Qualitative Research Archives

A new round of tariffs is forcing global brands to rethink their pricing strategies. The United States has announced sweeping import duties – raising tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles to 100%, with additional increases targeting semiconductors, critical minerals, solar cells, and steel. While reminiscent of the 2018 trade tensions, these measures land at a more fragile economic moment. Other countries are expected to respond, further tightening the vise on businesses already navigating slim margins and inflation-fatigued consumers.

Though tariffs are levied on importers, their cost typically travels downstream, landing with the end consumer. The difference this time is timing. These duties follow nearly four years of relentless inflation, with household budgets already strained by higher prices on everything from groceries to rent.

In March 2024, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that median household expectations for inflation remained stuck at 3% – a full percentage point above the central bank’s target. At the same time, spending growth has softened. Consumers aren’t just noticing higher prices. They’re changing how they shop.

According to PwC’s Global Consumer Insights Pulse Survey, 69% of shoppers said they’ve reduced non-essential spending due to rising prices. Nearly one in three said they’d switched to cheaper brands or private labels. Forty-three percent reported actively seeking out discounts or promotions.

The dilemma for brands is clear. Raise prices and risk losing share to lower-cost rivals, or absorb the tariffs and compress margins already under strain. Neither path is easy – especially in categories where loyalty is thin and substitutes are plentiful.

However, there is an opportunity – if brands have the right tools. Pricing isn’t guesswork. With behavioral research and elasticity modeling, businesses can test how consumers respond to different price points long before making changes. In markets where product origin influences perception, measuring how price interacts with sentiment and substitution has never been more critical.

Pricing Models for Navigating Demand Shifts

Model	Best Used For	Strength
Van Westendorp	Identifying acceptable price ranges	Fast, directional, simple to implement
Gabor-Granger	Estimating price sensitivity	Useful for product-level pricing
Conjoint Analysis	Testing price, feature, and origin trade-offs	Reveals real-world decision patterns
Discrete Choice	Forecasting market share under price scenarios	Ideal for competitive or global pricing

The pricing question isn’t binary. It’s not just whether to raise prices – but when, where, and for whom. Brands that are navigating this moment well aren’t reacting. They’re measuring.

Where the Pressure Hits First

These price hikes aren’t hypothetical. They’ve already begun to ripple through procurement and supply chains. In May, the US approved sweeping tariff increases on $18 billion worth of Chinese imports. The most visible: electric vehicle tariffs jumped from 25% to 100%. Other affected goods include semiconductors, batteries, medical equipment, and industrial metals. While the policy aims to safeguard strategic sectors, the short-term effect is clear – brands that depend on global sourcing are now facing higher input costs almost overnight.

For US-based manufacturers reliant on overseas inputs, the new tariffs are immediately disruptive. In sectors like electronics and electric vehicles – where China dominates component supply – there are few near-term alternatives. Benchmark Mineral Intelligence reports that China accounts for more than 70% of global battery cell production and over 80% of refined lithium. Reorienting supply chains isn’t just expensive. It’s logistically constrained.

Other categories – apparel, home goods, and consumer electronics – face similar vulnerabilities. The American Apparel & Footwear Association estimates that 40% of all clothing sold in the US still comes from China. Even brands that have diversified sourcing rarely achieve full exits. Standing up new capacity requires capital, workforce training, and time – particularly when quality control and speed to market are critical.

Retailers, too, are under pressure – especially in categories where shelf prices are watched closely and loyalty runs thin. In recent earnings calls, both Walmart and Costco flagged tariff-related risks. Walmart said it was actively scenario-planning for affected segments like electronics, appliances, and furniture. These are areas where private-label competition is fierce and price sensitivity is high. Passing along cost increases without losing volume is far from simple.

In food and beverage, tariff exposure goes beyond ingredients – it extends to packaging, machinery, and imported inputs across the value chain. Margins are already thin, and pricing missteps are less forgivable. While grocery inflation has eased since its 2022 peak, consumer memory is long. Kantar data shows that even small price hikes in 2024 prompted shoppers in the UK to trade down, boosting private-label share across nearly every category.

For many brands, the challenge isn’t just cost – it’s timing. Companies entered 2024 anticipating relief after three years of inflation. Instead, tariffs introduced fresh volatility at the exact moment consumers have become more price-sensitive – and less tolerant of surprises at the register.

Calibrating the Right Price

Inside boardrooms and pricing teams, one question repeatedly surfaces: How much can we raise prices before we lose the customer? Instinct won’t cut it. Brands need to quantify demand before it disappears.

At its heart, price sensitivity is about perception – how much a product feels worth paying for and how much slack a brand has before customers balk. That perception isn’t fixed. It shifts depending on the brand, the category, the context, and what else is on the shelf. This is why pricing research has moved from nice-to-have to necessity for companies under policy or cost pressure.

One of the most enduring tools is the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter. Developed in the 1970s, it remains in use because of its clarity: consumers are asked when a product feels like a bargain, too cheap to trust, starting to feel expensive, or too pricey to consider. From this, brands map an acceptable price range – a range that has narrowed in recent years as consumers react to repeated cost shocks, from freight to fuel to tariffs.

In categories like electronics, beauty, and automotive, price is only part of the equation. To understand what really drives purchase decisions, many brands turn to conjoint analysis – a survey-based method that models how consumers weigh trade-offs between price, brand, features, country of origin, and other factors. By asking shoppers to choose between product bundles, researchers can identify which elements hold the most value.

If shoppers consistently choose a slightly more expensive product because of its origin, that insight can help brands assess whether absorbing tariffs – or moving production – is worth it. It also flags which segments are less price-sensitive and more loyal, a crucial distinction when margins are thin and every unit matters.

Another widely used method is Gabor-Granger pricing, which measures purchase intent at different price points to estimate elasticity. It’s often used when decisions need to be made quickly or across a large product portfolio. While it doesn’t account for competitors, it can show where price increases are likely to hit hardest – or go unnoticed.

Many companies are now layering these models with real-time data – from loyalty programs, e-commerce behavior, and even point-of-sale heat maps – to fine-tune pricing down to the SKU. A 2023 McKinsey report found that brands using dynamic, data-informed pricing strategies saw profit lifts of 2% to 7%, even in flat-growth environments.

Pricing is no longer just a finance exercise. It now draws from behavioral science, brand strategy, and competitive analysis. When costs move quickly – and tariff rules shift with little warning – brands that understand what drives the willingness to pay are better equipped to make smart, fast decisions.

Strategy Under Pressure

A poorly timed price move doesn’t just hurt margins – it can shift entire market dynamics. Over the past five years, brands across sectors have faced rising costs, disrupted supply chains, and increasingly price-sensitive consumers. Some adjusted early and carefully. Others misjudged their customers – and paid for it. The gap between them highlights how well-informed pricing can build trust, while a misstep can fast-track brand erosion.

In 2018, Whirlpool welcomed tariffs on imported steel, betting they would level the playing field for domestic manufacturers. But as raw material costs climbed, so did Whirlpool’s prices – while rivals adjusted sourcing and held firm. By mid-2019, demand had slipped in the company’s key North American appliance segment. Shipments fell, and its early advantage vanished. Whirlpool had overestimated the power of patriotic branding and underestimated how quickly price gaps could trigger customer defection.

Uniqlo took a different path. In 2022, its parent company, Fast Retailing, raised prices only on high-demand products like its HEATTECH thermal line – leaving basics untouched. Executives framed the move not as a response to inflation, but as a reflection of better materials and improved quality. That message was delivered consistently to both consumers and investors. By the end of fiscal 2023, Fast Retailing had posted record profits, and Uniqlo remained one of Japan’s most trusted brands.

PepsiCo chose a quieter strategy. Faced with rising input costs in its Frito-Lay division, the company trimmed pack sizes while keeping sticker prices unchanged – a textbook case of shrinkflation. It didn’t announce the change, but shoppers picked up on it. Social media backlash followed, but unit economics held steady. In 2022 and 2023, PepsiCo posted revenue growth of 8.7% and 9.5%, crediting “responsible pricing” and sustained brand investment.”

In many markets, price tension didn’t boost brands – it boosted private labels. In the UK, store-brand sales surged as national brands introduced a string of small, poorly communicated price increases. Tesco’s Clubcard data revealed that consumers weren’t simply trading down – they were abandoning brands that no longer justified their price. By late 2023, Kantar reported that private labels made up over 52% of UK grocery sales, a level last reached during the global financial crisis.

These case studies don’t share a common tactic. What they share is calibration. The brands that got it right knew how far they could go – and with which segments. Some paired pricing shifts with clear messaging. Others moved quietly, trusting in long-term loyalty. But all respected the limits of what their customers would accept.

Good pricing does more than protect margins. It builds trust, reinforces perceived quality, and – most importantly – avoids unpleasant surprises. In markets where small increases can trigger a switch, clarity and timing matter as much as the number on the tag.

The Strategic Trade-Offs

Companies squeezed between rising costs and price-sensitive customers tend to reach for one of four levers: absorb the cost, raise the price, shrink the product, or redesign it. None are simple. Each carries risk. And the real challenge isn’t which tactic to use – but how to execute it without weakening brand equity or long-term pricing power.

Absorbing higher costs can maintain customer goodwill – but it’s rarely sustainable. In low-margin sectors like grocery and apparel, taking on even a 10% cost increase from tariffs or wages can wipe out profits. It might buy time, but without gains in volume, efficiency, or product mix, it’s a short-term fix with long-term limits.

Shrinkflation – reducing pack sizes while keeping prices flat – remains a go-to strategy in food and household goods. It works best where packaging disguises quantity changes and price comparisons happen by eye, not unit weight. But shoppers notice. A survey found that 64% of US consumers viewed shrinkflation negatively, and nearly half said it made them more likely to switch brands. The fallout is often reputational, not immediate – but in a loyalty-fragile market, perception matters.

For some brands, reshoring or diversifying supply chains is a way to hedge against tariff risk. Apple, for example, has invested heavily in moving production from China to India and Vietnam – not just for tariff relief, but to reduce geopolitical exposure. These shifts are slow and costly. Quality control, lead times, and logistics all become more complex. For most mid-sized firms, the barrier isn’t intent – it’s feasibility.

Dynamic pricing, once used mainly by airlines and ride-hailing apps, is gaining ground in retail. Powered by real-time data, it lets brands adjust prices based on demand, inventory, or market conditions. While rare in physical stores, it’s now common online. Amazon’s algorithm reportedly makes millions of daily changes to test what shoppers will tolerate. The danger lies in consistency. If pricing feels arbitrary or unfair, trust can fray – especially in categories where stability has long been the norm.

Some brands are taking a tiered approach. They hold prices steady on high-volume, price-sensitive products while testing increases on premium or niche lines. Others bundle extras – free shipping, loyalty rewards, extended warranties – to reframe value without raising list prices. These tactics don’t erase costs, but they redirect attention from the price tag to the perceived benefit.

These strategies differ in form but share one thing: insight. Brands that understand where price elasticity stretches – but doesn’t snap – are far better equipped to make changes that hold. That understanding doesn’t come from spreadsheets alone. It comes from consistently measuring how real consumers respond in the moment.

Price isn’t just a number. It’s a signal – to customers, competitors, and shareholders – of what a brand values, and how well it understands its market.

Pricing in a Slower Growth World

There is no universal playbook for navigating price hikes during a period of soft demand. But companies that treat pricing as a strategic discipline – grounded in research, not reaction – tend to make fewer missteps.

Several patterns are emerging. First, the most resilient brands treat pricing as part of product development – not something tacked on after costs are tallied. They design with trade-offs in mind: what customers see, what they value, and what they’ll pay more for. In these organizations, pricing sits alongside marketing, insights, and supply chain – not in a siloed finance function.

Second, short-term fixes are being replaced with structured testing. Companies that previously treated pricing research as an annual or ad-hoc exercise are now investing in more frequent, faster measurement – integrating survey-based models with real-time sales and competitive data. This shift isn’t about chasing perfect precision. It’s about reducing guesswork.

Third, regional variation is back in focus. After years of global price harmonization, more brands are returning to market-by-market pricing. Tariff impacts, consumer sentiment, and price sensitivity differ dramatically between the US, Southeast Asia, and Europe. A strategy that works in Singapore may unravel in Texas. Research agencies are increasingly being asked to localize price testing and conjoint simulations – especially for product lines being repositioned or repackaged due to input cost changes.

There’s also more internal scrutiny. Boards and shareholders are asking tougher questions about the long-term effects of pricing actions. What’s the risk of training customers to wait for discounts? Are private-label defections reversible? Are loyalty gains being offset by unit loss? The pressure is no longer just to raise prices – but to prove that doing so won’t damage the brand a year from now.

For leadership teams, pricing has become a balancing act between margin and momentum. Push too hard, and customers disappear. Hold back too much, and financials fall short. The brands that get it right are not guessing where the line is. They’re measuring it – then acting with discipline.

