Consumer Behavior Archives

Even as consumers trim expenses in travel, fashion, and dining out, there’s one area where spending continues to climb: their pets.

The global pet care market is now worth over $324 billion, with projections putting it close to $600 billion by 2033. In the United States alone, Americans are expected to spend more than $150 billion on their pets this year – up from $136 billion just two years ago. That’s roughly $1,700 per pet-owning household.

What’s driving the boom isn’t just more pets – it’s more premium care. Owners are trading up to organic diets, breed-specific supplements, and wearable health trackers. Subscriptions for virtual vet services and home delivery of fresh pet meals are becoming routine. Industry analysts say the trend reflects the growing “humanization” of pets, where wellness standards once reserved for people are now expected for animals, too.

Here at Kadence International, we’re seeing this shift play out across markets. Consumers might delay upgrading a phone or cut back on takeout, but they continue to invest in pet wellness – whether it’s probiotic chews, allergy relief supplements, or DNA testing kits. The behavior is less about indulgence and more about prioritizing quality of life for their animals.

The premiumization of pet care is quickly moving from niche to norm – redefining how pet owners allocate household budgets and how companies compete in one of the most resilient sectors of consumer spending.

Rising Demand in Emerging Markets Reshapes the Global Pet Economy

The pet care boom is no longer centered solely in the West. Markets once considered secondary – particularly across Asia and Latin America – are rapidly becoming the industry’s main growth engines, reshaping supply chains, product innovation, and competitive strategy.

China, long known for its production of pet goods, is now a consumption powerhouse. Urbanization, rising incomes, and a generational shift in attitudes toward pet ownership have driven the country’s pet economy past 270 billion yuan ($37 billion USD) in 2024, according to data from iiMedia Research. Functional pet foods, insurance services, and AI-enabled pet tech are flourishing in cities like Shanghai and Beijing, where single-person households and delayed family planning are accelerating the “pet as child” dynamic.

In Southeast Asia, pet ownership is rising fastest among millennials and Gen Z, particularly in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. Here at Kadence International, our fieldwork suggests that first-time pet owners in these markets are skipping entry-level products entirely – jumping straight into grain-free diets, subscription-based care boxes, and app-based training services. This leapfrogging effect mirrors what happened in fintech across emerging markets: consumers are building their relationship with brands in the premium tier from day one.

Meanwhile, in Brazil – the second-largest pet care market globally after the U.S. – veterinary services and pet health plans are expanding beyond affluent neighborhoods. Brazilian households spent an estimated $9 billion USD on pets in 2023, with wellness products now part of everyday grocery retail.

Even mature markets are shifting internally. In Japan and South Korea, birth rates are at historic lows, and a growing number of households treat pets not just as companions, but as emotional and psychological anchors. As a result, the types of products being purchased – from calming diffusers to mental stimulation toys – are changing the definition of core pet care categories.

This reshaping of the global pet economy isn’t just a redistribution of revenue; it’s altering the cultural context of pet ownership. The premium boom may have started in North America, but the future of pet wellness is being co-authored in Jakarta, São Paulo, Seoul, and beyond.

Premiumization in Pet Food and Supplements Redefines the Bowl

A decade ago, premium pet food meant a slightly higher protein count or a label with fewer artificial additives. Today, it means bioavailable nutrients, functional botanicals, customized formulations, and health claims that would feel at home in a human wellness catalogue.

The line between nutrition and therapy is blurring – and the market is responding. In 2023, sales of premium pet food grew at nearly double the rate of standard pet food globally, according to Euromonitor International. Functional claims – supporting gut health, mobility, immune strength, or anxiety reduction – have moved from the margins to the center of packaging in the U.S., UK, Japan, and South Korea. Shoppers are no longer choosing between brands; they’re choosing between outcomes.

Consumer behavior is shifting accordingly. Mintel reports that more than half of U.S. dog owners now actively seek out food with added health benefits, while one in three expect brands to personalize recommendations based on age, breed, or health status. In the UK, pet owners are increasingly mirroring their own dietary ethics, gravitating toward organic and even plant-based options. In Japan, aging pets are driving demand for easier-to-digest meals and portion-controlled packaging that reflects a pharmaceutical precision.

Supplements have quietly become one of the fastest-growing segments in the category. Once the preserve of niche online retailers, they are now a fixture in big-box pet stores and veterinary clinics. Calming chews, joint support powders, and probiotic drops are increasingly purchased not in response to a diagnosis, but as part of a preventive care routine. Subscription models are flourishing in this space – not for convenience alone, but because owners want continuity in their pets’ health regimen.

What’s emerging is a recalibration of value: not measured by bulk or brand familiarity, but by purpose. The pet food aisle is no longer just a product display – it’s a wellness portfolio, curated by consumers who increasingly expect the same standard of care for their pets that they do for themselves.

The App Will See You Now

Veterinary care is no longer confined to the clinic. A growing share of pet owners are now managing health check-ins, nutrition planning, and behavioral advice through digital platforms – often without ever leaving home. In many markets, this is less a futuristic leap and more a pragmatic pivot, driven by convenience, cost concerns, and a shortage of veterinarians.

The surge in telehealth for pets began during the pandemic, but it has since evolved into a new tier of service. Platforms like Pawp, Fuzzy, and Joii offer 24/7 vet consultations, monthly wellness plans, and AI-supported symptom triage. These aren’t replacing traditional care entirely, but they are reshaping the front line – handling minor concerns, triaging emergencies, and maintaining continuity between physical visits.

In the United States, pet telemedicine visits increased more than 300% between 2020 and 2023, according to data from the American Veterinary Medical Association. In the UK, the British Veterinary Association reported that one in five pet owners had used digital vet services in the past year. And in Southeast Asia, where access to veterinary professionals remains limited in many regions, digital care is emerging not just as an option but as infrastructure.

Tied closely to this trend is the rise of subscription-based wellness. What began with monthly deliveries of flea and tick medication has grown into a service model that includes customized food plans, behavioral coaching, supplements, and diagnostics – often bundled through a single platform or mobile app. Some services even offer annual blood testing with doorstep collection, designed to catch early signs of illness before symptoms surface.

The value proposition is as much about predictability as it is about health. For time-poor, urban pet owners – especially millennials and Gen Z – these services streamline routines and reduce the anxiety of not knowing when or how to act. They also lock in brand loyalty in a category where switching costs are otherwise low.

What makes this shift notable isn’t just the tech adoption – it’s the reframing of pet care as a continuous service, rather than an episodic, event-based expense. As competition grows and platforms race to add value, the veterinary space may be next in line for the kind of disruption already seen in human primary care.

Brand Spotlight: Butternut Box

Image credit Butternut Box

Launched in the UK, Butternut Box has become one of Europe’s fastest-growing premium pet food brands by reimagining how pet meals are made, marketed, and delivered. What began as a small direct-to-consumer startup offering fresh, human-grade dog food has evolved into a major player in the pet wellness space, known for its personalized subscription model and health-first messaging.

Every meal is pre-portioned, vet-approved, and tailored to the pet’s dietary needs – whether age, breed, or health condition. As demand for functional nutrition surged, Butternut Box expanded its offering to include treats, supplements, and, most recently, fresh food for cats.

The company has seen rapid growth. Revenues jumped significantly in 2023, and subscriber numbers continue to climb as the brand expands into new markets across Europe. Recent acquisitions and infrastructure investments are helping it scale beyond the UK, with operations now live in Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Poland.

Much of the brand’s appeal lies in its ability to align with pet owner expectations – offering transparency, convenience, and clear health outcomes. Its packaging, product formulation, and tone of voice are all geared toward the modern, wellness-minded consumer who wants more than just “better kibble.” And with fresh food sales rising across the industry, Butternut Box is well-positioned to lead the charge.

As the definition of pet health evolves, Butternut Box exemplifies how brands can thrive by staying close to consumer values. Its growth underscores a larger shift: pet owners aren’t just buying food – they’re investing in long-term wellness. And they’re choosing brands that make that easy, measurable, and personalized.

The Psychology Behind the Spend

Rational budgeting has never fully explained pet ownership. But in a year where inflation has squeezed discretionary spending across sectors, the continued rise in pet wellness expenditure points to something deeper: emotional economics.

In the United States, 62% of pet owners say they are spending “the same or more” on their animals despite cutting back in other parts of their lives, according to a 2024 survey by Morgan Stanley. And it’s not just pet parents in affluent neighborhoods. In Brazil, where real incomes have fluctuated over the past two years, pet care remains one of the most resilient retail categories, particularly among single-person households and retirees.

What’s driving this behavior isn’t just brand marketing or a surge in new product availability – it’s a cultural shift in the perceived role of pets. In many homes, animals are no longer companions; they’re emotional extensions of the self. Pet care spending is often framed not as an expense, but as an expression of identity, responsibility, and affection. That makes it far less vulnerable to economic headwinds.

There’s also the matter of control. In periods of uncertainty, consumers tend to focus on the things they can manage. For pet owners, that increasingly means doubling down on wellness – purchasing products and services that promise safety, health, and longevity. In this way, premium pet care has become part of a broader coping strategy: a way to nurture stability in an unstable world.

Consumer researchers are watching this closely. “What we’re seeing is a shift from reactive to anticipatory spending,” said one behavioral analyst in a recent study published by Mintel. “It’s no longer just about solving a problem – it’s about preemptively protecting what matters most.”

The implication for brands is significant. Emotional drivers are shaping not just what consumers buy, but how they engage – with higher expectations around transparency, ethics, and personalization. It’s no longer sufficient to claim that a product is “good for pets.” Increasingly, it has to feel like the right decision for the person making it.

What Comes Next for Pet Wellness Brands

The shift in consumer behavior is now being mirrored in boardrooms and investment portfolios. Private equity firms, legacy conglomerates, and health tech startups are all converging on a singular conclusion: pet care is no longer a recession-proof niche – it’s a lifestyle category with global, cross-demographic appeal.

In the past 24 months, more than a dozen pet wellness platforms have closed Series A or B funding rounds in excess of $20 million. Unilever acquired a majority stake in pet supplement brand Nutrafol Pets. Mars, already dominant in veterinary services through its ownership of Banfield and VCA, is doubling down on diagnostics and AI tools through its Kinship division. Even players outside the category – like Nestlé and L Catterton – have quietly expanded their holdings in high-growth pet food startups.

This capital infusion is reshaping not just how pet products are developed, but how they’re delivered. Subscription platforms are building vertically integrated ecosystems. Diagnostics companies are exploring partnerships with tele-vet apps. Consumer goods firms are rethinking packaging, sustainability, and supply chains to appeal to increasingly values-driven buyers.

To make sense of the momentum, here’s a snapshot of key growth areas attracting attention:

Emerging Investment Hotspots in Pet Wellness

Category	Why It’s Growing	Notable Moves (2023–2024)
Functional Pet Food	Rising demand for therapeutic and preventative nutrition	Nestlé invests in JustFoodForDogs
Tele-Veterinary Services	Expanding access, convenience, and lower cost barriers	Fuzzy and Pawp secure $25M+ in funding rounds
Pet Supplements	Proactive health management among Gen Z and millennials	Nutrafol Pets launches in North America
Diagnostics & Health Tech	Early detection, personalization, and longevity trends	Mars launches pet DNA and microbiome services
Subscription-Based Models	Strong retention, DTC control, consumer preference	PetPlate, BarkBox expand internationally

The next wave of competition won’t be driven solely by who has the best product – but by who owns the end-to-end relationship with the pet owner. As wellness becomes the defining lens through which pet care is viewed, brands will need to operate more like healthcare providers than traditional retailers.

The opportunity is enormous, but so is the expectation. The bar has been raised – by consumers, by capital markets, and increasingly, by the animals themselves, whose needs are now tracked, monitored, and optimized in real time.

A Wellness Revolution Still in Its Infancy

If the past five years marked the emergence of premium pet care as a trend, the next five will define it as an expectation. The convergence of health, data, and digital delivery has already reshaped human wellness; now it’s doing the same for animals – at speed and scale.

What we’re seeing is a new phase of maturity in pet ownership globally. In emerging markets, where pet care was once utilitarian, consumers are leapfrogging into advanced wellness behaviors – driven by rising incomes, smaller households, and increased digital access. In mature markets, the shift is more psychological: pets are not just part of the family, they are central to it, prompting a level of intentionality in purchase decisions that echoes human healthcare.

This signals not just a market opportunity, but a transformation in mindset. We expect to see a rise in predictive care models powered by biometric monitoring, AI-driven nutrition plans, and services that adapt in real time to the pet’s lifecycle or environment. The role of the vet will likely evolve, too – becoming more consultative and tech-enabled, supported by home diagnostics and subscription wellness ecosystems.

And while consumer demand is shaping the future, it’s also setting new standards. Transparency, traceability, and ethical sourcing will become baseline requirements. Products that once stood out for being “premium” will be judged instead by how well they anticipate needs, reduce friction, and integrate into a seamless care experience.

This is no longer a pet product story – it’s a consumer behavior story, unfolding across borders, cultures, and categories. As the definition of wellness continues to evolve, so too will the expectations around how we care for the animals in our lives.

The brands that succeed won’t just sell to pet owners. They’ll understand them – intimately, culturally, and contextually. That’s where the future of the pet industry will be shaped.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

On a humid Friday evening in Bangkok, a 29-year-old marketing executive taps through her banking app. She’s just paused her subscription to a second-tier streaming platform and declined an invite to a weekend brunch. But on her walk home, she stops at the Dior counter and buys a lipstick she’s been eyeing for weeks. It’s the one indulgence she’s allowed herself this month. “I cut back on everything else,” she tells a colleague. “This just makes me feel like me.”

Her behavior isn’t an anomaly – it’s a signal. Around the world, consumers are quietly renegotiating the terms of luxury. While macroeconomic forces push people to trim budgets, many are still carving out space for small, strategic indulgences. Austerity no longer looks like elimination; it looks like prioritization.

Call it frugal luxe, quiet indulgence, or strategic spending – this is not irrational behavior, but a recalibrated consumption model shaped by emotional utility and financial realism. Consumers are trading down in broad categories – opting for private-label groceries, reducing ride-hailing use, canceling entertainment bundles – yet they’re unwilling to let go of the symbols that anchor identity, aspiration, or routine.

The global backdrop is undeniable: inflation remains sticky in many economies, wages are lagging, and discretionary income is under strain. In the U.S., the consumer savings rate hovers below pre-pandemic norms. In Southeast Asia, rising living costs are altering middle-class consumption. In the U.K., nearly half of adults report having to cut back on non-essential purchases. And yet, prestige beauty sales are rising. High-end skincare, fragrance, and entry-point luxury fashion continue to perform.

This isn’t a contradiction. It’s a redefinition of value. And the brands that thrive in this moment won’t be those who offer the cheapest price – but those who understand the psychology of what consumers are still willing to pay for.

Because in an era of smarter spending, winning share of wallet means first earning a place in the consumer’s hierarchy of emotional needs.

The Rise of Frugal Luxe – A Global Snapshot

What began as anecdotal “lipstick effect” spending has evolved into a full-fledged global pattern: consumers are not abandoning consumption – they’re curating it. The frugal luxe mindset is not about depriving oneself, but about making deliberate, emotionally resonant choices under constraint.

Across geographies, data shows a clear shift. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Consumer Sentiment Survey found that 72% of consumers across developed and emerging markets report adjusting their spending behaviors, with the most common action being the substitution of high-cost items for lower-cost alternatives – except in categories they deemed “self-care” or “identity-reinforcing.” In Southeast Asia, a Bain & Company study noted that while middle-class households are spending less on dining out, they are spending more on skincare, small electronics, and niche fashion – categories where brand and aesthetic still hold value. In the U.S., prestige beauty grew 14% year-over-year in 2023, even as overall discretionary spending declined. In the U.K., Boots saw record sales in luxury fragrances priced under £50, many sold alongside budget groceries.

This is not a repeat of post-2008 frugality. Then, the consumer response was often to pull back across the board, saving as a virtue. Today’s frugality is more calculated than moralistic – and driven by a more sophisticated understanding of trade-offs. It’s not about saving for saving’s sake; it’s about cutting what doesn’t serve and keeping what does. That distinction is critical.

The economic pressures underlying this shift are real and persistent. Inflation has plateaued but remains elevated in key markets. Real wage growth is marginal. In many urban centers, rent and utility costs are consuming a larger share of monthly income than at any time in the past decade. But consumers are not reacting passively. They are actively reshaping their personal economies, determining where to trade down and where not to compromise.

Crucially, frugal luxe behavior is not confined to one cohort. Gen Z is driving it with curated shopping habits and value-hunting sophistication, but Millennials and even Gen X are adopting similar strategies. What’s shared is the intentionality. Consumers are no longer passively consuming – they are performing economic self-optimization, informed by a steady stream of content that frames “smart spending” as a lifestyle.

Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have normalized “dupe culture” – where users show off how they scored a product that looks like luxury but costs a fraction. Yet in the same feed, those same users will unbox a full-priced Diptyque candle or a single-item designer purchase. The message is not “buy less,” it’s “buy selectively.”

Globally, this has begun to reshape categories. In Japan, the longstanding culture of quality-over-quantity spending (known as shinayakana seikatsu) has found resonance with a younger generation of minimalists who still value premium skincare. In India, beauty brands are reporting a decline in full-sized product sales, but a rise in discovery kits and refillables. In Brazil, mid-market fashion is struggling while resale luxury and independent accessories brands thrive.

Across markets, the conclusion is the same: value is no longer binary. It’s not “luxury vs. bargain” – it’s “what justifies its place in my life?” Brands that misread this as simple downtrading risk irrelevance. Those who tune into this nuance will find opportunity – not just to sell more, but to sell smarter.

The Psychology Behind It – Why We Splurge While We Cut

At first glance, the frugal luxe mindset seems contradictory: a consumer balks at a $6 coffee subscription but buys a $75 serum without hesitation. Economically, it’s inconsistent. Psychologically, it’s perfectly rational.

This is where market dynamics intersect with behavioral economics. In times of uncertainty, people tend to seek out control, reward, and reinforcement – especially when broader financial agency feels compromised. These micro-luxuries become not just products, but emotional instruments: ways to reassert identity, regain a sense of choice, and anchor personal value.

Historically, this has played out before. The “lipstick effect” – a term coined during the early 2000s recession and later observed after 9/11 and in the 2008 financial crisis – described how consumers cut back broadly but still spent on small luxury items, particularly in the beauty category. Today’s version is more sophisticated. It’s not just about lipstick. It’s about emotional return on investment.

This is emotional ROI at work: the subconscious calculation consumers make when deciding whether something is “worth it” not just financially, but emotionally. That $75 serum isn’t just skincare – it’s a commitment to self-care. A branded candle isn’t just scent – it’s sanctuary in a chaotic world. These purchases are rarely made out of impulse alone. They’re rationalized, budgeted, even anticipated. In that sense, they offer the predictability that macroeconomic conditions lack.

Research from Deloitte confirms this. In a 2023 global consumer survey, 64% of respondents said they were more likely to buy products that made them feel emotionally secure, even if those products were non-essential. The strongest responses came from younger consumers, who reported using small purchases as a way to cope with financial stress and identity instability. This is less about indulgence, and more about calibration: consumers are rebalancing their mental and emotional portfolios as much as their financial ones.

Psychologists also point to the role of aspirational continuity. Consumers may be delaying larger goals – home ownership, international travel, luxury fashion – but they still want symbols of progress. A small luxury becomes a token of staying on track. This is particularly pronounced in status-driven categories like fragrance, skincare, and branded accessories, where even a single item can carry heavy semiotic weight.

There’s also a visibility factor. In the age of social media, consumer choices are publicly narrated. Selective spending allows people to maintain an aesthetic or aspirational identity while privately cutting costs elsewhere. In effect, frugal luxe is not just a financial strategy – it’s also a performance of resilience.

Understanding this nuance is critical for brand strategists. Consumers are not spending irrationally. They are optimizing emotional impact per dollar, seeking meaning, identity, and autonomy through purchases that feel earned – even if they seem extravagant on paper.

For brands, the opportunity lies not in asking, “Will they buy?” but “What role does this play in how they see themselves?”

Case Study: ASAI Hotels and the Art of Intentional Hospitality

Image credit: ASAI Hotels

In a market where consumers are trimming excess but still seeking meaning, ASAI Hotels offers a blueprint for how travel brands can deliver premium experience without premium pricing. Launched by Dusit International in 2020, ASAI was purpose-built for the frugal luxe traveler – those who want design, culture, and quality, but none of the gilded frills.

Instead of scaling luxury down, ASAI redefines it. Properties are lean by design – compact rooms, limited staff, no banquet halls or sprawling lobbies – but everything a modern traveler values is thoughtfully elevated. Beds are comfortable, showers rainfall, Wi-Fi fast. Public areas double as co-working spaces and social hubs. And in a strategic move that’s as cultural as it is commercial, each hotel is embedded in a local neighborhood, with a restaurant curated by local chefs and partnerships with nearby artisans, vendors, and guides.

This is not budget travel in disguise. It’s travel edited with intention. ASAI’s Bangkok Sathorn location opened with rates under USD $50 – a striking value in one of Asia’s most visited cities – but paired with Michelin-linked cuisine and locally inspired interiors. Guests don’t feel like they’re compromising. They feel like they’ve discovered something smarter.

What sets ASAI apart isn’t just the product – it’s the philosophy. From agile pricing packages to curated local experiences, the brand is engineered for the consumer who’s making trade-offs, but still wants to feel indulgent. Flexible cancellation policies, digital check-in, and concierge-style staff interactions cater to the desire for both control and care.

And it’s working. ASAI properties consistently receive high ratings for value, design, and service. The brand has expanded beyond Thailand into Japan and the Philippines, proving that its blend of affordability and authenticity has cross-border appeal.

In an era where travel is more intentional, ASAI has found the sweet spot: luxury reimagined as locality, quality, and thoughtful restraint. It’s a case study in what happens when hospitality listens closely – not just to how much travelers want to spend, but to what they want that spending to feel like.

Frugal Luxe in Practice – How It’s Changing Beauty, Fashion, and Travel

The frugal luxe mindset isn’t just influencing what people buy – it’s reshaping entire industries in how they develop, price, and market their offerings. Nowhere is this more visible than in beauty, fashion, and travel – sectors that sit at the intersection of identity, aspiration, and everyday ritual.

Beauty: Dupes and Devotion

Beauty is perhaps the clearest expression of frugal luxe in action. Consumers are cutting costs in functional skincare – opting for no-frills, dermatologist-backed drugstore brands – while still spending on hero products and signature scents. The rise of “dupe culture” – where TikTok influencers promote affordable versions of luxury products – hasn’t killed premium beauty. Instead, it has redefined what’s worth paying full price for.

Take Rare Beauty, which straddles affordability and prestige with minimalist packaging and emotionally resonant branding. In Southeast Asia, Korea’s Olive Young chain is thriving by offering shoppers both budget K-beauty staples and cult-favorite luxury imports. Meanwhile, direct-to-consumer platforms like Beauty Pie (UK) allow users to subscribe to access prestige formulas at wholesale prices – frugality without sacrifice.

Sales figures reflect this duality. While mass beauty volumes have remained flat, prestige beauty in the U.S. grew 14% in 2023 – driven not by breadth, but by a focus on high-performing or emotionally charged SKUs. The consumer isn’t buying more. They’re buying more intentionally.

Fashion: Capsule Thinking and Conscious Curating

In fashion, consumers are trading volume for selectivity. Capsule wardrobes – minimalist, mix-and-match collections anchored by a few standout pieces – are on the rise. Luxury resale platforms like Vestiaire Collective and The RealReal are growing in both inventory and credibility, as consumers seek quality without the markup. The resale market is projected to double by 2027, according to ThredUp’s 2024 report.

Brands are adapting. Zara has introduced higher-end “premium” capsules. COS and Arket are elevating materials and tailoring. In Asia, Taobao’s Luxury Pavilion is bridging mainstream ecommerce with designer credibility. The common thread is discretion over display. Quiet luxury, less logo-heavy but still recognizably refined, appeals to a frugal luxe buyer who wants lasting value, not viral novelty.

Fast fashion isn’t dead – but it’s being used differently. Consumers might wear high-street basics for casual or invisible moments, while saving higher-priced pieces for more visible or identity-expressive occasions. Spending is being segmented not by category, but by context.

Travel: Trade-Offs, Not Cutbacks

Even in the travel sector – often the first to be trimmed during downturns – frugal luxe is shifting patterns. Consumers are taking fewer trips, but spending more on personalization, experience, and wellness. Budget flights are paired with boutique hotels. Three-day getaways are traded up with Michelin-starred meals or spa packages. Travel is no longer about how far, but how meaningful.

Brands are adjusting accordingly. Luxury travel providers are offering shorter packages with high-touch service. Airlines are upselling “premium economy” tiers with lounge access and upgraded meals. The success of Airbnb Luxe and wellness retreats like Aman Essentials shows that even value-conscious travelers are willing to invest – if the experience feels transformative.

Even Google searches reflect the pivot. In 2024, searches for “affordable luxury travel” and “best value boutique hotels” outpaced traditional terms like “cheap flights” or “budget vacations.” The language of frugality is evolving, and so are the offerings designed to meet it.

How Brands Are Adapting – Strategy Shifts Across the Market

Brands that once relied on abundance, visibility, or exclusivity are now being challenged to respond to a consumer who shops with intent, scrutinizes value, and mixes luxury with restraint. Frugal luxe doesn’t mean less opportunity – it means a demand for sharper, more strategic brand behavior.

In beauty, fashion, and consumer goods, companies are rethinking not only pricing architecture, but positioning, messaging, and innovation pipelines. Tiered offerings – once used to ladder customers into prestige pricing – are now reversed. Entry-level luxury products are becoming lead sellers, not loss leaders. Dior’s Addict Lip Glow, Chanel’s Les Beiges Water Tint, and Le Labo’s travel-size scents are all examples of luxury distilled into a smaller, more accessible form – without losing cachet.

This has led to a rise in what analysts call “masstige”: prestige aesthetics at mass-market prices. But masstige has matured. It’s no longer about watered-down versions of designer goods. It’s about embedding value signals – ingredient quality, design, performance – into more approachable formats. Think of Glossier’s minimalist packaging, or Uniqlo U’s designer-led capsule collections. Even Apple has leaned into this zone, positioning older iPhone models as aspirational entry points for Gen Z.

Luxury groups are also evolving. LVMH and Kering have emphasized scarcity, small drops, and storytelling – leveraging limited availability over scale. On the other end, mass retailers are racing to elevate their image: Target’s partnership with designer brands, Boots stocking premium beauty, and H&M launching higher-end home collections. Everyone is meeting in the middle, because that’s where the frugal luxe consumer lives.

Pricing strategy is only part of the story. Messaging has also shifted from status to discernment. Ads no longer shout. They whisper – implying intelligence, curation, and insider knowledge. Brands are moving away from overt luxury cues and toward emotional narratives: empowerment, craftsmanship, quiet confidence. This reflects a deeper shift: luxury is no longer about proving wealth. It’s about affirming self-worth in an uncertain world.

Technology is helping brands track these nuances in real time. AI tools allow marketers to test price elasticity across segments, optimize product mix, and personalize offers based on behavioral signals. Subscription data, refill rates, and post-purchase engagement now drive product development cycles more than focus groups. This enables continuous recalibration of what the customer considers “worth it.”

Even loyalty programs are being reimagined. Cashback is no longer compelling. Instead, brands offer early access, customization, or social recognition. For a frugal luxe consumer, feeling valued is more motivating than saving money.

Some of the smartest adaptations are happening in emerging markets, where middle-class consumers are under greater financial pressure – but no less brand-attuned. In India, Nykaa uses data-driven bundling to pair affordable essentials with aspirational trial-size products. In Vietnam, localized DTC brands position themselves as “premium but practical.” In Mexico, curated marketplace models are growing – offering shoppers a mix of imported luxury and local craftsmanship at frictionless prices.

The core shift is this: consumers are no longer trading down because they’re disengaged from brands. They’re trading strategically because they’re more discerning. To win this audience, brands must think less about price points and more about permission – have you earned the right to be their one splurge?

That’s a higher bar – but a more loyal customer when cleared.

Research and Innovation in the Frugal Luxe Era

To adapt to the frugal luxe consumer, brands need more than instinct – they need precision. The same buyers who once followed broad loyalty patterns are now driven by a mix of psychology, price sensitivity, and emotional return. Understanding where they draw the line between indulgence and excess requires a new kind of consumer insight – one grounded in nuance, not averages.

That’s why the most future-focused brands are turning to agile, continuous research models. Traditional quarterly surveys and segmentation reports can’t keep pace with fast-changing consumer behavior. Instead, leading companies are investing in longitudinal panels, rapid user testing, and scenario-based modeling to predict what consumers will splurge on next – and what they’ll drop without hesitation.

In beauty, brands like Sephora and Charlotte Tilbury use shopper feedback loops tied to SKU-level sales data to refine product mix in real time. In fashion, resale platforms analyze upload frequency and price elasticity to anticipate consumer fatigue or desire. And in luxury travel, customer journey mapping isn’t just about destinations – it tracks sentiment shifts around personalization, sustainability, and perceived self-reward.

Beyond product, brands are rethinking innovation itself. Design-to-value models, once reserved for industrial engineering, are now being applied to consumer goods – ensuring that every feature, material, and format in a product serves either performance or emotional payoff. Packaging is lighter, messaging more focused, and hero SKUs are prioritized over bloated portfolios.

This moment also invites rethinking how value is communicated. Research shows that consumers are more likely to buy when they feel “in on the decision” – when the brand speaks to them as collaborators, not targets. That means transparent storytelling about sourcing, science, and savings – not just brand heritage or exclusivity.

In the frugal luxe economy, innovation isn’t about premiumization for its own sake. It’s about designing products and experiences that feel earned. And the brands that lead won’t be those who guess right – but those who listen smarter.

Frugality as a Lifestyle, Not a Phase

What began as a reactive shift in consumer behavior is fast becoming a structural one. Frugality is no longer seasonal or circumstantial – it is being integrated into the architecture of daily decision-making. The frugal luxe mindset isn’t a temporary belt-tightening – it’s a new blueprint for value.

In this emerging paradigm, traditional market signals are losing their predictive power. Income is no longer a reliable proxy for spending intent. Brand awareness doesn’t guarantee brand loyalty. Even sentiment data, unless layered with behavioral nuance, risks misdiagnosis. Consumers are more fluid than the models designed to capture them.

For strategists and researchers, this demands a reset. Legacy frameworks built around “value vs. premium” binaries or static personas can’t keep up with a consumer who is simultaneously trading down and trading up – sometimes in the same basket. The next generation of research will need to map micro-intentions: how consumers compartmentalize indulgence, what triggers rationalization, and which categories become immune to compromise.

Foresight leaders are already shifting from tracking what people buy to decoding why they justify it. That requires not just data, but empathetic intelligence – a blend of qualitative depth, contextual listening, and scenario-based modeling that captures the emotional calculus behind the cart.

The question for brands is no longer “how do we sell more?” It’s “how do we matter in a world where fewer things get bought, but those few are chosen with surgical precision?”

Because frugal luxe isn’t just a response to economic pressure – it’s a reflection of cultural evolution. Consumers aren’t retreating. They’re refining. And the brands that rise to meet them will be those that understand the mindset behind the money – not just the movement of it.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

On a rainy Thursday in Jakarta, over 8,000 Sociolla customers received a flash SMS alert offering 20% off select skincare products. By 12:10 p.m., web traffic had tripled. Less than 24 hours later, a follow-up email landed in their inboxes – cleanly designed, product-focused, and personalized with recommendations based on browsing history. The conversion spike didn’t come from a single channel. It came from the right message, at the right time, on the right screen.

It’s a pattern playing out across global markets. With notification fatigue and rising acquisition costs, brands are rediscovering the power of email and SMS – two of the most overlooked but effective tools in the marketer’s arsenal. What’s different now is how they’re being used together.

According to Statista, ad spending in the SMS Advertising market worldwide is forecasted to reach US$809.05m in 2025. Email continues to dominate ROI metrics, delivering an average return of $36 for every $1 spent. But the real shift is strategic. Marketers are no longer siloing these tools. They’re orchestrating them.

In the US, Brooklinen sends a gentle SMS nudge 30 minutes after an abandoned cart, followed by an email packed with customer reviews and lifestyle imagery to rebuild interest. In the UK, ASOS primes audiences with SMS during peak sale periods, then follows up with immersive lookbooks that drive larger basket sizes. For Asian markets like Indonesia and Thailand, timing SMS around commutes or lunch hours and layering email content after hours is a high-conversion formula.

And increasingly, WhatsApp Business is becoming part of that mix. In regions where the app dominates daily communication, brands are using it to share order updates, personalized offers, and real-time service, bridging the immediacy of SMS with the interactivity of chat. In countries like India, Malaysia, and the Philippines, WhatsApp isn’t just a messaging tool. It’s a conversion channel.

What’s emerging is a model of engagement where immediacy and storytelling coexist. Consumers may not articulate it, but their actions show a clear preference: urgency on the lock screen, depth in the inbox – and conversation in the chat thread.

