In an era of Big Data, where every click, every preference, and every voice is supposedly captured and analyzed, there exists a curious paradox—a silent majority that neither clicks nor voices its preferences in the ways marketers and pollsters expect. As we stand on the precipice of yet another presidential election, the airwaves are filled with predictions, poll numbers, and expert analyses, each promising an accurate forecast of America’s political future. But what if the real deciders of the next presidency are those who don’t participate in polls at all?

Consider the events of 2016, a year that will forever be etched in political history for defying conventional wisdom and turning polling science on its head. Pundits were left baffled, pollsters were questioned, and the world watched in disbelief as predictions crumbled on election night. Was this a one-off anomaly, or did it expose a fundamental flaw in how we gather and interpret public opinion?

This isn’t just a question for political analysts to ponder; it’s a critical concern for brands who rely on market research to understand their audience. If the people who are truly shaping our world, be it through their votes or their buying decisions, are those who remain unheard in conventional surveys, then are we building products, brands, and campaigns on a foundation of silence?

As we gear up for the 2024 presidential election, it’s time to ask the uncomfortable question: What if the people deciding elections—and perhaps your next business move—aren’t participating in your surveys? The answers might not only redefine our political landscape but also reshape how we approach market research in an increasingly unpredictable world.

The Two Groups: Participants vs. Non-Participants

Participants

• Who are they? They are the voices we hear, the data points we analyze, and the very foundation of our modern understanding of public opinion. From the politically engaged citizen to the avid consumer, these are individuals who willingly share their thoughts, preferences, and intentions through surveys and polls.
• Why do they participate? Is it a sense of civic duty or perhaps a desire to influence the world around them? Participants in polls often feel a connection to the topics at hand, a belief that their voice matters, or sometimes, a simple attraction to incentives and rewards. They want to be part of the conversation, and they’re willing to take the time to engage.
• How representative are they? This is where the waters become murky. While participants might paint a picture of the majority, are they truly emblematic of the population at large? An underlying bias may exist within this group, one that leans towards those more comfortable with sharing opinions or those who are more engaged with particular subjects. It’s a question that both political scientists and market researchers must grapple with, and the answer is far from clear.

Non-Participants

• Who are they? They are the unseen, the unheard, and the often-forgotten segment of our society. They are not merely those who refuse to answer a survey; they represent a diverse and complex group with motivations and views as varied as the participants themselves.
• Why don’t they participate? Some see the barrage of questions as intrusive, others distrust the entities collecting the information, and still, others may simply lack the time or interest. The reasons are multifaceted, and they often intertwine with socioeconomic factors, educational backgrounds, and personal values.
• What impact do they have when unaccounted for? The silence of non-participants isn’t merely a void; it’s a profound absence that can distort our perception of reality. Whether skewing the predicted outcomes of a landmark election or leading a company down a misguided path, the failure to hear these voices can result in a world that feels out of touch with a significant portion of its populace.

These two groups—participants and non-participants—create a complex tapestry that challenges our conventional methods of understanding human behavior. The difference between them isn’t just statistical; it’s a philosophical divide that calls into question the essence of representation and inclusivity in our modern society. As we move closer to the 2024 election and continue to evolve our business strategies, recognizing and reconciling this divide isn’t just prudent—it’s imperative.

Case Study: The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

In the lead-up to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, a palpable certainty permeated media outlets, dinner table discussions, and expert commentaries. The numbers were crunched, the predictions made, and the narrative set. According to polls, a Clinton victory was all but guaranteed. The only question that remained was the margin.

But as the night unfolded, a different story emerged—a story that would stun the nation and leave political analysts scrambling for answers.

Overview of Polling Predictions The numbers leading up to the 2016 election were unequivocal. Mainstream media and esteemed polling firms were unanimous in their predictions: a victory for Hillary Clinton. The polls pointed to key demographic support, favorable battleground state positioning, and an electorate that seemed to be leaning in her direction. The science of polling had spoken, and it left little room for debate.

Analysis of What Went Wrong But the unexpected happened. As the results trickled in, a gaping disconnect between the polling predictions and the reality on the ground began to surface. How could the polls have gotten it so wrong? Was it methodological flaws? Bias in sampling? Or a failure to capture the late-deciding voters?

The post-mortem analysis of the 2016 election revealed a complex web of errors, ranging from underestimating certain demographics to misreading voter enthusiasm. However, one factor stood out as particularly glaring: the silent majority, those who didn’t participate in the polls, had made their voices heard in the most profound way possible.

The Theory That Non-Participants Were a Significant Factor in the Election Outcome It’s a theory that goes beyond mere speculation. Some studies have suggested that many potential Trump voters were unwilling or unlikely to reveal their true voting intentions in pre-election surveys. Whether it was a distrust of the media, a fear of social backlash, or a broader disengagement from the political process, these non-participants skewed the landscape in ways that traditional polling methods failed to capture.

This isn’t just a historical curiosity or a political anomaly; it’s a seismic shift in our understanding of public opinion. If the unheard voices can decide the fate of a presidency, what else might they be influencing in our world? And how might this silent force be at play in market research, steering products and brands in directions we are yet to comprehend fully?

