Qualitative Research Archives

In a trade hall packed with natural food startups and plant-based hopefuls, the mushroom drinks were among the first to sell out. Odyssey’s lion’s mane “cold brew” disappeared before lunch. Popadelics’ truffle-dusted shiitake chips were gone by midday. And when the Natural Products Expo West wrapped for the year, trend watchers were left with one clear takeaway: mushrooms have stepped into the spotlight.

What was once a fringe ingredient, used mainly in traditional medicine or tucked inside a risotto, is now breaking into every aisle of the supermarket. In the past year, US retail sales of foods and drinks featuring “super mushrooms” hit 642 million dollars, rising nearly 20 per cent according to SPINS, a retail data provider specialising in natural and wellness products. Mushroom-based teas and ready-to-drink coffees surged 250 percent. Even kombucha brands have started adding lion’s mane and chaga, with that segment growing 71 percent year-on-year.

For many shoppers, the appeal is simple. These products promise benefits like focus and energy without the sugar highs or stimulant crashes. Once limited to wellness circles, mushrooms are now part of the grocery routine. They’re showing up in coffee replacements, snack packs, and evening wind-down drinks. What started as a fringe supplement is becoming a habit.

From Folk Remedy to Modern Shelf

Long before they appeared in energy drinks and snack aisles, mushrooms were prized in ancient medicine. Reishi was known as the “mushroom of immortality” in China. In Siberia, chaga was brewed to withstand winter. Even Ötzi the Iceman carried medicinal fungi over 5,000 years ago.

These weren’t culinary choices. They were tools for stamina, clarity, and resilience. Today’s mushroom boom draws from those roots—but trades folklore for sleek packaging and science-backed positioning.

Lion’s mane is now sold for memory. Cordyceps for stamina. Reishi for sleep. Some of the science is still emerging. Yet global momentum is clear. In one year, functional mushroom supplements brought in over 396 million dollars in the US alone, according to the Nutrition Business Journal.

What was once foraged is now formulated. Mushrooms are no longer a footnote in wellness. They’re becoming fixtures in grocery carts and morning routines.

The Brands Leading the Charge

Momentum in the mushroom category is not driven by a single breakout product but by a wave of innovation across beverages, snacks, supplements, and alternative proteins. This is not a health food aisle phenomenon. It is happening at scale, across national chains and direct-to-consumer platforms, with products designed to meet shoppers where they are.

In Finland, Four Sigmatic was among the first to position mushrooms as an everyday wellness tool. The company, founded by a group of foragers and biohackers, built an early following through niche communities. Today, its products are carried in over 7,000 stores across the United States, including Target, Whole Foods, Sprouts, and Walmart. Sales have surpassed 200 million dollars. Its lion’s mane coffee sachets, reishi hot cacao blends, and adaptogenic protein powders are no longer sold on novelty. They are merchandised on functionality, with new packaging focused on outcomes like “Think,” “Calm,” and “Defend.”

Odyssey Elixir, based in Los Angeles, has taken a more caffeinated path. The company produces sparkling beverages infused with lion’s mane and cordyceps, positioned as a clean energy alternative for younger consumers who are moving away from sugary sodas and synthetic ingredients. In 2023, Odyssey sold nearly 10 million cans and secured 6.3 million dollars in venture funding. Retail presence expanded rapidly, reaching over 6,000 stores, including CVS, 7-Eleven, and Publix. The brand’s founder, Scott Frohman, recalls early rejections from buyers. When Publix passed on the pitch, it was data from competitors that changed their minds and brought the brand onto shelves a few months later.

Across categories, these brands are responding to a spectrum of consumer priorities—mental focus, stress relief, indulgent snacking, and sustainable protein. Mushrooms provide a format flexible enough to meet all of them, whether brewed, blended, or jerky-dried.

In the snack aisle, Popadelics has turned shiitake mushrooms into a conversation starter. The brand launched through lifestyle marketing, placing its products in fashion boutiques and music festivals before entering grocery retail. By mid-2023, it had secured national distribution through Whole Foods. Some flavours remain backordered, a reflection of both novelty appeal and genuine demand.

Further up the supply chain, companies like Meati Foods are taking a different approach. Instead of using mushroom fruiting bodies, Meati grows mycelium, the root-like structure of fungi, as a base for alternative meat. Its steaks and cutlets are now sold in more than 7,000 stores. With more than 350 million dollars in investment and a 100,000-square-foot production facility in Colorado, the company is positioned as a contender in the race to scale sustainable protein.

These brands are not riding a single trend. They are building around a spectrum of consumer priorities, from mental focus and stress relief to indulgence and sustainable protein. Mushrooms offer a versatile base. Whether brewed, blended, baked, or dried into jerky, they are being used to create products that feel both innovative and familiar, crafted for mass retail and everyday use.

Science or Speculation

The popularity of functional mushrooms has grown faster than the body of evidence behind them. For every shopper who adds lion’s mane to their coffee for focus or chaga to a smoothie for immunity, there is still a lingering question of whether the benefits hold up under scientific scrutiny.

Research has made some progress. Lion’s mane has shown promise in small clinical studies related to cognitive support and nerve regeneration. One 2020 trial in Japan found that daily supplementation improved mild cognitive impairment among older adults. Other mushrooms have drawn interest for their immune-modulating compounds, particularly beta-glucans. In Japan, lentinan from shiitake and PSK from turkey tail are already used as adjuvant cancer therapies. These applications, however, remain outside the scope of conventional Western diets.

Image credit: Moku

In the United States, regulators have taken a cautious approach. The Food and Drug Administration has issued warning letters to brands making disease-related claims. Terms like “supports immunity” or “promotes mental clarity” are generally permitted. Anything more specific invites enforcement. This became clear in late 2024, when the agency declared Amanita muscaria, the hallucinogenic mushroom often found in “legal trip” candies and microdose gummies, as not generally recognised as safe. That designation removed the product from the food market, highlighting how quickly the line can shift between innovation and violation.

While most functional mushroom brands operate within approved boundaries, the category still lacks standardisation. There is little consistency in how extracts are processed, how doses are measured, or how active compounds are verified. This variability makes it difficult for researchers to compare outcomes, and for consumers to understand what they are buying. Experts like Dr. Julie Daoust, Chief Science Officer at M2 Ingredients, say that the future of the category will depend on clarity. “Modern wellness consumers are becoming increasingly educated,” she notes. “They want simplified products that are supported by data.”

Until more robust trials are conducted, much of the appeal will rest on experience and belief. That does not necessarily diminish the impact. In many cases, consumers are not expecting mushrooms to treat illness. They are reaching for products that feel better in the body and align with broader shifts toward clean energy, natural focus, and proactive health. For now, mushrooms sit in that quiet space between proven and promising, sold not as cure-alls, but as tools for daily performance.

Who Is Buying and Why

Functional mushrooms are no longer confined to fringe wellness circles. Today, their customer base spans from college students searching for natural focus to middle-aged parents replacing energy drinks with lion’s mane coffee. What connects them is not a demographic profile, but a shared appetite for clean-label function and the idea that food should do more than fill.

A national survey by the Nutrition Business Journal in 2024 found that 37 percent of Americans use foods or beverages enhanced with functional mushrooms. Another 27 percent report taking mushroom-based supplements. Usage is highest among Gen Z and millennials, but the interest cuts across age groups. These are not isolated early adopters. They are mainstream consumers with a growing awareness of terms like adaptogen and nootropic, many of them learning through TikTok reels or Amazon reviews rather than clinical trials.

Within that broader pool, motivations vary. Gen Z buyers are often looking for energy and focus. They are replacing sugar-heavy drinks with sparkling mushroom elixirs like Odyssey or swapping coffee for Four Sigmatic sachets that offer mental clarity without the caffeine crash. Amazon reported a 47 percent year-on-year increase in searches for adaptogens, a signal that functional terms are resonating with digital-native shoppers.

Millennials, meanwhile, are turning to mushrooms for stress support and immune resilience. The pandemic reshaped health priorities, and fungi-based products now offer a gentle, daily form of reinforcement. Reishi teas and chaga lattes are positioned as alternatives to wine or melatonin, especially for young parents navigating burnout. Familiar formats like snacks, broths, and chocolate blends continue to drive adoption.

The older end of the market is growing too. Interest in cognitive health and natural anti-inflammatory solutions is drawing Gen X and Boomers into the category. Many are less influenced by brand aesthetics and more persuaded by mainstream media coverage or endorsements from integrative doctors. When Lifeway Foods, best known for kefir, launched a mushroom beverage line in 2024, it was positioned for this segment with a focus on wellness benefits rather than trendy packaging.

These consumer groups are distinct, but the unifying thread is trust. People want to feel that what they are buying is real, purposeful, and rooted in something beyond marketing. That is part of why mushrooms, with their history in traditional medicine and visible whole-food forms, are outpacing some of the synthetic functional trends of the past decade.

The traction isn’t lost on grocers and investors. NielsenIQ reports that mushroom-containing grocery products generated over 3.4 billion dollars in US sales last year. Performance-focused segments led the charge, with sports-oriented mushroom products growing more than 30 percent. For a category that only recently stepped out of the supplement aisle, these numbers point to long-term viability—and a new kind of strategic relevance across the food and beverage industry.

As the category matures, consumer expectations are rising. Shoppers are examining ingredient sourcing, evaluating dosage, and learning to read labels more precisely. What began as a novelty has become part of the weekly grocery routine. Mushrooms are no longer just ingredients. They signal something deeper, carrying emotional meaning and delivering real benefits like focus, calm, or stamina.

The Retail Shift and Supply Chain Pressure

The popularity of mushroom-based products has not just reshaped consumer preferences. It has also forced retailers and suppliers to rethink how they categorize, source, and scale a once-afterthought food group.

In grocery stores across the United States, mushrooms have expanded beyond the produce section and supplement aisle. Retailers are building wellness-focused sets, grouping lion’s mane coffees, reishi teas, and chaga powders alongside probiotics and adaptogens. At Whole Foods, end caps now feature mushroom snacks next to CBD seltzers. Target, Walmart, CVS, and even 7-Eleven have integrated mushroom drinks into mainstream shelving. The placement is not just trend-based. It reflects strong sales and consumer pull.

This retail expansion is creating real pressure upstream. Demand for mushroom ingredients now exceeds what many producers can deliver. Lion’s mane, sought for its effects on focus and memory, grows slowly and resists easy cultivation. Cordyceps requires tightly controlled light and temperature conditions. Chaga, most commonly wild-harvested from birch trees in cold climates, can take years to reach maturity. For suppliers, this creates a bottleneck.

Image credit: Popadelics

Some companies are responding with vertical integration and tech-enabled growing systems. MyForest Foods operates a mycelium farm in New York and recently expanded to Canada, using fermentation and climate control to grow slabs of mushroom root for its alt-protein products. Meati Foods has built one of the largest mycelium production facilities in North America, capable of delivering the volume required for mass grocery distribution. These are not small experiments. Meati has received more than 350 million dollars in investment, and MyForest is scaling its AirMycelium platform to meet growing demand from CPG partners.

