Boycotts can upend entire markets overnight. In 2019, a diplomatic dispute between South Korea and Japan turned into a full-scale consumer revolt. Sales of Japanese beer in South Korea plummeted by 92%, and Uniqlo shuttered multiple stores as South Korean consumers rejected Japanese brands en masse. What began as a trade conflict quickly became an economic weapon wielded by consumers.

Boycotts are no longer just reactions to political events—they have become economic power plays. Global brands increasingly find themselves at the centre of cultural, political, and trade conflicts. Starbucks faced backlash from both conservatives and progressives over its unionisation stance, while Disney’s opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill sparked boycotts from both LGBTQ+ supporters and conservative groups. In today’s market, even neutrality is a decision with consequences.

Brands have become battlegrounds for political, social, and economic conflicts. Silence is no longer a shield. When French President Emmanuel Macron defended the right to publish caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in 2020, French businesses bore the consequences. Middle Eastern supermarkets pulled French products, and #BoycottFrenchProducts trended across social media. Carrefour scrambled to issue damage control statements. Even companies with no direct political involvement can be caught in ideological crossfire.

Managing consumer activism is no longer optional. Today’s boycotts can move markets and shake billion-dollar companies. In an era where brand loyalty is tied to political and social beliefs, companies caught in the crossfire risk more than just lost sales—trust, once broken, is far harder to rebuild.

Boycotts don’t just make headlines—they leave financial wreckage. In 2012, a territorial dispute between China and Japan ignited a mass boycott, sending Toyota’s sales in China tumbling 44% in a single month. The backlash erased years of market gains, forcing Toyota and Honda into a costly recovery battle.

Gen Z and brand boycotts

Even dominant brands can feel the sting of consumer backlash. During the U.S.-China trade war, nationalist sentiment fueled a #BoycottApple campaign, pushing many Chinese consumers toward Huawei. Apple maintained its global standing, but its sales took a hit—proof that even industry giants aren’t immune to geopolitics.

Some boycotts reshape markets permanently. In 2019, a South Korea-Japan dispute led consumers to abandon Japanese beer, cosmetics, and cars—habits that didn’t revert even after tensions cooled. Similarly, a 2006 boycott of Danish products in the Middle East, triggered by controversial cartoons, wiped out $70 million in sales for dairy giant Arla Foods. Even years later, some retailers never restocked Danish brands.

Not all boycotts leave scars. Starbucks has repeatedly faced backlash over labour policies and political stances, yet its dominance remains unshaken. The reason? A fiercely loyal customer base and a brand identity strong enough to weather short-term activism. The difference between a fleeting boycott and lasting damage often comes down to one factor: how replaceable the brand is. Companies with distinct identities bounce back. Those that hesitate, or fail to differentiate, may never recover.

Why Some Boycotts Fade While Others Leave Lasting Damage

For over 40 years, Nestlé has faced recurring boycotts over its infant formula marketing in developing countries. Despite its global dominance, consumer advocacy groups have kept the controversy alive, cementing Nestlé’s reputation as a corporate villain for many.

consumers and brand boycott

The oil industry faces a similar challenge. Shell and BP have endured decades of boycotts over environmental concerns. While these campaigns haven’t triggered financial collapse, they’ve permanently tarnished brand perception—especially among younger, climate-conscious consumers.

The real risk isn’t a single high-profile boycott—it’s the slow erosion of trust from repeated controversies. Over time, consumer activism can turn a brand name into shorthand for corporate misconduct, making reputation recovery an uphill battle. A boycott is more than a PR crisis; it’s a moment of truth. Brands can either reinforce loyalty or lose trust from all sides.

Some brands emerge stronger by standing their ground. Patagonia, for example, has made environmental activism central to its identity—even suing the Trump administration over national park protections. Rather than triggering backlash, the move galvanised its core customers.

Not all brands navigate boycotts successfully. When Carrefour’s Middle Eastern stores suffered backlash during the Macron controversy, the company tried to distance itself—but this only bred confusion and distrust. Silence can be as risky as speaking out. Consumers expect companies to take a stance, but a miscalculated move can alienate as many as it attracts. The real challenge isn’t whether to engage, but how to do so without escalating the crisis.

Avoiding controversy doesn’t mean avoiding backlash. In 2022, Disney’s attempt to stay neutral on Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill backfired spectacularly. Employees and LGBTQ+ activists pressured the company to take a stance, while conservatives retaliated once it did. Florida lawmakers stripped Disney of key tax privileges, leaving it alienated from both sides. A 2023 Harris Poll found that 82% of consumers expect brands to take a stand on social issues—yet 60% say they will stop buying if they disagree with the stance. The lesson? Taking a position can build loyalty with one group while permanently alienating another.

The risk isn’t just political—it’s about perception. Brands that fail to define their values risk having their identity shaped by the loudest voices. In today’s landscape, silence isn’t neutral—it’s a statement.

Navigating a boycott isn’t just about damage control—it’s about leadership. The brands that survive aren’t the ones scrambling to react, but those that take control of the narrative. When a boycott gains traction, the worst mistake a company can make is letting others define its response. A clear, well-structured message—consistent across all platforms—determines whether a brand weathers the storm or gets swallowed by it.

The financial hit of a boycott is often inevitable, but well-prepared brands see beyond the short term. Companies that anticipate consumer activism have contingency plans—shifting market focus, reinforcing ties with loyal customers, and ensuring financial resilience in the face of backlash.

A boycott can erupt in minutes, leaving companies no time to craft a careful response. In today’s hyper-connected world, silence is often seen as complicity, while a poorly handled statement can make things worse. The brands that survive aren’t those that avoid controversy—they’re the ones prepared for it.

The difference between a temporary backlash and a full-blown reputational crisis often comes down to preparation. The brands that weather boycotts aren’t scrambling in the heat of the moment—they have a crisis playbook ready long before trouble starts.

At the heart of any crisis playbook is a clear decision-making framework: Who makes the call on how to respond—the CEO, the communications team, or a crisis committee? Without a defined chain of command, brands risk internal chaos, mixed messaging, and costly missteps.

Just as critical is message control. In the social media age, companies no longer have the luxury of waiting days—or even hours—to respond. A delay means losing control of the narrative. The most prepared brands have adaptable, pre-drafted messaging ready to deploy, ensuring their first response is measured rather than reactionary.

trending hashtags

Not all boycotts require engagement. The strongest brands assess the market impact first—does the backlash threaten core revenue streams, or is it mostly symbolic? Overcorrecting in response to a boycott from non-customers can backfire, alienating loyal buyers—a mistake that has cost brands billions.

Boycotts don’t just test a brand’s values—they reveal whether a company was ever prepared to defend them. The biggest failures aren’t necessarily from taking the wrong stance, but from appearing unprepared, inconsistent, or defensive.  A boycott forces brands to make a critical decision: should they engage directly or let the controversy fade? The wrong choice can amplify the backlash, while the right move can reshape public perception.

Some boycotts are short-lived outrage cycles, driven by social media but lacking real economic impact. Rushing to respond can sometimes prolong the controversy rather than defuse it. Smart brands know when to let public sentiment run its course. But silence isn’t always an option. When a controversy gains enough traction, failing to engage can cause lasting damage. In those cases, brands must take control of the narrative before it’s shaped for them.

When two Black men were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks in 2018, the backlash was immediate. Instead of retreating, Starbucks’ CEO issued a direct apology, shut down 8,000 stores for racial bias training, and met with community leaders. By acting quickly, the company prevented long-term brand damage and reinforced its identity as a socially conscious brand.

The High Cost of Getting It Wrong

Contrast this with United Airlines’ 2017 fiasco, when a passenger was violently dragged off a plane. The airline’s initial response—a cold, legalistic defense of policy—only inflamed public outrage. Only after intense backlash did the CEO shift to an apologetic stance, but by then, the damage was done. The lesson? A delayed or tone-deaf response can make a crisis exponentially worse.

Knowing when to engage and when to stay silent isn’t about avoiding controversy—it’s about controlling the story. The strongest brands don’t just react to boycotts; they strategically decide whether to own the moment or let it pass. Brands overly dependent on a single geographic or ideological customer base are more fragile. Companies that diversify—whether through global expansion or appealing to multiple demographics—are far more resilient.

During the 2020 Middle Eastern boycott of French brands, Carrefour and Danone lost significant business over President Macron’s remarks. But both companies quickly refocused on growing consumer bases in Africa and Asia, stabilising their bottom line. Similarly, global tech brands facing boycotts in China have expanded into India and Southeast Asia to offset losses. Instead of engaging directly in controversy, they pivot their business strategy toward emerging markets, reducing long-term financial exposure.

Consumers today can spot corporate insincerity from a mile away. When brands respond to controversy with empty gestures rather than meaningful action, they risk deepening public distrust rather than repairing it.

Pepsi learned this the hard way in 2017 with its now-infamous ad featuring Kendall Jenner handing a can of Pepsi to a police officer during a protest. Instead of making a genuine statement, the ad came off as exploitative—a hollow attempt to co-opt social justice for marketing. The backlash was immediate. Pepsi pulled the ad within 24 hours, but the damage was already done.

H&M faced a different kind of fallout in 2021 when it tried to navigate allegations of forced labour in Xinjiang, China. The company issued a carefully worded—but vague—statement distancing itself from the controversy. Instead of appeasing consumers, the move backfired: Chinese authorities removed H&M from online platforms entirely. The half-measure pleased no one and led to real financial losses.

Consumers today can spot empty gestures. If a brand takes a stand, it needs to mean it—half-measures and corporate platitudes only make things worse. Brands that emerge from boycotts with their reputations intact are those that meet controversy head-on—with clarity, honesty, and decisive action. Attempts to placate all sides or hide behind corporate jargon only fuel further backlash.

When McDonald’s exited Russia in 2022 following the Ukraine invasion, it didn’t just issue a press release—it explained, in plain terms, the ethical and economic rationale behind its decision. By offering transparency instead of vague corporate messaging, it reinforced its credibility as a company willing to take a stand rather than simply responding to pressure.

Patagonia’s 2022 decision to transfer ownership to an environmental nonprofit wasn’t a publicity stunt—it was a long-planned move. By embedding activism into its business model, Patagonia proved that brand values can be more than just marketing.

Brands that rely on damage control instead of transparency often make things worse. Half-hearted statements, vague acknowledgments, or empty pledges do little to rebuild trust. Consumers today don’t just expect brands to take a stand—they expect them to back it up with real action.

Boycotts aren’t rare disruptions anymore—they’re part of doing business in a politicised world. The brands that navigate them best don’t avoid controversy; they prepare for it, understand their audience, and act with conviction when it matters. Some brands survive by doubling down on their values and reinforcing ties with their core customers. Others try to appease everyone and end up alienating all sides. The difference isn’t the controversy itself—it’s how well a brand understands its identity and whether it has the courage to stand by it.

Consumer activism isn’t an occasional disruption anymore—it’s a permanent force in the global marketplace. Modern boycotts are faster, more coordinated, and more politically charged than ever. For brands, this signals a fundamental shift: accountability isn’t optional, and neutrality is an illusion.

Why Boycotts Are Becoming More Frequent

Several forces have converged to make consumer boycotts more widespread—and more impactful—than ever before.

  • The Acceleration of Social Media
    What once took months of grassroots organising now happens in minutes. A single viral post can mobilise millions, turning hashtags like #BoycottApple and #DeleteUber into economic flashpoints overnight. The sheer speed of digital outrage leaves companies scrambling to control the narrative before it spirals.
  • The Rise of Economic Nationalism
    Boycotts are no longer just ideological protests—they’ve become geopolitical weapons. Trade disputes between the U.S., China, Japan, and South Korea have fueled consumer-driven economic retaliation, proving that governments are no longer the sole enforcers of economic policy.
  • Shifting Consumer Expectations
    Millennials and Gen Z expect companies to align with their values—not just sell products. According to a 2023 Harris Poll, 71% of Gen Z consumers say they would stop buying from a company that does not reflect their beliefs. Corporate reputation is no longer just about products—it’s about leadership, ethics, and action.
When consumers boycott brands

A New Risk: Backlash from Both Sides

Boycotts today aren’t just about what a company does—they’re about how different ideological groups interpret its actions. The result? Backlash from both sides.

  • Disney (2022-Present) – After opposing Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill, Disney became a target for both progressive activists (demanding stronger action) and conservatives (accusing it of corporate activism). The result? Sustained boycotts from competing sides.
  • Bud Light (2023) – The brand’s handling of its partnership with Dylan Mulvaney alienated both conservatives (who boycotted over the campaign itself) and progressives (who boycotted after Bud Light failed to stand by its decision). The result? A record sales decline and a leadership shake-up.
  • Target (2023-Present) – After backlash over its Pride Month merchandise, Target scaled back displays in conservative regions—only to face boycotts from both the right (for supporting LGBTQ+ issues) and the left (for failing to stand firm).