Data That Demands Attention

The performance metrics behind email and SMS are impressive.

Omnisend’s 2024 ecommerce report shows that automated emails account for just 2% of sends but drive 41% of all email orders. These messages see open rates of 42.1%, click rates of 5.4%, and convert at 1.9% – outperforming bulk campaigns across every measure. Automated emails like welcome, cart abandonment, and browse abandonment flows are particularly effective. Take Baking Steel, a U.S. brand known for its professional-grade pizza-baking surfaces. The company drives 33% of its total email revenue through automated messages, even though they represent just 2.3% of sends. Their cart abandonment series alone accounts for 27% of email revenue, while their welcome series delivers between $10 to $15 per email sent. It’s a clear example of how a small number of well-timed, behavior-based messages can punch far above their weight.

When paired with SMS, the impact grows sharper. SMS open rates hover around 98%, making it a high-visibility tool for time-sensitive nudges and transactional prompts.

Retailers are taking notice. In Southeast Asia, Love, Bonito enhances customer loyalty through LBCommunity+, offering perks like early access alerts and personalized styling sessions. While specific performance metrics aren’t publicly available, the brand’s hybrid approach – pairing SMS and email across loyalty tiers – has been widely recognized for deepening engagement and increasing repeat purchases among members.

The numbers tell a clear story. SMS delivers reach and urgency, while email drives context and conversion. Together, they’re not just a communications strategy – they’re an engine for revenue.

Speed Meets Substance

Brands are learning that velocity alone doesn’t drive results – it’s the balance between urgency and depth that converts.

Email and SMS each offer distinct strengths. SMS delivers speed, with nearly instantaneous open rates – ideal for alerts, reminders, and real-time nudges. Email offers space to tell a story, showcase visuals, and reinforce value.

Brooklinen, US-based home goods brand, effectively demonstrates this balance through its abandoned cart email strategy. The emails highlight free shipping, surface customer reviews, and feature clean product visuals, adding persuasion where a short-form message might fall short. The brand’s approach shows how reinforcing urgency with context can reignite purchase intent.

brooklinen-abandoned-cart-email-strategy

Image Credit: Active Campaign

Beauty Pie, a UK-based direct-to-consumer beauty brand, integrates email into its promotional ecosystem by offering exclusive perks to subscribers, including discounts and early access offers. These incentives drive sign-ups and build a permission-based channel for richer engagement.

While many brands continue experimenting with channel timing, the best results come when communication flows are mapped with intent – starting with immediacy and followed by storytelling.

Timing Isn’t Everything – Coordination Is

Hitting send at the right time is no longer enough. Today’s consumers expect connected experiences – where messages don’t just arrive on schedule but arrive with purpose.

Disjointed campaigns risk confusion or, worse, being ignored. According to Omnisend, brands that use three or more channels in a coordinated way see a 287% higher purchase rate than those using single-channel outreach. But coordination doesn’t mean duplication. It means sequencing messages across platforms in a way that feels human, not robotic.

Brands that succeed build journeys, starting with a short SMS that grabs attention and followed by a visual email that deepens the story. Automated triggers based on user behavior (like browse abandonment or wishlist adds) help ensure these touchpoints feel timely, not templated.

This shift from reactive timing to proactive orchestration pushes marketers to rethink their flows. It’s not about when a message is sent; it’s about how it fits into the bigger narrative.

Personalization That Pays Off

Personalization is no longer optional; it’s the standard. Brands that succeed use customer behavior as the blueprint for when, where, and how to communicate.

Brooklinen exemplifies this strategy by utilizing behavioral data to send personalized messages – welcoming new subscribers, reminding users of abandoned carts, and re-engaging inactive shoppers. Each email is optimized for timing and relevance, often highlighting customer testimonials and free shipping incentives to drive conversions. These flows are built to respond, not interrupt.

Personalization at scale means more than using a first name – it means designing communications that adapt to customer intent. The brands that get this right don’t just see better metrics; they build better relationships.

Inside the Inbox and Lock Screen

The real test of a campaign happens in seconds – on a lock screen swipe or an inbox scan. Successful brands know that getting the message seen is only the beginning. Getting it acted on is the goal.

Brooklinen’s cart abandonment email is a masterclass in the visual hierarchy: a clean header, compelling product image, a short reassurance (“Don’t worry, your cart’s still here”), and a call-to-action button with contrast and urgency. Paired with their SMS—“Still thinking it over? Your Brooklinen cart’s waiting…”—the combined impact is gentle and effective. No pressure, just presence.

Email marketers often focus on copy, but design plays just as critical a role. Omnisend recommends mobile-first layouts with clear CTAs, minimal text, and product visuals above the fold. For SMS, the best-performing messages are under 160 characters and feature clickable short links – delivered during peak engagement hours like lunchtime or early evening.

Though design elements may vary by region and industry, the pattern remains consistent: a visual hook, a clear message, and a frictionless path to action.

Whether it’s a text reminder to “Finish checking out before your 10% off expires” or an email showcasing reviews from people with similar purchase behavior, these touchpoints are designed to feel relevant in the moment. Not just another notification.

Lessons from the Brands Getting It Right

Some brands aren’t just testing SMS and email integration; they’re building it into how they communicate. And the results show.

Brooklinen has become a case study in lifecycle marketing. Their welcome flows introduce the brand’s voice with simplicity and style, often including a first-purchase discount and lifestyle imagery that reflects their clean aesthetic. Follow-up emails and SMS reminders – especially around cart abandonment – are personalized, brief, and supported by social proof. This multistep approach increases the likelihood of conversion without overloading the user.

Love, Bonito, a fashion brand based in Southeast Asia, strengthens loyalty through its LBCommunity+ program. Members receive early access notifications and personalized recommendations via email. While SMS is often used for time-sensitive drops, email delivers richer content – lookbooks, styling tips, and editor picks tailored to user preferences. It’s a strategy that respects both format and context.

Warby Parker, in the US, offers another strong model. Their abandoned cart emails pair sharp product imagery with service-driven reminders – like free shipping and easy returns. Meanwhile, SMS is used sparingly but strategically, such as to confirm appointments or alert customers when their in-store pickup is ready. The brand’s restraint adds to its impact.

Each of these brands succeeds not by doing more but by doing it better. Clear roles for each channel. Data-driven triggers. Messages that respect the medium and the consumer’s attention span.

Avoiding the Double Tap Trap

With nonstop notifications, message fatigue is real, and brands that overcommunicate are paying the price.

According to GetApp’s 2024 Digital Content Consumer Survey, 40% of U.S. consumers unsubscribe from brand texts and emails at least once weekly. Over half will unsubscribe if they receive four or more marketing messages from the same company within 30 days. The problem isn’t communication; it’s saturation.

Many consumers also see diminishing value in brand outreach. Nearly 49% of Americans say more than half of the emails they receive feel like junk, a perception that erodes trust and damages engagement.

The smartest marketers are now designing campaigns that avoid redundancy. A time-sensitive SMS may kick off a promotion, while email follows with more detail and imagery. Triggered automation ensures once a customer clicks or converts on one channel, the other backs off – preserving relevance without repetition.

Avoiding the double tap isn’t just about frequency; it’s about flow. Respecting your customer’s attention span is now a competitive advantage.

What Great Design Looks Like

In integrated campaigns, how a message looks can matter as much as what it says. Design is the first filter – especially on mobile, where space is limited and attention is scarce.

Omnisend’s benchmarks point to a consistent pattern: campaigns with a clear CTA, minimal text, and mobile-optimized visuals significantly outperform cluttered or text-heavy alternatives. For SMS, the highest-performing messages stay under 160 characters, often including a short, trackable link and a clear sense of urgency – whether it’s “Last chance: 20% off ends tonight” or “Your order is ready for pickup.”

On the other hand, emails benefit from layered content – clear headers, bold product imagery above the fold, and buttons that pop. Brooklinen’s campaigns frequently use short copy and soft color palettes that echo the brand’s tone. Beauty brands like Glossier and Love, Bonito often lead with visuals, letting product photos and user-generated content do the talking.

The golden rule is design for the scroll. Whether it’s a swipeable message or a mobile inbox preview, every pixel counts. Alignment between email and SMS design – through tone, color, and CTA language – helps reinforce the message without repetition.

The most effective campaigns don’t just look good. They work hard in small spaces – and stay out of the way once the job is done.

The Tech That Ties It All Together

Smart strategy means little without the infrastructure to support it. Behind every well-timed message and seamless customer journey is a stack of tools built to automate, segment, and adapt in real-time.

Marketers are increasingly turning to platforms that integrate email and SMS – allowing for centralized data, unified campaign flows, and cross-channel automation. Brands use technology to sync customer behavior across touchpoints, trigger messages based on actions (like page views or cart additions), and suppress redundant sends if a user has already converted.

This orchestration isn’t just efficient; it’s essential. With third-party cookies phasing out, first-party data has become the lifeblood of personalized marketing. Integrated platforms offer a direct line to user behavior, purchase history, and channel preferences, helping marketers reach the right audience without overstepping.

Brooklinen’s flows, for example, are powered by behavior-triggered automation that adjusts timing and content depending on customer interaction. Meanwhile, Glossier leverages its CRM system to send personalized messages to loyalty members based on engagement tiers and product affinity.

Tech isn’t the show’s star – but it’s what keeps the spotlight aligned. Without it, even the best creative and messaging strategy risks falling flat.

Final Send-Off

Consumers aren’t just scrolling; they’re actively filtering. Every ping, preview, and push competes for attention in a space where attention is finite.

The brands winning today aren’t louder. They’re smarter. They know when to text and when to email. They automate without sounding robotic. They build systems that talk to each other so their messages don’t overlap – or get ignored.

As marketing budgets tighten and customer expectations rise, the margin for error shrinks. SMS and email, when used in sync, offer rare precision: fast, personal, and measurable.

The smart play isn’t about choosing the right channel. It’s about connecting them, and knowing when to pause.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

In 2005, Nintendo was teetering on irrelevance in the UK. Once a dominant force, the gaming giant had been eclipsed by Sony’s PlayStation and Microsoft’s Xbox, holding a mere 5% market share in a space increasingly dominated by high-powered consoles and competitive gaming. Gaming had become synonymous with young, tech-savvy male audiences – a niche where Nintendo no longer held sway.

Within two years, Nintendo executed a turnaround that defied industry norms. By 2007, its UK market share had skyrocketed to 80%, driven by a marketing strategy that ignored the industry’s obsession with specs and focused on accessibility, playfulness, and the redefinition of what it meant to be a “gamer.” The Nintendo DS and Wii weren’t just consoles; they were cultural phenomena that expanded the gaming audience beyond teenage boys and esports enthusiasts to parents, professionals, and an emerging market now known as kidults – adults who engage in play-driven, nostalgic, and social entertainment.

This wasn’t just a comeback. It was a masterclass in market expansion, consumer behavior, and brand reinvention. Nintendo didn’t just take back its position in gaming – it transformed the industry’s entire trajectory. How did they do it? And what lessons can today’s brands learn from this seismic shift?

The Market Landscape Before Nintendo’s Comeback

By the mid-2000s, gaming was a high-stakes, high-performance industry. Sony and Microsoft were in an aggressive race, pushing cutting-edge graphics, processing power, and online multiplayer experiences. The PlayStation 2 was the undisputed king, selling over 155 million units globally, while the Xbox, backed by Microsoft’s deep pockets, had secured a loyal base of hardcore gamers. Nintendo, once the industry’s dominant force, had been relegated to an afterthought.

The problem? The market had narrowed. Gaming had become a battlefield of tech specs and realism, catering to an increasingly insular demographic – young male gamers. The industry had overlooked a fundamental truth: entertainment isn’t just about cutting-edge technology; it’s about accessibility, emotional connection, and cultural relevance.

This was the opportunity Nintendo saw before anyone else. Instead of competing on hardware power, the company pivoted toward a different gaming experience, prioritizing intuitive gameplay, social engagement, and an audience that had been ignored for too long.

Nintendo engineered one of the most dramatic turnarounds in business history by rejecting the industry’s fixation on complexity and high-performance specs. Its strategy didn’t just reclaim market share – it reshaped the gaming landscape, expanding the definition of who a gamer could be.

Key Strategies That Fueled Nintendo’s Success

Nintendo’s comeback wasn’t a fluke – it was a deliberate strategy that defied industry norms. While Sony and Microsoft escalated the hardware arms race, Nintendo redefined what gaming could be. Instead of emphasizing specs, it broadened its audience and made gaming more intuitive, turning the conversation from power to play.

#1. Expanding the Audience Beyond Gamers

Gaming had long been marketed to young men obsessed with high-speed, high-performance play. Nintendo shattered this mold by targeting demographics the industry had ignored: families, women, and older adults. The company understood gaming wasn’t inherently niche; it had simply been positioned that way.

The strategy was simple but groundbreaking: the barriers stopping non-gamers from picking up a controller. The Wii and Nintendo DS were designed to be intuitive, eliminating the intimidating learning curves of traditional gaming. This wasn’t about mastering complex button combinations or navigating hyper-realistic battlefields; it was about play.

Nintendo’s marketing leaned into this accessibility, positioning gaming as a shared experience rather than a solo, skill-based pursuit. Instead of hyper-stylized action sequences, Nintendo’s ads featured families playing together in living rooms, grandparents competing with grandchildren, and social settings where gaming wasn’t just entertainment; it was connection.

The result? Nintendo didn’t just win back players – it created millions of new ones. This wasn’t just about reclaiming dominance; it was about reshaping the gaming audience entirely.

#2. Leveraging Innovative Gameplay Experiences

Nintendo’s resurgence wasn’t about cutting-edge graphics, faster processors, or blockbuster storytelling. It was built on a simple yet powerful principle of consumer psychology: ease of use. By stripping away complexity, Nintendo made gaming more accessible than ever.

The Nintendo DS: A Touch-Based Revolution

It was built on a simple yet powerful principle of consumer psychology: ease of use. By stripping away complexity, Nintendo made gaming more accessible than ever.

Image Credit: Nintendogs Wiki Fandom

More importantly, Nintendo ensured the software supported this approach. Titles like Brain Age and Nintendogs weren’t designed for traditional gamers – they were built to attract a broader demographic, including older adults and casual players who had never picked up a console before. By moving away from conventional gaming tropes, the DS became a global sensation, selling over 154 million units.

The Wii: Motion-Control Gaming That Redefined Engagement

If the DS lowered the barrier to entry for handheld gaming, the Wii redefined accessibility in home entertainment. Launched in 2006, the Wii introduced motion-sensing controls that eliminated complex button inputs. Players could physically swing, punch, or steer their way through games, making gaming feel more interactive and immersive.

Image Credit: Game Rant

Bundling Wii Sports was a masterstroke. The Wii’s intuitive, motion-based gameplay made it essential for the living room, drawing in families, older adults, and social gamers. By 2007, the Wii had outsold the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

Rather than competing in the high-performance gaming race, Nintendo carved out an entirely new segment – one that prioritized intuitive, inclusive, and social play. The company didn’t just win back market share; it expanded the definition of gaming itself.

#3. Creating a Software Lineup That Sold Consoles

Nintendo’s success wasn’t just about hardware innovation. The real driver behind the DS and Wii’s dominance was a software strategy that prioritized accessibility, engagement, and repeat playability. While competitors focused on high-budget, graphics-heavy blockbusters, Nintendo leaned into intuitive, universally appealing experiences that turned occasional players into loyal consumers.

The Power of Bundled Games

Few games have matched the cultural impact of Wii Sports. With simple motion controls for tennis, baseball, and bowling, Wii Sports turned gaming into an active, social activity. The result? It became one of the best-selling games of all time.

Similarly, Brain Age for the DS tapped into a new category of users: adults looking for cognitive challenges. Its premise, built around mental exercises and daily training, positioned the DS as a lifestyle product. This pivot expanded Nintendo’s consumer base and set the stage for future mainstream gaming trends.

Franchises That Defined an Era

Beyond bundled titles, Nintendo doubled down on its iconic IPs. Mario Kart DS brought the beloved racing franchise to handheld gamers, while New Super Mario Bros. revitalized classic platforming for a new generation. These titles weren’t just nostalgia-driven – they were strategically designed to leverage Nintendo’s strongest assets while remaining accessible to casual players.

Image Credit: The Gamer

The Wii also saw a boom in motion-driven exclusives. Games like Wii Fit turned the console into a fitness tool, targeting a demographic far beyond traditional gamers. This content diversification ensured Nintendo wasn’t just selling consoles; it was building long-term engagement.