Yet even these systems are feeling strain. Popadelics, the mushroom chip brand now stocked in Whole Foods nationwide, has announced product backorders due to sourcing limits. As the category grows, more brands are competing for a limited supply of high-quality extracts. The result is a market where product development timelines are stretching, and price volatility is beginning to emerge.

Retailers are staying committed. Sales justify the shelf space, and consumers continue to respond to new formats and claims. But behind the merchandising, the category is in flux. Mushrooms are no longer confined to niche shelves. As they scale into commodity status, they bring new challenges in pricing, sourcing, and traceability.

Image credit Odyssey Elixir

The Fungi Future in CPG

Once a wellness niche, mushrooms have become one of the most dynamic shifts in packaged food. They tap into a rare combination: performance, familiarity, and freshness of format. As this momentum builds, the question is no longer whether functional mushrooms will remain relevant, but how far they might spread.

Across grocery aisles, mushrooms now carry the kind of meaning once reserved for probiotics or protein powders. These products are more than just ingredients. They’ve become symbols of focus, energy, and resilience. That shift moves them from fad to fixture. And mushrooms are showing signs of exactly that shift—embedded in daily routines, no longer riding novelty alone.

That shift has implications for how brands develop products and tell stories. Mushroom ingredients are already moving into formats far beyond coffee and jerky. Companies are testing fortified cereals, protein bars, and baby snacks. Lifeway Foods launched a mushroom-enhanced kefir line aimed at immune support. Alt-protein brands like Meati and MyForest are pitching fungi not as meat substitutes, but as a standalone category with its own identity. Even koji, a culinary mould used in fermented foods, is being reimagined as a flavour-forward ingredient for sauces, vegan charcuterie, and marinades.

This diversification reflects a deeper change in consumer behaviour. Shoppers are no longer driven solely by the desire for less – less sugar, meat, or caffeine. They are also seeking more. More utility, more focus, more resilience built into the rituals of daily life. Mushrooms, with their blend of medicinal history and modern formatting, speak to that shift. They align with a cultural moment focused on performance without pills and natural function without sacrifice.

What comes next is likely a wave of acquisitions and standardisation. Large CPG companies are watching closely. Some, like Danone and Constellation Brands, have already invested in adjacent wellness categories. Others are expected to move soon. As the category scales, we will see greater pressure for consistency, potency, and proof. That will mean clearer labelling, stronger supply chain traceability, and, inevitably, more clinical research. It may also mean a shakeout, as the market distinguishes between products that deliver and those that simply follow.

The fundamentals remain strong. This is a category built on tangible ingredients, measurable interest, and repeatable consumer habits. It has grown quietly, through everyday formats like coffee and snacks, not through Instagram hype. That subtle momentum may be its biggest strength. Functional mushrooms are not trying to disrupt. They are trying to last.

In a marketplace flooded with fleeting claims, mushrooms are offering something different: daily utility, steady results, and emotional resonance. They are not promising transformation. They are becoming habit. For CPG giants and startup founders alike, the question is no longer if mushrooms will lead. It is whether the rest of the aisle is ready to follow.

Understand What Today’s Consumers Really Want

From flavour innovation to functional benefits, consumer expectations are shifting fast. Our research helps CPG and food and beverage brands uncover the insights behind purchase decisions—so you can create products that resonate and endure. Kadence International is your partner in making smarter, evidence-based moves in a changing market. Submit a brief to start your project.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Every second, a huge amount of content competes for our attention—news feeds refresh, notifications alert us, and videos play automatically before we can skip them. People aren’t just scrolling through; they’re avoiding, filtering, and tuning out. This overload of information has made our attention very valuable. Recent studies indicate the average human attention span has dwindled to approximately 8 seconds, a significant drop from 12 seconds in 2000.

The implications for brands are staggering. A compelling campaign isn’t enough. A perfectly crafted message can still vanish if it fails to break through in the milliseconds it takes for a consumer to swipe away. There was a time when audiences were captive, and brand interactions were deliberate. That world no longer exists.

Market research is undergoing a major shift to decode real engagement. The industry is moving beyond self-reported preferences to track subconscious reactions, micro-movements, and real-time behavioural data. The goal? To measure not just what consumers say they notice but what captures their focus and drives action.

The Science of Attention – How Consumers Engage Today

Attention is multifaceted – layered, fragmented, and perpetually shifting. Consumers don’t merely watch, listen, or read; they skim, multitask, and filter. What seizes their focus momentarily may not register in memory, while seemingly trivial details might linger.

Researchers categorise attention into distinct types, each influencing brand engagement strategies:

Sustained Attention: The gold standard – deep, uninterrupted focus. Rare in today’s digital world, but invaluable. Think long-form podcasts, binge-worthy series, or an immersive gaming experience.
Selective Attention: The ability to filter out noise and focus on what matters. Algorithms fuel this, curating feeds so that only the most relevant content makes it through.
Divided Attention: The consumer is in multitasking mode, scrolling Instagram while half-listening to a podcast or watching TV with their phone in their hands.
Captive vs. Voluntary Attention: Some interactions are forced like unskippable ads. Others are earned like the type TikTok users actively seek out.

The shift is clear: brands aren’t just competing against competitors. They’re up against the entire digital ecosystem: social media, streaming platforms, instant messaging, and news alerts.

The challenge for market research is no longer just understanding consumer preferences but tracking real, unconscious engagement in a landscape designed to distract.

Rethinking Engagement Beyond Traditional Metrics

Traditional market research remains essential as it provides critical insights into consumer sentiment, preferences, and decision-making. However, in a world where attention is increasingly fragmented, the industry is evolving to complement established methods with new, real-time behavioural tracking.

Self-reported data, surveys, and focus groups still offer valuable context, helping brands understand why consumers think and feel a certain way. But what people say they engage with doesn’t always reflect their actual behaviour. Attention is often subconscious, shaped by instinct rather than intent.

New approaches bridge this gap by capturing real-time consumer engagement:

Eye-tracking and facial coding: Brands analyze where people’s eyes linger and how their expressions shift during ad exposure.
Biometric response analysis: Sensors detect physiological reactions like heart rate spikes and micro-expressions to measure subconscious attention.
AI-powered engagement tracking: Algorithms process scrolling behaviour, click patterns, and swipe speeds to assess content effectiveness.

This evolution isn’t about replacing traditional research; it’s about enhancing it. By integrating behavioural tracking with established methodologies, brands gain a full-spectrum view of consumer attention from stated preferences to real-world interactions.

How Brands Are Measuring Attention in Real Time

Leading brands no longer rely solely on traditional engagement metrics. They are leveraging behavioural data and AI-driven insights to track real consumer attention. These brands aren’t guessing what captures attention – they’re measuring it in real-time. By analyzing subconscious reactions and micro-engagement patterns, they ensure content isn’t just seen but retains focus.

Netflix: AI-Driven A/B Testing on Thumbnails
Netflix continuously experiments with different cover images for the same show to determine which visuals drive the most engagement. Through AI-powered A/B testing, the platform assesses user behaviour, tracking which thumbnails attract clicks and sustain interest. This data-driven approach maximises viewer retention, ensuring the most compelling artwork is displayed for each user based on browsing history and preferences.
Nike: Eye-Tracking for Ad Optimisation
Nike employs eye-tracking technology to study how consumers visually engage with video advertisements. Research reveals that high-energy action shots hold attention longer than static branding moments. By embedding logos and brand elements within dynamic sequences, Nike ensures its messaging remains visible even in a distracted viewing environment.

Strategies for Brands to Capture and Sustain Attention

Thriving in the attention economy requires more than visibility; it’s about maintaining focus long enough to inspire action. With audiences filtering content at unprecedented speeds, brands must employ intelligent, research-backed strategies to ensure meaningful and lasting engagement.

Hyper-Personalisation- Tailoring Content to Individual Preferences
Consumers have little patience for generic messaging. AI-driven platforms like Amazon utilise machine learning to analyze purchase history and browsing behaviour, delivering personalised product recommendations that align with individual user interests. This level of customisation enhances customer satisfaction and drives sales by presenting relevant items to shoppers.
The Strategic Deployment of Short-Form vs. Long-Form Content
Platforms such as TikTok and Instagram Reels demonstrate that concise, bite-sized content excels at capturing initial attention. Conversely, long-form content, like in-depth articles or documentaries, can cultivate deep engagement when audiences are genuinely interested. The key lies in discerning when and where audiences are most receptive to each format, a determination made possible through advanced market research techniques, including passive data collection and behavioural tracking.
Attention-Optimised Creative – Pre-Launch Testing
Every moment of content is valuable. With consumers filtering content at lightning speed, brands must ensure their messaging lands effectively before launching full-scale campaigns. Mars Inc. uses AI to evaluate how effective ads will be before they are launched, making sure important branding matches what the audience pays attention to.

Pre-launch attention testing, powered by neuromarketing and AI, is becoming a standard practice for brands aiming to maximise impact.

Case Study: How Mars Inc. Uses AI to Optimise Ad Effectiveness

Image Credit: Media Week

Background

As one of the world’s largest confectionery companies, Mars Inc. operates in a highly competitive industry where brand recall directly influences purchase decisions. Traditional ad testing methods provided valuable insights, but Mars recognised the need for a more precise, predictive approach to ensure its advertisements resonated before launch.

Approach

Mars developed Agile Creative Expertise (ACE), an AI-powered ad-testing tool designed to measure consumer attention, engagement, and emotional response in real-time. Unlike conventional research methods, ACE integrates biometric and behavioural analytics to refine ad content before it reaches audiences. The system leverages:

Eye-tracking technology to pinpoint where viewers focus their attention.
Facial coding analysis to measure emotional engagement with ad elements.
Machine learning models to predict, with 85% accuracy, whether an ad will drive sales.

By deploying these tools during the creative process, Mars ensures every ad is optimised for maximum impact, reducing wasted ad spend and enhancing message retention.

Outcome

Mars has successfully transformed its ad optimisation process by combining AI-driven insights with behavioural research. The results include:

More effective storytelling and branding placement, ensuring key messages are absorbed.
Improved return on ad spend (ROAS) by prioritising only the most impactful ad creatives.
Reduced reliance on post-campaign analysis, as ad effectiveness is determined before launch.

By integrating AI-powered pre-launch testing, Mars has redefined how brands measure and optimise consumer attention, setting a new benchmark for data-driven advertising.

The Future of Market Research in the Attention Economy

As consumer behaviour evolves, so must the methods used to understand it. The next frontier of market research goes beyond measuring what captures attention. It will predict why and how attention shifts in real time, helping brands stay ahead of fleeting engagement trends.

Beyond Clicks and Views – Deeper Engagement Metrics
Traditional engagement metrics like click-through rates and impressions offer a surface-level view of attention. The future lies in measuring dwell time, gaze duration, and interaction depth – metrics that reveal not just whether the content was seen but whether it made an impact.
AI and Predictive Attention Modeling
AI-driven research tools will forecast attention patterns based on historical and real-time behavioural data. Based on predictive analytics, brands can test content effectiveness before it launches, optimising design, messaging, and placement.
Ethical Considerations and Balancing Personalisation with Privacy
Transparency and ethical research practices will be critical as brands collect more granular engagement data. Consumers are increasingly aware of how their data is used, and regulatory shifts, such as stricter data protection laws, will shape how attention-based analytics are implemented. Striking the right balance between hyper-personalisation and privacy will define the next era of market research.

