Consumer Behavior Archives

Cash is disappearing from daily life across Southeast Asia. In 2019, nearly half of all transactions in Asia were made in cash. By 2027, that figure is expected to fall to just 14 percent, according to the Bank for International Settlements. Mobile wallets—once a convenience—are now overtaking physical currency as the region’s default mode of payment.

This isn’t just a shift in how people pay. It’s a full-blown rewrite of Southeast Asia’s consumer economy. From Bangkok to Manila, behavior, access, and mobility are being shaped by QR codes, app-driven incentives, and an ecosystem of competing fintech platforms racing to own the checkout moment.

The scale of adoption is staggering. In the Philippines, over 90 million people—around 80 percent of the population—use GCash or Maya, according to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. In Indonesia, QRIS transactions surged to 2.7 billion in 2024, up 66 percent from the year prior, based on data from Bank Indonesia.

Thailand logged more than 16 billion PromptPay transactions in 2023, cementing it as the country’s most common payment method. In Singapore, the SGQR system now supports over 30 digital payment schemes, allowing users to scan a single code and choose their preferred app—no cash, no card, no friction.

Unlike China and India, where single players dominate, Southeast Asia is shaping a multi-platform economy. Consumers aren’t just going digital; they’re actively choosing between wallets based on rewards, speed, and the ecosystem of services attached to each app.

The Regional Play

A landmark pact between five ASEAN countries is turning mobile payments into a regional system. Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and the Philippines have linked their QR code schemes, enabling cross-border wallet use. A Filipino tourist in Bangkok can pay with GCash. A Thai traveler in Singapore can use PromptPay. No currency exchange. No new app. Just scan and go.

This isn’t just symbolic cooperation. It’s a practical leap toward regional commerce at digital speed. Consumers already expect to scan and pay anywhere. Now, the infrastructure is catching up.

More than 100 million tourists visited ASEAN countries in 2024. Many of them already live cashless at home—and now expect the same abroad. For small businesses, cross-border payments mean a wider market without new infrastructure. A QR sticker and a smartphone are all it takes.

Policymakers see this as just the beginning. Cross-border wallet use could soon expand to remittances, regional e-commerce, and subscription billing. Southeast Asia is quietly building the infrastructure to support a truly interoperable digital economy.

Platform Power and Wallet Wars

Beneath all this infrastructure is a more urgent contest—one for daily dominance. Wallets are no longer just payment tools. They are retail ecosystems, vying for attention, behavior, and loyalty.

In Indonesia, ShopeePay, OVO, and Dana are locked in a three-way race, each tying payments to e-commerce, food delivery, and retail perks. In the Philippines, GCash leads with over 90 million users, while Maya carves out a younger audience through crypto, banking, and cashback. GrabPay holds ground in Singapore and Malaysia by weaving payments into transport and everyday services.

These wallets don’t just process payments. They offer credit, savings, loyalty points, insurance, and instant promotions. Consumers now choose where to shop based on who gives the better deal—not who’s closest or cheapest.

Brands are adapting fast. Retailers are building in-wallet offers and flash deals to stay top of mind. Banks are co-branding products to remain visible inside apps. In this economy, platform presence can matter more than price point.

Wallet ecosystems aren’t just changing how people pay—they’re changing how people choose. As competition heats up, the most powerful wallets are becoming retail platforms in their own right, collapsing the gap between promotion and purchase.

How Brands Are Winning in the Wallet Economy

Jollibee x GCash: Scaling Speed and Spend with QR Exclusives

Jollibee has turned mobile wallets into more than just payment tools. In early 2024, the Filipino fast-food giant piloted QR-only express counters in busy Metro Manila stores—accepting GCash exclusively for walk-up orders.

The results were immediate. Checkout times fell by 30 percent on average, with lunchtime throughput increasing by nearly 20 percent in the busiest branches. But the real advantage was behavioral. GCash-linked promotions—including “buy one, get one” bundles for specific meal sets—drove higher ticket sizes and repeat visits. Jollibee reported a 12 percent lift in average order value among wallet users compared to traditional cash or card buyers during the campaign window.

Beyond volume, the partnership gave Jollibee something more valuable: clear usage patterns. It tracked conversion by time of day, adjusted promotions instantly, and mapped how wallet users shop differently. The model offers lessons beyond fast food. QSR chains across the region are now experimenting with QR-linked incentives to boost order volume and loyalty.

Unilever Vietnam x ZaloPay: Closing the Loop on Sampling and Segmentation

Unilever Vietnam used mobile wallets for more than sales—it used them to test, learn, and refine. In a 2024 pilot with ZaloPay, the brand launched a digital sampling campaign for its new “urban essentials” personal care line targeting Gen Z professionals.

Consumers claimed samples directly through the ZaloPay app, but redemption came with a short quiz and opt-in to Unilever’s official account. In just three weeks, over 150,000 users participated. Of those, 17 percent converted to purchase. More importantly, the campaign delivered real data: which products got tried, how long users waited, and who came back to buy.

Traditional sampling often delivers little feedback and a lot of waste. This campaign flipped the script. For FMCG brands, it’s a path forward—less sampling waste, more segment-level insight, and faster market-readiness. It wasn’t just about targeting—it was about validating what a new segment actually wanted.

Wallets as Retail Real Estate

In Southeast Asia’s evolving consumer economy, mobile wallets are becoming the new shelf. They are visible, contextual, and central to purchase decisions. No longer just the endpoint, they’re shaping what happens before the sale is even made.

Wallets are now where discovery happens. Real-time promos, loyalty rewards, and flash deals make QR apps as influential as in-store signage. In Indonesia, ShopeePay’s “Deals Near Me” surfaces location-based offers that nudge shoppers toward one convenience store—or one coffee shop—over another.

UX Design is now strategy. What shows up on the payment screen—bundled meals, upsells, time-limited offers—can shift behavior in seconds. In a recent survey, 62 percent of Southeast Asian wallet users said an in-app offer had changed their purchase decision in the past three months.

Brands are responding with wallet-native campaigns. In the Philippines, GCash partners with major retailers to launch app-exclusive bundles. In Vietnam, FMCG players are testing ZaloPay-only SKUs to gauge price sensitivity among mobile-first Gen Z consumers.

For marketers, this changes the playbook. Campaigns now live inside the moment—built into the wallet, not broadcast through media. And just like endcaps in a store, wallet placement is scarce, valuable, and judged by performance.

How Digital Wallets Are Closing the Financial Gap

While wallets compete for urban customers, they also unlock access for millions previously excluded from formal finance. The World Bank estimates that over 40 percent of adults in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Vietnam remain unbanked. Mobile wallets are changing that.

Street vendors, farmers, and gig workers are now building financial histories with every tap. In Indonesia, over 29 million small businesses use QRIS to accept payments. In the Philippines, GCash delivers welfare payouts, subsidies, and remittances, often to people who’ve never walked into a bank.

This shift is producing an entirely new class of consumers. They’re connected but overlooked—digitally fluent but invisible to most traditional marketing models. For researchers, the challenge now is to understand how financial access rewires habits and reshapes trust.

Wallet adoption may be booming across the region, but no two markets look alike. Some are dominated by one or two players. Others support overlapping apps, bank wallets, and homegrown fintechs. The variation speaks to different consumer needs and regulatory choices.

Comparing Wallet Ecosystems Across ASEAN

Country	Dominant Wallets	Notable Features	Estimated Adoption
Indonesia	Dana, OVO, ShopeePay	QRIS compliance, local cashback, offline ubiquity	70–75%
Philippines	GCash, Maya	Microloans, utility payments, crypto access	80–85%
Thailand	PromptPay, TrueMoney	Linked to national ID and digital welfare payouts	90%+
Singapore	GrabPay, PayNow, DBS PayLah	High QR interoperability, cross-border ready	95%+
Malaysia	Touch ‘n Go, Boost	Toll road integration, state-backed incentives	80%+

Sources: Central bank data, World Bank Global Findex (2024), platform reporting

What This Signals

The wallet boom in Southeast Asia is not a trend—it’s a system reset. It’s changing how value flows, how behavior is tracked, and who gets included.

Consumers are gaining fast access to finance, but only through platforms that decide the terms. Governments see more. Banks lose ground. Retailers shift strategy. But the risks are real—ecosystem lock-in, data monopolies, and a widening gap for the disconnected.

Southeast Asia is building the prototype for a fully digital consumer economy. What works here won’t stay here. Markets with similar demographics will follow—some already are.

As wallets become embedded in daily life, they generate a stream of behavioral data that most traditional research methods cannot easily replicate. For brands and researchers alike, this shift is not just an operational upgrade—it is a structural advantage.

Who Gets Left Behind in a Wallet-Led Economy

Not everyone is tapping phones or using QR codes. Across Southeast Asia, millions still rely on cash, not by choice, but by necessity. As digital systems race ahead, they are leaving some consumers behind.

The elderly, rural communities, and informal workers without smartphones or stable internet still make up a large share of the population in countries like Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. For many, wallets remain either out of reach or out of trust.

Even in cities, resistance is growing. Consumers worry about data tracking, fraud, and hidden fees. In Thailand, a watchdog recently warned about wallet-based lenders targeting young users with high-interest loans disguised as pay-later perks.

Cash still offers something digital doesn’t—trust. In many traditional communities, handing over bills is easier, more familiar, and more accepted. As merchants go digital, cash users risk being pushed out of the transaction altogether.

Governments face a balancing act: modernize finance without deepening exclusion. Incentives for wallet use should not come at the cost of cash access, especially in rural or unbanked areas. For brands, the solution lies in hybrid systems that serve both digital adopters and cash loyalists.

The danger of a wallet-led economy is not that it moves too fast, but that it forgets who isn’t coming along. Progress will be measured not just in QR checkouts, but in how well the new economy includes the voices, habits, and limitations of every consumer.

A View from the Future Consumer

Southeast Asia is not just adopting digital finance—it’s rewriting the rules. While Europe debates regulation and the U.S. sticks to cards, this region is designing a payment system that is mobile, fast, and increasingly borderless. Consumers aren’t waiting for banks to evolve. They’re building the next model themselves.

For brands, the implications are clear. The old playbook—national campaigns, static rewards, and linear funnels—no longer works. Today’s consumers jump across apps, currencies, and contexts without hesitation. The winners will meet them there, designing not for convenience, but for relevance at the point of payment. Pricing isn’t set in advance. It’s surfaced in the moment—shaped by wallet prompts, bundled rewards, or time-limited offers.

For researchers, this landscape offers something rare: behavior in real time. Every wallet tap leaves a trackable decision—what was bought, where, when, and how the user was nudged. But knowing what happened is not the same as knowing why. That’s where research matters most. Ethnography, cultural fluency, and journey mapping are the tools that explain what dashboards alone can’t.

Research must move faster, go deeper, and sit closer to where decisions are made—in wallet ecosystems, in platform partnerships, and in the fast-evolving lives of Southeast Asian consumers.

Some brands are already blending behavior data with on-the-ground insight. In Vietnam, a beverage company spotted rural sales spikes through wallet data. Field interviews revealed the link: payday loans disbursed on the same day each month. That single insight reshaped everything—from promo timing to pack size.

The next breakthroughs in understanding consumers won’t come from dashboards alone. They’ll come from pairing live data with lived experience—decoding what people do and why they do it. The future of research isn’t digital by default. It’s embedded, agile, and built inside the systems where decisions happen.

Consumer power is shifting from income to intuition—from how much people spend to how fluently they move through the ecosystems around them. Southeast Asia isn’t adapting. It’s leading.

Kadence International helps brands decode evolving consumer behavior across Asia and beyond. To understand what drives tomorrow’s decisions, talk to our team.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Thailand is embarking on a bold economic initiative that intertwines fiscal stimulus with digital innovation. The government has launched a digital wallet scheme, providing eligible citizens a one-time payment of ฿10,000 (approximately USD 275). This initiative aims to invigorate local economies and accelerate the nation’s transition to a cashless society.

The program is being rolled out in phases, with the third phase targeting 2.7 million young individuals aged 16 to 20. These recipients will receive the funds through the Thang Rath app, a government-developed platform to facilitate digital transactions. The funds are intended for use within local communities, with certain restrictions to ensure the money stimulates domestic consumption.

Thailand’s digital wallet initiative aims to stimulate economic activity and promote digital transactions. The program’s first phase targeted 50 million citizens aged 16 and above, each receiving ฿10,000 (approximately USD 275) through a digital wallet. This approach is designed to encourage spending within local economies and accelerate the country’s shift towards a cashless society.

Thailand’s digital wallet program is a significant case study in integrating fiscal policy with digital technology. By distributing funds through digital means, the government stimulates the economy and encourages the adoption of digital payment systems, potentially influencing consumer habits and financial behaviors.

From Handout to Handset

This is money designed to move markets. Thailand’s ฿10,000 (USD 275) digital wallet credit is distributed exclusively via mobile apps. It has clear boundaries: it must be spent within a designated time period, in specific geographic areas, and only through participating merchants equipped to handle digital payments. The delivery mechanism is the government-backed Thang Rat app, which uses national ID verification to register users and link them to eligible purchases.

The program injects short-term liquidity while strategically embedding digital transactions into routine life. Access requires digital fluency – scanning codes, verifying identity, and transacting within the PromptPay ecosystem. The interface has been streamlined for ease, but the implications are layered. Thailand is accelerating the normalization of app-mediated spending across demographics and regions.

Financial institutions and major digital wallet providers are working behind the scenes to integrate merchant systems and stabilize the transaction flow to ensure rapid uptake. This isn’t limited to major retailers. Many small vendors, from noodle stalls to corner pharmacies, are registering to accept payments. The digital wallet scheme demands not just consumer participation, but full-scale merchant onboarding into a cashless economy.

This is a behavioral leap for millions of Thais who still rely heavily on cash. But for younger recipients, the transition feels intuitive. Many live on their smartphones, accustomed to social commerce, e-wallet promos, and gamified savings. What the government is effectively doing is placing a financial incentive on behavior they’re already inclined to adopt.

In this way, the program is a behavioral nudge packaged as an economic policy. It’s teaching people how to spend in a new way, and rewarding them for doing it quickly.

A Timed Windfall for Local Commerce

Businesses across Thailand are preparing for increased consumer spending driven by the digital wallet program. The requirement for funds to be used within a specific period encourages immediate spending, prompting merchants to adjust their pricing strategies and promotional activities accordingly.

