Consumer Understanding Archives

Consumer sentiment shifts rapidly, shaped not only by your company’s directives and strategies but also by external forces, such as viral trends, cultural movements, and economic forces. The brands that endure and adapt to these changes in real-time. Brand tracking is more than a periodic check-in – it’s essential for survival. By continuously monitoring brand health, companies can identify strengths, spot weaknesses, understand competitive positioning and adjust strategy accordingly.

But perception isn’t static. A brand with strong awareness today can lose relevance tomorrow if it fails to track how consumers feel, engage, and respond over time. To remain competitive, brands must continuously track their position in the market and be agile enough to adapt.

What is Brand Tracking, and Why Does it Matter?

Brand tracking measures a brand’s performance over time, helping companies identify shifts in the market, consumer trends, competitive trends, strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities to refine brand strategy.

Brand perception is fluid and influenced by consumer experiences, media narratives, and competitive shifts. Brand tracking helps companies answer critical questions:

Is our brand positioning resonating with the right audience?
How does our reputation compare to competitors?
What messaging, campaigns, or brand attributes build consumer loyalty?
Do external factors – economic shifts, social trends, or market disruptions – impact our brand perception?

Key Elements of Brand Tracking

Brand tracking goes beyond surface-level metrics to assess a brand’s health and market position. Key components include:

Brand Awareness: Measuring Recognition and Recall
- Unaided vs. Aided Awareness
- Top-of-Mind Awareness: The first brand a consumer thinks of in a category often signals market leadership and competitive strength.
Brand Perception & Sentiment Analysis
- Consumer Attitudes and Associations: Understanding how consumers feel about a brand—and the attributes they link to it—is key to shaping brand identity. These should include both functional benefits and emotional benefits. As well as brand personality.
Purchase Intent, Satisfaction & Customer Loyalty Metrics
- Likelihood of Purchase: Gauging how likely consumers are to choose a brand helps predict future sales.
- Satisfaction: Understanding brand satisfaction versus competitors
- Net Promoter Score (NPS): Measuring customers’ willingness to recommend a brand indicates satisfaction and loyalty.
Competitive Benchmarking
- Market Position Analysis: Comparing brand performance against competitors to identify strengths, weaknesses, and market opportunities.
- Share of Voice: Measuring a brand’s visibility in the market through media coverage and advertising reach.
Media & Advertising Effectiveness
- Campaign Impact Assessment: Assessing how marketing efforts affect awareness, perception, and sales.

Turning Data into Strategy

Brand tracking only matters if insights lead to action. Using data strategically, companies can refine marketing, reposition products, and strengthen customer loyalty.

Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses Before They Become Market Issues

Tracking brand health helps brands pinpoint areas where they excel and where they are losing ground. Rather than relying on assumptions, brands that act on measurable shifts in consumer sentiment can adjust messaging and engagement tactics before losing relevance.

Optimizing Marketing Campaigns

Effective marketing isn’t just about visibility; it’s about impact. Brand tracking measures how marketing efforts influence perception, loyalty, and purchase intent. If a campaign falls short, data allows brands to tweak real-time messaging rather than wait until the next cycle.

Benchmarking Against Competitors

Brand tracking is most powerful when measured against competitors. Comparing brand health metrics against competitors enables companies to identify gaps in positioning, capitalize on underserved markets, and anticipate industry shifts before rivals do.

Building Customer Loyalty

Brand tracking isn’t just for attracting new customers; it helps brands understand why existing customers stay or leave. Tracking loyalty metrics allows brands to implement better retention strategies, such as loyalty programs, improved customer service, or product innovation.

Brand Tracking Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Even the best tracking methods fail if poorly executed. Avoid these common mistakes to ensure insights lead to action.

Measuring Awareness Without Sentiment
A high awareness score means little if there are negative perceptions. Brands must pair awareness tracking with perception analysis to get a complete picture of their market position.
Tracking Without Business Goals
Brand tracking is useless if not tied to clear objectives. Tracking must support strategy, whether expanding markets, improving retention, or refining advertising.
Ignoring Qualitative Data
Numbers alone don’t tell the full story. Open-ended customer feedback and sentiment analysis reveal why brand perception shifts
Failing to Act on Insights
Insights are useless if brands don’t act. Whether trust is eroding or a competitor is gaining ground, companies must adjust accordingly..
Overlooking Market Trends
Brand perception doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Economic shifts, cultural trends, and competitors shape public opinion. Effective tracking accounts for these factors.

Brand Tracking Is Not an Option—It’s Survival

Brand perception is a moving target. What consumers think today may not hold true tomorrow, and brands that fail to monitor these shifts risk becoming irrelevant. The market does not wait for companies to catch up; brands that do not track, analyze, and act on data are at the mercy of competitors who do.

Tracking isn’t just about data—it’s about influence. It reveals when a brand resonates or repels, when trust strengthens or erodes. The best brands spot risks before they escalate and seize opportunities before they go mainstream.

Market leaders don’t wait for a crisis to understand their position. They track, measure, and adapt before perception shifts beyond their control. A brand that isn’t tracking its relevance isn’t just falling behind – it’s already lost control of the narrative.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Late one evening in Lagos, 22-year-old Chika is scrolling through TikTok, eyes fixed on a local influencer demoing the latest face serum. She watches the 30-second video twice, screenshots the product, and toggles over to Jumia to compare prices, scanning reviews that look a little too polished to be real. Before checking out, she sends a message to her cousin in Ibadan: “Have you tried this one? Is it legit?” Only after a thumbs-up and a money-back assurance from the seller does she complete the purchase – on mobile, of course.

This isn’t an isolated case. It’s a snapshot of how the next billion consumers will shop, click, and connect.

While Western economies grapple with saturation, inflation, and shifting loyalty, the momentum is migrating – toward Southeast Asia, Africa, and parts of Latin America. These regions are no longer just “emerging markets.” They are where the most dynamic, mobile-first, and digitally sophisticated consumers are coming of age.

The numbers make the case undeniable. According to the United Nations, over 85% of global population growth through 2050 will come from Africa and Asia. The GSMA reports that mobile internet penetration in Sub-Saharan Africa is set to reach 50% by 2025, up from 28% in 2019. Meanwhile, the World Bank highlights how smartphone adoption is leapfrogging traditional infrastructure, giving rise to an entire generation that skipped the PC era entirely.

But these consumers are not easily won. They are bilingual and bicultural, equally fluent in local slang and global memes. They are digitally native but deeply mistrustful, having grown up in online ecosystems rife with scams, misinformation, and empty brand promises. And they are forcing brands – both global and local – to rethink what it means to earn attention, deliver relevance, and build trust in the age of hyper-connectivity.

This is not just a demographic shift. It’s a behavioral revolution. And it’s already underway.

Meet the Next Billion: Demographics, Access, and Expectations

This new wave of consumers is young, connected, and coming online fast. In markets like Nigeria, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, the median age hovers around 25. These are societies where more than half the population wasn’t yet born when Facebook launched – and for them, digital engagement isn’t an evolution; it’s a native state.

Urbanization is accelerating across these regions, but it’s not confined to megacities. Second- and third-tier cities are becoming powerful engines of growth, fueled by digital access and rising educational attainment. In Vietnam, for instance, over 94% of youth are literate, and the number of university graduates has doubled over the past decade. Similarly, Nigeria’s youth enrollment in tertiary education is climbing, despite infrastructure constraints. With education comes language dexterity: millions speak at least two languages – one local, one global – and they switch between them instinctively, depending on the context, platform, or audience.

If their predecessors logged onto the internet, this generation lives inside it – and does so almost exclusively via smartphone. In Indonesia, smartphone penetration has surpassed 75%, with apps like Tokopedia, Gojek, and Shopee becoming gateways to everything from groceries to financial services. In sub-Saharan Africa, handset affordability and prepaid data plans have made mobile the default medium for learning, shopping, and socializing. The desktop? Many have never touched one.

Browser-based experiences are increasingly irrelevant. Instead, this generation navigates a constellation of apps, each with its own cultural role. WhatsApp is for family, Instagram for aspiration, TikTok for entertainment, and Telegram or local forums for unfiltered information. Platform behavior is deeply segmented and purpose-driven. Brands attempting to force a uniform message across channels are quickly tuned out.

And while their tech habits may look similar from a distance, the nuances run deep. In Nigeria, digital spaces are often leveraged as tools for activism and community solidarity. Mistrust in institutions has made peer recommendations and online reputation more powerful than formal brand campaigns. By contrast, in Indonesia, religious and cultural values shape how products are perceived and promoted – especially in sectors like fashion, beauty, and food. Vietnamese consumers, on the other hand, exhibit a high degree of tech optimism, embracing e-wallets and livestream commerce, but place enormous emphasis on product quality and after-sales service, driven by prior experiences with low-cost imports.

These differences matter. What unites the next billion is their digital fluency, but what distinguishes them is the lens through which they evaluate brands. A price drop may trigger interest in Nigeria, but in Vietnam, durability and performance often take precedence. In Indonesia, localized design or halal certification may be the tipping point. The common thread is that these consumers are not passive recipients of global marketing – they are active participants, savvy navigators, and, increasingly, vocal critics.

To engage them, brands must move past old assumptions about emerging markets being homogenous or easily won with scale. What’s unfolding is a more complex, more nuanced, and more demanding consumer environment – and it’s being shaped not just by demographics, but by deep-seated expectations forged in mobile-first, culturally hybrid, and rapidly evolving societies.

Mistrust Is the Default Setting

For many of the next billion consumers, skepticism isn’t a reaction – it’s a reflex. Decades of unreliable infrastructure, political instability, and inconsistent enforcement of consumer rights have conditioned buyers to approach brands and platforms with guarded caution. In these markets, trust is not assumed; it’s earned slowly and lost quickly.

The scale of the challenge is significant. According to Edelman’s 2024 Trust Barometer, trust in institutions – including businesses – remains markedly lower in developing regions than in developed ones. In Nigeria, only 42% of respondents said they trust brands “to do what is right,” compared to 62% in the UK. In Indonesia, that figure was closer to 50%, but even there, trust is often linked to familiarity rather than formal reputation – people tend to trust people, not corporations.

This backdrop has fueled the rise of peer-to-peer influence as a dominant decision-making force. In the Philippines, Facebook community groups like “Online Budol Finds” (slang for impulsive purchases) function as real-time marketplaces and review boards, where users share unfiltered opinions about products, pricing, and service. In Kenya, WhatsApp groups play a similar role, serving as both watchdog and validator in a system where traditional consumer protections are weak or absent. Even in Vietnam, where e-commerce infrastructure has rapidly improved, 54% of online shoppers say they rely on recommendations from friends or family over brand messaging, according to Statista.

This preference for informal verification mechanisms stems from bitter experience. Counterfeit goods remain a rampant issue across markets – from fake electronics in Ghana to diluted skincare products in Indonesia. In response, many consumers have developed an internal checklist: check the seller’s social proof, confirm the payment method, look for real customer images, and verify delivery policies. Brands that fail even one of these checks are likely to be discarded in seconds.

At the same time, digital mistrust is compounding the issue. Scams, phishing attacks, and fake reviews have tainted the e-commerce experience. The GSMA estimates that more than 40% of mobile internet users in Africa and Southeast Asia have experienced some form of online fraud or misleading advertising. In Indonesia alone, the National Cyber and Crypto Agency reported over 190 million cyberattacks and suspicious traffic incidents in 2023.

In this climate, even influencer marketing – a strategy once thought to fast-track trust – has grown less effective. In Vietnam, consumers increasingly question whether influencers are being paid to promote products they don’t actually use. The same holds true in Nigeria, where audiences are savvy enough to distinguish between genuine recommendations and sponsored scripts. The result is a gradual shift toward micro-influencers and community advocates, whose endorsements feel more relatable and less rehearsed.

The implications for global brands are profound. Standard top-down marketing no longer carries weight. Instead, trust must be layered in – through reliable service, consistent messaging, transparency in returns and refunds, and responsiveness on the platforms where consumers are active. Brands must also recognize the importance of publicly visible customer interactions. A fast, empathetic reply to a complaint in the comments section may matter more than a million-dollar ad campaign.

Trust, in this context, is not a brand asset; it’s a user experience outcome. And in a market where every interaction becomes a review, the next billion are watching, judging, and sharing – with or without you.

The Battle for the First Page (or First Screen)

For the next billion consumers, the path to purchase doesn’t begin with a browser search – it starts with a scroll. Discovery has shifted from keywords to content, from desktop search bars to full-screen video, and from global search engines to localized social ecosystems. As a result, the first screen – what shows up in a feed, on a homepage, or in a chat group – has become the most valuable real estate in the customer journey.

In Indonesia, 71% of internet users aged 16–24 say they use social media as their primary source for researching brands, according to DataReportal 2024. In Nigeria, that figure is nearly identical. TikTok, Instagram Reels, Facebook Marketplace, and YouTube Shorts aren’t just distractions – they’re digital storefronts where decisions are made in real time, often before a brand’s official website is ever visited. The lines between content, commerce, and community have all but vanished.

And while this trend is visible globally, its intensity in emerging markets is distinct. A key reason: data affordability drives platform choice and usage behavior. Telecom bundles that include free access to Facebook or WhatsApp often influence which platforms dominate attention. In the Philippines, for example, “Free FB” packages have made Facebook one of the most deeply entrenched platforms in the country’s digital culture – so much so that some users mistakenly believe it is the internet.

The importance of platform-specific strategy can’t be overstated. In Vietnam, product discovery frequently occurs through livestream commerce on TikTok Shop, where real-time interactions foster a sense of authenticity. In Kenya, small businesses routinely post promotions through WhatsApp Status or Telegram channels, bypassing traditional ad formats altogether. In Nigeria, where Twitter (now X) has a strong political and cultural presence, product conversations often unfold in threads filled with memes, humor, and direct audience engagement.

But it’s not just about where brands show up – it’s about how they’re experienced in the moment. Load speed, image optimization, and mobile UX have a direct impact on trust and retention. According to Google, 53% of mobile users in emerging markets will abandon a page that takes longer than three seconds to load. And that’s not just about tech – it’s about expectations. These consumers are used to fast, seamless, and low-friction digital experiences. Anything less suggests the brand doesn’t understand them.

Just as critically, language and localization now serve as first impressions. A landing page that defaults to English – or worse, uses awkward machine translations – can signal cultural detachment. By contrast, content tailored in local languages, with region-specific slang and visual references, is seen as a mark of respect and investment. It says: we’re not just here to sell; we’re here to understand.

In a space where attention is both fleeting and fiercely fought over, success no longer goes to the loudest voice or biggest budget. It goes to the most culturally fluent, visually intuitive, and platform-native presence. Winning the first screen isn’t about visibility alone – it’s about resonance.

The Rise of Reverse Aspiration and Quiet Power

Western brands once assumed that success in emerging markets meant becoming aspirational – symbols of modernity and affluence. But for today’s mobile-first generation, the tables are turning. Increasingly, it is not global prestige that earns admiration, but local relevance. In place of overt aspiration, there’s a growing sense of pride in indigenous culture, self-made success, and digital independence. What’s emerging is a quiet power: consumers who no longer seek to imitate the West, but expect brands – foreign and domestic – to meet them on their terms.

Across Southeast Asia and Africa, there’s a perceptible shift from status to substance. In Nigeria, youth are driving a surge in support for homegrown fashion labels like Orange Culture and Ashluxe – brands that blend global aesthetics with distinctly African narratives. A 2023 Euromonitor report found that 64% of Nigerian Gen Z consumers said they prefer to buy local brands that reflect their identity, even when international options are available.

This isn’t limited to apparel. In Indonesia, the halal cosmetics market has seen explosive growth, not merely as a religious preference but as an expression of cultural values. Brands like Wardah and Emina now rival – or outperform – multinational competitors in brand recognition among young women. These brands don’t compete by mimicking Western tropes. They succeed by embedding themselves in the rhythms of local life, from religious observances to beauty standards shaped by regional influencers rather than global celebrities.

The same dynamic is playing out in Vietnam’s tech sector, where local e-wallets like MoMo are outpacing foreign fintech entrants – not because of superior technology, but because they better understand the daily behaviors, payment rituals, and security concerns of the Vietnamese consumer. According to a 2023 study by Decision Lab, MoMo enjoys over 60% brand preference among young urbanites, in part due to its partnerships with local merchants and integration into everyday routines like topping up phone credit or paying utility bills.

Meanwhile, global culture is increasingly being shaped by these same markets. Afrobeats, once a niche genre, now tops international charts. Thai skincare routines are influencing global beauty trends. Filipino content creators are gaining global followers on TikTok not because they adapt to global norms, but because they confidently showcase their own. In this way, reverse aspiration is not just a rejection of old hierarchies – it’s an export of influence.

