Consumer Behavior Archives

Cash is disappearing from daily life across Southeast Asia. In 2019, nearly half of all transactions in Asia were made in cash. By 2027, that figure is expected to fall to just 14 percent, according to the Bank for International Settlements. Mobile wallets—once a convenience—are now overtaking physical currency as the region’s default mode of payment.

This isn’t just a shift in how people pay. It’s a full-blown rewrite of Southeast Asia’s consumer economy. From Bangkok to Manila, behaviour, access, and mobility are being shaped by QR codes, app-driven incentives, and an ecosystem of competing fintech platforms racing to own the checkout moment.

The scale of adoption is staggering. In the Philippines, over 90 million people—around 80 percent of the population—use GCash or Maya, according to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. In Indonesia, QRIS transactions surged to 2.7 billion in 2024, up 66 percent from the year prior, based on data from Bank Indonesia.

Thailand logged more than 16 billion PromptPay transactions in 2023, cementing it as the country’s most common payment method. In Singapore, the SGQR system now supports over 30 digital payment schemes, allowing users to scan a single code and choose their preferred app—no cash, no card, no friction.

Unlike China and India, where single players dominate, Southeast Asia is shaping a multi-platform economy. Consumers aren’t just going digital; they’re actively choosing between wallets based on rewards, speed, and the ecosystem of services attached to each app.

The Regional Play

A landmark pact between five ASEAN countries is turning mobile payments into a regional system. Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and the Philippines have linked their QR code schemes, enabling cross-border wallet use. A Filipino tourist in Bangkok can pay with GCash. A Thai traveller in Singapore can use PromptPay. No currency exchange. No new app. Just scan and go.

This isn’t just symbolic cooperation. It’s a practical leap toward regional commerce at digital speed. Consumers already expect to scan and pay anywhere. Now, the infrastructure is catching up.

More than 100 million tourists visited ASEAN countries in 2024. Many of them already live cashless at home—and now expect the same abroad. For small businesses, cross-border payments mean a wider market without new infrastructure. A QR sticker and a smartphone are all it takes.

Policymakers see this as just the beginning. Cross-border wallet use could soon expand to remittances, regional e-commerce, and subscription billing. Southeast Asia is quietly building the infrastructure to support a truly interoperable digital economy.

Platform Power and Wallet Wars

Beneath all this infrastructure is a more urgent contest—one for daily dominance. Wallets are no longer just payment tools. They are retail ecosystems, vying for attention, behaviour, and loyalty.

In Indonesia, ShopeePay, OVO, and Dana are locked in a three-way race, each tying payments to e-commerce, food delivery, and retail perks. In the Philippines, GCash leads with over 90 million users, while Maya carves out a younger audience through crypto, banking, and cashback. GrabPay holds ground in Singapore and Malaysia by weaving payments into transport and everyday services.

These wallets don’t just process payments. They offer credit, savings, loyalty points, insurance, and instant promotions. Consumers now choose where to shop based on who gives the better deal—not who’s closest or cheapest.

Brands are adapting fast. Retailers are building in-wallet offers and flash deals to stay top of mind. Banks are co-branding products to remain visible inside apps. In this economy, platform presence can matter more than price point.

Wallet ecosystems aren’t just changing how people pay—they’re changing how people choose. As competition heats up, the most powerful wallets are becoming retail platforms in their own right, collapsing the gap between promotion and purchase.

How Brands Are Winning in the Wallet Economy

Jollibee x GCash: Scaling Speed and Spend with QR Exclusives

Jollibee has turned mobile wallets into more than just payment tools. In early 2024, the Filipino fast-food giant piloted QR-only express counters in busy Metro Manila stores—accepting GCash exclusively for walk-up orders.

The results were immediate. Checkout times fell by 30 percent on average, with lunchtime throughput increasing by nearly 20 percent in the busiest branches. But the real advantage was behavioural. GCash-linked promotions—including “buy one, get one” bundles for specific meal sets—drove higher ticket sizes and repeat visits. Jollibee reported a 12 percent lift in average order value among wallet users compared to traditional cash or card buyers during the campaign window.

Beyond volume, the partnership gave Jollibee something more valuable: clear usage patterns. It tracked conversion by time of day, adjusted promotions instantly, and mapped how wallet users shop differently. The model offers lessons beyond fast food. QSR chains across the region are now experimenting with QR-linked incentives to boost order volume and loyalty.

Unilever Vietnam x ZaloPay: Closing the Loop on Sampling and Segmentation

Unilever Vietnam used mobile wallets for more than sales—it used them to test, learn, and refine. In a 2024 pilot with ZaloPay, the brand launched a digital sampling campaign for its new “urban essentials” personal care line targeting Gen Z professionals.

Consumers claimed samples directly through the ZaloPay app, but redemption came with a short quiz and opt-in to Unilever’s official account. In just three weeks, over 150,000 users participated. Of those, 17 percent converted to purchase. More importantly, the campaign delivered real data: which products got tried, how long users waited, and who came back to buy.

Traditional sampling often delivers little feedback and a lot of waste. This campaign flipped the script. For FMCG brands, it’s a path forward—less sampling waste, more segment-level insight, and faster market-readiness. It wasn’t just about targeting—it was about validating what a new segment actually wanted.

Wallets as Retail Real Estate

In Southeast Asia’s evolving consumer economy, mobile wallets are becoming the new shelf. They are visible, contextual, and central to purchase decisions. No longer just the endpoint, they’re shaping what happens before the sale is even made.

Wallets are now where discovery happens. Real-time promos, loyalty rewards, and flash deals make QR apps as influential as in-store signage. In Indonesia, ShopeePay’s “Deals Near Me” surfaces location-based offers that nudge shoppers toward one convenience store—or one coffee shop—over another.

UX Design is now strategy. What shows up on the payment screen—bundled meals, upsells, time-limited offers—can shift behaviour in seconds. In a recent survey, 62 percent of Southeast Asian wallet users said an in-app offer had changed their purchase decision in the past three months.

Brands are responding with wallet-native campaigns. In the Philippines, GCash partners with major retailers to launch app-exclusive bundles. In Vietnam, FMCG players are testing ZaloPay-only SKUs to gauge price sensitivity among mobile-first Gen Z consumers.

For marketers, this changes the playbook. Campaigns now live inside the moment—built into the wallet, not broadcast through media. And just like endcaps in a store, wallet placement is scarce, valuable, and judged by performance.

How Digital Wallets Are Closing the Financial Gap

While wallets compete for urban customers, they also unlock access for millions previously excluded from formal finance. The World Bank estimates that over 40 percent of adults in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam remain unbanked. Mobile wallets are changing that.

Street vendors, farmers, and gig workers are now building financial histories with every tap. In Indonesia, over 29 million small businesses use QRIS to accept payments. In the Philippines, GCash delivers welfare payouts, subsidies, and remittances, often to people who’ve never walked into a bank.

This shift is producing an entirely new class of consumers. They’re connected but overlooked—digitally fluent but invisible to most traditional marketing models. For researchers, the challenge now is to understand how financial access rewires habits and reshapes trust.

Wallet adoption may be booming across the region, but no two markets look alike. Some are dominated by one or two players. Others support overlapping apps, bank wallets, and homegrown fintechs. The variation speaks to different consumer needs and regulatory choices.

Comparing Wallet Ecosystems Across ASEAN

Country	Dominant Wallets	Notable Features	Estimated Adoption
Indonesia	Dana, OVO, ShopeePay	QRIS compliance, local cashback, offline ubiquity	70–75%
Philippines	GCash, Maya	Microloans, utility payments, crypto access	80–85%
Thailand	PromptPay, TrueMoney	Linked to national ID and digital welfare payouts	90%+
Singapore	GrabPay, PayNow, DBS PayLah	High QR interoperability, cross-border ready	95%+
Malaysia	Touch ‘n Go, Boost	Toll road integration, state-backed incentives	80%+

Sources: Central bank data, World Bank Global Findex (2024), platform reporting

What This Signals

The wallet boom in Southeast Asia is not a trend—it’s a system reset. It’s changing how value flows, how behaviour is tracked, and who gets included.

Consumers are gaining fast access to finance, but only through platforms that decide the terms. Governments see more. Banks lose ground. Retailers shift strategy. But the risks are real—ecosystem lock-in, data monopolies, and a widening gap for the disconnected.

Southeast Asia is building the prototype for a fully digital consumer economy. What works here won’t stay here. Markets with similar demographics will follow—some already are.

As wallets become embedded in daily life, they generate a stream of behavioural data that most traditional research methods cannot easily replicate. For brands and researchers alike, this shift is not just an operational upgrade—it is a structural advantage.

Who Gets Left Behind in a Wallet-Led Economy

Not everyone is tapping phones or using QR codes. Across Southeast Asia, millions still rely on cash, not by choice, but by necessity. As digital systems race ahead, they are leaving some consumers behind.

The elderly, rural communities, and informal workers without smartphones or stable internet still make up a large share of the population in countries like Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. For many, wallets remain either out of reach or out of trust.

Even in cities, resistance is growing. Consumers worry about data tracking, fraud, and hidden fees. In Thailand, a watchdog recently warned about wallet-based lenders targeting young users with high-interest loans disguised as pay-later perks.

Cash still offers something digital doesn’t—trust. In many traditional communities, handing over bills is easier, more familiar, and more accepted. As merchants go digital, cash users risk being pushed out of the transaction altogether.

Governments face a balancing act: modernise finance without deepening exclusion. Incentives for wallet use should not come at the cost of cash access, especially in rural or unbanked areas. For brands, the solution lies in hybrid systems that serve both digital adopters and cash loyalists.

The danger of a wallet-led economy is not that it moves too fast, but that it forgets who isn’t coming along. Progress will be measured not just in QR checkouts, but in how well the new economy includes the voices, habits, and limitations of every consumer.

A View from the Future Consumer

Southeast Asia is not just adopting digital finance—it’s rewriting the rules. While Europe debates regulation and the U.S. sticks to cards, this region is designing a payment system that is mobile, fast, and increasingly borderless. Consumers aren’t waiting for banks to evolve. They’re building the next model themselves.

For brands, the implications are clear. The old playbook—national campaigns, static rewards, and linear funnels—no longer works. Today’s consumers jump across apps, currencies, and contexts without hesitation. The winners will meet them there, designing not for convenience, but for relevance at the point of payment. Pricing isn’t set in advance. It’s surfaced in the moment—shaped by wallet prompts, bundled rewards, or time-limited offers.

For researchers, this landscape offers something rare: behaviour in real time. Every wallet tap leaves a trackable decision—what was bought, where, when, and how the user was nudged. But knowing what happened is not the same as knowing why. That’s where research matters most. Ethnography, cultural fluency, and journey mapping are the tools that explain what dashboards alone can’t.

Research must move faster, go deeper, and sit closer to where decisions are made—in wallet ecosystems, in platform partnerships, and in the fast-evolving lives of Southeast Asian consumers.

Some brands are already blending behaviour data with on-the-ground insight. In Vietnam, a beverage company spotted rural sales spikes through wallet data. Field interviews revealed the link: payday loans disbursed on the same day each month. That single insight reshaped everything—from promo timing to pack size.

The next breakthroughs in understanding consumers won’t come from dashboards alone. They’ll come from pairing live data with lived experience—decoding what people do and why they do it. The future of research isn’t digital by default. It’s embedded, agile, and built inside the systems where decisions happen.

Consumer power is shifting from income to intuition—from how much people spend to how fluently they move through the ecosystems around them. Southeast Asia isn’t adapting. It’s leading.

Kadence International helps brands decode evolving consumer behaviour across Asia and beyond. To understand what drives tomorrow’s decisions, talk to our team.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In 2023, more people moved to Charlotte, North Carolina than to New York City. Once known primarily as a banking hub, Charlotte is now among the fastest-growing metropolitan areas in the United States, with its population increasing by over 15% in the past decade. Its rising appeal is part of a larger pattern: a quiet but powerful migration away from megacities to what demographers call “secondary cities.”

This isn’t just an American phenomenon. Across global markets, from India to the UK to Southeast Asia, mid-sized cities are absorbing growth once concentrated in capital centres. In India, cities like Coimbatore and Ahmedabad are drawing IT investments and retail developments. In China, Chengdu has added more new retail space than many first-tier cities, and consumer spending in tier-2 urban areas is growing at a faster pace than in Beijing or Shanghai.

Affordability is a clear driver. As housing prices and costs of living continue to rise in the world’s biggest cities, residents and businesses are seeking out more livable alternatives. But what’s notable is that consumption isn’t declining as people move. In fact, recent data from McKinsey shows that residents of US secondary cities are just as likely to spend on premium goods and services as their peers in larger cities. The same is true in markets like Vietnam and Indonesia, where new urban enclaves are seeing surging demand for fast fashion, electronics, and beauty products.

This shift challenges a long-standing assumption: that consumer growth follows the gravitational pull of megacities. Instead, smaller urban centres are establishing themselves as independent engines of demand. They are not satellite economies or overflow markets—they’re increasingly self-sustaining hubs with distinct consumption patterns, retail ecosystems, and growth trajectories. Understanding these evolving dynamics isn’t just about tracking migration. It’s about recognising where the next wave of market opportunity is taking shape.

The Urban Migration Redrawing Consumer Behaviour

The reasons behind this urban realignment are pragmatic. In the United States, the average rent for a one-bedroom apartment in New York City now exceeds $3,000 a month. In contrast, cities like Raleigh or Nashville offer not only lower housing costs but also rising job opportunities and improved quality of life. Remote work has made this trade-off possible for millions. According to US Census data, more than 8.2 million people relocated across state lines in 2023, and the majority moved away from the country’s most expensive urban centres.

In the UK, London saw net domestic outflows in every quarter of 2023, as younger workers and families opted for cities like Birmingham and Manchester, where housing is more affordable and infrastructure investments have been accelerating. A similar pattern is unfolding across Europe and parts of Southeast Asia, driven by both economic necessity and post-pandemic lifestyle recalibrations.

