In an era of Big Data, where every click, every preference, and every voice is supposedly captured and analyzed, there exists a curious paradox—a silent majority that neither clicks nor voices its preferences in the ways marketers and pollsters expect. As we stand on the precipice of yet another presidential election, the airwaves are filled with predictions, poll numbers, and expert analyses, each promising an accurate forecast of America’s political future. But what if the real deciders of the next presidency are those who don’t participate in polls at all?

Consider the events of 2016, a year that will forever be etched in political history for defying conventional wisdom and turning polling science on its head. Pundits were left baffled, pollsters were questioned, and the world watched in disbelief as predictions crumbled on election night. Was this a one-off anomaly, or did it expose a fundamental flaw in how we gather and interpret public opinion?

This isn’t just a question for political analysts to ponder; it’s a critical concern for brands who rely on market research to understand their audience. If the people who are truly shaping our world, be it through their votes or their buying decisions, are those who remain unheard in conventional surveys, then are we building products, brands, and campaigns on a foundation of silence?

As we gear up for the 2024 presidential election, it’s time to ask the uncomfortable question: What if the people deciding elections—and perhaps your next business move—aren’t participating in your surveys? The answers might not only redefine our political landscape but also reshape how we approach market research in an increasingly unpredictable world.

The Two Groups: Participants vs. Non-Participants

Participants

• Who are they? They are the voices we hear, the data points we analyze, and the very foundation of our modern understanding of public opinion. From the politically engaged citizen to the avid consumer, these are individuals who willingly share their thoughts, preferences, and intentions through surveys and polls.
• Why do they participate? Is it a sense of civic duty or perhaps a desire to influence the world around them? Participants in polls often feel a connection to the topics at hand, a belief that their voice matters, or sometimes, a simple attraction to incentives and rewards. They want to be part of the conversation, and they’re willing to take the time to engage.
• How representative are they? This is where the waters become murky. While participants might paint a picture of the majority, are they truly emblematic of the population at large? An underlying bias may exist within this group, one that leans towards those more comfortable with sharing opinions or those who are more engaged with particular subjects. It’s a question that both political scientists and market researchers must grapple with, and the answer is far from clear.

Non-Participants

• Who are they? They are the unseen, the unheard, and the often-forgotten segment of our society. They are not merely those who refuse to answer a survey; they represent a diverse and complex group with motivations and views as varied as the participants themselves.
• Why don’t they participate? Some see the barrage of questions as intrusive, others distrust the entities collecting the information, and still, others may simply lack the time or interest. The reasons are multifaceted, and they often intertwine with socioeconomic factors, educational backgrounds, and personal values.
• What impact do they have when unaccounted for? The silence of non-participants isn’t merely a void; it’s a profound absence that can distort our perception of reality. Whether skewing the predicted outcomes of a landmark election or leading a company down a misguided path, the failure to hear these voices can result in a world that feels out of touch with a significant portion of its populace.

These two groups—participants and non-participants—create a complex tapestry that challenges our conventional methods of understanding human behavior. The difference between them isn’t just statistical; it’s a philosophical divide that calls into question the essence of representation and inclusivity in our modern society. As we move closer to the 2024 election and continue to evolve our business strategies, recognizing and reconciling this divide isn’t just prudent—it’s imperative.

Case Study: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

In the lead-up to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, a palpable certainty permeated media outlets, dinner table discussions, and expert commentaries. The numbers were crunched, the predictions made, and the narrative set. According to polls, a Clinton victory was all but guaranteed. The only question that remained was the margin.

But as the night unfolded, a different story emerged—a story that would stun the nation and leave political analysts scrambling for answers.

Overview of Polling Predictions The numbers leading up to the 2016 election were unequivocal. Mainstream media and esteemed polling firms were unanimous in their predictions: a victory for Hillary Clinton. The polls pointed to key demographic support, favorable battleground state positioning, and an electorate that seemed to be leaning in her direction. The science of polling had spoken, and it left little room for debate.