Attention is no longer optional; it’s the foundation of effective marketing. Consumers are overwhelmed with choices, and their focus is fragmented across multiple screens, platforms, and moments. Brands that assume visibility equals engagement are missing the bigger picture. Being seen isn’t the same as being remembered.

Brands that invest in cutting-edge research methodologies will not only capture fleeting focus but convert attention into lasting engagement and brand loyalty in an economy where attention is the most valuable currency.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Japan has one of the longest life expectancies in the world. Yet many of its citizens skip the dentist until something hurts, and the results are catching up with them.

While the country’s universal health insurance system provides broad access to dental treatments, from fillings to oral surgery, preventive habits remain inconsistent. Japan’s universal health insurance covers dental treatment, but preventive habits lag behind. According to the Japan Dental Association, fewer than half of adults (46 percent) go for dental checkups, while more than a third seek care only when symptoms appear. These figures are echoed by a February 2025 nationwide survey conducted by our sister company, Cross Marketing Inc., which collected responses from 2,400 Japanese adults aged 20 to 79. The findings reveal a striking paradox: most people believe in daily care, but few follow through with checkups. Even fewer recognise how oral health connects to heart disease or dementia.

As Japan’s population ages, this disconnect between belief and behaviour has wide-reaching implications. Oral health is increasingly recognised as a key component of healthy ageing and quality of life. Yet, without deeper integration into public health planning and broader cultural shifts, preventive oral care risks remaining an afterthought in one of the world’s most advanced healthcare systems.

Japan’s Healthcare Landscape — A System Built on Access but Facing New Pressures

Japan’s healthcare system has long been regarded as one of the most efficient and equitable in the world. With universal coverage since 1961, residents enjoy broad access to medical care at relatively low cost. Life expectancy is approximately 84.5 years, and health outcomes such as infant mortality and preventable hospitalisations remain among the best globally.

Dental care is included within this system. Most restorative procedures, oral surgeries, and prosthetic treatments are covered under public insurance, requiring only modest co-payments. However, preventive dental care tells a different story. While schoolchildren must undergo routine checkups and some employees receive dental screenings through their workplaces, many working-age adults fall outside of regular preventive protocols. Those in their 20s and 30s are particularly affected, with no mandated checkups and limited incentives to seek early care.

Utilisation of dental services also varies by region. Rural areas and lower-income prefectures report lower access to periodontal treatment and fewer outreach initiatives. These inequalities are compounded by disparities in health literacy, particularly around the long-term benefits of preventive oral care.

The consequences of inconsistent dental habits are becoming more visible with Japan’s ageing population. In long-term care facilities, elderly patients often suffer from complications related to poor oral hygiene, including dry mouth, tooth loss, malnutrition, and aspiration pneumonia. Although Japan’s healthcare system is structurally equipped to support preventive dental care, it has yet to embed it into everyday health behaviour across all age groups and regions.

Top Concerns Reflect Cosmetic Anxiety and Age-Linked Decline

When asked about their primary concerns related to oral health, Japanese adults overwhelmingly pointed to issues with appearance and daily discomfort. Topping the list were tartar buildup, stained teeth, and the sensation of food getting stuck — issues that reflect cosmetic discomfort more than a serious health risk.

These are not necessarily signs of poor health but reflect a desire for cleanliness, freshness, and cosmetic upkeep.

Tartar and tooth stains top the list, while gum and periodontal issues dominate among older respondents.

The focus on appearance was especially pronounced among respondents in their 40s, where concerns about tooth colouration were highest. By contrast, ageing-associated issues — such as gum disease and thinning gums — were most common among people in their 50s, 60s, and 70s. Gum-related problems became far more common with age, especially among older adults, indicating a shift from cosmetic to functional and medical concerns with age.

Two in ten respondents cited tooth decay, another key indicator of oral health decline. While it appeared across all age groups, its frequency did not spike as sharply in older populations as gum-related conditions did. This suggests that while cavities remain a concern, gum health may be the more pressing issue as people age.

The data presents a clear divide. Younger adults appear most concerned with aesthetics and mild discomfort, while older adults are increasingly affected by chronic oral conditions. These patterns provide valuable insight for public health efforts to tailor messaging, education, and services by age group.

The Ritual of Brushing Is Not Enough

Most people consider daily dental care essential for health and as part of their grooming routine. These findings point to a population that understands the value of daily hygiene.

Yet despite a strong commitment to brushing, fewer people adopt more comprehensive preventive practices. Many acknowledge that brushing alone isn’t enough. And while gum disease is widely feared, it doesn’t always spur preventive action.

This mismatch between perception and practice highlights a key nuance in Japan’s oral health culture. Brushing is seen as a personal duty, but dental visits aren’t yet part of that norm. However, the idea of visiting a dentist for preventive care is still not ingrained in the same way. Many rely on brushing alone, underestimating the importance of professional cleanings, periodontal checkups, and non-invasive screenings.

Attitudes-Toward-Daily-Oral-Care-and-Preventive-Habits

The data also revealed a reluctance among some respondents to seek dental care. A quarter of respondents admitted they avoid going to the dentist unless in pain, and 13 percent said they dislike visiting dentists altogether. These numbers suggest that while oral health is valued, the path to maintaining it is still viewed through a narrow lens.

The Mouth-Body Disconnect

Despite growing global evidence linking oral health to systemic diseases, awareness of this connection remains limited among Japanese adults. The survey findings were clear: understanding of the mouth-body link—like oral inflammation’s ties to heart disease or dementia—remains low. These are conditions that public health officials worldwide now consider closely tied to oral inflammation and periodontal disease.

Perceived-Link-Between-Oral-and-Systemic-Diseases

The data also showed that older adults were more aware of these links. People in their 60s and 70s demonstrated higher recognition of connections between oral health and conditions like arteriosclerosis, cerebral infarction, and aspiration pneumonia. Even so, awareness rarely exceeded 35 percent for any single disease across any age group.

This low recognition contrasts with decades of medical literature pointing to the systemic risks of untreated oral conditions. Periodontal disease, in particular, has been associated with elevated markers of inflammation that affect the heart and blood vessels. Poor oral hygiene has also been linked to the development of aspiration pneumonia in older adults, especially those in long-term care facilities.

One explanation may lie in how oral health has been framed historically. In Japan, as in many other countries, the mouth has often been treated as separate from the rest of the body in cultural and clinical settings. Dental care is viewed as important, but not necessarily medical. That perception is shifting slowly as experts call for integrating oral and general health services.

Closing the awareness gap will be essential as Japan confronts the dual challenges of an ageing population and rising rates of chronic disease. The data suggest that this will require better education and a shift in how oral health is positioned within the broader healthcare system.

The Ageing Divide in Dental Habits

As Japan’s population grows older, so does its dental behaviour. The survey revealed that regular dental visits increase significantly with age. Older adults are far more likely to go for regular checkups than their younger counterparts. Many in their 20s delay visits until there’s a problem — and a surprising number avoid the dentist altogether. In contrast, a third of young adults said they delay visits until problems appear.

This trend highlights a widening gap in preventive care between generations. Older adults appear to understand the importance of regular maintenance, likely due to direct experience with tooth loss, gum disease, and age-related oral complications. Younger adults, in contrast, often delay care until pain or visible problems emerge.

The implications extend beyond the dental chair. Poor oral health in older adults has been linked to malnutrition, frailty, and cognitive decline. In long-term care settings, conditions like aspiration pneumonia are now recognised as partly preventable through better oral hygiene. Integrating dental services into elder care has become a national priority, with some prefectures piloting programs that embed dental hygienists in aged care facilities.

Yet challenges remain. Even among older adults, routine visits are not universal. Mobility issues, regional disparities, or lack of family support can limit access. For younger people, the absence of mandatory screenings after adolescence creates a long stretch of disengagement during the early adult years, when lifelong habits take shape.

If Japan is to sustain its leadership in longevity and healthy ageing, oral health must be treated not as an optional service but as a core component of medical care across the lifespan.

Support Grows for Annual Dental Checkups

As awareness of oral health grows, so does public support for stronger preventive measures. A majority of respondents support the idea of mandatory annual checkups, with only a small minority opposed.

Public-Opinion-on-Making-Dental-Checkups-Mandatory

Support for mandatory checkups increases sharply with age, with older adults more likely to see the long-term value of preventive care. This generational divide reflects both a difference in experience and in perceived risk. Older adults are more likely to have experienced tooth loss, gum recession, or oral discomfort, and understand the long-term benefits of early detection and maintenance.

The conversation around compulsory dental exams is not new in Japan. The 8020 Campaign, launched in 1989 by the Ministry of Health and the Japan Dental Association, has long encouraged citizens to retain at least 20 natural teeth by age 80. While the initiative has raised awareness, it relies on voluntary compliance. Policymakers are now weighing whether more formal mandates — similar to annual health checkups — could be applied to dental care for working-age adults.

Efforts are also underway to expand oral health screenings in schools, integrate dental visits into company-sponsored health programs, and increase outreach in underserved regions. However, implementation remains inconsistent, and not all employers or municipalities can scale these services.

Our survey results suggest the public may be more ready for reform than expected. Formalising annual dental checkups could advance Japan’s preventive care strategy and reinforce the message that oral health is inseparable from general well-being.

What Comes Next for Oral Health in Japan

Our Oral Health Survey offers a sharp diagnosis of how Japan approaches oral health. This isn’t a failure of access; it’s a gap in mindset. While many people brush daily, fear gum disease, and express support for annual checkups, their behavior often stops short of proper prevention. This pattern is most visible among younger adults, who remain disconnected from regular care during critical years for long-term dental health.

In contrast, older adults are beginning to close that gap. Preventive visits are rising among seniors, and there is growing recognition of how oral health affects everything from nutrition to chronic disease. As the population ages, oral healthcare quietly becomes a foundation of healthy longevity.

What comes next will require more than awareness. Expanding access to preventive services, embedding dental screenings into routine care, and reducing regional disparities are essential. Just as important is reshaping public understanding by positioning oral care as a personal habit and a core part of medical well-being.

The next breakthrough won’t be high-tech; it’ll be a shift in perception. Treating the mouth as part of the body, not apart from it, will support health and dignity across the lifespan. As Japan extends life, it faces a quieter challenge: keeping those years pain-free. The path may begin not in hospitals, but in the dental chair.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Milk tea isn’t just a drink. It is a social signal. Samgyupsal isn’t just a meal — it has become a weekend ritual.

Few food trends have achieved what these did: mass appeal across socioeconomic classes, viral traction across platforms, and real estate-level impact in malls and high streets nationwide. Their success offers a blueprint for how food fads evolve into full-fledged consumer movements in the Philippines, driven by youth culture, social validation, and the pursuit of immersive, shareable experiences.

With over half the population under 30, Filipino consumers aren’t just early adopters; they’re active trendsetters. Food isn’t simply nourishment; it’s identity, entertainment, and currency for connection. Whether it’s a TikTok-worthy bite or a heritage dish reimagined for a new generation, the choices Filipinos make at the table are deeply intertwined with how they see themselves and the world.

