The Integral Role of Focus Groups in Modern Healthcare.

Image of the post author Geetika Chhatwal

Healthcare, at its core, revolves around people. From intricate surgeries to innovative health tech, the ultimate goal remains constant: improving patient outcomes. Understanding the myriad perspectives of patients and providers is central to achieving this. 

Enter focus groups. More than mere conversation circles, focus groups in healthcare have become essential feedback tools that drive change.

Understanding the Significance of Focus Groups in Healthcare

Focus groups comprise select individuals representing specific demographics, brought together to deliberate on designated topics. Within healthcare, they’re more than just discussions—they’re symposiums of lived experiences, professional insights, and potential solutions.

The Expanding Role in Healthcare

Cracking the Patient Experience: More than just gauging satisfaction, focus groups examine patients’ emotional journeys, pinpointing precise moments of unease, joy, or confusion during their healthcare experiences.

Shaping Medical Innovations: As tech pushes the boundaries of medicine, these groups serve as critical sounding boards. They relay potential user needs and unvoiced concerns, ensuring innovations are both groundbreaking and grounded in reality.

Informing Health Policies: As policies lay the framework for practice, focus group insights ensure these frameworks resonate with real-world needs and challenges.


Diving Deeper into the Pros and Cons

Advantages of using focus groups in a healthcare setting:

  • A Spectrum of Views: A well-conducted focus group offers a kaleidoscope of perspectives, often uncovering nuances missed in larger surveys.
  • Interactive Feedback Loop: Real-time conversations allow for spontaneous questions, generating richer data.
  • Revelation of Uncharted Concerns: These groups can spotlight issues entirely off researchers’ radar, paving the way for preemptive solutions.

Disadvantages of using focus groups for healthcare products and services:

  • Qualitative versus Quantitative: Focus groups give depth, not breadth. They reveal the ‘why’ but may not always represent the majority sentiment.
  • Dominance Bias: The loudest voices might overshadow subtler, equally vital, inputs.
  • Resource Intensity: From recruitment to analysis, focus groups demand time, expertise, and tools.

Methodology, Tools and Techniques

Strategic Recruitment: Leveraging digital platforms or specialized patient databases can ensure a diverse participant mix.

Comprehensive Recording: Advanced audio and video equipment capture every nuance for richer patient experience analysis.

Expert Transcription: Professional services can translate discussions into data-ready formats.

Sophisticated Data Analytics: With tools like NVivo, qualitative data turns into actionable insights.

Embracing Digital Evolution: Platforms like Webex or Google Meet now facilitate virtual focus groups, erasing geographical boundaries and logistical hiccups.

Examples of Focus Group questions for healthcare services

Given the broad spectrum of the healthcare field, here is a blend of open-ended and closed questions that can be adapted across various healthcare contexts:

Open-ended Questions:

Understanding Patient Experience: “Can you walk us through your last visit to our facility? What stood out to you the most?”

Identifying Pain Points: “What challenges or inconveniences have you encountered while accessing our healthcare services?”

Treatment and Follow-up: “Describe how you felt about the communication and guidance you received post-treatment. Were there areas you wish had been addressed differently?”

Digital Health Experience: “How has your experience been using our online patient portal or telehealth services? What improvements would you suggest?”

Closed Questions:

Closed questions can yield direct, quantifiable responses, while open-ended ones allow patients to share more comprehensive insights, making them a rich source of qualitative feedback. Both are crucial for refining healthcare delivery. Here are some examples of closed questions:

Facility & Staff Evaluation: “On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate the cleanliness and ambiance of our facility during your last visit?”

Appointment Scheduling: “Was the process of scheduling your last appointment straightforward and convenient? (Yes/No)”

Professional Interaction: “Did our medical staff explain the procedures and treatments in a manner that was easy for you to understand? (Yes/No/Somewhat)”

Privacy Concerns: “Do you feel your personal and medical information is kept confidential with us? (Yes/No)”

Exploring Mental Healthcare: Insights from European Adults with Lived Experiences


Mental well-being is fundamental to society, and while the World Health Organization underscores pillars like availability, accessibility, quality, and acceptability of healthcare, there’s a noticeable gap in high-quality mental healthcare for many Europeans. Tapping into the perspectives of those with firsthand experiences can yield deeper insights. This study aimed to collate the experiences of adult Europeans navigating mental healthcare.


The study engaged 50 participants from various European countries with diverse mental health challenges. Their experiences spanned both private and public sectors, covering inpatient and outpatient care. These participants were grouped for focus group interviews. All sessions, totaling seven, were meticulously audio-recorded and transcribed. A comprehensive thematic analysis led to the identification of five major themes, further divided into 13 subthemes.

Key Findings:

The Quest for Assistance:

  • Recognizing when professional intervention is needed.
  • Confusion about where to turn for aid.
  • The critical nature of timely assistance.

The Waiting Game: Assessment & Treatment:

  • Feelings related to being given priority or lack thereof.
  • Emotions of feeling forgotten during extended referral processes.

Treatment: A Mosaic of Needs:

  • The role of medication and dedicated professionals.
  • Collaboration and consensus on treatment routes.

The Pillars of Care: Consistency and Dignity:

  • The undeniable value of consistent care is rooted in empathy.
  • The need for a respectful care environment.

Roadmap to Refinement:

  • Simplifying and enhancing care access points.
  • Amplifying mental health awareness.
  • Recognizing patients as unique individuals with untapped potential.

This study offers a profound, user-centered lens into the world of mental healthcare in Europe, suggesting pathways to better, more compassionate care.

Final Thoughts

The healthcare universe is expansive, with every innovation, policy, or procedure having profound ripple effects. Focus groups serve as invaluable touchpoints, grounding these ripples in the reality of patient experience. As health standards evolve, the nuanced feedback from such groups ensures that change remains not just technologically advanced but deeply human-centric.

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.