For brands, the lesson is clear: you are not the center of the story. Consumers no longer measure themselves against your brand identity. Instead, they measure your brand against their values, communities, and cultural fluency. Products must be flexible, not fixed; branding must adapt, not dictate.

The rise of reverse aspiration doesn’t signal hostility toward global brands – it signals maturity. These consumers aren’t trying to join the global mainstream. They are the mainstream – digitally savvy, culturally proud, and shaping the conversation on their own terms. And they expect brands to understand that before making their pitch.

Strategies to Earn Attention and Trust

Capturing the attention of the next billion is not a matter of flashy creative or inflated ad budgets. These consumers are deliberate and discerning, quick to disengage from brands that don’t meet their standards or speak their language – both literally and figuratively. Trust is not a funnel; it’s a framework. And it requires consistent, intentional action across every touchpoint.

1. Hyper-localization isn’t optional – it’s foundational.
For emerging market consumers, brand credibility is tightly linked to cultural fluency. It goes beyond simple translation to a full embrace of local values, references, and usage contexts. In Vietnam, the delivery app Baemin differentiated itself by infusing its platform with witty Vietnamese slang, inside jokes, and hyper-specific product categories – earning loyalty not through function, but through cultural intimacy. In Kenya, Safaricom’s M-Pesa succeeded not just as a mobile payments tool, but because it was built around the realities of an unbanked population, with offline integration and SMS functionality that anticipated connectivity challenges.

2. Trust is built in the micro-moments.
In high-trust economies, consumers might forgive a misstep. In low-trust markets, every interaction matters. A delayed delivery, a missing refund, or a slow response to a query can permanently damage perception. In Indonesia, beauty brand Sociolla won favor by offering guaranteed authentic products, tracked delivery, and a no-hassle return policy – features that directly addressed consumer anxieties in a market flooded with counterfeits. Transparency, speed, and customer service are not operational choices; they are brand positioning strategies.

3. Community voices trump corporate messaging.
The age of the polished brand ambassador is fading. Peer influence, especially from micro-influencers and everyday content creators, now holds more sway. These are people with modest followings but high engagement, often speaking in native dialects or regional slang. In the Philippines, Shopee’s partnership with grassroots creators in smaller cities – rather than national celebrities – helped drive adoption among new internet users. Brands that co-create with local voices, elevate real customer stories, and share behind-the-scenes content signal a level of openness that consumers find relatable and reassuring.

4. Simplification drives conversion.
The mobile-first mindset means consumers expect streamlined interfaces, fast-loading pages, and frictionless payment processes. The most successful brands eliminate barriers rather than adding features. In India, Meesho – a platform that allows users to resell products through WhatsApp and Facebook – gained explosive traction not by competing on price or product, but by simplifying commerce to match the rhythms of informal entrepreneurship. Especially in markets with lower digital literacy or inconsistent connectivity, simplicity is not just convenient – it’s empowering.

5. Offer real value, not just marketing.
Beyond product benefits, brands that offer utility, knowledge, or community are more likely to earn sustained engagement. During the pandemic, Vietnam’s Vinamilk launched a nutrition education series across Facebook Live, fronted by local pediatricians and nutritionists. The effort was not overtly commercial, but it positioned the brand as a trusted source in a time of uncertainty – building long-term brand equity. Similarly, in Africa, MTN’s “Y’ello Hope” campaign provided remote learning support and free data for health workers, deepening brand connection far beyond mobile service.

6. Show up where it matters – and stay.
Too often, international brands treat emerging markets as seasonal experiments, testing campaigns without long-term investment. But consistency is critical. Consumers notice who’s around during key holidays, national events, and crises – and who disappears when results don’t come quickly. Building trust means being present, listening actively, and responding quickly, even when it’s not convenient. It means moving from transactional to relational.

Attention and trust are hard-won in these markets – but not impossible. Brands that succeed will be those that listen before speaking, localize without diluting, and deliver value at every step. It’s not about cracking a code – it’s about showing up, with respect, relevance, and reliability.

What the Next Billion Means for Global Strategy

The next billion consumers will not just change where companies grow – they will fundamentally reshape how companies think. For too long, emerging markets have been treated as the final frontier for global brands – places to extend reach and scale after success was achieved elsewhere. That model is not only outdated; it’s strategically short-sighted.

In markets like Vietnam, Kenya, and the Philippines, consumer expectations are being forged under entirely different conditions: mobile-first access, economic volatility, rapid urbanization, and a deep mistrust of centralized systems. The result is a set of behaviors that are more adaptive, more skeptical, and often more innovative than those seen in mature markets. Consumers here are not merely catching up – they are setting new standards.

Rather than viewing these markets as extensions of Western playbooks, companies should see them as innovation testbeds. Take mobile commerce: features like embedded payments, one-click checkout via messaging apps, or app-free transactions are not novelties – they are necessities driven by constraints around bandwidth, infrastructure, and financial inclusion. Yet these same constraints are producing solutions that may become best practices globally.

Similarly, platform design in these regions often centers on immediacy, low data consumption, and local integration. Global teams should be asking: What can we learn from the success of super apps in Southeast Asia? From the rise of voice notes and vernacular language content in India? From trust mechanics built into informal commerce networks across West Africa? These are not fringe behaviors – they are indicators of where global user expectations are headed.

The ability to operate in these ecosystems requires more than translation. It demands cultural intelligence, operational flexibility, and a long-term mindset. Localization must move beyond interface tweaks to encompass everything from payment methods and logistics to influencer partnerships and community engagement. A product launch is no longer the finish line; it’s the beginning of a multi-year trust-building process.

This shift calls for investment – not just in marketing – but in on-the-ground research, in building local teams with decision-making power, and in systems that can adapt quickly to feedback loops. The brands that will thrive are those that listen early, prototype fast, and refine continuously. That’s not reactive – it’s resilient.

The next billion are not waiting to be discovered. They are already online, already informed, already choosing. But they are choosing carefully. Their loyalty isn’t earned by reputation – it’s earned by repetition: consistent delivery, relevance, and respect over time.

What we’re seeing isn’t a short-term trend – it’s a structural redefinition of what global success looks like. And in this new equation, the old formulas – centralized control, broad generalizations, and push marketing – no longer hold. The competitive edge will belong to those who approach these markets not as territories to conquer, but as partners in evolution.

Because when consumers are multilingual, mobile-first, and mistrustful by design, brand engagement becomes a privilege – not a right. The challenge is not whether companies can reach them. It’s whether they can rise to meet them.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Boycotts can upend entire markets overnight. In 2019, a diplomatic dispute between South Korea and Japan turned into a full-scale consumer revolt. Sales of Japanese beer in South Korea plummeted by 92%, and Uniqlo shuttered multiple stores as South Korean consumers rejected Japanese brands en masse. What began as a trade conflict quickly became an economic weapon wielded by consumers.

Boycotts are no longer just reactions to political events—they have become economic power plays. Global brands increasingly find themselves at the center of cultural, political, and trade conflicts. Starbucks faced backlash from both conservatives and progressives over its unionization stance, while Disney’s opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill sparked boycotts from both LGBTQ+ supporters and conservative groups. In today’s market, even neutrality is a decision with consequences.

Brands have become battlegrounds for political, social, and economic conflicts. Silence is no longer a shield. When French President Emmanuel Macron defended the right to publish caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in 2020, French businesses bore the consequences. Middle Eastern supermarkets pulled French products, and #BoycottFrenchProducts trended across social media. Carrefour scrambled to issue damage control statements. Even companies with no direct political involvement can be caught in ideological crossfire.

Managing consumer activism is no longer optional. Today’s boycotts can move markets and shake billion-dollar companies. In an era where brand loyalty is tied to political and social beliefs, companies caught in the crossfire risk more than just lost sales—trust, once broken, is far harder to rebuild.

Boycotts don’t just make headlines—they leave financial wreckage. In 2012, a territorial dispute between China and Japan ignited a mass boycott, sending Toyota’s sales in China tumbling 44% in a single month. The backlash erased years of market gains, forcing Toyota and Honda into a costly recovery battle.

Even dominant brands can feel the sting of consumer backlash. During the U.S.-China trade war, nationalist sentiment fueled a #BoycottApple campaign, pushing many Chinese consumers toward Huawei. Apple maintained its global standing, but its sales took a hit—proof that even industry giants aren’t immune to geopolitics.

Some boycotts reshape markets permanently. In 2019, a South Korea-Japan dispute led consumers to abandon Japanese beer, cosmetics, and cars—habits that didn’t revert even after tensions cooled. Similarly, a 2006 boycott of Danish products in the Middle East, triggered by controversial cartoons, wiped out $70 million in sales for dairy giant Arla Foods. Even years later, some retailers never restocked Danish brands.

Not all boycotts leave scars. Starbucks has repeatedly faced backlash over labor policies and political stances, yet its dominance remains unshaken. The reason? A fiercely loyal customer base and a brand identity strong enough to weather short-term activism. The difference between a fleeting boycott and lasting damage often comes down to one factor: how replaceable the brand is. Companies with distinct identities bounce back. Those that hesitate, or fail to differentiate, may never recover.

Why Some Boycotts Fade While Others Leave Lasting Damage

For over 40 years, Nestlé has faced recurring boycotts over its infant formula marketing in developing countries. Despite its global dominance, consumer advocacy groups have kept the controversy alive, cementing Nestlé’s reputation as a corporate villain for many.

The oil industry faces a similar challenge. Shell and BP have endured decades of boycotts over environmental concerns. While these campaigns haven’t triggered financial collapse, they’ve permanently tarnished brand perception—especially among younger, climate-conscious consumers.

The real risk isn’t a single high-profile boycott—it’s the slow erosion of trust from repeated controversies. Over time, consumer activism can turn a brand name into shorthand for corporate misconduct, making reputation recovery an uphill battle. A boycott is more than a PR crisis; it’s a moment of truth. Brands can either reinforce loyalty or lose trust from all sides.

Some brands emerge stronger by standing their ground. Patagonia, for example, has made environmental activism central to its identity—even suing the Trump administration over national park protections. Rather than triggering backlash, the move galvanized its core customers.

Not all brands navigate boycotts successfully. When Carrefour’s Middle Eastern stores suffered backlash during the Macron controversy, the company tried to distance itself—but this only bred confusion and distrust. Silence can be as risky as speaking out. Consumers expect companies to take a stance, but a miscalculated move can alienate as many as it attracts. The real challenge isn’t whether to engage, but how to do so without escalating the crisis.

Avoiding controversy doesn’t mean avoiding backlash. In 2022, Disney’s attempt to stay neutral on Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill backfired spectacularly. Employees and LGBTQ+ activists pressured the company to take a stance, while conservatives retaliated once it did. Florida lawmakers stripped Disney of key tax privileges, leaving it alienated from both sides. A 2023 Harris Poll found that 82% of consumers expect brands to take a stand on social issues—yet 60% say they will stop buying if they disagree with the stance. The lesson? Taking a position can build loyalty with one group while permanently alienating another.

The risk isn’t just political—it’s about perception. Brands that fail to define their values risk having their identity shaped by the loudest voices. In today’s landscape, silence isn’t neutral—it’s a statement.

Navigating a boycott isn’t just about damage control—it’s about leadership. The brands that survive aren’t the ones scrambling to react, but those that take control of the narrative. When a boycott gains traction, the worst mistake a company can make is letting others define its response. A clear, well-structured message—consistent across all platforms—determines whether a brand weathers the storm or gets swallowed by it.

The financial hit of a boycott is often inevitable, but well-prepared brands see beyond the short term. Companies that anticipate consumer activism have contingency plans—shifting market focus, reinforcing ties with loyal customers, and ensuring financial resilience in the face of backlash.

A boycott can erupt in minutes, leaving companies no time to craft a careful response. In today’s hyper-connected world, silence is often seen as complicity, while a poorly handled statement can make things worse. The brands that survive aren’t those that avoid controversy—they’re the ones prepared for it.

The difference between a temporary backlash and a full-blown reputational crisis often comes down to preparation. The brands that weather boycotts aren’t scrambling in the heat of the moment—they have a crisis playbook ready long before trouble starts.

At the heart of any crisis playbook is a clear decision-making framework: Who makes the call on how to respond—the CEO, the communications team, or a crisis committee? Without a defined chain of command, brands risk internal chaos, mixed messaging, and costly missteps.

Just as critical is message control. In the social media age, companies no longer have the luxury of waiting days—or even hours—to respond. A delay means losing control of the narrative. The most prepared brands have adaptable, pre-drafted messaging ready to deploy, ensuring their first response is measured rather than reactionary.

Not all boycotts require engagement. The strongest brands assess the market impact first—does the backlash threaten core revenue streams, or is it mostly symbolic? Overcorrecting in response to a boycott from non-customers can backfire, alienating loyal buyers—a mistake that has cost brands billions.

Boycotts don’t just test a brand’s values—they reveal whether a company was ever prepared to defend them. The biggest failures aren’t necessarily from taking the wrong stance, but from appearing unprepared, inconsistent, or defensive. A boycott forces brands to make a critical decision: should they engage directly or let the controversy fade? The wrong choice can amplify the backlash, while the right move can reshape public perception.

Some boycotts are short-lived outrage cycles, driven by social media but lacking real economic impact. Rushing to respond can sometimes prolong the controversy rather than defuse it. Smart brands know when to let public sentiment run its course. But silence isn’t always an option. When a controversy gains enough traction, failing to engage can cause lasting damage. In those cases, brands must take control of the narrative before it’s shaped for them.

When two Black men were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks in 2018, the backlash was immediate. Instead of retreating, Starbucks’ CEO issued a direct apology, shut down 8,000 stores for racial bias training, and met with community leaders. By acting quickly, the company prevented long-term brand damage and reinforced its identity as a socially conscious brand.

The High Cost of Getting It Wrong

Contrast this with United Airlines’ 2017 fiasco, when a passenger was violently dragged off a plane. The airline’s initial response—a cold, legalistic defense of policy—only inflamed public outrage. Only after intense backlash did the CEO shift to an apologetic stance, but by then, the damage was done. The lesson? A delayed or tone-deaf response can make a crisis exponentially worse.

Knowing when to engage and when to stay silent isn’t about avoiding controversy—it’s about controlling the story. The strongest brands don’t just react to boycotts; they strategically decide whether to own the moment or let it pass. Brands overly dependent on a single geographic or ideological customer base are more fragile. Companies that diversify—whether through global expansion or appealing to multiple demographics—are far more resilient.

During the 2020 Middle Eastern boycott of French brands, Carrefour and Danone lost significant business over President Macron’s remarks. But both companies quickly refocused on growing consumer bases in Africa and Asia, stabilizing their bottom line. Similarly, global tech brands facing boycotts in China have expanded into India and Southeast Asia to offset losses. Instead of engaging directly in controversy, they pivot their business strategy toward emerging markets, reducing long-term financial exposure.

Consumers today can spot corporate insincerity from a mile away. When brands respond to controversy with empty gestures rather than meaningful action, they risk deepening public distrust rather than repairing it.

Pepsi learned this the hard way in 2017 with its now-infamous ad featuring Kendall Jenner handing a can of Pepsi to a police officer during a protest. Instead of making a genuine statement, the ad came off as exploitative—a hollow attempt to co-opt social justice for marketing. The backlash was immediate. Pepsi pulled the ad within 24 hours, but the damage was already done.

H&M faced a different kind of fallout in 2021 when it tried to navigate allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang, China. The company issued a carefully worded—but vague—statement distancing itself from the controversy. Instead of appeasing consumers, the move backfired: Chinese authorities removed H&M from online platforms entirely. The half-measure pleased no one and led to real financial losses.

Consumers today can spot empty gestures. If a brand takes a stand, it needs to mean it—half-measures and corporate platitudes only make things worse. Brands that emerge from boycotts with their reputations intact are those that meet controversy head-on—with clarity, honesty, and decisive action. Attempts to placate all sides or hide behind corporate jargon only fuel further backlash.

When McDonald’s exited Russia in 2022 following the Ukraine invasion, it didn’t just issue a press release—it explained, in plain terms, the ethical and economic rationale behind its decision. By offering transparency instead of vague corporate messaging, it reinforced its credibility as a company willing to take a stand rather than simply responding to pressure.

Patagonia’s 2022 decision to transfer ownership to an environmental nonprofit wasn’t a publicity stunt—it was a long-planned move. By embedding activism into its business model, Patagonia proved that brand values can be more than just marketing.

Brands that rely on damage control instead of transparency often make things worse. Half-hearted statements, vague acknowledgments, or empty pledges do little to rebuild trust. Consumers today don’t just expect brands to take a stand—they expect them to back it up with real action.

Boycotts aren’t rare disruptions anymore—they’re part of doing business in a politicized world. The brands that navigate them best don’t avoid controversy; they prepare for it, understand their audience, and act with conviction when it matters. Some brands survive by doubling down on their values and reinforcing ties with their core customers. Others try to appease everyone and end up alienating all sides. The difference isn’t the controversy itself—it’s how well a brand understands its identity and whether it has the courage to stand by it.

