

Synthesia is an AI-driven video production platform based in the United Kingdom that is transforming the way videos are created and consumed. The platform enables users to generate high-quality videos using AI avatars, eliminating the need for traditional video production teams, voiceovers, and expensive equipment. With applications spanning training, marketing, and social media content, Synthesia is democratising video creation, making it more accessible and cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.

Synthesia is a prime example of how AI is reshaping content creation, particularly in video production. Traditional video production requires multiple resources, such as cameras, studios, editors, and voice actors. With Synthesia, businesses can bypass these logistical hurdles and produce engaging, personalised videos at scale, reducing both time and cost. This AI-generated content trend is disrupting the media industry by offering an automated solution to one of the most resource-intensive areas of content creation—video production.

Technology and Impact
Synthesia’s AI platform uses machine learning to generate realistic human avatars that can speak multiple languages and convey messages in a natural, human-like manner. Users can simply input a script, select an avatar, and produce a fully formed video in a fraction of the time it would take with traditional production methods.

Efficiency: Video production time is reduced from weeks to just a few hours, enabling businesses to create content quickly and in multiple languages without the need for voice actors or on-location shoots.
Cost Reduction: Synthesia’s platform eliminates the need for expensive video equipment and editing teams, offering an affordable solution for companies looking to scale their content production.
Personalisation: Businesses can tailor content for different audiences and markets with ease, leveraging AI to generate multiple versions of a video with localised messaging.

One notable example of Synthesia’s impact is its partnership with IBM, where the company utilised Synthesia’s technology to create AI-powered training videos for employees. These videos were produced in multiple languages, enhancing the global accessibility of the training materials without requiring additional voiceovers or manual translations.

In another example, PepsiCo used Synthesia to create localised marketing campaigns across multiple regions, enabling the brand to produce high-quality content faster and at a fraction of the cost of traditional video shoots.

Synthesia exemplifies how AI is transforming content creation by making video production more efficient, accessible, and affordable. By removing barriers to entry, such as high production costs and lengthy timelines, Synthesia is opening up opportunities for businesses to scale their video content while maintaining personalisation and quality. This shift in how content is created aligns perfectly with the broader trend of AI-generated media, which is set to become a mainstream solution for businesses looking to remain competitive in an increasingly fast-paced media landscape.

By leveraging AI tools like Synthesia, companies can not only streamline their workflows but also adapt to the growing demand for faster, more personalised content in the media industry.

Trend 2: The Dominance of Niche Streaming Platforms

As consumer preferences become increasingly fragmented, niche streaming services are thriving by offering hyper-personalised content that caters to specific genres, interests, and demographics. These platforms focus on creating curated content that speaks directly to loyal, engaged audiences, setting them apart from mainstream streaming giants. While platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime dominate the global streaming market, niche services have carved out their own space by tailoring offerings to meet the needs of particular groups, whether through genre-focused content, cultural specificity, or unique entertainment needs.

Why This Will Disrupt:

Challenges the dominance of mainstream platforms by creating targeted appeal: Niche streaming platforms are challenging the widespread appeal of larger services by zeroing in on specific genres or cultures, providing a more focused and personalised viewing experience. As of 2023, niche streaming services are gaining ground, with some platforms growing their user bases by 50% year-over-year through targeted offerings.
Shifts revenue models toward subscriptions and community-driven funding: Many of these platforms are shifting their revenue models from ad-based to subscription-driven, tapping into a dedicated audience willing to pay for exclusive content. This trend is especially visible in platforms focusing on niche genres like horror, anime, or independent films, where users are more willing to support content they feel personally connected to.
Forces traditional broadcasters to rethink how they connect with fragmented audiences: The success of niche platforms is forcing traditional broadcasters to rethink their strategies and adapt to the demand for specialised content. As audience fragmentation continues, broadcasters will need to reevaluate their programming and content distribution to stay relevant in an ever-more segmented market.

In 2025, niche streaming services are expected to continue their rapid growth, offering unique and highly tailored content that appeals to a specific fanbase. As this trend continues, traditional streaming platforms and broadcasters will have to rethink their approach to content creation, production, and audience engagement to compete in an increasingly fragmented media landscape.

Case Study: Shudder – Dominating the Horror Streaming Space

Shudder is a niche streaming platform based in the United States that focuses exclusively on horror, thriller, and supernatural content. Launched in 2015, the service has successfully built a loyal and engaged user base by offering a curated library of genre-specific movies and series. Unlike mainstream streaming platforms like Netflix, which offer a broad range of genres, Shudder’s dedication to the horror genre has allowed it to carve out its own space in the streaming market.

