Market research resources Archives

In cafés from Stockholm to Singapore, something curious is happening to the humble latte. The milk has changed – but the meaning of what’s being poured has changed even more. Oat milk, once a fringe choice in vegan corners of Brooklyn and East London, now commands entire refrigerator shelves in mainstream supermarkets. In London alone, sales of oat milk have more than doubled in recent years, outpacing almond and soy. But its rise has sparked a question with global implications: is this just a Western infatuation – or the beginning of a broader, localized reinvention?

As plant-based milks grow in popularity, they are revealing more than just a shift in taste. They have become markers of identity, class, health politics, and cultural resistance. For younger generations in Western cities, oat milk is as much a badge of sustainability as it is a coffee additive. But in Asia, where soy and coconut milk have been kitchen staples for generations, Western brands often appear as tone-deaf outsiders. In India, almond milk is aspirational, signifying affluence and global awareness. In Japan, flavored soy milk is sold in vending machines next to corn soup and iced matcha. Each tells a story – not just of diet, but of what progress tastes like in different corners of the world.

The Western Story: When Climate Guilt Meets Café Culture

In the West, plant-based milk has surged from niche to mainstream at breakneck speed. In the UK, oat milk has overtaken almond as the best-selling non-dairy option, with the market valued at over £146 million in 2023 and projected to reach more than £430 million by 2030—a growth trajectory that reflects not just a change in taste, but in values. In the United States, the plant-based milk market has experienced significant growth, with revenue increasing from $2.71 billion in 2024, more than doubling since 2019. This surge reflects a broader trend, as supermarkets now allocate entire aisles to milk alternatives, accommodating the rising consumer demand.

For Gen Z and Millennials, this shift is as much about values as it is about flavor. The rise of “climatarian” diets—eating based on environmental footprint—has positioned oat milk as the virtuous option. It requires far less water than almond milk (48 litres per litre vs. 1,600) and carries a lower carbon footprint than cow’s milk. Among baristas, oat milk’s texture and foam-ability have cemented its status as the café go-to.

But these motivations are not universal. Among Gen X and Boomers, plant-based milk adoption often stems from health concerns—lactose intolerance, cholesterol, weight management—rather than climate ethics. Many still view oat and almond milk as a wellness product, not a moral choice. And the taste? It’s tolerated more than it is loved.

Despite its early momentum, the plant-based milk category in the U.S. is starting to show signs of fatigue. In 2024, sales declined by 5.2%, driven more by inflation-driven price sensitivity than by waning interest. What we’re seeing at Kadence International is that consumers are making sharper trade-offs at the shelf. While oat milk is still seen as on-trend, its pricing—often double that of dairy—has started to generate real resistance.

Image credit: Minor Figures

Minor Figures, a UK-based oat milk brand, has carved out a niche among creative professionals. Its hand-drawn packaging, minimalist design, and carbon-neutral commitment resonate with urban Gen Z. The brand installed oat milk refill stations in eco-minded cafés in East London, turning sustainability into something tangible. Co-founder Stuart Forsyth emphasizes their approach: “We want to grow sustainably, we want to grow ethically and just see where this sort of journey takes us.”

Still, even Minor Figures must contend with growing skepticism about “performative sustainability.” A growing share of younger consumers now want traceability—where was it grown? What happens to the packaging? As oat milk begins to look like the new default, the question becomes: what comes after default?

Southeast Asia: Taste First, Sustainability Later

If oat milk is the sustainability symbol of the West, in much of Southeast Asia, it’s still a curiosity—often priced high, unfamiliar in flavor, and positioned more as a lifestyle accessory than a kitchen staple. Here, taste and tradition are still the gatekeepers, and consumer priorities follow a different rhythm.

Soy and coconut milks remain the dominant non-dairy choices across the region. Long before Western plant-based trends took hold, these ingredients were already foundational in Southeast Asian cuisine. From Indonesia’s tempeh to Thailand’s tom kha, from soy puddings in Vietnam to rich coconut-based curries in Malaysia, non-dairy milk isn’t an “alternative”—it’s the original.

Yet, the surge of interest in plant-based eating is not being ignored. The market for dairy alternatives in Southeast Asia hit USD 3 billion in 2024 and is forecast to reach USD 4.1 billion by 2030. But the motivations driving that growth are not always what Western marketers expect.

For urban Gen Z consumers, the shift is being fueled by café culture and aesthetic appeal. In Singapore, Bangkok, and Ho Chi Minh City, oat milk is showing up in third-wave coffee shops, where latte art meets lifestyle branding. The creamy mouthfeel and mild taste of oat milk plays well with espresso, and baristas often frame it as the more “sophisticated” or “global” option. But the price—often two or three times higher than soy or coconut milk—makes it more of a treat than a household switch.

Health and digestion are also central to plant-based appeal. For Millennials balancing fast-paced urban lives with rising wellness awareness, soy milk retains a stronghold due to its protein content and familiarity. It’s not uncommon to see fortified soy drinks marketed for beauty benefits, gut health, or as part of fitness routines.

Among Gen X and Boomers, however, there’s little appetite for novelty. Traditional dairy is still prized, especially in countries like Vietnam, where sweetened condensed milk remains the heart of the national coffee. Coconut milk is not just nostalgic—it’s seen as natural, trusted, and tied to home cooking.

For Western brands attempting to gain traction here, the learning curve is steep. Oatly’s entrance into the region began with Malaysia and Singapore, distributed via speciality grocers and upscale cafés. The company announced in 2022 that Southeast Asia would form a “growth corridor” as part of its Asia expansion. But by 2024, it had shuttered its Singapore production facility to consolidate manufacturing back to Europe—a sign that demand in the region had not yet scaled fast enough to justify local production.

Oatly continues to maintain shelf presence in Singapore, but its growth in the region faces challenges. In December 2024, the company announced the closure of its production facility in Singapore as part of an asset-light supply chain strategy aimed at improving cost structures and reducing capital expenditures. This move reflects broader operational adjustments in response to evolving market dynamics in Asia.

The plant-based milk market in Singapore is becoming increasingly competitive, with local brands like Oatside gaining traction. In June 2023, Flash Coffee announced it would serve Oatside as the default in all milk-based beverages across its 24 outlets in Singapore. This highlights the growing consumer interest in plant-based options and the competitive landscape Oatly faces.

It’s evident that for plant-based products to succeed in Singapore, they must appeal to consumers in both taste and affordability. The sustainability pitch alone often isn’t sufficient; products need to meet consumer expectations in flavor and be competitively priced to gain widespread acceptance.

Local innovation may hold the key. In Thailand, companies are experimenting with rice milk made from surplus grains. In Indonesia, startups are blending coconut and cashew milk to cater to local palates while improving texture. Unlike oat, which has to be imported and processed, these ingredients are homegrown—offering not just flavor familiarity but economic resonance.

The tension in Southeast Asia isn’t whether consumers will adopt plant-based milk—it’s which ones, and why. Taste leads. Price follows. Sustainability, for now, lags behind. But for a younger class raised on Instagram, global branding, and iced matcha oat lattes, the next shift may arrive faster than expected.

Japan: Tradition Meets Innovation

In Japan, plant-based milk isn’t a trend—it’s tradition. Long before Western oat and almond milks arrived on convenience store shelves, soy was already woven into daily life. From tofu to miso to soy-based desserts, the legume’s liquid form has been consumed for centuries—not as a replacement, but as a cultural staple.

This historical baseline gives Japan a unique position in the global plant-based milk story. While much of the West is shifting away from cow’s milk, in Japan, dairy was never dominant to begin with. Lactose intolerance affects approximately 45% of the population to some degree, and the country’s culinary heritage has long favoured plant-based ingredients.

Yet even here, the landscape is shifting—quietly, and with the precision Japan is known for. In 2024, the soy milk segment still made up the overwhelming majority of plant-based milk sales, but oat and almond are inching upward. Projections estimate Japan’s oat milk market will expand from approximately $51.7 million in 2024 to over $163 million by 2033, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 12.6%.

But growth in Japan doesn’t mirror that of its Western counterparts. Oat milk here is not a lifestyle statement. It’s more likely to be encountered in a café serving Nordic-style pastries than in a supermarket fridge. In Tokyo’s upscale coffee districts—Daikanyama, Aoyama, and parts of Shibuya—young professionals are experimenting with oat lattes, but the movement is still niche.

Soy milk is still the default. People are curious about oat milk, but it’s expensive and unfamiliar. Soy is part of the Japanese identity.

Image credit: Marusan

The soy milk aisle in Japan looks nothing like its Western equivalents. There are over 30 flavors of soy milk in most convenience stores—banana, sweet potato, black sesame, and even matcha. Sold in small, colorful cartons, these drinks are as much a snack as a supplement. They appeal across generations and demographics, from school children to business executives.

Almond milk, introduced in earnest in the early 2010s, is viewed as a beauty product as much as a drink—touted for its vitamin E content and its role in “clean eating” routines. It’s marketed in lifestyle magazines and television ads featuring pop stars and Olympic athletes.

So where does that leave oat? Still finding its place. Japanese consumers value texture and subtlety in flavor—qualities that oat milk sometimes struggles to deliver in traditional dishes or teas. But its creamy body is finding fans in the coffee world, and as more cafés experiment with it, familiarity may breed demand.

What’s clear is that plant-based milk in Japan isn’t driven by environmental activism or dietary rebellion. It’s driven by harmony—with the body, with the palate, with the past. While the West frames oat milk as progress, in Japan, progress tastes familiar—it just might be flavored with yuzu or kinako.

India: Plant-Based Milk as Urban Status and Spiritual Alignment

In India, dairy isn’t just nutrition—it’s ritual. From temple offerings of milk to the everyday comfort of chai with malai, dairy products are woven into the country’s emotional and religious fabric. The white splash in a steel tumbler holds centuries of symbolic weight. So any conversation about plant-based milk here starts not with a health trend, but with the question: what could possibly replace something sacred?

The answer, for now, is: not much—but something is beginning to stir.

India’s plant-based milk market is still young, valued at around USD 50 million in 2024, but it is projected to grow at nearly 15% CAGR over the next six years. That growth, however, is uneven and tells a story less about dietary shifts and more about social signalling.

For Gen Z in India’s metros, plant-based milk is about cruelty-free living, fitness influencers, and Instagrammed morning routines. It’s not uncommon to see “dairy-free” smoothies and almond milk lattes showcased in the digital lives of young professionals in Bengaluru, Delhi, or Mumbai. These consumers often cite animal welfare, clean eating, and compatibility with lactose intolerance—affecting an estimated 60% of the population—as reasons for switching. But the shift is as much aesthetic as it is ethical. Almond milk isn’t just good for you; it looks good in a glass.

Millennials, especially those navigating careers abroad or within cosmopolitan India, are caught between reverence for traditional staples like paneer and ghee, and a rising curiosity about global wellness norms. Many are not rejecting dairy outright, but are experimenting with substitutes during certain meals, fasts, or fitness cycles. The language of Ayurveda also looms large—“easy on digestion,” “balance for pitta”—guiding product marketing and consumer trust.

For Gen X and Boomers, though, the idea of dairy-free milk is still foreign. Cow’s milk is considered pure in Hindu tradition. To deviate from it can feel like cultural heresy, particularly in religious households. Even within vegan circles, spiritual negotiations are common—almond milk in the smoothie, but cow’s milk in the temple.

And yet, there is movement at the margins.

Image credit: Good Mylk Co.

One company pioneering this shift is Goodmylk, a Bengaluru-based startup founded by Abhay Rangan in his teens. The company produces cashew and oat-based milk, peanut curd, and vegan butter. What sets it apart is its insistence on affordability and accessibility. “If we make it premium, we limit who gets to choose it,” Rangan said in an interview. Goodmylk raised $400,000 in seed funding and has focused on scaling without pricing itself out of the Indian middle class.

The brand also localizes its innovation. Mung bean and millet-based milks are in development—grains familiar to Indian households, now reimagined for lattes and cereal bowls. This strategy isn’t just functional—it’s cultural. “People trust what they’ve grown up with,” Rangan notes. “If we can use those same ingredients in new ways, we don’t have to change people. We just meet them where they are.”

What India reveals, perhaps more than any other market, is that the future of plant-based milk may not be about substitution—but about addition. The almond milk doesn’t replace the dairy in the chai. It sits next to it in the fridge, as an option, a symbol, a signal of modernity. Milk, in this context, is not just nourishment. It’s narrative.

Cross-Cultural Observations: What Tastes Like Progress?

From Bangkok cafés to Berlin grocery aisles, plant-based milk carries different meanings depending on where you are—and who you ask. To understand the global arc of milk alternatives, it’s not enough to look at adoption rates. You have to ask what each product represents in a cultural context. Because in the world of milk, progress has many flavors.

In the UK, oat milk has become shorthand for ethical living. It’s the fuel of the “climatarian”—those who select food based on its carbon footprint. It helps that oats grow abundantly in Europe and require far less water than almonds. But this is also about optics. Oat milk in a flat white signals something specific: sustainability without sacrifice. It says, “I’m paying attention.”

In Japan, soy milk is the opposite of a trend—it’s a staple. You’ll find banana soy milk in vending machines, black sesame soy in school lunch trays, and unflavored soy behind the counter of every ramen bar. Oat milk, by contrast, is a foreigner: imported, expensive, and still largely a café novelty. Where Western markets romanticize innovation, Japan reveres the familiar.

In India, almond milk is climbing—but it’s doing so as a marker of status. Its presence in a smoothie bowl or a vegan café menu connotes wellness, modernity, and a kind of cosmopolitan sophistication. It’s aspirational, not essential. Meanwhile, mung bean and millet milks are emerging quietly from startups like Goodmylk, using ingredients that feel both futuristic and deeply local.

In Southeast Asia, coconut milk is tradition in liquid form. It’s thick, aromatic, and the base of comfort food across generations. Oat milk, by comparison, is still figuring out how to earn trust—or at least a spot in the fridge. Soy milk, sold sweet and chilled at street stalls and in grocery chains, continues to dominate the category for its price, protein, and familiarity.

And then there’s the matter of price. Across nearly every market, oat milk carries a premium—often double or triple the price of cow’s milk, and far more than local alternatives. In the UK, it retails for £1.90 per litre compared to £1.20 for dairy. In Southeast Asia, import costs push oat milk into the realm of aspirational indulgence.