For F&B brands operating in this space, understanding what drives these choices means tapping into a uniquely layered market – one where Western influences blend with local pride, and novelty only sticks when it aligns with culture, context, and community.

Fusion Finds Its Filipino Soul

Restaurants across Metro Manila are rewriting the rulebook for Filipino cuisine. A new wave of chefs is blending local comfort food with global influences – turning kare-kare into curry bowls, transforming adobo into bao buns, and giving sinigang a Japanese ramen twist. These aren’t gimmicks; they’re calculated plays to tap into the Filipino craving for novelty without abandoning familiarity.

This approach appeals to a generation raised on K-pop and content algorithms. Diners want flavour, but they also want narrative – a dish that photographs well and tells a story. Fusion provides both. Sinigang is reinvented with beef short rib and watermelon at spots like Manam Comfort Filipino, offering a playful yet rooted take on the classic. Sarsa Kitchen + Bar builds on Negrense traditions but packages them with a contemporary edge, perfect for the urban millennial crowd.

F&B groups are taking notice. Mid-scale franchises are testing bolder menus inspired by these high-concept eateries, hoping to scale trend-led items before they hit saturation. With younger diners using food discovery as entertainment, fusion isn’t fringe – it’s a fast-moving commercial opportunity.

The Rise of Regional Ingredients

The mainstream Filipino menu is undergoing a quiet revolution – and it’s being led by ingredients once considered too obscure, too rural, or too slow to scale. Diners are now seeking depth: flavours that feel earned, ingredients that come with provenance, and dishes that tell regional stories.

Items like batuan, pili nuts, tabon-tabon, and taba ng talangka are moving from weekend palengke hauls to chef specials and curated tasting menus. Adlai, once a heritage grain, now appears in health-forward bowls and upscale rice alternatives. These ingredients aren’t just rich in flavour; they’re signalling exclusivity, craftsmanship, and cultural pride.

Restaurants like Toyo Eatery and Locavore have championed this movement by reintroducing ancestral ingredients to urban diners and building menus that are proudly Filipino but globally competitive. For F&B groups, this opens a path to elevating brand storytelling – whether through seasonal LTOs (limited-time offers), regionally inspired menu capsules, or direct sourcing partnerships with local farmers.

The shift isn’t about going backwards – it’s about building forward with authenticity. As Filipino consumers increasingly equate food choices with values, using regional and artisanal ingredients is a culinary and commercial advantage.

Plant-Based and Flexitarian

Meat may still dominate the Filipino plate, but the momentum behind plant-forward eating is growing – not as a fringe lifestyle but as a mainstream shift among millennials and Gen Z. This shift isn’t driven by ideology alone; it’s about wellness, affordability, and the increasing accessibility of meat alternatives in urban centres.

Traditional dishes are being reformatted for a new generation: laing without bagoong, kare-kare with jackfruit, sisig with tofu and mushrooms. Homegrown spots like Green Bar in Makati and The Wholesome Table in BGC have found success by blending comfort food aesthetics with health-forward menus. Their dishes don’t preach – they sell through flavor, familiarity, and lifestyle branding.

There’s a gap in the casual dining space for restaurant groups where plant-based menus are still treated as secondary. Introducing flexitarian lines – not full vegan menus, but deliberate plant-forward heroes – is a low-risk, high-upside way to meet the rising demand. It also signals alignment with values like sustainability, something younger consumers are rewarding with loyalty and spending.

What once felt like a niche segment is now a whitespace for innovation. And in a country where vegetables have always been part of the table, rethinking them for modern preferences is a return, not a departure.

Street Food 2.0 – Elevated and Instagrammable

Filipino street food has always been bold, flavorful, and accessible, but it’s never been this photogenic. What used to be served from pushcarts and roadside grills is now being reimagined for curated food halls, food parks, and Gen Z-focused dining places.

Think kwek-kwek with truffle aioli, isaw glazed in honey sriracha, or balut turned into a small-plate delicacy with sinamak foam. Brands like Boy Isaw and Mang Larry’s Isawan have helped normalise street food in structured retail settings, while new concepts like IhawJuan lean into design-forward booths, premium packaging, and consistent flavour control.

This trend thrives on nostalgia wrapped in novelty. It appeals to Filipino diners’ emotional connection to childhood and street culture while meeting modern expectations for hygiene, branding, and presentation. On TikTok and Instagram, street food with a twist is shareable gold.

For restaurant groups, the opportunity lies in format innovation: bite-sized, affordable, customizable items that fit both dine-in and grab-and-go formats. It’s also a chance to localise at scale, with regional street food variants offering ready-made menu expansion paths across the country.

Ancestral Filipino Cooking Techniques with A Modern Flair

Filipino chefs are reaching into the past not to replicate it but to reinterpret it. Slow, regional methods like pinaupong manok, pinais, kinilaw, tinapa, and kulawo are being reintroduced in refined forms, framed less as throwbacks and more as culinary heritage elevated for today’s palate.

At restaurants like Balay Dako in Tagaytay and Café Juanita in Pasig, long-held techniques are presented with care, often paired with storytelling that links each dish to family tradition or regional history. The appeal isn’t just authenticity – it’s depth. For consumers burned out by over-engineered food fads, these dishes offer a sense of grounding and meaning.

What was once seen as slow and provincial now feels premium. The tactile nature of these cooking methods – from banana-leaf wrapping to open-fire grilling – offers rich sensory experiences, ideal for diners seeking more than just taste.

For restaurant groups, this movement is an opportunity to differentiate themselves. Ancestral techniques lend themselves to seasonal menus, chef’s specials, and content-rich brand narratives. They also create space for regional partnerships and experiential formats, such as heritage dining nights or interactive prep counters. Tradition isn’t the opposite of innovation – it’s becoming its most compelling form in the Filipino market.

Filipino dining is not just about what’s on the plate – it’s a statement of identity, intent, and influence. As tastes evolve and boundaries blur between tradition and trend, the winning brands will move beyond imitation and lean into insight, capturing the cultural undercurrent driving the next wave of consumption.

Market research is your edge if you’re looking to tap into the next wave of Filipino food trends with confidence. From concept testing and menu optimisation to understanding shifting consumer behaviours across regions and generations, our team delivers the insights you need to make bold, informed decisions. Let’s uncover what’s next – together.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

For decades, pursuing a prestigious degree meant a one-way ticket to the West. The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia stood as the undisputed giants of international education, drawing millions of students eager to secure world-class credentials and global career opportunities. But the equation is shifting.

A growing number of students are rethinking the cost-benefit ratio of traditional Western degrees. Skyrocketing tuition fees, tightening visa policies, and economic uncertainty are forcing families to reassess whether the promise of a Western education still justifies the financial and bureaucratic burden. Meanwhile, Asia and the Middle East are rewriting the playbook.

Nowhere is this transformation more pronounced than in Singapore, an emerging education powerhouse that blends academic excellence with career mobility. With top-ranked universities, a thriving business ecosystem, and student-friendly visa policies, Singapore is taking the lead in challenging Western dominance. Alongside China and the UAE, it represents a new breed of global education hubs, offering a compelling mix of affordability, industry integration, and forward-thinking policies that are reshaping the future of overseas education.

As competition heats up, universities, policymakers, and brands that cater to international students must rethink their strategies. The question is no longer just where students want to study – but why they are making the choices they do.

The Changing Cost-Benefit Equation

Higher education has long been a high-stakes investment. For many international students, the promise of a Western degree once justified the steep price tag. But with tuition fees in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia climbing to unsustainable levels, students and their families scrutinise the return on investment like never before.

In the US, international students at public universities pay an average of $25,000 to $45,000 per year, while private institutions often exceed $50,000, excluding accommodation, healthcare, and living expenses. In the UK, tuition for international students at top universities can soar past £40,000 ($48,000) per year, with no government-imposed caps. Australia, long favoured for its post-graduation work opportunities, is now grappling with rising tuition, housing shortages, and surging living costs, making it an increasingly expensive choice.

Enter Singapore, China, and the UAE – education hubs delivering world-class degrees at a fraction of the cost. Singapore’s National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU) consistently rank among the world’s top institutions, yet tuition for international students remains significantly lower than Ivy League counterparts. Scholarships, tuition grants, and government-backed funding programs make higher education in Singapore accessible and financially strategic.

In China, universities like Tsinghua and Peking have climbed global rankings, while the Chinese government’s Belt and Road scholarships actively attract students from Africa, South Asia, and beyond. The UAE, home to branch campuses of NYU, Sorbonne, and London Business School, has positioned itself as a high-quality, English-language alternative with generous government incentives for international students.

As education costs in the West continue to rise, emerging destinations capitalise on the shift, offering students a degree without decades of debt.

Policy Shifts and Post-Graduation Pathways

For years, a Western degree came with an unspoken promise – better job prospects and a pathway to residency. That promise remains intact for many, but shifting immigration policies make it harder for international graduates to stay and work.

The United States has seen a rise in international enrollments, largely fueled by a 35% surge in Indian students, making them the largest international student group. While the US remains a dominant player, visa uncertainties and work restrictions discourage students looking for long-term career stability. The H-1B visa process remains a bottleneck, with thousands of applicants vying for limited approvals, leaving many graduates in limbo.

In the United Kingdom, strong international enrollments have been driven by reintroducing the two-year post-study work visa. However, the government is now considering stricter immigration rules, requiring foreign graduates to secure graduate-level jobs to remain in the country. If implemented, this could impact future enrollment growth, particularly among students seeking greater flexibility in post-study employment.

Meanwhile, Singapore is capitalising on these uncertainties. Unlike Western nations tightening post-study work rules, Singapore has designed a system that encourages international graduates to stay and contribute to its economy. The Employment Pass (EP) and Work Holiday Pass (WHP) offer clear pathways for students from Singaporean universities to transition into the workforce, with government-backed programs actively matching talent with in-demand industries.

China and the UAE are adopting similar strategies. China’s streamlined visa policies allow international graduates to enter its booming technology, finance, and manufacturing sectors more easily. The UAE’s long-term visa programs, including the Golden Visa, offer foreign graduates a 10-year residency option without employer sponsorship, making it an attractive alternative to the rigid visa pathways in the West.

While US and UK universities continue to attract students, the future is uncertain. As governments debate tighter immigration laws, new education hubs actively seek international talent, proving that higher education can lead directly to job opportunities, not just academic knowledge.

The Appeal of Regional Job Markets

A degree is no longer just about prestige; it’s about where it leads. For international students, post-graduation employment prospects are as crucial as the quality of education itself. Once seen as the gold standard for job opportunities, Western economies face rising unemployment, labour market saturation, and increasingly complex work visa requirements. In contrast, emerging education hubs are positioning themselves as direct gateways to thriving regional job markets.

Singapore has perfected this model. As a global financial and technology hub, it offers international graduates seamless entry into industries ranging from fintech and artificial intelligence to biomedical sciences and logistics and government-backed programs such as the Global Investor Program and Tech.Pass encourage skilled professionals to remain in the country, reinforcing Singapore’s reputation as an education destination that delivers on employability.

