I live in Tornado Alley, which means a roof isn’t just a roof – it’s armour. So when I found out mine needed replacing, I didn’t hesitate. I reviewed quotes, selected a company, signed the contract. All the hard stuff, I thought, was behind me.

Then came the question: what colour?

It felt like it should’ve been easy. But standing in my driveway, staring up at the expanse of shingles-to-be, I froze. It’s a massive, permanent decision – visible from every angle, exposed to the sky, the neighbours, and every passing storm chaser. Would black make the house too hot? Would brown make it look dated? Would grey clash with the brick?

Naturally, I turned to ChatGPT. I uploaded a photo of my home, asked for help, and was met with an avalanche of color-coded logic – slate complements red brick, brown warms the palette, weathered wood is a “classic choice.” The suggestions were smart, thoughtful… and somehow made things worse. I now had more choices, just better argued.

So I went to the manufacturer’s website and used their simulation tool, dropping different shingle colours onto a photo of my house. It helped, in theory. But once I narrowed it down to three, they all started to blur. On screen, they looked practically the same. That’s when my roofing company stepped in. They brought physical samples, laid them out in the sunlight, and – most importantly – showed me actual homes nearby with each of the colours installed. Only then, after all the tech, the swatches, and the analysis, could I make a choice I felt confident in.

This wasn’t indecision. It was decision friction. And it’s the kind of friction that brands, in their pursuit of offering more, often overlook.

The Psychology of Too Much Choice

We tend to think more choice equals more freedom. But in reality, more choice often creates more anxiety. Psychologist Barry Schwartz coined this dynamic the Paradox of Choice – the idea that while some choice is good, too much can lead to decision paralysis, increased regret, and less satisfaction overall.

This is especially true when the decision feels high-stakes. Choosing a roof colour isn’t just cosmetic – it’s a long-term investment, highly visible, and not easily reversed. When the pressure is on, our brain doesn’t appreciate abundance. It defaults to avoidance.

In one of the most cited studies in consumer psychology, Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper set up a jam sampling table in a grocery store. Shoppers were either offered six flavours or twenty-four. The larger display drew more interest – but those offered just six choices were ten times more likely to make a purchase. The takeaway? More options may attract attention, but fewer options drive action.

What’s happening under the surface is cognitive overload. Our working memory – responsible for weighing pros and cons – gets saturated quickly. With each new variable, our mental model has to recalculate. At a certain point, the decision becomes so mentally taxing that it feels easier to defer it, abandon it, or outsource it entirely. That’s not a lack of willpower. That’s the brain protecting itself from burnout.

When brands ignore this psychological friction, they unknowingly increase the likelihood of customer hesitation, second-guessing, or worse – inaction. Because when everything looks like a good option, nothing feels like the right one.

Why Some Decisions Deserve More Support

Marketers often treat decisions like they exist on a flat playing field. But in reality, choice sits on a hierarchy, and the higher up you go, the more psychological support people need.

Low-stakes decisions, such as choosing a gum flavour or a side dish, rarely cause friction. They’re inexpensive, reversible, and carry minimal consequences. High-stakes choices, on the other hand, are more complex, costly, and deeply personal. Whether it’s selecting a mortgage provider, a wedding dress, or a new roof, the risk of regret weighs heavier.

That’s when the brain switches gears. We move from intuition to analysis, and if overloaded, to avoidance. Behavioural economists refer to this as the decision fatigue curve. As the number of variables and the stakes increase, so does cognitive load. That’s why people delay home renovations or abandon full carts at checkout. It isn’t laziness – it’s self-preservation.

This is where tiered choice architecture can help. Instead of dumping every possibility on the table, brands can scaffold decisions. For example, a meal kit service might start by asking about dietary needs, then cooking skill, then taste preferences – delivering a filtered set of meals instead of all 200 at once. The consumer still feels in control, but the decision feels digestible.

Think of it like an elevator. Not every customer is heading to the top floor. Some want a shortcut to level two, others want to explore every stop. But without floors, stairs, or signage, everyone just stands around in the lobby – unsure of where to go next.

Smart brands design choice structures based on where decisions fall in the hierarchy and how much friction they carry. It’s not a nice-to-have – it’s essential.

Why Smart Tools Sometimes Backfire

Even when tools are meant to help, they can still make it worse. AI-generated recommendations, product filters, simulations – these were designed to ease decision-making. But when they simply layer on new variables without eliminating others, they amplify the problem.

In my case, ChatGPT gave me additional, well-reasoned colour suggestions. The roofing brand’s simulator let me “see” each option on my house. But with every added perspective, I became more uncertain – not less. What I needed wasn’t more input. I needed a system that filtered, narrowed, and helped me move forward confidently.

That’s the trap brands fall into. They assume the answer to choice anxiety is better information. But the real solution is constraint.

People don’t want endless options. They want a sense that they’re on the right path. And while visual tools are helpful, they rarely match the nuance of real-world conditions – light changes, neighborhood aesthetics, material textures. That’s why physical samples and in-person examples were what ultimately helped me decide. Not because they offered more data, but because they reduced ambiguity.

Even the smartest tools can fail if they don’t acknowledge the emotional weight of uncertainty. Help should feel like progress, not pressure.

The Business Case for Simplifying Choice

It’s one thing to talk about the theory of too much choice. It’s another to see what happens when companies actually do something about it.

Procter & Gamble once sold 26 different versions of Head & Shoulders shampoo. From dandruff control to citrus burst, there was something for every scalp scenario. But instead of boosting sales, the abundance of options led to customer hesitation – and stagnant shelves. When P&G reduced the number of variants from 26 to 15, something surprising happened: sales went up.

Why? Because fewer choices didn’t mean less relevance. It meant less confusion.

This pattern repeats across industries. GAP, for example, simplified its denim wall – once packed with indistinguishable fits – and saw shoppers choose faster and with more certainty. In tech, Apple’s limited product lines stand in stark contrast to Android’s sprawling menus. Apple doesn’t overwhelm with options. It offers what’s needed – and nothing more.

Even in the world of digital entertainment, Netflix has tested ways to surface fewer titles on screen to reduce decision paralysis and increase view time. Endless scroll may seem like engagement, but often it’s just a user trapped in the loop of not knowing what to pick.

These companies realised that offering fewer, better-differentiated choices creates momentum. It respects the consumer’s time, reduces cognitive strain, and makes the path to “yes” feel like a confident step – not a leap of faith.

In a world that equates abundance with value, restraint has become a competitive advantage.

What Brands Should Learn

When consumers are overwhelmed, they don’t want more options – they want clarity. The role of the brand is no longer just to offer a catalogue of possibilities, but to actively guide people through a decision journey that feels considered, contextual, and reassuring.

Start with curated collections. Rather than overwhelming customers with endless variants, group products into purposeful sets: “best for small spaces,” “most popular among professionals,” “ideal for warm climates.” Curation is not restriction – it’s a form of empathy.

Next, invest in personalised guidance. This could be as simple as a quiz that identifies key needs and filters options, or as advanced as AI-driven suggestions based on behavioural patterns. But the goal is the same: to remove irrelevant options, not add to the noise.

Then there’s context. Il Makiage, for example, doesn’t just match foundation shades – they show how those shades look on real people, under real conditions. They reinforce your selection with testimonials and visual proof, not just swatches on a screen.

Brands should also think about post-purchase validation. The moment after a decision is made is just as critical as the moment before. Thoughtful follow-up emails, affirming language, tips for first-time use – these reassure the customer they made a smart call.

Ultimately, this is about choice architecture. The brands that win don’t just give people more to choose from. They design the experience around how people actually make choices – emotionally, socially, and cognitively.

The Role of Research in Reducing Friction

Understanding decision friction isn’t guesswork – it’s measurable. According to a Baymard Institute study, nearly 70% of online shopping carts are abandoned – and one of the top reasons is a complicated decision process. This is where market research proves invaluable.

At its core, decision friction stems from uncertainty. But the source of that uncertainty – whether it’s lack of clarity, hesitation, or unspoken objections – differs by category, audience, and context. Research identifies these hidden blocks.

Qualitative studies reveal how consumers feel in the moment of indecision. Quantitative methods like conjoint analysis or maxdiff help identify which features drive real value. Segmentation shows how different customer types make decisions – some need freedom, others need a path.

Research also plays a critical role in post-choice validation – what gives people confidence after they say yes. The right message, email, or proof point can turn relief into brand trust.

If friction is the obstacle, research is the flashlight.

UX Doesn’t Stand for Unlimited Experience

In digital environments, more space doesn’t automatically mean more freedom. It often means more friction. In user experience (UX) design, subtraction – not expansion – is often the most powerful conversion tool.

Booking.com once overloaded its interface with filters, price badges, and urgency cues. But A/B testing revealed that simplifying the layout led to higher engagement. Shopify restructured its onboarding to guide users through sequential tasks rather than overwhelming dashboards. Completion rates rose.

Even streaming platforms like Disney+ and Netflix have learned to surface fewer but more relevant titles. Endless choice wasn’t delight – it was paralysis.

This is called cognitive offloading – helping users conserve mental energy by removing unnecessary decisions.

UX design, at its best, doesn’t just look good. It helps people move forward.

Final Thought

Decision-making is rarely logical alone. It’s emotional, contextual, and deeply personal – particularly when the stakes are high. Smart brands don’t just sell products. They design experiences that acknowledge the mental load customers carry.

The best marketing today isn’t louder. It’s sharper. It removes friction not by simplifying what you offer, but by anticipating how people choose. If you’re not thinking about how your customer feels at the point of decision, you’re not really in the business of persuasion.

You’re in the business of hoping.

And hope is not a strategy.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Boycotts can upend entire markets overnight. In 2019, a diplomatic dispute between South Korea and Japan turned into a full-scale consumer revolt. Sales of Japanese beer in South Korea plummeted by 92%, and Uniqlo shuttered multiple stores as South Korean consumers rejected Japanese brands en masse. What began as a trade conflict quickly became an economic weapon wielded by consumers.

Boycotts are no longer just reactions to political events—they have become economic power plays. Global brands increasingly find themselves at the centre of cultural, political, and trade conflicts. Starbucks faced backlash from both conservatives and progressives over its unionisation stance, while Disney’s opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill sparked boycotts from both LGBTQ+ supporters and conservative groups. In today’s market, even neutrality is a decision with consequences.

Brands have become battlegrounds for political, social, and economic conflicts. Silence is no longer a shield. When French President Emmanuel Macron defended the right to publish caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in 2020, French businesses bore the consequences. Middle Eastern supermarkets pulled French products, and #BoycottFrenchProducts trended across social media. Carrefour scrambled to issue damage control statements. Even companies with no direct political involvement can be caught in ideological crossfire.

Managing consumer activism is no longer optional. Today’s boycotts can move markets and shake billion-dollar companies. In an era where brand loyalty is tied to political and social beliefs, companies caught in the crossfire risk more than just lost sales—trust, once broken, is far harder to rebuild.

Boycotts don’t just make headlines—they leave financial wreckage. In 2012, a territorial dispute between China and Japan ignited a mass boycott, sending Toyota’s sales in China tumbling 44% in a single month. The backlash erased years of market gains, forcing Toyota and Honda into a costly recovery battle.

Gen Z and brand boycotts

Even dominant brands can feel the sting of consumer backlash. During the U.S.-China trade war, nationalist sentiment fueled a #BoycottApple campaign, pushing many Chinese consumers toward Huawei. Apple maintained its global standing, but its sales took a hit—proof that even industry giants aren’t immune to geopolitics.

Some boycotts reshape markets permanently. In 2019, a South Korea-Japan dispute led consumers to abandon Japanese beer, cosmetics, and cars—habits that didn’t revert even after tensions cooled. Similarly, a 2006 boycott of Danish products in the Middle East, triggered by controversial cartoons, wiped out $70 million in sales for dairy giant Arla Foods. Even years later, some retailers never restocked Danish brands.

Not all boycotts leave scars. Starbucks has repeatedly faced backlash over labour policies and political stances, yet its dominance remains unshaken. The reason? A fiercely loyal customer base and a brand identity strong enough to weather short-term activism. The difference between a fleeting boycott and lasting damage often comes down to one factor: how replaceable the brand is. Companies with distinct identities bounce back. Those that hesitate, or fail to differentiate, may never recover.

Why Some Boycotts Fade While Others Leave Lasting Damage

For over 40 years, Nestlé has faced recurring boycotts over its infant formula marketing in developing countries. Despite its global dominance, consumer advocacy groups have kept the controversy alive, cementing Nestlé’s reputation as a corporate villain for many.

consumers and brand boycott

The oil industry faces a similar challenge. Shell and BP have endured decades of boycotts over environmental concerns. While these campaigns haven’t triggered financial collapse, they’ve permanently tarnished brand perception—especially among younger, climate-conscious consumers.

The real risk isn’t a single high-profile boycott—it’s the slow erosion of trust from repeated controversies. Over time, consumer activism can turn a brand name into shorthand for corporate misconduct, making reputation recovery an uphill battle. A boycott is more than a PR crisis; it’s a moment of truth. Brands can either reinforce loyalty or lose trust from all sides.

Some brands emerge stronger by standing their ground. Patagonia, for example, has made environmental activism central to its identity—even suing the Trump administration over national park protections. Rather than triggering backlash, the move galvanised its core customers.

Not all brands navigate boycotts successfully. When Carrefour’s Middle Eastern stores suffered backlash during the Macron controversy, the company tried to distance itself—but this only bred confusion and distrust. Silence can be as risky as speaking out. Consumers expect companies to take a stance, but a miscalculated move can alienate as many as it attracts. The real challenge isn’t whether to engage, but how to do so without escalating the crisis.