Food stalls are printing QR codes, retailers are adjusting shift schedules, salon owners, café managers, and shopfront vendors are updating signage to remind passersby that e-wallets are accepted here. The shift is visible and urgent in provinces where cash has long dominated daily transactions.

In Bangkok’s inner districts, chains and convenience stores are doubling down on digital promotions. Buy-one-get-one offers, bundled discounts, and mobile flash sales are being calibrated to coincide with the disbursement dates. The psychology behind it is clear: create immediacy, trigger impulse purchases, and keep consumers in-app and on-premise.

Meanwhile, mom-and-pop stores in Chiang Mai, Khon Kaen, and Phuket are entering the formal financial ecosystem for the first time. Participation in the program requires digital onboarding. The upside: access to new customers flush with government-backed spending power. The risk: failing to move quickly could mean missing the wave altogether.

Consumer behavior is expected to be fluid but focused. Analysts anticipate that essentials and small indulgences, like meals, home goods, and personal care, will dominate early spending. But discretionary categories, especially fashion and electronics, could also benefit, particularly if retailers tailor offerings to fit within the ฿10,000 bracket.

This is a demand surge programmed into the system. Every player, from a street vendor selling grilled pork skewers to a regional supermarket chain, is being pulled into a countdown economy, where readiness and responsiveness could decide who gains and who gets left behind.

Digital Payments Go Mainstream in Thailand

The timing of Thailand’s digital wallet rollout is no accident. With PromptPay already embedded into daily life through peer-to-peer transfers and utility payments, the infrastructure for mass adoption was quietly laid years ago. What’s happening now is a sudden acceleration, where digital payments are no longer a convenience, but a condition for participation.

The mechanics are simple: the digital credit can only be spent via QR code transactions within the Thang Rat app or partner platforms. While younger, tech-savvy consumers may find the digital wallet system intuitive, older demographics and small businesses in semi-urban or rural areas face challenges in adopting this technology. Efforts are underway to support and educate these groups to ensure inclusive participation in the program.

This forced familiarity is a powerful lever. In previous government subsidies, such as the “Half-Half” co-payment scheme, uptake of digital payments spiked, but often reverted once the incentive expired. The difference this time lies in scale, urgency, and exclusivity. With no offline alternative, digital behavior becomes the default.

Retailers, both large and small, are expanding their digital loyalty ecosystems, leveraging infrastructure that’s already in place. Meanwhile, independent merchants are being trained through government-led and private sector initiatives, many of whom accept mobile payments alongside cash for the first time.

There are structural benefits too. Digital transactions bring transparency, reduce leakage, and pull more activity into the taxable economy. For financial institutions and fintech platforms, it’s a rare moment to onboard users en masse, expand digital credit histories, and introduce adjacent services like microloans and savings tools. What was once novel, QR payments and app-exclusive deals, is now baseline behavior. Habits form, preferences evolve, and expectations reset.

For Thailand, this isn’t just about going cashless. It’s about normalizing a new rhythm of consumption, one mediated by apps, verified by biometrics, and reinforced through constant interface with digital payment systems.

Programmed Consumption and the Rise of Directed Demand

Thailand’s digital wallet program doesn’t simply encourage spending; it shapes it. By placing parameters on how, where, and when the ฿10,000 can be used, the government has introduced a form of economic steering rarely seen at this scale. Unlike traditional cash stimulus, which relies on recipients to allocate funds freely, this initiative narrows consumer choice and concentrates activity into predefined lanes.

The logic is deliberate. Restricting usage to local businesses prevents capital leakage to international e-commerce platforms. Limiting the timeframe creates urgency. Requiring digital payment methods brings consumers and merchants into closer contact with formal financial systems. By specifying where and how the digital wallet funds can be used, the government effectively directs consumer spending towards specific sectors and regions, aiming to boost local economies and encourage digital payment systems.

This creates a behavioral moment for consumers. Faced with a ticking clock and a limited range of vendors, they are more likely to make purchase decisions that are reactive, needs-based, or convenience-driven. This doesn’t eliminate agency, but it does channel it. The consumer becomes a participant in a curated economic script.

Retailers are adapting quickly. Some design promotions that align with the wallet’s value cap, offering bundles or tiered discounts pegged just under ฿10,000. Others are integrating in-app incentives, such as exclusive digital deals or gamified rewards. It’s not a one-off campaign. It’s a moment for brands to convert compliance into long-term connection.

There are also downstream effects. Data trails emerge as millions engage in digital-first transactions over a condensed period. Purchase preferences, time-of-day activity, and location-based behavior are logged in real time. This creates a trove of behavioral insights for tech partners and financial services firms, potentially reshaping how credit scoring, product development, and localized marketing unfold in the months ahead.

Similar experiments have been attempted globally, particularly in conditional cash transfers. But Thailand’s version is uniquely digitized, centralized, and transactional. It offers a test case in how programmable money can accelerate economic recovery and behavioral adaptation.

Understanding how different consumer groups respond to this stimulus is essential for long-term strategy. Young adults, already comfortable with mobile interfaces, adapt rapidly, but older consumers may show resistance or partial adoption. Rural users face infrastructure gaps that could slow uptake or reshape spending patterns around trusted local merchants. Urban Gen Zs may spend impulsively and favor experiential categories, while Gen X participants lean toward utility-driven purchases. These behavioral distinctions matter for segmentation, pricing, and product development, particularly as brands look to refine future targeting based on wallet usage data.

New Norms in Marketing and Merchandising

The digital wallet program is forcing businesses in Thailand to rethink the fundamentals of how they market, merchandise, and manage demand. Digital credit may be temporary, but behavioral ripple effects influence how brands present themselves online and in-store.

At the heart of this transformation is timing. With a strict window in which the funds must be used, consumer attention is compressed. That changes the marketing calculus. There’s no luxury of a long lead funnel or sustained brand storytelling. Campaigns must hit fast and deliver clear value. QR codes aren’t just payment methods; they’re now marketing triggers, embedded in posters, flyers, and social posts that tie spending to immediacy.

Product curation has also shifted. Brands are building product bundles priced just below the ฿10,000 threshold, creating psychological cues for consumers to spend the full amount. Some offer flash deals that reset daily, while others push limited-time bundles through retailer apps or LINE commerce channels. These are not just promotions but engineered conversions calibrated to align with the digital wallet framework.

Inventory planning, too, has become more dynamic. Mid-sized retailers and national chains are using digital dashboards to track wallet-driven demand in real time, enabling rapid stock reallocation. Categories like food delivery, personal electronics, cosmetics, and small household appliances are spiking, especially among younger consumers already fluent in app-centered shopping habits.

The new challenge is coherence for businesses operating in both physical and digital spaces. Messaging must be synchronized across touchpoints, inventory systems must be tightly integrated, and customer service needs to anticipate a wave of first-time digital shoppers. This isn’t just a surge; it’s a behavioral onramp for consumers who have never interacted with a loyalty program or browsed a brand’s offerings through an app.

Loyalty itself is being redefined. With state-funded money in play, consumer allegiance becomes fluid. People are less concerned with brand heritage and more focused on price, accessibility, and in-app rewards. The brands that win in this window may not be the ones with the longest history, but the ones that adapt fastest to this new consumption model.

A Testbed for Market Entry and Innovation

Thailand’s digital wallet stimulus is becoming a live laboratory for market entrants and tech innovators. The initiative presents a rare opportunity to observe real-time consumer responses at scale, under state-structured conditions, by creating a compressed environment of digitally enabled, time-bound consumption.

This moment offers more than a demand bump for global brands and startups exploring Southeast Asia. It provides behavioral proof points. Which price points resonate with a digitally empowered consumer base? How do young adults prioritize purchases with a fixed wallet balance and expiration date? What formats – QR discounts, app-based coupons, social-first promotions – translate into immediate action?

For global brands operating in Thailand, the closed-loop nature of the wallet system introduces new constraints. Transactions are restricted to pre-approved domestic merchants using Thai QR payment infrastructure, sidelining international platforms and foreign e-commerce flows. This forces global players to rethink their localization strategy, not just in language or pricing but also in payment compatibility, compliance with local fintech protocols, and partnerships with Thai digital ecosystems. Without local enablement, access to wallet-driven demand is effectively off-limits.

These are questions that typical market entry research can only approximate. But in Thailand right now, the data is unfolding in real time.

Retail tech platforms are already responding. Point-of-sale solutions are being retrofitted to accommodate PromptPay and Thang Rat app syncing. Loyalty software providers are rolling out integrations tailored for the short-term stimulus. Meanwhile, financial institutions are watching new patterns emerge around credit top-ups, digital wallet storage, and tiered savings, insights that could inform broader regional product development.

For brands considering market entry, the digital wallet rollout reduces uncertainty. It forces clarity around key operational requirements: payment infrastructure compatibility, smartphone-optimized UX design, local partnership strategy, and promotional agility. Previously theoretical risks like payment fragmentation and uneven digital engagement are unfolding in real time, offering rare visibility.

There is also a broader story unfolding around interoperability. Local players that capture wallet-based spending may quickly gain bargaining power in distribution deals or tech partnerships. New winners could emerge, not just based on product strength but also on their ability to move quickly, adapt nimbly, and serve a new type of Thai consumer who expects digital fluency as the norm.

In this way, the program becomes more than a fiscal initiative. It is a proving ground for what works in digitally conditioned economies, and a barometer for how brands, especially those eyeing ASEAN growth, should rethink their playbooks.

Beyond the Wallet

The digital wallet program is temporary, but the behavioral architecture it introduces is anything but. Thailand’s push toward app-based, conditional cash disbursement may be a one-off stimulus. Still, it functions as a prototype that could shape the long-term relationship between consumers, digital ecosystems, and the state.

At a policy level, it hints at future mechanisms for targeted fiscal relief. With a national app tied to ID verification, merchant QR capability, and geofenced rails, Thailand has the infrastructure for agile, targeted interventions. Imagine fuel subsidies issued directly to drivers’ wallets, or education grants tied to purchases at approved vendors. Thailand is effectively building the scaffolding for programmable transfers that move beyond welfare and into consumer engineering.

For brands, this shifts the horizon. Suppose public spending can be deployed with this degree of precision. In that case, market strategy must now factor in state influence – not just regulation or taxation, but direct participation in how demand is created, distributed, and spent.

It also raises questions about data sovereignty and consumer privacy. Every transaction under this program is logged, time-stamped, and geolocated. While much of the data is anonymized or aggregated, tracking purchasing behaviors at this scale gives policymakers and platforms a new level of visibility and responsibility. Transparency, ethical use, and public trust will become defining themes as similar programs proliferate.

For consumers, the wallet scheme introduces a new normal, not just in how they pay but also in how they engage with money. Spending has become traceable and digitally shaped. This could foster a generation of Thais who expect convenience, traceability, and flexibility from every financial interaction—expectations that will extend far beyond this program.

In the broader Southeast Asian context, Thailand’s experiment is being watched. Governments from Vietnam to Malaysia are exploring their own pathways toward digital inclusion and financial modernization. If Thailand’s model successfully drives lasting consumer habits, similar regional models could be accelerated.

What remains unclear is whether these behaviors will stick. Will consumers continue favoring QR payments, or will familiar cash habits resurface? Much will depend on how embedded digital convenience becomes in daily transactions and whether follow-up incentives, merchant retention, and habit reinforcement mechanisms remain. This presents a live opportunity for market researchers to track post-stimulus drop-offs, digital payment stickiness, and evolving consumer loyalty under real-world conditions.

If replicated across ASEAN, this state-led digital payment model could redefine how governments stimulate economies and how brands prepare for demand. Thailand’s model offers a scalable blueprint in markets like Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, where digital infrastructure is expanding but financial inclusion remains uneven.

There’s also a broader possibility: what begins as a one-off wallet scheme could evolve into a prototype for Universal Basic Income trials delivered via fintech. Conditional, trackable, and segmentable, such frameworks would allow governments to deploy aid, test responses, tweak incentives, and monitor outcomes in real time.

Thailand’s digital wallet initiative illustrates the growing interplay between government policy and consumer behavior. For businesses, this underscores the importance of aligning with digital platforms and payment systems increasingly influenced by public sector strategies.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The next wave of edtech growth isn’t being engineered in boardrooms or classrooms. It’s unfolding in bedrooms, dorm halls, and digital chat groups – where students turn smartphones into production studios and learning platforms into launchpads. Armed with ring lights and revision hacks, Gen Z creators are transforming how education is marketed, consumed, and experienced.

As the creator economy collides with online learning, edtech firms increasingly tap into student-led content to drive adoption and engagement. These are not traditional brand ambassadors. They’re 17-year-olds making calculus go viral on TikTok, undergraduates breaking down coding concepts on YouTube, and peer influencers creating community-led momentum that no ad spend can replicate.

It’s a shift that goes beyond marketing. The rise of peer co-creation is shaping the very future of digital education, raising questions about influence, equity, and outcomes. And as both Western and Asian edtech platforms double down on this strategy, one thing is clear: the line between learner and creator is rapidly disappearing.

Students take control of the edtech narrative

This behavioral shift isn’t accidental. It’s a direct outcome of how Gen Z and Gen Alpha navigate the world: socially networked, algorithm-aware, and deeply influenced by peer credibility.

For today’s learners, discovering an edtech platform through a classmate’s Instagram Reel or a late-night TikTok “study with me” session holds more weight than a polished brand campaign. Tutorials, crash courses, and day-in-the-life videos now double as endorsements, often outperforming official content in reach and relatability.

Behind the scenes, edtech companies are starting to adapt. Instead of focusing solely on institutional partnerships or top-down content strategies, platforms nurture creator ecosystems. Sometimes, they quietly offer toolkits, early access, and micro-incentives to student influencers who generate organic traction. The logic is clear: trust is the new currency, and students trust each other.

This peer-powered loop doesn’t just drive engagement – it shapes product design, fuels viral growth and turns users into evangelists. For edtech brands seeking to scale in saturated markets, the most strategic growth play may be letting students take the mic.

Khan Academy builds influence through relatability

In the US, Khan Academy is leaning into student-powered storytelling without making a spectacle of it. While the platform’s core content remains institutionally produced, its growth on social media owes much to an informal network of young creators – high schoolers and college students explaining how Khan helped them prep for the SATs, ace AP exams, or survive algebra.