Shudder is a prime example of the growing dominance of niche streaming platforms that focus on specific genres or demographics. By focusing solely on horror, Shudder is able to offer a highly personalised and tailored viewing experience for its passionate audience. In an era when mainstream platforms struggle to cater to all tastes, Shudder’s hyper-focused content has allowed it to thrive by serving a dedicated fan base that craves specific genre content. This makes it a perfect illustration of how smaller, niche platforms are gaining traction and challenging larger platforms in terms of engagement, loyalty, and revenue.

Technology and Impact
Shudder’s ability to thrive in a crowded streaming market is thanks to its strong focus on curated content and its use of technology to cater to niche interests:

Curated Content: Shudder’s content library features a mix of classic horror films, independent horror movies, and exclusive originals, ensuring that it offers something for every horror fan. The platform regularly updates its catalogue, introducing seasonal content and exclusive releases that keep its audience engaged.
Community Engagement: By leveraging social media and horror communities, Shudder has developed a sense of community among its users, fostering loyalty and word-of-mouth marketing. Horror fans feel like they are part of a niche, like-minded group, which enhances the platform’s appeal.
Tech Integration: Shudder uses algorithms and user feedback to suggest tailored content to its subscribers, increasing viewer satisfaction and keeping audiences engaged with new content based on their viewing history.

Impact and Growth

Subscriber Growth: As of 2022, Shudder has surpassed 1 million subscribers globally, a significant milestone that highlights the growing demand for specialised, genre-specific content.
Exclusive Content: The platform’s original programming, such as Creepshow, The Last Drive-In with Joe Bob Briggs, and Shudder’s Horror of the Month series, has been key in differentiating it from other platforms and creating a unique viewing experience. These exclusives have helped attract horror fans looking for fresh, original content.

Challenges and Future Outlook

Expansion and Competition: While Shudder has experienced significant growth, it faces increasing competition from both traditional platforms, adding horror content and newer niche players emerging in the genre. To remain competitive, Shudder must continue to expand its offerings while retaining the strong community it has built.
Balancing Growth with Identity: As Shudder grows, it will be challenging to maintain its identity and niche focus while scaling up its subscriber base and content offerings. The platform must ensure that it remains true to its horror roots while accommodating the evolving tastes of its audience.

Shudder’s success in dominating the horror streaming market is a perfect example of how niche platforms are thriving by catering to a specific, loyal audience. By focusing on curated, high-quality content and fostering community engagement, Shudder has not only survived but thrived in an increasingly fragmented media landscape. As consumer preferences continue to fragment, Shudder’s success demonstrates the growing appeal of niche platforms and their potential to disrupt traditional, mainstream streaming services.

Trend 3: Creator-Led Media Ecosystems

The creator economy is revolutionising the media industry by reshaping how content is produced, distributed, and monetised. Platforms like Patreon, YouTube, and Substack have enabled individual creators to bypass traditional media channels and build direct relationships with their audiences. This shift is enabling creators to take control of their content, set their own terms, and access new revenue streams, disrupting the traditional media landscape where publishers, broadcasters, and agencies are the primary gatekeepers.

The rise of creator-led media ecosystems brings both opportunities and challenges:

Decentralises media production, reducing reliance on traditional gatekeepers: Creators now have the tools and platforms to produce, distribute, and monetise content without the need for large media companies or traditional publishing houses. This democratisation of content production allows for a wider range of voices and perspectives, giving rise to diverse, niche content.
Redefines advertising and sponsorship opportunities with micro and niche audiences: Creators are now able to build highly engaged, niche audiences that are difficult for traditional media outlets to match. Advertisers are increasingly looking to work with creators who have authentic, loyal followers rather than large-scale, impersonal reach. The ability to cater to micro-niches provides brands with more targeted and effective advertising opportunities.
Challenges media companies to innovate their talent acquisition and content strategies: As creators gain more influence, traditional media companies must adapt to keep up. To stay competitive, broadcasters and publishers need to rethink their content strategies, talent acquisition, and distribution methods, embracing more flexible, creator-centric approaches. Media giants must also adjust to the growing demand for on-demand, authentic content.

In 2025, creator-led media ecosystems are expected to continue to thrive, offering personalised, niche content that traditional media companies struggle to provide at scale. This trend is redefining how content is created, shared, and monetised, and traditional companies will need to innovate quickly or risk losing their relevance in an increasingly decentralised media landscape.