China’s rapid economic expansion has also turned its job market into a magnet for international talent. With companies like Huawei, Tencent, and Alibaba aggressively recruiting global professionals, demand for multilingual and culturally agile graduates is soaring. The UAE, leveraging its status as a business and innovation hub, attracts students looking to enter sectors like renewable energy, aviation, and financial services.

In contrast, graduates in Western nations face mounting challenges. The UK job market remains fiercely competitive, with international students often struggling to secure employer sponsorship. In the US, the H-1B visa process remains a bottleneck, with thousands of applicants vying for a limited number of approvals.

As global talent pipelines shift, students are making decisions based not only on the quality of education but on the likelihood of landing a job in a fast-growing economy. Emerging hubs aren’t just offering degrees – they’re offering futures.

Academic Excellence Beyond the West

Western universities have been the undisputed leaders in global education rankings for decades. But as higher education landscapes evolve, institutions in Asia and the Middle East are rapidly closing the gap. Fueled by aggressive government investment, industry collaboration, and cutting-edge research, these emerging education hubs prove that academic excellence is no longer exclusive to the West.

Singapore stands at the forefront of this shift. The National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU) consistently rank among the world’s top universities, surpassing many traditional Western institutions in research output and employer reputation. With strong ties to global corporations, these universities offer curricula that blend academic rigour with real-world application – an approach that has made Singapore a magnet for students seeking both knowledge and career mobility.

China is playing a similar game, with institutions like Tsinghua University and Peking University rising rapidly in international rankings. The Chinese government has poured billions into initiatives such as Project 985 and Double First-Class, elevating its universities into globally competitive research powerhouses. Breakthroughs in AI, quantum computing, and biotech are placing Chinese institutions at the cutting edge of innovation, making them increasingly attractive to students seeking access to world-class research facilities.

The UAE is taking a different approach, positioning itself as a global education hub through international partnerships. Dubai and Abu Dhabi host branch campuses of top Western universities, including NYU, Sorbonne, and MIT, offering students a Western-style education at a lower cost and with access to the region’s booming job market.

As emerging hubs climb the academic ranks, Western universities face a stark reality: prestige alone is no longer enough. The future of higher education belongs to institutions that can deliver both academic excellence and a direct pathway to global career opportunities.

Xiamen University offers a compelling example of how Chinese institutions attract international students by expanding beyond national borders. Its success underscores the growing appeal of Asian universities in global higher education.

Case Study: How Xiamen University Became a Magnet for International Students

Image Credit: Nature

Background

Founded in 1921, Xiamen University (XMU) has long been a powerhouse of higher education in China. While initially attracting students from Southeast Asian Chinese communities, XMU sought to expand its global presence and position itself as a leading destination for international students. By the early 2010s, with China’s growing influence in global education, the university recognised an opportunity to reach a broader audience by extending its footprint beyond its home country.

Strategies

Establishing an International Campus – In 2015, XMU launched Xiamen University Malaysia (XMUM), making history as the first large-scale overseas branch of a Chinese university. This strategic move placed XMU at the heart of Southeast Asia, where demand for internationally recognised degrees was rising.
Building Global Partnerships – The university strengthened collaborations with over 300 universities worldwide, increasing its appeal to international students and integrating more exchange programs.
Leveraging Cultural Soft Power – XMU expanded its global outreach through 16 Confucius Institutes across 13 countries, promoting Chinese language and culture, which attracted students interested in China’s economic and educational rise.
Offering Competitive Tuition and Scholarships – Compared to Western institutions, XMU positioned itself as a high-quality, cost-effective alternative, with tuition significantly lower than universities in the US, UK, and Australia. Government-backed scholarships further incentivised international enrollment.

Outcomes

Rapid Enrollment Growth – XMUM now hosts thousands of international students, making it a major higher education hub in Malaysia. XMU’s main campus in China has also seen rising international applications.
Stronger Regional Influence – By planting its flag in Malaysia, XMU increased China’s educational reach in Southeast Asia, providing local students with access to Chinese-style education without relocating to China.
A Sustainable Pipeline for Talent – The university’s emphasis on cross-border collaboration and industry integration has created direct pathways for students to enter China’s booming economy, particularly in technology and finance.

By strategically expanding beyond China’s borders, Xiamen University has redefined how Chinese institutions attract international students. Its success underscores a growing trend – students are looking beyond the West for globally relevant, cost-effective, and career-driven education. As competition in international higher education intensifies, XMU’s approach offers a playbook for universities seeking to adapt to this shifting landscape.

Cultural and Lifestyle Factors

Education is more than just academics. It’s an immersive experience shaped by culture, environment, and quality of life. For decades, students viewed Western countries as the ultimate destinations for international exposure. But as the cost of living in cities like London, New York, and Sydney skyrockets, students are reconsidering where they can thrive academically and personally.

Singapore has become a top choice for students seeking a balance between global connectivity and cultural familiarity. As one of the world’s safest and most efficient cities, it offers a seamless experience for international students. English is the primary language of instruction, and the country’s status as a melting pot of Asian and Western influences makes cultural adaptation easier. With a modern infrastructure, world-class public transport, and a strong emphasis on quality of life, Singapore offers the many advantages of Western cities – without the same financial burden.

China’s appeal lies in its sheer scale and economic power. Cities like Shanghai and Beijing are global business hubs, offering students exposure to a rapidly growing economy. Universities have also introduced more English-language programs, making education more accessible to international students. However, cultural differences and language barriers can still pose challenges for those unfamiliar with the region.

The UAE, particularly Dubai and Abu Dhabi, is emerging as an attractive alternative for students looking for a cosmopolitan lifestyle with strong job market integration. With a significant expatriate population, a thriving business ecosystem, and branch campuses of top Western universities, the country provides a high-standard education with fewer cultural barriers than some Asian destinations.

As students weigh their options, the decision is no longer just about where they can get the best degree; it’s about where they can build a future. Emerging education hubs prove that world-class learning experiences don’t have to come with the financial strain and cultural adjustment challenges often associated with Western universities.

The Future of Global Education Mobility

International education is undergoing a rapid transformation. Students weigh their options differently, prioritising affordability, job prospects, and policy stability over institutional prestige. Universities and governments that fail to adapt risk losing their global appeal.

Singapore is setting the pace. Its universities integrate AI-driven learning with industry collaborations, ensuring graduates are workforce-ready. Strategic alliances with institutions like MIT and Imperial College London further cement its status as an education hub with real-world impact.

China is leveraging its technological dominance to reshape academia. Personalised AI learning, blockchain-based credentials, and virtual classrooms are becoming standard. With aggressive international recruitment and rising global rankings, Chinese universities are drawing students once bound for the West.

The UAE is taking a different route, positioning itself as a transnational education hub. By hosting top Western universities and embedding research and innovation into its academic framework, it is creating a direct pipeline from study to employment in high-growth industries.

Meanwhile, Western institutions face mounting challenges. Rising tuition costs, visa hurdles, and uncertain post-study work opportunities force students to reconsider traditional destinations. The US and UK still attract strong international enrollments, but growth is driven by specific demographics – primarily Indian students in the US – while immigration policy debates threaten long-term stability.

The power dynamics in global education are shifting. Emerging hubs offer a compelling alternative: lower costs, stronger career pathways, and policies that welcome international talent. The future will belong to the nations and institutions that recognise this new reality and evolve with it.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The fastest way to read the economy might be through a grocery receipt.

In the United States, a staple as simple as frozen pizza has become a financial strategy, signalling how households manage cost, comfort, and consistency.

And the US isn’t alone. Across markets, pantry staples are doubling as economic sensors. In the UK, a jump in baked bean and private-label ready meal sales mirrors cost-of-living anxiety. In Japan, instant noodles remain resilient despite price hikes, especially premium options. In China, frozen dumplings are no longer seasonal but weekday staples. Each reflects how consumers behave when their budgets are under pressure.

For brands, these patterns aren’t background noise. They’re forecasting tools. The staples consumers cling to during disruption are often early indicators of more profound shifts in sentiment and strategy.

The psychology behind food choices

When financial stress sets in, consumers don’t just look for cheaper options; they look for control. Food becomes a tool to reclaim routine, reduce effort, and preserve small pleasures. In inflationary periods, what matters isn’t just price. It’s perceived value.

Today’s shoppers are making what behavioural economists call satisfying decisions: good-enough choices that balance budget, emotion, and effort. That explains the rise of “premiumised basics.” In Japan, consumers choose upscale instant ramen precisely because inflation makes dining out less accessible, and these products offer the comfort and experience of a restaurant meal at home. A frozen pizza or store-brand ready meal isn’t just a shortcut; it’s a psychological release valve.

Aggregated across millions of carts, these choices offer powerful signals. Brands that can spot the patterns early and build for them gain an edge.

Frozen pizza and the power of low-effort indulgence

In the US, frozen pizza has moved from the edge of the freezer to the centre of the meal plan. Sales reached $7.0 billion in 2024, reflecting growing demand for foods that balance indulgence and utility.

The pandemic normalised at-home dining, and inflation extended the habit. Frozen pizza delivers more than calories: it’s familiar, flexible, and low-friction. It substitutes for takeout, satisfies a group, and feels like a treat without requiring cooking skills. Consumers aren’t just trading down; they’re trading differently.

That shift has created space for brands like Screamin’ Sicilian and California Pizza Kitchen to position frozen products as restaurant-quality. Clear packaging, upscale branding, and perceived authenticity all signal that compromise isn’t necessary.

Evaluate your portfolio by the effort-to-satisfaction ratio. Consumers gravitate toward products that offer fast prep, emotional payoff, and cost consistency. Frozen pizza’s success shows how categories that meet these criteria outperform even in volatile markets.

UK shoppers trade brands for value

Baked beans have long been a UK staple, but recent sales data tells a deeper story.

In 2023, total baked bean sales rose 2.5%, but Heinz saw a 5.1% decline. Private labels surged, with Euroshopper and others gaining share. The shift is primarily driven by price sensitivity. As grocery bills rise, shoppers increasingly trade down to store-brand or value-tier options that offer similar taste and portion sizes at significantly lower prices. Loyalty to the category remains, but brand allegiance weakens when meaningful differentiation doesn’t match premium pricing.

The same is playing out in chilled ready meals. Tesco and Sainsbury’s expanded their value lines, and consumers responded. These aren’t subpar options as packaging, taste, and positioning have all improved. The new trade-down doesn’t feel like a sacrifice.

Legacy brands need to reassess elasticity. When brand loyalty erodes under pricing pressure, winning back market share means redefining value, not just dropping price. Functional improvements and narrative clarity are now essential to justify a premium.

Japan’s affordable upgrades

According to The Guardian, the price of instant ramen increased 20% over the past two years, but consumption remained high.

In Japan, inflation hasn’t dented demand for instant noodles. Nissin raised prices, yet consumption held steady. More surprising: it’s the premium SKUs that are growing fastest.

Consumers are seeking quality within constrained budgets. The appeal isn’t just cost; it’s comfort and cultural continuity. A bowl of gourmet-style ramen at home replaces an expensive lunch out. The transaction becomes emotional as much as practical.