Rather than launching overt influencer programs, Khan Academy benefits from what marketers might call “earned influence.” Creators like Thomas Frank—whose YouTube channel has over 3 million subscribers and more than 183 million views – frequently reference tools like Khan Academy in their tutorials. These mentions – organic, peer-driven, and peppered with personal success stories – carry a resonance that brand messaging rarely matches.

The result? A constant stream of creator-led endorsements embedded in motivational reels, test prep rundowns, and “study with me” live streams. The platform’s visibility continues to grow not through ads but through creators who view Khan as part of their academic survival toolkit. For students, it’s not just a resource. It’s a badge of belonging.

Classplus taps regional creators to drive depth over scale

In India’s competitive edtech landscape, Classplus has carved a distinct path by empowering educators to run their online classrooms. But increasingly, it’s students who are amplifying its reach. On Instagram, ShareChat, and even WhatsApp groups, testimonials and tutorials recorded by learners in Hindi, Tamil, and Bengali are helping the platform penetrate beyond metro cities into India’s vast tier-2 and tier-3 markets.

These are not slick influencer campaigns. Often filmed on low-budget phones with minimal editing, the content reflects real student experiences – test scores, improved confidence, or simply how a Classplus module helped crack a tough exam concept. The authenticity resonates, especially among first-generation digital learners seeking guidance in their native language.

Classplus hasn’t ignored the trend. The company has begun quietly supporting these student creators by spotlighting their content on its official channels and offering resources to help structure their narratives. In some cases, creators have even evolved into local brand champions – hosting peer workshops, leading Telegram study groups, and shaping how the platform adapts to regional needs.

While many edtech players chase national scale, Classplus is betting that peer-led credibility in small communities may prove more sustainable (and more powerful) than mass-market advertising.

Zenius turns TikTok into a learning laboratory

In Indonesia, Zenius is rewriting the rules of student engagement by meeting Gen Z exactly where they are – on TikTok. The platform, which offers curriculum-aligned content for K-12 learners, has seen a surge in student-driven explainers, study hacks, and motivational clips that blend humor with academic rigor. What might once have been dry exam prep is now delivered with trending sounds, meme formats, and an unmistakably local voice.

Rather than competing for attention, Zenius has embraced this creative energy. Its team actively encourages students to remix educational content into short-form videos and even runs nationwide creator challenges to spark participation. Top-performing videos – like a viral breakdown of Newton’s laws using motorbike stunts – don’t just boost app downloads. They position Zenius as a platform that understands and reflects the student mindset. Zenius’s own TikTok account, @zeniuseducation, has built a substantial following, demonstrating the platform’s resonance with Gen Z audiences in Indonesia.

The strategy taps into more than entertainment. By enabling students to co-create and share learning moments, Zenius is fostering a sense of ownership and community. Creators become informal tutors, and learning transforms into a social experience – one that travels through peer networks far faster than traditional classroom methods.

For a generation that learns in bursts, scrolls for validation, and values authenticity over authority, Zenius is proving the future of education might look a lot more like the For You Page.

How-Student-Creators-Are-Shaping-the-Future-of-EdTech

The influence dilemma behind student-led learning

As student creators gain traction, edtech companies navigate a delicate balance between engagement and responsibility. What happens when learning starts to look more like content creation? For every viral study hack or exam tip that spreads across TikTok or YouTube Shorts, there’s the risk of misinformation, burnout, or unintended pressure to perform for views.

Experts are divided. Some argue that co-creation fosters deeper learning, with students reinforcing their knowledge by teaching others. For example, an academic review of TikTok’s role in education cautioned that while it increases engagement, the brevity and virality of the content can undermine conceptual depth and accuracy, especially when non-experts are involved.

Others warn that when education is filtered through the lens of likes and shares, rigor can give way to popularity.

There’s also the question of transparency. As platforms begin to reward creators – either through visibility, free subscriptions, or direct payments – questions around sponsorship disclosure and authenticity are becoming harder to ignore. In a space where trust is everything, even the perception of promotion can erode credibility.

Mental health concerns are mounting, too. Students doubling as creators often juggle schoolwork with self-imposed content calendars, leading to stress, screen fatigue, and anxiety around performance metrics. Without clear boundaries or institutional support, the model risks amplifying the very challenges it aims to solve.

“TikTok is redefining how students access information, but it’s not a substitute for structured learning. Educators must help students think critically about the content they consume.”

From the study: TikTok’s Influence on Education, ResearchGate

The blending of learning and influence isn’t inherently flawed, but it demands stronger guardrails. If student creators are to shape the future of education, platforms will need to offer more than visibility. They’ll need to offer support.

Learning becomes a networked, creator-powered ecosystem

The convergence of student influence and educational technology is no passing trend; it’s reshaping how learning is discovered, delivered, and defined. What began as a handful of creators posting revision tips has evolved into a decentralized learning ecosystem where peer networks hold as much sway as professional educators.

Many edtech brands are adapting. Some invest in tools that allow creators to track engagement and refine their content. Others are experimenting with monetization models, giving high-performing student educators a path to income or certification. Features once exclusive to influencer platforms – analytics dashboards, branded content guidelines, creator portals – are quietly being layered into the backends of learning apps.

The implications are global. In the West, the trend is accelerating around standardized testing, college prep, and niche STEM content. In Asia, it’s unlocking growth in local language education and expanding access in low-bandwidth, mobile-first environments. While the pace may differ, the destination is the same: education that is personalized, social, and driven by those closest to the experience.

For brands, the message is clear. Students aren’t just users anymore. They’re builders of trust, momentum, and meaning. And in a market where attention is earned – not bought – platforms that empower them will lead the next generation of education.

Why this matters for brands

For brands operating in or adjacent to education, the rise of student creators is both a growth lever and a governance challenge. The decentralization of influence, from institutions to peers offers unmatched authenticity and reach but also introduces new variables around accuracy, accountability, and impact.

The platforms that will lead are not those that simply ride the trend but those that help shape it responsibly. That means investing in tools that empower young voices while embedding safeguards: content verification, mental health resources, and transparent disclosure practices. Aligning with creators is no longer just a marketing strategy; it’s a responsibility.

Students have become trusted messengers in a market where attention is earned, not bought. But with that trust comes a new mandate for brands: to amplify wisely and build ecosystems that value innovation and integrity.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Rising inflation and economic uncertainty were expected to put an end to discretionary spending for middle-income households. Instead, consumers are making room for indulgence. Across the US, UK, and Europe, households earning moderate incomes continue to prioritize non-essential purchases at rates far closer to affluent consumers than economic models predicted. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Consumer Sentiment Survey found that 42% of middle-income respondents in developed markets still plan to spend on travel, dining out, and personal care in the next year, just nine percentage points lower than high-income households.

The resilience of discretionary spending in the face of rising costs defies conventional economic assumptions. It is not a case of irrationality or denial. It reflects a shift in how consumers measure value. After years of pandemic-driven disruption, middle-class buyers are increasingly framing small luxuries as essential to emotional well-being, not as reckless spending. An affordable meal out, a short domestic trip, or a new skincare product carries more than monetary worth. It represents normalcy, reward, and agency in an environment where larger financial goals often feel less attainable.

This trend is not a short-term reaction to inflation, nor is it purely sentimental. It is structurally rational behavior shaped by stress, lifestyle adjustment, and evolving definitions of security. Spending on modest treats provides a sense of control and immediacy when long-term stability—home ownership, retirement savings—feels increasingly out of reach. Consumers are not abandoning caution; they are recalibrating what prudence looks like in real terms.

Understanding this shift is critical for brands, retailers, and policymakers. Indulgence spending among the middle class is not a deviation from rational economic behavior. It is an adaptation to new realities, where emotional resilience and quality of life have become primary considerations alongside price and necessity.

Tight Budgets, Sharp Choices

The pressure on household budgets is real. Inflation has driven up the cost of essentials—housing, food, energy—leaving less flexibility for discretionary categories. Yet rather than abandoning non-essential purchases altogether, middle-class consumers are reprioritizing with striking precision. The pattern is visible across the US, UK, and Europe: subscription services are among the first to be cancelled, big-ticket electronics are postponed, and plans for major home renovations are shelved. But the impulse to carve out space for small luxuries remains intact.

KPMG’s 2024 Middle-Class Financial Priorities report highlights this shift. In a survey of households earning between 75% and 150% of median income, nearly 60% reported cutting back on monthly expenses such as media subscriptions and dining delivery apps. However, the same respondents overwhelmingly indicated an intention to preserve budget for “quality of life” items, including occasional dining out, personal care products, and leisure travel under 500 miles. The data suggests that discretionary spending is not vanishing—it is being filtered through a more selective lens.

A similar rebalancing is evident in Europe. OECD research published earlier this year shows that while the ownership of new vehicles among middle-income households declined by over 8% between 2022 and 2024, spending on local travel, cultural events, and specialty food purchases held steady. In the UK, Deloitte’s 2024 consumer tracker found that middle-income households were 30% more likely to describe smaller, experiential purchases as “essential for well-being” than they were before the pandemic.

The underlying dynamic is a redefinition of value. Consumers are moving away from evaluating purchases solely on cost or prestige. Instead, the metric is experiential reward—whether a purchase delivers emotional uplift, stress relief, or a sense of personal investment. A $50 skincare product or a weekend away is justified not by indulgence for its own sake, but by what it represents: a manageable, affirming investment in quality of life.

This sharpening of priorities is not a retreat from financial responsibility. It is a recalibration. Households are preserving choice and pleasure even as long-term goals grow more distant. The middle-class response to inflation is not to close the wallet entirely, but to spend carefully, reinforcing emotional resilience where it matters most.

Where the Money Is Still Flowing

The resilience of middle-class discretionary spending becomes clearest when looking at where the money continues to move. Small luxuries, particularly those offering immediate personal gratification without long-term financial strain, are absorbing a disproportionate share of discretionary budgets. These are not extravagant purchases but considered indulgences—choices that allow consumers to feel rewarded without incurring future economic risk.

Dining out remains one of the strongest performing sectors. Mastercard SpendingPulse data from early 2024 showed that spending at fast-casual and premium-casual restaurants in the US rose by 8% year-on-year, even as fine dining bookings declined. Consumers are trading down from high-end experiences but refusing to give up the social and emotional value of meals shared outside the home. In the UK, Statista reports that visits to casual dining chains increased by nearly one-fifth compared to 2022 levels, concentrated among households earning £30,000 to £70,000 annually.

Beauty and skincare purchases are following a similar trajectory. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Beauty Survey found that middle-income consumers accounted for nearly half of the growth in skincare sales across Europe and North America, often favoring mid-tier brands offering “clinical-grade” results at accessible prices. Rather than abandoning beauty spending, buyers are shifting toward products that promise tangible outcomes—improved skin health, self-care benefits—over prestige branding. The emphasis is not on conspicuous consumption but on self-affirmation.

Domestic travel, particularly short-haul trips, has also proven remarkably resilient. According to Mastercard’s travel trends report, bookings for domestic leisure trips under 300 miles rose by 12% in the US during the past year, primarily driven by middle-income households. European markets such as France and Germany showed parallel trends, with regional rail and car rental bookings outperforming international air travel. Travel, even scaled down, remains a critical outlet for recreation and stress relief, viewed as a justifiable investment rather than a luxury.

Personal wellness has evolved from a niche concern to a consistent budget item. Deloitte’s 2024 Health and Wellness Tracker found that expenditures on fitness apps, meditation subscriptions, and nutritional supplements rose by nearly 15% among middle-income consumers compared to 2022. Spa treatments and boutique fitness sessions also saw modest but steady gains, especially when bundled into affordable packages. Wellness is increasingly framed not as optional self-indulgence but as proactive health maintenance—a narrative that middle-class consumers embrace even under financial strain.

What ties these sectors together is not mere resilience but strategic prioritization. Consumers actively choose experiences and products that deliver emotional payoff without undermining longer-term financial goals. Small luxuries have become part of how households navigate financial pressure, balancing restraint with resilience.

How Indulgence Looks Different Around the World

The appetite for small luxuries is global, but its expression varies sharply across markets. Cultural context, inflationary pressure, and recovery patterns from the pandemic shape how and where middle-class consumers indulge.

In the United States, experience is taking precedence over material accumulation. Mastercard’s 2024 SpendingPulse report shows that while retail sales for durable goods have slowed, spending on travel, dining, and entertainment continues to climb. Middle-income households prioritize activities that create memories and offer a sense of immediacy, even as they pull back on home goods and apparel. The pattern reflects a broader recalibration, where the value of money is increasingly measured in lived experience rather than possessions.

The United Kingdom mirrors this behavioral split, though with sharper trade-offs. Ipsos data published earlier this year indicates that middle-income British households are aggressively trading down on everyday essentials—switching to discount supermarkets and delaying home improvements—while deliberately protecting spending on experiential categories. Budget airline bookings, concert attendance, and dining at independent restaurants remain surprisingly resilient. The message is clear: not all spending is negotiable, even under pressure.

In continental Europe, the indulgence lens often narrows toward artisanal quality. In France and Germany, Euromonitor reports that while overall household budgets have tightened, purchases of artisanal food, skincare, and local leisure travel have held steady or even grown modestly. Consumers are not abandoning discretionary spending, but are redirecting it toward smaller, more meaningful pleasures that emphasize craftsmanship, locality, and authenticity.

Southeast Asia presents a different dynamic, driven by digital acceleration and aspirational consumption. In Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines, middle-income consumers are investing in affordable upgrades—beauty products, domestic travel, and entry-level tech such as smartphones and wearable devices. According to Bain & Company’s 2024 Southeast Asia Digital Economy Report, there has been a surge in beauty e-commerce, with mid-tier brands seeing the fastest growth among urban middle-class buyers. Here, indulgence is closely tied to self-improvement and digital connectivity rather than traditional luxury markers.

China and India present a distinct dynamic. In China, middle-class consumers focus on premium health, wellness, and education-related services. Mastercard’s 2024 China Consumption Outlook shows strong growth in short domestic leisure travel, boutique fitness memberships, and “new luxury” beauty brands that offer substance over logo appeal. In India, indulgence is often family-centered. Euromonitor data highlights that spending on family experiences—mall outings, cinema, casual dining, and affordable domestic holidays—is being prioritized, even as households economize on electronics and apparel. The middle class is seeking small windows of joy that offer collective, not just individual, payoff.