The 2016 election is not merely a case study; it’s a stark warning. It reminds us that in our zeal to quantify, predict, and control, we may be overlooking the very forces that drive the heart of our society. As we approach 2024, the lessons of 2016 must not be forgotten; they must be a call to reevaluate, recalibrate, and truly listen. Only then can we hope to understand the complexities of a world that refuses to fit neatly into our predictive models.

The Business Implication: How It Affects Market Research

If the consequences of overlooking non-participants could turn a political election on its head, the business world must heed this lesson with equal gravity. In an age where customer-centricity is not merely a buzzword but a lifeline, companies increasingly depend on surveys and market research to shape their products, branding strategies, and market positioning. But what happens when a significant portion of the audience remains silent?

How Companies Rely on Surveys for Product Development, Branding, etc. From multinational corporations to fledgling startups, surveys and polls have become essential tools for understanding customer preferences, forecasting trends, and gauging market reactions. They influence everything from the color of a new smartphone to the tagline of a global advertising campaign. In this data-driven environment, a clear and representative insight into consumer sentiment is not just valuable—it’s vital.

The Risks of Ignoring Non-Participants However, the ghost of the 2016 election looms large over the business landscape. Ignoring the silent majority in market research can be as catastrophic as misunderstanding a political constituency. If a company’s surveys only capture the voices willing to be heard, what valuable insights are being lost from those who choose to remain silent? It’s a blindspot that can lead to skewed data, misguided strategies, and, ultimately, commercial failure.

Real-World Examples Where Ignoring This Segment Led to Business Failures or Successes The stories are as varied as they are telling. Consider the once-prominent smartphone brand that missed shifting consumer preferences by focusing too narrowly on tech-savvy early adopters, ignoring the wider, silent customer base that craved simplicity. 

Or the breakthrough success of a food brand that went against conventional wisdom to target a previously overlooked demographic, finding a loyal customer base that competitors had ignored.

These examples are not mere anecdotes but emblematic of a truth that transcends industries and markets. The unheard voices, the silent preferences, and the unspoken needs of non-participants can make or break a business endeavor.

The implications are clear: In a world that values connectivity and engagement, we cannot afford to overlook the silent majority. Whether in the political arena or the marketplace, the voices not captured by traditional means are not just a statistical inconvenience but a hidden force shaping our world. Companies must learn from the lessons of the past and strive to understand this elusive segment. 

In doing so, they may unlock the key to innovation, resonance, and lasting success. The warning of 2016 is not just a political tale; it’s a business imperative. The question is, are we listening?

Strategies for a More Inclusive Approach

The revelation that the silent majority might hold sway over elections, products, and branding is not merely a challenge; it’s an opportunity. By finding ways to understand and include those who typically remain unheard, we can build a richer, more nuanced picture of our world. But how can this be achieved? What tools, ethics, and innovative methods can we employ to reach beyond the usual suspects?

How to Identify and Reach Non-Participants 

Reaching the silent majority begins with recognizing their existence and understanding their motivations. It involves looking beyond traditional survey channels and finding ways to connect with people where they are rather than where we expect them to be.

• Engage in Community Outreach: By interacting with people in their communities and at local events, a more diverse perspective can be gathered.
• Utilize Social Media and Non-Traditional Platforms: These channels can often reach those who may not typically engage with traditional surveys.
• Invest in Qualitative Research: In-depth interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic studies can uncover insights from those who might otherwise remain silent.

Innovative Methods and Tools for More Representative Sampling

Innovation in market research is not just a catchphrase; it’s a necessity for bridging the gap between participants and non-participants.

• Adaptive Sampling Techniques: By continually adjusting the sampling method based on initial responses, a more balanced view can be obtained.
• Gamification of Surveys: Making surveys more engaging and less formal might entice participation from those who usually shy away.
• Utilizing Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: These technologies can help predict and understand the silent majority’s preferences, even when explicit responses are lacking.

Ethical Considerations and Building Trust with Respondents

 At the heart of this endeavor lies trust. If non-participants are to become participants, they must believe that their voices will be heard, their privacy respected, and their opinions valued.

• Transparency in Data Usage: Being clear about how the information will be used can foster trust.
• Respecting Privacy and Confidentiality: Protecting personal information builds confidence in the process.
• Fostering Genuine Engagement: More than mere data points, respondents should feel that their insights contribute to something meaningful, whether it’s shaping a product or influencing a societal change.

The quest to include the unheard is not simple, nor is it without its pitfalls. But in an increasingly complex and interconnected world, it’s an undertaking worth pursuing. Whether we’re predicting the next president or designing the next must-have gadget, a more inclusive approach promises more accurate insights and a more empathetic and authentic connection with the very people we seek to understand and serve. It’s a path that demands creativity, ethics, and courage, but the rewards might just redefine how we see our world.

We find ourselves at a crossroads in a world inundated with data, voices, opinions, and predictions. We have at our fingertips the means to reach into the very psyche of our society, to understand desires, fears, hopes, and convictions. But in our pursuit of knowledge, we are confronted with a haunting paradox: the more we seek to know, the more we risk overlooking those who choose not to speak.