This price disparity cuts to the heart of a growing identity tension: who gets to eat for the planet? In many regions, sustainability remains a luxury. And with that, a subtle backlash is brewing against the Westernisation of food. Consumers in Asia, Latin America, and Africa are increasingly questioning why “plant-based” must mean foreign, expensive, and out of touch with local ecosystems. As these questions simmer, the most forward-thinking brands aren’t scaling Western models—they’re turning inward. Instead of exporting oat milk to Jakarta or Mumbai, they’re asking: what’s already growing here? And how do we make that the new norm?

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

The global tech retail market is slowing. Consumers who once chased every new release are now holding off, thinking harder, and stretching upgrade cycles across devices – from phones to wearables to home tech. What’s changed isn’t just price sensitivity; it’s mindset. The old rhythm of new-for-new’s sake is being replaced by a more deliberate calculation: Is this upgrade worth it?

Behind that shift are macroeconomic pressures that haven’t let up. Interest rates remain high, currencies are volatile, and fresh tariffs – particularly between the US and China – are reshaping buying decisions. Even the major players are feeling it. Apple posted a year-on-year decline in iPhone sales, while Samsung saw a temporary lift as consumers rushed to buy ahead of expected price hikes. In both cases, caution – not innovation – drove behavior.

The shift is generational too. Gen Z, long viewed as the frontline for early tech adoption, is starting to show signs of saturation. They still care about technology – but now they’re weighing durability, repairability, and long-term functionality over simply owning the newest device. The behavior is less impulsive, more selective.

This isn’t a rejection of innovation. It’s a recalibration. And it has real implications for how the world’s biggest technology companies market, price, and position their next wave of products.

The Shrinking Upgrade Window

Consumers aren’t replacing their tech as often as they used to. The once-standard two-year smartphone upgrade has stretched into a multi-year wait, with buyers holding onto devices for longer – sometimes much longer. It’s not just caution in a soft economy; it’s a growing sense that new releases simply aren’t offering enough to warrant the swap.

At Verizon, leadership recently acknowledged the shift. The average smartphone replacement cycle has crept past 3.5 years, a far cry from the predictable two-year rhythm that once drove steady sales. Apple users, too, are waiting longer, with data showing a noticeable lengthening of ownership compared to five years ago. It’s a trend driven partly by pricing, partly by the reality that last year’s model is still more than good enough.

Laptops are on a similar track. The three- to five-year refresh cycle is no longer a given. Consumers are holding off until their machines physically break or performance lags in a noticeable way. Best Buy’s CEO recently pointed to a lack of meaningful innovation as a reason buyers aren’t feeling urgency. And with cloud computing and browser-based software doing more of the heavy lifting, the need for higher-end specs is flattening for everyday users.

Televisions, too, are staying in homes longer. Improvements in display technology have plateaued from a consumer benefit perspective, and with software updates extending the life of streaming-enabled TVs, most households see no need to upgrade unless there’s a failure. Brands that offer long-term software support – up to seven years in some cases – are winning loyalty from customers who prefer durability over dazzle.

Even wearables, a category once defined by rapid iteration, are feeling the shift. Consumers are growing more selective, favoring meaningful innovation like medical-grade sensors or long battery life over iterative changes in design or interface. Replacement cycles are expanding, especially as prices climb and expectations rise.

In Southeast Asia, a surge in mid-tier smartphones is driving sales, suggesting buyers still want new tech – but they want it to stretch further. In contrast, consumers in the US and UK are sticking with their devices for three or four years, increasingly weighing whether an upgrade will deliver genuine daily impact.

Economic Pressures Meet Consumer Pragmatism

Inflation has eased slightly in some markets but remains a persistent factor shaping consumer behavior worldwide. In the US and UK, interest rates remain elevated, keeping credit card debt expensive and discretionary spending under pressure. Across Europe and Japan, wages have struggled to keep pace with core price increases, dampening retail confidence. And in high-growth regions like Southeast Asia, India, and China, economic uncertainty is pushing consumers toward more deliberate purchase decisions.

In the US, the impact is already visible. Retailers are reporting softer demand in key electronics categories, while store traffic has declined year-on-year. Online, browsing activity remains strong, but cart abandonment is climbing – particularly for products over the $500 mark. It’s not that consumers aren’t interested; they’re just taking longer to commit. The same story is playing out in the UK, where buyers are increasingly opting for refurbished tech, financing options, or delaying non-essential upgrades entirely.

In India and Southeast Asia, frugality doesn’t mean silence – it means selectivity. Consumers are still engaging, but through a different lens. Mid-tier smartphones and high-functionality budget laptops are outperforming premium models. Retailers in these markets report growing traction for bundled offers and longer warranty terms, as value and reliability edge out brand prestige.

Indonesia offers one of the clearest signals of this recalibrated mindset. Consumers there continue to spend, but with more scrutiny. Brand loyalty is softening, and trial is rising – especially for newer entrants that offer durability and local relevance. Many shoppers are trading up slowly, looking for technology that serves multiple roles, rather than devices that signal status or trend.

China, long a bellwether for tech enthusiasm, has shown uneven recovery in the retail sector. Urban consumers remain engaged, but rural and lower-tier city shoppers are increasingly budget-conscious. Brands with local manufacturing and flexible pricing structures are gaining share.

In Japan, where tech adoption tends to skew practical, the economic slowdown has reinforced existing behaviors. Consumers are delaying replacements, relying more on service programs, and opting for features that serve real lifestyle utility – especially among older demographics.

Retailers and manufacturers across all regions are adjusting accordingly. In-store messaging is shifting from “newest” to “smartest.” Online platforms are pushing price-match guarantees, extended return periods, and loyalty perks over flash launches. What used to be a race for innovation has become a contest of value – and the companies that acknowledge that shift early are seeing steadier results.

Gen Z Hits Pause

For years, Gen Z was seen as the tech industry’s sure bet – the cohort most likely to queue for launches, post the unboxing, and evangelize the next upgrade. But the momentum has shifted. While their interest in technology hasn’t faded, their expectations have evolved. Now, the question isn’t “what’s new?” but “what fits?”

Rising costs have played a role, but this is more than economics. It’s a cultural recalibration. Among younger consumers, there’s a growing rejection of hyper-consumption in favor of intentionality. The latest phone isn’t an automatic buy. The better question is whether it adds something meaningful to life – fewer Gen Z consumers are upgrading for status alone.

That shift is fuelling the refurbished and secondhand tech market, which has seen steady growth in the US, UK, and across Southeast Asia. Platforms offering certified pre-owned devices, especially smartphones and laptops, are seeing strong engagement from younger demographics. For many, it’s not just about price – it’s about extending the life of a product and avoiding unnecessary waste.

Aesthetic trends are moving in parallel. There’s a rise in what some in the industry are calling “tech quiet luxury” – products that prioritize function, minimalism, and long-term reliability over flash. Sleek, understated design is winning out over bold colors or feature overload. The appeal lies in gear that integrates cleanly into life, not tech that dominates it.

Online, the social narrative is shifting too. Gen Z’s digital footprint shows less excitement around launch-day content and more focus on utility. The rise of “why I didn’t upgrade” posts is telling. Influencers now get traction by explaining how they kept the same phone for four years, or why buying secondhand was the smarter move. The underlying message isn’t anti-tech – it’s pro-agency.

Brands are adjusting their messaging in kind. Marketing language has toned down the superlatives. Features are framed around real-life relevance – sleep tracking for mental health, battery life that actually lasts a weekend, cameras that work well in low light for night outs. There’s less interest in what a device can do, and more focus on what it should do, consistently.

Why Selling Smarter Is the New Selling Faster

Retailers and manufacturers are no longer assuming the upgrade cycle will take care of itself. As consumers grow more cautious with their tech spending, the industry is adapting – not by accelerating the push for newness, but by reengineering the value proposition.

Trade-in programs are now a core feature of the sales funnel. In the US and UK, major electronics chains have expanded their platforms to offer instant credit for used devices, with bonuses tied to specific models or upgrade windows. The aim isn’t just to incentivize sales, but to soften the sticker shock and signal circular value. In India, trade-ins have gone further. E-commerce platforms have introduced programs that accept non-functional phones and appliances – opening up access to affordable upgrades even for consumers sitting on obsolete tech.

Manufacturers are adjusting their product mix in parallel. Samsung’s A-series smartphones have become a centerpiece of the brand’s value-tier portfolio, offering everyday functionality without the premium markup. Apple, long a symbol of high-end exclusivity, is now leaning into the same logic. The latest iteration of its SE line – and more recently, the iPhone 16e – has quietly outperformed expectations, especially among younger buyers and in cost-sensitive markets.

Support for longer device life is becoming a differentiator. Retailers are offering extended warranties, low-cost protection plans, and – critically – greater support for self-service repair. The “right to repair” movement, once niche, has reached mainstream awareness in the US and Europe, pushing brands to make replacement parts and documentation publicly available. Some have gone further, offering repair kits and in-store diagnostics to extend product life without voiding warranties.

In Southeast Asia, telcos and electronics retailers are updating their messaging to meet the moment. Campaigns that once emphasized speed, camera quality, or size now lean into durability, battery longevity, and environmental impact. Flipkart, for instance, has repositioned its marketing language to speak to responsibility, not just features. These aren’t surface-level tweaks – they’re recalibrations shaped by a consumer mood that’s moved past launch-day glitz in favor of durability and long-term value.

Retailers that can respond to this shift without undermining revenue goals are likely to retain customer loyalty. The challenge now is delivering upgrades that feel earned, not obligatory – and that means competing not just on innovation, but on usefulness and trust.

Innovation Isn’t Dead. But It’s on Trial.

The appetite for innovation isn’t gone – it’s just more selective. As upgrade cycles stretch and wallets tighten, consumers are no longer lured by incremental improvements. They’re still willing to invest in technology, but only when the payoff feels tangible.

Devices that deliver clear, differentiated value are still commanding attention. Foldables, once a novelty, have matured into a legitimate category. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip and Fold lines continue to draw interest, not just for the form factor, but for the utility – larger displays in a pocket-sized profile, and new modes of productivity. Google’s Pixel 8 Pro, powered by its custom Tensor chip, is earning traction for its AI-driven tools that enhance real-world usage – from call screening to image editing – without relying on buzzwords.

Apple’s Vision Pro, meanwhile, may not be a mass-market product yet, but it offers a case study in how anticipation builds when the innovation is clear. Its launch was met with skepticism on price, but its mixed-reality interface and potential as a new computing platform still turned heads. Early adopters aren’t buying features – they’re buying futures.

What’s changed is the level of scrutiny. Consumers aren’t rejecting high-end tech; they’re applying higher standards. Battery life must hold up in real use, not just lab tests. Cameras must perform in varied conditions, not just daylight. AI features need to do something meaningful, not just inflate a spec sheet.

That’s changing the language of marketing. Across the US, UK, and Asia, brands are pulling back on superlatives and pushing use cases. Proof-of-benefit now matters more than megapixel counts or processing speeds. Instead of promoting what’s new, marketers are being forced to answer, “Why now?”

For companies that can deliver answers that resonate – whether through new form factors, smarter chips, or lifestyle utility – there’s still room to win. But unlike before, consumers aren’t just asking whether something works. They’re asking if it’s worth disrupting their routine for.

Global Trends in Divergence

While the broader trajectory of tech consumption is moving toward caution and selectivity, the pace and shape of that shift varies across markets. Cultural norms, economic stability, and consumer trust in brands all play a role in how – and when – people decide to upgrade.

In the US, the shift has been shaped by economic pressure and high consumer debt. Shoppers are taking longer to replace their devices, with the average upgrade cycle now stretching to 3.5 years. Refurbished phones and lower-tier models are gaining traction, especially among Gen Z and older millennials. Brand loyalty remains strong, but purchase decisions are being filtered through a sharper value lens.

The UK follows a similar pattern, though with more aggressive adoption of sim-only plans and long-term laptop use. Durability and repairability are emphasized more in brand messaging, and buyers are more willing to switch between ecosystems if they perceive better value.

In Japan, where consumer electronics are deeply embedded into everyday life, the trend is even more conservative. Many households prefer to maintain well-functioning older devices, especially in categories like home tech. The appetite for premium remains – but only if it’s built to last.

Emerging markets present a more nuanced picture. In India and Indonesia, demand continues to grow, but through a pragmatic filter. Consumers still want to upgrade, but they’re making trade-offs between features and affordability. Entry-level and mid-range Android models dominate, and demand for value-driven smart TVs is rising. Device repair shops are also thriving, offering affordable fixes that extend product life.

Germany reflects yet another dimension – green consciousness. There, sustainability is not just an ethical add-on; it’s a purchase driver. Consumers are increasingly seeking eco-certified products, energy efficiency, and software support that extends a product’s usable life.

These regional divergences remind us that consumer behavior doesn’t shift in a straight line. Global brands must not only read the macro trends, but understand the local motivations underneath them.

Regional Snapshot

Region	Consumer Sentiment	Average Upgrade Cycle	Popular Segments
US	Cautious	3.5 years	Budget, Refurbished
UK	Value-driven	3 years	Sim-only phones, Laptops
Japan	Conservative	4–5 years	Home tech, Premium older models
India	Mixed	2–3 years	Mid-range Android, TVs
Indonesia	Budget-first	2–3 years	Entry smartphones, Repairs
Germany	Green-conscious	4 years	Eco-friendly, Long-life gear

The Next Era of Tech Retail Is Measured, Not Mass-Market

The slowdown in tech upgrades isn’t a phase. It’s a reckoning. Consumers are no longer buying into the rhythm of annual releases and short-term novelty. The next era of consumer tech will be defined not by what’s new, but by what’s necessary – and by how well brands can prove their relevance beyond launch day.

The companies that will thrive over the next five years aren’t the ones with the biggest product pipeline. They’re the ones building around lifecycle value – prioritizing modularity, software longevity, and service ecosystems that extend the relationship between user and device. Subscription-based diagnostics, AI-powered support, and upgradeable components are already reshaping how loyalty is earned – and how revenue is sustained without constant churn.

It’s a shift in strategic fundamentals. Margins may compress as consumers stretch the life of their hardware, but brands that invest in intelligent add-ons, system integration, and health or sustainability functionality will find new pathways to relevance. A camera upgrade isn’t enough. Neither is a new color. If it doesn’t serve a deeper role in how we manage health, reduce waste, or improve everyday decision-making, it won’t pass the new test of value.