Image Credit: Game Stop

By focusing on intuitive gameplay, evergreen franchises, and software that appealed to untapped markets, Nintendo created a virtuous cycle: every best-selling game drove more console sales, and every console sale expanded the audience for future games. This strategy transformed Nintendo from an industry underdog to a market leader once again.

#4. Making Gaming More Affordable and Accessible

While Sony and Microsoft were engaged in a hardware race, pushing consoles with advanced graphics and premium pricing, Nintendo took a different approach. It focused on affordability, positioning the DS and Wii as low-cost, high-value alternatives that didn’t require a deep investment in gaming culture or expensive accessories. This pricing strategy wasn’t just about undercutting the competition; it was about lowering the barrier to entry and widening the consumer base.

Disrupting the Price War

In 2006, the PlayStation 3 launched at £425 in the UK, while the Xbox 360 ranged from £209 to £279. The Nintendo Wii, by contrast, entered at just £179—an accessible price point that made it an easy choice for families, casual gamers, and first-time buyers long priced out of gaming.

The DS followed a similar model. At launch, it was significantly cheaper than Sony’s handheld PSP, which was marketed as a high-performance portable console with multimedia capabilities. While the PSP struggled to compete with the rise of smartphones in the years ahead, the DS thrived by staying true to its core audience – offering simple, engaging experiences at a price point that felt accessible.

The Cost-to-Value Proposition

Price alone wasn’t enough – Nintendo had to prove value. Bundling Wii Sports gave consumers an instant reason to buy, eliminating the need for additional purchases. The Wii’s motion controls also removed the expense of extra accessories. Meanwhile, the DS thrived on a library of budget-friendly, mass-appeal titles, positioning gaming as an everyday activity rather than a luxury.

This affordability-first strategy had long-term implications. It cultivated a new generation of casual gamers, many of whom might never have considered purchasing a console. More importantly, it reinforced Nintendo’s reputation as the most accessible gaming brand, not just competing for market share but actively expanding the market.

By rejecting the premium-price model and focusing on mass-market adoption, Nintendo proved that success in gaming wasn’t just about hardware specs; it was about making gaming available to everyone.

#5. A Marketing Masterclass in Consumer Engagement

Nintendo’s comeback wasn’t just about hardware, software, or pricing – it was about storytelling. While Sony and Microsoft marketed gaming as a high-performance, immersive experience for dedicated players, Nintendo positioned gaming as something entirely different: a social, intuitive, and universally accessible activity. This shift in messaging was a fundamental repositioning of what gaming meant to consumers.

The Shift from Power to Play

Sony’s PlayStation 3 campaign emphasized its powerful hardware, with cinematic trailers showcasing hyper-realistic graphics and advanced processing power. Microsoft’s Xbox 360 leaned into its online gaming ecosystem, targeting hardcore players with a focus on multiplayer capabilities.

Image Credit: Miscrave

Nintendo went in the opposite direction. It didn’t market specs – it marketed people. Instead of high-adrenaline gameplay, its ads showed families, grandparents, and first-time gamers picking up a Wii remote and playing instantly. The message was clear: gaming wasn’t just for gamers anymore.

Turning Gaming into a Shared Experience

The Wii Would Like to Play became one of the era’s iconic marketing campaigns. Featuring two suit-clad Japanese men introducing the Wii to everyday households, it emphasized invitation over exclusivity. Nintendo wasn’t selling a console; it was selling interaction, laughter, and inclusion.

Image Credit: Playback

For the DS, Nintendo leaned into relatability. The Touch Generations campaign targeted non-gamers, featuring celebrities and everyday users engaging with brain-training games, puzzle titles, and social experiences. This wasn’t gaming for the elite; it was gaming for everyone, reinforcing the company’s core strategy of mass accessibility.

Here’s the 2006 Touch Generations Nintendo DS print ad.

Image Credit: ebay

Retail Strategy and Experiential Marketing

Beyond traditional advertising, Nintendo excelled at experiential marketing. The company rolled out widespread in-store demo stations, allowing hesitant buyers to try the Wii’s motion controls or experience the DS’s touchscreen before making a purchase. This hands-on approach eliminated skepticism and turned a casual interest into immediate conversion.

Nintendo also capitalized on the rise of social proof. Word-of-mouth marketing skyrocketed as the Wii became a staple in living rooms worldwide. The more people saw their friends and family engaging with Nintendo products, the more likely they were to join in, creating a viral effect that fueled record-breaking sales.

By shifting its marketing from performance-driven specs to emotion-driven engagement, Nintendo didn’t just sell consoles – it sold experiences. In doing so, it reshaped the gaming industry, proving that success wasn’t about catering to the existing market but creating an entirely new one.

#6. The Long-Term Impact on Gaming and Consumer Behavior

Nintendo’s strategy didn’t just reclaim market share – it redefined gaming itself. It shifted perceptions of who a “gamer” could be and expanded what gaming could offer. The ripple effects went beyond Nintendo, reshaping the industry and consumer expectations for years.

Mainstreaming Casual and Social Gaming

Before the Wii and DS, gaming was a niche hobby dominated by young men. Nintendo shattered that perception, proving gaming could be inclusive, social, and effortless. The runaway success of Wii Sports, Brain Age, and Nintendogs sparked demand for intuitive, accessible gameplay – paving the way for mobile gaming’s rise.

Nintendo inadvertently set the stage for the mobile gaming revolution by lowering the entry barrier and emphasising fun over complexity. The App Store, launched in 2008, followed the same principles: games that were simple to learn, easy to access, and designed for mass appeal. Today, the global mobile gaming market generates more revenue than console and PC gaming combined, a shift that can be traced back to Nintendo’s strategy of broadening the gaming audience.

The Legacy of Motion Controls and Interactive Gaming

Initially dismissed as a gimmick, the Wii’s motion controls became a blueprint for interactive gaming. Microsoft’s Kinect and Sony’s PlayStation Move were direct responses, chasing the demand Nintendo had created. More significantly, the idea of physical engagement in gaming extended beyond consoles – AR and VR gaming owe much of their mainstream appeal to Nintendo’s early innovations.

Image Credit: Nintendo

Nintendo’s focus on intuitive play also influenced how developers approached game design. Today, user-friendly mechanics and immediate engagement are central to many of the industry’s best-selling titles, from fitness-based games like Ring Fit Adventure to the continued success of Just Dance, a franchise built on motion-based play.

A Blueprint for Market Expansion

Nintendo’s greatest lesson wasn’t reclaiming market share – it was creating new demand. Rather than competing in a saturated market, it identified an untapped audience and built products around them.

This strategy continues to influence modern gaming. The resurgence of retro consoles, the rise of cloud gaming services that prioritize accessibility over hardware power, and even the success of games like Animal Crossing: New Horizons – which attracted a massive non-traditional gaming audience – can all be linked to the blueprint Nintendo established in the mid-2000s.

Nintendo didn’t just revive its brand – it reshaped the gaming industry. By proving that innovation comes from creating trends, not following them, it set a new standard for market disruption. And its influence didn’t stop at gaming.

Nintendo’s resurgence wasn’t just a corporate turnaround; it redefined how entertainment itself was consumed. By shifting gaming from a skill-based pursuit to a social, inclusive experience, it expanded the industry’s reach far beyond its traditional audience. The DS and Wii weren’t just successful consoles; they were cultural phenomena that reshaped consumer behavior, fueled the rise of casual gaming, and set the stage for today’s interactive entertainment trends.

The takeaway for brands? Market dominance isn’t about competing harder – it’s about expanding the playing field. Nintendo succeeded by challenging assumptions, identifying unmet consumer needs, and making gaming effortless and engaging. It didn’t just reclaim leadership; it shaped the future of digital entertainment for decades.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The marketing department, as we know it, is obsolete.

Generative AI develops millions of personalized ads in milliseconds. Consumers shape brand narratives in real-time. Predictive algorithms anticipate needs before customers even recognize them. The traditional marketing playbook isn’t just outdated; it’s collapsing. Legacy teams, built on rigid hierarchies and campaign cycles, are being outpaced by AI-augmented ecosystems designed for continuous adaptation.

Tomorrow’s marketing function won’t be a department. It will be an intelligence system embedded within product development, customer experience, and behavioral data science. Brands that fail to restructure will not just fall behind; they will disappear.

Winning in this new landscape requires more than AI-driven automation. Emotional intelligence, ethical AI governance, and seamless integration with business operations will separate leaders from laggards.

The shift is already happening. The only question is: how fast can marketing teams evolve?

The five pillars of the future marketing team

#1. AI-Augmented Strategy Teams – Humans and Machines as Co-Pilots

The future of marketing is not about AI replacing human creativity; it’s about AI augmenting it. In the next decade, marketing teams will no longer rely on static consumer personas or outdated segmentation models. Instead, they will deploy real-time predictive marketing engines powered by AI that adapt to shifting consumer behaviors instantaneously.

But here’s the critical distinction: AI will not replace human intuition but enhance its precision. The most successful marketing teams will be those that train AI to think like a strategist while ensuring humans retain control over brand ethos, ethical boundaries, and cultural nuance.

Nike’s marketing team has already embedded AI into its decision-making process, using machine learning to predict product demand, optimize pricing, and create hyper-personalized consumer journeys. However, Nike does not hand over creative control to algorithms; it ensures AI insights serve human-led storytelling and brand building.

However, AI’s increasing role raises governance concerns. If left unchecked, algorithmic bias, AI hallucinations, and opaque decision-making processes can erode consumer trust. Google’s ad-targeting models, for instance, have faced scrutiny for bias in content distribution, highlighting the need for marketing teams to establish AI ethics frameworks.

The human component will remain irreplaceable. AI can crunch data, but it cannot understand cultural nuances, context, or the emotional weight of a story.

Marketing leaders must own the governance of an AI-driven strategy, ensuring automation enhances brand trust rather than undermines it.

#2. Consumer intelligence & behavioral science units to decode decision-making in real-time

The future of marketing will not be driven by demographics but by deep behavioral insights. Real-time consumer intelligence hubs will help track sentiment, subconscious decision-making, and predictive behavioral shifts.

Neuroscience, biometric tracking, and AI-driven sentiment analysis will become the foundation of modern marketing teams. Instead of just asking consumers what they think, brands will measure how they feel in the moment. Eye-tracking, galvanic skin response, and neuro-marketing scans will reveal how audiences react to products, content, and messaging, eliminating the guesswork from engagement strategies.

Unilever has already integrated neuroscience into its advertising research, measuring emotional responses at a subconscious level. By analyzing brain activity, Unilever can determine whether an ad creates an authentic emotional connection before it ever reaches a consumer’s screen, ensuring campaigns resonate deeply rather than rely on assumptions.

However, access to such insights comes with ethical responsibility. As marketing teams gain deeper access to real-time consumer psychology, the risk of manipulation increases. Personalization cannot become digital surveillance.

Brands that thrive will use behavioral data to enhance consumer experiences, not exploit them. Ethical AI oversight within marketing teams will be non-negotiable.

#3. Hyper-personalization & growth teams leading the shift from segments to individuals

Marketing will no longer be about targeting audiences; it will be about orchestrating individual consumer journeys in real time. Growth teams will shift their focus from optimizing channels to engineering highly individualized consumer pathways powered by AI and real-time identity graphs.

Spotify’s AI-driven campaigns, like Discover Weekly and Wrapped, are personalized brand experiences rather than traditional marketing tools. Every interaction refines the algorithm, ensuring recommendations grow more precise, engagement deepens, and retention soars.

This level of hyper-personalization presents a paradox. The more tailored the experience, the more invisible the marketing becomes. When done well, the consumer does not feel targeted; they feel understood. But when algorithms misfire, the illusion shatters.

Growth teams of the future will need to master the balance between automation and authenticity, ensuring AI-driven personalization enhances human connection rather than replacing it.

#4. Decentralized, agile creative networks and the end of the traditional in-house model

Marketing teams will no longer operate as rigid, in-house departments. Instead, they will function as fluid, decentralized creative networks, tapping into on-demand talent pools powered by AI-driven collaboration platforms.

Gucci Vault has already embraced decentralized creativity, collaborating with independent digital artists and Web3 designers rather than dictating brand aesthetics from a central creative team. By co-creating with digital-native communities, Gucci ensures its brand narrative evolves organically rather than being imposed from the top down.

Maintaining brand consistency in a decentralized model will be challenging. Future marketing leaders must find ways to empower external creators while ensuring alignment with brand identity.

#5. Ethical & sustainable marketing frameworks: the new non-negotiable

Marketing will no longer be judged solely on performance metrics. The future belongs to brands that align with consumer values and embed ethics and sustainability into their strategies.

Patagonia’s self-imposed carbon tax and long-term sustainability initiatives have proven that consumers reward brands whose actions match their messaging. If a company fails in this area, it can lead to serious greenwashing and ethical mistakes that destroy trust. This is especially true because AI-powered fact-checking tools and decentralized watchdog communities can quickly reveal inconsistencies.

The rise of regenerative marketing will push brands beyond sustainability pledges toward long-term societal impact. Companies will shift from minimizing harm to actively contributing to environmental and social well-being. This will require marketing teams to collaborate with policymakers, sustainability experts, and ethical data specialists, creating a new discipline where profit and purpose are no longer opposing forces but interconnected drivers of success.

The future marketing team must integrate ethics into every stage of strategy and execution, ensuring profit and purpose are interconnected rather than opposing forces.

The future marketing leader – a hybrid of technologist, psychologist, and strategist

The CMO role is disappearing. In its place, a new breed of marketing leader is emerging, one who blends data fluency with behavioral science and technology expertise with strategic vision.

Companies like Adobe and Tesla already embed AI, automation, and predictive analytics into their core strategies. But successful marketing leaders will not just be digital experts – they will be experience architects, shaping every consumer touchpoint across an increasingly fragmented landscape.

As marketing, product development, and customer experience become inseparable, the Chief Growth Officer or Chief Experience Officer will replace the traditional CMO, reflecting marketing’s new mandate: not just to promote but to engineer adaptive, intelligent brand ecosystems.

The Marketing Team as a living intelligence system

The marketing team of the future is not just a department. It works as a living, changing system. AI helps boost human creativity, insights about customer behavior guide decisions, and decentralized networks share brand stories.

But technology alone will not define the winners. The brands that thrive will understand the irreplaceable role of human judgment – the ability to interpret, contextualize, and ethically apply data-driven insights.

To future-proof their marketing teams, organizations must:

Invest in cross-functional talent – marketers must be fluent in AI, behavioral psychology, and digital ecosystems.
Establish AI governance frameworks – bias, privacy, and transparency will be critical.
Shift from campaign-based marketing to real-time experience management or risk irrelevance.

Marketing is no longer a function. It is the foundation of consumer trust, brand longevity, and sustained competitive advantage. The next era will not belong to those who adapt, it will belong to those who lead the transformation.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Food prices in Japan have surged since 2022, shifting consumer habits in ways that brands cannot afford to ignore. A nationwide study by our sister company, CMG Inc., reveals the extent of this shift, showing how inflation influences where, what, and how often people buy groceries.

Japanese consumers have long prioritized quality and brand loyalty, often paying a premium for fresh, locally sourced ingredients. However, inflation is shifting these behaviors. Our study shows that more shoppers seek discounts, adjust grocery lists, and change stores to cope with rising costs.

Our study of Japanese consumers aged 20 to 69 found that 90% feel the strain of rising food costs, with 70% experiencing it intensely. Prices for essential staples like rice, leafy greens, and eggs have surged, pushing shoppers toward lower-cost alternatives, bulk buying, and store-switching strategies.

Households are adjusting by choosing cheaper alternatives, relying on discounts, and carefully planning purchases to minimize costs. The findings reveal how inflation shapes the Japanese food market today and how brands must adapt to meet shifting consumer priorities.

Japanese consumers feel the weight of rising food prices

how-Japanese-consumers-feel-about-food-inflation

Inflation is hitting middle-aged consumers the hardest. Women and those aged 40 to 60 report the most strain as they juggle rising grocery bills alongside housing, childcare, and utility costs.

Rice tops the list, with three-quarters of respondents saying its cost has risen. Leafy vegetables, eggs, and fruits are among the most frequently cited items experiencing price hikes. The rising costs of these essentials are pushing consumers to reconsider their grocery lists, with many shifting to more affordable alternatives or cutting back on certain items altogether.

Consumer sentiment suggests inflation is not just a financial strain but an ongoing source of anxiety. Many households are adjusting broader spending patterns, cutting back on dining out and non-essential purchases as they prioritize their grocery budgets. This heightened sense of caution underscores the urgency for brands to meet evolving needs with adaptable solutions.