Affordable premiumization is a long-term play. Consumers will spend a little more if the return feels meaningful. That means elevating basics, through taste, story, or packaging, to deliver a perceived upgrade without a price shock.

China’s modernised tradition

Frozen dumplings have become a year-round staple in Chinese households. Once reserved for holidays or family occasions, they’re now an everyday solution for time-strapped urban consumers. In 2024, the market reached $6.86 billion, with younger buyers, balancing long hours and shrinking leisure time, driving much of the demand.

This isn’t convenience displacing tradition; it’s adapting to new consumption habits. Frozen dumplings retain cultural relevance while offering speed, consistency, and modern formats.

Culturally rooted convenience products can unlock mass-market growth when paired with modern positioning. The key is to evolve the format and accessibility without stripping away the story.

India and the Philippines: Time-saving staples under strain

According to Future Market Insights, the ready-to-mix food market in India reached $440 million in 2023 and is projected to grow to $1.75 billion by 2033. Snacks and mixes form a dual growth engine, as consumers manage rising costs and time poverty.

These products aren’t replacing traditional meals; they’re reshaping them. Dosa batter and spice blends offer cultural authenticity without daily prep. Convenience without compromise is becoming a national default.

In the Philippines, canned sardines serve as both sustenance and security. With inflation averaging 6.1% in 2023 and over 20 tropical storms a year, demand for shelf-stable protein spikes in response to economic and environmental stress. Mega Global, which holds a 30% market share, invested over USD 1.7 million to expand capacity by 20%, betting on continued category growth. The company’s investment in expanded capacity is a bet that pantry-stable proteins will remain a default safety net.

In emerging and climate-vulnerable markets, brands win by delivering reliability. Food products that address economic or environmental uncertainty earn long-term trust. Packaging, shelf stability, and affordability aren’t features. They’re foundations.

Micro-trends as macro signals

The grocery aisle is a real-time indicator of consumer mood. It reveals where people are willing to compromise and where they won’t. In every market, different staples are rising for the same underlying reasons: they feel safe, smart, and familiar.

Country	Food Signal	Behavior Cue
USA	Frozen Pizza	Indulgent efficiency
UK	Baked Beans, Ready Meals	Brand elasticity
Japan	Instant Noodles	Affordable premiumization
China	Frozen Dumplings	Cultural speed
India	Mixes & Snacks	Time-cost optimization
Philippines	Canned Sardines	Resilience stockpiling

That’s not just retail behaviour. It’s brand insight. When inflation hits, when trust dips, when time disappears, the categories that survive aren’t the trendiest – they’re the ones that deliver.

The lesson for brands is clear: resilience lives in the ordinary. When the economic cycle turns again, the brands that stay in the basket will stay in the conversation.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Blueprints and performance specs no longer tell the full story. With buyers and stakeholders demanding greater transparency, industrial tech firms are under increasing pressure to disclose more than just technical capabilities.

Procurement teams across sectors are asking deeper questions – about carbon emissions, labour conditions, and lifecycle impact. European disclosure mandates and US reporting proposals are accelerating the shift. Once confined to consumer brands, transparency expectations are now reaching B2B suppliers of semiconductors, robotics, and industrial machinery.

Buyers Want More Than a Product Sheet

Technical performance remains critical, but it is no longer the only factor in industrial procurement. A 2024 study by Market Expertise found that ESG-related concerns now rank among the top ten decision drivers for global B2B buyers. This highlights a broader shift in evaluation criteria.

Suppliers are increasingly required to provide data on emissions reduction, ethical sourcing, and corporate governance. In sectors such as aerospace, mining equipment, and chemical processing, procurement teams are requesting carbon audits, labour practice disclosures, and diversity metrics alongside traditional technical specifications.

Firms that do not meet these requirements may be excluded from consideration altogether.

New Rules Are Forcing the Issue

Industrial tech firms no longer disclose sustainability data out of goodwill; they’re doing it to comply. In the US and Europe, regulators are making ESG transparency a legal requirement.

In January 2024, the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) came into effect, requiring thousands of companies – both EU-based and international firms with regional operations – to disclose detailed information on environmental impact, human rights, and governance. For the industrial tech sector, this means publishing previously considered proprietary metrics: carbon intensity, supply chain traceability, and even energy sources.

The pressure is mounting stateside as well. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to finalise rules this year mandating climate-related disclosures from publicly traded companies. This includes direct and indirect emissions data, climate risk assessments, and mitigation strategies, pushing firms in manufacturing and engineering to build new reporting infrastructures almost overnight.

The result: what was once optional is quickly becoming standard. And for firms hoping to win contracts in highly regulated markets, compliance isn’t just a checkbox; it’s a competitive edge.

Industrial Giants Begin Opening the Books

Some of the world’s largest industrial tech players are beginning to respond, not just with compliance but with proactive disclosures that mirror the transparency seen in consumer sectors.

Intel’s 2023–24 Corporate Responsibility Report goes beyond carbon emissions to include water usage, chemical management, and workforce diversity – information that was once buried in internal audits. In its 2023/24 ESG report, Lenovo disclosed targets for reducing scope 1 and 2 emissions, supply chain sustainability efforts, and metrics tied to circular economy goals. The company now ranks highest in the IT industry on the Hang Seng Corporate Sustainability Index.

NVIDIA’s 2024 sustainability report outlines how its data centres are optimised for energy efficiency, with scope 3 emissions and supplier climate programs prominently featured. These aren’t one-off updates; they’re becoming annual staples, complete with third-party verification and downloadable datasets.

For an industry known for tight-lipped operations and long procurement cycles, this shift signals more than regulatory compliance. It’s a recalibration of what trust looks like in the industrial age.

Supply Chains Are No Longer Exempt

Industrial tech firms are extending ESG scrutiny beyond their own operations. Suppliers are now under pressure to meet the same standards, sometimes higher. Contracts increasingly require disclosures not just on raw materials or manufacturing timelines but also on carbon intensity, labour conditions, and waste management practices.

Microsoft has already set the tone. In 2024, the company announced it would require key suppliers to use 100% carbon-free energy by 2030. The move came as Microsoft’s emissions rose nearly 30% year-over-year, largely due to expanded AI infrastructure and Scope 3 emissions tied to its supply base. It signals to partners: clean up or lose the business.

In Australia, chemicals and explosives company Orica has installed nitrous oxide abatement technology across multiple sites, reducing emissions by an estimated 15%, roughly equal to the annual output of all other Australian chemical producers combined. This investment wasn’t just about optics; it was about securing long-term contracts with environmentally conscious buyers.

The trend is clear: if your data isn’t clean, your bid may not even make the table.

Reporting Is Messy, Expensive, and Unfinished

For all the momentum, ESG reporting remains a logistical hurdle for many industrial tech firms. Gathering emissions data across sprawling operations, inconsistent supplier systems, and decades-old infrastructure isn’t just difficult; it’s costly and time-consuming.

A major pain point is standardisation. With dozens of frameworks in play—from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)—companies struggle to align disclosures that simultaneously satisfy investors, regulators, and buyers. Even firms that publish detailed ESG reports often face scepticism over data quality.

Governments are taking note. In February 2025, the European Commission proposed a 25% reduction in reporting burdens as part of its “Simplification Omnibus,” a move estimated to save businesses across the bloc €40 billion annually. While it won’t eliminate the need for transparency, the shift suggests that complexity may be one of the biggest roadblocks to effective ESG strategy.

The challenge now is not whether to report, but how to report meaningfully, consistently, and at scale.

Transparency Is Becoming a Selling Point

In industrial tech, where margins are tight and products are often commoditised, ESG transparency is emerging as a powerful differentiator. Firms that can clearly communicate their sustainability practices are gaining ground, not just with regulators but also with clients who now see environmental and social metrics as a measure of long-term value.

According to research, B2B buyers are more likely to renew contracts and pay premium prices to suppliers who can prove sustainable practices. This shift is being felt across sectors – from advanced manufacturing to semiconductors – as procurement teams weigh emissions data and ethics policies alongside delivery timelines and service-level agreements.

To meet demand, companies are investing in ESG-focused digital tools, embedding reporting capabilities into enterprise systems, and training frontline teams to speak the language of sustainability. The goal isn’t just compliance; it’s credibility.

For industrial tech firms, the message is clear: transparency isn’t a liability. It’s leverage.

What Was Optional Is Now Expected

The industrial tech sector is no longer immune to the scrutiny once reserved for high-profile consumer brands. Whether building chips, circuit boards, or heavy equipment, companies are being judged not just on what they make, but on how they make it, what they emit, and who they employ.

Procurement has become a proving ground. ESG credentials are now as critical as certifications and specs. The risk isn’t reputational for firms unprepared to meet these expectations – it’s commercial. Buyers are choosing partners who reflect their values, and those values are becoming quantifiable.

As regulatory timelines shorten and client expectations rise, the question isn’t whether to disclose but whether you’re disclosing enough, soon enough.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Luxury retail is hitting a generational speed bump. Once buoyed by the spending power of older millennials and Gen X, high-end fashion and beauty brands are now facing a slowdown, with Gen Z opting out of traditional luxury splurges.

Most recently, global markets from Paris to Shanghai have reported sluggish sales, prompting concerns across the industry. At the same time, the secondhand apparel market is booming. Thredup’s 2024 Resale Report projects it will reach $350 billion by 2028, growing three times faster than the overall global apparel market. The rise of resale isn’t just a trend; it’s a signal that younger consumers are actively reshaping what luxury means.

According to recent research, Millennials and Gen Z are projected to account for three-fourths of global luxury spending by the end of 2025 – a figure that makes this pivot in taste and behaviour impossible for brands to ignore. Conspicuous consumption is losing appeal for a generation raised amid climate crises, economic instability, and digital transparency.

The Rise of Secondhand and Sustainable Shopping

For a generation raised on side hustles and climate consciousness, the resale rack holds more appeal than the luxury boutique. Platforms like Depop, Vestiaire Collective, and The RealReal have become go-to destinations for Gen Z shoppers, trading upcycled finds and limited-run vintage pieces with the same enthusiasm that previous generations reserved for fresh-off-the-runway collections.

Sustainability is part of the draw, but so is value – why spend $2,000 on a new designer bag when you can score a rare archival piece for half the price?

Luxury brands are paying attention. Some, like Gucci and Balenciaga, have partnered with resale platforms or launched in-house re-commerce programs to capture a slice of the growing circular economy. But for Gen Z, these moves only matter if they appear real, not reactionary.

Designer Status Loses Its Shine

Flashy logos are no longer the badge of status they once were. For Gen Z, luxury is shifting away from overt branding and toward values like individuality, sustainability, and authenticity. Rather than chasing the latest drop from heritage houses, young shoppers lean into personal style, often expressed through vintage, upcycled, or indie-label finds.

Many industry reports show how Gen Z consumers consider sustainability a primary factor in their clothing choices, outranking brand prestige. This is reflected in their growing reliance on secondhand platforms and their preference for products that align with their ethics and identity.

A carefully curated thrift-store find or a niche designer piece carries more cultural capital than a mass-produced luxury item. For legacy brands, the challenge is clear: status isn’t just about labels anymore; it’s about meaning.