Avoiding controversy doesn’t mean avoiding backlash. In 2022, Disney’s attempt to stay neutral on Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill backfired spectacularly. Employees and LGBTQ+ activists pressured the company to take a stance, while conservatives retaliated once it did. Florida lawmakers stripped Disney of key tax privileges, leaving it alienated from both sides. A 2023 Harris Poll found that 82% of consumers expect brands to take a stand on social issues—yet 60% say they will stop buying if they disagree with the stance. The lesson? Taking a position can build loyalty with one group while permanently alienating another.

The risk isn’t just political—it’s about perception. Brands that fail to define their values risk having their identity shaped by the loudest voices. In today’s landscape, silence isn’t neutral—it’s a statement.

Navigating a boycott isn’t just about damage control—it’s about leadership. The brands that survive aren’t the ones scrambling to react, but those that take control of the narrative. When a boycott gains traction, the worst mistake a company can make is letting others define its response. A clear, well-structured message—consistent across all platforms—determines whether a brand weathers the storm or gets swallowed by it.

The financial hit of a boycott is often inevitable, but well-prepared brands see beyond the short term. Companies that anticipate consumer activism have contingency plans—shifting market focus, reinforcing ties with loyal customers, and ensuring financial resilience in the face of backlash.

A boycott can erupt in minutes, leaving companies no time to craft a careful response. In today’s hyper-connected world, silence is often seen as complicity, while a poorly handled statement can make things worse. The brands that survive aren’t those that avoid controversy—they’re the ones prepared for it.

The difference between a temporary backlash and a full-blown reputational crisis often comes down to preparation. The brands that weather boycotts aren’t scrambling in the heat of the moment—they have a crisis playbook ready long before trouble starts.

At the heart of any crisis playbook is a clear decision-making framework: Who makes the call on how to respond—the CEO, the communications team, or a crisis committee? Without a defined chain of command, brands risk internal chaos, mixed messaging, and costly missteps.

Just as critical is message control. In the social media age, companies no longer have the luxury of waiting days—or even hours—to respond. A delay means losing control of the narrative. The most prepared brands have adaptable, pre-drafted messaging ready to deploy, ensuring their first response is measured rather than reactionary.

trending hashtags

Not all boycotts require engagement. The strongest brands assess the market impact first—does the backlash threaten core revenue streams, or is it mostly symbolic? Overcorrecting in response to a boycott from non-customers can backfire, alienating loyal buyers—a mistake that has cost brands billions.

Boycotts don’t just test a brand’s values—they reveal whether a company was ever prepared to defend them. The biggest failures aren’t necessarily from taking the wrong stance, but from appearing unprepared, inconsistent, or defensive.  A boycott forces brands to make a critical decision: should they engage directly or let the controversy fade? The wrong choice can amplify the backlash, while the right move can reshape public perception.

Some boycotts are short-lived outrage cycles, driven by social media but lacking real economic impact. Rushing to respond can sometimes prolong the controversy rather than defuse it. Smart brands know when to let public sentiment run its course. But silence isn’t always an option. When a controversy gains enough traction, failing to engage can cause lasting damage. In those cases, brands must take control of the narrative before it’s shaped for them.

When two Black men were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks in 2018, the backlash was immediate. Instead of retreating, Starbucks’ CEO issued a direct apology, shut down 8,000 stores for racial bias training, and met with community leaders. By acting quickly, the company prevented long-term brand damage and reinforced its identity as a socially conscious brand.

The High Cost of Getting It Wrong

Contrast this with United Airlines’ 2017 fiasco, when a passenger was violently dragged off a plane. The airline’s initial response—a cold, legalistic defense of policy—only inflamed public outrage. Only after intense backlash did the CEO shift to an apologetic stance, but by then, the damage was done. The lesson? A delayed or tone-deaf response can make a crisis exponentially worse.

Knowing when to engage and when to stay silent isn’t about avoiding controversy—it’s about controlling the story. The strongest brands don’t just react to boycotts; they strategically decide whether to own the moment or let it pass. Brands overly dependent on a single geographic or ideological customer base are more fragile. Companies that diversify—whether through global expansion or appealing to multiple demographics—are far more resilient.

During the 2020 Middle Eastern boycott of French brands, Carrefour and Danone lost significant business over President Macron’s remarks. But both companies quickly refocused on growing consumer bases in Africa and Asia, stabilising their bottom line. Similarly, global tech brands facing boycotts in China have expanded into India and Southeast Asia to offset losses. Instead of engaging directly in controversy, they pivot their business strategy toward emerging markets, reducing long-term financial exposure.

Consumers today can spot corporate insincerity from a mile away. When brands respond to controversy with empty gestures rather than meaningful action, they risk deepening public distrust rather than repairing it.

Pepsi learned this the hard way in 2017 with its now-infamous ad featuring Kendall Jenner handing a can of Pepsi to a police officer during a protest. Instead of making a genuine statement, the ad came off as exploitative—a hollow attempt to co-opt social justice for marketing. The backlash was immediate. Pepsi pulled the ad within 24 hours, but the damage was already done.

H&M faced a different kind of fallout in 2021 when it tried to navigate allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang, China. The company issued a carefully worded—but vague—statement distancing itself from the controversy. Instead of appeasing consumers, the move backfired: Chinese authorities removed H&M from online platforms entirely. The half-measure pleased no one and led to real financial losses.

Consumers today can spot empty gestures. If a brand takes a stand, it needs to mean it—half-measures and corporate platitudes only make things worse. Brands that emerge from boycotts with their reputations intact are those that meet controversy head-on—with clarity, honesty, and decisive action. Attempts to placate all sides or hide behind corporate jargon only fuel further backlash.

When McDonald’s exited Russia in 2022 following the Ukraine invasion, it didn’t just issue a press release—it explained, in plain terms, the ethical and economic rationale behind its decision. By offering transparency instead of vague corporate messaging, it reinforced its credibility as a company willing to take a stand rather than simply responding to pressure.

Patagonia’s 2022 decision to transfer ownership to an environmental nonprofit wasn’t a publicity stunt—it was a long-planned move. By embedding activism into its business model, Patagonia proved that brand values can be more than just marketing.

Brands that rely on damage control instead of transparency often make things worse. Half-hearted statements, vague acknowledgments, or empty pledges do little to rebuild trust. Consumers today don’t just expect brands to take a stand—they expect them to back it up with real action.

Boycotts aren’t rare disruptions anymore—they’re part of doing business in a politicised world. The brands that navigate them best don’t avoid controversy; they prepare for it, understand their audience, and act with conviction when it matters. Some brands survive by doubling down on their values and reinforcing ties with their core customers. Others try to appease everyone and end up alienating all sides. The difference isn’t the controversy itself—it’s how well a brand understands its identity and whether it has the courage to stand by it.

Consumer activism isn’t an occasional disruption anymore—it’s a permanent force in the global marketplace. Modern boycotts are faster, more coordinated, and more politically charged than ever. For brands, this signals a fundamental shift: accountability isn’t optional, and neutrality is an illusion.

Why Boycotts Are Becoming More Frequent

Several forces have converged to make consumer boycotts more widespread—and more impactful—than ever before.

  • The Acceleration of Social Media
    What once took months of grassroots organising now happens in minutes. A single viral post can mobilise millions, turning hashtags like #BoycottApple and #DeleteUber into economic flashpoints overnight. The sheer speed of digital outrage leaves companies scrambling to control the narrative before it spirals.
  • The Rise of Economic Nationalism
    Boycotts are no longer just ideological protests—they’ve become geopolitical weapons. Trade disputes between the U.S., China, Japan, and South Korea have fueled consumer-driven economic retaliation, proving that governments are no longer the sole enforcers of economic policy.
  • Shifting Consumer Expectations
    Millennials and Gen Z expect companies to align with their values—not just sell products. According to a 2023 Harris Poll, 71% of Gen Z consumers say they would stop buying from a company that does not reflect their beliefs. Corporate reputation is no longer just about products—it’s about leadership, ethics, and action.
When consumers boycott brands

A New Risk: Backlash from Both Sides

Boycotts today aren’t just about what a company does—they’re about how different ideological groups interpret its actions. The result? Backlash from both sides.

  • Disney (2022-Present) – After opposing Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill, Disney became a target for both progressive activists (demanding stronger action) and conservatives (accusing it of corporate activism). The result? Sustained boycotts from competing sides.
  • Bud Light (2023) – The brand’s handling of its partnership with Dylan Mulvaney alienated both conservatives (who boycotted over the campaign itself) and progressives (who boycotted after Bud Light failed to stand by its decision). The result? A record sales decline and a leadership shake-up.
  • Target (2023-Present) – After backlash over its Pride Month merchandise, Target scaled back displays in conservative regions—only to face boycotts from both the right (for supporting LGBTQ+ issues) and the left (for failing to stand firm).

The Increasing Polarisation of Boycotts

Consumer boycotts have long been a form of economic resistance, but today they are something more—a permanent force reshaping how brands interact with the public. They are faster, more politically charged, and more frequent than ever. Companies aren’t just selling products anymore; they are expected to serve as political, cultural, and ethical entities. This shift demands a new kind of leadership—one that treats consumer activism as a reality to be managed, not just a crisis to be feared.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

On a rainy Thursday in Jakarta, over 8,000 Sociolla customers received a flash SMS alert offering 20% off select skincare products. By 12:10 p.m., web traffic had tripled. Less than 24 hours later, a follow-up email landed in their inboxes – cleanly designed, product-focused, and personalised with recommendations based on browsing history. The conversion spike didn’t come from a single channel. It came from the right message, at the right time, on the right screen.

It’s a pattern playing out across global markets. With notification fatigue and rising acquisition costs, brands are rediscovering the power of email and SMS – two of the most overlooked but effective tools in the marketer’s arsenal. What’s different now is how they’re being used together.

According to Statista, ad spending in the SMS Advertising market worldwide is forecasted to reach US$809.05m in 2025. Email continues to dominate ROI metrics, delivering an average return of $36 for every $1 spent. But the real shift is strategic. Marketers are no longer siloing these tools. They’re orchestrating them.

In the US, Brooklinen sends a gentle SMS nudge 30 minutes after an abandoned cart, followed by an email packed with customer reviews and lifestyle imagery to rebuild interest. In the UK, ASOS primes audiences with SMS during peak sale periods, then follows up with immersive lookbooks that drive larger basket sizes. For Asian markets like Indonesia and Thailand, timing SMS around commutes or lunch hours and layering email content after hours is a high-conversion formula.

And increasingly, WhatsApp Business is becoming part of that mix. In regions where the app dominates daily communication, brands are using it to share order updates, personalised offers, and real-time service, bridging the immediacy of SMS with the interactivity of chat. In countries like India, Malaysia, and the Philippines, WhatsApp isn’t just a messaging tool. It’s a conversion channel.

What’s emerging is a model of engagement where immediacy and storytelling coexist. Consumers may not articulate it, but their actions show a clear preference: urgency on the lock screen, depth in the inbox – and conversation in the chat thread.

Data That Demands Attention

The performance metrics behind email and SMS are impressive. 

Omnisend’s 2024 ecommerce report shows that automated emails account for just 2% of sends but drive 41% of all email orders. These messages see open rates of 42.1%, click rates of 5.4%, and convert at 1.9% – outperforming bulk campaigns across every measure. Automated emails like welcome, cart abandonment, and browse abandonment flows are particularly effective. Take Baking Steel, a U.S. brand known for its professional-grade pizza-baking surfaces. The company drives 33% of its total email revenue through automated messages, even though they represent just 2.3% of sends. Their cart abandonment series alone accounts for 27% of email revenue, while their welcome series delivers between $10 to $15 per email sent. It’s a clear example of how a small number of well-timed, behaviour-based messages can punch far above their weight.

When paired with SMS, the impact grows sharper. SMS open rates hover around 98%, making it a high-visibility tool for time-sensitive nudges and transactional prompts.

Retailers are taking notice. In Southeast Asia, Love, Bonito enhances customer loyalty through LBCommunity+, offering perks like early access alerts and personalised styling sessions. While specific performance metrics aren’t publicly available, the brand’s hybrid approach – pairing SMS and email across loyalty tiers – has been widely recognised for deepening engagement and increasing repeat purchases among members.

The numbers tell a clear story. SMS delivers reach and urgency, while email drives context and conversion. Together, they’re not just a communications strategy – they’re an engine for revenue.

Speed Meets Substance

Brands are learning that velocity alone doesn’t drive results – it’s the balance between urgency and depth that converts.

Email and SMS each offer distinct strengths. SMS delivers speed, with nearly instantaneous open rates – ideal for alerts, reminders, and real-time nudges. Email offers space to tell a story, showcase visuals, and reinforce value.

Brooklinen, a US-based home goods brand, effectively demonstrates this balance through its abandoned cart email strategy. The emails highlight free shipping, surface customer reviews, and feature clean product visuals, adding persuasion where a short-form message might fall short. The brand’s approach shows how reinforcing urgency with context can reignite purchase intent.

Image Credit: Active Campaign 

Beauty Pie, a UK-based direct-to-consumer beauty brand, integrates email into its promotional ecosystem by offering exclusive perks to subscribers, including discounts and early access offers. These incentives drive sign-ups and build a permission-based channel for richer engagement.

While many brands continue experimenting with channel timing, the best results come when communication flows are mapped with intent – starting with immediacy and followed by storytelling.