That also means guesswork is no longer good enough. The consumer calculus is changing fast, and brands need real insight – beyond sentiment, beyond surveys. They need to know who’s holding back, why they’re hesitating, and what would tip the balance. That’s where market research steps forward – not as validation, but as vision.

We’re not watching a slowdown. We’re witnessing a reset. The expectations have changed, the thresholds have risen, and the reward now goes to those who understand behavior before it hits the balance sheet.

I’d frame it this way: the most powerful upgrade a brand can offer today isn’t a new feature – it’s foresight.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

As households pull back on travel, fashion, and tech upgrades, one category remains oddly resilient: pet care. UK pet spending rose by 3.2% in volume in Q1 2024, even as overall consumer goods slowed. In the US, Chewy’s latest earnings show revenue up 5.6% year over year. Globally, this category isn’t just weathering economic pressure – it’s gaining strength.

What the Numbers Say Around the World

Pet spending continues to grow in markets where most discretionary categories are flat or falling. In Asia, it’s becoming a proxy for emotional investment, household identity, and lifestyle shifts.

China’s pet care market reached $13.6 billion in 2023, nearly double its size in 2018. Growth is strongest among younger consumers in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, where pets increasingly replace traditional family roles. Brands are competing on transparency, nutrition, and health—not just aesthetics.

In Japan, pet ownership has plateaued, but spending per pet is rising – especially in the senior care segment. One in three dogs is now elderly. Owners are investing in supplements, mobility products, and pet monitoring tech. High insurance uptake and new health startups reflect a market shaped by the aging of both pets and owners.

India’s market is now worth over $1 billion and growing at 20% annually. Urban consumers are moving from basic kibble to breed-specific diets, vet-on-call platforms, and DTC food brands. In Tier 1 cities, pets are increasingly seen as dependents.

Southeast Asia is surging. In Indonesia, halal-certified pet food is expanding fast among Gen Z and millennial Muslim households. In Singapore, pet-friendly condo designs and bundled digital pet services are reshaping the urban pet economy.

In each market, pet care is performing well and outperforming adjacent categories. Brands tracking the future of loyalty would do well to start here.

The Rise of the Pet-First Household

Pets are no longer peripheral. In many markets, they’ve become central. Budgets reflect it. So do routines, relationships, and expectations.

In the UK and US, Millennials and Gen Z are treating pets more like dependents than companions. For many, a pet arrives before a partner or child. This shift in household dynamics is reshaping spending habits. Food quality, preventative care, and even birthday celebrations are now routine.

In Japan, pets are becoming emotional anchors. The demand for stimulation toys, wearable monitors, and products for elderly animals reflects the number of owners who are filling care roles with pets.

In India and Indonesia, dogs and cats are now common in middle-class homes. In India, new pet parents are opting for nutrition consults and digital vet services early. In Indonesia, younger Muslim owners prioritize halal compliance – placing cultural fit on par with cost.

In space-constrained cities like Singapore, developers are building in pet zones. Condos market dog parks as amenities. Consumers may cut back on dining out, but continue spending on wellness plans for pets.

What Gets Cut, What Gets Kept

Inflation and higher interest rates have reshaped household budgets. Travel is down, tech purchases are delayed, and dining out has slowed, but pet care continues to hold firm.

In Japan, electronics and beauty are slipping, but veterinary visits remain consistent. In the UK, shoppers skip fashion but keep pet subscriptions. In the US, gym memberships decline while wellness spend on pets holds steady.

In India, mid-premium pet brands are outperforming projections. First-time owners are forming habits early and holding to them. In rural areas, cutbacks tend to hit entertainment before pet goods.

In Southeast Asia, households are scaling back on bulk essentials but still keeping up with pet care. Singaporeans are delaying home upgrades while renewing grooming memberships and upgrading pet tech.

These aren’t luxuries. They’re anchored in attachment. And that makes them more durable than many price-driven categories.

Brands and Retailers Follow the Loyalty

While other categories fight to stay in the basket, pet care is building momentum. Brands aren’t just holding on – they’re leaning in.

In the UK, supermarkets and specialty retailers are expanding premium lines. Pets at Home is scaling up subscriptions, grooming, and in-store vet services. The strategy isn’t about convenience – it’s about becoming routine.

In Japan, startups now offer genetic tests, mobility tracking, and remote health checks. Loyalty here is built on reassurance.

In India, digital-first brands focus on personalized nutrition and wellness bundles. Urban professionals are choosing care that fits their lifestyle – not just their budget.

In Southeast Asia, Indonesia’s halal-certified brands are growing. In Singapore, bundled food, grooming, and insurance on a single digital platform are setting new expectations.

The most resilient brands aren’t chasing promotions. They’re building stickiness.

The Subscription Model Comes Home

One reason pet care is proving so resilient: it’s tailor-made for subscriptions. Chewy’s Autoship model now accounts for over 70% of its revenue. Pets at Home’s subscription grooming and wellness plans are driving retention in the UK. And in India, platforms like HUFT and Supertails are building subscription boxes with food, treats, and supplements that mirror human wellness kits.

Recurring revenue in this category isn’t driven by convenience – it’s driven by rhythm. Feeding, grooming, walking, and checking in on a pet’s health are baked into daily life. And that makes pet subscriptions feel essential, not optional.

The result for retailers is a category with unusually high retention and low churn. For insight professionals, it’s a cue to rethink how LTV is calculated, especially in categories with strong emotional anchors.

The New Metrics of Loyalty

Traditional loyalty metrics miss much of what’s happening in pet care. This isn’t just about repeat purchases or basket size. It’s about trust, consistency, and emotional significance.

Consumers aren’t just loyal because the price is right. They’re loyal because switching feels risky. Because their pet depends on it. Because the product has become part of the household operating system.

That shifts the role of market research. Instead of only tracking NPS or discount redemption, we need to look at embeddedness: How often is a product repurchased without prompting? How quickly is a referral made after a good outcome? Does the customer describe the brand using human relationship language?

Brands that understand these cues – especially in high-growth markets – will outpace those still optimizing for price elasticity.

The Emotional ROI of a Full Bowl

Pet care isn’t just holding its ground. It’s changing how people define value.

Emotional value is rarely tracked as closely as price sensitivity. But it should be. Consumers will pause a subscription without thought, yet go out of their way for their pet’s preferred brand.

This kind of spending rarely shows up in top-line figures. It’s visible in retention curves, renewal rates, and what households protect first. In Japan, pet purchases are about continuity. In Singapore, pet tech provides reassurance. In India, ownership blends aspiration with emotional attachment.

The spending logic isn’t indulgent. It’s rooted in what feels stable when everything else isn’t.

The implication for brand and insight teams is structural. Emotional categories are not cut; they become the new baseline.

One lesser-known brand that illustrates this shift is Heads Up For Tails in India.

Case Study: Heads Up For Tails (India)

Founded in 2008, Heads Up For Tails (HUFT) began as a niche pet accessories brand in India. Over the years, it has evolved into a comprehensive pet care company, offering a range of products and services tailored to the Indian market. Recognizing the growing trend of pet humanization, HUFT expanded its offerings to include premium pet foods, grooming services, and wellness products. By 2023, the brand had established over 50 retail outlets across major Indian cities, complemented by a robust e-commerce platform.

HUFT’s strategy centers on understanding the emotional bond between pets and their owners, positioning itself as a partner in pet parenting rather than just a retailer. This approach has resonated with India’s urban pet owners, who increasingly view their pets as integral family members. The brand’s emphasis on quality, customization, and community engagement has fostered strong customer loyalty, even as consumers become more selective in their discretionary spending.

In a market where pet care is still emerging as a significant sector, HUFT’s growth underscores the potential for brands that align with evolving consumer values and behaviors. Their success illustrates how a deep understanding of local culture and consumer psychology can drive brand relevance and resilience.

What Pet Spending Teaches Us About the Next Consumer Economy

Pet care doesn’t just tell us where spending is strong. It tells us what matters when everything else is negotiable.

In every market where discretionary spending is tightening, this category is holding. Not because it’s a luxury, but because it’s emotionally embedded. It’s part of the household rhythm. It reflects identity, routine, and care.

This has implications far beyond dogs and cats. Categories that can build this kind of trust and meaning – through consistency, embedded services, and emotional utility – stand to inherit the next wave of loyalty. Not the kind driven by points or perks, but the kind that lives in habits, values, and daily life.

For insight teams, the takeaway is clear: the future of consumer behavior won’t be measured in what people want. It will be measured in what they refuse to give up.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Consumer sentiment shifts rapidly, shaped not only by your company’s directives and strategies but also by external forces, such as viral trends, cultural movements, and economic forces. The brands that endure and adapt to these changes in real-time. Brand tracking is more than a periodic check-in – it’s essential for survival. By continuously monitoring brand health, companies can identify strengths, spot weaknesses, understand competitive positioning and adjust strategy accordingly.

But perception isn’t static. A brand with strong awareness today can lose relevance tomorrow if it fails to track how consumers feel, engage, and respond over time. To remain competitive, brands must continuously track their position in the market and be agile enough to adapt.

What is Brand Tracking, and Why Does it Matter?

Brand tracking measures a brand’s performance over time, helping companies identify shifts in the market, consumer trends, competitive trends, strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities to refine brand strategy.

Brand perception is fluid and influenced by consumer experiences, media narratives, and competitive shifts. Brand tracking helps companies answer critical questions:

Is our brand positioning resonating with the right audience?
How does our reputation compare to competitors?
What messaging, campaigns, or brand attributes build consumer loyalty?
Do external factors – economic shifts, social trends, or market disruptions – impact our brand perception?

Key Elements of Brand Tracking

Brand tracking goes beyond surface-level metrics to assess a brand’s health and market position. Key components include:

Brand Awareness: Measuring Recognition and Recall
- Unaided vs. Aided Awareness
- Top-of-Mind Awareness: The first brand a consumer thinks of in a category often signals market leadership and competitive strength.
Brand Perception & Sentiment Analysis
- Consumer Attitudes and Associations: Understanding how consumers feel about a brand—and the attributes they link to it—is key to shaping brand identity. These should include both functional benefits and emotional benefits. As well as brand personality.
Purchase Intent, Satisfaction & Customer Loyalty Metrics
- Likelihood of Purchase: Gauging how likely consumers are to choose a brand helps predict future sales.
- Satisfaction: Understanding brand satisfaction versus competitors.
- Net Promoter Score (NPS): Measuring customers’ willingness to recommend a brand indicates satisfaction and loyalty.
Competitive Benchmarking
- Market Position Analysis: Comparing brand performance against competitors to identify strengths, weaknesses, and market opportunities.
- Share of Voice: Measuring a brand’s visibility in the market through media coverage and advertising reach.
Media & Advertising Effectiveness
- Campaign Impact Assessment: Assessing how marketing efforts affect awareness, perception, and sales.

Turning Data into Strategy

Brand tracking only matters if insights lead to action. Using data strategically, companies can refine marketing, reposition products, and strengthen customer loyalty.

Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses Before They Become Market Issues

Tracking brand health helps brands pinpoint areas where they excel and where they are losing ground. Rather than relying on assumptions, brands that act on measurable shifts in consumer sentiment can adjust messaging and engagement tactics before losing relevance.

Optimizing Marketing Campaigns

Effective marketing isn’t just about visibility; it’s about impact. Brand tracking measures how marketing efforts influence perception, loyalty, and purchase intent. If a campaign falls short, data allows brands to tweak real-time messaging rather than wait until the next cycle.

Benchmarking Against Competitors

Brand tracking is most powerful when measured against competitors. Comparing brand health metrics against competitors enables companies to identify gaps in positioning, capitalize on underserved markets, and anticipate industry shifts before rivals do.

Building Customer Loyalty

Brand tracking isn’t just for attracting new customers; it helps brands understand why existing customers stay or leave. Tracking loyalty metrics allows brands to implement better retention strategies, such as loyalty programs, improved customer service, or product innovation.

Brand Tracking Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Even the best tracking methods fail if poorly executed. Avoid these common mistakes to ensure insights lead to action.

Measuring Awareness Without Sentiment
A high awareness score means little if there are negative perceptions. Brands must pair awareness tracking with perception analysis to get a complete picture of their market position.
Tracking Without Business Goals
Brand tracking is useless if not tied to clear objectives. Tracking must support strategy, whether expanding markets, improving retention, or refining advertising.
Ignoring Qualitative Data
Numbers alone don’t tell the full story. Open-ended customer feedback and sentiment analysis reveal why brand perception shifts.
Failing to Act on Insights
Insights are useless if brands don’t act. Whether trust is eroding or a competitor is gaining ground, companies must adjust accordingly.
Overlooking Market Trends
Brand perception doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Economic shifts, cultural trends, and competitors shape public opinion. Effective tracking accounts for these factors.

Brand Tracking Is Not an Option—It’s Survival

Brand perception is a moving target. What consumers think today may not hold true tomorrow, and brands that fail to monitor these shifts risk becoming irrelevant. The market does not wait for companies to catch up; brands that do not track, analyze, and act on data are at the mercy of competitors who do.

Tracking isn’t just about data—it’s about influence. It reveals when a brand resonates or repels, when trust strengthens or erodes. The best brands spot risks before they escalate and seize opportunities before they go mainstream.

Market leaders don’t wait for a crisis to understand their position. They track, measure, and adapt before perception shifts beyond their control. A brand that isn’t tracking its relevance isn’t just falling behind – it’s already lost control of the narrative.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Boycotts can upend entire markets overnight. In 2019, a diplomatic dispute between South Korea and Japan turned into a full-scale consumer revolt. Sales of Japanese beer in South Korea plummeted by 92%, and Uniqlo shuttered multiple stores as South Korean consumers rejected Japanese brands en masse. What began as a trade conflict quickly became an economic weapon wielded by consumers.

Boycotts are no longer just reactions to political events—they have become economic power plays. Global brands increasingly find themselves at the center of cultural, political, and trade conflicts. Starbucks faced backlash from both conservatives and progressives over its unionization stance, while Disney’s opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill sparked boycotts from both LGBTQ+ supporters and conservative groups. In today’s market, even neutrality is a decision with consequences.

Brands have become battlegrounds for political, social, and economic conflicts. Silence is no longer a shield. When French President Emmanuel Macron defended the right to publish caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in 2020, French businesses bore the consequences. Middle Eastern supermarkets pulled French products, and #BoycottFrenchProducts trended across social media. Carrefour scrambled to issue damage control statements. Even companies with no direct political involvement can be caught in ideological crossfire.