Across these regions, indulgence spending is far from homogeneous. It is shaped by cultural narratives about success, wellness, and emotional reward. Yet the underlying behavior is consistent: even under inflationary strain, middle-income consumers are unwilling to surrender the experiences and products that sustain a sense of control, progress, and personal value.

Why Indulgence Feels Necessary, Not Excessive

The persistence of small luxuries in strained economic times is not a matter of consumer irrationality. It is a rational psychological response to prolonged stress, uncertainty, and shifting social norms. For many middle-class households, small indulgences have moved beyond occasional rewards to become a form of emotional maintenance—a way to reassert agency and sustain morale when broader financial goals feel increasingly distant.

Much of this shift can be traced to the post-pandemic “live for today” mindset. After years of deferred plans and disrupted routines, consumers across income levels have shown a greater willingness to prioritize present-day satisfaction. Behavioral economists point to the acceleration of hedonic adaptation—the tendency to return to a baseline level of happiness despite external changes—as a key factor. When future security feels less certain, spending on immediate emotional uplift becomes a practical way to protect mental well-being.

American Psychological Association research on stress-related spending supports this view. A 2024 report found that nearly 60% of middle-income consumers in the US admitted to occasional “treat spending” as a coping mechanism, with the majority framing such purchases not as extravagance, but as essential self-care. Similar patterns emerged in the UK and Singapore, where smaller, experience-driven expenditures were linked to lower reported stress levels in middle-income groups.

Social behavior further reinforces the normalization of indulgence. Small splurges—dining out, a weekend getaway, a new skincare regimen—are highly visible on platforms like Instagram and TikTok. Sharing these moments has become part of how consumers construct narratives of resilience and self-investment. The effect is cumulative. What once might have been considered unnecessary spending is now broadly perceived as a reasonable way to manage life’s pressures.

Rather than retreating into austerity, many middle-class consumers are making conscious choices to maintain emotional balance through manageable rewards. In modern economic conditions, where traditional markers of financial progress are harder to achieve, these decisions are not acts of recklessness. They are strategies for preserving stability, dignity, and optimism in everyday life.

Small Luxuries, Big Opportunities

For brands, the persistence of small indulgences offers more than a temporary sales opportunity. It signals a deeper shift in how consumers assign value—one that demands careful strategic recalibration. Positioning products as accessible rewards or emotional enhancers, rather than as markers of status or success, will increasingly define market relevance.

Middle-class consumers are not looking for extravagant gestures. They are seeking personal moments of satisfaction, convenience, or self-expression that fit into constrained budgets. Products that deliver relaxation, confidence, or small affirmations of progress resonate far more than those that lean heavily on traditional luxury cues. In this environment, storytelling around personal value matters more than aspirational branding. A meal kit that saves time and creates family rituals, a skincare serum that represents self-care rather than vanity, a local mini-break that restores mental clarity—these are the narratives gaining traction.

The danger for brands lies in misreading the room. Overemphasizing luxury, exclusivity, or aspirational distance risks alienating a consumer base that values relatability and tangible benefit over status. Innovation must center on affordability without sacrificing the experience of quality. Smart packaging, modular services, and tiered product lines are helping some brands maintain margins while broadening emotional appeal.

Real-time market research is critical to navigating these shifts. Understanding which categories of small luxuries matter most—and how definitions of indulgence vary between regions, income brackets, and life stages—allows brands to tailor offerings with precision. Blanket assumptions about “affordable luxury” no longer hold. The brands that invest in nuanced, behavior-led insights will be the ones best positioned to capture loyalty in an economy where emotional and financial resilience are increasingly intertwined.

Indulgence in an Age of Restraint

Discretionary spending among middle-income consumers is too often dismissed as irrational, a stubborn refusal to accept economic reality. This view misses the point. Small indulgences are not acts of denial. They are structural adjustments to a world where traditional financial milestones—home ownership, long-term savings, upward mobility—have become harder to secure. Preserving moments of joy, autonomy, and emotional stability has become a rational survival strategy.

Understanding these patterns is critical for anyone forecasting the next phase of consumer behavior. Micro-indulgence is more than a passing phenomenon. It is a leading indicator of broader consumer sentiment, revealing how confidence, stress, and hope are negotiated at the household level. Brands and policymakers that fail to track these shifts will misread the market, mistaking emotional recalibration for economic irrationality.

At Kadence International, our global research shows that middle-class indulgence is not a short-term reaction to inflationary pressure. It is an embedded behavioral shift, one that will continue to shape spending across sectors well beyond the current cycle. Those who frame their growth strategies around emotional consumption, rather than rigid income segmentation, will be best positioned to capture resilience spending in an economy where financial caution and the pursuit of quality of life are no longer at odds, but deeply intertwined.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

When wallets tighten, lipstick sales often loosen.

Beauty counters are buzzing across the US and UK – even as consumers pull back on big-ticket splurges like fashion, tech, and travel. Luxury lipsticks, skincare serums, and fragrances are flying off shelves, offering shoppers a small but satisfying escape from financial uncertainty.

It’s a familiar phenomenon with a new edge. Known as the “lipstick effect,” this pattern sees consumers trading down on larger purchases while indulging in little luxuries that deliver an instant emotional lift. But today’s version is shaped not just by economic pressures – but also by a cultural obsession with self-care.

In recent weeks, prestige beauty sales have proven remarkably resilient. According to Circana (formerly NPD Group), the U.S. prestige beauty market experienced an 8% growth in the first half of 2024, reaching $15.3 billion. In the UK, similar trends are playing out, with consumers leaning into beauty rituals to brighten up bleak headlines.

And it’s not just older shoppers who are clinging to old habits. Younger consumers – especially Millennials and Gen Z – drive this feel-good spending, treating beauty buys as affordable wellness investments in anxious times.

Younger Consumers Lead the Way

While beauty spending cuts across generations, younger consumers are shaping what small luxury looks like today.

Millennials and Gen Z – already steeped in self-care culture – keep beauty at the top of their shopping lists, even as they cut back on bigger lifestyle purchases like fashion or tech. For these consumers, beauty buys are less about occasional splurges and more about everyday wellness routines.

Fragrance layering, skincare rituals, and makeup experimentation have become embedded in how younger shoppers navigate stress and self-expression. Beauty products are positioned not just as cosmetics but as affordable tools for relaxation, creativity, and confidence.

Social media continues to fuel this behavior, turning beauty trends into global moments overnight. Viral skincare products, fragrance hacks, and affordable luxury recommendations constantly shape younger shoppers’ wishlists.

For a generation that values both experience and accessibility, small luxuries in beauty offer the perfect balance – indulgent enough to feel special and practical enough to justify the spend.

How Beauty Retailers Are Responding

Beauty retailers are moving quickly to meet consumers where they are – in search of small luxuries that feel special and attainable.

Premium beauty brands are expanding their ranges of travel-sized products, mini sets, and giftable formats to capture demand from shoppers looking for affordable indulgences. Retailers like Sephora and Ulta Beauty in the US have invested heavily in “trial and discovery” zones, allowing consumers to experiment with high-end skincare, makeup, and fragrance at lower prices.

In the UK, while mass-market chains like Boots may not operate in the luxury segment, they are leaning into accessible self-care with curated beauty edits, exclusive product bundles, and limited-time offers – helping cost-conscious consumers stretch their budgets without sacrificing quality.

Luxury fragrance brands are also innovating, offering layering bars, engraving stations, and bespoke consultation services in flagship stores, creating memorable experiences around smaller purchases.

Online, digital personalization has become a powerful tool. Beauty retailers are enhancing their platforms with tailored product recommendations, virtual try-ons, and rewards programs designed to keep shoppers engaged between purchases – reinforcing beauty as a repeat treat rather than a rare splurge.

For the industry, this pivot toward small luxuries isn’t just a response to the moment – it’s emerging as a long-term strategy for growth in a market where big-ticket spending remains unpredictable.

Luxury Brands Winning with Small Indulgences

Tom Ford Beauty – Turning Wellness into a Fragrance Success

Image Credit: Escentual
Background

Tom Ford Beauty, under Estée Lauder Companies, is best known for its ultra-luxurious positioning in fragrance and beauty. But as consumer demand shifted toward wellness and self-care, the brand saw an opportunity to evolve its narrative beyond glamour and sensuality.

Strategy

In 2024, Tom Ford Beauty launched Bois Pacifique, a fragrance inspired by founder Tom Ford’s childhood memories of Big Sur, California. The product was positioned within the growing wellness fragrance space – marketed as a calming, nature-inspired scent designed for emotional well-being.

Beyond the product, Estée Lauder doubled down on its ambitions for Tom Ford Beauty following its $2.8 billion brand acquisition in late 2022. The brand leaned on storytelling, innovation, and the strength of its global distribution network to fuel growth.

Outcome

Bois Pacifique is projected to generate $50 million in sales within its first launch year.
Prior to the acquisition, Tom Ford Beauty reported nearly 25% net sales growth in its fiscal year ending June 2022.
Estée Lauder has set an ambitious target for Tom Ford Beauty to reach $1 billion in annual net sales by the end of 2024.

(Sources: Vogue Business, Luxury Tribune)

YSL Beauty – Leveraging Digital Influence for Small Luxury Growth

Image Credit: Fashion Gone Rogue

Background

Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) Beauty, part of L’Oréal Group, is a leading player in prestige beauty with a strong foothold in fragrance, makeup, and skincare. Recognizing the power of digital culture – especially among Gen Z and Millennials – YSL Beauty has heavily invested in influencer-driven marketing and social media campaigns.

Strategy

Throughout 2023 and early 2024, YSL Beauty collaborated with high-profile celebrities like Dua Lipa while boosting its presence across TikTok and Instagram. The brand amplified visibility during key moments like Fashion Week, creating shareable content and interactive campaigns that resonated with younger, trend-savvy consumers.

Product innovation also remained at the heart of YSL Beauty’s strategy, with mini-sized offerings and discovery sets crucial to driving trial and engagement.

Outcome

YSL Beauty recorded a 94% surge in Earned Media Value (EMV) between April 2023 and March 2024.
Total impressions increased by 109%, reaching 9.1 billion during the same period.
The brand saw a 314% year-over-year growth in TikTok EMV, underscoring its success in capturing younger audiences on digital platforms.

Why This Trend May Last

What began as a response to economic uncertainty is fast becoming a new consumer habit – and beauty brands are betting it’s here to stay.

Unlike larger discretionary purchases, beauty products deliver instant gratification and emotional value. A new lipstick, a signature scent, or a skincare upgrade offers a quick mood boost — often for the price of a night out or less. In uncertain times, that balance of affordability and emotional return on investment is hard to beat.

The growing cultural emphasis on self-care is also reinforcing this behavior. For many consumers — especially younger ones — small beauty purchases are no longer occasional splurges but regular acts of personal wellness. A face mask or fragrance isn’t just about appearance — it’s tied to relaxation, routine, and identity.

Even if economic conditions improve, retailers and brands are unlikely to abandon strategies built around accessible luxury. Discovery sets, travel-sized products, and personalized shopping experiences are proving effective at driving loyalty and repeat purchases.

Beauty’s resilience in the face of economic pressures offers a glimpse of how future retail may evolve: not necessarily bigger, but smarter — built on emotional connection, small indulgences, and everyday moments of joy.

For consumers navigating an unpredictable world, the little luxuries may well become the ones that last.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The global tech retail market is slowing. Consumers who once chased every new release are now holding off, thinking harder, and stretching upgrade cycles across devices – from phones to wearables to home tech. What’s changed isn’t just price sensitivity; it’s mindset. The old rhythm of new-for-new’s sake is being replaced by a more deliberate calculation: Is this upgrade worth it?

Behind that shift are macroeconomic pressures that haven’t let up. Interest rates remain high, currencies are volatile, and fresh tariffs – particularly between the US and China – are reshaping buying decisions. Even the major players are feeling it. Apple posted a year-on-year decline in iPhone sales, while Samsung saw a temporary lift as consumers rushed to buy ahead of expected price hikes. In both cases, caution – not innovation – drove behavior.

The shift is generational too. Gen Z, long viewed as the frontline for early tech adoption, is starting to show signs of saturation. They still care about technology – but now they’re weighing durability, repairability, and long-term functionality over simply owning the newest device. The behavior is less impulsive, more selective.

This isn’t a rejection of innovation. It’s a recalibration. And it has real implications for how the world’s biggest technology companies market, price, and position their next wave of products.

The Shrinking Upgrade Window

Consumers aren’t replacing their tech as often as they used to. The once-standard two-year smartphone upgrade has stretched into a multi-year wait, with buyers holding onto devices for longer – sometimes much longer. It’s not just caution in a soft economy; it’s a growing sense that new releases simply aren’t offering enough to warrant the swap.

At Verizon, leadership recently acknowledged the shift. The average smartphone replacement cycle has crept past 3.5 years, a far cry from the predictable two-year rhythm that once drove steady sales. Apple users, too, are waiting longer, with data showing a noticeable lengthening of ownership compared to five years ago. It’s a trend driven partly by pricing, partly by the reality that last year’s model is still more than good enough.

Laptops are on a similar track. The three- to five-year refresh cycle is no longer a given. Consumers are holding off until their machines physically break or performance lags in a noticeable way. Best Buy’s CEO recently pointed to a lack of meaningful innovation as a reason buyers aren’t feeling urgency. And with cloud computing and browser-based software doing more of the heavy lifting, the need for higher-end specs is flattening for everyday users.

Televisions, too, are staying in homes longer. Improvements in display technology have plateaued from a consumer benefit perspective, and with software updates extending the life of streaming-enabled TVs, most households see no need to upgrade unless there’s a failure. Brands that offer long-term software support – up to seven years in some cases – are winning loyalty from customers who prefer durability over dazzle.

Even wearables, a category once defined by rapid iteration, are feeling the shift. Consumers are growing more selective, favoring meaningful innovation like medical-grade sensors or long battery life over iterative changes in design or interface. Replacement cycles are expanding, especially as prices climb and expectations rise.

In Southeast Asia, a surge in mid-tier smartphones is driving sales, suggesting buyers still want new tech – but they want it to stretch further. In contrast, consumers in the US and UK are sticking with their devices for three or four years, increasingly weighing whether an upgrade will deliver genuine daily impact.