The silent majority isn’t a mere demographic or a statistical hiccup; it’s a philosophical challenge. It demands that we question our assumptions, rethink our methodologies, and embrace a humbler, more nuanced approach to understanding our fellow human beings. Whether in politics or business, the unheard voices are not simply missing data; they represent a missed opportunity—a chance to engage, innovate, and connect on a deeper level.

The lessons of the 2016 election are not confined to the political arena. They are a mirror held up to all of us, reflecting our ambitions, oversights, and willingness to truly listen. As we approach the 2024 election and forge ahead in our business endeavors, we must ask ourselves: Are we content with the surface, with the easy answers and predictable narratives? Or are we willing to venture into the unknown, to seek out the silent, to hear the unspoken?

In this challenge lies our opportunity. In our willingness to listen, we find our strength. The voices are there, waiting to be heard. The question is, are we brave enough to listen?

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

• First Name*
• Last Name*
• Business Email*

Gender equality has been a hotly debated issue for years, and brands have been front and center in helping drive meaningful change. And although there has been much progress in dismantling gender stereotypes in advertisements and media, much work still remains to be done. 

Notable examples of progressive campaigns include Heineken’s commercial promoting gender inclusivity, Mohey’s wedding campaign challenging traditional norms in India, and Korean beauty brand SK-II’s “Change Destiny” campaign, which contests conventional beauty standards. Yet, some brands continue to present gender stereotypes. 

Advertising can be used to promote gender equality and challenge gender stereotypes. Studies have shown that media images are more impactful than books on gender equality. Advertisers can showcase their customers’ diversity in their communications and ultimately help create an environment where all genders are respected, accepted, and valued.

In a world where men and women lead similar lives, it is irrelevant to remind people of gender in the products they purchase and use. 

Today’s consumer increasingly expects to see the reality of their lives and gender equality from the brands it engages with. It is, therefore, a win-win situation for brands showcasing gender equality. 

The role of social media in helping upend gender stereotyping in the media. 

Social media has had a considerable influence in breaking down gender stereotypes. Before the existence of such platforms, women had little choice but to accept oppressive depictions and had no means to converse and gain solidarity with each other in finding such depictions unpalatable. However, with the rise of social media, women now have a powerful tool for engaging in meaningful dialogue about the various ways brands have perpetuated unfair stereotypes. The effect of such conversations has been inspiring and momentous.

The UK banned gender stereotyping from British ads.

In 2019, a significant development took place in the advertising industry in the United Kingdom by banning gender stereotypes in British ads. The UK’s advertising regulator made this decision, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), set out guidelines for agencies to eliminate stereotypes that could potentially cause harm, serious offense, or widespread negative impact.

This ban aimed to promote a more inclusive and diverse representation of gender in advertising, challenging outdated and harmful stereotypes that perpetuated gender inequality and limited societal perceptions. The ASA recognized that advertising plays an influential role in shaping cultural norms and beliefs, and by addressing gender stereotypes, it sought to create a more equitable and inclusive advertising landscape.

The ban on gender stereotypes meant that advertisers and agencies were required to avoid portraying stereotypes that reinforced traditional gender roles or demeaned individuals based on gender. Examples of such stereotypes included women depicted solely as caregivers or in passive roles, men portrayed as aggressive or incapable of household tasks, or advertisements suggesting that certain activities or interests were exclusively for one gender.

Advertisers were given six months to review their campaigns and make necessary changes to align with the new guidelines. The goal was to encourage advertisers to be more mindful of the potential impact of their messaging on societal attitudes and to promote a more balanced and realistic portrayal of gender roles and identities.

The ban on gender stereotypes in British ads aimed to address the harmful effects of stereotyping on individuals and society. It aimed to challenge traditional gender norms, empower individuals to be seen beyond rigid stereotypes, and foster a more inclusive and equal society.

The ASA’s decision received widespread support from advocacy groups and organizations working towards gender equality. By taking a proactive stance against harmful gender stereotypes in advertising, the UK set an important precedent, encouraging other countries and advertising industries to assess their practices and make positive changes.

However, it is worth noting that the ban on gender stereotypes does not mean that all depictions of gender are forbidden in advertising. Instead, it ensures that advertisements avoid perpetuating harmful and limiting stereotypes that can hurt individuals and society.

Banning gender stereotypes in British ads represented a significant step towards fostering more inclusive and equitable advertising practices. It signaled the recognition of the influential role of advertising in shaping societal perceptions and aimed to create a more diverse and empowering representation of gender in the media.

Studies show ads using progressive and inclusive advertising can help brands increase their ROI (return on investment) in several ways:

Targeting a wider audience.

By creating inclusive advertisements, brands can appeal to a wider audience, including people from diverse backgrounds, cultures, and lifestyles. This can help expand their reach and increase the number of potential customers who may be interested in their products or services.

Building customer loyalty.

Inclusive advertising can help build customer loyalty by demonstrating a brand’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) values. Customers who identify with a brand’s values are likelier to become loyal customers and advocate for the brand.

Enhancing brand reputation. 

Brands that embrace diversity and inclusion in their advertising can enhance their reputation and be viewed as socially responsible and forward-thinking. This can create a positive association with the brand and increase the likelihood of customers choosing their products or services over competitors.

Encouraging word-of-mouth marketing. 