Managing consumer activism is no longer optional. Today’s boycotts can move markets and shake billion-dollar companies. In an era where brand loyalty is tied to political and social beliefs, companies caught in the crossfire risk more than just lost sales—trust, once broken, is far harder to rebuild.

Boycotts don’t just make headlines—they leave financial wreckage. In 2012, a territorial dispute between China and Japan ignited a mass boycott, sending Toyota’s sales in China tumbling 44% in a single month. The backlash erased years of market gains, forcing Toyota and Honda into a costly recovery battle.

Even dominant brands can feel the sting of consumer backlash. During the U.S.-China trade war, nationalist sentiment fueled a #BoycottApple campaign, pushing many Chinese consumers toward Huawei. Apple maintained its global standing, but its sales took a hit—proof that even industry giants aren’t immune to geopolitics.

Some boycotts reshape markets permanently. In 2019, a South Korea-Japan dispute led consumers to abandon Japanese beer, cosmetics, and cars—habits that didn’t revert even after tensions cooled. Similarly, a 2006 boycott of Danish products in the Middle East, triggered by controversial cartoons, wiped out $70 million in sales for dairy giant Arla Foods. Even years later, some retailers never restocked Danish brands.

Not all boycotts leave scars. Starbucks has repeatedly faced backlash over labor policies and political stances, yet its dominance remains unshaken. The reason? A fiercely loyal customer base and a brand identity strong enough to weather short-term activism. The difference between a fleeting boycott and lasting damage often comes down to one factor: how replaceable the brand is. Companies with distinct identities bounce back. Those that hesitate, or fail to differentiate, may never recover.

Why Some Boycotts Fade While Others Leave Lasting Damage

For over 40 years, Nestlé has faced recurring boycotts over its infant formula marketing in developing countries. Despite its global dominance, consumer advocacy groups have kept the controversy alive, cementing Nestlé’s reputation as a corporate villain for many.

The oil industry faces a similar challenge. Shell and BP have endured decades of boycotts over environmental concerns. While these campaigns haven’t triggered financial collapse, they’ve permanently tarnished brand perception—especially among younger, climate-conscious consumers.

The real risk isn’t a single high-profile boycott—it’s the slow erosion of trust from repeated controversies. Over time, consumer activism can turn a brand name into shorthand for corporate misconduct, making reputation recovery an uphill battle. A boycott is more than a PR crisis; it’s a moment of truth. Brands can either reinforce loyalty or lose trust from all sides.

Some brands emerge stronger by standing their ground. Patagonia, for example, has made environmental activism central to its identity—even suing the Trump administration over national park protections. Rather than triggering backlash, the move galvanized its core customers.

Not all brands navigate boycotts successfully. When Carrefour’s Middle Eastern stores suffered backlash during the Macron controversy, the company tried to distance itself—but this only bred confusion and distrust. Silence can be as risky as speaking out. Consumers expect companies to take a stance, but a miscalculated move can alienate as many as it attracts. The real challenge isn’t whether to engage, but how to do so without escalating the crisis.

Avoiding controversy doesn’t mean avoiding backlash. In 2022, Disney’s attempt to stay neutral on Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill backfired spectacularly. Employees and LGBTQ+ activists pressured the company to take a stance, while conservatives retaliated once it did. Florida lawmakers stripped Disney of key tax privileges, leaving it alienated from both sides. A 2023 Harris Poll found that 82% of consumers expect brands to take a stand on social issues—yet 60% say they will stop buying if they disagree with the stance. The lesson? Taking a position can build loyalty with one group while permanently alienating another.

The risk isn’t just political—it’s about perception. Brands that fail to define their values risk having their identity shaped by the loudest voices. In today’s landscape, silence isn’t neutral—it’s a statement.

Navigating a boycott isn’t just about damage control—it’s about leadership. The brands that survive aren’t the ones scrambling to react, but those that take control of the narrative. When a boycott gains traction, the worst mistake a company can make is letting others define its response. A clear, well-structured message—consistent across all platforms—determines whether a brand weathers the storm or gets swallowed by it.

The financial hit of a boycott is often inevitable, but well-prepared brands see beyond the short term. Companies that anticipate consumer activism have contingency plans—shifting market focus, reinforcing ties with loyal customers, and ensuring financial resilience in the face of backlash.

A boycott can erupt in minutes, leaving companies no time to craft a careful response. In today’s hyper-connected world, silence is often seen as complicity, while a poorly handled statement can make things worse. The brands that survive aren’t those that avoid controversy—they’re the ones prepared for it.

The difference between a temporary backlash and a full-blown reputational crisis often comes down to preparation. The brands that weather boycotts aren’t scrambling in the heat of the moment—they have a crisis playbook ready long before trouble starts.

At the heart of any crisis playbook is a clear decision-making framework: Who makes the call on how to respond—the CEO, the communications team, or a crisis committee? Without a defined chain of command, brands risk internal chaos, mixed messaging, and costly missteps.

Just as critical is message control. In the social media age, companies no longer have the luxury of waiting days—or even hours—to respond. A delay means losing control of the narrative. The most prepared brands have adaptable, pre-drafted messaging ready to deploy, ensuring their first response is measured rather than reactionary.

Not all boycotts require engagement. The strongest brands assess the market impact first—does the backlash threaten core revenue streams, or is it mostly symbolic? Overcorrecting in response to a boycott from non-customers can backfire, alienating loyal buyers—a mistake that has cost brands billions.

Boycotts don’t just test a brand’s values—they reveal whether a company was ever prepared to defend them. The biggest failures aren’t necessarily from taking the wrong stance, but from appearing unprepared, inconsistent, or defensive. A boycott forces brands to make a critical decision: should they engage directly or let the controversy fade? The wrong choice can amplify the backlash, while the right move can reshape public perception.

Some boycotts are short-lived outrage cycles, driven by social media but lacking real economic impact. Rushing to respond can sometimes prolong the controversy rather than defuse it. Smart brands know when to let public sentiment run its course. But silence isn’t always an option. When a controversy gains enough traction, failing to engage can cause lasting damage. In those cases, brands must take control of the narrative before it’s shaped for them.

When two Black men were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks in 2018, the backlash was immediate. Instead of retreating, Starbucks’ CEO issued a direct apology, shut down 8,000 stores for racial bias training, and met with community leaders. By acting quickly, the company prevented long-term brand damage and reinforced its identity as a socially conscious brand.

The High Cost of Getting It Wrong

Contrast this with United Airlines’ 2017 fiasco, when a passenger was violently dragged off a plane. The airline’s initial response—a cold, legalistic defense of policy—only inflamed public outrage. Only after intense backlash did the CEO shift to an apologetic stance, but by then, the damage was done. The lesson? A delayed or tone-deaf response can make a crisis exponentially worse.

Knowing when to engage and when to stay silent isn’t about avoiding controversy—it’s about controlling the story. The strongest brands don’t just react to boycotts; they strategically decide whether to own the moment or let it pass. Brands overly dependent on a single geographic or ideological customer base are more fragile. Companies that diversify—whether through global expansion or appealing to multiple demographics—are far more resilient.

During the 2020 Middle Eastern boycott of French brands, Carrefour and Danone lost significant business over President Macron’s remarks. But both companies quickly refocused on growing consumer bases in Africa and Asia, stabilizing their bottom line. Similarly, global tech brands facing boycotts in China have expanded into India and Southeast Asia to offset losses. Instead of engaging directly in controversy, they pivot their business strategy toward emerging markets, reducing long-term financial exposure.

Consumers today can spot corporate insincerity from a mile away. When brands respond to controversy with empty gestures rather than meaningful action, they risk deepening public distrust rather than repairing it.

Pepsi learned this the hard way in 2017 with its now-infamous ad featuring Kendall Jenner handing a can of Pepsi to a police officer during a protest. Instead of making a genuine statement, the ad came off as exploitative—a hollow attempt to co-opt social justice for marketing. The backlash was immediate. Pepsi pulled the ad within 24 hours, but the damage was already done.

H&M faced a different kind of fallout in 2021 when it tried to navigate allegations of forced labor in Xinjiang, China. The company issued a carefully worded—but vague—statement distancing itself from the controversy. Instead of appeasing consumers, the move backfired: Chinese authorities removed H&M from online platforms entirely. The half-measure pleased no one and led to real financial losses.

Consumers today can spot empty gestures. If a brand takes a stand, it needs to mean it—half-measures and corporate platitudes only make things worse. Brands that emerge from boycotts with their reputations intact are those that meet controversy head-on—with clarity, honesty, and decisive action. Attempts to placate all sides or hide behind corporate jargon only fuel further backlash.

When McDonald’s exited Russia in 2022 following the Ukraine invasion, it didn’t just issue a press release—it explained, in plain terms, the ethical and economic rationale behind its decision. By offering transparency instead of vague corporate messaging, it reinforced its credibility as a company willing to take a stand rather than simply responding to pressure.

Patagonia’s 2022 decision to transfer ownership to an environmental nonprofit wasn’t a publicity stunt—it was a long-planned move. By embedding activism into its business model, Patagonia proved that brand values can be more than just marketing.

Brands that rely on damage control instead of transparency often make things worse. Half-hearted statements, vague acknowledgments, or empty pledges do little to rebuild trust. Consumers today don’t just expect brands to take a stand—they expect them to back it up with real action.

Boycotts aren’t rare disruptions anymore—they’re part of doing business in a politicized world. The brands that navigate them best don’t avoid controversy; they prepare for it, understand their audience, and act with conviction when it matters. Some brands survive by doubling down on their values and reinforcing ties with their core customers. Others try to appease everyone and end up alienating all sides. The difference isn’t the controversy itself—it’s how well a brand understands its identity and whether it has the courage to stand by it.

Consumer activism isn’t an occasional disruption anymore—it’s a permanent force in the global marketplace. Modern boycotts are faster, more coordinated, and more politically charged than ever. For brands, this signals a fundamental shift: accountability isn’t optional, and neutrality is an illusion.

Why Boycotts Are Becoming More Frequent

Several forces have converged to make consumer boycotts more widespread—and more impactful—than ever before.

The Acceleration of Social Media
What once took months of grassroots organizing now happens in minutes. A single viral post can mobilize millions, turning hashtags like #BoycottApple and #DeleteUber into economic flashpoints overnight. The sheer speed of digital outrage leaves companies scrambling to control the narrative before it spirals.

The Rise of Economic Nationalism
Boycotts are no longer just ideological protests—they’ve become geopolitical weapons. Trade disputes between the U.S., China, Japan, and South Korea have fueled consumer-driven economic retaliation, proving that governments are no longer the sole enforcers of economic policy.

Shifting Consumer Expectations
Millennials and Gen Z expect companies to align with their values—not just sell products. According to a 2023 Harris Poll, 71% of Gen Z consumers say they would stop buying from a company that does not reflect their beliefs. Corporate reputation is no longer just about products—it’s about leadership, ethics, and action.

A New Risk: Backlash from Both Sides

Boycotts today aren’t just about what a company does—they’re about how different ideological groups interpret its actions. The result? Backlash from both sides.

Disney (2022-Present) – After opposing Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill, Disney became a target for both progressive activists (demanding stronger action) and conservatives (accusing it of corporate activism). The result? Sustained boycotts from competing sides.
Bud Light (2023) – The brand’s handling of its partnership with Dylan Mulvaney alienated both conservatives (who boycotted over the campaign itself) and progressives (who boycotted after Bud Light failed to stand by its decision). The result? A record sales decline and a leadership shake-up.
Target (2023-Present) – After backlash over its Pride Month merchandise, Target scaled back displays in conservative regions—only to face boycotts from both the right (for supporting LGBTQ+ issues) and the left (for failing to stand firm).

The Increasing Polarization of Boycotts

Consumer boycotts have long been a form of economic resistance, but today they are something more—a permanent force reshaping how brands interact with the public. They are faster, more politically charged, and more frequent than ever. Companies aren’t just selling products anymore; they are expected to serve as political, cultural, and ethical entities. This shift demands a new kind of leadership—one that treats consumer activism as a reality to be managed, not just a crisis to be feared.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Wearables aren’t fringe anymore. Once seen as fitness accessories for gym-goers and early adopters, smartwatches and health trackers are becoming everyday essentials. In the first quarter of 2024 alone, global shipments of wearable devices hit 113 million units – an almost 9% jump compared to the year before. And that’s despite persistent inflation and consumer pullback across key markets.

What’s shifting? People are treating these devices less like gadgets and more like tools for managing stress, sleep, and overall health. Consumers are using them to take control – sometimes even before they know something’s wrong. And tech companies are keeping pace, building in more sophisticated health features, wrapping them in sleek design, and expanding their reach far beyond Silicon Valley.

China, for example, led the world in wrist-worn device shipments through most of 2024, with almost 46 million units sold in just the first three quarters. Japan’s older population is increasingly using wearables to monitor vitals and stay independent longer. In the US and UK, mainstream use is now less about steps and more about holistic wellness. Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia and India, lower-cost models are making wearables accessible to first-time buyers – especially younger users who want health data but don’t need an Apple logo to get it.

This rise isn’t just about health – it’s about habits. The adoption curve shows that consumers are steadily folding digital health tracking into their everyday routines, reshaping not only how we think about wellness but also how we’ll live and age in the years ahead.

From step counters to personal health assistants

The evolution of wearables mirrors a larger shift in how we define health. A decade ago, a fitness tracker was mostly just that – a tool for counting steps or logging runs. Now, it’s a wrist-worn health hub, checking heart rhythms, analyzing sleep, detecting stress, and even alerting users to abnormal vitals before symptoms appear.

This transformation hasn’t just changed the product – it’s reshaped the market. What started with athletes and early tech adopters has now spread across age groups and income levels. Smartwatches are on the wrists of office workers in Singapore, older adults in Tokyo, commuters in London, and Gen Z students in Delhi. And the demand isn’t slowing.

Global sales of wearables reached over $84 billion in 2024, with projections putting the market on track to more than double by 2030. That growth is being powered by consumers in Asia, where China continues to dominate volume thanks to homegrown brands, and where India and Southeast Asia are seeing rising uptake of budget-friendly devices. In Japan, demand is strongest among an aging population who are using wearables for peace of mind – keeping tabs on heart rate, sleep, and medication reminders.

The US and UK still lead when it comes to higher-end models and paid health tracking subscriptions. But what’s consistent across regions is the shift from passive to active wellness. As one analyst at Canalys put it recently, “We’re watching wearables move from fitness to full-spectrum lifestyle tech.”