Economic Pressures Meet Consumer Pragmatism

Inflation has eased slightly in some markets but remains a persistent factor shaping consumer behavior worldwide. In the US and UK, interest rates remain elevated, keeping credit card debt expensive and discretionary spending under pressure. Across Europe and Japan, wages have struggled to keep pace with core price increases, dampening retail confidence. And in high-growth regions like Southeast Asia, India, and China, economic uncertainty is pushing consumers toward more deliberate purchase decisions.

In the US, the impact is already visible. Retailers are reporting softer demand in key electronics categories, while store traffic has declined year-on-year. Online, browsing activity remains strong, but cart abandonment is climbing – particularly for products over the $500 mark. It’s not that consumers aren’t interested; they’re just taking longer to commit. The same story is playing out in the UK, where buyers are increasingly opting for refurbished tech, financing options, or delaying non-essential upgrades entirely.

In India and Southeast Asia, frugality doesn’t mean silence – it means selectivity. Consumers are still engaging, but through a different lens. Mid-tier smartphones and high-functionality budget laptops are outperforming premium models. Retailers in these markets report growing traction for bundled offers and longer warranty terms, as value and reliability edge out brand prestige.

Indonesia offers one of the clearest signals of this recalibrated mindset. Consumers there continue to spend, but with more scrutiny. Brand loyalty is softening, and trial is rising – especially for newer entrants that offer durability and local relevance. Many shoppers are trading up slowly, looking for technology that serves multiple roles, rather than devices that signal status or trend.

China, long a bellwether for tech enthusiasm, has shown uneven recovery in the retail sector. Urban consumers remain engaged, but rural and lower-tier city shoppers are increasingly budget-conscious. Brands with local manufacturing and flexible pricing structures are gaining share.

In Japan, where tech adoption tends to skew practical, the economic slowdown has reinforced existing behaviors. Consumers are delaying replacements, relying more on service programs, and opting for features that serve real lifestyle utility – especially among older demographics.

Retailers and manufacturers across all regions are adjusting accordingly. In-store messaging is shifting from “newest” to “smartest.” Online platforms are pushing price-match guarantees, extended return periods, and loyalty perks over flash launches. What used to be a race for innovation has become a contest of value – and the companies that acknowledge that shift early are seeing steadier results.

Gen Z Hits Pause

For years, Gen Z was seen as the tech industry’s sure bet – the cohort most likely to queue for launches, post the unboxing, and evangelize the next upgrade. But the momentum has shifted. While their interest in technology hasn’t faded, their expectations have evolved. Now, the question isn’t “what’s new?” but “what fits?”

Rising costs have played a role, but this is more than economics. It’s a cultural recalibration. Among younger consumers, there’s a growing rejection of hyper-consumption in favor of intentionality. The latest phone isn’t an automatic buy. The better question is whether it adds something meaningful to life – fewer Gen Z consumers are upgrading for status alone.

That shift is fuelling the refurbished and secondhand tech market, which has seen steady growth in the US, UK, and across Southeast Asia. Platforms offering certified pre-owned devices, especially smartphones and laptops, are seeing strong engagement from younger demographics. For many, it’s not just about price – it’s about extending the life of a product and avoiding unnecessary waste.

Aesthetic trends are moving in parallel. There’s a rise in what some in the industry are calling “tech quiet luxury” – products that prioritize function, minimalism, and long-term reliability over flash. Sleek, understated design is winning out over bold colors or feature overload. The appeal lies in gear that integrates cleanly into life, not tech that dominates it.

Online, the social narrative is shifting too. Gen Z’s digital footprint shows less excitement around launch-day content and more focus on utility. The rise of “why I didn’t upgrade” posts is telling. Influencers now get traction by explaining how they kept the same phone for four years, or why buying secondhand was the smarter move. The underlying message isn’t anti-tech – it’s pro-agency.

Brands are adjusting their messaging in kind. Marketing language has toned down the superlatives. Features are framed around real-life relevance – sleep tracking for mental health, battery life that actually lasts a weekend, cameras that work well in low light for night outs. There’s less interest in what a device can do, and more focus on what it should do, consistently.

Why Selling Smarter Is the New Selling Faster

Retailers and manufacturers are no longer assuming the upgrade cycle will take care of itself. As consumers grow more cautious with their tech spending, the industry is adapting – not by accelerating the push for newness, but by reengineering the value proposition.

Trade-in programs are now a core feature of the sales funnel. In the US and UK, major electronics chains have expanded their platforms to offer instant credit for used devices, with bonuses tied to specific models or upgrade windows. The aim isn’t just to incentivize sales, but to soften the sticker shock and signal circular value. In India, trade-ins have gone further. E-commerce platforms have introduced programs that accept non-functional phones and appliances – opening up access to affordable upgrades even for consumers sitting on obsolete tech.

Manufacturers are adjusting their product mix in parallel. Samsung’s A-series smartphones have become a centerpiece of the brand’s value-tier portfolio, offering everyday functionality without the premium markup. Apple, long a symbol of high-end exclusivity, is now leaning into the same logic. The latest iteration of its SE line – and more recently, the iPhone 16e – has quietly outperformed expectations, especially among younger buyers and in cost-sensitive markets.

Support for longer device life is becoming a differentiator. Retailers are offering extended warranties, low-cost protection plans, and – critically – greater support for self-service repair. The “right to repair” movement, once niche, has reached mainstream awareness in the US and Europe, pushing brands to make replacement parts and documentation publicly available. Some have gone further, offering repair kits and in-store diagnostics to extend product life without voiding warranties.

In Southeast Asia, telcos and electronics retailers are updating their messaging to meet the moment. Campaigns that once emphasized speed, camera quality, or size now lean into durability, battery longevity, and environmental impact. Flipkart, for instance, has repositioned its marketing language to speak to responsibility, not just features. These aren’t surface-level tweaks – they’re recalibrations shaped by a consumer mood that’s moved past launch-day glitz in favor of durability and long-term value.

Retailers that can respond to this shift without undermining revenue goals are likely to retain customer loyalty. The challenge now is delivering upgrades that feel earned, not obligatory – and that means competing not just on innovation, but on usefulness and trust.

Innovation Isn’t Dead. But It’s on Trial.

The appetite for innovation isn’t gone – it’s just more selective. As upgrade cycles stretch and wallets tighten, consumers are no longer lured by incremental improvements. They’re still willing to invest in technology, but only when the payoff feels tangible.

Devices that deliver clear, differentiated value are still commanding attention. Foldables, once a novelty, have matured into a legitimate category. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip and Fold lines continue to draw interest, not just for the form factor, but for the utility – larger displays in a pocket-sized profile, and new modes of productivity. Google’s Pixel 8 Pro, powered by its custom Tensor chip, is earning traction for its AI-driven tools that enhance real-world usage – from call screening to image editing – without relying on buzzwords.

Apple’s Vision Pro, meanwhile, may not be a mass-market product yet, but it offers a case study in how anticipation builds when the innovation is clear. Its launch was met with skepticism on price, but its mixed-reality interface and potential as a new computing platform still turned heads. Early adopters aren’t buying features – they’re buying futures.

What’s changed is the level of scrutiny. Consumers aren’t rejecting high-end tech; they’re applying higher standards. Battery life must hold up in real use, not just lab tests. Cameras must perform in varied conditions, not just daylight. AI features need to do something meaningful, not just inflate a spec sheet.

That’s changing the language of marketing. Across the US, UK, and Asia, brands are pulling back on superlatives and pushing use cases. Proof-of-benefit now matters more than megapixel counts or processing speeds. Instead of promoting what’s new, marketers are being forced to answer, “Why now?”

For companies that can deliver answers that resonate – whether through new form factors, smarter chips, or lifestyle utility – there’s still room to win. But unlike before, consumers aren’t just asking whether something works. They’re asking if it’s worth disrupting their routine for.

Global Trends in Divergence

While the broader trajectory of tech consumption is moving toward caution and selectivity, the pace and shape of that shift varies across markets. Cultural norms, economic stability, and consumer trust in brands all play a role in how – and when – people decide to upgrade.

In the US, the shift has been shaped by economic pressure and high consumer debt. Shoppers are taking longer to replace their devices, with the average upgrade cycle now stretching to 3.5 years. Refurbished phones and lower-tier models are gaining traction, especially among Gen Z and older millennials. Brand loyalty remains strong, but purchase decisions are being filtered through a sharper value lens.

The UK follows a similar pattern, though with more aggressive adoption of sim-only plans and long-term laptop use. Durability and repairability are emphasized more in brand messaging, and buyers are more willing to switch between ecosystems if they perceive better value.

In Japan, where consumer electronics are deeply embedded into everyday life, the trend is even more conservative. Many households prefer to maintain well-functioning older devices, especially in categories like home tech. The appetite for premium remains – but only if it’s built to last.

Emerging markets present a more nuanced picture. In India and Indonesia, demand continues to grow, but through a pragmatic filter. Consumers still want to upgrade, but they’re making trade-offs between features and affordability. Entry-level and mid-range Android models dominate, and demand for value-driven smart TVs is rising. Device repair shops are also thriving, offering affordable fixes that extend product life.

Germany reflects yet another dimension – green consciousness. There, sustainability is not just an ethical add-on; it’s a purchase driver. Consumers are increasingly seeking eco-certified products, energy efficiency, and software support that extends a product’s usable life.

These regional divergences remind us that consumer behavior doesn’t shift in a straight line. Global brands must not only read the macro trends, but understand the local motivations underneath them.

Regional Snapshot

Region	Consumer Sentiment	Average Upgrade Cycle	Popular Segments
US	Cautious	3.5 years	Budget, Refurbished
UK	Value-driven	3 years	Sim-only phones, Laptops
Japan	Conservative	4–5 years	Home tech, Premium older models
India	Mixed	2–3 years	Mid-range Android, TVs
Indonesia	Budget-first	2–3 years	Entry smartphones, Repairs
Germany	Green-conscious	4 years	Eco-friendly, Long-life gear

The Next Era of Tech Retail Is Measured, Not Mass-Market

The slowdown in tech upgrades isn’t a phase. It’s a reckoning. Consumers are no longer buying into the rhythm of annual releases and short-term novelty. The next era of consumer tech will be defined not by what’s new, but by what’s necessary – and by how well brands can prove their relevance beyond launch day.

The companies that will thrive over the next five years aren’t the ones with the biggest product pipeline. They’re the ones building around lifecycle value – prioritizing modularity, software longevity, and service ecosystems that extend the relationship between user and device. Subscription-based diagnostics, AI-powered support, and upgradeable components are already reshaping how loyalty is earned – and how revenue is sustained without constant churn.

It’s a shift in strategic fundamentals. Margins may compress as consumers stretch the life of their hardware, but brands that invest in intelligent add-ons, system integration, and health or sustainability functionality will find new pathways to relevance. A camera upgrade isn’t enough. Neither is a new color. If it doesn’t serve a deeper role in how we manage health, reduce waste, or improve everyday decision-making, it won’t pass the new test of value.

That also means guesswork is no longer good enough. The consumer calculus is changing fast, and brands need real insight – beyond sentiment, beyond surveys. They need to know who’s holding back, why they’re hesitating, and what would tip the balance. That’s where market research steps forward – not as validation, but as vision.

We’re not watching a slowdown. We’re witnessing a reset. The expectations have changed, the thresholds have risen, and the reward now goes to those who understand behavior before it hits the balance sheet.

I’d frame it this way: the most powerful upgrade a brand can offer today isn’t a new feature – it’s foresight.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

As households pull back on travel, fashion, and tech upgrades, one category remains oddly resilient: pet care. UK pet spending rose by 3.2% in volume in Q1 2024, even as overall consumer goods slowed. In the US, Chewy’s latest earnings show revenue up 5.6% year over year. Globally, this category isn’t just weathering economic pressure – it’s gaining strength.

What the Numbers Say Around the World

Pet spending continues to grow in markets where most discretionary categories are flat or falling. In Asia, it’s becoming a proxy for emotional investment, household identity, and lifestyle shifts.

China’s pet care market reached $13.6 billion in 2023, nearly double its size in 2018. Growth is strongest among younger consumers in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, where pets increasingly replace traditional family roles. Brands are competing on transparency, nutrition, and health—not just aesthetics.

In Japan, pet ownership has plateaued, but spending per pet is rising – especially in the senior care segment. One in three dogs is now elderly. Owners are investing in supplements, mobility products, and pet monitoring tech. High insurance uptake and new health startups reflect a market shaped by the aging of both pets and owners.

India’s market is now worth over $1 billion and growing at 20% annually. Urban consumers are moving from basic kibble to breed-specific diets, vet-on-call platforms, and DTC food brands. In Tier 1 cities, pets are increasingly seen as dependents.

Southeast Asia is surging. In Indonesia, halal-certified pet food is expanding fast among Gen Z and millennial Muslim households. In Singapore, pet-friendly condo designs and bundled digital pet services are reshaping the urban pet economy.

In each market, pet care is performing well and outperforming adjacent categories. Brands tracking the future of loyalty would do well to start here.

The Rise of the Pet-First Household

Pets are no longer peripheral. In many markets, they’ve become central. Budgets reflect it. So do routines, relationships, and expectations.

In the UK and US, Millennials and Gen Z are treating pets more like dependents than companions. For many, a pet arrives before a partner or child. This shift in household dynamics is reshaping spending habits. Food quality, preventative care, and even birthday celebrations are now routine.

In Japan, pets are becoming emotional anchors. The demand for stimulation toys, wearable monitors, and products for elderly animals reflects the number of owners who are filling care roles with pets.

In India and Indonesia, dogs and cats are now common in middle-class homes. In India, new pet parents are opting for nutrition consults and digital vet services early. In Indonesia, younger Muslim owners prioritize halal compliance – placing cultural fit on par with cost.

In space-constrained cities like Singapore, developers are building in pet zones. Condos market dog parks as amenities. Consumers may cut back on dining out, but continue spending on wellness plans for pets.

What Gets Cut, What Gets Kept

Inflation and higher interest rates have reshaped household budgets. Travel is down, tech purchases are delayed, and dining out has slowed, but pet care continues to hold firm.

In Japan, electronics and beauty are slipping, but veterinary visits remain consistent. In the UK, shoppers skip fashion but keep pet subscriptions. In the US, gym memberships decline while wellness spend on pets holds steady.