Timing Isn’t Everything – Coordination Is

Hitting send at the right time is no longer enough. Today’s consumers expect connected experiences – where messages don’t just arrive on schedule but arrive with purpose.

Disjointed campaigns risk confusion or, worse, being ignored. According to Omnisend, brands that use three or more channels in a coordinated way see a 287% higher purchase rate than those using single-channel outreach. But coordination doesn’t mean duplication. It means sequencing messages across platforms in a way that feels human, not robotic.

Brands that succeed build journeys, starting with a short SMS that grabs attention and followed by a visual email that deepens the story. Automated triggers based on user behaviour (like browse abandonment or wishlist adds) help ensure these touchpoints feel timely, not templated.

This shift from reactive timing to proactive orchestration pushes marketers to rethink their flows. It’s not about when a message is sent; it’s about how it fits into the bigger narrative.

Personalisation That Pays Off

Personalisation is no longer optional; it’s the standard. Brands that succeed use customer behaviour as the blueprint for when, where, and how to communicate.

Brooklinen exemplifies this strategy by utilising behavioural data to send personalised messages – welcoming new subscribers, reminding users of abandoned carts, and re-engaging inactive shoppers. Each email is optimised for timing and relevance, often highlighting customer testimonials and free shipping incentives to drive conversions. These flows are built to respond, not interrupt.

Personalisation at scale means more than using a first name – it means designing communications that adapt to customer intent. The brands that get this right don’t just see better metrics; they build better relationships.

Inside the Inbox and Lock Screen

The real test of a campaign happens in seconds – on a lock screen swipe or an inbox scan. Successful brands know that getting the message seen is only the beginning. Getting it acted on is the goal.

Brooklinen’s cart abandonment email is a masterclass in the visual hierarchy: a clean header, compelling product image, a short reassurance (“Don’t worry, your cart’s still here”), and a call-to-action button with contrast and urgency. Paired with their SMS—“Still thinking it over? Your Brooklinen cart’s waiting…”—the combined impact is gentle and effective. No pressure, just presence.

Email marketers often focus on copy, but design plays just as critical a role. Omnisend recommends mobile-first layouts with clear CTAs, minimal text, and product visuals above the fold. For SMS, the best-performing messages are under 160 characters and feature clickable short links – delivered during peak engagement hours like lunchtime or early evening.

Though design elements may vary by region and industry, the pattern remains consistent: a visual hook, a clear message, and a frictionless path to action.

Whether it’s a text reminder to “Finish checking out before your 10% off expires” or an email showcasing reviews from people with similar purchase behaviour, these touchpoints are designed to feel relevant at the moment. Not just another notification.

Lessons from the Brands Getting It Right

Some brands aren’t just testing SMS and email integration; they’re building it into how they communicate. And the results show.

Brooklinen has become a case study in lifecycle marketing. Their welcome flows introduce the brand’s voice with simplicity and style, often including a first-purchase discount and lifestyle imagery that reflects their clean aesthetic. Follow-up emails and SMS reminders – especially around cart abandonment – are personalised, brief, and supported by social proof. This multistep approach increases the likelihood of conversion without overloading the user.

Love, Bonito, a fashion brand based in Southeast Asia, strengthens loyalty through its LBCommunity+ program. Members receive early access notifications and personalised recommendations via email. While SMS is often used for time-sensitive drops, email delivers richer content – lookbooks, styling tips, and editor picks tailored to user preferences. It’s a strategy that respects both format and context.

Warby Parker, in the US, offers another strong model. Their abandoned cart emails pair sharp product imagery with service-driven reminders – like free shipping and easy returns. Meanwhile, SMS is used sparingly but strategically, such as to confirm appointments or alert customers when their in-store pickup is ready. The brand’s restraint adds to its impact.

Each of these brands succeeds not by doing more but by doing it better. Clear roles for each channel. Data-driven triggers. Messages that respect the medium and the consumer’s attention span.

Avoiding the Double Tap Trap

With nonstop notifications, message fatigue is real, and brands that overcommunicate are paying the price.

According to GetApp’s 2024 Digital Content Consumer Survey, 40% of U.S. consumers unsubscribe from brand texts and emails at least once weekly. Over half will unsubscribe if they receive four or more marketing messages from the same company within 30 days. The problem isn’t communication; it’s saturation.

Many consumers also see diminishing value in brand outreach. Nearly 49% of Americans say more than half of the emails they receive feel like junk, a perception that erodes trust and damages engagement.

The smartest marketers are now designing campaigns that avoid redundancy. A time-sensitive SMS may kick off a promotion, while email follows with more detail and imagery. Triggered automation ensures once a customer clicks or converts on one channel, the other backs off – preserving relevance without repetition.

Avoiding the double tap isn’t just about frequency; it’s about flow. Respecting your customer’s attention span is now a competitive advantage.

What Great Design Looks Like

In integrated campaigns, how a message looks can matter as much as what it says. Design is the first filter – especially on mobile, where space is limited and attention is scarce.

Omnisend’s benchmarks point to a consistent pattern: campaigns with a clear CTA, minimal text, and mobile-optimised visuals significantly outperform cluttered or text-heavy alternatives. For SMS, the highest-performing messages stay under 160 characters, often including a short, trackable link and a clear sense of urgency – whether it’s “Last chance: 20% off ends tonight” or “Your order is ready for pickup.”

On the other hand, emails benefit from layered content – clear headers, bold product imagery above the fold, and buttons that pop. Brooklinen’s campaigns frequently use short copy and soft colour palettes that echo the brand’s tone. Beauty brands like Glossier and Love, Bonito often lead with visuals, letting product photos and user-generated content do the talking.

The golden rule is design for the scroll. Whether it’s a swipeable message or a mobile inbox preview, every pixel counts. Alignment between email and SMS design – through tone, colour, and CTA language – helps reinforce the message without repetition.

The most effective campaigns don’t just look good. They work hard in small spaces – and stay out of the way once the job is done.

The Tech That Ties It All Together

Smart strategy means little without the infrastructure to support it. Behind every well-timed message and seamless customer journey is a stack of tools built to automate, segment, and adapt in real-time.

Marketers are increasingly turning to platforms that integrate email and SMS – allowing for centralised data, unified campaign flows, and cross-channel automation. Brands use technology to sync customer behaviour across touchpoints, trigger messages based on actions (like page views or cart additions), and suppress redundant sends if a user has already converted.

This orchestration isn’t just efficient; it’s essential. With third-party cookies phasing out, first-party data has become the lifeblood of personalised marketing. Integrated platforms offer a direct line to user behaviour, purchase history, and channel preferences, helping marketers reach the right audience without overstepping.

Brooklinen’s flows, for example, are powered by behaviour-triggered automation that adjusts timing and content depending on customer interaction. Meanwhile, Glossier leverages its CRM system to send personalised messages to loyalty members based on engagement tiers and product affinity.

Tech isn’t the show’s star – but it’s what keeps the spotlight aligned. Without it, even the best creative and messaging strategy risks falling flat.

Final Send-Off

Consumers aren’t just scrolling; they’re actively filtering. Every ping, preview, and push competes for attention in a space where attention is finite.

The brands winning today aren’t louder. They’re smarter. They know when to text and when to email. They automate without sounding robotic. They build systems that talk to each other so their messages don’t overlap – or get ignored.

As marketing budgets tighten and customer expectations rise, the margin for error shrinks. SMS and email, when used in sync, offer rare precision: fast, personal, and measurable.

The smart play isn’t about choosing the right channel. It’s about connecting them and knowing when to pause.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Digital advertising is struggling to maintain consumer engagement. The average person encounters thousands of ads daily, yet engagement rates continue to decline. Studies show that global click-through rates on digital ads have dropped, with banner blindness reaching record levels. At the same time, scepticism toward influencer marketing is growing, particularly as AI-generated endorsements become more common.

Younger consumers, especially Gen Z, seek more authentic, real-world brand interactions. The novelty of digital experiences is fading, making them easier to ignore. In contrast, live events and interactive experiences engage multiple senses, fostering emotional connections that screens often fail to replicate.

As a result, brands are rethinking their approach. Pop-ups, immersive installations, and brand activations are not just promotional tactics – they are strategic tools for building consumer loyalty. These in-person experiences not only create exclusivity but also encourage organic social sharing and generate earned media that digital ads often struggle to achieve. This shift marks the resurgence of experiential marketing in an era of digital fatigue.

Why Brands Are Shifting to Real-World Experiences

Brands looking to stand out are increasingly turning to real-world interactions. Once considered optional brand-building exercises, immersive activations are becoming a key strategy for engaging consumers beyond the digital space.

Luxury fashion house Jacquemus transformed a Paris metro station into a branded experience, featuring vending machines stocked with its signature handbags. The installation provided an exclusive, tactile interaction that drove viral engagement and led to inventory selling out within hours.

Image Credit: Paper Mag

In Tokyo, Muji has taken its minimalist philosophy beyond retail, turning brand engagement into a fully immersive experience. The Japanese retailer’s largest standalone store, located in Ginza, spans multiple floors and features an in-house bakery, Muji Diner, and more than 7,000 of its signature no-frills products. But beyond shopping, visitors can check into the Muji Hotel Ginza, which occupies the upper five floors of the building, extending the brand’s ethos into hospitality.

Image Credit: The Wallpaper

The Ginza hotel follows earlier openings in Beijing and Shenzhen, reinforcing Muji’s presence in experiential branding. Each of its 79 rooms showcases the brand’s design ethos, furnished exclusively with Muji products – from mattresses and towels to LED desk lights and lightweight travel pyjamas. Even small details, such as complimentary skincare products and toiletries, reflect Muji’s commitment to simplicity and functionality.

By blurring the lines between retail and hospitality, Muji offers more than a place to stay. Guests are not just consumers but participants in a curated environment shaped entirely around Muji’s aesthetic and values, turning an overnight stay into an extension of the brand experience.

Banco Itaú took a different approach in Brazil by building an interactive financial literacy park in São Paulo. Rather than relying solely on digital campaigns, the bank created a space where families could engage with money management concepts through gamified activities. Reports indicate the initiative increased trust, brand affinity, and a measurable rise in new account sign-ups.

These campaigns illustrate how physical presence can enhance brand engagement in ways digital marketing alone may struggle to achieve. Stepping into a branded environment, interacting with products, or participating in a curated experience can create a deeper, more lasting connection between consumers and brands.

Experiential Marketing Builds Influence, Not Just Awareness

Beyond generating buzz, experiential marketing can shape consumer perception and drive brand loyalty. Some of the most effective campaigns go beyond traditional advertising to create interactive experiences that turn passive consumers into active participants.

Research suggests that consumers are more likely to recall brands they have engaged with physically rather than solely online. Luxury automaker Porsche capitalised on this insight with its Porsche Unseen exhibition in Shanghai. Instead of traditional advertising, the brand curated an exclusive, invite-only experience where attendees viewed never-before-seen concept cars, interact with designers, and test-drove select models. The event was designed not just to showcase Porsche’s innovation but to deepen brand affinity among high-value consumers.

Physical experiences also have a multiplier effect through social sharing, amplifying brand reach in ways that digital ads alone may struggle to achieve. Evian’s Mountain of Youth activation in Shanghai is one example. The immersive alpine-themed experience featured real snow, ice tunnels, and interactive projections, reinforcing the brand’s identity as pure and rejuvenating. Attendees shared their experiences on social media, extending Evian’s brand messaging beyond the physical installation.

Image Credit: Maake

Industry experts argue that while digital marketing remains essential, immersive brand experiences create lasting consumer connections. A digital ad can be skipped, and an email can go unread, but a well-executed, tactile brand interaction has the potential to leave a lasting impression.

Proving the ROI of Experiential Marketing

Measuring the effectiveness of experiential marketing has long been a challenge. Unlike digital advertising, where brands can track impressions, clicks, and conversions in real-time, physical activations have traditionally been harder to quantify. However, advances in data tracking, geolocation technology, and integrated digital touchpoints are helping brands analyse their experiential campaigns more precisely.

Coca-Cola has experimented with RFID-powered brand activations to bridge this measurement gap. During its Coca-Cola Village event in Israel, attendees received RFID wristbands linked to their Facebook accounts. By scanning their wristbands at various activation stations, they could instantly “Like” different attractions and share their experiences online. According to company reports, this resulted in a 35% increase in brand engagement on Facebook, with campaign reach extending well beyond the event.

In Romania, Coca-Cola launched its Festival Bottle campaign, transforming bottle labels into wristbands for exclusive music festival access. Consumers scanned barcodes on their bottles using a smartphone app to determine if they had won festival passes. The campaign reportedly drove an 11% increase in sales, positioning Coca-Cola’s packaging as a functional tool and a cultural symbol among Romanian teens.

Volkswagen adopted a similar data-driven approach in Germany with its Power of Two test-drive experience. The initiative encouraged consumers to test-drive Volkswagen’s electric vehicles with a friend, gamifying the experience by tracking distance and energy efficiency. The campaign incorporated digital leaderboards and interactive data-sharing, and company figures indicate a 12% increase in post-test-drive conversions.

Beyond proving return on investment, measurement tools are also helping brands refine their strategies. By integrating digital extensions that capture real-time consumer insights, companies can optimise experiential campaigns to enhance engagement and long-term business impact.

Research-brief

The Future of Experiential Marketing

Experiential marketing continues to evolve, with brands exploring new ways to integrate technology, scale activations, and measure their impact. As digital fatigue rises, companies are experimenting with immersive experiences that blend the physical and digital worlds.

