Blueprints and performance specs no longer tell the full story. With buyers and stakeholders demanding greater transparency, industrial tech firms are under increasing pressure to disclose more than just technical capabilities.
Procurement teams across sectors are asking deeper questions – about carbon emissions, labour conditions, and lifecycle impact. European disclosure mandates and US reporting proposals are accelerating the shift. Once confined to consumer brands, transparency expectations are now reaching B2B suppliers of semiconductors, robotics, and industrial machinery.
Buyers Want More Than a Product Sheet
Technical performance remains critical, but it is no longer the only factor in industrial procurement. A 2024 study by Market Expertise found that ESG-related concerns now rank among the top ten decision drivers for global B2B buyers. This highlights a broader shift in evaluation criteria.
Suppliers are increasingly required to provide data on emissions reduction, ethical sourcing, and corporate governance. In sectors such as aerospace, mining equipment, and chemical processing, procurement teams are requesting carbon audits, labour practice disclosures, and diversity metrics alongside traditional technical specifications.
Firms that do not meet these requirements may be excluded from consideration altogether.
New Rules Are Forcing the Issue
Industrial tech firms no longer disclose sustainability data out of goodwill; they’re doing it to comply. In the US and Europe, regulators are making ESG transparency a legal requirement.
In January 2024, the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) came into effect, requiring thousands of companies – both EU-based and international firms with regional operations – to disclose detailed information on environmental impact, human rights, and governance. For the industrial tech sector, this means publishing previously considered proprietary metrics: carbon intensity, supply chain traceability, and even energy sources.
The pressure is mounting stateside as well. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to finalise rules this year mandating climate-related disclosures from publicly traded companies. This includes direct and indirect emissions data, climate risk assessments, and mitigation strategies, pushing firms in manufacturing and engineering to build new reporting infrastructures almost overnight.
The result: what was once optional is quickly becoming standard. And for firms hoping to win contracts in highly regulated markets, compliance isn’t just a checkbox; it’s a competitive edge.
Industrial Giants Begin Opening the Books
Some of the world’s largest industrial tech players are beginning to respond, not just with compliance but with proactive disclosures that mirror the transparency seen in consumer sectors.
Intel’s 2023–24 Corporate Responsibility Report goes beyond carbon emissions to include water usage, chemical management, and workforce diversity – information that was once buried in internal audits. In its 2023/24 ESG report, Lenovo disclosed targets for reducing scope 1 and 2 emissions, supply chain sustainability efforts, and metrics tied to circular economy goals. The company now ranks highest in the IT industry on the Hang Seng Corporate Sustainability Index.
NVIDIA’s 2024 sustainability report outlines how its data centres are optimised for energy efficiency, with scope 3 emissions and supplier climate programs prominently featured. These aren’t one-off updates; they’re becoming annual staples, complete with third-party verification and downloadable datasets.
For an industry known for tight-lipped operations and long procurement cycles, this shift signals more than regulatory compliance. It’s a recalibration of what trust looks like in the industrial age.
Supply Chains Are No Longer Exempt
Industrial tech firms are extending ESG scrutiny beyond their own operations. Suppliers are now under pressure to meet the same standards, sometimes higher. Contracts increasingly require disclosures not just on raw materials or manufacturing timelines but also on carbon intensity, labour conditions, and waste management practices.
Microsoft has already set the tone. In 2024, the company announced it would require key suppliers to use 100% carbon-free energy by 2030. The move came as Microsoft’s emissions rose nearly 30% year-over-year, largely due to expanded AI infrastructure and Scope 3 emissions tied to its supply base. It signals to partners: clean up or lose the business.
In Australia, chemicals and explosives company Orica has installed nitrous oxide abatement technology across multiple sites, reducing emissions by an estimated 15%, roughly equal to the annual output of all other Australian chemical producers combined. This investment wasn’t just about optics; it was about securing long-term contracts with environmentally conscious buyers.
The trend is clear: if your data isn’t clean, your bid may not even make the table.
Reporting Is Messy, Expensive, and Unfinished
For all the momentum, ESG reporting remains a logistical hurdle for many industrial tech firms. Gathering emissions data across sprawling operations, inconsistent supplier systems, and decades-old infrastructure isn’t just difficult; it’s costly and time-consuming.
A major pain point is standardisation. With dozens of frameworks in play—from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)—companies struggle to align disclosures that simultaneously satisfy investors, regulators, and buyers. Even firms that publish detailed ESG reports often face scepticism over data quality.
Governments are taking note. In February 2025, the European Commission proposed a 25% reduction in reporting burdens as part of its “Simplification Omnibus,” a move estimated to save businesses across the bloc €40 billion annually. While it won’t eliminate the need for transparency, the shift suggests that complexity may be one of the biggest roadblocks to effective ESG strategy.
The challenge now is not whether to report, but how to report meaningfully, consistently, and at scale.
Transparency Is Becoming a Selling Point
In industrial tech, where margins are tight and products are often commoditised, ESG transparency is emerging as a powerful differentiator. Firms that can clearly communicate their sustainability practices are gaining ground, not just with regulators but also with clients who now see environmental and social metrics as a measure of long-term value.
According to research, B2B buyers are more likely to renew contracts and pay premium prices to suppliers who can prove sustainable practices. This shift is being felt across sectors – from advanced manufacturing to semiconductors – as procurement teams weigh emissions data and ethics policies alongside delivery timelines and service-level agreements.
To meet demand, companies are investing in ESG-focused digital tools, embedding reporting capabilities into enterprise systems, and training frontline teams to speak the language of sustainability. The goal isn’t just compliance; it’s credibility.
For industrial tech firms, the message is clear: transparency isn’t a liability. It’s leverage.
What Was Optional Is Now Expected
The industrial tech sector is no longer immune to the scrutiny once reserved for high-profile consumer brands. Whether building chips, circuit boards, or heavy equipment, companies are being judged not just on what they make, but on how they make it, what they emit, and who they employ.
Procurement has become a proving ground. ESG credentials are now as critical as certifications and specs. The risk isn’t reputational for firms unprepared to meet these expectations – it’s commercial. Buyers are choosing partners who reflect their values, and those values are becoming quantifiable.
As regulatory timelines shorten and client expectations rise, the question isn’t whether to disclose but whether you’re disclosing enough, soon enough.
Get regular insights
Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.
Senior Marketing Executive
Sales & Marketing
General Manager PR -Internal Communications & Government Affairs
Vital Strategies
Customer Intelligence Director