In India, mid-premium pet brands are outperforming projections. First-time owners are forming habits early and holding to them. In rural areas, cutbacks tend to hit entertainment before pet goods.

In Southeast Asia, households are scaling back on bulk essentials but still keeping up with pet care. Singaporeans are delaying home upgrades while renewing grooming memberships and upgrading pet tech.

These aren’t luxuries. They’re anchored in attachment. And that makes them more durable than many price-driven categories.

Brands and Retailers Follow the Loyalty

While other categories fight to stay in the basket, pet care is building momentum. Brands aren’t just holding on – they’re leaning in.

In the UK, supermarkets and specialty retailers are expanding premium lines. Pets at Home is scaling up subscriptions, grooming, and in-store vet services. The strategy isn’t about convenience – it’s about becoming routine.

In Japan, startups now offer genetic tests, mobility tracking, and remote health checks. Loyalty here is built on reassurance.

In India, digital-first brands focus on personalized nutrition and wellness bundles. Urban professionals are choosing care that fits their lifestyle – not just their budget.

In Southeast Asia, Indonesia’s halal-certified brands are growing. In Singapore, bundled food, grooming, and insurance on a single digital platform are setting new expectations.

The most resilient brands aren’t chasing promotions. They’re building stickiness.

The Subscription Model Comes Home

One reason pet care is proving so resilient: it’s tailor-made for subscriptions. Chewy’s Autoship model now accounts for over 70% of its revenue. Pets at Home’s subscription grooming and wellness plans are driving retention in the UK. And in India, platforms like HUFT and Supertails are building subscription boxes with food, treats, and supplements that mirror human wellness kits.

Recurring revenue in this category isn’t driven by convenience – it’s driven by rhythm. Feeding, grooming, walking, and checking in on a pet’s health are baked into daily life. And that makes pet subscriptions feel essential, not optional.

The result for retailers is a category with unusually high retention and low churn. For insight professionals, it’s a cue to rethink how LTV is calculated, especially in categories with strong emotional anchors.

The New Metrics of Loyalty

Traditional loyalty metrics miss much of what’s happening in pet care. This isn’t just about repeat purchases or basket size. It’s about trust, consistency, and emotional significance.

Consumers aren’t just loyal because the price is right. They’re loyal because switching feels risky. Because their pet depends on it. Because the product has become part of the household operating system.

That shifts the role of market research. Instead of only tracking NPS or discount redemption, we need to look at embeddedness: How often is a product repurchased without prompting? How quickly is a referral made after a good outcome? Does the customer describe the brand using human relationship language?

Brands that understand these cues – especially in high-growth markets – will outpace those still optimizing for price elasticity.

The Emotional ROI of a Full Bowl

Pet care isn’t just holding its ground. It’s changing how people define value.

Emotional value is rarely tracked as closely as price sensitivity. But it should be. Consumers will pause a subscription without thought, yet go out of their way for their pet’s preferred brand.

This kind of spending rarely shows up in top-line figures. It’s visible in retention curves, renewal rates, and what households protect first. In Japan, pet purchases are about continuity. In Singapore, pet tech provides reassurance. In India, ownership blends aspiration with emotional attachment.

The spending logic isn’t indulgent. It’s rooted in what feels stable when everything else isn’t.

The implication for brand and insight teams is structural. Emotional categories are not cut; they become the new baseline.

One lesser-known brand that illustrates this shift is Heads Up For Tails in India.

Case Study: Heads Up For Tails (India)

Founded in 2008, Heads Up For Tails (HUFT) began as a niche pet accessories brand in India. Over the years, it has evolved into a comprehensive pet care company, offering a range of products and services tailored to the Indian market. Recognizing the growing trend of pet humanization, HUFT expanded its offerings to include premium pet foods, grooming services, and wellness products. By 2023, the brand had established over 50 retail outlets across major Indian cities, complemented by a robust e-commerce platform.

HUFT’s strategy centers on understanding the emotional bond between pets and their owners, positioning itself as a partner in pet parenting rather than just a retailer. This approach has resonated with India’s urban pet owners, who increasingly view their pets as integral family members. The brand’s emphasis on quality, customization, and community engagement has fostered strong customer loyalty, even as consumers become more selective in their discretionary spending.

In a market where pet care is still emerging as a significant sector, HUFT’s growth underscores the potential for brands that align with evolving consumer values and behaviors. Their success illustrates how a deep understanding of local culture and consumer psychology can drive brand relevance and resilience.

What Pet Spending Teaches Us About the Next Consumer Economy

Pet care doesn’t just tell us where spending is strong. It tells us what matters when everything else is negotiable.

In every market where discretionary spending is tightening, this category is holding. Not because it’s a luxury, but because it’s emotionally embedded. It’s part of the household rhythm. It reflects identity, routine, and care.

This has implications far beyond dogs and cats. Categories that can build this kind of trust and meaning – through consistency, embedded services, and emotional utility – stand to inherit the next wave of loyalty. Not the kind driven by points or perks, but the kind that lives in habits, values, and daily life.

For insight teams, the takeaway is clear: the future of consumer behavior won’t be measured in what people want. It will be measured in what they refuse to give up.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The wellness economy isn’t just growing – it’s taking over.

What started as a niche industry of boutique fitness studios and green juice bars has exploded into a $1.8 trillion global powerhouse. Today, wellness means AI-powered health diagnostics, biohacking retreats, and personalized longevity plans tailored down to the cellular level. Consumers aren’t just tracking steps anymore; they’re measuring stress responses, monitoring metabolic health, and optimizing their bodies like data-driven machines.

And they’re not just buying into wellness – they’re questioning it. Who can prove their claims? Which brands offer real science over marketing hype? Consumers demand transparency, personalization, and measurable results. The wellness-first mandate is rewriting the rules of business. Products that fail to deliver real well-being won’t just lose market share – they’ll disappear.

From skincare to financial services, travel to technology, brands are racing to embed wellness into every touchpoint. But who’s doing it right? And how will this next phase of the wellness revolution separate the disruptors from the dinosaurs?

Wellness as a Brand Imperative

Wellness isn’t an industry anymore. It’s an expectation. And for brands, failing to deliver isn’t just a missed opportunity – it’s a death sentence.

Millennials and Gen Z aren’t buying into wellness trends blindly. Raised on health tracking and biohacking culture, they don’t just want feel-good branding; they demand proof. Can a product deliver real cognitive benefits? Does a service measurably improve longevity? If not, it won’t last.

The stakes go beyond retail. Consumers want stress-free money management in finance—automated savings, real-time spending insights, and AI-powered financial planning. Employees now evaluate companies in the workplace on their mental health support, flexibility, and work-life balance policies. A free gym membership or wellness app isn’t enough. If brands don’t take well-being seriously, they’ll lose top talent to those who prioritize it.

Wellness is not just a product feature; it is an expectation that spans industries. The question isn’t whether brands should adapt. It’s whether they’ll survive if they don’t.

Workplace Wellness Is No Longer a Perk – It’s a Business Survival Strategy

Employee burnout is no longer a quiet crisis – it’s a corporate emergency. A disengaged, exhausted workforce isn’t just unproductive; it’s walking out the door. The companies that fail to prioritize well-being aren’t just losing morale. They’re losing their workforce.

For years, workplace wellness meant subsidized gym memberships and stress management webinars. That’s not enough anymore. Employees demand real change – flexible work, mental health support, and financial security. Companies that resist? They’ll watch their top talent leave for organizations that treat well-being as a business priority, not a line item in HR’s annual report.

Some companies are getting it right. Goldman Sachs expanded its mental health offerings, giving employees free therapy and resilience coaching. Microsoft’s four-day workweek experiment in Japan resulted in a 40% productivity boost – without burnout. Salesforce has gone beyond wellness perks, integrating financial literacy coaching and savings programs to reduce employees’ money stress.

The message is clear: workers expect companies to care about more than just their output. Leadership isn’t about offering wellness benefits as an afterthought; it’s about embedding well-being into the foundation of corporate culture.

The companies that lead on workplace wellness won’t just retain talent – they’ll attract the next generation of high performers. The ones that don’t? They’ll be left scrambling when the best employees leave for competitors that take well-being seriously.

Innovations in Product Development to Meet Wellness Expectations

At 3 p.m., Amanda Chang hits a wall. She’s not tired from lack of sleep, nor has she skipped lunch. She’s dehydrated—a reality she only recently started tracking after her smartwatch nudged her with a hydration reminder. Now, like millions of others, she reaches for an electrolyte packet instead of an afternoon coffee.

She’s not alone. The hydration economy is booming, fueled by a new consumer mindset that views optimal fluid balance as a pillar of longevity, mental clarity, and peak performance. Once reserved for athletes, electrolyte-enhanced drinks and functional hydration products have gone mainstream, reshaping how people approach energy and wellness.

Companies have taken note. Unilever’s acquisition of Liquid I.V. signals a strategic shift – hydration is no longer a niche category but a global wellness priority. Nestlé, too, has expanded its portfolio of functional beverages, tapping into a market where consumers aren’t just looking to quench their thirst but to optimize their biological performance.

This is just one example of how brands reinvent their products to align with a wellness-first consumer base. Across categories, companies are shifting from passive health benefits to science-backed, measurable, and highly personalized solutions.

In food and beverage, gut health is now front and center. Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics are transforming everything from yogurt to snack bars, with major players racing to offer digestive-support products backed by clinical research. Cognitive performance is another emerging focus, fueling demand for nootropics and adaptogens – ingredients designed to enhance focus, stress resilience, and mental clarity.

The shift toward longevity and biohacking is accelerating in beauty and personal care. Consumers are moving beyond anti-aging to skin health at the cellular level, with brands investing in microbiome research, peptides, and NAD+ boosters to enhance skin regeneration. Shiseido, for example, has poured resources into advanced skin longevity research, aligning with the consumer push for products that deliver quantifiable, long-term benefits rather than superficial fixes.

Meanwhile, household and consumer goods are experiencing a clean-label revolution. Transparency in sourcing and formulations is no longer optional – shoppers scrutinize ingredient lists, demanding non-toxic, sustainable, and ethically sourced products. Regulatory bodies are catching up, forcing brands to substantiate wellness claims with hard evidence. In a significant move, the Federal Trade Commission issued its first major update to health marketing guidelines since 1998, tightening restrictions on unproven claims and requiring all health-related advertising to be backed by credible, peer-reviewed scientific research.

Under the updated guidance, the FTC is taking a firm stance against what it identifies as “vague qualifying terms” in advertising. The agency asserts that all health-related claims made by companies must be substantiated by credible, peer-reviewed scientific research. This shift signals a tougher regulatory environment for health product marketers, emphasizing the importance of transparency and evidence-based communication in an industry often criticized for its lack of accountability.

Wellness is no longer an add-on – it’s the foundation of modern product development. Companies that treat it as a marketing gimmick risk losing to disruptors who understand that today’s consumers aren’t just buying products. They’re investing in performance, longevity, and measurable results.

AI, Wearables, and Predictive Wellness

Your body is now a data stream, and Big Tech wants in.

What started with step counters and calorie trackers has evolved into AI-driven biohacking, where algorithms don’t just monitor your health – they attempt to predict and optimize it. Consumers are no longer passively checking fitness stats; they’re outsourcing their well-being to wearables, biometric scans, and AI-driven health assistants.

And the biggest players are moving fast. Google’s AI-powered dermatology tool claims medical-grade accuracy. Apple’s Health app quietly reshapes preventive medicine, feeding real-time biometric data into predictive alerts for conditions like atrial fibrillation. Platforms like InsideTracker promise to extend your lifespan using machine learning to analyze your blood biomarkers and recommend longevity-focused interventions.

AI-powered mental health tools, like Woebot, offer chatbot-based cognitive behavioral therapy. Meanwhile, smart rings and glucose monitors claim to optimize health.

The next frontier? Brain-computer interfaces. Neuralink is experimenting with cognitive enhancement, and startups like Sens.ai are launching neurofeedback headsets that claim to rewire the brain for improved focus and resilience.

As technology continues to merge with biology, wellness is shifting from a reactive model to a precision-driven, predictive experience. Consumers no longer want generic health advice; they expect data-driven, AI-curated, real-time insights that empower them to optimize their lives with surgical precision. Brands that can deliver on this promise will lead the next wave of the wellness economy.

Wellness Is Rewiring the Way We Shop, Stay, and Travel

The future of retail and hospitality isn’t just about convenience; it’s about well-being. From high-end hotels to grocery stores, brands are redesigning physical spaces to support mental, physical, and emotional health in ways that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

At Lululemon’s immersive wellness hubs, customers can do more than shop for activewear – they can meditate, attend breathwork sessions, or recover with guided treatments. Sephora is curating its shelves to reflect a new consumer demand: clean beauty products with transparent, safety-tested ingredients. Meanwhile, luxury hotels are pivoting from indulgence to longevity, offering IV therapy, cryotherapy, and biometric-driven nutrition plans designed for more than relaxation. They’re selling optimization.

Even mass-market brands are responding. Airlines are no longer just upgrading seat comfort; they’re integrating circadian lighting and personalized nutrition options to mitigate jet lag. Coworking spaces are incorporating biophilic design and air purification systems as professionals demand healthier work environments.

This shift isn’t cosmetic; it’s structural. Wellness is no longer a category – it’s a design principle shaping how we shop, travel, and experience spaces. Consumers now expect retail stores, hotels, and workspaces to not only offer products and services but also actively enhance their well-being.

For brands, this is no longer about staying ahead of the curve. It’s about staying relevant.

Wellness Goes Ethical, But Are Brands Keeping Up?

Consumers aren’t just buying wellness. They’re demanding it on their terms. From sustainable packaging to ethical sourcing, today’s shoppers expect well-being to extend beyond the individual to the planet and society. And they’re holding brands accountable like never before.

This shift isn’t theoretical; it’s shaping spending habits. Nearly 80% of global consumers say sustainability influences purchasing decisions (IBM Institute for Business Value). That’s why Patagonia’s commitment to regenerative supply chains isn’t just branding; it’s a business necessity. Aesop has built a cult following around its sustainability-first skincare, while Stella McCartney is pushing the fashion industry toward bioengineered materials and circular design to cut waste.

