A pair of limited-edition sneakers sells out in seconds. A countdown timer warns shoppers to buy now—or miss out. An influencer teases an exclusive event, restricted to a select few. Despite a surplus of consumer choices, brands are making products deliberately harder to buy.

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO—the fear of missing out—have become core strategies in modern marketing, shaping how consumers shop and perceive value. What once seemed like organic demand is now carefully engineered. From luxury brands restricting supply to streaming services pulling content after 24 hours, the result is the same: consumers feel pressured to act before it’s too late.

How did brands turn psychology into a marketing machine? And when does persuasion cross into manipulation? As companies refine these tactics, the ethics of influence are becoming harder to ignore.

Why Consumers React to Scarcity, Urgency, and FOMO

Consumers like to believe they make rational decisions, weighing options and choosing what best fits their needs. The reality? Decisions are often driven by instinct. Scarcity, urgency, and fear exploit cognitive biases, triggering impulse rather than logic.

Scarcity: The Fear of Limited Supply
Nothing fuels demand like the illusion of rarity. When something is harder to get, it feels more valuable. Behavioural economist Richard Thaler’s research supports this: scarcity drives desire. Luxury brands have perfected the game. Hermès doesn’t limit Birkin bag production due to material shortages—it’s a strategy to keep the bags exclusive. Tech companies use the same approach. PlayStation 5’s perpetual “out of stock” status during launch wasn’t just supply chain issues—it kept consumers hooked, waiting for their moment to buy.

Urgency: The Pressure of Time
Hesitation feels like a loss when the clock is ticking. The Zeigarnik Effect, a psychological tendency to remember unfinished tasks, drives consumers to complete a purchase before the window closes. E-commerce platforms have perfected this trigger. Amazon’s “Lightning Deals” refresh hourly, urging shoppers to act fast. Travel sites flash “Only 2 rooms left!” warnings to heighten anxiety. The result? Split-second decisions with little time for second thoughts.

FOMO: The Power of Social Influence
Social media has turned FOMO into a marketing force. Seeing friends attend exclusive events or snag limited drops triggers an urgency no ad campaign can match. Snapchat and Instagram Stories disappear after 24 hours, making users compulsively check-in. Brands engineer this further with invitation-only product launches – think Clubhouse’s early-access model or Supreme’s drop culture. The goal isn’t just to sell; it’s to make consumers feel they’re part of something others can’t have.

Brands That Have Mastered Psychological Triggers

Some brands don’t just use scarcity, urgency, and FOMO; they’ve built their entire business models around them. They’ve turned these psychological levers into powerful revenue drivers by engineering desire and controlling access.

Hermès: The Art of Scarcity
No waiting lists. No online checkout. No guarantee of purchase even if you can afford it. The Hermès Birkin bag isn’t just a handbag; it’s a masterclass in controlled scarcity. By severely limiting production and requiring buyers to develop relationships with sales associates, Hermès ensures demand always outstrips supply. The result? A resale market where Birkins appreciate like investments, sometimes selling for double their retail price. In an industry where most items eventually go on sale, Hermès has made being unable to buy its product the ultimate status symbol.

Amazon: Urgency at Scale
E-commerce thrives on speed, and Amazon has utilised urgency better than anyone. Limited-time “Lightning Deals,” countdown timers, and messages like “Only 3 left in stock!” nudge consumers toward checkout. Prime Day, the company’s annual shopping event, is a prime example of when millions of deals disappear within hours, pushing shoppers to act fast. Amazon sells the anxiety of missing out on a bargain.

Supreme: FOMO in Its Purest Form
Supreme’s business model is built on hype. The streetwear brand’s infamous “drops” happen weekly, with products selling out in minutes, sometimes seconds. By keeping supply deliberately low and collaborating with high-profile brands, Supreme fuels a cycle of exclusivity and demand. Fans don’t just buy Supreme; they line up for hours to compete for the chance. With a resale market where items often fetch triple their original price, the brand has turned FOMO into a profitable ecosystem of scarcity-driven desire.

Social Commerce Meets FOMO with TikTok Shop:
TikTok has taken FOMO-driven shopping to a new level. By integrating e-commerce directly into its platform, the app encourages impulse purchases through time-sensitive deals and influencer-driven recommendations. “Only available for the next 24 hours” captions, live shopping events, and viral trends create a sense of now-or-never urgency. The difference? Consumers aren’t just buying from brands – they’re buying because their favourite creators make them feel like they’ll miss out if they don’t.