Progressive and inclusive advertising can lead to positive word-of-mouth marketing as customers share their positive experiences with the brand and its messaging with others. This can increase brand awareness and generate more leads and sales.

9 Ways advertisers can promote gender equality.

In recent years, we’ve seen a trend of brands attempting to use feminist values to sell fashion and beauty products to women. This approach involves aligning themselves with feminist values, such as empowerment and inclusivity, to appeal to consumers who identify with them. 

While some argue this is a positive step towards greater gender equality, others have criticized this trend as a form of “femvertising” more about selling products than promoting genuine social change.

So, how exactly do brands attempt to use feminist values to sell fashion and beauty products to women? Here are a few common tactics:

• Challenge gender stereotypes. 

Advertisers should avoid gender stereotypes and represent women in diverse roles and situations, showcasing their strengths, abilities, and achievements. This can help to break down harmful gender biases and create a more inclusive environment.

Some brands take a more critical approach to gender stereotypes in their advertising. For example, a campaign by the sanitary pads brand Always aimed to raise the issue of sexism towards women and try to turn that phrase into something positive. Building upon what brands like Nike and Dove started, it used consumer insights to connect with its target audience at a deeper level.

• Feature diverse body types.

Advertisers should showcase women with diverse body types, including those not traditionally represented in media. This can promote body positivity and create a more inclusive environment for women of all shapes and sizes. Personal care brand Dove has been at the forefront of this change. 

• Use inclusive language. 

Advertisers should use inclusive language that avoids assumptions about a person’s gender identity or preferences. For example, using “they” instead of “he” or “she” can be more inclusive of non-binary or genderqueer individuals

• Promote equal opportunities.

Advertisers should promote equal opportunities for women in their ads, highlighting their achievements and potential. This can help to break down gender barriers and create a more equal and inclusive society.

• Address women’s issues. 

Advertisers should address women’s issues in their ads, such as gender-based violence, unequal pay, and lack of representation in leadership roles. This can help to raise awareness and promote change.

• Celebrating Women’s Achievements

Some brands are using their advertising to celebrate women’s achievements and promote messages of empowerment. For example, Nike’s “Dream Crazier” campaign featured female athletes breaking down barriers and shattering stereotypes.

• Partner with women creators.

Advertisers should partner with women creators and influencers who can bring diverse perspectives and experiences to their ads. This can help to ensure that the content is more inclusive and representative of women’s diverse experiences.

• Advocate for women’s empowerment. 

Advertisers should advocate for women’s empowerment in their ads, promoting messages of self-confidence, resilience, and self-determination. This can create a more inclusive and supportive environment for women.

• Promoting Self-Care. 

Brands increasingly emphasize the importance of self-care and mental health in their marketing. By promoting the idea that taking care of oneself is empowering, these brands hope to tap into a growing trend toward wellness and self-improvement.

While this approach can effectively capture consumers’ attention and generate sales, it’s important to consider the authenticity of these messages and whether they truly promote gender equality or are just a form of “femvertising.” As consumers, we should be mindful of the messages we’re being sold and their impact on society as a whole.

The Role of Market research in helping brands embrace DEI.

When it comes to advertising, brands must always consider their audience. And in today’s society, that means being mindful of gender stereotypes and avoiding perpetuating them in ads. But how can brands break free from these harmful biases? 

Market research allows brands to better understand their target audience and the values and beliefs that shape their behavior. By conducting focus groups and surveys, brands can uncover important insights about their audience’s perceptions and expectations. This data is then used to inform the creative direction of advertising campaigns.

As mentioned earlier, one brand that has successfully used market research to break gender stereotypes is Always. The feminine care brand conducted a study and found that only 19% of women positively associated with the phrase “like a girl.” In response, Always created the “Like a Girl” campaign, which aimed to change the negative connotation of the phrase and empower girls and women. The campaign garnered over 90 million views on YouTube and was praised for its impactful message across the globe.

Fashion retailer H&M found that gender stereotypes were a major barrier for their male customers, who often felt discouraged from trying new styles due to societal pressure to conform to traditional masculinity. In response, H&M launched their “Modern Essentials Selected by David Beckham” campaign, which featured the soccer star sporting gender-neutral clothing and breaking free from gender norms. The campaign received positive feedback for its progressive message and inclusive approach.

These examples demonstrate the powerful impact that market research can have on breaking gender stereotypes in advertising. Using data to inform creative decisions, brands can create more relevant, meaningful, and impactful campaigns for their audience. Promoting gender equality in advertising gives brands the potential to shape cultural perceptions and impact society as a whole positively.

Examples of brands winning at inclusive advertising and gender equality worldwide. 

• Nike has been praised for its inclusive advertising campaigns that promote diversity, inclusion, and empowerment. Their campaigns often feature athletes and individuals from diverse backgrounds and highlight important social issues. One example is their “Dream Crazier” campaign, which celebrates female athletes and encourages women to break through barriers and reach their full potential.

• John Lewis, a British department store, has been recognized for its inclusive advertising campaigns. The brand’s “Man on the Moon” Christmas campaign, featured a young girl trying to connect with an elderly man who lives alone on the moon. The ad promoted inclusivity, compassion, and connection.