The Increasing Polarisation of Boycotts

Consumer boycotts have long been a form of economic resistance, but today they are something more—a permanent force reshaping how brands interact with the public. They are faster, more politically charged, and more frequent than ever. Companies aren’t just selling products anymore; they are expected to serve as political, cultural, and ethical entities. This shift demands a new kind of leadership—one that treats consumer activism as a reality to be managed, not just a crisis to be feared.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Forever 21 is closing its doors – again. Once the crown jewel of American mall culture, the fast-fashion giant is filing for bankruptcy for the second time in under five years. As shuttered storefronts stretch across the US, its downfall has become more than a brand misstep – a sign that the old fast-fashion model is running out of time.

In its place, a new breed of fashion titans is rising. Shein and Temu, two digital-first platforms with Chinese roots, have turned the industry on its head. Their tools? Artificial intelligence, real-time trend scraping, lightning-fast production, and a hyper-personalized consumer journey. These aren’t just cheap alternatives; they’re smart machines designed for a generation that grew up with TikTok, interactive shopping, and constant trends.

Forever 21’s decline isn’t a singular event. It’s part of a deeper market shift – one where legacy playbooks are being rewritten by code, content, and community. As fashion retail becomes more focused on digital channels, brands that do not change may become outdated and irrelevant.

Forever 21’s Fall Signals a Broken Retail Model

Forever 21’s descent didn’t happen overnight. It was a slow unravelling, a brand once emblematic of youth culture now outpaced by the very consumers it once captivated. At its peak, Forever 21 thrived on trend turnover, sprawling mall spaces, and low prices. But the retail landscape changed, and the brand didn’t.

As digital shopping accelerated and consumer expectations shifted, Forever 21 remained tethered to an outdated model – long production cycles, centralized design decisions, and a heavy reliance on brick-and-mortar foot traffic. Its once-successful approach became a liability. While consumers moved toward immediacy and personalization, the company doubled down on bulk inventory, sluggish turnarounds, and static pricing. It failed to keep pace with the velocity of online trend formation – a pace now dictated not by runways or retail calendars but by social feeds refreshed by the second.

The gap widened as Gen Z entered the market. Raised in an era of choice overload, platform-native shoppers sought brands that moved with them – fluid, responsive, and in sync with their aesthetic sensibilities. Forever 21, by contrast, felt stuck. Its collections lagged behind trends. Its online presence was clunky. It couldn’t deliver the frictionless experience digital-native brands were engineering.

Even attempts at reinvention – rebrands, collaborations, and in-store tech integrations – were often too reactive or off-mark. Market research during this period revealed a steady erosion in brand affinity among younger demographics, who increasingly dismissed mall-based fast fashion as outdated, unoriginal, or environmentally negligent. Once buzzing with teens, the retail floors became quieter, the racks fuller, and the margins thinner.

The retail model that once made Forever 21 a sensation has become outdated. And in an industry that now rewards adaptability over legacy, the brand’s decline underscores a critical truth: fashion doesn’t wait.

Shein and Temu Built a Smarter System

While legacy players like Forever 21 struggled to pivot, Shein and Temu were busy rewriting the rules of engagement. What distinguishes them isn’t just speed – it’s the system beneath the surface, a high-velocity engine built on data, automation, and platform-native behaviour. These brands aren’t retailers in the traditional sense; they’re algorithmic marketplaces fueled by machine learning, social signals, and a relentless feedback loop between consumer demand and product creation.

Inside Shein's fast-fashion model

Shein, in particular, operates more like a tech company than a fashion label. Its infrastructure is designed to detect real-time micro-trends, test new styles in limited batches, and scale only the best performers. Instead of seasonal collections, it drops thousands of SKUs daily – each one a calculated bet based on keyword spikes, user behaviour, and social engagement. What used to take legacy brands months now takes Shein days, with entire production cycles compressed into near real-time manufacturing.

Image Credit: Boffin Coders

Temu is building dominance on a different front. Backed by the e-commerce powerhouse PDD Holdings, its model leans heavily on gamification and bottom-dollar pricing, turning shopping into a behavioural loop. Discounts are dynamic, product discovery is algorithmically engineered, and the platform’s addictive scroll mimics social media architecture. Rather than chasing trends, Temu floods the feed with hyper-targeted inventory based on browsing data, purchase history, and behavioural nudges. Brand storytelling becomes secondary to price, pace, and personalization in this context.

Image Credit: Tech Crunch 

Temu's growth in numbers

Both companies excel at bypassing traditional gatekeepers. Instead of relying on expensive ad campaigns or celebrity endorsements, they tap into the power of peer-to-peer virality. TikTok hauls, influencer codes, and affiliate campaigns do more than drive traffic – they create a cultural moment, making shopping a social performance. The result is a decentralized and infinitely scalable distribution model.

Where traditional fast fashion brands pushed products, Shein and Temu pull consumers into a constantly evolving loop of discovery, validation, and conversion. It’s a model built not on intuition but on information, a data-centric approach that doesn’t just respond to the market but often predicts it.

Speed and Price Now Come with a Cost

But the same mechanisms fueling this meteoric rise are now drawing intensified scrutiny. As Shein and Temu scale at breakneck speed, regulators, watchdogs, and increasingly vocal consumer groups are beginning to question the true cost of their success. Investigations into labour practices, environmental degradation, and product safety are no longer confined to fringe activism; they’re reaching mainstream legislative agendas in the U.S. and Europe.

To soften criticism, Shein recently launched a resale platform in the U.S., positioning it as a circular fashion solution. Branded as a way for consumers to buy and sell secondhand Shein items, the initiative appears, on the surface, to nod toward sustainability. But industry experts and environmental advocates have been quick to call it out. Critics argue that the move lacks substance, pointing out that reselling ultra-low-quality garments does little to counteract the brand’s core business model – one built on volume, disposability, and micro-trend churn. The resale program, some say, is more about optics than impact.

Image Credit: Glossy

This tension highlights a bigger issue in the industry. The European Union has suggested tougher rules for transparency in textile imports, and U.S. lawmakers want more oversight on very cheap goods coming in through de minimis loopholes. These regulatory flashpoints are less about fashion and more about accountability – demanding that platforms operating on mass micro-consumption clarify how and where products are made, under what conditions, and at what environmental cost.

At the same time, cultural sentiment is shifting. What was once dismissed as disposable fashion is becoming a reputational risk. High-visibility criticism from sustainability influencers, investigative journalists, and even former brand collaborators is reshaping the narrative around what it means to shop cheap. For a growing subset of consumers, convenience and cost are no longer blind spots; they’re trade-offs weighed against a rising ethical awareness.

Still, the backlash isn’t yet translating into behavioural change at scale. Most consumers prioritize value and speed, even as they express concerns about sustainability. However, the growing friction between convenience and conscience is opening a critical window. For competitors, this is a signal: the future of fast fashion won’t just be about how quickly brands can produce – it will hinge on how transparently they can operate in a world that’s starting to ask harder questions.

Retailers Must Rethink the Entire Playbook

The road ahead demands a fundamental shift in how fashion brands think, operate, and communicate. Survival won’t come from marginal tweaks to legacy systems but from a reengineering of retail itself – beginning with the supply chain. 

Brands must move beyond cost efficiency and embrace operational intelligence. That means investing in technologies that enable demand sensing, real-time replenishment, and localized micro-manufacturing. Flexibility is no longer optional; it’s the foundation of relevance.

Equally critical is the evolution of pricing strategy. Competing with Shein and Temu on cost alone is a race few can afford to run. Instead, smart pricing – anchored in perceived value, quality assurance, and ethical sourcing – offers a more sustainable path. Consumers may be price-conscious, but they’re also becoming more aware of what pricing signals. Transparency around why a product costs what it does can strengthen trust and justify margins in a way race-to-the-bottom tactics cannot.

The marketing function must also be rebuilt for the algorithmic age. Traditional seasonal campaigns are losing ground to dynamic, always-on storytelling that responds to cultural shifts and consumer moods in real-time. This is where social commerce becomes critical, not as a trend but as infrastructure. Influencers are not just amplifiers; they’re now co-creators, collaborators, and curators of brand identity. Investing in decentralized content strategies, creator partnerships, and community-led design isn’t a nice to have – it’s how brands remain visible in a crowded, scroll-driven marketplace.

Finally, there’s the matter of trust. Authenticity becomes the ultimate differentiator in an ecosystem flooded with low-cost, high-frequency goods. Brands that can demonstrate their values through verifiable action – whether in ESG commitments, labour transparency, or community impact – will carve out a deeper connection with consumers navigating ethics. It’s not about appealing to everyone; it’s about being clear, consistent, and credible in what you stand for.

Guide to Gen Z

The Fast Fashion Reckoning Is Already Here

The fast fashion battleground is no longer about who can flood the market with the most products – it’s about who can navigate a volatile consumer landscape with speed, precision, and purpose. Shein and Temu have exposed the vulnerabilities of legacy brands not just by being faster or cheaper but by building systems attuned to cultural momentum, behavioural data, and the economics of digital attention. But their rise also highlights the limits of optimization when values, trust, and transparency are left out of the equation.

The future belongs to brands that can do both – move at the algorithm’s speed while operating with the discipline of long-term stewardship. Fashion is evolving from a product-based business to a platform-based experience, where relevance is won not once but constantly. For incumbents and challengers alike, this moment is not just a test of resilience. It’s a call to rethink what fashion means in a world where everything can be copied, but not everything can connect.

The rules have changed. What remains is the opportunity for those willing to radically rethink their systems as Shein and Temu have and to act before the next store closes.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A TV show about dysfunctional elites on vacation has done more for Four Seasons’ bottom line than any ad campaign could. Since The White Lotus aired, bookings at the luxury hotel’s Maui, Sicily, and Thailand properties have surged, with high-end suites seeing record demand. The show didn’t just showcase opulence – it turned its filming locations into must-visit destinations for high-net-worth travellers.

What started as a pandemic-era gamble – letting HBO use Four Seasons resorts as backdrops for satire – has become a masterclass in luxury hospitality marketing. Now, the brand is doubling down, offering private jet tours between its White Lotus resorts and reshaping how luxury travel intersects with pop culture.

This isn’t just a tourism bump. It’s a blueprint for how high-end brands can turn cultural cachet into long-term revenue.

Turning Screen Time into Bookings

The White Lotus didn’t just feature Four Seasons;it made the brand part of the story.

Following the debut of The White Lotus, Four Seasons experienced significant increases in interest and bookings. For instance, after Season 1, the Four Seasons Resort Maui at Wailea saw a 425% year-over-year increase in website visits and a 386% rise in availability checks. Similarly, during Season 2, the Four Seasons Hotel Taormina in Sicily reported a 193% increase in web traffic. With Season 3 set in Thailand, the Four Seasons Resort Koh Samui has already observed a 65% spike in searches shortly after the premiere.

Four Seasons Resort Maui at Wailea became shorthand for tropical indulgence, while Sicily’s San Domenico Palace, once a monastery, emerged as an icon of old-world grandeur. Following Season 2, the Sicilian property saw a 193% increase in web traffic. Now, with Season 3 set in Thailand, the Four Seasons Resort Koh Samui has already recorded a 65% surge in searches from travellers looking to step into the show’s next setting.

Rather than letting the hype fade, the hotel chain quickly capitalised. It introduced private jet itineraries linking its White Lotus resorts, offering an ultra-luxury package for guests looking to replicate the on-screen experience. More than just a tourism boost, the HBO partnership has given Four Seasons a new brand identity – one that sells not just a stay but a story.

TV Tourism Is the New Gold Rush for Hospitality Brands

Four Seasons isn’t the only brand cashing in on TV tourism. After Emily in Paris, hotel bookings in the French capital spiked, with luxury stays marketing their own “Emily-style” experiences. Game of Thrones turned Dubrovnik into a global tourism hotspot, with visitors flooding its medieval streets years after the series ended. The message is clear: travelers don’t just want a destination, they want a cinematic setting.

Hospitality brands are responding fast. Hotels are no longer just offering rooms – they’re curating worlds viewers already feel connected to. With the right media partnership, a resort becomes more than a destination; it becomes a cultural landmark. But to turn a pop culture moment into long-term brand value, it takes more than just letting the cameras roll.

Four Seasons understood this shift. It didn’t just lend its properties to The White Lotus; it leveraged the show’s themes of exclusivity and indulgence to redefine its own brand narrative. Every infinity pool, oceanfront suite, and private excursion wasn’t just a set piece; it became part of the experience the hotel could sell long after the credits rolled.

Experiential and Ultra-Luxury Tourism Is Redefining Travel Marketing

For luxury travellers, a five-star suite alone no longer satisfies. Today’s premium offering is access – an experience so exclusive, it feels scripted. This expectation is driving the rise of “live the show” tourism, where resorts don’t just host guests – they immerse them in a narrative they’ve already bought into.