Case Study: Bigo Live – Revolutionising Creator-Led Media Ecosystems in Southeast Asia

Bigo Live, founded in Singapore in 2016, is a live-streaming platform that allows creators to broadcast live content and receive real-time gifts, tips, and donations from their audience. Over the years, Bigo Live has evolved into a major player in the creator economy, especially in Southeast Asia, by offering creators a direct way to monetise their content through fan interaction and engagement. Unlike traditional media platforms, Bigo Live empowers individual creators to build and nurture their communities while earning revenue from their content.

Bigo Live is a perfect example of how the creator economy is transforming media production and consumption. By enabling creators to monetise their content directly through live-streaming and audience donations, the platform decentralises the media production process, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers. This aligns with the shift toward creator-led media ecosystems, where individual creators have more control over content creation, distribution, and monetisation.

Technology and Impact

Real-Time Interaction: Bigo Live allows creators to engage with their audience in real-time, fostering a sense of community and personal connection. The live interaction aspect is a key feature that sets the platform apart from pre-recorded content.
Monetisation Model: Creators earn revenue through virtual gifts, tips, and paid subscriptions from their viewers. Bigo Live’s integration of real-time gifting encourages continuous engagement and makes the monetisation process seamless.
Global Reach: While Bigo Live was founded in Singapore, its reach spans across Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and beyond. The platform’s ability to adapt to different markets by supporting local languages and preferences has contributed to its rapid growth.

Content Creators’ Success: Bigo Live has enabled numerous creators to turn live streaming into a full-time career. For instance, creators in Southeast Asia have earned thousands of dollars per month through real-time gifts and sponsored content, building large and dedicated fanbases. One notable example is a popular Indonesian live streamer who has garnered millions of followers and makes a significant income through gifts and tips during live broadcasts.

Challenges and Future Outlook

Competition: While Bigo Live is a major player in Southeast Asia, it faces competition from platforms like Twitch, YouTube, and local services, which are also focusing on live streaming and creator monetisation.
Regulatory Issues: As the platform expands, it must navigate varying regulations around content, online safety, and financial transactions in different countries, which could affect its operations.

Bigo Live is revolutionising the way creators engage with their audience, allowing for a more direct and profitable relationship between content creators and their fans. The platform exemplifies how technology is enabling the rise of creator-led ecosystems, empowering individuals to take control of their content and revenue streams. By fostering real-time interaction and offering an integrated monetisation model, Bigo Live sets a strong example for how live-streaming can thrive in the rapidly evolving media landscape.

Trend 4: Immersive Media Experiences

The media landscape is undergoing a dramatic transformation as advances in augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) redefine how content is consumed and interacted with. With the rise of immersive technologies, media experiences are becoming more interactive, offering audiences new ways to engage with content. From virtual concerts and live events to AR-enhanced news reporting and branded experiences, the boundaries of audience engagement are being pushed, creating exciting new possibilities for both entertainment and marketing.

As AR and VR technologies become more accessible, the traditional media consumption model is shifting. Audiences are no longer passive viewers; they are active participants in the stories unfolding around them. This shift is opening up new opportunities for storytelling, experiential marketing, and deeper audience connection.

Why This Will Disrupt:

Changes how audiences consume and interact with content: Immersive experiences allow audiences to engage with content in more interactive and personalised ways. Virtual reality offers a level of immersion that traditional media cannot match, whether it’s exploring a 360-degree concert experience or walking through a virtual world for an interactive film.
Creates new opportunities for storytelling and experiential marketing: VR and AR offer media companies and brands innovative ways to tell stories and engage customers. For example, VR can take viewers into the middle of the action in a way that traditional media, like television or film, simply cannot. AR, on the other hand, can overlay digital elements on the real world, creating an interactive layer that brands can use for experiential marketing campaigns.
Requires significant investment in technology and creative talent to deliver high-quality experiences: While the potential for immersive media experiences is vast, creating them requires considerable investment in both technology (AR/VR hardware and software) and creative talent (3D artists, interactive designers, etc.). The industry will need to evolve quickly to ensure the development of high-quality, engaging experiences that are accessible to mainstream audiences.

As these immersive media experiences become more commonplace, they will not only reshape entertainment but also have broader implications for education, tourism, gaming, and even shopping. By 2025, the expectation is that immersive technologies will become mainstream tools for engaging audiences, offering deeper and more personalised interactions than ever before.