Implications for Brands

As inflation shapes consumer habits, brands operating in the food industry must rethink their strategies. Price sensitivity is now a dominant force in purchasing decisions, making affordability and value essential selling points. Companies that rely on staple food products may need to introduce smaller pack sizes, bulk discounts, or subscription-based models to maintain customer loyalty.

This shift presents an opportunity for brands that offer alternatives to high-cost staples. The surge in demand for lower-cost items like bean sprouts and tofu suggests that consumers are willing to make substitutions. Positioning these products as smart, affordable choices through targeted marketing and in-store promotions could help brands capture market share.

Retailers and food manufacturers must also recognize that Japanese consumers actively seek ways to save. Loyalty programs, digital coupons, and promotional bundles could play a more significant role in purchasing decisions as shoppers become more selective about where they spend their money. Companies that can balance pricing strategies with perceived value will be best positioned to navigate the evolving food market in Japan.

How Consumers Are Changing Their Shopping Habits

changing-grocery-shopping-habits-in-Japan

As prices climb, Japanese consumers are becoming more strategic. Nearly 30% are actively hunting for clearance deals, while an equal share is switching supermarkets in search of lower prices. Discount chains and bulk retailers see increased foot traffic as shoppers shift from premium stores to budget-friendly alternatives.

Beyond price-driven decisions, shoppers are becoming more disciplined in their purchasing habits. Many are researching deals in advance, planning their shopping lists, and buying only what is necessary. This shift suggests that impulse buying is declining, making it harder for brands to capture spontaneous purchases. Instead, consumers approach grocery shopping with a calculated mindset, weighing every purchase against cost and necessity.

Digital engagement is also playing an increasing role in consumer decisions. More shoppers use online price comparison tools, retailer apps, and e-commerce platforms to track discounts and find the best deals. Brands that integrate their promotions seamlessly into these digital channels will have a greater chance of influencing purchase decisions early on.

However, in-store promotions and point-based rewards in Japan remain highly influential, offering brands an alternative way to engage cost-conscious consumers. Brands that integrate their promotions seamlessly into digital and physical retail channels will have a greater chance of influencing purchase decisions before consumers even enter a store.

Implications for Brands

With price-conscious behavior shaping the market, brands must adapt their pricing and promotional strategies. Offering flexible discounts and personalized promotions could help retain customers who might otherwise trade down to lower-cost alternatives. Brands traditionally relying on premium positioning may need to consider budget-friendly variations or value packs to stay competitive.

A prime example of a brand adapting to shifting consumer behavior is Nissin Foods, the maker of Cup Noodles. The company has introduced new flavors and healthier options for health-conscious consumers while maintaining affordability. Its focus on sustainability through eco-friendly packaging and responsible sourcing has also helped sustain consumer loyalty despite economic challenges.

Retailers also need to rethink in-store and digital promotions. Placing high-demand items in visible areas, bundling products at competitive prices, and integrating discount offers into mobile shopping apps can help maintain customer engagement. As shoppers become more deliberate, brands must ensure they are part of the decision-making process before consumers reach the checkout counter.

What are people buying less and more often?

top-10-foods-with-price-increases-in-Japan

Rice, snacks, and cabbage are the top three foods that people buy less of due to price increases.

Rising prices are forcing consumers to rethink where they shop and what they buy. The survey reveals a clear pattern – high-cost staples are being purchased less frequently, while affordable alternatives are gaining traction. Since 2021, Japan has experienced a significant surge in rice prices. In 2023, the average selling price for a 60-kilogram bag of rice was approximately ¥15,310 (about $139 USD). By January 2025, this price escalated to ¥25,927, a 69% increase from the previous year. This equates to roughly $171 USD.

At the same time, lower-cost and versatile food items are seeing an uptick in sales. Bean sprouts and tofu, known for their affordability and adaptability in Japanese cuisine, are among the top foods people buy more often. Bread, another relatively inexpensive staple, has also gained popularity. The trend suggests consumers prioritize foods that offer more servings, opting for ingredients that stretch further and provide better value.

Implications for Brands

Understanding these shifts is critical for food manufacturers and retailers. Brands in high-cost categories need to rethink how they position their products. Offering smaller portion sizes, value packs, or price promotions could help retain consumers considering cutting back. For brands selling products that are growing in demand, this is a moment to strengthen their market position. Highlighting the versatility, nutritional benefits, and affordability of products like tofu and bean sprouts can reinforce their appeal in price-sensitive times.

Retailers should also adapt by ensuring budget-friendly items are well-stocked and prominently displayed. Promotional strategies should focus on cost-effective meal solutions, helping consumers maximize their grocery budgets. As inflation influences purchasing decisions, brands that align their offerings with consumer priorities will be best positioned to maintain loyalty and sales.

How Japan’s food inflation compares to the West

Rice isn’t just a staple in Japan—it’s a cultural cornerstone and an economic indicator. Unlike many Western nations where grains are heavily imported, Japan produces most of its rice domestically, meaning price fluctuations reflect deeper economic shifts. This inflation trend mirrors similar surges in other staple foods worldwide, such as wheat in the U.S. and soybeans in China.

Food prices are rising worldwide, but the impact varies from country to country. While Japan is seeing sharp increases in staples like rice, vegetables, and eggs, the US and the UK markets are grappling with their inflation-driven shifts in consumer behavior. In Western markets, dairy products, meat, and processed foods have been among the most affected categories, driving consumers toward discount grocery chains, bulk buying, and private-label alternatives.

In the US, shoppers increasingly turn to wholesale retailers and discount supermarkets to cut costs. Many are switching from brand-name products to store-brand alternatives, with major retailers reporting a surge in private-label sales. Coupon usage once thought to be in decline, has made a strong comeback, mainly through digital platforms and loyalty apps. In the UK, where food inflation and the cost of living have been a persistent challenge, many households are scaling back on meat purchases and opting for frozen or tinned foods as a cost-saving measure.

Despite regional differences, the global trend is clear – consumers are becoming more intentional about how and where they spend their grocery budgets. The shift toward discount-driven shopping, meal planning, and strategic purchasing decisions redefines how food brands and retailers operate across markets.

While Japan sees a shift toward staples like tofu and bean sprouts, the US and UK consumer shifts lean toward private labels and bulk buying, highlighting different approaches to cost savings.

Implications for Brands

Brands must recognize that price sensitivity is no longer confined to specific regions. Inflation-driven purchasing habits are reshaping consumer expectations on a global scale. Affordability and value have become key decision-making factors, making it essential for brands to rethink their pricing and promotional strategies.

Companies that traditionally cater to premium or discretionary food categories may need to introduce flexible pricing structures, offering economy-sized packaging or subscription models to retain budget-conscious shoppers. Meanwhile, brands positioned in lower-cost categories have a unique opportunity to strengthen their appeal, emphasizing the affordability and versatility of their products.

Japan’s beef bowl industry thrives despite multiple price hikes due to rising costs. Zensho Holdings, the parent company of Sukiya, a Japanese restaurant chain that serves gyudon (beef bowls), curry, and other dishes, has reported strong profit growth and increased customer numbers, highlighting how strategic pricing and strong brand equity can sustain demand even in inflationary times. This resilience reflects Japan’s unique consumer behavior, where quality and convenience often precede purely cost-cutting measures.

Retailers, particularly those in markets where discount shopping is on the rise, should focus on making savings more accessible. Digital loyalty programs, targeted promotions, and clear communication around price advantages will be critical in maintaining consumer trust and engagement in a price-sensitive environment.

How brands can adapt to a cost-conscious market

Food inflation is not just reshaping consumer habits but redefining how brands must approach pricing, marketing, and product development. As shoppers prioritize affordability and shift toward lower-cost alternatives, companies must take a proactive approach to remain relevant in a rapidly changing market.

One of the most immediate strategies for brands is pricing flexibility. Offering a range of product sizes at different price points can help cater to varying consumer budgets. Smaller packaging options can attract shoppers looking to control their spending, while bulk discounts can appeal to those who prefer to stock up when prices are favorable. Subscription models that provide cost savings over time may also help retain customer loyalty, particularly for staple goods.

Product positioning is equally important. Brands that once relied on premium pricing must now justify their value through differentiation. Messaging focusing on nutritional benefits, sustainability, or versatility can encourage consumers to keep buying products even if prices increase. For brands in high-growth categories like tofu and bean sprouts, reinforcing affordability and multiple-use meal applications can strengthen market share.

Retailers have a crucial role to play in guiding purchasing decisions. Strategic in-store placements, meal-planning promotions, and digital tools that showcase the best value options can help shoppers navigate rising prices. Supermarkets that integrate personalized discounts, loyalty rewards, and digital coupons into their customer experience will be better positioned to retain price-sensitive consumers.

The brands that succeed in an inflationary market will listen to consumers, adapt to shifting priorities, and offer tangible value beyond price alone. As economic conditions continue to shape spending behavior, remaining flexible and responsive will define long-term brand resilience.

Turning Challenges Into Opportunities

Rising food prices are forcing consumers to rethink their purchasing decisions, but they are also creating new opportunities for brands willing to adapt. The shift toward cost-conscious shopping is not a temporary adjustment; it reflects a more profound change in consumer behavior likely to persist even if inflation stabilizes. Brands that recognize these shifts and respond strategically will retain their customer base and strengthen their market position in the long run.

Innovation will be key for companies in high-cost categories. Reformulating products to be cost-effective without compromising quality, offering flexible portion sizes, and introducing alternative ingredients can help brands navigate price sensitivity. For companies in growing categories, reinforcing the value of their products through effective messaging and promotions will be essential to sustaining momentum.

Digital engagement is also becoming more critical. Consumers increasingly rely on price-comparison tools, e-commerce discounts, and loyalty programs to make informed purchasing decisions. Brands that invest in personalized marketing, mobile-based promotions, and transparent pricing strategies will be better positioned to build long-term trust with their audience.

Food inflation is reshaping the competitive landscape, but it must not be a setback. Companies that approach this challenge with flexibility, creativity, and consumer-first thinking can turn market uncertainty into a moment of strategic growth.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

For years, brands have poured billions into social media, banking on its power to capture consumer attention. But many users are logging off, exhausted by algorithm-driven content, relentless ads, and digital fatigue. The rise of the social media detox movement presents an inconvenient truth for marketers: the platforms once considered indispensable may now push consumers away.

This shift isn’t anecdotal. Market research indicates a clear trend – users, especially Gen Z and millennials, are actively reducing screen time, muting notifications, and deactivating accounts in pursuit of mental clarity and reclaimed time. What was once an occasional break from digital noise is evolving into a broader consumer reset on social media engagement.

For brands, this poses a fundamental question: If audiences are stepping away from social platforms, how do businesses maintain visibility, connection, and influence?

The answer lies not in resisting the trend but in understanding the new rules of engagement.

Why are Consumers Logging Off?

Social media has dominated brand-consumer interactions for over a decade, but a growing segment of users is actively stepping back. The social media detox movement is no longer a fringe trend – it’s a behavioral shift with real marketing implications. Consumers, especially younger demographics, make intentional choices to reduce screen time, limit influencer engagement, and seek more authentic interactions.

The Numbers Behind the Shift

The ‘why’ behind the great digital detox.

Digital detoxing isn’t just about reducing screen time; it’s rejecting the attention economy. Research indicates consumers are logging off due to:

Mental wellness concerns: Young users cite anxiety, comparison culture, and doomscrolling as reasons to disengage.
Algorithm fatigue: The push toward AI-driven content curation has left users feeling manipulated rather than engaged.
Skepticism of influencer culture: With trust in influencers eroding, consumers are shifting toward community-based recommendations over celebrity endorsements.
Privacy concerns: Users are more aware of data collection practices and choose to interact in closed, private digital spaces.

While some consumers return to social media after temporary detox periods, others are making long-term behavioral changes, limiting their reliance on platforms indefinitely. Brands must prepare for a future where digital engagement is increasingly fragmented, requiring a more adaptable marketing strategy.

What the Social Media Detox Trend Means for Brand Marketing Strategies

Consumers aren’t just scrolling less – they’re re-evaluating their digital habits. Brands must rethink their engagement models if social media detoxing becomes a long-term shift rather than a temporary trend.

How do brands remain relevant when audiences deliberately tune out?

For years, brands have built marketing strategies around the assumption that social media is the primary touchpoint for consumer engagement. But with growing numbers of users stepping away, relying solely on platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook is becoming a risky proposition. The shift toward social media detoxing isn’t just about personal well-being—it’s altering how consumers interact with brands, discover products, and build trust.

The most immediate challenge is declining engagement. If consumers are reducing screen time, brands face shrinking opportunities to reach them through traditional social ads and influencer partnerships. This is particularly concerning for brands targeting Gen Z and Millennials, leading the movement toward digital detoxing. Ad fatigue is also accelerating the problem as consumers grow increasingly resistant to sponsored content and algorithm-driven recommendations.

Another major concern is the vulnerability of relying on rented platforms. With social media engagement declining, brands that have built their digital presence entirely on these platforms are now at the mercy of shifting algorithms and user behaviors. The lack of control over audience reach makes brands susceptible to sudden drops in visibility, forcing them to rethink their approach to audience building.

This shift is also reshaping digital advertising ROI. Brands that once saw high conversion rates from social media campaigns may now struggle as users actively disengage.

Customer acquisition costs (CAC) are rising as social media platforms become less effective at driving conversions. With ad engagement rates declining, brands are shifting investments toward alternative channels such as Google Ads, podcast sponsorships, and streaming service placements. Understanding where audiences are migrating is essential for maximizing marketing ROI. Marketers must evaluate whether continued investment in these channels delivers sustainable returns or if it’s time to diversify into owned media and alternative digital touchpoints.

Social media detoxing is not a sign that digital marketing is failing but indicates that consumer preferences are evolving. Brands that recognize this shift early can adapt their strategies to maintain engagement without being overly dependent on social media platforms.

How Brands Can Stay Relevant in an Era of Digital Detox

As consumers disengage from social media, brands must rethink their marketing approach. The solution isn’t to fight the trend – it’s to adapt by diversifying digital touchpoints, strengthening direct customer relationships, and creating value beyond algorithm-driven platforms.

First-party data is becoming a brand’s most valuable asset.

Zero-party data strategies: collecting voluntarily shared consumer insights through interactive content, preference centers, and surveys.

AI-driven CRM systems: leveraging predictive analytics to anticipate customer behaviors and engagement patterns.

Direct-to-consumer models: building deeper relationships via email marketing, loyalty programs, and exclusive brand communities.

With social media engagement fluctuating, brands can no longer rely on third-party platforms to maintain customer relationships. Investing in email marketing, loyalty programs, and brand-owned communities ensures a more direct and sustainable connection with consumers. Email, in particular, is experiencing a resurgence, with open rates outperforming social media engagement rates. Brands focusing on personalized, high-value content in inboxes can build deeper relationships without competing against ever-changing social algorithms.

Brands must also embrace alternative digital spaces.

Community-driven platforms such as Discord, Substack, and brand-owned apps offer a way to engage audiences without relying on social feeds. These platforms foster deeper loyalty by creating spaces where consumers opt in for value-driven interactions rather than being bombarded by passive content. SMS marketing is another underutilized tool, boasting high open rates while offering a direct, personal channel for communication. However, brands must strategically use it, ensuring messages provide real value rather than feeling intrusive.

Offline engagement is also gaining importance once again.

The return of experiential marketing, pop-up activations, and real-world brand interactions allows brands to reach audiences in meaningful ways beyond digital screens. With consumers craving authenticity, brands that create real-world experiences, whether through in-person events or retail activations, can strengthen connections in ways social media alone cannot achieve.

Influencer marketing is evolving as well.

The traditional influencer model, which relied on celebrity endorsements and massive follower counts, is losing effectiveness as trust in influencers declines. Consumers are now looking for recommendations from micro-communities and real-life social circles. Brands that pivot toward peer-driven advocacy – leveraging customer testimonials, employee ambassadors, and brand superfans – will have a stronger foundation for long-term engagement.

The era of passive social media consumption is fading, and brands that rely solely on scrolling behavior will struggle. The shift toward meaningful, value-driven engagement requires a new playbook, one that prioritizes direct relationships, diversified digital ecosystems, and real-world touchpoints. The next section explores how market research can help brands navigate this transition and predict future consumer behaviors.

The Role of Market Research in Navigating the Detox Trend

Guesswork is not an option for brands adjusting to the social media detox movement. Understanding evolving consumer behavior requires a data-driven approach, and market research plays a critical role in helping brands anticipate shifts, measure engagement beyond social media, and refine their strategies accordingly.

Predictive analytics is key to staying ahead of consumer behavior trends. Instead of relying on retrospective engagement metrics from social platforms, brands should leverage AI-driven modeling to forecast how audiences will likely interact with digital content. Behavioral data analysis can identify early signals of declining engagement, helping brands pivot before they see a drop in visibility or conversion rates.