And while device makers keep layering in new features – temperature sensing, stress tracking, blood oxygen levels – it’s the behavior behind the screen that matters most. Consumers aren’t just buying wearables; they’re changing how they relate to their own health. What’s changing fastest isn’t the tech – it’s how people are folding it into their everyday decisions.

Consumer Adoption Across Generations and Borders

Younger consumers may be driving volume, but wearables are winning over every generation – for very different reasons.

Among Gen Z and millennials, wearables are lifestyle enhancers. Sleep tracking, stress insights, and gamified fitness goals are baked into daily routines, often synced to social media. According to a 2024 YouGov poll in the US and UK, nearly 60% of millennials who own a wearable use it at least five days a week, while Gen Z’s interest is climbing fastest, especially in India, Indonesia, and the Philippines where affordable models are surging.

For younger users, it’s not just fitness. Wearables help manage anxiety, track menstrual cycles, and even gauge productivity. In Southeast Asia, TikTok influencers regularly promote smartwatch brands with built-in wellness challenges, and the appeal is sticking.

By contrast, Gen X and boomers tend to use wearables with a more clinical lens. In Japan, uptake among older adults rose sharply in the past two years, driven by growing interest in managing hypertension, irregular heart rhythms, and fall risk. Apple’s expanded medical alerts and ECG functions are frequently cited by Japanese media as valuable features for aging consumers. In the UK, NHS-backed pilot programs are offering wearables to older patients recovering from surgery or managing long-term conditions.

In the US, over 40% of Gen Xers who own a wearable say they’ve shared data with a healthcare provider, up from just 27% in 2021. But privacy concerns linger, especially among Gen Z. Despite their high usage, only 26% of Gen Z respondents to a 2024 eMarketer study said they would be comfortable sharing health data with doctors or insurers – suggesting a growing tension between usage and trust.

Here’s how adoption looks across some of the key markets:

Country/Region	Top Adopting Cohorts	Primary Use Cases	Notable Trends
US	Millennials, Gen X	Sleep, stress, fitness, medical alerts	High usage of subscription models like Fitbit Premium
UK	Millennials, Boomers	Heart monitoring, post-surgery recovery	NHS pilot programs integrating wearable tech
Japan	Boomers	Heart rate, fall detection, medication	Growing adoption in eldercare and wellness insurance schemes
India	Gen Z, Millennials	Step counting, calorie burn, wellness apps	High growth in low-cost smartwatch brands
Indonesia	Gen Z	Fitness tracking, daily health challenges	Influencer marketing fueling adoption
China	All age groups	Everything from fitness to medical alerts	Domestic brands dominate; strong public sector partnerships
Singapore	Millennials, Gen X	Health monitoring, workplace wellness	Wearables integrated into corporate wellness programs
Germany	Boomers, Gen X	Blood pressure, diabetes management	Insurance discounts tied to wearable usage

The generations aren’t divided – they’re stacked. What started with Gen Z is now reshaping how everyone manages health. And the industry knows it.

The Technology Arms Race

The more wearables become part of daily life, the harder tech companies are pushing to stay ahead. And they’re not just making devices faster or sleeker – they’re turning them into medical-grade tools, payment platforms, and personal wellbeing dashboards, all in one.

What started as a step-counting competition is now a full-blown innovation sprint. Apple’s latest Watch models detect arrhythmias and track ovulation patterns through temperature fluctuations. Samsung has layered in blood pressure monitoring and sleep scoring tied to cardiovascular insights. Google-backed Fitbit has pivoted from steps to stress, with its newer models using electrodermal activity sensors to gauge emotional strain in real time.

And it’s not just the big brands. In Japan, wearable developers are exploring integration with long-term care plans, while Singapore’s public health teams have trialed government-backed trackers to incentivize exercise and preventive check-ups. In India and Indonesia, homegrown brands like Noise and Realme are keeping up by offering entry-level smartwatches with features that mirror high-end models – heart rate variability, SpO₂ monitoring, and meditation modes – at a fraction of the cost.

The market is clearly rewarding innovation. Smart rings, once a fringe category, are now booming. Oura has become shorthand for wellness among executives and athletes, while Samsung’s anticipated launch of its Galaxy Ring is already stirring up the category. Analysts at Canalys expect the global smart ring segment to triple by 2026, with Asia leading the growth.

Sensors are getting better, but software is where the race is heating up. The shift toward AI-enabled personalization means devices are starting to behave less like monitors and more like coaches – detecting patterns, learning user behavior, and nudging people to take breaks, breathe deeply, or move more. Apple’s upcoming software update includes passive tracking of mental well-being, aiming to surface early indicators of depression and anxiety based on behavioral signals.

This arms race is no longer about having the best display or longest battery. It’s about owning the feedback loop: gathering data, interpreting it meaningfully, and turning that insight into habit-changing nudges. And with more users willing to share health data – whether for clinical support or lifestyle optimization – tech brands are rapidly becoming key players in the future of healthcare.

The Economics of Adoption in a Soft Economy

The flood of innovation might be grabbing headlines, but it’s the economics of wearables that’s driving their expansion into the mainstream – especially as consumers grow more cost-conscious.

Subscription models are a major pivot point. Fitbit Premium, Whoop, and Apple’s Fitness+ aren’t just upsells – they’re positioning wearables as part of a recurring wellness lifestyle. Fitbit Premium alone now has over 10 million paid users globally, according to Alphabet’s 2024 earnings report. Whoop, which has no upfront device cost and instead charges a monthly fee, has doubled its subscriber base since 2022, banking on athletes and executives willing to pay for deeper recovery and strain insights.

Yet in many markets, recurring costs are a harder sell. That’s where public and private incentives are stepping in. Singapore’s government-led LumiHealth program – developed with Apple – offers financial rewards for completing activity challenges and tracking sleep. In Germany, health insurers like TK and Barmer provide partial reimbursements for certified fitness wearables when used as part of preventive care. These programs aren’t about gadgets – they’re about reducing long-term healthcare costs.

Affordability is also being tackled at the hardware level. In India, for example, wearable brands like Noise and boAt have carved out a dominant position by offering smartwatches with fitness and health tracking features for under ₹2,500 ($30). These devices may lack the polish of premium models, but they’ve dramatically widened access, especially among younger consumers in urban areas. The result? India is now one of the fastest-growing wearables markets in the world, with domestic brands accounting for nearly 75% of total shipments in 2024.

In the US and UK, cost still matters. Refurbished models, bundle deals, and corporate wellness perks are helping buyers justify their spending. Entry prices are falling, but expectations are climbing. People want value – not just on the sticker but in the insights, the ecosystem, and the staying power of the device.

Wearables as Part of the Health Ecosystem

As wearable technology becomes more sophisticated, its integration into the broader health ecosystem is deepening, transforming patient care and preventive health strategies. Today’s devices don’t just count steps – they stream health data to doctors, flag risks in real time, and plug directly into telehealth platforms.

Seamless Integration with Healthcare Systems

In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) has initiated pilot programs to incorporate wearable devices into patient care. These programs focus on remote monitoring of patients with chronic conditions, allowing healthcare professionals to track vital signs and detect early signs of deterioration without requiring patients to visit healthcare facilities. This approach not only improves patient outcomes but also alleviates the burden on healthcare resources.

Similarly, in Japan, addressing the needs of an aging population has led to innovative uses of wearable technology. Companies like Tellus You Care have developed non-contact remote monitoring systems that track the health and safety of elderly individuals. These wearables can detect falls and monitor daily activities, enabling caregivers and medical professionals to respond promptly to emergencies.

Enhancing Telehealth Services

In the United States, the synergy between wearable devices and telehealth applications is revolutionizing patient care. Wearables can sync with telehealth platforms, providing clinicians with continuous health data streams. This integration allows for more accurate assessments during virtual consultations and facilitates proactive management of conditions such as hypertension and diabetes. For instance, patients using wearable blood pressure monitors can transmit their readings directly to their electronic health records, enabling healthcare providers to adjust treatments in real-time.

Addressing Data Privacy and Reliability Concerns

Still, the deeper wearables penetrate healthcare, the more they raise questions – especially around privacy. These devices collect a steady stream of highly personal health data, and not everyone knows where that information ends up. Breaches are rare, but when they happen, the fallout is big. Surveys show many users remain unclear about how their data is handled, which puts pressure on tech companies and healthcare providers to be far more transparent.

There’s also the question of how reliable the data really is. Wearables offer useful health snapshots, but they’re not always accurate enough to replace clinical tools. If users or doctors lean too heavily on that information, it can lead to wrong calls – or unnecessary stress. That’s why most healthcare providers treat wearable data as one piece of the puzzle, not the whole picture.

How Singapore Turned Wearables into a Public Health Tool

Image credit: LumiHealth

Singapore may be small in size, but it’s been outsized in ambition when it comes to health tech. In 2020, the government launched LumiHealth, a joint initiative with Apple that turns the Apple Watch into a national wellness tool. The idea was simple: incentivize citizens to stay healthy by gamifying fitness and preventive behaviors.

Participants download an app, pair it with an Apple Watch, and earn vouchers by completing health goals like walking, meditating, or getting flu shots. The rewards are modest – up to S$380 over two years – but the behavioral nudge is powerful. More than 200,000 residents signed up in the program’s first year, with high retention and engagement among older adults and those managing chronic conditions.

What makes LumiHealth notable isn’t just its use of wearable tech, but how it reframes wellness as a shared responsibility between citizen, government, and platform. It’s one of the first large-scale examples of a nation leveraging consumer-grade devices for population health – and a blueprint for how data, design, and nudges can shift real-world behavior.

The program has also informed broader policy. Health officials now see wearables as part of Singapore’s preventive care strategy. In 2024, pilot extensions were announced to include nutrition tracking and mental wellbeing prompts – making the Watch not just a step counter, but a guide for daily living.

From Devices to Digital Selfhood

As wearables sync more deeply with our health, they’re also syncing with something else: identity.

Fitness trackers and smartwatches are no longer just tools – they’ve become quiet status symbols, wellness affirmations, and, in some cases, lifestyle declarations. Wearing a Whoop band or an Oura ring signals a commitment to optimization. A Garmin on the wrist might suggest serious training. Even design choices – stainless steel finishes, leather straps, minimalist rings – convey intention. The wearable, in short, has become part of the personal brand.

This isn’t accidental. Tech companies are leaning into the rise of the quantified self: a movement that treats data as a mirror for self-improvement. Sleep scores are shared in group chats. Heart rate variability is discussed on Reddit threads. There’s even a social layer – Apple’s fitness rings can be closed collaboratively, while Fitbit allows real-time challenges with friends. What began as private tracking is now an interactive, sometimes performative, pursuit.

That said, cultural context shapes how wearables are used – and what they mean.

Region	Attitude Toward Wearables	Underlying Values
US & UK	Individualised health and performance tools	Self-optimisation, control, productivity
Japan	Monitors for long-term care and group wellbeing	Safety, longevity, family responsibility
India	Lifestyle enhancers for youth and urbanites	Aspirational health, affordability, digital status
Singapore	Incentivised national wellness participation	Community health, public-private collaboration
China	Everyday convenience tools across all ages	Functional utility, tech-forward lifestyle

In the West, wearable data is often framed in terms of productivity – how to sleep better, train harder, or manage stress. In much of Asia, especially in countries like Japan and Singapore, adoption has leaned more toward collective well-being: tracking to stay safe, support aging populations, or meet national health goals. While the hardware might be the same, the intention behind it can be radically different.

That’s the shift: wearables aren’t just keeping score anymore. They’re helping shape identity – quiet signals of the kind of life we’re trying to live.

The Future Forecast: Smart Living 2030

If the last decade was about wearables gaining acceptance, the next will be about wearables becoming invisible – fully embedded in our surroundings, our health systems, and our daily decision-making. By 2030, the line between body and technology will blur further, not through flashy upgrades, but through quiet, continuous presence.

One of the most anticipated frontiers is continuous, noninvasive blood glucose monitoring, widely viewed as the “holy grail” of wearables. Major tech players, including Apple and Samsung, have been investing heavily in research to bring this functionality to market. Success here wouldn’t just serve diabetics – it would recalibrate how millions think about food, energy, and performance in real time.

Another inflection point will be emotional health. Devices are beginning to detect mood states based on physical cues – micro-fluctuations in skin temperature, heart rate variability, or voice tone. In the next few years, we may see wearables that can flag the early signs of anxiety, burnout, or depressive episodes before the user is even aware. The implications for preventative mental health are enormous – but so are the ethical questions.

Artificial intelligence will be the connective tissue that binds these advances together. Already, AI is being used to turn raw data into feedback loops, coaching users to adjust behaviors. But by 2030, it’s likely that wearables will be part of more coordinated, multi-device ecosystems – syncing not just with phones and watches but also with smart homes, personal health dashboards, and even city infrastructure.

It’s a shift adjacent industries are already watching closely. Insurers are piloting risk models based on real-time biometric data. Pharma firms are testing wearable-driven trial designs and adherence tools. And in some cities, planners are exploring responsive environments – public spaces that adjust to physiological signals, from light and sound to air quality.

What’s next for wearables won’t be defined by tech specs – but by what people do with the data, and who they’re willing to share it with. Smart living by 2030 may not look like sci-fi. It may just look… seamless.

A Tipping Point for Personal Health

We’ve passed the point where wearables are optional tech accessories. They’ve moved into the domain of lifestyle infrastructure – tools people rely on not just for information, but for insight, motivation, and increasingly, autonomy.

When Apple’s COO Jeff Williams stood on stage at CES and said, “We’re not just building a watch – we’re building a guardian for your wellbeing,” it wasn’t marketing hype. It was a quiet signal of where the industry sees its role going: less device, more guide.

And yet, as wearables grow smarter, more embedded, and more predictive, we’re entering a new kind of contract with our devices – one where personal health is constantly measured, interpreted, and nudged. The convenience is undeniable. The value is rising. But so is the question: who controls the loop?

Will the decade ahead empower us to become more informed, more proactive, and more in tune with our health? Or will we find ourselves outsourcing our instincts to a wristband?

It’s a future being shaped now, one wrist at a time.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Even as consumers trim expenses in travel, fashion, and dining out, there’s one area where spending continues to climb: their pets.