Economic Pressures Meet Conscious Consumption

Inflation, student debt, and rising housing costs are prompting Gen Z to reassess their spending habits. While their overall spending power is rising, many are adopting frugal lifestyles, not just out of necessity but as a reflection of their values. Movements like “no-buy” and “low-buy” challenges have gained traction on platforms like TikTok, encouraging participants to limit their purchases to essentials. Financial pressures and a growing awareness of environmental and mental health concerns influence this shift.

Discretionary spending in the US is slowing, with luxury fashion down 12% in 2023 and another 9% in 2024, according to the Bank of America Institute. The drop signals a shift toward more intentional, value-driven consumption.

Environmental concerns also play a significant role. Deloitte’s 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Survey ranks climate change as one of the top concerns for younger consumers, influencing their preference for sustainable and ethically produced goods.

This financial restraint isn’t just shrinking purchases; it’s redirecting loyalty toward brands that reflect cultural roots and values.

Local Labels and Cultural Loyalty

Global luxury brands are facing increasing competition from a surge of homegrown talent. Gen Z consumers gravitate toward local designers who blend traditional craftsmanship with modern aesthetics and sustainable practices in markets like Indonesia and Japan.

In Japan, brands like Kapital and Visvim have garnered attention for their artisanal approach and deep cultural roots. Kapital, founded in Kojima, Okayama, is celebrated for its unique designs that draw inspiration from vintage Americana and Japanese heritage. Visvim, established in 2001, is known for its meticulous craftsmanship and commitment to quality, attracting a loyal global following.

In Indonesia, labels such as Sejauh Mata Memandang lead with textile collections grounded in local heritage and environmental consciousness. The brand applies slow fashion principles, utilising sustainable materials and traditional techniques to create pieces that resonate with environmentally conscious consumers.

These local labels often operate on smaller scales and with slower production cycles – an intentional contrast to the fast-paced churn of global fashion. For Gen Z, the appeal lies in purchasing pieces that feel personal and principled, rooted in their cultural identity and values.

A Digital Pivot to Stay Relevant

As Gen Z’s digital engagement deepens, luxury brands increasingly explore virtual platforms to connect with this tech-savvy demographic.

Gucci launched the “Gucci Garden” experience on Roblox in 2021, offering an interactive virtual exhibition celebrating the brand’s creative vision. Players could explore themed rooms inspired by Gucci’s campaigns, with their avatars absorbing elements of the exhibition and transforming into unique digital artworks.

These initiatives reflect a broader shift in the luxury industry, where digital interactions increasingly influence consumer behaviour. According to Bain & Company, approximately 70% of luxury purchases are influenced by online engagement, even if the final sale happens in-store.

To further enhance personalisation, brands like Louis Vuitton invest in AI-driven tools to tailor marketing campaigns and product recommendations based on consumer behaviour. For Gen Z, it’s not just about the product; it’s about the experience.

Rethinking Luxury for a New Generation

Legacy brands are learning that Gen Z wants more than a product – they want a point of view. In response, some of fashion’s biggest names are beginning to reframe luxury not as excess but as intention.

Burberry and Stella McCartney have rolled out repair and resale services, tapping into the circular economy. In 2023, LVMH announced plans to expand its environmental initiatives through Life 360, a roadmap focused on sustainable design, regenerative agriculture, and product longevity. Smaller labels are going even further, with capsule collections made entirely from deadstock fabrics or upcycled materials.

But authenticity remains the dealbreaker. Gen Z is adept at detecting greenwashing and is quick to call it out. A flashy sustainability pledge means little without visible follow-through, and younger consumers are doing their homework.

The path forward for luxury brands will likely require more than a seasonal campaign. It will take real investment in ethical production, meaningful storytelling, and experiences that resonate across digital and physical worlds. For a generation redefining value on its own terms, prestige alone no longer sells.

The Bottom Line

Luxury’s future won’t be built on legacy alone. With Gen Z rewriting the rules of status, style, and spending, brands that once thrived on exclusivity now face a different challenge: staying relevant in a world where authenticity, transparency, and values matter just as much as design.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

AI is transforming market research at breakneck speed. It can analyse vast datasets in seconds, extract sentiment from global conversations, and generate predictive insights that shape business decisions. The efficiency is undeniable. But AI alone is not enough.

Despite its advancements, AI will not replace human researchers. It operates within the confines of its training data, lacks contextual awareness, and cannot anticipate shifts before they emerge. AI is powerful, but it is not infallible. A misinterpreted trend or misleading prediction can lead to costly mistakes in consumer insights.

AI’s capabilities should not be mistaken for true intelligence or strategic thinking. It recognises patterns in historical data but lacks industry expertise and the ability to ask the right questions in the first place.

Brands that rely solely on AI-driven research risk making flawed decisions based on incomplete, biased, or outdated data. AI will continue to reshape market research, but human expertise remains indispensable for interpreting insights, challenging assumptions, and providing strategic foresight.

AI Lacks Context – And That’s a Problem for Market Research

AI predicts patterns; it does not comprehend meaning. It processes language based on past data, but it cannot truly understand context the way humans do. This limitation becomes clear in market research, where cultural nuance, sentiment, and local market dynamics are critical in shaping consumer behaviour.

Consider consumer sentiment analysis. A phrase like “That’s sick” can signal enthusiasm in one demographic but disapproval in another. In Japan, where indirect communication is common, consumers often soften negative feedback with neutral or ambiguous phrasing. AI models trained primarily on Western datasets may misinterpret this restraint as positive sentiment, leading to flawed insights.

AI’s failure to grasp more profound cultural shifts can also distort market trends. For example, an AI model analysing China’s luxury market might highlight rising spending on high-end brands without recognising the underlying sociopolitical drivers, such as government regulations on conspicuous wealth or the rising preference for quiet luxury among younger consumers.

Without human oversight, AI-driven research risks flattening cultural differences into misleading generalisations. An AI-optimised campaign, for instance, might target Gen Z in the U.S. and Southeast Asia with identical messaging, overlooking the vastly different values that shape purchasing decisions in each region.

AI processes data, but market research depends on understanding. Without human intelligence, context is lost.

Bias in AI Training Data

AI learns from data – flawed data leads to flawed insights. Bias in AI is not just a technical issue; it is a systemic challenge with real-world consequences for brands.

A Virginia Tech study of 555 AI models found bias in 83%. These biases stem from historical data imbalances, overrepresenting specific demographics, and cultural blind spots embedded in training datasets. In market research, this can distort consumer insights, favouring dominant markets while sidelining diverse global perspectives.

Western consumer behaviour, for example, dominates many AI training datasets. A fashion brand using AI to forecast global trends may receive insights heavily weighted toward European and North American aesthetics, overlooking emerging influences from Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America. AI may predict minimalist designs as a universal trend, while in reality, bold prints and intricate craftsmanship remain strong drivers of demand in emerging markets.

Bias extends beyond market trends to language models. Sentiment analysis tools trained predominantly in English struggle to detect tone, humour, and idiomatic expressions in other languages. AI interpreting social media conversations in India may fail to recognise how Hinglish (a blend of Hindi and English) influences consumer sentiment, leading to misclassifications.

These biases have real economic implications. A global brand launching an AI-driven campaign based on incomplete or skewed insights risks alienating key audiences, misallocating marketing spend, or missing untapped opportunities.

AI is a tool, not a substitute for human judgment. Researchers are essential for auditing AI insights, diversifying training data, and ensuring context before brands act.

AI Can’t Think – Flawed Prompts Lead to Flawed Insights

AI is only as accurate as the prompts it receives. Unlike human researchers, AI does not refine its inquiries. It passively generates responses based on query structure – even if the prompt is flawed, vague, or misleading.

Even skilled, prompt engineers face limitations. A poorly phrased prompt can generate oversimplified, generic, or incorrect conclusions. AI does not ask clarifying questions; it provides an answer, regardless of accuracy.

Take a simple query: “What are the key market trends in China’s e-commerce sector?” AI will likely generate an answer from public sources, summarising data that may be outdated, incomplete, or biased toward certain industries. But AI cannot:

Verify insights against proprietary industry reports
Assess real-time regulatory changes
Distinguish between consumer behaviour and aspirational trends

A human researcher, in contrast, would challenge surface-level answers, refine the inquiry, and verify data sources before drawing conclusions. They would incorporate firsthand industry reports, recent policy shifts, and expert interviews – elements AI alone cannot access.

This limitation is particularly risky when business leaders take AI-generated insights at face value. The consequences could be costly if a company bases expansion decisions on generic AI-driven market reports without considering local economic shifts or competitive dynamics.

Market research isn’t just about answers – it’s about asking the right questions. Until AI can think critically, human researchers remain essential for producing insights that are not just fast but accurate, relevant, and actionable.

AI and Data Privacy – The Hidden Risk for Market Research

Market research relies on proprietary data – confidential insights, sales figures, and competitive intelligence. However, AI models like ChatGPT cannot analyze private datasets unless directly integrated with a company’s internal systems. Even then, concerns over security, compliance, and intellectual property create significant barriers to full AI adoption in research.

Brands should be cautious about exposing sensitive business data to AI platforms. Customer transactions, internal strategy documents, and consumer feedback databases contain valuable insights that cannot be legally or ethically uploaded to public AI tools without strict safeguards.

Beyond security risks, data governance laws like GDPR (Europe) and CPRA (California) impose strict regulations on how consumer information is processed and stored. For example, an AI model generating insights from consumer purchasing data in the EU may inadvertently violate compliance rules if proper consent mechanisms are not in place.

Consider a global retailer analysing sales trends. If it relies on AI without integrating its proprietary transaction data, the model defaults to public consumer trends, often failing to reflect internal sales dynamics. The result? A misleading picture of market performance.

Privacy concerns also extend to consumer sentiment analysis. AI scrapes insights from social media, forums, and online reviews, but consumers do not always consent to their data being used for machine learning. Without clear ethical guidelines, brands risk violating consumer trust – or even regulatory standards – by unknowingly using AI-driven research based on unauthorised data extraction.

For AI to be a viable research tool, brands must build secure, proprietary models that ensure privacy compliance without compromising analytical potential. Until then, human researchers remain essential in handling market data ethically and strategically.

AI Relies on the Past – And That’s a Problem for Forecasting

AI is built on history. Every insight, prediction, and analysis it generates comes from past data. AI excels at pattern recognition but struggles with the unexpected.

Generative AI cannot foresee market disruptions, cultural shifts, or industry-defining moments that lack historical precedent. It operates within the boundaries of its training data, making it reactive rather than truly predictive.

Had AI forecasted the future of digital advertising in 2018, it would have prioritised Facebook and Instagram, entirely missing TikTok’s meteoric rise. AI lacks real-world intuition, qualitative industry insights, and cultural foresight – critical skills that human researchers possess.

AI also fails to anticipate black swan events – unforeseen disruptions that reshape industries overnight. The COVID-19 pandemic, financial collapses, and geopolitical crises that trigger supply chain shifts are beyond AI’s predictive capabilities.