Four Seasons has capitalised on this demand. In Sicily, guests can book private yacht tours along the same coastline where The White Lotus characters plotted their next move. In Thailand, where the latest season premiered, the chain has been marketing cultural excursions inspired by the series, turning its resorts into real-life extensions of the show’s world.

The strategy is paying off. VIP packages, custom itineraries, and pop culture-branded experiences now command premium rates – some exceeding $10,000 per stay, according to industry reports. Luxury travellers aren’t just buying comfort; they’re buying cultural capital. For hospitality brands, the takeaway is clear: locations don’t sell on their own. Story-driven experiences do.

Is TV the New Luxury Travel Influencer?

TV-driven-Tourism-hotspots

Forget glossy travel ads and celebrity endorsements – scripted entertainment is proving to be a more powerful driver of luxury tourism. The White Lotus turned Four Seasons from a high-end hotel chain into a must-visit brand, delivering hours of aspirational storytelling that no traditional campaign could replicate.

Luxury hospitality groups are taking note. The right on-screen exposure doesn’t just showcase a destination; it reshapes traveller demand. Hotels, airlines, and tour operators now see productions as strategic partners rather than passive tenants. From filming incentives to immersive brand collaborations, entertainment is becoming a long-term marketing asset.

For Four Seasons, The White Lotus wasn’t just a tourism bump – it was a repositioning moment. The show’s themes of wealth and indulgence aligned so closely with the brand that its resorts felt like characters in the story. Now, as other luxury brands chase their own White Lotus moment, the real competition isn’t location or amenities – it’s cultural relevance.

Luxury Hospitality Is Turning to Entertainment as a Growth Strategy

Four Seasons didn’t just benefit from The White Lotus; it created a new blueprint for luxury travel marketing. The divide between entertainment and hospitality is disappearing, and brands that fail to adapt risk being left behind.

High-end hotels are now seeking strategic partnerships with streaming platforms, aiming to replicate Four Seasons’ success. Destination collaborations with filmmakers are no longer just background deals; they’re becoming core business strategies designed to position hotels as aspirational travel hubs. The next phase of entertainment-driven tourism isn’t passive product placement; it’s about immersive brand integration, where travellers don’t just visit a location – they step inside a story.

This shift is already happening. Hotels are launching co-created experiences, interactive stays, and even story-driven itineraries modelled on cinematic worlds. The most forward-looking brands are embedding themselves where travel, entertainment, and culture converge – turning pop culture into long-term brand growth.

Cultural Relevance Is the New Currency of Luxury

In luxury hospitality, the meaning of status is shifting. It’s no longer defined solely by five-star service or remote, exclusive locations. Today, status is increasingly measured by how seamlessly a brand lives within the cultural moment.

The White Lotus gave Four Seasons more than exposure – it gave the brand narrative power. Suddenly, staying at the Four Seasons wasn’t just aspirational; it was culturally resonant. In a world where travellers want to mean as much as indulgence, the ability to connect with the zeitgeist is the ultimate differentiator.

In the attention economy, real luxury is no longer about where you go. It’s about how that place makes you feel – and whether the world is paying attention when you get there.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Alexa, which stores have the best deals right now? 

Once a futuristic notion, this question is now a reality for millions of consumers who rely on voice-activated devices for shopping lists, product recommendations, and more. As conversational AI becomes an integral part of daily life, voice-first commerce is reshaping brand engagement, challenging traditional marketing approaches, and unlocking new revenue opportunities.

But are brands truly ready for this shift? 

While some have embraced the potential of conversational AI, others are scrambling to catch up, struggling to redefine their strategies at a time when hands-free shopping and personalised voice interactions are the norm.

The question isn’t whether voice commerce will dominate – it’s how soon. Brands that adapt quickly and strategically will set themselves apart in this voice-first future, while the rest risk being left unheard.

The Rise of Voice-First Commerce

Voice commerce is rapidly becoming a mainstream consumer behaviour. 

The global voice recognition technology market is projected to grow to nearly $50 billion by 2029.

Consumer preferences are steering the surge in voice commerce, with hands-free convenience redefining how people shop, search, and interact. Smart speaker users now average 12.4 weekly tasks on their devices – nearly double the 7.5 recorded in 2017 – highlighting the growing integration of voice technology into everyday routines.

Brands must act now. This shift isn’t just about new tech; it’s about meeting customers where they are – on the go, multitasking, and expecting seamless experiences. For brands clinging to traditional e-commerce strategies, the window to pivot is closing.

How Conversational AI is Reshaping Brand Strategies

Conversational AI is transforming how brands interact with customers, pushing the boundaries of personalisation and engagement. Unlike traditional e-commerce, where interactions are largely visual and transactional, voice-first commerce creates opportunities for real-time, human-like conversations that build deeper connections.

Personalisation at Scale
AI-driven voice assistants use advanced natural language processing to deliver tailored recommendations. By analyzing past purchases, search history, and real-time preferences, these systems can create “segments of one,” offering highly personalised experiences. For example, a voice assistant can suggest a product refill based on a consumer’s purchase history or recommend a new service aligned with their preferences.

Improved Accessibility and Inclusivity
Voice technology breaks barriers, offering accessibility to older adults and individuals with visual impairments. For brands, this means tapping into previously underserved demographics and expanding their reach.

Enhanced Customer Service
Conversational AI is revolutionising customer support, from resolving issues instantly to guiding users through complex buying decisions. Voice assistants can handle inquiries 24/7, minimising wait times and enhancing satisfaction. Brands like Sephora and Domino’s have implemented conversational AI to simplify appointment bookings and food orders, creating frictionless customer journeys.

Challenges Brands Face with Conversational AI

The promise of conversational AI is immense, but its implementation comes with notable challenges that brands must overcome to fully leverage its potential.

Understanding Diverse Accents and Dialects
A significant barrier to effective conversational AI adoption is the ability to interpret diverse accents and dialects accurately. For instance, studies have shown that accents from regions like New York City, New Jersey, and Boston within the US market pose considerable difficulties for voice recognition systems. Distinct pronunciations and local slang in these areas often lead to misinterpretations, frustrating users and undermining trust in the technology. This highlights the need for brands to train AI models to handle linguistic nuances across regions and demographics.

Privacy and Data Security Concerns
Data privacy is another pressing issue. In a high-profile example, Italy’s data protection authority fined OpenAI 15 million euros for processing user data without adequate legal justification and transparency. The authority also cited inadequate age verification measures, exposing minors to potentially inappropriate content. These instances reflect broader consumer concerns about how personal data is collected, stored, and used in conversational AI systems.

Turning Challenges Into Opportunities
Brands that tackle these challenges head-on can gain a competitive advantage. Building AI systems that are linguistically inclusive and ensuring robust data privacy protocols will not only improve user experience but also foster trust among increasingly cautious consumers. Those proactively addressing these hurdles position themselves as leaders in the voice-first era, where reliability and consumer confidence are critical to success.

Brands Leading the Way with Conversational AI

As conversational AI becomes a cornerstone of voice-first commerce, some brands leverage its potential to drive engagement and boost sales. These early adopters offer valuable lessons for those looking to stay ahead of the curve.

Amazon’s Alexa: Setting the Standard for Voice Commerce
Amazon’s Alexa ecosystem has transformed how consumers shop, from reordering household essentials to discovering new products. With Alexa Skills tailored for brands, companies like Tide and Starbucks have seamlessly integrated into the consumer’s voice-enabled routine. Tide’s Alexa Skill, for instance, provides stain removal tips while subtly promoting its products, showcasing how conversational AI can blend utility with branding.

Sephora: Redefining Beauty Retail
Sephora has embraced conversational AI through virtual assistants that guide customers in selecting makeup and skincare products. By integrating its AI systems with Google Assistant, Sephora enables voice-driven appointment booking for beauty consultations, merging convenience with personalized recommendations. This approach not only enhances customer experience but also drives foot traffic to physical stores.

Case Study: Domino’s Frictionless Ordering Experience
Using Conversational AI

Image Credit: Shorty Awards

Since its founding in 1960, Domino’s Pizza has expanded to over 20,000 locations across 90 countries. A key milestone in this journey was the adoption of conversational AI to streamline operations and enhance customer experiences.

The Challenge

As consumer behaviour evolved, Domino’s recognised the need to offer more intuitive and convenient ordering methods. While effective, traditional online and phone orders lacked the seamless interaction modern consumers desired. The challenge was to develop a system capable of understanding and processing how customers express their orders, accommodating various accents, languages, and preferences.

The Solution

Image Credit: Google Cloud 

In August 2016, Domino’s began exploring Natural Language Understanding Solutions (NLU) and ultimately selected Google’s Dialogflow for its scalability and robust NLU capabilities. This platform allowed Domino’s to handle the extensive range of customer intents and ordering options inherent in its menu. By leveraging over 60  years of customer service expertise, Domino’s developed “Dom,” an AI-powered chatbot integrated across multiple platforms, including Google Assistant-enabled devices. Customers could now place orders by simply saying, “Hey Google, talk to Domino’s,” initiating a conversational ordering experience.

Implementation

The implementation process involved training the AI to manage both simple and complex ordering scenarios, ensuring it could handle the diverse ways customers might place orders. The user-friendly interface facilitated rapid development and deployment, enabling Domino’s to efficiently meet or exceed project milestones. The AI system was designed to integrate seamlessly with existing operations, providing a consistent and reliable customer experience across various digital platforms.

Results

Image Credit: Google Cloud

The introduction of conversational AI surpassed Domino’s initial expectations. The AI-powered ordering system not only enhanced customer convenience but also improved operational efficiency. The system’s performance led to continuous refinement of the conversational experience, allowing Domino’s to stay ahead of customer expectations and adapt to new interaction patterns. This commitment to innovation reinforced Domino’s position as a leader in digital transformation within the food service industry.

Learning from the Leaders

These examples highlight the versatility of conversational AI across industries. By focusing on consumer needs – whether it’s saving time, offering expert guidance, or simplifying everyday tasks – brands can create meaningful voice interactions that drive loyalty and revenue.

For brands still on the fence, these success stories highlight an essential truth: conversational AI is not a passing trend but a transformative force that will define the future of customer engagement.

The Future of Conversational AI in Voice Commerce

The evolution of conversational AI is accelerating, with innovations poised to redefine how brands engage consumers in the coming years. This isn’t just an extension of existing technology; it’s a shift toward a more intuitive, predictive, and immersive future.

Natural Language Processing Reach New Heights
Advances in NLP enable voice assistants to understand context, sentiment, and even subtle nuances in conversation. This development allows brands to move beyond basic commands and create meaningful, two-way interactions that feel almost human. Imagine a virtual shopping assistant that remembers your preferences and anticipates your needs before you articulate them.

Integration with Immersive Technologies
Converging conversational AI with augmented and virtual reality promises a new dimension of voice-driven engagement. Consumers could soon “walk” through virtual stores guided by a voice assistant, combining the convenience of e-commerce with the immersive experience of physical shopping.

Predictive Voice Analytics for Proactive Engagement
Predictive analytics powered by AI will allow brands to forecast consumer behaviour with unprecedented accuracy. Voice assistants will be able to recommend products based on upcoming events, seasonal trends, or personal milestones, creating hyper-relevant shopping experiences.

Generative AI Redefining Personalisation
Generative AI will further enhance voice commerce by creating highly customised interactions. From crafting personalised product descriptions to generating dynamic recommendations during conversations, this technology ensures every interaction feels uniquely tailored to the consumer.

The Ethical and Privacy Imperative
As the future of conversational AI unfolds, ethical considerations will take centre stage. Brands must be transparent about how they collect and use voice data, addressing consumer concerns about privacy and surveillance. Building trust will be just as crucial as building technology.

How Brands Can Prepare for the Voice-First Era

To thrive in the age of conversational AI, brands must adopt a proactive, voice-first strategy. Success will depend on blending innovative technology with a deep understanding of evolving consumer expectations.

Invest in Voice-Ready Infrastructure
Brands need robust systems that integrate with conversational AI platforms like Alexa, Google Assistant, or proprietary solutions. This includes optimizing product listings for voice search, ensuring seamless compatibility with voice-activated devices, and developing APIs for real-time interactions.

Prioritise Multilingual and Inclusive Design
Global markets demand voice solutions that cater to diverse languages, dialects, and accents. Brands must train AI systems to understand regional nuances, making their offerings accessible to a broader audience. Inclusivity should also extend to designing interfaces for users with disabilities, tapping into underserved markets.

Focus on Data Privacy and Ethical AI
Building trust is critical in a voice-driven world. Brands should establish clear policies on data collection and usage, ensuring transparency with consumers. Adopting ethical AI practices, such as eliminating bias in voice recognition, will enhance credibility and foster loyalty.

Collaborate with AI Ecosystem Leaders
Partnerships with technology giants and AI innovators can accelerate voice-first strategies. Whether leveraging Google’s advanced NLP or collaborating with Amazon on Alexa Skills, aligning with established platforms ensures smoother implementation and greater reach.