Consumer activism isn’t an occasional disruption anymore—it’s a permanent force in the global marketplace. Modern boycotts are faster, more coordinated, and more politically charged than ever. For brands, this signals a fundamental shift: accountability isn’t optional, and neutrality is an illusion.

Why Boycotts Are Becoming More Frequent

Several forces have converged to make consumer boycotts more widespread—and more impactful—than ever before.

The Acceleration of Social Media
What once took months of grassroots organizing now happens in minutes. A single viral post can mobilize millions, turning hashtags like #BoycottApple and #DeleteUber into economic flashpoints overnight. The sheer speed of digital outrage leaves companies scrambling to control the narrative before it spirals.

The Rise of Economic Nationalism
Boycotts are no longer just ideological protests—they’ve become geopolitical weapons. Trade disputes between the U.S., China, Japan, and South Korea have fueled consumer-driven economic retaliation, proving that governments are no longer the sole enforcers of economic policy.

Shifting Consumer Expectations
Millennials and Gen Z expect companies to align with their values—not just sell products. According to a 2023 Harris Poll, 71% of Gen Z consumers say they would stop buying from a company that does not reflect their beliefs. Corporate reputation is no longer just about products—it’s about leadership, ethics, and action.

A New Risk: Backlash from Both Sides

Boycotts today aren’t just about what a company does—they’re about how different ideological groups interpret its actions. The result? Backlash from both sides.

Disney (2022-Present) – After opposing Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill, Disney became a target for both progressive activists (demanding stronger action) and conservatives (accusing it of corporate activism). The result? Sustained boycotts from competing sides.
Bud Light (2023) – The brand’s handling of its partnership with Dylan Mulvaney alienated both conservatives (who boycotted over the campaign itself) and progressives (who boycotted after Bud Light failed to stand by its decision). The result? A record sales decline and a leadership shake-up.
Target (2023-Present) – After backlash over its Pride Month merchandise, Target scaled back displays in conservative regions—only to face boycotts from both the right (for supporting LGBTQ+ issues) and the left (for failing to stand firm).

The Increasing Polarization of Boycotts

Consumer boycotts have long been a form of economic resistance, but today they are something more—a permanent force reshaping how brands interact with the public. They are faster, more politically charged, and more frequent than ever. Companies aren’t just selling products anymore; they are expected to serve as political, cultural, and ethical entities. This shift demands a new kind of leadership—one that treats consumer activism as a reality to be managed, not just a crisis to be feared.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Wearables aren’t fringe anymore. Once seen as fitness accessories for gym-goers and early adopters, smartwatches and health trackers are becoming everyday essentials. In the first quarter of 2024 alone, global shipments of wearable devices hit 113 million units – an almost 9% jump compared to the year before. And that’s despite persistent inflation and consumer pullback across key markets.

What’s shifting? People are treating these devices less like gadgets and more like tools for managing stress, sleep, and overall health. Consumers are using them to take control – sometimes even before they know something’s wrong. And tech companies are keeping pace, building in more sophisticated health features, wrapping them in sleek design, and expanding their reach far beyond Silicon Valley.

China, for example, led the world in wrist-worn device shipments through most of 2024, with almost 46 million units sold in just the first three quarters. Japan’s older population is increasingly using wearables to monitor vitals and stay independent longer. In the US and UK, mainstream use is now less about steps and more about holistic wellness. Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia and India, lower-cost models are making wearables accessible to first-time buyers – especially younger users who want health data but don’t need an Apple logo to get it.

This rise isn’t just about health – it’s about habits. The adoption curve shows that consumers are steadily folding digital health tracking into their everyday routines, reshaping not only how we think about wellness but also how we’ll live and age in the years ahead.

From step counters to personal health assistants

The evolution of wearables mirrors a larger shift in how we define health. A decade ago, a fitness tracker was mostly just that – a tool for counting steps or logging runs. Now, it’s a wrist-worn health hub, checking heart rhythms, analyzing sleep, detecting stress, and even alerting users to abnormal vitals before symptoms appear.

This transformation hasn’t just changed the product – it’s reshaped the market. What started with athletes and early tech adopters has now spread across age groups and income levels. Smartwatches are on the wrists of office workers in Singapore, older adults in Tokyo, commuters in London, and Gen Z students in Delhi. And the demand isn’t slowing.

Global sales of wearables reached over $84 billion in 2024, with projections putting the market on track to more than double by 2030. That growth is being powered by consumers in Asia, where China continues to dominate volume thanks to homegrown brands, and where India and Southeast Asia are seeing rising uptake of budget-friendly devices. In Japan, demand is strongest among an aging population who are using wearables for peace of mind – keeping tabs on heart rate, sleep, and medication reminders.

The US and UK still lead when it comes to higher-end models and paid health tracking subscriptions. But what’s consistent across regions is the shift from passive to active wellness. As one analyst at Canalys put it recently, “We’re watching wearables move from fitness to full-spectrum lifestyle tech.”

And while device makers keep layering in new features – temperature sensing, stress tracking, blood oxygen levels – it’s the behavior behind the screen that matters most. Consumers aren’t just buying wearables; they’re changing how they relate to their own health. What’s changing fastest isn’t the tech – it’s how people are folding it into their everyday decisions.

Consumer Adoption Across Generations and Borders

Younger consumers may be driving volume, but wearables are winning over every generation – for very different reasons.

Among Gen Z and millennials, wearables are lifestyle enhancers. Sleep tracking, stress insights, and gamified fitness goals are baked into daily routines, often synced to social media. According to a 2024 YouGov poll in the US and UK, nearly 60% of millennials who own a wearable use it at least five days a week, while Gen Z’s interest is climbing fastest, especially in India, Indonesia, and the Philippines where affordable models are surging.

For younger users, it’s not just fitness. Wearables help manage anxiety, track menstrual cycles, and even gauge productivity. In Southeast Asia, TikTok influencers regularly promote smartwatch brands with built-in wellness challenges, and the appeal is sticking.

By contrast, Gen X and boomers tend to use wearables with a more clinical lens. In Japan, uptake among older adults rose sharply in the past two years, driven by growing interest in managing hypertension, irregular heart rhythms, and fall risk. Apple’s expanded medical alerts and ECG functions are frequently cited by Japanese media as valuable features for aging consumers. In the UK, NHS-backed pilot programs are offering wearables to older patients recovering from surgery or managing long-term conditions.

In the US, over 40% of Gen Xers who own a wearable say they’ve shared data with a healthcare provider, up from just 27% in 2021. But privacy concerns linger, especially among Gen Z. Despite their high usage, only 26% of Gen Z respondents to a 2024 eMarketer study said they would be comfortable sharing health data with doctors or insurers – suggesting a growing tension between usage and trust.

Here’s how adoption looks across some of the key markets:

Country/Region	Top Adopting Cohorts	Primary Use Cases	Notable Trends
US	Millennials, Gen X	Sleep, stress, fitness, medical alerts	High usage of subscription models like Fitbit Premium
UK	Millennials, Boomers	Heart monitoring, post-surgery recovery	NHS pilot programs integrating wearable tech
Japan	Boomers	Heart rate, fall detection, medication	Growing adoption in eldercare and wellness insurance schemes
India	Gen Z, Millennials	Step counting, calorie burn, wellness apps	High growth in low-cost smartwatch brands
Indonesia	Gen Z	Fitness tracking, daily health challenges	Influencer marketing fueling adoption
China	All age groups	Everything from fitness to medical alerts	Domestic brands dominate; strong public sector partnerships
Singapore	Millennials, Gen X	Health monitoring, workplace wellness	Wearables integrated into corporate wellness programs
Germany	Boomers, Gen X	Blood pressure, diabetes management	Insurance discounts tied to wearable usage

The generations aren’t divided – they’re stacked. What started with Gen Z is now reshaping how everyone manages health. And the industry knows it.

The Technology Arms Race

The more wearables become part of daily life, the harder tech companies are pushing to stay ahead. And they’re not just making devices faster or sleeker – they’re turning them into medical-grade tools, payment platforms, and personal wellbeing dashboards, all in one.

What started as a step-counting competition is now a full-blown innovation sprint. Apple’s latest Watch models detect arrhythmias and track ovulation patterns through temperature fluctuations. Samsung has layered in blood pressure monitoring and sleep scoring tied to cardiovascular insights. Google-backed Fitbit has pivoted from steps to stress, with its newer models using electrodermal activity sensors to gauge emotional strain in real time.

And it’s not just the big brands. In Japan, wearable developers are exploring integration with long-term care plans, while Singapore’s public health teams have trialed government-backed trackers to incentivize exercise and preventive check-ups. In India and Indonesia, homegrown brands like Noise and Realme are keeping up by offering entry-level smartwatches with features that mirror high-end models – heart rate variability, SpO₂ monitoring, and meditation modes – at a fraction of the cost.

The market is clearly rewarding innovation. Smart rings, once a fringe category, are now booming. Oura has become shorthand for wellness among executives and athletes, while Samsung’s anticipated launch of its Galaxy Ring is already stirring up the category. Analysts at Canalys expect the global smart ring segment to triple by 2026, with Asia leading the growth.

Sensors are getting better, but software is where the race is heating up. The shift toward AI-enabled personalization means devices are starting to behave less like monitors and more like coaches – detecting patterns, learning user behavior, and nudging people to take breaks, breathe deeply, or move more. Apple’s upcoming software update includes passive tracking of mental well-being, aiming to surface early indicators of depression and anxiety based on behavioral signals.

This arms race is no longer about having the best display or longest battery. It’s about owning the feedback loop: gathering data, interpreting it meaningfully, and turning that insight into habit-changing nudges. And with more users willing to share health data – whether for clinical support or lifestyle optimization – tech brands are rapidly becoming key players in the future of healthcare.

The Economics of Adoption in a Soft Economy

The flood of innovation might be grabbing headlines, but it’s the economics of wearables that’s driving their expansion into the mainstream – especially as consumers grow more cost-conscious.

Subscription models are a major pivot point. Fitbit Premium, Whoop, and Apple’s Fitness+ aren’t just upsells – they’re positioning wearables as part of a recurring wellness lifestyle. Fitbit Premium alone now has over 10 million paid users globally, according to Alphabet’s 2024 earnings report. Whoop, which has no upfront device cost and instead charges a monthly fee, has doubled its subscriber base since 2022, banking on athletes and executives willing to pay for deeper recovery and strain insights.

Yet in many markets, recurring costs are a harder sell. That’s where public and private incentives are stepping in. Singapore’s government-led LumiHealth program – developed with Apple – offers financial rewards for completing activity challenges and tracking sleep. In Germany, health insurers like TK and Barmer provide partial reimbursements for certified fitness wearables when used as part of preventive care. These programs aren’t about gadgets – they’re about reducing long-term healthcare costs.

Affordability is also being tackled at the hardware level. In India, for example, wearable brands like Noise and boAt have carved out a dominant position by offering smartwatches with fitness and health tracking features for under ₹2,500 ($30). These devices may lack the polish of premium models, but they’ve dramatically widened access, especially among younger consumers in urban areas. The result? India is now one of the fastest-growing wearables markets in the world, with domestic brands accounting for nearly 75% of total shipments in 2024.

In the US and UK, cost still matters. Refurbished models, bundle deals, and corporate wellness perks are helping buyers justify their spending. Entry prices are falling, but expectations are climbing. People want value – not just on the sticker but in the insights, the ecosystem, and the staying power of the device.

Wearables as Part of the Health Ecosystem

As wearable technology becomes more sophisticated, its integration into the broader health ecosystem is deepening, transforming patient care and preventive health strategies. Today’s devices don’t just count steps – they stream health data to doctors, flag risks in real time, and plug directly into telehealth platforms.

Seamless Integration with Healthcare Systems

In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) has initiated pilot programs to incorporate wearable devices into patient care. These programs focus on remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions, allowing healthcare professionals to track vital signs and detect early signs of deterioration without requiring patients to visit healthcare facilities. This approach not only improves patient outcomes but also alleviates the burden on healthcare resources.

Similarly, in Japan, addressing the needs of an aging population has led to innovative uses of wearable technology. Companies like Tellus You Care have developed non-contact remote monitoring systems that track the health and safety of elderly individuals. These wearables can detect falls and monitor daily activities, enabling caregivers and medical professionals to respond promptly to emergencies.

Enhancing Telehealth Services

In the United States, the synergy between wearable devices and telehealth applications is revolutionizing patient care. Wearables can sync with telehealth platforms, providing clinicians with continuous health data streams. This integration allows for more accurate assessments during virtual consultations and facilitates proactive management of conditions such as hypertension and diabetes. For instance, patients using wearable blood pressure monitors can transmit their readings directly to their electronic health records, enabling healthcare providers to adjust treatments in real-time.

Addressing Data Privacy and Reliability Concerns

Still, the deeper wearables penetrate healthcare, the more they raise questions – especially around privacy. These devices collect a steady stream of highly personal health data, and not everyone knows where that information ends up. Breaches are rare, but when they happen, the fallout is big. Surveys show many users remain unclear about how their data is handled, which puts pressure on tech companies and healthcare providers to be far more transparent.

There’s also the question of how reliable the data really is. Wearables offer useful health snapshots, but they’re not always accurate enough to replace clinical tools. If users or doctors lean too heavily on that information, it can lead to wrong calls – or unnecessary stress. That’s why most healthcare providers treat wearable data as one piece of the puzzle, not the whole picture.

How Singapore Turned Wearables into a Public Health Tool

Image credit: LumiHealth

Singapore may be small in size, but it’s been outsized in ambition when it comes to health tech. In 2020, the government launched LumiHealth, a joint initiative with Apple that turns the Apple Watch into a national wellness tool. The idea was simple: incentivize citizens to stay healthy by gamifying fitness and preventive behaviors.

Participants download an app, pair it with an Apple Watch, and earn vouchers by completing health goals like walking, meditating, or getting flu shots. The rewards are modest – up to S$380 over two years – but the behavioral nudge is powerful. More than 200,000 residents signed up in the program’s first year, with high retention and engagement among older adults and those managing chronic conditions.

What makes LumiHealth notable isn’t just its use of wearable tech, but how it reframes wellness as a shared responsibility between citizen, government, and platform. It’s one of the first large-scale examples of a nation leveraging consumer-grade devices for population health – and a blueprint for how data, design, and nudges can shift real-world behavior.

The program has also informed broader policy. Health officials now see wearables as part of Singapore’s preventive care strategy. In 2024, pilot extensions were announced to include nutrition tracking and mental wellbeing prompts – making the Watch not just a step counter, but a guide for daily living.

From Devices to Digital Selfhood

As wearables sync more deeply with our health, they’re also syncing with something else: identity.

Fitness trackers and smartwatches are no longer just tools – they’ve become quiet status symbols, wellness affirmations, and, in some cases, lifestyle declarations. Wearing a Whoop band or an Oura ring signals a commitment to optimization. A Garmin on the wrist might suggest serious training. Even design choices – stainless steel finishes, leather straps, minimalist rings – convey intention. The wearable, in short, has become part of the personal brand.

This isn’t accidental. Tech companies are leaning into the rise of the quantified self: a movement that treats data as a mirror for self-improvement. Sleep scores are shared in group chats. Heart rate variability is discussed on Reddit threads. There’s even a social layer – Apple’s fitness rings can be closed collaboratively, while Fitbit allows real-time challenges with friends. What began as private tracking is now an interactive, sometimes performative, pursuit.

That said, cultural context shapes how wearables are used – and what they mean.

Region	Attitude Toward Wearables	Underlying Values
US & UK	Individualised health and performance tools	Self-optimisation, control, productivity
Japan	Monitors for long-term care and group wellbeing	Safety, longevity, family responsibility
India	Lifestyle enhancers for youth and urbanites	Aspirational health, affordability, digital status
Singapore	Incentivised national wellness participation	Community health, public-private collaboration
China	Everyday convenience tools across all ages	Functional utility, tech-forward lifestyle

In the West, wearable data is often framed in terms of productivity – how to sleep better, train harder, or manage stress. In much of Asia, especially in countries like Japan and Singapore, adoption has leaned more toward collective well-being: tracking to stay safe, support aging populations, or meet national health goals. While the hardware might be the same, the intention behind it can be radically different.

That’s the shift: wearables aren’t just keeping score anymore. They’re helping shape identity – quiet signals of the kind of life we’re trying to live.

The Future Forecast: Smart Living 2030

If the last decade was about wearables gaining acceptance, the next will be about wearables becoming invisible – fully embedded in our surroundings, our health systems, and our daily decision-making. By 2030, the line between body and technology will blur further, not through flashy upgrades, but through quiet, continuous presence.