The global pet care market is now worth over $324 billion, with projections putting it close to $600 billion by 2033. In the United States alone, Americans are expected to spend more than $150 billion on their pets this year – up from $136 billion just two years ago. That’s roughly $1,700 per pet-owning household.

What’s driving the boom isn’t just more pets – it’s more premium care. Owners are trading up to organic diets, breed-specific supplements, and wearable health trackers. Subscriptions for virtual vet services and home delivery of fresh pet meals are becoming routine. Industry analysts say the trend reflects the growing “humanization” of pets, where wellness standards once reserved for people are now expected for animals, too.

Here at Kadence International, we’re seeing this shift play out across markets. Consumers might delay upgrading a phone or cut back on takeout, but they continue to invest in pet wellness – whether it’s probiotic chews, allergy relief supplements, or DNA testing kits. The behavior is less about indulgence and more about prioritizing quality of life for their animals.

The premiumization of pet care is quickly moving from niche to norm – redefining how pet owners allocate household budgets and how companies compete in one of the most resilient sectors of consumer spending.

Rising Demand in Emerging Markets Reshapes the Global Pet Economy

The pet care boom is no longer centered solely in the West. Markets once considered secondary – particularly across Asia and Latin America – are rapidly becoming the industry’s main growth engines, reshaping supply chains, product innovation, and competitive strategy.

China, long known for its production of pet goods, is now a consumption powerhouse. Urbanization, rising incomes, and a generational shift in attitudes toward pet ownership have driven the country’s pet economy past 270 billion yuan ($37 billion USD) in 2024, according to data from iiMedia Research. Functional pet foods, insurance services, and AI-enabled pet tech are flourishing in cities like Shanghai and Beijing, where single-person households and delayed family planning are accelerating the “pet as child” dynamic.

In Southeast Asia, pet ownership is rising fastest among millennials and Gen Z, particularly in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand. Here at Kadence International, our fieldwork suggests that first-time pet owners in these markets are skipping entry-level products entirely – jumping straight into grain-free diets, subscription-based care boxes, and app-based training services. This leapfrogging effect mirrors what happened in fintech across emerging markets: consumers are building their relationship with brands in the premium tier from day one.

Meanwhile, in Brazil – the second-largest pet care market globally after the U.S. – veterinary services and pet health plans are expanding beyond affluent neighborhoods. Brazilian households spent an estimated $9 billion USD on pets in 2023, with wellness products now part of everyday grocery retail.

Even mature markets are shifting internally. In Japan and South Korea, birth rates are at historic lows, and a growing number of households treat pets not just as companions, but as emotional and psychological anchors. As a result, the types of products being purchased – from calming diffusers to mental stimulation toys – are changing the definition of core pet care categories.

This reshaping of the global pet economy isn’t just a redistribution of revenue; it’s altering the cultural context of pet ownership. The premium boom may have started in North America, but the future of pet wellness is being co-authored in Jakarta, São Paulo, Seoul, and beyond.

Premiumization in Pet Food and Supplements Redefines the Bowl

A decade ago, premium pet food meant a slightly higher protein count or a label with fewer artificial additives. Today, it means bioavailable nutrients, functional botanicals, customized formulations, and health claims that would feel at home in a human wellness catalogue.

The line between nutrition and therapy is blurring – and the market is responding. In 2023, sales of premium pet food grew at nearly double the rate of standard pet food globally, according to Euromonitor International. Functional claims – supporting gut health, mobility, immune strength, or anxiety reduction – have moved from the margins to the center of packaging in the U.S., UK, Japan, and South Korea. Shoppers are no longer choosing between brands; they’re choosing between outcomes.

Consumer behavior is shifting accordingly. Mintel reports that more than half of U.S. dog owners now actively seek out food with added health benefits, while one in three expect brands to personalize recommendations based on age, breed, or health status. In the UK, pet owners are increasingly mirroring their own dietary ethics, gravitating toward organic and even plant-based options. In Japan, aging pets are driving demand for easier-to-digest meals and portion-controlled packaging that reflects a pharmaceutical precision.

Supplements have quietly become one of the fastest-growing segments in the category. Once the preserve of niche online retailers, they are now a fixture in big-box pet stores and veterinary clinics. Calming chews, joint support powders, and probiotic drops are increasingly purchased not in response to a diagnosis, but as part of a preventive care routine. Subscription models are flourishing in this space – not for convenience alone, but because owners want continuity in their pets’ health regimen.

What’s emerging is a recalibration of value: not measured by bulk or brand familiarity, but by purpose. The pet food aisle is no longer just a product display – it’s a wellness portfolio, curated by consumers who increasingly expect the same standard of care for their pets that they do for themselves.

The App Will See You Now

Veterinary care is no longer confined to the clinic. A growing share of pet owners are now managing health check-ins, nutrition planning, and behavioral advice through digital platforms – often without ever leaving home. In many markets, this is less a futuristic leap and more a pragmatic pivot, driven by convenience, cost concerns, and a shortage of veterinarians.

The surge in telehealth for pets began during the pandemic, but it has since evolved into a new tier of service. Platforms like Pawp, Fuzzy, and Joii offer 24/7 vet consultations, monthly wellness plans, and AI-supported symptom triage. These aren’t replacing traditional care entirely, but they are reshaping the front line – handling minor concerns, triaging emergencies, and maintaining continuity between physical visits.

In the United States, pet telemedicine visits increased more than 300% between 2020 and 2023, according to data from the American Veterinary Medical Association. In the UK, the British Veterinary Association reported that one in five pet owners had used digital vet services in the past year. And in Southeast Asia, where access to veterinary professionals remains limited in many regions, digital care is emerging not just as an option but as infrastructure.

Tied closely to this trend is the rise of subscription-based wellness. What began with monthly deliveries of flea and tick medication has grown into a service model that includes customized food plans, behavioral coaching, supplements, and diagnostics – often bundled through a single platform or mobile app. Some services even offer annual blood testing with doorstep collection, designed to catch early signs of illness before symptoms surface.

The value proposition is as much about predictability as it is about health. For time-poor, urban pet owners – especially millennials and Gen Z – these services streamline routines and reduce the anxiety of not knowing when or how to act. They also lock in brand loyalty in a category where switching costs are otherwise low.

What makes this shift notable isn’t just the tech adoption – it’s the reframing of pet care as a continuous service, rather than an episodic, event-based expense. As competition grows and platforms race to add value, the veterinary space may be next in line for the kind of disruption already seen in human primary care.

Brand Spotlight: Butternut Box

Image credit Butternut Box

Launched in the UK, Butternut Box has become one of Europe’s fastest-growing premium pet food brands by reimagining how pet meals are made, marketed, and delivered. What began as a small direct-to-consumer startup offering fresh, human-grade dog food has evolved into a major player in the pet wellness space, known for its personalized subscription model and health-first messaging.

Every meal is pre-portioned, vet-approved, and tailored to the pet’s dietary needs – whether age, breed, or health condition. As demand for functional nutrition surged, Butternut Box expanded its offering to include treats, supplements, and, most recently, fresh food for cats.

The company has seen rapid growth. Revenues jumped significantly in 2023, and subscriber numbers continue to climb as the brand expands into new markets across Europe. Recent acquisitions and infrastructure investments are helping it scale beyond the UK, with operations now live in Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Poland.

Much of the brand’s appeal lies in its ability to align with pet owner expectations – offering transparency, convenience, and clear health outcomes. Its packaging, product formulation, and tone of voice are all geared toward the modern, wellness-minded consumer who wants more than just “better kibble.” And with fresh food sales rising across the industry, Butternut Box is well-positioned to lead the charge.

As the definition of pet health evolves, Butternut Box exemplifies how brands can thrive by staying close to consumer values. Its growth underscores a larger shift: pet owners aren’t just buying food – they’re investing in long-term wellness. And they’re choosing brands that make that easy, measurable, and personalized.

The Psychology Behind the Spend

Rational budgeting has never fully explained pet ownership. But in a year where inflation has squeezed discretionary spending across sectors, the continued rise in pet wellness expenditure points to something deeper: emotional economics.

In the United States, 62% of pet owners say they are spending “the same or more” on their animals despite cutting back in other parts of their lives, according to a 2024 survey by Morgan Stanley. And it’s not just pet parents in affluent neighborhoods. In Brazil, where real incomes have fluctuated over the past two years, pet care remains one of the most resilient retail categories, particularly among single-person households and retirees.

What’s driving this behavior isn’t just brand marketing or a surge in new product availability – it’s a cultural shift in the perceived role of pets. In many homes, animals are no longer companions; they’re emotional extensions of the self. Pet care spending is often framed not as an expense, but as an expression of identity, responsibility, and affection. That makes it far less vulnerable to economic headwinds.

There’s also the matter of control. In periods of uncertainty, consumers tend to focus on the things they can manage. For pet owners, that increasingly means doubling down on wellness – purchasing products and services that promise safety, health, and longevity. In this way, premium pet care has become part of a broader coping strategy: a way to nurture stability in an unstable world.

Consumer researchers are watching this closely. “What we’re seeing is a shift from reactive to anticipatory spending,” said one behavioral analyst in a recent study published by Mintel. “It’s no longer just about solving a problem – it’s about preemptively protecting what matters most.”

The implication for brands is significant. Emotional drivers are shaping not just what consumers buy, but how they engage – with higher expectations around transparency, ethics, and personalization. It’s no longer sufficient to claim that a product is “good for pets.” Increasingly, it has to feel like the right decision for the person making it.

What Comes Next for Pet Wellness Brands

The shift in consumer behavior is now being mirrored in boardrooms and investment portfolios. Private equity firms, legacy conglomerates, and health tech startups are all converging on a singular conclusion: pet care is no longer a recession-proof niche – it’s a lifestyle category with global, cross-demographic appeal.

In the past 24 months, more than a dozen pet wellness platforms have closed Series A or B funding rounds in excess of $20 million. Unilever acquired a majority stake in pet supplement brand Nutrafol Pets. Mars, already dominant in veterinary services through its ownership of Banfield and VCA, is doubling down on diagnostics and AI tools through its Kinship division. Even players outside the category – like Nestlé and L Catterton – have quietly expanded their holdings in high-growth pet food startups.

This capital infusion is reshaping not just how pet products are developed, but how they’re delivered. Subscription platforms are building vertically integrated ecosystems. Diagnostics companies are exploring partnerships with tele-vet apps. Consumer goods firms are rethinking packaging, sustainability, and supply chains to appeal to increasingly values-driven buyers.

To make sense of the momentum, here’s a snapshot of key growth areas attracting attention:

Emerging Investment Hotspots in Pet Wellness

Category	Why It’s Growing	Notable Moves (2023–2024)
Functional Pet Food	Rising demand for therapeutic and preventative nutrition	Nestlé invests in JustFoodForDogs
Tele-Veterinary Services	Expanding access, convenience, and lower cost barriers	Fuzzy and Pawp secure $25M+ in funding rounds
Pet Supplements	Proactive health management among Gen Z and millennials	Nutrafol Pets launches in North America
Diagnostics & Health Tech	Early detection, personalization, and longevity trends	Mars launches pet DNA and microbiome services
Subscription-Based Models	Strong retention, DTC control, consumer preference	PetPlate, BarkBox expand internationally

The next wave of competition won’t be driven solely by who has the best product – but by who owns the end-to-end relationship with the pet owner. As wellness becomes the defining lens through which pet care is viewed, brands will need to operate more like healthcare providers than traditional retailers.

The opportunity is enormous, but so is the expectation. The bar has been raised – by consumers, by capital markets, and increasingly, by the animals themselves, whose needs are now tracked, monitored, and optimized in real time.

A Wellness Revolution Still in Its Infancy

If the past five years marked the emergence of premium pet care as a trend, the next five will define it as an expectation. The convergence of health, data, and digital delivery has already reshaped human wellness; now it’s doing the same for animals – at speed and scale.

What we’re seeing is a new phase of maturity in pet ownership globally. In emerging markets, where pet care was once utilitarian, consumers are leapfrogging into advanced wellness behaviors – driven by rising incomes, smaller households, and increased digital access. In mature markets, the shift is more psychological: pets are not just part of the family, they are central to it, prompting a level of intentionality in purchase decisions that echoes human healthcare.

This signals not just a market opportunity, but a transformation in mindset. We expect to see a rise in predictive care models powered by biometric monitoring, AI-driven nutrition plans, and services that adapt in real time to the pet’s lifecycle or environment. The role of the vet will likely evolve, too – becoming more consultative and tech-enabled, supported by home diagnostics and subscription wellness ecosystems.

And while consumer demand is shaping the future, it’s also setting new standards. Transparency, traceability, and ethical sourcing will become baseline requirements. Products that once stood out for being “premium” will be judged instead by how well they anticipate needs, reduce friction, and integrate into a seamless care experience.

This is no longer a pet product story – it’s a consumer behavior story, unfolding across borders, cultures, and categories. As the definition of wellness continues to evolve, so too will the expectations around how we care for the animals in our lives.

The brands that succeed won’t just sell to pet owners. They’ll understand them – intimately, culturally, and contextually. That’s where the future of the pet industry will be shaped.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

Exchanging pre-owned goods has been a cornerstone of human commerce, from ancient bartering systems to modern marketplaces. The age-old practice has evolved into a booming global second-hand market, prompting brands to rethink their strategies as sustainability and value drive consumer choices.

Projections indicate the second-hand market will continue its upward trajectory, potentially reaching $350 billion by 2028.

Understanding the Second-Hand Market

The second-hand market, also known as the resale or pre-owned market, involves the buying and selling previously owned goods. This market spans many products, including clothing, electronics, furniture, and vehicles, offering consumers access to items at prices typically lower than new equivalents. The rise of digital platforms has significantly expanded this market, making it more accessible and organized.

Types of Second-Hand Marketplaces

The proliferation of these diverse platforms has not only made second-hand shopping more accessible but has also contributed to its growing acceptance and popularity among a broad spectrum of consumers.

Thrift Stores and Charity Shops are physical retail locations where donated goods are sold to support charitable causes. These stores offer a variety of items, from clothing to household goods, at affordable prices.
Consignment Shops are retailers that sell items on behalf of owners, providing them with a percentage of the sale price once the item is sold. This model is common for higher-end goods, such as designer clothing and accessories.
Online Marketplaces: Digital platforms where individuals and businesses can list and purchase pre-owned items. Examples include eBay, Poshmark, and Depop, which have become increasingly popular due to their convenience and extensive reach.
Specialized Second-Hand Platforms: Niche marketplaces focusing on specific product categories, such as electronics or luxury goods. For instance, Back Market specializes in refurbished electronics, providing consumers with vetted, high-quality used devices.