In an environment shaped by shifting costs, tariff risk, and consumer fatigue, pricing is no longer a lever to pull. It’s a strategy to build.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

If B2B marketing were a person, it would be the studious, rational, and logical one. Meanwhile, B2C would be the creative, chatty one, full of emotions. But what if B2B and B2C become besties and learn from each other?

The reality is that business buyers are still people. They don’t switch off their emotions when making purchasing decisions for their companies. They crave trust, connection, and a sense of belonging – just like any consumer. The most forward-thinking B2B brands are taking notes from their B2C counterparts, investing in brand-building and storytelling to create deeper engagement.

Enter Payhawk, a B2B fintech company that’s rewriting the rules. Known for its streamlined payment solutions, Payhawk has traditionally relied on performance marketing and LinkedIn-driven lead generation. But now, the brand is shifting gears -borrowing from B2C’s playbook to craft a stronger, more relatable identity.

For B2B brands looking to cut through the noise, Payhawk’s strategy offers a crucial lesson: branding isn’t a luxury; it’s a competitive advantage.

Brand trust in B2B is no longer just about product

B2B brands have long relied on product superiority to drive trust. The logic was simple: offer a feature-packed, efficient solution, and businesses would buy in. But in an era where product differentiation is razor-thin, trust is built on something more human – brand perception, credibility, and emotional connection.

Payhawk understands this shift. As a fintech company competing in a crowded market of expense management platforms, it recognizes that being the best isn’t enough – it has to be the most trusted. Trust isn’t just about what a company sells but also about how it makes customers feel.

This is where B2B is borrowing directly from B2C. In consumer marketing, emotional branding is a dominant force – Nike sells motivation, Apple sells innovation, and Patagonia sells responsibility. Payhawk is applying the same principle, moving beyond transactional messaging to create an identity that resonates deeper.

But trust isn’t built through slogans or polished campaigns – it’s about sustained credibility. Payhawk’s approach includes:

Thought leadership that feels personal: Executive voices, not just corporate branding, lead the conversation on LinkedIn.
Community-driven engagement: Prioritizing customer stories and success narratives over traditional case studies.
Transparency as a differentiator: Instead of product-first messaging, the brand openly discusses industry challenges and inefficiencies, making it a trusted advisor rather than just a service provider.

The takeaway is clear: trust is now an emotional currency. Buyers aren’t just looking for vendors; they’re looking for brands they can align with – ones that don’t just sell solutions but embody values that matter.

Branding Vs. Lead Generation

The divide between brand-first B2B companies and lead-gen-focused B2B companies is widening.

Take Payhawk’s approach compared to Ramp – another fintech firm in expense management. While Ramp has built its growth through aggressive performance marketing, SEO dominance, and high-volume cold outreach, Payhawk has prioritized brand storytelling, digital engagement, and interactive campaigns to foster long-term affinity.

The difference?

Payhawk is shaping brand preference, while Ramp is optimizing for short-term conversion.
Payhawk has a higher organic brand recall, while Ramp still depends on direct-response advertising to stay visible.
Payhawk is engaging decision-makers emotionally, while Ramp is pushing product-first messaging.

Which strategy wins long-term? According to McKinsey, effective pricing strategies and tactics can deliver a 2% to 7% increase in return on sales. Meanwhile, companies with strong customer loyalty programs can command 5% to 25% higher prices than their competitors.

As markets become more saturated, B2B companies investing in branding will command stronger pricing power and avoid commoditization.

B2B buyers expect the same engagement as consumers

The traditional B2B sales cycle – awareness, consideration, decision – once followed a structured, predictable path. Buyers would engage with sales teams after extensive research, comparing features and pricing before making a rational choice. But that linear decision-making model is fading. Today’s B2B buyers expect a seamless, interactive, and consumer-like experience.

They are no longer content with cold outreach, gated content, or rigid sales funnels. Instead, they demand engagement, personalization, and trust-building interactions that feel natural, not forced. Brands that continue to rely solely on performance marketing or lead-gen tactics are missing the bigger picture: B2B buyers now expect the same emotional connection and intuitive experiences that define B2C brands.

So, how is Payhawk making B2B interactive?

One of the most striking examples of this shift toward engagement-driven B2B marketing is Payhawk’s recent Out-of-Home (OOH) campaign in London, which transformed traditional corporate finance messaging into an experiential brand moment.

Image Credit: Payhawk

At the heart of the campaign was the “Time Machine” – a giant interactive credit card installation designed to visualize just how much time businesses waste on manual expense management.

The concept: The installation highlighted finance teams lose up to 55,000 hours annually on manual processes, turning an abstract pain point into a tangible, relatable message.
The execution: Commuters at major London railway stations could press an oversized button on the installation, triggering a randomized generator of common finance team struggles – chasing receipts, reconciling expenses, or tracking missing invoices.
The impact: The campaign stopped busy professionals in their tracks, sparking real-world engagement and social media shares. By turning a mundane financial challenge into an interactive, humorous, and shareable moment, Payhawk redefined what B2B marketing can look like.

The campaign was designed to break the traditional mold of B2B financial advertising. The goal was not just to promote Payhawk’s solution but to create an immersive experience that resonated with finance and marketing professionals alike.

According to Payhawk’s CMO, Jack Cummings, the campaign speaks directly to professionals who manage international budgets, track team expenses, and juggle multiple financial responsibilities. By demonstrating the pain points visually and interactively, rather than through traditional messaging, the campaign created an emotional connection with the audience.

The Results

4 million impressions across London’s busiest commuter stations, reaching professionals in finance and marketing.
Direct engagement with thousands of business professionals who interacted with the installation and shared their experiences.
A shift in financial services advertising proving that even technical B2B offerings can be made engaging, relatable, and human.

Beyond OOH – A multi-touch approach to engagement

The “Time Machine” campaign was just one piece of a broader brand engagement strategy. Payhawk understands that building trust and loyalty in B2B requires multiple touchpoints beyond just one-off activations or static ad placements.

✔ Social engagement that feels authentic: While many B2B brands still treat LinkedIn as a corporate bulletin board, Payhawk engages in real-time conversations, shares user-generated content, and amplifies customer success stories, mirroring how consumer brands use social media to build trust.

✔ Customer journeys that don’t feel like sales funnels: Instead of aggressive retargeting or overreliance on gated content, Payhawk prioritizes delivering upfront value through educational content, transparent discussions on industry challenges, and interactive digital experiences that help potential buyers form a connection before they enter the sales funnel.

✔ Experiential marketing that captures attention: Payhawk’s OOH activation is part of a larger strategy to make B2B interactive, memorable, and emotionally resonant. By using humor, human pain points, and interactivity, it avoids the stale, jargon-heavy approach still used by many in corporate finance marketing.

This shift is about rethinking how B2B brands connect with their audience. Decision-makers don’t want to be pushed through a funnel; they want to engage, interact, and trust a brand before they even consider a purchase.

The brands that understand and embrace this new reality will lead the future of B2B marketing. Those that don’t? They risk becoming just another forgettable vendor in an overcrowded market.

The Next B2B Battleground

B2B brands have spent years optimizing for clicks, conversions, and cost-per-lead. But the companies winning today, and the ones that will dominate tomorrow, are optimizing for something far more powerful: brand preference.

Payhawk’s shift isn’t just a marketing evolution; it’s a competitive strategy. Having good features isn’t enough to build trust. Digital ads no longer grab attention like they used to. Buyers want more than just a product; they want a brand they can trust.

The takeaway for B2B companies is clear:

Lead generation without brand equity is a race to the bottom. Companies that compete only on performance marketing will struggle to build lasting differentiation.
Emotional connection is a business strategy, not a marketing gimmick. Buyers don’t just evaluate solutions – they align with brands that reflect their needs, values, and identity.
The most resilient brands aren’t the loudest or the fastest-growing. They’re the ones buyers remember, trust, and return to long after the marketing campaign ends.

B2B isn’t becoming B2C, but the lines are blurring. The brands that recognize this shift first will not only set the standard but also own the future of business-to-business marketing.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Forever 21 is closing its doors – again. Once the crown jewel of American mall culture, the fast-fashion giant is filing for bankruptcy for the second time in under five years. As shuttered storefronts stretch across the US, its downfall has become more than a brand misstep – a sign that the old fast-fashion model is running out of time.

In its place, a new breed of fashion titans is rising. Shein and Temu, two digital-first platforms with Chinese roots, have turned the industry on its head. Their tools? Artificial intelligence, real-time trend scraping, lightning-fast production, and a hyper-personalized consumer journey. These aren’t just cheap alternatives; they’re smart machines designed for a generation that grew up with TikTok, interactive shopping, and constant trends.

Forever 21’s decline isn’t a singular event. It’s part of a deeper market shift – one where legacy playbooks are being rewritten by code, content, and community. As fashion retail becomes more focused on digital channels, brands that do not change may become outdated and irrelevant.

Forever 21’s Fall Signals a Broken Retail Model

Forever 21’s descent didn’t happen overnight. It was a slow unraveling, a brand once emblematic of youth culture now outpaced by the very consumers it once captivated. At its peak, Forever 21 thrived on trend turnover, sprawling mall spaces, and low prices. But the retail landscape changed, and the brand didn’t.

As digital shopping accelerated and consumer expectations shifted, Forever 21 remained tethered to an outdated model – long production cycles, centralized design decisions, and a heavy reliance on brick-and-mortar foot traffic. Its once-successful approach became a liability. While consumers moved toward immediacy and personalization, the company doubled down on bulk inventory, sluggish turnarounds, and static pricing. It failed to keep pace with the velocity of online trend formation – a pace now dictated not by runways or retail calendars but by social feeds refreshed by the second.

The gap widened as Gen Z entered the market. Raised in an era of choice overload, platform-native shoppers sought brands that moved with them – fluid, responsive, and in sync with their aesthetic sensibilities. Forever 21, by contrast, felt stuck. Its collections lagged behind trends. Its online presence was clunky. It couldn’t deliver the frictionless experience digital-native brands were engineering.

Even attempts at reinvention – rebrands, collaborations, and in-store tech integrations – were often too reactive or off-mark. Market research during this period revealed a steady erosion in brand affinity among younger demographics, who increasingly dismissed mall-based fast fashion as outdated, unoriginal, or environmentally negligent. The retail floors, once buzzing with teens became quieter, the racks fuller, and the margins thinner.

The retail model that once made Forever 21 a sensation has become outdated. And in an industry that now rewards adaptability over legacy, the brand’s decline underscores a critical truth: fashion doesn’t wait.

Shein and Temu Built a Smarter System

While legacy players like Forever 21 struggled to pivot, Shein and Temu were busy rewriting the rules of engagement. What distinguishes them isn’t just speed – it’s the system beneath the surface, a high-velocity engine built on data, automation, and platform-native behavior. These brands aren’t retailers in the traditional sense; they’re algorithmic marketplaces fueled by machine learning, social signals, and a relentless feedback loop between consumer demand and product creation.

Shein, in particular, operates more like a tech company than a fashion label. Its infrastructure is designed to detect real-time micro-trends, testing new styles in limited batches and scaling only the best performers. Instead of seasonal collections, it drops thousands of SKUs daily – each one a calculated bet based on keyword spikes, user behavior, and social engagement. What used to take legacy brands months now takes Shein days, with entire production cycles compressed into near real-time manufacturing.

Image Credit: Boffin Coders

Temu is building dominance on a different front. Backed by the e-commerce powerhouse PDD Holdings, its model leans heavily on gamification and bottom-dollar pricing, turning shopping into a behavioral loop. Discounts are dynamic, product discovery is algorithmically engineered, and the platform’s addictive scroll mimics social media architecture. Rather than chasing trends, Temu floods the feed with hyper-targeted inventory based on browsing data, purchase history, and behavioral nudges. Brand storytelling becomes secondary to price, pace, and personalization in this context.

Image Credit: Tech Crunch

Both companies excel at bypassing traditional gatekeepers. Instead of relying on expensive ad campaigns or celebrity endorsements, they tap into the power of peer-to-peer virality. TikTok hauls, influencer codes, and affiliate campaigns do more than drive traffic – they create a cultural moment, making shopping a social performance. The result is a decentralized and infinitely scalable distribution model.

Where traditional fast fashion brands pushed products, Shein and Temu pull consumers into a constantly evolving loop of discovery, validation, and conversion. It’s a model built not on intuition but on information, a data-centric approach that doesn’t just respond to the market but often predicts it.

Speed and Price Now Come with a Cost

But the same mechanisms fueling this meteoric rise are now drawing intensified scrutiny. As Shein and Temu scale at breakneck speed, regulators, watchdogs, and increasingly vocal consumer groups are beginning to question the true cost of their success. Investigations into labor practices, environmental degradation, and product safety are no longer confined to fringe activism; they’re reaching mainstream legislative agendas in the U.S. and Europe.