Consumer sentiment tracking is another essential tool. While traditional social listening tools focus on platform-based conversations, the social media detox movement means brands must expand their reach to alternative data sources. This includes direct surveys, focus groups, in-app engagement metrics, and customer service interactions. Understanding why consumers are disengaging from social platforms and what alternatives they prefer allows brands to adapt without losing their audience.

Longitudinal studies provide deeper insights into whether digital detoxing is a passing trend or a lasting behavioral shift. Brands should not only measure current engagement levels but track behavioral changes over time. Are consumers leaving platforms temporarily before re-engaging, or are they permanently reducing their social media presence? Are younger audiences more likely to embrace alternative digital experiences? These insights help brands build long-term strategies instead of reacting to short-term fluctuations.

Beyond digital, ethnographic research can uncover how consumer behaviors are evolving offline. Observational studies and in-depth interviews can provide a clearer picture of how consumers interact with brands in physical spaces, whether through in-store experiences, brand-hosted events, or offline word-of-mouth. This shift is crucial as brands look to re-engage audiences in ways that don’t rely on algorithm-driven visibility.

Relying solely on past engagement patterns is no longer sufficient. Market research offers brands a proactive approach to understanding shifting consumer behaviors, enabling them to adapt with precision rather than assumption.

Examples of Brands Successfully Adapting to the Social Media Detox Trend

Some brands are already ahead of the curve, recognizing that relying solely on social media is no longer a sustainable marketing strategy. By diversifying their approach, prioritizing first-party data, and investing in alternative engagement channels, these companies are maintaining strong consumer relationships despite the rise of digital detoxing.

One example is Lush, the UK-based cosmetics brand that made headlines by stepping away from social media altogether. Frustrated with algorithm-driven limitations and the growing toxicity of digital spaces, Lush removed itself from major platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. Instead, the brand doubled down on email marketing, in-store experiences, and community-driven engagement. The result? A more direct, controlled communication strategy that allowed them to maintain brand loyalty while reinforcing their ethical values.

Image Credit: Lush

Another company adapting to the decline of social engagement is Patagonia. The outdoor apparel giant has long embraced an anti-advertising stance, prioritizing storytelling over traditional digital campaigns. While many brands compete for social media attention with aggressive paid promotions, Patagonia invests in long-form content, sustainability reports, and documentary-style storytelling. The company builds a stronger emotional connection with its audience without relying on social media algorithms by publishing in-depth research and hosting real-world environmental initiatives.

Luxury brands are also rethinking their digital presence. Bottega Veneta, for example, strategically decided to delete its social media accounts in favor of an exclusive digital magazine and VIP community model. By creating a more controlled, high-value content ecosystem, the brand shifted attention away from mass-market social media feeds and toward more personalized, premium engagement.

Image Credit: The Impression

Even FMCG brands are adjusting. Oatly, known for its plant-based milk alternatives, has embraced offline marketing activations and guerrilla-style advertising to maintain visibility without overly relying on digital engagement. From eye-catching billboards to in-person brand experiences, Oatly’s approach shows awareness can be built in ways that don’t require consumers to be constantly online.

These brands demonstrate a fundamental shift – brands that successfully navigate the social media detox movement build direct, value-driven consumer relationships. The key takeaway? Brands must stop treating social media as the default marketing channel and start viewing it as just one of a broader, more resilient engagement strategy.

The Next Phase of Digital Detoxing

The rise of social media detoxing isn’t a fleeting trend; it’s a symptom of a larger shift in how consumers engage with digital platforms. While some users may eventually return, their behavior will not be the same. The next phase of digital engagement will be defined by intentionality, privacy, and deeper value exchanges, forcing brands to rethink their long-term marketing strategies.

Social media platforms themselves are already adapting to this detox trend. Features like Instagram’s Quiet Mode and TikTok’s time management reminders signal that even tech giants recognize the risks of overexposure. Platforms will likely continue evolving, offering more user control over content consumption. However, these changes won’t necessarily benefit brands – if anything, they may further limit ad exposure and organic reach as users prioritize personal well-being over passive engagement.

Social media detoxing is not a rejection of digital engagement – it’s a demand for better digital experiences. Consumers are no longer willing to engage with brands passively; they expect intentionality, privacy, and authentic connections. For brands, the question is no longer whether they can survive without social media as their primary channel. The real question is whether they can afford to depend on it at all.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

When Miguel and Mikayla Reyes launched Quesadilla Gorilla in Visalia, California, they weren’t just selling quesadillas – they were tapping into a growing demand for customization. By letting customers build their meals with fresh ingredients and signature salsas, they transformed a small local shop into a rapidly expanding chain.

Fast food chains are no longer defined by speed alone – choice now drives the industry. Consumers are rejecting fixed menus in favor of meals that fit their diets, tastes, and lifestyles. A 2024 report by Tillster found that one in three quick-service diners skipped a restaurant because it lacked customization, a jump from 21% the previous year.

Personalization isn’t just a trend – it’s an expectation. More than half of diners (58%) say they’re more likely to recommend a fast food chain if they had a positive custom-ordering experience. For Quick Serve Restaurants or QSRs, that’s not just about loyalty – it’s about survival.

QSRs are racing to keep up, using technology to turn customization from a challenge into a competitive advantage. Self-service kiosks, now fixtures in many chains, fuel this shift. Demand is rising fast – 57% of diners want more of them, up from 36% last year. Beyond convenience, kiosks give customers greater control over their meals, making customization seamless.

But technology alone isn’t enough. A seamless experience matters just as much as the ability to customize. Nearly nine in ten diners (89%) say inconsistency across locations frustrates them, and more than half (57%) will take their business elsewhere because of it. Fast food chains that embrace personalization but fail to execute it uniformly risk losing the very customers they’re trying to attract.

Image credit: Quesadilla Gorilla

Quesadilla Gorilla is proof that customization isn’t just a gimmick – it’s a growth strategy. By giving customers complete control over their meals, the California-based chain has built a cult-like following and expanded rapidly. When diners feel ownership over what they’re eating, they don’t just return – they become brand ambassadors.

The Consumer-Driven Shift

Fast food was built on uniformity – the same burger, the same fries, the same experience. But consumers now expect meals that reflect their diets, values, and preferences – and they’re willing to pay for that control.

A recent report found that 72% of fast food customers prefer restaurants with personalized ordering, and a third have ditched a restaurant that lacked it. The message is clear: if QSRs don’t offer customization, someone else will.

Dietary Needs Are Driving Change

Health-conscious consumers and specialized diets are reshaping fast food. More people are adopting plant-based, keto, and allergen-free options, forcing QSRs to adapt. In the UK, a study found that 34% of Brits follow a flexitarian, vegetarian, or vegan diet. McDonald’s responded with its McPlant burger – a fully vegan option that proved so popular it became a permanent menu item.

Gluten-free and allergen-conscious dining is no longer niche – it’s mainstream. In the US, 32 million people have food allergies, and one in ten adults avoids gluten. QSRs that once overlooked these needs are now making them a priority. Chipotle lets customers filter its entire digital menu by allergens and diet preferences, making ordering safer and easier.

Regional Preferences Are Reshaping Menus

Personalization isn’t a one-size-fits-all trend – it looks different in every market. In Japan, MOS Burger lets customers swap ingredients for vegan, keto, or high-protein options. In India, where 40% of the population is vegetarian, McDonald’s runs separate vegetarian kitchens in select locations to meet demand.

Image credit: Salad Stop!

Customization in Southeast Asia is shaped by local food culture. In Singapore, SaladStop! thrives on made-to-order salads and grain bowls, catering to a region where 65% of consumers prioritize fresh, healthy ingredients (Statista, 2024). In South Korea, Lotteria’s “Mix Your Own Burger” system lets customers pick everything from the bun to the sauce, tapping into a younger generation that values choice.

Fast Food No Longer Means Fast Decisions

Fast food has evolved from a mass-production model to a made-for-you experience. Consumers expect meals to match their dietary needs and personal values and are willing to pay for that control. Whether it’s plant-based options, high-protein choices, or allergen-free meals, customization is no longer a perk; it’s the baseline. The brands that keep up are driving higher order values and stronger customer loyalty. Those that fall behind risk becoming irrelevant.

How AI and Technology Are Making It Possible

Technology is reshaping fast food, making personalization scalable. AI and machine learning are making customization scalable, helping restaurants tailor meals while streamlining operations. For fast food chains, this isn’t just about convenience – it’s about survival in an era where consumer expectations are shifting faster than ever.

AI-Powered Ordering Systems

Image credit: Wendy’s

Automation is now streamlining drive-thru service. Wendy’s has partnered with Google Cloud to roll out FreshAI, a voice assistant designed to speed up service and reduce errors. Already in 100 locations, the system is set to expand to 600 outlets by 2025. While some diners appreciate the efficiency, others miss the human touch – highlighting the tension between automation and experience in fast food’s tech-driven future.

Digital Kiosks and Personalization

Self-service kiosks are not just about convenience – they’re becoming personalized digital waiters. AI-driven kiosks now remember past orders, suggest meal pairings, and tailor recommendations based on dietary needs. By reducing friction and speeding up service, these machines are transforming customer interactions – and helping fast food chains increase sales along the way.

Machine Learning for Menu Customization

The smartest menus now learn from you. Machine learning lets QSRs track past orders, adapt to dietary preferences, and even tweak menus based on ingredient availability. Running low on an item? The system suggests an alternative in real-time. Beyond customer convenience, these AI-driven menus help restaurants reduce waste, streamline inventory, and boost margins.

Operational Efficiency Through AI

AI isn’t just in the front of house—it’s redefining kitchen operations behind the scenes. Predictive analytics help QSRs anticipate demand, adjust staffing, and keep inventory tight. The same technology can even flag equipment issues before they cause breakdowns, cutting costly downtime. The result? Faster service, lower costs, and a more efficient back-end operation.

This shift isn’t just changing how customers order – it’s restructuring the entire industry, from kitchen design to staffing strategies.

Business Impact and Industry Disruption

The push for hyper-personalization is reshaping how fast food chains operate, forcing them to balance customization with efficiency. Kitchens once designed for assembly-line efficiency are now adapting to a made-to-order model – one that delivers choice but also adds complexity. While brands that get it right see higher sales and stronger customer loyalty, those that can’t balance personalization with efficiency risk slowing down service and driving up costs.

Rethinking fast food Kitchens

Fast food kitchens are undergoing a major overhaul to meet the demands of customized ordering. McDonald’s is experimenting with automation at a Texas location, where robots handle grilling and order assembly. Meanwhile, AI-powered kitchen display systems (KDS) are helping restaurants reduce human error and improve efficiency.

Chipotle’s “Chipotlanes” are redefining the drive-thru experience. By separating app-based orders from in-store transactions, these digital lanes reduce congestion and speed up fulfillment. CEO Brian Niccol reports that digital sales reached 37% of total revenue in 2023 – a figure likely to climb as more customers opt for customized meals.

The Business Upside

Customization isn’t just a consumer preference – it’s also good for business. A study by McKinsey & Company found that brands offering personalized experiences drive 40% more revenue than competitors that stick to traditional menus. In fast food, higher-order values, repeat purchases, and improved brand loyalty are the biggest wins.

Data collection is another major advantage. Every custom order provides insight into consumer preferences, allowing QSRs to fine-tune menu options, predict demand, and minimize food waste. A report by the National Restaurant Association found that smart inventory management driven by AI could reduce waste by up to 15%, saving businesses millions annually.

The Hidden Costs of Personalization

Despite the upside, the shift toward extreme customization brings new risks. More complex orders require more ingredients, increased prep time, and a higher likelihood of operational slowdowns. In 2023, Shake Shack’s CFO, Katie Fogertey, noted that over-customization led to longer wait times, straining kitchens and frustrating customers.

There’s also the cost of technology. AI-powered ordering systems, digital kiosks, and smart kitchen tech require significant upfront investment – something smaller franchises may struggle to afford. According to a 2024 industry analysis by Deloitte, the cost of implementing AI-driven food prep technology can range from $500,000 to over $2 million per location, depending on the scale of automation.

For QSRs, the challenge is clear: how to balance efficiency with personalization without sacrificing speed or profitability. Some are leaning on AI, others on pre-set customization limits, but one thing is certain – fast food is no longer just about being fast.

Fast Food’s New Balancing Act: Customization Versus Efficiency

Fast food chains are under pressure to rethink their entire model as customization moves from novelty to necessity. The old system of standardized meals is being replaced by flexible menus that cater to individual preferences, but adapting at scale is no easy feat. While personalized ordering can boost sales and improve inventory management, the operational complexities are mounting – forcing even the biggest QSRs to reassess how they function.

Kitchens Built for Speed Are Getting a Makeover

The shift toward customization is forcing QSRs to rethink not just their menus, but their kitchens. Designed for efficiency and volume, traditional back-of-house operations are now struggling to accommodate a growing demand for personalized meals. Chains that once thrived on uniformity are now experimenting with new layouts, technology, and automation to keep up.

Quick-service chains are automating to stay competitive. McDonald’s is testing a robotics-driven location in Texas, where AI-powered kiosks and automated fry stations are reducing labor costs and speeding up prep times. At the same time, Chipotle is using automation in its kitchens, piloting robotic tortilla chip makers to streamline production without disrupting customization. As QSRs scale automation, the challenge isn’t just efficiency – it’s integrating technology without sacrificing the personalized experience customers expect.

More Choices, Bigger Profits

Customization isn’t just about consumer preference – it’s driving higher spending at fast food chains. Research from Deloitte highlights that brands excelling in personalization see stronger customer engagement and long-term loyalty. Meanwhile, studies on digital ordering trends show that consumers spend more when they can modify their meals, opting for premium ingredients or add-ons. For QSRs, this means a direct link between menu flexibility and increased revenue, making personalization more than just a marketing tool – it’s a business strategy.

Data is another major driver. Every custom order provides valuable insight into consumer preferences, allowing QSRs to refine menus, optimize ingredient sourcing, and reduce food waste. AI-driven inventory tracking is helping QSRs minimize waste and maximize margins. The National Restaurant Association estimates these systems could save restaurants millions annually by optimizing ingredient use.

The Cost of Getting Personal

Offering limitless choices isn’t always good for business. Shake Shack CFO Katie Fogertey warned that an influx of custom orders slowed service and strained kitchen operations, frustrating both customers and staff. More ingredients mean more prep time, higher operational costs, and a greater risk of bottlenecks – issues that can erode the efficiency QSRs rely on.

The shift toward automation comes with a steep price tag. AI-powered kiosks, digital ordering systems, and robotic kitchen assistants require significant upfront investment. A 2024 Deloitte report estimates the cost of implementing AI-driven food prep technology ranges from $500,000 to over $2 million per location – an expense that could widen the gap between industry giants and smaller franchises.

QSRs are now walking a tightrope between customization and efficiency. Some are doubling down on AI to streamline operations, while others are setting boundaries on how much personalization they allow. The brands that strike the right balance will define the next era of fast food – one where convenience and choice must work in sync.

The Future of Hyper-Personalized Fast Food

The next wave of fast food will be shaped by technology and consumer demand for hyper-personalization. What was once a novelty is fast becoming the norm, with AI-driven pricing, predictive meal planning, and real-time nutrition tracking set to redefine how QSRs serve their customers.

Dynamic Pricing

Dynamic pricing, long used in airlines and hotels, is now entering fast food. AI-powered pricing models adjust costs in real-time based on demand, location, and even weather. A surge in lunchtime traffic? Expect a slight uptick in menu prices. A slow afternoon? Discounts might appear to draw in customers. The goal isn’t just profit – it’s about balancing kitchen efficiency and customer flow to avoid bottlenecks.

AI-Generated Meal Plans

AI-driven meal planning is changing how customers interact with fast food menus. Using past orders, dietary preferences, and budget constraints, algorithms can now recommend tailored meals in real time. Billionaire Marc Lore, through his company Wonder, is betting on AI-powered meal curation that personalizes menus to match individual needs. The result? A shift from one-size-fits-all offerings to menus that adapt to customers – not the other way around.

Personalized Nutrition Tracking

Nutrition-conscious consumers are demanding more than just quick meals – they want food that fits their health goals. fast food chains are tapping into this trend by linking menus to wearable tech and health apps, offering real-time meal recommendations based on calorie needs, macros, or fitness plans. By turning fast food into a data-driven dining experience, QSRs are positioning themselves as allies in personal wellness rather than just a convenient option.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

AI-powered personalization isn’t without controversy. With fast food chains collecting customer data to refine menus and pricing, concerns over privacy and data security are growing. The 2024 exposure of the WildChat dataset, which leaked sensitive AI interactions, highlighted the risks of poor data handling. If QSRs want consumers to embrace AI-driven dining, they must prove their systems are transparent, secure, and not exploiting personal data for profit.