China’s urban development offers a sharper example. For over a decade, the central government has actively promoted growth in tier-2 and tier-3 cities as a way to reduce overreliance on Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen. Chengdu and Hangzhou have emerged as digital and cultural hubs in their own right, attracting tech startups, luxury retailers, and young professionals seeking lower living costs and less congestion. Between 2010 and 2020, Chengdu’s GDP more than doubled, and consumer spending rose in parallel.

India’s Smart Cities Mission, launched in 2015, is another case study in how policy can redirect population and spending patterns. The initiative, aimed at improving infrastructure and governance in 100 mid-sized cities, has already resulted in faster retail expansion in places like Indore and Bhubaneswar than in Mumbai or Delhi. According to the India Brand Equity Foundation, consumer electronics sales in tier-2 cities grew by 23% year-on-year in 2023, outpacing metropolitan areas.

What links these movements is not a retreat from consumption but a reshaping of it. Consumers in secondary cities aren’t pulling back; they’re reallocating their spending. Travel, home improvement, wellness, and personal tech are among the categories seeing strong growth. Rather than dining out five nights a week, they may invest in premium groceries or upgrade their living space. Rather than fast fashion hauls, they’re choosing higher-quality basics from emerging local brands.

The geography of consumer demand is no longer centred on a few megacity powerhouses. It’s diffusing across a wider map—one defined by affordability, connectivity, and rising expectations. This new distribution isn’t temporary. It reflects a deeper recalibration in how people want to live and what they choose to prioritise when they have more control over where they are.

Rising Cities to Watch Across Global Markets

The rebalancing of population isn’t just reshaping where people live—it’s altering the architecture of consumption. Cities that once played a secondary role in national economies are now driving demand across key categories, from beauty and electronics to groceries and home improvement. These are not temporary trends. They reflect long-term investments, shifting demographics, and the redistribution of growth across geographies.

In India, urban expansion is no longer confined to Delhi, Mumbai, or Bangalore. Mid-sized cities like Ahmedabad, Kochi, and Coimbatore are seeing a surge in both population and retail development. Ahmedabad, now part of India’s key freight and industrial corridor, is drawing major logistics and manufacturing investment, boosting both employment and disposable income. Kochi, a port city historically associated with trade, is evolving into a service economy with rising demand for consumer goods, even as its organised retail recovery lags behind some peers. In Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore’s industrial economy has been buoyed by its emergence as a textile and engineering hub, contributing to increased uptake of electronics, fast fashion, and D2C brands among its aspirational middle class.

In China, government-backed decentralisation has helped elevate cities like Chengdu, Wuhan, and Hangzhou into powerful regional markets. Chengdu’s GDP surpassed 2 trillion yuan in 2023, underpinned by thriving sectors such as tech services, gaming, and high-end dining. Wuhan, long known for its manufacturing base, is diversifying into optoelectronics and biotech, helping shift consumer demand toward health and wellness products. Meanwhile, Hangzhou—home to Alibaba and a growing number of innovation hubs—continues to drive premium consumption, particularly among younger professionals seeking upgraded personal care, fitness tech, and lifestyle products.

In Southeast Asia, a cluster of cities is quietly gaining ground. Da Nang, once considered peripheral to Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, has logged annual growth over 6% on the back of a booming service economy and increased tourism-linked retail. Surabaya, Indonesia’s second-largest city, saw retail sales top $100 billion in 2023, as more middle-income households gained access to modern trade and e-commerce. In the Philippines, Cebu posted a 6% increase in GDP last year, with infrastructure and tourism projects spurring demand for beauty, packaged food, and mobile tech.

In the US and UK, the shift away from megacities is most visible in cities like Charlotte and Austin, where population growth and GDP expansion have outpaced the national average. Charlotte has attracted a steady influx of residents and companies, with population now nearing 3 million and median retail prices having risen more than 50% over the last decade. Austin led US metro areas in GDP growth in 2023–24, thanks in part to its dual reputation as a tech and cultural capital. Across the Atlantic, Birmingham has attracted new retail entrants and commercial investment, while Bristol—one of the UK’s fastest-growing core cities—is seeing a younger demographic drive e-commerce and convenience spending trends.

What unites these cities is not their size, but their trajectory. They’re absorbing the momentum once monopolised by megacities, and in doing so, are becoming primary battlegrounds for brands competing across FMCG, luxury, and tech. Each reflects a different facet of a global shift toward distributed growth—one that rewards those who understand the nuances of local demand, not just national averages.

How Consumption Patterns Differ from Megacities

What’s emerging in these secondary cities isn’t just a new geography of growth—it’s a different style of consumption. While the megacities have long been the testing grounds for innovation, image-driven luxury, and niche categories, smaller urban markets are shaping demand through a blend of aspiration and pragmatism. Consumers in these cities are not necessarily spending less; they’re spending differently—guided by function, value, and a growing sense of local identity.

In these rising hubs, premiumization often takes on a more practical form. Rather than high-concept luxury or limited-edition drops, there’s stronger traction for what might be termed “everyday upgrades.” Products that offer quality, longevity, and status without signalling excess are gaining ground. In the US, for example, Uniqlo’s decision to expand into cities like Austin and Charlotte aligns with this mindset. The brand’s clean aesthetic, moderate price point, and reputation for functional basics resonate in markets where value is prized, but style isn’t overlooked. These are not anti-fashion cities—they simply reject the transience and markup that characterises fashion in New York or Los Angeles.

In China, L’Oréal has tailored its go-to-market strategies accordingly. The company segments its product lines and retail mix not just by income level, but by geography. In tier-1 cities, its high-end lines dominate marketing spend, while in tier-2 and tier-3 locations, there’s more emphasis on skincare basics with scientific credibility and accessible pricing. Offline retail formats also shift—with pop-up stores and mobile beauty trucks seeing greater success in secondary cities where e-commerce growth hasn’t yet plateaued, and where physical presence still builds trust.

One factor that consistently shapes behaviour in these markets is the multi-generational household. In many Indian and Southeast Asian cities, discretionary income is often pooled across family units. That influences purchasing decisions across categories—from appliances to packaged food—prompting brands to market not just to individuals, but to households as collective consumers. There’s also a preference for products that serve dual or extended purposes: tech gadgets that function across work and leisure, food brands that cater to both tradition and convenience, and beauty products positioned around self-care rather than indulgence.

There is, however, no uniform pattern. In the Philippines, the growth of Korean skincare brands in cities like Cebu is as much about digital influence as affordability. In Birmingham, the return of legacy department stores is tied to nostalgia and civic pride as much as retail demand. And in Chengdu, the rise of lifestyle cafés and boutique gyms reflects a younger population that wants access to the symbols of metropolitan living—without the daily grind of Beijing.

These cities are not diluted versions of their larger counterparts. They are developing their own consumer signatures, shaped by local infrastructure, employment patterns, and cultural nuance. For brands and strategists, the challenge lies in abandoning the notion of a one-size-fits-all urban consumer. The goal is no longer just market entry—it’s market fluency. And increasingly, fluency in these smaller, faster-growing cities may prove more valuable than reach in the capitals.

how-consumer-spending-varies-across-tier-1-and tier-2-cities

Implications for Brands

The changing face of urban demand calls for more than just expansion—it requires recalibration. As secondary cities gain economic influence, many of the assumptions that once shaped brand strategy are no longer reliable. Markets that were once considered peripheral now demand bespoke planning, grounded in the specifics of place rather than the generalities of national averages.

One immediate shift is the need for greater geographic precision in research. National surveys and tiered segmentation models often flatten regional nuance, failing to capture the complexity of cities like Coimbatore or Chengdu. For companies reliant on trend forecasting or demand modelling, that means moving from regional sampling to localised data capture, often city by city.

Product development and inventory planning are also evolving. In India, brands like Mamaearth and Plum are adjusting their SKUs for tier-2 and tier-3 cities, shifting from large-format products to smaller, trial-sized offerings that match local price expectations. In the US, national retailers like Target have refined their assortments in cities like Charlotte and Nashville, prioritising core everyday goods while reducing premium or seasonal inventory that underperforms outside the major metros.

Media planning is undergoing a parallel transformation. As digital access expands in emerging urban centres, traditional broadcast budgets are giving way to city-level targeting across mobile platforms and social commerce channels. Short-form video, regional influencers, and WhatsApp-based promotions are becoming more effective in places where ad fatigue hasn’t set in and trust in peer-to-peer recommendations remains high. In markets like Vietnam, TikTok is now the primary discovery channel for beauty and electronics purchases in cities outside Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, according to recent industry data.

Even logistics, often treated as an operational concern, is now central to brand reputation in smaller cities. The rise of same-day and next-day delivery expectations—previously confined to tier-1 cities—is now common in places like Cebu or Bristol. For many brands, the challenge isn’t reaching these markets, but reaching them reliably. That’s led to increased partnerships with regional fulfilment services, and in some cases, internal investments in micro-warehousing and localised dispatch.

This redistribution of consumer power is forcing brands to move beyond scale and standardisation. The era of national uniformity in messaging, product lines, and delivery models is fading. In its place is a more fragmented but arguably more dynamic landscape—one where understanding the pulse of smaller cities is becoming essential to staying relevant in the broader market. Brands that treat these urban centres as strategic priorities, not afterthoughts, will be the ones best positioned to grow as the next wave of consumer demand continues to take shape outside the old capitals.

The Future Is Smaller, Faster, and Closer Than You Think

The cities driving the next era of global consumption won’t always be the ones on postcards. They won’t host the Olympics or top the rankings for financial centres. But they will be where new preferences are formed, where loyalty is won, and where growth happens quietly until it isn’t quiet anymore.

This is not a temporary correction or a cost-of-living workaround. It’s a structural shift. In many ways, secondary cities are better attuned to the values shaping modern consumerism: access, flexibility, and balance. These are places where people can afford to live and choose how they spend, not just how much.

For brands, the path forward lies in proximity—not just geographic, but cultural. Success will depend less on scale than on sensitivity. Less on dominating share of voice in capital cities, and more on understanding how tastes evolve in places that rarely make headlines but increasingly make markets.

The middle is no longer a middle ground. It is the next frontier. And those who invest in it early will not just meet new demand—they’ll define it.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Thailand is embarking on a bold economic initiative that intertwines fiscal stimulus with digital innovation. The government has launched a digital wallet scheme, providing eligible citizens a one-time payment of ฿10,000 (approximately USD 275). This initiative aims to invigorate local economies and accelerate the nation’s transition to a cashless society.

The program is being rolled out in phases, with the third phase targeting 2.7 million young individuals aged 16 to 20. These recipients will receive the funds through the Thang Rath app, a government-developed platform to facilitate digital transactions. The funds are intended for use within local communities, with certain restrictions to ensure the money stimulates domestic consumption.

Thailand’s digital wallet initiative aims to stimulate economic activity and promote digital transactions. The program’s first phase targeted 50 million citizens aged 16 and above, each receiving ฿10,000 (approximately USD 275) through a digital wallet. This approach is designed to encourage spending within local economies and accelerate the country’s shift towards a cashless society.

Thailand’s digital wallet program is a significant case study in integrating fiscal policy with digital technology. By distributing funds through digital means, the government stimulates the economy and encourages the adoption of digital payment systems, potentially influencing consumer habits and financial behaviours.

From Handout to Handset

This is money designed to move markets. Thailand’s ฿10,000 (USD 275) digital wallet credit is distributed exclusively via mobile apps. It has clear boundaries: it must be spent within a designated time period, in specific geographic areas, and only through participating merchants equipped to handle digital payments. The delivery mechanism is the government-backed Thang Rat app, which uses national ID verification to register users and link them to eligible purchases.

The program injects short-term liquidity while strategically embedding digital transactions into routine life. Access requires digital fluency – scanning codes, verifying identity, and transacting within the PromptPay ecosystem. The interface has been streamlined for ease, but the implications are layered. Thailand is accelerating the normalisation of app-mediated spending across demographics and regions.

Financial institutions and major digital wallet providers are working behind the scenes to integrate merchant systems and stabilise the transaction flow to ensure rapid uptake. This isn’t limited to major retailers. Many small vendors, from noodle stalls to corner pharmacies, are registering to accept payments. The digital wallet scheme demands not just consumer participation, but full-scale merchant onboarding into a cashless economy.

This is a behavioural leap for millions of Thais who still rely heavily on cash. But for younger recipients, the transition feels intuitive. Many live on their smartphones, accustomed to social commerce, e-wallet promos, and gamified savings. What the government is effectively doing is placing a financial incentive on behaviour they’re already inclined to adopt.

In this way, the program is a behavioural nudge packaged as an economic policy. It’s teaching people how to spend in a new way, and rewarding them for doing it quickly.

A Timed Windfall for Local Commerce

Businesses across Thailand are preparing for increased consumer spending driven by the digital wallet program. The requirement for funds to be used within a specific period encourages immediate spending, prompting merchants to adjust their pricing strategies and promotional activities accordingly.

Food stalls are printing QR codes, retailers are adjusting shift schedules, salon owners, café managers, and shopfront vendors are updating signage to remind passersby that e-wallets are accepted here. The shift is visible and urgent in provinces where cash has long dominated daily transactions.

In Bangkok’s inner districts, chains and convenience stores are doubling down on digital promotions. Buy-one-get-one offers, bundled discounts, and mobile flash sales are being calibrated to coincide with the disbursement dates. The psychology behind it is clear: create immediacy, trigger impulse purchases, and keep consumers in-app and on-premise.

Meanwhile, mom-and-pop stores in Chiang Mai, Khon Kaen, and Phuket are entering the formal financial ecosystem for the first time. Participation in the program requires digital onboarding. The upside: access to new customers flush with government-backed spending power. The risk: failing to move quickly could mean missing the wave altogether.