These brands are selling access, exclusivity, and the psychological rush of securing something before it’s gone. However, as consumers become more aware of these tactics, brands must ask themselves: how long before urgency turns into exhaustion?

Where Do Brands Draw the Line?

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO are undeniably effective, but when does persuasion cross into manipulation? As brands push these psychological triggers harder, consumers are starting to push back.

Artificial Scarcity – Manufacturing Hype or Deception?
Not all scarcity is real. Some brands intentionally create stock shortages to generate buzz, only to quietly restock later. Luxury brands have long used this tactic, but now, even fast-fashion and tech companies are adopting it. Many product releases “sell out” in minutes, only reappearing later on resale platforms at inflated prices. The illusion of exclusivity works, but at what cost? Consumers are growing wary of brands that manufacture demand rather than earn it.

Urgency Fatigue – When Consumers Stop Caring
Constant countdown timers, flashing “limited stock” warnings, and one-day-only deals can lose their impact when overused. Studies show that consumers who repeatedly encounter false urgency eventually stop responding. Travel booking sites have faced regulatory scrutiny for exaggerating scarcity and listing “only one room left” when more are available. When urgency becomes routine rather than real, brands risk credibility.

FOMO Burnout – The Mental Toll on Consumers
Social media-driven FOMO isn’t just a marketing tool; it’s an emotional trigger. The pressure to stay ahead, secure the latest drop, or participate in an exclusive event can lead to anxiety and compulsive spending. A survey by Credit Karma found that nearly 40% of millennials have gone into debt because of FOMO-fueled purchases. Brands that lean too heavily on this strategy risk alienating consumers who feel manipulated rather than empowered.

Regulation and Consumer Backlash
Regulators are beginning to crack down. The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has fined companies for misleading urgency tactics. In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has warned brands against deceptive scarcity claims. Consumers, too, are becoming more vocal, calling out brands for fake limited editions and “forever sales.”

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO can drive engagement, but brands that misuse these tactics risk long-term damage. Once lost, trust is difficult to regain. The challenge now is clear: how can brands create real value?

How Brands Can Apply Psychological Triggers Effectively

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO aren’t inherently unethical when used correctly, they can enhance customer experience, create meaningful engagement, and drive sales without alienating consumers. The key is authenticity. Brands that use these psychological triggers responsibly build stronger relationships with their audience, while those that rely on deception risk losing credibility.

Authentic Scarcity – When Limited Means Limited
Consumers can spot artificial scarcity. If a product is marketed as exclusive but keeps reappearing, trust erodes. Instead, brands should create real constraints, whether through limited production runs, seasonal availability, or exclusive collaborations. Hermès maintains exclusivity by restricting supply, while high-end automotive brands use limited releases to sustain long-term desirability.

Strategic Urgency – Pressure Without Manipulation
Urgency works best when it feels natural, not forced. Time-sensitive promotions should be genuine, like early-bird event pricing, flash sales with clear expiration dates, or rewards for loyal customers who act quickly. Travel companies, after facing scrutiny for misleading urgency tactics, are shifting toward more transparent messaging, highlighting real-time booking trends rather than fabricating scarcity.

FOMO-Driven Engagement – Creating Experiences, Not Just Sales
FOMO doesn’t have to be about fear; it can be about excitement and belonging. Brands that foster community-driven experiences see long-term success. Exclusive memberships, VIP access, and interactive product launches tap into the power of FOMO while providing real value. For instance, TikTok’s live shopping feature blends urgency with entertainment, encouraging consumers to engage rather than feel pressured.

The Long Game – Balancing Demand with Trust
Short-term sales tactics can generate immediate results, but brands that rely too heavily on them risk fatigue. The most successful companies use scarcity, urgency, and FOMO sparingly, ensuring that when they do, it feels special. Transparency is key. If consumers understand why a product is limited, why a sale is ending, or why an offer is exclusive, they’re more likely to trust the brand and return for future purchases.

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO are some of the most powerful marketing tools, but their real strength lies in their use. Brands that use them responsibly will not only drive conversions but also build lasting loyalty in a market where trust is harder to earn than ever.

keeping-up-with-Gen-z

The Future of Scarcity, Urgency, and FOMO in Marketing

As consumers grow savvier, brands must rethink how they use psychological triggers. The old playbook – endless countdown timers, fake exclusivity, and misleading urgency – no longer works. Trust is becoming the new currency, and brands that misuse these tactics risk long-term damage.