Technology Is Elevating Physical Experiences

Experiential marketing is no longer limited to in-person activations. The rise of AR, VR, and AI-driven personalisation is enabling brands to extend real-world interactions into digital spaces, creating multi-sensory experiences that go beyond traditional advertising.

Dior Beauty’s AI-powered fragrance pop-up in Seoul illustrates how technology reshapes brand engagement. The activation used biometric sensors to analyse consumer emotions, tracking facial expressions and micro-reactions to recommend personalised scents. Instead of a static display, visitors engaged in an interactive experience that adjusted in real-time based on their preferences.

Heineken took a different approach, blending product innovation, humour, and workplace commentary into a digitally integrated activation. The brand introduced The Closer, a high-tech bottle opener that leveraged Bluetooth technology to close work apps when you pop the lid off a Heineken. The device, created in response to growing concerns over work-life balance during the pandemic, was promoted through a satirical product launch event inspired by tech industry keynotes, with actor Billy Eichner as the host.

Image Credit: Heineken

The campaign film showcased overwhelmed employees who, upon opening a Heineken, instantly saw their laptops and work notifications power down. By turning a simple action into a symbolic (and functional) break from work, Heineken positioned itself as a brand advocating for a better work-life balance. The campaign gained traction on social media as attendees and consumers shared their experiences using the device, amplifying Heineken’s message beyond the event itself.

Scalability Without Losing Exclusivity

One of the biggest challenges in experiential marketing is scale. While immersive activations can generate buzz, maintaining exclusivity while expanding reach remains a complex task. The key lies in creating personal and localised experiences, even when executed globally.

Nike’s House of Innovation stores in New York, Shanghai, and Paris illustrate this approach. Each store follows a core concept – an interactive retail space blending digital customisation and product storytelling – yet incorporates elements unique to its location. Shanghai’s store reflects Chinese streetwear culture, while New York’s version offers sneaker customisation based on real-time sports data. This flexible framework allows Nike to create tailored experiences while maintaining a cohesive global identity.

Exclusivity also plays a role in consumer engagement. Adidas’ Confirmed app, which provides access to limited-edition sneaker drops, extends experiential marketing beyond physical locations. The app requires users to visit geo-tagged locations to unlock early access, merging digital and real-world interactions. This approach not only increases foot traffic but also fosters a sense of exclusivity among dedicated customers.

Meanwhile, Louis Vuitton’s 200 Trunks, 200 Visionaries exhibition, a travelling showcase celebrating the brand’s 200th anniversary, demonstrates how luxury brands balance exclusivity with large-scale reach. The exhibition toured cities such as Paris, New York, Singapore, and Los Angeles, immersing attendees in Louis Vuitton’s heritage while generating localised content for each market. Invitation-only previews and VIP experiences ensured the activations remained exclusive while reaching a global audience.

As experiential marketing evolves, brands continue to explore ways to balance personalisation with scale. By designing adaptable, localised, and digitally integrated activations, companies aim to expand their reach without compromising authenticity.

Final Thoughts

Experiential marketing is regaining momentum as brands seek new ways to engage consumers beyond digital channels. A study by Gradient shows that 82% of retail companies have increased their experiential marketing budgets over the last three years. 

Consumer response is driving this investment. Research indicates that 85% of consumers are more likely to make a purchase after attending a live marketing event, while 91% report a more positive perception of brands following such experiences. Additionally, 64% of consumers maintain a favourable impression of a brand for at least a month after attending an activation, underscoring the long-term impact of immersive interactions.

However, scaling experiential marketing comes with challenges. High production costs, logistical complexity, and the need for skilled talent make execution a significant undertaking. Brands must navigate venue sourcing, real-time audience engagement, and seamless digital integrations – all while ensuring a consistent and impactful brand experience. Measuring ROI remains a hurdle, requiring brands to invest in data tracking and technology to justify the spending.

Despite these challenges, experiential marketing offers brands a tangible way to combat digital fatigue and foster engagement beyond a single interaction. With continued advancements in measurement and technology, brands that invest in scalable, strategic, and immersive experiences are positioning themselves for long-term consumer loyalty and business growth.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The marketing department, as we know it, is obsolete.

Generative AI develops millions of personalised ads in milliseconds. Consumers shape brand narratives in real-time. Predictive algorithms anticipate needs before customers even recognise them. The traditional marketing playbook isn’t just outdated; it’s collapsing. Legacy teams, built on rigid hierarchies and campaign cycles, are being outpaced by AI-augmented ecosystems designed for continuous adaptation.

Tomorrow’s marketing function won’t be a department. It will be an intelligence system embedded within product development, customer experience, and behavioural data science. Brands that fail to restructure will not just fall behind; they will disappear.

Winning in this new landscape requires more than AI-driven automation. Emotional intelligence, ethical AI governance, and seamless integration with business operations will separate leaders from laggards.

The shift is already happening. The only question is: how fast can marketing teams evolve?

The five pillars of the future marketing team

#1. AI-Augmented Strategy Teams – Humans and Machines as Co-Pilots

The future of marketing is not about AI replacing human creativity; it’s about AI augmenting it. In the next decade, marketing teams will no longer rely on static consumer personas or outdated segmentation models. Instead, they will deploy real-time predictive marketing engines powered by AI that adapt to shifting consumer behaviours instantaneously.

But here’s the critical distinction: AI will not replace human intuition but enhance its precision. The most successful marketing teams will be those that train AI to think like a strategist while ensuring humans retain control over brand ethos, ethical boundaries, and cultural nuance.

Nike’s marketing team has already embedded AI into its decision-making process, using machine learning to predict product demand, optimise pricing, and create hyper-personalised consumer journeys. However, Nike does not hand over creative control to algorithms; it ensures AI insights serve human-led storytelling and brand building.

However, AI’s increasing role raises governance concerns. If left unchecked, algorithmic bias, AI hallucinations, and opaque decision-making processes can erode consumer trust. Google’s ad-targeting models, for instance, have faced scrutiny for bias in content distribution, highlighting the need for marketing teams to establish AI ethics frameworks.

The human component will remain irreplaceable. AI can crunch data, but it cannot understand cultural nuances, context, or the emotional weight of a story.

Marketing leaders must own the governance of an AI-driven strategy, ensuring automation enhances brand trust rather than undermines it.

#2. Consumer intelligence & behavioural science units to decode decision-making in real-time

The future of marketing will not be driven by demographics but by deep behavioural insights. Real-time consumer intelligence hubs will help track sentiment, subconscious decision-making, and predictive behavioural shifts.

Neuroscience, biometric tracking, and AI-driven sentiment analysis will become the foundation of modern marketing teams. Instead of just asking consumers what they think, brands will measure how they feel in the moment. Eye-tracking, galvanic skin response, and neuro-marketing scans will reveal how audiences react to products, content, and messaging, eliminating the guesswork from engagement strategies.

Unilever has already integrated neuroscience into its advertising research, measuring emotional responses at a subconscious level. By analysing brain activity, Unilever can determine whether an ad creates an authentic emotional connection before it ever reaches a consumer’s screen, ensuring campaigns resonate deeply rather than rely on assumptions.

However, access to such insights comes with ethical responsibility. As marketing teams gain deeper access to real-time consumer psychology, the risk of manipulation increases. Personalisation cannot become digital surveillance.

Brands that thrive will use behavioural data to enhance consumer experiences, not exploit them. Ethical AI oversight within marketing teams will be non-negotiable.

#3. Hyper-personalisation & growth teams leading the shift from segments to individuals

Marketing will no longer be about targeting audiences; it will be about orchestrating individual consumer journeys in real time. Growth teams will shift their focus from optimising channels to engineering highly individualised consumer pathways powered by AI and real-time identity graphs.

Spotify’s AI-driven campaigns, like Discover Weekly and Wrapped, are personalised brand experiences rather than traditional marketing tools. Every interaction refines the algorithm, ensuring recommendations grow more precise, engagement deepens, and retention soars.

This level of hyper-personalisation presents a paradox. The more tailored the experience, the more invisible the marketing becomes. When done well, the consumer does not feel targeted; they feel understood. But when algorithms misfire, the illusion shatters.

Growth teams of the future will need to master the balance between automation and authenticity, ensuring AI-driven personalisation enhances human connection rather than replacing it.

#4. Decentralised, agile creative networks and the end of the traditional in-house model

Marketing teams will no longer operate as rigid, in-house departments. Instead, they will function as fluid, decentralised creative networks, tapping into on-demand talent pools powered by AI-driven collaboration platforms.

Gucci Vault has already embraced decentralised creativity, collaborating with independent digital artists and Web3 designers rather than dictating brand aesthetics from a central creative team. By co-creating with digital-native communities, Gucci ensures its brand narrative evolves organically rather than being imposed from the top down.

Maintaining brand consistency in a decentralised model will be challenging. Future marketing leaders must find ways to empower external creators while ensuring alignment with brand identity.

#5. Ethical & sustainable marketing frameworks: the new non-negotiable

Marketing will no longer be judged solely on performance metrics. The future belongs to brands that align with consumer values and embed ethics and sustainability into their strategies.

Patagonia’s self-imposed carbon tax and long-term sustainability initiatives have proven that consumers reward brands whose actions match their messaging. If a company fails in this area, it can lead to serious greenwashing and ethical mistakes that destroy trust. This is especially true because AI-powered fact-checking tools and decentralised watchdog communities can quickly reveal inconsistencies.

The rise of regenerative marketing will push brands beyond sustainability pledges toward long-term societal impact. Companies will shift from minimising harm to actively contributing to environmental and social well-being. This will require marketing teams to collaborate with policymakers, sustainability experts, and ethical data specialists, creating a new discipline where profit and purpose are no longer opposing forces but interconnected drivers of success.

The future marketing team must integrate ethics into every stage of strategy and execution, ensuring profit and purpose are interconnected rather than opposing forces.

The future marketing leader – a hybrid of technologist, psychologist, and strategist

The CMO role is disappearing. In its place, a new breed of marketing leader is emerging, one who blends data fluency with behavioural science and technology expertise with strategic vision.

Companies like Adobe and Tesla already embed AI, automation, and predictive analytics into their core strategies. But successful marketing leaders will not just be digital experts – they will be experience architects, shaping every consumer touchpoint across an increasingly fragmented landscape.

As marketing, product development, and customer experience become inseparable, the Chief Growth Officer or Chief Experience Officer will replace the traditional CMO, reflecting marketing’s new mandate: not just to promote but to engineer adaptive, intelligent brand ecosystems.

The Marketing Team as a living intelligence system

The marketing team of the future is not just a department. It works as a living, changing system. AI helps boost human creativity, insights about customer behaviour guide decisions, and decentralised networks share brand stories.

But technology alone will not define the winners. The brands that thrive will understand the irreplaceable role of human judgment – the ability to interpret, contextualise, and ethically apply data-driven insights.

To future-proof their marketing teams, organisations must:

  • Invest in cross-functional talent – marketers must be fluent in AI, behavioural psychology, and digital ecosystems.
  • Establish AI governance frameworks – bias, privacy, and transparency will be critical.
  • Shift from campaign-based marketing to real-time experience management or risk irrelevance.

Marketing is no longer a function. It is the foundation of consumer trust, brand longevity, and sustained competitive advantage. The next era will not belong to those who adapt; it will belong to those who lead the transformation.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Brand loyalty is no longer about what you buy – it is about who you are. Consumers do not just choose brands; they pledge their allegiance. Jeep Wrangler owners – called Jeepers, Apple users, Patagonia advocates, and Nike loyalists are not just customers – they are tribes bonded by shared values, identity, and purpose. A purchase is no longer a transaction; it is a statement.

This is not accidental. Brands have become cultural markers, shaping personal narratives and influencing how people define themselves. The shift is so profound that Seth Godin, one of the most influential voices in modern marketing, put it simply: “People don’t buy goods and services. They buy relationships, stories, and magic.”

But what happens when loyalty turns into something stronger? When a preference for one brand transforms into a rejection of others? When a brand becomes a badge of belonging, and stepping outside that tribe feels like a betrayal?

These allegiances are playing out in real time, shaping consumer behaviour in ways brands can no longer ignore.

Why brand tribalism is different today?

Brand loyalty used to be about habit and reliability. Customers would choose a brand because it is familiar, consistent, or available. Today, the choice is more personal. Consumers do not just buy – they pledge allegiance. A choice between Apple and Android is not just about software preferences; it signals a stance on design, privacy, and social status. Wearing Nike over Adidas is not just about comfort; it ties into cultural movements, athlete endorsements, and personal identity. Patagonia customers are not just buying outerwear; they are making a statement about sustainability and corporate ethics.

Social media has turned these preferences into public declarations. A sneaker drop, a product launch, or a rebrand reaches customers and mobilises them. Fans celebrate, critics attack, and the conversation spreads. Algorithms amplify the strongest voices, deepening the divide. Tribal loyalty fuels engagement, turning every campaign into a cultural moment. The more a brand stands for, the more its audience demands from it.

Algorithms and personalisation create echo chambers. Nike loyalists see Nike’s success stories. Apple users encounter articles that affirm their choice. Digital spaces create closed loops where brand loyalty is continuously reinforced, making it harder for consumers to see alternatives as anything but inferior.

This kind of loyalty comes with expectations. Customers expect brands to take a stand, be consistent, and reward their loyalty with more than good products. They want recognition, participation, and alignment with their values. When those expectations are not met, the fallout can be swift.

“A tribe is a group of people connected to one another, connected to a leader, and connected to an idea. For millions of years, human beings have been part of one tribe or another. A group needs only two things to be a tribe: a shared interest and a way to communicate.”