To soften criticism, Shein recently launched a resale platform in the U.S., positioning it as a circular fashion solution. Branded as a way for consumers to buy and sell secondhand Shein items, the initiative appears, on the surface, to nod toward sustainability. But industry experts and environmental advocates have been quick to call it out. Critics argue that the move lacks substance, pointing out that reselling ultra-low-quality garments does little to counteract the brand’s core business model – one built on volume, disposability, and micro-trend churn. The resale program, some say, is more about optics than impact.

Image Credit: Glossy

This tension highlights a bigger issue in the industry. The European Union has suggested tougher rules for transparency in textile imports, and U.S. lawmakers want more oversight on very cheap goods coming in through de minimis loopholes. These regulatory flashpoints are less about fashion and more about accountability – demanding that platforms operating on mass micro-consumption clarify how and where products are made, under what conditions, and at what environmental cost.

At the same time, cultural sentiment is shifting. What was once dismissed as disposable fashion is becoming a reputational risk. High-visibility criticism from sustainability influencers, investigative journalists, and even former brand collaborators is reshaping the narrative around what it means to shop cheap. For a growing subset of consumers, convenience and cost are no longer blind spots; they’re trade-offs weighed against a rising ethical awareness.

Still, the backlash isn’t yet translating into behavioral change at scale. Most consumers prioritize value and speed, even as they express concerns about sustainability. But the growing friction between convenience and conscience is opening a critical window. For competitors, this is a signal: the future of fast fashion won’t just be about how quickly brands can produce – it will hinge on how transparently they can operate in a world that’s starting to ask harder questions.

Retailers Must Rethink the Entire Playbook

The road ahead demands a fundamental shift in how fashion brands think, operate, and communicate. Survival won’t come from marginal tweaks to legacy systems but from a reengineering of retail itself – beginning with the supply chain.

Brands must move beyond cost efficiency and embrace operational intelligence. That means investing in technologies that enable demand sensing, real-time replenishment, and localized micro-manufacturing. Flexibility is no longer optional; it’s the foundation of relevance.

Equally critical is the evolution of pricing strategy. Competing with Shein and Temu on cost alone is a race few can afford to run. Instead, smart pricing – anchored in perceived value, quality assurance, and ethical sourcing – offers a more sustainable path. Consumers may be price-conscious, but they’re also becoming more aware of what pricing signals. Transparency around why a product costs what it does can strengthen trust and justify margins in a way race-to-the-bottom tactics cannot.

The marketing function must also be rebuilt for the algorithmic age. Traditional seasonal campaigns are losing ground to dynamic, always-on storytelling that responds to cultural shifts and consumer moods in real-time. This is where social commerce becomes critical, not as a trend but as infrastructure. Influencers are not just amplifiers; they’re now co-creators, collaborators, and curators of brand identity. Investing in decentralized content strategies, creator partnerships, and community-led design isn’t a nice to have – it’s how brands remain visible in a crowded, scroll-driven marketplace.

Finally, there’s the matter of trust. Authenticity becomes the ultimate differentiator in an ecosystem flooded with low-cost, high-frequency goods. Brands that can demonstrate their values through verifiable action – whether in ESG commitments, labor transparency, or community impact – will carve out a deeper connection with consumers navigating ethics. It’s not about appealing to everyone; it’s about being clear, consistent, and credible in what you stand for.

The Fast Fashion Reckoning Is Already Here

The fast fashion battleground is no longer about who can flood the market with the most products – it’s about who can navigate a volatile consumer landscape with speed, precision, and purpose. Shein and Temu have exposed the vulnerabilities of legacy brands not just by being faster or cheaper but by building systems attuned to cultural momentum, behavioral data, and the economics of digital attention. But their rise also highlights the limits of optimization when values, trust, and transparency are left out of the equation.

The future belongs to brands that can do both – move at the algorithm’s speed while operating with the discipline of long-term stewardship. Fashion is evolving from a product-based business to a platform-based experience, where relevance is won not once but constantly. For incumbents and challengers alike, this moment is not just a test of resilience. It’s a call to rethink what fashion means in a world where everything can be copied, but not everything can connect.

The rules have changed. What remains is the opportunity for those willing to radically rethink their systems as Shein and Temu have and to act before the next store closes.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

On a rainy Thursday in Jakarta, over 8,000 Sociolla customers received a flash SMS alert offering 20% off select skincare products. By 12:10 p.m., web traffic had tripled. Less than 24 hours later, a follow-up email landed in their inboxes – cleanly designed, product-focused, and personalized with recommendations based on browsing history. The conversion spike didn’t come from a single channel. It came from the right message, at the right time, on the right screen.

It’s a pattern playing out across global markets. With notification fatigue and rising acquisition costs, brands are rediscovering the power of email and SMS – two of the most overlooked but effective tools in the marketer’s arsenal. What’s different now is how they’re being used together.

According to Statista, ad spending in the SMS Advertising market worldwide is forecasted to reach US$809.05m in 2025. Email continues to dominate ROI metrics, delivering an average return of $36 for every $1 spent. But the real shift is strategic. Marketers are no longer siloing these tools. They’re orchestrating them.

In the US, Brooklinen sends a gentle SMS nudge 30 minutes after an abandoned cart, followed by an email packed with customer reviews and lifestyle imagery to rebuild interest. In the UK, ASOS primes audiences with SMS during peak sale periods, then follows up with immersive lookbooks that drive larger basket sizes. For Asian markets like Indonesia and Thailand, timing SMS around commutes or lunch hours and layering email content after hours is a high-conversion formula.

And increasingly, WhatsApp Business is becoming part of that mix. In regions where the app dominates daily communication, brands are using it to share order updates, personalized offers, and real-time service, bridging the immediacy of SMS with the interactivity of chat. In countries like India, Malaysia, and the Philippines, WhatsApp isn’t just a messaging tool. It’s a conversion channel.

What’s emerging is a model of engagement where immediacy and storytelling coexist. Consumers may not articulate it, but their actions show a clear preference: urgency on the lock screen, depth in the inbox – and conversation in the chat thread.

Data That Demands Attention

The performance metrics behind email and SMS are impressive.

Omnisend’s 2024 ecommerce report shows that automated emails account for just 2% of sends but drive 41% of all email orders. These messages see open rates of 42.1%, click rates of 5.4%, and convert at 1.9% – outperforming bulk campaigns across every measure. Automated emails like welcome, cart abandonment, and browse abandonment flows are particularly effective. Take Baking Steel, a U.S. brand known for its professional-grade pizza-baking surfaces. The company drives 33% of its total email revenue through automated messages, even though they represent just 2.3% of sends. Their cart abandonment series alone accounts for 27% of email revenue, while their welcome series delivers between $10 to $15 per email sent. It’s a clear example of how a small number of well-timed, behavior-based messages can punch far above their weight.

When paired with SMS, the impact grows sharper. SMS open rates hover around 98%, making it a high-visibility tool for time-sensitive nudges and transactional prompts.

Retailers are taking notice. In Southeast Asia, Love, Bonito enhances customer loyalty through LBCommunity+, offering perks like early access alerts and personalized styling sessions. While specific performance metrics aren’t publicly available, the brand’s hybrid approach – pairing SMS and email across loyalty tiers – has been widely recognized for deepening engagement and increasing repeat purchases among members.

The numbers tell a clear story. SMS delivers reach and urgency, while email drives context and conversion. Together, they’re not just a communications strategy – they’re an engine for revenue.

Speed Meets Substance

Brands are learning that velocity alone doesn’t drive results – it’s the balance between urgency and depth that converts.

Email and SMS each offer distinct strengths. SMS delivers speed, with nearly instantaneous open rates – ideal for alerts, reminders, and real-time nudges. Email offers space to tell a story, showcase visuals, and reinforce value.

Brooklinen, US-based home goods brand, effectively demonstrates this balance through its abandoned cart email strategy. The emails highlight free shipping, surface customer reviews, and feature clean product visuals, adding persuasion where a short-form message might fall short. The brand’s approach shows how reinforcing urgency with context can reignite purchase intent.

Image Credit: Active Campaign

Beauty Pie, a UK-based direct-to-consumer beauty brand, integrates email into its promotional ecosystem by offering exclusive perks to subscribers, including discounts and early access offers. These incentives drive sign-ups and build a permission-based channel for richer engagement.

While many brands continue experimenting with channel timing, the best results come when communication flows are mapped with intent – starting with immediacy and followed by storytelling.

Timing Isn’t Everything – Coordination Is

Hitting send at the right time is no longer enough. Today’s consumers expect connected experiences – where messages don’t just arrive on schedule but arrive with purpose.

Disjointed campaigns risk confusion or, worse, being ignored. According to Omnisend, brands that use three or more channels in a coordinated way see a 287% higher purchase rate than those using single-channel outreach. But coordination doesn’t mean duplication. It means sequencing messages across platforms in a way that feels human, not robotic.

Brands that succeed build journeys, starting with a short SMS that grabs attention and followed by a visual email that deepens the story. Automated triggers based on user behavior (like browse abandonment or wishlist adds) help ensure these touchpoints feel timely, not templated.

This shift from reactive timing to proactive orchestration pushes marketers to rethink their flows. It’s not about when a message is sent; it’s about how it fits into the bigger narrative.

Personalization That Pays Off

Personalization is no longer optional; it’s the standard. Brands that succeed use customer behavior as the blueprint for when, where, and how to communicate.

Brooklinen exemplifies this strategy by utilizing behavioral data to send personalized messages – welcoming new subscribers, reminding users of abandoned carts, and re-engaging inactive shoppers. Each email is optimized for timing and relevance, often highlighting customer testimonials and free shipping incentives to drive conversions. These flows are built to respond, not interrupt.

Personalization at scale means more than using a first name – it means designing communications that adapt to customer intent. The brands that get this right don’t just see better metrics; they build better relationships.

Inside the Inbox and Lock Screen

The real test of a campaign happens in seconds – on a lock screen swipe or an inbox scan. Successful brands know that getting the message seen is only the beginning. Getting it acted on is the goal.

Brooklinen’s cart abandonment email is a masterclass in the visual hierarchy: a clean header, compelling product image, a short reassurance (“Don’t worry, your cart’s still here”), and a call-to-action button with contrast and urgency. Paired with their SMS—“Still thinking it over? Your Brooklinen cart’s waiting…”—the combined impact is gentle and effective. No pressure, just presence.

Email marketers often focus on copy, but design plays just as critical a role. Omnisend recommends mobile-first layouts with clear CTAs, minimal text, and product visuals above the fold. For SMS, the best-performing messages are under 160 characters and feature clickable short links – delivered during peak engagement hours like lunchtime or early evening.

Though design elements may vary by region and industry, the pattern remains consistent: a visual hook, a clear message, and a frictionless path to action.

Whether it’s a text reminder to “Finish checking out before your 10% off expires” or an email showcasing reviews from people with similar purchase behavior, these touchpoints are designed to feel relevant in the moment. Not just another notification.

Lessons from the Brands Getting It Right

Some brands aren’t just testing SMS and email integration; they’re building it into how they communicate. And the results show.

Brooklinen has become a case study in lifecycle marketing. Their welcome flows introduce the brand’s voice with simplicity and style, often including a first-purchase discount and lifestyle imagery that reflects their clean aesthetic. Follow-up emails and SMS reminders – especially around cart abandonment – are personalized, brief, and supported by social proof. This multistep approach increases the likelihood of conversion without overloading the user.

Love, Bonito, a fashion brand based in Southeast Asia, strengthens loyalty through its LBCommunity+ program. Members receive early access notifications and personalized recommendations via email. While SMS is often used for time-sensitive drops, email delivers richer content – lookbooks, styling tips, and editor picks tailored to user preferences. It’s a strategy that respects both format and context.

Warby Parker, in the US, offers another strong model. Their abandoned cart emails pair sharp product imagery with service-driven reminders – like free shipping and easy returns. Meanwhile, SMS is used sparingly but strategically, such as to confirm appointments or alert customers when their in-store pickup is ready. The brand’s restraint adds to its impact.

Each of these brands succeeds not by doing more but by doing it better. Clear roles for each channel. Data-driven triggers. Messages that respect the medium and the consumer’s attention span.

Avoiding the Double Tap Trap

With nonstop notifications, message fatigue is real, and brands that overcommunicate are paying the price.

According to GetApp’s 2024 Digital Content Consumer Survey, 40% of U.S. consumers unsubscribe from brand texts and emails at least once weekly. Over half will unsubscribe if they receive four or more marketing messages from the same company within 30 days. The problem isn’t communication; it’s saturation.

Many consumers also see diminishing value in brand outreach. Nearly 49% of Americans say more than half of the emails they receive feel like junk, a perception that erodes trust and damages engagement.

The smartest marketers are now designing campaigns that avoid redundancy. A time-sensitive SMS may kick off a promotion, while email follows with more detail and imagery. Triggered automation ensures once a customer clicks or converts on one channel, the other backs off – preserving relevance without repetition.

Avoiding the double tap isn’t just about frequency; it’s about flow. Respecting your customer’s attention span is now a competitive advantage.