AI-Driven Personalisation – The Next Evolution of Urgency
Instead of blasting the same urgency messages to everyone, brands now leverage AI to make scarcity and FOMO feel personal. E-commerce platforms analyze browsing habits and purchase history to create dynamic, hyper-targeted urgency. Rather than generic “Only 3 left in stock!” alerts, AI can now tell a shopper, “This item has been viewed 200 times in the past hour by customers in your city.” This shift makes urgency more relevant and harder to ignore.

Web3 and Digital Scarcity – The New Luxury?
Blockchain is reshaping the concept of exclusivity. NFTs, tokenised memberships, and limited digital assets are turning scarcity into a verified, traceable feature rather than a marketing gimmick. In fashion and entertainment, brands are experimenting with “phygital” drops, where limited-edition physical products are tied to digital ownership, making them impossible to replicate or mass-produce. The result? Scarcity that is verifiable, not just implied.

The Consumer Backlash: Brands Walking a Fine Line
Consumers are pushing back against overused urgency tactics. The rise of anti-FOMO movements, such as the slow fashion trend, conscious consumerism, and “buy less, buy better” messaging, signals a shift away from impulse-driven spending. Brands that continue to rely on aggressive scarcity marketing without delivering real value could find themselves losing consumer trust.

The Shift Toward Ethical Marketing
Regulations will only get stricter, and consumer expectations will only rise. The future belongs to brands that create demand without deception – companies that balance excitement with authenticity. Whether through genuine exclusivity, AI-powered personalisation, or blockchain-backed scarcity, the next wave of marketing won’t be about forcing consumers to act. It will be about making them want to.

Urgency still matters with fleeting attention spans. But in the future, the most successful brands will not just create FOMO – they’ll create something worth waiting for.

The Fine Line Between Influence and Manipulation

Scarcity, urgency, and FOMO have shaped modern marketing, but they are no longer foolproof tactics. Consumers today are more informed, more sceptical, and less willing to be pressured into making purchases. The brands that continue to rely on outdated urgency tricks risk alienating their audience, while those that evolve will be the ones that thrive.

The future of marketing isn’t about manufacturing demand; it’s about meeting it in smarter ways. Real scarcity, backed by transparent supply constraints. Urgency that reflects genuine time-sensitive value, not fabricated pressure. FOMO that fuels community and belonging rather than consumer anxiety.

The brands that win in this landscape will be the ones that recognise a simple truth: consumers don’t just want to buy; they want to believe. And belief is built on trust, not tricks.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

If you could understand and influence human emotion, could you use this ability to increase sales and identify the most compelling advertisements, the perfect price point, or the most flawless product mix? 

While advertisers, psychologists, and salespeople have understood this connection for years, only a few have been able to use it to their advantage. Fortunately, neuromarketing is putting the ability to understand consumer behaviour and create compelling marketing tactics into the hands of many. 

In the modern business landscape, with constantly changing consumer preferences, companies must understand what drives consumer behaviour to stay ahead of the curve. 

“People buy on emotion and justify on logic.” Zig Ziglar 

Recent research has revealed that emotional decisions are not irrational or flawed, and our unconscious mind has its own logic. It processes millions of bits of data seamlessly without becoming overwhelmed, unlike our conscious mind, which has a bottleneck due to the limited capacity of our working memory to process only 3-4 pieces of new information at a time. 

However, the unconscious mind’s brilliance stems from its lifetime of learning from our successes and failures, and it makes decisions based on heuristics that have evolved. These decisions are often successful, leading experts to rely on their intuition or “gut feelings.”

The Iowa Gambling Task study highlights the effectiveness of the emotional brain. In this study, subjects were given a fixed budget and four decks of cards to draw from to win as much money as possible. The decks were arranged so that two offered consistent wins, while the other two had high payouts but carried significant risks. Although it took about 50 cards for people to stop drawing from the dangerous deck, it was on the 80th card that they could explain why. On the other hand, the subjects’ anxiety levels were tracked using a device that measured the electrical conductance of their skin, revealing that their hand trembled when they reached for the risky deck after drawing only ten cards. Hence, our intuition or unconscious mind quickly senses danger and makes decisions. On the contrary, logic is slow.