Drivers of the Second-Hand Market Surge

Several key factors propel the rapid expansion of the second-hand market:

Economic Considerations: Amidst global economic uncertainties and rising living costs, consumers increasingly seek cost-effective alternatives to new products. In the United States, the second-hand apparel market was valued at $43 billion in 2023, reflecting a 10.3% increase from the previous year.
This growth indicates a significant shift towards more affordable shopping options.
Sustainability and Environmental Impact: A heightened awareness of environmental issues has led consumers to adopt more sustainable consumption habits. Purchasing second-hand clothing reduces carbon emissions by an average of 25% compared to buying new items.
This eco-conscious mindset is particularly prevalent among younger generations, with 42% of global consumers aged 18 to 37 willing to purchase second-hand apparel as of 2021.
Digital Integration and Convenience: The proliferation of online resale platforms has revolutionized the accessibility and convenience of second-hand shopping. In 2023, online resale accounted for 46.5% of the U.S. second-hand market, amounting to $20 billion in sales.

Platforms such as ThredUp, Poshmark, and The RealReal have streamlined the process of buying and selling pre-owned items, attracting a diverse and tech-savvy consumer base.

These factors collectively contribute to the dynamic growth of the second-hand market, reshaping consumer behavior and retail strategies globally.

Strategic Implications for Brands

The surge in second-hand shopping presents both challenges and opportunities for brands. To navigate this evolving landscape, companies can consider the following strategies:

Integrate Resale into Business Models
- Branded Resale Platforms: Establishing in-house resale channels allows brands to maintain control over the customer experience and product authenticity. For instance, Patagonia’s “Worn Wear” program encourages customers to trade in used items for credit, promoting product longevity and sustainability.
  Partnerships with Resale Platforms: Collaborating with established resale marketplaces can expand a brand’s reach. Alexander McQueen’s partnership with Vestiaire Collective enables customers to sell pre-owned items back to the brand in exchange for store credit, fostering a circular economy.
Redefine the Value Proposition of New Products
- Emphasize Quality and Longevity: Highlighting the durability and timeless design of products can justify the investment in new items.
- Sustainable Practices: Adopting eco-friendly materials and ethical production methods can appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.
Enhance Customer Engagement
- Trade-In Incentives: Offering credits or discounts for returning used items can encourage repeat purchases and strengthen brand loyalty.
- Educational Campaigns: Informing consumers about the environmental benefits of purchasing new, sustainably produced items can influence buying decisions.

Global Perspectives: Eastern vs. Western Second-hand Goods Markets

The second-hand market’s expansion manifests differently across regions, influenced by cultural, economic, and technological factors. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for brands aiming to navigate and capitalize on the global resale economy.

Western Markets

In Western countries, the surge in second-hand shopping is primarily driven by sustainability concerns and economic considerations. Consumers are increasingly eco-conscious, seeking to reduce waste and carbon footprints by purchasing pre-owned goods. The proliferation of digital platforms like ThredUp, Depop, and Vinted has democratized access to second-hand items, making it convenient for consumers to buy and sell used goods. This shift is also influenced by a growing desire for unique, vintage pieces that allow for personal expression.

Asian Markets

In contrast, Asian markets exhibit unique dynamics in the second-hand sector:

Japan: The Japanese second-hand market has seen significant growth, with the domestic market for used goods nearly doubling 2010 to 2022.
This expansion is partly due to the popularity of flea market apps like Mercari, which have made buying and selling used items more accessible. Additionally, younger generations, referred to as “reuse natives,” are more inclined toward second-hand shopping, driven by economic factors and a cultural appreciation for high-quality, well-preserved goods. However, this trend has raised concerns about its impact on Japan’s GDP, as second-hand transactions do not contribute to producing new goods.
China and Korea: A comparative study of second-hand clothing consumption in China and Korea reveals that both countries have experienced growth in this sector, particularly among millennials and Gen Z. In China, platforms like “Xianyu” have become popular. Cultural factors, economic conditions, and technological advancements influence consumer behavior in these markets, with a notable shift from viewing second-hand shopping as a necessity for low-income households to a trendy, value-driven choice among younger consumers.

Implications for Brands

Brands must recognize and adapt to these regional nuances:

Tailored Strategies: Develop region-specific approaches considering local cultural attitudes toward second-hand goods. For instance, emphasizing product longevity and quality in Japan can resonate with consumers who value well-maintained items.
Platform Partnerships: Collaborate with popular local resale platforms to reach a broader audience. Understanding the preferred platforms in each region allows brands to effectively engage with consumers in those markets.
Cultural Sensitivity: Acknowledge and respect the cultural factors influencing second-hand shopping behaviors. Incorporating culturally relevant narratives can enhance brand authenticity and appeal.

By aligning strategies with regional characteristics, brands can effectively navigate the global second-hand market, fostering growth and consumer loyalty across diverse markets.

Generational Differences in Second-Hand Shopping

The surge in second-hand shopping is not uniform across all age groups. Understanding these variations is crucial for brands aiming to effectively engage diverse demographics.

Generation Z (Born 1997–2012)

Gen Z exhibits a strong inclination toward second-hand shopping, driven by both economic and environmental considerations:

Prevalence of Second-Hand Purchases: A significant 83% of Gen Z consumers have either purchased or are interested in purchasing second-hand apparel, surpassing the average for all age groups by 10.7%.
Economic Motivation: Approximately 64% of Gen Z individuals engage in second-hand shopping primarily to save money.
Sustainability Concerns: Environmental consciousness plays a pivotal role, with 36% of Gen Z consumers purchasing second-hand goods to reduce their ecological footprint.

Millennials (Born 1981–1996)

Millennials also demonstrate a robust engagement with the second-hand market, influenced by financial prudence and a desire for unique items:

Regular Participation: Approximately 29.7% of second-hand apparel shoppers in the U.S. are aged between 25 and 34, indicating active involvement in the resale market.
Financial Considerations: Economic factors are a significant driver, with many Millennials seeking value for money through second-hand purchases.
Unique Finds: Millennials’ pursuit of distinctive and vintage items motivates them to explore second-hand options, aligning with their preference for personalized and authentic products.

Generation X (Born 1965–1980) and Baby Boomers (Born 1946–1964)

While engagement is comparatively lower among older generations, there is a growing interest in second-hand shopping:

Participation Rates: Consumers aged 35 to 44 constitute 23.8% of second-hand apparel shoppers, while those aged 45 to 54 and 55 to 64 represent 16.6% and 11.8%, respectively.
Barriers to Adoption: Older consumers may face challenges such as perceptions of lower quality or concerns about the condition of second-hand goods, which can deter participation.

Implications for Brands

Recognizing these generational nuances enables brands to tailor strategies effectively:

Targeted Marketing: Crafting messages that resonate with each generation’s motivations such as emphasizing sustainability for Gen Z and value for money for Millennials can enhance engagement.
Diverse Platform Utilization: Leveraging platforms favored by different age groups, including social media channels for younger consumers and more traditional outlets for older demographics, ensures a broader reach.
Product Assortment and Quality Assurance: Offering a curated selection of high-quality second-hand items can address concerns about product condition, particularly among older consumers, fostering trust and encouraging participation.

By aligning strategies with each generational cohort’s distinct preferences and concerns, brands can effectively navigate the expanding second-hand market and cultivate a loyal, diverse customer base.

Case Study: thredUP’s Strategic Expansion in the Online Second-Hand Apparel Market

Image Credit: Dressember

Founded in 2009, thredUP has emerged as a leading online consignment and thrift store specializing in women’s and children’s apparel. The company’s innovative approach has significantly influenced the second-hand clothing industry, promoting sustainable fashion consumption.

Business Model and Growth

thredUP offers a user-friendly platform where individuals can buy and sell pre-owned clothing. Sellers send in their items using a “Clean Out Kit,” and thredUP manages the entire process, including quality inspection, photography, pricing, and listing. This managed marketplace model ensures a seamless experience for sellers and buyers, contributing to the company’s rapid growth. By 2021, thredUP had processed over 100 million unique second-hand items, underscoring its substantial impact on promoting circular fashion.

Technological Advancements

To support its expanding operations, thredUP has invested in technological infrastructure. In 2017, the company transitioned to Kubernetes for container orchestration, enhancing scalability and deployment efficiency. This shift reduced hardware costs by 56% and decreased deployment times by approximately 50%, enabling faster innovation and improved customer service.

Strategic Partnerships and Market Expansion

Recognizing the potential of the resale market, thredUP launched its “Resale-as-a-Service” (RaaS) program, partnering with major retailers like Gap and Walmart. This initiative allows brands to offer second-hand options to their customers, integrating sustainability into their business models and expanding thredUP’s reach. The RaaS program has positioned thredUP as a pivotal player in the broader retail ecosystem, facilitating the adoption of circular fashion practices.

Financial Milestones

thredUP’s innovative strategies have attracted significant investment, with over $130 million in venture capital raised by 2016. This financial backing has supported the company’s technological upgrades, market expansion, and strategic partnerships, solidifying its position as an online second-hand apparel market leader.

thredUP’s success exemplifies how embracing technology, fostering strategic partnerships, and promoting sustainability can drive growth in the second-hand apparel industry. As the market continues to evolve, thredUP’s model offers valuable insights for brands seeking to navigate and capitalize on the burgeoning resale economy.

Final Thoughts

The meteoric rise of the second-hand market is redefining the global retail landscape, driven by consumers’ increasing emphasis on sustainability, affordability, and unique product offerings. This shift is not merely a transient trend but a fundamental change in consumption patterns, compelling brands to reassess and adapt their strategies.

Embracing the resale economy offers brands many benefits, including access to new customer segments, enhanced brand loyalty, and contributions to environmental sustainability. The growing influence of Gen Z consumers, who prioritize ethical consumption and digital engagement, underscores the necessity for brands to innovate continually and align with these evolving values.

Brands that proactively incorporate second-hand offerings into their business models, emphasize product durability, and engage authentically with consumers are poised to thrive. The second-hand market is not just an alternative; it is becoming a cornerstone of modern retail strategy, reflecting a broader societal move toward conscious and circular consumption.

As the lines between new and pre-owned continue to blur, the imperative for brands is clear: adapt to the changing tides of consumer behavior or risk being left behind in a rapidly evolving marketplace.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

On a humid Friday evening in Bangkok, a 29-year-old marketing executive taps through her banking app. She’s just paused her subscription to a second-tier streaming platform and declined an invite to a weekend brunch. But on her walk home, she stops at the Dior counter and buys a lipstick she’s been eyeing for weeks. It’s the one indulgence she’s allowed herself this month. “I cut back on everything else,” she tells a colleague. “This just makes me feel like me.”

Her behavior isn’t an anomaly – it’s a signal. Around the world, consumers are quietly renegotiating the terms of luxury. While macroeconomic forces push people to trim budgets, many are still carving out space for small, strategic indulgences. Austerity no longer looks like elimination; it looks like prioritization.

Call it frugal luxe, quiet indulgence, or strategic spending – this is not irrational behavior, but a recalibrated consumption model shaped by emotional utility and financial realism. Consumers are trading down in broad categories – opting for private-label groceries, reducing ride-hailing use, canceling entertainment bundles – yet they’re unwilling to let go of the symbols that anchor identity, aspiration, or routine.

The global backdrop is undeniable: inflation remains sticky in many economies, wages are lagging, and discretionary income is under strain. In the U.S., the consumer savings rate hovers below pre-pandemic norms. In Southeast Asia, rising living costs are altering middle-class consumption. In the U.K., nearly half of adults report having to cut back on non-essential purchases. And yet, prestige beauty sales are rising. High-end skincare, fragrance, and entry-point luxury fashion continue to perform.

This isn’t a contradiction. It’s a redefinition of value. And the brands that thrive in this moment won’t be those who offer the cheapest price – but those who understand the psychology of what consumers are still willing to pay for.

Because in an era of smarter spending, winning share of wallet means first earning a place in the consumer’s hierarchy of emotional needs.

The Rise of Frugal Luxe – A Global Snapshot

What began as anecdotal “lipstick effect” spending has evolved into a full-fledged global pattern: consumers are not abandoning consumption – they’re curating it. The frugal luxe mindset is not about depriving oneself, but about making deliberate, emotionally resonant choices under constraint.

Across geographies, data shows a clear shift. McKinsey’s 2024 Global Consumer Sentiment Survey found that 72% of consumers across developed and emerging markets report adjusting their spending behaviors, with the most common action being the substitution of high-cost items for lower-cost alternatives – except in categories they deemed “self-care” or “identity-reinforcing.” In Southeast Asia, a Bain & Company study noted that while middle-class households are spending less on dining out, they are spending more on skincare, small electronics, and niche fashion – categories where brand and aesthetic still hold value. In the U.S., prestige beauty grew 14% year-over-year in 2023, even as overall discretionary spending declined. In the U.K., Boots saw record sales in luxury fragrances priced under £50, many sold alongside budget groceries.

This is not a repeat of post-2008 frugality. Then, the consumer response was often to pull back across the board, saving as a virtue. Today’s frugality is more calculated than moralistic – and driven by a more sophisticated understanding of trade-offs. It’s not about saving for saving’s sake; it’s about cutting what doesn’t serve and keeping what does. That distinction is critical.

The economic pressures underlying this shift are real and persistent. Inflation has plateaued but remains elevated in key markets. Real wage growth is marginal. In many urban centers, rent and utility costs are consuming a larger share of monthly income than at any time in the past decade. But consumers are not reacting passively. They are actively reshaping their personal economies, determining where to trade down and where not to compromise.

Crucially, frugal luxe behavior is not confined to one cohort. Gen Z is driving it with curated shopping habits and value-hunting sophistication, but Millennials and even Gen X are adopting similar strategies. What’s shared is the intentionality. Consumers are no longer passively consuming – they are performing economic self-optimization, informed by a steady stream of content that frames “smart spending” as a lifestyle.

Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have normalized “dupe culture” – where users show off how they scored a product that looks like luxury but costs a fraction. Yet in the same feed, those same users will unbox a full-priced Diptyque candle or a single-item designer purchase. The message is not “buy less,” it’s “buy selectively.”