One of the most anticipated frontiers is continuous, noninvasive blood glucose monitoring, widely viewed as the “holy grail” of wearables. Major tech players, including Apple and Samsung, have been investing heavily in research to bring this functionality to market. Success here wouldn’t just serve diabetics – it would recalibrate how millions think about food, energy, and performance in real time.

Another inflection point will be emotional health. Devices are beginning to detect mood states based on physical cues – micro-fluctuations in skin temperature, heart rate variability, or voice tone. In the next few years, we may see wearables that can flag the early signs of anxiety, burnout, or depressive episodes before the user is even aware. The implications for preventative mental health are enormous – but so are the ethical questions.

Artificial intelligence will be the connective tissue that binds these advances together. Already, AI is being used to turn raw data into feedback loops, coaching users to adjust behaviors. But by 2030, it’s likely that wearables will be part of more coordinated, multi-device ecosystems – syncing not just with phones and watches but also with smart homes, personal health dashboards, and even city infrastructure.

It’s a shift adjacent industries are already watching closely. Insurers are piloting risk models based on real-time biometric data. Pharma firms are testing wearable-driven trial designs and adherence tools. And in some cities, planners are exploring responsive environments – public spaces that adjust to physiological signals, from light and sound to air quality.

What’s next for wearables won’t be defined by tech specs – but by what people do with the data, and who they’re willing to share it with. Smart living by 2030 may not look like sci-fi. It may just look… seamless.

A Tipping Point for Personal Health

We’ve passed the point where wearables are optional tech accessories. They’ve moved into the domain of lifestyle infrastructure – tools people rely on not just for information, but for insight, motivation, and increasingly, autonomy.

When Apple’s COO Jeff Williams stood on stage at CES and said, “We’re not just building a watch – we’re building a guardian for your wellbeing,” it wasn’t marketing hype. It was a quiet signal of where the industry sees its role going: less device, more guide.

And yet, as wearables grow smarter, more embedded, and more predictive, we’re entering a new kind of contract with our devices – one where personal health is constantly measured, interpreted, and nudged. The convenience is undeniable. The value is rising. But so is the question: who controls the loop?

Will the decade ahead empower us to become more informed, more proactive, and more in tune with our health? Or will we find ourselves outsourcing our instincts to a wristband?

It’s a future being shaped now, one wrist at a time.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Even as consumers trim expenses in travel, fashion, and dining out, there’s one area where spending continues to climb: their pets.

The global pet care market is now worth over $324 billion, with projections putting it close to $600 billion by 2033. In the United States alone, Americans are expected to spend more than $150 billion on their pets this year – up from $136 billion just two years ago. That’s roughly $1,700 per pet-owning household.

What’s driving the boom isn’t just more pets – it’s more premium care. Owners are trading up to organic diets, breed-specific supplements, and wearable health trackers. Subscriptions for virtual vet services and home delivery of fresh pet meals are becoming routine. Industry analysts say the trend reflects the growing “humanization” of pets, where wellness standards once reserved for people are now expected for animals, too.

Here at Kadence International, we’re seeing this shift play out across markets. Consumers might delay upgrading a phone or cut back on takeout, but they continue to invest in pet wellness – whether it’s probiotic chews, allergy relief supplements, or DNA testing kits. The behavior is less about indulgence and more about prioritizing quality of life for their animals.

The premiumization of pet care is quickly moving from niche to norm – redefining how pet owners allocate household budgets and how companies compete in one of the most resilient sectors of consumer spending.

Rising Demand in Emerging Markets Reshapes the Global Pet Economy

The pet care boom is no longer centered solely in the West. Markets once considered secondary – particularly across Asia and Latin America – are rapidly becoming the industry’s main growth engines, reshaping supply chains, product innovation, and competitive strategy.

China, long known for its production of pet goods, is now a consumption powerhouse. Urbanization, rising incomes, and a generational shift in attitudes toward pet ownership have driven the country’s pet economy past 270 billion yuan ($37 billion USD) in 2024, according to data from iiMedia Research. Functional pet foods, insurance services, and AI-enabled pet tech are flourishing in cities like Shanghai and Beijing, where single-person households and delayed family planning are accelerating the “pet as child” dynamic.

In Southeast Asia, pet ownership is rising fastest among millennials and Gen Z, particularly in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. Here at Kadence International, our fieldwork suggests that first-time pet owners in these markets are skipping entry-level products entirely – jumping straight into grain-free diets, subscription-based care boxes, and app-based training services. This leapfrogging effect mirrors what happened in fintech across emerging markets: consumers are building their relationship with brands in the premium tier from day one.

Meanwhile, in Brazil – the second-largest pet care market globally after the U.S. – veterinary services and pet health plans are expanding beyond affluent neighborhoods. Brazilian households spent an estimated $9 billion USD on pets in 2023, with wellness products now part of everyday grocery retail.

Even mature markets are shifting internally. In Japan and South Korea, birth rates are at historic lows, and a growing number of households treat pets not just as companions, but as emotional and psychological anchors. As a result, the types of products being purchased – from calming diffusers to mental stimulation toys – are changing the definition of core pet care categories.

This reshaping of the global pet economy isn’t just a redistribution of revenue; it’s altering the cultural context of pet ownership. The premium boom may have started in North America, but the future of pet wellness is being co-authored in Jakarta, São Paulo, Seoul, and beyond.

Premiumization in Pet Food and Supplements Redefines the Bowl

A decade ago, premium pet food meant a slightly higher protein count or a label with fewer artificial additives. Today, it means bioavailable nutrients, functional botanicals, customized formulations, and health claims that would feel at home in a human wellness catalogue.

The line between nutrition and therapy is blurring – and the market is responding. In 2023, sales of premium pet food grew at nearly double the rate of standard pet food globally, according to Euromonitor International. Functional claims – supporting gut health, mobility, immune strength, or anxiety reduction – have moved from the margins to the center of packaging in the U.S., UK, Japan, and South Korea. Shoppers are no longer choosing between brands; they’re choosing between outcomes.

Consumer behavior is shifting accordingly. Mintel reports that more than half of U.S. dog owners now actively seek out food with added health benefits, while one in three expect brands to personalize recommendations based on age, breed, or health status. In the UK, pet owners are increasingly mirroring their own dietary ethics, gravitating toward organic and even plant-based options. In Japan, aging pets are driving demand for easier-to-digest meals and portion-controlled packaging that reflects a pharmaceutical precision.

Supplements have quietly become one of the fastest-growing segments in the category. Once the preserve of niche online retailers, they are now a fixture in big-box pet stores and veterinary clinics. Calming chews, joint support powders, and probiotic drops are increasingly purchased not in response to a diagnosis, but as part of a preventive care routine. Subscription models are flourishing in this space – not for convenience alone, but because owners want continuity in their pets’ health regimen.

What’s emerging is a recalibration of value: not measured by bulk or brand familiarity, but by purpose. The pet food aisle is no longer just a product display – it’s a wellness portfolio, curated by consumers who increasingly expect the same standard of care for their pets that they do for themselves.

The App Will See You Now

Veterinary care is no longer confined to the clinic. A growing share of pet owners are now managing health check-ins, nutrition planning, and behavioral advice through digital platforms – often without ever leaving home. In many markets, this is less a futuristic leap and more a pragmatic pivot, driven by convenience, cost concerns, and a shortage of veterinarians.

The surge in telehealth for pets began during the pandemic, but it has since evolved into a new tier of service. Platforms like Pawp, Fuzzy, and Joii offer 24/7 vet consultations, monthly wellness plans, and AI-supported symptom triage. These aren’t replacing traditional care entirely, but they are reshaping the front line – handling minor concerns, triaging emergencies, and maintaining continuity between physical visits.

In the United States, pet telemedicine visits increased more than 300% between 2020 and 2023, according to data from the American Veterinary Medical Association. In the UK, the British Veterinary Association reported that one in five pet owners had used digital vet services in the past year. And in Southeast Asia, where access to veterinary professionals remains limited in many regions, digital care is emerging not just as an option but as infrastructure.

Tied closely to this trend is the rise of subscription-based wellness. What began with monthly deliveries of flea and tick medication has grown into a service model that includes customized food plans, behavioral coaching, supplements, and diagnostics – often bundled through a single platform or mobile app. Some services even offer annual blood testing with doorstep collection, designed to catch early signs of illness before symptoms surface.

The value proposition is as much about predictability as it is about health. For time-poor, urban pet owners – especially millennials and Gen Z – these services streamline routines and reduce the anxiety of not knowing when or how to act. They also lock in brand loyalty in a category where switching costs are otherwise low.

What makes this shift notable isn’t just the tech adoption – it’s the reframing of pet care as a continuous service, rather than an episodic, event-based expense. As competition grows and platforms race to add value, the veterinary space may be next in line for the kind of disruption already seen in human primary care.

Brand Spotlight: Butternut Box

Image credit Butternut Box

Launched in the UK, Butternut Box has become one of Europe’s fastest-growing premium pet food brands by reimagining how pet meals are made, marketed, and delivered. What began as a small direct-to-consumer startup offering fresh, human-grade dog food has evolved into a major player in the pet wellness space, known for its personalized subscription model and health-first messaging.

Every meal is pre-portioned, vet-approved, and tailored to the pet’s dietary needs – whether age, breed, or health condition. As demand for functional nutrition surged, Butternut Box expanded its offering to include treats, supplements, and, most recently, fresh food for cats.

The company has seen rapid growth. Revenues jumped significantly in 2023, and subscriber numbers continue to climb as the brand expands into new markets across Europe. Recent acquisitions and infrastructure investments are helping it scale beyond the UK, with operations now live in Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Poland.

Much of the brand’s appeal lies in its ability to align with pet owner expectations – offering transparency, convenience, and clear health outcomes. Its packaging, product formulation, and tone of voice are all geared toward the modern, wellness-minded consumer who wants more than just “better kibble.” And with fresh food sales rising across the industry, Butternut Box is well-positioned to lead the charge.

As the definition of pet health evolves, Butternut Box exemplifies how brands can thrive by staying close to consumer values. Its growth underscores a larger shift: pet owners aren’t just buying food – they’re investing in long-term wellness. And they’re choosing brands that make that easy, measurable, and personalized.

The Psychology Behind the Spend

Rational budgeting has never fully explained pet ownership. But in a year where inflation has squeezed discretionary spending across sectors, the continued rise in pet wellness expenditure points to something deeper: emotional economics.

In the United States, 62% of pet owners say they are spending “the same or more” on their animals despite cutting back in other parts of their lives, according to a 2024 survey by Morgan Stanley. And it’s not just pet parents in affluent neighborhoods. In Brazil, where real incomes have fluctuated over the past two years, pet care remains one of the most resilient retail categories, particularly among single-person households and retirees.

What’s driving this behavior isn’t just brand marketing or a surge in new product availability – it’s a cultural shift in the perceived role of pets. In many homes, animals are no longer companions; they’re emotional extensions of the self. Pet care spending is often framed not as an expense, but as an expression of identity, responsibility, and affection. That makes it far less vulnerable to economic headwinds.

There’s also the matter of control. In periods of uncertainty, consumers tend to focus on the things they can manage. For pet owners, that increasingly means doubling down on wellness – purchasing products and services that promise safety, health, and longevity. In this way, premium pet care has become part of a broader coping strategy: a way to nurture stability in an unstable world.

Consumer researchers are watching this closely. “What we’re seeing is a shift from reactive to anticipatory spending,” said one behavioral analyst in a recent study published by Mintel. “It’s no longer just about solving a problem – it’s about preemptively protecting what matters most.”

The implication for brands is significant. Emotional drivers are shaping not just what consumers buy, but how they engage – with higher expectations around transparency, ethics, and personalization. It’s no longer sufficient to claim that a product is “good for pets.” Increasingly, it has to feel like the right decision for the person making it.

What Comes Next for Pet Wellness Brands

The shift in consumer behavior is now being mirrored in boardrooms and investment portfolios. Private equity firms, legacy conglomerates, and health tech startups are all converging on a singular conclusion: pet care is no longer a recession-proof niche – it’s a lifestyle category with global, cross-demographic appeal.

In the past 24 months, more than a dozen pet wellness platforms have closed Series A or B funding rounds in excess of $20 million. Unilever acquired a majority stake in pet supplement brand Nutrafol Pets. Mars, already dominant in veterinary services through its ownership of Banfield and VCA, is doubling down on diagnostics and AI tools through its Kinship division. Even players outside the category – like Nestlé and L Catterton – have quietly expanded their holdings in high-growth pet food startups.

This capital infusion is reshaping not just how pet products are developed, but how they’re delivered. Subscription platforms are building vertically integrated ecosystems. Diagnostics companies are exploring partnerships with tele-vet apps. Consumer goods firms are rethinking packaging, sustainability, and supply chains to appeal to increasingly values-driven buyers.

To make sense of the momentum, here’s a snapshot of key growth areas attracting attention:

Emerging Investment Hotspots in Pet Wellness

Category	Why It’s Growing	Notable Moves (2023–2024)
Functional Pet Food	Rising demand for therapeutic and preventative nutrition	Nestlé invests in JustFoodForDogs
Tele-Veterinary Services	Expanding access, convenience, and lower cost barriers	Fuzzy and Pawp secure $25M+ in funding rounds
Pet Supplements	Proactive health management among Gen Z and millennials	Nutrafol Pets launches in North America
Diagnostics & Health Tech	Early detection, personalization, and longevity trends	Mars launches pet DNA and microbiome services
Subscription-Based Models	Strong retention, DTC control, consumer preference	PetPlate, BarkBox expand internationally

The next wave of competition won’t be driven solely by who has the best product – but by who owns the end-to-end relationship with the pet owner. As wellness becomes the defining lens through which pet care is viewed, brands will need to operate more like healthcare providers than traditional retailers.

The opportunity is enormous, but so is the expectation. The bar has been raised – by consumers, by capital markets, and increasingly, by the animals themselves, whose needs are now tracked, monitored, and optimized in real time.

A Wellness Revolution Still in Its Infancy

If the past five years marked the emergence of premium pet care as a trend, the next five will define it as an expectation. The convergence of health, data, and digital delivery has already reshaped human wellness; now it’s doing the same for animals – at speed and scale.

What we’re seeing is a new phase of maturity in pet ownership globally. In emerging markets, where pet care was once utilitarian, consumers are leapfrogging into advanced wellness behaviors – driven by rising incomes, smaller households, and increased digital access. In mature markets, the shift is more psychological: pets are not just part of the family, they are central to it, prompting a level of intentionality in purchase decisions that echoes human healthcare.

This signals not just a market opportunity, but a transformation in mindset. We expect to see a rise in predictive care models powered by biometric monitoring, AI-driven nutrition plans, and services that adapt in real time to the pet’s lifecycle or environment. The role of the vet will likely evolve, too – becoming more consultative and tech-enabled, supported by home diagnostics and subscription wellness ecosystems.

And while consumer demand is shaping the future, it’s also setting new standards. Transparency, traceability, and ethical sourcing will become baseline requirements. Products that once stood out for being “premium” will be judged instead by how well they anticipate needs, reduce friction, and integrate into a seamless care experience.

This is no longer a pet product story – it’s a consumer behavior story, unfolding across borders, cultures, and categories. As the definition of wellness continues to evolve, so too will the expectations around how we care for the animals in our lives.

The brands that succeed won’t just sell to pet owners. They’ll understand them – intimately, culturally, and contextually. That’s where the future of the pet industry will be shaped.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Exchanging pre-owned goods has been a cornerstone of human commerce, from ancient bartering systems to modern marketplaces. The age-old practice has evolved into a booming global second-hand market, prompting brands to rethink their strategies as sustainability and value drive consumer choices.

Projections indicate the second-hand market will continue its upward trajectory, potentially reaching $350 billion by 2028.

Understanding the Second-Hand Market

The second-hand market, also known as the resale or pre-owned market, involves the buying and selling previously owned goods. This market spans many products, including clothing, electronics, furniture, and vehicles, offering consumers access to items at prices typically lower than new equivalents. The rise of digital platforms has significantly expanded this market, making it more accessible and organized.

Types of Second-Hand Marketplaces

The proliferation of these diverse platforms has not only made second-hand shopping more accessible but has also contributed to its growing acceptance and popularity among a broad spectrum of consumers.

Thrift Stores and Charity Shops are physical retail locations where donated goods are sold to support charitable causes. These stores offer a variety of items, from clothing to household goods, at affordable prices.
Consignment Shops are retailers that sell items on behalf of owners, providing them with a percentage of the sale price once the item is sold. This model is common for higher-end goods, such as designer clothing and accessories.
Online Marketplaces: Digital platforms where individuals and businesses can list and purchase pre-owned items. Examples include eBay, Poshmark, and Depop, which have become increasingly popular due to their convenience and extensive reach.
Specialized Second-Hand Platforms: Niche marketplaces focusing on specific product categories, such as electronics or luxury goods. For instance, Back Market specializes in refurbished electronics, providing consumers with vetted, high-quality used devices.