Marketing is all about understanding and influencing consumer behaviour. For years, brands have relied on traditional market research methods to understand customers’ needs and preferences. However, with advancements in neuroscience, researchers can now use cutting-edge tools and techniques to gain deeper insights into consumer behaviour. 

This blog post will explore neuroscience applications in marketing, its history, and the tools used to study consumer behaviour. We will also discuss the use cases of neuroscience in marketing, the new methods in consumer neuroscience research, and the future of neuromarketing.

beverage-trends-report

What is neuromarketing?

Neuromarketing or Neuroscience marketing involves utilising physiological and neural data to understand the drivers behind customers’ choices, inclinations, and decisions. By applying this knowledge, brands can enhance their advertising, product development, pricing, and other marketing strategies.

As a multidisciplinary field, there are many definitions of the term, but in simple terms, it is a form of decision science applying neuroscience ideas to the marketing field. 

In a nutshell, neuroscience applications in marketing refer to using neuroscience techniques and tools to understand consumer behaviour and develop effective marketing strategies. 

The concept is based on the idea that a person’s behaviour is driven by their brain activity and that marketers can use this knowledge to create more effective marketing campaigns.

Neuromarketing and neuroeconomics have been used interchangeably, confusing their differences. Many experts consider neuromarketing a subgenre of neuroeconomics that studies neuroscience in decision-making. But others argue that neuromarketing should be considered independent since it focuses on marketing.

History and Origins of Neuroscience for understanding consumer behaviours

The origins of neuroscience can be traced back to the early 19th century when researchers began studying the nervous system’s structure and function. Over time, the field has expanded to include studying brain activity and its impact on behaviour. In the 1990s, researchers began using brain imaging techniques such as fMRI and EEG to study brain activity and its relationship to behaviour. 

The term “neuromarketing” was popularised by Dutch marketing professor Ale Smidts in 2002; however, the field’s roots date back to the 1990s when rigorous research and experimentation began. Among the pioneers was US marketing professor Gerald Zaltman, who filed a patent for the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique (ZMET) four years before the term “neuromarketing” was coined. ZMET is a marketing research tool that delves into people’s conscious and subconscious thoughts using carefully curated image sets to elicit positive emotional responses and potentially influence purchasing decisions.

The use of neuroscience in marketing began in the early 2000s, with companies like Coca-Cola and Frito-Lay using fMRI to study consumers’ responses to their products.

One of the earliest recorded neuromarketing experiments occurred at Baylor College of Medicine in 2003, led by Professor of Neuroscience Read Montague. The study was an extension of a 1975 taste test challenge between Pepsi and Coca-Cola, where participants blindly tasted and selected their preferred drink. Although the results showed Pepsi as the winner, Coca-Cola continued to dominate the cola market share. Curious, Montague repeated the experiment, using fMRI scans to track participants’ brain activity this time.

The study revealed that different parts of the brain lit up depending on whether participants were aware of the brand they were consuming. Coca-Cola triggered responses from the medial prefrontal cortex associated with attention and short-term memory. When aware of the brand, participants preferred Coca-Cola over Pepsi, but when oblivious to the brand, they preferred Pepsi, as indicated by the ventral putamen, responsible for decision-making and reward perception.

Using neuroscience tools to sweeten market research

Consumer neuroscience tools are the instruments used to study brain activity and behaviour. These include biometric tools like eye tracking, facial recognition software, and imaging tools like EEG and galvanic skin response. Each tool has its inherent strengths and limitations, and usage would depend largely on the study’s goals. 

Eye tracking

Eye tracking is a tool used to measure eye movements and gaze behaviour. It is used to study how people process visual information and can help marketers understand which elements of their advertising or website design are most effective.

Facial recognition software

Facial recognition software analyses facial expressions and emotions. It is used to study consumers’ emotional responses to products, advertising, and other marketing materials.

fMRI

Imaging techniques such as fMRI are used to measure brain activity. They study how the brain processes information and responds to various stimuli.

ECG

ECG is used to measure heart rate and heart rate variability. It is used to study the emotional response to marketing materials.

Electroencephalography

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a neuromarketing research method used to measure cognitive processes, such as calculations, to predict consumer behaviour.