• Tanishq, an Indian jewelry brand, has been praised for its inclusive advertising campaigns celebrating diversity and inclusivity. One of their most notable campaigns was the “Ekatvam” campaign, which featured a Hindu-Muslim couple celebrating their baby shower. The ad received backlash from some conservative groups but also widespread praise for promoting unity and inclusivity.

• DBS Bank, a Singaporean bank, has been recognized for its inclusive advertising campaigns that promote diversity and inclusivity. Their “SPARKS” campaign featured stories of individuals from diverse backgrounds and celebrated their achievements and contributions to society.

• Swedish brand Ikea has been a pioneer in using advertising to promote gender equality. Their advertising focuses on breaking gender stereotypes in home decoration. In an effort to ensure that their advertisements send the right message to consumers, they worked with a panel of experts in the fields of social science, communication, and art to provide them with creative input and advice. One of their ad campaigns showed how male and female parents are equally involved in their child’s education. By showing male and female roles in household activities, Ikea is taking a proactive step in breaking down stereotypes about gender roles in the home.

• Levi Strauss has made a conscious effort to use advertising to promote gender equality by featuring men and women in their campaigns. They’ve also released several initiatives to reduce workplace bias and encourage the career progression of all genders. Their #WeAllFitIn campaign was aimed at fighting for workplace equality and diversity. The campaign was focused on creating an inclusive and empowering workplace for people of all genders and was designed to break down gender stereotypes and inspire all genders to reach their career aspirations.

• L’Oréal has long used advertising to challenge the traditional representation of beauty. They released the #WomenNotObjects campaign to address the fact that many ads in the beauty industry had traditionally featured women as objects of sexual desire instead of empowering and uplifting them. The campaign aimed to end gender stereotypes by using real women, not models, to tell the stories behind their products.

• Apple’s recent “Behind the Mac” campaign encouraged girls and women to explore their creativity and use the power of technology to reach their goals. In the ads, Apple used real women from various backgrounds and showcased their successes, helping to challenge gender stereotypes and promote gender equality.

While certain industries, like the beverage industry, are still plagued by gender bias, the retail industry has recently made strides toward gender neutrality, with toy and clothing retailers starting to respond to criticism. 

US-based retailer Target, for instance, has announced that it will remove gender-based signage from the children’s section of its stores, while Amazon has eliminated the option to categorize toys by gender. Even the Disney Store has made its Halloween costume collection gender-neutral. However, the beverage industry, particularly energy drink brands, is still motivated to leverage gender norms and anxieties to drive sales.

These are just a few examples of brands winning at inclusive advertising in different parts of the world. 

Advertising is an incredibly powerful tool that can help shape the conversation and further gender equality. When brands feature people of all genders and sexualities in ads, they demonstrate their commitment to promoting equality. They can also showcase diversity in roles and lifestyles that may not have previously been widely represented. Advertisers should also avoid using gender stereotypes that might influence the audiences’ views on what roles are appropriate for certain genders. Moreover, it’s important to focus on storytelling in advertisements, showing realistic scenarios and portraying different gender roles as unbiased and non-judgemental. In doing so, advertising can contribute to a more equal and just society.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

• First Name*
• Last Name*
• Business Email*

Bud Light recently found itself embroiled in controversy, demonstrating the potential pitfalls brands may encounter when they strive to align with an array of progressive causes, from gender identity to climate change.

The contention surrounding Bud Light underscores the precarious position companies can find themselves in when they strive to resonate with ‘woke’ culture. 

It serves as a stark reminder that while supporting progressive goals can reflect positively on a brand, tackling too many issues simultaneously can lead to criticism and potential damage to the brand’s reputation. For every cause or belief system, segments of the community feel the opposite. This can lead to polarization and potential damage to a brand’s reputation.

A marketing campaign featuring a transgender activist sparked conservative backlash, thrusting Bud Light into a contentious debate surrounding corporate engagement with ‘woke’ culture. 

What was once merely a beer selection has now become a symbolic stand in the discourse over the role and responsibility of corporations in societal issues.

So how did Bud Light’s seemingly simple choice of beer get dragged into a complex cultural controversy, and more importantly, what can brands learn from it?

In this digital age, the line between brand identity and social consciousness is increasingly blurred, with more consumers—particularly Millennials and Gen Z—expecting brands to take a stand on pressing societal issues. 

However, authenticity is key. ‘Woke-washing,’ or feigning interest in social causes for commercial gain, can be sniffed out by savvy consumers, often leading to more harm than good. This post explores the delicate dance of being a ‘woke’ brand, the potential benefits and pitfalls, and why purpose is becoming a powerful currency in the business world.

The Appeal of the Woke Brand

It’s undeniable that ‘woke’ brands can resonate with consumers. When executed authentically, aligning with social causes can lead to positive outcomes.

Consider Patagonia, an outdoor apparel brand. Their dedication to environmental activism is woven into the very fabric of their corporate identity. They’ve pledged 1% of sales to environmental groups, led a high-profile lawsuit over national parklands, and invested in sustainable product design. Their ‘activist’ stance is far from superficial—a commitment that echoes through every level of their operation.