Consumer behaviour is expected to be fluid but focused. Analysts anticipate that essentials and small indulgences, like meals, home goods, and personal care, will dominate early spending. But discretionary categories, especially fashion and electronics, could also benefit, particularly if retailers tailor offerings to fit within the ฿10,000 bracket.

This is a demand surge programmed into the system. Every player, from a street vendor selling grilled pork skewers to a regional supermarket chain, is being pulled into a countdown economy, where readiness and responsiveness could decide who gains and who gets left behind.

Digital Payments Go Mainstream in Thailand

The timing of Thailand’s digital wallet rollout is no accident. With PromptPay already embedded into daily life through peer-to-peer transfers and utility payments, the infrastructure for mass adoption was quietly laid years ago. What’s happening now is a sudden acceleration, where digital payments are no longer a convenience, but a condition for participation.

The mechanics are simple: the digital credit can only be spent via QR code transactions within the Thang Rat app or partner platforms. While younger, tech-savvy consumers may find the digital wallet system intuitive, older demographics and small businesses in semi-urban or rural areas face challenges in adopting this technology. Efforts are underway to support and educate these groups to ensure inclusive participation in the program.

This forced familiarity is a powerful lever. In previous government subsidies, such as the “Half-Half” co-payment scheme, uptake of digital payments spiked, but often reverted once the incentive expired. The difference this time lies in scale, urgency, and exclusivity. With no offline alternative, digital behaviour becomes the default.

Retailers, both large and small, are expanding their digital loyalty ecosystems, leveraging infrastructure that’s already in place. Meanwhile, independent merchants are being trained through government-led and private sector initiatives, many of whom accept mobile payments alongside cash for the first time.

There are structural benefits too. Digital transactions bring transparency, reduce leakage, and pull more activity into the taxable economy. For financial institutions and fintech platforms, it’s a rare moment to onboard users en masse, expand digital credit histories, and introduce adjacent services like microloans and savings tools. What was once novel, QR payments and app-exclusive deals, is now baseline behaviour. Habits form, preferences evolve, and expectations reset.

For Thailand, this isn’t just about going cashless. It’s about normalising a new rhythm of consumption, one mediated by apps, verified by biometrics, and reinforced through constant interface with digital payment systems.

Programmed Consumption and the Rise of Directed Demand

Thailand’s digital wallet program doesn’t simply encourage spending; it shapes it. By placing parameters on how, where, and when the ฿10,000 can be used, the government has introduced a form of economic steering rarely seen at this scale. Unlike traditional cash stimulus, which relies on recipients to allocate funds freely, this initiative narrows consumer choice and concentrates activity into predefined lanes.

The logic is deliberate. Restricting usage to local businesses prevents capital leakage to international e-commerce platforms. Limiting the timeframe creates urgency. Requiring digital payment methods brings consumers and merchants into closer contact with formal financial systems. By specifying where and how the digital wallet funds can be used, the government effectively directs consumer spending towards specific sectors and regions, aiming to boost local economies and encourage digital payment systems.

This creates a behavioural moment for consumers. Faced with a ticking clock and a limited range of vendors, they are more likely to make purchase decisions that are reactive, needs-based, or convenience-driven. This doesn’t eliminate agency, but it does channel it. The consumer becomes a participant in a curated economic script.

Retailers are adapting quickly. Some design promotions that align with the wallet’s value cap, offering bundles or tiered discounts pegged just under ฿10,000. Others are integrating in-app incentives, such as exclusive digital deals or gamified rewards. It’s not a one-off campaign. It’s a moment for brands to convert compliance into long-term connection.

There are also downstream effects. Data trails emerge as millions engage in digital-first transactions over a condensed period. Purchase preferences, time-of-day activity, and location-based behaviour are logged in real time. This creates a trove of behavioural insights for tech partners and financial services firms, potentially reshaping how credit scoring, product development, and localised marketing unfold in the months ahead.

Similar experiments have been attempted globally, particularly in conditional cash transfers. But Thailand’s version is uniquely digitised, centralised, and transactional. It offers a test case in how programmable money can accelerate economic recovery and behavioural adaptation.

Understanding how different consumer groups respond to this stimulus is essential for long-term strategy. Young adults, already comfortable with mobile interfaces, adapt rapidly, but older consumers may show resistance or partial adoption. Rural users face infrastructure gaps that could slow uptake or reshape spending patterns around trusted local merchants. Urban Gen Zs may spend impulsively and favour experiential categories, while Gen X participants lean toward utility-driven purchases. These behavioural distinctions matter for segmentation, pricing, and product development, particularly as brands look to refine future targeting based on wallet usage data.

New Norms in Marketing and Merchandising

The digital wallet program is forcing businesses in Thailand to rethink the fundamentals of how they market, merchandise, and manage demand. Digital credit may be temporary, but behavioural ripple effects influence how brands present themselves online and in-store.

At the heart of this transformation is timing. With a strict window in which the funds must be used, consumer attention is compressed. That changes the marketing calculus. There’s no luxury of a long lead funnel or sustained brand storytelling. Campaigns must hit fast and deliver clear value. QR codes aren’t just payment methods; they’re now marketing triggers, embedded in posters, flyers, and social posts that tie spending to immediacy.

Product curation has also shifted. Brands are building product bundles priced just below the ฿10,000 threshold, creating psychological cues for consumers to spend the full amount. Some offer flash deals that reset daily, while others push limited-time bundles through retailer apps or LINE commerce channels. These are not just promotions but engineered conversions calibrated to align with the digital wallet framework.

Inventory planning, too, has become more dynamic. Mid-sized retailers and national chains are using digital dashboards to track wallet-driven demand in real time, enabling rapid stock reallocation. Categories like food delivery, personal electronics, cosmetics, and small household appliances are spiking, especially among younger consumers already fluent in app-centred shopping habits.

The new challenge is coherence for businesses operating in both physical and digital spaces. Messaging must be synchronised across touchpoints, inventory systems must be tightly integrated, and customer service needs to anticipate a wave of first-time digital shoppers. This isn’t just a surge; it’s a behavioural onramp for consumers who have never interacted with a loyalty program or browsed a brand’s offerings through an app.

Loyalty itself is being redefined. With state-funded money in play, consumer allegiance becomes fluid. People are less concerned with brand heritage and more focused on price, accessibility, and in-app rewards. The brands that win in this window may not be the ones with the longest history, but the ones that adapt fastest to this new consumption model.

A Testbed for Market Entry and Innovation

Thailand’s digital wallet stimulus is becoming a live laboratory for market entrants and tech innovators. The initiative presents a rare opportunity to observe real-time consumer responses at scale, under state-structured conditions, by creating a compressed environment of digitally enabled, time-bound consumption.

This moment offers more than a demand bump for global brands and startups exploring Southeast Asia. It provides behavioural proof points. Which price points resonate with a digitally empowered consumer base? How do young adults prioritise purchases with a fixed wallet balance and expiration date? What formats – QR discounts, app-based coupons, social-first promotions – translate into immediate action?

For global brands operating in Thailand, the closed-loop nature of the wallet system introduces new constraints. Transactions are restricted to pre-approved domestic merchants using Thai QR payment infrastructure, sidelining international platforms and foreign e-commerce flows. This forces global players to rethink their localisation strategy, not just in language or pricing but also in payment compatibility, compliance with local fintech protocols, and partnerships with Thai digital ecosystems. Without local enablement, access to wallet-driven demand is effectively off-limits.

These are questions that typical market entry research can only approximate. But in Thailand right now, the data is unfolding in real time.

Retail tech platforms are already responding. Point-of-sale solutions are being retrofitted to accommodate PromptPay and Thang Rat app syncing. Loyalty software providers are rolling out integrations tailored for the short-term stimulus. Meanwhile, financial institutions are watching new patterns emerge around credit top-ups, digital wallet storage, and tiered savings, insights that could inform broader regional product development.

For brands considering market entry, the digital wallet rollout reduces uncertainty. It forces clarity around key operational requirements: payment infrastructure compatibility, smartphone-optimised UX design, local partnership strategy, and promotional agility. Previously theoretical risks like payment fragmentation and uneven digital engagement are unfolding in real time, offering rare visibility.

There is also a broader story unfolding around interoperability. Local players that capture wallet-based spending may quickly gain bargaining power in distribution deals or tech partnerships. New winners could emerge, not just based on product strength but also on their ability to move quickly, adapt nimbly, and serve a new type of Thai consumer who expects digital fluency as the norm.

In this way, the program becomes more than a fiscal initiative. It is a proving ground for what works in digitally conditioned economies, and a barometer for how brands, especially those eyeing ASEAN growth, should rethink their playbooks.

Beyond the Wallet

The digital wallet program is temporary, but the behavioural architecture it introduces is anything but. Thailand’s push toward app-based, conditional cash disbursement may be a one-off stimulus. Still, it functions as a prototype that could shape the long-term relationship between consumers, digital ecosystems, and the state.

At a policy level, it hints at future mechanisms for targeted fiscal relief. With a national app tied to ID verification, merchant QR capability, and geofenced rails, Thailand has the infrastructure for agile, targeted interventions. Imagine fuel subsidies issued directly to drivers’ wallets, or education grants tied to purchases at approved vendors. Thailand is effectively building the scaffolding for programmable transfers that move beyond welfare and into consumer engineering.

For brands, this shifts the horizon. Suppose public spending can be deployed with this degree of precision. In that case, market strategy must now factor in state influence – not just regulation or taxation, but direct participation in how demand is created, distributed, and spent.

It also raises questions about data sovereignty and consumer privacy. Every transaction under this program is logged, time-stamped, and geolocated. While much of the data is anonymised or aggregated, tracking purchasing behaviours at this scale gives policymakers and platforms a new level of visibility and responsibility. Transparency, ethical use, and public trust will become defining themes as similar programs proliferate.

For consumers, the wallet scheme introduces a new normal, not just in how they pay but also in how they engage with money. Spending has become traceable and digitally shaped. This could foster a generation of Thais who expect convenience, traceability, and flexibility from every financial interaction—expectations that will extend far beyond this program.

In the broader Southeast Asian context, Thailand’s experiment is being watched. Governments from Vietnam to Malaysia are exploring their own pathways toward digital inclusion and financial modernisation. If Thailand’s model successfully drives lasting consumer habits, similar regional models could be accelerated.

What remains unclear is whether these behaviours will stick. Will consumers continue favouring QR payments, or will familiar cash habits resurface? Much will depend on how embedded digital convenience becomes in daily transactions and whether follow-up incentives, merchant retention, and habit reinforcement mechanisms remain. This presents a live opportunity for market researchers to track post-stimulus drop-offs, digital payment stickiness, and evolving consumer loyalty under real-world conditions.

If replicated across ASEAN, this state-led digital payment model could redefine how governments stimulate economies and how brands prepare for demand. Thailand’s model offers a scalable blueprint in markets like Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, where digital infrastructure is expanding but financial inclusion remains uneven.

There’s also a broader possibility: what begins as a one-off wallet scheme could evolve into a prototype for Universal Basic Income trials delivered via fintech. Conditional, trackable, and segmentable, such frameworks would allow governments to deploy aid, test responses, tweak incentives, and monitor outcomes in real time.

Thailand’s digital wallet initiative illustrates the growing interplay between government policy and consumer behaviour. For businesses, this underscores the importance of aligning with digital platforms and payment systems increasingly influenced by public sector strategies.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Jollibee is rewriting the rules of global fast food.

After a strong financial year, the Filipino fast-food giant is entering 2025 with around USD 364 million earmarked to open as many as 800 new stores worldwide. That would push Jollibee’s total store count past 10,000, a staggering figure for a homegrown chain once dismissed as quirky outside Asia. But this is no vanity expansion. The brand’s global push reflects a more profound shift at home, where demand for quick, affordable meals surges, defying inflation, reshaping food culture, and fueling a new era of fast-food dominance in the Philippines.

This isn’t just about chicken and burgers. It’s about how one brand’s rise is capturing the cravings of an entire nation.

Fast food emerged as the most popular choice for dining out, particularly among chicken and burger lovers. Quick-service establishments accounted for over half of the industry’s total revenue, generating over USD 7 billion in 2023. Since then, the segment has been dominated by homegrown players, led by Jollibee Foods Corporation, whose portfolio includes Mang Inasal, Greenwich, and Chowking. McDonald’s remains a distant second, operating under the exclusive franchise of Golden Arches Development Corporation. As demand rises, local chains expand into provincial areas, while international brands continue to enter the market, adding more variety to Filipino tables.

Whether students meet after class, families treat themselves on weekends, or office workers order lunch through an app, the momentum is clear: Filipinos are dining out, ordering in, and doing it more often.

This revival isn’t a return to the past. It’s an acceleration. The pandemic disrupted routines and deepened appreciation for fast, reliable food options. A more mobile, value-conscious consumer emerged who now sees fast food as affordable and dependable.

Demand for fast food stays strong in the Philippines

The latest research indicates that consumer spending on food services remained steady despite elevated inflation rates, with quick-service restaurants showing particular resilience. Budget-friendly combo meals, seasonal promos, and tiered pricing have helped brands stay within reach for everyday customers.

For many, an under-two-dollar value meal is more than just food. It’s an accessible treat, a small reward at the end of a long day. In uncertain times, the routine of fast food offers something dependable.

Global ambition with local roots in the Philippines

Jollibee’s international footprint is a calculated strategy powered by years of steady domestic growth and rising demand from Filipino communities abroad. From Los Angeles to Riyadh, queues outside Jollibee outlets speak to nostalgia and a global appetite for distinctly Filipino offerings.

In 2024, Jollibee Foods Corp opened new stores across North America, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia, adding to its diverse portfolio that includes Smashburger in the U.S., The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, and Yonghe King in China. Its global network spans over 30 countries, with stronghold cities like Toronto and Dubai seeing expansion fueled by the diaspora and growing mainstream interest.