Case Study: VR Experiences by National Geographic – Pushing the Boundaries of Immersive Media

National Geographic, a leading media brand known for its educational content on natural history, exploration, and science, has embraced virtual reality (VR) to create immersive experiences that transport users to some of the world’s most remote and fascinating locations. Through its VR projects, National Geographic offers users the ability to dive into the ocean floor, explore the surface of Mars, or witness historical events from an entirely new perspective. This cutting-edge use of VR is designed not only for entertainment but also to educate, providing a deeper, more engaging experience than traditional media formats.

National Geographic’s VR initiatives are a perfect example of how immersive media technologies like VR are reshaping content consumption. By utilising VR, National Geographic is able to deliver content that goes beyond passive viewing. Rather than just showing viewers footage of a subject, VR places them within that environment, creating a sense of presence that engages audiences on an entirely different level. This trend aligns perfectly with the growing demand for interactive and immersive media experiences that offer more dynamic and participatory storytelling.

Technology and Impact

Virtual Reality Experiences: National Geographic’s VR experiences utilise cutting-edge technology to create 360-degree, fully interactive environments. From underwater explorations of the Great Barrier Reef to a first-person journey through Mars’ landscape, these experiences offer users a sensory immersion into places and experiences that would otherwise be impossible to access.
Educational and Emotional Engagement: The VR projects have been praised for their ability to emotionally engage users, particularly in educational contexts. For example, by diving into the ocean floor to witness coral reefs, users can gain a firsthand understanding of the impact of climate change. This level of immersion enhances the educational value of the content.
Accessibility: National Geographic’s VR experiences are available across multiple platforms, including Oculus Rift and HTC Vive, making them accessible to a wide audience. This approach ensures that the immersive experiences can reach users regardless of their physical location, further broadening the scope of the brand’s educational impact.

One of the most popular VR experiences from National Geographic, “Sea of Shadows”, takes viewers on an underwater adventure to witness the challenges faced by marine life. Users virtually dive into the ocean to explore coral reefs, observe marine species, and learn about conservation efforts in real-time. This experience provides more than just visuals—users can interact with the environment, gaining insights into the underwater ecosystem’s fragility and beauty, which traditional media formats cannot fully convey.

Challenges and Future Outlook

Scaling Immersive Content: While National Geographic’s VR experiences have been widely celebrated, producing high-quality VR content requires significant investment in technology, talent, and resources. Scaling this type of content to reach broader audiences without compromising quality remains a challenge for the media company.
Consumer Adoption: While VR technology has grown in popularity, it still faces barriers to widespread adoption, such as hardware requirements and cost. National Geographic will need to continue innovating to make VR content more accessible and user-friendly.

National Geographic’s VR experiences represent a major leap forward in how immersive media is transforming both entertainment and education. By offering users the ability to explore the world in ways that were previously unimaginable, National Geographic is enhancing storytelling, increasing audience engagement, and providing educational value through cutting-edge technology. As VR continues to evolve, it will play a key role in pushing the boundaries of media experiences, offering even more innovative and impactful ways for audiences to interact with content.

Final Thoughts

These trends—AI-generated content, niche streaming platforms, creator-led ecosystems, and immersive media experiences—are driving a wave of innovation that is reshaping how media is created, distributed, and consumed. The ability to harness emerging technologies and cater to ever-evolving consumer preferences has opened new opportunities for brands to engage audiences in more personalised, immersive, and interactive ways. As the media industry continues to evolve, staying ahead of these trends is crucial for maintaining relevance in a fragmented, competitive landscape.

For media companies, the key to thriving in this environment lies in embracing agility and innovation. Those who adapt quickly to the changing dynamics of content consumption and audience expectations will be best positioned to succeed. The future of media is rapidly transforming, and those who understand these shifts can capitalise on the new possibilities emerging in the space. To stay informed about these disruptive trends and how they’re shaping the future of the media industry, subscribe to Connecting the Dots, our monthly e-newsletter. Stay ahead of the curve, stay inspired, and lead the change in your industry.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The financial services industry, long regarded as conservative and slow to change, is now at the forefront of some of the most significant technological and societal shifts of the 21st century. As the pace of innovation accelerates, financial institutions are being forced to rethink their models and adapt to the evolving landscape. From the rise of decentralised finance to the integration of artificial intelligence in personal finance, the way consumers and businesses interact with money is undergoing a dramatic transformation.