AI-driven menus raise another concern – are they truly serving consumers, or just steering them toward higher-margin meals? Critics warn that AI could prioritize profits over nutrition, subtly pushing customers toward pricier, less healthy choices. Regulators are beginning to scrutinize how food brands deploy AI, with calls for transparency around algorithmic decision-making and whether recommendations serve the diner or the bottom line.

Empowering Consumers in the Age of Personalization

Fast food is no longer a one-size-fits-all industry. Consumers expect choices that reflect their health goals, ethical beliefs, and personal tastes – shifting from passive diners to active decision-makers. But with more power comes more risk. The industry must find a way to balance innovation with transparency, ensuring that personalization enhances, rather than exploits, the dining experience.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

B2B marketers have traditionally relied on account-level intent data, measuring company-wide engagement signals – website visits, content downloads, and webinar attendance – to identify potential buyers. But as decision-making power fragments across multiple stakeholders, these broad indicators are proving unreliable. Marketers aren’t just missing key players in the buying process; they’re wasting valuable resources targeting the wrong ones.

The playbook for digital tracking is being rewritten. With third-party cookies nearing extinction and privacy laws tightening, marketers are losing access to the passive behavioral insights they once took for granted. Marketers who once depended on aggregated company data to guide outreach are finding it increasingly difficult to pinpoint high-intent buyers. At the same time, the B2B buying journey has become more independent, with decision-makers conducting research long before speaking with vendors.

To navigate these shifts, companies are turning to buyer-level intent data, a more precise approach that focuses on individual engagement rather than generalized company activity. By tracking specific behaviors – such as downloading whitepapers, attending webinars, or engaging with product demos – marketers can identify real decision-makers, improve targeting, and accelerate the sales cycle.

The impact of this shift is already reshaping how businesses identify and engage potential buyers. The way B2B buyers engage has changed – and marketers are struggling to keep up. A 2023 Demand Gen Report revealed that 68% of B2B buyers now complete much of their research independently, long before speaking with a sales rep. This shift means old-school lead tracking methods – waiting for buyers to fill out a form or request a demo – are losing relevance fast. Account-level intent data – long considered a reliable indicator of interest – now often misdirects marketing efforts by signaling company-wide activity without revealing who within the organization is actually making decisions.

The inefficiencies are not just inconvenient – they are costly. Forrester (2024) reports that companies relying solely on account-level intent data misallocate up to 40% of their sales and marketing resources by targeting the wrong contacts. In response, leading enterprises such as Adobe, Salesforce, and IBM are investing in first-party and zero-party data strategies to refine how they track and engage actual buyers, shortening sales cycles and improving marketing ROI.

Marketers who continue to rely on outdated tracking models may soon struggle to keep up. As third-party tracking fades and precision targeting becomes the industry standard, companies that fail to adapt risk falling behind competitors who have already embraced buyer-level insights.

The End of Account-Level Intent Data?

Account-level intent data is no longer an asset – it’s a liability. The strategy that once shaped demand generation is now misleading marketers and misallocating budgets. Marketers have relied on broad signals – such as employees from the same company visiting a website – to gauge interest. Yet these indicators rarely reveal who within the organization has the authority to buy.

The inefficiencies are hard to justify. Studies show that nearly half of marketing budgets are misallocated because traditional tracking targets businesses, not the people making purchasing decisions. A recent LinkedIn B2B Institute report underscores the problem: only 17% of B2B decision-makers engage with cold outreach, making a scattershot approach increasingly ineffective.

The Cookiepocalypse: A Catalyst for Change

At the same time, data privacy laws and the decline of third-party cookies are forcing companies to rethink their strategies. With Google’s 2024 cookie phase-out, digital marketing is entering uncharted territory. For years, third-party cookies provided a passive, behind-the-scenes view of buyer behavior, allowing companies to infer intent without direct engagement. Now, with GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California tightening restrictions, the industry is at a crossroads: marketers must transition to first-party tracking or risk losing buyer visibility altogether.

The shift away from account-level tracking isn’t just about privacy concerns – it’s about effectiveness. Without third-party cookies or unrestricted tracking, marketers can no longer rely on aggregated company activity to infer buying intent. A company’s employees may be researching solutions, but without knowing who is leading the conversation, outreach efforts remain a gamble.

Industry Perspective: Why Marketers Are Moving On

Most marketing teams still get one thing wrong: they target companies instead of the people making decisions. Lee Odden, CEO of TopRank Marketing, sees this flaw firsthand:

“If you don’t know who within an organization is actively evaluating a purchase, you’re working with incomplete data and hoping for the best – rather than making informed, strategic decisions.”

This realization is pushing B2B firms toward buyer-level intent tracking, a more precise and privacy-compliant approach that focuses on identifying real decision-makers rather than broad company interest.

The Rise of Buyer-Level Intent Data

As traditional tracking methods fall short, buyer-level intent data is emerging as the solution. Unlike broad company-wide signals, this approach focuses on real individuals actively researching and evaluating solutions. For sales and marketing teams struggling with inefficiencies, this shift is more than a tactical adjustment – it’s a competitive necessity.

A More Targeted Approach

Buyer-level intent data captures specific behavioral signals that indicate a prospect’s actual interest. Instead of aggregating website visits or company-wide engagement, this method pinpoints:

Who downloaded a whitepaper or attended a webinar, signaling early-stage interest.
Who engaged with case studies or product demos, indicating deeper evaluation.
Who interacted with sales emails or initiated direct contact, revealing purchase readiness.

By mapping these real-time behaviors, marketing teams can craft more personalized outreach, while sales teams can engage high-intent buyers at the right moment, increasing efficiency and conversion rates.

Adoption Across the Industry

Leading B2B firms are overhauling their sales strategies by shifting to buyer-level intent tracking. Instead of casting a wide net, they are using real-time behavioral signals to prioritize engagement with actual decision-makers. By aggregating behavioral signals across digital channels, these tools help companies separate genuine prospects from passive interest. Some solutions integrate AI-driven analytics to prioritize outreach, identifying which individuals within an organization are actively evaluating a purchase rather than relying on vague company-wide activity.

The results are significant. A shift toward buyer-level intent tracking isn’t just theoretical – it’s driving real revenue gains. In one case, companies leveraging intent-driven targeting reported a 32% jump in lead-to-sale conversions, according to a Heinz Marketing study. Instead of chasing broad signals, these firms focused on high-intent buyers and saw immediate results.

A Data-Driven Competitive Edge

With B2B sales cycles becoming more complex, companies that pinpoint individual decision-makers are gaining a clear edge over competitors still relying on outdated tracking models. Businesses investing in buyer-level intent strategies report:

Higher engagement rates, thanks to more relevant, data-driven outreach.
Shorter sales cycles, as sales teams connect with prospects at the right moment.
Improved marketing efficiency, with resources directed toward buyers already in-market.

The shift is no longer optional – it’s a necessity for companies looking to stay ahead in a landscape where precision targeting is becoming the industry standard.

How Companies Are Using It

For businesses adopting buyer-level intent tracking, the results go beyond theory. By pinpointing decision-makers rather than chasing vague company-wide signals, sales and marketing teams are refining how and when they engage high-intent prospects. Instead of launching broad campaigns hoping to reach the right people, companies are now delivering highly targeted outreach based on real-time behavioral data.

Precision in Sales Outreach

The biggest transformation is in how sales teams prioritize and engage leads. Instead of filtering prospects by job title or company size, businesses are leveraging real-time intent signals to determine who is actively researching solutions and ready to buy. This shift allows for more strategic engagement, reducing wasted effort on unqualified leads and focusing resources where they matter most.

Tech giants like Adobe and Salesforce have already embedded buyer-level intent tracking into their sales enablement platforms, refining when and how their teams engage prospects. By analyzing interactions with content, pricing pages, and product demos, their sales reps are no longer relying on cold outreach or guesswork – they are reaching buyers at the right time, with messaging aligned to their specific interests. The result? Higher response rates and fewer wasted efforts.

AI-Powered Insights and Predictive Analytics

This shift isn’t just about who to contact – it’s about when. AI-driven tools are now deciphering behavioral signals to predict buying intent with unprecedented accuracy. These platforms track real-time engagement patterns – such as how often a prospect revisits a pricing page or downloads a product whitepaper – helping sales teams determine when a buyer is nearing a decision.

A 2024 Forrester study found that a leading cloud software company saw a 45% increase in engagement rates after abandoning traditional lead scoring in favor of AI-powered buyer intent tracking. Sales reps no longer pursued cold prospects – instead, they prioritized high-intent buyers, reducing their sales cycle length by 25% and significantly improving conversion rates.

Industry Perspective: A More Strategic Approach

Matt Heinz, President of Heinz Marketing, sees this shift as a defining moment in sales strategy:

“With buyer-level intent, sales teams don’t just know who to target – they know when and why. The difference between a warm lead and a ready-to-buy lead is timing, and this level of insight allows teams to focus their efforts where they’ll have the biggest impact.”

In an industry where deals are won or lost based on timing, acting too early means wasting resources; acting too late means losing to a competitor. Buyer-level intent tracking eliminates the guesswork, giving sales teams a real-time view into when a prospect moves from research to serious consideration.

A Competitive Edge in B2B Marketing

Companies that have moved beyond broad account-level tracking are seeing the benefits firsthand. By aligning outreach with actual buyer behavior, sales and marketing teams report:

Higher engagement rates, as prospects receive outreach tailored to their stage in the buying process.
More effective content strategies, with marketing teams producing insights that match real decision-making needs.
Shorter sales cycles, as sales teams identify and engage buyers before they formally enter the pipeline.

As B2B buying behavior grows more complex, relying on outdated tracking models is no longer sustainable. Companies still measuring broad company engagement rather than individual buyer activity risk wasting resources on leads that will never convert. Meanwhile, competitors using buyer-level insights are moving faster, engaging smarter, and closing deals while others are still chasing prospects that have already made a decision.

Ethical Considerations and Privacy Compliance

As companies shift to buyer-level intent tracking, the debate over data privacy and ethical marketing is growing. With regulators and consumers pushing for greater transparency, businesses that fail to adapt risk eroding trust and facing legal scrutiny. Unlike third-party tracking – where users are often monitored without their knowledge – buyer-level intent data operates on consent.

Why Opt-In Data Matters

The difference isn’t just technical – it’s fundamental. Traditional intent tracking relied on third-party cookies and passive data collection, often gathering user behavior without explicit approval. Buyer-level tracking, in contrast, is built on opt-in engagement, meaning prospects knowingly share their information. This includes:

Webinar registrations and gated content downloads.
Surveys and preference selections.
Direct interactions with sales and marketing campaigns.

A recent TrustArc study found that 73% of B2B buyers prefer companies that are transparent about how their data is used, reinforcing the need for clear, ethical data practices.

A Legal and Competitive Shift

The tightening of privacy laws worldwide is forcing companies to rethink how they collect and use data. Regulations such as GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California have already placed strict limits on tracking without consent, and Google’s Privacy Sandbox initiative is set to further restrict access to behavioral insights. Businesses that fail to adapt risk not only compliance issues but also losing consumer trust in an era where privacy expectations are higher than ever.

Unlike third-party tracking, first-party buyer intent strategies comply with evolving regulations by gathering data only from individuals who have actively opted in. But knowing who is engaging isn’t enough – companies need to understand what’s driving them.

This is where market research becomes essential. Buyer-level intent tracking may show who downloads a whitepaper or attends a webinar, but it doesn’t explain why they are searching, what pain points they are trying to solve, or what barriers exist before a purchase. Without deeper research, even the most advanced intent tracking risks misinterpreting engagement signals.

Market Research’s Role in the Buyer Intent Revolution

Buyer-level intent tracking reveals who is engaging and how they behave – but without market research, the why behind their decisions remains a mystery. Without insights into buyer motivations, barriers, and triggers, intent signals risk being misinterpreted, leading sales teams to pursue the wrong prospects. Tracking behavioral data is only one piece of the puzzle – understanding the motivations behind those behaviors is what turns data into strategy.

Traditional quantitative and qualitative research methods provide the context needed to validate and refine intent signals, ensuring companies aren’t just chasing clicks but engaging with real buyers who have a clear path to purchase. By combining survey research, focus groups, and ethnographic insights with real-time behavioral tracking, businesses can move beyond surface-level engagement data and uncover why buyers are searching, what they need, and what factors influence their decisions.

Market research also plays a crucial role in segmenting intent data effectively. Not all high-engagement prospects are equally valuable – without proper segmentation, companies risk wasting resources on buyers who may be interested but lack decision-making authority or budget alignment. By integrating attitudinal and psychographic research into intent tracking, businesses can build a complete picture of their buyers – not just who they are but what drives them to act.

The Future of Buyer Intent Tracking

B2B marketing is moving into a new phase, driven by AI, privacy-first strategies, and shifting data collection models. Companies that once relied on broad third-party tracking are now investing in AI-driven analytics and zero-party data to better understand and engage real buyers. The focus is shifting from passive tracking to active, consent-based insights, giving businesses a clearer, more accurate picture of buyer behavior without compromising privacy.

AI’s Role in Predicting Buyer Behavior

Advancements in machine learning and predictive analytics are transforming how companies interpret intent signals. AI-driven platforms now track patterns of engagement across multiple touchpoints – from whitepaper downloads to webinar participation – allowing businesses to determine not just who is interested, but when they are likely to act. Instead of relying on broad lead scoring models, sales teams can now prioritize real-time buyer readiness, increasing conversion rates and shortening deal cycles.

The End of Third-Party Dependence

With Google’s phase-out of third-party cookies, businesses are being forced to rethink how they collect and apply customer data. The reliance on passive tracking is fading, replaced by first-party and zero-party data strategies that capture explicitly shared intent signals rather than inferred behavior. This shift is not just about compliance – it’s about building trust and credibility in a market where buyers are increasingly wary of invasive tracking practices.

Industry Outlook: What’s Next?

Industry forecasts suggest that the shift to buyer-level intent tracking is only accelerating. Research shows that companies shifting to buyer-level intent tracking are already seeing a measurable advantage. In one industry survey, B2B firms using AI-driven buyer intent models reported higher engagement rates and faster sales cycles compared to those relying on account-based signals. Companies that fail to make this transition will not only struggle with lead quality – they risk being left behind in a market that increasingly values data transparency and hyper-personalized engagement.

A New Reality for B2B Marketing

For B2B companies, buyer-level intent tracking is no longer an emerging trend – it’s the new reality. The shift away from third-party tracking and broad account-level signals is reshaping how businesses generate demand, allocate resources, and close deals. In a competitive environment where timing, precision, and ethical data collection are becoming key differentiators, companies that fail to adapt will find themselves chasing leads that never convert while competitors secure high-intent buyers first.

This isn’t just an incremental improvement – it’s a fundamental restructuring of how marketing and sales teams identify and engage potential customers. Companies still relying on outdated tracking models will continue wasting budgets on low-quality leads, while those leveraging buyer-level insights will increase efficiency, shorten sales cycles, and improve conversion rates.

This isn’t just an evolution – it’s an ultimatum. The B2B world is changing fast, and the companies that master buyer-level intent tracking will control the future of sales and marketing.

The cost of hesitation? Wasted budgets. Slower deal cycles. Watching competitors close deals that should have been yours.

The question isn’t whether intent tracking will define the next era of demand generation – it already is. The only real question is whether your company will lead the shift, or get left behind.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Market research is more than a routine step in a business plan; it’s the compass steering companies through shifting consumer behaviors, emerging trends, and competitive pressures. Think of it as both a map outlining the broader landscape and a magnifying glass revealing the subtle details that influence strategic decisions. Whether in the brainstorming sessions of startups or the boardrooms of Fortune 500 giants, market research grounds business strategies in evidence, not assumptions.

Beyond spreadsheets and statistics, market research is, at its core, about storytelling – uncovering the voice of the customer and translating it into insights that drive action. In a world shaped by rapid technological shifts, evolving consumer expectations, and relentless global competition, understanding market dynamics isn’t a luxury – it’s the difference between growth and stagnation.

Market research goes beyond identifying the ‘what’; it uncovers the ‘why’ behind consumer behavior. It’s the critical link between raw data and strategic decisions, shaping everything from product development to marketing campaigns and growth strategies. When done well, it doesn’t just inform – it reveals untapped opportunities, reduces risks, and gives businesses the clarity to stay ahead in crowded markets.