But the push outward is rooted in confidence built at home. JFC’s record earnings have created room to double down on international markets, and the brand’s ability to localise, while staying true to its core identity, has become its competitive edge.

Regional QSRs take root beyond Metro Manila

While major players dominate the headlines, a quiet transformation occurs in provincial cities. Homegrown fast-food chains like Mang Inasal (also under JFC) and Potato Corner are seeing rapid expansion in tier-2 and tier-3 areas, where demand is driven by a growing middle class and increased infrastructure investment.

Cities like Iloilo, Cagayan de Oro, and General Santos have become new frontiers for QSR growth. These markets value familiarity, affordability, and local relevance, and regional chains are responding to these preferences with rice-based meals, grilled dishes, and snackable comfort food.

The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) notes that regional retail hubs posted double-digit growth in food service in 2024, a sign that the fast-food phenomenon is no longer concentrated in major urban centres. For brands, this shift signals the need to build hyper-local strategies, not just nationally but by province, city, and even neighbourhood.

Global fast-food chains step up competition in the Philippines’ quick-service market.

Jollibee may dominate the local scene, but it no longer stands alone. International quick-service brands are scaling up in the Philippines, eyeing the same value-driven, convenience-loving consumers.

McDonald’s Philippines, which opened its 700th store in 2024, continues to match Jollibee’s momentum with localised offerings and digital upgrades. Popeyes and Shake Shack are expanding footprints in Metro Manila, while brands like Tim Hortons and Five Guys are testing growth in urban centres. Each new entry promises variety and the pressure to compete.

What’s different now is the intensity. With a young, urban population and rising mobile penetration, the Philippine QSR market has become a battleground for homegrown and global players. Store count is only one metric. The real contest is for relevance: who can adapt, respond, and resonate fastest with local tastes and lifestyles?

Fast Food Menus that speak the local language

Taste is local, and brands are listening. Filipino diners want more than burgers and fries. They expect flavour profiles reflecting regional preferences and seasonal cravings. That’s why spicy chicken, sweet-style spaghetti, and ube-flavoured desserts are staples, not novelties, across fast-food menus.

Before launching new items like Spicy Tuna Pie or ube-flavoured desserts, Jollibee conducts sensory testing and product trials to gauge appeal across regions. JFC’s 2021 Sustainability Report outlines a quality assurance process that includes sensory evaluations and physicochemical analysis, ensuring every product meets both safety standards and consumer taste expectations.

Jollibee continues to lead with offerings designed around Filipino palates, from its best-selling Burger Steak to newly launched spicy Tuna Pie variants. McDonald’s Philippines has followed suit, bringing back its Twister Fries and McSpicy lines while experimenting with rice-based meals and desserts like the Ube McDip.

This localisation trend isn’t limited to Filipino chains. Even global brands are learning to localise faster, rolling out limited-time items that reflect local tastes. Product development has become both a marketing tool and a competitive differentiator, allowing brands to stay top-of-mind in a saturated landscape.

Sustainability now comes standard in fast food chains in the Philippines

Sustainability is no longer a side note—it’s influencing what Filipinos order, how often they return, and which brands earn their trust. Jollibee’s “Joy for Tomorrow” program has moved beyond recycling pledges and into action, including energy-efficient store designs, reduced food waste, and stronger partnerships with local farmers.

Other fast-food players are following suit. Biodegradable packaging, cage-free sourcing, and ingredient transparency are making their way into the mainstream. These shifts speak to a consumer base that wants convenience without compromise. The cost of a meal now includes a calculation of impact, and brands that take that seriously are gaining ground.

The screen is the new QSR storefront.

Ordering food has become a tap-and-go experience. Mobile apps, third-party delivery platforms, and social commerce are no longer add-ons; they’re central to the Filipino consumer journey.

In 2024, Food Industry Asia reported that nearly 60% of quick-service restaurant orders in Philippine cities were placed through digital channels.

Foot traffic has given way to app traffic, with brands competing on flash deals, loyalty rewards, and free delivery to stay top of mind.

Digital payments are now part of everyday life in the Philippines. In 2024, usage among adults aged 15 and up hit 33%, a steep climb from just 3.2% in 2018. The shift mirrors the rise of mobile-first ordering and in-app transactions, especially in fast-paced urban dining.

Jollibee’s mobile ordering platform has expanded its features, allowing personalised recommendations, pre-orders, and seamless integration with payment apps. McDonald’s Philippines, GrabFood, and Foodpanda continue to lead in delivery convenience, but newer players like TikTok Shop have begun to influence food discovery and promo-led conversions.

Fast food is no longer just about what’s on the menu; it’s about how quickly, easily, and enjoyably it can be accessed.

Where Gen Z eats, posts, and connects

For Gen Z in the Philippines, fast food isn’t just a meal; it’s part of the social fabric. Chains like Jollibee and McDonald’s have become informal meeting places, study zones, and TikTok backdrops. With free Wi-Fi, student discounts, and sleek interior revamps, fast-food locations are evolving into lifestyle spaces for a digital-first generation.

Over 70% of Filipinos aged 15–24 visit a fast-food restaurant at least once a week, not only to eat but also to socialise, stream content, or work on school assignments. The ambience, affordability, and accessibility make these venues a go-to choice, especially in areas with few alternatives.

QSR brands have noticed. Jollibee’s recent store designs incorporate more seating zones, charging stations, and group-friendly configurations. Meanwhile, McDonald’s continues to roll out McCafé-style concepts with a café vibe. Marketing also leans heavily on youth-driven platforms. Jollibee’s TikTok content, for instance, regularly goes viral thanks to campaign hooks that merge pop culture, food hacks, and humour.

This convergence of dining, content creation, and community adds a new layer to how fast food functions in Filipino society. It’s not just about convenience or flavour; it’s about belonging.

Innovation behind the fast-food counter

Fast food has always been about speed, but now it’s also about smarts. Behind the counter, brands adopt AI-driven inventory systems, real-time analytics, and predictive modelling to optimise operations.

On the consumer side, personalisation is becoming standard. Delivery apps suggest orders based on time of day, while loyalty platforms trigger tailored promos and gamified incentives. In 2024, over 8 in 10 Filipino consumers ordered fast food through delivery apps, the highest in Asia, making digital innovation a make-or-break factor for staying relevant.

This tech transformation isn’t just about convenience. It’s how brands scale, adapt, and survive in an economy where expectations move faster than supply chains.

A new flavour of identity in Philippine QSRs

Fast food in the Philippines has evolved from an occasional indulgence into a defining thread in everyday life. It reflects shifting routines, modern appetites, and a generation that blends tradition with convenience.

Jollibee’s global rise is not just a business story; it’s a cultural signal. It shows how a local brand, deeply rooted in national identity, can compete on the world stage without losing its soul. At the same time, the growing presence of foreign QSR players and the embrace of digital-first experiences suggest that Filipino consumers are increasingly cosmopolitan in their tastes, but still loyal to brands that understand them.

Jollibee’s QSR expansion isn’t just about chicken. It’s about claiming a cultural and commercial space that reflects where Filipino consumers are headed, and how fast the world is learning to follow.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The next wave of edtech growth isn’t being engineered in boardrooms or classrooms. It’s unfolding in bedrooms, dorm halls, and digital chat groups – where students turn smartphones into production studios and learning platforms into launchpads. Armed with ring lights and revision hacks, Gen Z creators are transforming how education is marketed, consumed, and experienced.

As the creator economy collides with online learning, edtech firms increasingly tap into student-led content to drive adoption and engagement. These are not traditional brand ambassadors. They’re 17-year-olds making calculus go viral on TikTok, undergraduates breaking down coding concepts on YouTube, and peer influencers creating community-led momentum that no ad spend can replicate.

It’s a shift that goes beyond marketing. The rise of peer co-creation is shaping the very future of digital education, raising questions about influence, equity, and outcomes. And as both Western and Asian edtech platforms double down on this strategy, one thing is clear: the line between learner and creator is rapidly disappearing.

Students take control of the edtech narrative.

This behavioral shift isn’t accidental. It’s a direct outcome of how Gen Z and Gen Alpha navigate the world: socially networked, algorithm-aware, and deeply influenced by peer credibility.

For today’s learners, discovering an edtech platform through a classmate’s Instagram Reel or a late-night TikTok “study with me” session holds more weight than a polished brand campaign. Tutorials, crash courses, and day-in-the-life videos now double as endorsements, often outperforming official content in reach and relatability.

Behind the scenes, edtech companies are starting to adapt. Instead of focusing solely on institutional partnerships or top-down content strategies, platforms nurture creator ecosystems. Sometimes, they quietly offer toolkits, early access, and micro-incentives to student influencers who generate organic traction. The logic is clear: trust is the new currency, and students trust each other.

This peer-powered loop doesn’t just drive engagement – it shapes product design, fuels viral growth, and turns users into evangelists. For edtech brands seeking to scale in saturated markets, the most strategic growth play may be letting students take the mic.

Khan Academy builds influence through relatability.

In the US, Khan Academy is leaning into student-powered storytelling without making a spectacle of it. While the platform’s core content remains institutionally produced, its growth on social media owes much to an informal network of young creators – high schoolers and college students explaining how Khan helped them prep for the SATs, ace AP exams, or survive algebra.

Rather than launching overt influencer programs, Khan Academy benefits from what marketers might call “earned influence.” Creators like Thomas Frank—whose YouTube channel has over 3 million subscribers and more than 183 million views – frequently reference tools like Khan Academy in their tutorials. These mentions – organic, peer-driven, and peppered with personal success stories – carry a resonance that brand messaging rarely matches.

The result? A constant stream of creator-led endorsements embedded in motivational reels, test prep rundowns, and “study with me” live streams. The platform’s visibility continues to grow not through ads but through creators who view Khan as part of their academic survival toolkit. For students, it’s not just a resource. It’s a badge of belonging.

Classplus taps regional creators to drive depth over scale.

In India’s competitive edtech landscape, Classplus has carved a distinct path by empowering educators to run their online classrooms. But increasingly, it’s students who are amplifying its reach. On Instagram, ShareChat, and even WhatsApp groups, testimonials and tutorials recorded by learners in Hindi, Tamil, and Bengali are helping the platform penetrate beyond metro cities into India’s vast tier-2 and tier-3 markets.

These are not slick influencer campaigns. Often filmed on low-budget phones with minimal editing, the content reflects real student experiences – test scores, improved confidence, or simply how a Classplus module helped crack a tough exam concept. The authenticity resonates, especially among first-generation digital learners seeking guidance in their native language.

Classplus hasn’t ignored the trend. The company has begun quietly supporting these student creators by spotlighting their content on its official channels and offering resources to help structure their narratives. In some cases, creators have even evolved into local brand champions – hosting peer workshops, leading Telegram study groups, and shaping how the platform adapts to regional needs.

While many edtech players chase national scale, Classplus is betting that peer-led credibility in small communities may prove more sustainable (and more powerful) than mass-market advertising.

Zenius turns TikTok into a learning laboratory.

In Indonesia, Zenius is rewriting the rules of student engagement by meeting Gen Z exactly where they are – on TikTok. The platform, which offers curriculum-aligned content for K-12 learners, has seen a surge in student-driven explainers, study hacks, and motivational clips that blend humor with academic rigor. What might once have been dry exam prep is now delivered with trending sounds, meme formats, and an unmistakably local voice.

Rather than competing for attention, Zenius has embraced this creative energy. Its team actively encourages students to remix educational content into short-form videos and even runs nationwide creator challenges to spark participation. Top-performing videos – like a viral breakdown of Newton’s laws using motorbike stunts – don’t just boost app downloads. They position Zenius as a platform that understands and reflects the student mindset. Zenius’s own TikTok account, @zeniuseducation, has built a substantial following, demonstrating the platform’s resonance with Gen Z audiences in Indonesia.

The strategy taps into more than entertainment. By enabling students to co-create and share learning moments, Zenius is fostering a sense of ownership and community. Creators become informal tutors, and learning transforms into a social experience – one that travels through peer networks far faster than traditional classroom methods.

For a generation that learns in bursts, scrolls for validation, and values authenticity over authority, Zenius is proving the future of education might look a lot more like the For You Page.

How-Student-Creators-Are-Shaping-the-Future-of-EdTech

The influence dilemma behind student-led learning

As student creators gain traction, edtech companies navigate a delicate balance between engagement and responsibility. What happens when learning starts to look more like content creation? For every viral study hack or exam tip that spreads across TikTok or YouTube Shorts, there’s the risk of misinformation, burnout, or unintended pressure to perform for views.

Experts are divided. Some argue that co-creation fosters deeper learning, with students reinforcing their knowledge by teaching others. For example, an academic review of TikTok’s role in education cautioned that while it increases engagement, the brevity and virality of the content can undermine conceptual depth and accuracy, especially when non-experts are involved.

Others warn that when education is filtered through the lens of likes and shares, rigor can give way to popularity.

There’s also the question of transparency. As platforms begin to reward creators – either through visibility, free subscriptions, or direct payments – questions around sponsorship disclosure and authenticity are becoming harder to ignore. In a space where trust is everything, even the perception of promotion can erode credibility.

Mental health concerns are mounting, too. Students doubling as creators often juggle schoolwork with self-imposed content calendars, leading to stress, screen fatigue, and anxiety around performance metrics. Without clear boundaries or institutional support, the model risks amplifying the very challenges it aims to solve.

“TikTok is redefining how students access information, but it’s not a substitute for structured learning. Educators must help students think critically about the content they consume.”

-From the study: TikTok’s Influence on Education, ResearchGate

The blending of learning and influence isn’t inherently flawed, but it demands stronger guardrails. If student creators are to shape the future of education, platforms will need to offer more than visibility. They’ll need to offer support.