Analysis of What Went Wrong But the unexpected happened. As the results trickled in, a gaping disconnect between the polling predictions and the reality on the ground began to surface. How could the polls have gotten it so wrong? Was it methodological flaws? Bias in sampling? Or a failure to capture the late-deciding voters?

The post-mortem analysis of the 2016 election revealed a complex web of errors, ranging from underestimating certain demographics to misreading voter enthusiasm. However, one factor stood out as particularly glaring: the silent majority, those who didn’t participate in the polls, had made their voices heard in the most profound way possible.

The Theory That Non-Participants Were a Significant Factor in the Election Outcome It’s a theory that goes beyond mere speculation. Some studies have suggested that many potential Trump voters were unwilling or unlikely to reveal their true voting intentions in pre-election surveys. Whether it was a distrust of the media, a fear of social backlash, or a broader disengagement from the political process, these non-participants skewed the landscape in ways that traditional polling methods failed to capture.

This isn’t just a historical curiosity or a political anomaly; it’s a seismic shift in our understanding of public opinion. If the unheard voices can decide the fate of a presidency, what else might they be influencing in our world? And how might this silent force be at play in market research, steering products and brands in directions we are yet to comprehend fully?

The 2016 election is not merely a case study; it’s a stark warning. It reminds us that in our zeal to quantify, predict, and control, we may be overlooking the very forces that drive the heart of our society. As we approach 2024, the lessons of 2016 must not be forgotten; they must be a call to reevaluate, recalibrate, and truly listen. Only then can we hope to understand the complexities of a world that refuses to fit neatly into our predictive models.

The Business Implication: How It Affects Market Research

If the consequences of overlooking non-participants could turn a political election on its head, the business world must heed this lesson with equal gravity. In an age where customer-centricity is not merely a buzzword but a lifeline, companies increasingly depend on surveys and market research to shape their products, branding strategies, and market positioning. But what happens when a significant portion of the audience remains silent?

How Companies Rely on Surveys for Product Development, Branding, etc. From multinational corporations to fledgling startups, surveys and polls have become essential tools for understanding customer preferences, forecasting trends, and gauging market reactions. They influence everything from the color of a new smartphone to the tagline of a global advertising campaign. In this data-driven environment, a clear and representative insight into consumer sentiment is not just valuable—it’s vital.

The Risks of Ignoring Non-Participants However, the ghost of the 2016 election looms large over the business landscape. Ignoring the silent majority in market research can be as catastrophic as misunderstanding a political constituency. If a company’s surveys only capture the voices willing to be heard, what valuable insights are being lost from those who choose to remain silent? It’s a blindspot that can lead to skewed data, misguided strategies, and, ultimately, commercial failure.

Real-World Examples Where Ignoring This Segment Led to Business Failures or Successes The stories are as varied as they are telling. Consider the once-prominent smartphone brand that missed shifting consumer preferences by focusing too narrowly on tech-savvy early adopters, ignoring the wider, silent customer base that craved simplicity. 

Or the breakthrough success of a food brand that went against conventional wisdom to target a previously overlooked demographic, finding a loyal customer base that competitors had ignored.

These examples are not mere anecdotes but emblematic of a truth that transcends industries and markets. The unheard voices, the silent preferences, and the unspoken needs of non-participants can make or break a business endeavor.

The implications are clear: In a world that values connectivity and engagement, we cannot afford to overlook the silent majority. Whether in the political arena or the marketplace, the voices not captured by traditional means are not just a statistical inconvenience but a hidden force shaping our world. Companies must learn from the lessons of the past and strive to understand this elusive segment. 

In doing so, they may unlock the key to innovation, resonance, and lasting success. The warning of 2016 is not just a political tale; it’s a business imperative. The question is, are we listening?

Strategies for a More Inclusive Approach

The revelation that the silent majority might hold sway over elections, products, and branding is not merely a challenge; it’s an opportunity. By finding ways to understand and include those who typically remain unheard, we can build a richer, more nuanced picture of our world. But how can this be achieved? What tools, ethics, and innovative methods can we employ to reach beyond the usual suspects?