Types of Market Research

Market research takes many forms, each crafted to uncover insights tailored to distinct business challenges. Its varied approaches mirror the complexity of today’s markets, where no single method can capture the full picture. From foundational studies to advanced data analytics, every technique adds a vital piece to the puzzle of understanding market dynamics.

Primary Research: Primary research is the investigative backbone of market research – where businesses go straight to the source to gather firsthand insights. Through surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations, companies can uncover not just what consumers think, but why they feel that way. Picture a tech startup rolling out a new app: beyond measuring user satisfaction, interviews can expose hidden frustrations, shaping more intuitive design updates. This direct, hands-on approach delivers raw, unfiltered data, giving businesses an edge rooted in real consumer experiences.

Consider a fictional case of a global beverage brand aiming to break into a new market. Through street interviews and interactive focus groups, the company uncovers that local consumers favor unique flavor profiles, diverging sharply from its standard offerings. Equipped with these insights, the brand launches a new product line tailored to regional tastes, outperforming competitors who relied solely on secondary data.

Secondary Research: While primary research gathers data firsthand, secondary research is more like investigative journalism – synthesizing insights from existing sources. This approach taps into industry reports, academic studies, government data, and competitor analyses to build a comprehensive picture. Imagine a company exploring entry into a new international market: by examining consumer spending trends, regulatory landscapes, and competitor strategies, they can benchmark their approach effectively. It’s a cost-efficient, time-saving method that’s indispensable for broad market assessments.

The strength of secondary research lies in its ability to provide context. For example, a global retailer expanding into emerging markets might rely on government economic reports, industry analyses, and demographic data to refine its entry strategy. This data-driven approach helps businesses identify growth opportunities, anticipate challenges, and make informed decisions without starting from scratch.

Qualitative Research: Qualitative research dives deep into the human side of data, uncovering the emotions, motivations, and perceptions that drive behavior. Through methods like in-depth interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic studies, it reveals the underlying ‘why’ behind consumer decisions. Imagine a luxury fashion brand exploring perceptions of sustainability. A focus group might surface an unexpected contradiction: while consumers express strong support for eco-friendly practices, their purchasing choices often lean towards aesthetics and price. These nuanced insights help brands connect with their audiences in more authentic and meaningful ways.

Ethnographic studies push qualitative research even deeper by immersing researchers directly into the consumer’s environment. Rather than relying on secondhand accounts, researchers observe behaviors in real time, capturing authentic interactions and unspoken habits. For instance, by studying how people naturally engage with smart home devices in their own spaces, tech companies have uncovered hidden usability challenges – insights that have driven meaningful product design improvements to better reflect real-world usage.

Quantitative Research: If qualitative research uncovers the stories behind consumer behavior, quantitative research measures their scale and significance. It’s the science to qualitative’s art – relying on structured methods like surveys, experiments, and statistical analysis to transform behaviors, preferences, and trends into hard data. Consider an e-commerce platform analyzing thousands of transactions to detect seasonal purchasing patterns. These insights don’t just highlight trends; they provide the statistical confidence needed to inform large-scale decisions, from inventory management to marketing strategies.

Large-scale political surveys conducted ahead of elections are a striking example of quantitative research in action. By analyzing data from thousands of respondents, these surveys uncover voter trends and predict outcomes with impressive precision. Businesses apply similar data-driven techniques to forecast market shifts, measure brand health, and refine marketing strategies – turning raw numbers into actionable insights that shape competitive advantage.

Exploratory Research: Think of exploratory research as the scouting party of market research – designed to navigate uncharted territories where little is known. It’s particularly valuable for startups looking to uncover unmet needs or identify gaps in the market. Rather than seeking definitive answers, exploratory research thrives on discovery, helping businesses refine their hypotheses and chart the course for more targeted, in-depth studies.

Consider a hypothetical tech startup venturing into the wearable health device market with no prior industry experience. By conducting exploratory research – through informal interviews, brainstorming sessions, and competitor analysis – they uncovered a niche demand for senior-friendly devices with simplified features. This discovery didn’t just inform their thinking; it became the foundation for their product development and go-to-market strategy.

Descriptive Research: Descriptive research is the storyteller of data, capturing ‘what is’ by mapping out current market conditions, consumer demographics, and behavioral patterns. It doesn’t seek to explain why behaviors occur but focuses on painting an accurate picture of the present. For example, a consumer electronics brand might use descriptive research to analyze how different age groups engage with smart devices, generating insights that inform targeted product development and marketing strategies.

Take, for instance, streaming platforms that rely on descriptive analytics to track viewer habits. By analyzing which genres resonate with different age groups and regions, they can fine-tune content recommendations and develop original programming tailored to specific audience segments. This data-driven approach helps platforms stay relevant in an increasingly competitive entertainment landscape.

When to Use Each Type of Market Research

Selecting the right research type is both an art and a science. It depends on the business objective at hand:

Objective	Recommended Research	Why It Works
Understanding consumer motivations	Qualitative Research	Captures deep, emotional insights
Measuring market size and trends	Quantitative Research	Provides statistically significant data
Testing new product ideas	Exploratory Research, Focus Groups	Identifies potential opportunities
Tracking brand awareness	Descriptive Research	Monitors changes and patterns
Competitive analysis	Secondary Research	Leverages existing data efficiently
Direct customer feedback	Primary Research (Surveys, Interviews)	Offers real-time, specific insights

Blending these methods often yields the richest insights, as each type compensates for the limitations of the others.

Sharpening Your Market Research Edge

Markets don’t sit still – and neither should the research that guides business decisions. As consumer habits shift with every technological leap, cultural trend, or global disruption, the methods companies use to understand their audiences must evolve in real time. Market research isn’t a static report filed away after a product launch; it’s a living process, one that sharpens with every new question, data point, and insight. The businesses that thrive aren’t just collecting data – they’re continuously refining how they gather, interpret, and act on it.

Define Clear Objectives

Good research starts with a good question. The difference between insightful data and a meaningless spreadsheet often comes down to how clearly the objective is defined. Broad, unfocused goals – like ‘What do our customers think?’ – rarely produce actionable insights. Instead, sharp, specific questions drive meaningful outcomes. For example, rather than asking, ‘How do people feel about our brand?’ a company might ask, ‘What motivates Gen Z consumers to choose our product over competitors?’ or ‘Which factors most influence brand loyalty among urban millennials?’ These targeted inquiries not only shape the research process but also ensure that the answers can directly inform business decisions.

Blend Data Sources

Relying on a single source of data is like trying to solve a puzzle with half the pieces missing. The most valuable insights come from stitching together information from multiple angles. Primary research – surveys, interviews, focus groups – offers firsthand perspectives straight from the target audience. But layering in secondary data, such as industry reports, competitor analysis, and even social media trends, provides context that raw numbers alone can’t capture. A company exploring international expansion might combine customer interviews in new markets with economic data, competitor case studies, and social listening tools to paint a complete picture. This blend of sources helps validate findings, uncover hidden patterns, and reduce the risk of bias.

Leverage Technology

Tech hasn’t just changed what we research – it’s revolutionized how we do it. Gone are the days when gathering consumer insights meant months of manual data collection. Today, AI-driven analytics can process vast datasets in seconds, identifying patterns invisible to the human eye. Sentiment analysis tools track how customers feel about brands in real time, while dynamic dashboards turn raw data into instantly digestible insights. For example, a retail brand can monitor the success of a marketing campaign as it unfolds, adjusting strategies based on real-time sales data and customer feedback. These tools don’t just speed up the process – they make it smarter, helping businesses pivot quickly in response to emerging trends.

Iterate and Adapt

Consumer behavior is a moving target. What resonates with an audience today might fall flat tomorrow, especially in industries driven by fast-changing trends. That’s why market research shouldn’t be treated as a one-and-done project. The most successful companies adopt an iterative approach, continually refining their strategies based on fresh data. Consider a streaming service that regularly tests new content recommendations, analyzing viewer engagement to tweak algorithms week by week. This agile mindset – where insights are constantly tested, updated, and applied – keeps businesses aligned with their audiences, even as preferences shift.

Foster Cross-Functional Collaboration

Market research isn’t just the domain of data analysts – it’s most powerful when it’s woven into every corner of an organization. Insights become more actionable when they’re shared across teams, from marketing and product development to sales and customer service. For instance, a product team might discover through user research that customers are confused by certain features. When that insight is shared with marketing, it can inform clearer messaging; when shared with sales, it can shape more effective pitches. Cross-functional collaboration ensures that research doesn’t just sit in a report – it drives decisions at every level.

From Data to Decisions

Collecting data is only half the battle. The real value lies in thoughtful analysis:

Clean the Data: Ensure accuracy by removing inconsistencies.
Code the Data: Organize qualitative responses for thematic analysis.
Analyze: Apply statistical tools to uncover patterns.
Interpret: Translate data into meaningful narratives that guide strategy.
Report: Craft compelling reports with clear visuals to communicate findings effectively.

ROI of Market Research

Market research is often seen as an essential business function, but its true value lies in how effectively it drives results. In an era where every budget line is scrutinized, companies increasingly ask: What’s the return on investment (ROI) of our research efforts? The answer isn’t always straightforward because the impact of research extends beyond immediate revenue gains. It shapes strategies, reduces risks, and uncovers opportunities that might otherwise remain hidden. To quantify this value, businesses must look at both the tangible and intangible benefits. Here’s how to evaluate the ROI of market research meaningfully.

Set Clear Metrics

Measuring the ROI of market research starts with defining what success looks like. Vague goals lead to vague outcomes, making it difficult to link research efforts to business results. Instead of generic objectives like ‘gain customer insights,’ companies should set specific, measurable goals aligned with broader business strategies. For example, a company launching a new product might use research to reduce time-to-market by identifying the most promising features early on. Metrics could include increased sales, higher conversion rates, improved customer retention, or even reduced marketing spend due to more targeted campaigns. When the research objective is tied to a quantifiable outcome, it becomes much easier to demonstrate its value.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

At its core, ROI is about comparing what you spend to what you gain. But with market research, the equation isn’t always as simple as dollars in versus dollars out. The benefits often go beyond immediate revenue, encompassing factors like reduced product failure rates, optimized pricing strategies, and improved customer satisfaction. For instance, investing $50,000 in consumer research might seem steep – until it prevents a multi-million-dollar product flop by identifying a critical flaw before launch. Businesses should consider both direct returns, such as increased sales or lead generation, and indirect benefits, like more efficient resource allocation or enhanced brand positioning. This holistic view provides a more accurate picture of the research’s true value.

Track Long-Term Impact

While some research delivers quick wins, its greatest value often emerges over time. Market insights don’t just influence a single campaign or product – they shape long-term strategies, guide innovation, and build a deeper understanding of evolving consumer behavior. To capture this long-term impact, companies should track key performance indicators (KPIs) beyond the immediate aftermath of a research project. For example, a brand health study conducted today might reveal trends that influence product development decisions for years to come. Similarly, customer satisfaction research can lead to operational changes that improve retention rates over time. By regularly revisiting past research and assessing how its insights have informed business growth, companies can better quantify its enduring ROI.

Global Market Research Considerations

Expanding into global markets offers businesses access to new customer segments, diversified revenue streams, and growth opportunities. However, with these opportunities come layers of complexity that domestic research rarely encounters. Conducting market research across borders isn’t as simple as replicating a survey in multiple languages – it requires a deep understanding of cultural, regional, and logistical nuances. To gather insights that truly reflect diverse markets, businesses must adapt their research strategies to local contexts while maintaining a consistent global perspective. Here’s what to consider when navigating the complexities of global market research.”

Cultural Sensitivity

Culture shapes how people think, behave, and make decisions – making cultural sensitivity a cornerstone of effective global research. A question that resonates in one market might fall flat or even offend in another. For example, consumer attitudes toward money, health, or personal success vary widely across cultures, and even colors, symbols, or imagery used in surveys can carry different meanings. To avoid cultural missteps, businesses should collaborate with local researchers who understand these nuances. This goes beyond language translation; it’s about cultural adaptation. For instance, while Western consumers might be comfortable providing direct feedback, respondents in some Asian markets may prefer more indirect ways of expressing dissatisfaction. Recognizing these subtleties ensures the data collected is both respectful and reliable.

Regional Trends

Global doesn’t mean homogeneous. Consumer behaviors are shaped by regional trends influenced by local economies, political climates, technological adoption, and social norms. What drives purchasing decisions in North America might be entirely different from what resonates in Southeast Asia or the Middle East. Consider the rapid rise of mobile payments in China compared to the continued reliance on credit cards in the US. A one-size-fits-all research approach risks missing these critical distinctions. Businesses must stay attuned to local market dynamics – tracking everything from economic shifts and regulatory changes to emerging consumer preferences. Partnering with regional experts or leveraging localized data sources can provide a clearer picture of what matters most to consumers in specific markets.

Logistical Challenges

Conducting research across borders comes with practical hurdles that can affect both the quality and timeliness of insights. Language barriers are an obvious challenge, but even when surveys are accurately translated, subtle differences in phrasing can alter respondents’ interpretations. Time zone differences complicate scheduling interviews, focus groups, or real-time data collection efforts. Additionally, technological access varies widely – while online surveys may be standard in urban areas with high internet penetration, they might not reach rural populations in less connected regions. To overcome these obstacles, businesses should tailor their methodologies to fit the local context. This could mean combining digital surveys with face-to-face interviews, using mobile-based research in mobile-first economies, or ensuring data privacy compliance aligns with regional regulations like GDPR in Europe. Flexibility and local expertise are key to navigating these logistical complexities.

Emerging Trends in Market Research

The landscape of market research is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements and changing consumer behaviors. To stay competitive, businesses must adapt to these emerging trends that are reshaping how insights are gathered, analyzed, and applied.

AI and Machine Learning:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are revolutionizing market research by automating data collection, enhancing predictive analytics, and uncovering patterns that traditional methods might miss. AI-powered tools can process vast datasets in real-time, enabling researchers to identify trends, forecast behaviors, and even segment audiences with precision. For example, sentiment analysis algorithms can scan millions of social media posts to gauge public perception of a brand instantly. This not only saves time but also provides more nuanced insights, helping businesses make data-driven decisions swiftly.
Social Listening:
In an era where consumers voice their opinions online, social listening has become indispensable. It goes beyond tracking brand mentions; it captures real-time consumer sentiment, identifies emerging trends, and monitors competitors. Platforms like Brandwatch and Sprinklr analyze data from social media, forums, and blogs, offering a comprehensive view of public discourse. For brands, this means staying ahead of potential PR crises, identifying new opportunities, and understanding customer needs without relying solely on traditional surveys.
Big Data Analytics:
The explosion of digital interactions has led to an abundance of data – commonly referred to as big data. Analyzing this data helps businesses uncover hidden patterns and correlations that inform strategic decisions. Big data analytics integrates information from various sources, such as transaction records, web analytics, and IoT devices, providing a holistic view of consumer behavior. Companies like Amazon and Netflix leverage big data to personalize recommendations, optimize supply chains, and predict market demands with remarkable accuracy.
Predictive Analytics:
While descriptive analytics tells us what happened, predictive analytics forecasts what’s likely to happen next. By using historical data, statistical algorithms, and machine learning techniques, businesses can anticipate future trends and consumer behaviors. This is particularly valuable in industries like retail and finance, where understanding purchasing patterns or market shifts can provide a competitive edge. Predictive models help in inventory management, targeted marketing campaigns, and even risk assessment.
The Rise of Agile Research:
Agile methodologies, borrowed from software development, are transforming market research. Agile research emphasizes speed, flexibility, and continuous feedback. Instead of lengthy, traditional research projects, agile approaches involve rapid cycles of data collection and analysis, allowing businesses to adapt quickly to changing market conditions. This is especially crucial in fast-paced industries where consumer preferences evolve rapidly, such as tech, fashion, and entertainment.
Emerging Technologies: Blockchain and AR/VR:
Emerging technologies like blockchain and augmented reality (AR) are also making inroads into market research. Blockchain ensures data transparency and security, addressing concerns about data integrity and privacy. Meanwhile, AR and virtual reality (VR) are being used for immersive research experiences, such as virtual focus groups or product testing in simulated environments. These technologies not only enhance data quality but also provide innovative ways to engage with participants.

In conclusion, the future of market research lies in the seamless integration of technology and human insight. As these trends continue to evolve, businesses that embrace and adapt to these innovations will be better positioned to understand their markets and anticipate changes.

Final Thoughts

Mastering market research is more than data collection; it’s about transforming insights into strategic action. In an era where consumer preferences shift rapidly, businesses that invest in robust, adaptive research methodologies position themselves for sustained success. Market research isn’t just a business function – it’s the strategic lens through which future opportunities come into focus.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.