Younger generations, like Millennials and Gen Z, heralded as socially conscious and action-oriented, are particularly attracted to purpose-driven brands. According to a 2022 Edelman report, 73% of Gen Z members surveyed buy or advocate for brands based on their beliefs and values.

Is being woke a double-edged sword?

We live in an era defined by hyper-awareness and the pursuit of social justice, and ‘being woke’ has emerged as a buzzword that brands are quickly embracing. 

However, it’s important to remember that for many, being ‘woke’ isn’t merely a trendy label but a commitment to recognizing and challenging systemic injustices. 

For brands, the decision to engage with ‘woke’ culture can be a double-edged sword, potentially offering a competitive edge while also risking backlash if handled insensitively.

In 2020, Nike, for instance, continued their tradition of bold socio-political stances with their “For Once, Don’t Do It” campaign in response to the Black Lives Matter protests. Flip-flopping their iconic slogan, this message was lauded for its relevance and empathy. On the other hand, Pepsi’s 2017 ad featuring Kendall Jenner appropriating the imagery of protest movements for a soft drink commercial was met with widespread criticism, seen as trivializing genuine struggles for justice.

These examples highlight the two edges of the ‘woke’ sword. When executed with authenticity and sincerity, brands can tap into the zeitgeist, connecting with consumers on a deeper level. 

However, if ‘wokeness’ is merely exploited as a marketing gimmick without understanding or respect for the underlying issues, it can lead to alienation and damage to the brand’s reputation.

So, how can brands effectively engage with ‘woke’ consumers, who are often at the forefront of these discussions? Here are some dos and don’ts:

DO:

• Educate Yourself: Understand the social issues that resonate with your audience. Authenticity comes from knowledge, so it’s crucial to stay informed about the conversations taking place within your demographic.
• Live Your Values: Consumers, particularly Gen Z, have a keen eye for inauthenticity. If your brand claims to stand for something, ensure those values permeate every aspect of your business, from supply chain practices to employee treatment.
• Partner with Relevant Organizations: Actions speak louder than words. Collaborating with NGOs or nonprofits that align with your brand’s values can demonstrate a tangible commitment to social causes.
• Appoint a crisis communications expert.

• Publish a transparent, honest Sustainability Report.

DON’T:

• Jump on Every Bandwagon: Not every social issue will be relevant or appropriate for your brand to comment on. Avoid tokenistic engagement with causes not aligning with your brand values or business area.
• Exploit Sensitive Issues: Consumers can spot when a brand is capitalizing on a social issue purely for profit. Always approach sensitive topics with care, respect, and a genuine desire to effect change.
• Ignore Feedback: If you face backlash, don’t disregard it. Apologize sincerely if needed, and use it as an opportunity to learn and grow.

Navigating ‘wokeness’ can indeed be a double-edged sword for brands. However, when done sincerely and thoughtfully, engaging with social issues can deepen connections with consumers, particularly younger ones, who value brands that stand for more than just their products or services. 

Ultimately, it’s about fostering a genuine commitment to social progress and reflecting that in all aspects of your brand.

The Danger of Woke-Washing

Appropriating social causes without genuine commitment can backfire, as Pepsi found out. This superficial display of ‘wokeness,’ often termed ‘woke-washing,’ can lead to consumer skepticism, negative press, and a damaged brand reputation.

Take H&M, for example. In 2018, the brand was accused of hypocrisy for promoting a feminist ad campaign while being linked to exploitative labor practices, including employing women in Bangladesh at low wages. This discrepancy between their outward messaging and business practices led to public outcry and boycott threats.

Purpose is a New Form of Conscious Capitalism

Increasingly, industry experts argue that purpose is becoming the new form of capitalism. Brands like Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s have championed this notion, embedding social responsibility into their business models.

Unilever has taken strides to reduce environmental impact and enhance societal value across its portfolio of brands, including committing to a deforestation-free supply chain by 2023. Similarly, Ben & Jerry’s has long championed various social causes, from climate justice to refugee rights, and has frequently used its platform to raise awareness and stimulate conversation around these issues.

In fact, in the early 1980s, as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was beginning to gain traction, the term “Caring Capitalism” was coined by Ben Cohen. Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield have become esteemed figures worldwide for their significant community activism. Their efforts have served as a beacon, inspiring countless brands over the past four decades to strive towards greater social responsibility.

Such purpose-driven business models can yield substantial returns. Harvard Business School found in a 2020 study that ‘firms of endearment,’ or those that focus on purpose beyond profit, outperformed the S&P 500 by 14 times over 15 years.

However, the purpose-driven brand isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. Not all attempts to ‘get woke’ will pay off. Brands must demonstrate consistent commitment and action towards the causes they align with or risk losing consumer trust. Companies need to back up their words with actions, showing consumers, they’re serious about making a difference.

As we navigate an increasingly conscious consumer terrain, the call for brands to ‘wake up’ and align with social causes becomes louder. 

Yet, brands must understand that ‘wokeness’ is not a marketing tactic but a commitment. It’s not about jumping on the latest cause to sell products but about integrating purpose into the core of business operations, ensuring actions align with words. 