Drivers of the Second-Hand Market Surge

Several key factors propel the rapid expansion of the second-hand market:

Economic Considerations: Amidst global economic uncertainties and rising living costs, consumers increasingly seek cost-effective alternatives to new products. In the United States, the second-hand apparel market was valued at $43 billion in 2023, reflecting a 10.3% increase from the previous year.
This growth indicates a significant shift towards more affordable shopping options.
Sustainability and Environmental Impact: A heightened awareness of environmental issues has led consumers to adopt more sustainable consumption habits. Purchasing second-hand clothing reduces carbon emissions by an average of 25% compared to buying new items.
This eco-conscious mindset is particularly prevalent among younger generations, with 42% of global consumers aged 18 to 37 willing to purchase second-hand apparel as of 2021.
Digital Integration and Convenience: The proliferation of online resale platforms has revolutionized the accessibility and convenience of second-hand shopping. In 2023, online resale accounted for 46.5% of the U.S. second-hand market, amounting to $20 billion in sales.

Platforms such as ThredUp, Poshmark, and The RealReal have streamlined the process of buying and selling pre-owned items, attracting a diverse and tech-savvy consumer base.

These factors collectively contribute to the dynamic growth of the second-hand market, reshaping consumer behavior and retail strategies globally.

Strategic Implications for Brands

The surge in second-hand shopping presents both challenges and opportunities for brands. To navigate this evolving landscape, companies can consider the following strategies:

Integrate Resale into Business Models
- Branded Resale Platforms: Establishing in-house resale channels allows brands to maintain control over the customer experience and product authenticity. For instance, Patagonia’s “Worn Wear” program encourages customers to trade in used items for credit, promoting product longevity and sustainability.
  Partnerships with Resale Platforms: Collaborating with established resale marketplaces can expand a brand’s reach. Alexander McQueen’s partnership with Vestiaire Collective enables customers to sell pre-owned items back to the brand in exchange for store credit, fostering a circular economy.
Redefine the Value Proposition of New Products
- Emphasize Quality and Longevity: Highlighting the durability and timeless design of products can justify the investment in new items.
- Sustainable Practices: Adopting eco-friendly materials and ethical production methods can appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.
Enhance Customer Engagement
- Trade-In Incentives: Offering credits or discounts for returning used items can encourage repeat purchases and strengthen brand loyalty.
- Educational Campaigns: Informing consumers about the environmental benefits of purchasing new, sustainably produced items can influence buying decisions.

Global Perspectives: Eastern vs. Western Second-hand Goods Markets

The second-hand market’s expansion manifests differently across regions, influenced by cultural, economic, and technological factors. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for brands aiming to navigate and capitalize on the global resale economy.

Western Markets

In Western countries, the surge in second-hand shopping is primarily driven by sustainability concerns and economic considerations. Consumers are increasingly eco-conscious, seeking to reduce waste and carbon footprints by purchasing pre-owned goods. The proliferation of digital platforms like ThredUp, Depop, and Vinted has democratized access to second-hand items, making it convenient for consumers to buy and sell used goods. This shift is also influenced by a growing desire for unique, vintage pieces that allow for personal expression.

Asian Markets

In contrast, Asian markets exhibit unique dynamics in the second-hand sector:

Japan: The Japanese second-hand market has seen significant growth, with the domestic market for used goods nearly doubling 2010 to 2022.
This expansion is partly due to the popularity of flea market apps like Mercari, which have made buying and selling used items more accessible. Additionally, younger generations, referred to as “reuse natives,” are more inclined toward second-hand shopping, driven by economic factors and a cultural appreciation for high-quality, well-preserved goods. However, this trend has raised concerns about its impact on Japan’s GDP, as second-hand transactions do not contribute to producing new goods.
China and Korea: A comparative study of second-hand clothing consumption in China and Korea reveals that both countries have experienced growth in this sector, particularly among millennials and Gen Z. In China, platforms like “Xianyu” have become popular. Cultural factors, economic conditions, and technological advancements influence consumer behavior in these markets, with a notable shift from viewing second-hand shopping as a necessity for low-income households to a trendy, value-driven choice among younger consumers.

Implications for Brands

Brands must recognize and adapt to these regional nuances:

Tailored Strategies: Develop region-specific approaches considering local cultural attitudes toward second-hand goods. For instance, emphasizing product longevity and quality in Japan can resonate with consumers who value well-maintained items.
Platform Partnerships: Collaborate with popular local resale platforms to reach a broader audience. Understanding the preferred platforms in each region allows brands to effectively engage with consumers in those markets.
Cultural Sensitivity: Acknowledge and respect the cultural factors influencing second-hand shopping behaviors. Incorporating culturally relevant narratives can enhance brand authenticity and appeal.

By aligning strategies with regional characteristics, brands can effectively navigate the global second-hand market, fostering growth and consumer loyalty across diverse markets.

Generational Differences in Second-Hand Shopping

The surge in second-hand shopping is not uniform across all age groups. Understanding these variations is crucial for brands aiming to effectively engage diverse demographics.

Generation Z (Born 1997–2012)

Gen Z exhibits a strong inclination toward second-hand shopping, driven by both economic and environmental considerations:

Prevalence of Second-Hand Purchases: A significant 83% of Gen Z consumers have either purchased or are interested in purchasing second-hand apparel, surpassing the average for all age groups by 10.7%.
Economic Motivation: Approximately 64% of Gen Z individuals engage in second-hand shopping primarily to save money.
Sustainability Concerns: Environmental consciousness plays a pivotal role, with 36% of Gen Z consumers purchasing second-hand goods to reduce their ecological footprint.

Millennials (Born 1981–1996)

Millennials also demonstrate a robust engagement with the second-hand market, influenced by financial prudence and a desire for unique items:

Regular Participation: Approximately 29.7% of second-hand apparel shoppers in the U.S. are aged between 25 and 34, indicating active involvement in the resale market.
Financial Considerations: Economic factors are a significant driver, with many Millennials seeking value for money through second-hand purchases.
Unique Finds: Millennials’ pursuit of distinctive and vintage items motivates them to explore second-hand options, aligning with their preference for personalized and authentic products.

Generation X (Born 1965–1980) and Baby Boomers (Born 1946–1964)

While engagement is comparatively lower among older generations, there is a growing interest in second-hand shopping:

Participation Rates: Consumers aged 35 to 44 constitute 23.8% of second-hand apparel shoppers, while those aged 45 to 54 and 55 to 64 represent 16.6% and 11.8%, respectively.
Barriers to Adoption: Older consumers may face challenges such as perceptions of lower quality or concerns about the condition of second-hand goods, which can deter participation.

Implications for Brands

Recognizing these generational nuances enables brands to tailor strategies effectively:

Targeted Marketing: Crafting messages that resonate with each generation’s motivations such as emphasizing sustainability for Gen Z and value for money for Millennials can enhance engagement.
Diverse Platform Utilization: Leveraging platforms favored by different age groups, including social media channels for younger consumers and more traditional outlets for older demographics, ensures a broader reach.
Product Assortment and Quality Assurance: Offering a curated selection of high-quality second-hand items can address concerns about product condition, particularly among older consumers, fostering trust and encouraging participation.

By aligning strategies with each generational cohort’s distinct preferences and concerns, brands can effectively navigate the expanding second-hand market and cultivate a loyal, diverse customer base.

Case Study: thredUP’s Strategic Expansion in the Online Second-Hand Apparel Market

Image Credit: Dressember

Founded in 2009, thredUP has emerged as a leading online consignment and thrift store specializing in women’s and children’s apparel. The company’s innovative approach has significantly influenced the second-hand clothing industry, promoting sustainable fashion consumption.

Business Model and Growth

thredUP offers a user-friendly platform where individuals can buy and sell pre-owned clothing. Sellers send in their items using a “Clean Out Kit,” and thredUP manages the entire process, including quality inspection, photography, pricing, and listing. This managed marketplace model ensures a seamless experience for sellers and buyers, contributing to the company’s rapid growth. By 2021, thredUP had processed over 100 million unique second-hand items, underscoring its substantial impact on promoting circular fashion.

Technological Advancements

To support its expanding operations, thredUP has invested in technological infrastructure. In 2017, the company transitioned to Kubernetes for container orchestration, enhancing scalability and deployment efficiency. This shift reduced hardware costs by 56% and decreased deployment times by approximately 50%, enabling faster innovation and improved customer service.

Strategic Partnerships and Market Expansion

Recognizing the potential of the resale market, thredUP launched its “Resale-as-a-Service” (RaaS) program, partnering with major retailers like Gap and Walmart. This initiative allows brands to offer second-hand options to their customers, integrating sustainability into their business models and expanding thredUP’s reach. The RaaS program has positioned thredUP as a pivotal player in the broader retail ecosystem, facilitating the adoption of circular fashion practices.

Financial Milestones

thredUP’s innovative strategies have attracted significant investment, with over $130 million in venture capital raised by 2016. This financial backing has supported the company’s technological upgrades, market expansion, and strategic partnerships, solidifying its position as an online second-hand apparel market leader.

thredUP’s success exemplifies how embracing technology, fostering strategic partnerships, and promoting sustainability can drive growth in the second-hand apparel industry. As the market continues to evolve, thredUP’s model offers valuable insights for brands seeking to navigate and capitalize on the burgeoning resale economy.

Final Thoughts

The meteoric rise of the second-hand market is redefining the global retail landscape, driven by consumers’ increasing emphasis on sustainability, affordability, and unique product offerings. This shift is not merely a transient trend but a fundamental change in consumption patterns, compelling brands to reassess and adapt their strategies.

Embracing the resale economy offers brands many benefits, including access to new customer segments, enhanced brand loyalty, and contributions to environmental sustainability. The growing influence of Gen Z consumers, who prioritize ethical consumption and digital engagement, underscores the necessity for brands to innovate continually and align with these evolving values.

Brands that proactively incorporate second-hand offerings into their business models, emphasize product durability, and engage authentically with consumers are poised to thrive. The second-hand market is not just an alternative; it is becoming a cornerstone of modern retail strategy, reflecting a broader societal move toward conscious and circular consumption.

As the lines between new and pre-owned continue to blur, the imperative for brands is clear: adapt to the changing tides of consumer behavior or risk being left behind in a rapidly evolving marketplace.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Passive loyalty is a thing of the past. Consumers are no longer swayed by points that take years to accumulate or discounts buried in the fine print. What once worked – simple earn-and-burn loyalty programs – now feels outdated when convenience, exclusivity, and instant gratification reign supreme.

Retailers are rewriting the rules. Loyalty is no longer free; it’s a product. From fashion and beauty to tech and travel, brands are introducing paid membership tiers that promise more than just savings. The shift isn’t subtle. Airlines are layering subscription perks onto frequent flyer programs, e-commerce giants are testing premium memberships, and direct-to-consumer brands are betting on exclusivity to drive retention. But as the subscription economy matures, cracks are starting to show.

Consumers are resisting an overload of memberships and scrutinizing whether the cost is justified. Some brands have thrived by offering tangible value, while others have struggled to justify their fees. The challenge isn’t just attracting subscribers – it’s keeping them engaged without alienating price-sensitive shoppers.

Understanding Consumer Expectations in the New Loyalty Landscape

Loyalty is no longer about collecting points; it’s about perceived value. Consumers have become more selective, weighing every subscription against its actual benefits. A decade ago, signing up for a loyalty program was a no-brainer. Today, even well-known brands face scrutiny when asking customers to pay for access.

Subscription fatigue is real. In a crowded market where streaming, food delivery, and retail memberships compete for the same wallet share, consumers are reevaluating what they truly need. A high annual fee isn’t a deal-breaker if the perks outweigh the cost, but brands that fail to deliver meaningful benefits see churn rates climb fast.

Personalization is the new battleground. Generic rewards don’t cut it anymore; shoppers expect loyalty programs tailored to their behavior. The most successful models use data to refine offerings, creating a sense of exclusivity without shutting out budget-conscious consumers. When done right, a well-structured loyalty program shifts the conversation from cost to value, keeping customers invested long after the first purchase.

Types of Loyalty Models in the Subscription Economy

Brands are adopting diverse loyalty models that blend traditional rewards with subscription-based benefits to retain customers. These models cater to varying consumer preferences and spending habits, ensuring a personalized and engaging experience.

Here are the primary types:

Paid Memberships with Exclusive Benefits
- Club Factory VIP (India, China, Southeast Asia): The E-commerce platform Club Factory offers a VIP membership where AI predicts purchasing behavior and provides personalized discounts on frequently bought products. This approach ensures members receive tailored deals, enhancing shopping efficiency and satisfaction.
- Watsons Elite (Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines): Watsons, a leading health and beauty retailer, offers a paid loyalty program that offers cashback on purchases, VIP in-store services, and early access to product launches. This blend of financial incentives and exclusive experiences creates a sense of privilege among members.
Tiered Loyalty Programs with Subscription Elements
- MATCHESFASHION (UK): This luxury fashion retailer employs a tiered loyalty system where customer spending determines their membership level. Higher tiers unlock benefits such as priority access to new collections, personal shopping services, and exclusive event invitations, encouraging increased spending and brand engagement.
- Trendyol (Turkey): A prominent e-commerce platform, Trendyol offers a tiered loyalty program with regionalized perks, including expedited shipping and special discounts. The program adapts to local market preferences, ensuring relevance and appeal to a diverse customer base.
Hybrid Models: Freemium Loyalty with Paid Upgrades
- Karma (Global): Karma offers a free service that alerts users to price drops on desired products. Members gain access to premium features like cashback on purchases and exclusive deals for a subscription fee, blending cost-free benefits with enhanced paid options.
- Blibli Plus (Indonesia): Blibli, an Indonesian online marketplace, offers a loyalty program with basic membership for free and standard benefits. Subscribers to Blibli Plus receive additional perks such as express delivery and special promotions, catering to casual shoppers and frequent buyers.
Experiential Subscriptions for Community and Access
- Beauty Pie (UK, US): Beauty Pie operates on a membership model where subscribers can access luxury beauty products at near-factory prices. This approach demystifies product markups and offers members significant savings, fostering a community of informed beauty enthusiasts.
- Public Lands (US): Focusing on outdoor gear and experiences, Public Lands offers a subscription that allows members access to exclusive events, workshops, and early product releases. This model emphasizes community building and experiential value over traditional discounts.

Designing Loyalty Programs for a Future-Proof Strategy

Retailers must craft loyalty programs that not only attract customers but also adapt to shifting consumer behaviors and market dynamics. The following strategies offer a blueprint for developing resilient and appealing loyalty initiatives:

Exclusive but Accessible: Pricing Memberships Wisely
- Dynamic Pricing Strategies: Dynamic pricing allows retailers to adjust membership fees based on demand, market trends, and customer segments. This approach ensures memberships remain attractive to a broad audience while maximizing revenue. For instance, offering lower fees during off-peak seasons can entice price-sensitive customers to join.
- Freemium Models: Introducing a free basic tier with optional paid upgrades can lower the barrier to entry, allowing customers to experience core benefits before committing financially. This model has been effective in increasing user acquisition and providing a pathway to upsell premium features.
Hyper-Personalization: Making Memberships Indispensable
- AI-Driven Personalization: Leveraging artificial intelligence to analyze customer data enables the creation of tailored experiences and offers. Personalized recommendations and exclusive deals based on individual preferences can significantly enhance member engagement and satisfaction.
- Behavioral Segmentation: By segmenting members based on purchasing habits and engagement levels, retailers can deliver customized rewards and communications, fostering a deeper connection and increasing loyalty.
Flexibility and Modular Benefits: Adapting to Consumer Preferences
- Customizable Perks: Allowing members to select benefits that align with their interests – such as free shipping, exclusive discounts, or early access to products, can enhance the perceived value of the membership.
- Short-Term and Seasonal Subscriptions: Offering flexible membership durations caters to customers hesitant about long-term commitments, allowing them to engage with the brand on their terms.
Beyond Discounts: Experiential and Social Rewards
- Exclusive Events and Content: Hosting member-only events and workshops or providing access to unique content can create a sense of community and exclusivity, differentiating the program from competitors.
- Community Building Initiatives: Encouraging members to participate in forums, social media groups, or referral programs fosters a sense of belonging and turns loyal customers into brand advocates.
Sustainability and Ethical Perks: Aligning with Values
- Eco-Friendly Incentives: Rewarding sustainable actions like recycling or choosing eco-friendly products appeals to environmentally conscious consumers and strengthens the brand’s commitment to sustainability.
- Charitable Contributions: Allowing members to donate rewards or a portion of their purchases to charitable causes can enhance the program’s appeal to socially responsible customers.