What Great Design Looks Like

In integrated campaigns, how a message looks can matter as much as what it says. Design is the first filter – especially on mobile, where space is limited and attention is scarce.

Omnisend’s benchmarks point to a consistent pattern: campaigns with a clear CTA, minimal text, and mobile-optimized visuals significantly outperform cluttered or text-heavy alternatives. For SMS, the highest-performing messages stay under 160 characters, often including a short, trackable link and a clear sense of urgency – whether it’s “Last chance: 20% off ends tonight” or “Your order is ready for pickup.”

On the other hand, emails benefit from layered content – clear headers, bold product imagery above the fold, and buttons that pop. Brooklinen’s campaigns frequently use short copy and soft color palettes that echo the brand’s tone. Beauty brands like Glossier and Love, Bonito often lead with visuals, letting product photos and user-generated content do the talking.

The golden rule is design for the scroll. Whether it’s a swipeable message or a mobile inbox preview, every pixel counts. Alignment between email and SMS design – through tone, color, and CTA language – helps reinforce the message without repetition.

The most effective campaigns don’t just look good. They work hard in small spaces – and stay out of the way once the job is done.

The Tech That Ties It All Together

Smart strategy means little without the infrastructure to support it. Behind every well-timed message and seamless customer journey is a stack of tools built to automate, segment, and adapt in real-time.

Marketers are increasingly turning to platforms that integrate email and SMS – allowing for centralized data, unified campaign flows, and cross-channel automation. Brands use technology to sync customer behavior across touchpoints, trigger messages based on actions (like page views or cart additions), and suppress redundant sends if a user has already converted.

This orchestration isn’t just efficient; it’s essential. With third-party cookies phasing out, first-party data has become the lifeblood of personalized marketing. Integrated platforms offer a direct line to user behavior, purchase history, and channel preferences, helping marketers reach the right audience without overstepping.

Brooklinen’s flows, for example, are powered by behavior-triggered automation that adjusts timing and content depending on customer interaction. Meanwhile, Glossier leverages its CRM system to send personalized messages to loyalty members based on engagement tiers and product affinity.

Tech isn’t the show’s star – but it’s what keeps the spotlight aligned. Without it, even the best creative and messaging strategy risks falling flat.

Final Send-Off

Consumers aren’t just scrolling; they’re actively filtering. Every ping, preview, and push competes for attention in a space where attention is finite.

The brands winning today aren’t louder. They’re smarter. They know when to text and when to email. They automate without sounding robotic. They build systems that talk to each other so their messages don’t overlap – or get ignored.

As marketing budgets tighten and customer expectations rise, the margin for error shrinks. SMS and email, when used in sync, offer rare precision: fast, personal, and measurable.

The smart play isn’t about choosing the right channel. It’s about connecting them, and knowing when to pause.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Streaming once promised a cheaper, simpler alternative to bloated cable packages. That era is ending. The subscriber land grab is over, and platforms are pivoting hard toward profitability – raising prices, pushing ad tiers, and upselling premium features that quietly pressure viewers to spend more.

Netflix, once the champion of disruption, now nudges users toward ad-supported plans or costlier premium options. Disney+, HBO Max, and Amazon Prime Video are following suit, each finding new ways to monetize content once available at a single flat rate. The result? A growing divide between basic and premium subscribers creating a class system that echoes the old cable era.

For viewers, the question is clear: Pay more for an uninterrupted, high-quality experience, or settle for less in a world where “basic” means ads, lower resolution, and restricted access. The future of streaming is shifting – and for many, it won’t be an upgrade.

Squeezing More from Subscribers

Low prices and bottomless content once defined streaming’s appeal. But the growth-at-any-cost era is over. Today, platforms are restructuring to wring more revenue from the users they already have.

Netflix long resisted ads – now, its ad tier is a gateway to more expensive plans. Features once standard, like 4K resolution, are now locked behind paywalls. And its crackdown on password-sharing is designed to turn passive users into paying ones.

Disney+ is bundling its services, locking Hulu and ESPN+ behind higher-priced packages. HBO Max, now rebranded as Max, has trimmed its catalog while introducing new pricing tiers, making ad-free viewing a privilege, not a standard. Even Amazon Prime Video, long considered a value-add to its retail empire, is rolling out ads unless users pay extra to remove them.

The Divide Between Premium and Basic Subscribers

Streaming once promised equal access – a single subscription unlocked the same content for everyone. That reality is disappearing. A growing divide now separates premium subscribers from those stuck on basic plans.

It’s no longer just about ads. Basic-tier users face lower video quality, fewer downloads, and restricted streaming options. Netflix locks 4K resolution behind a paywall. Disney+ reserves certain exclusives for higher-paying subscribers. Max and Amazon Prime Video follow the same playbook, gradually making standard features feel like upgrades.

This isn’t just inconvenience – it’s a redesign of access. Blockbusters, early drops, and high-definition are now privileges for those who pay more. A two-tiered system is emerging: premium users get the best, while the rest settle for second-rate.

The question is whether audiences will accept this shift or find ways around it.

Consumers Are Pushing Back Against Rising Costs and Subscription Fatigue

Audiences aren’t blindly accepting price hikes. Many are cutting back, consolidating services, or hopping between platforms based on what’s trending. Some are even turning to piracy, a practice once on the decline but now creeping back as frustration grows.

Nearly three-quarters of subscribers say they’re paying too much. As a result, 31% have already scaled back, and 29% are thinking about it.

Subscription fatigue is setting in. The market is oversaturated, and consumers are reaching their limit. With each price increase, more users question whether another monthly bill is worth it. Churn rates are rising, and platforms are scrambling to keep subscribers locked in.

Not all regions are reacting the same way. In lower-income markets, ad-supported tiers are gaining traction. But in wealthier countries, frustration is mounting as streaming costs rival the cable bills they once replaced.

Streaming Is Starting to Look a Lot Like Cable

Streaming was supposed to end cable’s reign, not recreate its worst features. Yet, as platforms carve up content into exclusives and push higher-priced tiers, consumers are facing the same frustrations that once drove them to cut the cord.

Must-watch shows are scattered across multiple services, forcing viewers to juggle subscriptions to keep up. Once simple, pricing models have morphed into a maze of tiers, bundles, and add-ons. Even staggered releases and blackout windows – hallmarks of traditional TV – are quietly making a comeback.

Some companies see an opportunity. Aggregators are emerging to bundle streaming services under a single bill, which resembles the old cable model. Apple and Amazon are already positioning themselves as digital gatekeepers, offering centralized hubs that package multiple services.

The convenience that once defined streaming is slipping away. What began as a revolution now echoes the very systems it sought to replace.

Brands Rethink Strategy as Streaming Turns Premium

As platforms rework their business models, brands are rethinking their approach. Streaming is no longer a commercial-free oasis – it’s a growing opportunity for advertisers willing to pay for premium placement.

Netflix’s ad-supported tier, once unthinkable, is now a prime spot for brands looking to reach engaged audiences. Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video follow suit, offering hyper-targeted ads powered by detailed viewer data. Unlike traditional TV commercials, these ads are tailored, personalized, and difficult to skip.

Sponsorships and product placements are evolving, too. Shows seamlessly integrate brands into their storylines, blurring the line between content and advertising. Reality series feature branded backdrops, scripted dramas include strategic product placements, and sometimes, entire episodes are built around sponsorships.

Case in point: HBO’s White Lotus didn’t just captivate audiences – it redefined the Four Seasons brand. A hotel became a character, driving real-world demand and reframing the idea of luxury travel.

For brands, streaming’s evolution is an opportunity but also a challenge. As premiumization pushes some viewers out, advertisers must decide whether to reach a shrinking audience or invest in a more engaged one.

As Streaming Becomes a Luxury, Can Affordability Survive?

The future of streaming is tilting toward exclusivity. Platforms are betting consumers will pay more for better quality, fewer ads, and access to premium content. But as prices climb, a crucial question remains – will affordable options still exist?

Ad-supported tiers offer a middle ground, but they come with trade-offs. Lower-quality video, unskippable ads, and restricted content make them feel like a downgrade rather than a real alternative. Meanwhile, piracy, long in decline, is creeping back as frustrated users look for workarounds.

Some platforms may hold off on full premiumization to keep price-sensitive users, especially in emerging markets. Others could test hybrid models – offering free content with upsell paths. But the direction is clear: cheap, unlimited streaming is being replaced by a tiered system where the best experience comes at a price.

Streaming was built on accessibility. The question now is whether that promise will survive.

The Future of Streaming Will Be Defined by Who Can Afford It

Streaming isn’t going away, but the experience is changing. The best content, highest quality, and most seamless access are increasingly reserved for those willing to pay more. What was once an industry built on affordability is turning into one that prioritizes premium subscribers.

For brands, this shift presents both opportunities and risks. Ad-supported tiers offer new ways to reach viewers, but the overall audience could shrink as prices rise. Marketers must decide whether to invest in high-spending premium users or reach the broader base still willing to tolerate ads.

The next chapter of streaming won’t hinge on content – it will hinge on cost. As platforms chase profits, accessibility is slipping. The era of cheap, all-you-can-watch entertainment is ending. What comes next depends on how much viewers are willing – or able – to pay.

Streaming’s Evolution Is Redefining Entertainment Access

Streaming is no longer an equal-access platform. A growing gap separates premium subscribers from those on budget plans. High-definition, uninterrupted viewing is now a luxury, while basic users navigate ads, lower resolution, and restricted content libraries.

Consumers are responding in different ways. Some are cutting back, keeping only essential subscriptions. Others rotate platforms, subscribing for a month, binge-watching, and canceling. Piracy, once on the decline, is making a comeback as viewers push back against rising costs.

More than half of Americans (53%) subscribed to a service in the past year just to watch one show. Of those, 72% canceled – 57% within the first month.

For brands, this fragmentation complicates marketing strategies. Streaming was once a direct line to engaged audiences. Now, it’s a fractured landscape where viewership depends on price tiers, ad tolerance, and content exclusivity. The rules are changing, and advertisers must adapt – or risk losing their audience.

Is Streaming Headed for a Breaking Point?

The race for subscribers is over. Now, platforms are fighting for control – of pricing, access, and how audiences consume content.

Ad-supported tiers, exclusive bundling, and premium restrictions aren’t just revenue strategies; they’re levers to dictate viewing behavior. Streaming is becoming a gated ecosystem, where top-tier access is reserved for those willing to pay more. The shift isn’t subtle; subscription churn is rising, bundling fatigue is setting in, and piracy, once in decline, is returning.

The industry is approaching a tipping point. Price hikes and paywalled features may drive short-term revenue, but they also push consumers to reconsider their subscriptions. Fragmentation makes it harder to justify multiple services, and frustration is growing. Viewers are finding ways around rising costs, and platforms may underestimate their willingness to walk away entirely.

The future of streaming won’t be dictated by platforms alone. Audiences still hold the power; if streaming loses its accessibility, its dominance could unravel. What began as an entertainment revolution is at risk of becoming an exclusive club, where access is a privilege and the audience that once fueled its rise is left behind.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A TV show about dysfunctional elites on vacation has done more for Four Seasons’ bottom line than any ad campaign could. Since The White Lotus aired, bookings at the luxury hotel’s Maui, Sicily, and Thailand properties have surged, with high-end suites seeing record demand. The show didn’t just showcase opulence – it turned its filming locations into must-visit destinations for high-net-worth travelers.

What started as a pandemic-era gamble – letting HBO use Four Seasons resorts as backdrops for satire – has become a masterclass in luxury hospitality marketing. Now, the brand is doubling down, offering private jet tours between its White Lotus resorts and reshaping how luxury travel intersects with pop culture.

This isn’t just a tourism bump. It’s a blueprint for how high-end brands can turn cultural cachet into long-term revenue.

Turning Screen Time into Bookings

The White Lotus didn’t just feature Four Seasons;it made the brand part of the story.

Following the debut of The White Lotus, Four Seasons experienced significant increases in interest and bookings. For instance, after Season 1, the Four Seasons Resort Maui at Wailea saw a 425% year-over-year increase in website visits and a 386% rise in availability checks. Similarly, during Season 2, the Four Seasons Hotel Taormina in Sicily reported a 193% increase in web traffic. With Season 3 set in Thailand, the Four Seasons Resort Koh Samui has already observed a 65% spike in searches shortly after the premiere.

Four Seasons Resort Maui at Wailea became shorthand for tropical indulgence, while Sicily’s San Domenico Palace, once a monastery, emerged as an icon of old-world grandeur. Following Season 2, the Sicilian property saw a 193% increase in web traffic. Now, with Season 3 set in Thailand, the Four Seasons Resort Koh Samui has already recorded a 65% surge in searches from travelers looking to step into the show’s next setting.

Rather than letting the hype fade, the hotel chain quickly capitalized. It introduced private jet itineraries linking its White Lotus resorts, offering an ultra-luxury package for guests looking to replicate the on-screen experience. More than just a tourism boost, the HBO partnership has given Four Seasons a new brand identity – one that sells not just a stay but a story.