Measure and Adapt Through Key Performance Indicators
Voice commerce success must be quantifiable. Brands should track engagement rates, voice search conversions, customer retention, and satisfaction. They can continuously refine their voice strategies by analyzing these insights to better meet consumer needs.

Prepare for a Voice-Only Future
While omnichannel strategies remain vital today, brands should experiment with voice-only campaigns and interactions. Developing exclusive voice-driven experiences will help them prepare for a future where voice commerce dominates.

The transition to voice-first commerce requires foresight and innovation. Brands that invest now in building their conversational AI capabilities will not only capture today’s opportunities but also shape the future of customer engagement.

The rise of conversational AI and voice-first commerce represents a massive shift in how consumers interact with brands. From streamlining purchases to creating deeply personalised experiences, voice technology revolutionises the customer journey. But this transformation comes with a challenge: brands must act swiftly and strategically to harness their potential.

As consumers prioritise convenience and personalisation, the question for brands is no longer whether to adopt conversational AI but how to do it effectively. The future belongs to those willing to innovate, adapt, and amplify their voice.

For brands willing to invest, the rewards are clear: deeper customer relationships, enhanced loyalty, and a competitive edge in the voice-first marketplace. The future of voice commerce isn’t distant—it’s unfolding now. Is your brand ready to be heard?

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In Tokyo’s famed Tsukiji Market, chefs scrutinise every fish not only for quality but for its entire journey to their cutting board. QR codes are scanned, traceability records examined, and proof of origin demanded. This is no fleeting trend; it’s a direct response to escalating concerns over food safety and sustainability, amplified by recent high-profile scandals in the global seafood industry.

Recent years have revealed major flaws in seafood supply chains, raising serious concerns about safety and sustainability. One of the most alarming cases involved harmful chemicals found in shrimp exports from India, triggering global fears over contamination. Investigations into seafood fraud have uncovered widespread mislabeling, with fish species swapped and origins hidden. A study found that nearly a third of seafood samples were mislabeled, including high-demand fish like tuna and snapper. In Europe, farmed salmon and cod have been fraudulently sold as wild-caught, further eroding consumer trust. These scandals have intensified calls for stricter regulations and clearer labelling to rebuild confidence.

These scandals have shifted consumer priorities. A recent survey found that 72% of global consumers are willing to pay more for traceable, locally sourced seafood. Transparency is no longer a niche concern – it’s shaping purchasing decisions worldwide, from San Francisco to Berlin. The MSC reports that 71% of consumers now prioritise verified sourcing, signalling a major shift in market expectations.

The Rising Tide of Local Seafood Demand

Consumer demand for local seafood is growing rapidly, driven by a shift in priorities from price and convenience to trust and sustainability. In the US, UK, and Asia, buyers are increasingly seeking seafood with clear sourcing information, preferring options that can be traced back to responsible fisheries. This shift reflects a broader scepticism toward mass imports as consumers and regulators push for stricter oversight and higher standards. With local seafood often offering fresher quality and shorter supply chains, its appeal continues to expand beyond niche markets and into mainstream retail and dining.

In the US, demand for local seafood is surging. Since 2018, NOAA’s Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP) has required importers to verify product origins, boosting confidence in traceability. A recent NOAA report found that local seafood consumption has risen 15% in five years, led by younger, eco-conscious shoppers. Retailers like Whole Foods and seafood markets are expanding their selection of sustainably sourced, locally caught products.

In the UK, sustainable seafood is no longer just a consumer preference – it’s influencing government policy. Since Brexit, the country has prioritised local sourcing as part of its food security and sustainability efforts. A recent WWF report found that nearly 60% of UK consumers actively seek sustainable seafood, with 42% favouring traceable, locally caught options.

Asia is seeing a similar shift. In Japan, Korea, and Singapore, consumers are moving away from mass imports, favouring sustainably sourced seafood with clear labelling. Japan has gone a step further, using blockchain to track seafood from catch to consumer, reinforcing the demand for transparency. Even in emerging markets like Thailand and Vietnam, locally sourced seafood is gaining ground, particularly in urban centres where awareness of sustainability is rising.

Regulatory pressure is accelerating the shift toward local seafood. The US and European Union have already tightened traceability requirements, and more governments are following suit. As seafood supply chains grow more complex, demand for verifiable, local sources is rising. Fisheries worldwide are under increasing pressure to adopt sustainable practices as both consumers and regulators push for greater accountability.

Once a niche preference, local seafood is now a major force in the global market, fueled by growing demand for trust, transparency, and sustainability.

The Psychology of the Plate 

Consumers aren’t just looking for seafood – they’re looking for certainty. Emotional, cultural, and health concerns are driving the demand for traceable, local seafood. With food safety scandals still making headlines, trust has become the deciding factor in purchasing decisions.

Trust is now central to how consumers buy seafood. A 2023 World Economic Forum (WEF) report found that 68% of consumers prioritise transparency, with many refusing to buy from suppliers who can’t verify their sourcing. This push for traceability isn’t just about sustainability – it’s about restoring confidence in an industry shaken by fraud and contamination scandals.

Health concerns are another major driver of transparency. Reports of chemical residues and antibiotics in imported seafood have led consumers to rethink their choices. A recent Food Safety Alliance study found that 62% of consumers are willing to pay more for seafood with verified health certifications, seeing traceability as a safeguard against contamination.

The “locavore” movement – once focused on produce – now extends to seafood. Younger generations are leading the charge. A WWF survey found that 82% of US millennials are willing to pay more for sustainably sourced seafood, with Gen Z following closely behind. These consumers aren’t just thinking about sustainability; they’re also factoring in labour practices and ethical sourcing.

“Consumers today want to know where their seafood comes from, how it was sourced, and whether it was sustainably caught. Transparency is no longer a luxury; it’s an expectation,” said Dr. Simon Edwards, Director of Marine Sustainability at the MSC, in an interview with FoodNavigator.

This shift isn’t just about seafood – it reflects a broader change in consumer behaviour. As sustainability, health, and ethics become priorities, businesses that embrace transparency will gain a competitive edge in an increasingly conscious market.

Dock to Dish Revolution

Image credit: Dock to Dish

Dock to Dish, a US-based seafood cooperative, is changing how seafood reaches consumers and restaurants by directly connecting local fishermen with their market. Focused on sustainability and freshness, the program offers a direct line from the ocean to the table, ensuring both quality and a deeper connection to the communities that catch the fish.

Since its founding, Dock to Dish has expanded to multiple coastal regions, including the West Coast, and garnered partnerships with high-profile chefs and restaurants. In California, one such chef, Michael Cimarusti, is at the forefront of the program. Known for his work at Providence and Connie & Ted’s, Cimarusti values the opportunity to support local fishermen. “One of my big motivators as a seafood chef is to keep American fishermen fishing,” he says. “It’s a dying industry, like being a small farmer. It’s no different to me because they’ve been regulated and consolidated out of their livelihoods in many cases.”

For Cimarusti and others in the program, Dock to Dish offers a solution to a critical problem: the shrinking of small, independent fisheries. Sean Barrett, co-founder of Dock to Dish, often hears the question, “How come no one’s doing what the farmers are doing with vegetables and produce? Why isn’t anyone doing that for fish and seafood?”

The company’s approach stands out for its innovation in seafood distribution. By bypassing the traditional supply chain, Dock to Dish not only guarantees fresher seafood, but it also ensures that every step of the process aligns with sustainable practices and supports local economies.

Cornish Sea Salt and Traceable Fisheries

Image Credit: Cornish Sea Salt

Overview:

Cornish Sea Salt, a UK-based company, is leading the way in ensuring the traceability of seafood products through the use of blockchain and QR code technology. In an era when consumers demand greater transparency, Cornish Sea Salt offers an innovative solution by providing detailed information about the origin and journey of its seafood, reinforcing trust and accountability throughout the supply chain.

Since integrating blockchain and QR codes, Cornish Sea Salt has made a significant impact on the UK seafood market. Though specific sales figures remain confidential, the company’s use of cutting-edge technology has solidified its reputation as a leader in sustainable practices. In a market where consumers are increasingly concerned about the sourcing and sustainability of their food, this commitment to traceability sets the company apart.

The post-Brexit landscape has further amplified the demand for local sourcing in the UK, with companies like Cornish Sea Salt capitalising on this shift. As the country looks to secure food sovereignty and support domestic industries, the emphasis on “local-first” marketing has resonated deeply with consumers. Cornish Sea Salt has positioned itself as not just a provider of high-quality seafood, but also as a champion of local, traceable products – offering a product that consumers can feel good about purchasing.

This consumer demand for transparency is not an isolated trend. A 2023 study by the MSC revealed that 67% of global seafood consumers factor in sustainability credentials when making purchasing decisions. This growing preference for traceable, responsibly sourced products is a clear indication that consumers are prioritising the story behind their food, making it a crucial factor for brands aiming to stay ahead of the curve.

Challenges and Countercurrents

The demand for local, traceable seafood is rising, but scaling this model presents significant hurdles. From logistics to pricing, producers must navigate multiple challenges to meet growing consumer expectations.

Logistical Issues

Seafood’s short shelf life makes distribution a major challenge for local producers. Unlike imports that arrive frozen, fresh seafood must move quickly from dock to market. In coastal regions, getting fish to urban centres on time is a logistical race. A 2023 report from the National Fisheries Institute (NFI) found that inefficiencies can cause up to 10% of a catch to be lost before reaching consumers.

The Price Barrier

Sustainably sourced, traceable seafood often comes at a premium – one that not all consumers are willing to pay. An MSC study found that while 52% of consumers support sustainable seafood, many hesitate due to higher costs. Imported seafood benefits from economies of scale, making it cheaper and more competitive, leaving local producers struggling to match prices.

Regulatory Roadblocks

Inconsistent seafood labelling laws create obstacles for local producers. In the US, the Seafood Import Monitoring Program requires traceability for imports, but no equivalent standard exists for domestic seafood, giving foreign suppliers an advantage. The EU enforces stricter traceability rules, but local fisheries often struggle to navigate complex and conflicting regulations. Without universal standards, small-scale producers face an uphill battle in proving sustainability and compliance.

The Overfishing Dilemma

Rising demand for local seafood brings a risk: overfishing. Some US and European fisheries are already showing signs of depletion, according to a WWF report. Without stricter management, growing demand could put ecosystems under strain, threatening the very sustainability that local seafood markets depend on.

Why Local Seafood Makes Business Sense

The demand for traceable seafood isn’t just about ethics – it’s a smart business move. Companies investing in local sourcing are seeing higher margins and long-term profitability as consumers increasingly prioritise sustainability and transparency.

The Profitability of Traceability

Local seafood commands premium pricing, with consumers willing to pay more for ethically sourced, transparent products. Restaurants and retailers that highlight traceability are seeing increased customer loyalty, as trust in sourcing becomes a key driver of purchasing decisions. Businesses that invest in verification and sustainable practices are not only meeting consumer expectations but also securing higher margins in a growing market.

Retailers and Restaurants Are Cashing In

Retailers and restaurants are capitalising on the shift. Whole Foods has expanded its local seafood sourcing, selling premium-priced products with verified sustainability credentials. High-end restaurants and seafood chains are partnering with local fisheries, appealing to customers willing to pay more for quality and responsible sourcing.

Technology Is Fueling Transparency

Innovation is driving the growth of local seafood markets, with blockchain leading the way in traceability. In Asia, companies like Ocean Impact Organisation use blockchain to track seafood from catch to consumer. QR codes on packaging allow shoppers to verify a fish’s origin, catch method, and journey through the supply chain. This level of transparency has become a major selling point, especially in markets where trust has been shaken by seafood fraud and contamination.

Beyond blockchain, tech-fishery partnerships are improving traceability. IBM Food Trust, for instance, works with US fisheries to enable real-time tracking of seafood products. These collaborations help fisheries authenticate their catch and meet growing consumer expectations for transparency.

The Hook 

The demand for local, traceable seafood isn’t a passing trend – it’s reshaping the food industry. A new generation of consumers is driving the shift, prioritising transparency, sustainability, and health over convenience. Recent seafood scandals have only accelerated the movement, reinforcing the need for a system built on trust.

Local seafood is no longer a niche; it’s the new standard. In the US, UK, and Asia, businesses embracing traceability and sustainability are leading a market that values authenticity and accountability. What was once an optional transparency measure – whether through blockchain or other tracking innovations – is now a competitive necessity.

Companies that fail to adapt risk falling behind. This shift isn’t about catering to a select group of eco-conscious consumers; it’s about meeting the expectations of a global market that demands proof at every stage of the supply chain. The case for traceable, local seafood is only growing stronger.