In this blog, we will explore four key trends poised to disrupt the financial services sector in 2025: Decentralised Finance (DeFi) going mainstream, AI-driven personal finance management, the rise of green finance and ESG investing, and the growth of embedded finance. These trends are reshaping the future of finance, and businesses must embrace innovation to remain competitive in an increasingly digital and customer-centric market.

Trend 1: Decentralised Finance (DeFi) Goes Mainstream

Decentralised finance (DeFi) is no longer just a niche sector for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. By 2025, DeFi platforms are expected to move into the mainstream, offering a full suite of financial services that challenge traditional financial institutions. These platforms leverage blockchain technology to provide peer-to-peer lending, decentralised exchanges, and blockchain-based asset management, allowing consumers to manage their finances without the need for intermediaries such as banks.

This shift to DeFi will disrupt the financial services industry by reducing reliance on centralised financial institutions, giving consumers more control over their financial decisions. With blockchain’s inherent transparency and security, DeFi offers greater accessibility to financial services for individuals who may not have access to traditional banking. This democratisation of finance is making it easier for consumers to participate in financial markets and gain access to investment opportunities.

For traditional financial institutions, DeFi represents both a challenge and an opportunity. Banks and financial firms will be forced to innovate or risk being left behind. In some cases, this may mean partnering with DeFi platforms to offer new services or integrating blockchain technologies into their operations.

The rise of DeFi is not just about competing with traditional finance; it’s about creating new ways for consumers to engage with and control their financial futures. As the DeFi ecosystem grows, it will continue to reshape the landscape of global finance.

Case Study: Cake DeFi – Empowering Users with Decentralised Finance Solutions

Cake DeFi, a Singapore-based fintech platform, is at the forefront of integrating decentralised finance (DeFi) with user-friendly solutions. The platform enables users to access a wide range of DeFi services, such as staking, liquidity mining, and lending, allowing them to generate returns from their crypto and digital assets.

Cake DeFi’s commitment to transparency and innovation is evident in its platform design, which offers easy access to DeFi applications while ensuring users understand the risks and rewards involved. The company has focused on building trust by providing a clear, accessible, and secure environment for users to engage with DeFi, helping to bridge the gap between traditional finance and the rapidly evolving world of decentralised finance.

This case study is an excellent example of how DeFi platforms are simplifying complex financial processes for consumers, making decentralised finance more accessible and mainstream. By offering transparent, easy-to-use services, Cake DeFi is contributing to the growing adoption of DeFi and demonstrating the future potential of decentralised financial ecosystems.

Trend 2: AI-Driven Personal Finance Management

Artificial intelligence is reshaping personal finance by offering hyper-personalised advice, automated budgeting, and predictive financial planning, making it easier for consumers to manage their money with precision. AI-powered apps analyze vast amounts of data, including spending habits, income, and financial goals, to offer tailored recommendations that empower individuals to make smarter financial decisions. These apps can help users track expenses, save automatically, and even invest based on their risk tolerance and long-term objectives.

The rise of AI in personal finance management threatens traditional financial advisors by providing cost-effective, scalable alternatives. Consumers no longer need to rely on expensive advisory services when AI can offer real-time, personalised guidance at a fraction of the cost. This shift is pushing financial institutions to adopt AI-driven solutions, integrating machine learning algorithms into their service offerings to stay competitive and meet customer expectations.

As AI continues to evolve, it will not only improve the quality of financial advice but also democratise access to financial planning tools, making them available to a broader range of consumers.

For financial institutions, embracing AI will be crucial to maintaining customer satisfaction and positioning themselves as leaders in an increasingly tech-driven financial landscape.

Case Study: Trim – Revolutionising Personal Finance with AI

Trim, an AI-driven personal finance tool based in the United States, assists users in managing their finances by identifying and eliminating unnecessary expenses. By analyzing spending patterns, Trim detects recurring charges such as subscriptions and negotiates bills on behalf of users, aiming to reduce monthly expenditures. This approach empowers consumers to make informed financial decisions and achieve their financial goals more efficiently.

Trim’s integration of artificial intelligence enables it to function as a virtual financial assistant, offering personalised recommendations and automating tasks like subscription cancellations and bill negotiations. This not only saves users time but also enhances their financial well-being by ensuring they are not overspending on services they no longer use.

By leveraging AI, Trim exemplifies how technology can transform personal finance management, providing users with tools to optimise their spending and savings. Its innovative approach serves as a model for integrating AI into financial services, offering valuable insights into the future of personal finance management.