― Seth Godin, Tribes: We Need You to Lead Us

The risks of identity-driven branding

A strong brand tribe can be an asset until it becomes a liability. When loyalty hardens into exclusivity, the same passion that fuels advocacy can turn into a rejection of anything that does not fit the tribe’s values. A brand that leans too heavily into one identity risks alienating those who do not see themselves reflected. A shift in messaging, a misstep in marketing, or a stance on a social issue can trigger a backlash from both within and outside the core audience.

Brands that once prided themselves on standing for something have found themselves trapped by it. A sustainability-focused company that fails to meet rising environmental standards faces harsher scrutiny than a competitor that never claimed to be eco-conscious. A brand built on inclusivity that stumbles on representation gets called out faster than one that never positioned itself that way. The deeper the connection, the stronger the expectation.

The need for agility has never been greater. A campaign that works today may spark controversy tomorrow. Cultural shifts happen in real time, and brand tribes, once unwavering, can fracture just as quickly. Companies that rely too much on one identity risk being boxed in, unable to evolve without backlash. The challenge is not just in building loyalty but in knowing how to navigate it when the landscape changes.

The balance between tribal loyalty and mass appeal

A brand that tries to appeal to everyone risks resonating with no one. However, a brand that caters too narrowly to its most devoted audience can be boxed in, unable to grow beyond its core following. Striking the balance between exclusivity and accessibility separates brands that thrive from those that fade into irrelevance.

Some brands embrace scarcity, making their products harder to get, their communities more selective, and their messaging tailored to a specific worldview. Limited releases, invite-only access, and membership-driven perks reinforce the idea that belonging is earned. Others take the opposite approach, using personalisation at scale to make every customer feel like part of something bigger while still appealing to the masses. Digital platforms allow for segmentation so precisely that a brand can be all things to all people without diluting its identity.

Technology has made it easier to foster brand loyalty without closing the door on broader appeal. AI-driven recommendations ensure customers see content that aligns with their values while still introducing them to new perspectives. Community-led marketing taps into the power of brand evangelists without making the message feel forced. The most successful brands build identity-driven connections while leaving room for evolution, ensuring loyalty does not become a limitation.

Case Study: Duolingo’s Viral Marketing and the “Death of Duo” Campaign

Image Credit: Duolingo’s Instagram

Background

Duolingo’s recent Death of Duo campaign exemplifies how brands can cultivate deep tribal loyalty while maintaining mass appeal. By leveraging humour, cultural references, and interactive storytelling, Duolingo engaged its diverse user base, sparking widespread discussion and reinforcing its unique brand identity.

In February 2025, Duolingo executed one of its boldest marketing stunts yet – the death of its beloved green owl mascot, Duo. The campaign, which humorously announced Duo’s passing, was a continuation of Duolingo’s long-standing strategy of blending pop culture, humour, and user engagement to reinforce brand loyalty. The company framed the stunt as a playful callout to procrastinating users, joking that Duo had “probably died waiting for you to do your lesson.” The campaign quickly went viral, dominating social media feeds and prompting engagement from users, influencers, and even other brands.

Marketing Strategy

Duolingo’s marketing strategy is characterised by its unhinged and playful brand voice, particularly on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. By personifying their mascot, Duo the Owl, in humorous and culturally relevant scenarios, they effectively engage a younger demographic. Their social media team crafts content that aligns with current internet trends and memes, fostering a strong sense of community among users.

The Death of Duo campaign reinforced this approach by incorporating several viral elements:

  • Social Media Engagement: The brand used humour to drive participation, even jokingly asking users for credit card numbers to sign up for Duolingo Max in Duo’s memory.
  • Celebrity Tie-Ins: The campaign referenced pop star Dua Lipa, continuing an ongoing joke about Duo’s “obsession” with the singer, leading to responses from fans and media outlets.
  • Cross-Platform Integration: Duolingo spread the campaign across TikTok, X, and Instagram, creating memes, fake crime scene investigations, and mock obituaries for the owl.

This was not an isolated stunt. Duolingo has consistently used irreverent, culture-driven marketing to cultivate a strong brand identity that resonates with loyal users and casual observers. Previous viral moments include their Duo on Ice April Fools’ campaign and their comedic threats to users who neglect their daily lessons. By maintaining this unpredictable, entertaining approach, Duolingo has turned language learning into a social experience that users actively engage with beyond just using the app.

Outcome

The Death of Duo campaign generated significant viral traction, with users and brands participating in the narrative. The brand’s ability to blend humour with direct engagement helped reinforce its unique identity and kept it at the forefront of digital marketing conversations.

Lessons Learned

Duolingo’s success shows that embracing an unconventional, bold brand personality can foster tribal loyalty without alienating potential users. By engaging with internet culture, incorporating humour, and making users feel part of the joke, Duolingo continues to strike a rare balance – creating an exclusive-feeling brand tribe while still appealing to a broad audience.

Case Study: Agent Provocateur’s Revival Through Niche Focus

Image Credit: Yahoo News UK

Background

Agent Provocateur, the luxury lingerie brand known for its provocative designs, faced financial difficulties and a diluted brand image in the mid-2010s. In 2017, Four Marketing acquired the brand, and this is when Agent Provocateur sought to return to its bold, avant-garde roots.

Strategy

Instead of chasing mass-market appeal, the brand refocused on its core audience – loyal customers who appreciated its distinctive, daring aesthetic. This involved emphasising high-quality craftsmanship, introducing new product lines like swimwear and costume jewellery, and creating marketing campaigns featuring confident, mature celebrities who genuinely love the brand. By staying true to its unique identity, Agent Provocateur strengthened its brand tribe while remaining accessible to new customers seeking luxury and exclusivity.

Outcome

This strategic shift led to a doubling of revenues over three years, with sales projected to reach £50 million by 2025. Agent Provocateur’s resurgence illustrates how a brand can balance deep tribal loyalty with a broader appeal by staying authentic and focusing on its niche market.

Future outlook on brand identity and consumer tribes

Loyalty is no longer a static relationship between brands and consumers. It is fluid, shaped by cultural shifts, digital ecosystems, and the growing expectation that brands stand for something beyond their products. The way we connect has changed. What used to be a simple exchange of goods or services has become a deeper connection based on identity. This connection is always being tested and redefined. 

Technology is accelerating this evolution. AI-driven personalisation allows brands to create hyper-individualised experiences, reinforcing consumer identity while adapting in real-time. Web3 and decentralised communities are reshaping ownership, giving consumers a more active role in shaping the brands they support. The rise of digital-first tribes, fueled by platforms like Discord, Reddit, and private membership networks, reduces the need for brands to appeal to the masses.

Yet, with every new opportunity comes risk. As consumer expectations grow, the margin for error shrinks. A brand that aligns too closely with a specific identity may be constrained when the cultural tide shifts. A brand that refuses to engage at all risks irrelevance. The future belongs to those who can move beyond traditional brand loyalty, building adaptable, authentic relationships, and evolving alongside their audience.

A brand is no longer just a product or a service – it is a belief system, a signal, a community. Consumers do not merely buy into brands; they embed them into their identities, defend them in public discourse, and expect them to reflect their evolving values. This shift has given brands unprecedented power, but with it comes volatility.

Loyalty that once lasted decades can now unravel in weeks. A misstep can fracture a tribe, while a well-calibrated move can turn passive buyers into lifelong advocates. The challenge is navigating the tension between deep connection and broad accessibility, between conviction and adaptability.

The future belongs to brands that understand how to cultivate belonging without exclusion, influence without alienation, and loyalty without stagnation. Brands that master this balance will not just thrive in the marketplace – they will redefine the very fabric of consumer culture.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

For years, brands have poured billions into social media, banking on its power to capture consumer attention. But many users are logging off, exhausted by algorithm-driven content, relentless ads, and digital fatigue. The rise of the social media detox movement presents an inconvenient truth for marketers: the platforms once considered indispensable may now push consumers away.

This shift isn’t anecdotal. Market research indicates a clear trend – users, especially Gen Z and millennials, are actively reducing screen time, muting notifications, and deactivating accounts in pursuit of mental clarity and reclaimed time. What was once an occasional break from digital noise is evolving into a broader consumer reset on social media engagement.

For brands, this poses a fundamental question: If audiences are stepping away from social platforms, how do businesses maintain visibility, connection, and influence?

The answer lies not in resisting the trend but in understanding the new rules of engagement. 

Why are Consumers Logging Off?

Social media has dominated brand-consumer interactions for over a decade, but a growing segment of users is actively stepping back. The social media detox movement is no longer a fringe trend – it’s a behavioural shift with real marketing implications. Consumers, especially younger demographics, make intentional choices to reduce screen time, limit influencer engagement, and seek more authentic interactions.

The Numbers Behind the Shift

The ‘why’ behind the great digital detox.

the-why-behind-social-detox

Digital detoxing isn’t just about reducing screen time; it’s rejecting the attention economy. Research indicates consumers are logging off due to:

  • Mental wellness concerns: Young users cite anxiety, comparison culture, and doomscrolling as reasons to disengage.
  • Algorithm fatigue: The push toward AI-driven content curation has left users feeling manipulated rather than engaged.
  • Scepticism of influencer culture: With trust in influencers eroding, consumers are shifting toward community-based recommendations over celebrity endorsements.
  • Privacy concerns: Users are more aware of data collection practices and choose to interact in closed, private digital spaces.

While some consumers return to social media after temporary detox periods, others are making long-term behavioural changes, limiting their reliance on platforms indefinitely. Brands must prepare for a future where digital engagement is increasingly fragmented, requiring a more adaptable marketing strategy.

What the Social Media Detox Trend Means for Brand Marketing Strategies

Consumers aren’t just scrolling less – they’re re-evaluating their digital habits. Brands must rethink their engagement models if social media detoxing becomes a long-term shift rather than a temporary trend.

How do brands remain relevant when audiences deliberately tune out? 

For years, brands have built marketing strategies around the assumption that social media is the primary touchpoint for consumer engagement. But with growing numbers of users stepping away, relying solely on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook is becoming a risky proposition. The shift toward social media detoxing isn’t just about personal well-being—it’s altering how consumers interact with brands, discover products, and build trust.

The most immediate challenge is declining engagement. If consumers are reducing screen time, brands face shrinking opportunities to reach them through traditional social ads and influencer partnerships. This is particularly concerning for brands targeting Gen Z and Millennials, leading the movement toward digital detoxing. Ad fatigue is also accelerating the problem as consumers grow increasingly resistant to sponsored content and algorithm-driven recommendations.

Another major concern is the vulnerability of relying on rented platforms. With social media engagement declining, brands that have built their digital presence entirely on these platforms are now at the mercy of shifting algorithms and user behaviours. The lack of control over audience reach makes brands susceptible to sudden drops in visibility, forcing them to rethink their approach to audience building.

This shift is also reshaping digital advertising ROI. Brands that once saw high conversion rates from social media campaigns may now struggle as users actively disengage. 

Customer acquisition costs (CAC) are rising as social media platforms become less effective at driving conversions. With ad engagement rates declining, brands are shifting investments toward alternative channels such as Google Ads, podcast sponsorships, and streaming service placements. Understanding where audiences are migrating is essential for maximising marketing ROI. Marketers must evaluate whether continued investment in these channels delivers sustainable returns or if it’s time to diversify into owned media and alternative digital touchpoints.

Social media detoxing is not a sign that digital marketing is failing but indicates that consumer preferences are evolving. Brands that recognise this shift early can adapt their strategies to maintain engagement without being overly dependent on social media platforms. 

How Brands Can Stay Relevant in an Era of Digital Detox 

As consumers disengage from social media, brands must rethink their marketing approach. The solution isn’t to fight the trend – it’s to adapt by diversifying digital touchpoints, strengthening direct customer relationships, and creating value beyond algorithm-driven platforms.

First-party data is becoming a brand’s most valuable asset.

Zero-party data strategies: collecting voluntarily shared consumer insights through interactive content, preference centres, and surveys.

AI-driven CRM systems: leveraging predictive analytics to anticipate customer behaviours and engagement patterns.

Direct-to-consumer models: building deeper relationships via email marketing, loyalty programs, and exclusive brand communities.

With social media engagement fluctuating, brands can no longer rely on third-party platforms to maintain customer relationships. Investing in email marketing, loyalty programs, and brand-owned communities ensures a more direct and sustainable connection with consumers. Email, in particular, is experiencing a resurgence, with open rates outperforming social media engagement rates. Brands focusing on personalised, high-value content in inboxes can build deeper relationships without competing against ever-changing social algorithms.

Brands must also embrace alternative digital spaces. 

Community-driven platforms such as Discord, Substack, and brand-owned apps offer a way to engage audiences without relying on social feeds. These platforms foster deeper loyalty by creating spaces where consumers opt in for value-driven interactions rather than being bombarded by passive content. SMS marketing is another underutilised tool, boasting high open rates while offering a direct, personal channel for communication. However, brands must strategically use it, ensuring messages provide real value rather than feeling intrusive.

Offline engagement is also gaining importance once again. 

The return of experiential marketing, pop-up activations, and real-world brand interactions allows brands to reach audiences in meaningful ways beyond digital screens. With consumers craving authenticity, brands that create real-world experiences, whether through in-person events or retail activations, can strengthen connections in ways social media alone cannot achieve.

Influencer marketing is evolving as well. 