Learning becomes a networked, creator-powered ecosystem

The convergence of student influence and educational technology is no passing trend; it’s reshaping how learning is discovered, delivered, and defined. What began as a handful of creators posting revision tips has evolved into a decentralised learning ecosystem where peer networks hold as much sway as professional educators.

Many edtech brands are adapting. Some invest in tools that allow creators to track engagement and refine their content. Others are experimenting with monetisation models, giving high-performing student educators a path to income or certification. Features once exclusive to influencer platforms – analytics dashboards, branded content guidelines, creator portals – are quietly being layered into the backends of learning apps.

The implications are global. In the West, the trend is accelerating around standardised testing, college prep, and niche STEM content. In Asia, it’s unlocking growth in local language education and expanding access in low-bandwidth, mobile-first environments. While the pace may differ, the destination is the same: education that is personalised, social, and driven by those closest to the experience.

For brands, the message is clear. Students aren’t just users anymore. They’re builders of trust, momentum, and meaning. And in a market where attention is earned – not bought – platforms that empower them will lead the next generation of education.

Why this matters for brands

For brands operating in or adjacent to education, the rise of student creators is both a growth lever and a governance challenge. The decentralisation of influence, from institutions to peers offers unmatched authenticity and reach but also introduces new variables around accuracy, accountability, and impact.

The platforms that will lead are not those that simply ride the trend but those that help shape it responsibly. That means investing in tools that empower young voices while embedding safeguards: content verification, mental health resources, and transparent disclosure practices. Aligning with creators is no longer just a marketing strategy; it’s a responsibility.

Students have become trusted messengers in a market where attention is earned, not bought. But with that trust comes a new mandate for brands: to amplify wisely and build ecosystems that value innovation and integrity.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

You’re watching a livestream. A pair of sneakers flash on screen, not as a hard sell, but as part of the host’s outfit. Before the segment ends, you’ve clicked, carted, and checked out, without ever intending to shop.

This is ambient shopping.

In 2025, 69% of consumers report making purchases while doing something else: scrolling through social media, watching content, or listening to a podcast. The shopping journey has diffused into everyday digital moments, becoming less of an event and more of a background behaviour.

What used to be a deliberate act – searching, comparing, deciding – now happens through exposure. Commerce has folded itself into the scroll, the stream, the story.

This isn’t just a shift in attention span. It reflects a new consumer posture, where intent is optional and interaction is often unconscious.

The Context Collapse of Commerce

Shopping no longer requires a shift in mindset. It happens mid-scroll, mid-stream, mid-conversation, folded into the same feed as entertainment, news, and personal updates.

The boundaries that once separated commerce from content have eroded. A beauty tutorial triggers a purchase. A meme account becomes a storefront. Livestream hosts don’t just entertain; they convert.

This is the new consumer environment: one feed, many functions. People don’t open shopping apps with intent. They encounter products passively, in spaces curated for relevance, not retail.

Brand Signal: Amazon x MrBeast
In 2024, Amazon partnered with YouTube creator MrBeast to produce Beast Games, a Prime Video series built around high-stakes, creator-driven competition. While not a direct shoppable integration, the collaboration signals Amazon’s long-game strategy: embedding its brand deeper into entertainment ecosystems where Gen Z and millennial audiences already spend time. As retail and media converge, partnerships like these reflect how commerce can grow ambiently through cultural relevance and presence, not just transactions.

In 2024, social commerce accounted for an estimated 19% of global ecommerce.

Social platforms have adapted fast. TikTok’s algorithm surfaces trending items before users realise they’re in demand. Instagram’s native checkout makes the path from discovery to purchase nearly invisible. Shoppable links, tagged products, and dynamic ads create an ecommerce layer that moves with the user.

There’s no funnel here. Just frictionless moments where curiosity meets convenience.

Designing for the Distracted

In a world of ambient shoppers, attention is fleeting and rarely focused. Products are chosen in seconds, often without sound, sometimes without context. Design has to do more with less.

For brands, this means optimising for recognition, not explanation. Packaging needs to pop on a 6-inch screen mid-scroll. Labels must convey function at a glance. Logos should be legible when compressed into a corner of a carousel ad.

Functionality also shifts. Shoppers aren’t always in a buying mindset, so products that solve immediate needs, such as hydration, energy, skin repair, and comfort, are more likely to convert. In beauty and personal care, this has driven a wave of minimalist formats: stick balms, on-the-go sprays, and single-dose sachets. In food, snackable and resealable dominate.

The sensory layer matters. Swipeable palettes shimmer under livestream lighting, stickers shift colour in motion, and packaging textures mimic velvet or gloss, begging for thumb contact. These cues don’t explain the product; they tempt the finger before the brain can even catch up.

Ambient shopping is designed without a captive audience. Relevance has to surface instantly, or it’s lost.

Ambient Influence – From Intent to Impulse

The traditional path to purchase is dissolving. Search, compare, decide – these steps still exist but no longer happen in sequence. In ambient shopping, influence works in reverse. Exposure comes first. Intent may never form.

Context drives the sale: who shared the product, where it appeared, and what mood the consumer was in. Algorithms precisely track these signals, building behavioural clusters that predict, not prompt, buying moments.

Brand Signal: Sephora’s Instagram Shoppable Posts
Sephora, a global beauty retailer, has effectively utilised Instagram’s shoppable posts to streamline the customer journey from discovery to purchase. Sephora allows users to explore product details and make purchases without leaving the app by integrating product tags into their posts and stories. This strategy has enhanced the shopping experience by reducing friction and meeting consumers where they are most engaged.

A user who lingers on fitness content might be served hydration tablets in the next reel. Someone who pauses on travel vlogs sees compression socks, not because they searched for them, but because the algorithm anticipates utility.

This isn’t personalisation as we knew it. It’s predictive proximity – placing the right product near the right emotion, habit, or setting. Instagram and TikTok deploy dynamic ad creatives that shift based on what users last hovered over, paused on, or bookmarked, even if they never clicked.

Every swipe, scroll, and second becomes part of a real-time model that interprets potential intent from ambient behaviour. That interpretation drives conversion.

The Market Research Mandate

Understanding ambient shoppers requires more than surveys and segmentation models. These consumers may not recall what they bought, let alone why. Intent is ambient, actions are reflexive, and memory is unreliable.

Market research tools—built around conscious decision-making—fall short. What’s needed is continuous visibility into behaviour as it unfolds. Passive metering, in-the-moment mobile intercepts, and digital ethnography are becoming essential to decoding this new mode of commerce.

Brands are replacing static personas with dynamic behavioural profiles, updated in real time through telemetry: app swipes, click paths, video completion rates, and dwell time. This data doesn’t just measure attention; it reveals patterns invisible to the consumer.

Ethnographic insight is also evolving. Researchers now observe not just what people say they do but how they behave when no one’s asking. Ambient commerce, by nature, hides in plain sight. To surface it, insight teams are embedding themselves within ecosystems – gaming platforms, live stream chats, private group DMs – where shopping happens without ever being called shopping.

Why It Matters

Ambient shopping disrupts marketing, product timing, UX, packaging, and platform strategy. Brands that fail to adapt may not only lose relevance; they may simply fade from view.

Brand Signal: MAC Cosmetics

MAC Cosmetics has leaned into AR-powered try-on tools, allowing Instagram users to experiment with lipstick shades in real time. These filters helped turn scroll time into trial time, extending product discovery into personal content streams.

The implication is clear: brands that rely solely on declared data will miss what matters. To serve the ambient shopper, research must become ambient too.

What’s Next: Invisible Interfaces, Voice Commerce, and Haptic Nudges

Shopping is dissolving into digital life. Sometimes that happens in a social feed. But increasingly, it occurs in a voice command, a wearable, a smart mirror, a YouTube scroll, or a fridge notification. The next wave of ambient shopping will be always on, always listening, always ready to act.

These moments are powered by a new layer of frictionless tech, voice-first commerce, smart home replenishment systems, in-car commerce experiences, and ambient computing that adapts to real-time behaviour.

Brand Signal: Walmart’s AI-Powered In-Home
In 2024, Walmart rolled out an AI feature that automatically restocks essentials in customers’ refrigerators based on usage patterns. By integrating replenishment with its InHome delivery service, Walmart has moved purchase decisions from conscious action to predictive automation.

Brand Signal: In-Car Payments Go Mainstream
As of 2024, fourteen global automotive brands offer in-car commerce solutions across fifteen countries. From paying for parking and fuel to ordering food, these systems turn dashboards into checkout counters, merging mobility with purchase convenience.

Smart assistants are already facilitating purchases through simple voice commands. But as they integrate with recommendation engines and personal data ecosystems, they’ll shift from reactive tools to proactive curators. A fridge that restocks based on dietary shifts. A speaker who suggests skincare before seasonal dryness hits. These systems won’t ask what you want. They’ll anticipate what you’ll need, then quietly deliver it, embedded into the devices that already know your routine.

Wearables and haptics will deepen the loop. Wearable-triggered shopping moments are already in play – whether it’s a subtle wrist vibration during a product drop, or biometric signals prompting contextual offers in sync with mood, movement, or health data.

Even ambient environments are joining in. TVs enable one-click buys mid-show, car dashboards suggest pit-stop promotions, and public displays respond to proximity and profile. Shopping doesn’t interrupt the experience; it rides alongside it. It’s not just ecommerce anymore; it’s ambient computing in retail, where the interface fades and the environment itself becomes the point of sale.

The future of retail isn’t about transactions. It’s about presence. The most successful brands will be those that adapt to being everywhere without feeling intrusive.

The Commerce You Don’t See Coming

The most powerful shopping moments no longer look like shopping. They’re quiet, quick, and nearly invisible, tucked between the stories we watch, the songs we stream, the feeds we skim. And yet, they’re redefining how products are discovered, evaluated, and bought.

Brands that chase attention will lose to those that understand absence. Ambient shoppers don’t want to be interrupted. They want relevance to find them – seamlessly, silently, when the moment feels right.

This isn’t about optimising for clicks. It’s about designing ecosystems that respond to presence, not prompts. Shopping becomes part of the atmosphere, not an activity. The opportunity lies not in louder campaigns, but in quieter cues – signals that align with context, emotion, and rhythm.

As digital behaviours blur and physical spaces become interactive, the lines between life and commerce will continue to dissolve. Invisibility, not innovation, will define the winners. The question for brands is no longer how to break through, but how to blend in – with precision, purpose, and a deep understanding of the shopper who never meant to shop.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Rising inflation and economic uncertainty were expected to put an end to discretionary spending for middle-income households. Instead, consumers are making room for indulgence. Across the US, UK, and Europe, households earning moderate incomes continue to prioritise non-essential purchases at rates far closer to affluent consumers than economic models predicted. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Consumer Sentiment Survey found that 42% of middle-income respondents in developed markets still plan to spend on travel, dining out, and personal care in the next year, just nine percentage points lower than high-income households.

The resilience of discretionary spending in the face of rising costs defies conventional economic assumptions. It is not a case of irrationality or denial. It reflects a shift in how consumers measure value. After years of pandemic-driven disruption, middle-class buyers are increasingly framing small luxuries as essential to emotional well-being, not as reckless spending. An affordable meal out, a short domestic trip, or a new skincare product carries more than monetary worth. It represents normalcy, reward, and agency in an environment where larger financial goals often feel less attainable.

This trend is not a short-term reaction to inflation, nor is it purely sentimental. It is structurally rational behaviour shaped by stress, lifestyle adjustment, and evolving definitions of security. Spending on modest treats provides a sense of control and immediacy when long-term stability—home ownership, retirement savings—feels increasingly out of reach. Consumers are not abandoning caution; they are recalibrating what prudence looks like in real terms.

Understanding this shift is critical for brands, retailers, and policymakers. Indulgence spending among the middle class is not a deviation from rational economic behaviour. It is an adaptation to new realities, where emotional resilience and quality of life have become primary considerations alongside price and necessity.

Tight Budgets, Sharp Choices

The pressure on household budgets is real. Inflation has driven up the cost of essentials—housing, food, energy—leaving less flexibility for discretionary categories. Yet rather than abandoning non-essential purchases altogether, middle-class consumers are reprioritising with striking precision. The pattern is visible across the US, UK, and Europe: subscription services are among the first to be cancelled, big-ticket electronics are postponed, and plans for major home renovations are shelved. But the impulse to carve out space for small luxuries remains intact.

KPMG’s 2024 Middle-Class Financial Priorities report highlights this shift. In a survey of households earning between 75% and 150% of median income, nearly 60% reported cutting back on monthly expenses such as media subscriptions and dining delivery apps. However, the same respondents overwhelmingly indicated an intention to preserve budget for “quality of life” items, including occasional dining out, personal care products, and leisure travel under 500 miles. The data suggests that discretionary spending is not vanishing—it is being filtered through a more selective lens.

A similar rebalancing is evident in Europe. OECD research published earlier this year shows that while the ownership of new vehicles among middle-income households declined by over 8% between 2022 and 2024, spending on local travel, cultural events, and speciality food purchases held steady. In the UK, Deloitte’s 2024 consumer tracker found that middle-income households were 30% more likely to describe smaller, experiential purchases as “essential for well-being” than they were before the pandemic.

The underlying dynamic is a redefinition of value. Consumers are moving away from evaluating purchases solely on cost or prestige. Instead, the metric is experiential reward—whether a purchase delivers emotional uplift, stress relief, or a sense of personal investment. A $50 skincare product or a weekend away is justified not by indulgence for its own sake, but by what it represents: a manageable, affirming investment in quality of life.

This sharpening of priorities is not a retreat from financial responsibility. It is a recalibration. Households are preserving choice and pleasure even as long-term goals grow more distant. The middle-class response to inflation is not to close the wallet entirely, but to spend carefully, reinforcing emotional resilience where it matters most.