TV Tourism Is the New Gold Rush for Hospitality Brands

Four Seasons isn’t the only brand cashing in on TV tourism. After Emily in Paris, hotel bookings in the French capital spiked, with luxury stays marketing their own “Emily-style” experiences. Game of Thrones turned Dubrovnik into a global tourism hotspot, with visitors flooding its medieval streets years after the series ended. The message is clear: travelers don’t just want a destination, they want a cinematic setting.

Hospitality brands are responding fast. Hotels are no longer just offering rooms – they’re curating worlds viewers already feel connected to. With the right media partnership, a resort becomes more than a destination; it becomes a cultural landmark. But to turn a pop culture moment into long-term brand value, it takes more than just letting the cameras roll.

Four Seasons understood this shift. It didn’t just lend its properties to The White Lotus; it leveraged the show’s themes of exclusivity and indulgence to redefine its own brand narrative. Every infinity pool, oceanfront suite, and private excursion wasn’t just a set piece; it became part of the experience the hotel could sell long after the credits rolled.

Experiential and Ultra-Luxury Tourism Is Redefining Travel Marketing

For luxury travelers, a five-star suite alone no longer satisfies. Today’s premium offering is access – an experience so exclusive, it feels scripted. This expectation is driving the rise of “live the show” tourism, where resorts don’t just host guests – they immerse them in a narrative they’ve already bought into.

Four Seasons has capitalized on this demand. In Sicily, guests can book private yacht tours along the same coastline where The White Lotus characters plotted their next move. In Thailand, where the latest season premiered, the chain has been marketing cultural excursions inspired by the series, turning its resorts into real-life extensions of the show’s world.

The strategy is paying off. VIP packages, custom itineraries, and pop culture-branded experiences now command premium rates – some exceeding $10,000 per stay, according to industry reports. Luxury travelers aren’t just buying comfort; they’re buying cultural capital. For hospitality brands, the takeaway is clear: locations don’t sell on their own. Story-driven experiences do.

Is TV the New Luxury Travel Influencer?

Forget glossy travel ads and celebrity endorsements – scripted entertainment is proving to be a more powerful driver of luxury tourism. The White Lotus turned Four Seasons from a high-end hotel chain into a must-visit brand, delivering hours of aspirational storytelling that no traditional campaign could replicate.

Luxury hospitality groups are taking note. The right on-screen exposure doesn’t just showcase a destination; it reshapes traveler demand. Hotels, airlines, and tour operators now see productions as strategic partners rather than passive tenants. From filming incentives to immersive brand collaborations, entertainment is becoming a long-term marketing asset.

For Four Seasons, The White Lotus wasn’t just a tourism bump – it was a repositioning moment. The show’s themes of wealth and indulgence aligned so closely with the brand that its resorts felt like characters in the story. Now, as other luxury brands chase their own White Lotus moment, the real competition isn’t location or amenities – it’s cultural relevance.

Luxury Hospitality Is Turning to Entertainment as a Growth Strategy

Four Seasons didn’t just benefit from The White Lotus; it created a new blueprint for luxury travel marketing. The divide between entertainment and hospitality is disappearing, and brands that fail to adapt risk being left behind.

High-end hotels are now seeking strategic partnerships with streaming platforms, aiming to replicate Four Seasons’ success. Destination collaborations with filmmakers are no longer just background deals; they’re becoming core business strategies designed to position hotels as aspirational travel hubs. The next phase of entertainment-driven tourism isn’t passive product placement; it’s about immersive brand integration, where travelers don’t just visit a location – they step inside a story.

This shift is already happening. Hotels are launching co-created experiences, interactive stays, and even story-driven itineraries modeled on cinematic worlds. The most forward-looking brands are embedding themselves where travel, entertainment, and culture converge – turning pop culture into long-term brand growth.

Cultural Relevance Is the New Currency of Luxury

In luxury hospitality, the meaning of status is shifting. It’s no longer defined solely by five-star service or remote, exclusive locations. Today, status is increasingly measured by how seamlessly a brand lives within the cultural moment.

The White Lotus gave Four Seasons more than exposure – it gave the brand narrative power. Suddenly, staying at the Four Seasons wasn’t just aspirational; it was culturally resonant. In a world where travelers want to mean as much as an indulgence, the ability to connect with the zeitgeist is the ultimate differentiator.

In the attention economy, real luxury is no longer about where you go. It’s about how that place makes you feel – and whether the world is paying attention when you get there.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Digital advertising is struggling to maintain consumer engagement. The average person encounters thousands of ads daily, yet engagement rates continue to decline. Studies show that global click-through rates on digital ads have dropped, with banner blindness reaching record levels. At the same time, skepticism toward influencer marketing is growing, particularly as AI-generated endorsements become more common.

Younger consumers, especially Gen Z, seek more authentic, real-world brand interactions. The novelty of digital experiences is fading, making them easier to ignore. In contrast, live events and interactive experiences engage multiple senses, fostering emotional connections that screens often fail to replicate.

As a result, brands are rethinking their approach. Pop-ups, immersive installations, and brand activations are not just promotional tactics – they are strategic tools for building consumer loyalty. These in-person experiences not only create exclusivity but also encourage organic social sharing and generate earned media that digital ads often struggle to achieve. This shift marks the resurgence of experiential marketing in an era of digital fatigue.

Why Brands Are Shifting to Real-World Experiences

Brands looking to stand out are increasingly turning to real-world interactions. Once considered optional brand-building exercises, immersive activations are becoming a key strategy for engaging consumers beyond the digital space.

Luxury fashion house Jacquemus transformed a Paris metro station into a branded experience, featuring vending machines stocked with its signature handbags. The installation provided an exclusive, tactile interaction that drove viral engagement and led to inventory selling out within hours.

Image Credit: Paper Mag

In Tokyo, Muji has taken its minimalist philosophy beyond retail, turning brand engagement into a fully immersive experience. The Japanese retailer’s largest standalone store, located in Ginza, spans multiple floors and features an in-house bakery, Muji Diner, and more than 7,000 of its signature no-frills products. But beyond shopping, visitors can check into the Muji Hotel Ginza, which occupies the upper five floors of the building, extending the brand’s ethos into hospitality.

Image Credit: The Wallpaper

The Ginza hotel follows earlier openings in Beijing and Shenzhen, reinforcing Muji’s presence in experiential branding. Each of its 79 rooms showcases the brand’s design ethos, furnished exclusively with Muji products – from mattresses and towels to LED desk lights and lightweight travel pyjamas. Even small details, such as complimentary skincare products and toiletries, reflect Muji’s commitment to simplicity and functionality.

By blurring the lines between retail and hospitality, Muji offers more than a place to stay. Guests are not just consumers but participants in a curated environment shaped entirely around Muji’s aesthetic and values, turning an overnight stay into an extension of the brand experience.

Banco Itaú took a different approach in Brazil by building an interactive financial literacy park in São Paulo. Rather than relying solely on digital campaigns, the bank created a space where families could engage with money management concepts through gamified activities. Reports indicate the initiative increased trust, brand affinity, and a measurable rise in new account sign-ups.

These campaigns illustrate how physical presence can enhance brand engagement in ways digital marketing alone may struggle to achieve. Stepping into a branded environment, interacting with products, or participating in a curated experience can create a deeper, more lasting connection between consumers and brands.

Experiential Marketing Builds Influence, Not Just Awareness

Beyond generating buzz, experiential marketing can shape consumer perception and drive brand loyalty. Some of the most effective campaigns go beyond traditional advertising to create interactive experiences that turn passive consumers into active participants.

Research suggests that consumers are more likely to recall brands they have engaged with physically rather than solely online. Luxury automaker Porsche capitalized on this insight with its Porsche Unseen exhibition in Shanghai. Instead of traditional advertising, the brand curated an exclusive, invite-only experience where attendees viewed never-before-seen concept cars, interacted with designers, and test-drove select models. The event was designed not just to showcase Porsche’s innovation but to deepen brand affinity among high-value consumers.

Physical experiences also have a multiplier effect through social sharing, amplifying brand reach in ways that digital ads alone may struggle to achieve. Evian’s Mountain of Youth activation in Shanghai is one example. The immersive alpine-themed experience featured real snow, ice tunnels, and interactive projections, reinforcing the brand’s identity as pure and rejuvenating. Attendees shared their experiences on social media, extending Evian’s brand messaging beyond the physical installation.

Image Credit: Maake

Industry experts argue that while digital marketing remains essential, immersive brand experiences create lasting consumer connections. A digital ad can be skipped, and an email can go unread, but a well-executed, tactile brand interaction has the potential to leave a lasting impression.

Proving the ROI of Experiential Marketing

Measuring the effectiveness of experiential marketing has long been a challenge. Unlike digital advertising, where brands can track impressions, clicks, and conversions in real time, physical activations have traditionally been harder to quantify. However, advances in data tracking, geolocation technology, and integrated digital touchpoints are helping brands analyze their experiential campaigns more precisely.

Coca-Cola has experimented with RFID-powered brand activations to bridge this measurement gap. During its Coca-Cola Village event in Israel, attendees received RFID wristbands linked to their Facebook accounts. By scanning their wristbands at various activation stations, they could instantly “Like” different attractions and share their experiences online. According to company reports, this resulted in a 35% increase in brand engagement on Facebook, with campaign reach extending well beyond the event.

In Romania, Coca-Cola launched its Festival Bottle campaign, transforming bottle labels into wristbands for exclusive music festival access. Consumers scanned barcodes on their bottles using a smartphone app to determine if they had won festival passes. The campaign reportedly drove an 11% increase in sales, positioning Coca-Cola’s packaging as a functional tool and a cultural symbol among Romanian teens.

Volkswagen adopted a similar data-driven approach in Germany with its Power of Two test-drive experience. The initiative encouraged consumers to test-drive Volkswagen’s electric vehicles with a friend, gamifying the experience by tracking distance and energy efficiency. The campaign incorporated digital leaderboards and interactive data-sharing, and company figures indicate a 12% increase in post-test-drive conversions.

Beyond proving return on investment, measurement tools are also helping brands refine their strategies. By integrating digital extensions that capture real-time consumer insights, companies can optimize experiential campaigns to enhance engagement and long-term business impact.

The Future of Experiential Marketing

Experiential marketing continues to evolve, with brands exploring new ways to integrate technology, scale activations, and measure their impact. As digital fatigue rises, companies are experimenting with immersive experiences that blend the physical and digital worlds.

Technology Is Elevating Physical Experiences

Experiential marketing is no longer limited to in-person activations. The rise of AR, VR, and AI-driven personalization is enabling brands to extend real-world interactions into digital spaces, creating multi-sensory experiences that go beyond traditional advertising.

Dior Beauty’s AI-powered fragrance pop-up in Seoul illustrates how technology reshapes brand engagement. The activation used biometric sensors to analyze consumer emotions, tracking facial expressions and micro-reactions to recommend personalized scents. Instead of a static display, visitors engaged in an interactive experience that adjusted in real time based on their preferences.

Heineken took a different approach, blending product innovation, humor, and workplace commentary into a digitally integrated activation. The brand introduced The Closer, a high-tech bottle opener that leveraged Bluetooth technology to close work apps when you pop the lid off a Heineken. The device, created in response to growing concerns over work-life balance during the pandemic, was promoted through a satirical product launch event inspired by tech industry keynotes, with actor Billy Eichner as the host.

Image Credit: Heineken

The campaign film showcased overwhelmed employees who, upon opening a Heineken, instantly saw their laptops and work notifications power down. By turning a simple action into a symbolic (and functional) break from work, Heineken positioned itself as a brand advocating for a better work-life balance. The campaign gained traction on social media as attendees and consumers shared their experiences using the device, amplifying Heineken’s message beyond the event itself.

Scalability Without Losing Exclusivity

One of the biggest challenges in experiential marketing is scale. While immersive activations can generate buzz, maintaining exclusivity while expanding reach remains a complex task. The key lies in creating personal and localized experiences, even when executed globally.

Nike’s House of Innovation stores in New York, Shanghai, and Paris illustrate this approach. Each store follows a core concept – an interactive retail space blending digital customization and product storytelling – yet incorporates elements unique to its location. Shanghai’s store reflects Chinese streetwear culture, while New York’s version offers sneaker customization based on real-time sports data. This flexible framework allows Nike to create tailored experiences while maintaining a cohesive global identity.

Exclusivity also plays a role in consumer engagement. Adidas’ Confirmed app, which provides access to limited-edition sneaker drops, extends experiential marketing beyond physical locations. The app requires users to visit geo-tagged locations to unlock early access, merging digital and real-world interactions. This approach not only increases foot traffic but also fosters a sense of exclusivity among dedicated customers.