Globally, this has begun to reshape categories. In Japan, the longstanding culture of quality-over-quantity spending (known as shinayakana seikatsu) has found resonance with a younger generation of minimalists who still value premium skincare. In India, beauty brands are reporting a decline in full-sized product sales, but a rise in discovery kits and refillables. In Brazil, mid-market fashion is struggling while resale luxury and independent accessories brands thrive.

Across markets, the conclusion is the same: value is no longer binary. It’s not “luxury vs. bargain” – it’s “what justifies its place in my life?” Brands that misread this as simple downtrading risk irrelevance. Those who tune into this nuance will find opportunity – not just to sell more, but to sell smarter.

The Psychology Behind It – Why We Splurge While We Cut

At first glance, the frugal luxe mindset seems contradictory: a consumer balks at a $6 coffee subscription but buys a $75 serum without hesitation. Economically, it’s inconsistent. Psychologically, it’s perfectly rational.

This is where market dynamics intersect with behavioral economics. In times of uncertainty, people tend to seek out control, reward, and reinforcement – especially when broader financial agency feels compromised. These micro-luxuries become not just products, but emotional instruments: ways to reassert identity, regain a sense of choice, and anchor personal value.

Historically, this has played out before. The “lipstick effect” – a term coined during the early 2000s recession and later observed after 9/11 and in the 2008 financial crisis – described how consumers cut back broadly but still spent on small luxury items, particularly in the beauty category. Today’s version is more sophisticated. It’s not just about lipstick. It’s about emotional return on investment.

This is emotional ROI at work: the subconscious calculation consumers make when deciding whether something is “worth it” not just financially, but emotionally. That $75 serum isn’t just skincare – it’s a commitment to self-care. A branded candle isn’t just scent – it’s sanctuary in a chaotic world. These purchases are rarely made out of impulse alone. They’re rationalized, budgeted, even anticipated. In that sense, they offer the predictability that macroeconomic conditions lack.

Research from Deloitte confirms this. In a 2023 global consumer survey, 64% of respondents said they were more likely to buy products that made them feel emotionally secure, even if those products were non-essential. The strongest responses came from younger consumers, who reported using small purchases as a way to cope with financial stress and identity instability. This is less about indulgence, and more about calibration: consumers are rebalancing their mental and emotional portfolios as much as their financial ones.

Psychologists also point to the role of aspirational continuity. Consumers may be delaying larger goals – home ownership, international travel, luxury fashion – but they still want symbols of progress. A small luxury becomes a token of staying on track. This is particularly pronounced in status-driven categories like fragrance, skincare, and branded accessories, where even a single item can carry heavy semiotic weight.

There’s also a visibility factor. In the age of social media, consumer choices are publicly narrated. Selective spending allows people to maintain an aesthetic or aspirational identity while privately cutting costs elsewhere. In effect, frugal luxe is not just a financial strategy – it’s also a performance of resilience.

Understanding this nuance is critical for brand strategists. Consumers are not spending irrationally. They are optimizing emotional impact per dollar, seeking meaning, identity, and autonomy through purchases that feel earned – even if they seem extravagant on paper.

For brands, the opportunity lies not in asking, “Will they buy?” but “What role does this play in how they see themselves?”

Case Study: ASAI Hotels and the Art of Intentional Hospitality

Image credit: ASAI Hotels

In a market where consumers are trimming excess but still seeking meaning, ASAI Hotels offers a blueprint for how travel brands can deliver premium experience without premium pricing. Launched by Dusit International in 2020, ASAI was purpose-built for the frugal luxe traveler – those who want design, culture, and quality, but none of the gilded frills.

Instead of scaling luxury down, ASAI redefines it. Properties are lean by design – compact rooms, limited staff, no banquet halls or sprawling lobbies – but everything a modern traveler values is thoughtfully elevated. Beds are comfortable, showers rainfall, Wi-Fi fast. Public areas double as co-working spaces and social hubs. And in a strategic move that’s as cultural as it is commercial, each hotel is embedded in a local neighborhood, with a restaurant curated by local chefs and partnerships with nearby artisans, vendors, and guides.

This is not budget travel in disguise. It’s travel edited with intention. ASAI’s Bangkok Sathorn location opened with rates under USD $50 – a striking value in one of Asia’s most visited cities – but paired with Michelin-linked cuisine and locally inspired interiors. Guests don’t feel like they’re compromising. They feel like they’ve discovered something smarter.

What sets ASAI apart isn’t just the product – it’s the philosophy. From agile pricing packages to curated local experiences, the brand is engineered for the consumer who’s making trade-offs, but still wants to feel indulgent. Flexible cancellation policies, digital check-in, and concierge-style staff interactions cater to the desire for both control and care.

And it’s working. ASAI properties consistently receive high ratings for value, design, and service. The brand has expanded beyond Thailand into Japan and the Philippines, proving that its blend of affordability and authenticity has cross-border appeal.

In an era where travel is more intentional, ASAI has found the sweet spot: luxury reimagined as locality, quality, and thoughtful restraint. It’s a case study in what happens when hospitality listens closely – not just to how much travelers want to spend, but to what they want that spending to feel like.

Frugal Luxe in Practice – How It’s Changing Beauty, Fashion, and Travel

The frugal luxe mindset isn’t just influencing what people buy – it’s reshaping entire industries in how they develop, price, and market their offerings. Nowhere is this more visible than in beauty, fashion, and travel – sectors that sit at the intersection of identity, aspiration, and everyday ritual.

Beauty: Dupes and Devotion

Beauty is perhaps the clearest expression of frugal luxe in action. Consumers are cutting costs in functional skincare – opting for no-frills, dermatologist-backed drugstore brands – while still spending on hero products and signature scents. The rise of “dupe culture” – where TikTok influencers promote affordable versions of luxury products – hasn’t killed premium beauty. Instead, it has redefined what’s worth paying full price for.

Take Rare Beauty, which straddles affordability and prestige with minimalist packaging and emotionally resonant branding. In Southeast Asia, Korea’s Olive Young chain is thriving by offering shoppers both budget K-beauty staples and cult-favorite luxury imports. Meanwhile, direct-to-consumer platforms like Beauty Pie (UK) allow users to subscribe to access prestige formulas at wholesale prices – frugality without sacrifice.

Sales figures reflect this duality. While mass beauty volumes have remained flat, prestige beauty in the U.S. grew 14% in 2023 – driven not by breadth, but by a focus on high-performing or emotionally charged SKUs. The consumer isn’t buying more. They’re buying more intentionally.

Fashion: Capsule Thinking and Conscious Curating

In fashion, consumers are trading volume for selectivity. Capsule wardrobes – minimalist, mix-and-match collections anchored by a few standout pieces – are on the rise. Luxury resale platforms like Vestiaire Collective and The RealReal are growing in both inventory and credibility, as consumers seek quality without the markup. The resale market is projected to double by 2027, according to ThredUp’s 2024 report.

Brands are adapting. Zara has introduced higher-end “premium” capsules. COS and Arket are elevating materials and tailoring. In Asia, Taobao’s Luxury Pavilion is bridging mainstream ecommerce with designer credibility. The common thread is discretion over display. Quiet luxury, less logo-heavy but still recognizably refined, appeals to a frugal luxe buyer who wants lasting value, not viral novelty.

Fast fashion isn’t dead – but it’s being used differently. Consumers might wear high-street basics for casual or invisible moments, while saving higher-priced pieces for more visible or identity-expressive occasions. Spending is being segmented not by category, but by context.

Travel: Trade-Offs, Not Cutbacks

Even in the travel sector – often the first to be trimmed during downturns – frugal luxe is shifting patterns. Consumers are taking fewer trips, but spending more on personalization, experience, and wellness. Budget flights are paired with boutique hotels. Three-day getaways are traded up with Michelin-starred meals or spa packages. Travel is no longer about how far, but how meaningful.

Brands are adjusting accordingly. Luxury travel providers are offering shorter packages with high-touch service. Airlines are upselling “premium economy” tiers with lounge access and upgraded meals. The success of Airbnb Luxe and wellness retreats like Aman Essentials shows that even value-conscious travelers are willing to invest – if the experience feels transformative.

Even Google searches reflect the pivot. In 2024, searches for “affordable luxury travel” and “best value boutique hotels” outpaced traditional terms like “cheap flights” or “budget vacations.” The language of frugality is evolving, and so are the offerings designed to meet it.

How Brands Are Adapting – Strategy Shifts Across the Market

Brands that once relied on abundance, visibility, or exclusivity are now being challenged to respond to a consumer who shops with intent, scrutinizes value, and mixes luxury with restraint. Frugal luxe doesn’t mean less opportunity – it means a demand for sharper, more strategic brand behavior.

In beauty, fashion, and consumer goods, companies are rethinking not only pricing architecture, but positioning, messaging, and innovation pipelines. Tiered offerings – once used to ladder customers into prestige pricing – are now reversed. Entry-level luxury products are becoming lead sellers, not loss leaders. Dior’s Addict Lip Glow, Chanel’s Les Beiges Water Tint, and Le Labo’s travel-size scents are all examples of luxury distilled into a smaller, more accessible form – without losing cachet.

This has led to a rise in what analysts call “masstige”: prestige aesthetics at mass-market prices. But masstige has matured. It’s no longer about watered-down versions of designer goods. It’s about embedding value signals – ingredient quality, design, performance – into more approachable formats. Think of Glossier’s minimalist packaging, or Uniqlo U’s designer-led capsule collections. Even Apple has leaned into this zone, positioning older iPhone models as aspirational entry points for Gen Z.

Luxury groups are also evolving. LVMH and Kering have emphasized scarcity, small drops, and storytelling – leveraging limited availability over scale. On the other end, mass retailers are racing to elevate their image: Target’s partnership with designer brands, Boots stocking premium beauty, and H&M launching higher-end home collections. Everyone is meeting in the middle, because that’s where the frugal luxe consumer lives.

Pricing strategy is only part of the story. Messaging has also shifted from status to discernment. Ads no longer shout. They whisper – implying intelligence, curation, and insider knowledge. Brands are moving away from overt luxury cues and toward emotional narratives: empowerment, craftsmanship, quiet confidence. This reflects a deeper shift: luxury is no longer about proving wealth. It’s about affirming self-worth in an uncertain world.

Technology is helping brands track these nuances in real time. AI tools allow marketers to test price elasticity across segments, optimize product mix, and personalize offers based on behavioral signals. Subscription data, refill rates, and post-purchase engagement now drive product development cycles more than focus groups. This enables continuous recalibration of what the customer considers “worth it.”

Even loyalty programs are being reimagined. Cashback is no longer compelling. Instead, brands offer early access, customization, or social recognition. For a frugal luxe consumer, feeling valued is more motivating than saving money.

Some of the smartest adaptations are happening in emerging markets, where middle-class consumers are under greater financial pressure – but no less brand-attuned. In India, Nykaa uses data-driven bundling to pair affordable essentials with aspirational trial-size products. In Vietnam, localized DTC brands position themselves as “premium but practical.” In Mexico, curated marketplace models are growing – offering shoppers a mix of imported luxury and local craftsmanship at frictionless prices.

The core shift is this: consumers are no longer trading down because they’re disengaged from brands. They’re trading strategically because they’re more discerning. To win this audience, brands must think less about price points and more about permission – have you earned the right to be their one splurge?

That’s a higher bar – but a more loyal customer when cleared.

Research and Innovation in the Frugal Luxe Era

To adapt to the frugal luxe consumer, brands need more than instinct – they need precision. The same buyers who once followed broad loyalty patterns are now driven by a mix of psychology, price sensitivity, and emotional return. Understanding where they draw the line between indulgence and excess requires a new kind of consumer insight – one grounded in nuance, not averages.

That’s why the most future-focused brands are turning to agile, continuous research models. Traditional quarterly surveys and segmentation reports can’t keep pace with fast-changing consumer behavior. Instead, leading companies are investing in longitudinal panels, rapid user testing, and scenario-based modeling to predict what consumers will splurge on next – and what they’ll drop without hesitation.

In beauty, brands like Sephora and Charlotte Tilbury use shopper feedback loops tied to SKU-level sales data to refine product mix in real time. In fashion, resale platforms analyze upload frequency and price elasticity to anticipate consumer fatigue or desire. And in luxury travel, customer journey mapping isn’t just about destinations – it tracks sentiment shifts around personalization, sustainability, and perceived self-reward.

Beyond product, brands are rethinking innovation itself. Design-to-value models, once reserved for industrial engineering, are now being applied to consumer goods – ensuring that every feature, material, and format in a product serves either performance or emotional payoff. Packaging is lighter, messaging more focused, and hero SKUs are prioritized over bloated portfolios.

This moment also invites rethinking how value is communicated. Research shows that consumers are more likely to buy when they feel “in on the decision” – when the brand speaks to them as collaborators, not targets. That means transparent storytelling about sourcing, science, and savings – not just brand heritage or exclusivity.

In the frugal luxe economy, innovation isn’t about premiumization for its own sake. It’s about designing products and experiences that feel earned. And the brands that lead won’t be those who guess right – but those who listen smarter.

Frugality as a Lifestyle, Not a Phase

What began as a reactive shift in consumer behavior is fast becoming a structural one. Frugality is no longer seasonal or circumstantial – it is being integrated into the architecture of daily decision-making. The frugal luxe mindset isn’t a temporary belt-tightening – it’s a new blueprint for value.

In this emerging paradigm, traditional market signals are losing their predictive power. Income is no longer a reliable proxy for spending intent. Brand awareness doesn’t guarantee brand loyalty. Even sentiment data, unless layered with behavioral nuance, risks misdiagnosis. Consumers are more fluid than the models designed to capture them.

For strategists and researchers, this demands a reset. Legacy frameworks built around “value vs. premium” binaries or static personas can’t keep up with a consumer who is simultaneously trading down and trading up – sometimes in the same basket. The next generation of research will need to map micro-intentions: how consumers compartmentalize indulgence, what triggers rationalization, and which categories become immune to compromise.

Foresight leaders are already shifting from tracking what people buy to decoding why they justify it. That requires not just data, but empathetic intelligence – a blend of qualitative depth, contextual listening, and scenario-based modeling that captures the emotional calculus behind the cart.

The question for brands is no longer “how do we sell more?” It’s “how do we matter in a world where fewer things get bought, but those few are chosen with surgical precision?”

Because frugal luxe isn’t just a response to economic pressure – it’s a reflection of cultural evolution. Consumers aren’t retreating. They’re refining. And the brands that rise to meet them will be those that understand the mindset behind the money – not just the movement of it.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.