Where the Money Is Still Flowing

The resilience of middle-class discretionary spending becomes clearest when looking at where the money continues to move. Small luxuries, particularly those offering immediate personal gratification without long-term financial strain, are absorbing a disproportionate share of discretionary budgets. These are not extravagant purchases but considered indulgences—choices that allow consumers to feel rewarded without incurring future economic risk.

Dining out remains one of the strongest performing sectors. Mastercard SpendingPulse data from early 2024 showed that spending at fast-casual and premium-casual restaurants in the US rose by 8% year-on-year, even as fine dining bookings declined. Consumers are trading down from high-end experiences but refusing to give up the social and emotional value of meals shared outside the home. In the UK, Statista reports that visits to casual dining chains increased by nearly one-fifth compared to 2022 levels, concentrated among households earning £30,000 to £70,000 annually.

Beauty and skincare purchases are following a similar trajectory. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Beauty Survey found that middle-income consumers accounted for nearly half of the growth in skincare sales across Europe and North America, often favouring mid-tier brands offering “clinical-grade” results at accessible prices. Rather than abandoning beauty spending, buyers are shifting toward products that promise tangible outcomes—improved skin health, self-care benefits—over prestige branding. The emphasis is not on conspicuous consumption but on self-affirmation.

Domestic travel, particularly short-haul trips, has also proven remarkably resilient. According to Mastercard’s travel trends report, bookings for domestic leisure trips under 300 miles rose by 12% in the US during the past year, primarily driven by middle-income households. European markets such as France and Germany showed parallel trends, with regional rail and car rental bookings outperforming international air travel. Travel, even scaled down, remains a critical outlet for recreation and stress relief, viewed as a justifiable investment rather than a luxury.

Personal wellness has evolved from a niche concern to a consistent budget item. Deloitte’s 2024 Health and Wellness Tracker found that expenditures on fitness apps, meditation subscriptions, and nutritional supplements rose by nearly 15% among middle-income consumers compared to 2022. Spa treatments and boutique fitness sessions also saw modest but steady gains, especially when bundled into affordable packages. Wellness is increasingly framed not as optional self-indulgence but as proactive health maintenance—a narrative that middle-class consumers embrace even under financial strain.

What ties these sectors together is not mere resilience but strategic prioritisation. Consumers actively choose experiences and products that deliver emotional payoff without undermining longer-term financial goals. Small luxuries have become part of how households navigate financial pressure, balancing restraint with resilience.

How Indulgence Looks Different Around the World

The appetite for small luxuries is global, but its expression varies sharply across markets. Cultural context, inflationary pressure, and recovery patterns from the pandemic shape how and where middle-class consumers indulge.

In the United States, experience is taking precedence over material accumulation. Mastercard’s 2024 SpendingPulse report shows that while retail sales for durable goods have slowed, spending on travel, dining, and entertainment continues to climb. Middle-income households prioritise activities that create memories and offer a sense of immediacy, even as they pull back on home goods and apparel. The pattern reflects a broader recalibration, where the value of money is increasingly measured in lived experience rather than possessions.

The United Kingdom mirrors this behavioural split, though with sharper trade-offs. Ipsos data published earlier this year indicates that middle-income British households are aggressively trading down on everyday essentials—switching to discount supermarkets and delaying home improvements—while deliberately protecting spending on experiential categories. Budget airline bookings, concert attendance, and dining at independent restaurants remain surprisingly resilient. The message is clear: not all spending is negotiable, even under pressure.

In continental Europe, the indulgence lens often narrows toward artisanal quality. In France and Germany, Euromonitor reports that while overall household budgets have tightened, purchases of artisanal food, skincare, and local leisure travel have held steady or even grown modestly. Consumers are not abandoning discretionary spending, but are redirecting it toward smaller, more meaningful pleasures that emphasise craftsmanship, locality, and authenticity.

Southeast Asia presents a different dynamic, driven by digital acceleration and aspirational consumption. In Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines, middle-income consumers are investing in affordable upgrades—beauty products, domestic travel, and entry-level tech such as smartphones and wearable devices. According to Bain & Company’s 2024 Southeast Asia Digital Economy Report, there has been a surge in beauty e-commerce, with mid-tier brands seeing the fastest growth among urban middle-class buyers. Here, indulgence is closely tied to self-improvement and digital connectivity rather than traditional luxury markers.

China and India present a distinct dynamic. In China, middle-class consumers focus on premium health, wellness, and education-related services. Mastercard’s 2024 China Consumption Outlook shows strong growth in short domestic leisure travel, boutique fitness memberships, and “new luxury” beauty brands that offer substance over logo appeal. In India, indulgence is often family-centred. Euromonitor data highlights that spending on family experiences—mall outings, cinema, casual dining, and affordable domestic holidays—is being prioritised, even as households economise on electronics and apparel. The middle class is seeking small windows of joy that offer collective, not just individual, payoff.

Across these regions, indulgence spending is far from homogeneous. It is shaped by cultural narratives about success, wellness, and emotional reward. Yet the underlying behaviour is consistent: even under inflationary strain, middle-income consumers are unwilling to surrender the experiences and products that sustain a sense of control, progress, and personal value.

Why Indulgence Feels Necessary, Not Excessive

The persistence of small luxuries in strained economic times is not a matter of consumer irrationality. It is a rational psychological response to prolonged stress, uncertainty, and shifting social norms. For many middle-class households, small indulgences have moved beyond occasional rewards to become a form of emotional maintenance—a way to reassert agency and sustain morale when broader financial goals feel increasingly distant.

Much of this shift can be traced to the post-pandemic “live for today” mindset. After years of deferred plans and disrupted routines, consumers across income levels have shown a greater willingness to prioritise present-day satisfaction. Behavioural economists point to the acceleration of hedonic adaptation—the tendency to return to a baseline level of happiness despite external changes—as a key factor. When future security feels less certain, spending on immediate emotional uplift becomes a practical way to protect mental well-being.

American Psychological Association research on stress-related spending supports this view. A 2024 report found that nearly 60% of middle-income consumers in the US admitted to occasional “treat spending” as a coping mechanism, with the majority framing such purchases not as extravagance, but as essential self-care. Similar patterns emerged in the UK and Singapore, where smaller, experience-driven expenditures were linked to lower reported stress levels in middle-income groups.

Social behaviour further reinforces the normalisation of indulgence. Small splurges—dining out, a weekend getaway, a new skincare regimen—are highly visible on platforms like Instagram and TikTok. Sharing these moments has become part of how consumers construct narratives of resilience and self-investment. The effect is cumulative. What once might have been considered unnecessary spending is now broadly perceived as a reasonable way to manage life’s pressures.

Rather than retreating into austerity, many middle-class consumers are making conscious choices to maintain emotional balance through manageable rewards. In modern economic conditions, where traditional markers of financial progress are harder to achieve, these decisions are not acts of recklessness. They are strategies for preserving stability, dignity, and optimism in everyday life.

Small Luxuries, Big Opportunities

For brands, the persistence of small indulgences offers more than a temporary sales opportunity. It signals a deeper shift in how consumers assign value—one that demands careful strategic recalibration. Positioning products as accessible rewards or emotional enhancers, rather than as markers of status or success, will increasingly define market relevance.

Middle-class consumers are not looking for extravagant gestures. They are seeking personal moments of satisfaction, convenience, or self-expression that fit into constrained budgets. Products that deliver relaxation, confidence, or small affirmations of progress resonate far more than those that lean heavily on traditional luxury cues. In this environment, storytelling around personal value matters more than aspirational branding. A meal kit that saves time and creates family rituals, a skincare serum that represents self-care rather than vanity, a local mini-break that restores mental clarity—these are the narratives gaining traction.

The danger for brands lies in misreading the room. Overemphasising luxury, exclusivity, or aspirational distance risks alienating a consumer base that values relatability and tangible benefit over status. Innovation must centre on affordability without sacrificing the experience of quality. Smart packaging, modular services, and tiered product lines are helping some brands maintain margins while broadening emotional appeal.

Real-time market research is critical to navigating these shifts. Understanding which categories of small luxuries matter most—and how definitions of indulgence vary between regions, income brackets, and life stages—allows brands to tailor offerings with precision. Blanket assumptions about “affordable luxury” no longer hold. The brands that invest in nuanced, behaviour-led insights will be the ones best positioned to capture loyalty in an economy where emotional and financial resilience are increasingly intertwined.

Indulgence in an Age of Restraint

Discretionary spending among middle-income consumers is too often dismissed as irrational, a stubborn refusal to accept economic reality. This view misses the point. Small indulgences are not acts of denial. They are structural adjustments to a world where traditional financial milestones—home ownership, long-term savings, upward mobility—have become harder to secure. Preserving moments of joy, autonomy, and emotional stability has become a rational survival strategy.

Understanding these patterns is critical for anyone forecasting the next phase of consumer behaviour. Micro-indulgence is more than a passing phenomenon. It is a leading indicator of broader consumer sentiment, revealing how confidence, stress, and hope are negotiated at the household level. Brands and policymakers that fail to track these shifts will misread the market, mistaking emotional recalibration for economic irrationality.

At Kadence International, our global research shows that middle-class indulgence is not a short-term reaction to inflationary pressure. It is an embedded behavioural shift, one that will continue to shape spending across sectors well beyond the current cycle. Those who frame their growth strategies around emotional consumption, rather than rigid income segmentation, will be best positioned to capture resilience spending in an economy where financial caution and the pursuit of quality of life are no longer at odds, but deeply intertwined.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Across the world’s fastest-growing consumer markets, one force is reshaping purchasing behaviour, product design, and service delivery: women. From Jakarta to Los Angeles, women are no longer a niche segment—they’re central to growth itself. In the US and UK, they already influence over three-quarters of consumer spending. In Asia, their economic clout is rising even faster, redrawing the map of modern consumption.

What’s notable isn’t just the scale of that influence—it’s the nature of the change. In emerging markets, women are leapfrogging traditional consumption curves. According to McKinsey, 47% of women in countries like India, Vietnam, and Indonesia say they plan to increase spending on categories tied to personal growth—wellness, education, digital tools—compared to just over one in four women in advanced economies. This isn’t just a response to rising incomes; it reflects shifting expectations about autonomy, quality of life, and long-term self-investment.

From single professionals in China to ageing populations in Japan and Singapore, women are redefining growth on their own terms. They’re fueling demand for high-touch services, longevity-focused health tech, and mobile-first commerce. In Southeast Asia, young women are using digital platforms not just to consume—but to build businesses and financial independence.

This is not a trend. It’s a structural realignment. The She-conomy spans geographies, life stages, and every category of spend. For brands, marketers, and policymakers, the challenge isn’t acknowledgment—it’s action: understanding how women are reshaping demand, and where that momentum is headed next.

Different Markets, One Direction

The rise of female economic power doesn’t follow the same path everywhere—but the momentum is global. In India, government-backed financial inclusion through schemes like Jan Dhan Yojana has enabled more than 300 million citizens—many of them women—to open first-time bank accounts. This structural shift in access is now fueling demand for education, micro-loans, and digital retail across urban and rural markets. Similarly, Indonesia’s regulatory push around e-commerce transparency has helped build consumer trust, enabling a surge in women-led digital businesses on platforms like Tokopedia and Shopee. Nykaa, a beauty marketplace founded by a former investment banker, went public in 2021—marking a milestone in female-focused consumer growth.

Image credit: Proctor & Gamble

Procter & Gamble’s “Always #LikeAGirl” campaign not only redefined adolescent hygiene marketing, but also reshaped its internal product innovation cycle. After the campaign’s success—reaching over 90 million views globally and boosting brand recall by 50 percent—the company invested in localized product design for underserved markets, including pad sizes tailored for Southeast Asian schoolgirls. The initiative drove a double-digit lift in brand penetration across key markets and remains a benchmark in behaviour-led brand transformation.

In China, women are redefining middle-class aspiration. Deloitte’s 2023 research shows that women in Tier 1 and 2 cities are more likely than men to purchase premium goods across skincare, electronics, and wellness. These choices are not about luxury—they’re about control over value. Many are now the primary household spenders, even in dual-income families.

In the US and UK, women already drive the majority of consumer spend—but their influence is evolving. They’re outspending men not just in traditional categories, but also in fintech and auto services. A 2024 NielsenIQ study found their purchase journeys are longer, more research-driven, and shaped by peer networks—prompting brands to rethink UX and communications from the ground up.

Southeast Asia may offer the clearest view of how quickly women’s economic roles are evolving. In markets like Indonesia and Vietnam, digital access has unlocked dual roles: consumer and entrepreneur. Platforms like TikTok Shop and Shopee Live are powering a wave of direct-to-consumer businesses led by women—often without physical storefronts. Bain & Company reports that in mobile-first economies, women now account for a rising share of all digital transactions.

Where Women Are Rewriting the Rules

The impact of female consumers extends well beyond traditional categories like beauty and household goods. The real shift lies in sectors once built with male defaults, where women are now setting new expectations—and rejecting outdated design assumptions.

In personal finance, women are adopting mobile budgeting tools, peer-to-peer lending, and investment platforms at rising rates—especially when these tools align with their financial priorities. In Western markets, platforms like Ellevest and Emma promote financial empowerment. In Asia, the trend is more practical: Indian women using Google Pay or PhonePe may not see themselves as investors, but their steady use of digital finance tools signals growing engagement.

In mobility, safety and accessibility are guiding new design priorities. Ride-hailing platforms across Southeast Asia have introduced women-only drivers, privacy features, and emergency tools as core service offerings. In cities like Bangkok and Jakarta, working women are using these services more frequently, reflecting how tailored features drive adoption, according to Grab’s 2023 regional data.

Health and wellness, once narrowly defined, are now among the most rapidly diversifying sectors for female consumers. Femtech is moving beyond fertility into menopause care, hormone diagnostics, and cycle monitoring. In Singapore and Japan, women over 45 are emerging as key adopters of wearable health tech and at-home diagnostic kits, reflecting both aging demographics and demand for greater autonomy. In Vietnam and the Philippines, startups are addressing affordability and discretion through telehealth platforms and pharmacy access tailored to women across life stages.