How to Identify and Reach Non-Participants 

Reaching the silent majority begins with recognizing their existence and understanding their motivations. It involves looking beyond traditional survey channels and finding ways to connect with people where they are rather than where we expect them to be.

• Engage in Community Outreach: By interacting with people in their communities and at local events, a more diverse perspective can be gathered.
• Utilize Social Media and Non-Traditional Platforms: These channels can often reach those who may not typically engage with traditional surveys.
• Invest in Qualitative Research: In-depth interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic studies can uncover insights from those who might otherwise remain silent.

Innovative Methods and Tools for More Representative Sampling

Innovation in market research is not just a catchphrase; it’s a necessity for bridging the gap between participants and non-participants.

• Adaptive Sampling Techniques: By continually adjusting the sampling method based on initial responses, a more balanced view can be obtained.
• Gamification of Surveys: Making surveys more engaging and less formal might entice participation from those who usually shy away.
• Utilizing Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: These technologies can help predict and understand the silent majority’s preferences, even when explicit responses are lacking.

Ethical Considerations and Building Trust with Respondents

 At the heart of this endeavor lies trust. If non-participants are to become participants, they must believe that their voices will be heard, their privacy respected, and their opinions valued.

• Transparency in Data Usage: Being clear about how the information will be used can foster trust.
• Respecting Privacy and Confidentiality: Protecting personal information builds confidence in the process.
• Fostering Genuine Engagement: More than mere data points, respondents should feel that their insights contribute to something meaningful, whether it’s shaping a product or influencing a societal change.

The quest to include the unheard is not simple, nor is it without its pitfalls. But in an increasingly complex and interconnected world, it’s an undertaking worth pursuing. Whether we’re predicting the next president or designing the next must-have gadget, a more inclusive approach promises more accurate insights and a more empathetic and authentic connection with the very people we seek to understand and serve. It’s a path that demands creativity, ethics, and courage, but the rewards might just redefine how we see our world.

We find ourselves at a crossroads in a world inundated with data, voices, opinions, and predictions. We have at our fingertips the means to reach into the very psyche of our society, to understand desires, fears, hopes, and convictions. But in our pursuit of knowledge, we are confronted with a haunting paradox: the more we seek to know, the more we risk overlooking those who choose not to speak.

The silent majority isn’t a mere demographic or a statistical hiccup; it’s a philosophical challenge. It demands that we question our assumptions, rethink our methodologies, and embrace a humbler, more nuanced approach to understanding our fellow human beings. Whether in politics or business, the unheard voices are not simply missing data; they represent a missed opportunity—a chance to engage, innovate, and connect on a deeper level.

The lessons of the 2016 election are not confined to the political arena. They are a mirror held up to all of us, reflecting our ambitions, oversights, and willingness to truly listen. As we approach the 2024 election and forge ahead in our business endeavors, we must ask ourselves: Are we content with the surface, with the easy answers and predictable narratives? Or are we willing to venture into the unknown, to seek out the silent, to hear the unspoken?

In this challenge lies our opportunity. In our willingness to listen, we find our strength. The voices are there, waiting to be heard. The question is, are we brave enough to listen?

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

• First Name*
• Last Name*
• Business Email*

Gender equality has been a hotly debated issue for years, and brands have been front and center in helping drive meaningful change. And although there has been much progress in dismantling gender stereotypes in advertisements and media, much work still remains to be done. 

Notable examples of progressive campaigns include Heineken’s commercial promoting gender inclusivity, Mohey’s wedding campaign challenging traditional norms in India, and Korean beauty brand SK-II’s “Change Destiny” campaign, which contests conventional beauty standards. Yet, some brands continue to present gender stereotypes. 

Advertising can be used to promote gender equality and challenge gender stereotypes. Studies have shown that media images are more impactful than books on gender equality. Advertisers can showcase their customers’ diversity in their communications and ultimately help create an environment where all genders are respected, accepted, and valued.