The traditional influencer model, which relied on celebrity endorsements and massive follower counts, is losing effectiveness as trust in influencers declines. Consumers are now looking for recommendations from micro-communities and real-life social circles. Brands that pivot toward peer-driven advocacy – leveraging customer testimonials, employee ambassadors, and brand superfans – will have a stronger foundation for long-term engagement.

The era of passive social media consumption is fading, and brands that rely solely on scrolling behaviour will struggle. The shift toward meaningful, value-driven engagement requires a new playbook, one that prioritises direct relationships, diversified digital ecosystems, and real-world touchpoints. The next section explores how market research can help brands navigate this transition and predict future consumer behaviours.

The Role of Market Research in Navigating the Detox Trend

Guesswork is not an option for brands adjusting to the social media detox movement. Understanding evolving consumer behaviour requires a data-driven approach, and market research plays a critical role in helping brands anticipate shifts, measure engagement beyond social media, and refine their strategies accordingly.

Predictive analytics is key to staying ahead of consumer behaviour trends. Instead of relying on retrospective engagement metrics from social platforms, brands should leverage AI-driven modelling to forecast how audiences will likely interact with digital content. Behavioural data analysis can identify early signals of declining engagement, helping brands pivot before they see a drop in visibility or conversion rates.

Consumer sentiment tracking is another essential tool. While traditional social listening tools focus on platform-based conversations, the social media detox movement means brands must expand their reach to alternative data sources. This includes direct surveys, focus groups, in-app engagement metrics, and customer service interactions. Understanding why consumers are disengaging from social platforms and what alternatives they prefer allows brands to adapt without losing their audience.

Longitudinal studies provide deeper insights into whether digital detoxing is a passing trend or a lasting behavioural shift. Brands should not only measure current engagement levels but track behavioural changes over time. Are consumers leaving platforms temporarily before re-engaging, or are they permanently reducing their social media presence? Are younger audiences more likely to embrace alternative digital experiences? These insights help brands build long-term strategies instead of reacting to short-term fluctuations.

Beyond digital, ethnographic research can uncover how consumer behaviours are evolving offline. Observational studies and in-depth interviews can provide a clearer picture of how consumers interact with brands in physical spaces, whether through in-store experiences, brand-hosted events, or offline word-of-mouth. This shift is crucial as brands look to re-engage audiences in ways that don’t rely on algorithm-driven visibility.

Relying solely on past engagement patterns is no longer sufficient. Market research offers brands a proactive approach to understanding shifting consumer behaviours, enabling them to adapt with precision rather than assumption. 

Examples of Brands Successfully Adapting to the Social Media Detox Trend

Some brands are already ahead of the curve, recognising that relying solely on social media is no longer a sustainable marketing strategy. By diversifying their approach, prioritising first-party data, and investing in alternative engagement channels, these companies are maintaining strong consumer relationships despite the rise of digital detoxing.

One example is Lush, the UK-based cosmetics brand that made headlines by stepping away from social media altogether. Frustrated with algorithm-driven limitations and the growing toxicity of digital spaces, Lush removed itself from major platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. Instead, the brand doubled down on email marketing, in-store experiences, and community-driven engagement. The result? A more direct, controlled communication strategy that allowed them to maintain brand loyalty while reinforcing their ethical values.

Image Credit: Lush 

Another company adapting to the decline of social engagement is Patagonia. The outdoor apparel giant has long embraced an anti-advertising stance, prioritising storytelling over traditional digital campaigns. While many brands compete for social media attention with aggressive paid promotions, Patagonia invests in long-form content, sustainability reports, and documentary-style storytelling. The company builds a stronger emotional connection with its audience without relying on social media algorithms by publishing in-depth research and hosting real-world environmental initiatives.

Luxury brands are also rethinking their digital presence. Bottega Veneta, for example, strategically decided to delete its social media accounts in favour of an exclusive digital magazine and VIP community model. By creating a more controlled, high-value content ecosystem, the brand shifted attention away from mass-market social media feeds and toward more personalised, premium engagement.

Image Credit: The Impression

Even FMCG brands are adjusting. Oatly, known for its plant-based milk alternatives, has embraced offline marketing activations and guerrilla-style advertising to maintain visibility without overly relying on digital engagement. From eye-catching billboards to in-person brand experiences, Oatly’s approach shows awareness can be built in ways that don’t require consumers to be constantly online.

These brands demonstrate a fundamental shift – brands that successfully navigate the social media detox movement build direct, value-driven consumer relationships. The key takeaway? Brands must stop treating social media as the default marketing channel and start viewing it as just one of a broader, more resilient engagement strategy.

The Next Phase of Digital Detoxing

The rise of social media detoxing isn’t a fleeting trend; it’s a symptom of a larger shift in how consumers engage with digital platforms. While some users may eventually return, their behaviour will not be the same. The next phase of digital engagement will be defined by intentionality, privacy, and deeper value exchanges, forcing brands to rethink their long-term marketing strategies.

Social media platforms themselves are already adapting to this detox trend. Features like Instagram’s Quiet Mode and TikTok’s time management reminders signal that even tech giants recognise the risks of overexposure. Platforms will likely continue evolving, offering more user control over content consumption. However, these changes won’t necessarily benefit brands – if anything, they may further limit ad exposure and organic reach as users prioritise personal well-being over passive engagement.

Social media detoxing is not a rejection of digital engagement – it’s a demand for better digital experiences. Consumers are no longer willing to engage with brands passively; they expect intentionality, privacy, and authentic connections. For brands, the question is no longer whether they can survive without social media as their primary channel. The real question is whether they can afford to depend on it at all.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A decade ago, purpose-driven marketing set brands apart by championing social and environmental causes. Today, it’s an expectation, not a differentiator. As scrutiny from consumers, watchdogs, and regulators intensifies, the stakes have never been higher. Public trust in corporate promises has plummeted, with over 60% of consumers sceptical of sustainability and social impact claims. Meanwhile, global regulations are tightening, imposing hefty penalties for vague or unverified ESG statements. The pressure is mounting, and the cracks are beginning to show.

For brands, the challenge is clear: evolve or risk being called out, cancelled, or left behind.

How Evolving Expectations Are Redefining Purpose-Driven Marketing

Consumer Scepticism at an All-Time High

Consumers are increasingly critical of brands’ ESG claims. High-profile incidents have intensified this scepticism. 

A 2023 survey revealed that 57% of Canadian consumers are sceptical of most corporate green claims.

Regulatory Crackdowns Are Raising the Stakes for Brands

Regulatory bodies are tightening their oversight of corporate ESG claims in response to growing consumer distrust. The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), enacted in 2023, requires companies with over 250 employees to disclose comprehensive ESG metrics backed by concrete evidence.

Failure to comply carries significant repercussions. In 2024, the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority banned several advertisements for misleading environmental claims, signalling a zero-tolerance approach to greenwashing. Similarly, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has initiated investigations into companies exaggerating sustainability claims, with potential fines reaching millions of dollars.

Technology as a Transparency Tool

To meet heightened scrutiny, brands are turning to technology for greater transparency. Blockchain is being utilised to trace product origins and verify sustainability claims. Platforms like Provenance enable companies to offer consumers verifiable supply chain information, fostering trust.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is also playing a pivotal role. By analyzing vast data sets in real-time, AI can help brands monitor compliance with ESG standards, identify potential risks, and ensure sustainability initiatives are not merely performative but result in measurable outcomes.

Why Some Purpose-Driven Efforts Fail

Superficial Storytelling Backfires

In early 2025, Procter & Gamble faced a lawsuit over misleading environmental claims for its Charmin toilet paper. The lawsuit alleged greenwashing, arguing that the company’s sustainability promises lacked meaningful environmental benefits.

The case highlights the dangers of superficial ESG storytelling. Unsupported environmental claims not only mislead consumers but also expose brands to legal and reputational risks.

Misalignment Between ESG Claims and Practices

In August 2024, LVMH’s Dior came under scrutiny for failing to meet supply chain disclosure requirements under the UK’s Modern Slavery Act. The brand’s website had outdated anti-slavery statements, casting doubt on the authenticity of its ESG commitments.

Discrepancies between ESG commitments and actual practices erode trust and invite regulatory scrutiny. Brands must ensure their operational realities align with public commitments to maintain credibility.

Case Study: H&M – A Cautionary Tale in Purpose-Driven Marketing

Image Credit: Just Style

Background

H&M launched its “Conscious Collection” to position itself as a leader in sustainable fashion. It pledged to achieve 100% sustainable or recycled materials by 2030 and introduced sustainability scores for its products, aiming to empower consumers to make informed choices.

The Issue

In 2022, H&M faced a class-action lawsuit in New York, accusing the brand of greenwashing. Investigations revealed that some sustainability scores were misleading and that the company’s fast-fashion business model contradicted its environmental claims. Critics argued that while H&M promoted sustainability, its overproduction and waste practices remained unaddressed.

The Outcome

The lawsuit dealt a significant blow to H&M’s reputation, highlighting the dangers of overpromising and failing to align purpose with core business operations. The incident symbolised how greenwashing could backfire, amplifying consumer scepticism and regulatory scrutiny.

Lessons Learned

  1. Avoid Superficial Messaging: Sustainability efforts must be deeply integrated into business operations.
  2. Ensure Transparency: Verifiable and accurate data builds trust and credibility.
  3. Address Systemic Issues: Tackle industry-wide challenges, such as overproduction, to align messaging with meaningful action.

Overpromising and Underperforming

In 2024, luxury fashion brands, including Gucci and Bottega Veneta, came under fire for scaling back their ambitious sustainability targets. Many revised their goals to align with the Paris Agreement’s 2050 net-zero target, highlighting the challenges of meeting earlier, more ambitious deadlines.

Overpromising ESG commitments without clear, actionable plans erodes public distrust and harms brand reputation. Companies must set realistic goals and communicate their progress to avoid perceptions of insincerity.

Building Credibility Through Authenticity

  • Align Actions with Words: Ensure that marketing messages accurately reflect the company’s actual practices. Misrepresentations can lead to legal repercussions and loss of consumer trust.
  • Maintain Transparency: Regularly update stakeholders on ESG initiatives and progress. Transparency fosters trust and demonstrates a genuine commitment to stated goals.
  • Set Achievable Goals: Establish realistic ESG targets with clear roadmaps for achievement. Overambitious promises without concrete plans can backfire, leading to incredulity.
global-dining-trends

Purpose-Driven Marketing Strategies Shaping the Future

Measuring Impact Over Messaging

Consumers and stakeholders demand tangible evidence of a company’s environmental and social commitments. Unilever exemplifies this by integrating comprehensive sustainability disclosures into its Annual Report. Included in the report are detailed insights into its progress on sustainability metrics, reinforcing the brand’s commitment to transparency and accountability.

Similarly, Danone has embraced the B Corp certification, reflecting its dedication to meeting rigorous social and environmental performance standards, accountability, and transparency. 

The Rise of Regenerative Business Models

Leading brands are shifting from traditional sustainability to regenerative practices that restore and enhance ecosystems. Patagonia, for instance, leads the way in regenerative organic agriculture, enhancing soil health, animal welfare, and social equity.

Driving Change Through Collaboration

Tackling complex global challenges demands collective action. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s New Plastics Economy initiative exemplifies how collaboration can drive systemic change. This initiative unites businesses, governments, and organisations worldwide behind a common vision of a circular economy for plastics, aiming to eliminate waste and pollution through innovative design and reuse strategies.

Image Credit: Ellen MacArthur Foundation – Circular economy butterfly diagram 

By leveraging shared knowledge and resources, the New Plastics Economy initiative effectively combats plastic pollution through cross-sector partnerships. These efforts prove that systemic change is possible when stakeholders unite around a common goal.

Engaging Communities for Meaningful Impact

Companies are recognising the power of working alongside local communities to develop solutions to social and environmental challenges. Engaging stakeholders at the grassroots level allows brands to create initiatives with lasting impact.

Harnessing Technology to Build Trust and Transparency

Technology is transforming corporate transparency. Blockchain, for instance, helps trace product origins and verify sustainability claims, offering consumers clear insights into supply chains. This integration fosters trust and drives accountability in purpose-driven marketing.

The Future of Purpose-Driven Marketing 

Authenticity as the Cornerstone

The evolution of purpose-driven marketing underscores a simple but critical truth: authenticity is non-negotiable. Consumers today expect more than buzzwords and polished campaigns; they want tangible proof of meaningful impact.

From Optics to Impact

Brands that will succeed in this new era focus on measurable outcomes rather than superficial messaging. Companies like Patagonia, Unilever, and Danone set the standard by embedding purpose into their operations, using technology for transparency, and co-creating with communities to drive meaningful change. Their efforts demonstrate that purpose-driven marketing isn’t just about addressing consumer demands – it’s about redefining what it means to do business responsibly.

For brands navigating this new landscape, the way forward is clear:

  • Embed Purpose into Core Operations: Purpose must extend beyond marketing and permeate every aspect of the business, from supply chain management to product development.
  • Invest in Transparency and Accountability: Leveraging technologies like blockchain and AI can help validate ESG claims and foster consumer trust.
  • Focus on Long-Term Value Creation: Sustainability should shift from a compliance-driven effort to a strategy for competitive advantage and systemic change.

Brands today face a pivotal choice: adapt to meet rising expectations or risk obsolescence. In a landscape where authenticity, transparency, and impact are paramount, the most successful brands will embed purpose into their core operations, treating it as a long-term business strategy rather than a passing trend.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

B2B marketers have traditionally relied on account-level intent data, measuring company-wide engagement signals – website visits, content downloads, and webinar attendance – to identify potential buyers. But as decision-making power fragments across multiple stakeholders, these broad indicators are proving unreliable. Marketers aren’t just missing key players in the buying process; they’re wasting valuable resources targeting the wrong ones.