These shifts reflect decades of economic, social, and technological change converging in real time. What is different now is visibility. The women’s market is no longer niche—it is investable, influential, and forcing transformation in sectors not traditionally shaped by female demand, including fintech, mobility, and health tech.

Rethinking Design for the Female Majority

Consumer behaviour is evolving faster than the systems built to support it. Despite women driving growth across nearly every sector, many products remain designed around male defaults—whether by oversight or inertia. In fields like automotive, banking, healthcare, and workplace technology, critical design choices still overlook the needs and realities of female users.

Nowhere is this design mismatch clearer than in financial services. Across markets, women tend to value stability, long-term planning, and goal setting over short-term speculation. Yet many platforms still emphasise speed, risk, and accumulation. A 2023 Oliver Wyman survey found that over half of women in Southeast Asia viewed financial products as inaccessible or irrelevant—not because of digital literacy, but because the products failed to reflect their priorities.

Healthcare reveals one of the most persistent blind spots. For decades, male-centric clinical research has left significant gaps in diagnostics and treatment for women. These oversights still shape healthcare delivery and insurance coverage. In Japan and Singapore, women over 50 are among the fastest-growing patient segments, yet services for chronic conditions, menopause, and mobility are often limited or unaffordable. Femtech startups are stepping in, but without the scale or policy support to reach the broader market.

Consumer technology still lags in addressing women’s needs. Smartphones rarely include standard safety features designed with women in mind. Fitness trackers overlook menstrual and hormonal health, and voice assistants often reinforce gender bias. In some markets, this leads to disengagement. In other countries, it fuels innovation: in India and the Philippines, women-led startups are designing platforms from scratch, prioritising safety, affordability, and multifunctionality.

For brands, the challenge is not cosmetic. Designing for women demands more than surface-level updates. It means rethinking assumptions embedded in product development, data models, and leadership itself. As the She-conomy grows, so do the costs of exclusion. Closing the design gap requires leadership accountability—not just marketing rhetoric.

What Not to Do When Marketing to Women

Don’t	Why It Fails
Gendered design shortcuts often alienate modern female consumers who prioritise function over form.	Treating all women as one group ignores differences in age, culture, income, and priorities.
Don’t lead with empowerment clichés	“You go girl” slogans ring hollow if the product lacks practical value or doesn’t solve a real need.
Don’t assume women want pink	Gendered design shortcuts often alienate modern female consumers who prioritize function over form.
Don’t condescend with messaging	Oversimplified language or tone that assumes low knowledge damages trust and credibility.
Don’t rely on stereotypes	Positioning women only as caregivers, beauty-focused, or emotional overlooks their broader influence and aspirations.
Don’t retrofit male-first products	Adapting products originally built for men often leads to poor usability and overlooked needs.
Don’t ignore life stages	Focusing only on young women misses major opportunities among midlife and older female consumers.
Don’t fake inclusion	Representation must go beyond the ad campaign—real credibility comes from leadership, product, and service decisions.

Missing the Market by Missing the Point

The commercial case for investing in women is well established, but execution continues to fall short. Brands still underestimate the complexity of female consumer behaviour—not due to a lack of data, but because of how that data is misread or dismissed. Treating women as a monolith remains one of the costliest errors in modern marketing.

In the US and UK, many campaigns have embraced empowerment messaging while ignoring product relevance, pricing, or usability. Ads that celebrate confidence often fail when paired with offerings that fall short of real needs. The backlash is commercial as much as cultural. A 2023 Deloitte survey found that over one-third of women aged 25 to 45 stopped buying from brands they felt misunderstood them. The figure was even higher in India and Indonesia, where younger women are more likely to switch brands and shape peer behaviour online.

The issue is not intent but misalignment. Many of the fastest-growing brands in women-led markets succeed by focusing on function rather than messaging. In Vietnam, one mobility app gained traction not through slogans, but by addressing concerns raised by female riders—identity checks, well-lit pickup points, and transparent routing. Adoption among working women grew without a single reference to empowerment.

Companies that invest in contextual insight are outperforming. In Japan, a healthcare retailer overhauled store layouts after research showed that women over 60 were avoiding certain aisles due to privacy concerns. The brand responded with discrete consultation areas, improved lighting, and redesigned shelving. Within a year, footfall among older female customers rose by nearly 30 percent.

What Women Want (From Brands)

Need	What It Looks Like in Practice
Relevance	Products designed for real needs, not stereotypes—e.g. femtech beyond fertility, financial tools that reflect life goals.
Usability	Seamless design, not just surface-level inclusion—e.g. ride-hailing safety features, discreet health services.
Affordability	Accessible pricing without sacrificing quality—especially in fast-growing markets like Vietnam and India.
Trust & Transparency	Clear language, evidence-based claims, and no pinkwashing—particularly in health, finance, and wellness.
Representation	Women reflected in design teams, leadership, and brand storytelling—not just the marketing campaign.
Adaptability	Services that shift with her life stage—e.g. elder health tech in Japan, career-focused financial planning in the US.
Privacy & Safety	Built-in protections in tech, mobility, and healthcare—not retrofitted add-ons.
Cultural Relevance	Localized products and services that reflect regional values, needs, and constraints—not one-size-fits-all solutions.

Why Understanding Women Is No Longer Optional

The She-conomy is not a passing phase. It reflects a structural shift in global spending power, accelerating across both developed and emerging markets. The error lies in expecting it to resemble earlier waves of women’s influence, limited to specific categories or life stages. Today, women are shaping not just what gets purchased, but how products are designed, services delivered, and brands evaluated.

At Kadence International, we see this shift firsthand. Our studies show women driving outsized momentum in sectors such as personal finance and tech-enabled healthcare. What stands out is their behavioral precision: women are more selective, more digitally fluent, and more likely to switch brands based on trust, relevance, and values. While many claim to design for women, few engage with the complexity behind that label—spanning income, culture, and lived experience.

This is no longer about targeting a segment—it’s about rethinking how demand itself is defined. Behavioural segmentation, real-time research, and co-creation are no longer strategic extras. They are foundational tools in a consumer economy increasingly shaped by women’s expectations, choices, and values. The companies succeeding are not simply measuring sentiment; they are building systems that evolve with it.

For brands and policymakers, the stakes are no longer theoretical. Designing for yesterday’s consumer while today’s buyer reshapes the rules is a fast path to irrelevance. The She-conomy is not a trend to follow—it is the future to build for. Those who fail to act will not merely fall behind. They will lose the right to be in the conversation.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

When wallets tighten, lipstick sales often loosen.

Beauty counters are buzzing across the US and UK – even as consumers pull back on big-ticket splurges like fashion, tech, and travel. Luxury lipsticks, skincare serums, and fragrances are flying off shelves, offering shoppers a small but satisfying escape from financial uncertainty.

It’s a familiar phenomenon with a new edge. Known as the “lipstick effect,” this pattern sees consumers trading down on larger purchases while indulging in little luxuries that deliver an instant emotional lift. But today’s version is shaped not just by economic pressures – but also by a cultural obsession with self-care.

In recent weeks, prestige beauty sales have proven remarkably resilient. According to Circana (formerly NPD Group), the U.S. prestige beauty market experienced an 8% growth in the first half of 2024, reaching $15.3 billion. In the UK, similar trends are playing out, with consumers leaning into beauty rituals to brighten up bleak headlines.

And it’s not just older shoppers who are clinging to old habits. Younger consumers – especially Millennials and Gen Z – drive this feel-good spending, treating beauty buys as affordable wellness investments in anxious times.

Younger Consumers Lead the Way

While beauty spending cuts across generations, younger consumers are shaping what small luxury looks like today.

Millennials and Gen Z – already steeped in self-care culture – keep beauty at the top of their shopping lists, even as they cut back on bigger lifestyle purchases like fashion or tech. For these consumers, beauty buys are less about occasional splurges and more about everyday wellness routines.

Fragrance layering, skincare rituals, and makeup experimentation have become embedded in how younger shoppers navigate stress and self-expression. Beauty products are positioned not just as cosmetics but as affordable tools for relaxation, creativity, and confidence.

Social media continues to fuel this behaviour, turning beauty trends into global moments overnight. Viral skincare products, fragrance hacks, and affordable luxury recommendations constantly shape younger shoppers’ wishlists.

For a generation that values both experience and accessibility, small luxuries in beauty offer the perfect balance – indulgent enough to feel special and practical enough to justify the spend.

How Beauty Retailers Are Responding

Beauty retailers are moving quickly to meet consumers where they are – in search of small luxuries that feel special and attainable.

Premium beauty brands are expanding their ranges of travel-sized products, mini sets, and giftable formats to capture demand from shoppers looking for affordable indulgences. Retailers like Sephora and Ulta Beauty in the US have invested heavily in “trial and discovery” zones, allowing consumers to experiment with high-end skincare, makeup, and fragrance at lower prices.

In the UK, while mass-market chains like Boots may not operate in the luxury segment, they are leaning into accessible self-care with curated beauty edits, exclusive product bundles, and limited-time offers – helping cost-conscious consumers stretch their budgets without sacrificing quality.

Luxury fragrance brands are also innovating, offering layering bars, engraving stations, and bespoke consultation services in flagship stores, creating memorable experiences around smaller purchases.

Online, digital personalisation has become a powerful tool. Beauty retailers are enhancing their platforms with tailored product recommendations, virtual try-ons, and rewards programs designed to keep shoppers engaged between purchases – reinforcing beauty as a repeat treat rather than a rare splurge.

For the industry, this pivot toward small luxuries isn’t just a response to the moment – it’s emerging as a long-term strategy for growth in a market where big-ticket spending remains unpredictable.

Luxury Brands Winning with Small Indulgences

Tom Ford Beauty – Turning Wellness into a Fragrance Success

Image Credit: Escentual
Background

Tom Ford Beauty, under Estée Lauder Companies, is best known for its ultra-luxurious positioning in fragrance and beauty. But as consumer demand shifted toward wellness and self-care, the brand saw an opportunity to evolve its narrative beyond glamour and sensuality.

Strategy

In 2024, Tom Ford Beauty launched Bois Pacifique, a fragrance inspired by founder Tom Ford’s childhood memories of Big Sur, California. The product was positioned within the growing wellness fragrance space – marketed as a calming, nature-inspired scent designed for emotional well-being.

Beyond the product, Estée Lauder doubled down on its ambitions for Tom Ford Beauty following its $2.8 billion brand acquisition in late 2022. The brand leaned on storytelling, innovation, and the strength of its global distribution network to fuel growth.

Outcome

Bois Pacifique is projected to generate $50 million in sales within its first launch year.
Prior to the acquisition, Tom Ford Beauty reported nearly 25% net sales growth in its fiscal year ending June 2022.
Estée Lauder has set an ambitious target for Tom Ford Beauty to reach $1 billion in annual net sales by the end of 2024.

(Sources: Vogue Business, Luxury Tribune)

YSL Beauty – Leveraging Digital Influence for Small Luxury Growth

Image Credit: Fashion Gone Rogue

Background

Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) Beauty, part of L’Oréal Group, is a leading player in prestige beauty with a strong foothold in fragrance, makeup, and skincare. Recognising the power of digital culture – especially among Gen Z and Millennials – YSL Beauty has heavily invested in influencer-driven marketing and social media campaigns.

Strategy

Throughout 2023 and early 2024, YSL Beauty collaborated with high-profile celebrities like Dua Lipa while boosting its presence across TikTok and Instagram. The brand amplified visibility during key moments like Fashion Week, creating shareable content and interactive campaigns that resonated with younger, trend-savvy consumers.

Product innovation also remained at the heart of YSL Beauty’s strategy, with mini-sized offerings and discovery sets crucial to driving trial and engagement.

Outcome

YSL Beauty recorded a 94% surge in Earned Media Value (EMV) between April 2023 and March 2024.
Total impressions increased by 109%, reaching 9.1 billion during the same period.
The brand saw a 314% year-over-year growth in TikTok EMV, underscoring its success in capturing younger audiences on digital platforms.

Why This Trend May Last

What began as a response to economic uncertainty is fast becoming a new consumer habit – and beauty brands are betting it’s here to stay.

Unlike larger discretionary purchases, beauty products deliver instant gratification and emotional value. A new lipstick, a signature scent, or a skincare upgrade offers a quick mood boost — often for the price of a night out or less. In uncertain times, that balance of affordability and emotional return on investment is hard to beat.

The growing cultural emphasis on self-care is also reinforcing this behaviour. For many consumers — especially younger ones — small beauty purchases are no longer occasional splurges but regular acts of personal wellness. A face mask or fragrance isn’t just about appearance — it’s tied to relaxation, routine, and identity.

Even if economic conditions improve, retailers and brands are unlikely to abandon strategies built around accessible luxury. Discovery sets, travel-sized products, and personalised shopping experiences are proving effective at driving loyalty and repeat purchases.

Beauty’s resilience in the face of economic pressures offers a glimpse of how future retail may evolve: not necessarily bigger, but smarter — built on emotional connection, small indulgences, and everyday moments of joy.

For consumers navigating an unpredictable world, the little luxuries may well become the ones that last.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The global tech retail market is slowing. Consumers who once chased every new release are now holding off, thinking harder, and stretching upgrade cycles across devices – from phones to wearables to home tech. What’s changed isn’t just price sensitivity; it’s mindset. The old rhythm of new-for-new’s sake is being replaced by a more deliberate calculation: Is this upgrade worth it?

Behind that shift are macroeconomic pressures that haven’t let up. Interest rates remain high, currencies are volatile, and fresh tariffs – particularly between the US and China – are reshaping buying decisions. Even the major players are feeling it. Apple posted a year-on-year decline in iPhone sales, while Samsung saw a temporary lift as consumers rushed to buy ahead of expected price hikes. In both cases, caution, not innovation, drove behaviour.