In a world where men and women lead similar lives, it is irrelevant to remind people of gender in the products they purchase and use. 

Today’s consumer increasingly expects to see the reality of their lives and gender equality from the brands it engages with. It is, therefore, a win-win situation for brands showcasing gender equality. 

The role of social media in helping upend gender stereotyping in the media. 

Social media has had a considerable influence in breaking down gender stereotypes. Before the existence of such platforms, women had little choice but to accept oppressive depictions and had no means to converse and gain solidarity with each other in finding such depictions unpalatable. However, with the rise of social media, women now have a powerful tool for engaging in meaningful dialogue about the various ways brands have perpetuated unfair stereotypes. The effect of such conversations has been inspiring and momentous.

The UK banned gender stereotyping from British ads.

In 2019, a significant development took place in the advertising industry in the United Kingdom by banning gender stereotypes in British ads. The UK’s advertising regulator made this decision, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), set out guidelines for agencies to eliminate stereotypes that could potentially cause harm, serious offense, or widespread negative impact.

This ban aimed to promote a more inclusive and diverse representation of gender in advertising, challenging outdated and harmful stereotypes that perpetuated gender inequality and limited societal perceptions. The ASA recognized that advertising plays an influential role in shaping cultural norms and beliefs, and by addressing gender stereotypes, it sought to create a more equitable and inclusive advertising landscape.

The ban on gender stereotypes meant that advertisers and agencies were required to avoid portraying stereotypes that reinforced traditional gender roles or demeaned individuals based on gender. Examples of such stereotypes included women depicted solely as caregivers or in passive roles, men portrayed as aggressive or incapable of household tasks, or advertisements suggesting that certain activities or interests were exclusively for one gender.

Advertisers were given six months to review their campaigns and make necessary changes to align with the new guidelines. The goal was to encourage advertisers to be more mindful of the potential impact of their messaging on societal attitudes and to promote a more balanced and realistic portrayal of gender roles and identities.

The ban on gender stereotypes in British ads aimed to address the harmful effects of stereotyping on individuals and society. It aimed to challenge traditional gender norms, empower individuals to be seen beyond rigid stereotypes, and foster a more inclusive and equal society.

The ASA’s decision received widespread support from advocacy groups and organizations working towards gender equality. By taking a proactive stance against harmful gender stereotypes in advertising, the UK set an important precedent, encouraging other countries and advertising industries to assess their practices and make positive changes.

However, it is worth noting that the ban on gender stereotypes does not mean that all depictions of gender are forbidden in advertising. Instead, it ensures that advertisements avoid perpetuating harmful and limiting stereotypes that can hurt individuals and society.

Banning gender stereotypes in British ads represented a significant step towards fostering more inclusive and equitable advertising practices. It signaled the recognition of the influential role of advertising in shaping societal perceptions and aimed to create a more diverse and empowering representation of gender in the media.

Studies show ads using progressive and inclusive advertising can help brands increase their ROI (return on investment) in several ways:

Targeting a wider audience.

By creating inclusive advertisements, brands can appeal to a wider audience, including people from diverse backgrounds, cultures, and lifestyles. This can help expand their reach and increase the number of potential customers who may be interested in their products or services.

Building customer loyalty.

Inclusive advertising can help build customer loyalty by demonstrating a brand’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) values. Customers who identify with a brand’s values are likelier to become loyal customers and advocate for the brand.

Enhancing brand reputation. 

Brands that embrace diversity and inclusion in their advertising can enhance their reputation and be viewed as socially responsible and forward-thinking. This can create a positive association with the brand and increase the likelihood of customers choosing their products or services over competitors.

Encouraging word-of-mouth marketing. 

Progressive and inclusive advertising can lead to positive word-of-mouth marketing as customers share their positive experiences with the brand and its messaging with others. This can increase brand awareness and generate more leads and sales.

9 Ways advertisers can promote gender equality.

In recent years, we’ve seen a trend of brands attempting to use feminist values to sell fashion and beauty products to women. This approach involves aligning themselves with feminist values, such as empowerment and inclusivity, to appeal to consumers who identify with them. 