The next big catch isn’t in distant waters – it’s waiting at the local dock. For businesses, embracing local seafood isn’t just about meeting demand – it’s about shaping the future of the industry.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced sweeping changes to how nutritional information is displayed on packaged foods. Under a rule proposed on January 14, 2025, food manufacturers would be required to feature a prominent “Nutrition Info box” on the front of most packages. This new labelling system aims to simplify consumer choices by categorising key nutrients – saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars – as “low,” “medium,” or “high,” offering a straightforward snapshot of a product’s health profile.

This initiative addresses mounting concerns over diet-related chronic diseases like diabetes and heart conditions, which place an increasing burden on public health systems. By streamlining how nutritional content is presented, the FDA seeks to empower consumers to make healthier choices quickly. The public has until May 16, 2025, to comment on the proposal, which could take effect as early as 2028 if finalised.

The proposal builds on recent FDA initiatives, including updates to the definition of “healthy” labelling and revisions to the Nutrition Facts panel. These efforts underscore a broader push for transparency and accountability in the food industry, setting the stage for a paradigm shift that could transform how consumers, manufacturers, and marketers engage with food products.

Countries like Australia, the UK, and Chile have pioneered FOP labelling systems, reshaping consumer behaviour and driving industry reform. The US now aims to join this global push for nutritional transparency, marking a critical step in aligning domestic policies with international trends.

Breaking Down the FDA’s Proposal

The FDA’s proposal represents a pivotal shift in how nutritional information will appear on packaged foods. At its core is the mandatory placement of a “Nutrition Info box” on the front of most packages, categorising saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars as “low,” “medium,” or “high” based on established dietary thresholds. This design aims to provide consumers with immediate, clear insights, eliminating the need to search for details on the back of the packaging.

The proposed changes respond to escalating public health challenges tied to diet-related conditions. With nearly 42% of American adults classified as obese, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the FDA sees clear labelling as a vital tool to promote healthier dietary choices and combat chronic diseases.

Industry Reactions

Industry reactions to the FDA’s proposal have been divided. Health advocacy groups applaud the initiative’s potential to simplify nutrition labelling and encourage informed choices. Meanwhile, food manufacturers voice concerns over the costs of redesigning packaging and reformulating products. Some critics warn that simplified labels may sacrifice nuance, potentially misleading consumers about broader nutritional contexts.

Despite expected industry resistance, the FDA remains firm in its commitment to align US policies with global standards for nutritional transparency. The underlying message is clear: food manufacturers must evolve to meet the demands of a health-conscious consumer base.

Learning from Global Approaches to Nutritional Transparency

As the US moves toward implementing new nutrition labelling, lessons from countries like Australia, the UK, and Chile provide critical insights into the challenges and opportunities ahead. These case studies reveal how policy changes can reshape consumer behaviour and transform industry practices.

Australia: The Health Star Rating System

Australia’s Health Star Rating system, launched in 2014, rates foods on a 0.5 to 5-star scale to help consumers quickly gauge nutritional quality. Ratings consider key factors like sugar, sodium, and saturated fat, as well as beneficial elements such as protein and fibre, offering a balanced assessment of overall healthiness.

Impact on Consumer Choices:
Research shows the Health Star Rating system has reshaped consumer habits, particularly among health-conscious buyers. Products with higher ratings consistently drive sales, demonstrating the power of clear, accessible labelling in influencing choices.

Industry Adaptation:
Manufacturers have adapted by reformulating products to secure higher ratings, often lowering sugar and sodium levels. Many brands now feature star ratings prominently in marketing, using them to stand out in competitive markets.

United Kingdom: The Traffic Light Labeling System

The UK’s traffic light labelling system, launched in 2013, uses red, yellow, and green to indicate high, moderate, or low levels of calories, sugar, fat, and salt. This intuitive design offers consumers a quick and clear understanding of a product’s nutritional content.

Consumer Preferences:
Studies reveal the colour-coded system resonates with consumers, simplifying the identification of healthier choices. Shoppers consistently favour traffic light labels over numeric formats, especially during time-pressed grocery trips.

Influence on Buying Behavior:
The traffic light system has been linked to shifts in consumer purchasing patterns, with a measurable decline in sales of products marked with red indicators. This has prompted many manufacturers to reformulate products, particularly those high in sugar and salt, to avoid red labels and maintain competitiveness.

Chile and Latin America: Warning Labels for High-Risk Nutrients

Chile led the way in 2016 with mandatory warning labels, using bold black-and-white icons to flag products high in sugar, sodium, calories, or saturated fat. This model has since been adopted across Latin America, including Peru, Mexico, and Uruguay.

Impact on Product Development:
The warning labels spurred widespread product reformulation. Many companies lowered sugar content to avoid high-sugar warnings, a designation that risks alienating health-conscious shoppers.

Marketing Adjustments:
Marketing practices have also been affected, as products with multiple warning labels often face negative consumer perceptions. Some brands have shifted focus to promoting healthier product lines and emphasising natural ingredients to rebuild trust.

Key Takeaways

  1. Simplified, Visual Information Drives Change: Systems like traffic light labels and warning icons show that consumers respond well to clear, easily interpretable information.
  2. Reformulation as a Competitive Necessity: Mandatory labelling often pushes brands to improve nutritional profiles, particularly to avoid negative perceptions tied to high-risk nutrients.
  3. Consumer Education is Crucial: Transparency initiatives are most effective when paired with public education campaigns that help consumers understand and use the information provided.
  4. Balancing Regulation with Branding: US manufacturers will need to find ways to comply with FOP requirements without sacrificing brand identity, drawing inspiration from global strategies that blend health messaging with effective marketing.

The US now has an opportunity to leverage these global learnings, ensuring its approach not only improves public health outcomes but also fosters innovation and accountability across the food industry.

Consumer Trends and the Appetite for Transparency

US consumers are calling for greater clarity in food labelling. According to a 2023 International Food Information Council (IFIC) survey, 63% of Americans actively look for nutritional details when shopping, a sharp increase in recent years. Yet nearly half report feeling overwhelmed by current labels, underscoring the need for clear FOP solutions.

Generational Insights: Millennials and Gen Z Leading the Charge

  • Millennials (Born 1981–1996):
    Millennials are spearheading the clean-label movement, prioritising transparency and simplicity in ingredients. Compared to older generations, they are more likely to scrutinise labels for added sugars, sodium, and artificial additives, making clear labelling a key factor in their purchasing decisions.
  • Gen Z (Born 1997–2012):
    Gen Z, raised in an age of instant access to information, demands quick, digestible details from brands. A 2024 NielsenIQ study found that 72% of Gen Z shoppers are willing to pay more for foods they consider healthier, with clear FOP labelling playing a pivotal role in influencing their perceptions.

These generational shifts have made transparency not just a preference but a baseline expectation for food brands, influencing how companies market their products and connect with their target audiences.

Transparency Reshaping Purchasing Behaviors

  1. Health-Conscious Choices:
    Consumers are increasingly rejecting products that are perceived as unhealthy. FOP labels categorising nutrients as “low,” “medium,” or “high” will help shoppers avoid items high in added sugars, saturated fats, or sodium.
  2. Trust as a Deciding Factor:
    Transparency builds trust, and brands with clear, honest labelling are far more likely to secure consumer loyalty. A 2023 Label Insight report found that 94% of consumers favour brands they perceive as transparent.
  3. Impact on Market Segments:
    The number of products marketed as “natural,” “organic,” or “low-sugar” has already risen, and clearer labelling is expected to accelerate this trend. Conversely, brands with poor nutritional profiles may see consumers shift to competitors with healthier options.

Transparency is no longer optional – it’s a baseline expectation for today’s informed, health-conscious consumers. As the FDA’s FOP labelling proposal advances, brands that embrace this demand will position themselves to succeed in an increasingly competitive market.

The Role of Package Testing in Adapting to FOP Labels

Adapting to the FDA’s new labelling rules brings challenges but also opens doors for innovation. Market research, especially package testing, is critical for meeting regulatory demands while keeping consumers engaged. By leveraging targeted testing methods, brands can fine-tune packaging to deliver clear nutritional information and maximise consumer appeal.

A/B Testing: Fine-Tuning Label Design and Placement

A/B testing enables brands to compare FOP label designs and identify what best captures consumer attention. For example, testing can assess:

  • Label placement, such as top-centre versus lower-left.
  • Colour schemes that balance brand identity with regulatory compliance.
  • Font size and style to enhance readability and impact.

By evaluating consumer preferences and purchase intent, A/B testing ensures packaging meets FDA standards without sacrificing visual appeal or branding.

Eye-Tracking Studies: Decoding Consumer Behavior

Eye-tracking studies provide detailed insights into how consumers engage with FOP labels. These studies help brands analyze:

  • Label visibility: Which parts of the packaging draw attention first?
  • Information retention: Are key nutritional details noticed and remembered?
  • Purchase intent: How do FOP labels influence buying decisions?

By understanding visual patterns, brands can optimise label size, placement, and design to ensure critical information stands out in busy retail settings.

Message Testing: Highlighting What Matters Most

Message testing helps brands pinpoint the nutritional claims that resonate most with their audience. This includes:

  • Testing phrases like “low sugar” or “high protein” to determine their influence on consumer perceptions.
  • Simplifying complex nutritional concepts without compromising accuracy.
  • Identifying regional and demographic differences in nutrient priorities to refine messaging.

Effective market research can uncover both opportunities and risks, such as the potential trade-offs between sugar reduction and perceived taste quality.

Real-World Examples of Package Testing Success

Investing in package testing equips brands to navigate the FDA’s FOP labelling rules with precision. These tools not only ensure compliance but also help optimise packaging to meet consumer expectations and build loyalty in an evolving, health-conscious market.

Nestlé: In Chile, where warning labels are mandatory, Nestlé used A/B testing to redesign packaging, reducing negative perceptions of sugar content while maintaining a family-friendly appeal. These changes, paired with product reformulation, boosted consumer trust.

Kellogg’s: In the UK, Kellogg’s used eye-tracking studies to refine traffic light labels, ensuring key nutritional data stood out. The result: improved consumer confidence and stronger alignment with health-conscious buyers.

PepsiCo: In Australia, PepsiCo conducted message testing before launching a low-sodium snack line. The term “reduced salt” was replaced with “balanced sodium,” which resonated better with consumers and drove sales growth.

Winning Strategies for Food Marketers

The FDA’s proposed labelling rules are more than a compliance hurdle – they’re an opportunity for brands to redefine their positioning and build consumer loyalty. By embracing strategic adaptations, companies can turn these regulations into a competitive edge, aligning their offerings with the priorities of health-conscious shoppers.

Reformulating Products to Improve Nutrition Profiles

Reformulating products is a powerful way to leverage FOP labelling, as healthier profiles naturally resonate with consumers. Labels categorising saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars as “low,” “medium,” or “high” will make products with better nutrition profiles stand out.

  • Reducing Negative Nutrients: To avoid unfavourable designations, brands like General Mills have already reduced added sugars in cereals by nearly 16% over the past decade, reflecting evolving consumer priorities.
  • Highlighting Positive Attributes: Adding fibre, protein, or vitamins not only meets health standards but shifts consumer focus toward benefits, positioning products as better choices in a crowded market.

Highlighting Positive Attributes Prominently on Packaging

Using FOP labels as part of a holistic packaging strategy allows brands to meet health-conscious expectations while maintaining a strong market presence.

  • Strategic Placement: Integrating FOP labels with visually appealing branding elements – such as clean colour schemes or bold health claims – enhances shelf visibility and consumer appeal.
  • Simplified Messaging: Clear phrases like “Heart-Healthy” or “Naturally Sweetened” resonate with today’s time-pressed shoppers, making complex nutritional benefits easier to understand.

Using Storytelling to Connect Labels with Brand Values

FOP labelling isn’t just about compliance – it’s a chance to tell a story. By linking labels to a brand’s mission, values, and health commitments, companies can create deeper consumer connections.

  • Educating Consumers: Packaging and campaigns can explain FOP labels’ significance, empowering shoppers. For instance, highlighting efforts to reduce sugar can build trust while reinforcing a brand’s dedication to public health.
  • Connecting to Broader Themes: Aligning FOP compliance with larger narratives like sustainability or community health can foster emotional connections. Oatly, for example, has tied its transparency efforts to environmental advocacy, earning loyalty from eco-conscious buyers.
  • Tailoring Messaging: Personalised storytelling that addresses the unique health concerns of Millennials, Gen Z, or families makes brands feel relevant and relatable, strengthening alignment with their target audiences.

When done right, FOP labels can become a cornerstone of brand storytelling, merging compliance with authenticity.

dining-personas

Challenges for the Industry

The FDA’s new labelling rules place food brands at a pivotal moment. Compliance is non-negotiable, but for products with less favourable nutritional profiles, maintaining creative freedom and the market appeal becomes a steep challenge. Striking the right balance between regulatory adherence and brand identity will be crucial.

The Tension Between Compliance and Creative Freedom

FOP labelling requires brands to surrender valuable packaging space to standardised information on saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars. For indulgence-focused products, this shift is especially challenging, as packaging that once evoked luxury or cravings must now make room for health metrics that could dissuade buyers. This tension demands innovative solutions to integrate compliance without diluting brand identity.