Meanwhile, Louis Vuitton’s 200 Trunks, 200 Visionaries exhibition, a traveling showcase celebrating the brand’s 200th anniversary, demonstrates how luxury brands balance exclusivity with large-scale reach. The exhibition toured cities such as Paris, New York, Singapore, and Los Angeles, immersing attendees in Louis Vuitton’s heritage while generating localized content for each market. Invitation-only previews and VIP experiences ensured the activations remained exclusive while reaching a global audience.

As experiential marketing evolves, brands continue to explore ways to balance personalization with scale. By designing adaptable, localized, and digitally integrated activations, companies aim to expand their reach without compromising authenticity.

Final Thoughts

Experiential marketing is regaining momentum as brands seek new ways to engage consumers beyond digital channels. A study by Gradient shows that 82% of retail companies have increased their experiential marketing budgets over the last three years.

Consumer response is driving this investment. Research indicates that 85% of consumers are more likely to make a purchase after attending a live marketing event, while 91% report a more positive perception of brands following such experiences. Additionally, 64% of consumers maintain a favorable impression of a brand for at least a month after attending an activation, underscoring the long-term impact of immersive interactions.

However, scaling experiential marketing comes with challenges. High production costs, logistical complexity, and the need for skilled talent make execution a significant undertaking. Brands must navigate venue sourcing, real-time audience engagement, and seamless digital integrations – all while ensuring a consistent and impactful brand experience. Measuring ROI remains a hurdle, requiring brands to invest in data tracking and technology to justify the spending.

Despite these challenges, experiential marketing offers brands a tangible way to combat digital fatigue and foster engagement beyond a single interaction. With continued advancements in measurement and technology, brands that invest in scalable, strategic, and immersive experiences are positioning themselves for long-term consumer loyalty and business growth.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The wellness economy isn’t just growing – it’s taking over.

What started as a niche industry of boutique fitness studios and green juice bars has exploded into a $1.8 trillion global powerhouse. Today, wellness means AI-powered health diagnostics, biohacking retreats, and personalized longevity plans tailored down to the cellular level. Consumers aren’t just tracking steps anymore; they’re measuring stress responses, monitoring metabolic health, and optimizing their bodies like data-driven machines.

And they’re not just buying into wellness – they’re questioning it. Who can prove their claims? Which brands offer real science over marketing hype? Consumers demand transparency, personalization, and measurable results. The wellness-first mandate is rewriting the rules of business. Products that fail to deliver real well-being won’t just lose market share – they’ll disappear.

From skincare to financial services, travel to technology, brands are racing to embed wellness into every touchpoint. But who’s doing it right? And how will this next phase of the wellness revolution separate the disruptors from the dinosaurs?

Wellness as a Brand Imperative

Wellness isn’t an industry anymore. It’s an expectation. And for brands, failing to deliver isn’t just a missed opportunity – it’s a death sentence.

Millennials and Gen Z aren’t buying into wellness trends blindly. Raised on health tracking and biohacking culture, they don’t just want feel-good branding; they demand proof. Can a product deliver real cognitive benefits? Does a service measurably improve longevity? If not, it won’t last.

The stakes go beyond retail. Consumers want stress-free money management in finance—automated savings, real-time spending insights, and AI-powered financial planning. Employees now evaluate companies in the workplace on their mental health support, flexibility, and work-life balance policies. A free gym membership or wellness app isn’t enough. If brands don’t take well-being seriously, they’ll lose top talent to those who prioritize it.

Wellness is not just a product feature; it is an expectation that spans industries. The question isn’t whether brands should adapt. It’s whether they’ll survive if they don’t.

Workplace Wellness Is No Longer a Perk – It’s a Business Survival Strategy

Employee burnout is no longer a quiet crisis – it’s a corporate emergency. A disengaged, exhausted workforce isn’t just unproductive; it’s walking out the door. The companies that fail to prioritize well-being aren’t just losing morale. They’re losing their workforce.

For years, workplace wellness meant subsidized gym memberships and stress management webinars. That’s not enough anymore. Employees demand real change – flexible work, mental health support, and financial security. Companies that resist? They’ll watch their top talent leave for organizations that treat well-being as a business priority, not a line item in HR’s annual report.

Some companies are getting it right. Goldman Sachs expanded its mental health offerings, giving employees free therapy and resilience coaching. Microsoft’s four-day workweek experiment in Japan resulted in a 40% productivity boost – without burnout. Salesforce has gone beyond wellness perks, integrating financial literacy coaching and savings programs to reduce employees’ money stress.

The message is clear: workers expect companies to care about more than just their output. Leadership isn’t about offering wellness benefits as an afterthought; it’s about embedding well-being into the foundation of corporate culture.

The companies that lead on workplace wellness won’t just retain talent – they’ll attract the next generation of high performers. The ones that don’t? They’ll be left scrambling when the best employees leave for competitors that take well-being seriously.

Innovations in Product Development to Meet Wellness Expectations

At 3 p.m., Amanda Chang hits a wall. She’s not tired from lack of sleep, nor has she skipped lunch. She’s dehydrated—a reality she only recently started tracking after her smartwatch nudged her with a hydration reminder. Now, like millions of others, she reaches for an electrolyte packet instead of an afternoon coffee.

She’s not alone. The hydration economy is booming, fueled by a new consumer mindset that views optimal fluid balance as a pillar of longevity, mental clarity, and peak performance. Once reserved for athletes, electrolyte-enhanced drinks and functional hydration products have gone mainstream, reshaping how people approach energy and wellness.

Companies have taken note. Unilever’s acquisition of Liquid I.V. signals a strategic shift – hydration is no longer a niche category but a global wellness priority. Nestlé, too, has expanded its portfolio of functional beverages, tapping into a market where consumers aren’t just looking to quench their thirst but to optimize their biological performance.

This is just one example of how brands reinvent their products to align with a wellness-first consumer base. Across categories, companies are shifting from passive health benefits to science-backed, measurable, and highly personalized solutions.

In food and beverage, gut health is now front and center. Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics are transforming everything from yogurt to snack bars, with major players racing to offer digestive-support products backed by clinical research. Cognitive performance is another emerging focus, fueling demand for nootropics and adaptogens – ingredients designed to enhance focus, stress resilience, and mental clarity.

The shift toward longevity and biohacking is accelerating in beauty and personal care. Consumers are moving beyond anti-aging to skin health at the cellular level, with brands investing in microbiome research, peptides, and NAD+ boosters to enhance skin regeneration. Shiseido, for example, has poured resources into advanced skin longevity research, aligning with the consumer push for products that deliver quantifiable, long-term benefits rather than superficial fixes.

Meanwhile, household and consumer goods are experiencing a clean-label revolution. Transparency in sourcing and formulations is no longer optional – shoppers scrutinize ingredient lists, demanding non-toxic, sustainable, and ethically sourced products. Regulatory bodies are catching up, forcing brands to substantiate wellness claims with hard evidence. In a significant move, the Federal Trade Commission issued its first major update to health marketing guidelines since 1998, tightening restrictions on unproven claims and requiring all health-related advertising to be backed by credible, peer-reviewed scientific research.

Under the updated guidance, the FTC is taking a firm stance against what it identifies as “vague qualifying terms” in advertising. The agency asserts that all health-related claims made by companies must be substantiated by credible, peer-reviewed scientific research. This shift signals a tougher regulatory environment for health product marketers, emphasizing the importance of transparency and evidence-based communication in an industry often criticized for its lack of accountability.

Wellness is no longer an add-on – it’s the foundation of modern product development. Companies that treat it as a marketing gimmick risk losing to disruptors who understand that today’s consumers aren’t just buying products. They’re investing in performance, longevity, and measurable results.

AI, Wearables, and Predictive Wellness

Your body is now a data stream, and Big Tech wants in.

What started with step counters and calorie trackers has evolved into AI-driven biohacking, where algorithms don’t just monitor your health – they attempt to predict and optimize it. Consumers are no longer passively checking fitness stats; they’re outsourcing their well-being to wearables, biometric scans, and AI-driven health assistants.

And the biggest players are moving fast. Google’s AI-powered dermatology tool claims medical-grade accuracy. Apple’s Health app quietly reshapes preventive medicine, feeding real-time biometric data into predictive alerts for conditions like atrial fibrillation. Platforms like InsideTracker promise to extend your lifespan using machine learning to analyze your blood biomarkers and recommend longevity-focused interventions.

AI-powered mental health tools, like Woebot, offer chatbot-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Meanwhile, smart rings and glucose monitors claim to optimize health.

The next frontier? Brain-computer interfaces. Neuralink is experimenting with cognitive enhancement, and startups like Sens.ai are launching neurofeedback headsets that claim to rewire the brain for improved focus and resilience.

As technology continues to merge with biology, wellness is shifting from a reactive model to a precision-driven, predictive experience. Consumers no longer want generic health advice; they expect data-driven, AI-curated, real-time insights that empower them to optimize their lives with surgical precision. Brands that can deliver on this promise will lead the next wave of the wellness economy.

Wellness Is Rewiring the Way We Shop, Stay, and Travel

The future of retail and hospitality isn’t just about convenience; it’s about well-being. From high-end hotels to grocery stores, brands are redesigning physical spaces to support mental, physical, and emotional health in ways that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

At Lululemon’s immersive wellness hubs, customers can do more than shop for activewear – they can meditate, attend breathwork sessions, or recover with guided treatments. Sephora is curating its shelves to reflect a new consumer demand: clean beauty products with transparent, safety-tested ingredients. Meanwhile, luxury hotels are pivoting from indulgence to longevity, offering IV therapy, cryotherapy, and biometric-driven nutrition plans designed for more than relaxation. They’re selling optimization.

Even mass-market brands are responding. Airlines are no longer just upgrading seat comfort; they’re integrating circadian lighting and personalized nutrition options to mitigate jet lag. Coworking spaces are incorporating biophilic design and air purification systems as professionals demand healthier work environments.

This shift isn’t cosmetic; it’s structural. Wellness is no longer a category – it’s a design principle shaping how we shop, travel, and experience spaces. Consumers now expect retail stores, hotels, and workspaces to not only offer products and services but also actively enhance their well-being.

For brands, this is no longer about staying ahead of the curve. It’s about staying relevant.

Wellness Goes Ethical, But Are Brands Keeping Up?

Consumers aren’t just buying wellness. They’re demanding it on their terms. From sustainable packaging to ethical sourcing, today’s shoppers expect well-being to extend beyond the individual to the planet and society. And they’re holding brands accountable like never before.

This shift isn’t theoretical; it’s shaping spending habits. Nearly 80% of global consumers say sustainability influences purchasing decisions (IBM Institute for Business Value). That’s why Patagonia’s commitment to regenerative supply chains isn’t just branding; it’s a business necessity. Aesop has built a cult following around its sustainability-first skincare, while Stella McCartney is pushing the fashion industry toward bioengineered materials and circular design to cut waste.

But ethical wellness isn’t just about environmental impact – it’s about who gets included. Wellness has long catered to a narrow demographic, but consumers now expect cultural competence and inclusivity. Fenty Skin has set a new standard in beauty with its commitment to diverse skin types, while fitness brands are finally recognizing the need for more representation in product design and marketing.

Yet, for all the progress, the industry still faces a reckoning. Greenwashing remains rampant, with brands exaggerating sustainability claims without transparency. Inclusivity marketing is everywhere, but how many companies reflect it in their hiring and leadership? Consumers are paying attention, and performative wellness will no longer cut it.

The new era of ethical wellness isn’t just about selling sustainability or inclusivity. It’s about proving it. The brands that back up their claims with action will earn loyalty. Those that don’t? They’ll be called out and left behind.

The Future of Wellness Is Personal, and Big Business Knows It

Wellness is no longer about staying healthy. It’s about engineering longevity, optimizing biology, and hacking the human body for peak performance.

This isn’t science fiction. Billion-dollar biotech startups like Altos Labs are pouring funding into cellular rejuvenation, while advances in senolytics – compounds designed to eliminate aging cells – are setting the stage for a world where aging itself could become a treatable condition. Skincare, nutrition, and fitness brands are already pivoting from anti-aging to lifespan optimization, signaling a shift that will reshape consumer health as we know it.

At the same time, digital wellness is becoming a fully immersive, data-driven experience. The metaverse isn’t just a playground for gamers – it’s becoming a wellness hub. Virtual reality meditation apps like TRIPP are gamifying mindfulness, and AI-powered health coaches are turning biometric data into real-time lifestyle interventions.

The era of one-size-fits-all health solutions is ending. DNA-driven nutrition plans, microbiome-based dietary regimens, and continuous glucose monitoring replace outdated wellness norms. Companies like Viome are leveraging gut microbiome analysis to create ultra-personalized food and supplement plans, while wearable tech is evolving from passive tracking to real-time health optimization.

For brands, the opportunity is massive, but so is the pressure. Consumers will no longer accept generic wellness promises. They expect science-backed, precision-driven solutions that seamlessly integrate into their daily lives.

The brands that embrace hyper-personalized, predictive wellness will define the future of health. The ones that don’t will be left selling yesterday’s version of well-being in a world that’s already looking ahead.