Galvanic skin response

Galvanic skin response is used to measure changes in skin conductance. 

beauty-trends

Tests used to understand consumer behaviour

Neurolinguistic programming (NLP)

Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) focuses on the relationship between language, behaviour, and the brain. It operates under the belief that language can shape thoughts and emotions and that modifying language can change thoughts and emotions. NLP is commonly used in marketing research to investigate how language and framing influence consumer behaviour and decision-making. For instance, it can be used to analyse how the language used in an advertisement affects the emotional response of consumers or how presenting a product in a specific manner can impact purchasing decisions.

Implicit association tests (IATs)

Implicit association tests (IATs) are psychological assessments that measure unconscious biases and attitudes by analysing the time it takes a person to associate a particular word or image with a specific category. In marketing research, IATs are often employed to study consumer attitudes and preferences and detect potential biases in decision-making processes. For example, IATs can be conducted to examine consumer attitudes toward various brands, products, or marketing messages.

NLP and IAT can provide valuable insights into consumer behaviour and decision-making processes and can be used with other neuroscience marketing research methods. 

Uses cases and applications of Neuroscience in Marketing

Several applications of neuroscience in marketing include advertising, branding, website optimisation, pricing, product development, and product experience.

For example, eye tracking can identify the most effective placement of ads on a webpage, while facial recognition software can identify the emotional response to an ad.

New Methods in Consumer Neuroscience Research

Recent advancements in technology have opened up new avenues for consumer neuroscience research. Virtual Reality (VR) can create realistic environments for studying consumer behaviour, while mobile EEG devices allow researchers to study brain activity in real-world settings.

Another exciting development is using machine learning algorithms to analyse large datasets of brain activity. This approach can help identify patterns and relationships between brain activity and behaviour, providing deeper insights into consumer behaviour.

Limitations of neuromarketing

  • Limited Sample Size

Neuromarketing research often requires expensive equipment and specialised expertise, which limits the number of participants involved in the study. This limited sample size could lead to biased results and generalisation errors.

  • Difficulty in Interpretation
    The interpretation of brain data is a complex process requiring the expertise of specialised neuroscientists. There often needs to be explicit agreement on what a particular brain activity pattern means, which can interpret neuromarketing data as challenging.
  • Lack of Real-Life Relevance
    Most neuromarketing research is conducted in laboratories and may not accurately reflect real-world scenarios. In real-life environments, consumers’ behaviour is often influenced by several external factors, such as culture, social norms, and personal experiences.
  • High-Cost
    Neuromarketing research requires expensive equipment and specialised expertise, which can be cost-prohibitive for small and medium-sized businesses. As a result, only large corporations can afford to invest in such research.
  • Ethical Issues
    Neuromarketing research raises ethical concerns, such as the possibility of manipulating consumer behaviour and invading their privacy. Consumers may be unaware of the research’s purpose, and their data could be misused for commercial gain.

Ethical considerations

  • Informed Consent
    Consumers should be fully informed about the research’s purpose and the data collection process. They should have the right to opt out of the study and have their data removed.
  • Privacy
    Neuromarketing research involves collecting sensitive personal information, requiring adequate data security measures to prevent breaches and unauthorised access.
  • Transparency
    The results of neuromarketing research should be transparently communicated without manipulating the data or using it to mislead consumers.
  • Fairness
    Neuromarketing research should not be used to exploit vulnerable consumers or unfairly target specific groups.
  • Responsibility
    Brands should take responsibility for their actions and use neuromarketing research ethically without manipulating consumers or promoting harmful products.

The Future of Neuroscience in Market Research

With the advancement of technology, neuroscience in marketing is expected to become even more prevalent. Gaining deeper insights into consumer behaviour can help brands create more effective marketing campaigns, improve product development and enhance the overall customer experience.

However, as detailed above, there are concerns about the ethical implications of using neuroscience in marketing. Critics argue that using these techniques can be invasive and that there are potential risks to consumer privacy.

As with any technology, using neuroscience in marketing responsibly and ethically is paramount. By doing so, brands can harness the power of neuroscience to gain deeper insights into consumer behaviour while respecting consumer privacy and autonomy.

Neuroscience applications in marketing offer exciting opportunities to gain deeper insights into consumer behaviour.  As technology evolves, new consumer neuroscience research methods are emerging. The future of neuroscience in marketing looks promising, offering new ways to improve the customer experience to drive business success.

Kadence International helps leading brands make game-changing decisions. If you are looking for a research partner to help better understand your customers, we would love to help. Simply fill out our Request for a Proposal here.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.