The rewards for companies that can strike the right balance are clear: deeper connections with consumers, a stronger brand reputation, and the opportunity to make a genuine difference in the world. As capitalism continues to evolve, it’s clear that purpose is more than just a trend—it’s becoming a new way of doing business.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

• First Name*
• Last Name*
• Business Email*

In the constantly evolving marketing world, one aspect remains a consistent cornerstone of a brand’s success: imagery. With the rise of digital media and a culture increasingly driven by visual content, the images a brand chooses to represent itself can significantly influence the perception and engagement of its audience. This blog post explores the concept of visual brand analysis, detailing how imagery can shape public perception and offering tangible examples, insights, and statistics to underscore the importance of this crucial facet of branding.

What is Visual Brand Analysis?

Visual brand analysis involves examining the visual elements that make up a brand’s Identity -—its logo, color scheme, typography, imagery, and design style. It investigates how these elements work together to convey a brand’s personality, values, and message and how they impact the brand’s perception among its target audience.

Studies show that humans process images 60,000 times faster than text, proving the adage that a picture is indeed worth a thousand words. This fact underscores the importance of visual branding and visual brand analysis.

The study “The Face of the Brand: How Art Directors Understand Visual Brand Identity” interviews 15 seasoned art directors who share their invaluable insights on the essence of a brand’s visual Identity, who defined visual brand identity as a brand’s universal look and feel, encompassing visual elements that stand the test of time. These elements collectively shape the brand’s unique Identity, from logos and typography to color schemes and layouts. The art directors emphasize that an “ownable” visual identity is distinctive and instantly recognizable, providing a powerful foundation for evoking desired brand meanings.

Visual Identity serves several critical functions in the context of a brand and its marketing strategy:

1. Brand Recognition: Visual Identity helps in establishing brand recognition. By consistently using the same visual elements, such as logos, color schemes, typography, and design style, companies can ensure that their brand becomes easily recognizable to customers.
2. Differentiation: A distinctive visual identity sets a brand apart from its competitors. It helps create a unique impression that separates your company from the rest, giving you a competitive edge.
3. Brand Personality and Values: Visual Identity can convey a brand’s personality and values. For example, a brand that uses bold, vibrant colors might be seen as energetic and creative, while a brand that uses a minimalist design might be perceived as sophisticated and modern.
4. Brand Loyalty and Trust: Consistency in visual Identity builds trust among customers. When a company’s visual elements remain consistent across all platforms and points of contact, it sends a message of reliability and professionalism, which can foster loyalty among customers.
5. Emotional Connection: Visual Identity can create an emotional connection with the audience. Colors, images, and designs can evoke certain feelings and associations, helping attract and retain customers on an emotional level.

In essence, the purpose of a visual identity is to create a cohesive and consistent image that represents a brand’s essence, communicates its values, and resonates with its target audience.

What are the elements of Visual Identity?

Visual Identity refers to the visual elements that represent and communicate the brand or Identity of a company, organization, or individual. These elements work together to create a cohesive and recognizable visual identity. The key elements of visual Identity typically include:

1. Logo: The logo is a unique and distinctive symbol or mark representing the brand. It is often the most recognizable element of a visual identity and serves as a visual representation of the company or organization.
2. Color Palette: A specific set of colors is chosen to represent the brand consistently across various applications. The color palette usually includes primary and secondary colors and any supporting colors. These colors evoke specific emotions and contribute to the overall brand personality.
3. Typography: The selection and use of specific fonts or typefaces play a crucial role in visual Identity. Typography defines the style and appearance of text in various brand communications, such as logos, headlines, body text, and other graphical elements.
4. Imagery and Photography Style: The choice of imagery and photography style used in visual Identity helps to convey the brand’s personality, values, and messaging. It may include specific types of visuals, such as illustrations, photographs, or graphics that align with the brand’s aesthetics.
5. Graphic Elements: Consistent graphic elements, such as patterns, icons, borders, or shapes, can enhance the visual Identity and add visual interest. These elements can be unique to the brand and help create a cohesive visual language.
6. Layout and Composition: How visual elements are arranged and presented in various brand materials, such as brochures, websites, or advertisements, contributes to the overall visual Identity. A consistent and well-designed layout helps maintain brand recognition and visual harmony.
7. Brand Guidelines: A comprehensive set of guidelines is created to ensure consistency in applying visual identity elements across different mediums. Brand guidelines provide instructions on logo usage, color specifications, typography rules, and guidelines for maintaining visual consistency.

These elements work together to create a strong and memorable visual identity that helps differentiate a brand and establishes a connection with its target audience.

Visual Identity Vs. Brand Identity 

Brand and Visual Identity are closely related concepts critical for establishing a strong and cohesive brand. However, they each serve distinct functions and encompass different elements.

Brand Identity refers to the overall image of a brand in the minds of consumers, encompassing all aspects that differentiate it from competitors, including the brand’s values, personality, and promise to customers. It’s the broader concept, encompassing every point of public interaction with a brand. This could include the brand’s mission statement, customer service, product quality, reputation, and visual components.

Visual Identity, on the other hand, is a subset of brand identity. It refers specifically to the visual elements of a brand, such as a logo, color palette, typography, imagery, and any other visual aspects used to represent the brand. Visual Identity is one of the ways a brand communicates its Identity to consumers and the world. It creates a consistent look and feel associated with the brand, making it easily recognizable and memorable.