The playbook for digital tracking is being rewritten. With third-party cookies nearing extinction and privacy laws tightening, marketers are losing access to the passive behavioural insights they once took for granted. Marketers who once depended on aggregated company data to guide outreach are finding it increasingly difficult to pinpoint high-intent buyers. At the same time, the B2B buying journey has become more independent, with decision-makers conducting research long before speaking with vendors.

To navigate these shifts, companies are turning to buyer-level intent data, a more precise approach that focuses on individual engagement rather than generalised company activity. By tracking specific behaviours – such as downloading whitepapers, attending webinars, or engaging with product demos – marketers can identify real decision-makers, improve targeting, and accelerate the sales cycle.

The impact of this shift is already reshaping how businesses identify and engage potential buyers. The way B2B buyers engage has changed – and marketers are struggling to keep up. A 2023 Demand Gen Report revealed that 68% of B2B buyers now complete much of their research independently, long before speaking with a sales rep. This shift means old-school lead tracking methods – waiting for buyers to fill out a form or request a demo – are losing relevance fast. Account-level intent data – long considered a reliable indicator of interest – now often misdirects marketing efforts by signalling company-wide activity without revealing who within the organisation is actually making decisions.

The inefficiencies are not just inconvenient – they are costly. Forrester (2024) reports that companies relying solely on account-level intent data misallocate up to 40% of their sales and marketing resources by targeting the wrong contacts. In response, leading enterprises such as Adobe, Salesforce, and IBM are investing in first-party and zero-party data strategies to refine how they track and engage actual buyers, shortening sales cycles and improving marketing ROI.

Marketers who continue to rely on outdated tracking models may soon struggle to keep up. As third-party tracking fades and precision targeting becomes the industry standard, companies that fail to adapt risk falling behind competitors who have already embraced buyer-level insights.

The End of Account-Level Intent Data? 

Account-level intent data is no longer an asset – it’s a liability. The strategy that once shaped demand generation is now misleading marketers and misallocating budgets. Marketers have relied on broad signals – such as employees from the same company visiting a website – to gauge interest. Yet these indicators rarely reveal who within the organisation has the authority to buy.

The inefficiencies are hard to justify. Studies show that nearly half of marketing budgets are misallocated because traditional tracking targets businesses, not the people making purchasing decisions. A recent LinkedIn B2B Institute report underscores the problem: only 17% of B2B decision-makers engage with cold outreach, making a scattershot approach increasingly ineffective.

The Cookiepocalypse: A Catalyst for Change

At the same time, data privacy laws and the decline of third-party cookies are forcing companies to rethink their strategies. With Google’s 2024 cookie phase-out, digital marketing is entering uncharted territory. For years, third-party cookies provided a passive, behind-the-scenes view of buyer behaviour, allowing companies to infer intent without direct engagement. Now, with GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California tightening restrictions, the industry is at a crossroads: marketers must transition to first-party tracking or risk losing buyer visibility altogether.

The shift away from account-level tracking isn’t just about privacy concerns – it’s about effectiveness. Without third-party cookies or unrestricted tracking, marketers can no longer rely on aggregated company activity to infer buying intent. A company’s employees may be researching solutions, but without knowing who is leading the conversation, outreach efforts remain a gamble.

Industry Perspective: Why Marketers Are Moving On

Most marketing teams still get one thing wrong: they target companies instead of the people making decisions. Lee Odden, CEO of TopRank Marketing, sees this flaw firsthand:

“If you don’t know who within an organisation is actively evaluating a purchase, you’re working with incomplete data and hoping for the best – rather than making informed, strategic decisions.”

This realisation is pushing B2B firms toward buyer-level intent tracking, a more precise and privacy-compliant approach that focuses on identifying real decision-makers rather than broad company interest.

The Rise of Buyer-Level Intent Data

As traditional tracking methods fall short, buyer-level intent data is emerging as the solution. Unlike broad company-wide signals, this approach focuses on real individuals actively researching and evaluating solutions. For sales and marketing teams struggling with inefficiencies, this shift is more than a tactical adjustment – it’s a competitive necessity.

A More Targeted Approach

Buyer-level intent data captures specific behavioural signals that indicate a prospect’s actual interest. Instead of aggregating website visits or company-wide engagement, this method pinpoints:

  • Who downloaded a whitepaper or attended a webinar, signalling early-stage interest?
  • Who engaged with case studies or product demos, indicating deeper evaluation?
  • Who interacted with sales emails or initiated direct contact, revealing purchase readiness.

By mapping these real-time behaviours, marketing teams can craft more personalised outreach, while sales teams can engage high-intent buyers at the right moment, increasing efficiency and conversion rates.

digital-privacy-and-tracking-timeline

Adoption Across the Industry

Leading B2B firms are overhauling their sales strategies by shifting to buyer-level intent tracking. Instead of casting a wide net, they are using real-time behavioural signals to prioritise engagement with actual decision-makers. By aggregating behavioural signals across digital channels, these tools help companies separate genuine prospects from passive interest. Some solutions integrate AI-driven analytics to prioritise outreach, identifying which individuals within an organisation are actively evaluating a purchase rather than relying on vague company-wide activity.

The results are significant. A shift toward buyer-level intent tracking isn’t just theoretical – it’s driving real revenue gains. In one case, companies leveraging intent-driven targeting reported a 32% jump in lead-to-sale conversions, according to a Heinz Marketing study. Instead of chasing broad signals, these firms focused on high-intent buyers and saw immediate results.

A Data-Driven Competitive Edge

With B2B sales cycles becoming more complex, companies that pinpoint individual decision-makers are gaining a clear edge over competitors still relying on outdated tracking models. Businesses investing in buyer-level intent strategies report:

  • Higher engagement rates, thanks to more relevant, data-driven outreach.
  • Shorter sales cycles, as sales teams connect with prospects at the right moment.
  • Improved marketing efficiency, with resources directed toward buyers already in-market.

The shift is no longer optional – it’s a necessity for companies looking to stay ahead in a landscape where precision targeting is becoming the industry standard.

How Companies Are Using It

For businesses adopting buyer-level intent tracking, the results go beyond theory. By pinpointing decision-makers rather than chasing vague company-wide signals, sales and marketing teams are refining how and when they engage high-intent prospects. Instead of launching broad campaigns hoping to reach the right people, companies are now delivering highly targeted outreach based on real-time behavioral data.

Precision in Sales Outreach

The biggest transformation is in how sales teams prioritise and engage leads. Instead of filtering prospects by job title or company size, businesses are leveraging real-time intent signals to determine who is actively researching solutions and ready to buy. This shift allows for more strategic engagement, reducing wasted effort on unqualified leads and focusing resources where they matter most.

Tech giants like Adobe and Salesforce have already embedded buyer-level intent tracking into their sales enablement platforms, refining when and how their teams engage prospects. By analyzing interactions with content, pricing pages, and product demos, their sales reps are no longer relying on cold outreach or guesswork – they are reaching buyers at the right time, with messaging aligned to their specific interests. The result? Higher response rates and fewer wasted efforts.

AI-Powered Insights and Predictive Analytics

This shift isn’t just about who to contact – it’s about when. AI-driven tools are now deciphering behavioural signals to predict buying intent with unprecedented accuracy. These platforms track real-time engagement patterns – such as how often a prospect revisits a pricing page or downloads a product whitepaper – helping sales teams determine when a buyer is nearing a decision.

A 2024 Forrester study found that a leading cloud software company saw a 45% increase in engagement rates after abandoning traditional lead scoring in favour of AI-powered buyer intent tracking. Sales reps no longer pursued cold prospects – instead, they prioritised high-intent buyers, reducing their sales cycle length by 25% and significantly improving conversion rates.

Industry Perspective: A More Strategic Approach

Matt Heinz, President of Heinz Marketing, sees this shift as a defining moment in sales strategy:

“With buyer-level intent, sales teams don’t just know who to target – they know when and why. The difference between a warm lead and a ready-to-buy lead is timing, and this level of insight allows teams to focus their efforts where they’ll have the biggest impact.”

In an industry where deals are won or lost based on timing, acting too early means wasting resources; acting too late means losing to a competitor. Buyer-level intent tracking eliminates the guesswork, giving sales teams a real-time view into when a prospect moves from research to serious consideration.

A Competitive Edge in B2B Marketing

Companies that have moved beyond broad account-level tracking are seeing the benefits firsthand. By aligning outreach with actual buyer behaviour, sales and marketing teams report:

  • Higher engagement rates, as prospects receive outreach tailored to their stage in the buying process.
  • More effective content strategies, with marketing teams producing insights that match real decision-making needs.
  • Shorter sales cycles, as sales teams identify and engage buyers before they formally enter the pipeline.

As B2B buying behaviour grows more complex, relying on outdated tracking models is no longer sustainable. Companies still measuring broad company engagement rather than individual buyer activity risk wasting resources on leads that will never convert. Meanwhile, competitors using buyer-level insights are moving faster, engaging smarter, and closing deals while others are still chasing prospects that have already made a decision.

Ethical Considerations and Privacy Compliance

As companies shift to buyer-level intent tracking, the debate over data privacy and ethical marketing is growing. With regulators and consumers pushing for greater transparency, businesses that fail to adapt risk eroding trust and facing legal scrutiny. Unlike third-party tracking – where users are often monitored without their knowledge – buyer-level intent data operates on consent.

Why Opt-In Data Matters

The difference isn’t just technical – it’s fundamental. Traditional intent tracking relied on third-party cookies and passive data collection, often gathering user behaviour without explicit approval. Buyer-level tracking, in contrast, is built on opt-in engagement, meaning prospects knowingly share their information. This includes:

  • Webinar registrations and gated content downloads.
  • Surveys and preference selections.
  • Direct interactions with sales and marketing campaigns.

A recent TrustArc study found that 73% of B2B buyers prefer companies that are transparent about how their data is used, reinforcing the need for clear, ethical data practices.

A Legal and Competitive Shift

The tightening of privacy laws worldwide is forcing companies to rethink how they collect and use data. Regulations such as GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California have already placed strict limits on tracking without consent, and Google’s Privacy Sandbox initiative is set to further restrict access to behavioural insights. Businesses that fail to adapt risk not only compliance issues but also losing consumer trust in an era where privacy expectations are higher than ever.

Unlike third-party tracking, first-party buyer intent strategies comply with evolving regulations by gathering data only from individuals who have actively opted in. But knowing who is engaging isn’t enough – companies need to understand what’s driving them.

This is where market research becomes essential. Buyer-level intent tracking may show who downloads a whitepaper or attends a webinar, but it doesn’t explain why they are searching, what pain points they are trying to solve, or what barriers exist before a purchase. Without deeper research, even the most advanced intent tracking risks misinterpreting engagement signals.

Market Research’s Role in the Buyer Intent Revolution

Buyer-level intent tracking reveals who is engaging and how they behave – but without market research, the why behind their decisions remains a mystery. Without insights into buyer motivations, barriers, and triggers, intent signals risk being misinterpreted, leading sales teams to pursue the wrong prospects. Tracking behavioural data is only one piece of the puzzle – understanding the motivations behind those behaviours is what turns data into strategy.

Traditional quantitative and qualitative research methods provide the context needed to validate and refine intent signals, ensuring companies aren’t just chasing clicks but engaging with real buyers who have a clear path to purchase. By combining survey research, focus groups, and ethnographic insights with real-time behavioural tracking, businesses can move beyond surface-level engagement data and uncover why buyers are searching, what they need, and what factors influence their decisions.

Market research also plays a crucial role in segmenting intent data effectively. Not all high-engagement prospects are equally valuable – without proper segmentation, companies risk wasting resources on buyers who may be interested but lack decision-making authority or budget alignment. By integrating attitudinal and psychographic research into intent tracking, businesses can build a complete picture of their buyers – not just who they are but what drives them to act.

The Future of Buyer Intent Tracking 

B2B marketing is moving into a new phase, driven by AI, privacy-first strategies, and shifting data collection models. Companies that once relied on broad third-party tracking are now investing in AI-driven analytics and zero-party data to better understand and engage real buyers. The focus is shifting from passive tracking to active, consent-based insights, giving businesses a clearer, more accurate picture of buyer behaviour without compromising privacy.

AI’s Role in Predicting Buyer Behavior

Advancements in machine learning and predictive analytics are transforming how companies interpret intent signals. AI-driven platforms now track patterns of engagement across multiple touchpoints – from whitepaper downloads to webinar participation – allowing businesses to determine not just who is interested, but when they are likely to act. Instead of relying on broad lead scoring models, sales teams can now prioritise real-time buyer readiness, increasing conversion rates and shortening deal cycles.

The End of Third-Party Dependence

With Google’s phase-out of third-party cookies, businesses are being forced to rethink how they collect and apply customer data. The reliance on passive tracking is fading, replaced by first-party and zero-party data strategies that capture explicitly shared intent signals rather than inferred behaviour. This shift is not just about compliance – it’s about building trust and credibility in a market where buyers are increasingly wary of invasive tracking practices.

Industry Outlook: What’s Next?

Industry forecasts suggest that the shift to buyer-level intent tracking is only accelerating. Research shows that companies shifting to buyer-level intent tracking are already seeing a measurable advantage. In one industry survey, B2B firms using AI-driven buyer intent models reported higher engagement rates and faster sales cycles compared to those relying on account-based signals. Companies that fail to make this transition will not only struggle with lead quality – they risk being left behind in a market that increasingly values data transparency and hyper-personalised engagement.