Risks for Brands with Unfavorable Nutrition Profiles

For brands with high levels of added sugars, sodium, or saturated fats, FOP labeling poses significant risks.

  • Erosion of Trust: Clear labels flagging “high” nutrient levels could undermine consumer confidence, particularly for brands already viewed as less transparent. Lost trust often redirects buyers to healthier competitors, compounding the challenge.
  • Regulatory and Public Scrutiny: Poor nutrition ratings may invite criticism from advocacy groups or regulators. In Chile, for instance, sugary beverage manufacturers faced declining sales and reputational hits after the introduction of mandatory warning labels.

Addressing Challenges with Research-Driven Strategies

Proactive brands can navigate FOP challenges by leveraging data-driven strategies that align compliance with consumer expectations.

  • Package Testing: Use A/B testing to assess design options that integrate FOP labels without sacrificing brand identity. Eye-tracking studies can ensure critical branding elements remain visible alongside required information.
  • Product Reformulation: Reformulate products flagged as “high” in sugar, sodium, or fat. Market research can guide these changes by gauging their impact on taste perception and repurchase intent.
  • Transparent Marketing: Build trust through campaigns that highlight efforts to improve nutritional profiles and educate consumers about balanced eating. Transparency fosters loyalty in a health-conscious marketplace.
  • Segmented Messaging: Focus on market segments less swayed by FOP labels, such as indulgence-seeking consumers. Tailored messaging can emphasise flavour or premium ingredients over health metrics.

By tackling these challenges with research-backed strategies, brands can adapt to the FOP landscape without losing their identity. Quick, thoughtful action will enable companies to comply with regulations while positioning themselves as trusted, innovative leaders in a marketplace increasingly defined by health-conscious consumers.

Building Long-Term Consumer Trust

The FDA’s FOP labeling rules offer more than a compliance challenge – they’re a chance for brands to deepen connections with health-conscious consumers. Food brands can transform FOP labels into a foundation for lasting trust and loyalty by prioritising transparency and authenticity.

FOP Labeling as a Trust-Building Tool

FOP labels directly address consumer demands for transparency, providing health-conscious shoppers with the tools to make informed decisions. These labels can strengthen trust and highlight a commitment to well-being when integrated into broader brand narratives.

  • Communicating Values: Transparent nutritional information signals accountability, fostering a perception of honesty that builds lasting loyalty.
  • Engaging Consumers: FOP labels can inspire conversations, from social campaigns on nutrition to highlighting reformulation efforts. These touchpoints deepen relationships and position brands as advocates for healthier lifestyles.

The Importance of Authenticity and Avoiding “Healthwashing”

Transparency must go hand-in-hand with authenticity to avoid alienating consumers. Overstating or misrepresenting a product’s health benefits – a tactic known as “healthwashing” – can erode trust and harm a brand’s reputation.

  • Aligning Marketing with Reality: Claims like “low sugar” must match FOP labels. Discrepancies between marketing and nutritional facts can confuse consumers and undermine confidence.
  • Real Change Over Optics: Savvy consumers recognise superficial claims. Brands that genuinely reformulate products or invest in sustainable practices will outshine competitors relying on shallow narratives.

Brands That Have Used Transparency to Build Loyalty

Transparency has helped many brands stand out in competitive markets, proving that authenticity builds trust and loyalty:

  • KIND Snacks: By displaying clear, front-of-package ingredient lists, KIND has cultivated a loyal following of health-conscious consumers who value simplicity and transparency.
  • Nestlé: Faced with Chile’s mandatory FOP warning labels, Nestlé reformulated products to reduce sugar content and launched campaigns to explain these changes, reinforcing its commitment to public health.
  • Chobani: With transparent sourcing and straightforward messaging, Chobani has earned a reputation for authenticity, resonating with consumers seeking honest, nutritious options.

Insights from Global Market Research

As the US moves toward implementing new nutrition labelling, lessons from global markets like Australia, the UK, and Chile provide a roadmap for navigating the shift. These countries’ experiences highlight both the challenges and opportunities that transparency brings to the food industry.

Australia’s Health Star Rating system demonstrates how simple, visual indicators can influence consumer preferences toward healthier options. However, its voluntary nature has led to inconsistent participation, particularly among less healthy brands. For US companies, this underscores the need for universal compliance to maintain trust and ensure meaningful impact.

The UK’s traffic light labelling system, featuring colour-coded indicators, has significantly shaped purchasing decisions, especially among families and younger shoppers. It has also spurred reformulation efforts, with brands lowering sugar and salt to avoid red labels. Transparency, as this system shows, not only informs consumers but also drives industry-wide changes. For US brands, adopting proactive reformulation strategies early could mitigate the reputational risks associated with unfavourable FOP labels.

Chile’s bold implementation of mandatory warning labels demonstrates how regulation can act as a catalyst for product innovation. The stark black-and-white warnings have led to a reduction in sales of high-sugar and high-salt products, but they’ve also opened the door for brands to introduce reformulated or alternative product lines. In a market where simplicity often equals clarity, US companies might consider how to balance compliance with consumer education to avoid potential misinterpretation of labels.

Market research is essential for navigating the complexities of FOP labelling. Tools like eye-tracking studies, A/B testing, and sentiment analysis help brands create labels that meet regulatory requirements while resonating with consumers. Package testing ensures that new labels align with broader brand messaging, maintaining trust during the transition.

For US brands, FOP labelling is an opportunity, not a constraint. By leveraging global best practices and investing in market research, companies can meet consumer demands for transparency while maintaining a competitive edge. The reward is clear: an empowered consumer base and a food industry rooted in trust and accountability.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The potential ban of TikTok in the United States is more than a policy decision. It’s a reckoning for marketers and content creators who depend on the platform. TikTok’s advertising revenue exceeded $18.5 billion globally in 2024, with approximately $10 billion attributed to the US market alone. For creators, the stakes are even higher; TikTok is a critical income source, contributing an estimated $24.2 billion to the US GDP and supporting over 224,000 jobs. A ban would not only devastate these livelihoods but also redirect billions in ad revenue to competitors like Meta and Alphabet, fundamentally reshaping the digital marketing landscape.

At the core of this disruption is a hard truth: brands and creators do not own their followers. Platforms like TikTok hold the data, dictate access, and can vanish or change their rules overnight. The potential fallout from a ban highlights the need for marketers to rethink their strategies. Diversifying platforms, leveraging market research, and building direct connections with audiences are no longer optional – they’re essential to survival in an unpredictable digital ecosystem.

The Illusion of Ownership

Social media has given brands and creators unprecedented access to audiences – but the power dynamic has always been skewed. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube control the data, dictate the algorithms and ultimately decide who sees what. For marketers, this creates an illusion of ownership, masking a fundamental vulnerability: when a platform changes its policies or faces regulatory action, access to that audience can disappear overnight.

TikTok exemplifies the scale of this dependency. With over 121 million monthly active users in the US and 1.6 billion globally, it has become a cornerstone for brands targeting younger demographics. 

In 2024, the average US adult spends 58.4 minutes daily on TikTok, up from 27.4 minutes in 2019. This five-year surge in engagement solidifies TikTok as one of the most captivating platforms in the digital landscape. For creators, TikTok offers a lucrative ecosystem, contributing billions in advertising and influencer revenue. However, this reach and revenue exist at the mercy of the platform’s continued operation.

History offers stark lessons on the risks of platform reliance. Vine’s abrupt shutdown in 2017 wiped out entire communities of creators and brands that had invested heavily in its ecosystem. Instagram’s move to a pay-to-play model, prioritising ads over organic reach, pushed many businesses to overhaul their strategies. YouTube’s recurring demonetisation policies have similarly left creators scrambling to replace lost income streams. Most recently, X (formerly Twitter) altered its monetisation model, tying payouts to engagement from Premium users and forcing creators to rethink how they generate revenue.

The lesson is clear: social media platforms are tools, not guarantees. Brands that fail to build independent, direct connections with their audiences risk losing more than visibility – they risk losing their entire foundation for engagement and revenue. As the TikTok ban looms, it’s a timely reminder that the only sustainable strategy is one that puts ownership of audience data back in the hands of brands and creators.

The Market Research Perspective

When platforms falter, market research becomes the ultimate safety net for brands. While social media metrics offer a glimpse into audience behaviour, they’re limited by the platform’s control over data. Market research tools, on the other hand, provide brands with the independence and depth needed to adapt in the face of disruption.

Understanding Audiences Beyond the Platform
Tools like social listening and sentiment analysis allow brands to track consumer behaviour and conversations across multiple channels, not just a single platform. These insights reveal what matters most to audiences – whether it’s sustainability, personalisation, or emerging trends – and help brands craft strategies that resonate even if access to a specific platform disappears. Audience segmentation further refines this understanding, enabling brands to pinpoint which demographics or regions align with their core values and products.

Identifying the Right Platforms
Market research also plays a pivotal role in identifying where brands should invest their resources. Not every platform appeals to every audience. For example, Gen Z users dominate TikTok, but Millennials are more active on Instagram, and professionals gather on LinkedIn. By analysing audience preferences and regional trends, brands can diversify their digital presence strategically, ensuring that no single platform dictates their success.

Pivoting in the Face of Disruption

The 2020 TikTok ban in India exposed the fragility of marketing strategies that depend on a single platform. With over 200 million users in India by 2020, TikTok was a key channel for reaching younger consumers. When the Indian government enforced the ban, citing national security and data privacy concerns, creators and brands were abruptly cut off from a massive audience. However, brands that had invested in understanding their audiences were able to pivot quickly, shifting their focus to platforms like Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. Bira 91, an Indian FMCG brand, used consumer insights to adapt its campaigns to Instagram Reels, targeting the same demographic. This data-driven strategy allowed the brand to recover a significant portion of its lost engagement, demonstrating the power of audience understanding and the ability to adapt swiftly to new platforms.

Similarly, Vine’s shutdown in 2017 left creators scrambling to maintain their digital presence. Vine had been one of the most influential platforms for short-form video content, but its sudden closure disrupted many creators’ revenue streams. Creators who had taken the time to understand their audiences and the type of content that resonated – whether humour, tutorials, or lifestyle inspiration – could transition smoothly to platforms like YouTube and Instagram. 

King Bach, born Andrew Bachelor, is a prominent actor, comedian, and content creator who initially rose to fame with his short, humorous videos on the now-defunct Vine platform. He became one of the top creators on Vine before the platform was shut down in 2017. Unlike many creators who struggled to transition, King Bach quickly adapted his content to YouTube, growing his channel to millions of subscribers. His ability to understand and cater to his audience’s preferences, regardless of the platform, allowed him to maintain relevance and continue his success beyond Vine. 

Recent changes to monetisation models on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have highlighted the ongoing risks of platform dependence. X has shifted its creator payout structure, tying payments to engagement from Premium users rather than ad revenue. This change has forced many creators to rethink how they engage with their audience and generate income. TikTok’s ability to recover quickly after the India ban was possible because brands and creators understood the nuances of their audience, enabling them to adjust their content strategies and move to new platforms without losing significant revenue or engagement.

These examples provide a vital lesson: platforms are volatile, but understanding your audience isn’t. The ability to pivot to new platforms and adjust content to meet shifting audience expectations is not just a reactive tactic but a proactive strategy grounded in solid market research. 

The Safety Net for the Future
Market research not only helps brands navigate disruptions but also empowers them to flourish in an unpredictable environment. By consistently analysing consumer behaviour, sentiment, and emerging trends, brands can anticipate changes and adapt proactively. 

Building a Platform-Agnostic Strategy

For brands navigating the volatile world of social media, diversification is not just a safeguard – it’s a strategy for sustained growth. Relying on a single platform exposes marketers to the whims of algorithm changes, policy shifts, or outright bans. By adopting a platform-agnostic approach, brands can ensure their message reaches audiences across multiple channels, minimising risk and maximising visibility.

The Case for Diversification
Platforms rise and fall, but audience expectations remain constant. Consumers want engaging, relevant content delivered where they are. Diversifying across multiple platforms allows brands to maintain connections with their audiences, even when one platform’s reach is disrupted. For example, creators who transitioned from Vine to YouTube and Instagram maintained their visibility by adapting their content to the preferences of each platform’s audience. The same principle applies to brands that seek long-term resilience.