Brands Getting Loyalty Right

Lookiero (Spain, France, UK) – Subscription-based personal styling with loyalty tiers.
Lookiero offers a curated fashion subscription service where customers receive personalized outfit selections. The brand’s loyalty tiers reward frequent subscribers with discounts, early access to limited-edition collections, and styling credits, creating a mix of exclusivity and practical savings.
Asia Miles (Hong Kong) – Multi-partner travel rewards program
Asia Miles, launched by Cathay Pacific, is a travel rewards program that collaborates with multiple airlines and over 800 partners across the dining, retail, and hospitality sectors. Members earn miles through various activities and can redeem them for flights, hotel stays, and lifestyle rewards. This extensive partner network enhances the program’s value proposition, offering flexibility and a wide range of redemption options.
GrabRewards (Southeast Asia) – Multi-service platform with an integrated loyalty program
Grab, a leading super-app in Southeast Asia, integrates its GrabRewards loyalty program across services like ride-hailing, food delivery, and digital payments. Users earn points for each transaction, which can be redeemed for discounts, vouchers, or premium services. The program features tiered memberships – Member, Silver, Gold, and Platinum – offering escalating benefits such as priority bookings and exclusive deals, effectively encouraging increased usage and customer retention.

The Future of Loyalty in the Subscription Economy

As the subscription economy continues to evolve, retailers are increasingly turning to advanced technologies to enhance their loyalty programs. Artificial intelligence and blockchain are at the forefront of this transformation, offering innovative solutions to meet the dynamic expectations of modern consumers.

AI-Powered Personalization

Artificial intelligence enables retailers to analyze vast customer data, facilitating highly personalized experiences. By leveraging AI, brands can predict purchasing behaviors, tailor rewards, and deliver targeted promotions that resonate with individual preferences. For instance, Tesco plans to expand its use of AI to personalize shopper experiences, utilizing data from its Clubcard loyalty scheme to suggest healthier choices and reduce waste.

AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants enhance customer engagement by providing real-time support and personalized recommendations. These tools not only improve the customer experience but also gather valuable insights that can be used to refine loyalty strategies. Wendy’s, for example, has introduced an AI-based loyalty platform that analyzes customer data to create tailored offers and rewards, thereby strengthening brand loyalty.

Blockchain-Based Loyalty Programs

Blockchain technology offers a decentralized and transparent framework for loyalty programs, addressing common challenges such as fraud, data security, and interoperability. By tokenizing loyalty points, retailers can provide customers with flexible and transferable rewards that can be redeemed across multiple platforms and partners. This approach not only enhances the value proposition for customers but also fosters a sense of community and engagement.

For example, Singapore Airlines’ KrisPay program utilizes blockchain to convert air miles into digital tokens, allowing members to spend them seamlessly with participating merchants.

Similarly, startups like Blackbird are exploring blockchain-based loyalty solutions to connect restaurants with patrons and offer rewards in the form of digital assets.

Integration of AI and Blockchain

The convergence of AI and blockchain technologies holds significant promise for the future of loyalty programs. AI can analyze blockchain-stored data to provide deeper insights into customer behavior, enabling more precise personalization and dynamic reward structures. Conversely, blockchain ensures the security and transparency of the data used by AI systems, fostering trust among consumers.

This integration can lead to the development of smart contracts that automatically adjust loyalty rewards based on real-time customer interactions and predefined criteria. Such systems can enhance efficiency, reduce administrative costs, and provide customers with immediate gratification, strengthening brand loyalty.

Emphasis on Ethical and Sustainable Practices

Modern consumers are increasingly conscious of ethical and environmental issues. Retailers can leverage this awareness by incorporating sustainability and ethical considerations into loyalty programs. For instance, offering rewards for eco-friendly purchases or supporting charitable causes can resonate with socially responsible customers, fostering deeper emotional connections with the brand.

Incorporating transparency through blockchain can further enhance credibility, as customers can verify the ethical sourcing and sustainability claims of products. This approach not only aligns with consumer values but also differentiates the brand in a competitive market.

The Rise of Experiential Rewards

Beyond traditional discounts and points, there is a growing trend toward offering experiential rewards that provide unique value to customers. These can include exclusive access to events, personalized services, or early product releases. Such experiences can create lasting memories and emotional bonds between the customer and the brand.

For example, luxury brands increasingly offer personalized shopping experiences or invitations to exclusive events as part of their loyalty programs, enhancing the perceived value and exclusivity associated with the brand.

Loyalty programs are undergoing a significant transformation. Brands are shifting from traditional point-based systems to subscription-based models, offering exclusive benefits to paying members. This strategy aims to foster deeper customer engagement and secure steady revenue streams.

However, as consumers face an increasing number of subscription options, they are becoming more discerning, leading to potential subscription fatigue. To navigate this challenge, retailers must ensure their loyalty offerings provide genuine value and personalized experiences. Leveraging advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, can help tailor these programs to individual preferences, enhancing customer satisfaction and retention.

Addressing the digital divide is crucial; as loyalty programs increasingly rely on apps, individuals without smartphones may feel excluded, missing out on exclusive deals and services. Retailers need to consider inclusive strategies to accommodate all customers.

The future of retail loyalty lies in balancing exclusivity with accessibility, leveraging technology for personalization, and ensuring inclusivity to foster genuine customer loyalty.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In a bustling market in Lagos, 26-year-old Aisha scrolls through Instagram, weighing whether to buy a locally made dress promoted by an influencer. The brand has no website, just a WhatsApp number for orders. With a few taps, she messages the seller, confirms the price, and arranges for cash-on-delivery. In markets like Nigeria, social commerce is leapfrogging traditional e-commerce. Shoppers don’t browse sleek e-commerce websites; they buy through Instagram DMs, Facebook groups, and TikTok live streams. The brands that fail to adapt to this reality risk missing out on the next billion consumers.

The numbers reveal an undeniable shift in global commerce. E-commerce sales are projected to grow from $5.13 trillion in 2022 to $8.09 trillion by 2028, driven by an influx of new consumers from high-growth regions. China and the United States still lead in online retail, contributing over $2.32 trillion in sales in 2023, but the real transformation is happening in emerging economies like India, Indonesia, Nigeria, and the Philippines. Here, mobile and social commerce has become the foundation of digital retail.

For brands, the challenge is not just expansion; it’s reinvention. These new consumers don’t shop the way the first billion did. Over 80% research products online using search engines, social networks, and short-form videos, while 76% rely on social validation – likes, influencer recommendations, and customer reviews – before making a purchase. Yet, nearly half of the world’s largest consumer brands still lack a presence in these emerging markets, leaving a vast opportunity for those willing to rethink their approach.

But being present is not enough. The next billion shoppers favor social commerce over traditional e-commerce, engage with brands through messaging apps rather than websites, and expect seamless digital experiences across devices – even in regions where internet access is unreliable. They are also fiercely value-conscious, prioritizing flexible payment methods like digital wallets and cash-on-delivery, options many global brands still fail to support.

Yet, many companies still operate with outdated digital commerce models built for Western markets. Global brands risk losing ground to more agile, regionally dominant competitors without rethinking payment systems, embedding social commerce, and optimizing for mobile-first experiences.

The next billion shoppers aren’t waiting for brands to catch up. The only question is: Are brands ready for them?

Who Are the Next Billion Shoppers?

A 22-year-old university student buys skincare products in India through a WhatsApp group chat. In Nairobi, a young entrepreneur sells handmade jewelry on Facebook Marketplace, coordinating payments through mobile money. Across emerging markets, consumers bypass traditional e-commerce models, turning to social-first, mobile-driven shopping experiences that global brands have barely begun to tap into.

These next billion digital consumers – predominantly in India, Indonesia, Nigeria, the Philippines, Egypt, and Kenya – are young, mobile-first, and digitally fluent. Internet access is expanding at an unprecedented pace, fueling a seismic shift in global commerce. Yet, many brands still fail to understand how these shoppers think and behave.

What sets them apart is how they shop. Unlike their Western counterparts, they favor informal, platform-driven commerce over conventional e-commerce sites. Social media, messaging apps, and peer-to-peer networks aren’t just places to connect; they are marketplaces, customer service hubs, and payment portals. A single Instagram post can trigger thousands of transactions, with sellers coordinating payments and deliveries through direct messages.

But logistical and economic challenges shape their habits. Cash-on-delivery remains dominant in many of these markets, and mobile data costs influence browsing behavior. Poor infrastructure in rural areas means last-mile delivery is unreliable, forcing consumers to adapt. In response, brands leverage micro-fulfillment centers, regional payment apps, and social commerce strategies to bridge these gaps.

By 2030, these emerging digital consumers will drive global e-commerce revenues past $8 trillion. But brands that attempt a one-size-fits-all approach will fail. To succeed, companies must embed themselves into local digital ecosystems, rethink payment and fulfillment strategies, and embrace how these consumers already shop, or risk becoming irrelevant in these emerging markets.

Digital Access Is No Longer a Barrier—But Trust and Infrastructure Are

On paper, the e-commerce revolution in emerging markets looks unstoppable. Smartphone penetration is soaring, digital payment systems are growing, and mobile data is cheaper than ever. But inside a small shop in Jakarta, 28-year-old Rizky still hesitates before clicking ‘buy’ on an Instagram ad.

“The products look good, but I’ve been scammed before,” he says, scrolling through the comments. “What if it never arrives? Or worse, what if it’s fake?”

Rizky’s concerns reflect a broader reality: while digital adoption is rising, trust remains one of the biggest barriers to e-commerce growth. Counterfeit goods, poor customer service, and unreliable delivery services have made many consumers skeptical. Even in fast-growing online markets, many prefer cash transactions or in-person shopping rather than risk a bad purchase.

Payments are another obstacle. While fintech solutions are expanding, millions of consumers remain unbanked or underbanked. In Nigeria and India, cash-on-delivery still dominates, yet many global brands continue pushing credit card-based payment systems. In a region where platforms like GCash in the Philippines, Paytm in India, and M-Pesa in Kenya have become standard, brands that fail to offer these options risk losing sales entirely.

Then there’s last-mile delivery, or the lack of it. In rural Indonesia and sub-Saharan Africa, poor infrastructure means packages take weeks to arrive – if they make it at all. Some brands have adapted, partnering with hyper-local delivery networks or setting up pickup hubs in community centers and convenience stores. Others still operate with rigid, one-size-fits-all supply chains that don’t work in these markets.

The lesson is clear: digital access alone won’t drive e-commerce success. Winning over the next billion shoppers requires more than just an internet connection; it demands localized payment solutions, seamless returns, and a serious investment in trust-building. Without these, even the best-designed digital strategies will fall flat.

How Brands Can Win the Next Billion Shoppers

In Manila, a small fashion retailer went from selling 50 dresses a month to 500 without launching a website. Instead, its business runs through Facebook Live sales and TikTok videos, where customers comment “Mine” to claim an item and settle payments via digital wallets. Across emerging markets, this is the new normal.

For global brands, the lesson is clear: scaling into high-growth digital markets requires far more than a translated website or a localized ad campaign. The next billion shoppers aren’t waiting for brands to find them on corporate e-commerce platforms – they’re already buying where they spend their time: social media, messaging apps, and peer-to-peer networks.

Yet, many Western brands still treat these channels as secondary sales tools rather than primary retail ecosystems. In Indonesia, Nigeria, and the Philippines, more than half of digital shoppers prefer buying through social media rather than traditional e-commerce websites. Brands that expect customers to visit standalone online stores are missing the point, as these shoppers expect brands to meet them where they already are.

That shift is forcing a rethink of engagement strategies. Live shopping, influencer-driven commerce, and peer recommendations have overtaken static product listings and website browsing. In China, where social commerce surpasses $500 billion annually, global brands have had to completely restructure their sales channels to compete with domestic players that integrate commerce seamlessly into entertainment. The same transformation is sweeping Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

But selling in these markets requires more than just showing up. AI-driven personalization is now a competitive necessity, not a luxury. Machine learning models are helping brands optimize pricing, tailor product recommendations, and automate language localization – yet many companies still fail to adjust their messaging, relying on generic campaigns that don’t resonate.

Language and cultural nuance can make or break a sale. While English is widely used in business, most consumers prefer to shop in their native language, engage with familiar imagery, and trust local influencers over foreign celebrity endorsements. Brands that get this right, like Coca-Cola and Unilever, see stronger conversion rates and long-term loyalty. Those that don’t risk alienating their audience before they even make it to checkout.

Simply put, what worked in established e-commerce markets won’t work here. Successful brands embed themselves in local digital ecosystems, embrace social-first shopping, and design their experiences around how consumers already buy, not how brands want them to buy.

Who Controls the Future of E-Commerce? Local Platforms Are Winning

When Indonesian beauty brand Somethinc wanted to expand online, it didn’t launch its website. Instead, it built its entire e-commerce strategy around Shopee and TikTok Shop, running daily flash sales and live-streaming product tutorials. The result? A 10x sales increase within months, driven entirely by social commerce and regional marketplaces.

Somethinc’s story isn’t unique. Across emerging markets, the next billion shoppers aren’t discovering products through branded websites; they’re buying from super apps, social media platforms, and dominant regional marketplaces. For global brands, winning these markets means playing by new rules where local giants, not Western e-commerce behemoths, set the terms of engagement.

The Power Shift: Regional Marketplaces vs. Global E-Commerce Giants
For years, companies like Amazon and Alibaba have defined global e-commerce. But that dominance is fading in Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Platforms like Shopee, Jumia, and MercadoLibre have become the default shopping destinations, offering localized logistics, digital wallet integrations, and cash-on-delivery options that global brands struggle to replicate.

The numbers tell the story. In China, social commerce sales surpassed $500 billion, with platforms like Douyin (China’s TikTok), Xiaohongshu, and WeChat driving transactions entirely within their ecosystems. The same model is now spreading across Indonesia, Nigeria, and Mexico, where more than half of online shoppers prefer purchasing directly through social media.

Yet, many Western brands still treat these marketplaces as secondary sales channels rather than core business platforms. In India, Flipkart and Myntra dominate e-commerce for fashion and electronics, while Tokopedia in Indonesia has built a hyper-localized supply chain that global competitors can’t match. Simply listing products on these platforms is not enough – brands must actively invest in platform-specific strategies, native advertising, and localized engagement.

Why Direct-to-Consumer Models Are Struggling
For decades, DTC strategies helped brands build direct relationships with consumers. But DTC isn’t the future in emerging markets; it’s a limitation. Brands that cling to standalone e-commerce sites are losing relevance as shoppers expect frictionless transactions within the platforms they already use.

Even in Western markets, the shift is happening. TikTok Shop’s expansion into the U.S. and U.K. signals a major shift in commerce dynamics – one that mirrors the e-commerce revolution already unfolding in Asia and Africa. The next billion shoppers won’t be navigating company websites – they’ll be purchasing inside their favorite apps.

The message is clear: The future of e-commerce belongs to platforms that seamlessly blend social engagement, localized logistics, and frictionless transactions. The brands that adapt to this reality – rather than trying to control it – will be the ones that capture the next wave of global consumers.

How Global Brands Can Win in the Next Billion Market

In India, fast-fashion brand Ajio doesn’t just sell online; it has redefined mobile-first commerce. Instead of relying on traditional e-commerce websites, it built its entire sales strategy around WhatsApp-based shopping, integrating local payment options and live-chat support for consumers who prefer conversational commerce. The approach has been so successful that WhatsApp shopping now drives a significant share of its sales in smaller cities and rural areas.

For global brands, this is the future of e-commerce, requiring a radical shift in strategy. Companies that treat these new markets like extensions of the West will struggle. Those that understand the unique behaviors, expectations, and challenges of the next billion consumers will dominate.

Here’s how brands can compete effectively in these emerging digital economies:

Market Research Can’t Be an Afterthought

Global strategies often fail because they assume all emerging markets behave similarly. Shopping habits, payment preferences, and brand trust vary drastically between Jakarta, Lagos, and Manila. Companies that skip deep, localized market research often launch with the wrong pricing models, payment options, and messaging that doesn’t resonate.

Many brands have learned this the hard way. Walmart’s struggles in India stemmed from misunderstanding local retail behaviors, forcing the company to pivot from a direct e-commerce approach to acquiring Flipkart. In contrast, brands like P&G and Coca-Cola invest heavily in country-specific consumer insights and have successfully built strong footholds in these markets.

Think Beyond Translation – Create Market-Specific Storytelling

Localization isn’t just about translating a global campaign into another language; it’s about understanding cultural nuances. Consumers in India, Indonesia, and Nigeria engage with storytelling differently than shoppers in New York or London.

Nike’s Southeast Asian marketing campaigns, for instance, don’t just feature global athletes. They include local sports icons and culturally relevant narratives, tapping into national pride and regional sports culture. This approach has driven significantly higher engagement than generic Western-focused messaging.

Build for Mobile-First, Low-Bandwidth Markets

In many emerging economies, the mobile phone is the only device people use to access the internet. More than 90% of internet users in these markets are mobile-exclusive, and many are on low-bandwidth connections.