While some argue this is a positive step towards greater gender equality, others have criticized this trend as a form of “femvertising” more about selling products than promoting genuine social change.

So, how exactly do brands attempt to use feminist values to sell fashion and beauty products to women? Here are a few common tactics:

• Challenge gender stereotypes. 

Advertisers should avoid gender stereotypes and represent women in diverse roles and situations, showcasing their strengths, abilities, and achievements. This can help to break down harmful gender biases and create a more inclusive environment.

Some brands take a more critical approach to gender stereotypes in their advertising. For example, a campaign by the sanitary pads brand Always aimed to raise the issue of sexism towards women and try to turn that phrase into something positive. Building upon what brands like Nike and Dove started, it used consumer insights to connect with its target audience at a deeper level.

• Feature diverse body types.

Advertisers should showcase women with diverse body types, including those not traditionally represented in media. This can promote body positivity and create a more inclusive environment for women of all shapes and sizes. Personal care brand Dove has been at the forefront of this change. 

• Use inclusive language. 

Advertisers should use inclusive language that avoids assumptions about a person’s gender identity or preferences. For example, using “they” instead of “he” or “she” can be more inclusive of non-binary or genderqueer individuals

• Promote equal opportunities.

Advertisers should promote equal opportunities for women in their ads, highlighting their achievements and potential. This can help to break down gender barriers and create a more equal and inclusive society.

• Address women’s issues. 

Advertisers should address women’s issues in their ads, such as gender-based violence, unequal pay, and lack of representation in leadership roles. This can help to raise awareness and promote change.

• Celebrating Women’s Achievements

Some brands are using their advertising to celebrate women’s achievements and promote messages of empowerment. For example, Nike’s “Dream Crazier” campaign featured female athletes breaking down barriers and shattering stereotypes.

• Partner with women creators.

Advertisers should partner with women creators and influencers who can bring diverse perspectives and experiences to their ads. This can help to ensure that the content is more inclusive and representative of women’s diverse experiences.

• Advocate for women’s empowerment. 

Advertisers should advocate for women’s empowerment in their ads, promoting messages of self-confidence, resilience, and self-determination. This can create a more inclusive and supportive environment for women.

• Promoting Self-Care. 

Brands increasingly emphasize the importance of self-care and mental health in their marketing. By promoting the idea that taking care of oneself is empowering, these brands hope to tap into a growing trend toward wellness and self-improvement.

While this approach can effectively capture consumers’ attention and generate sales, it’s important to consider the authenticity of these messages and whether they truly promote gender equality or are just a form of “femvertising.” As consumers, we should be mindful of the messages we’re being sold and their impact on society as a whole.

The Role of Market research in helping brands embrace DEI.

When it comes to advertising, brands must always consider their audience. And in today’s society, that means being mindful of gender stereotypes and avoiding perpetuating them in ads. But how can brands break free from these harmful biases? 

Market research allows brands to better understand their target audience and the values and beliefs that shape their behavior. By conducting focus groups and surveys, brands can uncover important insights about their audience’s perceptions and expectations. This data is then used to inform the creative direction of advertising campaigns.

As mentioned earlier, one brand that has successfully used market research to break gender stereotypes is Always. The feminine care brand conducted a study and found that only 19% of women positively associated with the phrase “like a girl.” In response, Always created the “Like a Girl” campaign, which aimed to change the negative connotation of the phrase and empower girls and women. The campaign garnered over 90 million views on YouTube and was praised for its impactful message across the globe.

Fashion retailer H&M found that gender stereotypes were a major barrier for their male customers, who often felt discouraged from trying new styles due to societal pressure to conform to traditional masculinity. In response, H&M launched their “Modern Essentials Selected by David Beckham” campaign, which featured the soccer star sporting gender-neutral clothing and breaking free from gender norms. The campaign received positive feedback for its progressive message and inclusive approach.