Brand identity is the holistic view of how a brand presents itself, interacts with its audience, and differentiates itself in the market. In contrast, visual Identity is specifically focused on the visual aspects that contribute to this overall perception.

The Impact of Visual Branding

The power of visual branding cannot be overstated. Consider Apple’s iconic logo: a simple apple with a bite taken out of it. It is instantly recognizable worldwide and conveys an image of sleek, innovative technology.

A survey by Reboot Online showed that logos and color schemes could significantly affect how a brand is perceived. The study found that participants remembered colored logos more than grayscale ones, showing the importance of color in memory retention and brand recognition.

Moreover, a study published in the Journal of Business Research concluded that visually consistent branding could lead to favourable brand value judgments. Brand consistency – from logos to social media posts – builds a recognizable and trusted image that attracts consumers.

Case Study: McDonald’s

McDonald’s offers a perfect example of the power of visual branding. The golden arches of McDonald’s are recognized by more than 88% of people worldwide. It’s a design so powerful that it often stands alone without the company name.

The red and yellow color scheme was chosen strategically: red is known to stimulate appetite and evoke feelings of excitement, while yellow promotes feelings of happiness. The amalgamation of these elements has contributed significantly to the company’s global recognition and success.

The Importance of Image in Social Media Branding

The advent of social media has amplified the significance of visual branding. Instagram, for instance, is a platform centered around image sharing. Brands have the opportunity to create a distinct visual style, helping to build recognition and loyalty among followers.

Buffer’s analysis of 30,000 Instagram profiles found that businesses post on average 1.56 times daily. This consistency in posting keeps their brand in the audience’s mind, contributing to better brand recognition and customer engagement.

But it’s not just about frequency. It’s also about maintaining visual consistency across all images posted. When brands ensure a cohesive look to their content, be it through a specific color palette, filter, or style of photography, it makes their posts instantly recognizable to their followers.

As Paul Rand, one of the century’s most influential graphic designers and creator of iconic logos like IBM and ABC, once said, “Design is the silent ambassador of your brand.” This statement couldn’t be more accurate when it comes to visual branding. A brand’s images and design elements silently communicate to its audience, subtly shaping their perception and influencing their behaviors.

Visual Brand Analysis: The Key to Success

With the critical role of images in brand perception, brands must conduct a visual brand analysis regularly. This process involves critically examining all visual elements used across all platforms – offline and online. It helps identify what is working and what’s not and can reveal opportunities for improvement and enhancement.

For instance, while your logo is distinct and memorable, your social media imagery needs to be more consistent, which could be hurting your brand recognition. Or your color scheme needs to resonate with your target demographic’s preferences, affecting your brand appeal.

The Process of Visual Brand Analysis

To conduct a visual brand analysis:

1. Start by reviewing all visual assets associated with your brand.
2. Examine your logo, color palette, typography, and other visual elements.
3. Consider their relevance to your brand values and their resonance with your target audience.

It might also be helpful to gather feedback from customers and stakeholders from an external perspective.

Next, assess the consistency of these elements across all platforms. Your visual Identity should be harmoniously and consistently represented, from your website and email campaigns to your social media profiles and offline marketing materials. Remember, consistency fosters trust and recognition.

Moreover, conduct a competitive analysis to see how your brand’s visuals stack up against your competitors. This exercise can inspire and uncover opportunities to differentiate your brand visually.

Case Study: Airbnb

Airbnb provides an excellent example of successful visual brand analysis and subsequent rebranding. The company was founded in 2008 with a basic logo and an unclear brand identity. However, as the company grew and evolved, it recognized the need for a visual brand that resonated with its global community.

After a comprehensive visual brand analysis, Airbnb rebranded in 2014, introducing a new logo known as the “Bélo”. This simple, versatile logo symbolizes belonging – a feeling Airbnb aims to evoke among its users. The brand also adopted a warm, vibrant color scheme to convey its friendly, welcoming nature.

The Future of Visual Brand Analysis: AI and Machine Learning

The future of visual brand analysis is bright, with technologies like AI and machine learning poised to play significant roles. These technologies can help brands analyze vast amounts of visual data quickly and accurately, providing valuable insights that can drive more effective branding strategies.

For example, logo recognition technology can help brands track their logo’s visibility and placement in social media images or event photos. Similarly, color analysis algorithms can determine the most prevalent colors in a brand’s social media images, helping identify any inconsistencies in the brand’s visual Identity.

Visual brand analysis is indispensable to building a strong, recognizable, appealing brand. Brand images can significantly shape perception and influence customer behavior in an increasingly visual world.

As aptly put by Theodore Levitt, a renowned professor at Harvard Business School, “The function of the marketer is to create and maintain a satisfactory and meaningful image in the mind of the market.” Therefore, brands must regularly review and optimize their visual Identity to align with their values and resonate with their audience.

By integrating visual brand analysis into your marketing strategy, brands can ensure your brand not only stands out from the competition but also creates a lasting positive impression in the minds of your customers.

Stay ahead

Get regular insights

Keep up to date with the latest insights from our research as well as all our company news in our free monthly newsletter.

• First Name*
• Last Name*
• Business Email*