Actionable Steps for Marketers

  • Cross-Promote Content
    • Ensure your content isn’t confined to a single platform. Create variations that can live on YouTube Shorts, Instagram Reels, and TikTok simultaneously.
    • Leverage cross-promotion to direct followers from one platform to another. For example, a TikTok video can include a call-to-action for a YouTube channel, ensuring audience migration if one platform falters.
  • Leverage Owned Channels
    • Establish and prioritise owned channels like websites, email newsletters, and apps. These channels give you direct access to your audience without relying on third-party algorithms.
    • Offer exclusive content, early access, or special discounts to encourage followers to subscribe to your newsletter or download your app. Brands like Glossier have successfully used newsletters to maintain strong connections with their communities outside social media.
  • Test New Platforms
    • Experiment with new platforms to stay ahead of emerging trends. YouTube Shorts, LinkedIn, and niche apps like BeReal offer untapped opportunities to reach specific audiences.
    • Monitor the performance of test campaigns to determine where your efforts yield the best results. For example, during TikTok’s early days, brands that embraced the platform reaped massive rewards as it became prominent.

Building a platform-agnostic strategy ensures that no single platform controls your access to your audience. By spreading content across multiple channels, cultivating owned platforms, and staying open to emerging trends, brands can future-proof their marketing efforts. 

Owning Your Data

When algorithms dictate visibility and platforms hold the keys to audience access, owning your data is the ultimate form of independence. First-party data – the information you collect directly from your audience – allows brands to build lasting, direct relationships with consumers while insulating themselves from the volatility of social media platforms. This isn’t just a safeguard; it’s a proven driver of higher ROI and long-term success.

The Power of First-Party Data
Unlike third-party data, which is aggregated and often incomplete, first-party data is accurate, actionable, and uniquely tailored to your brand. Studies show that marketing campaigns leveraging first-party data see a 2x–5x higher ROI than those relying on third-party sources. By owning this data, brands can create personalised experiences, predict customer behaviours, and optimise engagement without the constraints of platform algorithms or external disruptions.

Strategies for Building Direct Engagement

  • Email Campaigns with Value-Driven Content
    • Email remains one of the most effective channels for engagement, with an average ROI of $36 for every $1 spent.
    • Encourage users to subscribe by offering exclusive content, personalised recommendations, or early access to sales. For example, brands like Sephora use tailored email campaigns based on purchase history to drive repeat business.
  • Subscription-Based Services
    • Build direct, recurring revenue streams through subscription models. Offer exclusive content, VIP experiences, or premium products to subscribers.
    • Examples include Patreon for creators or The New York Times’ subscriber-only journalism, both of which successfully monetise audience loyalty.
  • Community-Building Tools
    • Platforms like Discord, Slack, or private forums enable brands to create intimate, engaged communities where they can interact directly with their audience.
    • These communities foster loyalty and allow brands to gather insights directly from their most invested users. For instance, fitness brand Peloton uses private Facebook and app-based groups to maintain a strong community connection.

As privacy regulations tighten and third-party cookies phase out, first-party data will only grow in importance. Brands that focus on building these direct connections now will have a significant competitive edge in the future. Owning your data means owning your audience – and in a landscape where platforms come and go, it’s the only way to ensure resilience and relevance for years to come.

Anticipating Audience Migration Patterns

When platforms falter, audiences don’t disappear – they migrate. Market research can help brands predict where their target demographics will go next, ensuring continuity in engagement. For instance, when TikTok was banned in India, many creators and audiences shifted to Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. Brands that anticipated this migration by monitoring audience preferences and testing campaigns on these platforms were able to adapt seamlessly, maintaining their presence and avoiding revenue loss.

Understanding Emerging Consumer Behaviors
Consumer habits are constantly evolving, driven by technology and cultural shifts. The rise of audio-only platforms like Clubhouse and Spotify Greenroom, as well as private social networks such as Discord, reflects a growing preference for more personalised and intimate digital interactions. Market research enables brands to identify these trends early, ensuring they can tailor their strategies to meet new demands. For example, brands that embraced podcast sponsorships and audio ads capitalised on the surge in audio consumption, creating authentic connections with their audiences.

Identifying Unmet Needs
Market research doesn’t just track existing trends – it uncovers gaps in the market that can guide new marketing initiatives. Predictive analytics and sentiment analysis allow brands to understand what consumers want but can’t yet find. For instance, a food brand analysing health-conscious consumer trends might discover a growing demand for plant-based proteins tailored to regional flavours. Acting on this insight could position the brand as a leader in an untapped category.

Predictive Analytics and Trend Analysis in Action
Predictive analytics transforms historical data into actionable forecasts, giving brands a strategic advantage. Consider how Netflix uses viewer data to anticipate trends in content preferences, ensuring its platform is always stocked with binge-worthy series. Similarly, fashion brands like Zara use trend analysis to predict seasonal demands, enabling them to produce and deliver popular items faster than competitors. These tools help brands remain proactive rather than reactive, turning insights into immediate action.

The Path to Proactive Marketing
Relying solely on past data or platform metrics is no longer enough in a digital ecosystem that changes by the day. Market research provides the foresight needed to anticipate disruptions and stay ahead of the curve. By predicting audience movements, understanding new behaviours, and identifying unmet needs, brands can not only navigate change but also lead it.

For marketers, embracing market research as a forward-looking tool is the difference between being caught off guard and setting the pace. In an unpredictable world, the brands that thrive will be those that see the next trend – or disruption – before it happens.

The Future Belongs to Prepared Marketers

The digital landscape has never been more uncertain. Platforms rise to dominance and fall from favour with increasing speed, leaving brands that depend on them vulnerable. The looming TikTok ban is not an isolated event – it’s a harbinger of the volatility that defines modern marketing. Those who cling to the illusion of platform permanence risk being swept away by the next disruption.

Prepared marketers understand that control is not given; it is taken. They are building direct connections with their audiences, harnessing the power of first-party data, and leveraging insights from market research to anticipate what’s next. They don’t wait for the ground to shift – they shape the terrain themselves.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The technology industry, long known for its constant innovation, is about to undergo even more transformative changes in 2025. As emerging technologies continue to evolve and global dynamics shift, businesses will face new opportunities and challenges that will reshape the future of tech. From quantum computing breakthroughs to the rise of ethical AI and the expansion of edge computing, these trends are set to disrupt the way industries operate and how technology will drive progress.

In this rapidly evolving environment, staying ahead of the curve is essential for tech companies to remain competitive. Let’s explore the four key trends that will redefine the technology landscape in the coming year.

Trend 1: Quantum Computing Enters Commercialisation

After years of research and theoretical advancements, quantum computing is finally making the leap from academic breakthroughs to real-world applications. In 2025, quantum technology is poised to solve complex, data-intensive problems across industries like finance, healthcare, logistics, and beyond. Companies are beginning to harness the power of quantum computing to perform calculations and simulations that would have been unimaginable with classical computers. This shift marks the start of a new era in computing, where quantum algorithms will drive unparalleled advancements in problem-solving capabilities.

Why This Will Disrupt:

  • Offers exponential speed-ups for data-intensive computations: Quantum computers have the potential to process massive datasets at speeds far beyond the capabilities of today’s supercomputers. This capability could revolutionise sectors such as pharmaceuticals, where simulations of molecular interactions could accelerate drug discovery, or finance, where quantum computing could optimise complex algorithms in real time.
  • Forces industries to reimagine processes that rely on advanced analytics: As quantum computing begins to tackle problems once thought unsolvable, industries will need to rethink their existing frameworks. From logistics to supply chain management, quantum algorithms could offer solutions that drastically improve efficiency and reduce costs by enabling more sophisticated predictive models and optimisation techniques.
  • Creates a race among tech companies to lead in quantum innovation and commercialisation: With its enormous potential, quantum computing has sparked a global race among tech giants, startups, and academic institutions to develop practical applications. Companies that successfully commercialise quantum technology first will hold a major competitive edge, driving innovations and leading the charge in industries from machine learning to climate modelling.

As quantum computing moves into the mainstream in 2025, businesses must adapt quickly to incorporate this powerful new technology or risk being left behind. The disruption it will bring across industries is profound, as quantum algorithms promise to revolutionise the speed and efficiency of data processing and complex decision-making.

Case Study: Google – Sycamore and the Quantum Leap

Google’s quantum computing project, Sycamore, demonstrated quantum supremacy in 2019 by solving a problem that was previously intractable for classical computers. The project marked a historic breakthrough, showing that quantum computers can perform specific tasks exponentially faster than conventional ones. As Google continues to push the boundaries of quantum technology, its ongoing research aims to transition quantum computing from theoretical breakthroughs to real-world applications that could revolutionise industries like finance, healthcare, and logistics, particularly those reliant on massive data processing and computational power.

Trend 2: AI Ethics and Regulation Take Center Stage

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in technology across industries, concerns regarding its ethical use and societal impact are growing louder. In 2025, AI is no longer just a tool; it’s a critical driver of business operations, decision-making, and even personal lives. With its vast potential, AI is also raising complex questions about fairness, accountability, and transparency. To address these concerns, stricter regulations and ethical frameworks are expected to reshape how AI is developed and deployed, ensuring it aligns with societal values while mitigating risks.

Why This Will Disrupt:

  • Adds compliance costs and slows down unregulated AI deployments: As governments and international bodies introduce new laws to ensure AI technologies are safe, fair, and transparent, companies will face increased regulatory compliance costs. The need to adhere to these regulations will slow down the rapid deployment of AI tools, particularly in sectors like finance, healthcare, and autonomous systems, where ethical considerations are paramount.
  • Pushes tech companies to prioritise transparency and bias mitigation: In 2025, the focus on AI ethics will force companies to address the biases that AI models can inherit from historical data or skewed training sets. Tech companies will need to invest in developing transparent AI systems that can be audited for fairness and accountability. This emphasis on ethical AI will drive innovation in tools for bias detection, algorithm transparency, and ethical oversight.
  • Creates opportunities for innovation in ethical AI tools and auditing solutions: With the growing demand for ethical AI, there will be a surge in the development of tools and services aimed at auditing, monitoring, and enhancing the ethical standards of AI systems. Companies will invest in creating new software, platforms, and methodologies to ensure that AI applications meet established ethical guidelines. This opens the door to new business opportunities focused on responsible AI development.

In 2025, as AI continues to shape industries, its ethical implications will take centre stage. With growing scrutiny from regulators, consumers, and advocacy groups, technology companies will need to innovate and prioritise the ethical development of AI to maintain trust and compliance, positioning themselves for long-term success in a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.

Case Study: NVIDIA – Revolutionising Edge Computing with Jetson

NVIDIA’s edge computing solutions, including the Jetson platform, enable real-time AI processing directly on edge devices, which is crucial for industries requiring immediate decision-making, such as autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and industrial automation. By bringing AI capabilities closer to where data is generated, NVIDIA helps reduce latency and improve the speed and efficiency of critical systems. With its innovations in edge computing, NVIDIA is accelerating the development of real-time applications in sectors where immediate data processing is essential, providing a competitive edge for businesses in fast-evolving markets.

Trend 3: The Growth of Edge Computing

Edge computing is rapidly emerging as a critical infrastructure in the technology landscape, especially as the Internet of Things (IoT) and 5G connectivity continue to expand. By processing data closer to the source—whether it’s on IoT devices or at local data centres—edge computing reduces latency and enhances real-time decision-making capabilities. As industries and applications become more reliant on fast, data-intensive tasks, edge computing offers a solution that minimises the delays associated with transmitting data to centralised cloud servers. This trend is not just about improving efficiency; it’s enabling new, more sophisticated use cases across multiple sectors.

Why This Will Disrupt:

  • Revolutionises sectors like autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and industrial automation: Edge computing is crucial in areas that require instantaneous data processing, such as autonomous driving and smart city infrastructure. In autonomous vehicles, for example, edge computing enables real-time analysis of data from sensors and cameras, ensuring the vehicle can respond to its environment with minimal delay. Similarly, smart cities rely on edge computing to manage traffic systems, utilities, and emergency responses, providing faster, localised control.
  • Reduces reliance on centralised cloud services, shifting infrastructure investments: As edge computing becomes more widespread, companies will increasingly invest in decentralised infrastructures rather than relying solely on centralised cloud services. This shift not only reduces the dependency on long-distance data transmission but also enables more localised control, enhancing security and efficiency. Organisations will have to rethink their cloud strategies, balancing centralised cloud computing with edge solutions.
  • Opens up new markets for edge devices and localised data solutions: With the growing adoption of edge computing, new markets are emerging for devices and solutions that support localised data processing. This includes edge hardware like micro data centres and software platforms for managing edge networks. The demand for edge solutions is opening opportunities for businesses to offer innovative products and services in sectors ranging from healthcare to retail, where real-time data processing is becoming more critical.

Edge computing is becoming a foundational technology, revolutionising industries by enabling faster data processing, reducing latency, and unlocking new possibilities in real-time decision-making. As this trend grows, it will not only change the way businesses handle data but also create new opportunities for innovation in tech infrastructure and localised services.

Case Study: The European Union’s AI Act – Shaping Ethical AI Regulation

The European Union has taken a global lead in AI regulation, with its AI Act establishing one of the world’s first legal frameworks for AI deployment. This act is designed to ensure that AI is used ethically across all sectors, focusing on high-risk applications such as healthcare, transportation, and public safety. By prioritising transparency, accountability, and fairness, the EU is pushing companies to comply with stringent guidelines, thereby addressing societal concerns related to bias, privacy, and safety in AI systems. The AI Act represents a major step forward in balancing innovation with responsibility in AI development.