But ethical wellness isn’t just about environmental impact – it’s about who gets included. Wellness has long catered to a narrow demographic, but consumers now expect cultural competence and inclusivity. Fenty Skin has set a new standard in beauty with its commitment to diverse skin types, while fitness brands are finally recognizing the need for more representation in product design and marketing.

Yet, for all the progress, the industry still faces a reckoning. Greenwashing remains rampant, with brands exaggerating sustainability claims without transparency. Inclusivity marketing is everywhere, but how many companies reflect it in their hiring and leadership? Consumers are paying attention, and performative wellness will no longer cut it.

The new era of ethical wellness isn’t just about selling sustainability or inclusivity. It’s about proving it. The brands that back up their claims with action will earn loyalty. Those that don’t? They’ll be called out and left behind.

The Future of Wellness Is Personal, and Big Business Knows It

Wellness is no longer about staying healthy. It’s about engineering longevity, optimizing biology, and hacking the human body for peak performance.

This isn’t science fiction. Billion-dollar biotech startups like Altos Labs are pouring funding into cellular rejuvenation, while advances in senolytics – compounds designed to eliminate aging cells – are setting the stage for a world where aging itself could become a treatable condition. Skincare, nutrition, and fitness brands are already pivoting from anti-aging to lifespan optimization, signaling a shift that will reshape consumer health as we know it.

At the same time, digital wellness is becoming a fully immersive, data-driven experience. The metaverse isn’t just a playground for gamers – it’s becoming a wellness hub. Virtual reality meditation apps like TRIPP are gamifying mindfulness, and AI-powered health coaches are turning biometric data into real-time lifestyle interventions.

The era of one-size-fits-all health solutions is ending. DNA-driven nutrition plans, microbiome-based dietary regimens, and continuous glucose monitoring replace outdated wellness norms. Companies like Viome are leveraging gut microbiome analysis to create ultra-personalized food and supplement plans, while wearable tech is evolving from passive tracking to real-time health optimization.

For brands, the opportunity is massive, but so is the pressure. Consumers will no longer accept generic wellness promises. They expect science-backed, precision-driven solutions that seamlessly integrate into their daily lives.

The brands that embrace hyper-personalized, predictive wellness will define the future of health. The ones that don’t will be left selling yesterday’s version of well-being in a world that’s already looking ahead.

The Wellness-First Mandate – Adapt or Be Left Behind

Wellness is no longer a trend. It’s the economic engine reshaping industries, the cultural shift redefining consumer priorities, and the business imperative separating industry leaders from the obsolete.

This transformation isn’t about virtue signaling or slapping a “clean” label on a product. It’s about structural change – a radical rethinking of how brands serve consumers when well-being is the ultimate currency. Companies that embed wellness into their DNA, from product formulation to workplace culture, will thrive. Those who view it as a passing fad will fade into irrelevance.

The future belongs to brands that do more than just sell – they safeguard, optimize, and extend quality of life. Precision health, longevity science, AI-driven well-being, and sustainability aren’t niche concerns anymore; they are market expectations. Consumers aren’t just buying – they’re scrutinizing. They want proof, not promises.

For brands, the choice is stark: evolve or fall behind. Wellness is no longer a consumer preference; it’s a corporate survival strategy. The brands that hesitate won’t just lose market share. They’ll disappear.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Brand loyalty is no longer about what you buy – it is about who you are. Consumers do not just choose brands; they pledge their allegiance. Jeep Wrangler owners – called Jeepers, Apple users, Patagonia advocates, and Nike loyalists are not just customers – they are tribes bonded by shared values, identity, and purpose. A purchase is no longer a transaction; it is a statement.

This is not accidental. Brands have become cultural markers, shaping personal narratives and influencing how people define themselves. The shift is so profound that Seth Godin, one of the most influential voices in modern marketing, put it simply: “People don’t buy goods and services. They buy relationships, stories, and magic.”

But what happens when loyalty turns into something stronger? When a preference for one brand transforms into a rejection of others? When a brand becomes a badge of belonging, and stepping outside that tribe feels like a betrayal?

These allegiances are playing out in real time, shaping consumer behavior in ways brands can no longer ignore.

Why brand tribalism is different today?

Brand loyalty used to be about habit and reliability. Customers would choose a brand because it is familiar, consistent, or available. Today, the choice is more personal. Consumers do not just buy – they pledge allegiance. A choice between Apple and Android is not just about software preferences; it signals a stance on design, privacy, and social status. Wearing Nike over Adidas is not just about comfort; it ties into cultural movements, athlete endorsements, and personal identity. Patagonia customers are not just buying outerwear; they are making a statement about sustainability and corporate ethics.

Social media has turned these preferences into public declarations. A sneaker drop, a product launch, or a rebrand reaches customers and mobilizes them. Fans celebrate, critics attack, and the conversation spreads. Algorithms amplify the strongest voices, deepening the divide. Tribal loyalty fuels engagement, turning every campaign into a cultural moment. The more a brand stands for, the more its audience demands from it.

Algorithms and personalization create echo chambers. Nike loyalists see Nike’s success stories. Apple users encounter articles that affirm their choice. Digital spaces create closed loops where brand loyalty is continuously reinforced, making it harder for consumers to see alternatives as anything but inferior.

This kind of loyalty comes with expectations. Customers expect brands to take a stand, be consistent, and reward their loyalty with more than good products. They want recognition, participation, and alignment with their values. When those expectations are not met, the fallout can be swift.

“A tribe is a group of people connected to one another, connected to a leader, and connected to an idea. For millions of years, human beings have been part of one tribe or another. A group needs only two things to be a tribe: a shared interest and a way to communicate.”

― Seth Godin, Tribes: We Need You to Lead Us

The risks of identity-driven branding

A strong brand tribe can be an asset until it becomes a liability. When loyalty hardens into exclusivity, the same passion that fuels advocacy can turn into a rejection of anything that does not fit the tribe’s values. A brand that leans too heavily into one identity risks alienating those who do not see themselves reflected. A shift in messaging, a misstep in marketing, or a stance on a social issue can trigger a backlash from both within and outside the core audience.

Brands that once prided themselves on standing for something have found themselves trapped by it. A sustainability-focused company that fails to meet rising environmental standards faces harsher scrutiny than a competitor that never claimed to be eco-conscious. A brand built on inclusivity that stumbles on representation gets called out faster than one that never positioned itself that way. The deeper the connection, the stronger the expectation.

The need for agility has never been greater. A campaign that works today may spark controversy tomorrow. Cultural shifts happen in real-time, and brand tribes, once unwavering, can fracture just as quickly. Companies that rely too much on one identity risk being boxed in, unable to evolve without backlash. The challenge is not just in building loyalty but in knowing how to navigate it when the landscape changes.

The balance between tribal loyalty and mass appeal

A brand that tries to appeal to everyone risks resonating with no one. However, a brand that caters too narrowly to its most devoted audience can be boxed in, unable to grow beyond its core following. Striking the balance between exclusivity and accessibility separates brands that thrive from those that fade into irrelevance.

Some brands embrace scarcity, making their products harder to get, their communities more selective, and their messaging tailored to a specific worldview. Limited releases, invite-only access, and membership-driven perks reinforce the idea that belonging is earned. Others take the opposite approach, using personalization at scale to make every customer feel like part of something bigger while still appealing to the masses. Digital platforms allow for segmentation so precisely that a brand can be all things to all people, without diluting its identity.

Technology has made it easier to foster brand loyalty without closing the door on broader appeal. AI-driven recommendations ensure customers see content that aligns with their values while still introducing them to new perspectives. Community-led marketing taps into the power of brand evangelists without making the message feel forced. The most successful brands build identity-driven connections while leaving room for evolution, ensuring loyalty does not become a limitation.

Case Study: Duolingo’s Viral Marketing and the “Death of Duo” Campaign

Image Credit: Duolingo’s Instagram

Background

Duolingo’s recent Death of Duo campaign exemplifies how brands can cultivate deep tribal loyalty while maintaining mass appeal. By leveraging humor, cultural references, and interactive storytelling, Duolingo engaged its diverse user base, sparking widespread discussion and reinforcing its unique brand identity.

In February 2025, Duolingo executed one of its boldest marketing stunts yet – the death of its beloved green owl mascot, Duo. The campaign, which humorously announced Duo’s passing, was a continuation of Duolingo’s long-standing strategy of blending pop culture, humor, and user engagement to reinforce brand loyalty. The company framed the stunt as a playful callout to procrastinating users, joking that Duo had “probably died waiting for you to do your lesson.” The campaign quickly went viral, dominating social media feeds and prompting engagement from users, influencers, and even other brands.

Marketing Strategy

Duolingo’s marketing strategy is characterized by its unhinged and playful brand voice, particularly on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. By personifying their mascot, Duo the Owl, in humorous and culturally relevant scenarios, they effectively engage a younger demographic. Their social media team crafts content that aligns with current internet trends and memes, fostering a strong sense of community among users.

The Death of Duo campaign reinforced this approach by incorporating several viral elements:

Social Media Engagement: The brand used humor to drive participation, even jokingly asking users for credit card numbers to sign up for Duolingo Max in Duo’s memory.
Celebrity Tie-Ins: The campaign referenced pop star Dua Lipa, continuing an ongoing joke about Duo’s “obsession” with the singer, leading to responses from fans and media outlets.
Cross-Platform Integration: Duolingo spread the campaign across TikTok, X, and Instagram, creating memes, fake crime scene investigations, and mock obituaries for the owl.

This was not an isolated stunt. Duolingo has consistently used irreverent, culture-driven marketing to cultivate a strong brand identity that resonates with loyal users and casual observers. Previous viral moments include their Duo on Ice April Fools’ campaign and their comedic threats to users who neglect their daily lessons. By maintaining this unpredictable, entertaining approach, Duolingo has turned language learning into a social experience that users actively engage with beyond just using the app.

Outcome

The Death of Duo campaign generated significant viral traction, with users and brands participating in the narrative. The brand’s ability to blend humor with direct engagement helped reinforce its unique identity and kept it at the forefront of digital marketing conversations.

Lessons Learned

Duolingo’s success shows that embracing an unconventional, bold brand personality can foster tribal loyalty without alienating potential users. By engaging with internet culture, incorporating humor, and making users feel part of the joke, Duolingo continues to strike a rare balance – creating an exclusive-feeling brand tribe while still appealing to a broad audience.

Case Study: Agent Provocateur’s Revival Through Niche Focus

Image Credit: Yahoo News UK

Background

Agent Provocateur, the luxury lingerie brand known for its provocative designs, faced financial difficulties and a diluted brand image in the mid-2010s. In 2017, Four Marketing acquired the brand, and this is when Agent Provocateur sought to return to its bold, avant-garde roots.

Strategy

Instead of chasing mass-market appeal, the brand refocused on its core audience – loyal customers who appreciated its distinctive, daring aesthetic. This involved emphasizing high-quality craftsmanship, introducing new product lines like swimwear and costume jewelry, and creating marketing campaigns featuring confident, mature celebrities who genuinely love the brand. By staying true to its unique identity, Agent Provocateur strengthened its brand tribe while remaining accessible to new customers seeking luxury and exclusivity.

Outcome

This strategic shift led to a doubling of revenues over three years, with sales projected to reach £50 million by 2025. Agent Provocateur’s resurgence illustrates how a brand can balance deep tribal loyalty with a broader appeal by staying authentic and focusing on its niche market.

Future outlook on brand identity and consumer tribes

Loyalty is no longer a static relationship between brands and consumers. It is fluid, shaped by cultural shifts, digital ecosystems, and the growing expectation that brands stand for something beyond their products. The way we connect has changed. What used to be a simple exchange of goods or services has become a deeper connection based on identity. This connection is always being tested and redefined.

Technology is accelerating this evolution. AI-driven personalization allows brands to create hyper-individualized experiences, reinforcing consumer identity while adapting in real-time. Web3 and decentralized communities are reshaping ownership, giving consumers a more active role in shaping the brands they support. The rise of digital-first tribes, fueled by platforms like Discord, Reddit, and private membership networks, reduces the need for brands to appeal to the masses.

Yet, with every new opportunity comes risk. As consumer expectations grow, the margin for error shrinks. A brand that aligns too closely with a specific identity may be constrained when the cultural tide shifts. A brand that refuses to engage at all risks irrelevance. The future belongs to those who can move beyond traditional brand loyalty, building adaptable, authentic relationships, and evolving alongside their audience.

A brand is no longer just a product or a service – it is a belief system, a signal, a community. Consumers do not merely buy into brands; they embed them into their identities, defend them in public discourse, and expect them to reflect their evolving values. This shift has given brands unprecedented power, but with it comes volatility.

Loyalty that once lasted decades can now unravel in weeks. A misstep can fracture a tribe, while a well-calibrated move can turn passive buyers into lifelong advocates. The challenge is navigating the tension between deep connection and broad accessibility, between conviction and adaptability.

The future belongs to brands that understand how to cultivate belonging without exclusion, influence without alienation, and loyalty without stagnation. Brands that master this balance will not just thrive in the marketplace – they will redefine the very fabric of consumer culture.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In early 2022, Panera Bread introduced its Unlimited Sip Club, a subscription service granting customers unlimited self-serve beverages for a monthly fee. It was among the first major fast-food chains to test a subscription-based model, shifting from traditional loyalty programs to a strategy aimed at securing recurring revenue and increasing customer visits.

Subscription models are becoming a mainstay as quick-service restaurants (QSRs) experiment with new ways to increase customer loyalty and spending. A 2025 report by the Food Institute found that 76% of restaurant owners plan to integrate gamification into their loyalty programs, signaling a move away from static rewards toward interactive engagement. The goal: turning casual customers into repeat visitors who interact with brand platforms daily.

The challenge now is whether consumers see enough long-term value in fast-food subscriptions to maintain their commitment – and whether brands can sustain profitability without diluting the appeal. As competition grows, success will hinge on balancing affordability, exclusivity, and genuine savings that justify a recurring fee.

The Consumer Shift Driving This Trend

Fast food has traditionally thrived on consistency – standardized meals, rapid service, and predictable experiences. But consumer expectations are shifting. Today’s diners seek more than just convenience; they crave value, exclusivity, and interactive experiences. This shift is fueling the rise of subscription-based dining and gamified loyalty programs, turning occasional transactions into habitual brand engagements.