That’s why progressive web apps (PWAs) and lightweight mobile sites outperform heavy, Western-style e-commerce platforms. Companies like Jumia in Africa and Tokopedia in Indonesia have invested in fast-loading mobile interfaces, ensuring that even consumers in low-data regions can shop seamlessly.

Payment and Fulfillment Must Be Localized

Credit cards are not the default in these markets. In India and the Philippines, cash-on-delivery remains a dominant payment method. In Kenya, M-Pesa is the standard for digital transactions. In China, QR-code-based WeChat Pay and Alipay drive nearly all online purchases.

Western brands that only integrate credit card checkouts exclude millions of potential customers. Companies that tailor their payment options—as Apple did by adding UPI payments in India—win consumer trust and adoption faster.

Social Commerce Is Now the Default, Not an Add-On

Social media isn’t just a marketing tool in emerging economies; it is the storefront. More than half of digital shoppers in Indonesia and Nigeria buy directly through social platforms, often engaging with brands through WhatsApp, Instagram, or Facebook groups.

Live-stream shopping is also exploding in popularity. Approximately 50% of the country’s internet users in China utilized live commerce in 2023. This model is quickly expanding across Southeast Asia and Latin America. Brands that ignore this trend risk losing to local sellers who understand the nuances of peer-driven shopping.

Logistics and Trust Are the Make-or-Break Factors

Selling a product is one thing. Getting it to the customer reliably is another.

Brands like Shopee and Jumia have gained an edge because they built extensive last-mile delivery networks, partnering with local couriers, pickup hubs, and even motorcycle taxi fleets to ensure orders arrive on time. Amazon, by contrast, struggled in markets like India because it initially relied on its Western fulfillment model rather than adapting to local infrastructure.

Trust is also a challenge. Consumers rely heavily on peer reviews and seller reputations before purchasing in markets with high counterfeit product risks. That’s why platforms like Tokopedia and Shopee have built-in buyer protection policies, a feature that global brands must adopt to compete.

The Time to Adapt Is Now

The next billion shoppers are reshaping digital commerce faster than most global brands can keep up. But this shift isn’t just about adding new markets to existing playbooks. It requires a fundamental change in how brands operate, engage, and build trust.

The companies that embed themselves into local digital ecosystems, rethink their approach to payments and fulfillment, and leverage social commerce as a primary – not secondary – strategy will lead the next era of global retail. The rest? They’ll be playing catch-up.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

On a humid Friday evening in Bangkok, a 29-year-old marketing executive taps through her banking app. She’s just paused her subscription to a second-tier streaming platform and declined an invite to a weekend brunch. But on her walk home, she stops at the Dior counter and buys a lipstick she’s been eyeing for weeks. It’s the one indulgence she’s allowed herself this month. “I cut back on everything else,” she tells a colleague. “This just makes me feel like me.”

Her behavior isn’t an anomaly – it’s a signal. Around the world, consumers are quietly renegotiating the terms of luxury. While macroeconomic forces push people to trim budgets, many are still carving out space for small, strategic indulgences. Austerity no longer looks like elimination; it looks like prioritization.

Call it frugal luxe, quiet indulgence, or strategic spending – this is not irrational behavior, but a recalibrated consumption model shaped by emotional utility and financial realism. Consumers are trading down in broad categories – opting for private-label groceries, reducing ride-hailing use, canceling entertainment bundles – yet they’re unwilling to let go of the symbols that anchor identity, aspiration, or routine.

The global backdrop is undeniable: inflation remains sticky in many economies, wages are lagging, and discretionary income is under strain. In the U.S., the consumer savings rate hovers below pre-pandemic norms. In Southeast Asia, rising living costs are altering middle-class consumption. In the U.K., nearly half of adults report having to cut back on non-essential purchases. And yet, prestige beauty sales are rising. High-end skincare, fragrance, and entry-point luxury fashion continue to perform.

This isn’t a contradiction. It’s a redefinition of value. And the brands that thrive in this moment won’t be those who offer the cheapest price – but those who understand the psychology of what consumers are still willing to pay for.

Because in an era of smarter spending, winning share of wallet means first earning a place in the consumer’s hierarchy of emotional needs.

The Rise of Frugal Luxe – A Global Snapshot

What began as anecdotal “lipstick effect” spending has evolved into a full-fledged global pattern: consumers are not abandoning consumption – they’re curating it. The frugal luxe mindset is not about depriving oneself, but about making deliberate, emotionally resonant choices under constraint.

Across geographies, data shows a clear shift. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Consumer Sentiment Survey found that 72% of consumers across developed and emerging markets report adjusting their spending behaviors, with the most common action being the substitution of high-cost items for lower-cost alternatives – except in categories they deemed “self-care” or “identity-reinforcing.” In Southeast Asia, a Bain & Company study noted that while middle-class households are spending less on dining out, they are spending more on skincare, small electronics, and niche fashion – categories where brand and aesthetic still hold value. In the U.S., prestige beauty grew 14% year-over-year in 2023, even as overall discretionary spending declined. In the U.K., Boots saw record sales in luxury fragrances priced under £50, many sold alongside budget groceries.

This is not a repeat of post-2008 frugality. Then, the consumer response was often to pull back across the board, saving as a virtue. Today’s frugality is more calculated than moralistic – and driven by a more sophisticated understanding of trade-offs. It’s not about saving for saving’s sake; it’s about cutting what doesn’t serve and keeping what does. That distinction is critical.

The economic pressures underlying this shift are real and persistent. Inflation has plateaued but remains elevated in key markets. Real wage growth is marginal. In many urban centers, rent and utility costs are consuming a larger share of monthly income than at any time in the past decade. But consumers are not reacting passively. They are actively reshaping their personal economies, determining where to trade down and where not to compromise.

Crucially, frugal luxe behavior is not confined to one cohort. Gen Z is driving it with curated shopping habits and value-hunting sophistication, but Millennials and even Gen X are adopting similar strategies. What’s shared is the intentionality. Consumers are no longer passively consuming – they are performing economic self-optimization, informed by a steady stream of content that frames “smart spending” as a lifestyle.

Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have normalized “dupe culture” – where users show off how they scored a product that looks like luxury but costs a fraction. Yet in the same feed, those same users will unbox a full-priced Diptyque candle or a single-item designer purchase. The message is not “buy less,” it’s “buy selectively.”

Globally, this has begun to reshape categories. In Japan, the longstanding culture of quality-over-quantity spending (known as shinayakana seikatsu) has found resonance with a younger generation of minimalists who still value premium skincare. In India, beauty brands are reporting a decline in full-sized product sales, but a rise in discovery kits and refillables. In Brazil, mid-market fashion is struggling while resale luxury and independent accessories brands thrive.

Across markets, the conclusion is the same: value is no longer binary. It’s not “luxury vs. bargain” – it’s “what justifies its place in my life?” Brands that misread this as simple downtrading risk irrelevance. Those who tune into this nuance will find opportunity – not just to sell more, but to sell smarter.

The Psychology Behind It – Why We Splurge While We Cut

At first glance, the frugal luxe mindset seems contradictory: a consumer balks at a $6 coffee subscription but buys a $75 serum without hesitation. Economically, it’s inconsistent. Psychologically, it’s perfectly rational.

This is where market dynamics intersect with behavioral economics. In times of uncertainty, people tend to seek out control, reward, and reinforcement – especially when broader financial agency feels compromised. These micro-luxuries become not just products, but emotional instruments: ways to reassert identity, regain a sense of choice, and anchor personal value.

Historically, this has played out before. The “lipstick effect” – a term coined during the early 2000s recession and later observed after 9/11 and in the 2008 financial crisis – described how consumers cut back broadly but still spent on small luxury items, particularly in the beauty category. Today’s version is more sophisticated. It’s not just about lipstick. It’s about emotional return on investment.

This is emotional ROI at work: the subconscious calculation consumers make when deciding whether something is “worth it” not just financially, but emotionally. That $75 serum isn’t just skincare – it’s a commitment to self-care. A branded candle isn’t just scent – it’s sanctuary in a chaotic world. These purchases are rarely made out of impulse alone. They’re rationalized, budgeted, even anticipated. In that sense, they offer the predictability that macroeconomic conditions lack.

Research from Deloitte confirms this. In a 2023 global consumer survey, 64% of respondents said they were more likely to buy products that made them feel emotionally secure, even if those products were non-essential. The strongest responses came from younger consumers, who reported using small purchases as a way to cope with financial stress and identity instability. This is less about indulgence, and more about calibration: consumers are rebalancing their mental and emotional portfolios as much as their financial ones.

Psychologists also point to the role of aspirational continuity. Consumers may be delaying larger goals – home ownership, international travel, luxury fashion – but they still want symbols of progress. A small luxury becomes a token of staying on track. This is particularly pronounced in status-driven categories like fragrance, skincare, and branded accessories, where even a single item can carry heavy semiotic weight.

There’s also a visibility factor. In the age of social media, consumer choices are publicly narrated. Selective spending allows people to maintain an aesthetic or aspirational identity while privately cutting costs elsewhere. In effect, frugal luxe is not just a financial strategy – it’s also a performance of resilience.

Understanding this nuance is critical for brand strategists. Consumers are not spending irrationally. They are optimizing emotional impact per dollar, seeking meaning, identity, and autonomy through purchases that feel earned – even if they seem extravagant on paper.

For brands, the opportunity lies not in asking, “Will they buy?” but “What role does this play in how they see themselves?”

Case Study: ASAI Hotels and the Art of Intentional Hospitality

Image credit: ASAI Hotels

In a market where consumers are trimming excess but still seeking meaning, ASAI Hotels offers a blueprint for how travel brands can deliver premium experience without premium pricing. Launched by Dusit International in 2020, ASAI was purpose-built for the frugal luxe traveler – those who want design, culture, and quality, but none of the gilded frills.

Instead of scaling luxury down, ASAI redefines it. Properties are lean by design – compact rooms, limited staff, no banquet halls or sprawling lobbies – but everything a modern traveler values is thoughtfully elevated. Beds are comfortable, showers rainfall, Wi-Fi fast. Public areas double as co-working spaces and social hubs. And in a strategic move that’s as cultural as it is commercial, each hotel is embedded in a local neighborhood, with a restaurant curated by local chefs and partnerships with nearby artisans, vendors, and guides.

This is not budget travel in disguise. It’s travel edited with intention. ASAI’s Bangkok Sathorn location opened with rates under USD $50 – a striking value in one of Asia’s most visited cities – but paired with Michelin-linked cuisine and locally inspired interiors. Guests don’t feel like they’re compromising. They feel like they’ve discovered something smarter.

What sets ASAI apart isn’t just the product – it’s the philosophy. From agile pricing packages to curated local experiences, the brand is engineered for the consumer who’s making trade-offs, but still wants to feel indulgent. Flexible cancellation policies, digital check-in, and concierge-style staff interactions cater to the desire for both control and care.

And it’s working. ASAI properties consistently receive high ratings for value, design, and service. The brand has expanded beyond Thailand into Japan and the Philippines, proving that its blend of affordability and authenticity has cross-border appeal.

In an era where travel is more intentional, ASAI has found the sweet spot: luxury reimagined as locality, quality, and thoughtful restraint. It’s a case study in what happens when hospitality listens closely – not just to how much travelers want to spend, but to what they want that spending to feel like.

Frugal Luxe in Practice – How It’s Changing Beauty, Fashion, and Travel

The frugal luxe mindset isn’t just influencing what people buy – it’s reshaping entire industries in how they develop, price, and market their offerings. Nowhere is this more visible than in beauty, fashion, and travel – sectors that sit at the intersection of identity, aspiration, and everyday ritual.

Beauty: Dupes and Devotion

Beauty is perhaps the clearest expression of frugal luxe in action. Consumers are cutting costs in functional skincare – opting for no-frills, dermatologist-backed drugstore brands – while still spending on hero products and signature scents. The rise of “dupe culture” – where TikTok influencers promote affordable versions of luxury products – hasn’t killed premium beauty. Instead, it has redefined what’s worth paying full price for.

Take Rare Beauty, which straddles affordability and prestige with minimalist packaging and emotionally resonant branding. In Southeast Asia, Korea’s Olive Young chain is thriving by offering shoppers both budget K-beauty staples and cult-favorite luxury imports. Meanwhile, direct-to-consumer platforms like Beauty Pie (UK) allow users to subscribe to access prestige formulas at wholesale prices – frugality without sacrifice.

Sales figures reflect this duality. While mass beauty volumes have remained flat, prestige beauty in the U.S. grew 14% in 2023 – driven not by breadth, but by a focus on high-performing or emotionally charged SKUs. The consumer isn’t buying more. They’re buying more intentionally.

Fashion: Capsule Thinking and Conscious Curating

In fashion, consumers are trading volume for selectivity. Capsule wardrobes – minimalist, mix-and-match collections anchored by a few standout pieces – are on the rise. Luxury resale platforms like Vestiaire Collective and The RealReal are growing in both inventory and credibility, as consumers seek quality without the markup. The resale market is projected to double by 2027, according to ThredUp’s 2024 report.

Brands are adapting. Zara has introduced higher-end “premium” capsules. COS and Arket are elevating materials and tailoring. In Asia, Taobao’s Luxury Pavilion is bridging mainstream ecommerce with designer credibility. The common thread is discretion over display. Quiet luxury, less logo-heavy but still recognizably refined, appeals to a frugal luxe buyer who wants lasting value, not viral novelty.

Fast fashion isn’t dead – but it’s being used differently. Consumers might wear high-street basics for casual or invisible moments, while saving higher-priced pieces for more visible or identity-expressive occasions. Spending is being segmented not by category, but by context.

Travel: Trade-Offs, Not Cutbacks

Even in the travel sector – often the first to be trimmed during downturns – frugal luxe is shifting patterns. Consumers are taking fewer trips, but spending more on personalization, experience, and wellness. Budget flights are paired with boutique hotels. Three-day getaways are traded up with Michelin-starred meals or spa packages. Travel is no longer about how far, but how meaningful.

Brands are adjusting accordingly. Luxury travel providers are offering shorter packages with high-touch service. Airlines are upselling “premium economy” tiers with lounge access and upgraded meals. The success of Airbnb Luxe and wellness retreats like Aman Essentials shows that even value-conscious travelers are willing to invest – if the experience feels transformative.

Even Google searches reflect the pivot. In 2024, searches for “affordable luxury travel” and “best value boutique hotels” outpaced traditional terms like “cheap flights” or “budget vacations.” The language of frugality is evolving, and so are the offerings designed to meet it.

How Brands Are Adapting – Strategy Shifts Across the Market

Brands that once relied on abundance, visibility, or exclusivity are now being challenged to respond to a consumer who shops with intent, scrutinizes value, and mixes luxury with restraint. Frugal luxe doesn’t mean less opportunity – it means a demand for sharper, more strategic brand behavior.

In beauty, fashion, and consumer goods, companies are rethinking not only pricing architecture, but positioning, messaging, and innovation pipelines. Tiered offerings – once used to ladder customers into prestige pricing – are now reversed. Entry-level luxury products are becoming lead sellers, not loss leaders. Dior’s Addict Lip Glow, Chanel’s Les Beiges Water Tint, and Le Labo’s travel-size scents are all examples of luxury distilled into a smaller, more accessible form – without losing cachet.

This has led to a rise in what analysts call “masstige”: prestige aesthetics at mass-market prices. But masstige has matured. It’s no longer about watered-down versions of designer goods. It’s about embedding value signals – ingredient quality, design, performance – into more approachable formats. Think of Glossier’s minimalist packaging, or Uniqlo U’s designer-led capsule collections. Even Apple has leaned into this zone, positioning older iPhone models as aspirational entry points for Gen Z.

Luxury groups are also evolving. LVMH and Kering have emphasized scarcity, small drops, and storytelling – leveraging limited availability over scale. On the other end, mass retailers are racing to elevate their image: Target’s partnership with designer brands, Boots stocking premium beauty, and H&M launching higher-end home collections. Everyone is meeting in the middle, because that’s where the frugal luxe consumer lives.

Pricing strategy is only part of the story. Messaging has also shifted from status to discernment. Ads no longer shout. They whisper – implying intelligence, curation, and insider knowledge. Brands are moving away from overt luxury cues and toward emotional narratives: empowerment, craftsmanship, quiet confidence. This reflects a deeper shift: luxury is no longer about proving wealth. It’s about affirming self-worth in an uncertain world.

Technology is helping brands track these nuances in real time. AI tools allow marketers to test price elasticity across segments, optimize product mix, and personalize offers based on behavioral signals. Subscription data, refill rates, and post-purchase engagement now drive product development cycles more than focus groups. This enables continuous recalibration of what the customer considers “worth it.”

Even loyalty programs are being reimagined. Cashback is no longer compelling. Instead, brands offer early access, customization, or social recognition. For a frugal luxe consumer, feeling valued is more motivating than saving money.