Trend 4: The Global Tech Talent Shortage

Despite rapid advancements in technology, the demand for skilled tech professionals continues to outpace supply, creating a significant challenge for companies across industries. As businesses increasingly rely on digital transformation, the need for experts in fields like AI, cybersecurity, data science, and software development has never been greater. However, the competition for these highly specialised roles is intensifying, leading to a global tech talent shortage. To address this gap, companies are focusing on upskilling programs, adopting no-code and low-code platforms, and exploring global talent pools to stay competitive in an evolving market.

Why This Will Disrupt:

  • Drives the adoption of automation tools to bridge the talent gap: With fewer tech professionals available, companies are turning to automation tools to handle repetitive tasks and optimise workflows. Technologies like AI and machine learning are increasingly being used to supplement human workforces, enabling companies to maintain productivity while navigating the shortage of skilled talent.
  • Increases competition for top talent, raising salaries and benefits: As companies vie for a limited pool of qualified tech professionals, compensation packages are becoming more competitive. High salaries, flexible work arrangements, and attractive benefits are being offered to lure top talent, which is driving up labour costs. For tech companies, this creates both a challenge and an opportunity to attract the best minds in the industry.
  • Forces companies to innovate workforce strategies and expand talent pipelines globally: To mitigate the talent shortage, companies are exploring new strategies for sourcing and retaining talent. This includes expanding their search beyond traditional markets and embracing global talent pools. Furthermore, companies are increasingly investing in programs to upskill existing employees, fostering a culture of continuous learning and adaptability within their workforce.

The global tech talent shortage is reshaping how companies recruit, train, and manage their workforce. As businesses face this critical challenge, they must adapt by embracing automation, investing in talent development, and expanding their reach to global talent pools. This shift will have lasting effects on the tech industry and the broader economy as companies continue to innovate to meet the growing demand for skilled professionals.

Case Study: Upwork – Bridging the Global Tech Talent Gap

Upwork, a leading freelancing platform, addresses the global tech talent shortage by connecting businesses with skilled professionals worldwide. Upwork’s AI-driven matching system allows companies to find the right tech talent—whether developers, data scientists, or other specialists—regardless of their geographic location. This flexible, on-demand workforce solution is helping organisations bridge the talent gap and scale quickly in a competitive market. By tapping into a global network of tech professionals, Upwork is helping companies overcome the challenges posed by the shortage of skilled workers, making it an essential platform in today’s tech-driven economy.

Final Thoughts

These four trends—quantum computing, AI ethics, edge computing, and the global tech talent shortage—represent a paradigm shift in the technology industry. As businesses adapt to the increasing pace of change, they will need to be agile and forward-thinking to stay ahead of the curve. Embracing innovation will be key to success, but companies must also address significant challenges, such as ethical AI development and workforce shortages, to build sustainable growth in this rapidly evolving landscape. To stay ahead of the disruptions on the horizon, it’s crucial for businesses to explore these trends and adapt their strategies accordingly. Subscribe to Connecting the Dots, our monthly e-newsletter, for deeper insights and strategies that will help you navigate these changes and prepare for the future of technology. Stay informed, stay inspired, and stay competitive.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The food and beverage industry, a cornerstone of everyday life, is undergoing rapid transformation as it adapts to shifting consumer demands and global challenges. As consumers become more health-conscious, sustainability-driven, and focused on convenience, the industry is being forced to innovate and meet these evolving expectations. In a world where wellness, sustainability, and speed are increasingly valued, the food and beverage sector is embracing new solutions to stay competitive.

In this blog, we will explore four key trends that are set to disrupt the food and beverage industry in 2025: the rise of plant-based and alternative proteins, the growing popularity of functional foods, the push for sustainable packaging and practices, and the integration of technology to deliver hyper-convenience. Each of these trends is not just a response to consumer demand but a reflection of broader societal shifts toward sustainability, health, and efficiency.

Trend 1: Plant-Based and Alternative Proteins Dominate

Plant-based proteins and lab-grown alternatives are no longer niche products—they are quickly becoming mainstream. In 2025, these protein sources are expected to dominate the food and beverage industry as consumers increasingly prioritise sustainability, animal welfare, and health benefits. With growing awareness of the environmental impact of animal agriculture, plant-based and lab-grown proteins offer an appealing alternative for consumers who seek ethical and health-conscious food options.

This shift will disrupt the industry by forcing traditional meat and dairy producers to innovate or risk losing market share to plant-based and lab-grown protein startups. The rise of alternative proteins will create opportunities for these startups to scale their operations and introduce more innovative protein solutions to the market. Additionally, supply chains will need to adapt to accommodate new ingredients, production methods, and distribution models, requiring major changes in how food is produced and delivered.

As these alternative proteins continue to evolve, they will reshape the global food system, influencing everything from agriculture to manufacturing processes and consumer behavior.

Case Study: V2food’s Plant-Based Meat Revolution in Australia

V2food, an Australian company founded in 2019, specialises in plant-based meat alternatives made from Australian-grown ingredients. Their mission is to create a sustainable version of meat to help feed the world’s rapidly growing population.

The company offers a range of products, including burgers, mince, sausages, schnitzels, and ready meals, all designed to provide the same protein as beef. V2food’s products are available at hundreds of outlets across Australia, including major retailers like Woolworths and Coles.

In 2020, V2food launched ready-made meals in Woolworths stores nationwide, furthering its product innovation and making plant-based eating more accessible. The company emphasises affordability to ensure mass-market appeal, aiming to make plant-based options accessible to a wide audience.

V2food’s commitment to sustainability and innovation positions it as a leader in the plant-based meat sector, catering to the growing demand for ethical and health-conscious food choices.

Research-brief

Trend 2: Functional Foods for Wellness

Functional foods, designed to support specific health goals such as improving gut health, boosting immunity, and enhancing mental well-being, are becoming increasingly popular in the food and beverage industry. Consumers are more health-conscious than ever, looking for products that not only nourish but also offer specific benefits, such as stress relief, cognitive function, or digestive health. Ingredients like probiotics, adaptogens, and nootropics are gaining traction in packaged foods and beverages, transforming everyday food choices into tools for holistic health.

This trend is set to disrupt the industry by increasing the demand for scientifically backed health claims in product marketing. As consumers seek more than just nourishment from their food, there is pressure on companies to provide clear, credible evidence that their products deliver on their promises. Furthermore, this growing focus on wellness is encouraging closer collaboration between food producers and the healthcare sector, blending nutrition with science to create better consumer experiences.

For brands, these products appeal to a market segment that values preventative health and well-being, representing a significant growth opportunity for brands that can deliver innovative, health-promoting solutions.

Case Study: OLIPOP’s Innovative Approach to Functional Beverages

OLIPOP, founded in 2018 by Ben Goodwin and David Lester, is an American beverage company specialising in prebiotic sodas designed to support digestive health. These beverages combine traditional herbal remedies with modern science to create functional drinks that promote gut health. Each 12-ounce can contain 9 grams of dietary fibre and 2 to 5 grams of sugar, offering a healthier alternative to traditional sodas.

The brand has experienced significant growth, with sales exceeding $200 million in 2023. OLIPOP is now available in over 25,000 stores across the United States, including major retailers like Target and Costco.

The company offers a variety of flavours, including Vintage Cola, Root Beer, and Peaches & Cream, catering to diverse consumer preferences.

OLIPOP’s success highlights a growing consumer interest in functional beverages that support health and wellness. By combining the familiar taste of soda with beneficial ingredients, OLIPOP has tapped into a market seeking healthier alternatives without sacrificing flavour. The brand’s rapid expansion and popularity underscore the potential for innovation in the beverage industry, particularly in the functional food sector.

Trend 3: Sustainable Packaging and Practices

Eco-conscious consumers are increasingly demanding that brands adopt sustainable packaging and reduce food waste, driving a significant shift across industries. Compostable materials, reusable containers, and carbon-neutral supply chains are becoming essential elements of responsible business practices. As environmental concerns continue to rise, businesses in the food and beverage industry must rethink how they design, package, and distribute their products to align with sustainability goals.

This trend will disrupt the market by adding pressure on brands to invest in sustainable innovations. Companies that fail to meet the growing consumer demand for eco-friendly products risk losing market share to competitors who prioritise sustainability. The rise of eco-conscious purchasing decisions is causing brands to rethink their packaging strategies, encouraging the use of materials that are both environmentally friendly and cost-efficient. However, balancing cost with environmental responsibility presents new challenges. 

As sustainability becomes a key differentiator, brands must navigate these complexities while maintaining profitability and responding to consumer demands for both sustainability and value.

Case Study: UpCircle’s Sustainable Skincare Revolution

UpCircle, founded in 2016 in the United Kingdom, is a pioneering skincare brand committed to sustainability and environmental responsibility. The company specialises in repurposing natural by-products from various industries, such as coffee grounds, apricot stones, and date seeds, transforming them into high-quality skincare products. This innovative approach not only reduces waste but also offers consumers effective, eco-friendly beauty solutions.

The brand’s dedication to sustainability extends beyond product formulation. UpCircle utilises 100% recyclable packaging, primarily made from glass and aluminium, minimising plastic use. They have implemented a “Return, Refill, Reuse” scheme, encouraging customers to return empty containers for refilling, thereby reducing packaging waste. Additionally, UpCircle is a certified Plastic Negative brand, meaning they remove more ocean-bound plastic than their packaging uses.

UpCircle’s innovative approach has garnered recognition in the beauty industry. Their products have been featured in various beauty reviews, highlighting their effectiveness and commitment to sustainability. For instance, a recent review praised UpCircle’s Cleansing Face Balm and Face Serum for improving skin texture and appearance, noting the brand’s dedication to using repurposed ingredients and recyclable packaging.

By integrating sustainability into every aspect of their business model—from ingredient sourcing to packaging and customer engagement—UpCircle sets a benchmark for eco-conscious beauty brands. Their holistic approach demonstrates that environmental responsibility and product efficacy can coexist, offering consumers a compelling choice in the skincare market.

dining-personas

Trend 4: Hyper-Convenience with Tech Integration

The growing demand for convenience is reshaping the food industry as technology continues to integrate into food delivery, meal kits, and retail experiences. AI-driven platforms, robotics, and automation revolutionise how consumers access, order, and prepare food. From smart refrigerators and voice-activated ordering to automated kitchens and delivery drones, technology is enabling faster, more personalised food experiences. Consumers now expect their meals to be prepared and delivered quickly, often with tailored options that match their tastes, dietary preferences, and schedules.

This trend will disrupt the industry by increasing competition for traditional food retailers, who must adapt to tech-enabled startups that offer convenience and efficiency. As automated systems and personalised experiences redefine the dining and shopping experience, restaurants and food retailers will need to invest in advanced infrastructure to meet growing expectations for speed, convenience, and customisation. 

The shift toward hyper-convenience also creates opportunities for innovation in meal delivery and grocery shopping, setting the stage for future advancements in the food tech space.

Case Study: Kiwi Campus – Revolutionising Food Delivery with Autonomous Robots

Kiwi Campus, a tech startup based in the United States, is transforming the food delivery industry by using autonomous robots to provide efficient, contactless service on university campuses. The company’s Kiwibots are designed to navigate sidewalks and streets, delivering food directly to students, faculty, and staff. This innovative approach not only reduces the need for human delivery drivers but also offers a sustainable, fast, and cost-effective solution for last-mile delivery.

Kiwi Campus’s autonomous robots are equipped with advanced AI and navigation systems that enable them to identify obstacles, find optimal delivery routes, and safely deliver food to customers. The company operates primarily in university settings, where the dense population and high demand for food delivery make it an ideal environment for robots.

Through its integration of AI-driven robots, Kiwi Campus has successfully enhanced the food delivery experience by offering a seamless, efficient, and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional methods. The company has expanded from its initial pilot program at UC Berkeley to other campuses, demonstrating the potential for robotics in revolutionising urban delivery systems.

By leveraging cutting-edge technology, Kiwi Campus exemplifies how automation and AI can disrupt traditional industries, offering a glimpse into the future of food delivery services.

Final Thoughts

The food and beverage industry is being reshaped by evolving consumer values and rapid technological advancements. Trends such as plant-based proteins, functional foods, sustainable packaging, and hyper-convenience are redefining consumer expectations, emphasising health, sustainability, and convenience. These shifts demand that brands remain agile and innovative to capitalise on new opportunities while adapting to market disruptions. The ability to innovate and stay ahead of these changes is crucial for businesses aiming to succeed in an increasingly competitive landscape.

For more insights into the latest trends and strategies shaping the future of the food and beverage industry, subscribe to Connecting the Dots, our monthly e-newsletter. Stay informed, stay inspired, and lead the change in your industry.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.