Subscription models have reshaped industries from entertainment to retail, and now they’re making their mark on fast food. A 2024 PYMNTS report found that 45% of US consumers subscribe to at least one food or beverage service, a sharp rise from 36% in 2020. Meal kits and coffee subscriptions paved the way, demonstrating the viability of prepaid dining experiences. Now, QSRs are leveraging similar strategies to lock in repeat visits and drive incremental revenue.

Beyond subscriptions, fast-food chains are integrating gamification to deepen customer engagement. Interactive loyalty programs appeal to psychological triggers – competition, achievement, and status – encouraging repeat visits. Rather than simply buying a meal, customers now earn points, unlock exclusive perks, and advance through membership tiers. A 2023 McKinsey report found that well-designed gamified programs can increase customer spending by up to 40%, making them a lucrative tool for QSRs looking to sustain long-term loyalty.

Younger generations, in particular, are embracing these changes. A recent survey found that millennials and Gen Z are 35% more likely than older demographics to engage with gamified rewards. The demand for digital-first loyalty experiences is fueling innovation worldwide. In Japan, McDonald’s revamped its MyMcDonald’s Rewards with AI-driven personalization, offering points multipliers during off-peak hours to encourage visits. Similarly, in the U.K., Pret A Manger has expanded its subscription model to include personalized incentives based on purchase history. The strategy is clear: engagement must go beyond discounts – it must create a habitual relationship between brand and customer.

There’s also a shift away from traditional discounts in favor of experience-driven perks. A 2024 Kantar study found that 60% of consumers now prioritize rewards that offer exclusivity over basic price cuts. Brands are adapting: Taco Bell’s Fire Tier Rewards unlock early access to menu innovations, while Domino’s Surprise Frees program randomly gifts free food to loyal customers, fostering excitement rather than predictable point redemptions. The shift signals that loyalty is no longer just about savings – it’s about status, engagement, and emotional connection.

The takeaway? Consumers no longer just want rewards – they want engagement. Subscription models and gamified loyalty programs are transforming routine purchases into ongoing brand relationships. As more fast-food brands invest in interactive engagement, the traditional playbook for customer retention is being rewritten. The next challenge? Ensuring these programs provide lasting value rather than becoming another short-lived marketing experiment.

How Fast Food Chains Are Adopting Gamification & Subscriptions

Fast-food chains are no longer simply rewarding repeat customers – they’re restructuring their entire loyalty approach. Subscription services and gamified rewards are turning once-sporadic transactions into habitual spending, offering brands a more reliable revenue stream. While traditional point-based programs still exist, more restaurants are shifting to systems that keep customers engaged daily, whether through app-based perks, tiered memberships, or monthly meal passes.

Pret A Manger, for example, has aggressively expanded its subscription model, first in the UK and now globally. Its “Club Pret” program, offering unlimited barista-made drinks for a fixed monthly fee, drove a 22% increase in global sales in 2023. The company reports that subscribers visit five times more frequently than non-members, significantly increasing food purchases alongside beverages. Similarly, McDonald’s Japan has rolled out digital-exclusive deals through its loyalty app, leveraging gamification to incentivize repeat visits.

While these models generate steady income, they also require constant fine-tuning. Subscription fatigue is real, and consumers are quick to cancel if they don’t see continuous value. Brands must balance pricing, perks, and exclusivity to keep customers engaged without feeling locked into a program that doesn’t evolve. Those that succeed – by offering tangible savings, personalized deals, and interactive rewards – are rewriting the rules of fast-food loyalty.

Luckin Coffee’s Play-to-Win Strategy

Image credit: Luckin Coffee

In China, Luckin Coffee has turned customer retention into a game. Unlike traditional point-based rewards, its app features dynamic challenges that encourage repeat visits. Customers who hit spending milestones unlock tiered discounts and free drinks, creating a loyalty ecosystem that goes beyond transactional incentives. The higher the engagement, the more exclusive the rewards – an approach that has cemented Luckin’s digital dominance in China’s competitive coffee market.

Luckin’s approach has yielded significant results. Its 2023 earnings report revealed that over 75% of transactions now originate through its app, demonstrating the effectiveness of its loyalty system. Customers engage with the platform an average of 21 times per month, far surpassing industry benchmarks. By integrating gamification into its core business model, Luckin has transformed occasional buyers into habitual customers, proving that digital-first strategies can redefine fast-food loyalty.

Burger King’s Subscription Bet in Europe

In Germany, Burger King is testing a different kind of subscription – one that locks in discounts rather than specific products. The chain’s King Deals program, launched in 2023, allows app users to pay a small monthly fee in exchange for access to exclusive offers, including half-price meals and premium add-ons. The goal is to increase repeat visits while giving customers a reason to keep the app on their phones.

Early reports suggest that the strategy is working. Burger King Germany has seen a 22% increase in repeat visits from subscribers compared to non-members, and the company is now considering expanding the program to other European markets.

Shifting From Discounts to Engagement

Subscription-based dining and gamified loyalty programs aren’t just about offering discounts – they’re about changing how consumers interact with fast-food brands. Whether it’s Panera making beverage purchases a habit, Luckin Coffee turning transactions into a game, or Burger King incentivizing app engagement, QSRs are redefining customer relationships.

Why QSRs Are Betting on Gamified Loyalty

Fast-food chains are increasingly adopting subscription models and gamified loyalty programs to enhance customer engagement and secure predictable revenue streams. These strategies not only foster repeat business but also provide a competitive edge in a crowded marketplace.

Predictable Revenue Through Subscriptions

For QSRs, subscriptions provide a buffer against industry volatility, replacing sporadic purchases with predictable, recurring income. Pret A Manger’s “Club Pret” subscription, which grants members up to five barista-made drinks per day for a fixed monthly fee, has transformed the company’s revenue model. The initiative played a key role in pushing Pret’s global sales past £1 billion in 2023, marking the first time in its history the company reached this milestone.

Other brands are experimenting with subscription-like promotions to drive habitual spending. In October 2023, Domino’s introduced its “Emergency Pizza” initiative, allowing loyalty members to redeem a free pizza after making a qualifying purchase. The result was a surge in sales and two million new loyalty sign-ups, reinforcing the effectiveness of structured, value-driven offers in retaining customers.

Enhanced Engagement Through Gamification

Gamified loyalty programs tap into behavioral psychology, using incentives, challenges, and exclusive content to drive repeat visits. McDonald’s Australia’s “MyMacca’s Rewards” program rewards customers with points per dollar spent, which can be redeemed for menu items – a model that has significantly increased app engagement. Beyond simple reward systems, leading QSRs are now incorporating dynamic challenges and real-time achievements, creating a sense of urgency and exclusivity that encourages repeat interactions.

Gamification is proving to be more than a gimmick – it translates directly into higher spending. A Mastercard report found that brands leveraging interactive loyalty mechanics saw a 60% spike in app engagement and a sixfold increase in purchase frequency within the first year of implementation. These figures highlight the growing role of digital ecosystems in fostering long-term brand loyalty.

Social Status Rewards and Exclusive Access

Beyond financial rewards, status-based loyalty structures add another layer of appeal. Customers are often willing to engage more deeply when programs offer exclusive perks tied to higher-tier status. Pizza Express has capitalized on this psychology with a loyalty program structured around bronze, silver, and gold tiers, where members unlock escalating benefits over time. The approach has attracted 2.7 million sign-ups in two years, demonstrating that tiered rewards can drive long-term engagement more effectively than one-time discounts.

Image credit: Pizza Express

Cross-brand collaborations are also enhancing the value proposition of loyalty subscriptions. Walmart+ has partnered with Burger King to provide members with discounts on digital orders and periodic free items, including a quarterly free Whopper. These partnerships add tangible benefits to subscription models, reinforcing brand value while leveraging existing customer bases.

The Numbers Behind Loyalty Innovation

The impact of these strategies is clear. Pret A Manger’s subscription service contributed to a significant jump in global system sales, reaching £1.1 billion while underlying profits rose 12% to £166 million in 2023. Similarly, Domino’s leveraged gamified loyalty to reverse declining sales, expanding its rewards program by an additional two million members in just a few months.

Image credit: Pret A Manger

As the fast-food landscape becomes increasingly competitive, QSRs that invest in loyalty innovation will have a distinct edge. Whether through gamification, subscription models, or status-based incentives, the brands that can turn customer interactions into habit-forming experiences will define the future of fast-food engagement.

The Risks and Challenges of Subscription-Based Fast Food

As more QSRs experiment with these models, potential pitfalls are becoming apparent. From subscription fatigue and economic pressure to logistical hurdles and consumer backlash, brands face mounting challenges in retaining long-term loyalty and sustaining profitability.

Subscription Fatigue

As subscriptions extend beyond streaming and retail into fast food, many consumers are reaching their limit. Households already manage monthly fees for entertainment, groceries, fitness apps, and meal kits – and they’re cutting back. A recent study found that 42% of US consumers feel overwhelmed by the number of subscriptions they manage, with many actively cancelling non-essential services.

This trend isn’t confined to Western markets. In South Korea, a Nielsen study reported a 28% drop in new subscription sign-ups across industries, including food and beverage. Consumers are becoming more selective, gravitating toward services that offer flexibility, exclusive benefits, and genuine savings. For QSRs, this means that simply offering a discount isn’t enough – brands must differentiate their programs through value-driven perks and long-term incentives or risk being abandoned.

Economic Pressures

Fast-food subscriptions thrive in strong economic conditions, but inflation and consumer spending cutbacks are testing their durability. While some customers justify paying upfront for daily meals or drinks, others are questioning the necessity. A recent PwC consumer sentiment report found that 60% of global consumers are actively reducing discretionary spending, with dining out and food subscriptions among the first to be reevaluated.

In Europe, where inflation has driven up food prices, subscription-based meal plans are under strain. A Kantar study showed that 35% of UK consumers have cut back on restaurant subscriptions and food delivery services, shifting toward home-cooked meals instead. Unless fast-food brands can demonstrate tangible cost savings or exclusive access to high-value perks, subscriptions risk becoming expendable luxuries during economic downturns.

The Operational Strain of Managing Demand

Beyond consumer concerns, fast-food chains must grapple with the logistical complexities of recurring transactions. Unlike one-time promotions, subscriptions guarantee a steady flow of orders, requiring precise forecasting for inventory, staffing, and fulfillment.

Japan’s Mos Burger learned this the hard way when it piloted a burger subscription model. Demand exceeded projections, leading to ingredient shortages and strained operations. The company had to restrict redemptions to non-peak hours to prevent service disruptions. This underscores a fundamental risk: if not carefully managed, subscriptions can overload supply chains, increase waste, and frustrate both staff and customers.

Technology is another critical hurdle. Seamless integration of subscriptions into apps and point-of-sale systems is essential, yet many brands underestimate the investment required. In India, a major fast-food chain faced backlash when its digital loyalty program crashed under heavy demand, blocking paid subscribers from redeeming offers. The PR fallout was immediate, reinforcing the importance of scalable, reliable tech infrastructure before launching subscription models at full scale.

Consumer Backlash

When customers feel they’re not getting enough value, they cancel – fast. A 2023 PYMNTS report found that 49% of subscription users drop a service within six months if they don’t perceive consistent benefits.

QSRs are particularly vulnerable to churn. Unlike streaming platforms, where exclusive content keeps subscribers engaged, fast-food loyalty hinges on repeat consumption. If consumers hit unexpected limits – whether through redemption restrictions, menu exclusions, or underwhelming savings – they abandon the program entirely.

In France, a leading coffee chain faced widespread backlash when customers discovered that its “unlimited drink subscription” excluded premium beverages – a restriction buried in fine print. Social media complaints erupted overnight, leading to a 32% drop in renewals within three months. The company was forced to revamp its offer to rebuild trust, but the damage had already dented its reputation.

For fast-food brands, subscription success hinges on transparency, trust, and long-term value. Consumers are willing to commit to recurring spending – but only if the benefits outweigh the cost. In an increasingly subscription-saturated market, brands that overpromise and underdeliver won’t just lose subscribers – they’ll lose credibility.

The Future of Fast-Food Loyalty Programs

Fast-food loyalty programs are at a crossroads. As competition intensifies, brands are moving beyond traditional discounts and punch cards, leveraging advanced technologies and hyper-personalized incentives to deepen customer engagement. However, the future of these programs will depend on whether they provide real, lasting value – or simply add to the growing fatigue of subscription-based services.

Emerging Innovations: AI, Gamification, and Blockchain

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how QSRs understand and engage with customers. By analyzing purchasing patterns and behavioral data, AI-driven loyalty programs can offer customized promotions, dynamic pricing, and predictive ordering. For instance, some brands are experimenting with real-time menu suggestions based on individual preferences, driving higher spending and deeper brand affinity.

Gamification is also evolving. Loyalty programs are incorporating augmented reality (AR) and blockchain technology to create more immersive and secure experiences. AR-driven campaigns allow customers to unlock exclusive deals through interactive digital experiences, while blockchain ensures transparent and fraud-proof reward transactions. These innovations move beyond transactional loyalty, aiming to foster a stronger emotional connection between brands and consumers.

Consumer Skepticism and Ethical Hurdles

Despite the technological advancements, loyalty programs face growing consumer skepticism. The increasing reliance on data collection and AI-driven personalization raises privacy concerns, prompting regulators to scrutinize how brands gather, store, and use consumer information. If customers feel they are being manipulated into spending more rather than receiving genuine benefits, backlash could follow.

Subscription-based models, once seen as a predictable revenue stream, are also losing some appeal. A 2024 industry survey found that consumers now manage an average of 5 to 7 active subscriptions, with many actively reducing non-essential commitments. The question for QSRs is whether fast-food subscriptions provide enough tangible value to justify a recurring financial commitment – or whether they will become another short-lived marketing trend.

Striking the Right Balance

The future of fast-food loyalty programs hinges on execution. Brands that focus purely on data-driven engagement without offering meaningful value risk losing customer trust. To succeed, QSRs must ensure that loyalty initiatives feel rewarding rather than obligatory, with clear, flexible benefits that align with consumer expectations.

Transparency in data usage, personalized but non-intrusive incentives, and rewards that genuinely enhance the dining experience will define the next generation of loyalty programs. As the industry evolves, brands that prioritize trust, flexibility, and customer-first innovation will lead – while those that overpromise and underdeliver risk being left behind.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.