Some of the smartest adaptations are happening in emerging markets, where middle-class consumers are under greater financial pressure – but no less brand-attuned. In India, Nykaa uses data-driven bundling to pair affordable essentials with aspirational trial-size products. In Vietnam, localized DTC brands position themselves as “premium but practical.” In Mexico, curated marketplace models are growing – offering shoppers a mix of imported luxury and local craftsmanship at frictionless prices.

The core shift is this: consumers are no longer trading down because they’re disengaged from brands. They’re trading strategically because they’re more discerning. To win this audience, brands must think less about price points and more about permission – have you earned the right to be their one splurge?

That’s a higher bar – but a more loyal customer when cleared.

Research and Innovation in the Frugal Luxe Era

To adapt to the frugal luxe consumer, brands need more than instinct – they need precision. The same buyers who once followed broad loyalty patterns are now driven by a mix of psychology, price sensitivity, and emotional return. Understanding where they draw the line between indulgence and excess requires a new kind of consumer insight – one grounded in nuance, not averages.

That’s why the most future-focused brands are turning to agile, continuous research models. Traditional quarterly surveys and segmentation reports can’t keep pace with fast-changing consumer behavior. Instead, leading companies are investing in longitudinal panels, rapid user testing, and scenario-based modeling to predict what consumers will splurge on next – and what they’ll drop without hesitation.

In beauty, brands like Sephora and Charlotte Tilbury use shopper feedback loops tied to SKU-level sales data to refine product mix in real time. In fashion, resale platforms analyze upload frequency and price elasticity to anticipate consumer fatigue or desire. And in luxury travel, customer journey mapping isn’t just about destinations – it tracks sentiment shifts around personalization, sustainability, and perceived self-reward.

Beyond product, brands are rethinking innovation itself. Design-to-value models, once reserved for industrial engineering, are now being applied to consumer goods – ensuring that every feature, material, and format in a product serves either performance or emotional payoff. Packaging is lighter, messaging more focused, and hero SKUs are prioritized over bloated portfolios.

This moment also invites rethinking how value is communicated. Research shows that consumers are more likely to buy when they feel “in on the decision” – when the brand speaks to them as collaborators, not targets. That means transparent storytelling about sourcing, science, and savings – not just brand heritage or exclusivity.

In the frugal luxe economy, innovation isn’t about premiumization for its own sake. It’s about designing products and experiences that feel earned. And the brands that lead won’t be those who guess right – but those who listen smarter.

Frugality as a Lifestyle, Not a Phase

What began as a reactive shift in consumer behavior is fast becoming a structural one. Frugality is no longer seasonal or circumstantial – it is being integrated into the architecture of daily decision-making. The frugal luxe mindset isn’t a temporary belt-tightening – it’s a new blueprint for value.

In this emerging paradigm, traditional market signals are losing their predictive power. Income is no longer a reliable proxy for spending intent. Brand awareness doesn’t guarantee brand loyalty. Even sentiment data, unless layered with behavioral nuance, risks misdiagnosis. Consumers are more fluid than the models designed to capture them.

For strategists and researchers, this demands a reset. Legacy frameworks built around “value vs. premium” binaries or static personas can’t keep up with a consumer who is simultaneously trading down and trading up – sometimes in the same basket. The next generation of research will need to map micro-intentions: how consumers compartmentalize indulgence, what triggers rationalization, and which categories become immune to compromise.

Foresight leaders are already shifting from tracking what people buy to decoding why they justify it. That requires not just data, but empathetic intelligence – a blend of qualitative depth, contextual listening, and scenario-based modeling that captures the emotional calculus behind the cart.

The question for brands is no longer “how do we sell more?” It’s “how do we matter in a world where fewer things get bought, but those few are chosen with surgical precision?”

Because frugal luxe isn’t just a response to economic pressure – it’s a reflection of cultural evolution. Consumers aren’t retreating. They’re refining. And the brands that rise to meet them will be those that understand the mindset behind the money – not just the movement of it.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

A new round of tariffs is forcing global brands to rethink their pricing strategies. The United States has announced sweeping import duties – raising tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles to 100%, with additional increases targeting semiconductors, critical minerals, solar cells, and steel. While reminiscent of the 2018 trade tensions, these measures land at a more fragile economic moment. Other countries are expected to respond, further tightening the vise on businesses already navigating slim margins and inflation-fatigued consumers.

Though tariffs are levied on importers, their cost typically travels downstream, landing with the end consumer. The difference this time is timing. These duties follow nearly four years of relentless inflation, with household budgets already strained by higher prices on everything from groceries to rent.

In March 2024, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that median household expectations for inflation remained stuck at 3% – a full percentage point above the central bank’s target. At the same time, spending growth has softened. Consumers aren’t just noticing higher prices. They’re changing how they shop.

According to PwC’s Global Consumer Insights Pulse Survey, 69% of shoppers said they’ve reduced non-essential spending due to rising prices. Nearly one in three said they’d switched to cheaper brands or private labels. Forty-three percent reported actively seeking out discounts or promotions.

The dilemma for brands is clear. Raise prices and risk losing share to lower-cost rivals, or absorb the tariffs and compress margins already under strain. Neither path is easy – especially in categories where loyalty is thin and substitutes are plentiful.

However, there is an opportunity – if brands have the right tools. Pricing isn’t guesswork. With behavioral research and elasticity modeling, businesses can test how consumers respond to different price points long before making changes. In markets where product origin influences perception, measuring how price interacts with sentiment and substitution has never been more critical.

Pricing Models for Navigating Demand Shifts

Model	Best Used For	Strength
Van Westendorp	Identifying acceptable price ranges	Fast, directional, simple to implement
Gabor-Granger	Estimating price sensitivity	Useful for product-level pricing
Conjoint Analysis	Testing price, feature, and origin trade-offs	Reveals real-world decision patterns
Discrete Choice	Forecasting market share under price scenarios	Ideal for competitive or global pricing

The pricing question isn’t binary. It’s not just whether to raise prices – but when, where, and for whom. Brands that are navigating this moment well aren’t reacting. They’re measuring.

Where the Pressure Hits First

These price hikes aren’t hypothetical. They’ve already begun to ripple through procurement and supply chains. In May, the US approved sweeping tariff increases on $18 billion worth of Chinese imports. The most visible: electric vehicle tariffs jumped from 25% to 100%. Other affected goods include semiconductors, batteries, medical equipment, and industrial metals. While the policy aims to safeguard strategic sectors, the short-term effect is clear – brands that depend on global sourcing are now facing higher input costs almost overnight.

For US-based manufacturers reliant on overseas inputs, the new tariffs are immediately disruptive. In sectors like electronics and electric vehicles – where China dominates component supply – there are few near-term alternatives. Benchmark Mineral Intelligence reports that China accounts for more than 70% of global battery cell production and over 80% of refined lithium. Reorienting supply chains isn’t just expensive. It’s logistically constrained.

Other categories – apparel, home goods, and consumer electronics – face similar vulnerabilities. The American Apparel & Footwear Association estimates that 40% of all clothing sold in the US still comes from China. Even brands that have diversified sourcing rarely achieve full exits. Standing up new capacity requires capital, workforce training, and time – particularly when quality control and speed to market are critical.

Retailers, too, are under pressure – especially in categories where shelf prices are watched closely and loyalty runs thin. In recent earnings calls, both Walmart and Costco flagged tariff-related risks. Walmart said it was actively scenario-planning for affected segments like electronics, appliances, and furniture. These are areas where private-label competition is fierce and price sensitivity is high. Passing along cost increases without losing volume is far from simple.

In food and beverage, tariff exposure goes beyond ingredients – it extends to packaging, machinery, and imported inputs across the value chain. Margins are already thin, and pricing missteps are less forgivable. While grocery inflation has eased since its 2022 peak, consumer memory is long. Kantar data shows that even small price hikes in 2024 prompted shoppers in the UK to trade down, boosting private-label share across nearly every category.

For many brands, the challenge isn’t just cost – it’s timing. Companies entered 2024 anticipating relief after three years of inflation. Instead, tariffs introduced fresh volatility at the exact moment consumers have become more price-sensitive – and less tolerant of surprises at the register.

Calibrating the Right Price

Inside boardrooms and pricing teams, one question repeatedly surfaces: How much can we raise prices before we lose the customer? Instinct won’t cut it. Brands need to quantify demand before it disappears.

At its heart, price sensitivity is about perception – how much a product feels worth paying for and how much slack a brand has before customers balk. That perception isn’t fixed. It shifts depending on the brand, the category, the context, and what else is on the shelf. This is why pricing research has moved from nice-to-have to necessity for companies under policy or cost pressure.

One of the most enduring tools is the Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter. Developed in the 1970s, it remains in use because of its clarity: consumers are asked when a product feels like a bargain, too cheap to trust, starting to feel expensive, or too pricey to consider. From this, brands map an acceptable price range – a range that has narrowed in recent years as consumers react to repeated cost shocks, from freight to fuel to tariffs.

In categories like electronics, beauty, and automotive, price is only part of the equation. To understand what really drives purchase decisions, many brands turn to conjoint analysis – a survey-based method that models how consumers weigh trade-offs between price, brand, features, country of origin, and other factors. By asking shoppers to choose between product bundles, researchers can identify which elements hold the most value.

If shoppers consistently choose a slightly more expensive product because of its origin, that insight can help brands assess whether absorbing tariffs – or moving production – is worth it. It also flags which segments are less price-sensitive and more loyal, a crucial distinction when margins are thin and every unit matters.

Another widely used method is Gabor-Granger pricing, which measures purchase intent at different price points to estimate elasticity. It’s often used when decisions need to be made quickly or across a large product portfolio. While it doesn’t account for competitors, it can show where price increases are likely to hit hardest – or go unnoticed.

Many companies are now layering these models with real-time data – from loyalty programs, e-commerce behavior, and even point-of-sale heat maps – to fine-tune pricing down to the SKU. A 2023 McKinsey report found that brands using dynamic, data-informed pricing strategies saw profit lifts of 2% to 7%, even in flat-growth environments.

Pricing is no longer just a finance exercise. It now draws from behavioral science, brand strategy, and competitive analysis. When costs move quickly – and tariff rules shift with little warning – brands that understand what drives the willingness to pay are better equipped to make smart, fast decisions.

Strategy Under Pressure

A poorly timed price move doesn’t just hurt margins – it can shift entire market dynamics. Over the past five years, brands across sectors have faced rising costs, disrupted supply chains, and increasingly price-sensitive consumers. Some adjusted early and carefully. Others misjudged their customers – and paid for it. The gap between them highlights how well-informed pricing can build trust, while a misstep can fast-track brand erosion.

In 2018, Whirlpool welcomed tariffs on imported steel, betting they would level the playing field for domestic manufacturers. But as raw material costs climbed, so did Whirlpool’s prices – while rivals adjusted sourcing and held firm. By mid-2019, demand had slipped in the company’s key North American appliance segment. Shipments fell, and its early advantage vanished. Whirlpool had overestimated the power of patriotic branding and underestimated how quickly price gaps could trigger customer defection.

Uniqlo took a different path. In 2022, its parent company, Fast Retailing, raised prices only on high-demand products like its HEATTECH thermal line – leaving basics untouched. Executives framed the move not as a response to inflation, but as a reflection of better materials and improved quality. That message was delivered consistently to both consumers and investors. By the end of fiscal 2023, Fast Retailing had posted record profits, and Uniqlo remained one of Japan’s most trusted brands.

PepsiCo chose a quieter strategy. Faced with rising input costs in its Frito-Lay division, the company trimmed pack sizes while keeping sticker prices unchanged – a textbook case of shrinkflation. It didn’t announce the change, but shoppers picked up on it. Social media backlash followed, but unit economics held steady. In 2022 and 2023, PepsiCo posted revenue growth of 8.7% and 9.5%, crediting “responsible pricing” and sustained brand investment.”

In many markets, price tension didn’t boost brands – it boosted private labels. In the UK, store-brand sales surged as national brands introduced a string of small, poorly communicated price increases. Tesco’s Clubcard data revealed that consumers weren’t simply trading down – they were abandoning brands that no longer justified their price. By late 2023, Kantar reported that private labels made up over 52% of UK grocery sales, a level last reached during the global financial crisis.

These case studies don’t share a common tactic. What they share is calibration. The brands that got it right knew how far they could go – and with which segments. Some paired pricing shifts with clear messaging. Others moved quietly, trusting in long-term loyalty. But all respected the limits of what their customers would accept.

Good pricing does more than protect margins. It builds trust, reinforces perceived quality, and – most importantly – avoids unpleasant surprises. In markets where small increases can trigger a switch, clarity and timing matter as much as the number on the tag.

The Strategic Trade-Offs

Companies squeezed between rising costs and price-sensitive customers tend to reach for one of four levers: absorb the cost, raise the price, shrink the product, or redesign it. None are simple. Each carries risk. And the real challenge isn’t which tactic to use – but how to execute it without weakening brand equity or long-term pricing power.

Absorbing higher costs can maintain customer goodwill – but it’s rarely sustainable. In low-margin sectors like grocery and apparel, taking on even a 10% cost increase from tariffs or wages can wipe out profits. It might buy time, but without gains in volume, efficiency, or product mix, it’s a short-term fix with long-term limits.

Shrinkflation – reducing pack sizes while keeping prices flat – remains a go-to strategy in food and household goods. It works best where packaging disguises quantity changes and price comparisons happen by eye, not unit weight. But shoppers notice. A survey found that 64% of US consumers viewed shrinkflation negatively, and nearly half said it made them more likely to switch brands. The fallout is often reputational, not immediate – but in a loyalty-fragile market, perception matters.

For some brands, reshoring or diversifying supply chains is a way to hedge against tariff risk. Apple, for example, has invested heavily in moving production from China to India and Vietnam – not just for tariff relief, but to reduce geopolitical exposure. These shifts are slow and costly. Quality control, lead times, and logistics all become more complex. For most mid-sized firms, the barrier isn’t intent – it’s feasibility.

Dynamic pricing, once used mainly by airlines and ride-hailing apps, is gaining ground in retail. Powered by real-time data, it lets brands adjust prices based on demand, inventory, or market conditions. While rare in physical stores, it’s now common online. Amazon’s algorithm reportedly makes millions of daily changes to test what shoppers will tolerate. The danger lies in consistency. If pricing feels arbitrary or unfair, trust can fray – especially in categories where stability has long been the norm.

Some brands are taking a tiered approach. They hold prices steady on high-volume, price-sensitive products while testing increases on premium or niche lines. Others bundle extras – free shipping, loyalty rewards, extended warranties – to reframe value without raising list prices. These tactics don’t erase costs, but they redirect attention from the price tag to the perceived benefit.

These strategies differ in form but share one thing: insight. Brands that understand where price elasticity stretches – but doesn’t snap – are far better equipped to make changes that hold. That understanding doesn’t come from spreadsheets alone. It comes from consistently measuring how real consumers respond in the moment.

Price isn’t just a number. It’s a signal – to customers, competitors, and shareholders – of what a brand values, and how well it understands its market.

Pricing in a Slower Growth World

There is no universal playbook for navigating price hikes during a period of soft demand. But companies that treat pricing as a strategic discipline – grounded in research, not reaction – tend to make fewer missteps.

Several patterns are emerging. First, the most resilient brands treat pricing as part of product development – not something tacked on after costs are tallied. They design with trade-offs in mind: what customers see, what they value, and what they’ll pay more for. In these organizations, pricing sits alongside marketing, insights, and supply chain – not in a siloed finance function.

Second, short-term fixes are being replaced with structured testing. Companies that previously treated pricing research as an annual or ad-hoc exercise are now investing in more frequent, faster measurement – integrating survey-based models with real-time sales and competitive data. This shift isn’t about chasing perfect precision. It’s about reducing guesswork.

Third, regional variation is back in focus. After years of global price harmonization, more brands are returning to market-by-market pricing. Tariff impacts, consumer sentiment, and price sensitivity differ dramatically between the US, Southeast Asia, and Europe. A strategy that works in Singapore may unravel in Texas. Research agencies are increasingly being asked to localize price testing and conjoint simulations – especially for product lines being repositioned or repackaged due to input cost changes.

There’s also more internal scrutiny. Boards and shareholders are asking tougher questions about the long-term effects of pricing actions. What’s the risk of training customers to wait for discounts? Are private-label defections reversible? Are loyalty gains being offset by unit loss? The pressure is no longer just to raise prices – but to prove that doing so won’t damage the brand a year from now.

For leadership teams, pricing has become a balancing act between margin and momentum. Push too hard, and customers disappear. Hold back too much, and financials fall short. The brands that get it right are not guessing where the line is. They’re measuring it – then acting with discipline.

In an environment shaped by shifting costs, tariff risk, and consumer fatigue, pricing is no longer a lever to pull. It’s a strategy to build.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.