These examples demonstrate the powerful impact that market research can have on breaking gender stereotypes in advertising. Using data to inform creative decisions, brands can create more relevant, meaningful, and impactful campaigns for their audience. Promoting gender equality in advertising gives brands the potential to shape cultural perceptions and impact society as a whole positively.

Examples of brands winning at inclusive advertising and gender equality worldwide. 

• Nike has been praised for its inclusive advertising campaigns that promote diversity, inclusion, and empowerment. Their campaigns often feature athletes and individuals from diverse backgrounds and highlight important social issues. One example is their “Dream Crazier” campaign, which celebrates female athletes and encourages women to break through barriers and reach their full potential.

• John Lewis, a British department store, has been recognized for its inclusive advertising campaigns. The brand’s “Man on the Moon” Christmas campaign, featured a young girl trying to connect with an elderly man who lives alone on the moon. The ad promoted inclusivity, compassion, and connection.

• Tanishq, an Indian jewelry brand, has been praised for its inclusive advertising campaigns celebrating diversity and inclusivity. One of their most notable campaigns was the “Ekatvam” campaign, which featured a Hindu-Muslim couple celebrating their baby shower. The ad received backlash from some conservative groups but also widespread praise for promoting unity and inclusivity.

• DBS Bank, a Singaporean bank, has been recognized for its inclusive advertising campaigns that promote diversity and inclusivity. Their “SPARKS” campaign featured stories of individuals from diverse backgrounds and celebrated their achievements and contributions to society.

• Swedish brand Ikea has been a pioneer in using advertising to promote gender equality. Their advertising focuses on breaking gender stereotypes in home decoration. In an effort to ensure that their advertisements send the right message to consumers, they worked with a panel of experts in the fields of social science, communication, and art to provide them with creative input and advice. One of their ad campaigns showed how male and female parents are equally involved in their child’s education. By showing male and female roles in household activities, Ikea is taking a proactive step in breaking down stereotypes about gender roles in the home.

• Levi Strauss has made a conscious effort to use advertising to promote gender equality by featuring men and women in their campaigns. They’ve also released several initiatives to reduce workplace bias and encourage the career progression of all genders. Their #WeAllFitIn campaign was aimed at fighting for workplace equality and diversity. The campaign was focused on creating an inclusive and empowering workplace for people of all genders and was designed to break down gender stereotypes and inspire all genders to reach their career aspirations.

• L’Oréal has long used advertising to challenge the traditional representation of beauty. They released the #WomenNotObjects campaign to address the fact that many ads in the beauty industry had traditionally featured women as objects of sexual desire instead of empowering and uplifting them. The campaign aimed to end gender stereotypes by using real women, not models, to tell the stories behind their products.

• Apple’s recent “Behind the Mac” campaign encouraged girls and women to explore their creativity and use the power of technology to reach their goals. In the ads, Apple used real women from various backgrounds and showcased their successes, helping to challenge gender stereotypes and promote gender equality.

While certain industries, like the beverage industry, are still plagued by gender bias, the retail industry has recently made strides toward gender neutrality, with toy and clothing retailers starting to respond to criticism. 

US-based retailer Target, for instance, has announced that it will remove gender-based signage from the children’s section of its stores, while Amazon has eliminated the option to categorize toys by gender. Even the Disney Store has made its Halloween costume collection gender-neutral. However, the beverage industry, particularly energy drink brands, is still motivated to leverage gender norms and anxieties to drive sales.

These are just a few examples of brands winning at inclusive advertising in different parts of the world. 

Advertising is an incredibly powerful tool that can help shape the conversation and further gender equality. When brands feature people of all genders and sexualities in ads, they demonstrate their commitment to promoting equality. They can also showcase diversity in roles and lifestyles that may not have previously been widely represented. Advertisers should also avoid using gender stereotypes that might influence the audiences’ views on what roles are appropriate for certain genders. Moreover, it’s important to focus on storytelling in advertisements, showing realistic scenarios and portraying different gender roles as unbiased and non-judgemental. In doing so, advertising can contribute to a more equal and just society.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

• First Name*
• Last Name*
• Business Email*