The Wellness-First Mandate – Adapt or Be Left Behind

Wellness is no longer a trend. It’s the economic engine reshaping industries, the cultural shift redefining consumer priorities, and the business imperative separating industry leaders from the obsolete.

This transformation isn’t about virtue signaling or slapping a “clean” label on a product. It’s about structural change – a radical rethinking of how brands serve consumers when well-being is the ultimate currency. Companies that embed wellness into their DNA, from product formulation to workplace culture, will thrive. Those who view it as a passing fad will fade into irrelevance.

The future belongs to brands that do more than just sell – they safeguard, optimize, and extend quality of life. Precision health, longevity science, AI-driven well-being, and sustainability aren’t niche concerns anymore; they are market expectations. Consumers aren’t just buying – they’re scrutinizing. They want proof, not promises.

For brands, the choice is stark: evolve or fall behind. Wellness is no longer a consumer preference; it’s a corporate survival strategy. The brands that hesitate won’t just lose market share. They’ll disappear.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In 2005, Nintendo was teetering on irrelevance in the UK. Once a dominant force, the gaming giant had been eclipsed by Sony’s PlayStation and Microsoft’s Xbox, holding a mere 5% market share in a space increasingly dominated by high-powered consoles and competitive gaming. Gaming had become synonymous with young, tech-savvy male audiences – a niche where Nintendo no longer held sway.

Within two years, Nintendo executed a turnaround that defied industry norms. By 2007, its UK market share had skyrocketed to 80%, driven by a marketing strategy that ignored the industry’s obsession with specs and focused on accessibility, playfulness, and the redefinition of what it meant to be a “gamer.” The Nintendo DS and Wii weren’t just consoles; they were cultural phenomena that expanded the gaming audience beyond teenage boys and esports enthusiasts to parents, professionals, and an emerging market now known as kidults – adults who engage in play-driven, nostalgic, and social entertainment.

This wasn’t just a comeback. It was a masterclass in market expansion, consumer behavior, and brand reinvention. Nintendo didn’t just take back its position in gaming – it transformed the industry’s entire trajectory. How did they do it? And what lessons can today’s brands learn from this seismic shift?

The Market Landscape Before Nintendo’s Comeback

By the mid-2000s, gaming was a high-stakes, high-performance industry. Sony and Microsoft were in an aggressive race, pushing cutting-edge graphics, processing power, and online multiplayer experiences. The PlayStation 2 was the undisputed king, selling over 155 million units globally, while the Xbox, backed by Microsoft’s deep pockets, had secured a loyal base of hardcore gamers. Nintendo, once the industry’s dominant force, had been relegated to an afterthought.

The problem? The market had narrowed. Gaming had become a battlefield of tech specs and realism, catering to an increasingly insular demographic – young male gamers. The industry had overlooked a fundamental truth: entertainment isn’t just about cutting-edge technology; it’s about accessibility, emotional connection, and cultural relevance.

This was the opportunity Nintendo saw before anyone else. Instead of competing on hardware power, the company pivoted toward a different gaming experience, prioritizing intuitive gameplay, social engagement, and an audience that had been ignored for too long.

Nintendo engineered one of the most dramatic turnarounds in business history by rejecting the industry’s fixation on complexity and high-performance specs. Its strategy didn’t just reclaim market share – it reshaped the gaming landscape, expanding the definition of who a gamer could be.

Key Strategies That Fueled Nintendo’s Success

Nintendo’s comeback wasn’t a fluke – it was a deliberate strategy that defied industry norms. While Sony and Microsoft escalated the hardware arms race, Nintendo redefined what gaming could be. Instead of emphasizing specs, it broadened its audience and made gaming more intuitive, turning the conversation from power to play.

#1. Expanding the Audience Beyond Gamers

Gaming had long been marketed to young men obsessed with high-speed, high-performance play. Nintendo shattered this mold by targeting demographics the industry had ignored: families, women, and older adults. The company understood gaming wasn’t inherently niche; it had simply been positioned that way.

The strategy was simple but groundbreaking: the barriers stopping non-gamers from picking up a controller. The Wii and Nintendo DS were designed to be intuitive, eliminating the intimidating learning curves of traditional gaming. This wasn’t about mastering complex button combinations or navigating hyper-realistic battlefields; it was about play.

Nintendo’s marketing leaned into this accessibility, positioning gaming as a shared experience rather than a solo, skill-based pursuit. Instead of hyper-stylized action sequences, Nintendo’s ads featured families playing together in living rooms, grandparents competing with grandchildren, and social settings where gaming wasn’t just entertainment; it was connection.

The result? Nintendo didn’t just win back players – it created millions of new ones. This wasn’t just about reclaiming dominance; it was about reshaping the gaming audience entirely.

#2. Leveraging Innovative Gameplay Experiences

Nintendo’s resurgence wasn’t about cutting-edge graphics, faster processors, or blockbuster storytelling. It was built on a simple yet powerful principle of consumer psychology: ease of use. By stripping away complexity, Nintendo made gaming more accessible than ever.

The Nintendo DS: A Touch-Based Revolution

It was built on a simple yet powerful principle of consumer psychology: ease of use. By stripping away complexity, Nintendo made gaming more accessible than ever.

Image Credit: Nintendogs Wiki Fandom

More importantly, Nintendo ensured the software supported this approach. Titles like Brain Age and Nintendogs weren’t designed for traditional gamers – they were built to attract a broader demographic, including older adults and casual players who had never picked up a console before. By moving away from conventional gaming tropes, the DS became a global sensation, selling over 154 million units.

The Wii: Motion-Control Gaming That Redefined Engagement

If the DS lowered the barrier to entry for handheld gaming, the Wii redefined accessibility in home entertainment. Launched in 2006, the Wii introduced motion-sensing controls that eliminated complex button inputs. Players could physically swing, punch, or steer their way through games, making gaming feel more interactive and immersive.

Image Credit: Game Rant

Bundling Wii Sports was a masterstroke. The Wii’s intuitive, motion-based gameplay made it essential for the living room, drawing in families, older adults, and social gamers. By 2007, the Wii had outsold the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

Rather than competing in the high-performance gaming race, Nintendo carved out an entirely new segment – one that prioritized intuitive, inclusive, and social play. The company didn’t just win back market share; it expanded the definition of gaming itself.

#3. Creating a Software Lineup That Sold Consoles

Nintendo’s success wasn’t just about hardware innovation. The real driver behind the DS and Wii’s dominance was a software strategy that prioritized accessibility, engagement, and repeat playability. While competitors focused on high-budget, graphics-heavy blockbusters, Nintendo leaned into intuitive, universally appealing experiences that turned occasional players into loyal consumers.

The Power of Bundled Games

Few games have matched the cultural impact of Wii Sports. With simple motion controls for tennis, baseball, and bowling, Wii Sports turned gaming into an active, social activity. The result? It became one of the best-selling games of all time.

Similarly, Brain Age for the DS tapped into a new category of users: adults looking for cognitive challenges. Its premise, built around mental exercises and daily training, positioned the DS as a lifestyle product. This pivot expanded Nintendo’s consumer base and set the stage for future mainstream gaming trends.

Franchises That Defined an Era

Beyond bundled titles, Nintendo doubled down on its iconic IPs. Mario Kart DS brought the beloved racing franchise to handheld gamers, while New Super Mario Bros. revitalized classic platforming for a new generation. These titles weren’t just nostalgia-driven – they were strategically designed to leverage Nintendo’s strongest assets while remaining accessible to casual players.

Image Credit: The Gamer

The Wii also saw a boom in motion-driven exclusives. Games like Wii Fit turned the console into a fitness tool, targeting a demographic far beyond traditional gamers. This content diversification ensured Nintendo wasn’t just selling consoles; it was building long-term engagement.

Image Credit: Game Stop

By focusing on intuitive gameplay, evergreen franchises, and software that appealed to untapped markets, Nintendo created a virtuous cycle: every best-selling game drove more console sales, and every console sale expanded the audience for future games. This strategy transformed Nintendo from an industry underdog to a market leader once again.

#4. Making Gaming More Affordable and Accessible

While Sony and Microsoft were engaged in a hardware race, pushing consoles with advanced graphics and premium pricing, Nintendo took a different approach. It focused on affordability, positioning the DS and Wii as low-cost, high-value alternatives that didn’t require a deep investment in gaming culture or expensive accessories. This pricing strategy wasn’t just about undercutting the competition; it was about lowering the barrier to entry and widening the consumer base.

Disrupting the Price War

In 2006, the PlayStation 3 launched at £425 in the UK, while the Xbox 360 ranged from £209 to £279. The Nintendo Wii, by contrast, entered at just £179—an accessible price point that made it an easy choice for families, casual gamers, and first-time buyers long priced out of gaming.

The DS followed a similar model. At launch, it was significantly cheaper than Sony’s handheld PSP, which was marketed as a high-performance portable console with multimedia capabilities. While the PSP struggled to compete with the rise of smartphones in the years ahead, the DS thrived by staying true to its core audience – offering simple, engaging experiences at a price point that felt accessible.

The Cost-to-Value Proposition

Price alone wasn’t enough – Nintendo had to prove value. Bundling Wii Sports gave consumers an instant reason to buy, eliminating the need for additional purchases. The Wii’s motion controls also removed the expense of extra accessories. Meanwhile, the DS thrived on a library of budget-friendly, mass-appeal titles, positioning gaming as an everyday activity rather than a luxury.

This affordability-first strategy had long-term implications. It cultivated a new generation of casual gamers, many of whom might never have considered purchasing a console. More importantly, it reinforced Nintendo’s reputation as the most accessible gaming brand, not just competing for market share but actively expanding the market.

By rejecting the premium-price model and focusing on mass-market adoption, Nintendo proved that success in gaming wasn’t just about hardware specs; it was about making gaming available to everyone.

#5. A Marketing Masterclass in Consumer Engagement

Nintendo’s comeback wasn’t just about hardware, software, or pricing – it was about storytelling. While Sony and Microsoft marketed gaming as a high-performance, immersive experience for dedicated players, Nintendo positioned gaming as something entirely different: a social, intuitive, and universally accessible activity. This shift in messaging was a fundamental repositioning of what gaming meant to consumers.

The Shift from Power to Play

Sony’s PlayStation 3 campaign emphasized its powerful hardware, with cinematic trailers showcasing hyper-realistic graphics and advanced processing power. Microsoft’s Xbox 360 leaned into its online gaming ecosystem, targeting hardcore players with a focus on multiplayer capabilities.

Image Credit: Miscrave

Nintendo went in the opposite direction. It didn’t market specs – it marketed people. Instead of high-adrenaline gameplay, its ads showed families, grandparents, and first-time gamers picking up a Wii remote and playing instantly. The message was clear: gaming wasn’t just for gamers anymore.

Turning Gaming into a Shared Experience

The Wii Would Like to Play became one of the era’s iconic marketing campaigns. Featuring two suit-clad Japanese men introducing the Wii to everyday households, it emphasized invitation over exclusivity. Nintendo wasn’t selling a console; it was selling interaction, laughter, and inclusion.

Image Credit: Playback

For the DS, Nintendo leaned into relatability. The Touch Generations campaign targeted non-gamers, featuring celebrities and everyday users engaging with brain-training games, puzzle titles, and social experiences. This wasn’t gaming for the elite; it was gaming for everyone, reinforcing the company’s core strategy of mass accessibility.

Here’s the 2006 Touch Generations Nintendo DS print ad.

Image Credit: ebay

Retail Strategy and Experiential Marketing

Beyond traditional advertising, Nintendo excelled at experiential marketing. The company rolled out widespread in-store demo stations, allowing hesitant buyers to try the Wii’s motion controls or experience the DS’s touchscreen before making a purchase. This hands-on approach eliminated skepticism and turned a casual interest into immediate conversion.

Nintendo also capitalized on the rise of social proof. Word-of-mouth marketing skyrocketed as the Wii became a staple in living rooms worldwide. The more people saw their friends and family engaging with Nintendo products, the more likely they were to join in, creating a viral effect that fueled record-breaking sales.

By shifting its marketing from performance-driven specs to emotion-driven engagement, Nintendo didn’t just sell consoles – it sold experiences. In doing so, it reshaped the gaming industry, proving that success wasn’t about catering to the existing market but creating an entirely new one.

#6. The Long-Term Impact on Gaming and Consumer Behavior

Nintendo’s strategy didn’t just reclaim market share – it redefined gaming itself. It shifted perceptions of who a “gamer” could be and expanded what gaming could offer. The ripple effects went beyond Nintendo, reshaping the industry and consumer expectations for years.

Mainstreaming Casual and Social Gaming

Before the Wii and DS, gaming was a niche hobby dominated by young men. Nintendo shattered that perception, proving gaming could be inclusive, social, and effortless. The runaway success of Wii Sports, Brain Age, and Nintendogs sparked demand for intuitive, accessible gameplay – paving the way for mobile gaming’s rise.