A New Reality for B2B Marketing

For B2B companies, buyer-level intent tracking is no longer an emerging trend – it’s the new reality. The shift away from third-party tracking and broad account-level signals is reshaping how businesses generate demand, allocate resources, and close deals. In a competitive environment where timing, precision, and ethical data collection are becoming key differentiators, companies that fail to adapt will find themselves chasing leads that never convert while competitors secure high-intent buyers first.

This isn’t just an incremental improvement – it’s a fundamental restructuring of how marketing and sales teams identify and engage potential customers. Companies still relying on outdated tracking models will continue wasting budgets on low-quality leads, while those leveraging buyer-level insights will increase efficiency, shorten sales cycles, and improve conversion rates.

This isn’t just an evolution – it’s an ultimatum. The B2B world is changing fast, and the companies that master buyer-level intent tracking will control the future of sales and marketing.

The cost of hesitation? Wasted budgets. Slower deal cycles. Watching competitors close deals that should have been yours.

The question isn’t whether intent tracking will define the next era of demand generation – it already is. The only real question is whether your company will lead the shift, or get left behind.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

At a recent industry conference, a question echoed across panel discussions and breakout sessions: how can marketers deliver more with less? This isn’t just rhetoric; it’s the pressing reality for many brands. Budgets are shrinking, expectations are growing, and the pressure to achieve measurable impact has never been greater.

One marketer shared how her team had to scale back a multi-channel campaign slated for a national rollout. Instead, they redirected their resources toward a single, high-performing digital channel where they could precisely target their most engaged audience. The result? Not only did the campaign hit its goals, but it did so at a fraction of the original cost. Stories like this are becoming the norm, not the exception.

For marketers, stretching every dollar requires more than creativity—it demands strategy. Decisions about where to invest, what to cut, and how to maximise efficiency must be rooted in clear priorities and hard data. In this environment, resourcefulness isn’t just an advantage; it’s a necessity. Marketers everywhere are grappling with this balancing act, redefining success under tighter constraints. The question is no longer just about spending less—it’s about spending smarter.

The Financial Squeeze on Marketing

Economic uncertainty has tightened the purse strings across industries, leaving marketers with fewer resources to achieve the same—or greater—results. Inflation has increased the cost of media buys and production while shifting consumer behaviour has made it harder to predict what will resonate. For many brands, the challenge isn’t just cutting costs; it’s doing so while staying competitive and relevant in a crowded marketplace.

This dual pressure often creates a paradox: budgets are reduced, but expectations remain high. Marketing teams are asked to deliver growth, retain customers, and expand reach, all while working with smaller allocations. It’s a dynamic that forces hard decisions, from scaling back campaigns to reallocating resources to the most promising channels.

In this climate, guessing is not an option; market research is an essential compass for navigating these constraints. Understanding customer priorities, media habits, and emerging trends allows brands to target more effectively and avoid costly missteps. Whether identifying which product features resonate most with consumers or pinpointing high-potential market segments, data-driven insights help marketers focus on what truly drives results. In a world where efficiency is king, research isn’t just helpful—it’s essential.

The Power of Data-Driven Decisions

When budgets are tight, understanding your market isn’t just an advantage—it’s a lifeline. In lean times, consumer priorities shift rapidly, and assumptions about what worked before can quickly become outdated. Market research offers the clarity needed to navigate this uncertainty, providing a window into what matters most to consumers and where brands can make the biggest impact.

Segmentation studies, for example, help brands identify their most valuable audiences, ensuring resources are directed at the customers most likely to engage or convert. Competitive analysis can reveal gaps in the market or highlight where rivals are overextending themselves, presenting opportunities to outmanoeuvre them. Trend forecasting, meanwhile, equips marketers to stay ahead of consumer demands, positioning their brands as proactive rather than reactive.

The cost of guessing wrong can be steep. Consider the case of a retailer that invested heavily in broad-based advertising without fully understanding its audience’s shifting preferences. Sales stagnated, and valuable ad dollars were wasted. In contrast, a competitor conducted targeted research, identifying a growing interest in sustainable products among its core demographic. By reallocating its budget toward promoting eco-friendly offerings, the competitor not only avoided a costly misstep but also gained market share.

Data-driven decision-making isn’t about spending more; it’s about spending smarter. In an era of constrained resources, market research is the difference between throwing darts in the dark and hitting the bullseye. It ensures every dollar is backed by insight, helping brands focus their efforts where they count the most.

Optimising Resource Allocation

In times of financial constraint, efficiency isn’t optional—it’s imperative. For marketers, the first step is to take a hard look at what’s already in play. Are current campaigns delivering measurable results? Are tools and subscriptions being fully utilised? Conducting a thorough audit can uncover untapped potential and areas where resources are being stretched too thin.

The true opportunity lies in reallocation. Research-backed insights can help marketers identify high-impact investments—platforms, audiences, and strategies that deliver the best returns. For instance, a brand might discover that its email campaigns are driving higher engagement than its social media ads, prompting a shift in focus. Similarly, geographic data might highlight regions where customers are more likely to convert, allowing marketers to narrow their targeting and maximise efficiency.

Equally important is identifying what’s not working. Market research can spotlight underperforming initiatives that are draining budgets without contributing to business goals. Whether it’s a campaign that fails to resonate or a tool that’s rarely used, cutting these elements frees up resources for more effective strategies.

Optimisation isn’t about doing less—it’s about doing better. By evaluating what drives impact and shedding what doesn’t, marketers can stretch their budgets further and achieve results that outpace the dollars spent. It’s a disciplined approach that transforms constraints into a catalyst for smarter, more focused strategies.

Refining Campaign Targeting

When every dollar counts, casting a wide net is a luxury few brands can afford. Precision targeting has become the cornerstone of effective marketing, allowing companies to connect with the right audiences at the right time while keeping costs in check. Hyper-personalisation, driven by first-party data and programmatic advertising, plays a pivotal role. By tailoring messages to individual preferences and behaviours, marketers can drive higher engagement and conversions without inflating budgets.

The rise of AI and automation has taken this precision to the next level. AI-powered tools can analyze vast datasets in real time, identifying trends and opportunities that would be impossible to spot manually. From optimising ad spend to creating dynamic, personalised campaigns, these technologies allow marketers to stretch their resources further while improving outcomes. For example, an AI tool might identify that a specific audience segment responds better to video ads during evening hours, enabling a brand to refine its media strategy for maximum impact.

Retargeting and loyalty campaigns provide a cost-efficient way to maximise returns. Re-engaging existing customers is often far less expensive than acquiring new ones, and the returns can be significant. Whether it’s through personalised email campaigns, exclusive offers, or reminders based on past interactions, focusing on customer retention can deliver measurable results with minimal investment.

Refining targeting isn’t about spending more—it’s about spending smarter. By leveraging data, technology, and proven strategies, marketers can achieve more precise and impactful results, ensuring every dollar works harder to deliver on its goals.

Leveraging Strategic Partnerships

When budgets are tight, collaboration can unlock new opportunities without adding significant costs. Strategic partnerships with non-competing brands, for instance, allow companies to share resources while expanding their reach. Co-branded campaigns have proven especially effective in this regard. Take the partnership between a fitness apparel company and a smoothie chain: by pooling marketing efforts, they promoted a healthy lifestyle to a shared audience, splitting costs while doubling exposure. Such partnerships not only stretch budgets but also enhance brand credibility by associating with complementary businesses.

Affiliate and influencer marketing are similarly cost-efficient strategies that deliver measurable results. Instead of investing heavily upfront, brands can pay affiliates or influencers based on performance, ensuring their dollars go directly toward outcomes like clicks, sales, or leads. Micro-influencers, in particular, offer a high ROI, as their niche audiences tend to be more engaged and authentic. For example, a small home goods retailer might partner with local influencers who can showcase products in relatable, real-world contexts, generating trust and conversions on a modest budget.

Community and grassroots marketing present another low-cost, high-impact approach. By engaging local audiences through events, sponsorships, or cause-related initiatives, brands can build loyalty and visibility without relying on expensive media buys. A restaurant chain, for example, might sponsor youth sports leagues or partner with schools for fundraising nights, creating goodwill and word-of-mouth promotion.

Strategic partnerships are about amplifying impact, not costs. By aligning with the right collaborators and leveraging shared goals, brands can extend their reach and resonate with audiences, even when resources are limited. It’s a practical, relationship-driven approach that ensures marketing dollars are spent wisely.

Strengthening Through Partnerships

Collaboration remains one of the most resourceful strategies for brands looking to amplify their reach without stretching their budgets. Collaborative campaigns, in particular, have proven their worth time and again. Consider how an outdoor gear company and a travel agency joined forces to promote eco-tourism. By combining their resources, they reached adventure-seekers with co-branded content and bundled offers, cutting marketing costs while maximising visibility for both brands. These types of partnerships are not just cost-effective—they also create a stronger, unified message that resonates with shared audiences.

Affiliate and influencer marketing offer another powerful way to extend impact. The key to success lies in using research to identify partners who align with your target audience. An apparel brand, for example, might focus on micro-influencers whose followers match their customer demographics, ensuring every collaboration feels authentic. Affiliates, meanwhile, provide a pay-for-performance model, allowing brands to scale efforts without unnecessary risk. When driven by data, these partnerships can deliver precise, measurable results.

Grassroots marketing, informed by local insights, is another avenue for impactful, low-cost campaigns. Community-focused research helps brands understand the values, habits, and preferences of their audiences on a hyper-local level. A regional grocery chain, for instance, might host farmer’s market events or sponsor local cultural festivals, creating genuine connections with the community while avoiding the high costs of mass media advertising. Such efforts not only build brand loyalty but also position the company as a meaningful part of the local fabric.

Strengthening through partnerships isn’t just about shared expenses—it’s about shared value. By aligning with complementary businesses, carefully chosen influencers, and community efforts, brands can achieve significant reach and engagement while staying firmly within budget constraints.

Innovating on a Budget

When resources are limited, innovation becomes a marketer’s most powerful tool. Platforms like TikTok and WhatsApp have become fertile ground for experimentation. For example, a direct-to-consumer beauty brand used TikTok to launch a campaign featuring short, playful tutorials created by employees and fans. By tapping into consumer research showing TikTok’s dominance among younger audiences, the brand achieved millions of views at a fraction of the cost of traditional media. Similarly, WhatsApp has become a low-cost platform for engaging directly with customers, with brands using it for personalized updates, exclusive offers, and even customer support.

User-generated content (UGC) offers another cost-effective way to amplify reach. By analyzing market research to understand what resonates with audiences—whether it’s a particular style of imagery, storytelling, or humor—brands can inspire customers to create and share their own content. A fitness apparel company, for instance, invited users to post their workout routines wearing branded gear, turning loyal customers into unpaid brand ambassadors. UGC not only saves on production costs but also brings a level of authenticity that’s hard to replicate through traditional ads.

Content repurposing is another strategic approach to stretching budgets. Research can pinpoint which formats—blog posts, videos, infographics, or social media snippets—are driving the most engagement. Once identified, these pieces can be repurposed across multiple platforms to extend their lifespan and reach. A thought leadership article, for example, can be broken down into social media posts, a webinar, and a series of email newsletters, ensuring that a single investment in content continues to deliver value over time.

Innovating on a budget isn’t about taking shortcuts—it’s about finding smarter, more creative ways to connect with audiences. By leveraging emerging channels, empowering customers to co-create, and making the most of existing content, brands can maintain momentum and relevance without breaking the bank.

smarter-budget-allocation-in5-steps

Lessons for Executives

For marketing leaders facing tight budgets, a few core principles can mean the difference between survival and success. At the core of these principles is the strategic use of market research, which transforms raw data into actionable insights. Research doesn’t just identify opportunities—it ensures every dollar spent contributes to the bottom line. Understanding shifting consumer preferences or pinpointing high-performing segments can provide clarity in an otherwise uncertain landscape.

Aligning marketing efforts with overarching business goals is another critical step. Campaigns should be measured not by vanity metrics but by their contribution to growth, retention, or market share. This means setting clear objectives, ensuring every initiative serves a purpose, and tracking outcomes with precision.

Finally, success depends on empowering teams to act on these insights. Training staff to interpret and apply research findings effectively is as important as having the data itself. Investing in tools and technologies that streamline processes and enhance decision-making equips teams to innovate, adapt, and deliver results under pressure.

In today’s environment, the smartest investments are in understanding the market, aligning efforts with strategy, and enabling teams to execute with precision. These principles form a playbook for not just surviving lean times, but thriving within them.

Closing Thoughts

Tight budgets often force businesses to confront a harsh reality: there’s no room for waste. But within that constraint lies opportunity. Lean times have a way of sharpening focus, spurring innovation, and compelling teams to find creative solutions that deliver more with less. It’s not about cutting corners—it’s about recalibrating for efficiency and impact.

Market research is the backbone of this approach. It’s the difference between guessing and knowing, between acting on instinct and making informed decisions. When every dollar matters, understanding what works—and why—becomes non-negotiable. Research-driven strategies don’t just keep the lights on; they illuminate the path forward, allowing brands to outperform competitors even in the most challenging circumstances.

This isn’t just survival—it’s evolution. The brands that embrace data, empower their teams, and remain agile in their strategies aren’t just weathering economic storms; they’re building resilience for the future. Lean budgets may feel like a constraint, but in reality, they’re a call to rise to the occasion. Smart decisions, backed by insight, are the foundation of enduring success. The tools are there. The question is: who’s bold enough to use them?

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.