Trend 3: Green Finance and ESG Investing

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing is rapidly reshaping capital allocation in the financial services industry. As consumers and investors increasingly prioritise sustainability and ethical practices, financial institutions are responding by launching green bonds, sustainable exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and ESG-focused investment funds to meet this rising demand. ESG investing goes beyond financial returns, encouraging investments that align with socially responsible practices and contribute to positive environmental and social outcomes.

This shift toward green finance is attracting a new generation of socially conscious investors, who are more inclined to support companies that prioritise sustainability. As demand for ESG investment options grows, financial institutions are increasingly being pressured to offer these products and services, as they align with evolving customer expectations. Companies that want access to capital will need to demonstrate that they are adhering to sustainable and ethical practices, further embedding ESG principles into corporate decision-making.

For financial services firms, this trend represents both a challenge and an opportunity. To remain competitive, they must reallocate resources toward ESG compliance, develop innovative sustainable products, and adapt to a new investment paradigm.

As ESG investing becomes the standard, financial institutions that fail to embrace these changes may find themselves out of step with market demands and regulatory trends.

Case Study: HSBC Green Bonds – Leading the Charge in Sustainable Finance

HSBC has positioned itself as a leader in the green finance space by issuing green bonds to fund sustainable projects, including renewable energy initiatives and eco-friendly infrastructure. The bank has committed to a $10 billion sustainable bond issuance by 2025, underlining the growing importance of green bonds in capital allocation.

These green bonds are part of HSBC’s strategy to address investors’ increasing demand for socially responsible investment options. By funding environmentally impactful projects, HSBC is not only driving sustainability but also demonstrating how financial institutions can generate positive social and environmental returns while maintaining financial profitability.

HSBC’s green bonds are a prime example of how large financial institutions are integrating ESG principles into their financing operations. This case study highlights how green bonds provide a practical and scalable solution for funding sustainable development, making them a crucial tool in the broader movement toward sustainable finance.

Trend 4: The Growth of Embedded Finance

Embedded finance is revolutioniasing the financial services landscape by blurring the lines between traditional financial products and other industries. Companies across sectors, from e-commerce to technology, are increasingly integrating financial services—such as payments, lending, and insurance—directly into their platforms. This seamless integration creates a more convenient and frictionless customer experience, allowing consumers to access financial products without leaving the platforms they already use.

By embedding financial services into their offerings, non-financial companies are not only enhancing their customer experience but also increasing competition within the financial sector. These businesses are no longer limited to selling products in their primary domain; they can now provide financial solutions alongside goods and services. This shift is disrupting the traditional financial ecosystem, compelling established financial institutions to innovate and rethink how they deliver their products and services.

The rapid growth of embedded finance is forcing traditional financial institutions to adapt their distribution strategies. Rather than relying solely on physical branches or traditional banking products, financial services companies must now find new ways to integrate their offerings into the digital platforms where consumers are already engaging.

Embedded finance is not just transforming the way consumers access financial services—it’s reshaping the very nature of the financial services industry itself.

Case Study: eBay’s “Capital for eBay Business Sellers”
eBay partnered with YouLend to launch “Capital for eBay Business Sellers,” offering financing options directly to its business sellers. This integration allows sellers to access capital without leaving the eBay platform, streamlining their operations and enhancing their growth potential.

By embedding financing solutions into its platform, eBay provides its sellers with quick and flexible access to funds, enabling them to invest in inventory, marketing, and other growth initiatives. This approach not only supports the growth of individual businesses but also strengthens eBay’s value proposition as a comprehensive platform for entrepreneurs.

This case study exemplifies how embedded finance can enhance the value proposition of e-commerce platforms by offering seamless financial services that meet the immediate needs of business customers.

Final Thoughts

The trends shaping the future of the financial services industry—Decentralised Finance, AI-driven personal finance management, Green Finance and ESG investing, and Embedded Finance—are not just shifts but a fundamental redefinition of the landscape. These developments are reshaping how financial services are delivered, with technology and consumer demand at the forefront of driving this transformation.

For financial institutions to stay competitive, embracing innovation, agility, and customer-centric strategies will be crucial. Adapting to these changes will enable businesses to remain ahead of the curve and capitalise on new opportunities presented by these disruptions. For more insights into the latest trends and strategies shaping the future of the financial services industry, subscribe to Connecting the Dots, our monthly e-newsletter. Stay informed, stay inspired, and lead the change in your industry.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.