AI’s reliance on past data also reinforces outdated assumptions. A model trained on consumer trends from five years ago may still prioritise pre-pandemic spending behaviours, outdated media consumption habits, or product preferences that no longer align with reality.

Human researchers, by contrast, don’t just analyse the past – they interpret weak signals, identify emerging behaviours, and anticipate shifts before they become trends. They engage in social listening, expert interviews, and in-field observations, capturing the intangibles that AI misses.

Brands that rely too heavily on AI risk making decisions for a world that no longer exists. The real advantage lies in blending AI’s efficiency with human foresight.

AI’s Misinformation Problem – And Its Consequences for Market Research

AI doesn’t just analyse data; it generates it. And that creates a serious challenge for market research: misinformation.

AI models do not verify sources, cross-check facts, or assess credibility. They generate responses based on statistical probability, not journalistic rigour or industry expertise. As a result, AI can hallucinate, fabricate, or reinforce false narratives if the underlying data is flawed.

This can result in flawed, high-stakes decisions in market research. A global brand basing a product launch on AI-generated insights risks misallocating millions if the model’s training data is flawed, biased, or outdated.

Misinformation compounds over time. When biased assumptions are repeatedly fed into AI systems, errors are reinforced, creating a cycle of false insights. This is particularly dangerous in industries where consumer preferences shift rapidly and misinformation spreads easily, such as beauty, health, finance, and sustainability. If an AI model trained on outdated reports falsely claims Gen Z is abandoning luxury goods or that plant-based diets are declining, brands that act on these insights risk missing real opportunities.

Misinformation isn’t always deliberate – sometimes, it stems from incomplete or outdated datasets. However, in market research, the cost of acting on false data remains the same, regardless of intent.

Human oversight is essential. AI can accelerate research, but only human expertise ensures insights are accurate, credible, and free from misinformation.

AI Lacks Brand Intelligence

AI can process vast amounts of data, but it lacks brand-specific knowledge. Unless explicitly trained, it cannot access proprietary company reports, internal sales data, or confidential market intelligence. AI insights remain broad, generic, and detached from a brand’s unique positioning without direct integration.

In highly competitive industries, this limitation is costly. Consider a global CPG company researching snack preferences across different markets. AI can summarise consumer sentiment from public data, but cannot:

Analyse internal sales across product categories
Evaluate past marketing campaigns’ impact on brand perception
Incorporate real-time data from loyalty programs or first-party surveys

Without these layers of proprietary insight, AI’s recommendations remain surface-level. They may identify macro trends but cannot drive brand-specific decision-making.

AI also falls short in competitive analysis. It can compare publicly available brand narratives, pricing, and digital marketing strategies, but it cannot assess a competitor’s internal strategy. A luxury fashion brand entering India needs more than AI’s broad take on “Indian consumer behaviour.” It requires firsthand research, competitor benchmarking, and localised insights – elements AI cannot generate independently.

Ultimately, market research is not just about understanding consumers – it’s about understanding them in the context of a brand’s goals, positioning, and competition. AI can identify trends, but only human researchers can align insights with business strategy, competition, and brand equity.

AI is a Tool – Human Expertise is the Advantage

AI is revolutionising market research, accelerating data analysis and expanding access to insights. But it remains just that – a tool, not a replacement for human expertise. AI can summarise data, detect patterns, and automate tasks, but it cannot think critically, challenge assumptions, or grasp the deeper context behind consumer behaviour.

Brands that rely solely on AI risk decisions based on incomplete, biased, or outdated insights – errors that can cost millions. Those who combine AI-driven efficiency with human judgment, strategic reasoning, and cultural expertise will gain a decisive competitive edge. The future of market research isn’t AI vs. humans – it’s AI with humans. The brands that master this balance won’t just adapt; they will lead.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Once dismissed as retail relics, physical storefronts are making a surprising comeback – this time, powered by digital-first brands. From pop-ups to permanent flagships, online-native companies are opening brick-and-mortar locations not out of necessity but by design.

Amazon Style offers shoppers curated fashion based on browsing history. Warby Parker’s clean, minimalist stores blend seamlessly into upscale neighbourhoods, offering eye exams alongside Instagrammable interiors. In Bangkok, Pomelo Fashion invites customers to try on app-selected items in sleek fitting rooms before completing purchases from their phones.

It’s a reversal that reflects more than a retail pivot. While digital advertising remains cheaper in terms of pure reach, online CPMs average between $3 and $10, compared to $22 or more for traditional media, customer acquisition online is becoming less efficient. As competition intensifies and privacy changes limit ad targeting, many direct-to-consumer brands see digital acquisition costs climb, sometimes exceeding average order values. In this landscape, storefronts are emerging as strategic complements: part showroom, part service centre, part brand theatre. For these brands, it’s not just about footfall. It’s about reducing digital dependency and building loyalty through real-world engagement.

Why Physical Retail Now

For years, e-commerce promised a frictionless future – one-click checkouts, fast shipping, and endless inventory. But as digital storefronts multiplied, so did the challenges: skyrocketing customer acquisition costs, rising return rates, and a sea of sameness. Today, even the most digitally fluent brands are discovering that a website alone can’t deliver emotional connection or tactile trust.

Physical stores are filling the gap. A well‑designed storefront gives customers something the digital shelf can’t: the ability to touch, try, and experience. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, e‑commerce accounted for 15.3 % of total U.S. retail sales in 2023—a share that continues to rise quarter by quarter. While physical stores still drive the bulk of retail activity, the steady growth of online shopping, especially during major events like Black Friday, signals a lasting shift in consumer behaviour.

Still, not all categories follow the same trajectory. Furniture and home‑furnishing purchases increasingly migrate online; nearly 31 % of home furnishing sales occurred digitally in 2023. Consumer electronics remains split, with value and convenience driving online growth, but big‑ticket purchases often favour in‑store confidence. And goods like plants, outdoor supplies, garden products, and decorative home items, where touch, size, and immediacy matter, have stubbornly resisted complete digital takeover. Big‑box outlets continue to dominate these segments, with traditional furniture and outdoor‑living stores capturing the lion’s share of consumer spending.

In other words, the price tag and physicality of the item strongly influence where consumers choose to shop. You can order a lamp or phone online, but the comfort of a store still wins when it comes to the feel of a sofa, the freshness of a plant, or the scale of a patio set.

But these new retail spaces aren’t built for volume. They’re designed for impact. Brands are leaning into high-touch service, curated displays, and neighbourhood-specific assortments. Instead of acting as isolated outposts, these stores function as real-world extensions of the brand, driving online traffic, deepening engagement, and turning one-time buyers into repeat customers.

The playbook is shifting: Stores aren’t just about sales – they’re about staying top of mind in a distracted, digital-first world.

Pomelo Fashion’s Omnichannel Evolution

Founded in 2013 by David Jou and Casey Liang, Pomelo Fashion has emerged as a leading omnichannel fashion brand in Southeast Asia. Initially operating solely online, the company has expanded its presence with physical stores in Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia.

Central to Pomelo’s strategy is its “Tap.Try.Buy” service, which allows customers to order items online, try them on at a designated store, and pay only for what they choose to keep. This approach enhances the shopping experience by integrating the convenience of online browsing with the assurance of in-store fitting.

In May 2025, LeadIQ reported that Pomelo Fashion achieved $750 million in annual revenue, marking a substantial leap from the $38 million recorded in 2022

Pomelo’s expansion efforts have included entering new markets, such as Cambodia, where it partnered with Zando Group to establish a retail presence. Additionally, the company has focused on enhancing supply chain efficiency by implementing unified inventory systems and streamlining return processes.

By seamlessly blending online and offline experiences, Pomelo Fashion continues to adapt to the evolving retail landscape, aiming to meet the diverse preferences of its customer base.

Why online brands are opening stores

For digital-first companies, opening a physical store isn’t about replicating traditional retail – it’s about amplifying what already works. With online customer acquisition costs climbing and attention spans shrinking, many brands view stores as a channel for deeper engagement rather than just sales.

Stores offer what websites can’t: human connection, hands-on product trials, and immediate service. They create environments where discovery feels organic and tactile, and shoppers can linger, ask questions, and build trust. That trust often carries over into digital behaviour. According to Warby Parker’s most recent earnings report, customers who engage with online and retail touchpoints tend to have higher lifetime value.

For brands like Pomelo, stores also provide critical feedback loops. Each in-person interaction offers insights into fit, preferences, and regional trends – data that helps refine everything from product design to inventory allocation. Physical locations are no longer separate from e-commerce platforms – they’re extensions of them, working in sync to personalise the experience and drive loyalty.

The result is a more resilient retail model, one that spans screens and sidewalks.

The evolving role of the website

While physical spaces gain momentum, the brand website remains the nerve centre of the modern retail ecosystem. But its role is shifting – from being the sole point of sale to becoming a connective platform that bridges discovery, transaction, and service.

Today’s websites aren’t just digital catalogues. They power appointments for in-store try-ons, host loyalty programs, manage returns, and sync with physical inventory in real-time. At Pomelo, the app and website are critical to the “Tap.Try.Buy” model, allowing customers to browse, reserve, and purchase without friction. Warby Parker’s platform does the same, letting users schedule eye exams, browse local store stock, or complete an in-store purchase online.

For brands blending offline and online, the website is no longer the endpoint – it’s the interface. It carries the brand’s identity, handles the logistics, and learns from each customer interaction. As stores become more experiential, the website does the heavy lifting behind the scenes, ensuring a seamless handoff between channels.

The digital shelf might not be enough on its own anymore, but it’s more important than ever in making the entire system work.

What shopping will look like in 2050

If you walk into a store in 2050, you might not walk out with a bag. Instead, your personalised selections – curated by AI, informed by biometric data, and filtered through your sustainability preferences – could arrive at your door within hours, if not minutes.

Retail futurists envision spaces that act less like inventory warehouses and more like interactive brand labs. Physical stores may shrink in size but grow in sophistication, equipped with augmented reality mirrors, smart shelves, and real-time language translation for global shoppers. Facial recognition could trigger dynamic pricing based on loyalty status or previous purchases if consumers opt in.

Sustainability will likely shape store formats, too. Modular, low-waste layouts, carbon-neutral delivery options, and locally sourced assortments could become table stakes. Data from online and in-store behaviour will sync seamlessly, creating a “phygital” loop where discovery, trial, and purchase span both worlds.

But some things won’t change. Shoppers will still crave connection, story, and the confidence that comes from seeing and touching a product before committing. The brands that win in 2050 may look futuristic – but at their core, they’ll understand something timeless: trust is built person-to-person, even when powered by pixels.

Retail’s Quiet Reinvention

What began as a tactical move to lower return rates or offer fitting rooms has turned into something more fundamental: a rethinking of what retail means. Digital-first brands aren’t just entering physical spaces; they’re redesigning them on their terms.

These aren’t legacy department stores or big-box chains. They’re focused, frictionless, and hyper-intentional. Every square foot has a purpose, whether to host an eye exam, facilitate same-day pickup, or serve as a live feedback loop for product development.

The quiet reinvention underway isn’t about going back – it’s about moving forward with the tools, data, and expectations of a new era. The lines between online and offline are no longer blurred. They’re gone entirely.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.