The shift is generational too. Gen Z, long viewed as the frontline for early tech adoption, is starting to show signs of saturation. They still care about technology – but now they’re weighing durability, repairability, and long-term functionality over simply owning the newest device. The behavior is less impulsive, more selective.

This isn’t a rejection of innovation. It’s a recalibration. And it has real implications for how the world’s biggest technology companies market, price, and position their next wave of products.

The Shrinking Upgrade Window

Consumers aren’t replacing their tech as often as they used to. The once-standard two-year smartphone upgrade has stretched into a multi-year wait, with buyers holding onto devices for longer – sometimes much longer. It’s not just caution in a soft economy; it’s a growing sense that new releases simply aren’t offering enough to warrant the swap.

At Verizon, leadership recently acknowledged the shift. The average smartphone replacement cycle has crept past 3.5 years, a far cry from the predictable two-year rhythm that once drove steady sales. Apple users, too, are waiting longer, with data showing a noticeable lengthening of ownership compared to five years ago. It’s a trend driven partly by pricing, partly by the reality that last year’s model is still more than good enough.

Laptops are on a similar track. The three- to five-year refresh cycle is no longer a given. Consumers are holding off until their machines physically break or performance lags in a noticeable way. Best Buy’s CEO recently pointed to a lack of meaningful innovation as a reason buyers aren’t feeling urgency. And with cloud computing and browser-based software doing more of the heavy lifting, the need for higher-end specs is flattening for everyday users.

Televisions, too, are staying in homes longer. Improvements in display technology have plateaued from a consumer benefit perspective, and with software updates extending the life of streaming-enabled TVs, most households see no need to upgrade unless there’s a failure. Brands that offer long-term software support – up to seven years in some cases – are winning loyalty from customers who prefer durability over dazzle.

Even wearables, a category once defined by rapid iteration, are feeling the shift. Consumers are growing more selective, favouring meaningful innovation like medical-grade sensors or long battery life over iterative changes in design or interface. Replacement cycles are expanding, especially as prices climb and expectations rise.

In Southeast Asia, a surge in mid-tier smartphones is driving sales, suggesting buyers still want new tech – but they want it to stretch further. In contrast, consumers in the US and UK are sticking with their devices for three or four years, increasingly weighing whether an upgrade will deliver genuine daily impact.

Economic Pressures Meet Consumer Pragmatism

Inflation has eased slightly in some markets but remains a persistent factor shaping consumer behaviour worldwide. In the US and UK, interest rates remain elevated, keeping credit card debt expensive and discretionary spending under pressure. Across Europe and Japan, wages have struggled to keep pace with core price increases, dampening retail confidence. And in high-growth regions like Southeast Asia, India, and China, economic uncertainty is pushing consumers toward more deliberate purchase decisions.

In the US, the impact is already visible. Retailers are reporting softer demand in key electronics categories, while store traffic has declined year-on-year. Online, browsing activity remains strong, but cart abandonment is climbing – particularly for products over the $500 mark. It’s not that consumers aren’t interested; they’re just taking longer to commit. The same story is playing out in the UK, where buyers are increasingly opting for refurbished tech, financing options, or delaying non-essential upgrades entirely.

In India and Southeast Asia, frugality doesn’t mean silence – it means selectivity. Consumers are still engaging, but through a different lens. Mid-tier smartphones and high-functionality budget laptops are outperforming premium models. Retailers in these markets report growing traction for bundled offers and longer warranty terms, as value and reliability edge out brand prestige.

Indonesia offers one of the clearest signals of this recalibrated mindset. Consumers there continue to spend, but with more scrutiny. Brand loyalty is softening, and trial is rising – especially for newer entrants that offer durability and local relevance. Many shoppers are trading up slowly, looking for technology that serves multiple roles, rather than devices that signal status or trend.

China, long a bellwether for tech enthusiasm, has shown uneven recovery in the retail sector. Urban consumers remain engaged, but rural and lower-tier city shoppers are increasingly budget-conscious. Brands with local manufacturing and flexible pricing structures are gaining share.

In Japan, where tech adoption tends to skew practical, the economic slowdown has reinforced existing behaviours. Consumers are delaying replacements, relying more on service programs, and opting for features that serve real lifestyle utility – especially among older demographics.

Retailers and manufacturers across all regions are adjusting accordingly. In-store messaging is shifting from “newest” to “smartest.” Online platforms are pushing price-match guarantees, extended return periods, and loyalty perks over flash launches. What used to be a race for innovation has become a contest of value – and the companies that acknowledge that shift early are seeing steadier results.

Gen Z Hits Pause

For years, Gen Z was seen as the tech industry’s sure bet – the cohort most likely to queue for launches, post the unboxing, and evangelise the next upgrade. But the momentum has shifted. While their interest in technology hasn’t faded, their expectations have evolved. Now, the question isn’t “what’s new?” but “what fits?”

Rising costs have played a role, but this is more than economics. It’s a cultural recalibration. Among younger consumers, there’s a growing rejection of hyper-consumption in favour of intentionality. The latest phone isn’t an automatic buy. The better question is whether it adds something meaningful to life – fewer Gen Z consumers are upgrading for status alone.

That shift is fuelling the refurbished and secondhand tech market, which has seen steady growth in the US, UK, and across Southeast Asia. Platforms offering certified pre-owned devices, especially smartphones and laptops, are seeing strong engagement from younger demographics. For many, it’s not just about price – it’s about extending the life of a product and avoiding unnecessary waste.

Aesthetic trends are moving in parallel. There’s a rise in what some in the industry are calling “tech quiet luxury” – products that prioritise function, minimalism, and long-term reliability over flash. Sleek, understated design is winning out over bold colours or feature overload. The appeal lies in gear that integrates cleanly into life, not tech that dominates it.

Online, the social narrative is shifting too. Gen Z’s digital footprint shows less excitement around launch-day content and more focus on utility. The rise of “why I didn’t upgrade” posts is telling. Influencers now get traction by explaining how they kept the same phone for four years, or why buying secondhand was the smarter move. The underlying message isn’t anti-tech – it’s pro-agency.

Brands are adjusting their messaging in kind. Marketing language has toned down the superlatives. Features are framed around real-life relevance – sleep tracking for mental health, battery life that actually lasts a weekend, cameras that work well in low light for night outs. There’s less interest in what a device can do, and more focus on what it should do, consistently.

Why Selling Smarter Is the New Selling Faster

Retailers and manufacturers are no longer assuming the upgrade cycle will take care of itself. As consumers grow more cautious with their tech spending, the industry is adapting – not by accelerating the push for newness, but by reengineering the value proposition.

Trade-in programs are now a core feature of the sales funnel. In the US and UK, major electronics chains have expanded their platforms to offer instant credit for used devices, with bonuses tied to specific models or upgrade windows. The aim isn’t just to incentivise sales, but to soften the sticker shock and signal circular value. In India, trade-ins have gone further. E-commerce platforms have introduced programs that accept non-functional phones and appliances – opening up access to affordable upgrades even for consumers sitting on obsolete tech.

Manufacturers are adjusting their product mix in parallel. Samsung’s A-series smartphones have become a centrepiece of the brand’s value-tier portfolio, offering everyday functionality without the premium markup. Apple, long a symbol of high-end exclusivity, is now leaning into the same logic. The latest iteration of its SE line – and more recently, the iPhone 16e – has quietly outperformed expectations, especially among younger buyers and in cost-sensitive markets.

Support for longer device life is becoming a differentiator. Retailers are offering extended warranties, low-cost protection plans, and – critically – greater support for self-service repair. The “right to repair” movement, once niche, has reached mainstream awareness in the US and Europe, pushing brands to make replacement parts and documentation publicly available. Some have gone further, offering repair kits and in-store diagnostics to extend product life without voiding warranties.

In Southeast Asia, telcos and electronics retailers are updating their messaging to meet the moment. Campaigns that once emphasised speed, camera quality, or size now lean into durability, battery longevity, and environmental impact. Flipkart, for instance, has repositioned its marketing language to speak to responsibility, not just features. These aren’t surface-level tweaks – they’re recalibrations shaped by a consumer mood that’s moved past launch-day glitz in favour of durability and long-term value.

Retailers that can respond to this shift without undermining revenue goals are likely to retain customer loyalty. The challenge now is delivering upgrades that feel earned, not obligatory – and that means competing not just on innovation, but on usefulness and trust.

Innovation Isn’t Dead. But It’s on Trial.

The appetite for innovation isn’t gone – it’s just more selective. As upgrade cycles stretch and wallets tighten, consumers are no longer lured by incremental improvements. They’re still willing to invest in technology, but only when the payoff feels tangible.

Devices that deliver clear, differentiated value are still commanding attention. Foldables, once a novelty, have matured into a legitimate category. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip and Fold lines continue to draw interest, not just for the form factor, but for the utility – larger displays in a pocket-sized profile, and new modes of productivity. Google’s Pixel 8 Pro, powered by its custom Tensor chip, is earning traction for its AI-driven tools that enhance real-world usage – from call screening to image editing – without relying on buzzwords.

Apple’s Vision Pro, meanwhile, may not be a mass-market product yet, but it offers a case study in how anticipation builds when the innovation is clear. Its launch was met with skepticism on price, but its mixed-reality interface and potential as a new computing platform still turned heads. Early adopters aren’t buying features – they’re buying futures.

What’s changed is the level of scrutiny. Consumers aren’t rejecting high-end tech; they’re applying higher standards. Battery life must hold up in real use, not just lab tests. Cameras must perform in varied conditions, not just daylight. AI features need to do something meaningful, not just inflate a spec sheet.

That’s changing the language of marketing. Across the US, UK, and Asia, brands are pulling back on superlatives and pushing use cases. Proof-of-benefit now matters more than megapixel counts or processing speeds. Instead of promoting what’s new, marketers are being forced to answer, “Why now?”

For companies that can deliver answers that resonate – whether through new form factors, smarter chips, or lifestyle utility – there’s still room to win. But unlike before, consumers aren’t just asking whether something works. They’re asking if it’s worth disrupting their routine for.

Global Trends in Divergence

While the broader trajectory of tech consumption is moving toward caution and selectivity, the pace and shape of that shift varies across markets. Cultural norms, economic stability, and consumer trust in brands all play a role in how – and when – people decide to upgrade.

In the US, the shift has been shaped by economic pressure and high consumer debt. Shoppers are taking longer to replace their devices, with the average upgrade cycle now stretching to 3.5 years. Refurbished phones and lower-tier models are gaining traction, especially among Gen Z and older millennials. Brand loyalty remains strong, but purchase decisions are being filtered through a sharper value lens.

The UK follows a similar pattern, though with more aggressive adoption of SIM-only plans and long-term laptop use. Brand messaging emphasises durability and repairability more, and buyers are more willing to switch between ecosystems if they perceive better value.

In Japan, where consumer electronics are deeply embedded into everyday life, the trend is even more conservative. Many households prefer to maintain well-functioning older devices, especially in categories like home tech. The appetite for premium remains – but only if it’s built to last.

Emerging markets present a more nuanced picture. In India and Indonesia, demand continues to grow, but through a pragmatic filter. Consumers still want to upgrade, but they’re making trade-offs between features and affordability. Entry-level and mid-range Android models dominate, and demand for value-driven smart TVs is rising. Device repair shops are also thriving, offering affordable fixes that extend product life.

Germany reflects yet another dimension – green consciousness. There, sustainability is not just an ethical add-on; it’s a purchase driver. Consumers are increasingly seeking eco-certified products, energy efficiency, and software support that extends a product’s usable life.

These regional divergences remind us that consumer behaviour doesn’t shift in a straight line. Global brands must not only read the macro trends, but understand the local motivations underneath them.

Regional Snapshot

Region	Consumer Sentiment	Average Upgrade Cycle	Popular Segments
US	Cautious	3.5 years	Budget, Refurbished
UK	Value-driven	3 years	Sim-only phones, Laptops
Japan	Conservative	4–5 years	Home tech, Premium older models
India	Mixed	2–3 years	Mid-range Android, TVs
Indonesia	Budget-first	2–3 years	Entry smartphones, Repairs
Germany	Green-conscious	4 years	Eco-friendly, Long-life gear

The Next Era of Tech Retail Is Measured, Not Mass-Market

The slowdown in tech upgrades isn’t a phase. It’s a reckoning. Consumers are no longer buying into the rhythm of annual releases and short-term novelty. The next era of consumer tech will be defined not by what’s new, but by what’s necessary – and by how well brands can prove their relevance beyond launch day.

The companies that will thrive over the next five years aren’t the ones with the biggest product pipeline. They’re the ones building around lifecycle value – prioritising modularity, software longevity, and service ecosystems that extend the relationship between user and device. Subscription-based diagnostics, AI-powered support, and upgradeable components are already reshaping how loyalty is earned – and how revenue is sustained without constant churn.

It’s a shift in strategic fundamentals. Margins may compress as consumers stretch the life of their hardware, but brands that invest in intelligent add-ons, system integration, and health or sustainability functionality will find new pathways to relevance. A camera upgrade isn’t enough. Neither is a new colour. If it doesn’t serve a deeper role in how we manage health, reduce waste, or improve everyday decision-making, it won’t pass the new test of value.

That also means guesswork is no longer good enough. The consumer calculus is changing fast, and brands need real insight – beyond sentiment, beyond surveys. They need to know who’s holding back, why they’re hesitating, and what would tip the balance. That’s where market research steps forward – not as validation, but as vision.

We’re not watching a slowdown. We’re witnessing a reset. The expectations have changed, the thresholds have risen, and the reward now goes to those who understand behaviour before it hits the balance sheet.

I’d frame it this way: the most powerful upgrade a brand can offer today isn’t a new feature – it’s foresight.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.