Nintendo inadvertently set the stage for the mobile gaming revolution by lowering the entry barrier and emphasising fun over complexity. The App Store, launched in 2008, followed the same principles: games that were simple to learn, easy to access, and designed for mass appeal. Today, the global mobile gaming market generates more revenue than console and PC gaming combined, a shift that can be traced back to Nintendo’s strategy of broadening the gaming audience.

The Legacy of Motion Controls and Interactive Gaming

Initially dismissed as a gimmick, the Wii’s motion controls became a blueprint for interactive gaming. Microsoft’s Kinect and Sony’s PlayStation Move were direct responses, chasing the demand Nintendo had created. More significantly, the idea of physical engagement in gaming extended beyond consoles – AR and VR gaming owe much of their mainstream appeal to Nintendo’s early innovations.

Image Credit: Nintendo

Nintendo’s focus on intuitive play also influenced how developers approached game design. Today, user-friendly mechanics and immediate engagement are central to many of the industry’s best-selling titles, from fitness-based games like Ring Fit Adventure to the continued success of Just Dance, a franchise built on motion-based play.

A Blueprint for Market Expansion

Nintendo’s greatest lesson wasn’t reclaiming market share – it was creating new demand. Rather than competing in a saturated market, it identified an untapped audience and built products around them.

This strategy continues to influence modern gaming. The resurgence of retro consoles, the rise of cloud gaming services that prioritize accessibility over hardware power, and even the success of games like Animal Crossing: New Horizons – which attracted a massive non-traditional gaming audience – can all be linked to the blueprint Nintendo established in the mid-2000s.

Nintendo didn’t just revive its brand – it reshaped the gaming industry. By proving that innovation comes from creating trends, not following them, it set a new standard for market disruption. And its influence didn’t stop at gaming.

Nintendo’s resurgence wasn’t just a corporate turnaround; it redefined how entertainment itself was consumed. By shifting gaming from a skill-based pursuit to a social, inclusive experience, it expanded the industry’s reach far beyond its traditional audience. The DS and Wii weren’t just successful consoles; they were cultural phenomena that reshaped consumer behavior, fueled the rise of casual gaming, and set the stage for today’s interactive entertainment trends.

The takeaway for brands? Market dominance isn’t about competing harder – it’s about expanding the playing field. Nintendo succeeded by challenging assumptions, identifying unmet consumer needs, and making gaming effortless and engaging. It didn’t just reclaim leadership; it shaped the future of digital entertainment for decades.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The marketing department, as we know it, is obsolete.

Generative AI develops millions of personalized ads in milliseconds. Consumers shape brand narratives in real-time. Predictive algorithms anticipate needs before customers even recognize them. The traditional marketing playbook isn’t just outdated; it’s collapsing. Legacy teams, built on rigid hierarchies and campaign cycles, are being outpaced by AI-augmented ecosystems designed for continuous adaptation.

Tomorrow’s marketing function won’t be a department. It will be an intelligence system embedded within product development, customer experience, and behavioral data science. Brands that fail to restructure will not just fall behind; they will disappear.

Winning in this new landscape requires more than AI-driven automation. Emotional intelligence, ethical AI governance, and seamless integration with business operations will separate leaders from laggards.

The shift is already happening. The only question is: how fast can marketing teams evolve?

The five pillars of the future marketing team

#1. AI-Augmented Strategy Teams – Humans and Machines as Co-Pilots

The future of marketing is not about AI replacing human creativity; it’s about AI augmenting it. In the next decade, marketing teams will no longer rely on static consumer personas or outdated segmentation models. Instead, they will deploy real-time predictive marketing engines powered by AI that adapt to shifting consumer behaviors instantaneously.

But here’s the critical distinction: AI will not replace human intuition but enhance its precision. The most successful marketing teams will be those that train AI to think like a strategist while ensuring humans retain control over brand ethos, ethical boundaries, and cultural nuance.

Nike’s marketing team has already embedded AI into its decision-making process, using machine learning to predict product demand, optimize pricing, and create hyper-personalized consumer journeys. However, Nike does not hand over creative control to algorithms; it ensures AI insights serve human-led storytelling and brand building.

However, AI’s increasing role raises governance concerns. If left unchecked, algorithmic bias, AI hallucinations, and opaque decision-making processes can erode consumer trust. Google’s ad-targeting models, for instance, have faced scrutiny for bias in content distribution, highlighting the need for marketing teams to establish AI ethics frameworks.

The human component will remain irreplaceable. AI can crunch data, but it cannot understand cultural nuances, context, or the emotional weight of a story.

Marketing leaders must own the governance of an AI-driven strategy, ensuring automation enhances brand trust rather than undermines it.

#2. Consumer intelligence & behavioral science units to decode decision-making in real-time

The future of marketing will not be driven by demographics but by deep behavioral insights. Real-time consumer intelligence hubs will help track sentiment, subconscious decision-making, and predictive behavioral shifts.

Neuroscience, biometric tracking, and AI-driven sentiment analysis will become the foundation of modern marketing teams. Instead of just asking consumers what they think, brands will measure how they feel in the moment. Eye-tracking, galvanic skin response, and neuro-marketing scans will reveal how audiences react to products, content, and messaging, eliminating the guesswork from engagement strategies.

Unilever has already integrated neuroscience into its advertising research, measuring emotional responses at a subconscious level. By analyzing brain activity, Unilever can determine whether an ad creates an authentic emotional connection before it ever reaches a consumer’s screen, ensuring campaigns resonate deeply rather than rely on assumptions.

However, access to such insights comes with ethical responsibility. As marketing teams gain deeper access to real-time consumer psychology, the risk of manipulation increases. Personalization cannot become digital surveillance.

Brands that thrive will use behavioral data to enhance consumer experiences, not exploit them. Ethical AI oversight within marketing teams will be non-negotiable.

#3. Hyper-personalization & growth teams leading the shift from segments to individuals

Marketing will no longer be about targeting audiences; it will be about orchestrating individual consumer journeys in real time. Growth teams will shift their focus from optimizing channels to engineering highly individualized consumer pathways powered by AI and real-time identity graphs.

Spotify’s AI-driven campaigns, like Discover Weekly and Wrapped, are personalized brand experiences rather than traditional marketing tools. Every interaction refines the algorithm, ensuring recommendations grow more precise, engagement deepens, and retention soars.

This level of hyper-personalization presents a paradox. The more tailored the experience, the more invisible the marketing becomes. When done well, the consumer does not feel targeted; they feel understood. But when algorithms misfire, the illusion shatters.

Growth teams of the future will need to master the balance between automation and authenticity, ensuring AI-driven personalization enhances human connection rather than replacing it.

#4. Decentralized, agile creative networks and the end of the traditional in-house model

Marketing teams will no longer operate as rigid, in-house departments. Instead, they will function as fluid, decentralized creative networks, tapping into on-demand talent pools powered by AI-driven collaboration platforms.

Gucci Vault has already embraced decentralized creativity, collaborating with independent digital artists and Web3 designers rather than dictating brand aesthetics from a central creative team. By co-creating with digital-native communities, Gucci ensures its brand narrative evolves organically rather than being imposed from the top down.

Maintaining brand consistency in a decentralized model will be challenging. Future marketing leaders must find ways to empower external creators while ensuring alignment with brand identity.

#5. Ethical & sustainable marketing frameworks: the new non-negotiable

Marketing will no longer be judged solely on performance metrics. The future belongs to brands that align with consumer values and embed ethics and sustainability into their strategies.

Patagonia’s self-imposed carbon tax and long-term sustainability initiatives have proven that consumers reward brands whose actions match their messaging. If a company fails in this area, it can lead to serious greenwashing and ethical mistakes that destroy trust. This is especially true because AI-powered fact-checking tools and decentralized watchdog communities can quickly reveal inconsistencies.

The rise of regenerative marketing will push brands beyond sustainability pledges toward long-term societal impact. Companies will shift from minimizing harm to actively contributing to environmental and social well-being. This will require marketing teams to collaborate with policymakers, sustainability experts, and ethical data specialists, creating a new discipline where profit and purpose are no longer opposing forces but interconnected drivers of success.

The future marketing team must integrate ethics into every stage of strategy and execution, ensuring profit and purpose are interconnected rather than opposing forces.

The future marketing leader – a hybrid of technologist, psychologist, and strategist

The CMO role is disappearing. In its place, a new breed of marketing leader is emerging, one who blends data fluency with behavioral science and technology expertise with strategic vision.

Companies like Adobe and Tesla already embed AI, automation, and predictive analytics into their core strategies. But successful marketing leaders will not just be digital experts – they will be experience architects, shaping every consumer touchpoint across an increasingly fragmented landscape.

As marketing, product development, and customer experience become inseparable, the Chief Growth Officer or Chief Experience Officer will replace the traditional CMO, reflecting marketing’s new mandate: not just to promote but to engineer adaptive, intelligent brand ecosystems.

The Marketing Team as a living intelligence system

The marketing team of the future is not just a department. It works as a living, changing system. AI helps boost human creativity, insights about customer behavior guide decisions, and decentralized networks share brand stories.

But technology alone will not define the winners. The brands that thrive will understand the irreplaceable role of human judgment – the ability to interpret, contextualize, and ethically apply data-driven insights.

To future-proof their marketing teams, organizations must:

Invest in cross-functional talent – marketers must be fluent in AI, behavioral psychology, and digital ecosystems.
Establish AI governance frameworks – bias, privacy, and transparency will be critical.
Shift from campaign-based marketing to real-time experience management or risk irrelevance.

Marketing is no longer a function. It is the foundation of consumer trust, brand longevity, and sustained competitive advantage. The next era will not belong to those who adapt, it will belong to those who lead the transformation.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Pricing Models for Navigating Demand Shifts

Where the Pressure Hits First

Calibrating the Right Price

Strategy Under Pressure

The Strategic Trade-Offs

Pricing in a Slower Growth World

Get regular insights

Brand trust in B2B is no longer just about product

Branding Vs. Lead Generation

B2B buyers expect the same engagement as consumers

So, how is Payhawk making B2B interactive?

The Results

Beyond OOH – A multi-touch approach to engagement

The Next B2B Battleground

Get regular insights

Forever 21’s Fall Signals a Broken Retail Model

Shein and Temu Built a Smarter System

Speed and Price Now Come with a Cost

Retailers Must Rethink the Entire Playbook

The Fast Fashion Reckoning Is Already Here

Get regular insights

Data That Demands Attention

Speed Meets Substance

Timing Isn’t Everything – Coordination Is

Personalization That Pays Off

Inside the Inbox and Lock Screen

Lessons from the Brands Getting It Right

Avoiding the Double Tap Trap

What Great Design Looks Like

The Tech That Ties It All Together

Final Send-Off

Get regular insights

Squeezing More from Subscribers

The Divide Between Premium and Basic Subscribers

Consumers Are Pushing Back Against Rising Costs and Subscription Fatigue

Nearly three-quarters of subscribers say they’re paying too much. As a result, 31% have already scaled back, and 29% are thinking about it.

Streaming Is Starting to Look a Lot Like Cable

Brands Rethink Strategy as Streaming Turns Premium

As Streaming Becomes a Luxury, Can Affordability Survive?

The Future of Streaming Will Be Defined by Who Can Afford It

Streaming’s Evolution Is Redefining Entertainment Access

More than half of Americans (53%) subscribed to a service in the past year just to watch one show. Of those, 72% canceled – 57% within the first month.

Is Streaming Headed for a Breaking Point?

Get regular insights

Turning Screen Time into Bookings

TV Tourism Is the New Gold Rush for Hospitality Brands

Experiential and Ultra-Luxury Tourism Is Redefining Travel Marketing

Is TV the New Luxury Travel Influencer?

Luxury Hospitality Is Turning to Entertainment as a Growth Strategy

Cultural Relevance Is the New Currency of Luxury

Get regular insights

Why Brands Are Shifting to Real-World Experiences

Experiential Marketing Builds Influence, Not Just Awareness

Proving the ROI of Experiential Marketing

The Future of Experiential Marketing

Technology Is Elevating Physical Experiences

Scalability Without Losing Exclusivity

Final Thoughts

Get regular insights

Wellness as a Brand Imperative

Workplace Wellness Is No Longer a Perk – It’s a Business Survival Strategy

Innovations in Product Development to Meet Wellness Expectations

AI, Wearables, and Predictive Wellness

Wellness Is Rewiring the Way We Shop, Stay, and Travel

Wellness Goes Ethical, But Are Brands Keeping Up?

The Future of Wellness Is Personal, and Big Business Knows It

The Wellness-First Mandate – Adapt or Be Left Behind

Get regular insights

The Market Landscape Before Nintendo’s Comeback

Key Strategies That Fueled Nintendo’s Success

Get regular insights

The five pillars of the future marketing team

The future marketing leader – a hybrid of technologist, psychologist, and strategist

The Marketing Team as a living intelligence system

Get regular insights

Helping brands uncover valuable insights

Get In Touch